User talk:K6ka/Archives/2014/July

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Top | Talk page (new message) | Userpage | Contributions | User log | Global account | Guestbook
Current time (in UTC): 16:01, 30 April 2024 UTC [refresh]
Current time (in EST): 12:01, 30 April 2024 EDT [refresh]

Oxbridge Content Removal

Hello, We took out the information about the Computer Science Program because it is outdated and no longer accurate. It should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.132.104.229 (talk) 14:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise against editing an article about your own company, since you'll have a conflict of interest in the subject. If you do edit, please make sure you edit in a neutral tone and avoid promoting your company or using Weasel words. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 14:43, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know

Just to let you know, I replaced your warning here with a welcome message, because the IP was removing hoax content. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup App on Vada Update

The app now scans links for http/https and replaces with relative links where possible. If you notice bugs in the app, do let me know. 930913 {{ping}} 17:43, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@A930913: One thing I did notice is how the app slows down... a lot. It takes much longer to load a page now. Could there be an option to disable this? --k6ka (talk | contribs) 17:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But it tells you where it's up to on the top right . What it really needs is a preparse mode, so it can generate the diffs beforehand, ready for when you review it. Y/n? 930913 {{ping}} 18:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@A930913: That might indeed be better than what it is right now... but I still stand for the option to disable that ;) --k6ka (talk | contribs) 20:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Dalian Maple Leaf

Sorry, I am new to this process. The two edits were due to the fact that they contained inaccuracies. They were clearly placed there by someone who has a grudge against Maple Leaf Schools. I will try to remove them again and this time leave a reason. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnsconklin (talk • contribs) 17:03, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

edits to Rob Allyn"

Hello I am not familiar on how to add those new information about the person's past career, but I have provided credible information with credible sources, please clean it up instead of deleting everything.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.175.24.137 (talk) 16:59 4 July 2014

No, I'm afraid I cannot do so. You appear to be trying to merge the biographies of two different people into one article. Consider creating a new article for this other Rob Allyn instead of trying to squish it together, if the person you are writing about meets the notability, verifiability, and neutral point of view guidelines. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 17:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it is the same person. http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/04/rob_allyn_used_to_run_local_po.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.175.24.137 (talk) 17:34, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if that's the case, consider merging it into the article into a reasonable manner. In other words, don't write everything in the lead as if it were a brand new article, which it isn't. For instance, create a section just below the lead and write about how he used to be a politician. Always remember to cite sources and write in a neutral tone. If you need assistance, you can ask at the Teahouse, and if you need to save your work somewhere, feel free to create an account and save it into your personal sandbox. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 17:39, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Its not a mistake by me

Hello K6ka, I changed some things as of the fact that they are true! I researched Sam & Cat and the changes I make is accurate. If you have any questions please contact me and if you wanna know the information for yourself I will give you the address cite to the exact location where I got my info.


From, Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Sultan (talk • contribs) 22:02, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris Sultan: Can't you just give me the citation right now? --k6ka (talk | contribs) 22:27, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 July 2014

New user Deleted contribution to Bergen, Norway

Hello K6ka

I am sorry if I have violated any rules of Wikipedia. I am new to this. I just established an account.

My "editing" was caused by what I read was written about Madam Felle on the page about Bergen, Norway.

My family has lived in this city since 1552, and we did business in Sandviken, where the statue of Madam Felle is placed for geneartions. What was written on the existing page is actually directly wrong. This is my city, and I know the story of Madam felle very well, and can back it up by public records.

I really want to set this straight, so what do I do??

Kind regards,

Jan Eek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eekjan01 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Looking at your edits and your explanation here, it appears that you have added original research. Original research is what we call "Things that you've did yourself/lived through/experienced in person and called it fact." For security reasons, Wikipedia prohibits original research and requires all additions to be supported by a citation, and cited sources must be considered reliable. Your edit was reverted because it 1. Did not cite a source, and 2. Appeared to consist of original research, and judging by your explanation it appears to be.
If you want to re-add this piece of information, consider merging it with the existing text instead of awkwardly slapping on additions (e.g. "Actually, that was not the case..."). If you want to develop the article in your own userspace before copy and pasting a fixed version in, you can do so in your personal sandbox. And as always, if you have questions, you should never hesitate to ask them at the Teahouse - in fact, I'd recommend you drop in for a visit right now! --k6ka (talk | contribs) 17:15, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I am in a pickle.

Me, and probably 250.000 other people from Bergen knows that what is publizied is wrong.

What I am writing is not "original research". Look up: http://www.bergenbyarkiv.no/bergenbyleksikon/arkiv/14326518

I says exactually what I write, and more.

So, what do I do when I know that there are errors on a public site? Just leave it, or???

Regards Jan Eek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eekjan01 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Eekjan01: Exactly what I've told you - merge it into the article and cite the source you gave me. This article shows you how to cite a source in an article. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 18:15, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks!

Nedhartley (talk) 13:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trap

A source has been given for the change to the stylistic origins section along with a comments from other users citing their agreement with the change (in my talk and in the Trap talk page) to the stylistic origins sections of the trap music page.

My initial edit was made in good faith and is only disputed by one user staticVapor who has given no reasons for his (Blanking, illegitimate) Vandalism. I will make no further changes until an admin agrees where this issue sits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.178.88.81 (talk) 16:43, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This does not excuse the fact that you are edit warring. When in a content dispute, you must stop editing the article and focus attention on the talk page, editing the article only when a consensus has been established. Even if the article is held in a slightly degrading quality than normal, it's the only way we can stop the fire from growing. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 16:47, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have stopped K6ka as soon as I saw your warning, as I take it very seriously. I am relatively new to wikipedia and have provided sources as required and achieved a measure of consensus amongst all other users except for staticVapor on the talk page. Who incidently has not provided any sources or information showing that the stylistic origins of EDM trap is only 'Southern Hip Hop', before removing my changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.178.88.81 (talk) 16:51, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus is an agreement on all users. Keep discussing it with the user until an agreement has been reached. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 16:54, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have observed the edit wars between 129.178.88.81 and staticVapor and the only individual who seems to dispute the changes is staticVapor himself. Why was user 129.178.88.81 threatened with having his IP blocked, when StaticVapor has made multiple edits with no sources to back up his actions? it seems a tad unfair to me.

Also user 129.178.88.81 did provide a source showing the links between dubstep and trap (see below)

The LA weekly also noted the links between the newer electronic form of Trap and its UK Bass progenitor Dubstep http://blogs.laweekly.com/westcoastsound/2012/10/trap_music_edm_uz_baauer_ugk.php?page=2 stating re Trap "You could basically call it the next phase of dubstep. It plays at a club-ready 140 bpm while retaining dubstep's craze-inducing drops. (That said, eschewing the over-hyped and much-disparaged name "dubstep" is definitely a good PR move.)"

user 129.178.88.81 also provides a source showing the links between crunk (southern hip hop) and UK Grime with the following source

And finally similiarities between the intense sound of Crunk and Grime have been noted before with Lil Jon in 2004 a well known Crunk artist stating in the BBC with regards to Grime Artist Dizze Rascal "“I like Dizzee,” Lil Jon said recently, joining the Dylan Mills fan club, which also includes Andre 3000. “Even if I don’t know what the f**k he be saying.”" and even as far back as 2004 from when this article is dated American media outlets were noted for paying attention to this UK Bass Genre noting "Having all but ignored UK urban music for years, even American artists and magazines like XXL are opening their ears to the cockney accents spitting their stories over chaotic keys and speaker-smashing bass" http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/collective/A3299204

Even prompting another user to remark

After reading these sources about grime/crunk artists collabing before the EDM trap boom I'd be for keeping grime as a stylistic origin. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 11:38, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

It very much looks like one user StaticVapor has been able to set the agenda, above all other users with regards to the trap music page. I dont want to get involved, but I think you should revaluate your position and revert staticVapor's recent edit and wait until other users except for him, show their concerns with the stylistic origins section of the trap music wikipedia page.

I for one dont think user 129.178.88.81 changes can be viewed as original research as he has a good source and users back the changes made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.174.219.170 (talk) 19:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's still not an excuse to edit war. Edit warring exemptions are fairly rare, and are limited to reverting vandalism, self-reverts, etc. See WP:EDITWAR. Both parties need to discuss the issue first before they edit again. If edit warring ravages, a report at WP:AN3 should be filed. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 19:57, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

about the reviews of the surfs with sense

i think what i wrote on the smurfs makes sense and it obviously says on the critics part, the film was criticized by its script, but the performances of the actors and the voice acting were generally praised even (if i m not mistaking) the cgi animated smurfs, don't you think what i said was correct?

201.141.155.170 (talk) 01:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC)diego 201.141.155.170 (talk) 01:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You make no sense at all. Looking at your contributions you have never edited a page related to this subject. The only edit you've made other than to my talk page was this, which I reverted as it was unconstructive. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 02:26, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pepe Le Pew

Okay, I understand now. I will stop adding him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanBurnsTheHaruhiSuzumiyaFantard (talk • contribs) 16:33, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@RyanBurnsTheHaruhiSuzumiyaFantard: Mistake. Oh, and your signature is unacceptable. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 16:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will change it. --RyanBurnsTheHaruhiSuzumiyaFantard (talk) 16:42, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Last Change Waste Management, Inc

Harm did not start a collection route 3 years after Wayne founded WM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.101.9.1 (talk) 17:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you find a source for this? --k6ka (talk | contribs) 17:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How is my edit not "neutral" on the M4 page?!

Do explain on my edit was not "neutral". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.79.22.89 (talk) 20:17, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"This is someone's pathetic attempt at..." does not sound neutral at all to me. You're implying that their attempt was stupid, wrong, or otherwise plumply ridiculous. Things on Wikipedia must be written in neutral point of view. Even if someone did something wrong, we do not say "They are a terrorist and totally deserve to get arrested" or "They suck" or "They're pathetic". --k6ka (talk | contribs) 21:25, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My changes to "Dong"

I believe that you're wrong. Wiktionary has no article named "Dong", but there's dong instead. Also, as you would see in the wiktionary article, it's also used as a name for Dildo. Perhaps I should justify these in the comments and/or make those two changes separate, but imho both are justified. 31.182.133.57 (talk) 11:34, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I hit revert mainly because you linked to dildo, which is a common word in many unconstructive edits. But I have reverted my edit, thank you for telling me. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 14:15, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well looks like it would help if you were more careful before you reject somebody's work next time. 31.182.133.57 (talk) 16:15, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Bit hard to say, especially during the busier times of day when there are lots of edits that need to be reverted. Anyways, a mistake here and then is no big deal. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 16:19, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2014 kidnapping and murder of Israeli teenagers. AlanS (talk) 17:45, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AlanS: Please see your talk page. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 17:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1RR

All articles in the topic space of the Israeli - Palestinian conflict are subject to a 1RR limitation. You have broken WP:1RR on 2014 kidnapping and murder of Israeli teenagers with this revert: [1] and I suggest you undo it. Brad Dyer (talk) 18:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Brad Dyer: You know what, I don't even want to get into trouble. I firstly have no interest in this subject nor did I come here looking for trouble, only came across this while recent changes patrolling. I don't even want to jump into a snake pit. Enough is enough. I need to walk the dog, and I do not want to involve myself in this situation again. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 18:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Brad Dyer: This edit explains everything, and this is not a violation of 1RR as clear-cut vandalism must be reverted. Vandalism overrides any revert rule and must be reverted. This requires no further conversation. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 18:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 July 2014

Arrambam

I did not make any contributions to Arrambam! 203.106.152.90 (talk) 02:11, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the diff. It is likely that your IP address changed owners and used to belong to someone else, who probably vandalized Wikipedia at one point in time. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 02:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some untitled comment

hey can you tell me what changes i made/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.32.36.35 (talk) 12:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See your contributions. The links are on your talk page - [2][3][4] --k6ka (talk | contribs) 13:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ritter

The reliable source is that he is currently in prison for soliciting minors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.242.234.55 (talk) 14:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, well, where is your citation? --k6ka (talk | contribs) 14:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Intradeco Holdings page

hello k6ka I wanted to thank you for helping me delete the page I created. but I have a question. when you set it up for deletion was it for discussion? does that mean that if no one debates on the deletion of the page it gets deleted? for the last 2 days I have been trying to figure out how to delete the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpaldingTac (talk • contribs) 15:24, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@SpaldingTac: Articles for deletion is when the community gets together and discusses whether the page should be kept or not. It differs from proposed deletion, which means the page can be deleted if there are no objections. An articles for deletion is where people discuss what to do with the page, and it either results in keep, merge, redirect, or delete. If a consensus is not reached, the page is usually not deleted, and instead tagged for improvement. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 15:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Blacksmith may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • super high speed tool steels have more than 2% carbon but ordinary alloys seldom have more than 1%){{fact|date=July 2014} The presence of carbon allows steel to assume one of several different

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BRICS page re-edit

All the GDP values listed for Brazil, Russia, India and China have to be mentioned in TRILLION units. Please check individual pages of each country and what Unit is followed. It is not billion, It is trillion.

Chandrakumar 9944244179 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.65.175.58 (talk) 17:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Reverted. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 18:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ernesto Kreplak

I have opened a discussion about the article Ernesto Kreplak at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Ernesto Kreplak. As you have been involved with the discussion about the article, I suggest that you check that discussion and comment your ideas about it. Cambalachero (talk) 03:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

regarding the Intradeco Holdings page

hello again, I wanted to add that we also want to delete the page because of the fact that we do not have enough information. so we prefer not to be on the page. I am also getting warning messages from wiki stating that the page does not meet the requirements to be an actual reference page on wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpaldingTac (talk • contribs) 13:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't refer to Wikipedia as "wiki"...
Anyways, where are you getting these warning messages? Your talk page contains messages with several links that lead to pages that likely have the answers to the questions you have. You should read them. The maintenance tags on the article Intradeco Holdings indicate the article has issues, and is a "call-to-arms" for editors and "You can help out!" sign for readers. If you can improve the article, please do so!.
Also, as mentioned, please make your case on the articles for deletion page. Click here to go to the discussion page and leave your notes there, not on my talk page. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 13:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decapitation

Dear K6ka, i would like you to edit this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decapitation, concerning the part of Bosnia and Herzegovina, cause the statments in it are simply not true, no decapitations were ever held during the war especially not by the Bosnian army, that part is filled with lies and assumptions and i tried to open the source for that part of the text but i didnt find anything in it that could conifirm what was written.So please can you remove that part. All the best, cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.78.234.34 (talk) 14:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

After browsing with the Wayback Machine, this is the only page that has been archived, and it does mention that at least one person was beheaded. I've added it to the article. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 14:42, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 World Cup Final

I believe I didn't vandalize I simply was adding a fact. How is anything wrong with that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olympiads are best (talk • contribs) 17:12, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Olympiads are best: Articles are best written if they stick to the facts. Since the article was only about the Finals, I believed the addition was unnecessary. And if you're talking about this, that is completely irrelevant. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 17:17, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) In fact, K6ka has in my view already been incredibly tolerant and forgiving. I would be quite happy to see you blocked right now for the stupid garbage you have been adding. If you want to participate in this encyclopaedia you need to clean up your act. Start editing seriously and you will be welcomed as a useful contributor. DBaK (talk) 19:47, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_editor re Od rance mate. — TransporterMan (TALK) 15:20, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

Swash (brand)

k6ka - apologies for the change to the Swash (brand) page. had intended to update the page to reflect the fact that the swash brand has changed, there's a lot of news out about the new brand update and I just wanted to update the page to reflect.

[5] [6] (Editational (talk) 16:31, 21 July 2014 (UTC))[reply]

You should rewrite the article in your own words, and in a neutral tone. Do not simply copy and paste from websites as that would be a copyright violation, which could get you blocked. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 16:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

k6ka - apologies for the change to the Swash (brand) page. had intended to update the page to reflect the fact that the swash brand has changed, there's a lot of news out about the new brand update and I just wanted to update the page to reflect.

https://news.google.com/news/story?pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=swash&ncl=dswyW3XegqNj6KM_oAZP4OEsZfVLM&cf=all&scoring=d (Editational (talk) 16:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC))[reply]

List of creatures in Primeval

As a recent contributor at List of creatures in Primeval your input to a discussion at Talk:List of creatures in Primeval#Removal of substantial amounts of content would be appreciated. Thank you. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:50, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Carey Business School may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • pediatrics/thyroid/people/robert_udelsman-2.profile |title=Robert Udelsman, MD, MBA, FACS, FACE > Thyroid Center | Pediatrics | Yale School of Medicine |publisher=Medicine.yale.
  • Endocrine Cancers Program, Smilow Cancer Hospital; Chairman of the Board, Yale Medical Group]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:54, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 July 2014

Hamas

Not sure if you are a bot or a person! Re my edit on Hamas just now: I was trying to convert a bare URL footnote using Reflinks and made a mess of it. (The Reflinks tool is still live, apparently.) I was just about to correct my error, when I saw that you had already corrected it. I will have another go, but if I fail, I will restore the text to as it was before. --P123ct1 (talk) 18:58, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Oh, and yes, I am a person. ClueBot NG is a bot. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 19:00, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New huggle 3.1 is going to be released soon

Hi K6ka, we are to release a new major version of huggle, but we did receive almost no feedback from our beta testing team, which you are a part of (see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members). It would be of a great help if you could download it (if you have windows, all you need to do is getting http://tools.wmflabs.org/huggle/files/huggle3.1.0beta.exe and putting it to a folder where you have installed huggle) and test it. You can always get a help with making it @ #huggle connect!

Major changes:

  • Multisite support - you can now log in to unlimited number of wikis in 1 huggle session and get a huge queue of all edits made to these wikis. This is good for smaller projects which gets overlooked often.
  • Ranged diffs - you can select multiple revisions and get a huge diff that display all changes done to them.
  • Fixes of most of bug reports we had so far

In case you found a bug, please report it to bugzilla: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?product=Huggle&list_id=147663 thank you! Petrb (talk) 10:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hi, how are you? I saw you edit on Wikipedia and Wikia was you have rollback rights here. --Allen talk 05:02, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey AllenHAcNguyen. Yes, I do have rollback privileges here, and I commonly use it to revert vandalism - not too much of a writer here, necessarily. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 14:50, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:K6ka/Archives/2014/July&oldid=1084048146"