Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2016/03
- 2016
This page is an archive of past discussions from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to request page protection, please do so at WP:RFPP.
01 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism - Vandalism due to artwork being used as a new twitch.tv emoticon (as of 2/29/2016) for a popular twitch.tv streamer. Lord Nightmare (talk) 19:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:40, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:42, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Since yesterday, 3 different users with almost no edit history have repeatedly added copyvio pictures to the article. Biwom (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 15:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This is about the inclusion of a pic; I invite you to find other users to chime in and find consensus. Lectonar (talk) 15:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: Non-approved accounts inputted attendance numbers when the tour has not even finished yet. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protection is used rather than pending changes on high-volume pages. Deryck C. 19:40, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The article history shows a number of reverts in the last 24 hours, a lot of them from editors who do not understand WP:RS and WP:OR, and are disrupting the article as a result. . Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for 24 hours. I hope the discussion will be fruitful. Deryck C. 19:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the past hour alone, this page has been vandalized by multiple unregistered accounts. I request that this page receive semi-protection until shortly before or on the day of the event. Thanks. ~Lord Laitinen~ (talk) 18:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Once again, hi-profile character from hi-profile film gets daily IP and newly-created "editor" vandalism. — TAnthonyTalk 18:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Edit warring an sock puppetry created by IP users. RenRen070193 14:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated antisemitic trolling by IP. RolandR (talk) 16:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Malcolmxl5 for 48 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated antisemitic trolling and fringe edits by IP. RolandR (talk) 16:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Malcolmxl5 for 48 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Outbreak of IP vandalism today getting tedious to deal with. Could you please consider semi-ing it for a few days? Thanks. DBaK (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Or maybe PC instead please? That can be very effective too. Cheers DBaK (talk) 16:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Lectonar for 1 week. tutterMouse (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This page is constantly being vandalized by one IP address after another. CLCStudent (talk) 15:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 17:42, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by sock Nolantron. TJH2018 (talk) 17:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the vandal returns after that, re-report and I'm sure you will get the page protected for longer. Yaris678 (talk) 17:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This article is a constant magnet for childish vandalism, mainly repeatedly changing George Washington's rank from 1976 to 1776. The article needs to be semi-protected for at least six months, if not as long as one year, to discourage these repeated attacks, which are now occurring at least once every few days or so. -O.R.Comms 17:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: Childish it may be, but the vandalism edits are so few and far between that imho, semiprotection would be overkill; I even think that pending changes would be too much. Seems to me to be a case of watchlist and revert, but I will leave the decision to someone else. Lectonar (talk) 17:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – She's been in the news since the Oscars and it's attracted a lot of vandalism. APK whisper in my ear 14:40, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP Vandals changing content of page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 03:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined This is just one IP; better to report for edit warring here. Lectonar (talk) 10:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. IPs adding attendance for tour dates that have not occurred. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 06:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Under different usernames begining 2600, keeps adding bogus entry . Boleyn (talk) 07:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP edit wars over birthday. Someone with facebook account should actually check the given source for birthday and revert page to correct date, then add a long semi protection. Denniss (talk) 08:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Long-term semi - Persistent inappropriate edits by multiple v.4 and v.6 IPs (possibly the same editor), reverted by numerous well-established editors and ClueBot over the course of at least 5 months. The IP editor seems to have a burr up their behind that they cannot shake loose. BMK (talk) 03:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sixth of March 08:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 08:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Materialscientist: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Unilateral move with no support. Even the official website shows the current name. I suggest move protection until this is settled via discussion at the article's talk. Jetstreamer Talk 10:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Participants are encouraged to find consensus. Lectonar (talk) 10:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Someone hoping IP addresses in the 217.38.* range keeps changing the sourced name for another on this article. Been happening since 27 January 2016 till today looking at the history. KylieTastic (talk) 10:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Despite infrequent editing, none of PC edits were good. Alternatively, renew pending changes. George Ho (talk) 19:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 22:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Blatantly false claims of being "African American". ⁓ Hello71 03:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is an RfC ongoing about the type of infobox, but edit-warring is continuing. Please protect the page so that RfC can finish without edit-warring tearing up the page. RGloucester — ☎ 05:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've kept it shorter this time, but will watch. Lectonar (talk) 08:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unknown IP's attacking user and putting up unwanted and inappropriate images and making consistent threats. TJH2018 (talk) 04:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Gilliam for 48 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 07:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from an unruly vandal that constantly uses different IP addresses to evade blocks (soon to be the subject of a sockpuppet investigation). DarkKnight2149 04:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely by Gilliam. tutterMouse (talk) 07:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Hoax movie. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 05:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - previous temp. protection expired and vandalism has continued . LoudLizard (talk) 19:13, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 01:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Nonconsensual editing -- With this subject being a major issue in the 2016 American presidential campaign, this article has gotten plenty of attention. Editors are making edits that are w/o consensus (since there is a discussion on the talk page), and then end up reverted. There has been some vandalism by IPs as well. I am advocating for months-long pending changes protection as to enhance the ability to manage questionable edits without imposing too many restrictions and forcing people out of the discussion. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined There have been no edits at all for more than 5 days now, and we do not protect pages pages preemptively. If this picks up, please relist. Lectonar (talk) 22:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection. Hdjensofjfnen (UTC) 00:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 01:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent IP vandalism ("embezzlement") and unsourced/poorly sourced allegations. Coretheapple (talk) 01:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I just gave the IP a final warning for its edits. If it continues, report to AIV. Only seems to be one user so protection isn't needed. only (talk) 01:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- There are two IPs active on this page, and as you can see they are persistent. Coretheapple (talk) 01:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- The other IP was a week ago; I don't think it's worth a protection right now. only (talk) 01:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- There are two IPs active on this page, and as you can see they are persistent. Coretheapple (talk) 01:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same disruptive removal again. Qed237 (talk) 18:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined Most recent vandalism was by one IP, which seems to have stopped. Plenty of good IP contributions. You have warned the IP vandal, which is the right thing to do. If the vandalism by this IP continues, report it at WP:AIV. If you believe this IP is a previously blocked editor, mention that when you report it. Yaris678 (talk) 22:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Ongoing edit warring by two users for several days; needs to be addressed. Loyalmoonie (talk) 19:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 22:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Given I've just been editing this template accidentally by not subst-ing, I think this template is significantly high-vis to warrant TP. -- samtar talk or stalk 20:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Lectonar (talk) 22:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Aeonx (talk) 20:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 22:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Slow-motion edit war taking place with one IP repeatedly inserting unsourced POV shooting apologia. IP hasn't breached 3RR and won't discuss, so requesting a reasonably long page protection to stop the disruption. Marianna251TALK 20:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. The IP already had the last warning. Lectonar (talk) 22:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 22:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous edits regarding the Ted Cruz = Zodiac Killer meme. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:34, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Annoying vandalism changing the name of the companies. AxG / ✉ / 10 years of editing 18:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent long-term vandalism. 2607:FB90:A524:1B4A:0:45:EF0A:BD01 (talk) 19:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 22:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP hopping edit-warring, also covered under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 22:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC) 22:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 22:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
02 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated IP insertion of OR comparisons of child abuse to space alien abduction. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 15:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- User is a floating IP that has already evaded the block to edit the article's talk page. Page protection request remains. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by a former, disgruntled, band member. He/they are not adding anything contributing, and continue to "erase history" of the established credentials of the band. They are not presenting facts in edits, only personal opinions. I have tried discussing this personally, but have been blocked on every medium. JJGeneral1 (talk) 16:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. High level? Lectonar (talk) 16:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 19:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Page is now being re-created at Bollywood Zoom. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected Deleted, and creation protected the second one too. Lectonar (talk) 20:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GABHello! 20:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:00, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – People are abusing him due to his poor form in Asia Cup. GreenCricket (talk) 17:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:43, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – One editor repeatedly reverting a discussed and consensual move. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:17, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Corrected request. I thought I had restored the consensual title before posting this request. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:22, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 19:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP of blocked user:Yakbul edit warring/disruptive editing since Jan 2016. --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined PC seems to have the situation under control. Yaris678 (talk) 13:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued removal of AfD tag by IPs. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 11:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Less than one attempt per day is manageable. I have watchlisted. 14:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Lectonar (talk)
Semi-protection: High level of IP hopping with intent to vandalize. CLCStudent (talk) 17:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:01, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – POV IP continuing to attempt to insert incorrect information. Hopefully if its protected for a few days, they'll lose interest. Onel5969 TT me 12:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 12:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For over six months, the only IP edits and the only edits of some SPAs (User:Asitshouldbe, User:Contribute100, User:Lisboa100) have been to avoid describing this man - born in Stoke-on-Trent, England "with both Bajan (Barbados) and English heritage" - as an English businessman, apparently because "they" think that no-one with mixed ethnic origins can be described as English. A talk page discussion was started, but they have not joined it. NebY (talk) 16:30, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 16:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qpalzmmzlapq | talk | contribs 16:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 16:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:SOCK of WP:SITEBAN-ned editor Fangusu restoring their edit request. This sockmaster has restored their request several times in the last few months. Steel1943 (talk) 00:43, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- {{RFPP}} I have blocked the two IPs that the banned user has been using. If necessary, I will consider a range block, but I don't think it is necessary at this time. Yaris678 (talk) 09:17, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Fangusu is now using a new IP to edit this page after the previous ones were blocked. Also, a rangeblock on this editor will not work since the first quadrant is almost never even the same on their IPv4 address (as shown in the page's edit history.) Steel1943 (talk) 15:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:SOCK of WP:SITEBAN-ned editor Fangusu restoring their edit request. This sockmaster has restored their request several times in the last few months. Steel1943 (talk) 00:43, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- {{RFPP}} As mentioned above at #Talk:Yoga pants. Yaris678 (talk) 09:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Fangusu is now using a new IP to edit this page after the previous ones were blocked. Also, a rangeblock on this editor will not work since the first quadrant is almost never even the same on their IPv4 address (as shown in the page's edit history.) Steel1943 (talk) 15:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- United States House of Representatives elections, 2016 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unknown user is making suspicious real-time election results. TJH2018 (talk) 05:20, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Seems to have died down, in view of real results coming in. Please relist if there are more problems. Lectonar (talk) 10:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Various IPs are removing two sources out of three for the fleet size and leaving only their preferred source. It's hard to say which source is the most accurate so all three should be left in. I admit that my behaviour has not been great here. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:15, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined I'd say engage the IPs directly and get them on the talk-page; they might be newbies, and what they are doing is not really vandalism either. Semi-protection is not a solution here, imho, as long as it is not clear which source is reliable. Lectonar (talk) 11:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please semi-protect my talk page for a month. Fangusu socks everywhere. Steel1943 (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've kept that to one week too...should give you a slight respite. I've protected your userpage too (if you don't want that, please ping me). Will watchlist. Lectonar (talk) 15:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Template protection: The current protection level of this template is too low, so I would like to increase level for this to prevent vandalism by non-Template editors and Administrators. Also includes Template:Guideline and Template:Legal policy.Shwangtianyuan Happy Chinese New Year to everyone 01:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined I see no activity that would warrant such protection. On the contrary, I see the normal wiki editing process happening. Ramping up the protection would just get in the way of this. I wouldn't consider this template "high-risk". Yaris678 (talk) 09:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nathan2055talk - contribs 01:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism after recent release from protection period. 208.54.5.166 (talk) 03:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There was indeed vandalism after the protection ended, but not enough to warrant another protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Full Protection: Regular Page Vandalism.BGreenwiki (talk) 10:17, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some temporary non-constructive edits after the recent election. Onel5969 TT me 01:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But some constructive IP edits too...please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 08:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP/new account vandalism. A very short period of time would work. Ajraddatz (Talk) 03:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Just for a couple of days until the spree is over. High level of recent IP vandalism. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:43, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mult. IP's vandalizing page. TJH2018 (talk) 22:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Seems to have died down. Lectonar (talk) 08:22, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP and unautoconfirmed account vandalism. 208.54.5.166 (talk) 00:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP User is changing the nationality of the subject of the article without citations. I reverted the edit three times, only to be undone immediately. Suggest a short term protection. jojo@nthony (talk) 11:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring likely by one user with multiple IPs. Not willing to discuss on talk:Social work, keeps reverting Jim1138 (talk) 11:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism from different IPs by adding the same text over and over: "(The slowest color)" User User_talk:2601:247:C001:7790:F987:37E0:951C:FAA3 was warned, but yet another IP is now being used. - Thank you, CZmarlin (talk) 23:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Copyright violations; the previous protection expired due to a recent move. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 01:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Musa Talk 05:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent sockpuppetry. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 06:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent sockpuppetry. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 06:17, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:22, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by a user and at least one sock of the user over mentioning a criminal conviction in the article. . 331dot (talk) 09:02, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Since pending changes protection was applied to this page, there have been little to no constructive IP edits, all of which have been speedily reverted. 208.54.5.166 (talk) 00:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Anna Frodesiak for 1 month. tutterMouse (talk) 06:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. The last time I've asked for a temporary semi-protection, and it was good until the semi-protection lasted; but now lots of unregistered users and non-confirmed users start to change again the article without trustful sources or redundant sources (someones even without sources). --HardstyleGB (talk) 02:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by EdJohnston for 3 months. tutterMouse (talk) 06:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Some Star Wars pages
- Star Wars: The Force Awakens (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Star Wars sequel trilogy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Last slew of edits have been nothing but multiple IPs adding bogus titles and being reverted. No value to these edits at alloknazevad (talk) 03:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For the first. Declined for the second: not enough recent vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 08:55, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Lectonar: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:11, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- I know...thank you bot.
Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 09:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recurring vandalism by IP, including repeated posts of "lorem ipsum". Jacona (talk) 22:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Ip has stopped after last warning. Lectonar (talk) 22:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. TJH2018 (talk) 22:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 22:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A bunch of jerks keep vandalizing the module for nationalistic reasons. Changing colors arbitrarily,[1] deleting Kurdish names,[2]... most popular by far is blanking the page entirely.[3][4][5] A significant amount are anons so semi protection would help. Note this has been semi-protected before for the same reasons. Also if he/she isn't already Ömeristan should be blocked from editing the module due to serial vandalizations. --Monochrome_Monitor 02:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 6 months. EdJohnston (talk) 02:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- THANK YOU!!!! --Monochrome_Monitor 03:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced information by IP editors regarding a supposed UK launch, of which their only source is an unsourced forum post. This vandalism has restarted since the previous page protection expired. Bbb2007 (talk) 20:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The IP should be warned and reported to AIV if the vandalism continues. Lectonar (talk) 21:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:55, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by LittleLiza1, Kfribz, Aleezaali, Gjmng, Wenwenannie all within 30 minutes, all using visual editor. . Abel (talk) 21:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 21:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: For over a month, a different users with no edit history have repeatedly bring back the old version of the article that have no reliable sources and false charts. CesarLeto (talk) 15:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Deryck C. 19:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Page was previously semi-protected to prevent IP-vandals, possibly one with a morphing IP, that were/was the page with original research fancruft last month. Now that page protection has expired, the IP-vandals have returned to reinserting original research nonsense.--Mr Fink (talk) 17:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Only two IPs vandalising in the last few days. I've blocked the one that vandalised today. Yaris678 (talk) 17:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 22:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
03 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism spanning last several days. H.dryad (talk) 16:19, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 16:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of sock puppetry. CLCStudent (talk) 19:13, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Bbb23 for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 19:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Since 24 February, IP editors have been adding/removing members from this group without citing any sources. (I can't find any sources to support the changes.). Random86 (talk) 21:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a years-long history of IP vandalism to this article. Nearly every IP edit going back for years is vandalism. This is strange enough for what appears to an obscure topic that it makes me think there is some kind of persistent off-wiki targeting of this article. . Gnome de plume (talk) 16:58, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is very slow, so pending changes should do the trick. Lectonar (talk) 18:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Very high level of IP vandalism. - DVdm (talk) 18:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 18:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Some good edits; some bad. Regardless, I see reverts. George Ho (talk) 09:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:06, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Only one good IP edit; the rest were bad and reverted. George Ho (talk) 09:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:22, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP block evasion by User:Shima Joel. McGeddon (talk) 10:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 11:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes - the editor started using IP addresses (User:41.190.3.242, User:41.190.3.187) to edit the article, the morning after their sockpuppet account was blocked. --McGeddon (talk) 16:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Done I blocked the Ips...we'll see. Lectonar (talk) 16:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Three SPAs edit warring over something about the conversation of energy being a corporate conspiracy. McGeddon (talk) 16:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 16:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 12:12, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 12:22, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection - Either meat or sockpuppetry, new account being created to insert unsourced material about a high school student.[6][7][8] - Aoidh (talk) 15:42, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'll block the socks as well. Bishonen | talk 16:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Article had been under temporary semi-protection until Jan. 31; vandalism resumed shortly after it expired.Roving Ginger (talk) 15:44, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Well, not shortly...but then in force. Lectonar (talk) 15:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP vandalism of nonsensical examples resuming shortly after last block expired. McGeddon (talk) 16:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 16:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – a string of anon vandals. EauZenCashHaveIt (I'm All Ears) 09:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dewritech (talk) 11:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk 11:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. One IP user already blocked. Lectonar (talk) 11:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Non-notable, and this article is just COI [[WP:SPAM|spam]. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC). Joseph2302 (talk) 07:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Only one (re-)creation in 2016; let's see how it develops. Lectonar (talk) 08:18, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Fangusu. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 14:21, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk 14:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:46, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dawnseeker2000 02:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - just one incident in last week and a half - not really out of control yet. AlexiusHoratius 05:46, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment – This article has seen an elevated level of vandalism since late December. Dawnseeker2000 08:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Full-protection: High level of IP vandalism.--Regular Iranian (talk) 04:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 05:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip vandalism editing . Kayser Ahmad (talk) 04:18, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 05:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increased addition of information that cannot be verified by reliable sources. Information is also being added for episodes that have yet-to-air on Logo TV. livelikemusic talk! 04:12, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Ten National Airs with Variations for Flute and Piano (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- The Magical Legend of the Leprechauns (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Leprechaun (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP-hopper – same edits (adds "March 2016"). —Bruce1eetalk 06:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – regarding false hiatus. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 07:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Users changing Trumpf to Drumpf without sourcing due to "current popularity". Apriestofgix (talk) 21:00, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected.. The protection expires in five days though may need extension. tutterMouse (talk) 06:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, specifically well-sourced scandal documentation keeps getting deleted. Oh No! It's Faustus37! it is what it is - speak at the tone 00:49, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 02:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 (talk) 02:19, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. only (talk) 02:42, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – I'm not sure what this crap is, but it being added by a floating IPv6 editor......this is the reference. John from Idegon (talk) 05:34, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 06:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has resumed after the page was unprotected yesterday. Melonkelon (talk) 01:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:48, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RoMind (talk) 02:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been hit with multiple IP vandalism today, after 6 months with only one edit in that period. BilCat (talk) 03:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:43, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – dynamic IPv6 and v6, same person, same vandalism edits. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:42, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Several further acts of vandalism and disruptive editing in the last couple of days. A view of the public logs shows that the article for this high-profile footballer has suffered from persistent vandalism, disruptive editing and BLP violations. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 04:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandal. An admin blocked them but they just came back at new IP. The game is released on March 24, so maybe protect the page until the end of March? The vandal may lose interest once the game is actually out. CurlyWi (talk) 05:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IPv4 and v6 same person. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 02:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 00:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 02:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Edit warning. --忍者ポップ (talk) 04:42, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs edit warring to retain unsourced and poorly sourced text, especially "uncredited" performances. Binksternet (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
this user is wrong good info is being adding but this user keep wanting it gone not on at all costs if ask me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.246.169 (talk) 20:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 20:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been subject to regular vandalism for weeks. As a BLP I'd request at least a short duration. Thank you. Hy Brasil (talk) 22:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Bongwarrior.. MelanieN (talk) 01:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This article represents a very controversial subject, and for that reason it should be semi-protected to keep it safe from vandals. Ethanlu121 (talk) 23:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is persistent but not terribly frequent. Let's give PC protection a try. MelanieN (talk) 01:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs and unconfirmed editors insist on changing subject's team affiliation before any official announcement of a contract. Please semi-protect for several days. General Ization Talk 00:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article is already under PC protection, which should remain in place when the semi-protection expires. MelanieN (talk) 01:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: An editor added Harrison Ford to the page, and it was recently deleted. That editor should know by now that Ford's character, Han Solo, was killed by the evil Kylo Ren in Star Wars: The Force Awakens. AdamDeanHall (talk) 15:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Question: Are you sure semi-protection will help solve your problem? Deryck C. 19:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Note: As I said the last time protection was requested and granted: reference 3 in the article says that "...the enitre cast will return...". Harrison Ford could be in the movie although his character has been killed... Lectonar (talk) 21:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Note: That has been said since before TFA was released, likely to avoid giving away the plot point that Solo was killed in the film. Recent announcements of the cast don't seem to mention Ford. 331dot (talk) 09:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done Warn the user appropriately if they are continually adding unsourced content. If it is sourced, this is a content dispute. Finally, we should not worry about WP:SPOILERs and include any relevant information, even if it gives the plot away to some — MusikAnimal talk 18:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 19:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Vandal. Lots of Donald Trump entries. Should be added since Donald Trump is a controversial topic. Text input from anon: An example of this is Donald Trump, sadly a man who might win the election for presidency, which shows how many bigots there are in America. No matter how many times you try and change this I will keep re-editing this, and anyone who changes this is a bigot as well. TJH2018 (talk) 20:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alllright.... Lectonar (talk) 21:02, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
04 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent Heavy IP vandalism. JumpiMaus (talk) 17:16, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User talk are semi-protected for short durations only in the most severe cases of vandalism from IP users. Users whose talk pages are semi-protected should have an unprotected user talk subpage linked conspicuously from their main talk page to allow good faith comments from non-autoconfirmed users'. @User:CAPTAIN RAJU, please keep that in mind. Lectonar (talk) 20:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This page needs indefinite semi-protection. A sock of this WP:SITEBAN-ned editor, Fangusu, just posted an unblock request using an IP. Fangusu, when logged in as Fangusu, is currently blocked from editing their own talk page. They have already been informed that they have to go through the standard offer process to get their account unblocked. At this point, until Fangusu goes through the proper channels to get their account unblocked and unbanned, there really is no reason for IPs to edit their talk page. Steel1943 (talk) 19:44, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of recent IP vandalism.DVdm (talk) 20:24, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 20:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 12:21, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. You've warned already. Lectonar (talk) 12:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BLP. Volunteer Marek (talk) 16:45, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:48, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – There are so many disruptive edits it's getting hard to combat the edits correctly (users accidentally reverting good edits, etc.) - this is a page that could benefit from PC. Garchy (talk) 17:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- As a note to add onto the automated comment - this was declined last night, however the editing has continued with new IP users. Garchy (talk) 17:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm satisfied there's a longer term issue here. BethNaught (talk) 17:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from a dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 10:07, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:39, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Request one week semi protection for BLP issues - Australian politician being targeted for BLP vandalism. -- Callinus (talk) 10:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by logged off ips. Wgolf (talk) 03:06, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:13, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:55, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Autoconfirmed editor edit warring to remove content. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:10, 4 March 2016 (UTC) edit: This was brought up at WP:ANI#Ylevental - COI and related issues. Probably should have mentioned that. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is constantly being reverted, and redirect to companies by random IPs. Boomer VialHolla 12:33, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Question: Does anyone understand what is going on here? The page had been a redirect for years... then over recent months, various IPs have added content and then changed it to a redirect. The really weird thing is that the IP which adds content is the one that then creates the redirect... and then it repeats with a different IP.... several times. Yaris678 (talk) 12:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected I don't...but have pending changes protected nonetheless. It isn't ennough disruption for full- or semiprotection. @Boomer Vial...please read the protection policy, if you have not done so already. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 12:48, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. DaltonCastle (talk) 23:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism for overlinking. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 02:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Vandalism comes from IP 75....Lectonar (talk) 08:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/silliness from various IPs. Eman235/talk 02:33, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is too low in frequency even for pending changes. Lectonar (talk) 08:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Garchy (talk) 05:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vandalism mainly from IP 68... Lectonar (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. *1226 08:02, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:07, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very high profile article linked to from news articles, e.g. http://www.bustle.com/articles/145652-donald-drumpfs-wikipedia-page-is-proof-that-john-olivers-last-week-night-segment-had-the-impact and http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/donald-drumpf-wikipedia-now-exists-after-john-olivers-trump-takedown-w166114. Everymorning (talk) 22:13, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, I do see some edit-warring which is minor, but I only see vandalism from one IP, which stopped. If the problem reappears, I would be happy to protect the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 23:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- This isn't necessary. The only editor edit warring at the page is Electricburst1996. Am in the process of filing at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring page now.Cebr1979 (talk) 23:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Now done.Cebr1979 (talk) 23:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- This whole debacle has involved multiple editors. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 23:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Been taken to ANEW. tutterMouse (talk) 07:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 07:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recently announced as Donald Trump's "Chairman of National Security Advisory Committee". Being associated with a contentious politican, and with his page having a history of controversy, I suggest that his page may become a target for politicized editing.
Declined, we do not protect pages pre-emptively.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various anonymous editors are removing the AFD tag, and have been doing so since the page was nominated for deletion. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:38, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by IPs from Catania. Binksternet (talk) 08:43, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:32, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's an IP-hopping anonymous editor that keeps adding unconstructive edits. Repeated warnings and blocks have not worked so far. See article history, this has been going for three months now. Perhaps a longer edit protect will work. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The subject is now a hate figure for the Hindu nationalists, and the vandalism and POV pushing are becoming endemic. Pending changes protection would be quite valuable. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:03, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also pending changes protected for 6 months. Lectonar (talk) 10:39, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – thrice the creating again. Britty192 (talk) 10:30, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, probably by fans due to recent articles which came out about his life, huge spike in edits after this requestYakulto (talk) 23:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 23:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:32, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: An IP keeps changing the title of one of the article's sections. I reverted the edit. Then they change the title again. I then revert the edit again and also add a note on why they shouldn't edit the section's title. The IP ignored the note and did the same edit again and again. A couple of other users reverted this IP's edits. The person behind this IP keeps coming back with a different IP and makes the same edit like every few hours. Statik N (talk) 01:30, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass-changes of information on a page that already is described in an in-universe style, without citations for verification, which ultimately leads to fan-cruft editing on a level of original research. livelikemusic talk! 03:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined - only one IP recently - if it's vandalism warn and report at AIV, otherwise discuss it with them. AlexiusHoratius 04:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every single edit in 2016 has been vandalism or reverting vandalism. Marianna251TALK 21:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined That in itself is not grounds for semiprotection. The vandalism is not very frequent if compared to articles which really need to be semiprotected. Please read the protection policy if you have not done so already. Lectonar (talk) 21:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- I have read it. I felt that a 100% vandalism rate (excluding reversions) on a BLP page, by multiple different IPs, with over half the vandalism edits taking place in the last couple of days was sufficient to warrant a request for protection. I agree that it doesn't see as much vandalism as other articles, but the point about all the edits in 2016 being vandalism was to show that this is very persistent, more so than other articles which receive a blitz of vandalism edits that dies down after a few days. If you don't feel semi-protection is appropriate, would you consider pending changes protection as an alternate? Marianna251TALK 22:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- I had that in mind, but some ideas why I didn't even pending changes protect in the end: the vandalism edits are just that, simple stupid, sometimes outright childish vandalism; there is no agenda here to harm the subject of the article I can see, so while this is a BLP, the vandalism is not BLP-centered. I think the vandalism just happens because the author is just more or less popular with different peoople. After all, Wikipedia is (or should be) the encyclopedia that every one can edit:). Whatever it is worth, you have gained another watcher for the article. For an article that had more pronounced vandalism, plaese see Foo Fighters, which I protected today. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 22:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 22:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 22:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - MrX 00:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – ridiculous amount of drive-by vandalism recently, no constructive edits from IPs for some time. Montanabw(talk) 04:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:33, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 04:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 04:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:38, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring between users. TJH2018 (talk) 22:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined I don't know what you're seeing. I don't see any edit warring. only (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 6:32, March 4, 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. The article is under PC protection and has been for a week. Let's give the PC a chance to work. MelanieN (talk) 02:00, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 6:32, March 4, 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article is under PC protection and will continue to be through next November. However, the recent pace of vandalism edits has been too heavy for PC alone. MelanieN (talk) 02:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several IPs which appear to be the same individual are refusing to discuss proposed changes, and instead, are constantly reverting back to their version. I propose the page be semi-protected for at least one week, while an attempt at communication is left on the article's talk page. Thank you. . GoneIn60 (talk) 19:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined For now...I see 3 Ips whose edits may be seen as vandalism. They have stopped editing for now.Please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 21:43, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A wave of IP editors (83.44.181.86; 50.79.20.241; 172.112.98.56; 2600:1012:b112:490d:60:2d62:83ee:c29; 2605:e000:4ec8:ff00:55a9:82f0:3a57:c0ea) has kept emerging and vandalizing the article. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 19:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This goes for Ip 172...the other edits by IPss have been made days ago. Lectonar (talk) 21:46, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of "comedy" as a genre by various IPs, no sources provided. DonIago (talk) 21:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Edit warring and high level of IP vandalism.SilviaMG (talk) 18:09, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 18:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism over the past couple of days by IP user (50.200.185.226). Aloha27 talk 19:54, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. It's only one IP (static). Please let me know if they come back with a different IP, Aloha27 and I'll protect. Bishonen | talk 20:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wheel vandalism by IPs and unconfirmed editors. General Ization Talk 23:12, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 23:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
05 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: IPs keep adding wrong sales and deleting hidden note about why those sales numbers are wrong. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 04:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:30, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Same as before, IPs keep adding wrong sales and deleting hidden note about why those sales numbers are wrong. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 04:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent additions of unsourced content - Johnson is rumoured to be getting released by the Colts, however this has not been confirmed by the team. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 16:48, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 05:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 17:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
This page encountering a lot of vandalism please semi-protect it WP MANIKHANTA 12:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WP MANIKHANTA (talk • contribs)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 17:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlimited Pending-change protection: because of users persistent vandalism and numerous edit warring.
Note: this page had been protected once on 8 February 2016 (1). K!lluminati (talk) 16:48, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined No vandalism edits since more than a fortnight. Lectonar (talk) 17:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Protection: persistent additions by vandals that subject committed suicide (see [9]). Quis separabit? 16:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by CambridgeBayWeather for 1 week. tutterMouse (talk) 19:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP with a conflict-of-interest (See my talk page for claim) is engaged in redirecting, blanking or otherwise editing for marketing purposes. -- ferret (talk) 18:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Sergecross73 for 1 week. tutterMouse (talk) 19:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP with a conflict-of-interest (See my talk page for claim) is editing for promotional/marketing purposes, ignores warnings and efforts to discuss directly. -- ferret (talk) 18:35, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Sergecross73 for 1 week. tutterMouse (talk) 19:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Expected high level of vandalism following the release of the trailer which has raised considerable emotive criticism, regards.Twobells (talk) 19:10, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Ymblanter for two weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 19:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent Fangusu WP:SOCK target. Also, this talk page has been temporarily semi-protected in the past for the same reason. Steel1943 (talk) 19:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, for the time being, the sock is not so active, and there are obvious benefits in having the talk page unprotected. If it really gets worse, pls reapply.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:09, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Renew pending changes. Agreed to George Ho about the fact about many reverts. Recent reversions of changes that were pending. I think this article needs to be reviewed more often to avoid disruptive editing or vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:00, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -Starke Hathaway (talk) 12:50, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes Article is frequently attacked by POV pushers and vandals. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 12:15, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, That's not an 'attack', that's a content dispute. There may be a case for full protection, but semi won't be that effective, not least because at least one of the people involved is a confirmed account. GedUK 13:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
User:Ged UK, I didn't ask for semi-protection -- I asked for pending changes. Please reconsider. Thank you. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 18:39, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Note: What goes for semi goes for pending changes too. I too see edit-warring. Lectonar (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please see article history. GABHello! 01:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:55, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Ponyo for 3 days. tutterMouse (talk) 13:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Article is being bombarded by a YouTuber's fan because this guy plays well on a videogame for him.
- Automated comment: Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given. This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:26, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Creation protection (salting): Currently nominated as WP:CSD#G3 for the fourth time at this page (after being speedly deleted at AfD as G3), Latin's Next Top Model already salted after being 3 times between December 30 and January 2 as G3. -- sandgemADDICT yeah? 04:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Also adding the following pages, deleted at same AfD, also nominated for G3ing, and expanded version of title already salted:
- La's Next Top Model (cycle 1) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- La's Next Top Model (cycle 2) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- La's Next Top Model (cycle 3) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- La's Next Top Model (cycle 4) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
-- sandgemADDICT yeah? 04:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users are adding back movies and other TV specials airing on Nickelodeon, which a number of editors including myself having been removing in attempting to reduce the WP:Scope of what is presented. Prior to the past week, this article contained all sorts of movies and specials that aired on Nickelodeon, but are not long enough to be classified as a movie, nor a movie that has its origins at Nickelodeon. The article simply became a collection of indiscriminate information. The talk page describes what editors are attempting to do to make this not WP:IINFO, under the sections "Original movies" and "Entries that are 'out of the scope' of this list". MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support request. The article is in the process of a major overhaul, as previously it was a hodgepodge list of WP:INDISCRIMINATE entries, nearly all of which were unsourced. While the article is in the process of being narrowed down to a proper scope (and better sourced), semiprotection would help alot in preventing the IPs who keep trying to undo all of this work without any discussion. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:43, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The article is already pending changes protected, and this does a good job. I really do not see much vandalism that gets through here. Lectonar (talk) 20:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:21, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs.Crboyer (talk) 18:21, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Full-protection: Signs of possible whitewashing and vandalism from both IP editors and registered editors. George Leung (talk) 19:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- You beat me to it. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 20:52, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another redirect page that it continually restored, and redirected. Boomer VialHolla 22:42, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by an IP, who hit my user page, got blocked, and is now using a different IP address. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:16, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Regular mindless vandalism over the past few days, some was missed by Cluebot. The-Pope (talk) 01:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 09:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (sorry slow response stopped my edit here) Graeme Bartlett (talk)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent addition of Hoaxes as IP Sockpuppet of User:TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther : Talk 03:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 09:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 07:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 02:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Basically anti-semitic trolling.Volunteer Marek (talk) 04:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, please. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Please also protect Jewish Bolshevism; same issue. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
@EdJohnston: Here's a duplicate RPP for the same article. Boomer VialHolla 06:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – Both Jewish Bolshevism and the talk page are now semied. I would rangeblock the IP if I thought there was a workable rangecontribs tool. EdJohnston (talk) 06:10, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and edit warning. 81.88.49.34 (talk) 05:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 06:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 06:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ViperSnake151 Talk 14:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – A user continuously adding problematic information including external links, contact numbers and more. I and user Bgwhite asked him to stop his disruptive contribution and read the Wikipedia guidelines on his/her talk page but the user continuously adding the promotional and problematic information to the page which waste our time to undid his/her edits. I am requesting for pending changes because the user is autoconfirmed. Thank You. GSS (talk) 18:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. As he is autoconfirmed, neither pending changes protection nor semi-protection would be effective. Lectonar (talk) 20:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 31 hours. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:26, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent ip vandalism and disruptive editing against consensus. Suggest about three months. Wolbo (talk) 23:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:24, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Sem- protection Sourced details of her and Andrew Garfield's break up are being constantly stripped away by IP's who claim that there's no truth to the breakup. Don't care either way, but we have legitimate sources pointing to they've broken up and they won't stop reverting. Requesting semi protection to prevent IP's from editing. Rusted AutoParts 19:44, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:15, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 20:50, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:01, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requested change of protection from pending changes to semi protection. All IP/New User edits to page have been vandalism over a long period of time, so no indication that good faith edits would be prevented by semi protection. Jevansen (talk) 22:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 22:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
06 March 2016
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent longterm vandalism, BLP violations. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 12:36, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:24, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IP User has resumed dubious editing. jojo@nthony (talk) 13:00, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:39, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. The same or various users are doing different editions from different static IPs. A few users were advised but those IPs always make some editions in a day and then they return with another IP which starts very similar to the other ones (this one is a example[1]). Several anonymous users start to change again the article without trustful sources, or they use sources to put another percentages which aren't the ones mentioned on the source. --HardstyleGB (talk) 15:26, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Lectonar: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:52, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sudden burst of unconstructive edits in wake of her death announcement by IP's. Safiel (talk) 16:47, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Reduction of semi-protection. Percheron is currently the TFA, so WP:Semi applies: "administrators should semi-protect it for brief periods in most instances". Vandalism has been mostly "normal" for a TFA, and protecting it until Sunday will mostly have no effect after today. Protecting admin seems to not have a problem with this. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 21:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:52, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done, it's got three hours on the clock, not much point asking for it to be unprotected now. tutterMouse (talk) 17:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Consistent IP vandalism, ignoring other users explanations and readding unsourced information. adamstom97 (talk) 08:04, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Sjö (talk) 14:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:19, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected by Zzuuzz for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 17:31, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: disruptive editing: POV pushing, possibly sockpuppetry. The talk page is not used. Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:24, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 00:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:53, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Despite infrequent editing, I see reverts everywhere. By the way, does the latest revert count? The info was reverted but then reinserted by a user. George Ho (talk) 05:44, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 10:47, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Hoaxing continues; this biography is someone's running joke. Binksternet (talk) 09:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:50, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Own userspace. Babymissfortune 05:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Nate Diaz just won UFC Reedman72 (talk) 06:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Gilliam for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 07:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism related to Donald Trump. ONR (talk) 06:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected until 1 December. BethNaught (talk) 09:36, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Restore pre-EW protection. High visibiliy page. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 20:10, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected Acalamari 20:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Acalamari: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- People went straight back to edit warring! :( Acalamari 21:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Now fully protected by GB fan. Well and graciously done. Lectonar (talk) 21:58, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Done (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 06:42, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All sorts of edit warring, disruptive editing, and downright vandalism. Also possible socking/sockpuppetry. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 04:08, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 05:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Died recently and has been in the news a lot. Everymorning (talk) 04:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 05:23, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 23:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 23:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 00:45, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 05:03, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting this page to be semi-protected until November 14, 2016 in accordance to the other Donald Trump related articles. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 00:47, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 05:04, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 02:26, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 05:05, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Little to no constructive edits (other than reverting vandals) after the previous protection period. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 02:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And pending-changes for 3 months — MusikAnimal talk 05:08, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 03:05, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:57, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Peacemaker67. — MusikAnimal talk 05:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism in a real time event where updating the page has become difficult. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 03:22, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:57, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Peacemaker67. — MusikAnimal talk 05:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Bayan Muna and Neri Colmenares
- Bayan Muna (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Neri Colmenares (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, IPs insists the political organization's links to the Communist Part of the Philippines without support from a reliable source. Same for the Bayan Muna politician. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 11:26, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For both. Lectonar (talk) 22:10, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent sockpuppetry. RenRen070193 12:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For both. Lectonar (talk) 22:10, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing in the wake of a character's death. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:30, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Goes both for the Ip and Lexawood. Lectonar (talk) 22:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – We're getting a bunch of drive-by IP editors claiming the band broke up without offering anything in the way of sources to do so (and yes, I've asked, check the edit history). We've had one registered user do it too, but it's mostly bare IPs. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 04:38, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism / Persistent IP sockpuppetry. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 05:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 21:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I know it's a bit anti-climatic to request this for protection (and ironic...), but the only IP edits in awhile have been nonsense/vandalism. (This is more of a proposal than a request...). FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 05:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:44, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor keeps putting a statement that the show has not been renewed for a third season in the article that is not supported by the source given. The show is still airing its second season, and Disney has not yet announced whether or not the show is getting a renewal. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 05:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. IP 173.... has stopped after your last warning. Lectonar (talk) 21:49, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Salmaan Taseer's killer has just been hanged. So this page is going to be vandalized for quite a few days. --Peaceworld 09:09, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Please relist it it picks up; for now vandalism isn't there very much. Lectonar (talk) 21:50, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by Philippine-based IP user who insists on adding Power Rangers broadcast info. Areaseven (talk) 11:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Persistent vandalism by several IP users with wrong info and false edits. True Nation 12:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IPv6 adding bogus info to article, categories that are blatantly false. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 21:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 17:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined following events. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Monarchy of Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection against anon ip editor reverting edits without either edit summary or participation in talk page discussion. --₪ MIESIANIACAL 17:54, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 21:54, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – We're getting a bunch of drive-by IP editors claiming the band broke up without offering anything in the way of sources to do so (and yes, I've asked, check the edit history). We've had one registered user do it too, but it's mostly bare IPs. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 04:38, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism / Persistent IP sockpuppetry. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 05:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 21:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I know it's a bit anti-climatic to request this for protection (and ironic...), but the only IP edits in awhile have been nonsense/vandalism. (This is more of a proposal than a request...). FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 05:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:44, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor keeps putting a statement that the show has not been renewed for a third season in the article that is not supported by the source given. The show is still airing its second season, and Disney has not yet announced whether or not the show is getting a renewal. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 05:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. IP 173.... has stopped after your last warning. Lectonar (talk) 21:49, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Salmaan Taseer's killer has just been hanged. So this page is going to be vandalized for quite a few days. --Peaceworld 09:09, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Please relist it it picks up; for now vandalism isn't there very much. Lectonar (talk) 21:50, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by Philippine-based IP user who insists on adding Power Rangers broadcast info. Areaseven (talk) 11:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Persistent vandalism by several IP users with wrong info and false edits. True Nation 12:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IPv6 adding bogus info to article, categories that are blatantly false. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 21:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 17:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined following events. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Monarchy of Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection against anon ip editor reverting edits without either edit summary or participation in talk page discussion. --₪ MIESIANIACAL 17:54, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 21:54, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection for say a month. Endless offensive ranting by a political extremist using several IPs. Note that under WP:ARBPIA3, non-auto-confirmed users are not permitted to edit this page at all, so semi-protection will not effect legitimate editors. Zerotalk 22:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Whether ArbCom's discretionary sanctions really apply to mainspace talk pages has been disputed. Treating this as if it were any other talk page — MusikAnimal talk 22:48, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 23:33, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 23:37, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Since this is probably only going to get worse as time goes on I am asking for protection until after the election. The vandalism and sockpuppetry has gotten to a level where it is mostly reverts. Majora (talk) 00:00, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. clpo13(talk) 18:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:55, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. clpo13(talk) 18:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 22:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Regular ongoing IP vandalism. I'm requesting 3 months of PC1. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 22:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hit with IPs and new accounts for the classic scam attempts. --allthefoxes (Talk) 20:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 22:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
07 March 2016
Renew pending changes: Things were calm for a few weeks until just one revert this months. George Ho (talk) 10:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined. PC protection expires on March 9 and I'm inclined to let it lapse. The recent pace of one reversion a week is something that can be handled by normal page watching. MelanieN (talk) 16:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This BLP has been subject to a neverending edit war going back two years, and it seems to be flaring up particularly strongly recently. This needs to get sorted out and it won't happen if they can just keep reverting ad infinitum. The Drover's Wife (talk) 11:20, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. MelanieN (talk) 16:43, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The subject is the target of a witch hunt in India. Unregistered users adding abusive content. A similar page, Kanhaiya Kumar, has been semi-protected and pending-changes protected. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for two reasons. One, most of the people involved in this edit warring are auto-confirmed, so protection wouldn't help. And two, a lot of the things being reverted as "vandalism" are not vandalism - they are trivial points of style and the like. I don't see any attempts to add "abusive content". In fact the article errs on the side of puffery and unreferenced praise for the subject, which I will remove. MelanieN (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism to phishing sites. Deku-shrub (talk) 17:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Death date vandalism. Picked up again the day after the previous protection expired. Dismas|(talk) 18:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Months of the same inappropriate edit by IP hopping socks. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Borcker. Meters (talk) 19:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism has now moved to talk page - main article is already under protection. Garchy (talk) 15:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protection of talk pages is unusual but is necessary in this case. MelanieN (talk) 17:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Well, that settles that; the page and the talk page have both been deleted. --MelanieN (talk) 17:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @MelanieN: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Done, there's no other template which really conveys "it was deleted". tutterMouse (talk) 18:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many I.P.s attack the page just for the purpose of caste promotion. Altering sourced contents and adding OR. SMahenS (Talk) 18:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 19:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
The article says that Tacitus refers to the Huns as the "Hunnoi", which dovetails nicely with the Chinese "Xiōngnú" and is a fact found all over the internet; however, according to [10], Tacitius refers to them as "Hunos." I do not know Latin, so perhaps "Hunnoi" is acceptable in some declension, but the claim in this article that Tacitus says "Hunnoi" does not have a citation. Can someone knowledgeable about Latin check this out? The talk page is protected, so I cannot add a talk section, so I am adding it here as I will probably forget about this issue by the time the page is unprotected. --BLebow4500 (talk) 20:50, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @BLebow4500: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- It seems this is a general protection removal request page. I have no idea where I'm at. I'm talking about the article Huns. --BLebow4500 (talk) 20:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Fixed © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 21:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, but I still can't edit the Huns page or the talk page, so I'm not sure what it is that you fixed :( --BLebow4500 (talk) 23:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oh you referred to Huns. I was referring to [11] this error the bot Cyberbot I was referring above. I'm not an admin, so I can't do something about your request. You should probably go to Talk:Huns to discuss Tacitus's reference. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 00:39, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, but the talk page is protected, lol. --BLebow4500 (talk) 00:41, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was about to say that. Let me contact that page with this one. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 00:42, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, but the talk page is protected, lol. --BLebow4500 (talk) 00:41, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oh you referred to Huns. I was referring to [11] this error the bot Cyberbot I was referring above. I'm not an admin, so I can't do something about your request. You should probably go to Talk:Huns to discuss Tacitus's reference. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 00:39, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, but I still can't edit the Huns page or the talk page, so I'm not sure what it is that you fixed :( --BLebow4500 (talk) 23:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- It seems this is a general protection removal request page. I have no idea where I'm at. I'm talking about the article Huns. --BLebow4500 (talk) 20:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
I appreciate you adding that request to the talk page. Thank you. --BLebow4500 (talk) 03:42, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
{{RFPP|do}}
Lectonar (talk) 08:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
My request for editing the talk page of the Huns article has been deleted from this page but it has not yet been addressed. Somebody kindly put a note on that talk page and it refers here. Can my request please be restored until the issue has been resolved? --BLebow4500 (talk) 15:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Restored though given how involved and specialist the info needed is, discussion can't be conducted here as it's not a substitute talkpage. I'll paste the question for you though I feel like it's a Reference desk sort of question but those are semi-protected too. tutterMouse (talk) 17:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- BLebow, the usual first step in requesting unprotection of a page is to ask the administrator who protected it; in this case, User:EdJohnston. I am pinging him to come and look at this request, so that he can decide if he is willing to end the talk page protection now, or prefers to wait until the expiration of the protection on March 27. --MelanieN (talk) 18:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected – EdJohnston (talk) 18:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recommending protection of the page until the leadership dispute of Libyan Investment Authority is resolved and Court ruling available.
Information presented on page should be balanced to produce a more neutral perspective in order to not to misinform or mislead the readers - information about both parties claiming LIA leadership which is impaired by user Altinvest2015. . BlueSeedRose (talk) 12:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The two of you are engaged in an edit war; both of you have been warned. Take it to the talk page and stop reverting each other. MelanieN (talk) 17:14, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism adding Brendon Fraser to the list as part of a 4chan meme. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:18, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:20, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism after protection expired. clpo13(talk) 00:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For now...vandalism took two weeks to pick up again after last ptotection expired. Lectonar (talk) 10:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous disruptive editing by IP editors (probably one person). Marek.69 talk 12:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous disruptive editing by IP editors (probably one person). Marek.69 talk 12:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection or pending changes: IP user or users removing cited content. OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 13:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism.DARIO SEVERI (talk) 14:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator JamesBWatson. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Constant, almost daily WP:BLP violations and vandalism over the past month, and sporadic problems dating back to last year before then. Given Mallya's current legal problems and controversial status in India, long-term semi-protection may be sensible. . QueenCake (talk) 16:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 00:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 02:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent addition of unsourced content by similar IP users. Molecule Extraction (talk) 03:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:14, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Virtually all edits over the past two years has been vandalism by non-autoconfirmed accounts and reversion of same. Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is very low frequency, even under the threshold for pending changes protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persisent edits. --Deffrman (talk) 04:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined I see not much vandalism..... Lectonar (talk) 10:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Regular vandalism to this page, as it's got something to do with women and sex...; semi-protection has been requested several times on the article's talk page. Actually I thought we already had it semi-protected, perhaps it's expired? Could you set it for a year or two? EvMsmile (talk) 11:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Premature reports of an unofficial signing. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 23:26, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- No longer needed – Signing is official now. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 02:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done Lectonar (talk) 09:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 23:47, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: I dont think the talk page needs to be portected anymore. Igotrekt (talk) 23:36, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- The protection need has soared since December when it was protected and short of the subject leaving the public eye to live in the wilderness, it'll probably need it until long after this year is over. tutterMouse (talk) 08:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done Lectonar (talk) 08:33, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: To make room for a move from Kalki subramaniam. - MrX 02:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- pinging @User:RHaworth Lectonar (talk) 10:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level misinformation from IPs due to speculative internet claims. StarScream1007 ►Talk 02:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:14, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persisent disruptive edits amid heavy expansion. Article is in the process of being expanded greatly as a result of several new episodes released this week. Anonymous users are frequently adding incorrect, unsourced, or rumored information. Soren121 (talk) 03:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of season three table despite no season three episodes being known yet--no sources. Amaury (talk) 04:20, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Alex|The|Whovian? 04:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Materialscientist: I noticed you protected the requests immediately before and after this request, but skipped this particular page, which is undergoing the exact same issue that Jason Rothenberg (television producer) was having. Could we get an immediate protection on The 100 (TV series), please? Thanks. Alex|The|Whovian? 07:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 10:18, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- List of Asia Cup Twenty20 International cricket records (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Content which do not support the references were being added. I request a semi protection will do. Vin09 (talk) 06:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Although infrequent, bad editing has been reverted this year. George Ho (talk) 07:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:18, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Not on individuals but groups as a whole. Well, groups are subject to WP:BLP policy. George Ho (talk) 08:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:20, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 00:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think the edit rate is low enough to try PC. Went for a long period because it has been protected a few times before. Yaris678 (talk) 09:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – Also, please extend the semi-protection to indefinite - based on the page's earlier history, anonymous IP vandalism resumed almost immediately after the page became unprotected and had to be re-protected within a few months, and that seemed to be too much. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 01:14, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 09:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP hopping vandal. Reported by Erik Corell to ANI a few times now. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive911#Returning_troll, Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Latest_IP_of_a_troll, and Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#IP-hopping_troll. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 01:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 09:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal. Reported by Erik Corell to ANI a few times now. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive911#Returning_troll, Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Latest_IP_of_a_troll, and Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#IP-hopping_troll. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 01:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 09:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This is my bot's configuration page. Vandalism here could cause the bot to misbehave. -FASTILY 09:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 20:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Tacitus
The article says that Tacitus refers to the Huns as the "Hunnoi", which dovetails nicely with the Chinese "Xiōngnú" and is a fact found all over the internet; however, according to [12], Tacitius refers to them as "Hunos." I do not know Latin, so perhaps "Hunnoi" is acceptable in some declension, but the claim in this article that Tacitus says "Hunnoi" does not have a citation. Can someone knowledgeable about Latin check this out? The talk page is protected, so I cannot add a talk section, so I am adding it here as I will probably forget about this issue by the time the page is unprotected. --BLebow4500 (talk) 20:50, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @BLebow4500: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- It seems this is a general protection removal request page. I have no idea where I'm at. I'm talking about the article Huns. --BLebow4500 (talk) 20:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Fixed © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 21:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, but I still can't edit the Huns page or the talk page, so I'm not sure what it is that you fixed :( --BLebow4500 (talk) 23:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oh you referred to Huns. I was referring to [13] this error the bot Cyberbot I was referring above. I'm not an admin, so I can't do something about your request. You should probably go to Talk:Huns to discuss Tacitus's reference. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 00:39, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, but the talk page is protected, lol. --BLebow4500 (talk) 00:41, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was about to say that. Let me contact that page with this one. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 00:42, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, but the talk page is protected, lol. --BLebow4500 (talk) 00:41, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oh you referred to Huns. I was referring to [13] this error the bot Cyberbot I was referring above. I'm not an admin, so I can't do something about your request. You should probably go to Talk:Huns to discuss Tacitus's reference. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 00:39, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, but I still can't edit the Huns page or the talk page, so I'm not sure what it is that you fixed :( --BLebow4500 (talk) 23:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- It seems this is a general protection removal request page. I have no idea where I'm at. I'm talking about the article Huns. --BLebow4500 (talk) 20:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
I appreciate you adding that request to the talk page. Thank you. --BLebow4500 (talk) 03:42, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: in order to create redirect to Stephen_C._Harrison. It was protected seven years ago, so protection is unlikely to be still needed. Rentier (talk) 04:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected Lectonar (talk) 08:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and starting of IP wars about Nationalist, Populist, Neo-Nazist, Clerical fascism ideologies and even sources informations of this political party. – Sudden burst of unconstructive edits in wake of Slovak parliamentary election, 2016 results by IP's. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 17:05, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We'll give this a try, but semi-protection may not be sufficient to stop the edit warring, since many of the participants are auto-confirmed. It may become necessary to full-protect the article to get people to start talking; at this point there is no discussion at all at the talk page. The title of the article has been changed to Kotleba – People's Party Our Slovakia, so that is what I semi-protected. MelanieN (talk) 03:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @MelanieN: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, I figured the bot might have trouble with that title change. --MelanieN (talk) 04:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Done, changed the title for the bot--Ymblanter (talk) 08:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, I figured the bot might have trouble with that title change. --MelanieN (talk) 04:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More IP vandalism after recent release from protection period. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 18:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 04:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock Nolantron is targeting page. TJH2018 (talk) 22:49, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editing/vandalism. (For 2-4 days.). Nairspecht (talk) 07:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant violent messages from ip sock. Nordic Dragon 07:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., we do not protect talk pages indefinitely, and disruption only started yesterday as far as I can see--Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting 1-2 week semi. IPs, for weeks, have attempted to claim that this film is based on The Blair Witch Project, heavily suggesting that the film is a copycat through a selective (and incorrect interpretation) of the references. There were also numerous examples of copy/pasting prose directly from references, like here where we see problematic and vague phrasing "based on the lines of" language, which is a selective interpretation of this reference's lead. Over these weeks, they have refused to open discussion or participate in existing discussion. In the most recent iteration, one of the IPs has added to the lead, without sufficient context, that the film takes its inspiration from the film. The semi is requested to inspire them to discuss, since they have no interest in doing this without being forced. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Generally we don't semi-protect when there's a content dispute. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor WP:HOUNDING Caden, delivering insults and personal attacks. Binksternet (talk) 04:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Infinite0694 (Talk) 04:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple new accounts. Majora (talk) 05:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Done (by Amatulic) Materialscientist (talk) 05:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IPs edit warring. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:17, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 22:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 22:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 18:05, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Cyphoidbomb.. MelanieN (talk) 03:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 20:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. What I see is not obvious vandalism; it is a content dispute, where the IP adds material and you remove it. I have fully protected the page for one day in the hopes that you will take your disputes to the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 04:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An apparent IP raid is currently happening. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 21:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 22:00, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: For some reason, and despite notices on this page, new users seem to frequently post to this Talk page which is intended for discussion of improvements to the Help:Getting started page, not as a place to request help. Please semi-protect indefinitely. General Ization Talk 05:39, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined And the newbies are trying to get started and are looking for help; after all it is in good faith. If they make a mistake and use the wrong page, so what? Graciously revert and point them to the right page, try to be helpful and welcoming. Lectonar (talk) 20:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- That's just lovely, and happens to be exactly what I would do, but I am not the only person who deals with these edits (and am not interested in making it my mission here). Other editors simply revert them, leaving the newbie's question unanswered; and/or the question will sit for a period of time because no one is actively watching that Talk page. Protecting this page wouldn't penalize for or prevent anyone from seeking help with their good faith questions; it would simply force them to read the content on the page and post the question in a location where it is likely to be answered. Please give this a reconsideration. General Ization Talk 20:38, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- My decline stands, but I have brought this up at Help talk:Getting started, people are kindly invited to comment. Lectonar (talk) 21:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Within the past few hours an IP user is frequently deleting some of the nominees. After the information was restored this user (who was warned) comes back and does the same the again. HappyAppy10 (talk) 06:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Main prepetrator blocked, and seems to have died down. Please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 21:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP-hopping editor (possibly the page creator) has been persistently removing maintenance templates from the page without any explanation, hopping IPs well before they are eligible for an AIV block. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 12:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article is at AfD Lectonar (talk) 21:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.Luke de paul (talk) 13:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Lectonar (talk) 21:25, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 05:52, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 18:00, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 19:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 22:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 22:55, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An anonymous editor first used the undo button many times to revert many edits by many editors over and over, ignoring multiple warnings from an administrator until finally relenting.
Next the anonymous editor filed a Dispute resolution claim that was closed because "failure by one of the editors to address reasonable questions" as well as the recommendation to "advise the other parties that disruptive editing can be reported at WP:ANEW or WP:ANI, and that disruptive editing by unregistered editors is best dealt by requesting semi-protection" after an moderator asked for assistance, "Would another moderator please take a look at the case regarding the Foundation for Economic Education because quite frankly it is the dumbest case I've ever seen, and I have no idea what to do with it."
The second moderator who advised the first moderator strongly cautioned the anonymous editor to stop the disruptive behavior and advised me to "just ignore unconstructive talk page comments" which I followed. The anonymous editor decided that the lack of replies to their disruptive talk page comments somehow gave them consensus to edit as they saw fit. I contacted the moderator again and that moderator recommended that I "Resume discussion on the article talk page."
This is all on top of perpetually issuing completely bogus warnings to anyone who disagrees with the anonymous editor's actions.
The anonymous editor has now graduated to blatant vandalism. Abel (talk) 02:59, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
At 18:35 used 107.107.58.110 for vandalism, then minutes later at 22:04 used 107.107.62.140 for more vandalism. Could be multiple people, but that seems unlikely. Abel (talk) 03:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Anonymous editor has probably used 166.172.60.242, 107.107.58.110, 107.107.62.140, 107.107.56.247, 166.171.186.247, 107.107.60.42, 107.107.60.65, 107.107.61.236, 166.171.186.88, 107.107.63.201, and 107.107.59.153 often in rapid succession. Abel (talk) 18:03, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is quite slow, so pending changes should do the trick. Sorry for the late reaction. Lectonar (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Not slow at all. This has been going on for months. I guarantee that as soon as this expires the disruptive behavior will start right up again. When that happens, should I contact you or is there some other procedure to follow? Abel (talk) 21:44, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- The current pending revision edit summary says "Fix wrong grammar" yet the edit is attempting to inject improper grammar. How does someone reject a pending edit? Abel (talk) 22:43, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am not a smart person. Now I see that undo is the thing I am supposed to click on. Abel (talk) 22:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- The current pending revision edit summary says "Fix wrong grammar" yet the edit is attempting to inject improper grammar. How does someone reject a pending edit? Abel (talk) 22:43, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 21:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 22:01, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 22:42, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 22:45, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
08 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Most IPs are adding tests and WP:OR, some WP:POV as well. Vin09 (talk) 05:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator MelanieN.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 06:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from untraceable IP addresses.--PhiladelphiaInjustice (talk) 07:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – As with Donald Drumpf, which has already been semi'd, this page is a huge target for BLP violations while Trump's campaign is going on. Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:01, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: It was announced earlier today that Microsoft has cancelled a big project of Lionhead's and is considering closing down the studio itself. People have been prematurely jumping on this as though the studio immediately shut its doors today and no longer exists. We should probably have this page semi-protected for a few days, until the over-enthusiastic fans disperse.DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 03:02, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shortly after previous protection expired, vandalism resumed, so longer semi protection seems appropriate here. . Everymorning (talk) 03:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Requesting a short semi-protection from IP/Non-autoconfirmed users. Article previously fell afoul of WP:LINKFARM/WP:EL and conversation has been held in editor Talk pages, but removal of external links are still being reverted, usually by an IP editor after editors with accounts have been warned/informed. The short semi-protection would allow for autoconfirmed users to continue discussions/edits while not allowing for potential IPsocks/IP editors to revert. Stesmo (talk) 04:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent IP attempts to recreate article, was made into a redirect per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduardo (rapper) and previously protected for same reason. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:00, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The AfD allowed for recreation if the subject becomes more notable, but these recent expansions are essentially identical to the previously redirected version. Maybe in 6 months there will be more to say about him. MelanieN (talk) 18:11, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IPs vandalism. Vanthorn msg ← 02:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:21, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Long time Semi-protection: Again, after 3 month protection expiration, standard vandalism by removal and change of content by socks of indef blocked Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azul411/Archive. - DVdm (talk) 09:53, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:15, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. McGeddon (talk) 14:54, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:47, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected by Ultraexactzz until April 8. tutterMouse (talk) 18:18, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unofficial trade information being added. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 21:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 23:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A surge of vandalism seems to be happening on this BLP. —Granger (talk · contribs) 14:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated "selfie shoes" vandalism by User:Borcker through different IPs today. McGeddon (talk) 15:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – To allow template editors. Mlpearc (open channel) 03:52, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Template protected indefinitely. No reason to stop template editors from editing it. Yaris678 (talk) 15:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: As news filters through about the recent drug revelations, "me-first" editors are randomly adding bits and bobs anywhere, requiring multiple clean-ups. Thanks. GiggsIsLegend (talk) 20:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- +1 --Je suis Nigérian (talk) 21:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, sorry for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
IP vandalism. Music01 (talk) 20:40, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:20, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Long term problem where IP editors erroneously add villages or towns to the list of cities. I think every IP edit in the past several years has had to be reverted. No new content is likely to be needed as new municipalities are rare. Semi-protection would not harm the project. Dual Freq (talk) 23:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 11:03, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Long term problem where IP editors erroneously add cities to the list of villages or towns. I think every IP edit in the past several years has had to be reverted. No new content is likely to be needed as new municipalities are rare. Semi-protection would not harm the project. Dual Freq (talk) 23:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 11:03, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is an edit war going on with one user removing sourced material and another reverting the removals. I reverted the last edit to remove the sourced material and think the article should be protected until the matter can be resolved. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:22, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued edits by IP users that have been resolved on the talk page. Apriestofgix (talk) 00:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:58, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP editors vandalising page. Mike1901 (talk) 09:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 21:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Yaris678 (talk) 21:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 23:43, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Yamaguchi先生 for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 08:52, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The poor English of edit summaries on recent vandalism, and the idiosyncratic use of "temple" to refer to templates indicates that User:Composcompos12 is now IP hopping to impose his version of the template. Bazj (talk) 07:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Regular IP edits "correcting" pronouns against MOS:IDENTITY. McGeddon (talk) 23:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:40, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.TomCat4680 (talk) 23:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous short page protections haven't made the troll go away; could I have a five day semi protection, please?. bonadea contributions talk 23:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of five days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unofficial trade information being added. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 21:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 21:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Even after the principal 45.58... IP vandal was blocked, a new 185.116... has arisen. The 185... vandal's methodology includes reversions of reversions. Julietdeltalima (talk) 22:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- and now IP 2A02:7AA0... has moved in for the kill. Julietdeltalima (talk) 22:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Already done. (by Yamaguchi) Katietalk 23:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's changing height for some reason the past two weeks or so. Gloss 22:33, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes as IP Sockpuppet of User:TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther : Talk 23:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. GoldenRainbow (talk) 13:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- I wouldn't have said "high". @Macaque123: would you like your page protected? BethNaught (talk) 14:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Since the vandalism has continued,
Semi-protected BethNaught (talk) 22:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Continuing name dispute, already been moved once (and returned) since the last protection lapsed. Either indefinite or an even longer temporary protection. Maybe permanent semi-protection as well, due to unhelpful IP edits... Paris1127 (talk) 17:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The title was moved once and promptly moved back; previous move warring was years ago. No need to protect unless it happens again. MelanieN (talk) 17:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – blocked user continuing to vandalize the page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Done (by Yamauchi). Materialscientist (talk) 21:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
09 March 2016
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is continuously being attacked by the IPs. This happened in the past also. SMahenS (Talk) 15:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — MusikAnimal talk 17:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
IP attack this page and insult me --FPP (talk) 17:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. — MusikAnimal talk 17:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry by Nolantron. Confirmed sockmaster. TJH2018 (talk) 19:39, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please ping me if you feel it can be unprotected earlier. Lectonar (talk) 21:11, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and persistent removal of sourced content (mostly controversies) by IP and new editors. Rahulparasor (talk) 10:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Edit-warring. Ymblanter (talk) 17:09, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism. Appears essentially every edit in the last two months has been reverted. . -- ferret (talk) 18:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting this page be semi protected for a decent amount of time. Dozens of ip editors making non-constructive edits. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:13, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping editor reverting multiple editors to insert WP:GAMECRUFT into article. Scr★pIronIV 16:51, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 (talk) 17:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:23, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Ohnoitsjamie for 3 months. tutterMouse (talk) 18:45, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from new editors and IPs. DuncanHill (talk) 17:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Malcolmxl5. tutterMouse (talk) 18:45, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Site banned editor Fangusu starting edit wars with IPs to reinstate their edits, like usual. Steel1943 (talk) 17:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Fangusu IP socking. Steel1943 (talk) 17:51, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Either Fangusu is editing my talk page with an IP or she's sent in the Calvary to defend her. Not sure, but because of this, I'd like my talk page semi-ed for a few days. Steel1943 (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Nolantron evading block... TJH2018 (talk) 03:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, Id' rather that Darkknight2149 (talk · contribs) asked for themselves at this point, it's not that bad at the moment. GedUK 13:24, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.*1226 06:17, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, I'm not really seeing any. Most recent edits are sourced. GedUK 13:34, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Freedom Mouse (talk) 16:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 (talk) 02:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:21, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-Protection: Disruptive editing / Addition of unsourced content. The page will be vandalised or edited disruptively as soon the film will be released. Please protect it for a bit long time. 175.110.63.111 (talk) 05:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and persistent removal of false information by IP and mobile editors. I've had to undo edits at least 8 times in the last 3 months for this article and over 30 times the year prior. Yleonmgnt (talk) 10:35, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That's not a very high edit rate for semi protection. Hopefully pending changes will be enough. GedUK 13:37, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Smoore95GAGA. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 23:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:11, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection: Sadly the racist troll is back and will just keep creating new accounts until the page is protected. MarnetteD|Talk 01:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:18, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unofficial free agent signing information repeatedly being added. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 02:11, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:14, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, using multiple IP's. IP has been invited to discuss the edits and he refuses. IP was warned and persists. Request 2 weeks given the time span he has already shown. Niteshift36 (talk) 23:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unofficial free agent signing information repeatedly being added. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 13:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Urgent temporary semi-protection: Very high level of IP vandalism and other unconstructive edits on an article featured in a Google Doodle. It's receiving 10K's of views with only 42 watchers. Eperoton (talk) 11:51, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I gave it a short protection before I got here. Might need to be redone later if it doesn't calm down. GedUK 13:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Template protection: Highly visible template – This is no longer widely used, either by transclusion count or number of crosslinks. Also, other such copyright templates tend to be template protected nowadays. Pinging protecting administrator Dragons flight. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:00, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Don't think Dragons flight is coming, little on the not so active side these days too. Any other admin wish to lower protection? tutterMouse (talk) 06:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Done Lowered to template-protected. Lectonar (talk) 08:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP:82.2.223.50 is changing political position on The Daily Telegraph article; firstly, without citing any references and secondly, references that do not support their change to "right wing". Another editor and myself have asked them to supply correct references, use article Talk page for discussion and stop edit warring. There has been no reply. It seems that there is an agenda here, rather than abiding to a neutral point of view and obtaining consensus through discussion. David J Johnson (talk) 23:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption. VQuakr (talk) 07:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Someone has created Prim lyza with citations. While it is not perfect, it is cited and is a start. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Done by Vanjagenije. tutterMouse (talk) 06:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 14:40, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. MelanieN (talk) 23:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated additions of unsourced content by Tumblr members. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 17:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- In addition to this, please also semi-protect The 100 trilogy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 22:22, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to Fear the Walking Dead. MelanieN (talk) 23:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Applies to The 100 trilogy. MelanieN (talk) 23:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: There have been vandalisms on the page by addition of two false titles: "Tale of the Jedi Temple" and "The Order of the Dark Side", neither of which have been officially confirmed yet. AdamDeanHall (talk) 18:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined. The title changes are all coming from one editor, who is auto-confirmed so semi-protection would not help. The user has been final-warned for edit warring; suggest reporting them if they do it again. MelanieN (talk) 23:59, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Possible edit-warring. Lots of reverts, disruptive edits, potential WP:BLP violations ,one user possibly trying to own the article. This is all likely because the subject has become an attack issue in the Republican presidential campaign. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. until the 12th. Not really enough activity in last 24 hours or so for full protection at this time. AlexiusHoratius 01:55, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @AlexiusHoratius: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:13, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (protection was dropped when the page was moved.) AlexiusHoratius 02:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article was protected in November over attempts to rewrite this obscure village article as a similarly-named hoax band; this has resumed within a week of protection expiring. McGeddon (talk) 18:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:11, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For the last thirty days, there has been persistent vandalism by IP user(s). Gmcbjames (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent long-term vandalism from IP/new users. The1337gamer (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP/new users. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 21:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Kiraroshi1976: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:38, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Cyberbot I: - I think I corrected the problem. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 23:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP-vandalism.--SaməkTalk 21:53, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 18:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:53, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection Edit warring to add back promotional content by likely sock puppets of band members. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:10, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 01:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Johnson has a new found medical issue, IP are making changes as if he has left the band, no official statement has been released as of yet. Semi would also work. Mlpearc (open channel) 22:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 23:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GABHello! 23:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. six months by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 01:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 12:10, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing socking from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Caidin-Johnson. McGeddon (talk) 12:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is not terribly frequent but it is persistent. Seems like a good candidate for PC protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:38, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism. The article is now a Good Article. Edits are removing Good Article material. The page had been semi-protected temporarily twice - yet the vandalism still occurs. SatDis (talk) 13:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by unregistered editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by unregistered editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A section composed entirely of WP:OR is repeatedly re-added to the Wiki page (usually by IPs) despite my requests to check out the talk page where I have explained why such a section cannot be included. This has been going on for more than two months now. I say "usually by IPs" because at times some wiki editors re-added the section but ceased to do so after I requested them to engage on the talk page (they did not actually engage on the talk page though, just stopped re-adding the WP:OR section). Human10.0 (talk) 10:22, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, it is mostly introduced by an autoconfirmed user. I can fully protect the article if the talk page communication fails.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Ymblanter A user re-added the section again. He did not engage on the talk page and I don't think that particular user will (in a constructive manner at least). I say this because he has a history of messing with my edits. I would strongly agree if you fully protect the article (without the WP:OR section that users keep on re-adding for whatever reasons). —Human10.0 (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Ymblanter A user re-added the section again. He did not engage on the talk page and I don't think that particular user will (in a constructive manner at least). I say this because he has a history of messing with my edits. I would strongly agree if you fully protect the article (without the WP:OR section that users keep on re-adding for whatever reasons). —Human10.0 (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping editor keeps adding unconstructive or downright vandalism. See latest revert: it covers unsourced claims, changing of years from 2010 to 1810, saying a game was banned because of "high impact scary violence and cruelty" and removing sourced information. The pending changes does not work apparently. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. I blocked the IP network range they're using for 6 months. That should put an end to it. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Requesting that the page be reverted to the status quo and fully protected due to edit warring by registered user during the course of multiple ongoing discussions on the article's talk page and at WP:NPOVN. That, or the offending user be blocked.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:40, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
10 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – 24 hour, temporary, VanEman is adding POV onto all Jewish prayer related articles when one article at Western Wall would suffice. Tried using talk page at Western Wall but he failed to listen. This article is not about prayer per se, it is about the article of prayer and has nothing to do about women praying at the western wall so a picture of women praying at the western wall or pictures of women praying and getting arrested doesn't belong. Sir Joseph (talk) 01:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks more like a content dispute. The user is autoconfirmed anyway, so semi won't do anything. If edit warring continues file a report at WP:ANEW — MusikAnimal talk 17:00, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 24 hour, temporary, VanEman is adding POV onto all Jewish prayer related articles when one article at Western Wall would suffice. Tried using talk page at Western Wall but he failed to listen. This article is not about prayer per se, it is about the article of prayer and has nothing to do about women praying at the western wall so a picture of women praying at the western wall or pictures of women praying and getting arrested doesn't belong. Sir Joseph (talk) 01:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Warning both parties about edit warring — MusikAnimal talk 17:06, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. DaltonCastle (talk) 07:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 17:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This is a very high profile page due to Drumpf's standing in the election and the "meme" status of this skit. It has already gotten some test edits from IPs already and could very easily end up as a BLP violation if care isn't taken in editing it. Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I assume you meant Donald Trump (Last Week Tonight) but even so my decision still stands — MusikAnimal talk 16:54, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by various IPs and users. Perhaps semi-protected for a week or so? Moony22 17:42, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thinking about it, a shorter period of time would probably do the trick, less than a day. Moony22 17:47, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator NuclearWarfare. — MusikAnimal talk 18:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Once the semi-protection/block expires, they keep coming. This is a recurring problem. —Vensatry (Talk) 18:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Cyphoidbomb. Katietalk 18:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continuous anon-IP vandalism and block-evasion since March 7, escalating within the last 24 hours. --Tenebrae (talk) 04:44, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent long-term vandalism. Very widely known topic. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 09:11, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruption from IPs adding WP:PEACOCK and WP:OR. —IB [ Poke ] 09:53, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war related to the word "actor" vs "actress". Wayne Jayes (talk) 12:35, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism or addition of unsourced content from multiple IPs over the past week or two. Previously semi-protected for similar issues. ~ RobTalk 16:39, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Magic♪piano 16:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pretty sure this brief period will do the trick — MusikAnimal talk 17:20, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
IPs are on the loose. Persistent and coordinated vandalism by multiple IPs. Semi. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has continued after the expiration of previous protection. BilCat (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:54, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Edit warring - long history of. Much by IP directly linked to BES Utilities which appears to be whitewashing. Jim1138 (talk) 01:02, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:56, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection Edit warring - long history of. As with BES Utilities above IP links to BES Utilities Jim1138 (talk) 01:02, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:56, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Uppercase version of Manan Shah is already salted. Wgolf (talk) 01:08, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection Edit warring - long history of. A user, using IPs, is deleting contents sourced from official FIFA sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by El cazador (talk • contribs) 01:46, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:59, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's an IP-hopping editor that keeps removing Category: Science fiction video games for no reason. Repeated warnings have not worked, and this has been going on since August 2015. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:41, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Perhaps start off with 3 months semi? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 09:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:50, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 (talk) 17:14, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – test. Kamilkonnonrey18 (talk) 17:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Question: You want to test semiprotection? Or test WP:RFPP? And I see no persistent vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 20:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected No vandalism indeed, but it's your userspace so I've semi'd — MusikAnimal talk 16:52, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from unregistered users. Peter Sam Fan | talk 15:02, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes might not be enough. Lectonar (talk) 15:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Peter Sam Fan | talk 15:13, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 06:38, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:13, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Longterm semi-protection: Trolling and edit-warring by an IP-hopper that's been going on for 12+ days despite endless futile talk-page discussions and an ANI thread ([14] see subthread "IP-hopping, edit-warring, trolling, and vandalism"). Picked back up right after a three-day semi-protection expired. Please semi-protect the Talk page too, as the IP-hopper has been repeatedly vandalizing that. Softlavender (talk) 10:00, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of Two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bgwhite (talk) 10:34, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Lilimar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Talk:Lilimar (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: Notability established at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilimar Hernandez. Requesting unprotection to create redirect. nyuszika7h (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Also talk page for article, also create protected, so headers can be added. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- They are still protected. nyuszika7h (talk) 18:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Done (pages have been restored) Lectonar (talk) 08:35, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Has recurred to recent IP vandalism after expiry of semi-protection. Also faces a challenge with a posted statement to the talk page with members of the group declaring intent to come in to engage in POV editing with conflicts of interest on the page.[15] Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 03:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 04:13, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This problematic page was semi-protected for six months ending Jan. 14, 2016. Almost immediately after that, anon IPs returned and no fewer than six registered editors since then have had to revert the same vandal edit. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:55, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - recently around one incident a week - just revert for now and re-list if the problem continues. AlexiusHoratius 04:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Edit warning. --Deffrman (talk) 04:09, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @AlexiusHoratius: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:00, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:18, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A brief glance at the page history shows many recent additions of content that is either unsourced or referenced to dodgy web sources. In a BLP this is especially problematic. . Vanamonde93 (talk) 02:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#173.174.98.84_and_32.97.110.60_edit_warring_in_Mexican_free-tailed_bat. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 03:04, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:30, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. one week by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 04:39, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unofficial free agent signing information repeatedly being added. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 04:04, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:20, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued adding of promotional content by an unregistered user using different ips. Rentier (talk) 04:13, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unofficial free agent signing information repeatedly being added. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 04:30, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:37, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP -based edit war. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Please note that this editor has reverted to add a BLP violation back in. IMDB isn't reliable to say someone is a conspiracy theorist. Also the text removed relied solely on primary sources to paint a negative slant of the subject. How is thinking one is haunted by demons notable without reliable and significant secondary coverage? Better sourcing is needed on this BLP. 2600:1002:B118:DB1C:945C:C651:1F09:ACDD (talk) 22:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 23:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Amaury (talk) 03:32, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yopie (talk) 03:32, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:16, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could we please have temporary protection? Indignant fans are anxious to make forumlike posts about the manager's future, or lack thereof, and it's getting boring monitoring it and reverting it all. Thanks. DBaK (talk) 20:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:01, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 21:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Antisemitic trolling by socks of banned user. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:45, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. a bit by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 03:02, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: High level of IP and new user vandalism due to the popularity of the Broadway show and album, Hamilton (musical). In the musical (and history), Burr assassinated Alexander Hamilton. Currently that article is also semi-protected for this reason. X4n6 (talk) 00:38, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:04, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IagoQnsi (talk) 19:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:09, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Page of a high profile doctor in India attracting vandalism. Jacobspeeds2 (talk) 22:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 22:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Article attacked by two different editors, who seem to be angry fans. She seems to have made plot decisions for the show Pretty Little Liars, including ending a romantic relationship between two of the characters. These editors aren't taking it well. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:57, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Floquenbeam (talk) 01:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
11 March 2016
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – omg i.p. bouncer keeps added unsourced info/disruptive edits about shows that have been shows THAT ARE VERY VERY unlikely to be rerun on this network . Digifan23 (talk) 20:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:29, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High Vandalism edits by IP address. JØ +TALK 08:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes--Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: - Rash of Bangladeshi IPs, and single edit new accounts, changing "International Cricket Council" to "Indian Cheating Council" and similar anti-iIndian vandalism. - Arjayay (talk) 09:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Addition of Hoaxes as User:Bertrand101 IP Sockpuppet. LG-Gunther : Talk 10:15, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous disruptive editing, same as Schistosomiasis. CFCF 💌 📧 12:11, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recent vandalism by IP's and new users. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:29, 11 March 2016 (UTC) Support Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 19:39, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: With the show approaching, it would be best to protect this from any further movement or non-user editing. . Adventuretimer1Come along with me, to a land beside the sea, 18:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:35, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Full-protection: On March 20 EdJohnston full protected for 5 days or until editing disputes have been resolved. After 4 days no concrete edits have achieved consensus and significant fundamental issues persist which will require further talk page discussion with broadened participation, possibly including dispute resolution or requests for comment. Request full protection indefinite or until editing disputes have been resolved. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 00:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- I recommend declining this request. If a new war breaks out when protection expires, blocks might be considered. Nothing prevents you from opening up a WP:RFC. EdJohnston (talk) 00:58, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:14, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. If you don't reach consensus on the talk-page, then consider dispute-resolution. The RfC mentioned above is also a way forward. Lectonar (talk) 10:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection - this account was created when I got my first smartphone because I was worried about rollback errors; as it turned out I have hardly used the account at all and there is a note on the talk page asking that people contact me on my main account's talk page. Because this talk page has attracted a persistent troll, it would save time for all involved to have it permanently semi protected. --Bonadeaphone (talk) 08:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Yaris678 (talk) 17:59, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of slo-mo IP vandalism from the end of February through yesterday. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 18:34, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Constant edits by an unregistered IP, and the reasons given for such edits are unsophisticated for wikipedia's standards. I'm requesting there to be semi-protection, but the amount of time for which I'll leave up for the administrators to decide.Osh33m (talk) 20:01, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- FYI: Indefinite semi-protection would mean the article would be protected forever (or until someone manually unprotected it). -IagoQnsi (talk) 20:53, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Edited: Sorry about that. Definite temporary semi-protection. Osh33m (talk) 21:06, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The words Wapanese, and Weeabo are both racial slurs that link to the article so as a result the page has been vandalized. I will leave it up to admin how long to protect this for but I would treat it the same as any other slur linked page on Wikipedia. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 23:10, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and now a newly registered are constantly adding a long list of stores despite all being told it fails NOTDIR etc, Thanks, . –Davey2010Talk 01:19, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther : Talk 01:46, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:31, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vanamonde93 (talk) 02:39, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing attacks on several K-pop artists' articles based on adding same-sex spouses on their infobox. Multi-month campaign. Please check the protection log of the article and similar articles currently at RFPP. . Dr. K. 02:58, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highish-traffic target; getting IP vandalism. All recent contributions by IPs have been nonconstructive. VQuakr (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:35, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IPv6 and IPv4, same person, dubious and unreferenced info persistent. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Plenty of IP editors (83.44.181.86; 50.79.20.241; 172.112.98.56; 2600:1012:b112:490d:60:2d62:83ee:c29; 2605:e000:4ec8:ff00:55a9:82f0:3a57:c0ea; 172.112.98.56; 2605:e000:4ec8:ff00:348d:4199:1313:4fbe) have kept emerging and vandalizing the article. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 15:35, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:36, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:18, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection never works, discruption continues. Qed237 (talk) 17:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is being attacked by long time hoaxer (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/جواد رمضانی شوراب and article history) currently IP-hopping. Deli nk (talk) 13:06, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- To a lesser degree, he is also attacking Zero Tolerance (2015 film), so maybe protection of that article can be considered as well. Deli nk (talk) 13:08, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A lot of unsourced and unverifiable information has been added to this article either by IP or relatively new users. Would request semi-protection for about a couple weeks or a month at most. Thanks. Inter&anthro (talk) 14:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent additions of unsourced or poorly cited material from IP users, which is becoming something of a commonality these days on such Junior and Senior Eurovision articles. Wes Mouse ✒ 15:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Back in late January, this page was protected for 10 days due to repeated vandalism related to the Barcelona-Real Madrid soccer rivalry. Since protection expired, it started up again and hasn't stopped, this time with fans of another rival joining in: [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. Since the "Barcelona's training ground" thing is apparently based on a game that happened back in November, it's probably not going away any time soon. Egsan Bacon (talk) 18:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Azealia911 talk 23:52, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - request was good at the time but the article has been quiet for a bit. Already semiprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:50, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Yeepsi (talk) 13:31, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Edit request: This edit should be reverted, for the reason that the subject of a COI allegation should not be allowed to just remove the discussion of the evidence of such a COI unilaterally. 70.24.7.43 (talk) 13:02, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done As that has been here for quite a time now. Procedural. Lectonar (talk) 09:47, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Slow-motion edit war over whether to include a reference to the Captain America film: 5 back-&-forths in past 12 months. The IPs involved are different each time so probably little point in warning or reporting them. : Noyster (talk), 18:27, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - not really active enough - just revert it if it's no good and re-list if the situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 02:52, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, puerile humor with WP:BLP violations. 2601:188:0:ABE6:E8F0:C33:B6B:86F2 (talk) 23:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:47, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandals bombing it. Fdssdf (talk) 23:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Vandalism continuing at a breakneck pace, just to concur with Fdssdf. Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:14, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:49, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP addresses edits. JØ +TALK 15:37, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Inbound IP and new account attacks. Dr. K. 18:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:54, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: From semi protection to no protection. PatGanj (talk) 16:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 16:47, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Archives of old discussions, no-one needs to edit them. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:32, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IP users keep adding external links to a pornographic audio clip. IagoQnsi (talk) 19:38, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Either semi or revoke TPA - editing the unblock request to make it appear approved and then revert-warring over removal of the unblock request. Nick—Contact/Contribs 19:25, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Lectonar (talk) 21:27, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Fairly persistent vandalism, and has been protected for vandalism twice in the past. Also not an article that has legitimate edits very often, since it's just a disambiguation page. Seems likely that vandals will keep adding "I'm the queen!" notes ad infinitum, so perhaps the protection should be indefinite as well. IagoQnsi (talk) 19:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User editing from multiple IPs (some of them blocked many times) keeps making the same disruptive edits despite multiple warnings leftat the talk pages. Jetstreamer Talk 20:53, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:56, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent recent vandalism. AIRcorn (talk) 21:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Still getting heavy vandalism. AIRcorn (talk) 01:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:29, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 22:02, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – At least until the current American election cycle is over - could we *please* put this under auto-confirmed edit-protection? Just look at all the vandalism from just today. Shearonink (talk) 22:14, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- PLEASE. Shearonink (talk) 01:50, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:24, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Despite low editing, none of IP edits were helpful. Mostly, they have been reverted. Alternatively, renew pending changes if semi is too much. George Ho (talk) 22:35, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
12 March 2016
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 20:07, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think vandalism has been too frequent recently for PC to be effective. We might consider installing PC protection after this semiprotection expires. MelanieN (talk) 20:45, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistant and long-term vandalism. Very noticeable especially when someone is researching science. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 21:47, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:51, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: This page either needs a much longer temporary semi protection or an indefinite pending changes protection. Constant target for vandalism by young fans, and has picked up the past few weeks. Gloss 16:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 16:42, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP addresses edits. JØ +TALK 06:44, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 15:54, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 15:54, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:00, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Silly as this sounds, apparently there are a number of people extremely upset that mansaf, a rice dish eaten in several Middle Eastern countries, is described as "Jordanian and Palestinian" (with appropriate academic citations), and keep removing "Palestinian". For literally a couple years now we get regular bursts of this exact vandalsim, from varying IP addresses, cropping up every couple weeks. It's disruptive, continuous, and wastes time of several editors who have to patrol it, and sometimes the vandalism slides undetected for weeks, validating the vandals' attempts to rewrite food history. What's the best way to prevent this? MatthewVanitas (talk) 12:31, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by IP-hopping disruptive editor. Deli nk (talk) 13:09, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:23, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continuous edit warring between a registered account and IP hopper. Widr (talk) 13:39, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:22, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:20, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Page is under 500/30 restrictions currently, enforced by Special:AbuseFilter/698. Since non-autoconfirmed editors will have their edits rejected anyway it would be best to semi-protect to prevent editor frustration. Strongjam (talk) 16:57, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- It looks like the edit filter will prevent IP edits from being saved to this page. Do you still think semiprotection is needed? I think they get a message if they try to save. EdJohnston (talk) 18:06, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Semi-protection isn't strictly needed, but it will help cut down on editor frustration. Instead of crafting an edit and having it rejected they instead will just have the "View Source" button. — Strongjam (talk) 18:15, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected, once the enforcement has been changed, pls file for unprotection or ping any administrator.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:08, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Like pretty much every other NBA team article, consistent IP vandalism over a long period of time. —DangerousJXD (talk) 07:15, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. There is no obvious duration for semi-protection, because vandalism is steady an relatively low-key; on the other hand, there are good IP edits. I have chosen to configure pending changes for 1 year. If an acute period of vandalism occurs, pls file for additional short semi-protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:12, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This problematic page was semi-protected for six months ending Jan. 14, 2016. Almost immediately after that, anon IPs returned and no fewer than six registered editors since then have had to revert the same vandal edit. Request made on March 10 was turned down with note to resubmit if the anon IP vandalism continued. It did so today. [26] Experience with this article for nearly two years has shown that the anon IPs are relentless, and they indeed returned almost immediately after the six-month protection ended.--Tenebrae (talk) 08:56, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. The article had pending changes configured, but since indeed there was not a single good IP edit in the last year or more, I semi-protected it for a year, and removed PC protection as moot.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:04, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Blocked user User:HankMoodyTZ is still adding unreferenced content into this article using variable IP adresses like[27].--Oleola (talk) 19:24, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Blocked user User:HankMoodyTZ is still adding unreferenced content into this article using variable IP adresses like[28].--Oleola (talk) 19:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IPs continue to change battle result, troops figures and casualty figures. Kansas Bear (talk) 19:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Both of the most recent participants in the dispute are autoconfirmed.) AlexiusHoratius 07:04, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Blocked user User:HankMoodyTZ is still adding unreferenced content into this article using variable IP adresses like[29].--Oleola (talk) 19:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Author continually removing CSD tag on NN autobiographical page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:19, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: Page was deleted, recreated at Alex Bugatti ( blogger) RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined (deleted and only created once.) AlexiusHoratius 02:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All referenced content was removed and replaced with promotional stuff. Rathfelder (talk) 22:02, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 02:22, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection Ongoing vandalism in violation of the WP:PRESERVE policy. Kendrick7talk 03:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 06:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – resumed immediately after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 06:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Kingdom of Ireland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Lordship of Ireland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: An IP from Hong Kong keeps on doing an edit every couple of days and it keeps on being reverted by different editors. The IP keeps changing so I haven't been able to communicate with them and they don't leave an edit comment or go to the talk page. This has been happening since last June. The IP may have a point and I've requested a change to the template concerned in the articles but no action there and multiple editors have reverted the IP. They need to say what's bugging them or just stop and go away. Dmcq (talk) 18:52, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (On both.) AlexiusHoratius 02:31, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by 45.50.173.186. GetSomeUtah (talk) 00:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 02:13, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Page is under attack from a series of socks. MarnetteD|Talk 01:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor Lazylaces has stated that they don't mind dealing with the vandals. MarnetteD|Talk 01:46, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 10:54, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, I only see one unconstructive edit after the protection expired, and pending changes are already there.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Content that appears to be WP:LIBEL has been added using range of IP addresses over a period of several days. Drchriswilliams (talk) 21:55, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent high profile news event, persistent vandalism. aqwfyj Talk/Contribs 22:59, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:22, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tons of IP users have been completely ruining this article with vandalism today. Somehow most of it slipped by vandalism patrollers, just discovered it with dozens of unreverted vandalism edits. IagoQnsi (talk) 23:07, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:20, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection or Pending changes protection: IP vandalism of false tour dates. This page was semi-protected for only a week last time. This page should be protected until the tour is over. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 23:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:16, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing attacks on several K-pop artists' articles based on adding same-sex spouses on their infobox. Multi-month campaign. Please check the protection log of the article and similar articles such as Park Chanyeol and Byun Baek-hyun. Fans vandalise the article then take screenshots to share with other fans. Please see this admission by a vandal of a similar article. Dr. K. 23:53, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:15, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
13 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. clpo13(talk) 17:38, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 18:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Done by Acroterion. BethNaught (talk) 19:16, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection or at least reduction to TE protection (edit and move); I can't think of any reason this should have any protection at all. If "between 700 and 1200 transclusions" somehow qualifies as "highly visible", marginally, then maybe autoconfirmed protection is sufficient, to prevent anon vandals from doing silly things? — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 18:34, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Note: @SMcCandlish: As I understand it, you're asking for complete unprotection, but maybe also semi-protection, in which case it is currently semi-protected. Since I've recently reframed my understanding of what a high-risk template entails, I'm cautious about taking action here. My input would be that retaining the current semi-protection is fine and adequate. I'm not sure if I'm comfortable unprotecting, but you're right in pointing out that no protection at all will almost certainly not yield negative results. Airplaneman ✈ 19:08, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Airplaneman: The problem is the full-sysop move protection; any prot. level of TE or lower would work, I just didn't see any rationale for it having higher-than-autoconf, since the edit protection is set to that. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 19:19, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Template protected. Thanks for pointing that out, @SMcCandlish:. Airplaneman ✈ 19:23, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- YW. Thx for the fix. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 19:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Airplaneman: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:56, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection or at least reduction to TE protection (edit and move); just a redir, will full protection for no apparent reason. I can't fix the double redirect in it. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 19:02, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- temporary full protection: Was protected by Lectonar couple of weeks ago,[30] edit warring still not stopped, a now a new IP address is hopping and edit warring over three different editors now. Capitals00 (talk) 16:34, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The groups official status has not been announced, "I don't think so" is not an official statement. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:04, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Today is twentieth anniversary of the massacre, and page is attracting vandalism. Nick Cooper (talk) 18:30, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:56, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:57, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:57, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Fangusu sock edits. Please see protection log. Steel1943 (talk) 17:17, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:59, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant blatant vandalism, page blanking, etc. This page has been protected in the past and now IP editors are ruining it again. This has been happening on and off for years. OldSkool01 (talk) 14:07, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. —Vensatry (Talk) 17:07, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Some local files
- File:Button shifting.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- File:Button sub link.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- File:Button definition list.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- File:Button code.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- File:Button align left.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Downscale to upload+move protection Seeing as the content of the filepage does not affect the actual transcluded file the edit protection is unnecessary, original protecting administrator was asked but appears to be inactive.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus:
Done. I've changed all 5 files to edit:autoconfirmed; move:templateeditor; upload:templateeditor, which seems to be the most appropriate combination given the tools we have today (which are substantially different from those in 2007 when the protection was last changed). Deryck C. 17:16, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus:
Unprotection: It is already 4 years, give IPs one more chance. But "move = sysop" will be better. 333-blue 09:40, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Pinging Lowellian and Deryck Chan as protecting admins. tutterMouse (talk) 10:41, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Done as suggested. Deryck C. 16:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: There is a reasonable draft of this article that cannot be accepted until protection is removed. RadioFan (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected Deryck C. 16:36, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: A reasonable draft is waiting acceptance . RadioFan (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Done as suggested. Deryck C. 16:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism on a contentious current event-ish topic. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, last 12h seem to be ok except for one vandal edit swiftly reverted, and there are good IP edits.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:03, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute with edit-warring. Discussion is in progress at the dispute resolution noticeboard. Please page-protect the article for about 5 days to force the editors to discuss at DRN rather than engage in edit-warring. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - request was good at the time but the article has been quiet for a bit. Re-list if issues continue. AlexiusHoratius 10:38, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – campaign going on to promote Miss Grand International, run by IPs over several articles. The Banner talk 09:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 10:30, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 01:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 10:09, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Editing kind of slow, but none of IP edits hints a good edit. George Ho (talk) 01:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 10:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Every time protection goes off, the vandals return. Do something permanent, please. Montanabw(talk) 03:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - around one incident a week. Just revert it. AlexiusHoratius 10:17, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. clpo13(talk) 18:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:04, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP users. Jdcomix (talk) 01:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IP has been constantly (evading blocks) vandalising all my sub pages. —Vensatry (Talk) 13:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Massive disrupt of the page due to a political event in Kerala, India. Please check the logs and see many IPs are trying to vandal this page. I request for a protection. abhilashkrishn talk 10:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:37, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Few hours after protection expired, ridiculous disruptiveness started again. Brustopher (talk) 11:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected Escalating this quickly is unusual but IMO justified. I couldn't spot any productive IP edits in the past couple of years. BethNaught (talk) 11:30, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Please bring down Creepypasta to Pending changes, Please. — 2601:183:4000:D5BD:E404:EA86:FB4C:C7D8 (talk) 01:20, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @2601:183:4000:D5BD:E404:EA86:FB4C:C7D8: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Pinging @Drmies: who was the protecting administrator.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:20, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- @2601:183:4000:D5BD:E404:EA86:FB4C:C7D8: Any other reasons for bringing down to pending changes? You can't just say what to do; you must state your reasons for changing protection too. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 22:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- The article is a shit magnet, which is why it was protected. I still don't understand Pending Changes, which still appears to me as an appeaser: you can look at your edit before we revert it. Please note what the IP editor proposed adding on the talk page. Drmies (talk) 00:15, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Not unprotected. This article attracts way, way too much nonsense. PC is not useful in articles that attract a high level of inappropriate editing. Courcelles (talk) 01:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Jamie Maclaren
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unexplained removal of content. Simione001 (talk) 02:30, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 06:23, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:24, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Slow edit warring / content dispute by unregistered editors. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:26, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by accounts, needs review. JØ +TALK 07:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:26, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Page has previously been protected four times. When each one expires, IP vandalism returns, at a high rate. Now getting into the main section of the tournament itself, it's becoming harder to check each and every edit. Previous protection worked very well with good-faith IP editors requesting changes via the talkpage. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:29, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IPs claiming "wide critical acclaim", when few reviews are out. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:04, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – So many bad IP edits. George Ho (talk) 23:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:06, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Nationwide opinion polling for the Democratic Party 2016 presidential primaries (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 23:15, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:07, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 02:49, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 02:49, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 02:52, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:14, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This page and other WW2 pages are subject to POV edits by IP. David J Johnson (talk) 19:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, especially from a particular user who includes the name "Derrick Mureithi" in the article as an important historical figure of the school. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 20:12, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 23:45, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article was protected, then unprotected and vandalism and drive-by useless edits started up again. Can we make this permanent semi, please?. Montanabw(talk) 03:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:23, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. There has been a persistent edit war between multiple editors - registered and unregistered - about whether or not Samurai Jack qualifies as "acquired" or "original" programming. One camp says it's acquired because the show originated on Cartoon Network and re-aired on Adult Swim for a while, while another camp says it's now original because a fifth season was confirmed for Adult Swim. Addition of a hidden instructional note did nothing to quell the edit war. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 02:33, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, sorry for not reacting earlier--Ymblanter (talk) 22:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, sorry for not reacting earlier--Ymblanter (talk) 22:09, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: for a longer period of time. High level of IP vandalism by 121.129.146.118.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 10:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:15, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 03:23, March 12, 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- This Wikipedia page still suffers of lots of vandalism by this registered and unregistered users so I was wondering if you can protect it.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 04:37, March 12, 2016 (UTC)
- No, this is what we call an edit war. Courcelles (talk) 01:23, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- This Wikipedia page still suffers of lots of vandalism by this registered and unregistered users so I was wondering if you can protect it.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 04:37, March 12, 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. George Ho (talk) 23:18, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected until 1 August 2016, after which the convention will be over. Courcelles (talk) 01:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Fangusu sock is at it again. (See the protection log for details.). Steel1943 (talk) 00:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 01:12, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Democratic Party presidential debates and forums, 2016 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 20:05, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done There is a lot of editing by IPs and non-autoconfirmed users, but almost all of it appears to be constructive. MelanieN (talk) 20:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Republican Party presidential debates and forums, 2016 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 20:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Democratic Party presidential debates and forums, 2016 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 20:05, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done There is a lot of editing by IPs and non-autoconfirmed users, but almost all of it appears to be constructive. MelanieN (talk) 20:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Republican Party presidential debates and forums, 2016 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 20:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 21:54, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:42, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. GABHello! 22:46, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:34, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated insertion by User:BEH Communications of unreferenced promotional material and removal of referenced content. Rathfelder (talk) 22:49, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:36, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This article has been a target of sockpuppets since at least January and I just reported another one. Suggest a long period of semi-protection. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/David Adam Kess/Archive for the whole sordid history. DanielRigal (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:39, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple ip addresses. Govindaharihari (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:41, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – That crooked IP hopper will never stop adding single-film appearance characters to a table that requires only "recurring" characters. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:11, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent religious POV. Charles (talk) 09:56, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- This is now very disruptive.Charles (talk) 20:39, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:13, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: non-confirmed editors creating articles at this redirect. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:13, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:17, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unexplained changes and disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 16:17, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Per WP:Deceased_Wikipedians/Guidelines#On_the_userpage. I'm trying to get better information and better verification but the condolence page on the German Wikipedia is pretty authoritative. DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·ʇuoɔ) WER 21:57, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts to add unsourced or false information to an upcoming album article; many details are being released in the near future and we can expect many updates to this article. --Another Believer (Talk) 23:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:04, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 talk 02:35, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:07, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Per WP:Deceased_Wikipedians/Guidelines#On_the_userpage. I'm trying to get better information and better verification but the condolence page on the German Wikipedia is pretty authoritative. DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·ʇuoɔ) WER 21:57, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts to add unsourced or false information to an upcoming album article; many details are being released in the near future and we can expect many updates to this article. --Another Believer (Talk) 23:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:04, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 talk 02:35, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:07, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
14 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: repeated addition of copyrighted material/images. -Managerarc™ talk 18:44, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 19:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued addition of non-notable trivia by IP range. Hopefully a couple months. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Quite a heated dispute over a sentence of text. Hopefully it blows over. Airplaneman ✈ 19:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A user seems determined to mess up this article. Might need protection for a few hours or a day. . H.dryad (talk) 19:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:01, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This page has been repeatedly repeatedly created by User:Manojgupta24. Adding page creation protections will insure that he doesn't do this again. Ethanlu121 (talk) 15:29, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected. I took a few minutes to consider whether or not this was necessary, as it was only recreated once. I don't want to be too heavy-handed, but I think in this case the page doesn't have any immediate future potential, so a SALT is fine, in my opinion. Just a friendly note, @Ethanlu121: the correct word here is "ensure," not "insure". All the best, Airplaneman ✈ 19:10, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: It was temporarilly protected last September by User:NeilN due to IPs repeatedly removing information. As of today, two tag-teaming IPs have begun changing exactly the same information, and I will not keep reverting them. Even though it consists of vandalism. Cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:46, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- You should be blocked for your repeated flagrantly false claims of vandalism that you've made here and in several other places. Read up on WP:NOTVAND and WP:NPA. I corrected an absurdly incorrect statement. I thought that people, generally speaking, were aware that the Earth has a north pole and a south pole, which makes two poles. Your efforts to make one article claim that it has three are honestly quite bizarre. 77.47.80.202 (talk) 18:35, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note This user has been blocked for similar behaviour on another article. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:08, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am completing the three ear challenge currently.[1] Airplaneman ✈ 19:17, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistant and high level of IP vandalism from various IPs. Found5dollar (talk) 18:27, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:35, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 19:20, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over past week. Lizard (talk) 16:19, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 19:01, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 16:59, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 19:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP POV pushing. Continued addition of unsourced content. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 19:05, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Was protected briefly yesterday but is still under attack. Thanks, Biwom (talk) 14:10, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. It's essentially one IP. Lectonar (talk) 14:40, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:44, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There is a sudden spurt of edits by unregistered users adding unsourced OR to this delicately balanced article. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:48, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism directly after previous protection expired. Qed237 (talk) 14:21, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:05, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing/edit-warring by IP hopping editor, possibly a return of the "ceiling fan vandal" (see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/David Beals). Deli nk (talk) 14:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:05, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Coffee: Blocking individual IPs used by an IP-hopping editor helps for only as long as it takes for the editor to access a new IP address. The block-evading IP 59.154.89.30 (talk · contribs) has just showed up to make the same disruptive edits. Could you please reconsider semi-protecting the article? Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 16:45, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:59, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Coffee: Blocking individual IPs used by an IP-hopping editor helps for only as long as it takes for the editor to access a new IP address. The block-evading IP 59.154.89.30 (talk · contribs) has just showed up to make the same disruptive edits. Could you please reconsider semi-protecting the article? Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 16:45, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of spam/copyvio links. SummerPhDv2.0 14:52, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:06, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: for a longer period of time High level of IP vandalism from Korea Telecom.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 05:20, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:31, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Last time 121.129.146.118 was blocked for 24h but page was not protected.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 06:46, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Template-protected files
- File:Button align left.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- File:Button code.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- File:Button definition list.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- File:Button sub link.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- File:Button shifting.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
[Upload=Allow only administrators] & [Move=Allow only administrators]: Template-protected after this request (which wasn;t actually requesting template protection), but per policy (WP:TPROT) template protection is only appropriate for high-risk templates, modules, and other highly-transcluded pages. See also the comments at these two RFPP requests re pages in other namespaces that were template-protected. Pinging protecting admin @Deryck Chan:. - Evad37 [talk] 07:05, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:16, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Evad37: These images are used in the interface, hence I decided that template protection would be appropriate. They're part of the once-default Monobook skin's editing interface. Deryck C. 11:06, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Actually I may be wrong. Do template editors have permission to edit interface messages? Deryck C. 11:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- No – for example, I can't edit MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext (you may be thinking of group/page notices, which template editors are able to edit) - Evad37 [talk] 11:33, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for testing.
Done protection changes as you suggested. Deryck C. 12:50, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for testing.
- No – for example, I can't edit MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext (you may be thinking of group/page notices, which template editors are able to edit) - Evad37 [talk] 11:33, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Actually I may be wrong. Do template editors have permission to edit interface messages? Deryck C. 11:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Evad37: These images are used in the interface, hence I decided that template protection would be appropriate. They're part of the once-default Monobook skin's editing interface. Deryck C. 11:06, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP cruft started the moment the last protection expired. —IB [ Poke ] 09:47, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. sst✈ 10:31, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:01, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article's troll/vandal/sock-IP is back and this time, he is IP hopping, after his original IP is blocked by an admin. . Codename Lisa (talk) 12:10, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 12:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This page is a magnet for vandals as the subject is a lightning rod. PC1 would at least keep the IP vandalism from being visible. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:00, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Endless sockpuppetry by socks of Starship9000 (talk · contribs) and Nsmutte (talk · contribs). Please consider indefinite semi-protection, as another extended period of semi protection earlier was not enough to convince them to give it up. GABHello! 13:29, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:59, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been going on for months. Someone even complained about it on the talk page. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 02:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:29, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, I am afraid at this point full protection would create more harm than good.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP-hopper. Has been going on for a real long time. Crboyer (talk) 04:40, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:24, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from various IP and newly-registered users within the past few days. Israel's Son 04:45, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:27, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article that was changed as a redirect per afd that keeps on getting changed. Wgolf (talk) 05:53, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Posts on Reddit & Hacker News claiming his death, no news articles or verifiable sources, multiple edits from IPs or new editors. —Hobart (talk) 19:13, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - nearly all the edits I checked were good faith and it looks like it has been confirmed. Re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 01:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: unsourced additions and edit warring.LM2000 (talk) 20:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 22:49, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 01:44, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Anonymous IP editor constantly changing figures for the war dead without providing any sources for his changes. Today, a newly created account made its first edit by making the exact same changes as the IP editor. This is possibly the same IP editor who created the single-purpose account just for this edit. EkoGraf (talk) 19:29, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:29, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
indefinite Protection against edits: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upton-by-Chester_High_School [[31]] I want protection against edits for this page to prevent students from editing it. All edits from this point forwards are to come from ourselves (this account) please. Thanks. UptonHighSchool (talk) 20:12, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined There is no way that will happen, official accounts are not given sole ownership of articles, and usenames such as UptonHighSchool are not permitted per the username policy. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:17, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. namely the filer of this report. BethNaught (talk) 20:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dan56 (talk) 22:46, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:28, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 01:00, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High-risk article. Just half an hour ago, an IP added nonsensical stuff in the candidates section, adding things such as "Bachelor Party" and "Bird's Power Party", but they don't exist in Singapore. 2679D (talk) 11:37, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, I don't see a pattern of consistent and overwhelming vandalism; I think it'd be better to leave it unprotected at this time to allow for possible productive changes in this current event. Airplaneman ✈ 18:55, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring from long-term-problem shifting IPv6 user (see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive912#Rangeblock_needed_for_Millennials_.E2.80.94_Generation_X_long-term_disruption). McGeddon (talk) 19:17, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This page's protection expired just yesterday and the edit warrior, trolling and disruptive IP has returned under a new IP again. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 19:37, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:12, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. two weeks by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 22:47, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Drive-by IPs are predominantly vandals, pending changes will allow the legitimate edits but stop the nonsense. Montanabw(talk) 20:07, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Due to the renaming, the template is not protected as it should be. George Ho (talk) 21:43, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by fringe POV-pushing IPs; problem has been persistent for several weeks now. Constantine ✍ 22:42, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:55, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
15 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New accounts (likely socks) repeatedly deleting content from the article. Alexbrn (talk) 17:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined First try talking to them — MusikAnimal talk 17:43, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.CLCStudent (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Long term semi-protection: As I have outlined in the header at Talk:Michael Marder, this article has been under promotional pressure by a couple of named accounts and several IP addresses almost since it was created. Please semi-protect this article for say 6 months to stop this longterm abuse of Wikipedia as a personal webpage. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 19:50, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not edited frequently enough for semi-protection. Katietalk 21:17, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined: There's definitely more activity over the past few days, but a good number of reversions have been to edits made by autoconfirmed users. In this case, I don't think semi would help much. Airplaneman ✈ 15:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP-hopping editor that keeps on removing science fiction related categories and WikiProject banners from a wide range of articles and other categories. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:15, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - only a couple edits so far - would rather wait before protecting as it's a talk page. AlexiusHoratius 14:35, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP edit-warring. Mezigue (talk) 13:31, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. by Favonian (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) for 24 hours. Airplaneman ✈ 15:29, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Macedonian, a Greek (talk) 23:32, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - looks like the vandalism ended when the date changed - re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 14:26, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon user (using IPv6) has been removing the logo from the page, even thought it is the current logo in use by the station. Warnings issued to the various IPs have not helped. Requesting temporary protection of the page. Thank you. Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC) 04:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined - a couple in the last couple weeks isn't too many - just revert them for now and re-list if the disruption gets worse. AlexiusHoratius 14:27, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Protecting administrator refuses to extend protection. However, there have been reverts in the past 30 days, including just one this month. If PC is insufficient, how about semi-protection instead? George Ho (talk) 07:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:41, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - only one incident in last couple weeks. AlexiusHoratius 14:29, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalized over the past few weeks continuously. It may need to be protected for a week or so. . H.dryad (talk) 18:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:16, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This article has been repeatedly vandalized for a very long time. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A user seems to be doing a great deal of major editing without discussion in this page and they have been persistent for some days now. I am not sure if the additions would fall into WP:OR or not as the additions and removals (including some references) are quite extensive. Temporary page protection may be in order. . H.dryad (talk) 17:16, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:41, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism or test edits by IPs and recently-created accounts. The problem is never acute from a single source, but continuous from a wide variety of sources, never letting up for more than a few days at a time. Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 17:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lengthy history of disruption — MusikAnimal talk 17:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 17:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 17:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by socks of blocked User:Nsmutte. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 16:12, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- I Like It When You Sleep, for You Are So Beautiful Yet So Unaware of It (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – genre warring. Karst (talk) 15:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – We seem to have a rather persistent IP-hopper vandal that keeps inserting a 17 March 2016 date. . Codename Lisa (talk) 16:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 16:27, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:49, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:38, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Serbian political parties
- Serbian Progressive Party (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Social Democratic Party (Serbia) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Democratic Party (Serbia) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Serbian political parties (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated reverts from multiple IP's of updated numbers of Serbian National Assembly members by political party. No valid explanations given in edit summaries. Farolif (talk) 23:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is indeed strange. Let's see if a week helps. Airplaneman ✈ 15:43, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IPs removing references and referenced information. --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 11:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:24, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:49, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:38, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Serbian political parties
- Serbian Progressive Party (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Social Democratic Party (Serbia) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Democratic Party (Serbia) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Serbian political parties (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated reverts from multiple IP's of updated numbers of Serbian National Assembly members by political party. No valid explanations given in edit summaries. Farolif (talk) 23:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is indeed strange. Let's see if a week helps. Airplaneman ✈ 15:43, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IPs removing references and referenced information. --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 11:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:24, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:50, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, it is more like a content dispute, and seems to have stopped.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:29, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 00:17, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:25, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring without discussion. This page was semi-protected for a week on 21 February, but the problem has returned now that it is unprotected - an IP continues to add POV language to the text without discussing it on the talk. Perhaps longer protection might persuade the IP to edit constructively? Wcp07 (talk) 10:53, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- List of international cricket centuries at the Green Park Stadium (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by evading blocks. —Vensatry (Talk) 11:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:36, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Quite a bit of drama spilling over into main article. Suggest semi protection until the Candidates Tournament ends on 4/1. 75.117.98.121 (talk) 15:04, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @75.117.98.121: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:08, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, I do not see any problematic edits, at least not in the last couple of days--Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated libelous vandalism from anon IPs inserting a person's name into the article. Kindzmarauli (talk) 21:16, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 01:53, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; children adding their names to article. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This and various other Syrian Civil Warr related articles (all under sanction for 1RR) have been wrecked by the persistent vandalism of User:Kordestani; but this has had the usual effect of sucking in otherwise 'good' editors. Protection, and reversion to stability, will deflate and cool the passions here. . Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 20:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 20:26, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:47, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Lectonar (talk) 20:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:13, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Protecting administrator refuses to extend PC protection. However, there have been reverts this month during protection. Probably someone else shall take the role. George Ho (talk) 22:00, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:07, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 3 vandals since protection was lifted. Apriestofgix (talk) 15:31, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined 1 IP 3x....less than 1 vandalism per day. Please report to AIV next time. Lectonar (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 20:05, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Edit warring despite ongoing discussion on talk page. Sepsis II (talk) 20:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:29, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
16 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mlpearc (open channel) 03:36, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — MusikAnimal talk 15:37, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:33, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP/user vandalism. Yeepsi (talk) 15:49, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected Extensive history of disruption, resuming more or less as soon as previous period expired — MusikAnimal talk 19:46, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Smalljim. — MusikAnimal talk 19:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs performing BLP-violating edits to Marco Rubio's name and changing Donald Trump's pic without discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:36, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism and undiscussed changes by IPs including vandalism of Marco Rubio's name and changing Donald Trump's pic. Steel1943 (talk) 18:38, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Editor blocked for edit-warring. Continued via a now block sockpuppet account. Betty Logan (talk) 18:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:56, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:49, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user continually adds unsourced content and when asked to provide references, he merely reverts to his own version. H.dryad (talk) 13:17, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:44, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and reverts from different users, attempts have been made to focus the attention to the talk page, so that no further edit be made before reaching consensus. CounterTime (talk) 13:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. When this expires blocks will be in order for those who continue to edit war — MusikAnimal talk 17:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page recreated 3 times in the space of less than an hour. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 16:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Promotional/spam article created 4 times in the past 24 hours. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 17:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 11:34, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. sst✈ 12:06, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, It's one IP that *might* be editing disruptively, but I don't think they are. Just not necessarily editing to our style guides mainly. If action does need to be taken, it should be taken against them, not the page at this stage. GedUK 12:14, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: please semi-protect for at least a month. Someone posted a very inappropriate picture.Bobsanders1991 (talk) 15:26, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent recent addition of either unsourced material, or material clearly against talk page consensus. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:21, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 05:32, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:06, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of Linkspam by one or more anon editors. Brianhe (talk) 09:49, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:04, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Recent incident of move vandalism by Cow cleaner 5000 socks has demonstrated that this list needs move protection like its parent article. It is unlikely that the list will be renamed without a WP:RM anyways and the CC5K socks have been targeting this list and its parent article for years. —Farix (t | c) 11:10, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This stub article is near an edit war (or in the middle of a 3-editor war, depending on whether one IP user created an account specifically to edit this article), and an editor with only edits on this page put up a deletion template. Fdssdf (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That's an edit war. I've also removed the PROD as that's for uncontroversial deletions which this clearly isn't. @Fdssdf: If nothing's resolved when protection is removed, I'd suggest taking it to AfD. GedUK 12:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ethanlu121 (talk) 23:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., vandalism is too infrequent for long-term semi-protection--Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – apparently its silly season. Gaijin42 (talk) 02:34, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 02:48, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High profile individual. . -- Fdizile (Programmer and Wikipedian) 21:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Bongwarrior (talk)
Full-protection: Severe edit warring by User:Jytdog CaptainYuge (talk) 21:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Not going to happen, and ANI is more than enough--Ymblanter (talk) 22:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 01:12, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Done --Kinu t/c 01:55, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption and unexplained removal. Qed237 (talk) 19:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, Disruption appears primarily to be the work of one autoconfirmed editor over the course of a few days. I don't think semi-protection is the best solution here. Airplaneman ✈ 21:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism which is likely to continue if not semi-protected soon. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:43, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined: I believe pending changes are sufficient for the amount of vandalism the article is currently receiving (3 instances on the past 2 weeks). Pending changes are currently set until April 19, 2016 by KrakatoaKatie (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Airplaneman ✈ 21:13, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of infantile IP vandalism by constantly adding "(The slowest color)" to this article. Thank you, CZmarlin (talk) 22:43, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
17 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also persistent sockpuppetry. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 20:22, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 20:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:12, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:19, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated IP and "throwaway account" vandalism following previous semiprotection's expiration. Also has indications on the talk page of organized persons from within the Oath Keepers movement working to organize the vandalism for POV pushing reasons. Requesting semiprotection be restored in order to keep the article from falling prey to organized "slow burn" attacks. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 15:19, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Update: vandalism has not just resumed from IPs but appears to be spreading to other related articles. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/75.107.214.21 Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 15:38, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 17:14, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hasn't been recreated since August last year. tutterMouse (talk) 14:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article was recreated yesterday with something that had to be oversighted. MelanieN (talk) 20:54, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP hopping ongoing vandalism. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:39, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:10, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Favonian for one week. tutterMouse (talk) 20:19, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – To allow template editors. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 03:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 15:07, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: For the same reason shown by me in this request (october 2015), that was accepted. This page is a mini stub vandalized by anons from early 2011, mainly in the section about the personalities, with nonsenses as this or this other (just to link last vandalisms of 2015). In my periodic inspection tour I found this, very similar to the other examples linked before. The IPs are very similar (115.186.138.5 -oct 2015-, 115.186.185.62 -mar 2016-) and, IMHO, another semi-pro should be useful. Due to the fact that anon contribs to this page were, until now, only vandalisms, I would suggest a very long protection (5 years or more). Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 04:12, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There's been exactly one IP edit to the page since protection expired in October 2015, and two edits in total. No way this article should be protected for five days, much less five years or more. Katietalk 14:54, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent Removal of content by IP. MBlaze Lightning (talk) 14:11, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Katietalk 15:12, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 02:52, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support A meme has placed Ted Cruz as the lead vocalist of the band and it's started to be attacked. I suspect that will last for at least a few more weeks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:06, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Opencooper (talk) 12:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page has been repeated target for obvious block evasion sockpuppetry. Nat Gertler (talk) 16:38, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:24, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Bishonen for 1 month. tutterMouse (talk) 17:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 21:06, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:28, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Coffee for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 11:10, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 04:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:51, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: There's an ongoing edit war over who founded the site. I don't know who is right - the referenced sources aren't online. I worry about protecting the wrong version. Perhaps some admin with a track record of getting to the bottom of things would like to sort this out. Philip Trueman (talk) 11:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The 217.38.0.0/16 range is putting false information into the article. Katietalk 14:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Not persistent and editing users admins, autoconfirmed and confirmed. --Mtherwjs (talk) 04:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Not unprotected. Your request makes little sense, and the article's edit history shows ample cause for protection. Favonian (talk) 16:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of referenced content and substitution of PR material. Rathfelder (talk) 13:13, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 17:44, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Continually being targeted by IP editors violating BLP. Kindzmarauli (talk) 15:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:49, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: (or temporary at least) - IP-hopping user persistently re-adding the same non-sourced content, a supposed agency with zero hits on Google. This page has just been cleaned-up after long-term abuse, spam, adverts and inappropriate edits by various IP users. - theWOLFchild 16:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 19:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
18 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Same problem as before, Can I suggest about 6 months to a year, thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:43, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- @AlexiusHoratius: Thank you but, the edits are due to a band members death, we are waiting for an official statement from the band regarding thier status, as in this discussion, I'm afraid these disruptive edits won't end anytime soon hence the request for 6 months or more. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- I extended it to two weeks. (Right now I think six months is a bit much. We can re-protect it in a couple weeks for a longer period if it looks like it's needed then.) AlexiusHoratius 19:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- @AlexiusHoratius: Thank you but, the edits are due to a band members death, we are waiting for an official statement from the band regarding thier status, as in this discussion, I'm afraid these disruptive edits won't end anytime soon hence the request for 6 months or more. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry via changing IP addresses. Repeatedly inserting unsourced content. - MrX 19:22, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See page history, sock after sock. My user page has previously had an indefinite semiprotection, but it was lost when a sock moved the page... Thomas.W talk 21:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Same problem as before, Can I suggest about 6 months to a year, thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:43, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- @AlexiusHoratius: Thank you but, the edits are due to a band members death, we are waiting for an official statement from the band regarding thier status, as in this discussion, I'm afraid these disruptive edits won't end anytime soon hence the request for 6 months or more. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- I extended it to two weeks. (Right now I think six months is a bit much. We can re-protect it in a couple weeks for a longer period if it looks like it's needed then.) AlexiusHoratius 19:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- @AlexiusHoratius: Thank you but, the edits are due to a band members death, we are waiting for an official statement from the band regarding thier status, as in this discussion, I'm afraid these disruptive edits won't end anytime soon hence the request for 6 months or more. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry via changing IP addresses. Repeatedly inserting unsourced content. - MrX 19:22, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See page history, sock after sock. My user page has previously had an indefinite semiprotection, but it was lost when a sock moved the page... Thomas.W talk 21:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 16:59, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:47, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandal by some users. KurodaSho (talk) 18:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Socks of a banned user have been vandalizing the page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. one week by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 18:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 18:29, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User behing several IPs keeps making the same disruptive edits time after time after blocks protections expire. Jetstreamer Talk 12:43, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Although the latest IP was blocked more had been used and it looks like the issue had been going on for months. AlexiusHoratius 18:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Possible sock edits, inserting copy vio image, and non-engagement on the talk page. Edit summaries show that they have no interest in discussion. Chaheel Riens (talk) 13:33, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:35, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring from Italian IPs, no references provided. Binksternet (talk) 15:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:37, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs edit warring to swap Goffin for Taylor -- wrong information. Binksternet (talk) 15:11, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:38, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One of the many targets of an IP hopping vandal. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Another_troll_IP. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined - just one recent edit. AlexiusHoratius 11:22, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 06:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Obviously you don't know what vandalism is. Vandalism is intentional disruption. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.161.202.13 (talk) 06:53, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - most recent dispute looks like it has calmed down. AlexiusHoratius 11:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sunni Islam (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Shia Islam (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP range seems intent on introducing deliberate nonsensical errors to denigrate Shia Islam. Philip Trueman (talk) 15:33, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 16:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: requested to halt IP vandalism. Robert Brukner (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Last IP edit was a week ago. Lectonar (talk) 11:04, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Highly-visible and often-linked page for vandalism in the long-term. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 00:12, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 11:00, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 00:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - request was good at the time but the article's been quiet for about 12 hours now. AlexiusHoratius 11:04, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 talk 00:38, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Ongoing disruptive edits. Article has previously been semi-protected for up to one month. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - report was good at the time but article has been quiet about 12 hours. AlexiusHoratius 11:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 02:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - looks like the disruption has ended for now - re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 11:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding false claims of LaFell signing with NFL teams that there are no reports of him actually signing with. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 03:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined - report was good but looks like the vandalism has ended. AlexiusHoratius 11:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High risk of vandalism, due to the person's political affiliation. His political party is one of the highly controversial parties in his country. As this is a new page and , thus requesting for a semi-protection to avoid upcoming disruptions. Fpmobd (talk) 03:32, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Yeepsi (talk) 11:46, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: This page is currently semi-protected along with the other Interstate highway articles. However, it has little edits and no vandalism when I looked at the history.This article doesn't need protection.
Declined Ends in a few days anyway...Lectonar (talk) 11:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP hopping user is continually adding a non-notable name. JumpiMaus (talk) 15:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 19:53, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I see no edits on the article's talk-page...Lectonar (talk) 10:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Some IPs are changing the person's birthplace. --Eurofan88 (talk) 20:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Seems to have died down...please relist if it picks up.Lectonar (talk) 10:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by user Adamstraw99. 1.The editor has removed sections referenced from wikipedia itself https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambarisha.2.The editor continues to change long-standing texts without referencing them and claiming them as "grammar fix minor" {{https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Astra_%28weapon%29&diff=710564444&oldid=710294079}} 3.When tried to contact over his talk page,he's using abusive language,for which I have reported already.So,reaching a consensus isn't an option.4.The editor is cautiously avoiding 3revert rule but continues to edit unnecessarily and without mentioning source,very frequently.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Astra_%28weapon%29&action=history Ankisur2 (talk) 20:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Semi-protection would be useless, as the user is autoconfirmed. I am not inclined to fully protect the article for the moment. This is a case for dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 10:59, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- List of Kamen Rider Drive characters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Related List of Kamen Rider Drive episodes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. James J. Lambden (talk) 07:26, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- This is a lie he's deleting all my changes without giving a reason that makes sense.--2601:140:8206:3980:D5E4:D0C4:4215:FA98 (talk) 07:35, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks like a content dispute. I have fully protected both articles for a day to stop the edit warring. Please work it out on the talk page, where the IP has already begun a discussion. MelanieN (talk) 14:58, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection for an extended period: High level of IP vandalism by 31.178.93.173 since January 24.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 13:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection An IP user with either a proxy server or a dynamic IP has repeatedly vandalized this page today by redirecting it to random articles or replacing all the reports with nonsense. Obviously retaliation for being reported. Mmyers1976 (talk) 17:54, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- I strongly suggest extending that to indefinite semi-protection - it is highly unlikely anyways that IPs or new users would be able to understand what this page is really about. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 00:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Seems to have died down. We have IPs that repeatedly deliver good reports...and saying that they do not understand what this page is really about is, well, just not true. Lectonar (talk) 08:29, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sixth of March 11:23, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – There has been an almost continuous effort by IPs and SPAs to change Tesla's ethnicity from Serbian to Croatian, or Serbian to Austro-Hungarian, etc., against a firmly established consensus that has been challenged may times (by SPAs) and has always remained the same. The article is not edited frequently, so PC1 is necessary to prevent further disruption. Please ping me if further explanation or justification is needed. Thank you. - MrX 12:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection until April 3: Constant addition of unverified retirement based on rumour originating from tabloid outlet TMZ. TMZ notes: "Sources connected to Sting tell us he was evaluated by several doctors... Our sources tell us Sting may make his official announcement next month at the WWE Hall of Fame ceremony".[32] Protection until April 3 (the day after the ceremony) seems relevant, as misinformation is likely to be continually added until then. B. Mastino (talk) 20:56, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:26, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:47, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 07:13, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:14, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
semi-protection: Protection against IP, in contrast to remove source content.--SaməkTalk 07:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- This is a false request. I removed the content because the cited source is not written by a historian. It's not a WP:RS. I clarified it by my edit summaries. But this guy abuses his rollback right to revert my contributions and started edit warring. --188.159.238.86 (talk) 08:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:13, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – variety of different IPs and new accounts making the same edit with very little explanation. Brustopher (talk) 09:32, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:19, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 talk 23:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors. livelikemusic talk! 00:13, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:02, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Attack IP again after opening template.--SaməkTalk 07:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Protect per WP:UPROT, vandal fighting has left my user talk page and its lesser-watched subpages at risk of vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 11:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This article persistently has unsourced countries added to the various conflicts. I've worked on cleaning up the article multiple times, and am currently working on a draft to fix the issues. I shouldn't have to edit war with IPs and newer users over the incorrect addition of material. For example, someone (or multiple people) have added just about every conflict that took place during the Cold War as a Soviet Union vs. United States proxy war, even changing one entry where I had sourced both of these countries supporting the same side. You can compare my draft to the current version of the article for comparison. -©2016 Compassionate727(Talk)(Contributions) 15:17, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This article has a very long history of IP vandalism. Blocks in the past have led to numerous block evasions and/or IP hopping. Numerous sock IP's that may also be LTA IP vandals. 198.236.17.79 (talk) 15:49, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistently recreated article (more persistent than anything I've ever come across) on subject which has already been deleted: WP:Articles for deletion/John Galea. Persistent sockpuppetry to recreate. Persistent use of sockpuppets to remove deletion tags. Boleyn (talk) 17:54, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:29, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs (that are part of a current sock investigation) have been adding spam/illegal links to the article. Hoping a short semi protection will help in the interim until the users working on the sock investigation complete it. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:58, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Pending changes are useless; unsourced (and irrelevant) additions keep coming back to this BLP. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:10, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Yamaguchi先生 for 6 months. tutterMouse (talk) 07:30, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page is being recreated as a spam link for a diet plan. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected by Mike Rosoft. tutterMouse (talk) 07:30, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Various userspace pages
- User:Malik Shabazz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Malik Shabazz/Articles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Malik Shabazz/Awards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Malik Shabazz/Bottom (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Malik Shabazz/Homes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Malik Shabazz/Inspirations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Malik Shabazz/Speedy Deletion (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Malik Shabazz/Top (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Malik Shabazz/Travels (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Malik Shabazz/Userbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Malik Shabazz/Userboxes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Malik Shabazz/WikiProjects (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Malik Shabazz/Wikipedia Bookmarks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Malik Shabazz/csdh.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Malik Shabazz/vector.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:MShabazz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:MShabazz/vector.css (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:MShabazz/vector.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User talk:MShabazz (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
I protected these pages when I was an administrator to prevent vandalism. I'm no longer an administrator and the page protection is a nuisance. Please unprotect them. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:33, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected BethNaught (talk) 08:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term WP:DE by IP users:
- Deliberate factual errors [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]
- Repeatedly adding "little orphan girl" describing a character or changing "child" to "little girl" [39], [40], [41], [42], [43]
- Removal of content [44]
- Unsourced content [45], [46], [47], [48], [49]
- Other strange edits [50], [51]
This article appears to be the target of an online fan group of the subject. Over several years, this article has experiencd many similar edits as those above. At one time the article resembled a WP:MEMORIAL which included a drawing of the subject as the main infobox photo, a quotebox with words purportedly attributed to her murderer and a link to an audio file from a film appearance.
Because these types of edits have continued for several years, requesting indefinite semi-protection so edits similar to those linked above cannot continue to be made by unregistered/non-confirmed contributors. AldezD (talk) 13:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Question: What dispute resolution options have been tried? Has anyone reported it to ANI? Either would seem to be more appropriate than reporting it here. Yaris678 (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Reply—WP:3O as well as other discussions have been started on the talk page about WP:NOTMEMORIAL and addition of WP:COPYVIO/YOUTUBE links and WP:V unsourced info, but those have not been addressed by unregistered users who continue to make edits similar to those earlier linked in this request. Four unique editors other than myself have provided contributions on the talk page since 8 July 2013. While the edits by unregistered users can be undone without protecting the page, this is an editing pattern that has gone one for years, and adding indefinite protection would at least hinder future edits similar to the type of editing linked above. AldezD (talk) 22:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Another example: While this request is ongoing, an IP user changed quoted text to differ from the exact quote contained in the linked source: Revision as of 21:10, 16 March 2016. AldezD (talk) 13:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hmmm.... I can see some of these edits introduce problems, but I don't think you are responding in the right way. For example, the edit you linked to is technically incorrect, but if you remove the quotes around "she was still playing roles of 7 and 8 year olds" then arguably we have an improvement to the article.
- I recommend you try the following:
- Where edits can be worked with, to improve the article (as in the above case) make the changes necessary to improve the edit.
- Where it doesn't look like the edit can be worked with, follow WP:BRD, unless you are convinced that the editor isn't trying to be constructive.
- Avoid referring to WP:NOTMEMORIAL. As mentioned at Talk:Judith Barsi#I've asked for a third opinion at Wikipedia: Dispute resolutions, this relates to notability of article subjects, rather than details of the content of articles.
- Yaris678 (talk) 18:28, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sounds good. Thanks for your input. AldezD (talk) 19:25, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Another example: While this request is ongoing, an IP user changed quoted text to differ from the exact quote contained in the linked source: Revision as of 21:10, 16 March 2016. AldezD (talk) 13:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Reply—WP:3O as well as other discussions have been started on the talk page about WP:NOTMEMORIAL and addition of WP:COPYVIO/YOUTUBE links and WP:V unsourced info, but those have not been addressed by unregistered users who continue to make edits similar to those earlier linked in this request. Four unique editors other than myself have provided contributions on the talk page since 8 July 2013. While the edits by unregistered users can be undone without protecting the page, this is an editing pattern that has gone one for years, and adding indefinite protection would at least hinder future edits similar to the type of editing linked above. AldezD (talk) 22:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined. Sounds like advice has been helpful. Tagging for the bot. MelanieN (talk) 23:36, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism by IP users. Molecule Extraction (talk) 10:31, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 03:57, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- This page is getting attacked every 20 seconds, would really appreciate an admin jumping on this sooner rather than later. -IagoQnsi (talk) 04:11, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:14, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Greenwich Mean Time (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- permanent semi-protection. The banned User:Vote (X) for Change has once again returned to Greenwich Mean Time. This has been going on for many years and I believe it is time for permanent page semi-protection. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vote (X) for Change. Jc3s5h (talk) 18:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Jc3s5h: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:11, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
I don't know why this editor is accusing me of being a sock. His complaint is that I am "claiming that GMT has exactly the same meaning as GMT". What on earth does that mean? 77.98.244.158 (talk) 19:13, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Editor is now claiming that I am "wikistalking" him/her because I posted a reply to his/her comment above. 77.98.244.158 (talk) 20:38, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see that a sockpuppet investigation has been requested, and that is the appropriate way to handle this. MelanieN (talk) 20:59, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 20:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. by MusikAnimal. BethNaught (talk) 22:37, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Only semi-protection: We currently have both Pending Changes Level 1 protection and semi-protection. The semi-protection is rendering the Pending Changes useless. --Peter Sam Fan | chat? 15:35, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:54, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done Yes PC is useless at this time, but the semiprotection is temporary until the end of the holiday season (although I would say that 3 April is a little long). The indef PC will just on have to be reapplied once the semiprotection expires. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 03:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:40, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP addresses; request 1 week semi. Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 10:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:52, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP addresses; request 1 week semi. Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 10:50, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. clpo13(talk) 02:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Or PC, perhaps. Various anonymous editors want their principal's DUI to be front-and-center in the article lead. clpo13(talk) 03:30, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:20, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: There's very heavy IP vandalism, even death threats, from angry football fans. Jeppiz (talk) 21:53, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Pinging @Smalljim: since they just reverted on that page. Mind protecting too? EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Done by Smalljim. BethNaught (talk) 22:36, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring, with unblockable editors so WP:ANEW has already rejected it. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:49, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BencherliteTalk 22:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also persistent sockpuppetry. Several IPs working in concert. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- And again. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- And many more. Anybody home here? 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:09, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Understood. Thanks. When (not "if") the IPvandals return, so will we. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Indefinite semi-protection. A harvest of WP:BLP vandalism by unhappy tv viewers, continuing after end of recent protection. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:27, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:07, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sixth of March 01:54, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 22:11, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 02:00, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Page was just unprotected on the 15th, but the vandalism is still an issue. Part of it seems to be the same user on two IPs. ItsIzumi (talk) 02:17, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Materialscientist had the good sense to apply one month of semi-protection to this article back in January of this year, but not long after it expired there was another spat of sometimes accidental edits by IP users including one on March 7 which blanked the entire article and had the summary "sorry first time :( plz fix Im so sorry it do=int mean to do this". I don't get the sense that these edits are vandalism per se, only that they are being made by inexperienced users who should probably be prevented from getting their feet wet by editing/ damaging this popular article (which gets 3,000-5,000 views a day, nearly 10,000 some days). I also don't think that this kind of accidental/ experimental editing is going to die down in a week or a month— the topic will always be one of interest. In that light, I'd like to suggest indefinite semi-protection or pending changes, since any temporary protection only seems likely to lead to more requests for temporary semi-protection as soon as it expires. Thanks. KDS4444Talk 07:54, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
19 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption, unreferenced additions, hoaxing and falsehoods from Italian IPs, including Special:Contributions/82.61.34.110, Special:Contributions/79.53.4.206, and Special:Contributions/79.30.91.134. Note that this person said that Don Costa was shot by the John Lennon murderer Mark David Chapman rather than dying of a heart attack. Binksternet (talk) 08:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: There was just one vandalism this week. Still, checking edits is needed. --George Ho (talk) 09:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Zzuuzz: Airplaneman ✈ 20:47, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- No real inclination to take any action on this at this time. If an admin has an opinion be my guest. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given the current state of the article, I think it's worth extending the pending changes protection for another month. Airplaneman ✈ 20:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Blatantly false claims of ethnicity, no positive IP contributions in the past month AFAICT. ⁓ Hello71 11:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:50, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from 2602:306:CD04:62E0:185F:AE31:819D:12CA , no sources to support this repeated edit 2601:602:C502:F57C:FCBE:7E3E:E580:572C (talk) 20:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/sockpuppetry. Mikarga (talk) 22:43, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unsourced edits and other disruptive editing by IP editors. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 03:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: (preferably for a month or longer) Persistent POV edits and reinsertion of WP:SYNTH (see [52], [53], [54]) as well as unexplained removal of templates. The article had been semi-protected previously and the protection recently expired. Some recent IP edits are suspiciously similar to users who were banned for sockpuppetry and harassment. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:44, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: say for 2 months? We have IP addresses that are attacking and defending this BLP and it is making the editing more difficult than it needs to be and has been for a long time (I just showed up there). Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 15:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:39, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Would recommend semi-protection due to already persistent vandalism and expected future vandalism due to new parliamentary role, just as Wikipedia page of previous W&P secretary IDS was semi-protected. Anonposeidon (talk) 13:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined There have been good IP editors. There were two silly ones; one is stale and I blocked the other. Pages are not protected pre-emptively. I put it on my watchlist. BethNaught (talk) 14:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Ongoing vandalism, disruptive editing due to newspaper gossip. SLBedit (talk) 17:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:17, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous blanking of page. WadeSimMiser (talk) 23:42, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined - report was good at the time but it looks like the situation has calmed down. AlexiusHoratius 08:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – This is Obviously of Removal Content and Blank Talk Page by Sock of User:TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther : Talk 08:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined - page has been quiet for a bit and I think the block is about to expire. AlexiusHoratius 11:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 08:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 11:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption, warring, and IP hopping. The same disruptive WP:SPA IP hopper is back that made the article get semi protected on the 16th of January. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:53, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- It is just one IP; they should be warn, and then one can go to WP:3RRN.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined - user has been warned, report them to WP:3RR if they continue. AlexiusHoratius 07:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: IP users creating account just to add promotional content. Nairspecht (talk) 07:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:17, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated redirect vandalism from a certain IP range. Blake Gripling (talk) 07:39, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 100+ edits in last 4 days. NYDirk (talk) 00:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 08:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. NYBrook098 (talk) 04:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 08:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent dynamic IP vandalism. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 04:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 08:39, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple unregistered editors. ElKevbo (talk) 22:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Indiana Hoosiers should also be semi-protected, too. ElKevbo (talk) 23:31, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (On both.) AlexiusHoratius 07:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing attacks on K-pop artists. IPs and new accounts adding same-sex spouses to K-pop male artists' infoboxes. Part of an ongoing, multi-month BLP vandalism campaign on multiple K-pop articles by IPs and new accounts/socks. Please see my report at AIV yesterday and also my recent comments at RFPP. Dr. K. 22:19, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:44, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ever since his death just recently, IPs are vandalizing the page with a bunch of incorrect info. Zappa24Mati 22:23, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:45, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing attacks on K-pop artists. IPs and new accounts adding same-sex spouses to K-pop male artists' infoboxes. Part of an ongoing, multi-month BLP vandalism campaign on multiple K-pop articles by IPs and new accounts/socks. Please see my report at AIV yesterday and also my recent comments at RFPP . Dr. K. 22:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same as for Louisville Cardinals men's basketball. What I predicted is coming true. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 00:05, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same as for Louisville Cardinals men's basketball. What I predicted is coming true. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 00:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:49, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism from new users and IP during the NCAA Tournament. I'd recommend Indiana University Bloomington and Indiana Hoosiers men's basketball be protected as well. 🍀 Corkythehornetfan 🍀 02:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:50, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ChamithN (talk) 03:50, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rolling IP's inserting questionable images. TJH2018 talk 22:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:32, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for 2 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 06:57, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism around the recent lawsuit. /wiae /tlk 23:29, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Smalljim for 48 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 06:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. Persistent IP vandalism, due to recent lawsuit. -- Wikipedical (talk) 23:35, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Smalljim for 48 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 06:59, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption and socking. IP reinstating content that was re-added by an Arbcom/CU blocked puppet. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:43, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- This user throws insults around to get his way. He is claiming socking, but here [55], he is clearly stating otherwise. This user is only treating IP edits as second class citizens and throwing insults. (24.157.56.12 (talk) 19:12, 18 March 2016 (UTC))
Oh, and there's a WP:3RR violation made by said IP as well as one can see. - LouisAragon (talk) 19:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- You did not do that? You edit warred as well. (24.157.56.12 (talk) 19:28, 18 March 2016 (UTC))
- As one can clearly see, the user reverted my edits THREE time: [56]. (24.157.56.12 (talk) 19:30, 18 March 2016 (UTC))
- Read WP:3RR; the rule is violated with the fourth revert. You made four reverts, thus you violated it. I didn't violate it as we can see. - LouisAragon (talk) 19:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- I did not know that. But you, playing innocent is asinine. You clearly knew, did not work in good faith; instead reverted my edits, falsely accused me, and caused unnecessary drama. I went to dispute resolution; and instead you brought me here: falsely accused me and started name calling. (24.157.56.12 (talk) 19:37, 18 March 2016 (UTC))
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hulk Hogan vandalism (repeated). Lucas "nicatronTg" Nicodemus (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)
Done by Smalljim. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 00:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 00:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)
Done by Smalljim. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 00:57, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems possibly related to this, but I'm not sure. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 00:44, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Done by Smalljim. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 00:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
University of Louisville articles
- University of Louisville (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Louisville Cardinals (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Louisville Cardinals men's basketball (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- James R. Ramsey (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Pending changes: On and off again vandalism with respect to an ongoing scandal related to UofL's men's basketball team. I will actively review changes. I may request this on additional articles as necessary. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:05, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Note that Rick Pitino is already protected in this manner. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (For the basketball team.)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. (On the other three.) AlexiusHoratius 18:45, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Police service editing it themselves using accounts/IPs removing dark history from the article. 104.128.253.62 (talk) 17:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - pretty slow pace, probably better to just revert them for now. AlexiusHoratius 18:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018 talk 21:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
20 March 2016
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 16:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 21:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Adding non reliable sources, making editing tests, changing monetary figures—all of these since more than a week. Protecting the article shall be very beneficial. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:59, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, speculation of results of currently airing season. BOVINEBOY2008 20:39, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 20:56, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. KH-1 (talk) 07:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Yossimgim (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yossimgim) making disruptive edits and edit-warring from dynamic IPs on this article for over a month. Triggerhippie4 (talk) 11:27, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 20:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Yossimgim (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yossimgim) making disruptive edits and edit-warring from dynamic IPs on this template for over a month. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 11:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 20:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:296E:B120:F444:9E29 (talk) 16:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 20:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is a debate over the inclusion of University of Toronto's contribution to popular culture. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to be perfectly manageable. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:38, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs are starting to go crazy with the edits. ilovemusic (Talk To Me!) 14:17, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined A lot of IP addresses appear to be making constructive edits. It's unfair and unproductive to bar them from editing. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I will be helping to counter vandalism for most of my time on Wikipedia. I've already encountered several editors on have made disruptive edits/vandalism on my user page. I expect more to come, as I continue to rollback inappropriate edits and such. Temporary protections instead of indefinite protections is also fine by me. FiendYT ★ 19:43, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Need at least 2 weeks of full lock. LONG, and I do mean LONG edit war is ongoing. I'm gonna report the "holy warriors" in aminute, but do lock this down please. . FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 04:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 18:16, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: The main film. DuplixD (talk) 08:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 14:25, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The aforementioned page has experienced a high level of vandalism in the last 24 hours from a number of different IP addresses. This is related to significant recent media coverage of this individual, as a result a temporary restriction may be most appropriate. Arkhangelsk185 (talk) 12:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined It's more a case of scattered disruption among many good IP edits. There's an ongoing content dispute over a section heading that involves IPs that has not yet devolved into an edit war, and semi-protection is inappropriate under these circumstances. That could change, of course, but for now it seems busy yet okey-dokey. Katietalk 14:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To cool off ip who continues to insist on adding unsourced material. Onel5969 TT me 14:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Done by Katie. BethNaught (talk) 16:56, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 16:56, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Vandalized three times this month. George Ho (talk) 09:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- @KrakatoaKatie: I can see how this page could use pending changes beyond the expiry date. I'm just hesitant to override other admin actions just to pre-empt vandalism. Airplaneman ✈ 20:49, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Note: Actually I think that 3 vandalisms a month don't warrant a prolongation of pending protection; in olden times we would have said "just watchlist and revert". Lectonar (talk) 10:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, can be reprotected if problems reappear.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:49, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, sorry for not reacting earlier--Ymblanter (talk) 11:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, only one IP, and they seem to have lost interest. Sorry for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Despite low editing, none of IP edits were good; they have been reverted lately. I notified the protecting administrator, but she hasn't responded yet. Also the protection is expiring soon. --George Ho (talk) 03:13, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:17, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator KrakatoaKatie. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:39, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – We need 10 days of 100% pure gold lock on this page. Two editors in along drawn out edit war. Tried to talk to one of them, he said his reverts were not over 3PR even though he has added the same material like 20 times. An anon IP failing the duck test is also involved. So please just lock the box before pandora opens it, the indo-pak pages tend to become a huge can of worms if let out fo hand. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 04:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. They're trying to start a discussion on the edit warring noticeboard so I want to keep full protection to a minimum but people need to take a breather. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:27, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If it starts up again right after it expires, I think indefinite is warranted. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Unregistered users kept on adding information that are not yet confirmed. This has been done three times already. MBdemigod (talk) 10:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:44, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism. Longtime sock vandal who loves removing the word "fictional" from the lead of articles about fictional characters. Aquaman has been protected several times because of these childish edits. See User:DangerousJXD/sandbox#Fictional IP Sock Vandal for more information. The person needs to be stopped. They aren't doing this crap at one page either. I could list dozens of pages. —DangerousJXD (talk) 07:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Talk:International sanctions during the Ukrainian crisis (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: persistent sockpuppetry. There is normally not much going on this talk page, so one or three days protection would probably make no harm Ymblanter (talk) 11:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Multiple IP addresses used. . Abel (talk) 12:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 13:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recently, the climate data has been changed by various IP users, claiming that using 60 years of extremes is irrelevant. They also claim "There is no point in adding 60 years old extremes which are result of the an extremely abnormal cold penetration that occurred 60 years ago in the entire northern hemisphere". This is wrong since extremes should use the longest period of reference possible because it is more representative of the highest and lowest temperature that the city can receive (useful for probabilistic data). That's why the most reliable climate data are the ones with the longest period of records. As well, that claim is cherrypicking data and plus extremes don't change regardless of the average conditions, only if a new one is broken or if the old one is invalidated. I have reverted their edits, explaining them clearly in the edit summary why their edits were reverted yet they still continue to push their own version, despite being less accurate. Ssbbplayer (talk) 04:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 10:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Currently the repeated target of threats requiring oversight (appropriate emails sent and actions taken). fredgandt 04:37, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 12:13, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: IPs keeps on changing referenced information. Roughly, once a month edits such as this, this, this and this pop up (these are examples taken between October and February). Zoupan 22:47, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 01:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 03:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Rolling IP's adding unreffed content after removed. TJH2018 talk 03:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:15, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by new or unregistered editor(s). ElKevbo (talk) 22:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 23:00, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 00:02, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 00:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term, on-going disruptive editing by repeated sock-hopping IP. livelikemusic talk! 00:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thitojhapali, so many SPAs that are obvious socks. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, Seems like this discussion has been closed as "speedy delete" so hopefully we won't need to protect the page anymore. Airplaneman ✈ 20:44, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism and other disruptive editing from IP editors.Cupoftea155 (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, Seems like the last spate of vandalism on March 13 resulted in a 72 hour block for the IP responsible. Since then, there's been 1 instance of IP vandalism (March 17) and one good change (March 18). I decline based on this low activity in the past five days. Airplaneman ✈ 20:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent sockpuppet new user vandalism. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 22:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
21 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GABHello! 19:28, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semiprotection: Persistent changing of ethniticy, against sources, by a plethora of ip's. Probably best to change pending changes to semiprotection. DVdm (talk) 19:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: This article has had only two edits this year and ten edits ago takes one all the way back to September 2015 - it's hardly a hotbed of controversy and edit warring. I can't see any reason for it to still be semi-protected. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:14, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- It's been a common vandalism target for bored schoolkids in the past, it's not going to lessen with time as there'll always be new pupils being taught about it and bored to distraction by it. It's a stable article anyway so unless something new comes up about this several centuries old battle, it's fine. tutterMouse (talk) 16:41, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Pinging @User:RoySmith...although the lack of vandalism-edits might be due to the fact that the article is semi-protected. Might be toned down to pending changes level one, though. Lectonar (talk) 17:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- I vaguely remember protecting this. As mentioned above, this seems to be a perennial magnet for vandalism. I don't know what makes it so attractive, but apparently it is. I'm not actually up on all the various protection levels available now. My general philosophy is to apply the least restrictive protection which will do the job. If we now have a new capability which is less restrictive than what I applied four years ago, then I certainly have no objection to giving it a try. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- The reason it's heavily targeted is because it's taught as part of history lessons for kids in the UK so you'll have a few of them bored going and making trouble here, there's no mystery to it. tutterMouse (talk) 18:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- I vaguely remember protecting this. As mentioned above, this seems to be a perennial magnet for vandalism. I don't know what makes it so attractive, but apparently it is. I'm not actually up on all the various protection levels available now. My general philosophy is to apply the least restrictive protection which will do the job. If we now have a new capability which is less restrictive than what I applied four years ago, then I certainly have no objection to giving it a try. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Done Brought down to pd level 1. Lectonar (talk) 18:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'll be watching to see if the edit rate is high enough that it'll be back to semi-protected indef again. tutterMouse (talk) 18:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Me too.....Lectonar (talk) 18:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Pinging @User:RoySmith...although the lack of vandalism-edits might be due to the fact that the article is semi-protected. Might be toned down to pending changes level one, though. Lectonar (talk) 17:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 13:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semiprotection - subject to consistent and intense IP vandalism by anonymous editor(s) over past two days - recently promoted to FA and nominated for front page on April 23. Thanks.--Smerus (talk) 17:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, mostly by IPs. I recommend protection for at least the rest of the season/series, which is about 17 days. Musdan77 (talk) 17:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The usual reference desk troll is back. Deli nk (talk) 15:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Created four times; twice in last three days. —swpbT 16:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semiprotection: Ever since fancruft was removed from the page, an anonymous vandal with a morphing IP has been repeatedly deleting the cast and characters section from the article for no given reason.--Mr Fink (talk) 17:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Russian editor (talk) 12:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Compared to other days it's ok today... Lectonar (talk) 12:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ten days or two weeks semi-protection should be enough to spoil the fun of some IP-vandals. The Banner talk 14:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism and seems like it is attracting more trolls after a news report has been published about a previous vandalism. See media report. Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Sigh. The same three editors that were warring on other indo pak pages are here as well. Please protect for a couple of weeks. And can the admin doing this PLeasE be kind enough to block the warriors as well. (I have reported them on 3PR). This seems to be like a virus migrating from page to page. . FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 04:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined - article has quieted down after most recent period of disruption - but I'll check back over the next few days. Re-list if the situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 10:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The edit warring cancer is here as well. Please consider this report to be part of a pattern of edit warring and protect all pages that I have requested for an equal duration. These guys srsly need to cool off. . FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 04:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - no edits in last couple days. AlexiusHoratius 10:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring -D.Gerard is consistently vandalizing the page. He is biased against cryptocurrency and people are trying to fix it but he keeps attacking it. Legionof7 (talk) 04:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - article history is certainly active recently, but I don't know that it looks terribly disruptive - just active. (In other words there aren't too many reverts.) Re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 10:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of promotional links. Article is prone to advertisements and referral/affiliation links. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 10:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 09:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 10:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 02:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 10:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 02:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - pursue dispute resolution. AlexiusHoratius 10:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, resuming after end of recent page protection. Multiple accounts edit warring over images--perhaps an SPI is warranted--and promotional edits. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also pending-changes protected for 1 month. Lectonar (talk) 14:28, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Azealia911 talk 23:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined - looks like the most recent period of disruption is over, but re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 09:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 02:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined - looks like the edits have calmed down a bit. AlexiusHoratius 10:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two successive attempts of inserting non-NPOV content in a short time. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 02:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined just one account (looks like the previous IP registered one). Pursue dispute resolution if no one else edits the article and the dispute continues; if new accounts/IPs show up re-list here. AlexiusHoratius 10:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 22:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined - looks like the article has calmed down after being the mainpage FA. AlexiusHoratius 09:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Changes made on rumours. Qed237 (talk) 11:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing practices. ViperSnake151 Talk 22:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated tagging of IP talk page for speedy deletion, despite being informed that user talk pages are not subject to deletion. I don't see any privacy issues, despite such claims being made. Safiel (talk) 03:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Cnslrken2. Binksternet (talk) 04:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Cnslrken2. Binksternet (talk) 04:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – There have been many G5 speedy deletions. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism. See the protection request I made for Wolverine (character) just yesterday. Aquaman has too been protected multiple times for this same reason. Same person. Same edits. Won't stop. So on. There's a section on my talk page and in my sandbox for some basic information. —DangerousJXD (talk) 08:14, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. Until next time. —DangerousJXD (talk) 10:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started again as the protection expired. Musa Talk 08:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User from dynamic IP address wrongly changes one of the players' birthdays every time a new squad is confirmed. Examples: 1,2,3,4. I can't talk to him on his talk page, and he ignores the articles talk page, edit summaries and comments in the source text. Kinetic37 (talk) 10:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 02:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:20, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 02:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:02, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. two days by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 10:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, continuing after lifting of last protection. At this point probably merits a longer lock. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary move protection - active page-move war, 5 moves since from 18 March. Dl2000 (talk) 03:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi: Persistent vandalism (adding "Nazi" to BLP lede) --Hillbillyholiday talk 10:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent blanking by multiple IPv6. General Ization Talk 02:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 02:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 02:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Disagreement over implementation of WP:JR. See also Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies#Implementing the "Jr." RfC and WP:VPP#RfC: Amending MOS:JR on comma usage. clpo13(talk) 22:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 09:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going disruptive and test editing by IP's on a BLP of a musical group and/or band. livelikemusic talk! 23:16, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 09:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Full-protection: Persistent vandalism, most of which was from IPs. Cédric wants to abolish "Convention №. 2" like abolishing slavery. 23:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 09:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, from the same IP range that necessitated protection on List of Kamen Rider Drive characters and List of Kamen Rider Drive episodes a few days ago. James J. Lambden (talk) 23:22, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 09:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Four different IPs (two from Sweden, two from UK) have blanked big sections of this article just in the last five days, each has been reverted. Would be nice to slow them down a bit. Thanks. -- Krelnik (talk) 23:39, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 09:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IP-hopping editor(s) bent on giving false balance to an opinion article and removing primary sources on the mistaken assumption that primary, non-independent sources are inherently unreliable. clpo13(talk) 00:02, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- That is not true. There is a source from an independent source that contradicts the non-independent source you provide. So, we should either keep both or none to have a neutral point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.174.219 (talk) 07:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 09:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. It was Nowruz today (21 March), so there's always a lot of IP disruption on it. It's semiprofected about every year around this date. - LouisAragon (talk) 01:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 09:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There are rumors and tweets to the effect that the subject has died at 33 years of age. However, we cannot include this claim in the article here without the citation of a reliable source (there are no such reports at this time). Please semiprotect for a short time to allow time for reliable sources to emerge if true. General Ization Talk 02:02, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 10:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring due to an apparent misunderstanding of where a piece of information is located within a source. ~ RobTalk 04:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 20:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two more RR on the Captain America passage in the 10 days since my previous request. Semi-protection will be the only way to bring the shifting-IP contenders to the talk page. : Noyster (talk), 10:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Exactly, 2 reverts in more than a week.... Lectonar (talk) 20:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP User, presumably close to the subject of the article, is keeping on deleting content. jojo@nthony (talk) 19:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lot of IP editors making unconstructive changes. . EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 20:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Dcirovic (talk) 18:17, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 21:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Page has now been semi-protected due to persistent vandalism and sockpuppetry. Marianna251TALK 21:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. So it is...Lectonar (talk) 21:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Page has now been semi-protected due to persistent vandalism and sockpuppetry. Marianna251TALK 21:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by Adarsh Prakah (talk · contribs), 1.39.49.7 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), and 1.39.49.187 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), likely all the same user. clpo13(talk) 18:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. I have blocked the account indefinitely, and the IP addresses for a few days. Also, a check of the editing history of the 1.39.49.xxx IP range shows that editing is fairly light, and very little of it is constructive, so I have blocked the range for 36 hours. This is a much better way of dealing with problems than page protection in a case like this, where it is possible to block all accounts and IP addresses that have been involved with little risk of collateral damage, so that other editors are not prevented from editing the page. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 21:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Done by Favonian. BethNaught (talk) 21:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
22 March 2016
Semi-protection: I requested a semi-protection for Lip Sync Battle Philippines the other day and was granted for a month but since another editor created a separate page for the List of Lip Sync Battle Philippines episodes, I am also requesting for it to be protected because an unregistered user once again started adding unsourced information which is obviously a vandal. (The same problem with Lip Sync Battle Philippines when the list of episodes were still on the main page.) MBdemigod (talk) 03:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 12:37, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Hi! As I said above, it happened before on the main page when the list of episodes were still there, but since the list of episodes already had a separate page, the vandals that has been happening on the main page (by the same unregistered user) continued here on List of Lip Sync Battle Philippines episodes. Anyway, I'll just request for another when this happens again to justify my request. MBdemigod (talk) 13:43, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: I requested a semi-protection because this page is vandalized by many users. Doomclause (talk) 14:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Please talk to the user and express any concerns you have with their editing — MusikAnimal talk 16:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked IP using page to troll admins. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Article has been subjected to disruptive editing by a now indefinitely blocked editor. Edits have been resumed through one sockpuppet and numerous IP edits. Full case is outlined at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Dcasey98_reported_by_User:Betty_Logan_.28Result:_Indefinite_block.29. Betty Logan (talk) 18:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recently an IP editor keeps changing the article without providing any references for the changes. [57] [58] [59] There was a discussion about this particular subject a couple of months ago, and a consensus was reached that the article should not be updated in this way until things change and reliable references can be provided -- see Talk:Gun laws in Illinois#RfC: Magazine capacity and state preemption. — Mudwater (Talk) 10:28, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now - only two editors involved in a content dispute so far - pursue dispute resolution and/or WP:3rr. AlexiusHoratius 12:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:56, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IPs in the same range, I suspect 3 hours semi is all we'll need — MusikAnimal talk 17:08, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: There is no need for new users or IPs to edit this. Laber□T 17:32, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: article is religious. it must be protected from deletion. wiki tamil 100 11:08, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 12:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Daily vandalism. Rosekelleher (talk) 13:01, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Quite a way off from daily at the moment. PC seems a better option. GedUK 13:08, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: IP vandalism too minor to suggest semi-protection. Zero Serenity (talk - contributions) 14:50, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi seems very appropriate here — MusikAnimal talk 16:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recurrent vandalism by multiple IP addresses. Recent vandalism includes racist commentary. ClueBot isn't catching everything, and in some cases in the past week or so vandalism has stayed on the page for several hours before being reverted. Safehaven86 (talk) 15:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 16:29, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism by adding false boxscore. I knew this would happen once the tour has just started. Would like a semi-protection until December 1st. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 04:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: There have been reverts during protection. Protecting administrator refuses to extend, so I guess someone else might. --George Ho (talk) 05:32, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Standard response for Fangusu socks. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 05:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: indefinite, as a growing number of IPs are making massive reverts & thus disrupting any progress being made at that article by other editors. IPs 'might' be the same individual. GoodDay (talk) 11:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:42, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – BLP policy is cited as a reason to revert. George Ho (talk) 06:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:32, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. This has been going on for over a year now. The vandal in question is also threatening me on my user talk page. Simione001 (talk) 06:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper repeatedly reverting changes and attacking other editors in edit summaries. (Not that being called homosexual is actually an insult, but the IP thinks it is, so I'm going with the intent here.). Marianna251TALK 12:23, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP test editing and removing information.Cebr1979 (talk) 01:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 02:46, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Low-grade edit warring. BilCat (talk) 03:19, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:47, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: obvious COI editor is back and again editing from an IP and is edit warring to keep negative content out of the article. Please semi-protect for 1 month. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 04:15, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 04:21, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP test editing and removing information.Cebr1979 (talk) 01:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 02:46, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Low-grade edit warring. BilCat (talk) 03:19, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:47, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: obvious COI editor is back and again editing from an IP and is edit warring to keep negative content out of the article. Please semi-protect for 1 month. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 04:15, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 04:21, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: No reason for anybody to have to change this. It's been vandalized, and I have had to revert it back. Peter Sam Fan 15:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The most recent vandalism was a month ago. The incident before that was more than a year ago. Maybe it just needs a few page watchers (It currently has only one). MelanieN (talk) 23:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Fangusu IP socks again. Please refer to this page's protection log for further details. Steel1943 (talk) 01:00, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 02:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – There's a persistent sock who seeks to removed cited information. We've already established multiple user accounts as socks, and I suspect the IP address is the same. Given no consensus on the AfD, this page should be indef protected from new or IP edits. Cahk (talk) 02:37, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. only (talk) 02:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to be a lot of people, primarily IP users, inserting non-NPOV or outright false information into this article in the past week. Has been protected previously. IagoQnsi (talk) 19:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Far from all IP-edits are vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hulk Hogan vandalism again. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 21:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:51, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism through block evasion. —Vensatry (Talk) 18:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Yuchitown (talk) 20:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Yuchitown
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP user: 86.154.230.126. H.dryad (talk) 20:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 20:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 18:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of WP:REFSPAM to illegal copies of episodes by IP addresses. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 18:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism or disruptive edits. Lengthy log. '''tAD''' (talk) 21:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
23 March 2016
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting indefinite protection, following years of disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors, by way of adding information that cannot be verified. livelikemusic talk! 01:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- This page was under protection for the same-exact kind of edits and was granted protection; now protection is gone, and the same kind of edits have immediately returned! livelikemusic talk! 01:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., last step before infinite semi.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:29, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user keeps blanking the page and violating the 3RR rule. Peter Sam Fan 15:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn The IP was just blocked. --Peter Sam Fan 16:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 16:41, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – And when Bob Ross is protected, this page becomes a vandal magnet . Mlpearc (open channel) 16:27, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits since March 8; protection expired March 6. Katietalk 16:43, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user keeps blanking most of the page. Peter Sam Fan 14:36, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Never mind. The IP user was just blocked.
Withdrawn by requestor. tutterMouse (talk) 14:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated non confirmed vandals. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:06, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:22, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple accounts and IPs. Laber□T 18:40, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:18, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by DavidWBrooks for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 19:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: There is a developing edit war. --evrik (talk) 01:46, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. by me earlier today. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced content addition – Continual addition of unsourced airdates and WP:COPYVIO summaries. Katniss♥ 13:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Let's find out who the masked IP really is .... gosh, it's Old Man Rivers, the fairground attendant. And I'd have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for you pesky admins ... back in the real world, there are some good faith IP edits in the past week too, so I think pending changes should help sort out the wheat from the chaff. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is a vandal magnet . Mlpearc (open channel) 16:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: User request - page has been permanently semi-protected before and I'd appreciate it again (recreated my page to clean page history). NottNott talk|contrib 16:41, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Same inane anonymous vandal at List of fictional cats in animation is returning to reinsert and edit-war to preserve its inane original research opinions.--Mr Fink (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, this is just one IP, and their talk page is even a redlink.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. clpo13(talk) 20:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefiniate semi-protection: page deleted per AfD, recreated by IPs.LM2000 (talk) 21:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, this is just one user, I now warned them. If they continue, please present them at WP:3RRN--Ymblanter (talk) 08:23, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Img related vandalism; might want to consider a range block. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 01:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- That rangeblock is probably be good enough for now. (ie, this can probably be closed) -- The Voidwalker Discuss 01:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor. tutterMouse (talk) 05:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Can an admin please temporarily restrict this redirect from being reverted by anonymous editors to an unsourced stub that does not verify notability? --Another Believer (Talk) 19:32, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:23, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Page has been repeatedly semi-protected to prevent an IP-hopping anonymous vandal totally obsessed with inserting and edit-warring to preserve original research opinions, and also demonstrates to be wholly incapable of understanding how to cite claims or even carry on civil or rudimentary discussions. Page protection has just expired yesterday, and this inane vandal has returned to carry on its inane quest.--Mr Fink (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:41, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: I think there was a recent edit war between two IP addresses. Winterysteppe (talk) 03:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – removal of sources, addition of non-npov content and unreliable references from multiple accounts. -Managerarc™ talk 18:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Most of the offending accounts are not autoconfirmed. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:30, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two IP edits were good; the rest end up reverted, despite low frequency of editing. George Ho (talk) 19:23, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:36, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors back making edits to the voice actors (no sources). Same pattern of behavior as before. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 23:52, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:23, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator SQL. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:20, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some idiot on multiple IPs keeps adding Bruce Wayne as a notable alum. John from Idegon (talk) 03:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:18, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Regular addition of "Ashley Nicole" nonsense over the last few months by the 2602:306:BCBA:1B80:x:x:x:x IP range, which has picked up again recently. -- I need a name (talk) 18:01, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 22:50, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: User page of Daniel Weinreb (died September 7, 2012). Does not seem like any one should be able to edit it. . H.dryad (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The subject was sentenced today for murder, which attracted POV pushers from both Russian and Ukrainian side, who do not really help to keep the article neutral. Three days semi should be sufficient.Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
24 March 2016
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuously being vandalised with clearly promotional material and removal of content by a single user. Fritzmann2002 12:26, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined - only one recent account - warn/report at WP:3rr or WP:AIV. Otherwise pursue dispute resolution. AlexiusHoratius 14:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fangusu - active again with IPs. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: I reverted a good faith edit. Big8388desa (talk) 06:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- That's not really justification for unprotection and looks like you're in the middle of a content dispute, you and NinjaRobotPirate should take it to the talkpage. tutterMouse (talk) 07:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Not unprotected — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:40, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Not sock puppet, page German Wikipedia and Russian Wikipedia. can edit protected. 31.220.110.89 (talk) 07:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Not unprotected — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:40, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Fangusu IP socks editing this page again. Please see the page's protection log for details. Steel1943 (talk) 01:45, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Talk pages are seldom protected. If you don't like the comment, ignore it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:45, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism over the past week. Yeepsi (talk) 16:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 17:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible page and always prone to anon vandal attacks. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 15:55, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. The vandal you just reverted was autoconfirmed. BethNaught (talk) 17:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of disruptive editing from IP's following removal from protection; multiple issue tags removed without said-issues being fixed, etc. livelikemusic talk! 03:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:38, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Or disputed content; PC ain't enough for such disputes. George Ho (talk) 05:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Three attempts at creating an autobiography in under 24 hours. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:17, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected six months by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 14:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. - sneaky edits linking the ideology (left-wing nationalism) of the political party to Maoism without sources to backup that they follow Maoism.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 12:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks involved in adding the same POV content. — LeoFrank Talk 13:22, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death, IP vandalism. Mike1901 (talk) 13:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A single IP keeps adding material to the article lede that is opposed by 4 registered users and another IP. This is slow motion edit warring so I suggest relatively long temporary protection may be in order. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 00:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
IP address editing several automotive pages against Project Automobile consensus
- Nissan Navara (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Toyota Hilux (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Mitsubishi Triton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Recently a series of IP editors has participated in and ignored consensus at WikiProject Automobiles [[60]] by changing a term from "pickup truck" to "utility vehicle" Request pages be set to confirmed editors only. Springee (talk) 00:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. or until the talk page threads definitively close, or until I can work out exactly what consensus is, whichever comes sooner. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Not Consensus, reread talk page in full — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.196.0.239 (talk) 12:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- That's kind of why the articles are protected right now. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:56, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Full-protection: Persistent vandalism and edit warrning. 31.220.110.89 (talk) 07:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection:
High level of IP vandalism. DaltonCastle (talk) 17:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Ottoman concubines
- Handan Sultan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Halime Sultan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection:Persistent disruptive editing by a dynamic IP, with repeted source falsification (changing the meaning of sourced content without changing or challenging the source) and addition of unsourced content.--Phso2 (talk) 21:36, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Would someone please put PERMANENT semi-protection on this article? Every time it goes off, the vandals are back. Montanabw(talk) 05:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:45, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection would be good. It's the target of a cross-wiki vandal at the moment, and while I've been able to block a bunch of his IPs, it's time for bed so probably best to protect the page. Thanks, Ajraddatz (talk) 07:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:20, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:48, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Per [61], the name of the airport is "Birsa Munda Airport", but a user seems adamant in moving it to "Birsa Munda International Airport" without any valid rationale of the airport being renamed. — LeoFrank Talk 07:10, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Move protected indefinitely. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced spoilers by multiple IP editors. Linguist 111talk 08:20, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Thomas.W talk 09:13, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: 200+ transclusions; protecting administrator less than active at the moment. George Ho (talk) 06:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Done — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of items associated with Weekly Shōnen Jump (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – repeated sock puppetry. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:25, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined I am loath to protect AfD's ...this is still manageable. Have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 22:22, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Asking 4 It (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- This Is What the Truth Feels Like (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by User:DoItToIt7 Carbrera (talk) 22:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 22:42, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Supreme Genghis Khan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry including [62], [63] and [64]. . TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 00:26, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Drmies. tutterMouse (talk) 06:40, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism and test edits from IP addresses. Rehman 13:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We seem to be having an edit war here. . H.dryad (talk) 17:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 22:27, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Lectonar: FYI, the problematic editor has already been blocked (for impersonation / disruption / abusing multiple accounts): Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stylized as "stylized" currently; formerly "stylizeD"/Archive. So would a period of semi-protection do instead, rather than full? That would give it some anti-sock protection but also allow regular editors to carry on. BencherliteTalk 22:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Of course it does. Thanks for pinging me. Lectonar (talk) 22:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: I am sick and tired of seeing constant edit warring on the lead section of this page over the silly years issue whenever the page gets unprotected. But I don't know what to do about it aside from asking for more protection. LjL (talk) 18:32, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too much vandalism/disruptive editing for pending changes which is already in place. Lectonar (talk) 22:41, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Five instances of vandalism in the last couple of days, from at least three users, none of whom are autoconfirmed. . Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 22:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As a commonly used slang term, this page has been subjected to the same kind of vandalism as LOL and Yahoo! and just like that deserves long-term, if not indefinite, semi-protection from new and unregistered users. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 13:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how it develops. Lectonar (talk) 22:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ViperSnake151 Talk 18:17, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Done: 1 month semi, 3 months PC1. BethNaught (talk) 22:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The article has seen consistent vandalism by IP users which has increased in the past month or so. During the last 30 days alone the article has been vandalized 7 times by IPs. It has occurred here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. There have been almost no constructive edits by IPs on this article-almost only those showing clear vandalism. There is no edit-warring, just IPs coming in and making obviously disruptive edits. Due to the fact that nearly all IP users editing this article are doing so to deface it, I consider an indefinite semi-protection to be justified. Enough is enough. Thank you for considering the request. Display name 99 (talk) 21:40, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It was last protected a long time ago so indefinite protection is not warranted. The last good IP edit was three weeks ago, and there has been a steady stream of vandalism since then, so we'll start with two weeks. Please re-report if vandalism continues after this period and the protection may be extended. BethNaught (talk) 22:06, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of same disruptive editing following previous page protections. livelikemusic talk! 02:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., infrequent but steady vandalism--Ymblanter (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editing frequent; also, there have been too many reverts in days. George Ho (talk) 05:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced information by numerous IPs based around press speculation. Egghead06 (talk) 07:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:56, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 10:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- DWDZ-TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- DYBU-TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sixth of March 11:25, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by two new users who are not autoconfirmed (I checked) and an IP user. . Peter Sam Fan 14:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:43, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 21:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – nationalist ip dispute, no talk page, no communication, only edit war. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 20:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:31, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent throwaway account vandalism. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 21:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 21:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IP addresses. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 21:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
25 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon genre reverts without discussion. Karst (talk) 15:39, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page getting destroyed by IP users because the Hurricanes lost and dropped out of the tournament last night. Protection for a few days should be enough. IagoQnsi (talk) 16:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:39, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yep, someone protected it ~20 minutes after I posted this. -IagoQnsi (talk) 17:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Current tabloid scandal drawing serious violations of BLPGOSSIP. Rebbing 19:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism. See section on my talk page, section on IP in question's talk page, recent protection requests for Wolverine (character) and Sabretooth (comics), and past protections for Aquaman for basic information. Also a section at WikiProject Comics talk page. Have had to explain this crap over and over so I don't feel like linking to exact places. IP sock loves removing the word "fictional" from the lead of articles about fictional characters. Consider protecting Abomination (comics) too as the same behavior is happening there. Has started at Deadpool now so I'll likely be requesting that page be protected very soon. —DangerousJXD (talk) 00:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Time for a protection spree.
- Elders of the Universe:
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
- Abomination (comics):
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. The revert message that User:DangerousJXD used suggested we had to wait for one more round of vandalism. That seems an overly bureaucratic interpretation of the rules. If you spot the same kind of vandalism (removing of the word fictional) happening to the same class of articles (comic books, characters etc.) then just report rather than waiting.
- Deadpool:
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected..
- Elders of the Universe:
- Hope that helps. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too many anon IPs putting in snarky comments about the Browns being a "Semi-pro" team and other similar comments. Vjmlhds 17:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:38, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Roving IP repeatedly adding material (again, soon after previous protection lifted) without getting consensus on talk page. Talk page was also PP due to vandalism from IPs of similar area. Jim1138 (talk) 21:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:09, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit-warring is ongoing, and doesn't show signs of resolving itself on the talk page. Please fully protect this page so as to facilitate discussion. . RGloucester — ☎ 23:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:05, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: When not under semi-protection, page is constantly vandalized by an anonymous vandal with a morphing IP who insists on inserting, reinserting and edit-warring in order to keep and preserve unsourced WP:original research. Anonymous vandal demonstrates no ability or understanding of how to cite sources, nor ability nor understanding of how to use talkpages for discussion beyond angry whining. The only way to keep this vandal at bay is to semi-protect its favorite targets, and even then, it's a waiting game, at best.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:44, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:05, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A quick look at the page history should show you why I'm requesting this. I admit that the vandalism is nothing TOO major, but it's so persistent and unrelenting (and all from unregistered users) that I see no alternative. I even tried to sort things on the article talk page, but that solved absolutely nothing. Thegreatluigi (talk) 03:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Reduce to un-protected Page was move protected by Coffee on 24 March, though since then no body has tried to move the page. This does not look right bat all. I hope the page is completely un protected soon. By Airindia418. —Preceding undated comment added 06:17, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined. Nobody has tried to move the page since the protection because the protection prevents it. Since it has been moved at least four times this month, it would be reasonable to require some discussion on the article's talk page before moving it again. See WP:RM. -- zzuuzz (talk) 09:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistently vandalised due to footballer's recent conviction. Boleyn (talk) 08:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced spoilers by multiple IPs. Linguist 111talk 08:58, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Linguist 111talk 08:58, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:50, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – There has been a lot of unsourced, COI and/or BLPVIO editing on this page in recent weeks. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of AfD template by different IPs. 331dot (talk) 10:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been sabotaged. Perfectly sourced content being removed despite repeated warnings. Therefore I ask for the page to be protected. Mona778 (talk) 11:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An IP or three continue to add content violating WP:FRINGE/WP:V. The 89.110 IP has been at it since before 2014. Requesting temp but have no objection to a longer time period. Izno (talk) 12:15, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP in full revert mode with zero discussion, 3RR complaint filed but no action for hours, so semi protection to force discussion. Also requested on Supremacy Clause. Ravensfire (talk) 21:26, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Yamaguchi先生 for 2 weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 07:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Unconstructive IPs. There's a hidden note on the page that summarizes this. —DangerousJXD (talk) 22:04, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Gilliam for one month. tutterMouse (talk) 07:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandlism from a few IPs. --allthefoxes (Talk) 05:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: There have been reverts. I contacted the protecting administrator, but he took no action at this point. --George Ho (talk) 07:15, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Lots of IPs rushing to term his cause of death as heart failure, which has not been confirmed. Died earlier today, so BLP still applies. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:26, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 03:56, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Full-Protection: High level of IP vandalism, persistent erroneous editing. This has been extremely upsetting and I really hope you protect this page from being harassed further. 149.43.124.15 (talk) 22:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined "erroneous" edits are only vandalism if they are done deliberately; all I see is good faith changes. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – I don't know, a few days or so?. Laber□T 23:45, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Principal culprit, Adelesäñűş (talk · contribs) blocked by Liz (talk · contribs) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 00:05, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, how he just replaced the complex text with something like "you are either boy or girl", and included some emojis in the edit summary... Laber□T 00:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Qpalzmmzlapq | talk | contribs 17:04, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 17:48, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Waiting for resolution on the talk page Clivel 0 (talk) 17:13, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Katietalk 17:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism of a user in repeated areas. I suggest a temporary semi protection. I don't know why I need a signature ~Malachq (talk) 17:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. BethNaught (talk) 17:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
26 March 2016
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.Silaslej (talk) 13:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.Silaslej (talk) 13:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 13:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism, including BLP vios such as death claims. BilCat (talk) 17:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing. Ralletsretni (talk) 21:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined There's a bit of back and forth, but not really enough to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism and unsourced edits. Aloneinthewild (talk) 13:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:34, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism to this user's talk page continues not long after a previous, one-day, semiprotection had ended. MPFitz1968 (talk) 15:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: persistent IP vandalism (see [65]). Quis separabit? 19:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 09:18, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Currently on the Main Page as ITN. George Ho (talk) 09:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:39, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism. Huldra (talk) 11:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see again after that. Widr (talk) 11:35, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated insertion of apparently good-faith but incomprehensible (due to bad English) paragraph by unregistered editor. . Robert McClenon (talk) 02:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 04:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Worried sockpuppets of Supreme Genghis Khan would vandalize my user page- they vandalize whoever reverts them. . TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 08:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Been protected before, and continued IP vandalism through made-up results/tournament information. . Joseph2302 (talk) 08:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see again after that. Widr (talk) 08:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring by IP editors obviously associated with the company, removing sourced content they don't like for some reason. Please semi-protect for 1 month. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 17:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:06, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent changes to box office gross without sources by IP addresses. Common issue in Indian film articles. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:56, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Abusive messages from multiple IPs across a broad range of networks. Prefer short-term, please. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 04:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Drmies. tutterMouse (talk) 06:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP's adding unsourced info based on a rumor. RF23 (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: People have been modifying this page for their own agenda for a while, could an admin and revert this to a stable version (I've already reverted the section to a 2015 version) and full-protect for a while. There's more discussion at WP:ANI#MfD end run GAME. QEDK (T 📖 C) 05:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Equil빵(talk) 06:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ycplaertalk under Investigation for sock puppetry [66]Suspected vandalism[67] TaoWoAini (talk) 01:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:49, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:34, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Speculation from,new accounts. Qed237 (talk) 18:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 22:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely.
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant edits without any reliable sources by certain editors that insist that the series is British-produced when it is not. Alex|The|Whovian? 12:15, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There seems to be a dispute about how old she was when she began her career. . Dismas|(talk) 12:19, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Two weeks maybe?. Laber□T 14:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs GWAR. SummerPhDv2.0 15:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hoax credits added to filmography by IP editors. See User:NinjaRobotPirate/Animation hoaxer#Copycat and WP:ANI#Proposing a community ban for 166.137.105.84. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 12 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruptive/tests. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 23:15, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from attention from reddit. TranquilHope (talk) 23:15, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:19, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Persistent "sexual orientation" vandalism. Laber□T 23:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 23:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IPs continue to remove content. Chronic Lyme is exceedingly controversial and these issues have come in waves for years. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:18, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism issues, might be a good candidate for pending changes protection?. IagoQnsi (talk) 02:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The dispute came back after protection expired. George Ho (talk) 04:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Don't potentially need IPs and new users editing this and adding something malicious or similar. Amaury (talk) 15:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, per WP:PPINDEF this can only be edited by yourself and administrators. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: lots of IP vandals 67.139.185.66 (talk) 22:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Seconded, lots of IP users changing Adam Hills' name to insults very aggressively. :) -IagoQnsi (talk) 22:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Done Widr (talk) 23:09, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IPs. UFC events - specially PPV events - require protection due to recurrent vandalism. In this case, the event is a milestone and already has vandalism. Registered users are capable enough to update this article and there's no need for unregistered users edits on this one. That's why an indefinite semi-protection is needed. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 00:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see again after that. Widr (talk) 00:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- It has been semi-protected before. But anyway, if it happens I'll be here again. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'll keep it on my watchlist. Widr (talk) 01:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- It has been semi-protected before. But anyway, if it happens I'll be here again. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism from IP/ISP user ... GELongstreet (talk) 01:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 01:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
27 March 2016
Indian Parliament political parties & alliance groups
- Rajya Sabha (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Lok Sabha (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Janata Parivar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- United Progressive Alliance (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- National Democratic Alliance (India) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Permanent semi-protection: Persistent updates to the 'as on' dates on these pages from multiple IPs on a daily basis. The edits are disruptive enough when there are no actual changes to the political party compositions, but often the date is updated when there is a composition change without any corresponding edit to this effect. Example - On the Rajya Sabha page, I recently 'moved' two seats from Indian National Congress (INC party list) to a Nominated partisan status (Nominated list), as well as changed the United Progressive Alliance page to reflect same, despite the fact that both pages had been edited less than an hour earlier to say that they were up-to-date. ADD: My edits to the party composition are usually reverted without explanation by the IP which changes the 'as on' date everyday (incl. weekends, when the legislature would not be in regular session). Farolif (talk) 05:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined. I see where you are coming from, but I do not see in any of the articles sufficient disruptive activity to justify protection, not even speaking of indefinite semi. We do not protect articles preemptively, if a serious problem occurs you are welcome to resubmit articles here. Sorry for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- The Pirates Who Don't Do Anything: A VeggieTales Movie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Ass soon as the page protection ended, the anon returned with the same edits. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:44, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruptive/vandalism. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 21:39, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: persistent disruptive editing after multiple prior protections. The Banner talk 17:01, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- @The Banner: I've indef semi protected it, did you intend to request full protection? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:50, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I did. The editor who does most of the disruptive editing has a full account. I suspect him also of having multiple other accounts in the past but beyond effective range of the CheckUsers. And as he only edits one subject (Jinotega), it is easier and more effective to just close the door instead of starting to run behind him with blocks and sockpuppet investigations. The Banner talk 08:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- @The Banner: Is this Jinotega93? I'd prefer the warning/block/page or topic ban approach, I'm loathe to apply long-term full protection to an article due to one account. But I'll leave this open if other admins disagree. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- One person, multiple accounts and IPs. The Banner talk 21:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done, we should not fully protect articles because of just one account. If they misbehave, they should be blocked.Ymblanter (talk) 17:17, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- One person, multiple accounts and IPs. The Banner talk 21:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- @The Banner: Is this Jinotega93? I'd prefer the warning/block/page or topic ban approach, I'm loathe to apply long-term full protection to an article due to one account. But I'll leave this open if other admins disagree. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I did. The editor who does most of the disruptive editing has a full account. I suspect him also of having multiple other accounts in the past but beyond effective range of the CheckUsers. And as he only edits one subject (Jinotega), it is easier and more effective to just close the door instead of starting to run behind him with blocks and sockpuppet investigations. The Banner talk 08:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Group D table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped. Apologies for not reacting earlier, I am on a wikibreak.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Group B table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped. Apologies for not reacting earlier, I am on a wikibreak.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Group C table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped. Apologies for not reacting earlier, I am on a wikibreak.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Group E table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped. Apologies for not reacting earlier, I am on a wikibreak.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Group F table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped. Apologies for not reacting earlier, I am on a wikibreak.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Fourth-placed teams table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, some autoconfirmed users introduced indeed wrong info, but I do not think the template deserves full-protection at this point.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:12, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Runners-up table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped. Apologies for not reacting earlier, I am on a wikibreak.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BLP concerns. Recent spate (today) of persistent death vandal-edits by probably-related IP/anons. Shearonink (talk) 16:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 20:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:44, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Reduce to template-editor protection: Need to be able to work on the code of this to better share features with Template:Collapse, the wrapper version. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 20:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Done by Ymblanter Katietalk 20:45, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent IP hopping and disruption. Ad hominem/personal attacks towards me as well.[68]. Please consider a range block as well, if possible. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:49, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:33, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/82.59.218.233, Special:Contributions/82.57.178.192 and Special:Contributions/82.53.180.77. Binksternet (talk) 18:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/82.59.218.233, Special:Contributions/82.57.178.192 and Special:Contributions/82.53.180.77. Binksternet (talk) 18:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Widr (talk) 16:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/82.59.218.233, Special:Contributions/82.57.178.192 and Special:Contributions/82.53.180.77. Binksternet (talk) 18:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/82.59.218.233, Special:Contributions/82.57.178.192 and Special:Contributions/82.53.180.77. Binksternet (talk) 18:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/Disruptive editing. Ralletsretni (talk) 19:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Widr (talk) 16:10, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – almost every edit from IP editors on this page have been unsourced and hoaxes. The1337gamer (talk) 20:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:12, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2016 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, usually not conforming to WP:NPOV. HarryKernow (talk) 22:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Majority of recent IP edits appear to be helpful. Widr (talk) 16:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two IP vandals already in the past couple minutes, and probably more to come (they just lost in the NCAA tournament). IagoQnsi (talk) 04:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/82.59.218.233, Special:Contributions/82.57.178.192 and Special:Contributions/82.53.180.77. Binksternet (talk) 18:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 16:19, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection Article is frequently vandalized by IP editors. In fact, no constructive edits since January 2015. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 16:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Huon. Widr (talk) 18:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated BLP-violations by IP-hopper trying to portray the subject of the article in as negative a way as possible, by both adding negatively phrased accusations and removing sourced material. Thomas.W talk 20:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Widr: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:33, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Katietalk 20:46, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
America's Next Top Model individual seasons
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 1) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 4) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 5) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 6) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 8) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 9) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 11) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 12) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 14) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 16) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 17) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 18) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 20) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 21) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 22) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Linguist 111talk 15:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., except for the last one which I protected for a year.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Increase to template-editor protection: As with the Template:Collapse top variant, this is transcluded in thousands of places and affects large blocks of content, so it has high vandalism (or even just incompetent breakage) potential. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 20:14, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A fairly relentless vacillation between 'Hunter pointed the gun at the stage' and 'hunter pointed the gun in the air'. All edits by anonymous users, both using reasonably reliable sources. A compromise or middle-ground sorted out in talk is what's needed, not back and forth edits of the article with the same sources. Anastrophe (talk) 21:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., since only IP users are edit-warring, semi-protection is sufficient for the moment.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection Persistent sockpuppetry. 172.58.33.193 (talk) 17:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:56, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Group A table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Group G table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:10, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Group H table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection due to relentless IP vandalism (see [69]). Quis separabit? 19:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Adding mixtapes by anon IPs to the discography section while it should only list the mian albums as the artist has a main discography page. Karst (talk) 15:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:03, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism, similar to that which the page experienced before its previous protection. Alex|The|Whovian? 01:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LL221W (talk) 04:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 10:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Speculations and unsourced information has been continuously added to the page. MBdemigod (talk) 08:56, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most of the IP additions have been helpful so far. Widr (talk) 10:59, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page was once again hit with disruptive edits hours after protection expired. This protection should run at least for a few months, or until the season ends. United States Man (talk) 14:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – PC may be appropriate because some edits are legitimate. — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 04:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: IP vandalism twice today already on a highly visible article needs protection. Brian Everlasting (talk) 10:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not enough disruption for indefinite protection, though. Widr (talk) 11:02, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a target due to Easter. 331dot (talk) 12:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Long-term unexplained reverting by single-purpose account. wctaiwan (talk) 16:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 00:26, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. QEDK (T 📖 C) 19:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:49, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for 1 week by Deb. tutterMouse (talk) 06:36, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. -©2016 Compassionate727(Talk)(Contributions) 01:02, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That takes us up to the Republican convention; I couldn't see any recent good IP edits worth using PC for. BethNaught (talk) 09:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: As an Internet meme, this article is (and has been) highly at risk of persistent vandalism, especially by IP address-owned users. Gamingforfun365 (talk) 06:39, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Out of the blue indefinite protection is generally frowned upon. BethNaught (talk) 09:31, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.Dan56 (talk) 15:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 00:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection - Birth info is vandalized again. And will probably continue.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two edits since January. Widr (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, too many baseless editing, mostly by IP users. Neutrality dispute due to vandalism and reckless editing. Fpmobd (talk) 21:49, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 00:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Dynamic IP from UK adding unsourced anthem. Dr. K. 00:34, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 00:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-proection: High level of IP vandalism by multiple IP users. BattleshipMan (talk) 23:06, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 23:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
(Indefinite?) Semi-protection The article was released from its previous protection on March 16, 2016, and since then, users with IP addresses and others have been vandalizing the article with member nicknames etc, leading to other users needing to revert their edits constantly. I believe the article should be protected indefinitely, or at least for a longer period of time. Thank you. Tigress223t@lk 23:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 23:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – anon IP vandal. ww2censor (talk) 00:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 00:04, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See talk. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users trying to link their Youtube channels (FilthyFrank, idubbbztv & MaxMoeFoe). Stereorock (talk) 18:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 23:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 23:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
28 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism. The article is already protected, but the talk-page needs protection, too. Huldra (talk) 19:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent spare of vandalism form anons, tired of reverting. Shearonink (talk) 20:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See repeated page CSDs for being an attack page, plus Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Plebcentral. | Naypta✉ opened his mouth at 20:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Kelapstick. Widr (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of disruptive editing by IP's. Tvx1 15:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This level of vandalism should be easy to handle by simply reverting. Widr (talk) 15:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Long-term spammer User:Alex9777777. McGeddon (talk) 19:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized within an hour of the expiration of 3 months' protection (admin edits only). This article is a favorite target of socks of Jaredgk2008. Please extend protection. General Ization Talk 19:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Reduce to semi-protection: Page was fully locked by Beetstra on 29 February, though there has not been a single disruptive edit by logged-in users since on 21 February the semi-protection expired. As Beetstra states to be on "Wikibreak", I'm directly requesting this change here, though I left a note on the admin's talk page. --PanchoS (talk) 01:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Please also note that it was the same admin Beetstra who globally blacklisted (!) the newspaper's official website earlier in February on the basis that the website is being repeatedly added to all language versions of the newspaper's article – something that isn't illegitimate at all. This really looks like outright abuse of administrative powers. --PanchoS (talk) 01:19, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Procedurally
Declined, doubt this'll be handled here though you may wish to take it to the Administrator's Noticeboard. tutterMouse (talk) 15:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced material by IP editors; no engagement on Talk page despite requests. Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 16:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP-hopping editors keep adding Cherrybelle to the article, even though Woollim Entertainment isn't mentioned on that page. Random86 (talk) 18:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator DMacks. Katietalk 19:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent editwarring – Persistent editwarring and disruptive editing by IP users. Needs frequent patrol by pending changes. 86.158.72.75 (talk) 14:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 14:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Pending changes protection There has been a debate on the delegate count here Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016#Delegate count on what source to use with most opting for Associated Press, despite this though users keep changing the numbers to match other sources that may not be reliable. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- There is at least one user that keeps changing the numbers, and not discussing the issue despite being linked. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition by numerous IPs of unsourced information to BLP. Egghead06 (talk) 16:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Despite low editing, almost none of IP edits were good. Alternatively, renew pending changes. George Ho (talk) 20:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Let's see again when pending protection expires in a few days. Widr (talk) 10:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: Was semi protected before. Was not returned when most recent full protection ended. Very controversial topic and IP vandalism is occurring. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Looks like semi isn't helping here. — LeoFrank Talk 14:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 10:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and incorrect edits Exussum12 (talk) 14:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Exussum12: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – First we had socks, now we have IPs trying to remove any suggestion that the alt-right is white nationalist/supremacist and anti-Semitic, despite the sources. I'm guessing there's an off-wiki campaign. . Doug Weller talk 14:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs. Alamshdir (talk) 14:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – For the same reasons in the pending changes logs. Will just not stop vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:42, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 09:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ninefive6 (talk) 06:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 09:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – [70] and [71]- persistent sockpuppetry from User:Supreme Genghis Khan. TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 09:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Socks are so few and rare that protection isn't warranted. Widr (talk) 09:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going disruptive and borderline fan-cruft-like information being added by IP's and other anonymous editors, that also violates the crystal-ball policy and verifiable sources that are cited within the article. livelikemusic talk! 13:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users. Molecule Extraction (talk) 04:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 09:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users. Molecule Extraction (talk) 05:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 09:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going disruptive editing and edit-wars from IP's and anonymous editors, plus potential socks. livelikemusic talk! 12:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 12:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eric444 (talk) 13:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed soon after protection expired. Everymorning (talk) 22:02, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 08:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs removing reports about themselves. Binksternet (talk) 00:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Widr (talk) 08:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 02:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 08:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP trying to make a point. —DangerousJXD (talk) 11:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick action. —DangerousJXD (talk) 11:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
I don't know: Continued edit war even after page protection
--103.55.147.30 (talk) 02:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator MusikAnimal. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Spate of recent activity from IP conspiracy enthusiasts inserting weasel wording or frank advocacy of conspiracy theories. Probably a month would be sufficient for now. Acroterion (talk) 04:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No productive IP editing for quite a while. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:Block evasion by an IP of a user that has been blocked indefinitely. Molecule Extraction (talk) 18:01, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing it. Which IP? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- This. Sock of user Parkchiqmu. Molecule Extraction (talk) 03:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:Block evasion by an IP of a user that has been blocked indefinitely. Molecule Extraction (talk) 18:02, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing it. Which IP? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:39, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- This. Sock of user Parkchiqmu. Molecule Extraction (talk) 03:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor disruptively removing properly cited text, and reverting multiple other editors to do so. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 04:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- FKC is unhappy that he is outnumbered in the discussion on the talk page and hoping to eliminate an editor he disagrees with. The request should be declined. Msnicki (talk) 05:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- The user's comment on my mental state is inaccurate. I think anyone can see, looking through the article's history, that the IP editors there have been editing disruptively, most recently by reverting multiple other users in an edit war. That's a perfectly legitimate reason to request article protection. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 07:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please discuss before making any additional edits. Dispute resolution is available if you can't reach consensus. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of longish-term IP/new user vandalism. IagoQnsi (talk) 02:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 09:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pretty frequently targeted by IP vandals. Might be a good candidate for indefinite protection or pending changes. IagoQnsi (talk) 04:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 09:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tons of IP vandalism, especially in the past few days. Might be good to protect at least until a few days after the 2016 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament concludes (April 4). IagoQnsi (talk) 04:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 09:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.--Bozalegenda (talk) 22:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 22:39, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all recent history is vandalism or reverts thereof. Everymorning (talk) 02:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Page gets around 1-2 vandalism edits per week at most. No need to protect that level of vandalism. Jayron32 02:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, and edit-warring vandals. Yay. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 03:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 08:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Edit war and pov pushing. Panam2014 (talk) 19:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, only autoconfirmed users are participating in edit-warring, so that semi-protection would not help.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
@Ymblanter: I propose a full protection for 1/2 weeks. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:56, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- In fact you were the only one reverting since the talk page discussion started, so I do not think it would be a good idea right now.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuously adding non-English content and blanking content. Vipinhari || talk 19:26, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. And the page already has pending changes protection. Widr (talk) 19:34, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism for many months. Deku-shrub (talk) 20:33, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 20:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13(talk) 18:17, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:43, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13(talk) 18:17, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:45, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring. clpo13(talk) 18:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
29 March 2016
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. SLBedit (talk) 20:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over various issues, which continued immediately after the previous brief article protection expired. NB: as a look at the article's revision history will confirm, I have NOT been involved in any of the more recent edit warring. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 21:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing namecrufting and vandalism by red accounts. John from Idegon (talk) 16:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.
User(s) blocked. Rjd0060 (talk) 17:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rjd0060 (talk) 17:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated IP / New-Account vandalism often trying to insert references to "Zodiac Killer" into the article.
It'd probably be best to semiprotect this in order to at least keep the drive-by vandalism down. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 21:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – There are many users who move back and forth between this title and Enthiran 2, such as Bollywood Nude, Kailash29792, and Arjayay. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Move warring appears to have stopped as of 25 March — MusikAnimal talk 14:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Current event, and on the main page. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 10:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Widr: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done since protection was removed for now. Widr (talk) 14:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is a regular target of a series of socks of a long-time vandal. BilCat (talk) 18:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Semi-protect creation please. Laber□T 16:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IPs. UFC events - specially PPV events - require protection due to recurrent vandalism. In this case, the event is a milestone and already has vandalism. Registered users are capable enough to update this article and there's no need for unregistered users edits on this one. That's why an indefinite semi-protection is needed. -> That's what I said three days ago. It just got unprotected and vandalism has begun again. The page has been protected for a short period of time a couple times already. It's about time we add an indefinite semi-protection, please. -> I don't know why this was removed without response, but once again vandalism keeps going on that page... Gsfelipe94 (talk) 16:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
{{RFPP|s|1 week}}
— MusikAnimal talk 16:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Semi-protected for a period of /on July 11, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I did not know MusikAnimal was handling it at the same time however given that these articles are frequently the source of issue I've protected it until the 11th of July - rather than the inevitable extensions and re-protections at every expiry. Rjd0060 (talk) 17:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- No worries, this works for me — MusikAnimal talk 17:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As might be expected for "one of the most polarizing [trailers] in recent memory", IP vandalism (mostly editing the trailer's reception from "mixed" to "negative", against sources) has resumed since the previous protection expired. McGeddon (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
full-protection: A lot of edit war with various users. Protection for 2 weeks or 2 months. Panam2014 (talk) 21:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot IpTalk to my owner:Online 21:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- I suggest not issuing the protection. User:Panam2014 was a recent participant in a 3RR case about this page that I closed, and is now restricted from editing there. I am disappointed that he is now seeking other methods of continuing the dispute. EdJohnston (talk) 21:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- @EdJohnston and Lectonar: The topic topic which was more or less arbitrary than me EdJohnston imposed does not forbid me to do "administrator noticeboard " especially since a wave of Pov pushing hard since December 2015. It is my right not to accept this pov pushing faced by many contributors.Kiluminati doesn't respect the 3RR. For that, he should be Warned. Could you re open the request or permit me to re open a new. The Kiluminati's 3RR : [78], [79], [80]. The edit introduced by Kiluminati : [81], [82]. The map before the edit : [83]. Clearly, he has violated 3RR. It is a 3RR violation, not a user problem. Panam2014 (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- If there was a 3RR breach on the page, it was days ago. Full protection is denied; as I said: dispute resolution is the way to go. Lectonar (talk) 11:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Lectonar: It is the problem . The 3RR ended only because Edjohnston forbade me to me to change the module. But Kiluminati has not been blocked or warned from continuing. Could you consider my demand? because in the opposite case it amounts to giving carte blanche to continue Kiluminati . Especially since he already paticipate to various edit war with @LightandDark2000, Bigles, and PutItOnAMap:. Panam2014 (talk) 11:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- I suggest not issuing the protection. User:Panam2014 was a recent participant in a 3RR case about this page that I closed, and is now restricted from editing there. I am disappointed that he is now seeking other methods of continuing the dispute. EdJohnston (talk) 21:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion from User:Diamese, adding back their old, imaginary "pinnipeds, cetaceans, dinosaurs" plot summary and hoax cast list within an hour of the previous protection expiring. McGeddon (talk) 15:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 15:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Much vandalism today. The king of the sun (talk) 16:09, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected by Edison for 3 days. tutterMouse (talk) 16:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Edit warring by indef blocked user Romanian and proud using multiple IPs, adding unsourced/biased content. There seems to be at least one good IP user trying to fix the mess he created. Denniss (talk) 11:09, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 14:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Usual post-Indian film release IP editing. Nairspecht (talk) 11:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 14:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Will Pig (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Creation-protection: Abusive BLPVIO. Created twice today and blocked twice, by User: Deb @ 09:52, and User:Fuhghettaboutit @ 12:22. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of items associated with Weekly Shōnen Jump (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Gaijin42 (talk) 12:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AfD is not attracting much attention from unconfirmed users outside the socks, I think 2 days semi will be fine — MusikAnimal talk 14:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Runners-up table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the page was put on pending revisions, five out of the seven edits have been vandalism. (only one of these editors was autoconfirmed) The protection level should be increased to semi-protection so as not to take up editor time reviewing each edit and to stop the vandalism. Constructive edits from IP-editors would still be available via edit requests. Opencooper (talk) 03:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It will revert to PC1 for 7 days. Yaris678 (talk) 12:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Has been protected many times in the past, but after being unprotected it's been vandalized again. — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 09:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 09:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Upgrade this from indefinite pending changes to indefinite semi protected. Not a single constructive IP edit in the recent history and waste of editor's time reverting. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 12:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Two voice actresses
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Semi-protection: Ongoing unsourced additions, which will likely continue if left unprotected. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Done Widr (talk) 13:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: This page is substituted every time I sign with four tildes. If someone edited this page, I would unwittingly be posting their message every time I used my signature. Not to mention, there is really no reason that anyone besides myself would need to edit this page. IagoQnsi (talk) 17:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- @IagoQnsi: It's probably best for you just to copy and paste that into the signature box on Special:Preferences (and tick the "Treat the above as wiki markup" box) that way you won't need to worry about having to substitute it. Full protection won't let you edit it either, so if you want to substitute a signature your best option is to move your signature to User:IagoQnsi/signature.js as that way it can only be edited by administrators and yourself. If you don't want to go with either of those options, put a note here and another admin will address your request. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:14, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Not to mention that the signature as is would comfortably come under the 255 character limit so substituting the page is redundant as usually substituting in signatures is for more complex signatures using more than 255 characters. tutterMouse (talk) 17:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Procedurally
Declined, four days is more than long enough to know it's not happening. IagoQnsi, the markup fits in the regular signature so just add it there, it isn't doing anything special enough to need to be substituted. tutterMouse (talk) 06:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent addition of Hoaxes as IP Sock of TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther : Talk 03:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 06:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite creation protection: Obviously a non-notable company. Page has been made 3 times this week. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Done Widr (talk) 09:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent addition of Hoaxes as IP Sock of TV5Ozamiz. LG-Gunther : Talk 03:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Whitelist page of bot, wouldn't want IPs meddling around with the regex. QEDK (T ☕ C) 05:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Already done. since 2007. tutterMouse (talk) 06:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, as of late. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 09:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 09:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism along with the band article (although much less so than that article), so some protection would be good on this one. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 09:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 09:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent off-topic addition of material. Now user OSTalgie but formerly a litany of IPs have been adding information about a Turkish "social media sensation"'s arrest. This has almost nothing to do with the US Attorney who processed his case's career but everything about sending attention to that person with legitimacy from this article. Note in the edit summary user:OSTalgie didn't even spell this article's subject's name correctly, it obviously has nothing but the most tangential relationship to Preet Bharara. JesseRafe (talk) 16:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Katietalk 19:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- That's an unsatisfactory response. The editor has used 4 IPs and only just now created a username for the first time (sole edit). Please look into the substance of the allegation rather than just saying it's two users edit-warring. Vandalism removal does not constitute 3RR. JesseRafe (talk) 19:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This article has been created three times and Gabriel J. Fowler has now been created twice. A7 every time. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected – Indefinitely create-protected by another admin on 24 March. I've also salted Gabriel J. Fowler. EdJohnston (talk) 04:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Page protected only at request of user that reverted about 30 changes by various editors over many months, than requested full protection to protect their version. Legacypac (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – No reason you can't ask the protecting admin, User:Callanecc, who has been active recently. It looks like this page has been used as a vehicle for a policy debate during March. The talk page is still open for business. EdJohnston (talk) 00:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Adam9007 (talk) 20:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 20:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Erin Sanders
Erin Sanders (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Request semiprotection. What can I say? IPs and new users have had a ball making weird edits with this one. It needs a semiprotect at the minimum. White Arabian Filly Neigh 21:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism of BLP - 5 occurrences in past week. SamWilson989 (talk) 23:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: IP socks are edit warring to restore an apparently hoax entry. Meters (talk) 03:27, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — LeoFrank Talk 16:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 19:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs from Sicily. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive917#Sicilian_IPs_pushing_Durium_Records.2C_Nikka_Costa.2C_inserting_falsehoods_globally. Binksternet (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 20:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs from Sicily. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive917#Sicilian_IPs_pushing_Durium_Records.2C_Nikka_Costa.2C_inserting_falsehoods_globally. Binksternet (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 19:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent edit warring, constant target for disruptive IP editing. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 18:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 18:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: Renewed damage by sockpuppet of banned user User:Vote (X) for Change. Jc3s5h (talk) 20:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'm glad you saw through this ridiculous request. The alleged "damage" is not specified and the claim of "sockpuppetry" is unsubstantiated. 77.98.244.158 (talk) 20:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
30 March 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MB298 (talk) 23:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:36, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated additions by IP editor of material designed as promotion. . Nomoskedasticity (talk) 12:24, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users keep vandalizing this page. . Peter Sam Fan 18:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:25, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- DWYE (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- DXFB (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- DXFD (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated by socks of Roi Casilana. Sixth of March 22:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – 300,000+ transclusions as of the last database report. ~ RobTalk 16:43, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Redirect to highly visible template; there are 140,000+ transclusions of this redirect. ~ RobTalk 16:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection or Indefinite template protection: Disruptive editing, multiple vandalism editions and issues by unregistered and registered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 11:06, March 30, 2016 (UTC)
- This Wikipedia page suffers of lots of vandalism by this registered and unregistered users, so I opt to give this page a better protection from this vandalism users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 11:06, March 30, 2016 (UTC)
- For more information additionally the current users making this vandalism editions are User:"The Phenomenal (Decay)" and User:Cms0678 the ones who vandalize this Wikipedia.
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 18:08, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- For more information additionally the current users making this vandalism editions are User:"The Phenomenal (Decay)" and User:Cms0678 the ones who vandalize this Wikipedia.
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP and new-user vandalism (which the vandals took to my userpage yesterday). I have to believe they'll have forgotten about this in a week so that should be enough. Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A bit of the normal vandalism, by some IP's. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IPv6 deletions without explanation . Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done Seems to have died down; sorry for late reply. Lectonar (talk) 13:56, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. In particular, people keep violating MOS:TM and changing every occurrence of Amiibo in the article to amiibo, because they believe their special toy deserves special treatment on Wikipedia and doesn't need to follow the rules. One IP user in particular blatantly lied in his summary and said that MOS:TM actually AGREED that Amiibo should be lower-case: the user 134.88.62.140. Thanks. Avengah (talk) 18:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Renew pending changes: Last revert was a week ago. Looking at history log, none of IP edits have been accepted. --George Ho (talk) 20:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – One year. In the past this article has been semiprotected four times and put under pending changes once. (I'm leaving out of account several periods of full protection, which may reflect hot edit wars). It is unlikely that the editing climate will change much in the next few years; we may have to accept long-term semiprotection. EdJohnston (talk) 17:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Please protect the text of the Proclamation itself – it is the norm on Wikis about such foundational documents that the text be quoted (eg US Declaration of Independence, Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, etc, where this is feasible, but in this case the text keeps being removed for some reason. I'd like to request that it be protected; it's important that readers should see what the Proclamation actually said. Pageturners (talk) 08:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- The text was added once in the last two years, by Pageturners five days ago. This was Pageturners' first and so far only edit to the article apart from restoring it just now. It was reverted by me – not by an IP – with a clear edit summary. I invite Pageturners to discuss the matter on the article talk page. Scolaire (talk) 09:03, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Lectonar (talk) 09:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
I have added the text more than once, and it has been removed each time; I don't understand why it's referred to as the only edit. I don't know how to use the Talk item for discussion. I tried (just now) going to Scolaire's page and looking at the Talk items, but can't see any reference to the Proclamation page; there is a reference to a rather strange edit of the page covering a relative of mine, which removes the name by which she was always known (John Brennan), which I'd put in brackets in the title, and instead makes a whole new Wikipedia item for her writing name (which everyone who knew her called her), separate from a page under her birth name. Again, it's Wikipedia style that in foundational documents the text is quoted. The removal of the text of the central document of the Irish State seems to be purely political. Pageturners (talk) 12:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Please go to Talk:Proclamation of the Irish Republic, and acquaint yourself with our protection policy; protection is not the way to go here. Lectonar (talk) 13:08, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors are adding adding hoax credits and attempting to make it more believable by blanking the details of his death. For example: [84]. See User:NinjaRobotPirate/Animation hoaxer#Copycat for more details on this vandal. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 21:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:19, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Elisfkc (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:06, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The article was protected before for a week. However, the rotating IP has not bothered to discuss on the talk page and has just resumed adding numbers based on unreliable sources. Would like a longer protection length. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Several portuguese football related articles suffering from IP vandalism
- Football in Portugal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of football clubs in Portugal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Portuguese football competitions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Portuguese football league system (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Campeonato de Portugal (league) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Portuguese football champions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Portuguese National FA Levels (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Rpo.castro (talk) 14:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. by various admins. Yaris678 (talk) 12:02, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous IP edit-warring, Recurrent POV editing instances in the past too. Faizan (talk) 11:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kinetic37 (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:03, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 23:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism of article under Wikipedia:ARBPIA3#500/30. . Huldra (talk) 13:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – dynamic IP removing content without explanation. Qed237 (talk) 13:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in the last few days. Gen. Quon (Talk) 14:23, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Anonymous IP addresses possibly related to the banned sock puppet User:Misterkimono continue to restore unreferenced and biased information without attempting to discuss the edits on the talk page. Requesting locking edits to registered users only. Thanks! JiminyCroquet (talk) 14:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see again after that. Widr (talk) 14:45, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 12:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: There has been a ridiculously stupid war between IPs going on for a while now. Read the hidden note in the lead of the page. The childishness is over which fictional character gets mentions before another in a sentence. It's outright dumb and needs to stop. —DangerousJXD (talk) 11:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected This is too slow in number of edits to semiprotect; let's try pending changes. Lectonar (talk) 11:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Lectonar, pending changes is fine and I really appreciate the speedy response but this will not achieve anything. The edits need to stop. Reverting them doesn't stop them. Neither does the fact that they're labelled as pending changes. Now I'm not saying "pretty please semi-protect it" (I wasn't confident it would be anyway). I'm just saying this won't stop these edits from happening, which is the reason for this request. —DangerousJXD (talk) 11:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- I am aware of that...but it does prevent the edits from going "live" (so whomever does this can't say: look, I inserted Aquaman/Batman/Tatataman; this spoils their fun just enough to take the joy out of it)...and I assure you: you can't stop stupid editing. Lectonar (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Lectonar, pending changes is fine and I really appreciate the speedy response but this will not achieve anything. The edits need to stop. Reverting them doesn't stop them. Neither does the fact that they're labelled as pending changes. Now I'm not saying "pretty please semi-protect it" (I wasn't confident it would be anyway). I'm just saying this won't stop these edits from happening, which is the reason for this request. —DangerousJXD (talk) 11:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism of article under Wikipedia:ARBPIA3#500/30. Huldra (talk) 13:29, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism from anons. Optakeover(Talk) 07:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 07:36, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-violation. This article just came off on protection-period, and an IP is straight back. Also, this article is under Wikipedia:ARBPIA3#500/30: permanent semi should be uncontroversial. Please also protect the talk-page. Huldra (talk) 11:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No recent vandalism on the talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistant reinsertion (disruptive editing) of WP:OR by two IPs and a sock- all being used to evade 3RR. SPI running concurently. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:43, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Random IP editing out sourced material
- List of wars involving India (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Cho La incident (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Nikhilmn2002 (talk) 01:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Also include List of wars involving the People's Republic of China. Shulinjiang is just evading his block. Capitals00 (talk) 05:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, sorry for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – MageLam and Lemongirl942 keep on moving back and forth between this title and Changi Point. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- @GeoffreyT2000: We are currently collaborating on improving articles of Singapore places. The moves are occurring after discussions (for certain articles we agreed to move articles back to their original name in order to preserve history). See User:Lemongirl942/SG geo articles improvement project#Changi Village and Changi Point --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, not needed--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Lots and lots and lots of vandalism. Has a history of vandalism. —DangerousJXD (talk) 09:52, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. SkyFlyFiveTalkpage|Contributions 00:10, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 05:52, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 01:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 05:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Steady stream of ip vandals over the past couple weeks. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 01:49, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 05:10, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Unconfirmed cast members were continuously added by unregistered users. It may give the wrong info to the fans of the said show. MBdemigod (talk) 11:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:52, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – An IP editor from the same general area of the US appears to be using sockpuppetry to get their way on the talk page and is very early edit warring on the article's main page. If it's not sockpuppetry then it looks like vote stacking. SQGibbon (talk) 02:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- @SQGibbon: and reviewing admin, I also filed an SPI related to this. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Yourname. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 04:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and WP:BLP violations. SkyFlyFiveTalkpage|Contributions 03:22, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 04:56, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: There's been sustained IP vandalism for the last month. I think two weeks of protection could deter the vandal from returning.Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Report here again if disruption resumes after that. Widr (talk) 06:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 06:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppets of [[User:Supreme Genghis Khan] have returned:
This vandal will keep coming back as pages get unprotected. . TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 06:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:37, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: The page Internet Movie Database was previously move protected, but the protection did not copy over after it was moved (by an administrator, since the page was move protected). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Done Widr (talk) 06:11, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. SkyFlyFiveTalkpage|Contributions 00:10, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:09, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Philip J Fry Talk 00:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:51, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – See history. ukexpat (talk) 01:37, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:49, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopping vandals keep adding unsourced opinions in the article which violate core policies. It's vandalism and disruptive. . Dave Dial (talk) 06:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 06:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple users vandalising (IP & registered). Mike1901 (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Wow, I was in an IRL meeting this whole time and was aware of virtually none of this. I am in y'all's debt and send out virtual cookie plates or other dietarily appropriate tokens of appreciation. Thank you so much. Julietdeltalima (talk) 22:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Linguist 111talk 01:53, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 04:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See recent edit history. Tons of IP disruptive edits. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 04:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
31 March 2016
Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of vandalism from students to a school page with inappropriate material. Jpeifer (talk) 16:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Holding off for now. Most disruption came from the single user who was already autoconfirmed, and now blocked — MusikAnimal talk 17:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Seems to be a specific person jumping IP addresses regularly, likely someone with a conflict of interest. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 17:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Second this request. IPs are edit warring to introduce controversial material about the actions of other BLPs cited to McAdams' blog. Gamaliel (talk) 19:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked tech support spambot continues to spam on their talk page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Done semispamprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP article has a long history of vandalism. IP vandalism accumulating just three weeks after the last one-year semi-protection ended. DPH1110 (talk) 16:40, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected Protection log says it all — MusikAnimal talk 17:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - large amount of vandalism from IPs today. Kinetic37 (talk) 18:43, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing and edit warring from IP-hopping and anonymous user who appears to be trying to enforce his/her preferred version of the article. 86.158.72.75 (talk) 18:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:14, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rash of IP editors the past couple days vandalizing page. Asking for semi protection for 2 days or so. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Same Wachowski naming edit-warring by proxy, see above (The Matrix request). GABHello! 02:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Player is indefinitely suspended for drug use, so this is not an issue that will go away, hence the indefinite duration. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:31, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Twice. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 05:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Move protected No move vandalism in quite some time, but this still seems like a good candidate based on the history and the unlikely need for it to ever be moved — MusikAnimal talk 17:37, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther : Talk 08:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Started back up almost immediately after the last 1-year protection expired — MusikAnimal talk 17:40, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-running edit war between countless IP users about whether this beverage originated in Australia or New Zealand. IagoQnsi (talk) 15:38, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spat of IP vandalism. DPH1110 (talk) 16:38, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:42, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – On-going edit war by IP-hopping editor. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:45, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:42, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of information that violates {{Infobox television}} and the MOS of television, as well as information that defies verifiable content and the crystal-ball policy. livelikemusic talk! 02:42, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is mainly IP 90.xxx. Lectonar (talk) 12:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Recent death with a high increase in IP vandalism today. Rohaq (talk) 11:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined Most of the IP-edits are not vandalism, overall not much disruption. Lectonar (talk) 11:34, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow editing, but IP edits have been reverted, not accepted. George Ho (talk) 19:05, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, sorry for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Despite low editing, edits have been reverted during PC-protection. George Ho (talk) 19:18, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced IP edits, that need reverting. JMHamo (talk) 14:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:31, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Spurious categories from User:Borcker, block evading on three different IPs in 12 hours. McGeddon (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 15:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Laber□T 20:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —Kusma (t·c) 09:57, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Laber□T 20:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —Kusma (t·c) 09:57, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Laber□T 20:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —Kusma (t·c) 09:57, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 22:56, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Note: Recuse. I'm a resident of Tulsa. -Philippe (talk) 02:49, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —Kusma (t·c) 09:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Laber□T 20:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —Kusma (t·c) 09:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Laber□T 20:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —Kusma (t·c) 09:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Laber□T 20:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —Kusma (t·c) 09:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Laber□T 20:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —Kusma (t·c) 09:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip vandalism on article unde WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Huldra (talk) 03:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther : Talk 08:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. —Kusma (t·c) 09:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Slow IP edit warring by blocked User:Borcker again. McGeddon (talk) 12:57, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:16, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Borcker is getting block-evadingly excited about the first anniversary of the selfie shoes April fools joke. McGeddon (talk) 13:40, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I daresay this article might not be arond much longer... Lectonar (talk) 13:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Donald Trump campaign manager incident
- Michelle Fields (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Corey Lewandowski (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Pending changes: Both of these pages are in the news right now regarding Donald Trump's campaign manager being charged for battery against a journalist at a press conference. Numerous WP:NPOV and otherwise problematic edits are being made to both pages by newly created, single-purpose accounts that appear to have a partisan axe to grind. Both articles are WP:BLPs and it is becoming increasingly difficult to effectively patrol/monitor these pages for problematic new edits. Safehaven86 (talk) 20:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both. Lectonar (talk) 12:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent attempts to add "not to be confused with jQuery" by various IPs. This BLP has been protected in the past for the same reason. Jschnur (talk) 21:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Low-level frequency. Lectonar (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 05:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – One same user with a dynamic IP address is trying to add unsourced claims. He add it regularly without sourcing when it is removed. Needs a long term protection. Charles Turing (talk) 11:05, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Block evasion by Giubbotto non ortodosso
- Chris Brown discography (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Chris Brown (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Royalty (Chris Brown album) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Graffiti (Chris Brown album) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Back to Sleep (song) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Run It! (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Before the Party (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Psycadelik Thoughtz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Fan of a Fan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- F.A.M.E. (album) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Bruno Mars (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Giubbotto non ortodosso. See the case page at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Giubbotto non ortodosso to see how wide the scope is, with many socks and lots of IP addresses from the Rimini/Ravenna/Forli-Cesena area of Italy. Binksternet (talk) 15:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Done In most cases, disruption stopped two days ago and was confined to a short timespan, so that I do not see much sense in protecting now. I am sorry for not reacting earlier. Three or four articles were protected earlier by other administrators, or now by me, when disruption was longer.Ymblanter (talk) 10:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It continues. More new accounts and IPs adding information that does not belong. --allthefoxes (Talk) 22:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:26, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Apparently still a target for blp violations. Just emailed OS about IP edits. Requesting this be semi-ed for a bit again. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 06:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. The article is already PC protected for another month. Widr (talk) 06:40, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: See previous protection request. Shortly after previous protection expired, same edits resumed. —DangerousJXD (talk) 07:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:57, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – If you look in the page history, lots of sockpuppetry going on with socks of User:Supreme Genghis Khan. TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 09:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 09:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant edit warring against policy, there is a concentrated effort at this link to enact mass edits, to edit war via multiple proxies. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 21:58, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -Philippe (talk) 02:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Fangusu. 10 block-evading posts in the last 26 hours. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 22:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done - as a matter of principle, I don't like to protect talk pages. It closes off so many options for fixing articles. However, I've issued a range block to the IPs that have been recently disruptive. Let's see if that help? If not, feel free to re-request here, or on my talk. -Philippe (talk) 02:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Iris (American band) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Andrew Sega (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Reagan Jones (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: A dynamic IP keeps reverting sourced information on the aforementioned articles. Λeternus (talk) 00:31, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- - for Iris,
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. For Andrew Sega,
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., for Reagan Jones,
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. -Philippe (talk) 02:37, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppetry directly after previous protection ended. Qed237 (talk) 22:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sigh. Folks need a new hobby, socking is getting old. -Philippe (talk) 02:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New and IPs editing article under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Huldra (talk) 23:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - No significant recent protection history, I don't want to do too much more than this for the first protection in recent history. -Philippe (talk) 02:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of information that violates {{Infobox television}} and verifiable sources. livelikemusic talk! 00:19, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I hate doing this because there are anons actively editing, but I don't see a consistent enough IP to just block the one trouble-maker. -Philippe (talk) 02:43, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous long-term vandalism, disruptive editing from IPs and anonymous users. Greater level of protection needed: although pending changes is making it easier to counter the vandalism ultimately it's not deterring it. 86.158.72.75 (talk) 00:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I am loathe to do much longer, because ultimately there isn't a sufficiently broad pattern of vandalism for indef. Feel free to resubmit if needed at the conclusion. -Philippe (talk) 02:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs have been repeatedly unsourced and what appears to be copyrighted content to this article and the same content to Common purpose. This has been going on for about 2 weeks and appears to be increasing in frequency. I am One of Many (talk) 23:18, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -Philippe (talk) 02:36, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been repeatedly unsourced and what appears to be copyrighted content to this article and the same content to R v Jogee. This has been going on for about 2 weeks and appears to be increasing in frequency. I am One of Many (talk) 23:19, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -Philippe (talk) 02:34, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism (clearly one person using multiple IPs). IagoQnsi (talk) 23:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:49, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – POV pushers. TJH2018 talk 19:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done Not a good enough reason to protect a talk page. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:45, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Only one IP edit was accepted; others have been reverted, including the latest two weeks ago. George Ho (talk) 19:08, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 19:25, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – during PC-protection. George Ho (talk) 19:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:06, 30 March 2016 (UTC)