Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2016/02

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2016

01 February 2016

Battle of Erzurum (1877)

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.

Details: Since 3 January 2016, some anonymous users from Turkey are vandalizing a well-sourced article related to Russo-Turkish wars, “Battle of Erzurum (1877)”, by changing the number of Russian casualties from 400-600, which is supported by sources, to unreferenced 3,000-4,000 ([1], [2], [3]), 720,000 ([4]), 725,000 ([5]) and even 850,000 ([6]), despite the fact that these figures have nothing to do with the sources cited and the whole text of the article and are not supported by anything whatsoever. Eriba-Marduk (talk) 19:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Don't know why it didn't go through, but it has now. Katietalk 21:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms of Marxism

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GABHello! 20:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Thong (clothing)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of sockpuppet of site banned editor User:Fangusu. The sock master has been editing this page at least almost once a day since January 28. Steel1943 (talk) 21:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a little on the lengthy side for a talk page but it's been edited solely by the socks since October. Katietalk 21:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

St. John's IceCaps

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism regarding John Scott (ice hockey). Yosemiter (talk) 21:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IP harassment/vandalism

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism by a user indefinitely banned for harassment and trolling.Volunteer Marek (talk) 21:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by FPAS Katietalk 21:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Baye Oumar Niasse

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism and BLP violations being added by various IP's. Subject is "in the news" after being traded to a different team - a short period of semi might be needed. Fyddlestix (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Qriket

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by some irate customers. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 18:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Finn (Star Wars)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More of the "Traitor" nonsense that it was recently protected for... Scr★pIronIV 19:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Giv'at Ze'ev

Indefinite semi-protection: WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 20:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC) 20:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 20:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great Western Railway (train operating company)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism from a set of IPs, possibly socks from banned user Devonexpressbus. Possible COI issues and adding unreferenced / OR sentences. NordicDragon Talkpage 21:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: can I ask your decision to be revieved in light of recent events please. Thanks NordicDragon Talkpage 15:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As it seems a static IP... I reconsider and say: Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue.. protecting an article because of one user disrupting is like shooting on sparrows with a cannon. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 16:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pillowtalk (song)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing/Addition of Unsourced content . MusaTalk ☻ 14:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abiola Dauda

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism caused by recent transfer move, . Blethering Scot 20:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bethany Hamilton

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Though today's vandal has already been blocked, this BLP has a long history of persistent vandalism. Deli nk (talk) 15:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sony Pictures Entertainment hack

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 16:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Minala

Indefinite semi-protection: Consistent running joke that this person is older than he is. '''tAD''' (talk) 16:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This same disruption to the birth date appears to be the only thing unconfirmed users are interested in, so I've reset PC as it doesn't seem to be helping — MusikAnimal talk 18:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Will2022

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple and persistent vandalism attempts. Will2022 (talk 17:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected — MusikAnimal talk 18:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hoe (tool)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In addition to quite common vandalism, hoe is a slang term for a person, usually female who acts slutty. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Henshall

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SMK Ibrahim

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs and new users. Emotionalllama (talk) 14:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renato Sanches

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Cashewnøtt (talk) 14:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wayne Smith (Texas politician)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Long term attempts to create an unsourced promotional page, with continued removal of sourced content. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for 2 weeks by Zzuuzz. tutterMouse (talk) 18:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pep Guardiola

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of edit warring by IPs in the last hour. Associated with change in subject's job. Hack (talk) 13:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support I request that it be semi-protected until the end of the season: 1 July. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Kazim-Richards

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – player is negotiating a transfer to scottish football team today, blp vandalism is already evident today and is highly likely to continue for a few days. ℕ ℱ 13:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Computer hardware

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandal who keeps resetting their modem to avoid blocks. Emotionalllama (talk) 14:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Khan filmography

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and edit-warring by a stubborn IP who refuses to listen to anyone. Frankie talk 10:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Debbie Schlussel

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – two different IPs adding "transsexual"... Nomoskedasticity (talk) 10:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined 2 Instances in 2 days. Relist if it persists. Lectonar (talk) 11:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Myx

Temporary semi-protection Persistent addition of Vandalism by Dan Joshua B. Apura IP Sockpuppet. 112.198.82.102 (talk) 11:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cali Thornhill DeWitt

pending changes consistent malicious vandalism by unregistered editors Bipandboppop (talk) 00:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: @Bipandboppop: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joey Graceffa

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Israel-related animal conspiracy theories

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A quick overview of the page history shows a full-blown content dispute; in an area supposedly under 1RR, this is even more troublesome. . Vanamonde93 (talk) 02:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined For now; the talkpage is used for good effect now. I will leave a message there, and watchlist. Lectonar (talk) 11:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mathieu Debuchy

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours (window closes 11pm UTC tonight). Qed237 (talk) 13:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whoopi Goldberg

Temporary semi-protection: IP edits by chronicly socking blocked user (see also List of awards and nominations received by Chris Rock) –Jason A. Quest (talk) 13:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hindi

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated childish personal attacks by IP-hopper (against User:Materialscientist). Thomas.W talk 14:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 15:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfred Owen

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amortias (T)(C) 23:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 09:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Independent Institute

Temporary semi-protection: New user Atomicperspective posting malicious content is believed to be a disgruntled former intern against whom Independent Institute has a court-issued restraining order and who is subject to arrest in California under a court-issued Ramey warrant. InformWik (talk) 02:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 09:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Elneny

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Javier Mascherano

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism to BLP by various IPs related to subject's possible imprisonment. Egghead06 (talk) 09:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped, sorry for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)

Temporary full protection: Edit warring over uninvolved admin edit that was the result of a RFC review.[7] AlbinoFerret 04:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I would tend to fully protect for some days. Second opinion please? Lectonar (talk) 11:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC) Lectonar (talk) 11:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio Luna

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. 19 of latest 50 edits made by IP users, one even entering not referenced data that is already cited earlier in the article. Arius1998 (talk) 06:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, this is not BLP, and vandalism is infrequent--Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Scott (ice hockey)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A lot of NPOV policy violations at the moment, considering the controversy surrounding his playing in the NHL All-Star game. Pending changes protection is proving to be insufficient. ElementBroccoli (talk) 00:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic Development Bank

Semi-protection Repeated deletion of sourced material, by an IP and also by new accounts. The IP claims to be an employee of the bank. IP has failed to follow the advice he was given at the Teahouse and has not discussed on the article talk page. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bitblue Technology

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – spam for non-notable company created 4 times in a week. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 11:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

War in Donbass

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs have been making the same disruptive edit for months. There is no reason why editors should have to waste time reverting this. Please semi this page. RGloucester — ☎ 22:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Julius Caesar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated vandalism/disruptive editing over 4+ weeks (meaning since the previous page protection ran out on Jan 3, 2016). KungAvSand (talk) 01:48, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely agree. Plus, Julius Caesar is a big target to me. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected I hear he wasn't that big ;-) Lectonar (talk) 09:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

United States presidential election, 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – And now no good edits from IPs (minus the reversion of the bad edits). Plus a suppression of a revision. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Hoffman (audio engineer)

Extend pending changes: Although protected by Katie, understandably, she has a lot of faith on IP editors. On the other hand, even with low editing, there have been reverts. The protection will expire soon. --George Ho (talk) 04:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Wogan

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent death, several edits by unregistered IPs not in line with BLP policy. Mike1901 (talk) 09:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Leonardo DiCaprio

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frankie talk 11:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Miazga

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rani Mukerji filmography

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated changes to incorrect information by IP vandals. Krimuk|90 (talk) 06:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Terminator (franchise)

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. NeoBatfreak (talk) 22:30, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. NeoBatfreak, what I see is that you and some IPs have a disagreement about content, That does not make them vandals, and protection is not used as a way to help the autoconfirmed user win the argument. I also don't see any attempt to discuss the issue on the talk page, which is what you are supposed to do, or any addition of sources, which is the way to win the argument. MelanieN (talk) 00:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Trump

Semi-protection at least until his son stops running for president Most edits in the past month or two have been IP vandalism or reverting of IP vandalism, and it's only going to get worse if the Trump campaign keeps going. pbp 23:49, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, as he is related to the Donald Trump thing, which strongly attracts vandalism and other bad-faith edits. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 07:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. wL<speak·check> 07:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Colosseum

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistant long-term vandalism. I can't believe how much vandalism has been going on in this article. Has been a long problem and the problematic edits must stop. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 05:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:29, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HTTP cookie

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending Changes is not proving productive on this page. Edits by non-autoconfirmed users are all vandalism. I believe it previously had indef semi protection. William Avery (talk) 10:44, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that recently at least two edits of non-autoconfirmed users were accepted, one on 18 January and one on 25 December. Whereas it is true that most of such edits are vandalism, the edits are not that frequent, and I believe we should give a chance to non-autoconfirmed users to improve the article. I recommend extending pending changes instead.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:49, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 5 albert square (talk) 00:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jurassic World

Semi-protection: A lot of unsigned users and users not autoconfirmed are repeatedly trying to add too many specific details to the Plot section, which are in violation of WP:PLOTSUM. Parsley Man (talk) 04:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. In addition to the plot size issue, I see lots of other vandalism including section blanking; one vandal has been blocked. MelanieN (talk) 00:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Winkelvi

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Blocked user is now pinging other users, discussing articles and now fighting other users while under a 7 day block. He also mentions another user is not welcome on his talk page, forgetting the talk page is for the benefit of the project, and is not his personal domain. . Legacypac (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. By all means ask the blocking admin. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amrita Sher-Gil

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. LynwoodF (talk) 17:56, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Raashid Alvi

Extend pending changes: Protecting administrator not very active at the moment. There have been reverts on unsourced claims or vandalism. George Ho (talk) 04:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now - only one IP in last few months. AlexiusHoratius 19:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Chris Rock

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GABHello! 23:04, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Report those socks to AIV, please? I'll be busy for a bit. Katietalk 23:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

South Asia

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/disruptive edits and edit-warring based on personal interpretations by an WP:SPA IP. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, IP started discussion at the talk page and was so far ignored by other users.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Oldershaw Academy

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and sockpuppetry. GABHello! 21:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin Johnson

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Subject just told the Detroit Lions he is "planning to retire" and IP address are editing saying he is retired violating WP:CRYSTALBALL. Currently protected to all edits are being reviewed, I think it should elevated to semi-protected to where no IP addresses should edit. Rockchalk717 22:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding on, this page is receiving an edit every minute and has 36 pending requests--Rockchalk717 22:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That will put it one week after the rosters unlock - hopefully the Lions will figure it out by then. (But we are talking about the Lions here.) Katietalk 23:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

02 February 2016

And She Was

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edits that violate WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:3RR. Boomer VialHolla 16:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:17, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 16:31, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Boomer Vial: The ANEW report by itself is sufficient. If there is only one user involved there is no need to file a request here – it will be declined. Thanks — MusikAnimal talk 16:33, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@MusikAnimal: Ok, I understand. The ANEW was just taking a long time to go through, and the user was continually edit-warring. But they have been blocked, so all is resolved. Thanks! :) Boomer VialHolla 16:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan Super League

Temporary protection: Broadcast of the league is only in Pakistan, UAE & U.K. Various IPs are putting false information that it will be broadcast in India, australia, New Zealand, Sri lanka (which is a lie) to get money from channel subscription through people of those nations. Read my both edit summaries. Sunray9 (talk) 17:37, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent trolling by banned user. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:39, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 20:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deep web (search)

Semi-protection: Various types of ongoing vandalism Deku-shrub (talk) 19:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 20:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Groundhog Day

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we get this semi-protected just for a day or so? Persistent vandalism from IP/newly registered users. thanks!. Mike1901 (talk) 20:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blurryface

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. High level of IP vandalism. MYS77 ✉ 14:17, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just one IP...180.xx Lectonar (talk) 14:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Circumcision

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See edit history. Edit warring over recent addition. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 16:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Syco Music

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by various IPs, just like article Syco (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), protected (till 16 February 2016) earlier today DVdm (talk) 17:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 18:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002

Unprotection: A is finished and possibly ready to be move to mainspace. --5.228.176.80 (talk) 09:14, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clemson Tigers football

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent edit warring/content dispute. Boomer VialHolla 10:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Yes...it is exactly that: a content dispute. As i can see there was no use of the article's talk-page; everybody is communicating more or less by edit summaries. Lectonar (talk) 10:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Lerner

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by various IPs and a user DVdm (talk) 15:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 15:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Von Miller

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by various IPs. - DVdm (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gilliam. — MusikAnimal talk 15:45, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MyAnimeList

Unprotection: A draft located at User:Arsonal/MyAnimeList is finished and possibly ready to be moved to mainspace. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @RHaworth:, the protecting admin--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done (for the bot) Lectonar (talk) 09:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Mountain Goats

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 07:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Except that there has been nothing but disruption since January, apart from the times the article was protected. Widr (talk) 08:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok.. you feel strongly about the article...there was disruption and two good faith edits, imho. Wikipedia is supposed to be the encyclopedia that everyone can edit, which means that we should keep open this option unless there is strong disruption. If this picks up in frequency, please relist. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 08:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pilipinas Commercial Basketball League

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/addition of content that is totally unrelated to the subject. Israel's Son 08:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Manuel Pellegrini

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 Ligue 2

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of uinsourced changes to league table regarding promotion and relegation. Qed237 (talk) 15:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:49, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marina and the Diamonds

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing, lengthy log. '''tAD''' (talk) 18:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. lenghty but not all ip-edits are vandalism; overall frequency very low Lectonar (talk) 07:50, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And She Was

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit warrior. I've made a report at WP:ANEW about their seven reverts, but maybe this queue will move more quickly. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Really just one editor here... Lectonar (talk) 07:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:No-edit orders

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I just reverted IP vandalism that survived for 6 months and over a year. Elvey(t•c) 06:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This page needs more watchers; edit frequency very low. I have watchlisted myself. Lectonar (talk) 07:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Korina Sanchez

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.RenRen070193 07:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aljo Bendijo

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing last week (see also article page history for justification).RenRen070193 07:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jabba the Hutt

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mlpearc (open channel) 01:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It doesn't seem all that persistent. only (talk) 04:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UFC on Fox: Johnson vs. Bader

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP addresses. Fbdave (talk) 10:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Syco

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs, immediately after previous protection expiration DVdm (talk) 11:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conquest of Mecca

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Eperoton (talk) 14:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - request was good at the time but the article has quited down since. Re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 03:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lohanthony

Indefinite full protection. KC M. 19:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done - No reason for full protection given, none apparent. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Open Championship

Semi-protection: The word "incorrectly" continues to be re-added by IPs; page has already been temporarily semi-protected twice. There might be another solution, but I don't know what. pʰeːnuːmuː →‎ pʰiːnyːmyː → ‎ɸinimi → ‎fiɲimi 20:46, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 03:39, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Big Tobacco

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:09, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Usos

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lillian Garcia screwed up on RAW and announced them as Grammy winning. They're not musicians. IP editors fail to see that. CrashUnderride 01:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should let it blow over. only (talk) 04:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carbon fibers

Semi-protection: Edit warring on the addition of a fringe theory on sexism (which really does not belong in that article). Materialscientist (talk) 02:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 04:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cook County Democratic Party

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Hugh (talk) 03:56, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 04:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

National Hockey League

Temporary Semi-protection: Upswing in level of IP vandalism. A brief semi until the silliness passes would be helpful. oknazevad (talk) 04:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Who knwos when the legend that is John Scott will die down, though... only (talk) 04:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eben Pagan and David DeAngelo

Edit request: Pages are currently salted after deletion review. Request edit to a redirection to The Syndicate (group). Spectra239 (talk) 01:07, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

pinging @User:RHaworth. He salted the second one. Lectonar (talk) 14:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Kudpung protected the other article, pinging. tutterMouse (talk) 15:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think Kudpung is no longer an admin; a loss, I must say. Lectonar (talk) 15:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that is disappointing, I'd still welcome his opinion though. tutterMouse (talk) 18:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done (for the bot) Katietalk 04:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derry, New Hampshire

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Fisher

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator RHaworth. Katietalk 04:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grin Department

Creation protection – This has been recreated over the past few days over and over again . Wgolf (talk) 03:17, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 03:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Somalis

Temporary semi-protection: IPs persistently changing first word to "Somalians", contrary to sources and article title, without discussion. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Saido Berahino

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:34, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Elabdellaoui

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yaya Sanogo

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:37, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Dyche

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:18, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:44, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tbhotch's archives

Indefinite semi and move protection. These pages should not be edited or moved [8][9] without a real reason. Requesting per WP:UPPROT. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 02:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 02:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Summer Rae

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism issues by unregistered.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 6:25, February 1, 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Fletcher (footballer)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NYBrook098 (talk) 21:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done once, protection expired, Done again. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carles Romagosa Vidal

Creation protection: Thrice-created page on an individual determined via AfD to fail WP:N. —swpbT 22:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done by BethNaught (talk · contribs). --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Giannelli Imbula

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours. Qed237 (talk) 22:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Number 57 (talk · contribs). --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Velma Dinkley

Temporary semi-protection: Bit of a vandal magnet of late. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of five days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Emenalo

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism over past 24 hours. : Noyster (talk), 00:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Manuel Pellegrini

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 17:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The managerial change is sourced now. If disruption resumes, re-report. Katietalk 21:12, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Norfolk Constabulary

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – logo twice replaced with a swastika. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 21:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bobbie

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cam Newton

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 01:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 02:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Karaikal Carnival

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 16:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined @Wiki tamil 100: Same as last decline... no one has edited this page other than you in six months, so there's no reason to protect it. More at Wikipedia:Protection policy — MusikAnimal talk 18:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nerijus Numavičius

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Long term attempts to create an unsourced data, facts are mixed with opinions, continued removal of sourced content. 17:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 18:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aleister Crowley

Semi-protection: Persistent recent IP vandalism, i.e. 2 January 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Midnightblueowl (talk • contribs) 18:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Many good-faith edits — MusikAnimal talk 18:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

03 February 2016

Arjun Karki

Semi-protection: Repeated promotional and copyright violation edits involving several accounts, apparent WP:COI. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jayson Blair (actor)

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Someone tried to add unsourced statement about this actor. There have been reverts on adding it. George Ho (talk) 19:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Liam Will

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has been created 4 times in the past day. Article is about a non-notable "sports reporter", most likely a kid in school. Request page be WP:SALT'ed . RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected — MusikAnimal talk 20:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arjun Karki

Semi-protection: Repeated promotional and copyright violation edits involving several accounts, apparent WP:COI. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jayson Blair (actor)

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Someone tried to add unsourced statement about this actor. There have been reverts on adding it. George Ho (talk) 19:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Liam Will

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has been created 4 times in the past day. Article is about a non-notable "sports reporter", most likely a kid in school. Request page be WP:SALT'ed . RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected — MusikAnimal talk 20:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Almánza

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP repeatedly removing AfD notice. [10] [11]. JbhTalk 13:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, The IP has now started engaging on the AfD, so hopefully they'll understand how it works. Relist if they don't stop. GedUK  13:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yemeni Civil War detailed map

fully protected: Disruptive editing by some users caused to Edit-War. revision & editing without citing the source by Panam2014 happened several times. K!lluminati (talk) 14:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is too false. The problem is in the module not in template. Kiluminati could be a Wikipedia:Single-purpose account. The account appeared in December and he speaks of vandalism. It removes sources such as Masdar speaking advances loyalists and source map with Al Masira , official media Houthi . This is unacceptable. I gave a source. --Panam2014 (talk) 15:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 15:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics‎

Temporary semi-protection: Heavy disruption from a known IP troll. --JBL (talk) 15:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 18:03, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Almánza

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP repeatedly removing AfD notice. [12] [13]. JbhTalk 13:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, The IP has now started engaging on the AfD, so hopefully they'll understand how it works. Relist if they don't stop. GedUK  13:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yemeni Civil War detailed map

fully protected: Disruptive editing by some users caused to Edit-War. revision & editing without citing the source by Panam2014 happened several times. K!lluminati (talk) 14:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is too false. The problem is in the module not in template. Kiluminati could be a Wikipedia:Single-purpose account. The account appeared in December and he speaks of vandalism. It removes sources such as Masdar speaking advances loyalists and source map with Al Masira , official media Houthi . This is unacceptable. I gave a source. --Panam2014 (talk) 15:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 15:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics‎

Temporary semi-protection: Heavy disruption from a known IP troll. --JBL (talk) 15:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 18:03, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 I-League

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from IP addresses. Coderzombie (talk) 12:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NativeForeigner Talk 15:02, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alen Simonyan

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Re-created twice in two days after AFD, along with fork Simonyan Alen. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/InnaBeglaryan. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fork already creation-protected Lectonar (talk) 14:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tanga (clothing)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Several recent daily edits by socks of site banned editor User:Fangusu. Steel1943 (talk) 15:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Done Semiprotected for three months. -- The Anome (talk) 15:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:38, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done tutterMouse (talk) 17:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blade & Soul

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Part of a series of article affected by this ANI thread. All other affected articles were protected. A rangeblock was put in place, but the IP is slipping through it. Scr★pIronIV 16:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Future Perfect at Sunrise. — MusikAnimal talk 17:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Parma Senior High School

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant attacks from IPs and new users. Emotionalllama (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WebXpress

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – no indication of notability, re-created three times in one week. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 12:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. GedUK  13:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kashmiris

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's really going to be no end to this IP person trying to erase references to Dards. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected As the frequency is so low, pending changes should be enough. Lectonar (talk) 13:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Four the Record

Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism. This page was protected early last month, but for only 4 days. —Bruce1eetalk 13:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

General Mayhem

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been created and deleted too many times. JMHamo (talk) 13:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. GedUK  13:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Achinoam Nini

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing by IP-user calling the subject a "far-left extremist activist." This has resulted in a massive edit war.Crboyer (talk) 03:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 07:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Freemen on the land

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by PoV IP. Doug Weller talk 07:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Taylor Swift

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frankie talk 07:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agar.io

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kharkiv07 (T) 22:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 23:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Some good faiths edits. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CNN Philippines

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - This is CNN Philippines Article has Place of Canada has affiliate of CNN Philippines As CNN Philippines-Canada Vandal. 121.1.31.102 (talk) 00:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WKPT-TV

Temporary pending changes. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 02:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Rubio

Semi-protection: Increased disruptive IP activity since caucus.CFredkin (talk) 03:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Roulette (song)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky. Binksternet (talk) 07:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dyan Castillejo

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – as protection previous added content of pokemon vandal in December 17, 2015 is now unprotected. Oripaypaykim (talk) 11:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paraiyar

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edit continues after two expiration of page protections. Users and IPs are keen on their own view that could link or against with Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. AntanO 03:20, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@RegentsPark: any thoughts on this? You were last to protect and last to revert at the page. only (talk) 04:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if it is necessary. IP action is limited and we have a registered user making changes. --regentspark (comment) 16:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I looked at this last night and decided to let it cook for a while. No changes since then, so I don't think any protection is necessary, but I'll defer to someone who knows the subject matter and the arb case a little better. Katietalk 16:33, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 02:38, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Lord of the Rings

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page is about the book, not the film series, why all the disruptive to this page is amazing, I would think this would be true for the film series therefore I think Perm-semi is appropriate. It would be much easier to handle the edit requests. Mlpearc (open channel) 03:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I daresay the book is way more popular than the films, although in a more hidden way. I'll try PC first. Lectonar (talk) 07:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson Martínez

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 23:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Mitchell

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent tagging by IP addresses - at least one probably a socking recently banned user. Please semi protect for a month or so, til they get bored and go away. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 01:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plintron

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – There are three recent deletion log entries. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:02, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:35, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Results of the Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Insistence by IP address to spam the page of excess material against consensus of talk page131.91.7.2 (talk) 18:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 06:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of African countries by GDP (PPP)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism has returned barely after the former protection expired. Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Protection expired on December 15 and there's been exactly one user edit since. Katietalk 01:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of African countries by GDP (nominal)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Vandalism. Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 01:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interstates and other highway articles

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppet vandalism using unconfirmed accounts. Imzadi 1979 → 15:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined For all; sockpuppet accounts have been blocked. Lectonar (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Until tomorrow when the sockmaster makes another new account or two, or rotates onto a new IP, Lectonar. Imzadi 1979 → 16:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trans-Pacific Partnership

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 20:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Sheppard

Semi-protection: Long-term IP vandalism. Apparently people have difficulty differentiating between the actor and his roles. ‖ Ebyabe talk - General Health ‖ 21:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Waqar Hashmi

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 00:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interstates and other highway articles

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppet vandalism using unconfirmed accounts. Imzadi 1979 → 15:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined For all; sockpuppet accounts have been blocked. Lectonar (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Until tomorrow when the sockmaster makes another new account or two, or rotates onto a new IP, Lectonar. Imzadi 1979 → 16:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trans-Pacific Partnership

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 20:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Sheppard

Semi-protection: Long-term IP vandalism. Apparently people have difficulty differentiating between the actor and his roles. ‖ Ebyabe talk - General Health ‖ 21:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Waqar Hashmi

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 00:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

04 February 2016

Rooney Mara

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism. Lapadite (talk) 19:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Schumacher

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. There are unconfirmed reports that this 7-time F1 champion may have died and editors are adding the news as fact and without reliable sources. Dawnseeker2000 19:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Steyning Grammar School

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amortias (T)(C) 20:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Lectonar (talk) 20:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Bingham, 7th Earl of Lucan

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive IP vandalism. Firebrace (talk) 11:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:UkPaolo

Indefinite full protection. wiki tamil 100 12:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined No reason given and no vandalism to justify protection -- GB fan 12:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iran Air

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jetstreamer Talk 14:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Just a disagreement in the reading of available sources (and some overenthusiastic editing); please use the article's talk-page to hash it out. Lectonar (talk) 14:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiki Tamil 100 user.jpeg

Temporary full protection. wiki tamil 100 11:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Not done Image(s) deleted. Lectonar (talk) 11:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Action Hero Biju

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Publicists trying to promote their websites by adding review links. Please grant protection. Nairspecht (talk) 11:41, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The user who is adding the link is autoconfirmed, so semi-protection wouldn't avail to anything. I would start by talking to him. Lectonar (talk) 11:45, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lab Rats (U.S. TV series)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Amaury (talk) 14:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voltage

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Geryhall31 (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 PBA Philippine Cup Finals

Semi-protection: Anon user/s keeps on adding POV statements in this article after the championship series finished yesterday evening. The anon is now engaging in an edit war to keep his POV paragraph there. WayKurat (talk) 04:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 09:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Tae-yeon

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. *1226 09:41, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined I don't see vandalism, I see disagreement. Use the article's talk-page please. Lectonar (talk) 09:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dimitris Siovas

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 20:18, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Masuaku

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 20:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

David Fuster

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 20:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Elabdellaoui

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 20:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pajtim Kasami

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 20:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Manuel da Costa (footballer)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 20:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Days of Our Lives cast members

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of disruptive editing by way of addition of unverifiable information that lead to the previous page blocks. A permanent block is needed, to continue preventing this type of editing. livelikemusic talk! 01:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Lab Rats episodes

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of non-sourced material. Amaury (talk) 04:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Disraeli

Semi-protection: High level of IP edit warring by 109.65.53.175 (talk · contribs), on this and other articles in breach of WP:OVERLINK. According to their talk page, it looks like this has happened under another IP address previously. – SchroCat (talk) 23:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Debbie Does Dallas

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war over whether to embed the film in the article, link to the film on Commons, or do neither. Some editors are reverting despite discussion on the talk page to overturn or keep with the original consensus to include only a link. clpo13(talk) 05:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., semi-protection against socks should be sufficient at this point.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Babri Masjid

Extend pending changes: There have been reverts and some good edits in the past thirty days. --George Ho (talk) 06:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:47, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mahidevran Sultan

Full protection: Repeated Name change that should remain as the person is known today "Mahidevran Sultan" or simply "Mahidevran". Several IP address and users only mentioning one source while constantly editing (deleting) other relevant sources. All sources should be valued and shown into the article rather than mentioning just one (in this case, Leslie P. Peirce's book) source of one's interest. Please protect the article in it's current position after reviewing the sources. Thanks (talk) 19:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Katietalk 03:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandro Domínguez (footballer, born 1981)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 20:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 03:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

James I. Mestrovitch

Indefinite semi-protection. For some reason, this obscure page is a major Balkan IP trollfest. After I improved it significantly based on hard references, revert hell broke loose. I don't see it improved by an anon anytime soon. No such user (talk) 22:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also gave the 3RR warning to your registered user and I'll give him the ARBMAC warning in about two minutes. I'm broadly construing. Katietalk 03:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Demi Lovato: Stay Strong

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from several IP addresses (probably one person). Disruptive edits keep happening all the time.. Give Your a Break 19:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 21:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Solidarity (Polish trade union)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP repeatedly inserting wild non-WP:RS claims. [14].

Please revert him/her and protect the article. Zezen (talk) 20:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. only (talk) 21:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They House

Indefinite full protection: This article has been recreated multiple times after multiple CSDs with the same content by different users, so it needs to be salted. Thank you. In veritas (talk) 01:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Katietalk 02:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan Lane

Indefinite semi-protection: The previous 2-day semi-protections have been useless as disruption (including unexplained removals of text) keeps coming back soon after they expire. It will likely get worse if not semi-protected again soon and for much longer than before. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:08, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Muppet*Vision 3D

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – User 72.235.27.231 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) keeps adding unsourced content . epicgenius (talk) 18:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 19:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clemson Tigers football

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Page is still being used as grounds for constant edit warring. The editors involved have started to use the talk page, but are still at odds on which revision is correct. Page needs to be fully protected (admins only), until a correct version can be decided. Boomer VialHolla 23:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 00:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anti (album)

Temporary semi-protection: rsistent disruptive editing – IP repeatedly removing sourced information. shαnєч σf rєdhill (RH1) 15:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bugzy Malone

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – If I could choose "all of the above" in the semi-protection list on Twinkle, I would. There are daily edits by IPs that either give incorrect information, change things unnecessarily, or simply remove things from the page. Primefac (talk) 16:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Luka Milivojević

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 20:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., edits are infrequent, and I configured pending changes instead of semi-protection. Let us see how they would work.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sasha Banks

Indefinite semi-protection: Disruptive editing, still multiple persistent vandalism issues by unregistered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 4:02, February 2, 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism resumed as soon as the previous protection expired. MelanieN (talk) 22:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

05 February 2016

1: Nenokkadine

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent editing tests since the last two months. Article requires protection, mainly for its stability. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 21:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Manoj Kumar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Whole lot of vandalism and removal of content. Dat GuyTalkContribs 20:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Boehme

Creation protection: Nonsense page created six times total, four times in roughly the last month. —swpbT 20:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arjuna

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is continuously vandalized by an editor for the last couple of days. He dont have a user id so its impossible to send a message and he continues vandalizing everyday. Its really difficult to clean up an article every single day so i would like to make this article temporarily protected. . Arjunkrishna90 (talk) 02:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conchobar

Temporary semi-protection: persistent insertion of a false rumour about the name of the son of a minor pop star, going on for about three weeks and shows no sign of dying down. Not all IPs, but the ones with usernames all seem to be new accounts and so should be covered by semi-protection. --Nicknack009 (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The expulsion of the Albanians

Temporary move-protection: - Page repeatedly moved to The Expulsion of the Arnauts and reverted - discussion has been started at Talk:The expulsion of the Albanians by a third editor, but neither of the edit warring editors has yet joined in - Arjayay (talk) 14:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kotak Mahindra Bank

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous users adding promotional content. The page is currently being rewritten since it looks like an advertisement. Nairspecht (talk) 12:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RuPaul's Drag Race (season 8)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has become a stomping ground for IP's and anonymous editors to add-in original research. livelikemusic talk! 13:37, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eugene McMenamin

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been vandalized by multiple accounts, was restored to a version almost a month old. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kidz Bop

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Talk page discussion is ongoing. (Note: Page already has Pending Changes protection.) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

José Juan Barea

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again Vandalism after Protektion lifted. Kante4 (talk) 18:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Russell Wilson

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. aqwfyj Talk/Contribs 23:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 11:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BAG Tools

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – To prevent this from happening again. -- Cheers, Riley 07:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Church

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 13:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 17:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wiki tamil 100

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 12:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Question: Since you are the only editor to ever edit the page, what persistent vandalism are you talking about? -- GB fan 12:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA coefficient

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 in film

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There has been almost 70 edits, most of them reverts, on this page in the last six days. Editors are not using edit summaries, and need to take this dispute to the talk page. Boomer VialHolla 16:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined If it is an edit war, it is a very slow one. You have warned, correctly (albeit for 2015 in film), so this is more a question of implementing blocks after reporting at the perinent noticeboards. Lectonar (talk) 20:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: That would be WP:ANEW, correct? Boomer VialHolla 06:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valencian Community

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The last 22 consecutive edits to this article are flat reverts, mostly by autoconfirmed users. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 17:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now....Hmmmm...IP 81xxx has been blocked; the 2 warring autoconfirmed users, (User:Satesclop and User:JaumeR) are 2 RR both. Lectonar (talk) 19:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have warned both; if it continues please report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring . Lectonar (talk) 19:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I appreciate that, but I would like to draw your attention to this diff, covering 23 revisions by 9 different users, in which the only content that changed was one diacritic. But I defer to your judgement. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 23:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kshama Sawant

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:52, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BLP it is, silly vandalism in some few instances it is too. Lectonar (talk) 20:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of Ilirida

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP continues to add an infobox containing false, unverifiable information. --Local hero talk 19:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 19:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It appears to be multiple IP addresses so I hope you'll reconsider. Regardless, I'll follow the process you've suggested. --Local hero talk 21:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agar.io

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism since the protection was lifted. Protected four times in the past. I request semi or PC protection for least six months, as the page still receives 2,000 views a day. Esquivalience t 21:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sundar Pichai

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 21:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Corazón que miente

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Philip J Fry / talk 22:19, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maurice White

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death, which will surely garner a lot of attention in the media. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Treaty of Waitangi

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Heavy IP based editing in lead up to political anniversary. . Stuartyeates (talk) 22:46, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And should clear up after the weekend. Come back if it gets significantly worse in the meantime. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Monsuno

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs from 202.89.x.x range, often changing vocabulary. Warned and blocked multiple times, particularly for altering another editor's comments on the talk page, but the editor simply resets their IP whenever they are blocked. —Farix (t | c) 23:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taharrush jamai

Semi-protection. Two new/little-used accounts and two IP addresses are adding to the lead that these mass sexual assaults are carried out by Muslim men, as opposed to men. [15][16][17] [18] (Note: the last diff shows one of them only tweaking what I wrote, but that's because I earlier made the mistake of reverting to one of their versions. I've explained here.) SarahSV (talk) 23:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More reverts. [19][20][21][22] SarahSV (talk) 06:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandro Cuello

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 23:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Horse worship

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes is useless, we need to shut down IP edits at this article as they are virtually never constructive. Semi is needed. Montanabw(talk)|GO THUNDER! 00:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Amanda (aka DQ) 11:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Exodus

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP repeatedly inserting large chunks of original research. Jeppiz (talk) 00:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I am entering valid sources. Review the edits yourself. There is original research in the article already. All I am adding is information from valid sources. Just because this person disagrees with it does not make it original research. 173.238.79.44 (talk) 00:36, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The IP has posted info which fails verification and which is off-topic. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The IP also violates WP:SYNTH by citing a book cover as evidence for verifying information. The IP pretends that he would render all sources included in the book, but imho he renders the point of no particular source whatsoever. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You bet. Please work out consensus on the talk page, and 173, tone down your rhetoric and recognize that we work on a WP:CONSENSUS model here. Thanks, Antandrus (talk) 02:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP disruption. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:37, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Macklemore

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated changes by IP editors to spouse name all day; a few days' semi-protection would be appreciated. TJRC (talk) 01:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Little Prince (2015 film)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP has repeatedly made unnecessary edits to the page by inserting and then removing this edit repeatedly. Another IP address has expressed a problem with this behavior. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 01:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 65

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 35

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edgewood Junior/Senior High School

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 02:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Faith

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalized by vulgar and inappropriate content. I don't want to keep people from adding good content but I also want to keep the page appropriate for all ages. All I ask is for the chance to keep the page respectable. Thanks Bobsanders1991 (talk) 03:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Timlin

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, which will hopefully die down when CBB finishes. Boleyn (talk) 06:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:4TheWynne

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandal has gone from vandalising my user page (which was protected) to vandalising my talk page. Consistently changing IP addresses. Blocking will not be enough. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 07:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

06 February 2016

Kashmir conflict

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – long history of edit warring and protection on this page. Kindly protect it till discussion ends on talk page. Human3015 TALK  08:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have calmed down at the moment; please continue talk page conversation rather than revert war. only (talk) 13:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Kaohsiung earthquake

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current event, disruption to good edits by IPs. Rollingcontributor (talk) 12:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I only see a few IP edits, and not a lot of them are disruptive. Considering the current event nature of this article, it's relatively calm; if IP vandalism does pick up, re-report it. only (talk) 13:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Logan Lynn Roberts

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – user:denniss is attacking me. Logan Lynn Roberts 12:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined, I've deleted the page; your page was clearly a promotional/spam profile. Please do not recreate. only (talk) 13:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John C. Calhoun

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The article has been vandalized by IP users on February 5th, January 28th, January 11th, January 6th, December 23rd, and December 7th. If one counts the incident on January 6th as being within this month, that makes it 4 times in one month. I think that this should be enough. Display name 99 (talk) 03:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Muppets Take Manhattan

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 12:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Madhuri Dixit

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Enough times this article is being vandalized now. Please semi-protect per WP:BLP indefinitely. —IB [ Poke ] 12:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elisha Cuthbert

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Over the past month, a few newer users have been adding a tidal wave of poorly sourced and unsourced content. When they bother to source it, it's often sourced to obviously unreliable sites, like social media and Wordpress blogs. Semiprotection won't stop it all, but it'll make it easier to manage. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tornadoes in the United States

Temporary semi-protection: Long-term/persistent vandalism by IP's and non-autoconfirmed users. Also persistent sock puppetry is very likley. Tryadon (talk) 01:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The requesting account has been blocked as a sockpuppet. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Take Me Home (One Direction album)

Temporary semi-protection: Long-term/persistent vandalism by IP's and non-autoconfirmed users. Also persistent sock puppetry is very likley. Tryadon (talk) 03:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The requesting account has been blocked as a sockpuppet. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ionic bonding

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last 50 edites - nothing but vandalism (and reverts). Christian75 (talk) 09:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The IP has been blocked, insufficient vandalism from other sources to justify protection at this time. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:ReadEditReadEdit

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User is now spaming his talk page after being blocked. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 22:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Lectonar (talk) 08:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Filmfare Award for Best Female Playback Singer

Temporary semi-protection: An unverified editor wants to use this like a fan page and is indulging in persistent disruptive editing on this page. Request for temporary protection. --ANKMALI (talk) 04:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 13:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"List of Converts" articles with galeries

Temporary semi-protection: Due to a current discussion in WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES containing the verbiage "large populations" several users are seizing the opportunity to remove all galleries, specifically in articles having to do with religion. Since a religion is not an ethnicity, nor is religion mentioned in the discussion, I request Temporary semi-protection to KEEP the galleries until the discussion is settled one way or another. Trinacrialucente (talk) 07:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. First, there is edit-warring which includes autoconfirmed users from both sides, so that full protection would be required. Second, it is a content dispute, it should be properly discussed, and full protection of the articles is an overkill. And the images would be restored/removed depending on the outcome of the discussion anyway. Try to discuss it with the users first.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MattyBRaps

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – permanent vandalism by IPs. Denniss (talk) 23:37, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of seven days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Ritzheimer

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Frequent vandalism + BLP violations. MB298 (talk) 00:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Disambiguation

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A content dispute is leading to several editors reverting one another at Wikipedia:Disambiguation. I'd like to see this page fully protected until the talk page discussion regarding the issue is closed. -- Tavix (talk) 01:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Bagumba. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:45, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More pages PC-protected by inactive admins

Extend pending changes: Very little amount of good IP edits. Reverts have still occurred, especially in the past 30 days. Protecting administrators inactive at the moment. George Ho (talk) 09:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:51, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pepe the Frog

Semi-protection: like most internet memes, this seems to attract a lot of vandalism and copyvio uploads. Jolly Ω Janner 04:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo Airways

Semi-protection. Couple of IP reverting and not taking it to the talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NXT TakeOver: Dallas

Semi-protection: Persistent high level of IP vandalism. Originalchampion (talk) 02:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sport Club Corinthians Paulista

Extend pending changes: Reverts still occur in the past 30 days. George Ho (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:51, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Let's see what happens after pending changes expires. Lectonar (talk) 21:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Pratt

Extend pending changes: I don't know how frequently edited the article is, but reverts have occurred, especially in the last 30 days. George Ho (talk) 09:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Let's see what happens after pending changes expires. Lectonar (talk) 21:33, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Era (geology)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping Gamergate vandalism. DuncanHill (talk) 06:53, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When We Were Young

Disruptive edits. Music01 (talk) 20:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 02:45, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars sequel trilogy

Temporary semi-protection: - but perhaps for a little longer this time. IP vandals can't seem to stay away. - theWOLFchild 00:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Courageous (50)

Temporary semi-protection: This page has received dozens of vandalizing edits in the last 2 days, but not a lot before that. Air.light (talk) 05:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Municipal solid waste

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GABHello! 21:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of seven days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Taiwan earthquake

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-output vandal on page currently. RickinBaltimore (talk) 22:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adolf Eichmann

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 2 different IPs and a registered account today. GABHello! 02:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 02:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Mirra

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by an unregistered editor, on a page about someone who has recently died. Digifiend (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not only vandalism, recent event. Lectonar (talk) 21:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ryback

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Trying every noticeboard I can. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 06:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 19:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And She Was

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Trying every noticeboard I can. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 06:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 20:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Farah Karimi (actress)

Creation Protection: The page is repeatedly recreated. Please delete and protect it.--MusaTalk ☻ 19:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Now at Afd. Lectonar (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — MusikAnimal talk 18:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scroll saw

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by an ip of this specific page. Isit2004 (talk) 19:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 19:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

07 February 2016

Cam Newton

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after unprotection, and he's starting in Super Bowl 50 today, the most watched program in the U.S. of the year. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:42, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Hart

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism and BLP violations.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 19:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Odin

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A wave of IP editors (93.221.253.114; 84.139.125.10; 84.139.120.115; 93.221.203.172; 84.183.120.126; 2a02:810c:c3f:ee8c:ec76:9c72:7356:4fc8; 179.195.110.45; 93.221.212.164; 93.221.233.138; 93.221.252.112) has kept emerging and vandalizing the article Talk Page. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 20:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected pages [Edit=Allow only template editors and admins]

Full protection (same time periods): Template protection probably accidental, as it is only appropriate for high-risk templates, modules, and other highly-transcluded pages per WP:TPROT. Evad37 [talk] 02:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, but let's ping Harry and CorbieVreccan first — MusikAnimal talk 18:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I put List of Power Rangers Dino Supercharge episodes at template protection because it's been plagued with socks, and it's the only thing we have between ten edits/four days (which the sockmaster is gaming with trivial effort) and admins only, but there's no reason somebody trustworthy couldn't edit it if they needed to. You can full protect it if you want, but that would seem to me to be bureaucracy for its own sake. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Full protection is fine with me. My rationale at the time was the same as for HJ - choosing something between semi and full, for the same reasons. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 19:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As a template editor, I wouldn't feel comfortable editing a mainspace article that had been template-protected – particularly if from the protection log entry it appears the admin meant to use full protection. Keep in mind also that there are only 122 template editors (less than one-tenth of the number of admins). The only extra potential edits are if one of them finds a template protected article (I only found these through Special:ProtectedPages), and then decides to edit through protection because they can, even though that wasn't what they were entrusted to do (i.e. not part of WP:TPE or WP:TPROT). So while admins can do WP:IAR protections and template editors can do IAR edits, in my opinion it is so close to full protection that full protection might as well be used. I can see the attractions of something a bit stronger than 10 edits/4 days to stop persistent socks while still allowing a significant number of editors, but I don't think template-protection does a good job of it. - Evad37 [talk] 01:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do we actually need any protection for List of Power Rangers Dino Supercharge episodes? This redirect has not yet been edited disruptively.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done sort of. I increased Betty X to Full protection (same duration) and dropped the power rangers redirect to indef semi. Template protection is not used as an in-between for articles/redirects. If the power rangers redirect needs to be increased to full, fine by me, but I didn't see enough to warrant indef full at this time. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected pages [Move=Allow only template editors and admins]

Full Move protection (same time periods): Template protection probably accidental, as it is only appropriate for high-risk templates, modules, and other highly-transcluded pages per WP:TPROT. Evad37 [talk] 02:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done kelapstick(bainuu) 21:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew McMahon

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by IP. Miszatomic (talk) 20:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected only (talk) 20:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hani and Moorim School OST Vandalism by IPs

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent reverts concerning Hani's contribution to the Soundtrack. Alicia leo86 (talk) 10:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done, one semi-protected for a week, for another one I do not see any disruption in the last couple of days.Ymblanter (talk) 16:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ravidassia religion

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs. I admire @Chrisw80 patient effort to address the heavy unsourced vandalism and soapboxing there, so far. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 22:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated unblock requests by banned user. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped for now only (talk) 12:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ice Age characters

Semi-protection: Page has been previously semi-protected to prevent a persistent anonymous vandal using multiple IPs from inserting original research and edit-warring to protect its original research. Now that the page is no longer semi-protected, the vandal has returned. Longer or indefinite semi-protection is necessary to discourage the vandal, who has demonstrated that it is incapable of discussion, and is resistant to blocking.--Mr Fink (talk) 15:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Airplaneman. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion polling for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Unsigned edits keep on changing colours (original: "remain" green, "leave" red), but incompletely and inconsistently, making page inconsistent with itself and other wikipedia pages. These colours are used for e.g. the 1975 EC referendum. Last edit chose different colours but made text unreadable. Besides, switching colours would require swapping colours (green always comes before red on Wikipedia), but not done, which denotes vandalism. Verbal abuse from IPs in talk section also denotes vandalism. Requesting semi-protection to stop edits by IPs until solution is found, to keep page as it is and in line with other wikipedia pages. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcauchy (talk • contribs) 19:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Fast and the Furious

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy IP vandalism over the last two weeks. Page came out of a previous semi-protection on January 22, 2016 and IP vandalism started up almost immediately. Safiel (talk) 21:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas City Royals

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rameez Raja

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 09:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 11:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UFC Fight Night: Hendricks vs. Thompson

Semi-protection: High level of IP / new user vandalism. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 02:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Lankiveil for 12 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 07:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi-5 (Australian band)

Semi-protection: Frequent IP vandalism, disruptive editing and edit wars (one currently ongoing). Band page has been protected before for this reason. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 04:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as far as the band article is concerned. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. as far as the TV series is concerned. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coboy Junior

Semi-protection: Persistent problematic edits from an anonymous user with multiple IPs. Diffs: [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28]. At least 5 IPs so far over the last several days, all making the same edit. I'm AGF'ing, but I just can't figure out what this editor is trying to say. The language seems as if they think the subject is a TV show, but it's not...it's a musical group. They're trying to add refs, but they're doing it wrong and the linked refs go nowhere. It seems pretty clear that English isn't their first language, and there may be related competency issues. The same editor has made similarly problematic edits to Despicable Me (franchise) and related articles. I'm hoping temporary semi-protection of Coboy Junior may discourage them from simply re-adding the same text ad nauseum and reach out for assistance (user talk page messages would be futile, as they never edit from the same IP twice). --IllaZilla (talk) 06:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:7&6=thirteen

My talk page. I'm under attack. Needs a semi at least after the attacker is blocked. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. SarahSV (talk) 01:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given. This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, If you reply to User:7&6=thirteen there should not be a problem. Pings and bots sometimes have a problem with my user name. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 02:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed the issue with the request, just wanted a {{pagelinks}} template. tutterMouse (talk) 08:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, guess I was wrong, I'll just request an archiving. tutterMouse (talk) 08:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

G-Dragon

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Explicit. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Beck

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Amberrock. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP was told many times to stop edit warring the page, but refuses. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 13:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Both the requester and the IP have been blocked. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Dark Knight Trilogy

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user keeps vandalising the "Recurring cast and characters" section by adding characters who only had single film appearances, when the title clearly reads "recurring". Kailash29792 (talk) 17:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The IP is autoconfirmed, so semi will not work, have issued a warning for edit-warring and reverted to pre-war version. Ping me if the war continues. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fortran

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. SarahSV (talk) 23:00, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Murton

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant unsourced edits regarding a pending sports transaction that has not been confirmed by team. Cubbie15fan (talk) 22:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No attempts have been made to discuss this content matter on article or user talk. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blurryface

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over the last few days. Yeepsi (talk) 22:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clemson–South Carolina rivalry

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by a number of IPs which all geolocate to Bethel Park, Pennsylvania. No attempts are being made at article talk page to discuss these disruptive edits. GarnetAndBlack (talk) 20:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. GarnetAndBlack, I've taken your word for it that this is vandalism, and I semi-protected for a week. But several IPs were adding that one game was a forfeit. Is that definitely wrong? SarahSV (talk) 01:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Those several IPs were all geolocated to the same town in Pennsylvania, and IP hopping of this nature is generally frowned upon. As for the content, neither school recognizes the game in question as anything other than what it was, a USC victory, and this can be verified in the annual football media guides published by the two schools. The forfeit was imposed by the ACC (not the NCAA) solely for purposes of awarding a conference championship. GarnetAndBlack (talk) 02:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger shark

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an anonymous vandal operating several IPs, changing from one IP to another as each IP is blocked. Continually rewords information to be error, masked by deceptive edit summaries.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. by another admin. only (talk) 02:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WRFF

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term protection is needed for persistent vandalism. Whack-a-mole blocks haven't stopped the issue, nor has short term (24 hours to a week) of protection. Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC) 20:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done I can only see one previous protection, so perhaps some logs are missing, but it's clear that someone keeps arriving with the same vandalism, so I've added indefinite semi-protection. SarahSV (talk) 01:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toyota Hilux

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an anonymous vandal operating several IPs, changing from one IP to another as each IP is blocked. Labors under the inane assumption that "pickup truck" is somehow emotive and vulgar.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. by another admin. SarahSV (talk) 01:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Wilshere

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 01:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Schistosomiasis

Temporary semi-protection for 1 month. We have an aggressive IP editor who is edit warring based on harsh interpretations of policy (removing every bit of everything not fully cited over the objections of several editors who are trying to improve the article.) this is quite the opposite of the usual vandal, but it is as disruptive. Please semi. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 06:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page should actually be protected from edit-warring registered users, including the requester here, who insist on keeping unsourced material in the article after it has been removed and after having been "citation needed" tagged for a reasonable amount of time. Ignoring the Wikipedia sourcing pillar is not acceptable. And saying that several editors "are trying to improve the article" is a complete fabrication. They have done nothing to source the unsourced material - they simply restore it, saying that the burden is on me to either source it myself or leave it untouched. 70.124.133.228 (talk) 06:53, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
agree w/ Jytdog, semi-protection would be a very good idea for 1 month--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: User warned for now. SarahSV (talk) 23:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done for the bot. SarahSV (talk) 01:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A different IP is making some of the same edits, so semi-protected for one month. SarahSV (talk) 04:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

City of Manchester Stadium

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Leicester just defeated Man City in Manchester so a lot of vandalism from Leicester fans. Qed237 (talk) 14:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 01:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Goodman

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 01:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Molotov cocktail

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boulevard of Broken Dreams (Green Day song)

Semi-protection: There's been persistent additions of fake and unverified charts by IPs and new users here too, as well as random chart number changes not found in the sources.. It has been a problem for months, and the first page of 50 edits consists almost solely of such edits and subsequent reverts to them. Kokoro20 (talk) 13:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pakistani artists

Semi-protection: Repeated addition of artists with no article. Notes to talk pages have failed as the IP addresses keep changing, and a note on the article talk page has been ignored. Whpq (talk) 14:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, per WP:WTAF, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Paul Oman-Reagan

Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism since January 30, targeting a living person currently in the news as part of coordinated online harassment campaign, connected to doxing, and other ongoing activities across several sites. 142.166.156.85 (talk) 20:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent death

Full protection: Autoconfirmed user repeatedly readding content in defiance of a commented out warning added by an admin. Diff to when the warning was added: [29]. For the repeated readditions of content: see the recent history of the article, the (maybe confused?) user readding the content is Darek555. 112.195.153.6 (talk) 00:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It keeps happening. Can we have the page protected already? 112.195.153.6 (talk) 17:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, you should be blocked as you edit anonymously only from IP and you permanently deleting my section , you have no right with this what you are doing, on discussion users confirm that Path of Exile have permadeath mode. Please restore my section and protect.--Darek555 (talk) 21:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Discuss it on the talk page, please. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

War in Donbass

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes is not sufficient here. This is my third protection request dealing with the same matter. Some IP hopper keeps making the same disruptive changes over and over again. This has happened for months, yet nothing has been done about it. The last protection request resulted in PC, but that doesn't stop the IP. Please semi this page. RGloucester — ☎ 19:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pavee Lackeen

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 22:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Generator Rex

Temporary semi-protection: Page was previously semi-protected against IPs making unconstructive, original research fancruft edits. Now that page-protection has worn off, same IPs/same users have returned to reinsert exact same fancruft edits back into the article.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dev joshi

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This article was re-created as per deletion of A7 criteria. Moreover the variation was also made here. So no option but to be salted off. . SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 09:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ice Age: Collision Course

Temporary semi-protection: Page is currently being besieged by different persistent IP vandals.--Mr Fink (talk) 15:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 19:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CL (singer)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent increase in persistent non-constructive editing . Onel5969 TT me 18:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

08 February 2016

Ronald McNair

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by a range of IPs. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 14:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lunar New Year

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1o days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

25 (Adele album)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP disruption of adding false sales and certifications. —IB [ Poke ] 19:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yo-Kai Watch

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism trying to link to Cory in the House. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Milana Vayntrub

Temporary semi-protection: or IPv6 2605:e000:2340:400/64 range block. Range has repeatedly changed Uzbek to Soviet. Previously rangeblocked for 24-hours, but now back a week later. See Talk:Milana Vayntrub#Soviet/Uzbek. Glrx (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Romanowski

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism after a recent controversial social media comment. Lizard (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yves Mehanna

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 21:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Warning

Need Admin edit (not move) protection level reduced to Template Editor, to add features from sibling template {{Notice}}.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  15:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done BethNaught (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Venus Palermo

Permanent semi-protection: This article has been a morass of IP disturbance for a couple of years. Mainly by the subject's mother (who originally created the article and also even created a wiki article on herself, Margaret Palermo, through her registered account before that account was temporarily blocked and she started using IPs instead) and other COI editors, but also just random IP vandalism. Dealing with it is more than one or two editors can handle, and frankly we should not put up with it anymore. Softlavender (talk) 11:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie (2015 Malayalam film)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Adding unsourced claims by IPs and some promotion only accounts. Charles Turing (talk) 13:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zika virus

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feather

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal keeps blanking page under different IPs. Ches (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--31h on the /24. DMacks (talk) 20:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And then Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. y User:Yamaguchi先生. No objection from me to this longer-term target-specific action for a looooong-term vandal magnet. DMacks (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Md Tanvir Hossain

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The user created this after Tanvir Hossain was protected after he had created the article there four times, as well as at his own user page once. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 Chelsea F.C. season

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruptive edits. Qed237 (talk) 10:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The problem with this article is that a large number of edits are by autoconfirmed users, so semi-protection wouldn't achieve much. If anyone violates WP:3RR or edit wars generally, consider taking them to WP:AN3 instead. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lukaslt13

Indefinite semi-protection: If the IP addresses to try to mess around with User pages that they can not enter. To edit certify members and administrators. I have only myself to protection. Take out insurance. Because, some IP adresse wrote to my page in Lithuanian Wikipedia, and I had problems. Wikipedia great! - Lukaslt13 My talk - Yes? - Yes 10:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Lukaslt13[reply]

Anybody hear me? Hello?--Wikipedia great! - Lukaslt13 My talk - Yes? - Yes 11:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Lukaslt13[reply]
Not done There were no edits from IP's to your userpage here in the English Wikipedia; we do not protect preemptively. We can not protect your userpage in the Lithuanian Wikipedia. Please relist when your userpage gets vandalized. Lectonar (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Memphis Depay

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by a series of IPs. . Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 14:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Mattythewhite. Liz Read! Talk! 18:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Jimbo Wales

Semi-protection: Banned IP user wont get the hint.Only in death does duty end (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The user returned with a new IP, protection might be needed. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. I have blocked. Lectonar (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Colton Cosmic just switches IP's continuously, so its needs semi-protection sadly. Its a cycle with him, page gets semi'd, he goes quiet for awhile, comes back when its open again. Only in death does duty end (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator John Reaves. Liz Read! Talk! 18:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wallingford, Connecticut

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent and long term attempts to use the article as a means of promoting real estate values in the area. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked the most recent spammer. Katietalk 18:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Keenan (writer)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KungAvSand (talk) 16:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

United States v. Nixon

Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism, multiple accounts. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Mike Rosoft. Katietalk 18:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Juan José Expósito Ruiz

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As per what the vandal said, he has a dynamic IP. Dat GuyTalkContribs 18:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby Challenge 3

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Liz Read! Talk! 18:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Formation World Tour

Semi-protection: No history of page vandalism since the page was just made, but it is bound to be vandalized. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 08:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Lectonar (talk) 08:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Nanny

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Melonkelon (talk) 11:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

9GAG

Temporary semi-protection due to persistent IP vandalism. Beach drifter (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- GB fan 18:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Helminthiasis

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP-edits despite multiple warnings . CFCF 💌 📧 00:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: CFCF, there was a similar problem yesterday with that IP, but the disruption was a little clearer then. In this case, can you explain why it isn't simply a content dispute? SarahSV (talk) 03:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Primarily because the IP is not engaging in discussion, or acknowledging that opinions other than his own may impact the content of the article. This is a continuation of the exact same behavior he was warned and asked not to engage in. CFCF 💌 📧 07:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
He seems to have begun engaging in constructive editing since my request, and as such I would put this request on hold. CFCF 💌 📧 07:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 08:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gegard Mousasi

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The pending changes isn't enough to prevent reverts on the same content. George Ho (talk) 08:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chadtronic

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Autobio of non-notable and disruptive WP:SPA. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 11:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sanam Teri Kasam (2016 film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MusaTalk ☻ 00:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. There are other IPs that are making positive contributions, so I am loath to semi-protect. I have warned the disruptive IP. If blanking re-occurs, please ping me. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prem (film actor)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent removal of AfD template by multiple accounts. According to the discussion at AfD, this is one of multiple promotional incarnations, and has engendered an SPI as well. Ideally, deletion with salt is recommended. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Page already deleted by Drmies. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected by Drmies (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 08:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Norse religion

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive socking (see page history). Thomas.W talk 08:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iran Air

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Protection request declined recently. Please reconsider. Jetstreamer Talk 14:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

C.D. Guadalajara

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism keeps occurring almost every day, usually from unregistered users. Cal-isco15 (talk) 06:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Faust

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – False death reports, likely a 4chan prank. FallingGravity (talk) 07:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joaquín Guzmán‎

Temporary semi-protection until 02/16/2016: Persistent vandalism for last days/weeks/months. --Obsuser (talk) 04:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welding

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost every day is vandalized, sometimes even multiple times a day. In veritas (talk) 05:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See how that goes. Feel free to ping me if it comes back after two weeks. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Peacemaker67 Thank you! In veritas (talk) 06:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Abraham (actor)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Targetted alot with several vandalistic IP edits. Refer these diffs please [30], [31], [32], [33], [34] and [35]. Removing adequate "sourced content" plus keeping own views for his religion. . SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 06:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Milot Rashica

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. MYS77 ✉ 03:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This appears to be a Kosovo-related issue. No attempts have been made to discuss on article or user talk pages. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Under-19 Cricket World Cup

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing high-traffic cricket tournament. Surprisingly vandalism-free until now (IPs have been more helpful than hindersome), but vandalism has escalated now the tournament is in its final stages, and is getting more difficult to detect with the increased number of edits to the page. IgnorantArmies (talk) 07:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There appear to be positive contributions being made by IPs and non-autoconfirmed users, so I'm loath to semi-protect at this time. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Expulsion of the Albanians

Full-protection: Edit warring. 77.37.134.66 (talk) 18:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The edit-warring user has been blocked. If they return, ping me. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Equator (Uriah Heep album)

Temporary semi-protection: Genre warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disrupting IP has been {{blocked}} by KrakatoaKatie. Mlpearc (open channel) 01:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Given the block, not necessary at this time. If they return, ping me. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Javed Afridi

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. MusaTalk ☻ 00:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Demaryius Thomas

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP and new user vandalism, due to the Super Bowl game (this person is a player in that game.) –Gladamastalk 02:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeMarcus Ware

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. –Gladamastalk 02:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Drmies. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marshawn Lynch

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to Lynch's intention to retire. As of now, there has been no official announcement. TheTMOBGaming2 (talk) 03:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully things will have settled down by then. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Banjara

Semi-protection: High level of IP / new user vandalism. Djadjko (talk) 01:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Super Bowl LV

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This is a redirect that is five days into a Redirects for Discussion debate, which looks almost 100% certain to end in deletion. IP's are repeatedly removing the RfD tag and/or converting to article content while RfD debate is underway. Since we are 5 days into the RfD, request 3 days semi protection to cover the remaining balance of the RfD discussion. Safiel (talk) 03:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gravity Falls

Temporary semi-protection until 02/16/2016: Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous IPs either making inappropriate changes to dates, or incessantly adding inconsequential fancruft minutia.--Mr Fink (talk) 03:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Religion in Israel

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP editors trying to repeat the same inferior edit that has been rejected on the talkpage already a long time ago. Debresser (talk) 13:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully, this will get the IPs engaging on talk. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Scully

Ongoing vandalism Deku-shrub (talk) 14:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Messi–Ronaldo rivalry

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One of the IPs is autoconfirmed, but this will help. Take the IP with three warnings to AIV if it continues. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Billboard Mainstream Top 40 number-one songs of the 1990s

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This has been going on since just before the beginning of 2016 with this article, with various IPv6 users 2600:1006:b1* as well as users Billyjamesd, Grohlhole and Frankupapa (who are indefinitely blocked as sockpuppets of another blocked user ... see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002/Archive) all altering info about who was #1 on the Billboard Mainstream Top 40 chart. The common denominator with all these users is their replacing whoever is listed with a Green Day song, going against what is said in the references given. I've been following this across at least a couple of Billboard-related articles ... List of Billboard Hot 100 top 10 singles in 2005 and List of Billboard Mainstream Top 40 number-one songs of 2005 in particular ... as well as seeing all sorts of vandalism on Green Day related articles for a few weeks ("When I Come Around" and "Wake Me Up When September Ends" for example), and it's getting frustrating to say the least about needing to revert these falsities put in these articles, either by myself or other editors watching them. MPFitz1968 (talk) 15:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Atdhe Nuhiu

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Rameez Raja

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from many new accounts. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Bbb23. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Margot Robbie

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – an IP is being particularly persistent. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 11:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sing (2016 film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A persistent vandal has been adding fake cast lists to this article. Examples: [36], [37], [38], and [39]. These all fail verification, as none of the cast members added in the edits appear in the citation. This has been going on for over a month. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Undertaker

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit war between several users. Dcheagle • talk • contribs 21:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And due to the absolutely egregious violations of 3RR: User(s) blocked. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Location map/data/Serbia

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP address vandalize the template my changing the map. It should be permanently semi-protected, ip have nothing to do in location template subpages. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 16:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This looks like a part of the Kosovo independence dispute. No attempt to communicate with IPs has been made, insufficient disruption to justify protection at this time. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Giraffidae

Temporary semi-protection: An anonymous vandal is repeatedly vandalizing Giraffidae, and changes to a new IP in order to evade each successive block.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Gardner (record holder)

Temporary semi protection: Multiple IPs and accounts attacking this article today. Meters (talk) 23:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Party 4

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs. « Ryūkotsusei » 20:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Party 5

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs. « Ryūkotsusei » 20:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Basque Country (autonomous community)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Iñaki LL (talk) 20:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit-warring over map to be used. Needs a consensus on talk, RfC it if you need to. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Norwich City F.C.

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Infrequent (every 1-2 days) vandalism from a number of IPs, so pending changes seems the best option to prevent this. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See how that goes, happy to extend if the IPs aren't put off. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:POV-check

Unprotection: From full protection to template editor protection (including the move protection). The move protection is the issue (same with the three above). I'm cleaning up stray ungrammatical hyphenation in a few remaining templates in this class, and have run into a handful that can't be moved without admin bits.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  23:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Although this doesn't seem to me to be a move that should be done unilaterally. Is there discussion regarding the move? kelapstick(bainuu) 01:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Every time I RM them, they get moved. Every time I list them at RM for speedy moving they get moved. Every time I move them manually, they stay moved. I took this slow for months and months, and there is no push-back. I just moved a bazillion of them, and no one cared. The reasons to move them are that the hyphenation is nonsensical in English (looks like an idea imported from French Wikipedia, since that language uses hyphenation a lot, and French speakers using English do it frequently, like referring to pool as "pool-billiard", a construction that is silly in English); it was very randomly and very spottily applied resulting in most templates (naturally) not having this "randomly hyphenate-some words-but not others-like that" mess; and thus people never being able to remember which were and were not hyphenated, resulting in more and more and more pointless redirects being made all the time so that attempts at guessing which spelling will work will all work. If we just get rid of the pointless hyphenation, people will mostly stop making hyphenated versions. Several years ago there was general move across WP:TFD to move as many template names as feasible to plain-English constructions and away from confusing gobbledegook, at least if they're expected to be used by human editors directly. This is just overdue cleanup in furtherance of that goal.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  02:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cleanup-bare URLs, etc.

Unprotection: From x protection to template editor protection (including the move protection). Do I need to keep listing these individually, or should I just bunch them up? [I've tried bunching them up this time.]  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  02:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noted your response above above, thanks for the info. Bunching up is fine. Saves multiple responses on the admin end.--kelapstick(bainuu) 02:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done kelapstick(bainuu) 02:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Islam

Temporary full protection: Two editors are edit warring to insert a disputed passage and refusing to respond on the talk page. Please restore the long-standing version of the passage (05:31, 5 February 2016‎) and temporarily lock the page to enable proper WP:DR. Eperoton (talk) 01:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please contact the other editors and urge them to discuss on the article talk page. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Victory

Temporary Semi-protection: - Short term protection against IP editor making mass changes without sources or edit summaries, edit warring and refusal to discuss on talk page after request to do so. Thanks - theWOLFchild 17:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 21:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 GT3 Le Mans Cup season

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. JohnMcButts (talk) 18:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mandy

Semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism / trolling by now-blocked User:Ezzabell, 2 new accounts and IP afterwards. GermanJoe (talk) 12:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:28, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Russell Wilson

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. aqwfyj Talk/Contribs 14:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: There are two issues going on with this article. First, there was some vandalism from IP editors this morning, but it seems to have subsided. Second, there is a content dispute—to which aqwfyj is a party—about Wilson's ethnicity. There is an open RFC about it at the article's talk page. The article was fully protected on 1 Feb because of this dispute. (@Doug Weller: Pinging you so you're aware of this discussion.) I blocked one participant of the content dispute (Nezi1111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)) on 5 February; aqwfyj only barely escaped a block for edit warring based on his agreement to stop reverting the article for the next 24 hours.
I present all this to provide some history about the article. I'm close enough to the situation that I don't want to act directly here. I would recommend declining this request as written for lack of persistent vandalism. I also don't think the article needs fully protected again. However, fresh eyes would help the situation. —C.Fred (talk) 15:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just to add to this, I made the request again due to additional IP editor vandalism that has occurred since the last request was denied. For a page as visible as this, without semi-protection, IP editor vandalism is fairly consistent from my observation. aqwfyj Talk/Contribs 16:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done I protected it due to an edit war. Looking back over the last couple of months, semi-protection would have had little to no effect on the article. Today seems to have been an exception and I see 28 watchers who have visited recent edits, suggesting that normal vandalism can be controlled. Doug Weller talk 19:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cleanup-rewrite

Unprotection: From full protection to template editor protection.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  23:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done This was template protected in 2013, it's only fully move protected.kelapstick(bainuu) 23:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:POV-statement

Unprotection: From full protection to template editor protection.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  23:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Increased from semiprotection to template protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Weasel-inline

Unprotection: From full protection to template editor protection.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  23:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done This was template protected in 2013, it's only fully move protected.23:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)kelapstick(bainuu)

Special Anti-Terrorist Unit (Serbia)

Full-protection: Edit warring / content dispute. 122.155.3.22 (talk) 17:51, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Both users have already been warned for edit-warring. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chemical substance

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

David de Gea

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 103.6.159.77 (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

09 February 2016

Bad Aibling rail accident

Temporary semi-protection (eg. 3–7 days). Current event with high death toll and the first IP has turned up.[40]. —Sladen (talk) 14:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not necessary yet imho. Willing to semi-protect if it becomes a major issue. Mjroots (talk) 15:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now - most of the anon edits I checked were good, but this will probably change after a day or two. Re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 17:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaurs (TV series)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from an anonymous, IP-hopping vandal with a long history of inserting poorly written, unsourced original research identification, and vociferous edit-warring to protect said original research edits. Edit summaries of "you promise never to undo it again" clearly identifies it as the exact same vandal who attacks Pete (Disney) whenever that page is not semi-protected.--Mr Fink (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - last month averages an incident every week or two - probably better for now to simply revert them. AlexiusHoratius 17:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sexism

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, including edit warring. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

VHS

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal. Deli nk (talk) 20:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Davey Havok

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping editor attacking the article today. Deli nk (talk) 19:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Google easter eggs

Semi-protection: Recent IP vandalism of high passing interest fun subject. fredgandt 19:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Electricburst1996

Indefinite semi-protection: My page was recently vandalized by an IP address that was blocked by Cyphoidbomb. I want my page semi'd to prevent any further incidents like this. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 19:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. AlexiusHoratius 20:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew McConaughey

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism by several anonymous editors over the past few hours. Entranced98 (talk) 19:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Stasko

Semi-protection: IP-hopping vandal keeps adding picture of another person to the infobox. Peter James (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AbbVie

This page continues to be updated with non-cited information. Updates are reverted as this page has been "taken over" by unknown user who continues to change the page with outdated information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmedick (talk • contribs) 20:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I do not see any disruption--Ymblanter (talk) 14:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rebel Heart (Madonna album)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of recent IP disruptions by changing sales and adding WP:OR. —IB [ Poke ] 16:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC
Semi-protected indefinitely. by Drmies. tutterMouse (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

White pride

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Must be a defend-a-racist day. Vandalism all day long after a week of no edits at all. No longer a penguin (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for 3 days by Drmies. tutterMouse (talk) 20:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gucci

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DWRX

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of Hoaxes by User:Bertrand101 IP Sockpuppet. 121.1.31.102 (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Henrik Ahnberg

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dewritech (talk) 10:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Man, what happened? This must have been posted on 4Chan or reddit. Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

California University of Business and Technology

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Truewiki2016 was blocked for a week for edit-warring; now there's a "new" editor (Swecheng) who has picked up where Truewiki2016 left off. It's obvious that they intend to persist; can we please have semi-protection for a couple of weeks. . Nomoskedasticity (talk) 12:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. three months by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 16:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Patriot (American Revolution)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Additional protection, please. Valid edits outnumbered by vandalism. Hertz1888 (talk) 15:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fleetlands F.C.

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs at 82.110.109.* Vipinhari || talk 16:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bayombong

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. 121.1.31.102 (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 10:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of Twelver Shia Islam

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – requesting a week long gold lock. slow burning editwar where an IP hopper and multiple editors are in dispute. Please protect before someone gets themselves blocked. . FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - last protection was a couple weeks ago and only one anon since then (a few days ago) - not really disruptive enough for full protection. If the anon is just going to make a couple edits once a week or so, reverting it is probably a better option than protecting an article from any editing. AlexiusHoratius 10:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Markoolio

Temporary protection: - Vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salman of Saudi Arabia

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.Mezigue (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Foo Fighters

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and non auto confirmed accounts. 172.56.39.222 (talk) 01:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 02:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taharrush jamai

Semi-protection. This article is being discussed on Facebook and Reddit. Several IPs and SPAs have arrived since 1 February to add to the first sentence that these mass sexual assaults are distinctive to Arabs or Muslims. After 18 reverts, Lectonar added three days semi-protection on 5 February, and it has now started up again. SarahSV (talk) 03:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimir Putin

Temporary full protection: High level of edit-warring of large chunks of content. A page protection would encourage users to use the talk page. Étienne Dolet (talk) 09:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Pest (1997 film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/)[1] 03:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. one week by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 04:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Object sexuality

Temporary semi-protection. Disruptive IP hoppers. Steadily adding that the sexual fetish/paraphilia named object sexuality is a sexual orientation, with no attempt at discussion other than this small section at my talk page, which makes it clear that object sexuality is a sexual fetish/paraphilia. Some reverts of the disruption have also made this clear with edit summaries. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 05:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Herschel

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 06:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 06:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Branning

Extend pending changes: There have been reverts while the protecting administrator is inactive at the moment. George Ho (talk) 07:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Godzilla (franchise)

Pending changes: To prevent mixups in anything throughout said articles... — 2601:183:4000:D5BD:49:8EB:C5A6:9A3B (talk) 17:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 18:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frente al mismo rostro

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Philip J Fry / talk 22:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Semi-protection won't help in this case, and full protection not warranted at this time. Gave user a final warning (and a welcome). Miniapolis 00:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Drones World Tour

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Would like semi-protection for six months. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 23:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Western Springs, Illinois

Semi-protection: repeated IP vandalism. Aleph Kaph (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

American football

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KungAvSand (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Robinson (American actor)

Persistent IP vandalism. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 03:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Principle of least privilege

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BethNaught (talk) 23:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Super Bowl 50 halftime show

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non admin) Endorsing this request. The subject has flared up emotion and we see it in the edit history.--Mr. Guye (talk) 02:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fine Brothers

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. PM800 (talk) 00:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Leonardo DiCaprio

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frankie talk 16:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I see differing opinions; mostly autoconfirmed editors, so semiprotection wouldn't do anything to prevent it. Lectonar (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Empire Strikes Back

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping editor edit warring to add trivia. Scr★pIronIV 16:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas the Tank Engine film characters

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced content for a future film by several IPs. No responses to talk requests/talk page. . SummerPhDv2.0 19:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Very slow and only one instance today...please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boku Dake ga Inai Machi

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP addresses keep removing spoilers. The series is pretty popular and just started, so that's to be expected. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 08:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of ISIL-related events (2016)

Temporary semi-protection: A frequently updated article about a controversial topic, with a growing history of unproductive and/or poorly informed edits. 3hunna (talk) 10:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not really much vandalism, actually much less than I would expect. Lectonar (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Page (fighter)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Strange edit war. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas MacDonagh

Semi-protection: Recent high level of vandalism. Hohenloh + 21:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Winchester

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. The page was previously protected for 2 years which expired on 26 January 2016. The vandalism returned after. AD (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Northwest

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 23:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More move-protected but minor templates

Need Admin protection move (and if applicable) edit protection reduced to Template Editor (but there is no need to raise edit protection above Autoconfirmed). Same as the batches already processed earlier.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  04:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kempegowda International Airport

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of traffic stats against consensus by IP socks of User talk:Vigneshr1711. — LeoFrank  Talk 16:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Liz Read! Talk! 18:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby Challenge 2

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP vandals that were vandalizing Rugby Challenge 3 earlier today to cause page to be protected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Souad Faress

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of BLP IP vandalism. Amortias (T)(C) 22:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 22:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Roberts

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 22:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10 February 2016

Arabian horse

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The only new accounts or IPs to edit this article are vandals or the promoters of "magic unicorn horses." Waste of editor resources to be babysitting this article. Montanabw(talk) 23:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., to be honest, the level of vandalism is moderate, last time it was semi-protected was 2007, I do not see any reason why it should be indef-protected now. If vandalism resumes after two weeks we can re-protect it or configure pending changes--Ymblanter (talk) 08:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Appaloosa

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another horse breed article plagued by IP and new accounts either vandalizing or promoting "magic unicorn horses" Featured Article, too. Editors have other things to do than vandal patrol on this one, please. Montanabw(talk) 23:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lectonar.. GedUK  12:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 Montreal Canadiens season

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs, maybe around 4 of them, are adding unsourced scores. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 03:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So Fresh: The Hits of Summer 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous blanking of page, and addition of unrelated content by multiple IPs. ilovechristianmusic (Tell Me Something!) 03:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Nugent

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Mlpearc (open channel) 04:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., vandalism is infrequent, let us try pending changes.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Turing Pharmaceuticals

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. 2605:6000:8B43:5B00:6C53:D634:9559:60C2 (talk) 04:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, not high level.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Power Rangers Dino Charge characters

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 09:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Prescott

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. clpo13(talk) 09:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Future Perfect at Sunrise. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Moore

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – bog-standard vandalism from IP . Nomoskedasticity (talk) 09:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ctwabn (talk) 10:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of oldest living people

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 10:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Callanecc.. Filer warned not to edit-war on good faith edits and call them "vandalism". Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CATV Africa, Asia, and Oceania

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unnecessary links. -Niceguyedc Go Huskies! 11:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 FA Cup

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I checked the few edits made over the last week and I can see explanations for all of them. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rameez Raja

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. -Anjana LarkaSEND WIKILOVE💗 11:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NBA Live (video game series)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 112.198.98.37 (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NBA 2K (series)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 112.198.98.37 (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Combat 18

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For over a month an IP has been changing this to call the group Nazi instead of neo-Nazi, and adding that its ideology includes anti-Western sentiment despite the lack of any source. I'm a bit dubious about the IP's other edits but don't have the time or knowledge to check them. Doug Weller talk 13:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also, adding to watchlist and will re-protect if they start up after that. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Andreessen

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism from several IPs over the past few hours. Entranced98 (talk) 15:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. three days by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 18:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pooja Gandhi

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cyberbot II/Run/PC

Indefinite semi-protection: To prevent tampering from anonymous users. —cyberpowerBe my Valentine:Limited Access 16:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indef. AlexiusHoratius 18:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Walker

Temporary -protection:- Vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Von Miller

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Benteke

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 17:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Benny Dayal

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by a series of related IPs. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 18:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shalom Television

Unprotection: The channel received significant coverages. Requesting an un-salt for the page. . SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 08:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Have a look on these coverages [42], [43], [44] and [45] on several Catholic news portals. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 09:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please contact User:Master of Puppets, the admin who deleted and salted the last version (if you have not done so already). Lectonar (talk) 10:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the chances of unprotecting are greater if there's a draft article ready to move into place. There might be some sourcing but it still needs to stand as an article. tutterMouse (talk) 12:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I know because the article passes the guideline criteria (an article must have received "significant coverage" in reliable sources that are independent of the subject). Probably, i had contacted the salting admin for this matter. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 13:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have several reservations about this that I've detailed on my talk page. m.o.p 17:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Technically this is being discussed elsewhere so I feel it's Not done, any admin can override this of course. tutterMouse (talk) 07:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump

Edit semi-protected: The header states that he "earned...support among working-class voters, as well as widespread opposition from Hispanics/Latinos, Muslims, business leaders, and other Republicans," but does not cite a source. This is not the language used later on in the article where it says "...earned him support among working-class voters and voters without college educations amid heavy and frequent controversies in the news media." I think it's unfair to paint him in this way without at least citing a source because potential voters of those groups may read the header and get an impression of him without actually looking into his positions for themselves. My request or suggestion is to change the language in the header to what is said later in the article (which is cited), or cite a source for the original claims. WikiUser2244 (talk) 01:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done No specific edit proposed. The article talk page is the appropriate venue for discussion of content. Katietalk 03:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My specific edit was to change the last line of the header to what it is says later in the article. I said "My request or suggestion is to change the language in the header to what is said later in the article (which is cited), or cite a source for the original claims." If you can't find a source or if that's not how this process works then my "proposal" is to just change the wording to match. Also, the talk page is also semi-protected, otherwise I wouldn't have posted here. WikiUser2244 (talk) 04:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You'd be right, that isn't how the process works. You need to bring what specific changes you want to have made, admins are only proxies for these small edits after all so they can't do anything that requires more than a copypaste or that forwards a specific POV. If you have a different wording for the unsourced sentence in the lede then that probably could be done seeing as it's an unsourced statement, just need to say where it is and what it should read as with cites if you have them. tutterMouse (talk) 06:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so I'd like to change the last sentence of the header to read "Trump's politically incorrect, anti-illegal immigration politics, which also concentrated on terrorism and national security concerns, earned him support among working-class voters and voters without college educations amid heavy and frequent controversies in the news media," for the reasons stated originally. The source that cites this is source 200. WikiUser2244 (talk) 14:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.128.73.5 (talk) [reply]

Restoring as the request wasn't actually done, I would do it but it's a hot button article I'd rather not be involved with. tutterMouse (talk) 11:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In short, I agree with the first responding admin that this is a talk page matter. In detail: It should be "anti-illegal-immigration policies"; that's a three-word compound adjective. Needs comma before "amid" (the voters' educations are not what's amid the controversies). Other than that, this seems reasonable wording as far as it goes, but not as a blanket replacement. My concern would be that there are likely other sources in the the article for "widespread opposition from" various demographics. It's not that the lead is making a unitary unsourced claim; rather it is doing what a lead is supposed to do, summarizing various material in the article that is sourced lower down. It's a general principle that stuff in the lead does need to be sourced there but only if it's likely to be controversial or challenged. Anything at all like this is controversial and likely to be challenged, so the lead simply needs the sources for those claims added to it, even if WikiUser2244's particular wording tweak is also used as a substitute for part of it. The only danger would be WP:OR, in the form of synthesis that "leads" the reader, e.g. if it said something like "because of his position on national security concerns, he earned the enmity of Hispanic voters", an implication our sources don't make and that we should not draw (they suggest that it was because of his anti-illegal-immigration perspective, which while it relates strongly to national security concern, in Trump's views, to Muslim immigration, it does not to Hispanic immigration).  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  15:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Four days is a long time, don't think WikiUser2244 is returning but I'll ping them anyway to see if they have any more input. tutterMouse (talk) 12:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Calling time on this, doesn't seem like anyone is willing to change the lede (not to mention it's actually transcluded from a different article) so this one's just procedurally not done as per KrakatoaKatie. tutterMouse (talk) 11:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Katietalk 14:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images

Temporary Full-protection: despite the locking up of the page last week for 3 days...we still have a problem...not sure why they are not working on the wording on the talk page instead of in edit summaries. We simply have no need to see 10 changes to a page because some are not sure how to word things....work it out - then edit.-- Moxy (talk) 17:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
{{RFPP|p|5 days}} Lectonar (talk) 21:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lectonar, your edit summary in protecting [46], "Use the talk page please...communicating only by edit summaries a little unkind", shows you have no idea what's going on. Unkind? What are you talking about??? Recent edit summaries [47] -- "good point... I'm sure you're right, but still I think this wording is better... how about this?" -- obviously reflect completely collegial, friendly, constructive editing, in the last twelve hours focused on trying to get one little phrase clear. Christ, we've even been thanking each other for these edits! There's no dispute at all. Get your finger off the hair-trigger, put you pistol back in its holster, and if you don't have time to find out what's going on, then move on and let someone else handle it. You obviously aren't giving due attention when you protect 5 pages in six minutes [48].
The baseless complaint of one editor...whose meandering thoughts are tied together with dots...who hasn't participated in the editing...and shows no interest in doing so...and whose objection...is simply that he doesn't want to "see 10 changes to a page because some are not sure how to word things"...is not a reason to protect.
David Eppstein, BushelCandle, please comment. EEng 22:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: It can be quite disconcerting for some inexperienced editors when there are many edits to a page in a short period of time. They may feel overwhelmed and not able to spend the time to examine each individual small and incremental edit. However, these feelings of inadequacy may be salved by the comforting thought that other, more competent editors are keeping an eye on things and it is not necessary for them to act as page guardians. However, Moxy is hardly inexperienced. He should have realised by now that he does not necessarily have to examine individually a series of 10 successive edits. If he hasn't drastically changed his user interface, in the edit history he should be able to just click on the radio buttons for the first and last edits of a particular series and see the global effect summarised. The advantage in editing in small increments is that it is relatively easy for any editor (including Moxy) to revert a particular edit that he's not happy with.
IMO, EEng has been punctilious in using the discussion page to discuss with other editors any historic or proposed edits that have either not achieved consensus (by being reverted) or he suspects may require a consensus in advance.
Where detailed editing of the MoS is concerned, it is grossly inefficient to discuss the placement of every semi-colon in advance. This idea that there can be too many edits to a page' (when each of those edits build collegiately on the edits of others) does seem totally against the spirit and ethos of a Wiki. Are we to give up the idea that a group of editors may together co-operatively construct a better page? Who is Moxy proposing as custodian of this particular page? After the page is unlocked, what would he think is a reasonable rate of improvement? One edit per minute, hour, day or week? Genuine question because I really don't think there is any precedent for this strange complaint...
I'm also rather concerned that, despite hinting in his complaint above of the need for prior discussions about needed edits to occur on the protected article's discussion page, he did not canvass opinion there for his perceived need to fully protect the page again. How do we protect against this sort of individualistic behavior ? By requesting a topic ban for him ?
This log confirms the truth of EEng's statement above that, with the odd exception, editing has recently been cordial and collegiate on the protected page.
BushelCandle (talk) 23:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have disengaged from the talk page of this MOS page because of the battleground attitude of some participants: every little point, no matter how seemingly uncontroversial it should be, gets attacked and discussed to death. This is a case in point. There are two major sets of RFCs open (one on how strongly we should discourage image scaling, another on image galleries in certain articles) but the edits to the MOS have largely avoided those issues and focused on small improvements to clarity and grammar. Despite this, even that type of change is too much for some of the editors on the talk page, who want everything locked down, everything reverted to the status quo ante, and every change battled in countless nested discussions and RFCs until it dies from exhaustion rather than ever actually being enacted. This RFPP seems to fit that pattern very clearly, and I am disappointed that Lectonar has fallen in with this request, without more carefully examining whether any of the recent changes were actually the controversial ones that are still under discussion. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • What I saw was disagreement and a died down discussion on the talk-page; what I did not see was consensus. Imho in this case it is not the for the protecting admin to make a decision as to the worth of the arguments, because that would make him involved. If another admin wants to unprotect, go right ahead. Lectonar (talk) 07:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Softlavender, can you please do the honors, since Lectonar has the ridiculous idea that he can't undo his own obviously mistaken action?
Lectonar, you don't need to evaluate "the worth of the arguments" (what arguments?) because what's going on on the talk page has no bearing on page protection; what matters is whether the actual editing that's going on is collegial and appropriate; as seen above, if you'd just read the edit summaries you would have seen that it was, and that it has nothing to do with the various discussions/disputes on the talk page. Your contributions history [49] shows that you do almost no actual article editing; given that, maybe you're not the best admin to be evaluating what is and is not appropriate editing behavior. And also as previously noted, protecting five pages in six minutes is not an appropriate rate at which to make such decisions, so if you don't have time to give due consideration, please leave the job to others. EEng 12:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected - although I do agree with Moxy in that it'd be better discuss on the talk page rather than through edit summaries. AlexiusHoratius 17:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
While I appreciate your doing what Lectonar should have done himself, I'm sure I speak for all others who actually edit the page in expressing bafflement at your comment. For example, you've made 823 edits to South Dakota [50], yet only 37 (yes, thirty-seven!) posts to that article's talk page [51]. Why aren't you gaining consensus for those edits in advance? Why are you communicating via edit summaries such as trim; these would be okay at list of people from sd, but for Olympians I think actually winning a medal sounds like a reasonable cut-off and custer sp pic wasn't bad but didn't show anything new; had been 5 pics, all West River. Revomed Custer and some of the forced image sizes and staggered placement of remaining photos. Shouldn't you have discussed those things on the talk page? Do you not agree the article should be protected to force you to do so, even though none of your recent edits is disputed? EEng 18:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barstool Sports

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subjected to persistent IP user vandalism. TheWarOfArt (talk) 22:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 00:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – since January 17. SMP0328. (talk) 22:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 00:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

D.O. (singer)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incoming IP, new account attacks. . Dr. K. 01:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan Sprayberry

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism—it's apparently the in thing for IPs to add themselves as Dylan's wife or girlfriend. This has been happening with increasing frequency since September. – Robin Hood  (talk) 02:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Black Panther Party

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HighInBC 02:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2016 WWE Network events

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edits are nonsensical. JC · Talk · Contributions 18:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 20:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SeaWorld

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is a target of animal-rights activists who add unsourced non-neutral opinions, disrupting the neutrality of it. Recommend long-term temporary (a month) semi-protection. McDoobAU93 23:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Xiumin

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't get why but people keep changing this guy into a "daddy" even after many anti-vandals fought to change them back. Thank you. Ueutyi (talk) 00:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: @Ueutyi: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kai (singer)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism –Obvious misinformation presented and being added repeatedly. Ueutyi (talk) 00:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shari Redstone

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editors are engaged in a revert war. Boomer VialHolla 00:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trypophobia

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the start of January this year, its edit history has been almost entirely vandalism. Stickee (talk) 22:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 23:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Bryan

Semi-protection:, Multiple vandalism issues by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 3:40, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 23:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to update

Reduction to Template Editor protection needed, to fix redirs to point to Template:Cite magazine, not Template:Cite journal. Or an admin can just fix them if they need to retain full-protection for cascading reasons.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  16:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: I can't modify the cascading protection for individual specific pages without waiting. Can you give me more information on the proposed redirection (eg why is it uncontroversial, will it affect the current uses)? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

11 February 2016

Fastlane (2016)

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 02:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism/unsourced additions have been resuming as soon as the recent protections expired. MelanieN (talk) 20:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

High level of long term vandalism from IP users; keeps blanking page and redirecting to other articles. 128.61.26.55 (talk) 05:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined No disruption since last request was declined — MusikAnimal talk 16:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wild 'n Out

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Dynamic IPv6 adding likely false, but definitely unreferenced info to article. Refuses to discuss issue and is edit warring this. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Josiah Willard Gibbs

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I know this is on the main page, but there has been a good amount of vandalism. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I personally don't protect the TFA barring the most extreme of disruption. Any admin should feel free to override my decision — MusikAnimal talk 16:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Rogers (Days of Our Lives)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors that go against several of Wikipedia's policies and ibox template guidelines. livelikemusic talk! 01:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Days of Our Lives

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued on-going sock-puppetry editing that goes against Wikipedia's policies on consensus and their own guidelines. Previous protections were from same kind of behaviors. livelikemusic talk! 01:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has been protected repeatedly in recent months, with vandalism resuming as soon as the protection expires. MelanieN (talk) 19:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prostitution law

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the past few hours. . Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 19:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Boing! said Zebedee. BethNaught (talk) 19:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Athenian democracy

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs in range 170.158.137.xxx seem to be vandalizing this a good bit today. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 19:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected BethNaught (talk) 19:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gregg Popovich

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP user. SOAD KoRn (talk) 12:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hayes Grier

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by three different IPs today. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hulk (comics)

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism from various users.Crboyer (talk) 18:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by Hungama TV

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 12:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Ivanvector

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of a blocked and talk page access revoked user making appeals to unblock on my talk page. I can't unblock them and wouldn't if I could. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 17:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Winters Mill High School

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wasim Raja

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Much vandalism here since the end of January, all by AIPs. I don't know enough about cricket to understand why. ubiquity (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paraiyar

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IPs and some users are keen to change the content as per bias. Already, I have requested PP, but denies. However, dispute edits continues. AntanO 18:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hank Aaron

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 18:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

French colonization of the Americas

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has resumed after a month-long block and virtually every anonymous edit since then has been just that. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 04:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not high level. Lectonar (talk) 10:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Einstein Syndrome

Create protection: Repeated recreation of an article that was deleted at AfD (see logs of Einstein syndrome, which was salted a few weeks back). DoctorKubla (talk) 12:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deleted as G4 before. Lectonar (talk) 13:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 15

Interstate 15 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Unprotection: I don't think this page needed to be protected in the first place because there was less vandalism.

What's the point?! – Semiprotection expires in about 12 hours... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 08:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Game Show Network

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – same problem with IP with a LONG history of disruptive edits/unsourced info about GSN becoming a 24 network dedicated to Steve Harvey. Digifan23 (talk) 23:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Genetically modified crops

Semi-protection for a few days. A very determined IP is moving from one IP address to another, and keeps trying to add unsourced nonsense to the lead sentence. --Tryptofish (talk) 00:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Koch family

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. DaltonCastle (talk) 05:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bersant Celina

Semi-protection: IP users keep changing the country of birth from FR Yugoslavia to Kosovo, but the convention is to keep the name of the country as it were on the day of birth. Cashewnøtt (talk) 09:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jemilah Mahmood

Temporary semi-protection: Recent episodes of vandalism to the article. Nny84 (talk) 10:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Nines

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. 172.56.38.186 (talk) 00:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom Hearts III

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Most recent semi-protection was just removed, and the vandalism has started again. Requesting pending changes this time to see if that helps or makes any difference. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trihex

Semi-protection: Viewers of Trihex's Twitch stream have been vandalizing the page at a very rapid rate. Wzrds3 (talk) 05:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Day trading

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Random IP repeatedly adding opinion to lead. While sourced to an Italian site, that does not specifically address ethical issues with day trading. The dynamic IP does not seem to want to participate in debate over the relevance and keeps adding the same opinions without further comment. Temporary protection may get them to engage in the discussion underway on the article talk page. noq (talk) 23:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sandbox

Semi-protection: Long-term IP vandalism. Coordinated effort and/or sock puppetry is very likley here. 172.56.38.186 (talk) 00:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Surprised this wasn't done by now - that page seems to be a magnet for test edits by new users for some reason. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bongwarrior: Thanks, however it appears as though the page is still unprotected. Can you fix this, please? 172.56.38.186 (talk) 00:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Bongwarrior: Are you sure you want to permanently protect the sandbox. First, all sorts of welcome messages and level one warnings direct users and IPs to go there to make test edits. If they can't make edits there they are going to wonder why they were sent there. Next, it is better for the vandalism to happen there then in article space. Also, the nonsense posted there, if it doesn't get removed by other editors, is removed by Cyberbot 1 so there isn't damage to the rest of the encyclopedia. If it does get protected there is bound to be some blowback so you might want to discuss it at WP:AN first. Thanks for you time in considering this. MarnetteD|Talk 01:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Gotta agree with MarnetteD here. I just manually cleared it; we could have Cyberbot clear it more frequently as opposed to protecting it. Dozens of templates and warnings and pages direct new users to experiment on that page. I think semi-protection would be an ungood thing that asks for all kinds of trouble. Katietalk 02:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done - Okay, fun's over. I'm marking this for the bot because it probably won't archive otherwise. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Evan Tann

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Almost all content has been removed by vandals. Valid and relevant citations and the content they referred to have been removed. Image has been removed without explanation. Many of these edits beginning the 28th of May, 2015 are from new user accounts with insufficient history. Some of the edits were already reverted by Hgilbert, but the page has been vandalized again. Appears to be a coordinated effort or sock-puppetry over a period of more than 6 months. Iwoo.222 (talk) 00:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Katietalk 02:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bret Hart

Temporary semi-protection: Frequent vandalism, unsourced additions, edit warring and deliberate errors from IPs and new users.LM2000 (talk) 04:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Japheth J. Omojuwa

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. User:Wikimayor (talk) 05:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Wikimayor (talk) 05:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Metrojet Flight 9268

Semi-protection: IP edits subverting discretionary sanctions - very frustrating. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - only one IP recently - if the disruption worsens maybe full protection but I don't think it's that bad yet. AlexiusHoratius 22:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP User has been vandalizing page, redirecting page to various articles. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - disruption appears to have died down. AlexiusHoratius 22:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Sweden asylum center stabbing

temporary-protection: - vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - not many anon edits and although the page is rather active it's not really experiencing the level of disruption usually required for full protection. AlexiusHoratius 22:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rageh Omaar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 20:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 22:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

InterDigital

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. There are numerous edits to this page that reflect partisan views on patent debates or potential opposition to the company on other grounds, and the only recourse is to delete those malicious edits, resulting in little/no content. I've made proposed edits on the Talk page, as instructed by an admin. I'd appreciate someone reviewing, and then proceeding with protection.Vandewille (talk) 19:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 21:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sallekhana

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. See [52] and Talk:Sallekhana. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. (One of the editors has been blocked for 24 hours, situation will probably calm down a bit.) AlexiusHoratius 21:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Antony Coia

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 19:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 21:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Drake equation

Semi-protection: Edit warring, and copyvio from an IP. Should be just long enough to get us all on the same page with guidelines. Geogene (talk) 19:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - anon hasn't edited the article in almost 24 hours and appears to have taken it to the talk page. AlexiusHoratius 21:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Debra Burlingame

Semi protection. Also will be included in watchlist. Consider reprotecting if they begin afterwards as well. Tharasanderson (talk) 14:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 18:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Location map/data/Serbia

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is 2. request, IP vandalizes, this module subpage should not be open to IP edits, editing links here influence thousands of pages, this is third attack in one week!. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 22:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indef. AlexiusHoratius 22:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
AlexiusHoratius, just FYI. This isn't really about vandalism, it is about the Kosovo dispute, and whether the location map for Serbia should present Kosovo as separate or part of Serbia. The map that was being inserted was one that showed Serbia without Kosovo. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of wars involving the United States

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP with a history of vandalism persistently edit-warring without using the talk page. EtherealGate (talk) 22:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Topp Dogg

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 21:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of largest companies by revenue

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 21:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elon Musk

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Monstercat

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of various IPs making changes against consensus. --allthefoxes (Talk) 21:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese football league system

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs 46.50.*.* edit warring. SLBedit (talk) 19:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Public holidays in Germany

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 20:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. three days by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 22:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Liviu Dragnea

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 20:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 20:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Adejo

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 20:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carmen Jordá

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 21:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unification of Germany‎‎

Temp semi - Persistent IP vandalism. BMK (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Otto von Bismarck

Temp semi - Same as above, persistent IP vandalism. BMK (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Mary High School

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 21:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

12 February 2016

2016 Asia Cup

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and the tournament hasn't started yet! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple userspace pages

No need for any of these to be edited, user request in own space, and older archives have been semi-protected. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done BethNaught (talk) 21:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disc jockey

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 20:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

XXXY (film)

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, typically somewhat juvenile, also on XX/XY. Trankuility (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's disappointing. All edits since October 2015 are either IP vandalism or reverts. Trankuility (talk) 13:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes... but I only count about 10-15 vandalism edits in more than 3 months...this is way from high level. Lectonar (talk) 13:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would argue that when the fixes for vandalism so far outweigh substantive changes or improvements to the article then it's a problem that needs to be addressed. More so for XX/XY. Trankuility (talk) 14:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 14:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Autodesk

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Account blocked and rangeblock implemented. Elockid Message me 16:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Drake equation

Semi-protection: IP continues edit warring copyvio into article, talk page discussion not productive. Geogene (talk) 01:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Capital punishment in Japan

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. KungAvSand (talk) 14:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for 24 hours by JamesBWatson. tutterMouse (talk) 16:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Hunt

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism .Mezigue (talk) 15:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

James Sears

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Various IPs reverting to push claims published by the subject's own publication which have been contradicted by reliable sources cited here. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 00:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incest

Semi-protection: Persistent IP and non-autoconfirmed accounts. Two of these accounts have been blocked as vandalism-only accounts. With this in mind, the socking is likley to continue. 172.56.38.35 (talk) 01:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too infrequently edited for semi-protection--Ymblanter (talk) 12:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

XX/XY

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, as with XXXY (film). Trankuility (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A bit more vandalism than at the request above, but still way under the threshold for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Budbrooke

Temporary Semi-protection: Alterations being being made by User: Cls14 based on subjected opinion and believed by the less charitable amongst us on behalf of the owner of the establishment mentioned in the amenities section for commercial interests.149.254.218.85 (talk) 00:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like it on record here that I removed a sentence that stated that a restaurant in the village was 'nicknamed' an 'eyesore'. I challenged this as it was not referenced. He then referenced a parish newsletter. I obtained a copy of the newsletter and it did not mention the word eyesore. He is angry as I have been removing unreferenced material. Cls14 (talk) 09:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Essentially 1 IP... Lectonar (talk) 09:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 13:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Naprapathy

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Under recent vandalism and POV pushing since redirect to chiropractic was approved at RfD. Delta13C (talk) 10:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., no reasons for the time being why it should be indefinitely protected. RfD did not actually approve anything, and the talk page discussion can be continued, if the reverting users finally find the talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Only Girl (In the World)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock puppetry and evasion by MariaJaydHicky. Using IP accounts following the indefinite block of a new registered account.  — Calvin999 11:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Until Reddit and Kotaku calm down, (https://www.reddit.com/r/SocialJusticeInAction/comments/459dxn/sjws_try_to_hijack_metal_gear_solid_v_wikipedia/) perhaps this article should be semi protected...?. Glenzo999 (talk) 03:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • no Declined - Article was semi-protected weeks ago. It's auto confirmed editors who have made all the recent changes. Sergecross73 msg me 03:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 13:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of European countries by average wage

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. --HardstyleGB (talk) 03:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

58th Annual Grammy Awards

Temporary semi-protection: Fans (IP) adding their favorite artists on the 'performers' list, removing others.Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Stanley Cup Finals broadcasters

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 01:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblock applied. Elockid Message me 05:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of NHL outdoor games broadcasters

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 02:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblock applied. Elockid Message me 05:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2011 NHL Winter Classic

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.38.35 (talk) 02:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Elockid Message me 05:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NHL on NBC commentators

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 02:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblock applied. Elockid Message me 05:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Magdalene

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Elizium23 (talk) 22:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - only one IP active. Either pursue dispute resolution or report them at the 3rr noticeboard if they continue edit warring. AlexiusHoratius 02:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheap Thrills (song)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring from user who will not provide reliable sourcing. --Another Believer (Talk) 23:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., it is unfortunately nobody tried to talk to the new user.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by Comedy Central

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 06:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Billy the Kid

Temporary semi-protection: Intentional disruptive editing – Requesting this article be protected ASAP from IPs. I have no faith the current IP with a mission will stop with only this round of disruption as long as the article is in the process of GA review. The IP geolocates to the Bronx, NY (very possibly the same one that's been following me from article to article attempting to get me in to edit war for months) has just undone the work at the article I did last night, knowing I am on a 1RR restriction and cannot revert what they did. I would see this as vandalism since the "edit" has taken everything I improved according to suggestions at the GA review and undid them. Others might not see it as vandalism, so I'm not taking a chance at going beyond my 1RR restriction (as vandalism would be an exception to the restriction). Would appreciate protection at least until the GA review is done. Am pinging Ritchie333 and Drmies as they are both familiar with my restriction (and possibly this IP). -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"I can't revert war so no one else should edit the page." LOL. 107.107.62.241 (talk) 16:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As a neutral observer, it's my view that this post alone is proof enough that WV's suspicions are not unfounded regarding the bad faith with which this IP user is editing. Hallward's Ghost (Kevin) (My talkpage) 16:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The change I made is good, but someone disagrees solely for the sake of disagreeing. Who is truly the disruptive one in this case? (Hint: the one attempting to own the page and game the system) 107.107.62.241 (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You are clearly trolling WV with your previous post to this page, and I've left a warning on your IP talkpage to that end. Hallward's Ghost (Kevin) (My talkpage) 16:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's now obvious this IP vandal troll (who very well could be a known WP:LTA IP that geolocates to the Bronx and NYC) is following me. A pox upon them! "LOL" -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 05:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Metrojet Flight 9268

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continuous editing over a content dispute, despite talk page discussion trying to find a solution. Tvx1 20:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring is by this editor now requesting full protection to enshrine their position. Other editors (including me) compromised and added cites to infobox. Full explanation in talk. Legacypac (talk) 20:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Contest above statement. I have request full protection so that we can allow the talk page discussion to run its course. The above editor and Lipsquid have been editing the article repeatedly over the last 24 hours over disputed content despite the talk page discussion and there not being evidence of a consensus for their position at all. That can be considered disruptive. The only aim of my edits and this request is to restore and stabilize the consensus version of that article that had now, for the disputed content, existed for about two months. Tvx1 20:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I requested last night, in an attempt to prevent disruptive anon ip edits. This was declined and Legacypac reminded me that reversions of ip edits are not subject to 1RR restriction. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This request is another form of edit warring started by T on the 9th where they willfully breached 1RR in less then an hour ignoring the huge warnings. Legacypac (talk) 21:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This request page is not the place to accuse other editors of "willfully breaching 1RR". I can also confirm that this request by User:Tvx1 is being made totally in good faith. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now, at least. Hopefully enforcement of 1RR will work instead. Floquenbeam (talk) 01:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nashville International Airport

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism by the same user. It has repeatedly deleted airlines and routes from the destination tables on this page. This user has done the same action for 10+ times and it is slowly growing into an edit war with many airport editors. *AirportUpdater* (talk) 04:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please take a look at Nashville International Airport's page and view User: 2602:306:8330:C5F0:D543:C7AA:E420:1E0 actions. This user's numbers have changed each time it edits which might make it seems like it's multiple users, but it's not. Please protect this page. *AirportUpdater* (talk) 05:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mojo Rawley

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 3:56, February 10, 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cyberbot II/Run/Charts

Indefinite semi-protection: Shouldn't be controlled by IP editors. —cyberpowerBe my Valentine:Limited Access 02:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Elockid Message me 04:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Baekhyun

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr. K. 04:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Park Chanyeol

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing IP attacks. Dr. K. 04:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 05:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Blue's Clues episodes

Temporary semi-protection: A persistent IP-hopping long-term disruptive editor that has necessitated protection of this article in the past has returned as soon as the last protection expired. Deli nk (talk) 21:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Kelly Clarkson

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 22:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, persistent over a 24+hour period by various IPs and vandal-only accounts. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 23:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First Bulgarian Empire

Temporary semi-protection: There is currently an on-going discussion of the maps used on this page, and consensus has been reached regarding some of them. At least two IP users and one new user (perhaps all the same person) have been adding alternative maps and removing the maps that have gained consensus without engaging in discussion. The user(s) claim that the maps are unsourced, but that is incorrect. The user(s) have been engaging in this activity now for several days, despite reversions by multiple editors, so protection would be appreciated. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 23:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Baird

Temporary semi-protection: High level of recent IP vandalism and addition of unsourced content to lead. Melcous (talk) 23:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DreamWorks Channel

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced information by IP editors. Bbb2007 (talk) 23:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flash (comics)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attacks from IPs. Emotionalllama (talk) 23:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016

Semi-protection: Currently there is some major confusion over whether or not certain pieces of information should be included in the infobox or not. Considering how important an article like this is in relation to the elections, wikipedia should strive to remain neutral. We are having major problems with people wanting wikipedia to be a "crystal ball". JP16103 05:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dardan Berisha

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced and disruptive edits from dynamic IP and sockpuppets. Qed237 (talk) 15:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:16, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Life of Pablo

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With the album being released today there has been a number of nonsense edits. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I suggest a month of protection. This is also the second wave of vandalism and unsourced content from IPs for the article. Aria1561 (talk) 20:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I'd just like to update to any admin scrolling through this page that I've had to revert about 50+ edits with unsourced material added by IPs. Thank you for your consideration. Aria1561 (talk) 00:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Social Democratic Party (Romania)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Portia White

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not sure why this page is attracting so much vandalism and confused edits over the last day but it may need to be looked into. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 19:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nashville International Airport

Semi-protection: Persistent IP and un-autoconfirmed account vandalism. This page seems to have a very long history of vandalism and edit warring + edit wars. 172.56.38.186 (talk) 00:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see an occasional contested edit (just two in the past 48 hours) from a dynamic IP. I also see lots of constructive editing by IPs so I am reluctant to semi-protect. I don't know about "very long history"; the article has never been protected before. MelanieN (talk) 19:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mick Wheble

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Racingmanager (talk) 20:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 21:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Priestley

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gilliam. — MusikAnimal talk 21:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13 February 2016

Twice (band)

Semi-protection: Frequent vandalism, especially from from IPs. Has been protected before and vandalism starts right back up once protection expires. Katzenlibrary (talk) 22:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

White Legion (Zaire)

Temporary semi-protection: Recent persistent removal of sourced content (without providing reason for the changes) by several IPs. Crispulop (talk) 23:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Binoy Job

Semi-protection: recent uptick in vandalism from various IP addresses. Dl2000 (talk) 03:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Randleman

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death. JMHamo (talk) 21:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please provide diffs? I could not find any vandalism.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CBC News Network

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion and edit warring by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP. clpo13(talk) 19:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Ponyo. BethNaught (talk) 20:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Pichilemu earthquake

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion and edit warring by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP. clpo13(talk) 19:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Ponyo. BethNaught (talk) 20:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Connie Booth

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion and edit warring by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP. clpo13(talk) 19:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Ponyo. BethNaught (talk) 20:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Donetsk People's Republic

Temporary Protection Persistent disruptive editing. – A specific user is constitantly attempting to revert while ignoring consensus on the talk page. In addition to the block i am advancing through the dispute resolution process, opening up a request for comment. I ask the page be protected until the dispute resolution process has run its course.XavierGreen (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The "persistent disruptive editing" here is by XavierGreen who seems to have a chronic case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT.Volunteer Marek (talk) 0::6:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
A lengthy discussion on the issue was held here [[53]], which clearly failed to produce a consensus to change the infobox from Geopolitical Organization to Warfaction. Despite the lack of consensus and objections from other users, User:Volunteer Marek and User:Iryna_Harpy have been consistantly attempting to force the change through anyway, putting vandalism warnings on the talk page of any editor who attempts to revert them. I have opened a request for comment on the talk page.XavierGreen (talk) 06:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it is XavierGreen who has been consistently editing against consensus and reliable sources. There have been other editors reverting this user. Please check the discussion on the talk page. In fact, it has gone beyond IDIDNTHEARTHAT to pure WP:CRUSH. As pointed out to XavierGreen, it isn't even an issue for consensus, but one of policy. The use of a 'Geopolitical organizations' infobox was inappropriate after this article and the LPR article (below) used a 'country' infobox. This may have stood for a long time, but only due to the fact that all of the Ukrainian crisis articles were being edit warred by POV pushers from their inception with no hope of any sense being made of them until they'd stabilised to some degree. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 08:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined OP warned for discretionary sanctions. BethNaught (talk) 12:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Iryna : No, it is not original research , it's just an excuse to justify your forced passage . You did not have to change the page without consensus. If you are confident about yourself, why you have not started looking for a consensus? This is because you do not have one . And if you were not is that the majority of contributors do not agree that this is an original research. Your change is not collaborative . --Panam2014 (talk) 12:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Luhansk People's Republic

Temporary Protection Persistent disruptive editing. – A specific user is constitantly attempting to revert while ignoring consensus on the talk page. In addition to the block i am advancing through the dispute resolution process, opening up a request for comment. I ask the page be protected until the dispute resolution process has run its course.XavierGreen (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As per the user's above request, there has been a protracted discussion on the DPR's talk page. This tactic of pushing for page protection for the user's preferred version is WP:GAME. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 08:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined OP warned for discretionary sanctions. BethNaught (talk) 12:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Iryna : No, it is not original research , it's just an excuse to justify your forced passage . You did not have to change the page without consensus. If you are confident about yourself, why you have not started looking for a consensus? This is because you do not have one . And if you were not is that the majority of contributors do not agree that this is an original research. Your change is not collaborative . --Panam2014 (talk) 12:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Polish census of 1931

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A long drawn out edit war which involved Ip hoppers and now involves a new user. Requesting full prot before someone gets a block handed to them.(There have been no 3pr violations till now, the edit war is kinda slow burning). P.S I am uninvolved, just came here to read. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 09:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Black Panther Party

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Since the beginning of the year, only three registered editors have made edits to the article other than to revert vandalism or unsourced and inappropriate content. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of ∞, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 14:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jie-Shen Li

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page for a nonexistent user that keeps being recreated. Wondering also if sockpuppetry is in play. Asking for "temporary" in case an actual user creates this account, seems like a plausible username. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done by RHaworth for a period of ∞. After ∞ the page will automatically be unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 14:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miracle Whip

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP editor from the same range has been vanadlizing this page since December, 2015, returning after temp protections have expired. They are back again. The change is always to describe the product as "mayonnaise." Suggest a longer duration this time in hope they will go away... Geoff | Who, me? 13:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 63 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 14:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

R5 (band)

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Prof tpms

Temporary semi-protection: To protect the page. Prof TPMS (talk) 00:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Language

I'd like to add a question to the Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Language page. The page is semi-protected, and so is the talk page. My question is as follows;

Origin of the given name "jessica"

Hi. Re. the name "Jessica", the wikipedia article Jessica_(given_name) says in the first paragraph that it comes from a Hebrew word meaning 'foresighted'. However, in the side-box of the article, it says it means 'wealthy'.

Googling a little gives me similar mixed results.

Thanks in anticipation of any answers :-) 81.108.18.234 (talk) 04:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: @81.108.18.234: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Posted to WP:RD/L. Tevildo (talk) 11:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sanam Teri Kasam (2016 film)

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Musa Talk  17:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cuckold

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and libel. '''tAD''' (talk) 01:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 02:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of experiments from Lilo & Stitch

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism in the past two weeks or so, with users adding false and/or speculative information, or removing existing information.WPA (talk) 03:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Elockid Message me 04:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in Australian service

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ch'marr (talk) 02:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 02:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nadeshot

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of vandalism in last couple of weeks or so. Boomer VialHolla 04:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A bit early for indefinite. Let's try two weeks and see how that goes. Elockid Message me 04:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bishop Luers High School

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rampant vandalism over the past few days. John from Idegon (talk) 04:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also, made a few blocks. Elockid Message me 04:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Omayra Sánchez

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kayla Mueller

Extend pending changes: Despite infrequent editing, there have been reverts within the past three to six months. Also, I asked the protecting administrator for the request, but he hasn't responded yet. George Ho (talk) 17:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Mr. Stradivarius. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Black Lives Matter

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 3 months didn't seem to stop the persistent vandalism. Requesting long term or indef semi-protection. Majora (talk) 23:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Country

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. 172.58.32.171 (talk) 01:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Big Jock Knew

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IPs over a long period which is unlikely to ever go away owing to the association with the Old Firm football derby. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 18:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Forte

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. He has been informed he will not be resigned, but many are confusing this as released. he is still a Bear until March 2, but it keeps being changed. TropicAces (talk) 18:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of banned video games

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP-hopping editor keeps adding unsourced information and unconstructive edits, like saying video games are banned because of "asteroid impact". Repeated warnings have not worked. A temporary edit protection might make clear Wikipedia is not the place for these lame jokes. Soetermans. T / C 23:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:80.28.179.99

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked IP is reverting talk page to use as advertising. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alpine chough

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Tangled Ever After

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be the target of a spambot IP. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:16, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Zoolander No. 2

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be the target of a spambot IP, similar to Talk:Tangled Ever After. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

14 February 2016

AstroTurf

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption and edit warring by IP-hopping editor. Gnome de plume (talk) 12:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1/52 of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 14:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Welbeck

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kolo Touré

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption after this player just scored his first goal. Qed237 (talk) 15:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe 2015

Extend pending changes or semi-protection - Edits have been reverted while administrator is inactive at the moment. --George Ho (talk) 04:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated disruption to lede by IPs. Alexbrn (talk) 06:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Atkinson

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tag team idiocy in progress. Basically it is a steam of barely literate IP editors adding blatantly defamatory content to a BLP. Seems pointless to deal with them one by one. Lets just protect this for a while and hope they go away. DanielRigal (talk) 12:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since it's just IPs, semi will cover it. By the time they could get autoconfirmed accounts (which should hopefully be beyond their comprehension), the protection will have expired anyway. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valencian Community

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 178.108.202.66 (talk) 22:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 04:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Turbo Kid

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Opencooper (talk) 04:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Somalis

Semi-protection: Persistent undiscussed changes of first word of article from "Somalis" to "Somalians" by IPs. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 08:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Breitbart News Network

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amounts of IP vandalism, some bad enough that it had to be RevDeleted. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 08:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Kissinger

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism/disruptive editing, carried out by a number of IPs and new accounts over the last 24 hours (ever since the previous protection expired). . Vanamonde93 (talk) 19:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 04:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

David Newman (composer)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Hoaxing by IPs from Mexico. Binksternet (talk) 20:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. Gave the level 4 warning to your IP - it's static, so if he resumes, report him to AIV. Katietalk 04:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Secret Life of Pets

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors are misrepresenting sources and repeatedly adding hoax casting information. See User:NinjaRobotPirate/Animation hoaxer for details. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. If it resumes, let us know. :-) Katietalk 04:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

American Tragedy (album)

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and socking/block evasion. 208.54.5.205 (talk) 18:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nivin Pauly

Temporary semi-protection: . JO Bieson (talk) 18:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mole

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. 208.54.5.187 (talk) 02:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 04:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Britney: Piece of Me

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued, on-going disruptive editing from IP's and anonymous editors; by way of adding in unverifiable information, and changing information that contradicts reliable sources that are cited within the article. livelikemusic talk! 00:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 01:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:117Avenue

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 00:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ping @117Avenue: to see if they're okay with this or want indefinite protection. clpo13(talk) 00:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 01:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Debresser

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 00:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ping Debresser to see if they're okay with this or want indefinite. clpo13(talk) 00:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 01:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undertale

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page receives almost constant vandalism from IP editors, with very few good faith changes from non-established users. It really needs to be semi-protected until the "meme" status of this game dies down. Nathan2055talk - contribs 01:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also extended the pending changes to 3 months (originally set to expire in 8 days) as a precautionary measure once the semi-protection expires. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 01:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Titanic II

Temporary semi-protection: Recent vandalism and edit warring (without providing sources for the changes) from new mobile users and ISPs. Blue Riband► 21:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see much vandalism. There has been some disagreement about things like verb tense and current status, but it looks as if those issues are under discussion at the talk page, as they should be. MelanieN (talk) 20:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Srikalahasti

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 06:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Allen

Semi-protection: Basketball player who has not officially retired yet but several IPs seem to think otherwise. —DangerousJXD (talk) 22:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beats of Rage

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and 3RR violations. 208.54.5.205 (talk) 18:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston.. MelanieN (talk) 22:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Austin Green

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism over last couple of days consistently turning "Brian" into "Brain" at several spots. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nergis Mavalvala

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of sourced content. clpo13(talk) 19:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Isla Vista killings

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by unsigned users and accounts that are not autoconfirmed. Parsley Man (talk) 06:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is infrequent but persistent; previous short-term semi-protection hasn't really dealt with the problem; let's see what longer-term PC protection can do. MelanieN (talk) 21:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia

Semi protection An editor 151.237.102.118 who is linked here as a confirmed IP-sock of User:Sumatro persistently pushes undiscussed images by edit-warring, along with other IPs. Serdik (talk) 12:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 La Liga

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced and disruptive edits. Qed237 (talk) 12:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15 February 2016

Hashtag activism

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IP addresses reverting without edit summaries or discussion on talk. PeterTheFourth (talk) 02:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History of video games

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Disruptive editing by IP users. Vipinhari || talk 15:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 20:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arunachal Pradesh

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Openly racist, IP hopping vandal has caused the page to be protected multiple times before, but always returns when protection expires. The user has repeatedly added racial epithets to the article and/or edit comments, some of which have been redacted. Zanhe (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is a tough call. There is a certain level of constructive IP editing, and since the protections have not escalated very high as yet, I have Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. However in recognition of the long-term problem I have Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 19:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gerard Fabiano

Pending changes: WP:COI issues. An anonymous user claiming to be Gerard Fabiano has been removing sourced content from this article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also softblocked the registered user as a username policy violation. Katietalk 18:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cannabis

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Clattenburg

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zebroid

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Steady stream of anon IP vandals and unhelpful edits. Montanabw(talk) 08:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

David Newman (composer)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hoaxing again. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/187.172.105.221. Multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 14:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joël Matip

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People jumping the gun and changing content, which will not happen before 1 July. Kante4 (talk) 14:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Dun

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection ended on the weekend and the unconstructive edits have returned. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nissan Navara

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Multiple IP's from the same place in Australia keep on editing the page, saying that it is a Utility Vehicle. It's only known as a Utility Vehicle there. This has been going on for a few weeks. The IP's have been constantly reverting when their edits are reverted by other users, including me and think they are right, and every time it happens, it results in an edit war, so i think it needs protection to solve the dispute. . Class455fan1 (talk) 14:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vrinda Grover

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Ulis

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Norse religion

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The previous protection expired earlier today, and there's already an entire drawer's worth of socks hard at work there... Thomas.W talk 17:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Philbin

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant effort to add "Jew" as the name of the person which doesn't appear to be the case. Muzammil (talk) 07:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now its weird spellings - Joeseph Philbin, Joenathan Philbin, etc. I've reverted twice - wouldn't like to venture for the third time. --Muzammil (talk) 07:12, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 11:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bankstown railway line

Temporary semi-protection: An IP continues to remove sourced content and add POV without responding to discussion on user page or talk page. Wcp07 (talk) 10:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Studios

Indefinite semi-protection: The format in which I had the page for a while, showing the film title, the release date, the wrestler featured and the studio seems to be working and I think it should stay this way in the future. I am also a frequent editor of this article and would love it to keep up with the consistency. SJJM4EVER (talk) 11:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, this would not appear to be a good/valid reason for page protection; no evidence of vandalism or disruptive editing is provided. Other editors should have the chance to contribute unobstructed; cf. WP:OWN. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 11:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined SJJM4EVER, please use the article's talk page and try to gain concensus if you want something like that implemented. Lectonar (talk) 11:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cunty

Indefinite full protection. I've created it as {{R from typo}} for county, but as this has a history of being used for vandalism (see all three past deletions) by registered users, I expect its existence to make it a target for IP vandalism. Aside from the possibility of sending it to cunt, I can't imagine any way to make a good-faith changes to this redirect. Since I've just created it, protecting it myself might be seen as WP:INVOLVED. Nyttend (talk) 15:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected Lectonar (talk) 15:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Trump Organization

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No constructive edits throughout the the entire month of Feb. Page is prone to IP trolls. Nodayrt (talk) 20:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Lectonar (talk) 10:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Empire

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent long-term vandalism. If not indefinite, a long temporary protection is advised/encouraged. Nodayrt (talk) 23:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Lectonar (talk) 10:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Testingpage

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – spam page by confused spammer, created 3 times in an hour. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 12:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done for a ten-day period. Nyttend (talk) 14:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Madison High School (Madison, Ohio)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by new accounts. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 23:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 10:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obafemi Martins

Temporary semi-protection: At least for a week. We have IP users adding content, stating that he has left Seattle, but it's not official yet which is a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. – Michael (talk) 00:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

William Lorge

Temporary semi-protection: Page has been protected several times previously against efforts of a disruptive IP editor with an apparent COI. After a respite, the disruptive edits have resumed. JohnInDC (talk) 02:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try this first.... Lectonar (talk) 11:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi-5 (Australian band)

Semi-protection: Request for protection while a Good Article Review is occuring. High level of IP vandalism. SatDis (talk) 05:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I support the above request, the article was previously protected and almost immediately after its lifting an anonymous IP made a series of disruptive edits. I'm the GA reviewer and would rather be completing that process than dealing with annoying vandals: make WP better by reducing their opportunities.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please ping me if protection seems no longer necessary. Lectonar (talk) 11:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Google Earth

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – [Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (expires 15:33, 2 March 2016) [Move=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (expires 15:33, 2 March 2016) (Persistent disruptive editing). Unguriu (talk) 16:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I don't see a lot of vandalism, and most IP editing appears to be constructive. I do see edit warring (by autoconfirmed users) over a subject which has been extensively discussed at the talk page, and I will comment on that at the appropriate user talk page. MelanieN (talk) 00:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@MelanieN: I have commented on the article's talk page, and I ask you to take a look at what I said, because I think there may be some important aspects. LjL (talk) 02:39, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'll reply at your talk page. --MelanieN (talk) 04:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 10:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016

temporary semi-protection: Edit war over superdelegate counts. Requesting protection before this gets worse. This has been argued multiple times in the talk page and we have a solution agreed upon. We need this protection to prevent an edit war and to protect the neutrality of wikipedia.. JP16103 17:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Haman (biblical figure)

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:383E:3FA3:2868:37E5 (talk) 23:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Nyttend for 3 days. tutterMouse (talk) 09:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Neon Lights Tour

Semi-protection: Many of the recent edits have been fancruft inflations of revenue, which will likely continue if this isn't semi-protected soon. Article was previously protected for a week. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Challis

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has a long history of vandalism and BLP violations. If not indefinite, a long-term temporary/recent changes protection is encouraged/advised here. Nodayrt (talk) 20:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Just one user was causing problems recently, and they have now been blocked. MelanieN (talk) 01:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grayslake, Illinois

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Frosty ☃ 07:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

United States presidential election, 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No constructive edits throughout the the entire month of Feb. Page is prone to IP trolls. Nodayrt (talk) 20:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The last two edits, made after you left this request, are constructive. At the same time, I can see a lot of disruptive editing; I'll leave a note at talk regarding the advisability of temporary semiprotection. Nyttend (talk) 00:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NBA All-Star Game records

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is constantly being vandalized/introduction of factual errors. Boomer VialHolla 03:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NBA All-Star Game

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism — Myasuda (talk) 03:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Srinivasan

Temporary semi-protection: Recent death of Antonin Scalia has led to much talk of Srinivasan being a potential nomination to the Supreme Court, which per WP:CRYSTAL wouldn't belong in his article. Furorimpius (talk) 07:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Whether this kind of information belongs in the article is currently under discussion at the talk page. Work it out there. In any case, semi-protection would not prevent this kind of material, since it is being added (with references) by auto-confirmed users. MelanieN (talk) 23:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Super Sentai

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Sock puppetry. 112.198.90.2 (talk) 12:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. In fact most of the editing of this page is done by IPs, and most of it appears to be constructive. MelanieN (talk) 23:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lil Dicky

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users and non-confirmed accounts. Much of the vandalism is extremely inappropriate (including references to Hitler, overt sexual references, etc.). Examples: [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61]. Page previously has had protection for sockpuppetry and also recently for vandalism. Chrisw80 (talk) 22:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kodak Black

Pending-changes protection level 1: High levels of vandalism or BLP violations from unregistered and new users. I am not an editor of this page (I'm not even a fan of the music genre) but I stumbled across it and noted the editing history is flooded with reverts. Artist is clearly notable (see these articles by Forbes and Spin magazines) but the Wikipedia article appears unable to move forward as so much energy is being spent undoing edits. Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 19:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think the vandalism is too frequent for PC to work well. MelanieN (talk) 01:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Reigns

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has a long history of vandalism and BLP violations. If not indefinite, a long-term temporary/recent changes protection is encouraged/advised here.

Semi-protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 01:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shoot the Rapids

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The ride is rumored to be removed, but has yet to be confirmed. The removal should be confirmed next weekend. Until then, it should be protected so that it is not constantly vandalized. Astros4477 (Talk) 20:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trump Tower (New York City)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No constructive edits throughout the the entire month of Feb. Page is prone to IP trolls. Nodayrt (talk) 20:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Martin (boxer)

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:B405:1D0E:C4BC:EA9A (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Nyttend.. MelanieN (talk) 01:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frankie MacDonald

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been subjected to repeated vandalism and content blanking from IP addresses. T.C.Haliburtontalk nerdy to me 18:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Death Eater

Temporary semi-protection: Moderate level of IP vandalism over the past few months. Where we're going, we don't need roads. (talk) 19:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Moore

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same editor has returned to do the same vandalism... . Nomoskedasticity (talk) 11:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous protection expired Feb. 13; vandalism from dynamic IP resumed immediately. MelanieN (talk) 23:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Army (Ellie Goulding song)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption resumed immediately after previous protection expired. Widr (talk) 14:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has needed virtually continuous protection for all of its short life. MelanieN (talk) 23:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Adejo

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maqbool Bhat

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Rapid/Disruptive editing by multiple un-autoconfirmed accounts and IPs. Nodayrt (talk) 06:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump, Jr.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP violations. No constructive edits by IP or new users for almost a month. Qzd (talk) 20:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of the election campaign, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ivanka Trump

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism after recent protection period. Nodayrt (talk) 20:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of the election campaign, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16 February 2016

2015 in American television

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 20:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 17:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Navi Mumbai

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism by user 182.59.82.191. The person also deleted a level 1 warning against vandalism from his/her talk page. A level 2 warning has been posted on his/her talk page. To prevent him/her from further rampant deletion, a semi-protection has to be added to the page. Thank you. — Deepak_HK「@talk」 16:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 17:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Naval battles - persistent sock puppetry & block evasion

Temporary semi-protection: Chronic sock puppetry and block evasion, including persistent insertion of unsourced / poorly sourced material - see page histories, Talk page and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/UnbiasedVictory/Archive. JohnInDC (talk) 20:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both articles. Lectonar (talk) 21:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rap Monster

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GABHello! 15:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Horse (Katy Perry song)

Semi-protection: Fancruft additions, which will likely continue if this remains unprotected. Previous protection was for one month. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 19:44, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Proctor (Salem witch trials)

Temporary semi-protection: Currently being bombarded by various IPs in the 205.125.33.x range Egsan Bacon (talk) 20:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 21:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Rain Song

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 05:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of Twelver Shia Islam

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip's are edit warring among themselves and the stability of this article has now gone to dogs. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:42, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:52, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeon Jungkook

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GABHello! 15:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Several of the problem editors have been blocked, but they were not the only ones. This article has really been under siege. MelanieN (talk) 19:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dharampal Singh Malik

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See also Dharampal singh malik (currently up for speedy). —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 01:51, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that the page creator has started socking. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chapter1947. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 10:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected — MusikAnimal talk 16:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Viola Beach

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sıgehelmus (Talk) |д=) 02:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Billboard Mainstream Top 40 number-one songs of 2005

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 03:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vishal Malik

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Also repeatedly recreated at Vishal malik (currently up for speedy, again). —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 01:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that the page creator has started socking. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chapter1947. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 10:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. And page deleted. Lectonar (talk) 10:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Taylor Swift

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frankie talk 11:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Coffee for 3 days. tutterMouse (talk) 16:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carnival

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be attracting a good bit of vandalism today. . Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 13:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Edgar181 for 24 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 16:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attracting much vandalism this morning. . Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 14:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Edgar181 for 24 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 16:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes s4 & 5

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring despite both a local consensus and a WikiProject consensus against misusing the FirstEngAirDate parameter. Opencooper (talk) 06:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to have been overlooked, so a note that this is still open and the editors involved are continuing to edit war and not use talk pages. Opencooper (talk) 06:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., both--Ymblanter (talk) 11:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Max B

Semi-protection: Numerous edits from multiple anonymous users (some of which seem to be the same user from multiple IP addresses). Extreme persistence in adding certain acts to "Associated acts" while removing others. Despite a talk on one of the IP's pages, and a willingness to compromise by including his desired act into the "Associated acts", he/she continue to remove others from the infobox. Malintent can be seen in how the user insists on inserting his/her desired acts in the forefront of the "Associated acts" list, while more notable acts are left for latter down the list. Anyone knowledgeable on the subject, would know Dame Grease and French Montana are much more significant in their association with article subject Max B. Furthermore, a verification of any of Max B's discography shows references to "associated acts" Al Pac, Mak Mustard and Stack Bundles in the tracklisting. For example- a look at the MOB tape [63] show references towards Stack Bundles, while a look into any of Max's records between 2008-2010 including his album Vigilante Season show mentions of Al Pac and/or Mak Mustard. Furthermore, citations remain scattered throughout the article itself (where relevant), yet disputing user references "non-notability" as reason during his/her edits. DA1 (talk) 20:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In my edit, i made sure to include Isaiah Toothtaker, whilst restoring mentions of Young Los, Mak Mustard, Al Pac and Stack Bundles in the "Associated acts". However, you repeatedly removed those acts, despite the several references to those acts in the article. DA1 (talk) 22:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The several references to those acts is not sufficient to add them to the infobox. See Template:Infobox musical artist#associated acts. 153.205.18.1 (talk) 22:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[67] [68] [69] [70] [71] All make mention of Mak Mustard and Al Pac. The "Charge It To The Wave" DVD and "Coke Wave DVD" further mention these artists. Anyone who is familiar with Max's music, will be aware of these associated acts. As would they be familiar with producer Young Los, also cited in the article here [72]. Additional materials of reference: [73] [74] [75] and [76] DA1 (talk) 22:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think you have to familiarize yourself with the WP:SOURCE policy. 153.205.18.1 (talk) 22:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Film and music records are relevant sources, especially given the nature of the article subject. This seems to be a purely one way dispute from your end. One could easily begin make similar fallacious disputes against your desired "associated act", since your are unwilling to accept the numerous sources provided to you regarding the others, whom we have footage of with Max B and numerous references in his records and music, alongside the films and articles cited. In any case, I will leave it for the mods to decide. I've made my point. DA1 (talk) 22:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Terrence Romeo

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Babymissfortune 01:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Puthiya Niyamam

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Typical new Indian film release vandalism. Nairspecht (talk) 08:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BMI/font

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – parent template is protected as is another subtemplate. Created this subtemplate to make parent template comply with WP:COLOR. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Lectonar (talk) 08:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Yes it is...I think. Lectonar (talk) 08:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plasticine

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continued edit-warring. Discussion now returned to ANI. . Burninthruthesky (talk) 10:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Samsung Galaxy S7

Unprotection: Samsung galaxy S7 was created and stubified per the recent, accidental confirmation of the phone. ViperSnake151  Talk  05:32, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Philg88. tutterMouse (talk) 10:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mikhmoret

Temporary semi-protection, perhaps for a month. IP and new editors keep rewriting the article, I suspect with the aim at advertising a hostel. The last attempt is particularly concerning due to the untruthful nature of the edit summary (they are restoring their own version, not the original). Number 57 17:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 3 in a month after so few edits over the course of years isn't too disruptive. only (talk) 01:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Padilla

Temporary Semi-protection: IP user consistently deleting sourced and valid information. Nixin1976 (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 01:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Girl Who Sees Smells

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 112.198.101.55 (talk) 02:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 03:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beloved Eun-dong

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 112.198.101.55 (talk) 02:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 03:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! My Lady

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 112.198.101.55 (talk) 02:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 03:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Millennials

Semi-protection: the page history has become (again) a mess of back-and-forth modifications of the claimed range of this generation, mostly by passing-by IP addresses. This has been a long-term problem. LjL (talk) 17:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC) Potentially even consider full protection as some established editors have started piling on to the edit wars without distinguishing themselves from the more anonymous users by explaining the reasons for their edits and reverts using edit summaries or otherwise. LjL (talk) 21:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I know there was an ANI thread about this (last week?) so I'm going to send you to AN3 for more thorough investigation. Katietalk 18:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IMI Desert Eagle

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - report was good at the time but it looks like the disruptive edits have stopped. AlexiusHoratius 01:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bauhaus (band)

Semi-protection: Genre-warring from abusive IP editor.Mezigue (talk) 19:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - IP has been warned about edit warring and it looks like it's been the only one lately. AlexiusHoratius 01:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boulevard of Broken Dreams (Green Day song)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism by likely the same person whose socks have just been blocked. Hzh (talk) 02:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 03:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:UBX/female

Unprotection: From full protection to template editor protection, less than 1300 transclusions. 117Avenue (talk) 00:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done AlexiusHoratius 01:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disney Princess

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – need a short term protection from an IP-jumper making vandalizing/unconstructive additions. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Google Earth

Semi-protection: there was recently a request for protecting this page, but it was denied as the main culprit was Unguriu, an autoconfirmed account, now blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet, part of a series that have edit warred on the article for a long time. But now the same edits are being made by an IP address in a different range from the one linked to Unguriu before, so I don't know that chasing the ever-changing addresses would be easier than just semi-protecting the page (again). Pinging in particular MelanieN who is aware of the situation and dealt with the previous request. LjL (talk) 02:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Curious George episodes

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been under vandalism threat for several weeks now. The most common type of vandalism is page and section blanking. Fdssdf (talk) 02:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Catalonia

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 02:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. MelanieN (talk) 20:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon GO

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism and addition of false unsourced content. The1337gamer (talk) 19:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 20:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Coronel

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 21:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sian Blake

Temporary semi-protection: This person is the subject of a high-profile trial, I have already reverted one anon edit as inappropriate in view of legal issues. PatGallacher (talk) 02:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 18:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Laffer curve

Temporary full protection: ongoing edit wars, short of 3RR (despite claims), concerning issues debated on the talk page at length, among established editors. Recent history shows this has reached disruptive levels. LjL (talk) 02:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. If it resumes tomorrow, WP:AN3 is thataway. Katietalk 18:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Techno-thrillers

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping editor keeps changing against consensus. Repeated warnings have not worked. Perhaps a temporary edit block shows this is not how we do things on Wikipedia. Soetermans. T / C 14:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Katietalk 18:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Margot Robbie

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – suspicious activity has started again after being unprotected only a short time ago. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 12:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only IP edits since protection expired were test edits. Katietalk 18:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:TheManchoMan

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting that the talk page rights be revoked for user after vulgar personal attacks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Katietalk 17:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aaarghh... okay, how about

User(s) blocked. with talk page access revoked. (I love Cyberbot.) Katietalk 18:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Feuerstein

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Everymorning (talk) 16:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17 February 2016

Social conservatism in the United States

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Overtly biased edits have been plaguing this article. Disruptive edits and their reverts are the majority of the edits on this page. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The level of disruption is far under the threshold even for pending changes protection; we're talking about at most 2 dozen edits the last year here. Lectonar (talk) 15:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EYDAP

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly edited by a sock. With a semi at least 4 days of wait before being able to edit could perhaps slow the sock down. Qed237 (talk) 16:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Lerner

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Webster (British author)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs vandalizing the article. It may not be immediately apparent that the edits are vandalism, as some of the changes may look as though they are being made in good faith, but as noted on the talk page, on close examination it's clear they are vandalism - for example, they deliberately misidentify the article subject's non-fiction books as novels. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 23:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Alternatively, warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FreeKnowledgeCreator Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:42, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic socialism

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Because of the subject's increased prominence of the US presidential campaign, this article is attracting more unsourced edits and such. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If the unsourced or poorly sourced content was added more and started to look more like a BLP violation of one of the candidates then I would consider it. Yaris678 (talk) 13:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur

Semi-protection: A lot of promotional content has been added to the page by unregistered users in past. Due to this, the page did not meet encyclopedia standards and quality content was also deleted. Sanjeev Sharma 09:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But well done on your recent improvements to the article. If the promoters come back and are persistent, ask again here. Yaris678 (talk) 13:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Esoh Paul Omogba

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected — MusikAnimal talk 17:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! Squints

Create protection: Keeps being recreated after CSD deletions -- samtar whisper 16:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Scott. — MusikAnimal talk 17:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Xenia (hotel)

Temporary move protection: Keeps on being moved by sock. Qed237 (talk) 16:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected — MusikAnimal talk 17:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DEPA

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly edited by a sock. With a semi at least 4 days of wait before being able to edit could perhaps slow the sock down. Qed237 (talk) 16:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Evangelos Mytilineos

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly edited by a sock. With a semi at least 4 days of wait before being able to edit could perhaps slow the sock down. Qed237 (talk) 16:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mytilineos Holdings

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly edited by a sock. With a semi at least 4 days of wait before being able to edit could perhaps slow the sock down. Qed237 (talk) 16:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Annastacia Palaszczuk

Semi-protection: Outbreak of vandalism with potentially libellous comments. LynwoodF (talk) 12:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BLP violations. Yaris678 (talk) 13:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moree, New South Wales

Semi-protection: subject to very regular vandalism from IPs and new accounts. LibStar (talk) 14:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Leonardo DiCaprio

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frankie talk 21:51, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Transcendentalism

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Long-term IP abuse. Cidemoc (talk) 00:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gameplay of Pokémon

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by un-autoconfirmed accounts and IP's. Cidemoc (talk) 01:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Liberalism

Indefinite pending changes: Because of the nature of the article, this page has drawn vandals. IPs and others have been attacking this article frequently. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gemma Chan

Temporary semi-protection: A single anon IP, the SPA 213.1.8.136, has been edit-warring to add ethnicity unrelated to the subject's notability, despite two registered editors — myself and User:Hegvald — pointing out on the talk page that the anon IP is violating MOS:BLPLEAD. Instead of attempting to seek consensus, he has behaved belligerently, writing, "Hegvald, are you a racist against Chinese people?" and throwing other insults. He is now on the cusp of 3RR, but rather than edit-war with him, I ask for page protection. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zdravko Čolić

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Zoupan 03:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

King Liar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Petty vandalism + unsourced revisions + promotional content. Nairspecht (talk) 16:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Larry P. Arnn

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Polmandc (talk) 04:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mayfair High School

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 05:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valley Christian High School (Cerritos, California)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple new accounts and IPs Meters (talk) 05:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Presidents of the Philippines

Permanent semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism for a period of two months. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 06:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:31, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

René Laennec

Semi-protection: High rate of IP vandalism, likely due to Laennec being the subject of today's Google Doodle. -- Perey (talk) 07:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adult Swim

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 08:33, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aquaman

Semi-protection: Page was protected once; since expiration, edits have not stopped. See page history. All by one person. Indefinite, preferably. Something needs to be done about that sock though. They have used at least ten different IPs and possibly one account, although the account is only possible and not a sure thing like all the IPs. I am unfamiliar with how busting socks or taking action against socks works so I can't do anything there. —DangerousJXD (talk) 09:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wake Me Up When September Ends

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruptive edits from IP users with the same prefix 2600:1006:b1xx:*, falsifying how song did on the record charts as well as its sales certifications. This same family of IP users has also been disrupting other Green Day related articles, including recently semi-protected Boulevard of Broken Dreams (Green Day song). MPFitz1968 (talk) 02:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charlene McMann

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and persistent sockpuppetry. Cidemoc (talk) 03:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by KrakatoaKatie for 1 week. tutterMouse (talk) 07:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shannon Noll

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Page has been semi-protected once before (for a week here by AlexiusHoratius), but the IPs are back again so perhaps a longer period of protection is warranted this time around. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:42, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Package format

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We have a case of an Internet vigilante persistently trying to add an entry to the article without properly factoring in the inclusion criteria, instead resorting to deceit and edit warring. This his 16th attempt since 27 December 2015. When mentioned the source issue, he called me "bloody and clueless idiot incapable of reading referenced book". This page was once previously been protected because of the same editor by CambridgeBayWeather. But the editor came back today. Codename Lisa (talk) 22:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 31 hours (talk · contribs). Nyttend (talk) 02:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Brown

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by un-autoconfirmed accounts and IP's. Cidemoc (talk) 00:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. only (talk) 01:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Xavier Woods

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 7:18, February 16, 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 01:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Extra Credits episodes

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Consistent deletion of the links to the relevant videos the article is listing, verging on 3RR violation. El Nero Diablo (talk) 06:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please hold on this. The user above has reverted my attempt at a discussion on this topic on their talk page. None have violated 3RR. Alex|The|Whovian? 06:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
By the nature of having "verged on" violation of 3RR means it's not yet violated the rule but would have if one more reversion happens by either side, thus why I called for the protection BEFORE either side violated the rule. El Nero Diablo (talk) 06:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't really explain why you initially reverted my attempt at a discussion, does it? And actually, violating 3RR means more than three reverts. So, definitely not "one more reversion by either side". Alex|The|Whovian? 06:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. — MusikAnimal talk 16:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This request is no longer required, discussion has been worked out on user talk page though it should have been on article talk page initially anyway. El Nero Diablo (talk) 03:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yoweri Museveni

Semi-protection: Time to Time Vandalism. He is the president of Uganda, and with the recent presidential elections in the country this week the number of vandal edits are rising. I predict after he wins the election there will be some angry people too. Sputink (talk) 23:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Katietalk 01:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whiteboard

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cidemoc (talk) 00:33, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 01:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Blackwell

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent change of valid links. Jetstreamer Talk 00:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jetstreamer: I don't understand. The archive.today links don't work for me, while the archive.is links do. Why do you say they're valid links, and why should we protect the page given that they don't work? (You don't need to ping me when you answer - I should see it.) Katietalk 00:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you're right. They were working a few weeks ago. I think I should revert my recent edits regarding this. Thanks for the heads up and disregard this request.--Jetstreamer Talk 01:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Thanks! :-) Katietalk 01:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Private Peaceful

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 02:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

C. J. McCollum

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 20:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 02:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Tangled

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some ip-hopper keeps removing stuff and gripping about the sequel. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 02:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NXT TakeOver: Dallas

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism and unexplained removal of content. Previous protection was set at one week. Originalchampion (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Yaris678 (talk) 21:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Qzd

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Katietalk 01:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Amell

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 00:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conservation of energy

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be attracting a lot of negative attention today. . Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 13:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MelanieN (talk) 18:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mikel Merino

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. MYS77 ✉ 14:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Several of the recent IP edits have been useful. Indeed, some IPs are reverting the small amount of IP vandalism this page gets. Yaris678 (talk) 18:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Johannesson

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. MYS77 ✉ 14:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 18:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
IMYS77, can see you are having trouble with some new users which may actually be the same user. If this continues, consider reporting it to WP:ANI. Yaris678 (talk) 19:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18 February 2016

The Challenge: Rivals III

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Challenge season articles have a long history of being plagued by unsourced spoiler vandalism and additions of poorly-sourced content by IP users throughout their initial MTV run. On average, Challenge season articles run for about 2 1/2 months — per a short trailer on MTV.com, the season will not premiere until May 2016. With that said, I recommend a 6-month semi-protection in order to block any potential unwanted IP spoiler vandalism. DPH1110 (talk) 06:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., we do not protect pages pre-emptively, and the amount of vandalism so far would not justify 6 month protection. However, I see your point, and if vandalism resumes after 2 weeks, I believe the chance the page would be 6 months semi-protected then is big.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:POTD protected/2016-02-19 subpages

Temporary full-protection: These pages will be appearing on the Main Page tomorrow, but because they are added randomly, therefore the cascade protection doesn't work. See this ERRORS report about a previous case. Armbrust The Homunculus 13:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Both. Lectonar (talk) 19:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zodiac Killer

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could we just make this article fully autoconfirmed protected? Persistent simmering vandalism (usually by new editors or IPs) adding content that associates Ted Cruz w/ZK. Same problems happening at the Cruz article (which at this time is autoconfirmed protected). Shearonink (talk) 18:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reaffirming my request. Persistent, systemic vandalism by IPs today adding content - either text or images - equating Cruz with ZK. Pending Changes not enough in my opinion. Shearonink (talk) 19:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. It's a viral-joke - starting in January on Twitter that has migrated onto WP's pages. Shearonink (talk) 19:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just checked the page, but now it's under full admin/template editor protection.... Shearonink (talk) 19:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Old admin groping around for his glasses.... Lectonar (talk) 19:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rooster (song)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 03:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 15:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Action Hero Biju

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. JO Bieson (talk) 03:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 15:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thirupadiripuliyur railway station

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users making unnecessary edits. Karthik 04:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Work out your content disagreement on the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 15:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Gambia

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered editors insist in changing official language from English to Arabic, without consensus and an accredited source. B.Lameira (talk) 18:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Galileo affair‎ and Talk:Galileo Galilei

Long time Semi-protection: Again, after protection expiration, standard vandalism by restoration of talk page comments by socks of indef blocked Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azul411/Archive. - DVdm (talk) 13:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @DVdm: Leave me a list of the IPs and I'll block them a while longer for block evasion. Katietalk 17:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GitHub

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Days of vandalism calling GitHub "anti-white" (probably stemming from this article) mostly IPs but there have been users doing it. Emotionalllama (talk) 16:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fatin Gökmen

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same user is back pushing the same unreferenced POV. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's some socking going on here too, and one of these guys is close to autoconfirmed. Katietalk 17:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spartan race

Temporary semi-protection: Long-term content dispute between newly created users/IPs and a couple of established editors. This is the most recent issue caused, but reading above the linked section will give some background. I'm attempting to work with Jkxyz to sort this out. Thanks. -- samtar whisper 22:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Thank you for your efforts. Lectonar (talk) 11:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

James Zogby

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 prohibits IP editors from editing this article and any other articles broadly related to Israel/Palestine. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Turbo Kid

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The protection recently expired and the vandalism just continued again. Opencooper (talk) 02:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiccan views of divinity

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the past few hours. . Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 20:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Milana Vayntrub

Indefinite semi-protection: Repeated vandalism and unconstructive editing by an editor using a dynamic IP address. Previous blocks and attempts to discuss the content changes have not dissuaded this IP editor, who has stated his/her intention to continue making a controversial change despite lacking consensus: [77] -Kudzu1 (talk) 04:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I will watchlist. Lectonar (talk) 10:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Christgau

Indefinite pending changes: Let's see how it goes with PC. . © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 22:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lectonar (talk) 12:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mae Jemison

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits almost daily since February 8, with numerous unconstructive edits today. EricEnfermero (Talk) 02:16, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Lpkids2006

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sixth of March 08:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mrs. Doubtfire

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A gazillion IP edits, most of one character? Same as at Madame Doubtfire article.   Aloha27  talk  11:06, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 87B

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Madame Doubtfire

Temporary semi-protection: I have no idea what's happening on this page. Over the past few minutes, an IP editor has made over 250 to this page. Some appear helpful (although I haven't had a chance to check yet) but the vast majority consist of adding a space, then deleting it again. I don't know if protection is the best option or whether a block would be better, but it's just clogging up the page history at the moment. Absconded Northerner (talk) 09:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 11:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tower of London

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This high-profile page seems to attract a lot of casual and silly vandalism from first-time editors. PC seems to work quite well at the London Eye article, which has similar issues - could we please try it here? Thanks. . DBaK (talk) 10:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. DBaK (talk) 10:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish football top scorers

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chelsea Clinton

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent, potentially libelous vandalism on this high-profile BLP (almost 250,000 views this past month) - the latest vandalism standing for almost 24 hours, which is unacceptable. Indefinite semi-protection requested until after the campaign.Tvoz/talk 03:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Javed Afridi

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism/Disruptive Editing started after the protection expired. Musa Talk  17:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Yamaguchi先生 until March 3. tutterMouse (talk) 07:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fittipaldi F8

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lectonar.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Runhappy

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – (again) Article has previously required protection. IP-hopping editor keeps trying to remove the same material over and over to whitewash the article. Because it is not always the same anon IP (and because there appears to have been at least one COI account created for the same purpose) this article needs indefinite semi-protection; blocking the user or the IPs seems to be ineffective. Montanabw(talk) 19:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SCP Foundation

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The SCP Foundation article has been receiving fairly consistent vandalism for awhile, mainly claiming that it is a real organization or changing the description of one of the SCPs, SCP-426, to the first person (in-universe, SCP-426 is a toaster that can only be referred to in the first person). This is becoming a waste of everyone's time, and I'd like for this page to be placed under pending change protection. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kanhaiya Kumar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject of this article is the topic of a lot of news coverage right now, which results in a lot of IPs coming by with unsourced content additions. I'm counting at least 5 separate ones in the last 24 hours. Temporary semi- until this cools off. . Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Trump

Semi-protection for three months: When protection lapsed last week, vandalism picked up right where it left off, and is likely to continue as long as his son remains heavily in the public eye. pbp 17:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anno Domini

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 23:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Harvard University people

Semi-protection: Someone keeps adding a non-notable person to the list and in the criminal section (as far as I can tell, they have never been convicted of crime, but there seems to be a controversy surrounding this individual in Thailand). Patken4 (talk) 01:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 03:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Memphis Depay

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 15:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 15:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Unguriu

User block, protection or semi-protection: this blocked user has repeatedly abused their own talk page (see history) including messing with unblock review templates. I think the best route would be to revoke talk page access from the particular user, rather than protecting the page, but I am unsure of the best venue to request that. Please direct me for next time. LjL (talk) 18:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I've removed their talkpage access instead — please come back if, well, if there is IP abuse. And now I suppose I have to revdel stuff... groan... OK, I will. Bishonen | talk 18:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's not my fault if I'm Jennifer Lopez! LjL (talk) 18:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA coefficient

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Matches started this week and disruption continued (and will get worse). Qed237 (talk) 20:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19 February 2016

Stacey Dash

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Probably one user acting with sockpuppets, an SPI case is already opened. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

James R. Ramsey

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new accounts vandalizing and blanking content. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 19:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:54, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Uribe

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated additions of unofficial free agent signing information. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 20:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Le'Veon Bell

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. 2607:FB90:A52B:E806:0:44:44BC:7101 (talk) 20:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Naprapathy

Temporary semi-protection: Persist disruptive/copyvio edits by fresh and IP accounts. Alexbrn (talk) 07:10, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent page protection expired and a new protect needs to be for a much longer time. Delta13C (talk) 11:08, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin Harris

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – anon IP vandalism over the past 24 hours. Karst (talk) 08:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

St Mary's Church, Haddenham

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated addition of copy/pasted material from http://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/bucks/vol2/pp281-286 which is public domain thought the page is tagged This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved. A previous cycle resulted in a blocked anon and an IP change. Jim1138 (talk) 08:41, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coboy Junior

Temporary semi-protection: Article was recently semi'd for 1 week, now unprotected, and problematic anon has resumed the same behavior with no change: [78] [79]. IPs of anon are not consistent, so semi-protection is the only effective means of curbing the disruption. Request a longer period this time, say 2 weeks. --IllaZilla (talk) 15:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dale Bozzio

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP, inserting flowery language and making the lead sound like a fan page or agent's press release. Wikipedia policy on neutrality and peacock language explained on talk page but IP just ignores it. Source given (MTV) does not justify the language either. Request revert to previous version (don't want to look like I'm edit-warring) and semi-protection. MaxBrowne (talk) 15:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DisneyToon Studios

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, which is the adding of non-existing future films. May be socks of Harrysstoller. Spshu (talk) 15:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yoweri Museveni

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page (and perhaps other candidates in the Uganda election) should probably be protected for a week or two. Tis attracting a lot of vandalism. Xmp (talk) 15:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Little Prince (2015 film)

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 16:54, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. one month by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 20:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The X Factor (UK TV series)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going disruptive editing from IP's and anonymous editors, who are editing against reliable sources. livelikemusic talk! 02:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:10, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by DragonflySixtyseven for 3 days. tutterMouse (talk) 18:04, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of beauty contests

Renew pending changes: Reverts still occur this month. --George Ho (talk) 08:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 09:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Street Fighter V

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Newly released video game, part of long-running and popular series. Unconstructive and/or vandalism edits have been reverted repeatedly. A temporary edit protection should do the trick. Soetermans. T / C 16:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Sergecross73 for 1 week. tutterMouse (talk) 18:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kanye West discography

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and other unconstructive edits within the past hour. Entranced98 (talk) 00:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Far from all Ip-edits are unconstructive or vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 11:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Western Wall

Temporary semi-protection: Chesdovi continuously adds POV information, resulting in reverts, see the talk page where he admits he is a POV pusher. He was told to seek consensus before adding in contentious information. He is trying to make it seem that the Western Wall is not a holy site for the Jews because he is an anti-Zionist. I am seeking semi-protection so that discussions can happen on the talk page, reach a consensus and then be brought into the main page. Sir Joseph (talk) 04:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More inflammatory remarks by SJ. He seems oblivious to policy guidelines on things as basic as RS and OR. I am all for reaching consensus, but he seldom replies, and when he does it is a never ending back and forth with arguments which do not align with policy, not to mention the never ending swipes and personal attacks. SJ needs to learn that other people have alternative views which they are entitled to have. Chesdovi (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And that is why I want the page protected. You continue to add stuff to the main page without reaching consensus.You tried creating a page Jewish boycott of the Western Wall, that was deleted, you then tried to merge that into this article and that was reverted and then on the talk page you just keep adding section upon section of whatever source you can google to suit your POV no matter how fringe or minor it is. That is why I want the page protection, to protect the integrity of the article. All one has to do is look at the history of the article at your contributions and at the reverts done by not just me, but by others to see that you are the disruptive editor here. Sir Joseph (talk) 05:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So am I not to post even to talk? What is this? Why have you not yet replied to this? I waited a week at Mea Shearim, you did not reply, and then removed text a second time: [80], [81]. I do not "keep adding" the same material. But you keep revert any thing I edit, even seemingly "non-contentious" material. What you mean by the "integrity" of the article is to keep it with it's pro-Jewish, Pro-Israeli and pro-Zionist slant. You care not one iota about any other section of the page. That is evidence of a disruptive POV. Chesdovi (talk) 05:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't respond to you because that is already in the article. I reverted your Meah Shearim reverts because that is a stupid entry. Just because the PA met with some residents in a PR stunt doesn't mean it gets to be in the article. Meah Shearim is part of Israel, it's inside the Green Line, why would it be part of the PA, so it's clearly POV and FRINGE to include. I revert what you edit if it's clear that it's a disruptive edit, like your Jewish boycott of the Western Wall article and similar edits. We get it, you hate Zionists and wish Israel to be destroyed, but you still need to follow Wikipedia policies while you do so. Sir Joseph (talk) 07:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy Frog

Renew pending changes: None of pending edits by newly registered editors were good. George Ho (talk) 08:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the edits weren't constructive, isn't semi-protection a better option than extending PC knowing it isn't working? tutterMouse (talk) 08:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sultan (2016 film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again reporting here due to a course of IP vandalism started again right after its protection tenure. Diffs are here, well take a look ([82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87] and [88]). SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 09:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not that much vandalism after the protection expired. Please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 08:13, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Shōnen Jump

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Cow cleaner 5000 vandal has returned. Has been vandalizing the article with false claims and fake sources for 2 years. —Farix (t | c) 10:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is very low-level. The article sees no edits for months at a time. Lectonar (talk) 08:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Prof tpms

Indefinite full protection: Too many enemies. Prof TPMS (talk) 11:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: You are sure you want it fully protected? Even you couldn't edit it then....Lectonar (talk) 12:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined If you want it semiprotected, just ping me. Lectonar (talk) 08:18, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yvan Baker

Semi-protection: Repeated additions by anonymous editors who want to turn this biographical article into a resume.EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 12:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Seems to have stopped after your warning. Lectonar (talk) 08:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015 in American television

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 19:16, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:28, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Visit (2015 American film)

Temporary semi-protection - Vandalism by unsigned users. Parsley Man (talk) 23:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GitHub

Indefinite semi-protection: 236 transclusion(s) found. RezonansowyakaRezy (talk | contribs) 00:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not convinced, but would welcome more opinions.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Lectonar (talk) 07:57, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars Episode VIII

Semi-protection: Some editors keep adding Harrison Ford as Han Solo to the page. They should know that Han Solo was killed by Kylo Ren in Star Wars: The Force Awakens. AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: One of the sources on the page says that "...the entire cast will return....". Just as a note.... Lectonar (talk) 14:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite semi-protection: An editor had just added Harrison Ford as Han Solo to the infobox section of the page and I had to delete it...again. That's why I am requesting an indefinite semi-protection of the Star Wars Episode VIII page. AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., so far no reasons for indefinite protection--Ymblanter (talk) 08:47, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Madhuri Dixit

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Enough IP disruption goes to this article on a daily basis. Administrators please check the history and the prot log, its time to indeff this one. . —IB [ Poke ] 09:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Lectonar (talk) 10:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Denver Broncos

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Only three days after the end of a three-week semi-protection, IP vandals are at it again. A minimum one-month semi-protection would be appreciated. DPH1110 (talk) 10:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alexia Thomas (activist)

Indefinite pending changes: A user created a page named after themselves. After this content was redacted after an AfD discussion, a number of new users exhibiting similar behavior showed up and began removing maintenance tags and attempting to restore the older versions of the article. I suspect all of these are sockpuppets of the original author, but she seems to show no signs of slowing down. Adding some form of page protection to curb this behavior may be in order. Thank you for your attention. . Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 13:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also pending-changes protected for 3 months. Lectonar (talk) 08:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NXT TakeOver: Dallas

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Bangladeshi television and radio channels

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One user was blocked for Spam the article has since moved in using IPs to add the same advertising to the article. Hopefully a short term semi will stop this behavior. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:LG-Gunther

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  07:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected I wouldn't call one act of vandalism to your user-page persistent, but here you go.Lectonar (talk) 08:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Brave Little Toaster (film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Req: 1 month semi. There is some uncertainty about the release date of this film, with multiple sources being in apparent conflict. IP hoppers keep asserting their own POVs, in some cases using poor references like this instead of the video's liner notes. This has been recurring since December 2015 or so, which is very odd for a film from 1987. You almost wonder if it's not a coordinated disruption, or if the attention to this old film is inspired by some meme or other form of groupthink. There's an open discussion on the talk page, yet none of the IPs have bothered to discuss. Some other examples of the changes: [89][90][91][92] (a couple of these appear to be from IPs on the East Coast of the US, which might suggest coordination, or a single user.) Other disruptions: [93][94] Thanks!. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 11:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adrien Brody

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GABHello! 21:11, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Lectonar (talk) 08:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Onuachu

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP Policy violations and vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 21:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Lectonar (talk) 08:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of records of India

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GABHello! 22:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. Lectonar (talk) 08:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skylight Films

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes by User:TV5Ozamiz IP Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  00:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Nearly a month has passed since protection expired, but there have been only two IP edits in that time; it's not yet to the point that protection would be good. Nyttend (talk) 03:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teraa Surroor

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Musa Talk  00:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Nothing (band)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There's an anonymous user who seems intent on making unsourced changes to this page. So far three different editors have reverted those changes, and two have left talk page messages with no response. A brief semi-protection seems in order. Absconded Northerner (talk) 09:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The warnings were the correct thing to do and the IP seems to have stopped. If this behaviour returns, escalate the warning, e.g. to {{uw-disruptive3}} or {{uw-unsourced3}}. If the behaviour continues after that, report to WP:ANI and the IP will probably get blocked. The incident is only worth reporting here if there are multiple IPs involved. Yaris678 (talk) 18:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jama Aden

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Might need protection for a short while. Someone keeps trying to remove sourced information. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 14:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The article needs work, actually. Protection will not help. Lectonar (talk) 19:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Minnetrista

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A user insists on adding unencyclopedic content to this article. . Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 14:56, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 19:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20 February 2016

Bahrain's cultural locations - requesting protection; people continuously keep removing Bahrain's heritage

semi-protection: persistent vandilism - bahrain's cultural heritage is being vandalised — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bh.alnasser (talk • contribs) 13:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done regarding Sar, Bahrain because the page has been blanked pending copyright investigation. MelanieN (talk) 17:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done regarding Jid Ali; issued a final warning about vandalism and edit warring to the requesting party Bh.alnasser. MelanieN (talk) 17:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cato (spy)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 02:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 17:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ryazhenka

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by user Off-shell, who keeps reverting this page to an incorrect version, claiming disputed origins of the drink, while citing a cookbook as a source. This is despite few members correcting the page.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. To the requesting user, please sign your requests. Also, please learn to tell the difference between vandalism and a content dispute, and please engage the other user at the talk page, where they started a discussion several months ago, with so far no response. MelanieN (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 in American television

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from problematic IP-hopping editor. Editor keeps changing "person of color" to "black man/black woman", and registered editors apparently have a huge problem with that. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 04:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by MusikAnimal for 48 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 20:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sony Music Entertainment

Semi-protection: Persistent high level of IP vandalism, relating to the claims made by Ke$ha against Dr Luke. Dr Luke's page has been protected, so it seems the vandals have moved on to his employer. Marianna251TALK 18:16, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Also for Sony. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Biersack

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as the floodgates opened, so did the vandalism!. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 19:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Lectonar (talk) 20:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sunni Islam

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 14:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Quit blindly reverting each other and start discussing. Katietalk 18:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Mountain Goats

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuing disruption and sock puppetry. Widr (talk) 17:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Nanny

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated blanking by shifting ips. John from Idegon (talk) 17:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bronchiolitis obliterans

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CFCF 💌 📧 17:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mozart and scatology

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:55, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Northeastern University

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IP users. . Calidum ¤ 02:40, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 in American television

Semi-protection: Edit warring. TomCat4680 (talk) 07:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Owen (comedian)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ⁓ Hello71 18:13, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 GT3 Le Mans Cup

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A user is changing IP addresses, and has continued to disrupt the article after the previous protection expired. JohnMcButts (talk) 18:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Partialism

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from multiple IPs about "face fetishism". McGeddon (talk) 19:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:18, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sprout (TV network)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Per request of another editor; request for indefinite protection Reason: Constant, persistent vandalism. Boomer VialHolla 19:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since I see lots of constructive editing by IPs, I do not think indefinite protection is appropriate or necessary. MelanieN (talk) 17:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KSCS

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Revolving IP vandals/sockpuppets. Recently left a message for one admin in the edit comments. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 21:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RuPaul's Drag Race

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going, heavy disruptive editing from IP's and anonymous editors. livelikemusic talk! 02:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ethereum

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Even though I've suggested that the matter be discussed on the talk page, an IP editor keeps reverting the article to a version that I and another user have been trying to improve. There is already a discussion about the issues on the talk page, but this has been ignored by the IP editor(s). Dodi 8238 (talk) 10:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Welbeck

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aston Villa F.C.

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism over the last few weeks. Straykat99 (talk) 00:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boku Dake ga Inai Machi

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempt to remove plot details on the bases that they are spoilers in violation of WP:SPOILER. —Farix (t | c) 01:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March to WrestleMania: Live from Toronto

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 18:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Lectonar for 3 days. tutterMouse (talk) 08:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligent design movement

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yobol (talk) 20:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

United Patriots Front

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and long-term socking. Exempted (talk) 04:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Materialscientist for 1 week. tutterMouse (talk) 08:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Career4mnc.com

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:00, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 12:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of web analytics software

Permanent Semi-protection: Recurring promotional attempts and blanking by IP editors such as Special:Contributions/2601:18D:101:351B:790E:4DD4:BFD0:86F8; The potential seems to stay permanently due to the type of the article that makes it an obvious target for spamming and the vandalism is probably a reaction of the editors whose promotional/non-compliant edits have been undone.Yuwash (talk) 03:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 07:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous

Temorary Semi-protection: I hate to ask it, but there are numerous unconfirmed accounts trolling the page. Meters (talk) 05:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Can't say we didn't try. tutterMouse (talk) 06:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Brown

Unprotection: There are two athletes with the page (Brandon Brown (racing driver) and Brandon Brown (basketball born 1985)), and I feel like it'd make sense for there to be a disambiguation page at its place. Zappa24Mati 04:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Lectonar (talk) 07:49, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grayson Allen

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, multiple accounts, apparent socks. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped for now. If it resumes after this weekend's game, let us know. Katietalk 01:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vikings (season 4)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor constantly removes most of the list of reccuring cast members of Vikings (season 4), stating that "the episodes are not sources for the cast list", even though the whole cast appeard and were listed in the end credits of the episode. Rey Keshe (talk) 14:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I've formally warned you against violating 3RR for this article though you've already done your fourth revert. If you had been warned, I would have blocked you. Stop it. Katietalk 01:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Akasha

Temporary pending changes: Low-level vandalism, even when editing is infrequent. George Ho (talk) 21:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SarahSV (talk) 01:55, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Baselios Cleemis

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 04:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The disruption is being caused by autoconfirmed accounts. Semi-protection won't help. Sorry. Katietalk 01:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Safdar

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptively edited by multiple IP's. Musa Talk  06:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 01:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Anselmo

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:57, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 01:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by unsigned users. Parsley Man (talk) 20:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Only one IP edited the article in last 48 hours, and he's blocked. Katietalk 01:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

George Pell

Semi-protection: Regular vandalism. Increase in vandalism highly likely in view of today's reports of police investigation. Boscaswell talk 21:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. I see only one disruptive IP in the last 24 hours. If it gets rowdy, let us know. :-) Katietalk 00:56, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valencian Community

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Same edit war as Catalonia. Elizium23 (talk) 21:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. No edits today. Katietalk 00:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Milana Vayntrub

  • Milana Vayntrub (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  • Indefinite semi-protection: Unfortunately, blocking one IP address used by a dynamic-IP vandal has not stopped his or her efforts to scrub mentions of the actress' Uzbek ethnicity/nationality from the page despite a lack of consensus. -Kudzu1 (talk) 22:13, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: @Kudzu1: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked 2605:E000:2340:400::/64 - this is one person, but with IPv6 addresses you have to rangeblock to stop his disruption. Katietalk 00:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Undertaker

Semi-protection: Article was full protected last week; since coming off of that there has been nonstop vandalism, unexplained blankings and sockpuppetry.LM2000 (talk) 22:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

N'Golo Kanté

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Exempted (talk) 02:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 04:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Cawthon

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism to article. -Liance talk/contribs 00:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Hail Mary passes in American football

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting for protection per talk page request; persistent non-NPOV/vandalism edits. Boomer VialHolla 12:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tarzan (1999 film)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continued edit warring over the release date of a film. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let It Go (Disney song)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Superman ownership disputes

Temporary semi-protection: For two or three days now, some evidently related anon IPs have been making non-constructive and apparently needling edits to this article for what seems like themselves having fun. --Tenebrae (talk)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21 February 2016

Mark Caguioa

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Babymissfortune 06:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 17:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The X Factor (Australian TV series)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors by way of adding in original research that either contradicts reliably sourced content within article or that cannot be verified. livelikemusic talk! 16:49, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 17:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fuller House (TV series)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Lectonar (talk) 17:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tao (entertainer)

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.Edit Warring,Reverts done by IP users possibly IP hopping, Versatile29 (talk) 10:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valencian Community

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Content dispute/edit warring – Similar edit-war than Catalonia and the Basque Country. — Jɑuмe (dis-me) 19:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why was it denied? And why Catalonia has full protection and has kept a wrong version? Also isn't it possible our articles have semi-protection status due to constant IP vandalism? — Jɑuмe (dis-me) 20:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please note: a response from the bottom is not a decline in itself. As for Catalonia, please check with the protecting admin, and be aware that they may have protected the WP:Wrong version. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 03:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined There hasn't been an IP edit to this article since February 14. Katietalk 13:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sonam Kapoor

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I know it's already PC protected but I think it needs to be semi protected as IPs out there constantly experiment with and vandalize the article. Frankie talk 07:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not enough IP disruption to justify semi-protection. Katietalk 13:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zirakpur

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 07:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 13:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hypnosurgery

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeatedly hit by selfpromoting socks; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nsmutte. Thomas.W talk 15:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator JamesBWatson. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anarky

Semi-protection: The article was just placed on Wikipedia's mainpage and has since been bombarded with vandalism and non-constructive editing. DarkKnight2149 16:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio Brown

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Weight being changed to 198 even though NFL.com says 181. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 17:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines men's national basketball team

Temporary pending changes: Mainly edited by IP addresses. Pending changes will help so a reviewer can review the edits first. Babymissfortune 06:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Katietalk 13:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Cubs

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 04:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Socialism

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 12:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015 in American television

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Disruptive activity keeps reoccurring despite declined RfPP requests. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 04:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Royce Gracie

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 05:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sitting Bull

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of drive by anon IP vandalism lately. . Montanabw(talk) 05:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SpongeBob SquarePants (film series)

Semi-protection: Persistent additions of unsourced content by numerous IP's. Exempted (talk) 06:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

K. B. Hedgewar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden spurt of edits changing the birth and death dates. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin James

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nohomersryan (talk) 04:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dharamgarh

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – this article is not for advirtisement..lots of newbies coming here and trolling. Ishwar⊕⊗ 05:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wiki tamil 100

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 06:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined No vandalism on your userpage. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandbox

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – xyz. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 14:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@LoudLizard:, is this a test? © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). Tbhotch:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
@Tbhotch: Yes, sorry. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 00:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor tutterMouse (talk) 07:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:4TheWynne

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – never thought this would be happening, but my user and talk pages have both been the targets of vandalism recently. Both have also been protected recently. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 11:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User page protected for a bit longer. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference Desk subpages

Request unprotection of WP:RD/H, WP:RD/M, as per suggestion at RFC here [95]. Have discussed this several times with protecting admin, who persists in protecting, against wishes of other admins and emerging consensus at reference desk talk page. SemanticMantis (talk) 19:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I went to the reference desk and wanted to ask a question. I discovered when I tried that it was protected, but there was a message there, a workaround that I could "submit an edit request". However, when I clicked on that it brought me to the talk page which is ALSO PROTECTED. That means that the very message providing a workaround for the protection of the reference desk leads you down the garden path to a "solution" that is foiled by the same mechanism. So I am asking for at least the talk page to be unprotected. 67.244.114.239 (talk) 21:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: RD/M's protection recently expired and was protected again because the disruptive sockpuppeting resumed a few hours after. The resolution to this probably won't be found here though and we can't use this place as a temporary holding pen for questions for the protected desks. tutterMouse (talk) 07:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This will not be resolved via unprotection requests. Lectonar (talk) 07:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skylight Films

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes and vandalism by IP Sock of User:TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of films produced and released by Star Cinema

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes and vandalism by IP Sock of User:TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Francois St. Laurent

Semi-protection: Vandalism from IP address users since Thursday night. If this is not an option right now, is there another option that works? I am not looking to block everyone from editing the page, but due to recent events and multiple reverts, I think it's safe to at least do something. Mandoli (talk) 23:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yovani Gallardo

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism Taffe316 (talk) 01:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HTTP cookie

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – or extend pending changes; none of this month's edits by IPs were good. George Ho (talk) 21:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016–17 UEFA Champions League

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This will only get worse, when editors want to add team that has not secured qualification. Qed237 (talk) 22:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Goldberg

Semi-protection: IP-hopping vandal/section-blanker. B. Mastino (talk) 21:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's all lies I just have a dynamic IP and I am not a vandal124.195.206.13 (talk) 21:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Five section blankings based on "invalid" sources, when I pointed you toward a doctrine stating that they are very much valid? Yup, vandal. Your insults aren't likely to go down well with admins either ([96], [97]). B. Mastino (talk) 21:40, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bankstown railway line

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced POV editing by IP users, dates back to December 2015. All IP edits since around then have been non-constrictive, or reverting this material. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 02:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of airports in India

Temporary semi-protection: - repeated addition of multiple Dhuri-related hoax entries by new likely sock accounts and IPs. Created hoax-articles have been removed, verified sock accounts blocked (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ravikiran singh). GermanJoe (talk) 08:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes--Ymblanter (talk) 09:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neerja Bhanot

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nairspecht (talk) 09:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Basque Country (autonomous community)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Same edit-war as Catalonia. Elizium23 (talk) 21:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I suggest to use "indefinite semi-protection" instead — Jɑuмe (dis-me) 20:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Q*bert

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IP hopper making nonconstructive edits. Crboyer (talk) 01:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by HJ Mitchell for 24 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 06:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Puerto Rico

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism-- About 20 times today. The last is the anon trying to avoid being caught by reverting itself, but continuing with the game. Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 03:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anons have continued to vanadalized this article twice since I have posted for protection here. --Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 04:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Golbez for 3 days. tutterMouse (talk) 07:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vikings (season 4)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – User AlexTheWhovian constantly reverts edits made by me on other users, refusing to acknowledge the Tv show Vikings as a source for the show itself. Please put a protection against those disruptive editings. Thanks. Rey Keshe (talk) 08:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Pending changes is for nonautoconfirmed editors. Katietalk 17:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Craig

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long string of edits made against consensus by different IPs (same editor), and other disruptive edits. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 10:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Afro-Arab

Semi-protection: High level of IP editors vandalism. --Djadjko (talk) 21:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BethNaught (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pop music

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP jumping vandalism. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked 209.9.128.40/29, please re-report if the vandal escapes this range. BethNaught (talk) 22:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vikings (season 4)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – User AlexTheWhovian constantly reverts edits made by me on other users, refusing to acknowledge the Tv show Vikings as a source for the show itself. Please put a protection against those disruptive editings. Thanks. Rey Keshe (talk) 08:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Pending changes is for nonautoconfirmed editors. Katietalk 17:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Craig

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long string of edits made against consensus by different IPs (same editor), and other disruptive edits. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 10:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Afro-Arab

Semi-protection: High level of IP editors vandalism. --Djadjko (talk) 21:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BethNaught (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pop music

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP jumping vandalism. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked 209.9.128.40/29, please re-report if the vandal escapes this range. BethNaught (talk) 22:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

22 February 2016

Lucy Stone

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chesnaught555

Semi-protection: My user page has been vandalised numerous times. Ches (talk) 19:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 20:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anderson, Rabin and Wakeman

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – There have been three page moves by Dyolf~enwiki, all of which have been reverted by Bondegezou. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected Katietalk 20:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John J. Pershing

Temp (long) semi - Reoccurence of persistent vandalism. BMK (talk) 20:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., must be reprotected if vandalism resumes after three days--Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Visa_requirements_for_Romanian_citizens

Semi-protection: This article is prone and has undergone many edit wars and disputes, some of which have caused by User:Laurentiu_Popa and others by User:Twofortnights. That is why I believe semi-protection is the better course of action to ameliorate such issues. (may even prevent further edit warring) Whatshouldichoose (talk) 14:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The only "wars and disputes" were created by User talk:Whatshouldichoose who keeps changing this page to a less informational one, despite the rest of the users who watch this page keep on reverting his changes.Laurentiu Popa (talk) 14:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the only one is YOU. YOU'RE the one who is so uptight about this. So am I, but none of the rest of the users watching the page are. User:Twofortnights agrees that the content should be fitting but that this format is better. Please stop acting like you serve every other user watching this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whatshouldichoose (talk • contribs) 15:20, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 15:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Milana Vayntrub

Indefinite semi-protection: A previous block and rangeblock have not stopped a persistent IPv6 vandal from continuing to edit-war on this page, as he/she has been doing over the course of several months. -Kudzu1 (talk) 18:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:49, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sheher Gondon

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – No evidence that this person exists, and each instance of the article has been a nonsensical mash-up of unrelated pieces of content. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 19:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carey Price

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We had protection before, and then it expired and IPs kept changing his birth place, if we could get protection back that would be great. Dbrodbeck (talk) 03:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:37, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dulo clan

Temporary semi-protection: Slow motion edit war by dynamic IPs over the past ten days, likely connected to a current SPI. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 16:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:51, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

K. C. Pant

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – After an attempt to discuss the issue on the user's talk page and an ANEW discussion that came to nothing, various IP editors have continued to make unhelpful edits to the article. . My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 16:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 17:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rapper Rony Musician

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please salt. General Ization Talk 17:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. General Ization, this title is obviously an attempt to get round the creation protection of Rapper Rony (Musician) from November. I expect other variants will turn up, please keep an eye out. Bishonen | talk 17:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy Frog

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still target of 1 chisper (talk · contribs) socks adding bogus cast. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done - pending changes protected by MelanieN. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, Coffee, you are fast! 0;-D My comment: At the time of the previous (declined) request, PC protection was still in place. Since then it has expired and vandalism has resumed. The PC protection seems to have worked pretty well during the three months it was in place, so I restored it for a year. MelanieN (talk) 16:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jan-Michael Vincent

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism since his mention in Rick and Morty. Joeykai (talk) 04:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas the Tank Engine film characters

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced material by dynamic IPs. . SummerPhDv2.0 15:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Selfie

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated varied-IP edits from long-term "selfie shoe" vandal User:Borcker, over the past few days. McGeddon (talk) 15:37, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taboo

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Shifting IP (likely User:Borcker) repeatedly adding "tattoos" and "heterosexuality" to the list of common taboos. McGeddon (talk) 15:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zootopia

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article had been semi-protected until April, but this somehow fell off during a page move a few hours ago (an IP has just vandalised it) - possibly an error in User:NinjaRobotPirate "moving protection settings" from an unprotected article to this one?. McGeddon (talk) 16:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, could have been. I corrected a disruptive page move by an autoconfirmed user, and the page seems to have subsequently lost its protection. I wouldn't be surprised if that were the intention. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:India

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 05:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined Lectonar (talk) 11:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of radio stations in Central Luzon

Temporary semi-protection: The article has been subject to vandalism by Bertrand101's IP socks within this month. Sixth of March 09:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Summer Olympics

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by multiple IPs to claim there are 207 National Olympic Committees in spite of multiple warnings and even an in-text hidden note explaining that there are, in fact, 206 NOCs and they should not change that.Smartyllama (talk) 13:51, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:00, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Wonnacott

Semi-protection: Continual and sustained attempts to add poorly sourced WP:OR uncovering birth year and other family details. This is either one editor with a roving IP or several. Sustained discussion and explanation has taken place on Talk page to explain why these BLP violations are out of order. Sionk (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is very low-level. Lectonar (talk) 10:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 15:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ark of the Covenant

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One user who has contributed repeatedly seems to think he is entitled to censor the article. Another user is reverting without an intelligent summary or reason. SammuleRobberts (talk) 02:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An IP and this editor have been edit warring the editor reverting without an intelligent summary or reason is probably me, evidently WP:RS is neither.If this is the IP he's past 3rr. Doug Weller talk 06:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Seems to have died down...relist if this picks up, although protection is not the the right venue. Do edit summaries have to be intelligent? Lectonar (talk) 12:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 15:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rameez Raja

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism has recommenced after short semi-protection. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MattyBRaps

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Article is again a vandalism magnet, we should try pending changes over complete IP block. As he's a young musician which seems to attract samge age vandals the duration should be for the whole year. Denniss (talk) 08:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bayombong

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  10:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., disruptive edits are infrequent--Ymblanter (talk) 12:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Bonadea

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could I have a brief semiprotection of my user talk page, please? An ip hopping block evader is disrupting it regularly, and although it's a moment's work to revert the vandalism every time it is getting tedious. bonadea contributions talk 11:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If you need more or less please ping me. Lectonar (talk) 11:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Servando Carrasco

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has been vandalized several times; "Married to Alex Morgan" has been added to the honors section and reverted twenty-four times since August 2015. Joeykai (talk) 02:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle Campbell

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 02:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Loriendrew please use more informative edit summaries when reverting as it helps the correct decision be made on requests like this. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kantar Media Philippines

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of content that is against the subject by some IP and newly-registered users. Sixth of March 02:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~~

Julie Higginson

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The IP keep adding unsourced BLP info where the date of birth is not sourced or possibly a hoax? Your thoughts. Britty192 (talk) 04:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:11, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DWRX

Semi-protection: Still the same reason why it should be protected: Bertrand101. Please make it longer than three months. Sixth of March 05:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bilal Saeed

Unprotection: Merge Bilal Saeed (singer) this article. Musa Talk  03:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've moved the page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Woody Paige

Unprotection: I think the sockpuppets not going to vandalise or eased down to negative levels the article again because its is the right time to unprotected the article. It clear. Britty192 (talk) 05:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it, see the logs. This article has been under constant attack for years, no reason to think it's just going to stop after a few months of protection and the vandalism eased down to nothing because of the protection. tutterMouse (talk) 06:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's alright because i might give anyone to edit Woody Paige article again to not for IP Addresses or New Users. Full protection is being isolated from any English Wikipedia article and only full protected article on the English Wikipedia. Not fair it has been vandlaised even if admin has stored semi protection so many times but nothing has changed. Britty192 (talk) 07:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Full protection is needed because that specific vandal used autoconfirmed accounts to get around the semi-protection. Drop it down to semi-protection and you'd just see the same thing again. tutterMouse (talk) 08:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 08:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noel Ignatiev

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – A POV-pushing editor has repeatedly inserted the same crap, twice sourced to an unreliable blog and once unsourced, to this BLP. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The user has been warned sufficiently that they should be blocked if they do it again. MelanieN (talk) 01:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Rocky Rajesh

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Requesting brief (31 hours or so) protection on article to foster discussion. IP hopping editor at 112.134.* keeps adding unsourced content without participating in open discussion. Content is further problematic because it's unclear what "Extra Fighter" means. Sounds non-noteworthy, but without discussion, who knows?. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 22:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mr Bot, I realise Cyphoidbomb headlined his request Talk:Rocky Rajesh, but he actually asked for protection of the article. To foster discussion, what's more. How's the IP gonna discuss if I protect the talkpage? Bishonen | talk 23:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Oh crap. I must've launched the Twinkle request from the talk page instead of from the article. I messed up. Bishonen, I'll withdraw this and resubmit my request for the main article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I won't re-request, since Bish was kind enough to protect. My brain not working. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:A guy saved by Jesus

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I see no reason to continue allowing anonymous and new users to edit my page. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 02:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Olson (photographer)

Temporary full protection: Repeated vandalism by two IPs and one user; Requesting brief protection (e.g. 48 hours) because vandals come from this thread about J. Olson on reddit; it should calm down tomorrow or the day after. Okhjon (talk) 23:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Rogers (Days of Our Lives)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of same pattern of behavior that lead to the page's previous protections. livelikemusic talk! 01:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jackie Chan

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – So many reverts this month. George Ho (talk) 01:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copa América Centenario

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:148E:C83F:DA5B:B0BD (talk) 01:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kesha

Semi-protection: Numerous IPs (and some registered users) repeatedly vandalizing page. Almost all of these edits have been described by the vandals as "fixed typo" or "typo" in their edit summaries - so this is possibly a coordinated activism campaign of some kind, though I'm no detective. The topic of the page is someone involved in an extremely heated controversy that may be protracted for several months, so long-term protection may be required. BaseballPie (talk) 01:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DestinationAlan (talk) 14:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Ministro Pistarini International Airport

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent modification of links, likely related to block evasion [98]. Jetstreamer Talk 17:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Saints of Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica

Semi-protection: Edit-warring IPs. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Very slow edit-warring...Lectonar (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuel Emenike

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Corso

Long-term semi-protection: A long-term vandal consistently using new sockpuppets frequently targets this article for vandalism. It just became unprotected after six months and was immediately vandalized on the first day of non-protection. ElKevbo (talk) 17:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 22:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kamma (caste)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Caste pages are always magnets for POV-pushing, but this article is particularly tiresome because there are prominent caste historians that have published dubious information. I am requesting indefinite semi-protection due to persistent POV editing (deletion of sourced content, addition of unsourced/poorly-sourced content). Kautilya3 (talk) 18:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 22:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:StanProg

Semi-protection: IP comment blanking has resumed after the previous protection expired.Cordless Larry (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of another month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Stanprog..if you want it unprotected, just ping me please. Lectonar (talk) 22:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

23 February 2016

2016 in American television

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing - replacing "person of color" with "black woman", courtesy of a problematic IP-hopping editor - resumed almost immediately after protection expired. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 14:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Wikipedia is not censored. Niggaz With Attitude didn't have a problem with "blacks" (well, maybe they did with specific ones, but still...), why would anyone else? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per Mertesacker

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Xiongnu

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent fringe promotion and edit warring through socking for many years. The article was recently semi-protected for a month but the behaviour resumed immediately after the semi-protection expired. Krakkos (talk) 17:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Lectonar (talk) 19:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conor McGregor

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP and new users, possible the same user/socks?. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rafael dos Anjos

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High degree of recent vandalism from new and IP editors. Drm310 (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Republican Party presidential candidates, 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – John Cena trolls are back. IP and new account adding him to this page. Majora (talk) 04:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Fast and the Furious

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – has been protected recently, but the vandalism has continued. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 11:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:07, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tokyo

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. XFusionSGX (talk) 13:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP users. Vipinhari || talk 17:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Page - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%EF%BB%BF&redirect=no Vipinhari || talk 17:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Los Lonely Boys (album)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Parade of multiple IP editors coming in to remove a link to a music label in contravention of WP:REDLINK. Editors come in, remove the linking around the not yet created article page. CC Ghmyrtle as the admin who has reverted and blocked several of the IPs. Hasteur (talk) 17:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin, thankfully. All the redlink removals have been done by a single IP editor, who has been blocked multiple times in recent weeks for removing redlinks on numerous articles, and who keeps re-emerging under new identities. I'm making at least daily reports to WP:AI/V, but so far the problem has not yet been finally resolved. Protecting this page is a good idea, nevertheless. Ghmyrtle (talk) 18:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:04, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Cook

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been deleted 6 times. Boleyn (talk) 18:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 19:04, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Introduction to editing with VisualEditor/1

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Prominent help page, getting overwritten by test edits and so on. John of Reading (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently a target of the Ref Desk Troll, has created multiple accounts to vandalize page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:59, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jayron32. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Entertainment

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ref Desk Troll is starting to move to this page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:38, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jayron32. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 Ligue 1

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The problems are created by one user, who did not edit after the last warning. Let us wait.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MGM Springfield

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous erroneous edits per last few hours of edits. FFM784 (talk) 02:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Water cycle

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 04:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Jung

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing attacks by IPs and new accounts portraying her as "married" to same-sex K-pop artists. . Dr. K. 05:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rothesay Netherwood School

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been removing information without explanation. T.C.Haliburtontalk nerdy to me 05:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bayley (wrestler)

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Sherick (talk) 03:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin Cheng

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – continuation of edit war. Mdann52 (talk) 07:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Romano

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 07:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plasticine

Full-protection: Continuing edit-warring and vandalism. 82.132.233.167 (talk) 20:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 04:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Love

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 00:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shane McMahon

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Nikhilmn2002 (talk) 02:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Otaku

Semi-protection: Long term vandalism, this page may need a months plus worth of protection. History is here: [99]. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: @Knowledgekid87: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie Martinez (singer)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Death vandal. Karst (talk) 08:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kebab

Semi-protection. Macedonian, a Greek (talk) 18:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Man-Thing (film)

Temporary semi-protection: For two days, anon IPs have been making non-constructive edits, including removal of citation requests, adding duplicate information, and horrendous grammar and prose, and they appear very insistent. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:55, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

White Dominican (Dominican Republic)

Temporary semi-protection: For two days, anon IPs have been adding non-constructive edits, and persistent and unjustified removal of tags. Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 23:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudip Bose

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Article itself semiprotected for sockpuppeting, and socks have started to drift over here as well. . Coretheapple (talk) 17:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I do not see a need for it, and a closing administrator should be qualified enough to discount votes of socks.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undertale

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article needs a edit protect update. Constant reverts, thanks to anon IPs. Pending changes does not work. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 18:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Leaving PC protection in place until May. MelanieN (talk) 04:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sigurdur Thordarson

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.shield34 (talk)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vans

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:11, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:49, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Floquenbeam. Katietalk 22:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Techno-thrillers

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There's an IP-hopping anon editor, that keeps going against consensus. Repeated warnings accross these addresses have not worked. A temporary edit protection might make clear this is not how we do things on Wikipedia. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 18:19, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trollied

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Davethorp (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Visa requirements for Romanian citizens

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Major edit warring. See WP:ANI#Things out of control. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The amount of edit warring is ridiculous from all involved parties, but I must note that Whatshouldichoose (who I believe started the bold, massive WP:REMOVAL that led to the edit war) seems be be basically an WP:SPA for this article. LjL (talk) 21:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

24 February 2016

Bruce Rauner

Semi-protection: There are so many IPs and new users vandalizing his page, and I do not think it will ever stop. CLCStudent (talk) 18:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

R v Elliott

Renew pending changes: Although editing is infrequent, the IP edits have been reverted. Current administrator very active, so I could give him a message, but I read the edit notice banner. He seems very busy nowadays, and he says that he has health issues. --George Ho (talk) 19:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: @George Ho: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. George Ho (talk) 19:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC protection had actually not expired yet, but it seems to be necessary and working well, so I extended it for another month. MelanieN (talk) 21:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aluminium

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing recently. Hdjensofjfnen (u | t | c) 21:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 21:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dance Moms

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dance Moms is the subject of periodic vandalism by a unresponsive, persistent IP hopping vandal who removes links, rearranges content, deliberately misspells words after they've been corrected, etc. He or she seems to have something against Maddie Ziegler as that is the link he primarily keeps removing. The same editor is making similar edits at Dance Moms (season 1), Dance Moms (season 2), Dance Moms (season 3), Dance Moms (season 4), Dance Moms (season 5) and Dance Moms (season 6), so these all need protecting. All of these pages were last protected for two weeks at the end of January after a similar request that I made here,[100] but the vandal has returned anyway. AussieLegend (✉) 05:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2601:248:4200:708A::/64 blocked one month for vandalism. If he returns under new IPs, let me know. Katietalk 15:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Pakistan Super League

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – user violating Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Pakistan Super League and continuously adding false information. full protecting the article for 2 or 3 months will reduce the vandalism. . -Anjana LarkaSEND WIKILOVE💗 10:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Anjana Larka: If the user attempts to evade the block, or any other editor starts to edit the page without consensus, please contact me at my talk page so that I can protect the page at that point. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LaTour

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Lapadite (talk) 14:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The disruptive editor is autoconfirmed, so semi-protection won't help. Report them to WP:AIV after an appropriate warning if he continues to blank content. Katietalk 15:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dance Moms

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dance Moms is the subject of periodic vandalism by a unresponsive, persistent IP hopping vandal who removes links, rearranges content, deliberately misspells words after they've been corrected, etc. He or she seems to have something against Maddie Ziegler as that is the link he primarily keeps removing. The same editor is making similar edits at Dance Moms (season 1), Dance Moms (season 2), Dance Moms (season 3), Dance Moms (season 4), Dance Moms (season 5) and Dance Moms (season 6), so these all need protecting. All of these pages were last protected for two weeks at the end of January after a similar request that I made here,[101] but the vandal has returned anyway. AussieLegend (✉) 05:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2601:248:4200:708A::/64 blocked one month for vandalism. If he returns under new IPs, let me know. Katietalk 15:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Pakistan Super League

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – user violating Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Pakistan Super League and continuously adding false information. full protecting the article for 2 or 3 months will reduce the vandalism. . -Anjana LarkaSEND WIKILOVE💗 10:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Anjana Larka: If the user attempts to evade the block, or any other editor starts to edit the page without consensus, please contact me at my talk page so that I can protect the page at that point. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LaTour

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Lapadite (talk) 14:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The disruptive editor is autoconfirmed, so semi-protection won't help. Report them to WP:AIV after an appropriate warning if he continues to blank content. Katietalk 15:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RuPaul's Drag Race

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of disruptive editing that provided the page's previous protections. livelikemusic talk! 01:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined That was just one IP; please warn them if it picks up, and report to AIV. Lectonar (talk) 14:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skimboarding

Semi-protection: Persistent long-term vandalism by numerous IP's. Rightdown (talk) 03:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Macklemore

Semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Rightdown (talk) 05:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yoga pants

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Known sockleader targeting this article from multiple IPs. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For those unaware, this is Fangusu. Katietalk 16:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Camisole

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – One of a known sockleader's favourite targets to edit from multiple IPs. Has been going on for quite a long time. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked most recent Fangusu IP. Katietalk 16:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tankosić

Temporary protection: Persistent sockpuppetry Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 16:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@KrakatoaKatie: Just saying, the history of the article is really just reverts. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Low frequency of edits makes this a perfect candidate for PC. Yaris678 (talk) 17:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lennart Poettering

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP-hopping defacer. LjL (talk) 17:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protection was applied by Smalljim, not me. Yaris678 (talk) 17:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Trolling. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've kept it short, as it counters the openness that characterizes the help-desks....but I think this is a problem that won't go away. Lectonar (talk) 17:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tori Kelly

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism where people keep putting different stuff for Best New Artist. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 04:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My Favorite Martian (film)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. This page has a long history of persistent vandalism to the film's plot from IPs. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 06:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rapid transit in India

Indefinite semi-protection: - repeated ongoing addition of hoax articles by socking user (4th or 5th incarnation by now). See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ravikiran singh. GermanJoe (talk) 12:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 15:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sundar Pichai

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 12:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wild 'n Out

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IPv6 2602:306:CF98:5EC0::/64 immediately resumed re-adding unreferenced, likely fake info to article after last 7-day protect expired. Attempts at communication ignored. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charlene McMann

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistently someone with a US-based ISP address is continuously removing the section about the subject's conviction, which are sourced and reported in the media. The PP expired within the last 24 hours, and the same person is back at removing the information. Cahk (talk) 14:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015 San Bernardino attack

Indefinite semi-protection: This is currently a hot topic within the USA, and is subject to a large amount of media attention. This should be semi-protected to prevent anonymous vandalism. . TJH2018 (talk) 22:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, so far we did not have a single instance of recent vandalism at that page. I would be happy to protect the page if vandalism starts.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neerja

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nairspecht (talk) 05:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Masada

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, block-evading vandal plaquing this article for weeks. Please protect article for at least 30 days to discourage the misbehavior and give the cleanup squad some rest. . Hertz1888 (talk) 14:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As the dispruptive editing is rather infrequent. Lectonar (talk) 15:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh and Asian Ethnicities/Religions

Temporary semi-protection: Continued IP vandalism. Pursuant to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ifaz Ali Khan/Archive, Religion in Bangladesh was semi-protected until 7 February, and 103.230.104.0/22 was anon-only blocked until 11 February. Beginning 12 February, vandalism resumed from 23 IPs in the range 103.230.104.1 - 103.230.107.16, to the above articles (listed in order of most in need of protection to least in need of protection, if there is reluctance to protect them all). As with the earlier sockpuppets, the edits insert unsourced dubious information about other Asian ethnicities or religions into articles about Bangladesh and vice versa. Alternative ideas about how to deal with this are welcome. Worldbruce (talk) 07:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Could someone who knows how to rangeblock look at this please? The edit frequency is quite low, so I would'nt protect if I dont have to. Lectonar (talk) 19:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I have range blocked 103.230.104.0 to 103.230.111.255. I think that is the correct range. I have never range blocked before, but the instructions were pretty clear, so I think I've done it right. Let me know if there are any problems. Yaris678 (talk) 13:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The X Factor (UK TV series)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of the same type of disruptive editing from IP's and anonymous editors by way of adding in original research, which is what provided the page's previous protections. livelikemusic talk! 01:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Randy California

Temporary semi-protection: IP edit war continuing over 12 days. Accurizer (talk) 12:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Next time, do not wait for 12 days.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indo-Pakistani War of 1971

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war ongoing. Please protect for at LEAST 10 days so that a compromise can be reached. . FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 10:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I don't see that much activity on the page..the edit-warring is very slow. If all parties continue to refrain from reverting back and forth, i just do not see the need for full protection right now. Other opinions welcome. Lectonar (talk) 11:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar:, the edit-warring intensified yesterday, so that I think we cn fully protect the article for three days. It will not solve the main problem though.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indeed it won't. Partaking parties are invited to use the talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 09:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy Horse

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Drive by IPs do little except vandalize. Montanabw(talk) 07:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Souad Faress

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Keri (talk) 11:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Add: The vio being inserted is of such a serious nature that it requires oversighting (see page history for examples); simply reverting is not a feasible solution. Keri (talk) 12:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WSRM

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qpalzmmzlapq | talk | contribs 01:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 08:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Ezrin

Semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism Winterysteppe (talk) 05:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These edits are being made at about 10 per minute right now. Meters (talk) 05:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters: The page seems to be protected now. Rightdown (talk) 05:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, thanks. Meters (talk) 05:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. tutterMouse (talk) 08:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WSRM

Semi-protection: Absolutely massive IP vandalism spree. The page is such a mess that even ClueBot is reverting to a vandalized version of the page. HalfShadow 06:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 08:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eilabun massacre

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing and edit warring from IPs and anonymous users against WP:ARBPIA3. 86.153.74.179 (talk) 21:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In spite of this; [102][103][104][105]. 86.153.74.179 (talk) 21:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The users involved in the disruption have all been blocked. Therefore, there is no need to protect the page at this time. We do appreciate your notifications though, and I will definitely act immediately on any further editors that disrupt these articles. If you have any further concerns feel free to contact me at my talk page. Thank you, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jalapeño

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This page seems to undergo a lot of vandalism and/or useless edits. Hdjensofjfnen (talk|contribs) 00:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - around one incident every couple weeks or so - just revert it. AlexiusHoratius 01:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cory Bernardi

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on a BLP. StAnselm (talk) 01:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Temple Mount

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing and edit warring from IPs and anonymous users against WP:ARBPIA3. 86.153.74.179 (talk) 21:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Concordia Lutheran High School (Texas)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 02:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ben (film)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Likely one editor abusing multiple accounts. (Although none of the vandal accounts are currently blocked). Rightdown (talk) 02:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mathieu Flamini

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – His team lost a high level game today and he conceded a penalty so some angry "fans". Qed237 (talk) 22:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bolton Wanderers F.C.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of anon vandalism due to club being in financial difficulty . JMHamo (talk) 23:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy McConnell

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – None of IP edits were good. Alternatively, renew pending changes. George Ho (talk) 23:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dexter Fowler

Semi-protection: Unconfirmed reports that he has signed a contract with the Baltimore Orioles - awaiting official team confirmation. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 23:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Western Wall

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing by IPs not allowed to edit here under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. RolandR (talk) 00:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. by another admin for one month. AlexiusHoratius 01:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Black September Organization

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing and edit warring from IPs and anonymous users against WP:ARBPIA3. 86.153.74.179 (talk) 00:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. AlexiusHoratius 01:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

James Logan High School

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being repeatedly vandalised. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 18:13, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assassination of Abraham Lincoln

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 19:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ, please acquaint yourself with our protection policy. Lectonar (talk) 19:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I will even though I have many times already, thank you for your service @Lectonar:

Anonymous (group)

Review of protection: I was asked by ChristophThomas to lift the indefinite semiprotection placed on this article in 2009. I am not active enough to make a decision either way, and so I leave the request here for other views. For my part, I think it unwise to remove it in light of the protection history in 2008 leading up to the indef and the talk page now. ÷seresin 21:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected I think based on the edit requests and other nonsense on the talk page and its archives, that unprotection would be an extraordinarily bad idea. Katietalk 22:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
the only thing that is nonsense is to leave an article for over 6 years straight semi-protected. None of the talk page entries qualifies as vandalism attempts --ChristopheT (talk) 01:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still standing by this protection and I don't think anything has materially changed since I originally protected the article. While I agree this article might not be a vandalism magnet for eternity, it absolutely will remain one while 4chan and Anonymous are internet phenomenons. Indefinite protections are the status quo on 4chan related articles, for example: 4chan and Christopher Poole . While I agree indefinite protections are not a best practice, I believe these are common sense. If you want to argue that all article in this "category" should be unprotected, I invite you to take this to a broader audience. Brandon (talk) 02:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
no disrespect but I expect admins to administrate - which in this case means apply the rules we have in place. Now rules says we remove protection from time to time - 6 years is not a bad time to do just that (unless of course you think it is too much work to un protect the page and protect it later if the page is the target of vandalism) --ChristopheT (talk) 02:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Brandon...what do you thing about pending changes protection for some time to see how much vandalism comes in at all. Lectonar (talk) 07:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@ChristophThomas: The decision not to take action can be an administrative action (a rabbit hole some of us have recently explored with bitter tears and great anguish). We've been trusted to use our judgment. There are some pages that are indefinitely protected to prevent long-term disruption, and I agree with Brandon that this article is one of those. If someone disagrees, they're welcome to unprotect it. I wouldn't suggest pending changes only because I think the edit rate will be too high once the vandalism gets going, and it will be too much for the reviewers. Katietalk 15:04, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The edit rate was another thing I wanted to see, actually. Lectonar (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
why speculating when a few mouse clicks will simply tell us if it is true or not ? seriously - how much time does it take to un-protect a page and protect it if "edit rate will be too high once the vandalism gets going". 3.5 min times 2 ? so - that is a little over a minute per year for this particular article - which seems to be a rather fair effort to provide to find out if the protection level the last few years was actually justified --ChristopheT (talk) 15:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because you don't need to drop a hammer on your foot to know it'll hurt. tutterMouse (talk) 18:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Definitely backing Katie and Brandon up here... this is a page that needs permenant semi-protection. There is no net positive to unprotecting the article (much akin to 4chan), and there is no net positive to continuing this conversation here. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CNN Philippines

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  09:58, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bachelor (season 20)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous edit war done by IP user after expiry of the IP block. ApprenticeFan work 13:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 19:07, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pathogen

Semi-protection: Frequent and persistent vandalism.MartinezMD (talk) 16:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Far from every ip-edit is vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 19:08, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Refugee

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is facing persistent vandalism from IP users. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 17:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Every vandalism, and there are sometimes days between the surges, was by a single, albeit different user. These can be warned off and blocked instead of protecting the page. Lectonar (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Bomer

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High degree of recent vandalism from new and IP editors. 2607:FB90:A43A:7565:0:2D:EBB8:9A01 (talk) 19:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oaths of Strasbourg

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors vandalizing this article. ~ RobTalk 20:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 20:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

25 February 2016

Robert F. Kennedy

Semi-protection: Ongoing disruptive edits. Previous semi-protection was for 3 months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Last protection was in 2014. The IP-user is just one edit away from a block. Lectonar (talk) 17:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The IP was already blocked by the time you left that comment. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Green Party of England and Wales

Semi-protection: Vandalism, including editing to say the party is "Right wing populist." This party is left-wing. Dragonrider17 (talk) 17:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially one IP playing around, I'd say two people on one computer, reverting each other. Lectonar (talk) 17:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alan F. Daniels

Renew pending changes: Just one edit reverted this month. Other than that, no other edits since semi-protection expired. --George Ho (talk) 19:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism edits have been very rare; however, since those edits are BLP violations, I am extending the PC protection for another 3 months. MelanieN (talk) 21:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zuzka Light

Semi-protection: There have been persistent edits trying to focus on exploitative information, not a neutral point of view, and diminishing the significant contributions to her current industry. Looking for protection so that only page admins can make edits as to protect the biographies of living persons who have had a recent high level of media interest. 108.210.71.93 (talk) 16:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There isn't such a permission as "page admin". I don't think protection is necessary, as it seems to be only one IP editor trying to write a new version of the biography. Discussion will be more useful. Deryck C. 16:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Agree...if necessary, consider dispute-resolution. Lectonar (talk) 16:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Matthew

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term disruptive editing by a user that seems to not want to discuss the content issue at hand. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 16:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: This is a content dispute. As such, I'll consider short-term full protection to persuade a discussion, but won't apply semi. Deryck C. 16:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, sure thanks. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 16:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ah not an issue anymore -- User(s) blocked. by MusikAnimal. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 16:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boy Better Know

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 20:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TotalBiscuit

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing vandalism. ukexpat (talk) 20:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生. (semi) — MusikAnimal talk 22:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... as bot will complain — MusikAnimal talk 22:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jaap Stam

Semi-protection: Persistant sockpuppetry. CLCStudent (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 month. EdJohnston (talk) 19:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fangusu

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Besides the fact that the sockmaster has been constantly responding on this page throughout its history by using IPs, no report or statement on this page has been made by an IP that Fangusu did not use themselves. This editor has a socking history with IPs that goes back almost 8 years, and the current period of consecutive time doing so is now 6 months. Also, see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Fangusu - indefinite talk protection request for more related info. Steel1943 (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 19:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 UEFA Europa League knockout phase

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John A. Macdonald

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has been ongoing since approximately 2 hours since the last semiprotection expired, right up to today, but there's been a serious increase in the last week or so. The last time an IP made an edit to this article that was not clearly vandalism was Feb. 5, before that Jan. 2, and then I got back as far as last August before I gave up looking for another one. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 20:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pet

Semi-protection: High level of IP hopping and vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jayron32.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor: Kaôh Rōng

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Katanin (talk) 18:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian Wrestling Championships

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked user and sock continue to vandalize page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Tae-yeon

semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. *1226 06:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For the first two. Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. for the last one. Lectonar (talk) 14:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lyndon LaRouche

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 17:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has been going on for a forthnight now. Lectonar (talk) 17:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Château de Meudon

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is a target of the "Blue Undigo" vandal. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Although the newest incarnation has been blocked. Lectonar (talk) 18:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bilton School

Temporary Semi-protection (until at least mid-March, please). Introduction of personal opinion and unsourced/poorly sourced negative content. When the school's OFSTED report is published in March it will be a reliable source, but we don't have one yet. Laura Jamieson (talk) 12:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sunderland A.F.C.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by multiple IPs. Although it's (just about) manageable at the moment, it's likely to continue while Adam Johnson's trial for child sex offences is front page news. Requesting page protection before it gets worse. Marianna251TALK 12:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA coefficient

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of a lot of vandalism as it is a nation and club ranking. IP's and new accounts wants to put their nation and club first in the lists and make unsourced changes. Given the history I think indef semi is the best, because on matchdays it is too much activity for pending changes. Qed237 (talk) 15:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Semi-protected until 1 September 2016, a bit after the end of this year's Euro cup. I hesitate to apply indefinite just yet. Deryck C. 16:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds Live Feels Live World Tour

Temporary protection, again: Persistent vandalism, introduction of unsourced content. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. A large number of IPs have vandalized the page recently, including one persistent vandal who keeps trying to pretend the series aired on British preschool channel CBeebies. Many other IPs tend to add false info to the already extremely-lengthy plot section, and since the page is somewhat of a mess anyway, I feel semi-protection would be best on the page. 108.20.47.212 (talk) 22:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zimbabwe

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, by which is mainly long-term vandalism. AeroAuxiliary (talk) 04:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arda Turan

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 06:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dave King (businessman)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. GABHello! 21:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 06:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iceman (comics)

Semi-protection: Persistent removal of the "Sexuality" section in the article by anonymous users without explanation. Havok (T/c/e) 21:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 06:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On My Mind (Ellie Goulding song)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Widr (talk) 22:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 06:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Desert Oasis High School

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 00:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 06:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bulldog

Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring and IP vandalism. 172.56.39.187 (talk) 01:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 06:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wake Me Up When September Ends

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same family of IPv6 users (2600:1006:b1xx:*) at it again in this article, like before the article was last semi-protected, persistently introducing false info. IP users in the recent history have same prefix, but quite likely the same person. MPFitz1968 (talk) 01:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 06:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asim Azhar

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted 3x in 13 months. Boleyn (talk) 06:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. AlexiusHoratius 06:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nate Diaz

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent run of IP vandalism. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The protection log says it is protected until Feb. 27. Thanks anyhow, bot. --MelanieN (talk) 22:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Onuachu

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Scored a goal against Manchester United and therefore has attracted much vandalism. Requesting protection for 2 weeks. Shreerajtheauthor (talk) 18:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miracle on Ice

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by an IP address and a new user. CLCStudent (talk) 18:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just two users....semiprotection would be overkill Lectonar (talk) 20:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pancreas

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Recently undergone quite a bit of disruptive editing. Hdjensofjfnen (u | t | c) 21:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nostalgia Critic

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.--EclecticEnnui (talk) 22:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. BethNaught (talk) 22:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bow Group

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Three socks within the last week. GABHello! 20:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sapphire Braces

Create protection: Advertisement recreated three times in two weeks. —swpbT 20:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. MelanieN (talk) 22:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Libby Schaaf

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Apparent sock-puppet has resumed inserting copyvio material. Nat Gertler (talk) 20:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Farrah Abraham

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over the course of several months.Legitimus (talk) 19:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Calera, Alabama

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 19:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity Baptist Church sex scandal

Temporary semi-protection: An IP editor apparently from the congregation has been vandalizing the article. Maybe give it a month? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

26 February 2016

List of current Star Magic artists

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes by IP Sock of User:TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User was blocked by JamesBWatson Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regal Entertainment

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes by IP Sock of User:TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User was blocked by JamesBWatson Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

President of Uganda

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Link is currently featured on "in the news". Semi-protection until it is no longer a current event requested. 8.14.172.48 (talk) 13:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IPs are also making good faith edits such as this, which semi-protection would prevent. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aljo Bendijo

Semi-protection: BLP policy violates and persistent vandalism since I noticed earlier especially poor references which is unaccepted. RenRen070193 13:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Q*Bert

Temporary semi-protection:Edit warring on main page; more nonsensical posts on the talk page.Crboyer (talk) 17:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by John Reaves for 1 week. tutterMouse (talk) 19:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of current Star Magic artists

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes by IP Sock of User:TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User was blocked by JamesBWatson Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regal Entertainment

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes by IP Sock of User:TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User was blocked by JamesBWatson Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

President of Uganda

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Link is currently featured on "in the news". Semi-protection until it is no longer a current event requested. 8.14.172.48 (talk) 13:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IPs are also making good faith edits such as this, which semi-protection would prevent. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aljo Bendijo

Semi-protection: BLP policy violates and persistent vandalism since I noticed earlier especially poor references which is unaccepted. RenRen070193 13:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Q*Bert

Temporary semi-protection:Edit warring on main page; more nonsensical posts on the talk page.Crboyer (talk) 17:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by John Reaves for 1 week. tutterMouse (talk) 19:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

88th Academy Awards

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cahk (talk) 10:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Laxman Gole

Semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Liv & Maddie

Indefinite semi-protection: This is intended to be a redirect to the Disney Channel TV series Liv and Maddie, and should be no reason for users to make this other than a redirect. MPFitz1968 (talk) 15:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Coffee. tutterMouse (talk) 16:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Get Weird

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of original research which cannot be confirmed by reliable sources. livelikemusic talk! 15:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Evad37/ToDoLister/additem

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – WP:UPPROT request: page is substituted by my user script User:Evad37/ToDoLister. Evad37 [talk] 15:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Louis C.K.

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism (02/26/16) – Continued addition of original research which cannot be confirmed by reliable sources. Ibarabi (talk) 15:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: @Ibarabi: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Wilson (police officer)

Pending changes: BLP policy violations – BLP/vandalism issues going back a while, occurring intermittently but not, I think, often enough to justify semi. Everymorning (talk) 23:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is few and far between...not even on a level for pending changes. I have watchlisted instead. Lectonar (talk) 10:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Code Pink

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 02:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 10:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Genius (website)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short term protection is required due to high influx of new accounts intent on vandalizing this article . McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 10:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Masser

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent long term vandalism of this article, apparently by someone personally connected with the subject's family. Chrisw80 (talk) 09:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:48, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Memphis Depay

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mercedes-Benz W116

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anons (e.g., 60.50.28.231) have been changing this page. Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 11:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tripoli under Italian rule

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A swarm of IPs and new users vandalising the page today. A couple of days should be enough. Sjö (talk) 11:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gilgit-Baltistan

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I would like to request pending changes protection for this page, just as we did for the Azad Kashmir page. The same issues arising here, IP's changing Pakistan to India etc. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Let us try for 1 year first, can always be extended if needed.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My House

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user continuously removes the name of JayFrance from the credits. See the history page of My House (Flo Rida song). Eurofan88 (talk) 21:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Song article has been Semi-protected by EdJohnston for three months, the EP article remains unprotected. tutterMouse (talk) 06:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Ymblanter (talk) 08:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Shōnen Jump

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  05:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely by Courcelles. tutterMouse (talk) 08:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peppa Pig

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. AeroAuxiliary (talk) 00:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Drmies (talk) 03:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Baroque music

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. AeroAuxiliary (talk) 00:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Drmies (talk) 03:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Welbeck

Semi-protection: Continued disruptive editing after recent release from protection period. AeroAuxiliary (talk) 00:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Drmies (talk) 03:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Unicode

Template protection: Highly visible template – Pinging Ruud Koot (last protecting admin); this template with 60,000 or so transclusions probably doesn't need full protection, no particularly sensitive transclusions are known either. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Done, although I have my doubts this template should even still exist (see its talk page). —Ruud 22:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done for the bot. tutterMouse (talk) 06:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Azerbaijani language

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/disruption and IP hopping. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Drmies for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 06:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Know Your Enemy (Green Day song)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and/or possible socking. AeroAuxiliary (talk) 01:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Drmies (talk) 03:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Azerbaijanis

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/disruption and IP hopping. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Drmies for two weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Cryan

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. We've tried temporary before. This looks long-term. Edwardx (talk) 22:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. by Drmies. tutterMouse (talk) 06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Saints of Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A wave of IP editors (2001:468:d01:92:1409:fd8e:7bda:44e2; 70.56.255.40; 2001:468:d01:92:944f:5b59:136a:9bed; 128.223.147.27) has kept emerging and vandalizing the article. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 01:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Drmies for 1 week. tutterMouse (talk) 06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sanam Teri Kasam (2016 film)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started as the protection ended. Musa Talk  01:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Drmies for one week. tutterMouse (talk) 06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Healy

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, most of which is long-term. AeroAuxiliary (talk) 01:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Drmies for 6 months. tutterMouse (talk) 06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Hall, Baron Hall of Birkenhead

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip vandalism today. They seem to hop to another once the IP is warned a couple of times, to avoid AIV action. . CrowCaw 01:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Drmies: Sorry to ping you Doc, but I see you're active and so is the BLP vandal... CrowCaw 03:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Drmies for 6 months. tutterMouse (talk) 06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pet

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Most recent from two accounts (both reported to WP:AIV). Note that the vandalism occurred immediately after the protection period. AeroAuxiliary (talk) 04:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Materialscientist for 3 months. tutterMouse (talk) 06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thunder (Leona Lewis song)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Same person using different IP's adding the same unsourced content I keep removing.  — Calvin999 21:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 22:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I Am (Leona Lewis song)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Same person using different IP's adding the same unsourced content I keep removing.  — Calvin999 21:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 22:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – To preemptively prevent sock puppets of Soft skin from continuing their racist trolling. . GABHello! 23:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Seconded - It's not been this bad for some time. Can we lock RD/S for a few hours? Tevildo (talk) 23:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Done Protected by Bish. GABHello! 01:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Guru Har Rai

Renew pending changes: Despite low editing, bad edits have been reverted lately. George Ho (talk) 19:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. PC protection will expire on Feb. 27. Problematic edits have been infrequent enough lately that normal page watching should be adequate to deal with it. Ask again if the situation changes. MelanieN (talk) 21:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Christina Hoff Sommers

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs reverting good faith edits. Binksternet (talk) 19:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Last protection was for one year. Since it's a BLP I think indefinite protection is warranted. Katietalk 20:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The page should not have been protected, in my opinion. The behavior of the IPs has been neither better nor worse than that of editors using accounts. Binksternet apparently has an editing dispute with the IPs, and gains an unfair advantage through article semi-protection. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 20:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
FKC is correct. This has to do with 128.175.185.8 undoing an edit from FyddleStix. After MarkBernstein added it back, DHeyward (not an IP) removed it again. Binksternet restored it a second time and then 128.4.140.76 removed it. This attempt to block IPs within minutes of this seems like B avoiding discussing the issue with DH and blaming it on IPs alone when it is not an IP-only issue. The two 128s might be the same editor, maybe their ISP rotated them in that 10 hour interim between edits or something. 184.145.18.50 (talk) 20:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have to share the above opinion. There has been a dispute over content, but the contribution of IPs was no more disruptive than that of other editors, and they weren't involved in BLP violations. - Bilby (talk) 21:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Quite. And Binksternet's rationale for semi-protection is flawed, in any case: that an edit is made in good faith does not mean it must not or should not be reverted. Good faith edits can legitimately be reverted in many cases. If anything, full protection of the article - to stop both IPs and most users using user accounts from editing - would have been more appropriate, since it looks as though an extended conflict is developing at the Sommers page. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 21:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirming other IP is me. Using two devices.128.175.185.8 (talk) 22:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...having read the (rather extensive) talk-page of the article, this is definitely a content dispute, with the Ip's behaviour not better or worse than that of the established editors. @Katie...would you reconsider? Lectonar (talk) 22:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, reviewed it all, and now it's Fully protected for three days. Katietalk 22:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ismail I

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruption, as well as IP hopping and sock puppetry. Very sticky and annoying, and its a major problem on these Safavid-related articles. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gargamel

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article redirected day of protection expiration, requesting longer PP. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 20:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maine State Route 24

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by different users. 331dot (talk) 22:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Rashford

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Made his debut, so loads of unsourced additions and vandalism . JMHamo (talk) 22:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Number 57. — MusikAnimal talk 22:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

27 February 2016

Peafowl

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trinidad and Tobago

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.33.31 (talk) 04:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dominican Republic

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and edit warring/edit wars. 172.58.33.31 (talk) 04:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Haplogroup J-M172

Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring/content dispute. Dat GuyTalkContribs 20:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability of Wikipedia

Semi-protection: Incessant trickle of red user and IP vandalism. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Sam

Renew pending changes: Some good edits; some bad. I can see edits reverted. --George Ho (talk) 02:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Marianna251

Indefinite semi-protection: I've had three IPs vandalise my user page in the last couple of days. Semi-protection would be useful. Marianna251TALK 16:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ontario Civil Liberties Association

Temporary Semi-protection: persistant edit warring of unsouced content into article. 1 month maybe? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 17:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Rubio

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user persistently vandalizing page. Jdcomix (talk) 18:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fuller House (TV series)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jim1138 (talk) 20:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 01:21, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Peacemaker67 for 3 days. tutterMouse (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Murdoch

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs and SPA. Jim1138 (talk) 10:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Peacemaker67 for 3 days. tutterMouse (talk) 16:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

James

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., no good IP edits for a long time.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undefined

Temporary full protection: Explained on Talk:Undefined#Talk. -- . Frankie talk 21:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Thanks for the heads up Frankie, I've notified WP:VPT to see if we can swiftly deal with this issue. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 08:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1975–76 UEFA Cup

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1976–77 UEFA Cup

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bernie Sanders

Pending changes Persistent edit warring. James J. Lambden (talk) 08:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Coffee.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undisputed III: Redemption

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IP users adding the bogus name "Javad Rameezani" on the article. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/جواد رمضانی شوراب. Areaseven (talk) 08:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

James

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., no good IP edits for a long time.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undefined

Temporary full protection: Explained on Talk:Undefined#Talk. -- . Frankie talk 21:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Thanks for the heads up Frankie, I've notified WP:VPT to see if we can swiftly deal with this issue. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 08:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1975–76 UEFA Cup

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1976–77 UEFA Cup

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bernie Sanders

Pending changes Persistent edit warring. James J. Lambden (talk) 08:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Coffee.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undisputed III: Redemption

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IP users adding the bogus name "Javad Rameezani" on the article. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/جواد رمضانی شوراب. Areaseven (talk) 08:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bold and the Beautiful

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediately resume of sock-puppet behavior editing that leads to the page's previous protections. livelikemusic talk! 16:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bates College

Semi-protection: Article has just become unprotected after one month of semi-protection and is already being vandalized by one or more unregistered editors. ElKevbo (talk) 00:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(The IP addresses all map back to the college if someone has some time on their hands and a desire to e-mail the college's abuse address. ElKevbo (talk) 00:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC))[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Ixfd64 for a frankly pathetic 24 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 06:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science

Temporary Semi-protection: The racist troll is back and will just keep creating new accounts until the page is protected. MarnetteD|Talk 01:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Ian.thomson for 24 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 06:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA election

Temporary semi-protection: Given that he was just elected, and there's already been some low-level IP vandalism. SounderBruce 17:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined completely for the first, and not yet for Infantino. High edit rate doesn't equal disruption, though I do see a brewing conflict over the Italian/Swiss/Greek thing. If it gets worse, let us know. :-) Katietalk 22:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian Canoeing Championships

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GABHello! 17:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The problem users have all been blocked, but the socks proliferate very quickly. Protecting to give everybody a break from Whack-a-Mole. MelanieN (talk) 01:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel DeWeldon

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Promotional SPAs edit warring to add poorly-sourced, promotional fluff to a BLP. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked /64 for one week. Katietalk 22:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Starship9000

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GABHello! 01:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Courcelles (talk) 01:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

King Alfred Plan

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent attempts to make this look resl. Doug Weller talk 21:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Reeve

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Dispute over wording and sources of a particular section (see [106]). clpo13(talk) 23:49, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. to encourage editors to thrash out consensus on talk. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Sir Sputnik

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Requesting semi-protection of my own talk page due to sockpuppetry by Alexiulian25 (talk · contribs). Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Work from Home

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2607:FB90:270D:97C1:0:38:C4C4:AE01 (talk) 19:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Katietalk 22:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Q*bert

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 20:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Katietalk 22:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Martin

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Érico (talk) 21:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Odell Beckham Jr.

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The page was recently un-protected 3 days ago, and it has already had 5 obvious vandalisms since. Lizard (talk) 22:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

28 February 2016

Cairo League

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. If he resumes, take it to AIV for block evasion by you-know-who. Katietalk 16:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Malala Yousafzai

Indefinate semi-protection: This page has a history of protection, which always ends up with vandals coming back for more. Even with pending changes, all edits from IPs are vandalism.

Declined Katietalk 16:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC) PC is working just fine. Katietalk 16:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Mike1901

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting Talk page semi-protection for the next couple of hours until sock quietens down with their fake edit warring notices. Mike1901 (talk) 19:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 20:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Walmington-on-Sea

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by clutch of related IPs. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hillsborough Community College

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP's continue to add same unsourced, non-notable list entry to page. They do not engage when notified on their talk pages, just keep edit warring with no explanation. Jacona (talk) 20:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don Knotts

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Death date vandalism continues on this article. The article was already protected once. Can we do it again and for longer?. Dismas|(talk) 14:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Navi Mumbai

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Till now three non-registered (IP) users have deleted/modified more or less the same information from this article page. It seems that it is the same user using different IP addresses (182.59.82.191/182.59.112.241/182.59.72.210) and all the three IP addresses are located in the same place with the geographical co-ordinates being 19.076 (latitude), 72.8777 (longitude) for all the three IP addresses (source: ww.IPlocation.net). So no doubt it's the same user. Therefore, warning the user or even blocking the user is not an option. Hence, I request you to semi-protect this article. Thank you. — Deepak_HK「@talk」 15:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Mayhew

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Non-stop IP BLP vandalism. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Vandalism is under control and there are some useful IP contribs. Yaris678 (talk) 12:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yaya Sanogo

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Winnie the Pooh and the Blustery Day

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Infrequent editing, but reverts are happening lately. George Ho (talk) 20:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The recent spate of vandalism seems to be a small number of IPs/new accounts, who seem to have stopped. Yaris678 (talk) 11:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1978–79 UEFA Cup

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped for the time being.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1979–80 UEFA Cup

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped for the time being.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1980–81 UEFA Cup

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped for the time being.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

7/27 (album)

Semi-protection: New page with unreliable edits. Difficult to monitor each edit. raul1798 (talk) 12:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, some of the IP edits seem to be constructive, and this might be crucial for the article which is currently AfDed.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse racism

Renew pending changes: Reverts still occur despite low editing. George Ho (talk) 20:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Had been PC protected for 6 months, which was about to expire. Vandalism was persisting so I think indefinite PC is the best option in the circumstances. Yaris678 (talk) 11:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arnold Hunter

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Resurgent vandalism after previous protection expired. Tvx1 23:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Self-balancing two-wheeled board

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Datbubblegumdoe[talk – contribs] 15:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Mrfrobinson

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User keeps reverting a redirect to a renamed account. Renameduser024 (talk) 19:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects should stay. QuackGuru (talk) 19:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You don't control user's talk pages. Stop with your harassment please. Renameduser024 (talk) 19:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is not your user talk page. It is a redirect. QuackGuru (talk) 19:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renameduser024 can you login as Mrfrobinson (to prove its you) and add the {{retire}} to the old account (even as a dummy edit because its there already-- add a period or something). Then read over WP:Clean Start make sure your doing this right. -- Moxy (talk) 20:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A suspicious IP has returned. QuackGuru (talk) 21:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. tutterMouse (talk) 06:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Brockie

Temporary semi-protection: An anon IP has been edit-warring for a day to add uncited personal-life claims to this biographical article, despite two registered editors reverting him. Needless to say, he's not discussing anything. --20:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

And now that anon IP — who was blocked today as a sock of blocked registered user User:Optim.usprime — is block-evading again, making the identical edit under the guise User:2607:fb90:24a3:6364:0:31:c882:2c01. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wilbur Scoville

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 23:47, 27 February (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sukhe (rapper)

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Musa Talk  14:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimir Putin

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox motor race

Template protection: Highly visible template. – Nascar1996 (talk • cont) 03:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CBS Dream Team

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism television. --忍者ポップ (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 31 hours. --忍者ポップ (talk) 06:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CNN Philippines Updates

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent recreation of article over redirect Jim1138 (talk) 08:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Modu Chanyu

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP socking, fringe promotion and edit-warring. Krakkos (talk) 14:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.}--Ymblanter (talk) 10:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Smith (British singer)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced hoax death claims and related vandalism . General Ization Talk 02:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 10:00, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boricua College

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 05:08, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. Persistent, yes, but only one IP address, which I just blocked. But if they restart with a different IP, then make another request here. Floquenbeam (talk) 05:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noel Gugliemi

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 10:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Augustine Thottakara

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created 4 times in 4 days, A7'd every time. Azealia911 talk 21:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 21:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chelsea Manning

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – One month passed after semi-protection expired. George Ho (talk) 23:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 07:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confraternity of Christian Doctrine

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qpalzmmzlapq | talk | contribs 03:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Materialscientist for 1 year. tutterMouse (talk) 06:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sahaswan

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent re-addition of same totally unsourced material, PoV "This is highly educated area of the town" and long list of non-notable people - SPA IP warned numerous times now also has an account. - Arjayay (talk) 12:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MelanieN (talk) 00:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Ross

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we just indef-semi this page, PC is just as bad as reverting the vandals in the first place. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Darkknight2149

Semi-protection: A user has been harrassing me non-stop. Even though the user is blocked each time, they change their IP address every time to keep doing it. For the next few days, I will be rounding up every single one of the user's IP addresses and their account (Nolantron) for a SOCK investigation. I will need my talk page and, if necessary, my user page protected until this is over. DarkKnight2149 02:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See You on the Other Side (Korn album)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term edit warring over genres. I call the big one bitey (talk) 02:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Naked mole-rat

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.33.31 (talk) 05:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IP vandalism is a few days old. Mostly one IP, which has been blocked. Since then an IP has added good content. Yaris678 (talk) 22:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zootopia (film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Redirect being hijacked by a sockpuppeteer who wants to write a different version of the article. McGeddon (talk) 19:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unicycle

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - report was good at the time but it looks like the disruption has ended. AlexiusHoratius 19:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

William Lane Craig

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page just came off semi-protection, and the ip has started reverting again. Another week or two of protection might be helpful. Thanks.   — Jess· Δ♥ 03:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see vandalism; I see a content dispute and edit warring. There is discussion at the talk page; I'm locking the article for a day to give you all the chance to work it out without anyone getting blocked. MelanieN (talk) 00:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sahaswan

Semi protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 172.58.32.83 (talk) 00:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rappers from Sacramento, California

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP blanking and vandalism. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is a constant target for sneaky vandalism (changes in numbers). The content of this page should change rarely, only when the IMF, WB or CIA update their figures yearly. IPs constantly change data counter to given sources. Requesting protection for a decent while as it get's very tiresome to check sources and inevitably revert edits. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 22:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of countries by GDP (PPP)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same reason and request as List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita above. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 22:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vans

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism relating to the "Damn Daniel" online trend. --Ches (talk) 22:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Johnson (basketball)

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.2602:306:3357:BA0:81AF:E18A:628B:6212 (talk) 22:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Canola

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of drive-by IPs unhappy that the grain is also called "rapeseed", other POV-pushing. Montanabw(talk) 02:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too infrequently edited for pending changes--Ymblanter (talk) 22:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thoroughbred

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Another article where drive-by IPs do nothing but vandalize. Montanabw(talk) 02:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try one year first--Ymblanter (talk) 22:12, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Smriti Irani

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – She is currently part of a political Drama in India because of a aggressive speech she gave against her opposition which are inviting trolls to the page!.  A m i t  웃   02:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 19:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 19:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Badminton

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Regardless of (in)frequency of editing, this page suffers from reverts of bad edits. Alternatively, renew pending changes. George Ho (talk) 21:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 21:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miles from Tomorrowland

Renew pending changes: Reverts still occur despite infrequent editing. George Ho (talk) 21:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GERRICO GARCIA

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – One day the recreation will be chronic. Britty192 (talk) 21:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 21:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

29 February 2016

User:Vipinhari

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: We should perhaps ask Vipinhari if he wants it protected. Lectonar (talk) 11:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please semi-protect my userpage. Vipinhari || talk 16:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected — MusikAnimal talk 16:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aliens versus Predator 2

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive edits after expiration of initial protection. 331dot (talk) 12:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 3 instances of vandalism since the last protection expired. Lectonar (talk) 12:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mahfiruz

Semi-protection: Blanking and inclusion of OR by 3-4 IPs since November 2015. Zoupan 15:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption began immediately after expiration of previous one month lock. Katietalk 17:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Trump

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Garchy (talk) 17:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Terrence Melton

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Marianna251TALK 17:07, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Football League Cup

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism . JMHamo (talk) 19:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. While there are some disruptive edits, the majority of non-autoconfirmed edits appear to be constructive. Any admin is free to override this decision if the rate of disruption increases. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sarfraz Ahmed

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -Anjana LarkaSEND WIKILOVE💗 12:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The vandalism was days ago and has died down; it it picks up, please relist. Lectonar (talk) 12:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yuvraj Bhardwaj

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – AfD template is continually being removed before consensus is reached. Boomer VialHolla 12:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Football League Cup Final

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Match today and disruption has started. Qed237 (talk) 14:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. While there is some disruption, the majority of non-autoconfirmed edits are constructive. If that changes feel free to re-request protection, but remember we want to encourage editing not prevent it. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sonam Kapoor

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is vandalized or tested by IPs at least once in a day. I don't see why this shouldn't be semi-protected but PC protected. -- . Frankie talk 16:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cate Blanchett

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – numerous forms of disruptive editing. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 13:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{RFPP|aiv}} For both IPs, 111. and 66.... Lectonar (talk) 13:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There are various other IPs not that long ago. Yaris678 (talk) 13:51, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ten National Airs with Variations for Flute and Piano

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warning. --忍者ポップ (talk) 10:45, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. For all articles listed. Lectonar (talk) 12:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done (for the bot) Lectonar (talk) 13:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Caballero1967

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anons ( 60.50.28.231 175.136.224.245) have been systematically vandalizing my userpage and leaving the same messages (in Malay). . Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 12:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Lectonar (talk) 12:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Channel Four Television Corporation

Semi-protection: Repeated addition of non-free content (inappropriate in template namespace per WP:NFCC#9) by three separate IPs (possibly IP-hopping) during the last week. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 13:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Khan Jabir

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Both articles have been repeatedly recreated by a socking hoaxer. McGeddon (talk) 11:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Both. Lectonar (talk) 11:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zootopia

Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism – Repeatedly moved to redundant "(2016 film)", "(film)", "Disney's ... (2016 Film)" titles recently. McGeddon (talk) 11:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected Lectonar (talk) 11:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zootopia

Temporary semi protection: Semi-protection has fallen off of this article (again) as a result of one editor moving it and another moving it back. (The protection stayed on the Disney's Zootopia (2016 Film) article that it was moved to. Is this a bug?) Article was previously protected through to April due to a sock vandal. --McGeddon (talk) 11:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't think it's a bug; I remember happening things like this...but can not remember why they happen. Lectonar (talk) 12:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Requesting protection to prevent the racist refdesk troll from exploiting another opportunity to keep trolling. GABHello! 00:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 29

Temporary semi-protection: It's here at last - February 29, Wikipedia time. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 01:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Afzal Guru

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered nationalists and separatists flock to this page of a convicted separatist, resulting in persistent vandalism. Better to semi-protect it. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 11:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Subway (restaurant)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.33.87 (talk) 19:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Google easter eggs

Permanent Semi-protection: Regular (albeit relatively infrequent) vandalism of previously temporarily semi-protected page with. fredgandt 06:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sham Idrees

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. Musa Talk  07:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nadeshot

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandal edit inserted by multiple IPs. Marianna251TALK 23:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Captain America

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.39.205 (talk) 23:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lullism

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 00:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USNS_Lawrence_H._Gianella_(T-AOT-1125)

Temporary Semi-protection: Lots of users editing page with troll unreliable information about this boat entering the Falcon 9 SES-9 launch exclusion zone. 107.5.215.61 (talk) 01:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paul van Dyk

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP in news, some vandalism. ViperSnake151  Talk  01:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mind of Mine

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors, by the way of addition in information that violates the crystal ball policy, reliable sources and original research not supported by verifiable sources. livelikemusic talk! 03:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RuPaul's Drag Race

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same kind of editing patterns that lead to page's previous protections. Page requires some restructuring that could be disrupted by anonymous editors adding in information that cannot be confirmed by reliable sources. livelikemusic talk! 03:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Hartnell

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 03:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Writing's on the Wall (Sam Smith song)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to Oscars' result. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 04:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To Pimp a Butterfly

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep adding unnecessary and unsourced genres in the article in the last few days. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 15:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:35, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Leap year

Semi-protection: Edit warring by multiple newly-created user ids User:Mada2016 and User:Doodle 2016, vandalism by User:Arshad Xihan. Jc3s5h (talk) 17:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC) corrected & updated 20:45[reply]

 Comment: I've also RPP'd February 29 here. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 01:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marina and the Diamonds

Semi-protection: obsessed fans making themselves relatives or partners of this BLP. Lengthy log. '''tAD''' (talk) 17:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Staal

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:C55D:A696:A8C6:A172 (talk) 18:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:48, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sing (2016 film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Various IPs edit-warring to add an unsourced "TBA" cast list added by blocked sock User:UndergroundZootopie. McGeddon (talk) 12:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Institution of Engineers (India)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP's continuously adding contact numbers to the page since very long time. GSS (talk) 14:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keenan Christenson

Full protection: BLP that keeps getting restored without any reliable sources, and will likely continue if left unprotected. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merlin Network

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Sam Shemtob (talk) 20:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Archive/2016/02&oldid=1201755952"