User talk:Rich Farmbrough/Archive/2016 April

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Previous · Index · Next


Jump-to links

2024   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2023   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2022   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2021   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2020   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2019   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2018   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2017   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2016   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2015   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2014   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2013   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2012   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2011   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2010   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2009   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2008   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2007   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2006   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2005   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

2004                                                           Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec ·

April Fools? Nope! Welcome to the Women Scientists worldwide online edit-a-thon during Year of Science[edit]

Join us!

Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon -
a Year of Science initiative

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage[reply]

Reversion[edit]

Hi Rich Farmbrough/Archive: A recent edit you performed here has been reverted. You may want to check it out. North America1000 15:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter – April 2016[edit]

– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 17:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pan Am Flight 841 has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

The Signpost: 1 April 2016[edit]

Privacy and dark traffic[edit]

Good catch.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  21:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Need your help[edit]

Hi Rich, I've added all the articles from the various feeds to: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Metrics#March 2016. Can you please remove the duplicates and other wizardry? Thanks, --Rosiestep (talk) 01:19, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I don't want to sleep, it's boring! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 01:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Rich, thank you for catching that error I made with the UNICEF figures. SarahSV (talk) 06:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 11:34, 3 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Accusation of falsified credentials[edit]

Hi Rich Farmbrough,

I trust you're fine. I want to let you know that I forwarded my credentials and employment document to the OTRS team. Thanks. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 14:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Research help" proposal[edit]

Did you see this close 13 (+ 8 on discussion page) vs 5 claiming for...lol...o well trial will end on April 7 anywas--Moxy (talk) 16:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moxy: It's OK. ReXXs closed in favour of "my" proposal, which is to close the pilot, not in favour of the pilot proposal (which was never made at VP). All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 17:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Hey Rich, wanted to follow up and make sure you know that I have no hard feelings on the research help stuff. We still disagree, of course, but that's something that happens all day all around Wikipedia. In the future, just please make sure your pings actually ping people. :-) Also, for your amusement, I made an accidental edit with my staff account last night (I was leaving a message on Commons and forgot to log back out). Given the edit's content, the irony is absolutely palpable. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Much appreciated - and I did have a little grin at that edit. I am absolutely sure that the ideas behind Research Help are important, which is why I have tried to encourage those working on it to express them a little more clearly - sadly to no avail so far.
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep in mind that both Wiki Librarians are good people and, like me, are long-term volunteers (long before they started with the WMF). I wouldn't be surprised if many of the ideas they work on came pre-employment! Although I don't have direct knowledge of situations like this (I'm in Comms, not CE), I think I'd be safe in saying that they're more than happy to listen to community comments—in fact, I would say that getting adequate participation is one of the hardest tasks they and everyone else at the WMF has... unless something goes wrong, of course. ;-) Keep working with them, get others to work with them, look for places where both camps could compromise, and I think in the end something great could result. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maps[edit]

Hi, I want to include some maps in some of the articles. I want a consensus for that. Please make your comments on the talk pages of Talk:Achaemenid Empire and Talk:Parthian Empire. Arman ad60 (talk) 11:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave edit summaries[edit]

Hi. Could you please leave edit summaries, especially when your edit affects navigation like this? Although edit summaries are always useful, if you don't feel like getting into that habit, the next time you change a section heading, you could also change the /* Section heading */ markup in the summary, and/or add an {{anchor|old section title}} to the section. Cheers. fredgandt 13:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, well that would be easily dealt with by a little java-script, that I used to run. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 13:09, 4 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #203[edit]

TB[edit]

(official hat on) I just replied to you over on Meta. Best, Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 22:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And again! Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 04:29, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Once more, with feeling! Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 00:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Ellis[edit]

I fixed up your ref. Billboard is not a book but a periodical, and is not the title of the article, which is "A Day in the Life of Terry Ellis"; credited author is Jim McCullaugh; it's on page 46; ISSNs go in the |issn= parameter. --Redrose64 (talk) 08:25, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 12:40, 6 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Wikicology arbitration case opened[edit]

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Wikicology. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Wikicology/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 22, 2016, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Wikicology/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The message was sent using the case's MassMessage list. Unless you are a party, you may remove your name from the list to stop receiving notifications regarding the case.

RfC[edit]

Hi Rich, I thought you might be interested in this. Best regards -- Marek.69 talk 21:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This stub was a bit of a mess as you left it: "visitors come in readership"? unsourced, garbled formatting? What was going on there? PamD 12:51, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably KVM switching. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 13:25, 11 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Shhh! Invitation to Women in Espionage[edit]

You are invited...

Women in Espionage worldwide online edit-a-thon

--Rosiestep (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage[reply]
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Wikidata weekly summary #204[edit]

Number[edit]

I hope you don't mind that I subtly changed your comment. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:18, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind. But the idea was to record the number at that time, per Xaosflux's "tracking this will be able to provide a real time count of how many registered established seasoned editors are around for a bit". All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 12:49, 13 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The Signpost: 14 April 2016[edit]

Nomination of Alpha Kappa Omicron for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alpha Kappa Omicron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Kappa Omicron until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richard Farmbrough. I am just notifying you as a courtesy since you did add a few sources to the article while it was still a draft and other than the article's creator you are really the only other editor to significantly contribute to it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:11, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #205[edit]

Hi RF,

I trust you're fine. I need clarification on a particular source. User:Plx1 once stated on the evidence page that every single sources in the Igogo festival are fake and forgery. This is very untrue. The major mistakes I made was that I never knew that the exact page is what should be cited when citing google books. I fixed the problems with sources in that article, I also add new sources. I explained these mistakes of not citing the exact page on the evidence page under my section. One of the sources User:Plx1 described as forgery " Poynor, Robin (November 1987). "Ako Figures of Owo and Second Burials in Southern Nigeria". African Arts (UCLA James S. Coleman African Studies Center) 21 (1): 62–63+81–83+86–87. doi:10.2307/3336502." did supported the claim that Igogo festival is combined with new yam celebration and I used the source to support that single line. User:PIx1 returned to the evidence page to write ""a new reference has appeared, supposed to be about the celebration of new yams. This Poynor's paper is easy to find [1]. Page 86 is made of end notes. None of them is about yams or the Igogo festival. Nor any other part of this reference paper. Dear mentors, any comments ?"

I was surprised to see this comment because that source on page 86 reads:

"The number seventeen seems to be of ritual significance in Owo. Igogo, the most important annual festival in the kingdom, a combination of New Yam festival and purification ceremony merged with a memorial to the goddess Oronshen, also takes place over a seventeen-day period. The burial of the Olowo takes seventeen ritual days. These and other significant ceremonies all begin on the day of the five-day market."

I was confused and I left a message on their talk page here pointing them to what the source actually says. I asked if there is something I am missing so that they can point me to it because I don't understand why they felt the sources didn't supported the claim. User:Plx1 ignored me and returned to the evidence page to write

"these fake references have been trashed out by their author (and the article reduced from 11,250 bytes to 6,928 bytes). At [11], a new reference has appeared, supposed to be about the celebration of new yams. This Poynor's paper is easy to find [1]. Page 86 is made of end notes. None of them is about yams or the Igogo festival. One of them, note 3, is about the signification of a 17 days period. One line refers to yams. Nor any other part of this reference paper. Dear mentors, any comments ?

I was perplexed to see this again. I am learning but I'm not sure why they feel the source didn't supported the claim and the source is a forgery. I contacted User:Smartse for clarification perhaps I'm missing anything but Smartse said "the reference is saying (in very brief passing) that the festival is similar to the New yam festival but doesn't explicitly state that yams are celebrated during Igogo. Although English is not my primary language but I don't think the source is saying "Igogo festival is similar to the New yam festival". Is that what the source is saying? Wikigyt@lk to M£ 13:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plx1 has acknowledged what you wrote, by modifying his evidence. The footnote says it is a combination or merging of three things. Because this seems to disagree with the contemporary reference which has the two festivals separated by a week, I would be very careful about what goes in the article. I would suggest that the Upeli is 12 days, and the New Yam festival is 5 days later, making 17 days in total. Similarly the eje seems to involve gunshots while for the igogo they are forbidden.
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 01:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Thank you so much, RF. I have already added another source that supported the claim, here. Do you think the source is good enough? I have also found more sources that supported the claim. Let me know what you think. Thank you. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 18:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dato Abdul Malik Mydin listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dato Abdul Malik Mydin. Since you had some involvement with the Dato Abdul Malik Mydin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't the editor ask me in the first instance? All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 14:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Nomination of Angela Wright for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angela Wright is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela_Wright until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mathglot (talk) 18:59, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rich Farmbrough: Regarding reference 2: 'Solent SkillQuest Autumn 2008 Newsletter': I was unable to locate this on worldcat or Google. Can you please expand this reference so that it may be verified? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 22:10, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You could try Southampton Library. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Nomination of Janet Brumby for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janet Brumby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Brumby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edits[edit]

Thank you for your great edits to Let's Get Married. ) Moscowamerican (talk) 04:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 16:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Photography[edit]

You are invited...

Women in Photography
worldwide online edit-a-thon

--Rosiestep (talk) 12:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage[reply]
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

The Signpost: 24 April 2016[edit]

FYI... you created a redirect to itself. Bgwhite (talk) 08:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TYVM> All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 16:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Flynn Adam albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. QEDK (TC) 15:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objection to this being deleted, it has served its purpose. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 16:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #206[edit]

Women artists of Middle East / North Africa... a WiR & Guggenheim collaboration[edit]

File:Monir Portrait-exh ph021.jpg
You are invited...

Women artists of Middle East / North Africa
worldwide online edit-a-thon

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

DYK for Pan Am Flight 841[edit]

On 30 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pan Am Flight 841, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after the 1972 hijacking of Pan Am Flight 841, the pilot received honors at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport as well as death threats and vandalism at his home? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pan Am Flight 841. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Pan Am Flight 841), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]