Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2017/05

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2017

01 May 2017

Indefinite creation protection being requested, as this article has been recreated several times now, and is purely promotional and always qualifies for WP:CSD#A7. Wes Wolf Talk 01:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Mifter (talk) 05:01, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. UpsandDowns1234 (🗨) (My Contribs) 02:49, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Mifter (talk) 05:13, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Upgrade to Semi-protection: Yesterday, List of Donald Duck universe characters was page-protected to protect against an IP-hopping vandal, as this page is one of its favorite targets to insert WP:OR commentary (and editwar to preserve said commentary). However, previous experience has repeatedly shown that auto-confirmation does not deter this vandal in the slightest, and it would be much better to upgrade the page-protection to semi-protection, as said vandal operates primarily through IPs.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC left in place NeilN talk to me 15:35, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 01:44, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary long term semi-protection: @Vanamonde93 and Favonian: as always, predicted at this RPP, vandalism by restoration of talk page comments and article edits by socks of indef blocked Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azul411. - DVdm (talk) 08:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've protected the article for a year. The talk page has already been protected till July: let's wait to see what happens with it, because talk pages should not be protected lightly in any case. Vanamonde (talk) 09:34, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion and disruptive editing by floating IP. 331dot (talk) 12:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and removal of sourced text for political reasons related to Armenian Genocide (see [1]). Quis separabit? 01:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 05:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kid's show 'revival' targets

Temporary semi-protection: Months-long campaign by a bouncing IP to list false revivals for these series with 'a revival is planned for 2017' and appropriate categories; a month is preferable. Nate (chatter) 01:53, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 05:11, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Digifan23 (talk) 01:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 05:10, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent politically motivated vandalism; soapboxing, changing party affiliations. . Dschslava Δx parlez moi 01:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 02:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see any reason for indefinite protection at this point--Ymblanter (talk) 07:12, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of abusive sockpuppet. See Warner Bros. and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer for examples. Ebyabe talk - Border Town07:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 08:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Now a vandalism target itself. Ebyabe talk - Inspector General07:58, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 08:03, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recently premiered series, removals of content on pages against WP:SPOILER. -- AlexTW 21:35, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:56, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:11, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:56, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Seeing as the template is now archived; paging the first sentence of WP:PP as the reason. Note that it will need to be removed from WP:CASC as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected (the protecting admin is inactive and either way, nine transclusions is no longer high risk) Mifter (talk) 05:37, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An unregistered user with an agenda (they have only edited this one page) has repeatedly removed valid material opposing his POV. RobP (talk) 14:06, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MelanieN (talk) 23:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I'd like my page only to be accessible to editing by me. I would like this done to prevent vandalism. Trevor Casey (talk) 21:21, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. ‪No need exists, see ‬WP:UPROT. MelanieN (talk) 23:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism is persistent. Page should have perm protection. Trevor Casey (talk) 23:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC). Trevor Casey (talk) 23:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and Pending Changes extended to Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 05:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 03:37, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 05:14, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs and newly created accounts. Prefall 04:34, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 05:14, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:55, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 05:17, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kellymoat (talk) 00:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 03:20, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – a history of vandalism and genre warring by MariaJaydHicky. and it didn't take long after the previous page protection was removed for another "new" account to try making the same genre changes also adding the same reference page(s). Kellymoat (talk) 01:51, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 02:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism. Deadman137 (talk) 02:04, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 03:34, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Mr. Guye (talk) 20:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done User is still active, this would prevent them from creating their own userpage. Also, the last creation of the page was five months ago. If the user themselves requested it of course it would be granted. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Brojam (talk) 22:06, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:14, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. -- Dane talk 22:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: previous protection expired and vandals were right back at it. Deadman137 (talk) 00:46, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Page sees constant vandalism by an IP-hopping vandal trying to insert, reinsert and edit-war in order to keep said vandal's original research nonsense opinions about how "Pete (Disney) is a wolf".--Mr Fink (talk) 19:17, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The previous semi-protection has expired, and the vandalism has resumed. —Granger (talk · contribs) 21:09, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ‪Rettetast‬.. --MelanieN (talk) 23:52, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:01, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Constantly vandalised by IPs or single-purpose accounts right after the protection expired, over 25 reverts in 2 days Snowflake91 (talk) 22:04, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:04, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 11:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like slow-motion sock puppetry. MelanieN (talk) 23:32, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – apparently the subject editing the bio. adding unnecessary and promotional material. . Saqib (talk) 18:07, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:45, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Benyamin-ln (talk) 18:21, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 18:49, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Full Protection: It is the signature of User:SammyMajed.  • Sammy Habib-Kemal Majed  • Talk  • Creations • Wikipedia Arabic  •
18:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. — Maile (talk) 19:43, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This has been deleted for 4th time now. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rehmat Aziz Chitrali (2nd nomination). . Saqib (talk) 12:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined actually, one of thsoe AfDs ended in no consensus and one in keep. It has only been deleted twice, within a span of six years, so there is no reason to assume it will be recreated in a way that is disruptive. SoWhy 13:07, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@SoWhy: the bio was created by a well established Wikipedia user who was using Wikipedia for self promotion. He has recently caught socking and appearently he was using his sock team to gaming the previous AfD's. He has intentions to re-create the bio so I urge that this page be protected to avoid re-creation. --Saqib (talk) 17:49, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Edit-warring and persistent disruptive editing (deletion of sources)

As already said months ago by an other contributor, the article """needs serious work to clean up the writing, fix up the citations, and remove insufficiently sourced non-neutral statements""". [2]. Launebee is only trying again to get the article stuck on the version that s/he wrote. This not acceptable, as no consensus has been reached. XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 16:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
XIIIfromTOKYO is precisely trying to delete the sources added meanwhile. --Launebee (talk) 16:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And this statement was before a change of content, it is not related to the current version. --Launebee (talk) 16:20, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As you can see, this statement was followed by a change and is not relevant anymore. --Launebee (talk) 16:22, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Now at ANI. NeilN talk to me 16:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: Please note that the ANI is not about this webpage, but about the personal attacks against me. --Launebee (talk) 16:35, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Still not done. Both editors properly blocked by another admin for edit warring. --NeilN talk to me 16:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – "Added content" canned edit summary vandalism. A Great Catholic Person (talk) 18:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 18:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Mifter (talk) 18:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

02 May 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:20, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:41, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Lots of traffic/vandalism, probably due to the recent release of GoTG2 and the "I Am Groot" meme. Border of Phantasm (Complaint Center) 20:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am Groot...or: Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:44, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nickag989talk 20:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and edit warring by unregistered editors. Digifiend (talk) 19:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 19:56, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, again. Retardednamingpolicy (talk) 19:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 19:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I asked for this a couple days ago, it was declined for some reason. . d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 19:34, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 20:02, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Today's FA. Gamebuster19901 (TalkContributions) 17:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There looks to be persistent vandalism, but protecting the main page should be done as small as possible. It upholds the principle that Wikipedia can be edited by anyone... since it's on the main page ;-). ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:00, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seen on Help:Getting started that is auto linked by welcome templates. Lets lock this shortcut no need to change. Moxy (talk) 18:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:08, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from a variety of different IP editors. Please can we semi-protect this page? Samshltn (talk) 12:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 13:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple newly registered accounts are adding the same spamlinks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:05, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new accounts are adding the same linkspam. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:08, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new accounts are adding spamlinks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Despite an edit notice, various single-purpose accounts are "fixing" the article in aid of the "get to philosophy" game. Just plain Bill (talk) 11:00, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – the self promotional autobio was created and maintained by a now blocked team of socks who used team of socks to dodge the deletion consensus in some afd's . the subject have plans to re-create it User_talk:Rachitrali#Deletion_Review so better it be protected. Saqib (talk) 15:05, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 16:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar:: Also please protect Rehmat Aziz. this is same person. --Saqib (talk) 16:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Saqib: You're welcome. Lectonar (talk) 16:31, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper keeps adding questionable edits that also specifically mentions that citations are useless. . Zhanzhao (talk) 15:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:39, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Sundostund (talk) 16:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Sundostund (talk) 16:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:41, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

03 May 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - Persistent vandalism, false and unsourced accusations regularly added by multiple IP addresses. Repeated requests for page deletion despite consensus for non-deletion in January 2016, where page was deemed to meet notability requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.216.134.196 (talk)

Declined A couple of things...
  • The most recent AfD was in December 2016, and the result was no consensus to delete. Notability was not clearly established.
  • There are no obvious examples of vandalism in the last two months. I do, however, see some content disputes, which need to be addressed on the talk page.
  • Much of the recent editing has been done by anonymous editors. Protecting the page will result in collateral damage.
So, no protection is merited at this time. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 15:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The same sockpuppeteer, who appears to be indefinitely banned user SchoolcraftT, is back again requesting the same edits to distance that contradict reliable sources (Google Maps, Bing Maps). The user has returned twice after week-long temporary semi-protects. I'd like to ask for a much longer temporary period or permanent semi-protection. Bitmapped (talk) 20:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It still is a talk-page, so let's escalate this slowly. Lectonar (talk) 21:15, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 21:23, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP sock. See page history as well as 86.142.69.143 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 86.163.59.24 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). clpo13(talk) 17:59, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 19:33, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP sock. clpo13(talk) 18:00, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 19:33, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kosack (talk) 18:50, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 19:37, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I request a semi protection on President Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed of Somalia due to being a target of spam. Since his election, rivals have been editing this page changing his name,university and much more. If we could come to an agreement that would be great! ((unsigned|Editorguy123098}}

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Note: I corrected the header for this entry.) caknuck ° needs to be running more often 19:23, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent changes to make Blount a member of some NFL team even though there are no sources saying he has been signed by one. Jasper Deng (talk) 16:51, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:04, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism by multiple, unrelated, IPs. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 18:02, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:09, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: spam. Widefox; talk 08:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde (talk) 10:05, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
COIN is Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Enova_Technology_Corp. Long-term 2015-2017, suggest long-term semi (and salting of article at COIN). Widefox; talk 14:24, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent content dispute. 32.218.152.53 (talk) 13:23, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 14:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism continued from IPs after un-protection. Request to protect again. Coderzombie (talk) 16:28, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:01, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of sourced information. Vanamonde (talk) 09:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 15:56, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --1990'sguy (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: consensus to move the page has been reached at [[3]]. Kostas20142 (talk) 16:32, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already unprotected. Expired yesterday. NeilN talk to me 16:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent copyright violations (see e.g. http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/canterbury/section5.rhtml) from multiple IP addresses. /wiae /tlk 12:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism – continued removal of content. – Sabbatino (talk) 13:53, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:34, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: RM already closed-consensus reached. Kostas20142 (talk) 16:36, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already unprotected. Already expired NeilN talk to me 16:10, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Semi still on. NeilN talk to me 16:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Article requires protection against editor who violated 3RR by adding disputed content with claims of helping against WP:CRYSTAL; however, edits were introducting CRYSTAL by declaring roles of future films. -- AlexTW 01:10, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Was this page glosssed over when replying to every other request before and after it...? -- AlexTW 08:23, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 10:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent disruptive editing - removal of cited content.and addition of unsourced claims. BilCat (talk) 02:52, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 05:31, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP editor in the Cincinnati area, likely the candidate in question or a friend/acquaintance of his, repeatedly attempts to insert a full, article-style bio for a candidate who does not meet Wikipedia's standards to have his own article. ALPolitico (talk) 04:56, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 05:33, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent unchecked IP vandalism. RF23 (talk) 07:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 10:05, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. WolvorineKnife (talk) 08:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Vanamonde (talk) 10:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – I/P conflict. Shrike (talk) 09:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Vanamonde (talk) 10:10, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism from IP hopper. Truth be toad (talk) 09:46, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 10:11, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing Anonymous IPs recently have been making quite a few disruptive edits.--Harout72 (talk) 00:23, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 05:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP persistently edit-warring with fraudulent/libelous claim to have created McFarlane's character Spawn. Each of these articles has been temp-protected at least once, with IP returning to this activity after expiration. See also: this

User(s) blocked. Mifter (talk) 05:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP has been disrupting the page recently. Jamie Tubers (talk) 02:05, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Mifter (talk) 05:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent blanking during a dispute being discussed on the article's talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:11, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 06:57, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 03:39, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to make a similar request. Thank you General. :) --Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract04:11, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 06:54, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP editors persistently restoring violations of WP:BLP for months now. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 06:16, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too infrequntly edited for semi, pending changes should do the job.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection till end of season 22 May. Repeated vandalism by IPs. Coderzombie (talk) 17:58, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP users. Random character sequence (talk) 21:49, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Ymblanter (talk) 06:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Weeks of vandalism from IPs and new accounts, without any recent constructive changes from same. Murph9000 (talk) 05:17, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 05:34, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced edits and vandalism from IPs, resuming quickly after previous protection expired. Simplexity22 (talk) 21:47, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'll request a fortnight's protection here. The page was protected last week after my request here. Repetitive BLP violations have again resumed ("scam entrepreneur" "conman" etc) due to the recent failure of the Fyre Festival, which the subject organized. I believe this current interest will go down in a fortnight. Thanks. Lourdes 02:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 05:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism, not prevented by PC. James (talk/contribs) 23:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 00:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent edit warring by IPs. Jonas kam (talk) 00:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 05:22, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could we up the protection on this article? For some reason it is attracting persistent vandalism from multiple IP-editors from Illinois/Indiana/Iowa this week. Shearonink (talk) 01:11, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 05:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IPs. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:16, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 4 fortnights, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 05:26, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Can we return this to ECP, please? We have seen a string of disruptive edits, particularly removal of sourced information for which consensus exists, since it was lifted: and many of the editors involved are autoconfirmed. . Vanamonde (talk) 12:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yes we can. Lectonar (talk) 13:05, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – At least until the end of the week. Ebyabe talk - General Health22:26, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Innisfree987 (talk) 22:36, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Indefinitely, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a redirect page that will not need to be a stand alone article. Except for maintenance adjustments on the page, there is no reason this redirect would need to be edited. But, yes, it was vandalism. If anyone thinks indef is too long for its protection, they are welcome to make a request in the section below to have it changed. — Maile (talk) 22:56, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

04 May 2017

Pending changes: WP:BLP violations or vandalism, even when infrequent. George Ho (talk) 07:46, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 13:16, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Vandalism occurring. --George Ho (talk) 07:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 13:16, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Teahouse seems to be the target of a vandal, switching usernames and editing while logged out. PC protection doesn't need to be for very long, I think. If the person implementing it could add something to the header of the Teahouse as well to indicate why edits are not automatically posted(as it is for new users) 331dot (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done It looks like it has slowed down. Probably not needed. ~ GB fan 12:00, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued Plagueis (sp?) meme vandalism/disruption. . CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:37, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Talk says in the ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES Notice that The article has been protected so that only users with extended confirmed rights can make edits. however right now its semi protected and not extended protected. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 10:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: As far as I can see the article was never extend-confirmed protected....@Acroterion: Lectonar (talk) 13:28, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since April 20, a variable IP has repeatedly deleted sourced info and changed info in a way the sources do not support. This has been reverted by 23 editor, Materialscientist, William M. Connolley, IronGargoyle, Murph900, Suonii180, Zoupan, Jim1138, Jdcomix, and myself; but the IP persists. Edward321 (talk) 00:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Nevertheless, she persisted!" Already unprotected by administrator Drmies.. MelanieN (talk) 03:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is suffering from revert vandalism. An IP editor is reverting a legitimate change, not because he or she has is in a dispute. His/her silly edit summaries read: "Just because you are Canaidan, so I go agree with you!" and "Je vais d’accord avec vous, le canadien guy". Codename Lisa (talk) 09:49, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. There initially was a dispute with 198.13.187.2 (IP from Canada) but this person seems to have given up his/her position. The vandal uses Chinese IPs: 119.53.118.176, 221.9.12.219, 221.9.22.200. —Codename Lisa (talk) 09:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:20, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Vandalism occurring. -- Alex Sims (talk) 11:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Boing! said Zebedee. NeilN talk to me 13:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

05 May 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bennv3771 (talk) 13:58, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:50, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IPs. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 14:19, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:30, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 20:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism by IPs. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 13:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just the one IP in the last week. Apart from that, article not even heavily edited. Lectonar (talk) 13:41, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 42.109.139.97 (talk) 15:00, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism dating back several months, mostly by IP editors but also by some vandalism-only accounts. Kendall-K1 (talk) 16:45, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created and deleted 5 times now.... JMHamo (talk) 16:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 17:05, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

06 May 2017

Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism was also done to my talk page by same IP-user who is still violation the named Conviction (2016 TV series)-artcile named above. Needs some protection until this user sees, he/she is just doing disruptive work here.--Robberey1705 (talk) 16:28, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Robberey's page is not being vandalized. The IP has simply responded to the edit war in kind, which Robberey refers to as vandalism (there is a long-term issue with Robbery referring to any edits with which he disagrees as vandalism, and any editor he encounters across multiple pages as a stalker). As above, page protection is inappropriate. --Drmargi (talk) 17:38, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. Katietalk 17:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistently poor, BLP violating edits. Page last protected on 29 April; requesting that temporary protection be restored. jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:42, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 21:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – For a long time please. See also protection log, this article has been vandalised extensively by an LTA. Dat GuyTalkContribs 21:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 21:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:30, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:46, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Despite the pending changes protection, there is still a high level of unconfirmed user and IP vandalism. Requesting additional short term semi protection on top of the pending changes to assist with this. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:57, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:45, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

create protection:Contiues to be recreated DoABarrelRoll.dev(Constable of the WikiPolice) 19:26, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:46, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP violations by IP-hopping editor. Deli nk (talk) 12:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:09, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Dawnseeker2000 15:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Doug Weller. Katietalk 18:07, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguisttalk|contribs 17:45, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Short term or temporary protection should be adequate. Thanks, -Fnlayson (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:18, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Jdcomix (talk) 17:50, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit warring by IPs. : Noyster (talk), 09:38, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:18, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Dawnseeker2000 15:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Doug Weller. Katietalk 17:44, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – This BLP has been persistently the target of disruptive editing by IP editors over a period of several months. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:27, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Black Kite. Katietalk 17:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Unnecessary move protection, the title has not been debated for a while. I left a message on the protecting admin's talk page and never received a response. . Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Katietalk 17:38, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Race is May 6 (tomorrow), page gets a lot of driveby vandal hits. Temporary semi for about 48 hours, please. Montanabw(talk) 04:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repetitive IP changes. People don't understand how maths works. Other IPs are editing to compare results to last election, not notional results based on boundary changes. (In the SNP section, the seats change should show a net loss of 7. See results table below for clarification or follow the BBC link) 49.200.119.98 (talk) 07:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jasper Deng (talk) 07:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent recent IP editing against long-standing consensus. Taivo (talk) 15:48, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A consensus was reached regarding if the use of "racist" was appropriate in this article. After finding several reliable sources, it was decided it was appropriate usage. However, IPs and new accounts continue to remove "racist" or replace it with "controversial" even after the comments clearly state that if a change wants to be change must be discussed. eg: [4] [5] This page has also been semi-protected twice before for these same reasons. MasontWang (talk) 17:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:08, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Further repeated vandalism by various IP editors soon after the previous temporary protection measure was lifted about a week ago. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 06:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

07 May 2017

Semi-protection: High IP vandalism. Slime 123 Globox Barbara Rayman (talk) 22:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 00:57, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OP indeffed as vandal. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 00:58, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 17:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced and random figures for the budget by different IPs. Jupitus Smart 12:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from mobile editors. A Great Catholic Person (talk) 14:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 17:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Disruptive editing again, single-purpose account (SPA) vandalism as well as vile language by unregistered user. If a permanent semi protection is not introduced, the article will be vandalized again by unregistered users. For more justification please look at page history which will show the trend of vandalism from the past month or so. The vile language as well as swear words have been removed. Oliszydlowski, 08:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. + Pending-changes protected for a period of 3months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC) Lectonar (talk) 17:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending-changes: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism. 42.109.167.55 (talk) 10:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:14, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Philip J Fry Talk to me 11:04, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP and single purpose account vandalism over the past few days. Justeditingtoday (talk) 16:59, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hardly any productive IP edits over the past year, so a longer term may be beneficial. Acroterion (talk) 17:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Bertrand101 IP Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  05:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 06:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protection should be enough Lectonar (talk) 16:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – First part of a newly released mega movie. All the lowlifes who cannot vandalise the sequel (protected) are resorting to vandalising the first part . Jupitus Smart 12:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Jupitus Smart: I rather think that you should refrain from denigrating other users; they vandalise, you report, and the article gets protected. No need for name-calling. Lectonar (talk) 16:15, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – The word "Persian" is constantly edit to "Arabian" or similar, and is part of a naming dispute described at Persian Gulf naming dispute. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:14, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – as a famous TV show that is being long-term vandalized. Lil Johnny (talk) (contribs) 01:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Not used that much. TEP is reserved for cases like cleanup, POV, and advert. KMF (talk) 22:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined per this discussion. If anyone needs to edit this template, please say so and the protection level can be considered, but it makes little sense to clog up RFPP dealing with many requests to reduce protection levels on templates no-one wants to edit. ~ Rob13Talk 05:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP and SPA vandalism. Lizard (talk) 04:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:14, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing, constantly recurring, happening through many different IPs. Doctorkaufman (talk) 05:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:37, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 06:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring vandalism about age, same as last time. Grayfell (talk) 08:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Fans, IPs posting their predictions. I think this will last until the show airs. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 22:45, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cornerstonepicker Did you mean create protection or semi protection? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@CambridgeBayWeather: Semi-protection Cornerstonepicker (talk) 04:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I thought. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Return of vandalism from the same user who went as MySuperBelt85 (talk · contribs), now as a IP. TheDeviantPro (talk) 01:42, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An editor is continuously warring over an image in the article, which needs to be settled in WP:FFD. Please full protect it for the timebeing for the sake of the article's stability. This is a WP:GA. —IB [ Poke ] 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 (talk) 04:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing. Neutralitytalk 04:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:11, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent blanking and vandalism for IP addresses. Protect till end of tournament, May 22. Coderzombie (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism of name to Bernd . KylieTastic (talk) 22:59, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 04:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term target of attack. . Mr. Guye (talk) 00:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: if it's long-term I think it should be permanent? Lil Johnny (talk) (contribs) 00:39, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems like a good target for vandalism, as seen in page history. Lil Johnny (talk) (contribs) 00:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Beginning 14 November 2016, [6] an ip user has repeatedly, often using deceptive edit summaries, added the assertion that 'cacciatore was named for Italian poet Antonio Cacciatore'. No such person ever existed. Dlabtot (talk) 01:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:55, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems like a good target for vandalism . Lil Johnny (talk) (contribs) 01:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Resumption of disruptive edits within hours of previous block expiry. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 10:07, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:44, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A rotating set of IPs is insisting on putting the secondary name for the language in the infobox twice. This has been explained to them to no avail. MarnetteD|Talk 14:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There was a lot of problem editing in April, but rare recently. If it gets back to the level it was in April, ask again. MelanieN (talk) 21:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Kostas20142 (talk) 15:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mz7 (talk) 19:46, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repetitive vandalism on article by fans of Hamilton (musical). Most are perpetrated by IP's and one-time non-auto-confirmed editors with clearly malicious edits. Page requires protection as traffic has increased in recent years, and multiple acts of vandalism are committed and reverted (often by ClueBot NG) each month. Stormy clouds (talk) 09:20, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 18:12, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: How long semi protection does this get me. The longer the better. At the top of my regular talk page I give a link to my alternate talk page, so communicating with me is no problem. SlightSmile 15:12, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 18:08, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent violations by IP-hopping editor. Talks have been done. The series stays "present" as long as there is no official confirmation by the network ABC. This decisions have been made by other users then me in December 2016, as written in the coment section of the history of the article. Some IP-User does not seem to get this, now goes agains me about an "edit" war he/she/it has started and is just not able to calm down. Article should be protected until May Sweeps are done by ABC in 14 days and the official cancelation is confirmed.--Robberey1705 (talk) 16:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neither editor involved in this slow edit war has made any effort to discuss the edit on the talk page, and both are aggressively warring a semantic hair split. Semi is inappropriate until they use the talk page and resolve using the way the community expects. --Drmargi (talk) 16:47, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@my personal stalker-Margi As you might see, this user does not know how to use a talk page. But I won't use it either, as a discussion has been helt in December 2016 in the comments. It was NOT me who suggested, leaving the series as "present" even tho it is, of course, over. Other useres made the choice, also on the article of Notorious (2016 TV series) to leave it "present" as long as there is not official confimation on side of ABC. And there isn't. I am just keeping up the given status quo, which is, in fact "present". But as you are able to see: the screeming IP-User does not get this point. Therefore a protection until May Sweeps is the only way to satisfy all. The confirmation about a cancelation will be there in 14 days anyway.--Robberey1705 (talk) 16:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neither do you. "Discussion" does not take place via edit summary. There has been no discussion, you are equally culpable in this edit war, your approach to conflict resolution is to be the one who shouts loudest, and you refuse to work toward consensus, or even acknowledge the process. Page protection is not the answer to the problem; neither is an aggressive message to an IP such as you left on the article talk page after by comments above. --Drmargi (talk) 17:36, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For the reviewing administrator: it bears mention that this nonsense is also going on at Notorious (2016 TV series) as well, where there is also an equally aggressive slow edit war. Frankly, the two need a little break to calm down and stop edit warring. --Drmargi (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Each editor gave an edit warring warning to the other before their last reverts, so it's clear they were aware. I'm going to decline page protection for now; if the edit war resumes, please report it to WP:AN3. Katietalk 18:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:12, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Maile (talk) 22:18, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

08 May 2017

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism for about 20 minutes from several different users and IPs. 65HCA7 11:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 14:48, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Speedied 5x. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 19:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of longterm abusive IP vandal. Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel16:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. NeilN talk to me 19:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist 17:04, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:30, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 17:06, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 3 years NeilN talk to me 19:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 17:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Edgar181. NeilN talk to me 19:24, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Datbubblegumdoe[talkcontribs] 18:17, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:17, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spirit (Depeche Mode album) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: The page needs to be protected again, as the disruptive editing by Polish IP hopper continues. Disembodied Soul (talk) 18:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by random IPs (Causing degradation in quality of good article). UserK (talk) 10:30, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:12, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fixed. NeilN talk to me 17:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – increase in IP vandalism over last 24 hours, likely due to recent performance. —KuyaBriBriTalk 12:04, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:13, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This album is an early recording from a band that is currently popular. Several editors continue to create it at various locations. It fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM but the fans don't accept this. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:24, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Walter Görlitz: There needs to be a proper AFD for this. NeilN talk to me 15:18, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
An AfD for a redirect? OK. But I can't do an AfD while the page is locked. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:26, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Walter Görlitz: An AFD for the repeatedly deleted content about the album. I don't see any discussion for this matter. If you are willing to start one I will knock the protection down to ECP. --NeilN talk to me 15:30, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have started one. I don't know if the protection level dropped, but it's been nominated. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, a person keeps using slightly different IP addresses coming from the same area (Thessaloniki, Greece) replacing sales numbers that are official with VGChartz estimations despite explanations of why this is incorrect and repeatedly being reverted. They have been doing this continuously for almost 2 weeks and seem determined to not stop.ThatPerson903 (talk) 14:37, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:20, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per disruptive IP editor ignoring hidden note about article content. -- AlexTW 03:04, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 07:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Kostas20142 (talk) 12:05, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GB fan. Kostas20142 (talk) 13:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – previously created under Rehmat Aziz Chitrali and Rehmat Aziz which are now protected. all should be protected for indefinite period. . Saqib (talk) 14:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 14:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN:; could Rehmat Aziz Chitrali and Rehmat Aziz also be protected for indefinite period. the subject surely has intention to recreate the bio. --Saqib (talk) 14:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Saqib: Done. --NeilN talk to me 14:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Vandal activities has been unending amongst many other articles relating to Classical Korean History Wandrative (talk) 08:14, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP, now two, are adding personal opinions and using trivial language that contradict the sources. They use no source to support what they write and they just revert without a summary. Attar-Aram syria (talk) 08:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Next time, report trouble before you violate 3RR. El_C 09:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Financial vandalism. Persistent addition of random figures as budget and movie gross by different IPs. Jupitus Smart 08:57, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kosack (talk) 09:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting additional ECP protection over existing pending changes, as despite the pending changes, there is still a lot of disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:59, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Chronic name vandalism, name keeps getting written as "Jiffy" yet the correct name is "Jif". KNorth192 (talk) 02:34, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde (talk) 04:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See: [7]. - Mlpearc (open channel) 03:37, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just one revert within the period that I would have protected it for. Vanamonde (talk) 04:45, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article is under attack by a harassment-minded vandal. (He is engaged in this certain type of vandalism.) Just to clarify, if anyone thinks this is actually a good-faith editor having a dispute, I've been collecting the various IP addresses of this certain malicious person for a couple of years and attaching geolocation data to them. I will provide this info on request to admins. (But of course, if my past requests here is any indication, you guys know this malicious person.). Codename Lisa (talk) 04:08, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing to non-compliant colour by dynamic IP. -- AlexTW 02:02, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:01, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing to non-compliant colour by dynamic IP. -- AlexTW 02:03, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism. Deadman137 (talk) 05:02, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 05:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The plot was copied from http://www.movietubeon.com/watch-dirty-grandpa-full-movie/, which was published on January 22, 2016. That text was pasted into the plot section seven days later. It's a copyright violation and cannot stand. Binksternet (talk) 14:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This should do it. Needs more eyes, though. Lectonar (talk) 18:49, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – User was indef'd for self-promotion, and had talk page access revoked after posting the same self-promotional material after being blocked. IP editors have now twice posted the same self-promotional material since the user was denied talk page access. Reasonable to assume it is the blocked user editing anonymously to evade the block. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:20, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 05:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editwarring IP hopper . Doug Weller talk 05:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An article about a Hindu religious text either being attacked as non Hindu by various people or another IP hopper . Doug Weller talk 05:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  23:19, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:40, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: (K-pop) Fans, IPs posting their predictions. It will probably last until the show airs. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:06, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 04:34, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mélencron (talk) 00:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ronhjones. Vanamonde (talk) 04:34, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP vandalism is becoming tedious to undo. Suggest protecting for at least a week, possibly two. GoneIn60 (talk) 01:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 04:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal is back; has already been blocked this week, but changes IPs. Long-term protection is the only route to protect the article. The Old JacobiteThe '45 02:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Vanamonde (talk) 04:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Page has long-standing history of being vandalized and disruptively edited by IP's and other anonymous editors; continued addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content, as well as removal of reliable sources. Pending changes is not secure enough for this page, and full protection should be given. livelikemusic talk! 02:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not seeing the justification for EC protection. Vanamonde (talk) 04:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing to non-compliant colour by dynamic IP. -- AlexTW 02:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Vanamonde (talk) 04:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism. Deadman137 (talk) 02:31, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gilliam. Vanamonde (talk) 04:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Millahnna (talk) 03:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Vanamonde (talk) 04:44, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent misgendering of the subject by unconfirmed users. Also request that an edit warning be inserted to inform editors that this article is subject to discretionary sanctions. Funcrunch (talk) 03:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 04:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name – Username cannot pass WP:Username policy. Mr. Guye (talk) (My aftermath) 20:39, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~ Rob13Talk 20:48, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 45.47.111.86 (talk) 20:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:55, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent and repeated trolling from an LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:59, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Years of vandalism, page blanking, disruptive editing; only slowed down by occasional page protection. I've also left the Admin-required move protection that was already in place. — Maile (talk) 01:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request. Note that the page is a redirect to my talk page, so don't be surprised if you're redirected there. Please do not protect my talk page. Gestrid (talk) 22:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJuliancolton | Talk 23:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request. Gestrid (talk) 22:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJuliancolton | Talk 23:36, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated restoring of unsourced / non-notable alumni - no wiki page - by multiple IPs. Jim1138 (talk) 23:15, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:39, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:35, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I had protected this until shortly before 8pm French time; now it is well under control, and the French system of prediction of the result is such that there is virtually no chance that anyone else than Macron is the winner. Lectonar (talk) 19:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption from South Africa, multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 15:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 19:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption from South Africa, multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 15:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 19:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs persistently removing info (some uncontroversial, some potentially controversial) despite invites to discuss on its talk page. Also misleading edit summaries for this, such as 'update' when it's actually just deletion or 'minor'. Boleyn (talk) 21:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of some obsessed vandal who has a thing for insisting that there should not be any fluff about the macOS version prior to formal release. Blake Gripling (talk) 07:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 16:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just give up... I will keep bothering or modifying until you understand that Mac should NOT be listed as platform until the release. AS YOU CAN SEE, BANS AND BLOCKS WON'T STOP ME. AND I WILL CONTINUE FOREVER WITH TROLLING/ EDIT WARS, IF NECESSARY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.52.13.15 (talk) 16:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 16:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
08:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 17:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi () 12:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 17:26, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: This film is not releasing, better to keep as a draft. For now this page needs to be salted. SuperHero👊 13:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Just recreated once. Lectonar (talk) 16:11, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anons and newly-registered accounts attempting to censor content, sometimes disguised by adding unnecessary citations that say no more than the extant ones. Probably the same person doing it all. Sitush (talk) 15:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:50, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption from South Africa, multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 15:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – If you look at the history of the page, it has been continually edited in a disruptive/vandalism-ish way by User:GramereC (almost all of their talk page is warnings about that editing). This got onto the Editor Assistance Noticeboard and I would suggest indefinite protection to make sure that GramereC cannot continue their edits. They last edited on May 4th of this year in the same disruptive fashion, so it is still going on. This may deserve higher protection than I nominated it for (this is the first time I have nominated a page for protection) due to the extent of their disruption. Nerd1a4i (talk) 16:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Said user is already autoconfirmed, so semi-protection would not be effective. Lectonar (talk) 17:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Constant IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 16:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:04, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism that reoccurs as soon as the page gets unprotected. This is common with all recent Miss Universe articles. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 16:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Actually not as soon as the page is unprotected... Lectonar (talk) 19:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:14, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We have IP's adding new photographs and changing data as the new President elect is about to declared. Should be IP protected till official confirmation arrives. Jupitus Smart 18:39, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I had protected this until shortly before 8pm French time; now it is well under control, and the French system of prediction of the result is such that there is virtually no chance that anyone else than Macron is the winner. Lectonar (talk) 19:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I should have worded it more clearly. I don't doubt that Macron will be winning, but IP editors are removing Hollande's pictures with some replacing it with Le Pen, besides other vandalism. That was the reason for my asking. Jupitus Smart 19:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I counted 2 Le Pens and 1 Merkel...I'll give this some hours, then. Lectonar (talk) 19:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 7 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:11, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kosack (talk) 18:43, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent disruption by various IPs, including additions of unsourced defamatory content re: BLPs. . K.e.coffman (talk) 18:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 19:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 19:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Brough87 provoked an edit warring, so there are no consensus for his edit in talk page and violated 3RR. --Panam2014 (talk) 19:26, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. This needs dispute resolution; the page is already protected. Lectonar (talk) 19:48, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aristophanes68 (talk) 19:39, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:49, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John of Reading (talk) 19:59, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:49, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – anon IPs inserting info causing an edit war. Aristophanes68 (talk) 20:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ronhjones. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term problem of unsourced additions and vandalism. 157.49.2.161 (talk) 20:35, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This was protected back in 2010. The team has been inactive for the past two years, and seems like there is no need for protection. 42.109.162.253 (talk) 15:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SpacemanSpiff:? Lectonar (talk) 21:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Now at TfD. Lectonar (talk) 16:04, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This protection was put it into place in error due to an edit war that has re-ignited There was no disrupive editing to begin with. 184.14.214.99 (talk) 09:09, 7 May 2017 (UTC) Note: There hadn't been any changes to the article up until January of this year. 184.14.214.99 (talk) 09:43, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. Your very recent efforts on Talk:Mountain Parkway Byway demonstrate that protection is very much warranted. Favonian (talk) 10:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

09 May 2017

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Third recent creation just deleted. Originally deleted under PayPal World Financial Services. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13Talk 16:07, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism within the past month. Melodies1917 (talk) 17:42, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year NeilN talk to me 20:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A hopping anon is repeatedly inserting poorly sourced content. They're undoing my edits, which suggests they should have seen the edit summary re: my comment about the issue on the talk page. They're been reverted by others, too. Sitush (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 3 months NeilN talk to me 20:02, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: this page will be prevent vandalism and disruptive editing. Also this prevent the registered account user and anonymous account user from editing. Thank you. - Rama Ybrahim (Talk) 05:43, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No-one other than you has ever edited it. Extended protection won't stop confirmed registered users editing it. The only way to do that would be full protection and then only admins would be able to edit it. GedUK  11:09, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: @Ged UK: same request was posted one-two hours ago to this one, which was denied by NeilN. (This is my first time of tattletale, possibly/hopefully the last one.)
    I saw this request first, and requested user to update his signature, then I realised he had made same request previously, and Neil had requested him to update his signature too. User is not much good with English language, and this request gives me doubt if he understands the concept of vandalism.
    The account is barely 31 days old, and has been granted rollback user-right, and has "IP block exemption." —usernamekiran(talk) 15:13, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – it had been protected until july 6 2018. but someone changed it to a lesser date. that protection has expired. sock vandals are back. Kellymoat (talk) 11:17, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pending changes is still on and can handle current level of activity. If disruption increases please re-report. NeilN talk to me 12:45, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Enough! – it's been jumping about like a frog on a griddle. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:37, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Once the official title can be sourced, this can be moved to the appropriate title. Lectonar (talk) 18:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor creating non-notable article overwriting a redirect. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. El_C 06:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by several IPs. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 13:28, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – "invented pineapples" meme is going around and people are screwing with the page. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 13:49, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:24, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2017

11 May 2017

Pages within Gestrid's userspace

Indefinite semi-protection: User request as a defense against potential vandalism, as I usually work in anti-vandalism. Note that most of the talk pages are redirects to my base talk page. Do not protect my base talk page, please. The pages that end in ".css" and ".js" are not CSS and JavaScript pages. They are the talk pages for CSS and JavaScript pages and are editable by anyone. Also, I apologize: I did not realize the request would turn out to be this large and that I had so many subpages. Gestrid (talk) 16:55, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Let me quote the protection policy....user pages may be protected upon a request from the user, as long as a need exists. I somehow fail to see the need for protection, to be honest. The (sub-)pages may be protected if they are vandalised (but not preemptively), so I'd suggest to ask for protection when vandalism occurs. Lectonar (talk) 20:43, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 (talk) 03:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: WNYY98, by who? NeilN talk to me 03:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: (suggested until election date on 8th June) This minor national politician's page was flagged as having COI edits at the last UK general election and now has a couple of new apparent-SPAs adding unsourced or improperly sourced promotional material such as "Craig enjoys visiting local businesses, schools and voluntary organisations and seeing the fantastic work that these do". Perhaps if it's restricted to autoconfirmed users they'll make suggestions on the talk page instead Dtellett (talk) 12:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. For now disruption is not that high. Lectonar (talk) 12:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. It won't stop. AffeL (talk) 12:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just the odd occurrence of vandalism; sometimes the article goes completely unedited for days. Lectonar (talk) 12:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IPs (probably several bored HS students?) vandalizing this article today. Altamel (talk) 20:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 20:53, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

11 May 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Three different attempt to change the English air dates even though the cited source states the the series airs on Sunday mornings at 1am. —Farix (t | c) 17:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 20:07, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – repeat recreation for promo only by several undisclosed COI editor accounts (see WP:COIN). Widefox; talk 17:51, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected SoWhy 20:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Flare-up of IP vandalism this week, some oversightable. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:51, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 20:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is getting a lot of vandalism hits because of her recent conviction. Jip Orlando (talk) 18:43, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. SoWhy 20:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Large number of forth-and-back reverts, as a result of sneaky vandalism (plausible misinformation; see article talk page). Two different anonymous vandals and four registered editors are involved. FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 20:06, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 20:16, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Pending changes isn't stopping different IPs from making the same unsourced addition. : Noyster (talk), 09:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. That's not the role of pending changes; pending changes works fine here, because it prevents the unsourced addition of going "live". Lectonar (talk) 09:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Spinout article of Payrexx which is repeatedly recreated for promo only by several undisclosed COI editor accounts - see WP:COIN. Widefox; talk 17:57, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- John Reaves 20:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 19:39, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- John Reaves 19:58, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Offending editor is edit-warring over the same content as before the previous one-week protection but in a different format, as soon as it was over, without posting on the talk page any further. -- AlexTW 10:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection of what exactly? Because you don't want a line ("has yet to be announced") that is against Wikipedia:CRYSTAL to be removed therefore locking the thread so no one could edit it? That line is also unsourced to Begin with, so that's another issue. Two editors already said that that line should be removed. TheVeryHotWikipedian (talk) 11:38, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As can be seen, the offending editor has taken this discussion here as well, unaware that discussions are not a vote, continuing their WP:OWN behaviour and refusing to discuss properly. -- AlexTW 11:42, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Stop deflecting the real issue by accusing editors of owning the article. Two editors already disagreed with you, and you are the only one who is insisting to keep the line which is unsourced and against Wikipedia:CRYSTAL.TheVeryHotWikipedian (talk) 11:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have protected again, but I suspect any reoccurrence of such edit-wars when the protection expires will be met with blocks for both parties involved in the edit-war which is frankly over a triviality. Black Kite (talk) 11:48, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers for that. And agreed that it's a triviality, and yet, the editor insists on removing it continuously. One can only restore the previous version of the WP:STATUSQUO and WP:CONSENSUS so many times. -- AlexTW 11:50, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 11:56, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:44, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Several instances of vandalism by unregistered IPs. SamHolt6 14:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:58, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP user blanking content. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Random pointless edits made by different IP addresses (specifically, adding new lines at the top of the page and removing them). It's not exactly vandalism since I haven't seen them change the article directly, but it fills up the view history and it doesn't help. This has been going on since December of last year. FosterHaven (talk) 06:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This has to be dealt with in another fashion; have a look at User talk:191.17.73.193 e.g.; filing an SPI would probably be the best course of action, as it permits easier blocks of the (prospective) socks. Lectonar (talk) 07:07, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:43, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:50, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumption of Disruption after expiry of previous protection. Vanamonde (talk) 08:53, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 (talk) 20:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. — Maile (talk) 21:14, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism (as with Justice for Men and Boys), which is only likely to continue before, during and after the UK General Election, 8 June 2017. The Vintage Feminist (talk) 02:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 02:53, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jr abad deleted pages

Indefinite create-protection: Repeatedly recreated. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jr abad 209.249.5.140 (talk) 06:06, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 07:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eddie891 (talk) 16:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 01:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GiovanniSidwell (talk) 17:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 01:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 03:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

12 May 2017

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kellymoat (talk) 12:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 17:46, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long term abuse, highly visible. WNYY98 (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 17:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection – This page needs to salted. - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected clpo13(talk) 21:29, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created and deleted four times. JMHamo (talk) 21:10, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected clpo13(talk) 21:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Might want to protect this talk page from rants that the 'Babylonian' editors here (which means non-Rastafarian) are 'homoes'. Doug Weller talk 12:57, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like a troll to me. I see where you're coming from, but protecting a talk page shuts out a whole class of editors from being able to change anything. A block would be better, but the IP appears to be a T-Mobile with probably too much collateral. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism within the last few days, one user in particular keeps reverting edits to own viewpoint with no reference to support. BillyBatty (talk) 15:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @BillyBatty: Swapping Bermondsey for Lewisham sounds more like POV-pushing than vandalism; however the IP has gone over 3RR so blocked for 24 hours. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism over the last two months. Ckruschke (talk) 16:54, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. While some IP edits are questionable, others such as this should be considered good faith. If any particular IP is being obviously disruptive and screwing about, try WP:AIV Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - IP address adding unsourced COPYVIO. Jytdog (talk) 17:36, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Unsourced copyvio? Lectonar (talk) 17:50, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – speedied 4x in last 3 years. —KuyaBriBriTalk 18:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:16, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Middle East countries and others (related to Arab-Israeli conflict)

Extended protection: Fearing of more vandalism, extend protect these articles per Wikipedia:ARBPIAINTRO and Portal talk:Syrian Civil War. Supreme Dragon (talk) 13:25, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – PCR give 9 days is wasting time. IP hopping edit warrior is still at his tricks. A month of semi, please. Ymblanter was the admin who PP1d this. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 14:06, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EW continues by IPs d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 16:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:10, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent bad IP edits, assertations of vaporware, spelling, I have to patrol it anyway. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 16:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The only really bad edit in the past week is this one. If you get re-reverted, pop back here and we'll investigate. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: Don't revert the PC just because I said so, if you think the time is right now, then put it in! I just personally preferred to wait a little longer to see if the disruption died down of its own accord. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ritchie333: We just crossed edits and opinions...I had looked through the article history, and just thought it would be ok to pc-protect....1 month is nothing, and pc is much less intrusive than semi. Admins disgression. All is well :) Lectonar (talk) 17:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I often use pending changes to evaluate the amount of disruption; easy to do when you watch the article. And: Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:15, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, okay, I wondered what "I have to patrol it anyway" meant - if you've got it on your watchlist then the good faith edits won't be held up long. And skimming through the past 3 months or so of the article's history, I think most anon edits are good faith, though I frequently bang my head against a desk when IPs add stuff that can be easily sourced but don't bother. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I update the article weekly, and I have found it best to check the history for edits before changing the article. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 17:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing by IP editor(s). Required several restores over the last week or so. Suggested duration: 1 month. — kashmiri TALK 09:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long protection log, still subject to Super Bowl related vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 09:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No more edits for five days. If it starts up again, consider requesting pending protection. SoWhy 11:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all IP edits are declined . Flow 234 (Nina) talk 10:33, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined no reason to assume that PCP can't keep on handling it. The whole point of it is to allow those good IP edits to be made despite the protection. SoWhy 12:00, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 (talk) 10:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 17:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal making many unconstructive edits at this BLP. Bahooka (talk) 15:16, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created and deleted five times. JMHamo (talk) 16:33, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:07, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 17:04, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spam links addition by IPs. Vin09(talk) 13:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - IP added one spam link and has been warned. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 16:50, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – 2x recreated + elsewhere [8]. Widefox; talk 07:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined once every seven years is not "repeatedly" SoWhy 10:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection (suggest until election date 8 June). Repeated (5x in 6hrs) reinsertion of same piece of BLP-violating content by multiple IP editors and new SPAs. Dtellett (talk) 09:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No need for one month but you might want to open a WP:SPI case. SoWhy 11:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 (talk) 10:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not been recreated for nine years now. SoWhy 10:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 (talk) 10:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined only twice SoWhy 10:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism re-started after previous protection expired. Deadman137 (talk) 13:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:50, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Article speedied 7x in last 10 years. —KuyaBriBriTalk 14:47, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chaffey College

Temporary semi-protection: Month-long campaign from floating IP at University of Minnesota re non-GNG AirBnb dispute. Chaffey College [9],[10],[11], [12],[13],[14],[15],[16] and Educational Testing Service [17],[18],[19]. UW Dawgs (talk) 06:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Both. Lectonar (talk) 07:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism 176.209.254.181 (talk) 09:00, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Unrelenting Russia-based IP hopping vandalism since February 2017. — Maile (talk) 11:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 10:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 11:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create-protection: Repeatedly recreated see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jr abad Please ask WayKurat to open a new reports for two socks . 38.96.9.224 (talk) 21:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article has only been recreated once. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Non-logged-in (and chiefly mobile) users have recently been removing content and corrupting the formatting of this page. Multiple such edits have occurred since the beginning of the year, each having been manually reverted by various users. Rriegs (talk) 22:41, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I suggest a permanent protection. The disruptions don't seem to stop when there's no protection. Jamie Tubers (talk) 01:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not seeing the level of pervasive disruptive editing that we normally expect when protecting a page. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:15, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP changed "Kiev" to "Kyiv" without discussion for 3 times. Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 02:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article is already pending changes protected. That seems to be doing its job. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The usual IP POV attempts. Doug Weller talk 05:56, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption not big enough for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:00, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent WP:VANDALISM every few months - all vandalism appears to come from IP addresses and nonconfirmed users. Previous request cannot be parsed per Cyberbot I comment, thus a new one has been created. Cosmic Clone (talk) 21:37, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 06:44, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - on going vandalism. Capitals00 (talk) 06:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 06:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by new accounts. People are adding Hindi, Persian to the infobox with no real reason. Blanked twice in the last 24 hours. Changing flag from Tibet to China to Tibet to China (somebody even added both the flags side by side) over the last few days, in the region with significant populations list. Jupitus Smart 06:47, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirm: Should be protected per WP:ARBPIA3. GalatzTalk

Extended confirmed protected SoWhy 19:54, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long protection log, highly visible. WNYY98 (talk) 23:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too much disruptive editing and too many short term page protections. Clearly something longer term is required. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits (potentially qualify as vandalism, checking) by one person using varying IPs. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 23:35, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator KrakatoaKatie. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Company flacks perpetually creating SPAs to try to change article to Maaxis instead of Cheng Shin. Examples:

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the problem persists come back. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruption of IP editor based on their disagreement with the content and critical reviews after previous page protection expired. -- AlexTW 22:27, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple copyright violations and COI content added repeatedly. Please see history. I would recommend protection for 6 months. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 22:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This does look like a long term issue. Let's see if three months will drive them off. If not come back and we can extent the PP. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:03, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Block evasion - likely from User:Bulgarian Archer, using varying IPs. Home Lander (talk) 22:54, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:06, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - MrX 03:29, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A user is apparently trying to circumvent their block. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/老山哥哥. Dodi 8238 (talk) 16:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A single edit is not sufficient to institute protection. SoWhy 20:06, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:38, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined only created twice SoWhy 20:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – As you can see this page's history it's been a hub of lot of ip's to expand un-sourced content on this page without giving proper refs to the content it is here requested from the admins to please protect this page for one month for stopping this un-sourced content addition. Regards, TKSS (talk) 18:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC). TKSS (talk) 18:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 20:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Due to the mention of this character in the hit musical “Hamilton”, vandalism is persistent and the present protection level does not seem adequate since vandalism keeps breaking through unabated. Please set up a similar protection level as with other Hamilton related pages like Peggy Schuyler, Aaron Burr, Elizabeth Schuyler Hamilton, Alexander Hamilton himself, etc. Isananni (talk) 09:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two edits today, pending protection is plenty to handle that. SoWhy 19:56, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection Yes there is only one editor who is being reverted for last 3 days, but it seems that there is content dispute and before the edit war becomes worse the page should be protected already. Capitals00 (talk) 14:51, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined already reported to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Problematics SoWhy 20:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection - An editor keeps removing the numbering of this Nova Scotia premier, despite their being no consensus for doing so. Also, his deletions are disruptive, as all the other NS premiers are numbered. GoodDay (talk) 15:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. SoWhy 20:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – 3 creations inc. Draft:Enova Technology Corporation WP:NOT long term undisclosed IP&account WP:COI / spammers at Enova, noted at WP:COIN. Widefox; talk 22:32, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 22:37, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There seems to a be a huge dispute about if this article should be included as a separate article or not, which has led to multiple counts of WP:edit_waring and WP:Blanking, especially for such a new article. menaechmi (talk) 20:27, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:29, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy (talk) 20:32, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:36, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal edits appear to be from the same person, using different IPs. Creation7689 (talk) 20:52, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator John Reaves. Lectonar (talk) 22:06, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been vandalizing the page in recent times. Jamie Tubers (talk) 21:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 22:07, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kellymoat (talk) 21:42, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 22:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

13 May 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism/disruptive editing by IPs. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 03:25, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 03:29, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long term vandalism target. WNYY98 (talk) 04:26, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adventure Time season 7, 8, and 9

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Cartoon Network recently unveiled a new way of dividing these seasons and enumerating the various episodes, and the implementation of this information is being reverted by a number of IPs. Here is a small smattering of examples: [20] [21] [22] [23]--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Season 7 has to be indefinitely semi-protected, since everything else has been already tried. By analogy, I also indefinitely semi-protected seasons 8 and 9, though they did not enjoy a similar level of vandalism yet. If someone thinks this is an overkill, they are welcome to adjust the protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – per AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trusted Storage specification - COI disruption: IP and new editor. Widefox; talk 17:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection, if the AfD has a consensus to redirect and protect, I will leave that to the closing admin. Mifter (talk) 03:19, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP. MahenSingha (Talk) 19:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 03:20, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term abuse. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:08, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Mifter (talk) 03:21, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 03:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — There has been numerous edits on the article with no reliable links/sources by IP users in the past weeks. Haveyouseenthisboy (talk) 10:58, 13 May 2017 (PST)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 03:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is block evasion edit warring, the page is being vandalized by different IP addresses now, a game of Whack-a-Mole. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:52, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Neutralitytalk 04:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – [24] [25] [26] [27] [28]. Corvus tristis (talk) 05:12, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:12, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lil Johnny (talk) (contribs) 02:52, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 03:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BLP issue.Volunteer Marek (talk) 02:53, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 fortnights, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 03:28, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please reduce the level of protection page is Coolpad Group, Coolpad Group in the process of development, the need for more people to understand the objective of cool, I will post one by one in the process of editing and Wikipedia communication, to determine the legal and factual information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Man888888 (talkcontribs) 09:15, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

just COI and socks, ignore it. Matthew_hk tc 12:57, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think the bot is referring to my request for page protection, which was denied by an admin here due to insufficient recent disruptive activity. My request may have been a bit too brief, causing the admin to only look at one potential sock's single edit. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 17:16, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 17:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated rearranging of the main viewpoint character in order to give the impression that a female character is the lead. Quite possibility sockpuppetry by Nintenchris5963 using IPs. —Farix (t | c) 10:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 03:16, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Persistent vandalism by IP and spambots. (Alex jirgens (talk) 20:00, 12 May 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Already protected by administrator Caknuck. -Mifter (talk) 03:20, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the past several months by a wide variety of IP editors (see also WP:MUPPETSLTA). Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 02:43, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 03:21, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been persistent inappropriate edits by IP users in the past couple weeks. Dolotta (talk) 02:49, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 03:22, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. WNYY98 (talk) 10:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 11:57, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: User is banned, page history is littered with automated warnings that are then reverted. – Train2104 (t • c) 20:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected Indefinite. — Maile (talk) 23:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and repeated insertion of hoaxes, vandalism and/or unsourced content by anons. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - let's see if it persists after it expires, and if so we'll go indef semi-protection. Neutralitytalk 01:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring . - Mlpearc (open channel) 00:04, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Nyttend. for two days. Neutralitytalk 01:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi Protection Persistent vandalism made by anons and new users. Gary "Roach" Sanderson (talk) 00:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - if vandalism continues after expiry, we can indef semi. Neutralitytalk 01:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

14 May 2017

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing slow-motion edit war over cryptoviral extortion. Jasper Deng (talk) 23:03, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:04, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: extensive vandalism. Neutralitytalk 23:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:51, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: From different IPs, person adding false music certifications over and over again. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:28, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:42, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Everyday 3-4 disruptive editing about aired, or upcoming episode. As episodes aired with gap of many days, and with different sequence in episodes. That is leading to disruptive editing from mostly IP users, making it difficult to maintain/stabilise the article. Requesting autoconfirmed protection for at least 30 days. Thanks. —usernamekiran(talk) 17:25, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created and deleted eight times, why I don't know... JMHamo (talk) 18:59, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hold on: This might be more innocent than it looks. I've encountered two {{merge}} tags pointing at it. I suspect it's an old documentation example parameter that someone failed to change when tagging. I'm fixing the tags, which may make this moot. See Special:WhatLinksHere/Talk:Destination1. Murph9000 (talk) 19:06, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, I've removed all of the malformed merge tags where there was no obvious discussion started, and corrected those which had at least some discussion. It was down to the instructions in Wikipedia:Merging, and some lazy or just bad tagging from a variety of people who did a drive by tag without starting a discussion or checking their work. So, that explains what was going on. The page creation here is explained and innocent (there were around a dozen pages with a big notice telling people to create this talk page). It might still be worth protecting if we expect the same mistakes to repeat themselves. Alternatively, we can fix the template, docs, or both to prevent it. Murph9000 (talk) 19:26, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: -->Some content with source has been here for months, Mr rnddude, an editor who has done B-class, GA-class and A-class reviews is backing, at least partially, the inclusion, but XIIfromTokyo is deleting it again and again. --Launebee (talk) 17:58, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 12:13, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:46, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – More than 1,000 transclusions; being merged with {{ja-stalink}} (over 9,000 transclusions). Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
14:16, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done AlexiusHoratius 16:40, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:41, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been the subject of a concerted campaign against Leslie Mann, including BLP violations. The Old JacobiteThe '45 15:26, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:43, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has been subjected to persistent vandalism from IPs, which I suspect to be from User:BlueGreenWhite (who has been blocked). The edits have been trying to move uncited Igbo centric entries to the top, while deleting heavy parts of other entries. Very similar to edits of the linked user. I think this page should be protected for one or two months, and also have the IP range of BlueGreenWhite blocked; I have a feeling the disruptions to the articles are not over. Jamie Tubers (talk) 15:52, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:44, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 06:33, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done AlexiusHoratius 16:33, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistant spamming by sockpuppets and IPs.last protection ended a week ago and now it starts again. The Banner talk 08:34, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:29, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistant spamming by sockpuppets and IPs. Last protection ended 10 days ago and now it starts again. The Banner talk 08:36, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:27, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

15 May 2017

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Revolving IP user (5 IPs beginning 173.67...) is attacking this page and a few others with trivial details about case histories and docket numbers that are not encyclopedic. Also, frequent mention of George Soros which is a favorite talisman of those harboring extreme political views, this page subject is a member of the Democratic party. As are the others he or she is targeting. JesseRafe (talk) 02:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Prolog. Semi-protected, which is sufficient. Lectonar (talk) 21:50, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is a conflict about the title of this page. Coekon (talk) 04:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Discussion is already taking place. Lectonar (talk) 21:52, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is the second time that I am bringing this page here. The disruptive POV editing by unregistered users persists. I would like to request a month's semi-protection to let the movement subside. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:53, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One IP hopping editor insertiung the same teenage fantasy inane commentary over several days and 7 separate edits.  Velella  Velella Talk   12:51, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:@Velella: Yes, I reverted few similar edits a few days ago. But I am not sure they are enough to justify protection, I want the protection though. —usernamekiran(talk) 16:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator MLauba. Lectonar (talk) 21:53, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MLauba. Lectonar (talk) 21:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unconfirmed details surrounding the venue of the Eurovision Song Contest 2018. The host city was only announced on 15 May; with the organisers conducting a bidding process for potential venues to submit candidature. Therefore no venue has been chosen yet. Wes Wolf Talk 16:50, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. PUNKMINKIS (CHAT) 18:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a long term vandalism magnet, long stream of vandalism edits from random IPs and new users. Murph9000 (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Indefinite. This article has been protected off and on for vandalism since 2007. It was PC-1 indefinite since 2013 this time. And the vandalism just kept rolling along. I changed it to semi, but left it at indef. If someone disagrees with the indef, they are welcome to request a change in the section below this. — Maile (talk) 20:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is absolutely no reason at the present time for this category to be edited. The IP hopped clearly isn't going to let it drop. Betty Logan (talk) 17:15, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Indefinite — Maile (talk) 20:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP vandalism over the past two days; it's a waste of time for editors to keep unaccepting revisions; would be nice if the protection can be modified to a semi for three or four days or so. That should be enough. Lourdes 17:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP users. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 17:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 19:47, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Lil Johnny (talk) (contribs) 17:44, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 19:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Lil Johnny (talk) (contribs) 17:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 19:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sports vandalism and possibly sockpuppetry. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:52, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 19:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Apparently dead, according to unconfirmed reports. Needs some protection until clarity sets in.Crboyer (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Has been confirmed; usual activity for an article of this type. Heavily edited, but well under control. Lectonar (talk) 12:40, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Carlstak keeps removing the Country Bar. By his edits, he is clearly hateful towards this country that my ancestors came from. Please protect this page. He is showing bias and favor towards Spain and belittling Florida. EastFloridaHistorian (talk) 14:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. As all users involved are at least autoconfirmed, semi-protection would not be effective. Lectonar (talk) 14:44, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This was already declined once, earlier today as a content dispute, advising nominator that semi-protection would have no effect, and to take it to WP:ANEW. — Maile (talk) 15:51, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Jayron32. And now it's fully protected. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 16:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism, especially from newly registered editors. George Ho (talk) 16:15, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:43, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 04:00, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined has died down; discussion is taking place at the article's talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 12:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Page has been facing consistent vandalism from both IP's and users for over a month. Just look at page history, for example. Pending changes protection was previously granted for a month but didn't really stop much unfortunately and that has since expired anyway. Kamalthebest (talk) 04:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article last edited 2 days ago. Lectonar (talk) 11:03, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking by Maleidys Perez (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). — JJMC89(T·C) 14:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also applied a range block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:15, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Live event, needs to be protected so it doesn't get updated until after the show. [29] --- PageantUpdater (talk) 00:50, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Late to the party (sorry about that), but let's give this another day to calm down. Lectonar (talk) 12:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Anonymous editors are insistent on inserting and editwarring to preserve WP:original research material that violates both WP:CRYSTAL and WP:SYNTH.--Mr Fink (talk) 01:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:07, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – We had a spate of anons/newly registereds adding big chunks of unsourced info a few months ago. They appear to be back. Sitush (talk) 08:42, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Might just be a spate; please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 12:09, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: See Talk:List of Formula One driver records#Protection from Edits from Unregistered users. The PC should help for IP's could update but the regular editors could maintain the quality of the article. Babymissfortune 09:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 195 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:11, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism and unencyclopedic additions from unregistered IP's who seem to think Wikipedia is a free self-promotion website.  : -->

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:01, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please unprotect SahBabii. He is now notable and I have prepared a draft. He is signed to Warner Brothers Records, on the Billboard charts, write up in NY Times and in radio rotation all over the world. Your help in this matter is greatly appreciated.Kimber0316 (talk) 18:41, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I take it you would like Draft:SahBabii unprotected. @RHaworth:, the protecting admin. And I think this should go to WP:Refund, as there are several problems here which are beyond the scope of unprotection Lectonar (talk) 17:44, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: Isn't this yet another sock of OfficialPankajPatidar? --NeilN talk to me 09:12, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: Of course it is possible, but after reading the op's talk-page and their help-desk query, I agfed. That's why I pinged RHaworth; I see no problem in lifting the protection of the draft-page. The article is another problem, as the title is blacklisted. Lectonar (talk) 18:48, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Somewhat. @Kimber0316: Please work on the draft at Draft:SahBabii. Lectonar (talk) 09:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all of your help. Is there a way to have the article blacklist removed as well?

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mélencron (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:41, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – made controversial play leading to vandalism here. WNYY98 (talk) 21:56, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:42, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 02:05, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:43, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs repeatedly adding current airing info in violation of WP:NOTTVGUIDE. DonIago (talk) 03:13, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 19:55, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – more edit warring. – S. Rich (talk) 03:41, 14 May 2017 (UTC) NOTE: I've posted an {{inuse}} template, but would like the RPP to go into effect immediately. Just remove the template when protecting. Thanks. 04:05, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez, in looking at the recent Talk:Southern Poverty Law Center posts, it looks like multiple issues are in contention. Please protect for a couple of weeks. Thanks again. – S. Rich (talk) 04:12, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm done for now with my "inuse" template. Please lock down now so that discussion can ensue. – S. Rich (talk) 06:04, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined For now. I left a message at the talk-page and am watching the article Lectonar (talk) 19:59, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User Carlstak has showed extreme bias against the Republic of East Florida. Simply see his last edit and our conversation on the talk page. He doesn't want to "dignify" this nation with a country info bar. WHY!? He is being discriminatory. He will only edit this page if he is putting it down, usually by claiming it was not a real country, discussing slavery, or saying that no one wanted to even rebel against Spain... despite almost ALL of Spain's colonies rebelling within the next two decades!. EastFloridaHistorian (talk) 22:09, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined You might want to take this to WP:ANEW instead. Content dispute is not vandalism. Also, FYI, Semi-protection allows anyone with a history "at least four days old and has at least ten edits to Wikipedia", so I think you had something else in mind. — Maile (talk) 00:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The kids TV network IP vandals were using Universal Kids to dump unsourced shows and schedules on that article even though it's not on the air until September 9 and has literally nothing about it; that's already been protected until Labor Day, but then was rightfully redirected because we have little to nothing about the new channel. Thus, they've moved on to Sprout, which UK is replacing with the same detritus and low-quality sources, thus I'm asking for three months there too to save our sanity during the US summer break. Nate (chatter) 23:58, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 19:53, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: ongoing vandalism from anonymous IP address after sister article 2017 GP3 Series was semi-protected because of their actions (I would report them, but I don't know how to report IP vandals). Prisonermonkeys (talk) 00:24, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 19:54, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Ongoing disruption and edit warring. Request protection so that matter can be discussed on talk page in good faith. Anotherclown (talk) 05:41, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have died down; if it flares up, consider dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 19:45, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated edits by a person or persons who disagree with the use of the term "riot" to describe this event, without offering sources that their preferred term ("massacre") is typically used. 331dot (talk) 08:36, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 16:26, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis (talk) 13:18, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 16:39, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent vandalism by new vandalism-only accounts. View the latest contributions. PapíDimmi (talk | contribs) 17:33, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit 2 days ago. Lectonar (talk) 19:43, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

16 May 2017

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly re-created by WP:SOCKs of the same person. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Willi000000000000000000004444444. Cosmic Clone (talk) 23:37, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. I wouldn't normally think it appropriate to salt a name after only two creations. But it is in a short space of time and clearly bad-faith. Yaris678 (talk) 12:40, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Simione001 (talk) 00:47, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pure vandalism page. cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! (Talk | Contributions) 02:22, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spam. The spam remains in the article! QuackGuru (talk) 04:08, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Edit rate is low, but high proportion of IP/new edits are vandalism or spam. Required semi-protection several times a few years ago. Yaris678 (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kosack (talk) 04:56, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is an ongoing dispute regarding a section of the article. Additions and reversions regarding this section have been ongoing for days. Discussions on the article's talk page and elsewhere have been ongoing. These discussions should not take place on the article. The article should be unlocked when this dispute is resolved. SMP0328. (talk) 05:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but you need to stop trying to "tag shame" the article because you didn't get your way. And if you're asking for protection in good faith, then you should have asked for BEFORE you reverted, because otherwise it just looks like you're trying to get admins to protect your version.Volunteer Marek (talk) 05:36, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My version would be the one without your section that violates BLP, NPOV, and is clearly a criticism section. Your version is the one that includes that section without my tags. The current version is a middle ground. Locking the article in that middle ground sounds reasonable, as it doesn't have favor either of our favored versions. SMP0328. (talk) 05:52, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 12:41, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I still believe that the article should be locked, until the dispute is resolved. Whether someone is edit-warring is a separate matter. SMP0328. (talk) 23:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:31, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Semi-protection would not work; this probably needs dispute resolution... Lectonar (talk) 08:04, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Additions of factual errors. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:06, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: edit warring - unrelated people keep editing false or unverified updates to the page

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:02, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow edit war since 8 May between two editors. Human3015 TALK  23:40, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 21:52, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute over concerns with Hong Kong, and whether it is to be included as a territory in China, or on its own, due to being an autonomous territory. livelikemusic talk! 16:03, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am really urging this, as now the editor is sock-hopping through multiple IP's. I've counted up to five IP's since yesterday, and who knows how many more they'll attempt to create to continue their vandalism. livelikemusic talk! 03:44, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism over the past couple of weeks. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 22:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by several IP's, especially in rapid succession making it hard to revert to last good revision. Jiten Dhandha • talk • contributions • 22:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent spam, IMO. QuackGuru (talk) 16:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 21:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 17:09, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Heavy IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Heavy vandalism? 1 disruptive edit on the 15th, no edits at all before that for 2 days. Have you got the right article? Lectonar (talk) 21:56, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:57, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:57, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued sockpuppet warring over content. Ebyabe talk - General Health20:11, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Extended-confirmed protection. Lectonar (talk) 22:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The city officials' names keep being changed by IPs in the 163.150.226/227... range. These same IPs have been substituting content with references to "GCF Learn Free". –FlyingAce✈talk 20:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 22:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17 May 2017

Full protection: Edit warring on the photo in the infobox. 219.79.96.177 (talk) 01:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing from unconfirmed users and IP addresses. This is a new page, and there was disruptive editing from accounts changing info that is false. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 01:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi - Few days or a week. Must be a slow week at school because apparently the students have nothing better to do. TimothyJosephWood 17:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 20:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant vandalism from various IPs and distruptive accounts. Adding fan content despite several warnings. Soaper1234 - talk 20:48, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Including but not limited to this person https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/24.190.175.146 who has also hit * Our Town (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Morty C-137 (talk) 20:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lord Roem.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – There seems to be a lot of reversions of unsourced additions. Looking through the history, I see a lot of content about "court cases", "2017 trial", etc in edit summaries going back to April 14, 2017 which is when edit activity picked up. I did some research and found out about lots of development in this subject, including Hernandez being acquitted (twice?), him being found hanged in his cell, and rumors of homosexuality. I came here because this was the 22nd most viewed article in April 2017. There are also BLPs involved, like Hernandez's fianceé, so this is important. @General Ization was over the revision history reverting edits, so I'm mentioning them (positively, of course) since they likely saw more than I. Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 00:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor(s) making multiple nonsense edits. DonIago (talk) 16:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent revisions . Peter Rehse (talk) 17:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sergecross73. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP editors, often with slur material. Example like this https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=P._G._T._Beauregard&type=revision&diff=780871525&oldid=780863107, but it's ongoing due to the statue removal in New Orleans last night and will probably continue due to more statues due to be removed. Morty C-137 (talk) 18:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite is a little much at this point. clpo13(talk) 19:04, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP edits today, some of which are vandalism, and some of which are edit warring. Egsan Bacon (talk) 18:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 19:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War III

Full protection: Persistent edit-warring over the last few weeks. Two SPA editors insist on changing the genre of a real-time-strategy game to a MOBA (Multiplayer Online Battle Arena) - anyone who has played either of these types know there is a vast difference. I opened up a talk-page discussion and dropped a message directly on on of them. As registered editors semi-prot is insufficient, which is unfortunate as there are good contributions by other IP editors. A few days of full protection might make them engage on the talkpage. Only in death does duty end (talk) 12:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also pinged the other users to the talk page. clpo13(talk) 18:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Vandalism resumed once previous protection expired. Dlabtot (talk) 14:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mélencron 12:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently linked from Google search page, so a lot of traffic and IP vandalism. Escape Orbit (Talk) 13:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

24 hours please, that... or someone who wants to explain to the entirety of the internet the difference between British and American English. TimothyJosephWood 13:57, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It was at pending changes, but the rate of editing is too high for that to be very effective right now. clpo13(talk) 18:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of serious BLP violations. Peacock (talk) 17:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. JTP (talkcontribs) 01:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To go until after the event is over. Seems like this is common with WWE PPVs. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:57, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of an alleged new cast member in the second season with no source to back up the claim. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection expired 2 days ago. Since then there's been 16 edits by 10 users and the only constructive one was MusikBot removing the pp-semi template. This page is a perpetual vandalism magnet. . EvergreenFir (talk) 17:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. It looks like the page was previously indef semi-protected but that was removed when it was fully protected during an edit war. clpo13(talk) 18:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring by by IPs and new users.Casprings (talk) 15:33, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You might wanna get a move on protecting the Current events Portal as now the same disruptive IP is re-adding a BLP-violating WP:HOAX to it.Volunteer Marek (talk) 16:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Can we please get a hurry up on this protection? It's a BLP issue with potential real life implications.Volunteer Marek (talk) 17:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: A range block is now in place on main IP range that was causing the disruption. 2600:8800:ff04:c00::/64 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)). Mz7 (talk) 21:53, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. The most recent IP/new-user edits to the page have been constructive. Yaris678 (talk) 11:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip vandals continue to add unsourced content . Digifan23 (talk) 20:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not sure if indefinite is the right way to go yet, 3 months for now. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguisttalk|contribs 23:40, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It seems the IP-hopping vandal has found a new target. Article has been repeatedly vandalized from various IPs for days on end. The Old JacobiteThe '45 01:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Although pending changes helps, still getting alot of vandalism. RichT|C|E-Mail 00:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Once the semi has gone, the page will still be PC protected. Yaris678 (talk) 12:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Anon. vandalism has ramped up today for some reason. At least half a dozen bad edits in the last half hour alone. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 11:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC):[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Luk talk 12:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. ToThAc (talk) 14:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RickinBaltimore. (non-admin closure) ToThAc (talk) 15:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP users. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. James (talk/contribs) 06:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can we unprotect this page? Im pretty sure it became protected due to vandalism but i beliebve that issue has long passed Crewcamel (talk) 05:24, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93:--Ymblanter (talk) 08:08, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined There's plenty of back-and-forth going on between autoconfirmed editors as it is, so I'm not inclined to unprotect. If another admin thinks differently, they are welcome to do so. Vanamonde (talk) 06:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism despite user talk page warnings and invitations to discuss on article talk page.. AndrewDressel (talk) 17:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nickname vandalism from different IP addresses. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:40, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current insistent recreation of an article from a redirect which already points to an article about the subject . Onel5969 TT me 19:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Melodies1917 (talk) 20:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated removal of multiply-sourced content by IPs and newly-registered single-purpose accounts, e.g. [30][31][32]. The article relates to a politician who is currently standing for re-election, and has been involved in a controversy. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:56, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism immediately resumed after protection expired. WNYY98 (talk) 02:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 02:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recently deceased author, with a controversial news story hitting a number of news outlets in the past 24 hours. Various IP editors are starting to make BLP violations, mostly regarding the article he wrote that is now making the headlines. Waggie (talk) 05:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopper persistent removing links to the Bengali language and replacing them by links to to the Hindi language, despite sources saying that Bengali is the most common language. The Banner talk 10:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One IP was blocked a few hours ago but they've obviously come back using another address. Repeatedly adding unsourced info and removing unsourced. Sitush (talk) 16:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:56, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Reverted edits were apparently unconstructive. --George Ho (talk) 16:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Trying again since page has been facing consistent vandalism from both IP's and users for over a month. Just look at page history, for example. Pending changes protection was previously granted for a month but didn't really stop much unfortunately and that has since expired anyway. Kamalthebest (talk) 20:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 20:55, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple users, most likely due to Charlie Wright as the new Rodrick. EEllis2002 (talk) 22:31, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mz7 (talk) 22:40, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple users, also most likely due to the change in cast in Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Long Haul (film). EEllis2002 (talk) 22:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mz7 (talk) 23:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from numerous IPs. Has been protected before, but vandalism has resumed after protection expired. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I don't think the activity level of the disruption on the article is high enough to justify semi-protection at this time. Mz7 (talk) 21:47, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unidentified IP user continuously deleted sourced data and modifies the main part of the article WP:Vandalism is suspected. Please make the article at least semi-protected. Yatzhek (talk) 12:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. clpo13(talk) 21:40, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection. Please can you unprotect that page or decrease the time of semi-protection from 3 months to one week, please? I really promise I will not make any disruptive edits to that page, in case I need something important to add that is constructive, that I notice sometimes. Please do it. Thanks, 64.237.236.136 (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected Use edit requests please. NeilN talk to me 16:06, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect the page, 'cause I need to add something to that page, but is constructive. Thanks, 64.237.236.136 (talk) 14:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected Use edit requests please NeilN talk to me 16:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 14:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. clpo13(talk) 21:27, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism. Cosmic Clone (talk) 17:33, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, this could be solved with a block on the offending IP. No need for protection I don't think. Cosmic Clone (talk) 17:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Update: Just saw another vandalism offense on the page: Special:Diff/780699226, coming from a different IP. I'll let the reviewing administrator make the decision for this one. Cosmic Clone (talk) 17:40, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. No vandalism since the second IP was blocked. clpo13(talk) 21:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Page is seeing a surge of vandalism edits by both vandalism accounts and vandalism IPs.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – That's probably because it is currently today's featured article. Since the day is almost over, I don't think protection is necessary. Mz7 (talk) 21:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – After 50 edits, there have been zero sources added to this article about a book. It is difficult to tell what's true and what's false. What's more, this is an enormously high-profile page; in April, it was the second most viewed article we have. Number one? The TV show based on it. See [33]. Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 23:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – edit war now, persistent POV-pushing . The Banner talk 23:54, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Not eligible for indef semi, because it haas not previously been protected. If vandalism and POV-pushing resumes after this temp protection expires, then indef might be appropriate. 01:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)~

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 00:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mz7 (talk) 21:04, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Koala15 keeps posting episodes that never showed. Bob.altamont (talk) 02:38, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Koala15 is autoconfirmed, so semi-protection would not prevent them from editing the article. Mz7 (talk) 21:06, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created Hoax Radio Network edits by User:Bertrand101 Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:32, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – The article has only been created once and the account has been blocked. Mz7 (talk) 21:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, request protection until the UK general election on 8 June 2017. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 18:04, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:38, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppet target. See page history of her spouse Wayne Allwine. Ebyabe talk - Border Town19:40, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy IP vandalism the last couple of days. Deli nk (talk) 22:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – vandalism immediately resumed after protection expired. WNYY98 (talk) 06:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 22:35, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Galvoci01 (talk) 07:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 22:39, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by different IPs. Over the last few days, the only edits to the page has been vandalism and the consequent reverts by editors. Jupitus Smart 12:39, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Duplicate of report above.) Mz7 (talk) 22:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Bunch of IPs are adding Donald Trump. It is likely, that we will need a long term protection. McSly (talk) 21:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 22:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Addition of unsourced defamatory content by IPs about the Murder of Seth Rich. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 22:12, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism Real tlhingan (talk) 19:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 22:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending Changes: There was some "fan-fiction" based edits with his page. This level of protection should reduce the likelihood of some fan-fiction based edits. Also, some editors were changing the profile from Agust D to Suga as he's a member of BTS, same person. Tibbydibby (talk) 21:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 22:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption by IPs and 'new editor. Eagleash (talk) 22:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 22:06, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection — For some reason, this particular UK film has consistently been the subject of jingoistic vandalism by anon IPs who insist that despite WP:FILM MOS that says only the distributor of the country of origin is listed, the the US distributor must be listed as well. I say jingoistic since no one is insisting the same for other English-language territories such as Australia. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:01, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced addition of nickname DVdm (talk) 05:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 21:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant unsourced recreation of speculative film . Peter Rehse (talk) 10:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 21:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Home Lander (talk) 14:35, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some recent revisions will almost certainly need to be erased here. Home Lander (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There are some decent IP edits here. Let's try pending protection, given the BLP implications. clpo13(talk) 21:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's so bl**dy boring - either everyone thinks they are genuinely the greatest and most original wit in the US or else there's some kind of meme/fashion/whatever ... hey, let's put politicians in as examples of invertebrates! It had a few days protection on 10 May but it's all kicking off again - could it maybe have a tiny bit longer please, this time? Just to give editors a break from the, er, humour. Thanks. DBaK (talk) 14:39, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 21:19, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP and new users. NicoScribe (talk) 14:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 21:32, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption returned after previous protection expired. Block evasion, see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Iloveartrock. Binksternet (talk) 17:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Widr. clpo13(talk) 21:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism or sockpuppetry – Done by one newly registered editor and two IPs within close numeric range. --George Ho (talk) 19:53, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 21:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Since we have this new user rights group, we ought to let template editors use it as well. Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 16:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator WOSlinker. in 2013. Note that the cascading protection on the Main Page will prevent editing by anyone other than admins anyway as it is rarely off the main page. Woody (talk) 17:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – To allow template editors to edit. Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 17:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Woody (talk) 17:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

18 May 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism. — TAnthonyTalk 14:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:37, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Yunshui. clpo13(talk) 18:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP revisions . Peter Rehse (talk) 15:24, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection due to anonymous abuse: see here (April 11), here (April 13), here (April 19), and here (May 18). Given the persistence of the editor and his willingness to use edit summaries abusively, I respectfully suggest that pending changes protection not be applied and that this be protected for months, not days. Rebbing 12:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try a month first. It can always be extended. clpo13(talk) 18:24, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I again request protection for this target of a long-term abuser who evades their block. It doesn't need to be long at all, but they seem persistent today at least. 331dot (talk) 12:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Yunshui. clpo13(talk) 18:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – IP edits have high tendency to be unconstructive. WNYY98 (talk) 17:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:42, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2602:306:35FC:6D40:D51F:B0AE:C81E:90CA (talk · contribs) blocked by Oshwah. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:51, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Presistant vandalism. 219.79.180.165 (talk) 03:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:59, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from IPs, changing of sourced information, etc. BurritoBazooka Talk Contribs 11:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:04, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Amid his appointment as special counsel to oversee a high profile investigation, protection is needed. —Fundude99talk to me 22:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Lot of editing but not a lot of obvious vandalism. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 23:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Fritz1543 (talk) 00:19, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Lot of editing but not a lot of obvious vandalism. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:43, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous user, using different IPs, disruptive edits. Musdan77 (talk) 18:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. IP has been blocked for edit warring. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations, persistent but intermittent vandalism Gamebuster19901 (TalkContributions) 13:49, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A serious BLP violation edit was left up for over a week. Gamebuster19901 (TalkContributions) 13:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator GB_fan.. Gamebuster19901 (TalkContributions) 14:14, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant sckpuppet revisions . Peter Rehse (talk) 13:49, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GB fan. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant sckpuppet revisions . Peter Rehse (talk) 13:50, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GB fan. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:IP vandalism following NBA lottery. Will happen again draft night and before. Thomas.R (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If things pick up and to the point that protection is justified, re-report. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:24, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Another IP of LTA Satt 2[34]. Its one of his favorite articles, so you might consider making it indefinitely. -. LouisAragon (talk) 16:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Article is being vandalized by an IP address who keeps adding unsourced genres. When the user sources, his sources come from unreliable sites. The IP in question, despite being rather quiet, is refusing to cease his misconduct (i.e., threatening to "lose it" if his edits are reversed), and may also be a sockpuppet of one or more indefinitely blocked users.--Loyalmoonie (talk) 17:38, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Chris[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level and presistant IP vandalism on rumour edits about the band's status without any relible sources. **XZ** (talk) 10:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The subject died today. Persistent vandalism by IP editors. Editor5454 (talk) 11:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism -- Sherenk1 (talk) 11:52, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done See above. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Several thousand transclusions. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
11:52, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Editions reverted by the anonymous user see 1 and 2. 148.0.109.17 (talk) 01:37, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:48, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Editions reverted by the anonymous user too, see 1 and 2. 148.0.109.17 (talk) 01:46, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:51, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant short-term vandalism. see [35] [36] [37] Nuobgu (talk) 02:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:53, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Babymissfortune 03:04, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Expires 24 June at 23:59Z. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:56, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 07:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:00, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP edits on transfer rumour and test edits. One month protection is enough, but until 1 July the transfer window open, better. Matthew_hk tc 07:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous disruptive editing by an IP editor (SPI in the process) over the last weeks which now resumed right after the recent semi expired. — kashmiri TALK 23:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:37, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant long-term vandalism from a multitude of different IPs due to recent news events. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:46, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/unexplained POV changes by IP. --1990'sguy (talk) 15:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the IP user is hopping IPs. They are similar, but they are a different one each time. --1990'sguy (talk) 02:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, content dispute.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More IP socks of LTA Satt 2[38] - . LouisAragon (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:29, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive dynamic IPv6 edit warring and uncommunicative, this has been going on for the last few months and a longer than normal protect would be appreciated. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – History of vandalism and with last match this weekend, it is more to come. Qed237 (talk) 21:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:29, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Since this was protected because it is "high-risk", template editors ought to be allowed to edit it. Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 01:10, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected--Ymblanter (talk) 10:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longterm target of IP vandal. When protection expires, vandalism always resumes. Ebyabe talk - Inspector General18:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • User:Ebyabe, glancing at the edit history, it looks like there is disagreement about whether redlink items (films, TV shows) such as "At Your Service, Ltd. (TV Series)" can be included in the works listed. That work shows up in IMDB for the actor. None of the items show a reference. Perhaps it should show as a "blacklink", not calling for an article, rather than as a redlink. How is this not a legitimate content dispute? I am not familiar with how this kind of issue works and I am not familiar with this specific situation, I am asking. --doncram 19:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Regardless of the content in question, edit warring is ongoing and discussion is not taking place. I'm hoping that this will get that process moving along... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Brojam (talk) 18:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – see protection log. Brojam (talk) 18:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Well meaning but misinformed IPs continue to try to insert a premiere date for the next episode of the season, based on an Adult Swim website that mentions the "next showing" of any episode on Cartoon Network's schedule; actual schedule listings show that the May 20 date is scheduled for reruns (http://www.adultswim.com/videos/schedule/). Not a humongous deal but it is tiring to try to correct them all individually, maybe protect it for a little while till the show is in regular season broadcast? Morty C-137 (talk) 19:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:42, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Korny O'Near (talk · contribs) keeps removing content from Isaac Newton in popular culture, despite having no consensus for such removal. Talk page discussions haven't curbed the behaviour either, and they apparently refuses to follow WP:DR. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Headbomb: Wouldn't having the user blocked be a better fix? Instead of punishing everyone that isn't an admin for this 1 person's actions?(Non-administrator comment) Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 01:18, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You're both edit warring on this article, so I've left a warning on both your user talk pages, and fully protected the article. Please stop edit warring and discuss the dispute before any more changes are made by either of you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Harassment from Janagewen's IP sock(s). Jan. has increased his activity level recently (since SPI is so backlogged) and based on past behavior I have no doubt there will be more of the same. Two weeks, please? Jeh (talk) 05:23, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - See the message I left on your user talk page. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please protect this page for 30 days until an RFC is completed, because there is being persistent edit-warring even after attempting moderated discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:00, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:20, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent COI edits, probably sockpuppetry. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:57, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Over the last week, this page has only been subject to content warring by IPs about her personal details - her year of birth (which is properly referenced though vandals keep changing that), her ethnicity (no proper references exist and IPs belonging to 2 states have been trying to appropriate her as belonging exclusively from their respective state), the languages she can speak etc. All this has got to do with a recent movie of her's getting a lot of popularity and the content warring will probably stop if IP protected for a while, till the movie frenzy dies down. . Jupitus Smart 13:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:23, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - Mlpearc (open channel) 15:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See 69.92.166.44, Switchtoglide, 69.92.166.44 and 69.92.166.44
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent additions of unsourced content. --Another Believer (Talk) 16:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Pending changes is not working, as is a current Google Doodle - over 175 edits today - Request semi for 24 hours, by when Google will have dropped it - Arjayay (talk) 16:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Support: I highly support this, but please make it 48-72 hours in duration or more Ryan (talk) 17:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by Hopping IP Address. LG-Gunther :  Talk  11:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:37, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary MOVE full protection: Request temporary MOVE protection, due to repeated moves while page under move discussion. Please take admin action to help move discussion run its course instead of edit warring and disruption instead. Thank you ! . Sagecandor (talk) 13:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: New vandalism from different IP sources. Sagecandor (talk) 15:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Looks like both the repeated moves and persistent vandalism have stopped for now, so protection is unnecessary at this time. Mz7 (talk) 02:38, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Gamebuster19901 (TalkContributions) 14:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Though I do see a spike in activity the past few days. Let me know if it persists and we can probably semi-protect the article for a few days. Mz7 (talk) 02:42, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by IP users - I am reverting edits on this page almost on a bi-weekly basis. Wiki.0hlic 15:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Neutrality. Mz7 (talk) 02:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nsmutte vandalism. See also abuse log. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editor has been blocked. - Mlpearc (open channel) 17:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Please re-report if the disruption continues. Mz7 (talk) 21:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Manicpanic00 (talk) 00:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mz7 (talk) 02:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection Present version of this article is same as what it was more than one year ago.[39] However article is frequently edit warred this month disruptively by WP:SPAs. Capitals00 (talk) 00:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, this is not a valid reason for full protection--Ymblanter (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 23:36, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant vandalism from multiple users due to the firing of Brad's wife. This article has been protected many times in the past due to vandalism, but the protection recently expired. EEllis2002 (talk) 22:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 23:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two IPs vandalizing the article within the last few minutes. MPFitz1968 (talk) 02:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. One IP blocked. The other hasn't edited since their last warning. clpo13(talk) 18:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: or stronger not sure reporting this article for higher protection because it is consistently violating WP:3RR and if any talking is done its through edit summaries not talk page of the article. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 13:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. clpo13(talk) 18:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The page is a target of a habitual block evader(Cebr1979) who will just come back tomorrow with a different IP. 331dot (talk) 19:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Sparsely vandalized this year. --George Ho (talk) 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of Cebr1979 who constantly evades his block. 331dot (talk) 08:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no vandalism. Merely edits that benefit Wikipedia as explained in the edit summaries.2001:569:77E2:3900:60BA:DC54:EFB5:F4DC (talk) 12:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. But knowing how persistent Cebr1979 is, don't hesitate to re-report if there's further disruption. clpo13(talk) 18:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of Cebr1979 who constantly evades block. 331dot (talk) 08:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no vandalism. Merely edits that benefit Wikipedia as explained in the edit summaries.2001:569:77E2:3900:60BA:DC54:EFB5:F4DC (talk) 12:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. But knowing how persistent Cebr1979 is, don't hesitate to re-report if there's further disruption. clpo13(talk) 18:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of Cebr1979 who constantly evades block. 331dot (talk) 08:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no vandalism. Merely edits that benefit Wikipedia as explained in the edit summaries.2001:569:77E2:3900:60BA:DC54:EFB5:F4DC (talk) 12:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. But knowing how persistent Cebr1979 is, don't hesitate to re-report if there's further disruption. clpo13(talk) 18:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of Cebr1979 who constantly evades block. 331dot (talk) 08:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no vandalism. Merely edits that benefit Wikipedia as explained in the edit summaries.2001:569:77E2:3900:60BA:DC54:EFB5:F4DC (talk) 12:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. But knowing how persistent Cebr1979 is, don't hesitate to re-report if there's further disruption. clpo13(talk) 18:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of block evader. 331dot (talk) 11:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no vandalism. Merely edits that benefit Wikipedia as explained in the edit summaries.2001:569:77E2:3900:60BA:DC54:EFB5:F4DC (talk) 12:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Range 2001:569:77e2:3900::/64 blocked for a month. -- Luk talk 12:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. But knowing how persistent Cebr1979 is, don't hesitate to re-report if there's further disruption. clpo13(talk) 18:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of block evader. 331dot (talk) 11:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no vandalism. Merely edits that benefit Wikipedia as explained in the edit summaries.2001:569:77E2:3900:60BA:DC54:EFB5:F4DC (talk) 12:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Range 2001:569:77e2:3900::/64 blocked for a month. -- Luk talk 12:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. But knowing how persistent Cebr1979 is, don't hesitate to re-report if there's further disruption. clpo13(talk) 18:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal persistently blanking the page and replacing it with a childish insult towards Harley-Davidson owners (particularly outlaw clubs). Blake Gripling (talk) 14:04, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The vandal was evading a block, so I range blocked it. That should take care of the problem for a little while. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2017

20 May 2017

Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Possible non-notable Israeli-Palestinian content article created by a non-EC user. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:54, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:40, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Moxy (talk) 03:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • No content dispute that I can see, but extended confirmation would help to prevent future disruption (like what recently happened on the article from an autoconfirmed account). Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:59, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry guys wrong request ....yes extended confirmation would be fine. That said block has worked--Moxy (talk) 16:56, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Two temporary semiprotections have not deterred several IP-editors who are using the page as an unencyclopedic public relations brochure. Unfortunately they seem unfamiliar with WP practices and style, and repeated attempts to reach out to them and engage and educate on the talk page for the article have been ignored. Sugggest indefinite semi-protection. Samshltn (talk) 13:19, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Samshltn: Your own edits have not been without problems and you seem to be focused on this article. Do you have a connection to the subject? NeilN talk to me 13:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: @NeilN: I was just writing on your own talk page to reach out to you. I do not have a connection with the subject, no. My focus is on maintaining an enclyclopedic style, and that interest has only arisen after stumbling across this page. I apologise for any of my own edits that have been problematic as I learn the ropes. I hope that you agree that I'm clearly keen to engage, learn, and improve our Wikipedia. Samshltn (talk) 13:54, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: @NeilN: I should point out that there are quite a few edits made by the anonymous user that have been just fine, I would have clicked 'thank' if he was only a registered user. I'm not blanket-undoing his edits, I'm trying to co-operate to create an encyclopedic style, but the editor doesn't respond on the talk page. He acts as an autonomous uncooperative editor. If you have suggestions for how I can reach out and try to help this editor maintain an encyclopedic style, your help would be greatly appreciated. Samshltn (talk) 14:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 16:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. Now done. EdJohnston (talk) 17:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 15:59, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 16:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Recommend replacing with a fully protected {{wiktionary redirect}}. feminist 07:51, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesBWatson: Lectonar (talk) 18:50, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
agree with User:Feminist, with creating the redirect, oppose full protection, semi should be enough. Gamebuster19901 (TalkContributions) 14:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – It is still unclear if having this be a redirect to Wiktionary will be a net benefit to our readers. If you just want to keep people from recreating an article of that name, the full protection takes care of that. Suggest that anyone who favors the redirect should make a request at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects. If the close is favorable, an admin can do whatever is necessary. If User:JamesBWatson wants to take a different action, he can do so. EdJohnston (talk) 16:47, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No longer used, converting to redirect. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
15:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template is still transcluded on 10848 pages @Jc86035: Gamebuster19901 (TalkContributions) 16:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Gamebuster19901: Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Ja-stalink shows no transclusions; all of them have been replaced by AnomieBOT. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
16:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't realize that a bot was removing transclusions, at the time it was transcluded on many pages. Sorry for the confusion! Gamebuster19901 (TalkContributions) 17:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – This template is already redirected to Template:STN and both source and target are now covered by template protection. So there doesn't seem to be anything more to do. EdJohnston (talk) 16:54, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This redirect was protected as a result of a deletion discussion. Since there is now a new article, the protection is neither useful nor appropriate. (The protecting administrator appears to be inactive.). Modernponderer (talk) 23:15, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Windows Calendar is currently full-protected as a redirect to Calendar (Windows). It seems evident that the source and target are just different ways of naming the same thing, so it is unclear why we should open the way for creation of a new article at Windows Calendar. Most likely, someone would come along and recreate a new article inadvertently. Agree with you that the verdict of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows Calendar is superseded thanks to creation of a new acceptable article at Calendar (Windows). EdJohnston (talk) 17:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

20 May 2017

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Dynamic IP. Geraldo Perez (talk) 12:57, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 20:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nonstop editions of unsourced content by IP users. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 13:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Try PC again. Feel free to return if it doesn't stop it. Woody (talk) 20:36, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unregistered IPs frequently add unsourced information . MassiveYR 18:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 20:40, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring and disruptive editing by different IPs. Jingiby (talk) 10:55, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Semi protection is not correct anyway in most content disputes and there is no try to discuss the matter on the talk page, so you might want to try that first. SoWhy 12:55, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism by 3 different IPs. Dat GuyTalkContribs 11:28, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 20:18, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:11, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Article deleted. — Maile (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection due to disruptive editing and multiple serious BLP violations by new and anonymous editors. Please note that Google Knowledge Graph—the sidebar that shows up on many Google searches—does not respect pending changes protection, thus, pending changes protection would not be adequate in this case; see here for details. Rebbing 11:08, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I understand the problem of PC protection re Google but if we also consider what Google or others do with the content, we can never use PC protection. Regards SoWhy 12:49, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
SoWhy: Google's sidebar is seen by far more people than the Wikipedia page, and it uses information derived from Wikipedia. It's our responsibility to ensure, as best as possible, that that information is not libelous. Additionally, the bug that causes Google to see unaccepted versions of PC-protected pages is in Mediawiki'a API, not Google's code. The subject of this article is currently the subject of media and popular attention, and the page has recently been modified both to report defamatory insinuations and sexually-degrading insults. Pending changes protection remains viable for ordinary vandalism and disruptive editing, but if limiting defamation isn't sufficient reason to use semi-protection for a few days, what is‽ Rebbing 13:50, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Rebbing: I'm willing to accept your logic for now within the requirements of WP:BLP to err on the side of caution. However, I expect you raise this problem at the relevant Village Pumps to facilitate discussion whether we need to change the proteciton policy in these cases, until the bu in the API is fixed, since the problems I mentioned above exist in many cases, not just this one. Regards SoWhy 14:18, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 11:08, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 12:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 11:25, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 12:41, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP trolling. Widefox; talk 11:25, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined no such edits in the last two days. SoWhy 12:39, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High profile referee, subject of a lot of vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 12:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 12:40, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A sockfarm owner is working overtime to remove references that the movie is a remake from this page. He was running one of the oldest hoaxes on Wikipedia earlier. This back and forth game has been ongoing since December last. The admin who had PC protected the page, had semi-protected the page on my request. The sockpuppetry had stopped then. But since semi-protection ended and it went back to PC, the sockpuppetry has continued, with him removing the data and references. The original admin is on a vacation and I don't want to pester her, otherwise I would have asked her again. PC was okay as long as editors were reverting the vandalism. But recently an established editor accepted the revision, in what I believe was an oversight on his part, as all other editors who had reverted the sockpuppets edits earlier seemed to agree that the removal was wrong. A long/indefinite semi-protection is therefore warranted as I don't believe that any good edits will be made by IPs in the near future. Jupitus Smart 12:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 13:13, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of unconfirmed-user and IP schoolboy vandalism. . Julietdeltalima (talk) 22:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:49, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: A consensus has formed against it ever being created: Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_November_26#Template:.28country.29_redirects. Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 02:50, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Unless the page is being repeatedly recreated there is no need. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit-warring and disruptive editing by multiple IPs. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 10:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:34, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and Hoaxes edits By User:Bertrand101 IP sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  10:20, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:35, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sagecandor (talk) 21:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sagecandor (talk) 21:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sagecandor (talk) 21:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:45, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction to Semi/Unprotection: Edit warrior is an IP address, so no need for full protection. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 05:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a content dispute, and we usually try not to give advantage to one side.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:50, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: This might be block evasion by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Janagewen, if you look at the IP ranges involved. If so, not a content dispute, just trolling / evasion / vandalism / etc. It's pretty much a LTA case now across a range of articles related to x86 architecture. Murph9000 (talk) 08:06, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done; I would normally wait for the protecting admin, but given the protection expires in 3 days, and they have not been editing for 3 days, I went ahead and reduced the protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: What appears to be a single purpose account persists in adding description for an entry on the disambiguation page that is not supported by the liked article and refuses to discuss. olderwiser 03:17, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:56, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a difference between planning to name her as a nominee and her nominee actually being announced formally. Reddevil0728 (talk) 04:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent additions of unsourced factual error. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:44, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A Great Catholic Person (talk) 04:48, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:05, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User attempting to use article to promote his PhD thesis and to paint it as the authoritative word on subject; is continuing to revert despite repeated efforts to get him to use the talk page. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:34, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:08, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Libelous/BLP vandalism by IP users. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 06:21, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:11, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – nothing but reverts towards anon edits. WNYY98 (talk) 02:41, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:35, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – User with many revdels subverting semi-protection. WNYY98 (talk) 02:50, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done for the same length as the semi. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:41, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continues to be consistently vandalized due to blown lead in Super Bowl, only came off PC around 20 days ago. WNYY98 (talk) 02:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:45, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 03:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:48, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sagecandor (talk) 21:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 02:23, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Continuous reverting and editing of this article by a Wikipedia user P199 without any reliable source has resulted in content dispute/edit warring. Barrera marquez 23:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:00, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and petty insults being added by IP users. Ravensfire (talk) 23:47, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator CIreland. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:27, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a persistent edit to the page for from various IP users, though there is no source to corroborate this (disputed fact) claim. Though, it can equally be assumed to be done under good faith. Nonetheless there are too many edits to same information that have to be reverted in one day. . Sreeking (talk) 01:46, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unsourced edits by various IP users, many are likely vandalism - Tystnaden (talk) 02:36, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:33, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content and deletion of sourced content.VictoriaGraysonTalk 21:33, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:34, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sagecandor (talk) 21:42, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:36, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sagecandor (talk) 21:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:41, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism with same type of unreferenced content inserted (see recent 71.11.137.150, 107.77.206.36 edits) Hmlarson (talk) 19:56, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:20, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of content removal and vandalism from IP users, just 2 days before the event even take place. Nickag989talk 20:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:46, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 19:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:41, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – highly visible due to conviction today. WNYY98 (talk) 19:29, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:42, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP edits to include paragraphs from very unreliable sources (anonymous Reddit thread). Edits from the same IPs have been made to the Rochester Institute of Technology page to remove references to Computer Science Hours. This person has been warned on multiple occasions, and shifting IPs prevents user blocking. Alexwho314 (talk) 19:48, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:17, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Possible non-notable Israeli-Palestinian content article created by a non-EC user. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:54, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:40, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Moxy (talk) 03:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • No content dispute that I can see, but extended confirmation would help to prevent future disruption (like what recently happened on the article from an autoconfirmed account). Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:59, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry guys wrong request ....yes extended confirmation would be fine. That said block has worked--Moxy (talk) 16:56, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Two temporary semiprotections have not deterred several IP-editors who are using the page as an unencyclopedic public relations brochure. Unfortunately they seem unfamiliar with WP practices and style, and repeated attempts to reach out to them and engage and educate on the talk page for the article have been ignored. Sugggest indefinite semi-protection. Samshltn (talk) 13:19, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Samshltn: Your own edits have not been without problems and you seem to be focused on this article. Do you have a connection to the subject? NeilN talk to me 13:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: @NeilN: I was just writing on your own talk page to reach out to you. I do not have a connection with the subject, no. My focus is on maintaining an enclyclopedic style, and that interest has only arisen after stumbling across this page. I apologise for any of my own edits that have been problematic as I learn the ropes. I hope that you agree that I'm clearly keen to engage, learn, and improve our Wikipedia. Samshltn (talk) 13:54, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: @NeilN: I should point out that there are quite a few edits made by the anonymous user that have been just fine, I would have clicked 'thank' if he was only a registered user. I'm not blanket-undoing his edits, I'm trying to co-operate to create an encyclopedic style, but the editor doesn't respond on the talk page. He acts as an autonomous uncooperative editor. If you have suggestions for how I can reach out and try to help this editor maintain an encyclopedic style, your help would be greatly appreciated. Samshltn (talk) 14:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 16:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. Now done. EdJohnston (talk) 17:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 15:59, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 16:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Recommend replacing with a fully protected {{wiktionary redirect}}. feminist 07:51, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesBWatson: Lectonar (talk) 18:50, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
agree with User:Feminist, with creating the redirect, oppose full protection, semi should be enough. Gamebuster19901 (TalkContributions) 14:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – It is still unclear if having this be a redirect to Wiktionary will be a net benefit to our readers. If you just want to keep people from recreating an article of that name, the full protection takes care of that. Suggest that anyone who favors the redirect should make a request at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects. If the close is favorable, an admin can do whatever is necessary. If User:JamesBWatson wants to take a different action, he can do so. EdJohnston (talk) 16:47, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No longer used, converting to redirect. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
15:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template is still transcluded on 10848 pages @Jc86035: Gamebuster19901 (TalkContributions) 16:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Gamebuster19901: Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Ja-stalink shows no transclusions; all of them have been replaced by AnomieBOT. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
16:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't realize that a bot was removing transclusions, at the time it was transcluded on many pages. Sorry for the confusion! Gamebuster19901 (TalkContributions) 17:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – This template is already redirected to Template:STN and both source and target are now covered by template protection. So there doesn't seem to be anything more to do. EdJohnston (talk) 16:54, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This redirect was protected as a result of a deletion discussion. Since there is now a new article, the protection is neither useful nor appropriate. (The protecting administrator appears to be inactive.). Modernponderer (talk) 23:15, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Windows Calendar is currently full-protected as a redirect to Calendar (Windows). It seems evident that the source and target are just different ways of naming the same thing, so it is unclear why we should open the way for creation of a new article at Windows Calendar. Most likely, someone would come along and recreate a new article inadvertently. Agree with you that the verdict of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows Calendar is superseded thanks to creation of a new acceptable article at Calendar (Windows). EdJohnston (talk) 17:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

21 May 2017

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is evidence that someone is attempting to whitewash the page and has been for years. See the talk page for more info. Gestrid (talk) 12:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Sem-protection would not stop COI edits. There is no evidence an IP has attempted to circumvent the block so semi wouldn't help. Woody (talk) 15:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced, promotional and copyright violation content. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bring it back if they start socking again. Woody (talk) 15:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  14:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done PC isn't available for templates and I don't think a long-term semi would be appropriate here given the time between edits. Woody (talk) 15:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Anon IPs battling at Controversies section of a polarizing figure. I think the Ivanka Trump section is neutral at the moment, but at least one anon IP continually inserts POV language. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 19:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Came off a 2 year semi protection several months ago and majority of edits since then have been either vandalism or its removal. WNYY98 (talk) 09:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism (mostly by IPs). —BarrelProof (talk) 15:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: user request- currently inactive user subpage. Sro23 (talk) 18:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 18:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been on PC for several years, but edit rate too much for PC. Was recently subject to a short-term semi protection. Highly visible and subject to vandalism for obvious reasons. WNYY98 (talk) 09:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pending looks like it is working. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Significant upcoming changes are occurring with the branding of this television service, would like to avoid edit wars and disruptive editing due to limited information (a similar occurrence happened in July 2016 when two major networks change programming affiliation). Request one week semi-protection. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 09:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Woody (talk) 12:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A little help with vandalism please. Just FYI, the next release of Windows, which might bring about something that requires this article to be changed, is no sooner than September this year. So, if you lock it down until September, the world won't end in fire and brimstone. Codename Lisa (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Woody (talk) 12:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 11:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Woody (talk) 12:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attempt by ip to circumvent AfD discussion . Onel5969 TT me 13:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as a repeatedly recreated page. Woody (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attempt by ip to circumvent AfD discussion - constant recreation . Peter Rehse (talk) 14:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 15:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP sports vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 11:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 12:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Non notable actress. Repeatedly recreated by PR agency. Coderzombie (talk) 13:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 15:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. – Repeated disruptive editing by IP editor(s) which resumes the moment page protection expires (happened already twice in the last two weeks). Third PP requested, this time possibly a longer one. — kashmiri TALK 14:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 15:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 04:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – similar reasons to his wife's article. WNYY98 (talk) 05:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined A lot of editing but not much reverting. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – not sure why page was unprotected? see protection log. WNYY98 (talk) 08:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long protection log, highly visible, frequent unconstructive edits . WNYY98 (talk) 08:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Saqib (talk) 08:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The city officials' names keep being changed by different IPs. . –FlyingAce✈talk 08:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Same issues as Chino Hills, California. –FlyingAce✈talk 08:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:50, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: unnecessary, the article had not been subject to any type of disruptive editing. --Makeandtoss (talk) 01:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: The country of Jordan is older than the conflict. Jordan is a high level article and it is not "relating to the Arab–Israeli conflict". Egypt, for example, is not under this protection. Makeandtoss (talk) 11:57, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree and believe this is irrelevant for the discussion, but another administrator will take the decision.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
How is exactly is it irrelevant? Egypt and Jordan held identical roles in the conflict. --Makeandtoss (talk) 12:51, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps no one ever requested Egypt be protected, which is the key element in the Arb Com policy. If somebody requests protection, the article receives protection. If no one requests protection, it remains unprotected. As mentioned below, you might want to argue that point directly to Arb Com for clarification. — Maile (talk) 13:29, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am posting here in response to a request from Makeandtoss on my talk page. I protected Jordan per a request yesterday, and did it by-the-book according to clarifications I had recently received regarding ArbCom decision Palestine-Israel articles. If another admin disagrees, they have the option of changing the protection. I have had no participation or vested interest in Arb Com's case, but I suggest that if Makeandtoss feels Jordon should not be part of the Arb Com decision, then he should address this to Arb Com directly. — Maile (talk) 12:42, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Maile66 and Ymblanter: Do you think it would be useful to have a discussion that comes up with some criteria for "broadly interpreted"? The United States has repeatedly involved itself in the conflict. Is Foreign policy of the United States eligible for ECP? --NeilN talk to me 13:36, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely have some criteria. As is, it depends on a judgement call from any admin, regardless of whether or not that admin has knowledge of the said conflict. Or if an admin has extensive knowledge of the conflict, it's still currently vague as to the interpretation. Criteria would be very helpful. — Maile (talk) 13:40, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Maile66: Where would you recommend this discussion take place? At WP:AN, Wikipedia talk:Requests for page protection, or somewhere else? --NeilN talk to me 13:54, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would just ask ArbCom for clarification, this is their decision.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:59, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be possible for this to happen where it can become an amendment to the Arb Com decision? I just think it's a good idea to have the clarification officially attached to the Arb Com decision. Then the decision could be posted on WT:RPP. — Maile (talk) 14:00, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter and Maile66: I will email Arbcom, pointing to this thread, and asking if they want to get involved. Usually they leave such details to the hoi polloi. --NeilN talk to me 14:06, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Since the admin who applied ECP to Jordan named WP:ARBPIA3 in their edit summary, they must have thought that their protection was justified by Arbcom authority. So User:Maile66's protection should be appealable at WP:Arbitration enforcement. I don't see a need to ask Arbcom directly what to do. Also I don't see a need for a specific set of rules for when to protect. Personally, I wouldn't protect automatically, but I would impose ECP it if there seemed to be a justification. In case of doubt in a particular case, the consensus of admins at AE ought to be sufficient. EdJohnston (talk) 17:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
EdJohnston I agree with you re: justification but Arbcom has taken away admin discretion in this area. --NeilN talk to me 17:25, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User:NeilN has now opened Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Clarification request: Discretionary sanctions (2014) which might help to answer these questions. This is not trying to get rules for when ECP should be applied, but only how to ask for restrictions to be undone. EdJohnston (talk) 18:49, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@EdJohnston: That was done yesterday with American Politics articles in mind but it's applicable to all DS restrictions. Arbcom has indicated they're discussing and deciding what to do for the issues raised here. --NeilN talk to me 18:54, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined - Unprotection is declined, since the protection appears to have the authority of discretionary sanctions. It can't be lifted without the consent of User:Maile66 unless you get consensus at a place like WP:AE. The above discussion suggests ways you could appeal the protection if you believe it is unnecessary. EdJohnston (talk) 03:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP cruft and fan nonsense for newly released single. Abi-Maria (talk) 19:33, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. There are too many good IP edits and not many overtly disruptive edits. Woody (talk) 20:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – just came off protection and vandalism has resumed . WNYY98 (talk) 05:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – To allow template editors to edit. Fully protected since 2008. Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 03:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2 million transclusions is a lot. On the other hand, I don't think we've had many problems with changing full prot->template prot even on such high use templates. Opinions? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) I don't think that's necessary, since the template just calls a Lua module (which is also fully protected) and shouldn't need editing. I think it would be better to lower the protection of the module, since it's harder to break things in the Scribunto editor. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
14:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would say, if it's not broken, don't fix it. Gamebuster19901 (TalkContributions) 18:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'd disagree, considering that Wikipedia is built around the principle that anyone can edit it, and it therefore aims to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing so that anyone can add material and correct errors is part of the protection policy. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:11, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If Template:Navbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) does not cause the sky to fall with just template protection, this one should be no worse. Murph9000 (talk) 08:17, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) I agree with Jo-Jo Eumerus here. PP stipulates that no more protection should be used than needed and full protection is not needed when template editor protection is not problematic. Regards SoWhy 08:21, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yet again, this has been discussed with a conclusion that we shouldn't handle unprotection requests with no rationale beyond the philosophical. If you disagree, you're welcome to handle the dozens of requests we're likely to get en-masse from the couple editors interested in making sure protection levels in the template space are "perfect". This was an actual problem in the past, not some imagined potential issue. Yes, in an ideal world, everything would have the ideal protection level. This is not an ideal world. There are resource constraints. We have few active admins. Why are we wasting what resources we do have discussing these sorts of requests over-and-over when they yield zero tangible benefit to the encyclopedia? ~ Rob13Talk 15:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe just accept or decline each request and ask people to avoid mass nominations. "Don't need" is not a strong argument against anything, while "oy, too many requests at once!" is. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:19, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done I'm going to decline this based on the above discussion, plus the fact that a template editor did not make the request. I'd find it much more compelling if a TE asked for the change, but this seems to be changing it for the sake of change. Katietalk 02:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Race is in about an hour and the vandals are already hitting the article, 24 hours semi, please. Montanabw(talk) 21:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 02:26, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Jockey in big horse race today, vandals hitting by altering data, BLP concerns. 24 hours should be enough. Montanabw(talk) 21:27, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 02:26, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Big horse race for this trainer today, vandals hitting with BLP errors, deliberately introducing false data. 24 hours should do . Montanabw(talk) 21:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 02:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 (talk) 22:17, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 02:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:23, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 02:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – same editors as Sidecar. WNYY98 (talk) 22:34, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 02:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. jmarkfrancia (talk) 03:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors keep adding native scripts despite the recent RfC. Vensatry (talk) 04:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Requesting for a block of this file, per the Protection Policy, as user seems to have reverted to their owning of their own preferred upload of the image, which they previously displayed at File:Green Light (Official Single Cover) by Lorde.png, which did receive a protection. And per {{Duck}}, it's likely to happen once again. Sorry if this is wrong page; did not see a request for file upload protection under the TW tab!. livelikemusic talk! 13:28, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. And ask for a {{whale}} because the files look exactly the same to me. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – highly visible, just came off ECP and already being vandalized. WNYY98 (talk) 02:39, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That seems excessive. Materialscientist. I would have went with six months or maybe a year. El_C 05:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I won't mind any admin to amend duration of my any semi-protection, provided that admin would watch the article, and step in if disruption resumes after sprotection expiry (I don't watch Ivanka Trump, but I believe vandalism there will not subside for the next 4 years). Materialscientist (talk) 05:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to give IPs a chance to make constructive edits in six months, even if it's likely that they'd be disruptive edits, too. I'm watching it, so I'll amend it accordingly and we'll go from there. (I may have to up it to ec, anyway—we'll see how it goes.) Thanks. El_C 05:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Person acting from many IPs posted some of my personal information on my page and is re-adding it when I remove it. Alexwho314 (talk) 02:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Please consider if you also want to request oversight. TheDragonFire (talk) 03:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Opabinia regalis. TheDragonFire (talk) 03:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated by Bertrand101, a long-term abuser known for fabricating hoax articles on Philippine radio stations. Blake Gripling (talk) 04:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 04:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long protection log. Just came off a protection and vandalism has quickly resumed. WNYY98 (talk) 22:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Today's spree was one IP, so let's see if we can get by with PC first. Katietalk 02:39, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent additions of unsourced material particularly by IP users. Jennica / talk 00:26, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced or disruptive content. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Someone has been repeatedly attempting to remove Donald Trump's name as a client. Don't really know why. I was surprised that an article on Gizmodo investigated this. Can you temporarily semi-protect the page? Thanks. --Smghz (talk) 21:19, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Katietalk 02:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Can we maybe get a couple month duration or something? Protection expired and anonymous editors immediately started trying to insert faulty information again. Morty C-137 (talk) 22:19, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Addition of defamatory content by block-evading user. Jiten Dhandha • talk • contributions • 22:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Katietalk 02:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unconstructive edit rate too high for PC with visibility. WNYY98 (talk) 22:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content and factual errors by several sockpuppets and IP users. snapsnap (talk) 19:37, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Woody (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, removal of source links and data from multiple IPs which appear to be coming from Australia. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:40, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Woody (talk) 20:45, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long term vandalism target, frequented by children/schools. WNYY98 (talk) 22:13, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Katietalk 03:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction to 24 hours / Unprotection: Unnecessary indefinite protection since the file either gets replaced by a new file with a different name or it gets moved to Wikimedia Commons.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:302:D1A2:C740:683E:9063:7475:8D3 (talkcontribs) 23:12, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. It is Non-free so won't be moved. Also, discuss it with the admin who protected it as per the page instructions. Woody (talk) 16:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Administrator who protected the page will not talk to any IP address users without an account on the user's talk page. --2602:302:D1A2:C740:717A:E819:3F56:1944 (talk) 01:46, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction to 24 hours / Unprotection: Unnecessary indefinite protection since the file either gets replaced by a new file with a different name or it gets moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:302:D1A2:C740:683E:9063:7475:8D3 (talkcontribs) 23:12, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. It is Non-free so won't be moved. Also, discuss it with the admin who protected it as per the page instructions. Woody (talk) 16:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Administrator who protected the page will not talk to any IP address users without an account on the user's talk page. --2602:302:D1A2:C740:717A:E819:3F56:1944 (talk) 01:46, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction to 24 hours / Unprotection: Unnecessary indefinite protection since the file either gets replaced by a new file with a different name or it gets moved to Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:302:D1A2:C740:683E:9063:7475:8D3 (talkcontribs) 23:12, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. It is Non-free so won't be moved. Also, discuss it with the admin who protected it as per the page instructions. Woody (talk) 16:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Administrator who protected the page will not talk to any IP address users without an account on the user's talk page. --2602:302:D1A2:C740:717A:E819:3F56:1944 (talk) 01:46, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2017

23 May 2017

MLS team article "ownership" edits each week

Indefinite pending changes due to a high level of immature and unconstructive editing. It seems that at least one team, sometimes as many as three, are hit every week because there is a paramater for ownership which is displayed as Owner in the infobox. When a player is instrumental in the defeat of another team, that player is said to "own" the team, at least in American slang. And so the "ownership" of at least one team is changed each weekend. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Walter Görlitz Any chance that you could provide links to this happening. I don't want to be protecting pre-emptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure:
There are more, but the anons are not usually nice enough to leave an edit summary. Since the league is presently 24 teams, any anon can potentially make this change to any team article. Not all competitions happen on weekends. I, or another editor usually catch them, but having more eyes on them will be beneficial in catching this sort of problem behaviour. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Marking this request as 'Done' because the protections seem to be in place and the archive bot won't take this away. EdJohnston (talk) 20:22, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 07:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected clpo13(talk) 08:21, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • State Farm Territorial Cup Series (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  • This page is repeatedly updated with non sanctioned results, as the competition has been dead since the 2011-12 season. The official website has been linked [1], which hasn't been updated in 6 years, since sponsorship of the competition left. I request this page be locked until this competition ever starts up again. Due to the high profile rivalry of the two universities - I feel misinformation as such is detrimental to the overall quality of the rivalry.

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 09:44, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – article on non-existent company, using paste of Telstra. Uncle Roy (talk) 10:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Yaris678 (talk) 12:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: User with multiple IP addresses is adding the same false/unsourced information to the article, consistent with editing pattern of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TomWatkins1970. Nqr9 (talk) 12:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article seems to attract vandalism soon after each period of protection expires. HandsomeFella (talk) 12:37, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SHort of indefinitely protection the page, this hopefully will put an end to this. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP hoping account adding unsourced info/BLP violations. Two accounts blocked today, editing with at least two others. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added the info with the ref that the IPs (finally!) provided. Whether the award itself is notable is another matter. Hope this helps. --Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare15:02, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It didn't. Now new unsourced info is being added. :( --Ebyabe talk - State of the Union15:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:49, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Serols (talk · contribs) blocked by Nyttend. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi 24 hours - Today's Google Doodle. I'm just gonna go ahead and stick this here because if the last dozen or so times we've gone through this is any indication, if I wait until we get to the vandalism-per-minute mark, it's going to be a crap chute for two or three hours before someone actually gets around to protecting it. I figure by the time the RFPP backlog gets to this point the West Coast will have woken up and the page will actually need immediate protecting. TimothyJosephWood 14:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 16:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: Living politician article protected indefinitely October 2012, several election cycles ago. Article Political positions of Paul Ryan has recently been updated, and needs concise summarization in the Political positions section of article Paul Ryan as per WP:Summary style. Protecting admin already asked, protecting admin inactive. 13.54.152.171 (talk) 18:00, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing at Paul Ryan does not seem to be super busy. Maybe pending changes protection could work? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Reduced to indef PC. clpo13(talk) 21:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

23 May 2017

Temporary semi-protection: persistent abuse by writing abusive and harmful comments and edits to the page. Protection would be great! Editorguy123098 (talk)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor continues to disrupt page. There is an attempt to build a consensus on the talk page which is being ignored and cited content being consistently removed. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:50, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor changes IP and continues to add uncited content on the page. There is an attempt to build consensus on the Talk page which is ignored with no understanding of Reliable sources. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:49, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent, years-long disruptive editing by numerous IPs and new editors. Possible sockpuppet/meatpuppet issues. James (talk/contribs) 15:53, 23 May 2017 (UTC) Done[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Babymissfortune 17:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:07, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:37, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over list of programmes -- relevant guideline at WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Binksternet (talk) 17:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is full protection necessary? Looking at the page history, it appears that this edit war is with mostly IP addresses. Wouldn't semi-protection, preventing IPs from editing the article, be less restrictive and solve the problem without cutting everyone out? Sunil The Mongoose (talk) 17:31, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Question: If the IPs are ban/block evading WP:LTA users as implied by the edit reasons, then semi protection is warranted. If this is a content dispute with no firmly settled upon consensus, semi protection is not appropriate as it'd be giving logged in users an undue advantage. So, is this an LTA case, disruptive editing or a content dispute? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also compelled to decline this request unless evidence that this IP is an LTA user is presented... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined - No answers to questions, and page has not been edited in over a day. Full protection seems unnecessary, as IP addresses were causing the disruption. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:01, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name – It is not even possible to choose this username. Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 11:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Defamatory content multiple IPs. Geraldo Perez (talk) 12:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Disruptive activity isn't at a high enough rate to justify protection at this time. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:04, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Page should be protected, there are tons of unsourced IP edits and removals. We must do something about it. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 09:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:01, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 10:04, 23 May 2017 (UTC) Done[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:16, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dlohcierekim - Did you mean to set both semi protection and pending changes protection on this article? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ack. will reset. thanksDlohcierekim (talk) 11:19, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Just wanted to check in case you didn't mean to ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:02, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 10:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long term vandalism target, most recent anon edits unconstructive . WNYY98 (talk) 05:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Disruptive activity isn't at a high enough rate to justify protection at this time. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by User:Brianmagallano IP sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  05:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full semi-protection: Any potential vandalism that would occur due to the fact that any high profiles of any US high-ranking officials are potentially targeted. Saiph121 (talk) 08:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined—We don't protect pages preemptively. El_C 09:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruptive edits by several IPs and "new editors"; need protection so the article can be reviewed and ensure compliance with WP:BLP. Jack | talk page 08:50, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:34, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and Hoax edits by User:Bertrand101 IP sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  08:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:34, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Various seasons of RuPaul's Drag Race

Temporary semi protection: Almost immediately after protection was lifted from these pages, an anon IP began making the same non-consensus edits that the pages originally were protected against. When warned, he falsely replied, "How about you stop. The consensus has been reached a long time ago. Fuck off."

--Tenebrae (talk) 13:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If any are protected, I'm not seeing it. Here are what pertinent revision messages I'm finding:

  • Season 1 - 23:40, 21 May 2017‎ MusikBot (Removing protection templates from unprotected page)
  • Season 2 - 19:20, 20 May 2017 MusikBot (Removing protection templates from unprotected page)
  • Season 3 - 23:50, 20 May 2017 MusikBot (Removing protection templates from unprotected page)
  • Season 4 - 23:50, 20 May 2017 MusikBot (Removing protection templates from unprotected page)
  • Season 5 - 23:50, 20 May 2017 MusikBot (Removing protection templates from unprotected page)
  • Season 6 - 21:30, 20 May 2017 MusikBot (Removing protection templates from unprotected page)
  • Season 7 - 08:40 21 May 2017 MusikBot (Removing protection templates from unprotected page)
  • Season 8 is not protected, since an anon IP made a vandal edit here, today
  • All Stars Season 1 is not protected, since the disruptive edit made at edit here, today
  • Since I couldn't confirm whether All Stars Season 2 was protected or not, I've removed it from the list.
  • However, I've added Season 9 due to vandalism here, today, and another editor's talk-page request for protection.--Tenebrae (talk) 18:20, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done The articles that require it have already been protected. The others that do not have been left as-is. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Obvious sockpuppetry by Kkjj, though the account is not currently blocked, so I don't know why they're using proxies. Editing style is the exact same: persistence in outright removing valid information rather than trying to improve the article. Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:25, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:29, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Cascading enabled thru Main Page. 209.249.5.130 (talk) 02:36, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – The Main Page is already fully protected with cascading protection settings turned on, and the Main Page itself is also already transcluded in several cascading protected pages (e.g. Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page). While the Main Page is transcluded in this userspace page, a non-administrator will still be unable to modify the Main Page itself due to these protections. Thus, there doesn't appear to be a need to increase the protection level on this page, absent any comments from HJ Mitchell. Mz7 (talk) 04:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Lots of unverified and unsourced edits due to Manchester Arena Incident. StrikeDog (talk) 03:44, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – 2.4k+ transclusions. - Mlpearc (open channel) 04:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Simplexity22 (talk) 04:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 209.249.5.130 (talk) 04:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Persistent vandalism by ever shifting IP of indef blocked user N738139 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) DVdm (talk) 13:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: user and IP range blocked. Perhaps no need for protection anymore. - DVdm (talk) 16:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined - The recent IPs are still covered by the /64 rangeblock, so semi not yet needed. Let me know if this changes. EdJohnston (talk) 02:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, at least twenty instances of it in the last month, with the last one being from a new user that seems to have registered only to vandalize. About half of the edits are of JonTron's name, with a mix of blatant vandalisms and good faith edits. It is coming from wide range of IP users, there are regularly new vandals, a third of the last sixty edits are vandalism and almost another third are reversions, and the subject of the page is a living person. --Kallene (talk) 21:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 21:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:44, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Constant removal of image unnoticed until some days later every time. --George Ho (talk) 00:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continue disruptive editing by IP after previous edit war on article. -- AlexTW 00:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone vandalize this article. Vladimirrizov20my talk 15:20, 22 May 2017 (UTC)  Done[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. clpo13(talk) 06:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent violations of NPOV by Peruvian IPs. Binksternet (talk) 16:49, 22 May 2017 (UTC)  Done[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. clpo13(talk) 06:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from an anonymous vandal abusing either a morphing IP or a number of IPs in order to delete portions of the article for no reason.--Mr Fink (talk) 21:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)  Done[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. clpo13(talk) 06:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi. Constant vandalism. White Arabian Filly Neigh 22:11, 22 May 2017 (UTC)  Done[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. clpo13(talk) 06:16, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs adding unconfirmed director. Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract01:12, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please. Someone look into the page. Too many people are adding Joss Whedon to the credits when he's only on the post-production.Crboyer (talk) 04:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. clpo13(talk) 06:16, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – attracting attention due to potential last game tonight . WNYY98 (talk) 03:21, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. clpo13(talk) 06:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. lovkal (talk) 17:49, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 23:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - much of the recent stuff doesn't appear to be vandalism. AlexiusHoratius 23:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Incident that is currently underway - easily subject to speculation and other false or uncited information. 74.215.34.2 (talk) 00:27, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

+1 to this request -- there's a fair amount of IP vandalism happening already, so temporary semi-protection would be helpful. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BencherliteTalk 01:07, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Constant extreme vandalism by a sockpuppet who keeps creating new socks. Atlantic306 (talk) 17:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:04, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This BLP has been heavily vandalized today; it's basically a news thing, and the article has never needed protection before, so a short semi-protection of a few days or a week will likely be sufficient. Sideways713 (talk) 22:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. three days by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 00:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring against consensus on sales figures, as discussed several times at Talk:Janet Jackson discography. Binksternet (talk) 22:56, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. one week by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 00:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The PAS's followers not regonised term of Pan because in Malaysia, Pan means for (Parti Amanah Negara) or National Trust Islamic Party (Malaysia). Please protect for PAS & Amanah pages in en.wiki. Keluang hitam (talk) 12:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute between myself and another editor. —Fundude99talk to me 13:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. You said it best. Take this to the talk page please. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:36, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@RickinBaltimore: We have discussed it very throughly on the talk page. What he can't seem to understand is per WP:HONOR, honorific prefixes aren't not general included in front of an individuals name, and keeps reintroducing it. I've already told him to get consensus before reintroducing it and it seems that he is ignoring me.—Fundude99talk to me 17:38, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 19:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or pending changes until this person gets bored.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 16:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:02, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Endless stream of IPs vandalising with a mixture of unsourced, adding random names, adding Jeremy Corbyn, and generally WP:CB. Suggest long protection, as WP is being widely ridiculed in the media for this.[40] Murph9000 (talk) 20:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist 20:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing by IP address(es) editor that is also unresponsive to discussion attempts. Thanks, — PaleoNeonate — 21:02, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MLS team article "ownership" edits each week

Indefinite pending changes due to a high level of immature and unconstructive editing. It seems that at least one team, sometimes as many as three, are hit every week because there is a paramater for ownership which is displayed as Owner in the infobox. When a player is instrumental in the defeat of another team, that player is said to "own" the team, at least in American slang. And so the "ownership" of at least one team is changed each weekend. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Walter Görlitz Any chance that you could provide links to this happening. I don't want to be protecting pre-emptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure:
There are more, but the anons are not usually nice enough to leave an edit summary. Since the league is presently 24 teams, any anon can potentially make this change to any team article. Not all competitions happen on weekends. I, or another editor usually catch them, but having more eyes on them will be beneficial in catching this sort of problem behaviour. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Marking this request as 'Done' because the protections seem to be in place and the archive bot won't take this away. EdJohnston (talk) 20:22, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 07:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected clpo13(talk) 08:21, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • State Farm Territorial Cup Series (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  • This page is repeatedly updated with non sanctioned results, as the competition has been dead since the 2011-12 season. The official website has been linked [2], which hasn't been updated in 6 years, since sponsorship of the competition left. I request this page be locked until this competition ever starts up again. Due to the high profile rivalry of the two universities - I feel misinformation as such is detrimental to the overall quality of the rivalry.

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 09:44, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – article on non-existent company, using paste of Telstra. Uncle Roy (talk) 10:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Yaris678 (talk) 12:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: User with multiple IP addresses is adding the same false/unsourced information to the article, consistent with editing pattern of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TomWatkins1970. Nqr9 (talk) 12:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article seems to attract vandalism soon after each period of protection expires. HandsomeFella (talk) 12:37, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SHort of indefinitely protection the page, this hopefully will put an end to this. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP hoping account adding unsourced info/BLP violations. Two accounts blocked today, editing with at least two others. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added the info with the ref that the IPs (finally!) provided. Whether the award itself is notable is another matter. Hope this helps. --Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare15:02, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It didn't. Now new unsourced info is being added. :( --Ebyabe talk - State of the Union15:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:49, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Serols (talk · contribs) blocked by Nyttend. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi 24 hours - Today's Google Doodle. I'm just gonna go ahead and stick this here because if the last dozen or so times we've gone through this is any indication, if I wait until we get to the vandalism-per-minute mark, it's going to be a crap chute for two or three hours before someone actually gets around to protecting it. I figure by the time the RFPP backlog gets to this point the West Coast will have woken up and the page will actually need immediate protecting. TimothyJosephWood 14:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 16:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: Living politician article protected indefinitely October 2012, several election cycles ago. Article Political positions of Paul Ryan has recently been updated, and needs concise summarization in the Political positions section of article Paul Ryan as per WP:Summary style. Protecting admin already asked, protecting admin inactive. 13.54.152.171 (talk) 18:00, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing at Paul Ryan does not seem to be super busy. Maybe pending changes protection could work? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Reduced to indef PC. clpo13(talk) 21:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

24 May 2017

Temporary protection: Recreation of G11 Page DoABarrelRoll.dev(Constable of the WikiPolice) 18:43, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Ponyo. BencherliteTalk 19:00, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:54, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Some old vandalism removed as well, while I was at it. BencherliteTalk 18:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Suitable as a redirect to Against the Current (band). {{R from member}}. feminist 07:44, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Redirect created. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:14, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Currently the recipient of repeated vandalism from multiple IP addresses. Egsan Bacon (talk) 16:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism/transfer rumour. After the previous protection was expired, ip edits on adding transfer rumour was back. Request 1 week or 1 month protection Matthew_hk tc 17:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 18:06, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-running disruptive editing by dynamic-IP anons geolocating to same city, to inflate infobox statistics for a footballer contrary to sources in article, to add unsourced stats, and to add a club for which, according to sources suplied at talk page, subject never played. Still ongoing despite addition of hidden note directing editor(s) to talk page. Struway2 (talk) 17:37, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 18:04, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of talk page by unregistered users. User:Oliszydlowski 13:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)  DoneDlohcierekim (talk) 14:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. Woody (talk) 16:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. —MRD2014 📞 contribs 13:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It has a long protection log with 2 previous periods of PC that didn't stop the vandalism. Woody (talk) 16:19, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A multitude of anonymous users blanking sections without discussion. —Guanaco 14:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Defamatory and libelous claims are being repeatedly added in his bio with no citations. Suggest locking it as this is running at over 100 an hour. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:A0BF:9F00:78A9:A7D4:4FE4:5BED (talk) 15:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is clearly a content dispute and the page is now protected so that discussion can take place on the talk page and not in edit summaries. Woody (talk) 16:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unsourced/poorly sourced changes. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:31, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 16:32, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IP editor(s) are back inserting content there is no consensus for. As soon as page protection comes off, they are back. The last administrator who protected the page, Oshwah, seriously blundered by only protecting the page for 48 hours. This page has been protected for 3 months or longer. It is long past time for indefinite. Otherwise I will be back here in a week, month, or whatever as soon as the next temporary protection ends. Since May 1 2015 there have been over 30 edits adding the same trivia to the article that have been reverted by at least five different registered USERs including myself and the page has been protected multiple times during that same time period....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:25, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Keeping an eye on things for the moment. Want to see how high the disruptive editing rate is before I protect... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Hopping IPs edit warring with multiple editors, persistently disrupting with unsourced content, for several days now. Requesting one week semi, or whatever is appropriate. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 12:28, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple accounts, presumably students. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 12:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)  Done[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:45, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edited by dynamic IP of indef block account (Efc1878) so should be semi for a while. Qed237 (talk) 10:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edited by dynamic IP of indef block account (Efc1878) so should be semi for a while. Qed237 (talk) 10:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edited by dynamic IP of indef block account (Efc1878) so should be semi for a while. Qed237 (talk) 10:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edited by dynamic IP of indef block account (Efc1878) so should be semi for a while. Qed237 (talk) 10:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edited by dynamic IP of indef block account (Efc1878) so should be semi for a while. Qed237 (talk) 10:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:18, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edited by dynamic IP of indef block account (Efc1878) so should be semi for a while. Qed237 (talk) 10:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:19, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edited by dynamic IP of indef block account (Efc1878) so should be semi for a while. Qed237 (talk) 10:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:19, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edited by dynamic IP of indef block account (Efc1878) so should be semi for a while. Qed237 (talk) 10:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edited by dynamic IP of indef block account (Efc1878) so should be semi for a while. Qed237 (talk) 10:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting at least 6 months protection; steady vandalism starts up again after page is unprotected, with around 1 unconstructive edit every day from IPs and new accounts. Quasar G t - c 11:31, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

auto confirm for 1 yearDlohcierekim (talk) 11:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
11:45, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:25, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This will be the fourth time that I have had to request that this article be semi-protected, due to frequent and unrelenting disruptive edits from an unregistered editor currently using this IP: 98.25.195.28. He is also using a mobile device and makes edits under mobile IPs, such as this one: 2606:a000:131b:e9:11e6:91ae:7126:8a01, which may qualify as sockpuppetry. The last semi-protection period for this article was six months in length, but this editor is just going to immediately continue to disruptively edit the moment the protection period ends, as he did with the previous one, so indefinite semi-protection is desirable. Jackdude101 (talk) 02:39, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't see how the edits by 2606:A000:131B:E9:D83:E478:6E96:16C are disruptive. I spot checked their edits to the article, and the user provides references and the edits don't appear to be vandalism. You reverted this edit, and warned the other IP for vandalism - how is this vandalism? I don't see that there's any disruption going on to justify protection. Can you explain and help me to understand? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah: That's just one of the mobile IPs used by this user. If you observe the article's edit history, all of those other mobile IP edits are him (I can tell, because they all have the same geolocation). The main reasons for why this person's edits are disruptive are due to their inconsistent grammar (I have to grammar check and revise all of his edits accordingly), and the information he posts is often in violation of Wikipedia:Relevance of content, which are ones that I revert. He also posts with a wall of separate edits each time, which I am concerned he is doing purposely to make reverts of his edits more difficult. He seems to believe that every single piece of related information to the article's subject, no matter how unimportant or trivial, should be added to the article, and the concept of maintaining the quality of the article, which presently has GA status, is not a priority with him. I have messaged him several times to please address these issues, including in one of the talk pages of one of his other IPs here: 24.88.92.254, but he does not respond to messages. The only times when he is interested in talking are when the article is protected, as you can see on the article's talk page (he was posting under the 24.88.92.254 IP the last time he posted there). Observe the poor grammar in his posts on the talk page. This is consistent with just about every edit he adds to the article, which requires someone (me) to check the article multiple times a day to make sure the article doesn't read like jibberish. Again, I have addressed this with him, but he never responds to messages when he is able to edit. This editor is a consistent nuisance, and should not be allowed to continue making poor edits to this article. If you want additional information about this editor, simply inquire with @Sundayclose: or @SummerPhDv2.0: and they will share the same sentiment regarding this editor. Jackdude101 (talk) 05:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Immediately after this page's semi-protection expired the same person committing a high level of IP vandalism (constant disruptive and incorrect edits) that forced me to request it be semi-protected last time began doing it again, again from slightly different IP addresses coming from the same area (Thessaloniki, Greece). They keep replacing sales numbers that are official with VGChartz estimations despite explanations of why this is incorrect and repeatedly being reverted. They are now trying to justify their estimated sales numbers by applying a game's sales split percentage in the UK to its sales split for the entire world which is obviously incorrect to do and estimating, not using official numbers. Before the page was semi-protected they had been doing this every day continuously for 2 weeks and are clearly determined to not stop. They will not stop editing this page to feature incorrect information despite being told why it is incorrect multiple times. If indefinite semi-protection is impossible then at least a multiple-month period of semi-protection is ideal though they would likely return once it was over. ThatPerson903 (talk) 07:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warned IP for edit warring. Had not been engaged on user talk. Watching.Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done 1 month auto confirmed.Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism, multiple IPs Jim1138 (talk) 09:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a recent vandal target based on edit history. 331dot (talk) 10:20, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dlohcierekim - Looks good - you set pending changes protection on the article for 1 month. If that was your intention, then you did so correctly. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 07:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A transfer which will happen in 2018, people of course adding it right now. Kante4 (talk) 17:13, 23 May 2017 (UTC) Done 2 days autoconfirmed.Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dennis Bratland (talk) 01:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)  Done 3 days autoconfirmed.Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Ymblanter (talk) 07:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism by different IPs/new users. Bennv3771 (talk) 05:04, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:18, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Repeated addition of unreliable source from a range of different IPs. Bakilas (talk) 07:09, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection I have seen unconstructive edits by annons on this page recently. Gary "Roach" Sanderson (talk) 00:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Rate of disruption isn't at a high enough level to justify protection at this time. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:31, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost every edit since March has been vandalism or reverting vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – long term vandalism target, but hasnt been protected in several years and likely not active enough for semi-protection. WNYY98 (talk) 01:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. WNYY98 (talk) 02:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:39, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:20, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Rate of disruption isn't high enough for me to justify protecting the page at this time. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued addition of unsourced content . Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 22:49, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:12, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued addition of unsourced content . Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 22:49, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:12, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create-protection: Repeatedly recreated by Bertrand101 socks. 38.96.9.224 (talk) 21:45, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I considered doing that, but w/ it unprotected, I always know where to look. It might make his creations harder to find.Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:02, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Again vandalism from unregistered users. Third time this article is being submitted for an indefinite semi-protection. This will keep reoccurring and vividly the article cannot be open for editing by unregistered users. The same unregistered user also made vulgar remarks on personal talk page. Oliszydlowski 00:51, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 00:57, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:52, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 01:49, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been constant vandalism on this page for years, and yet nothing has been done to contain it. Instead of doing a temporary protection as has been done in the past. Please place a permanent protection on this page. . Nhajivandi (talk) 20:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Indefinite full protection is not something we ever do, except for a very few unique pages like the Main Page. ‑ Iridescent 20:25, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Ravensfire (talk) 23:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism and edit warring with multiple IPs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - Mlpearc (open channel) 15:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Woody (talk) 17:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Recent move warring. Binksternet (talk) 16:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Recent move warring. Binksternet (talk) 16:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent, deliberate misgendering of non-binary subject by unconfirmed editors. (BLP article, should be subjection to discretionary sanctions for gender-related issues.) Funcrunch (talk) 17:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:34, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued removal of cited information by what seems to be company reps both logged in and out. Has been protected once before, edits resumed after it expired. 331dot (talk) 17:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The rate of disruption doesn't seem high enough to justify protection, but I will keep an eye on things and watch for further disruption... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated additions of (apparently) copyrighted lyrics; extended-confirmed might work better than semi if this meets the criteria. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2017

26 May 2017

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IPs (probably the same person) have been replacing sourced nickname with an unsourced one for several months now. Dee03 16:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:27, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued removal of cited content related to the company's legal issues by IPs and new accounts (potentially socks) after end of previous protection. RA0808 talkcontribs 17:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued attempts to add hoax information. Ravensfire (talk) 19:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:35, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. An IP keeps editing warring without even using the talk page on their profile or the page itself.Nikhilmn2002 (talk) 19:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:43, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Technical support scammers are targetting this article again - IPs and new users are repeatedly replacing the contents of the article with something that agrees with the story they tell scam victims over the phone. bonadea contributions talk 19:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated re-insertions of unsourced & unlikely content over past 2 days. : Noyster (talk), 19:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:51, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - persistent changing the atheism in the pie charts into dull colours, opposed to bright colors for religions, thus creating an intentional negative association with irreligon and replace recent data witch sources by old obsolete data by FrankCesco26 and JimRenge ~Hazelares~ 20:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a content dispute. Stop edit warring and work it out on the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 18:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:52, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:00, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed soon after protection expired. Everymorning (talk) 21:39, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:05, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed immediately after previous six-month protection expired. Gestrid (talk) 21:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:10, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amounts of ip based vandalism, due to ongoing political scandal. Winner 42 Talk to me! 00:05, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Risker. MelanieN (talk) 19:15, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has come under disruptive editing from a sole-IP account, who keeps adding and removing content that contravenes WP:ARBAA. Wes Wolf Talk 01:13, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Election is tomorrow, his opponent, Greg Gianforte just assaulted a reporter today and it is making international news. Best to do 48 hours semi just to tone down the vandals and drive-bys. Montanabw(talk) 03:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 124.84.84.220 (talk) 03:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:31, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dubious changes by dynamic IP hopper. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:39, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The same guy, different IPs, and its been a very long time of this, since 27-February. The IP always insist that this is a turkish bread and the word is turkish against all the sources. Then accuse others of racism.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 09:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi - Someone thought it would be a good idea to write an article about their company, and didn't consider that someone else might make a connection between it and a fairly major scandal. ...also... I may have created Leakgate (India), and I'm getting pretty tired of being pinged every few minutes because someone removed and the readded the wikilink. TimothyJosephWood 10:42, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, since I woke up to three successive reverts and notifications, and posted this this morning, nothing more has come of it. Unless it crops back up, this can probably just as well be declined. TimothyJosephWood 15:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indian institutes spammed with cellphone numbers

Semi-protection: IP-hopping socks of Rahul singh love keep spamming phone numbers into these articles; as per investigation by Usernamekiran, apparently commercial and/or malicious [41]. Galgotias University (same issue) already semi-protected by Oswah. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent disruptive editing, copyright violations and promo. The Banner talk 13:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much and too frequent vandalism, and because of that too much work for reviewers, for pending changes protection to be reasonable. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 15:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- John Reaves 17:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resumed when previous protection (and blocks) expired. — JJMC89(T·C) 16:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- John Reaves 17:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Just as at its namesake, Regional at Best. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Indefinitely, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disruption seems to have come from new (or new at the time) accounts. Let's start with semi- -- John Reaves 17:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent childish vandalism most probably in retaliation for the group's actions in the Marawi crisis. While I definitely don't support the group, the Maute group could probably care less and it makes it harder for everyone else to make an encyclopedia article.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 17:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 18:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 172.58.43.98 (talk) 17:46, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

26 May 2017

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 (talk) 04:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 14:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: There has been quite a bit of vandalism from unregistered users. I'd like some time to clean it up and hopefully remove the Avengers references. menaechmi (talk) 15:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 16:53, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP BLP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, repeat of January 2017 attacks that led to a 30 day block. Single individual is attacking multiple pages in addition to this one with non-sensible "low quality url" deletions.Thomas H. White (talk) 10:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since the edits are rather low frequency but nevertheless disruptive, Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding a not complete transfer. Kante4 (talk) 17:12, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Still more IP-vandalism directed at the subject.Crboyer (talk) 17:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:46, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lower to PC protection: Has been semi'd for a few years, so it would probably be a good idea to experiment with PC, without prejudice against reprotection if persistent vandalism resumes. Protecting admin has barely been active this year and has had only a handful of edits in 2017 so is unlikely to give an immediate response. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected and Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:49, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Player is the subject of transfer speculation and is attracting attention. OZOO 12:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Primefac. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article was previously semi-protected for a week due to additions of unsourced material and disruptive editing. Same disruption and the odd bit of vandalism has reoccurred in the last week or so. Requesting longer period of protection. Wes Wolf Talk 12:53, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected three weeks and Pending-changes protected three months. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long term issues with disruption, including many unsourced/poorly sourced additions. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected one year. After that expires we can evaluate whether indefinite semi-protection is needed. I did, however, extend the pending changes protection to indefinite. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP-hopping vandal leaving deceptive edit summaries. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 14:44, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 16:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. PUNKMINKIS (TALKYTALK) 15:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 16:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:54, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected one month and Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 16:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – hoax article repeatedly re-created under this title, Michael Angelo Oentardi, MX (Michael Angelo Oentardi), etc. Choosing to salt this one, as it's the title under which it went to AFD. Uncle Roy (talk) 07:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. While I think it's more a case of COI and shameless self-promotion of a NN artist than a hoax, I have salted all three pages. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 14:46, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Uncle Roy: Blocks usually work better than salting in cases like this, since we won't have watchlisted whichever title he decides to spam himself at next. The AFD'd version was about a different individual, too, FYI. —Cryptic 15:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense, thanks. Uncle Roy (talk) 15:21, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, especially today because of rumored release date. Melodies1917 (talk) 16:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 16:47, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Iloveartrock using Peru IPs. Binksternet (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see much evidence that they're using autoconfirmed accounts, so Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 16:44, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 09:59, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 14:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer speculation. Qed237 (talk) 10:49, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent targeting by promoters - page was previously semi protected but has been unprotected and within days promoters of Mumbai Film School are back Tip.Stall (talk) 11:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 14:49, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Player is currently the subject of increasing transfer speculation and is attracting regular attention from IP users. Kosack (talk) 11:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – repeat recreation by globally banned user. See [[42]] Widefox; talk 12:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 14:54, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Edit warring/content dispute with both registered/confirmed users and IP editors alike. Requesting full-protection for a temporary period of time (say, one or two weeks) to encourage all parties involved to discuss the issues/problems on the article's talkpage. 172.58.43.252 (talk) 21:25, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Edit warring/content dispute with both registered/confirmed users and IP editors alike. Requesting full-protection for a temporary period of time (say, one or two weeks) to encourage all parties involved to discuss the issues/problems on the article's talkpage. 172.58.43.252 (talk) 21:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. Thanks for reporting this; it was probably valid at the time, but it's been a while sicne the edit-warring ceased. Please re-report if problem resumes. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Old football season page, repeatedly vandalized. . Coderzombie (talk) 05:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mz7 (talk) 06:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. —MelbourneStartalk 09:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:23, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 06:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article is agitating undid revision from unregistered user and it try to edit not uniform discography. User:Zealous37 (talk) 1740, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 04:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 05:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Enigmaman. Mz7 (talk) 06:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent additions of unverified URLs that are almost certainly scam/phishing sites. I've long held the opinion that articles about dark web-related sites (e.g. Tor hidden services) should be indefinitely semi-protected. So many of them are subject to frequent attempts to change these URLs to scam sites which endanger our readers every time it happens. Tor hidden services, etc. have no central authority like the rest of the web, making hacking, phishing, hijacking, etc. a big problem for a website that wants to ensure the integrity of its content. This article has seen some particularly active editing by a variety of new users (protecting admin may also wish to block this sock farm), and I'm requesting indefinite protection, though I realize standard operating procedure would be to make it temporary... — Rhododendrites talk \\ 22:17, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Looking into the sockfarm now. Mz7 (talk) 03:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhododendrites: You're right, there are a lot of single-purpose accounts here. I've filed an SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GramsTeam with what I found. Most of them look like WP:DUCKs but there are a few anomalies. Mz7 (talk) 04:23, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Great. Nothing really to add to the SPI, so will just watchlist it. Thanks for being thorough. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Mz7 (talk) 04:38, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 123.136.112.75 (talk) 03:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Mz7 (talk) 04:38, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: --78.95.47.33 (talk) 19:27, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. No reason given, and anyhow this is not the place to request unprotection of this redirect. Make your request on the talk page of NawlinWiki, the administrator who protected it. MelanieN (talk) 22:05, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from unregistered users over the past four days. --Parkfly20 (talk) 20:05, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. I see lots of edits by unregistered users at that page, but the vast majority appear to be constructive. --MelanieN (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article is getting changed with false information over and over again. Please lock it for some time User:Zealous37 (talk) 22:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Mz7 (talk) 03:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unkownzero. Sro23 (talk) 01:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Mz7 (talk) 03:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP user with different mac addresses has been reverting my edits to the page. The user removed content from the infobox without leaving an explanation. I have left notes on the talk pages, but didn't get any response.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 01:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 03:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Target of User:Jaredgk2008 socks who frequently make it to auto-confirmed status. Sro23 (talk) 01:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:43, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Please refer to recent edits below highlighting vandalism of this wiki page:

(cur | prev) 12:48, 25 May 2017‎ Beshogur (talk | contribs)‎ . . (22,729 bytes) (-7)‎ . . (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 12:38, 25 May 2017‎ 37.210.245.100 (talk)‎ . . (22,736 bytes) (-74)‎ . . (ended of martial law in mindanao) (undo) (cur | prev) 12:37, 25 May 2017‎ 37.210.245.100 (talk)‎ . . (22,810 bytes) (-18)‎ . . (undo) (cur | prev) 12:35, 25 May 2017‎ 37.210.245.100 (talk)‎ . . (22,828 bytes) (+21)‎ . . (philippine army hasbeen surrender) (undo) (cur | prev) 12:34, 25 May 2017‎ 37.210.245.100 (talk)‎ . . (22,807 bytes) (+5)‎ . . (Philippine government surrender) (undo) (cur | prev) 12:33, 25 May 2017‎ 37.210.245.100 (talk)‎ . . (22,802 bytes) (+61)‎ . . (Philippine government surrender) (undo) (cur | prev) 12:25, 25 May 2017‎ 37.210.245.100 (talk)‎ . . (22,741 bytes) (+23)‎ . . (military m113 has been captured by maute group) (undo). Agila81 (talk) 13:19, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. As a brand-new current event this article is being heavily edited by many users and needs watching, but I don't see a pattern of vandalism sufficient to justify protection. Note that the name of the article has been changed to Marawi crisis. MelanieN (talk) 19:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Due to the reports about the investigation, the article is experiencing a high level of disruption from unregistered accounts. . K.e.coffman (talk) 01:21, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Reluctant to indefinitely semi-protect, in the spirit of open editing. However, appreciate that the subject will still be notable (and probably a vandalism target) in three months, so please do re-report if the vandalism resumes post-August. Euryalus (talk) 01:37, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Well I've removed an unsourced content, an user keep reverting my edits. Beshogur (talk) 19:23, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 18:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 19:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 23:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 19:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP address keeps on editing the page. Changing what has been set. For example, the IP changes the background color of the cell even there is a color that is set to it. It is annoying that I have to edit it back. I hope you could give protection on the article for IP address edits for 3 months. Thank you very much. Leo kingston (talk) 01:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 19:26, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Has been protected several times before for long periods of time for the same reason. The TV Boy (talk · contribs) 18:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can this article please have a break from its childish and recurrent vandals? Thanks. DBaK (talk) 20:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and disruptive editing recently by various IP and new registered editors. Some examples are: [43], [44], [45], [46] and [47].

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note that the article is also move-protected because of move-warring. MelanieN (talk) 22:15, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IPs (probably the same person) have been replacing sourced nickname with an unsourced one for several months now. Dee03 16:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:27, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued removal of cited content related to the company's legal issues by IPs and new accounts (potentially socks) after end of previous protection. RA0808 talkcontribs 17:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued attempts to add hoax information. Ravensfire (talk) 19:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:35, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. An IP keeps editing warring without even using the talk page on their profile or the page itself.Nikhilmn2002 (talk) 19:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:43, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Technical support scammers are targetting this article again - IPs and new users are repeatedly replacing the contents of the article with something that agrees with the story they tell scam victims over the phone. bonadea contributions talk 19:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated re-insertions of unsourced & unlikely content over past 2 days. : Noyster (talk), 19:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:51, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - persistent changing the atheism in the pie charts into dull colours, opposed to bright colors for religions, thus creating an intentional negative association with irreligon and replace recent data witch sources by old obsolete data by FrankCesco26 and JimRenge ~Hazelares~ 20:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a content dispute. Stop edit warring and work it out on the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 18:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:52, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:00, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed soon after protection expired. Everymorning (talk) 21:39, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:05, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed immediately after previous six-month protection expired. Gestrid (talk) 21:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:10, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amounts of ip based vandalism, due to ongoing political scandal. Winner 42 Talk to me! 00:05, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Risker. MelanieN (talk) 19:15, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has come under disruptive editing from a sole-IP account, who keeps adding and removing content that contravenes WP:ARBAA. Wes Wolf Talk 01:13, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Election is tomorrow, his opponent, Greg Gianforte just assaulted a reporter today and it is making international news. Best to do 48 hours semi just to tone down the vandals and drive-bys. Montanabw(talk) 03:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 124.84.84.220 (talk) 03:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:31, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dubious changes by dynamic IP hopper. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:39, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The same guy, different IPs, and its been a very long time of this, since 27-February. The IP always insist that this is a turkish bread and the word is turkish against all the sources. Then accuse others of racism.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 09:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi - Someone thought it would be a good idea to write an article about their company, and didn't consider that someone else might make a connection between it and a fairly major scandal. ...also... I may have created Leakgate (India), and I'm getting pretty tired of being pinged every few minutes because someone removed and the readded the wikilink. TimothyJosephWood 10:42, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, since I woke up to three successive reverts and notifications, and posted this this morning, nothing more has come of it. Unless it crops back up, this can probably just as well be declined. TimothyJosephWood 15:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indian institutes spammed with cellphone numbers

Semi-protection: IP-hopping socks of Rahul singh love keep spamming phone numbers into these articles; as per investigation by Usernamekiran, apparently commercial and/or malicious [48]. Galgotias University (same issue) already semi-protected by Oswah. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent disruptive editing, copyright violations and promo. The Banner talk 13:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much and too frequent vandalism, and because of that too much work for reviewers, for pending changes protection to be reasonable. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 15:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- John Reaves 17:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resumed when previous protection (and blocks) expired. — JJMC89(T·C) 16:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- John Reaves 17:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Just as at its namesake, Regional at Best. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Indefinitely, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disruption seems to have come from new (or new at the time) accounts. Let's start with semi- -- John Reaves 17:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent childish vandalism most probably in retaliation for the group's actions in the Marawi crisis. While I definitely don't support the group, the Maute group could probably care less and it makes it harder for everyone else to make an encyclopedia article.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 17:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 18:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 172.58.43.98 (talk) 17:46, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

27 May 2017

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Wikidesctruction vandal. 115.164.53.132 (talk) 12:40, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by a fan of Comilla (recently protected for the same issue), ongoing since at least 13:13, 18 May 2017. Batternut (talk) 12:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from recently created accounts and IP addresses. Adamgerber80 (talk) 16:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:02, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of unnecessary plot details (see WP:PLOTSUM & WP:VG/CONTENT) by a dynamic IP. Sakretsu (talk) 17:27, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:04, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This bridge got inaugrated recently. Seems all kind of editing is being done now with no heed to WP:NPOV or WP:SECONDARY . Two week duration should be sufficient. . Devopam (talk) 10:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Some of the edits by IPs/New editors are actually constructive, and I'd rather not lock them out. Vanamonde (talk) 11:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. DantODB (talk) 06:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumption of disruption after expiry of previous protection. Contentious topic, disruption is not likely to die down soon. . Vanamonde (talk) 07:11, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption isn't frequent enough or recent enough for semi-protection. Let's see what PC can do. MelanieN (talk) 19:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vanamonde (talk) 07:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:10, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 11:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 03:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 11:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent edit warring. Jim1138 (talk) 06:24, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 11:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 07:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Vanamonde (talk) 11:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. 1.618033 goldensqᴉɹʇuoɔ 19:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. Linguisttalk|contribs 19:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 220.107.26.81 (talk) 23:53, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit-warring by IPs, both suspected socks of Janagewen (reported.) Jeh (talk) 01:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:29, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 03:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:36, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long term issues with unsourced/speculative additions. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:54, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template editor protection: High-use template, recently Lua-ified from Template:Respell, which is already protected. Nardog (talk) 19:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same person changing IP addresses to mess with filmography. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 23:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Israelis

Indefinite 30/500 protection: Arbitration enforcement. 209.249.5.130 (talk) 23:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 21:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:24, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The same unsourced claims added by anons 202.134.11.148 (now blocked) and IP neighbours 202.134.14.145 and 202.134.11.137) and new accounts since 15 May 2017. Batternut (talk) 21:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:22, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users disputing sources. Jennica / talk 22:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:21, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

University of Georgia

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal from 107.77.*.* (AT&T Mobility LLC). Need either protection or a range block. Murph9000 (talk) 22:12, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Both articles.) AlexiusHoratius 02:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. Dennis Bratland (talk) 23:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:16, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 09:22, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP users been getting persistent recently. 1.618033 goldensqᴉɹʇuoɔ 19:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Indefinite. What happened, is that this article had been semi-protected for 3 years. As soon as that expired, which was March 2017, vandalism resumed. That being the case, I indefed this. — Maile (talk) 00:09, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP user/sockpuppet. Farolif (talk) 00:22, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 00:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

28 May 2017

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero. --Lanwi1 (talk) 15:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indef. AlexiusHoratius 03:19, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero. --Lanwi1 (talk) 15:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indef. AlexiusHoratius 03:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sargon of Akkad/Carl Benjamin featured this page in a YouTube video and people are flocking over to cause disruption. Snowstormer (T | C) 19:05, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Swarm 05:11, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated POV or unsourced additions. . Sjö (talk) 08:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Philip J Fry (talk) 17:38, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – and adding unsourced content. Brojam (talk) 18:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 05:00, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Non IP-account abuse WP:SOCK. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 04:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 04:54, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Wikidesctruction vandal. Destiny Leo (talk) 09:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 19:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent genre warring from IPs. Destiny Leo (talk) 09:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:02, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Qed237 (talk) 10:11, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:03, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Grayfell (talk) 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 22:06, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just came off protection yesterday, already getting tons of vandalism. This will likely continue throughout Donald Trump's time in office if not protected. WNYY98 (talk) 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Euryalus (talk) 22:06, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

29 May 2017

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping editor keeps adding a non notable person. Everymorning (talk) 19:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 21:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent BLP violating edits by IP address; bad sourcing mostly; also UNDUE and clear POV Jytdog (talk) 20:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Enigmamsg 21:35, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Last protection of 2 days didn't seem to had any effect. The TV Boy (talk · contribs) 20:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Enigmamsg 21:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Not sure why is exgtended confirmed . Flow 234 (Nina) talk 10:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eh... Looks like it was ECd by User:Maile66 because ArbCom, in their myopic wisdom decided we should indefinitely protect a few dozen thousand articles related to the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. TimothyJosephWood 10:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it was because of ArbCom. Prior to this, there had been numerous other protections of the article going back a year. The ArbCom protection on it now is because of this :originating RPP, my talk page discussion on this, RFPP discussion, Arb discussion. I did it by the book, according to this from NeilN. There has been the post-protection argument, "The country of Jordan is older than the conflict. Jordan is a high level article and it is not "relating to the Arab–Israeli conflict", and something along the lines that Jorden just happens to be "a country in the region". For all of those thoughts, please refer to 1948 Arab–Israeli War, Six-Day War and Timeline of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (post-mandate period to present day). The article was protected per ArbCom's decision on articles related to countries involved in that conflict, and the historical record puts Jordan as a major player. — Maile (talk) 20:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, per Maile66's reasoning. Primefac (talk) 17:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism problem, but edited infrequently enough where PC could still work. WNYY98 (talk) 15:43, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Enigmamsg 21:12, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Team recently secured promotion to premier league. See also abuse log. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Enigmaman. I protected this myself hours ago. Enigmamsg 21:11, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:51, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of until after the premier, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 21:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection request for this article which has had numerous IP edits, often with non-English content, with unsourced or weakly sourced material. Suggest 2 days. --Zefr (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – In https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mohabbat_Khawab_Safar&oldid=781816859, unsourced content was edited so I want to temporary protect page so that it can get rid of such unsourced contents. International Editor Shah (talk) 13:48, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 13:54, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Not a notable organization. Repeatedly recreated by the users of organization. Coderzombie (talk) 16:49, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 16:50, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 17:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 17:32, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and hoax edits by Dan Joshua B. Apura IP sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  05:20, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Preemptive Request due to this being an ongoing, politically-charged issue. Developments in the issue could trigger vandalism. Thank you! --Popcrate (talk) 09:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Popcrate: Not disagreeing that this won't be a target of political vandalism, but as of yet I can't see anything in the recent history which warrants a page protection. We very rarely do pre-emptive protection, as it prevents people from legitimately editing articles. I've added the article to my watchlist, and will apply page protection when I start seeing vandalism (though please do re-request here!). I'm not declining this request as of yet, and would welcome another administrator to review this request for pre-emptive protection -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 09:32, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Page seems to be the target of a person or persons(IP addressses vary) who feel that the number of awards/nominations listed is too low, but they offer no sources for a different number, and tend to resort to personal attacks to make their points. 331dot (talk) 09:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and hoax radio station edits by User:Bertrand101 IP sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias (T)(C) 09:13, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 73.21.220.82 (talk) 03:59, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias (T)(C) 09:14, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block-evading IPs back at it with harassment and borderline personal attacks almost immediately after previous protection for the same reason expired. A longer protection than before should be applied. Amaury (talk | contribs) 07:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:58, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For a couple of days supporters of a fringe researcher have been making false claims in this article. However, today this escalated with a claim that someone who could be identified because their official position was named had made death threat against this researcher. I've rev/del'd this as it was so obvious, but as I've edited the article I don't think I should protect it. Doug Weller talk 10:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:49, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero. --Lanwi1 (talk) 04:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 09:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero. --Lanwi1 (talk) 04:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 09:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero. --Lanwi1 (talk) 04:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 09:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 09:40, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by people with vested interests who want to change the information one to show things that didn't happen - 4 times today alone. . NicklausAU (talk) 05:27, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:43, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User persistently reverting to made up page (probably about themselves) on different IP addresses (two accounts also blocked). KylieTastic (talk) 09:08, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 09:11, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Page is getting a good amount of vandalism in the last hours. GoPurple'nGold24 09:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 09:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Champions League

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption for this WP:TOOSOON had it deleted. Now it has been restored by a bot as a redirect, which it should be, so it deserves good protection from recreation. Qed237 (talk) 09:45, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – A lot of disruption and vandalism for an article with many links to it. Should be protected as a redirect. . Qed237 (talk) 09:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Related requests merged. Note also the hyphen vs. dash in the title. Murph9000 (talk) 14:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 04:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
15:58, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. - only six transclusions Mifter (talk) 04:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism / personal attacks using information that is already present under the personal life section of ht entry. Kentpollard (talk) 19:11, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Mifter (talk) 04:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 04:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 07:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm personally not sure this comes close enough to the modern Arab-Israeli conflict to be encompassed within the Arb sanctions as its only sourced connection is the remark of a single scholar. As the article has not seen any recent disruption, and has less than 50 edits in nearly five years I am erring on the side of that we are an open encyclopedia that anyone can edit and declining the protection (I also suspect the fact that this request has sat for nearly two days reflects the hesitancy of other patrolling admins to protect the page due to its tenuous connection to the sanctions.) Mifter (talk) 04:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by atleast 4 different IPs, besides two new editors, with a new IP coming up after each warning. . Jupitus Smart 06:53, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by ipsocks of Bigshowandkane64. General Ization Talk 00:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This will be the fourth time that I have had to request that this article be semi-protected, due to frequent and unrelenting disruptive edits from unregistered editors. When semi-protection was last requested, it was due to no sources being cited by these unregistered editors, but now it's mainly unimportant and trivial information coupled with very poor grammar and sources that are not always reliable. Attempts have been made to reason with this person (I believe the edits are coming from the same person, as they all come from the same geolocation), but despite messages to the talk pages in several of this person's IPs and in edit revert summaries, he's not getting the message. It's also difficult because in addition to using non-mobile IPs, he primarily edits with a mobile device, which adds another layer of difficulty with monitoring and messaging him, which is pointless because he never responds to messages anyway. These edits happen sporadically every few days and are also done in such a way that the edits overlap, making them difficult to revert. When you observe the article's history, you'll see a wall of unregistered edits, with a large chunk of them being reverted with similar reasons given for each revert. The article currently has GA status and if he were allowed to continue unimpeded (and someone like me was not here to police him), the article's quality will eventually be downgraded. I don't want that to happen, and I'm tired of having to monitor this article every single day to keep that from happening. The last semi-protection period for this article was six months in length, but this unregistered editor is just going to immediately continue to disruptively edit the moment the protection period ends, as he did with the previous one, so indefinite semi-protection is desirable. Jackdude101 (talk) 01:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Anon vandals keep on replacing the subject's photo with Ai-Ai Delas Alas' picture. See 1, 2 for evidence. WayKurat (talk) 01:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Immediately after previous protection expired, the socks are back . Sro23 (talk) 21:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bongwarrior. -Mifter (talk) 05:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Most edits are unconstructive edits and reversion. Long-term abuse.  Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 22:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Mifter (talk) 05:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. SLBedit (talk) 23:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 05:07, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Target of "get to philosophy" game. Just plain Bill (talk) 23:13, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 20 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 05:08, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has long-standing history of persistent vandalism by way of adding unsourced or poorly sourced content to article. livelikemusic talk! 23:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 05:13, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistant dirsruptive editing, nearly all edits in the past month have been either reverts or reverted. — IVORK Discuss 23:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 05:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Increase in protection requested. Current edit warring amongst autoconfirmed users. - Bri (talk) 01:10, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Edit-warring user has been blocked for 31 hours. If problems recur, consult the blocking admin. MelanieN (talk) 23:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes isn't working, needs permanent semi. Montanabw(talk) 03:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Actually, indef PC seems the ideal protection for this article, which experiences recurrent but infrequent vandalism. MelanieN (talk) 23:58, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term protection requested: IPs repeatedly (as in often several times a day) entering fake higher numbers for GDP etc. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 10:10, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 04:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article maybe in vandalism period as it is released fresh, maybe for box-office collections, cast names etc. Requested protection for same. SuperHero👊 16:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 04:41, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Probably needs longer term disruptive editing protection based on history. Seems to be a long running edit war over multiple accounts and IPs. -- Dane talk 18:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Primefac. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Unexplained and unsourced addition and removal of contents. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 19:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 4 fortnights, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 04:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – List of users and IP addresses that have contributed vandalism to this page, without citing sources:

- Dassault555 - Beshogur - 37.210.245.100 IP address. Agila81 (talk) 22:23, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I think this is because the subject is on the main page as "In the news".(Non-administrator comment) Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 22:24, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's possible the article might still need protection because of its prominence, so ask again if vandalism becomes a problem. Right now I don't see much vandalism, and I do see constructive editing from unregistered users. MelanieN (talk) 23:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As soon as the previous page protection expired, a disruptive IP hopper has returned to re-add his original research against the consensus on the talk page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 02:53, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Well meaning but misguided use of userspace. The topic will never meet GNG. . Legacypac (talk) 20:13, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This looks more like a candidate for CSD. The only edit since the user created it in 2011, was a 2012 bot edit. — Maile (talk) 22:54, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeat recreations by globally banned user's socks. As per en: Benutzer:Schmitty , Stuart Styron , de: Stuart Styron, simple en: Stuart Styron. Widefox; talk 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Indef — Maile (talk) 00:53, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated attempts to add promotional and unsourced information by recently blocked sock. IP has returned making same edit. As they have proved persistent, protection is to prevent further disruption by this editor. Ravensfire (talk) 02:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Re-report if this continues with different IPs -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism for 3 weeks by 71.208.0.0/16. An admin on WP:AIV was reluctant to block a /16 so suggested page protection. --ChiveFungi (talk) 14:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. All articles semi-protected for a month, except main article, which was already semi-protected thru 6/27. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 02:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People keep on vandalizing this article changing her name and not providing a source . HardcoreWrestlingFan 17:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. All articles semi-protected for a month. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 02:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's been fixed now. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 02:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by dynamic IPs. Sundostund (talk) 19:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like some disagreement over images which is being discussed at the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 20:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, transfer rumour and test edits. Matthew_hk tc 06:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguisttalk|contribs 07:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – all individual players pages...high level of vandalism from user Qed 237. Persistent removal of sourced stats. Steviechips (talk) 08:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing, persistent and high level of vandalism from user Qed 237 including the individual players' pages he mentioned above. Reverting sourced stats in the infobox had become as business as usual for him. He wanted to take over the place. Stevie 09:00, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Already protected. MelanieN (talk) 00:39, 29 May 2017 (UTC) The article is already indefinitely semi-protected. MelanieN (talk) 00:39, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IP's. Adamgerber80 (talk) 01:56, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There has been a high percentage of inappropriate IP edits for this article for the past few weeks. Dolotta (talk) 02:28, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all edits are vandalism and its removal. WNYY98 (talk) 03:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:00, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP(s) making trolling edits against consensus, same IP(s) are currently at SPI Pincrete (talk) 23:23, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SPI case was closed as original source IP was too old for identity verification. Koncorde (talk) 00:45, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism by IP socks of long-indef'd editor (SPI report here). Jeh (talk) 01:45, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ian.thomson. MelanieN (talk) 23:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same as last March. One IP trying to run the place. SlightSmile 01:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: I use this wiki page for info on when the next set of Naruto Shippuden episodes are released and I have been using it for several years. See, beginning in January of 2016, Viz Media began releasing a set of ten to twelve episodes every ten weeks, so I have been using this page in order to know when to catch them. Today I logged on and all the dates on this page along with all the dates on Seasons 1 through 20 for the entire show were changed to week intervals. I had to spend about an hour changing it back. I would like them all protected at least until new dates on future episodes need to be added. LordShozin (talk) 03:30, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ GB fan 12:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero. --Lanwi1 (talk) 15:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent nationalist POV pushing. This has been going on for years. The offending edits are pretty obvious so pending changes might be the answer. : Noyster (talk), 21:22, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Indef. — Maile (talk) 20:42, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Eagleash (talk) 23:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IPs. Practically every edit over the past month has been vandalism. Prefall 00:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:47, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 08:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – It's getting very very boring dealing with the humourists and their incessant Paul Ryan references. It is obviously A Thing - try this search and you'll see why. Can this article please have a long long break? PP for a few days at a time is not really working. And I just guessed at what to request now so please feel free to change it to something better! Thanks. . DBaK (talk) 09:54, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Olidog (talk) 10:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:12, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Should be protected with status quo (without the honour). Qed237 (talk) 19:58, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - A considerable amount of vandalism in the month of May. The public logs also shows a long history of persistent vandalism. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 20:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently going through repeated vandalism attempts from multiple accounts. Nat Gertler (talk) 20:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:42, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Debresser (talk) 20:28, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Frequent vandalism - Currently being vandalized by numerous users to due CHON's Facebook fan group. Necrossady (talk) 20:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (I think this report got removed in an edit conflict FYI) -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:54, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent edit-warring by unconfirmed accounts and unregistered editors to add unsourced content. MPS1992 (talk) 20:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated antisemitic vandalism by IPs. RolandR (talk) 21:10, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There have been a number of recent cases of vandalism to the article, a few of which have not been caught by ClueBot, probably due to Kahoot's prevalence in schools. Arzg (talk) 21:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

30 May 2017

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguisttalk|contribs 16:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep adding which are not sourced. Amdmustafa (talk) 20:44, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:40, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – recent multiple layers of vandalism by new users. d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 20:52, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:41, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 14:47, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's a disambiguation page. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism, article is already move-protected but a semi might need to be added. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:25, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There is the usual sort of heated content disputes and borderline edit warring, but I'm not seeing much in the form of deliberate WP:DE. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of anon edits that need reverting. JMHamo (talk) 19:47, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 20:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Inadequately referenced (and often speculative) changes continue even after indefinite semi-protection. If ECP isn't indefinite, then indefinite semi-protection should be restored immediately after ECP ends. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indef would be going too far. Honestly even EC should not be needed; if newish accounts are adding unsourced content, warn them, and then report them. Vanamonde (talk) 04:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have extended the protection period to 1 month, so that it is beyond the release date of the album. I think we can expect disruptive editing to increase up to that point. I will have another look at the article at some point between the release and the end of that month and change the protection back to indefinite semi. Yaris678 (talk) 08:27, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2018 and 2019 in film

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IPs adding questionable or false material, a persistent problem on all of the "(future year) in film" articles. Trivialist (talk) 10:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring by a new editor and 2-3 IP's over the last 24-48 hrs. Also see this DRN request which was denied on protocol. Yashovardhan (talk) 18:27, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A confirmed user keeps changing the number and results of the awards the group has won. Multiple edits have been published by User:Welcometothenewmillenium. De88 (talk) 19:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Excuse me but I'll let you know I was trying to help the page article and correct it's errors and mistakes. Please, do not put the blame on me as I'm only helping and contributing to the article. The auto-confirmed user that kept making changes to the article and changes all of the group's awards to won was not made by me it was made by another user that's unidentified. So, please learn who you are calling out the next time you point the finger at someone! As you can see I already made a complaint about the craziness of the changes to the page. If you want to semi-protect it that's fine but don't blame me for the vandalism. Thank you! What's up everybody and welcome to my page!

Welcometothenewmillennium 14:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---WeLcOmEtOtHenEwMiLlEnIuM (Talk) 14:33, 30 May 2017 (UCT)

    • So then who is the user responsible for the vandalism? I see your username along with another IP but none of the edits have the changes where I can just revert them. I am trying to get this article to GA status but these edits won't help do that at all. It would be helpful to know who is the user messing around with this page. User:Welcometothenewmillenium De88 (talk)
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:49, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK I've semi protected the article for 24 hrs. The edit warring needs to stop. Take this discussion to the talk page and make sure to ping all involved parties. If there is deliberate vandalism that can be handled at AIV. (FYI I am traveling so I may not respond quickly to any messages directed to me.) -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:52, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I understand your concern but don't blame or point fingers until you actually know who did the vandalizing. If you caught on to my IP address edits those were errors I was trying to fix in the article and then not long after I edited the page another user came and un did everything. So, everyone's edits were changed as you can see. I was only trying to help it not create havoc. Unfortunately, I cannot identify the person as the address is not clear and unknown. I wish I knew who it was and if I do happen to know I will most definitely notify you. I only help articles not break them. Going back to your complaint about it being semi-protected or going to GA status. I feel as though it should be left up to a vote. Everyone should make that decision not just one person. That's all thanks for your concern. Welcometothenewmillennium 14:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---WeLcOmEtOtHenEwMiLlEnIuM (Talk) 14:57, 30 May 2017 (CST)

    • By the way, I hope your happy because I did your homework for you. I tracked down the user and found it's IP address. User talk:177.72.193.205 -- That's the user you need to contront not me. No need to do so anyway because the user has already been confronted and told no and been warned if it happens again their account will be terminated. ---WeLcOmEtOtHenEwMiLlEnIuM (Talk) 15:18, 30 May 2017 (CST)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. DoABarrelRoll.dev(Constable of the WikiPolice) 16:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Quasar G. 16:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:13, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple IP and new users adding variations of "Joseph Kargbo Jr." to either the founder or notable artists sections. Random character sequence (talk) 17:55, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 18:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism from user under various IPs and fresh accounts. Nat Gertler (talk) 13:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:59, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sagecandor (talk) 14:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Edgar181. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP edit warring. Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 15:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:08, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs resumed after last protection expired. James (talk/contribs) 16:13, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring. Addition of text should be status quo revision. Opencooper (talk) 06:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by Vianello. — Maile (talk) 12:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and unsourced controversial content. Matthew_hk tc 10:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The page protection was expired on 29 May, since then vandal return. Seem the page need longer protection. Matthew_hk tc 14:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 16:30, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request Indefinite Semi-protection: Repeated disruptive edits by anonymous user (or users) regarding a false and unverifiable AFC recipient named Jay Fracek-Rubin since Aug. 2015. Repeated deletions of the false recipient only sees them returned or undone. False information is always accompanied by a broken-link citation. Anonymous users have also attempted to delete talk page discussions regarding the false information. Heavydpj (talk) 12:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Player is currently the subject of increasing transfer speculation and is attracting regular attention from IP users. Kosack (talk) 12:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Player is currently the subject of increasing transfer speculation and is attracting regular attention from IP users. Kosack (talk) 12:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Recent protection expired and problems continue.Ad Orientem (talk) 16:52, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing.HAAKO8 (talk) 18:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 21:23, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – most recent edits are ip vandalism and its removal. WNYY98 (talk) 06:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi () 06:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:44, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 04:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Enigmamsg 05:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 07:49, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 10:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users and new editors. THE DIAZ talkcontribs 09:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. The vandalism goes back a long way. Yaris678 (talk) 09:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: High level of IP vandalism. Iñaki (Talk page)01:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 04:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Mifter (talk) 04:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism problem, but edited infrequently enough for PC to be effective. WNYY98 (talk) 04:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde (talk) 04:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi () 06:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Lordtobi: Why indefinite protection? Lectonar (talk) 08:46, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FA Cup and football players

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:22, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. It appears that the vast majority of edits to the FA Cup article by IPs are productive, and vandalism does not appear to be an enormous problem. MelanieN (talk) 20:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of dynamic IP sock. Qed237 (talk) 19:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've merged these related requests, to try to help with the current backlog. Murph9000 (talk) 14:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This applies to all the player articles except Gareth Barry. That article is under indefinite PC protection which appears to be doing the job. MelanieN (talk) 20:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, bot. Yes, I know. It can be confusing when I put more than one action on a page. Don't worry about it, go ahead and archive. Good bot. --MelanieN (talk) 00:03, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 06:32, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing (addition of unsourced content) by user 96.2.127.20. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Enigmamsg 01:22, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 01:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. There was a fair bit of activity away back on May 10 and before, but apparently only one edit since then. However, please re-report if more active vandalism resumes - sports player articles can be a magnet for these things. Euryalus (talk) 01:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs adding altering box office earnings without sources. Editor5454 (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing.

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism . — Chevvin 02:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 02:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Clear case of page being recreated by PR agency and sockpuppets. Coderzombie (talk) 03:59, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 04:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long term vandalism, a large percentage of edits are vandalism/removal. WNYY98 (talk) 04:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Vanamonde (talk) 04:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined One IP vandalized it in the past couple of months. Enigmamsg 21:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent wp:vandalism Groiglery1217 (talk) 18:41, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigmamsg 21:23, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations. 45.123.197.254 (talk) 19:54, 29 May 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Declined Enigmamsg 21:27, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Grayfell (talk) 00:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 01:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Recent history is nothing but vandalism/reverts. WNYY98 (talk) 04:17, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philip J Fry (talk) 22:28, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:00, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hunter Strickland and Bryce Harper

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP and new users due to news event on 29 May 2017. Jaufrec (talk) 23:48, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Enigmamsg 00:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edits contrary to MOS:CREDENTIAL.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 12:49, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from IP address after warning given to user PerfectlyIrrational. Likely logged-out user and or sockpuppet of user PerfectlyIrrational as form of socking. . Sagecandor (talk) 15:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. and Template:Alt-right footer. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Newbies are constantly moving the article, Thanks,. –Davey2010Talk 22:03, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:14, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant thanks as always :), –Davey2010Talk 22:51, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

31 May 2017

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most edits since removal of indefinite semiprotection have been vandalism/reverts. WNYY98 (talk) 06:42, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is an edit war that has been taking place since May 24 and has recently picked up quite a bit within the last 48 hours. The edit war is between two users and an I.P., none of which have taken it to the talk page as one suggested. Users edit warring are: I.P. 24.131.53.212, KillerFrosty, and SeminoleNation. Please fully protect this article until they can use the talk page to obtain a consensus. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 20:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And I'm sorely, sorely tempted to place edit warring blocks all around. Katietalk 21:48, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Player is currently the subject of increasing transfer speculation and is attracting regular attention from IP users. Kosack (talk) 21:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:34, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

University of Georgia

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from 10.77.*.* (AT&T Mobility LLC). Previous protection has only just expired. Needs a longer period of protection, and/or a range block of the IPs. Murph9000 (talk) 21:32, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I looked into a rangeblock over the individual IP blocks placed by Zzuuzz but there's too much collateral – pretty dynamic range. Katietalk 21:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: This article seems to be under indefinite semi-protection. I am asking if it can be downgraded to pending changes. It appears that the article could use help from unregistered users. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retain the protection please to avoid edit wars and possible vandalism on a sensitive topic. We would rather invite unregistered members to come onboard and do editing after they understand Wiki protocols. Devopam (talk) 10:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce the protection to indefinite pending changes, please. The article needs help. — Tyler Durden (talk) 12:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have you asked the protecting admin, EdJohnston, as you are required to do? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:48, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined As the protecting admin does not reply....the long list of protections, including some full protections, and a after re-read of the talk-page archives...I conclude that in this case the bad would outweigh the good; the topic is simply too contentious. Should any other admin want to downgrade to pending-changes, go ahead. Lectonar (talk) 15:44, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: It might be worth it to try de-protecting this article, given that the incidents which caused the original protection are "long over" in Internet terms. Izno (talk) 22:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kingpin13? --NeilN talk to me 14:14, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try some middle ground here; I will watchlist. Lectonar (talk) 21:38, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Ongoing addition of unsourced content. SLBedit (talk) 16:34, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:22, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism across multiple days. El cid, el campeador (talk) 16:57, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated BLP-violations by IP-hopper (adding fake death date and death place, starting before the date of supposed death...) on John Green (author). See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bsnwisbr‎. . - Tom | Thomas.W talk 17:51, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Her date of birth had been vandalised. Plum3600 (talk) 22:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Plum3600 One IP has been blocked and I see no source for either claimed birthplace. NeilN talk to me 13:58, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP and new editor claiming to be the article's subject is persistently removing sourced information. AussieLegend () 05:29, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Now at WP:BLPN NeilN talk to me 13:48, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lots of unsourced or personal opinions added by IP and low-ranking users. TropicAces (talk) 11:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)tropicaces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @TropicAces:...pray say: what is a "low-ranking user"? Lectonar (talk) 15:34, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar like users with only a few dozen edits and don't have a set up page. A lot of the time their edits are more distributive than not. Maybe there's a term for it, besides someone who isn't an "extended confirmed user", just my observations... TropicAces (talk) 17:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]
@TropicAces:...yes, the term is "inexperienced"; and disruptive they might appear, but many are just a little clueless and hopelessly lost in the jungle of Wikipedia. So..a little dose of assuming good faith might not be amiss. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 17:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

temporary full-protection: - Currently many heated emotions concerning this person. Vandalism from user accounts. --BabbaQ (talk) 13:07, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done BabbaQ, the article is semi-protected. If autoconfirmed editors are violating BLP they should be reported and blocked. NeilN talk to me 13:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit rate too high for PC, long protection log. WNYY98 (talk) 01:32, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The protection log may be long, but before the 3 days semiprotection in April 2017, the last protection was in 2010(!) Lectonar (talk) 15:23, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: There have been edits that disrupts formatting and content since removal of semi protection. jmarkfrancia (talk) 07:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- AlexTW 11:39, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:35, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Bennv3771 (talk) 13:58, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:06, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JTP (talkcontribs) 14:24, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:36, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 15:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:36, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – increase in vandalism in last few days. WNYY98 (talk) 01:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:00, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism target, recent uptick. WNYY98 (talk) 01:37, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:55, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of unreferenced/dubious content by IP and newly registered users. Bluesphere 10:25, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:50, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Blue Edits (talk) 10:42, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:46, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced changes to BLP. Qed237 (talk) 11:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:44, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 11:54, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:39, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by various IP-users ... GELongstreet (talk) 12:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 3 months NeilN talk to me 13:37, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Persistent IPs changing the release date to 1 June 1967.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 22:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most edits since semi-protection expiry have been vandalism and its removal. WNYY98 (talk) 01:34, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, pending changes seem to be doing the job.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit rate too high for PC. WNYY98 (talk) 01:57, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 05:16, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. El cid, el campeador (talk) 00:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content dispute - IPs changing the number of seasons the series has had against consensus, and there has been no communication on the talk page from these IPs explaining their reasoning. The dispute has been discussed on the talk page before, Talk:Mako: Island of Secrets#Labeling Season 2B?, regarding how Netflix numbered the seasons of this series, and current consensus identifies there are three seasons, despite Netflix showing four. (Netflix's labeling of seasons 2 and 3 has been considered as just season 2.). MPFitz1968 (talk) 01:20, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:58, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: I just checked the log on the article, and it indicates that it's semiprotected indefinitely, not 3 days. MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, corrected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 07:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP users. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 03:46, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Mifter (talk) 04:40, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: After being semi-protected for 3 months, IPs connected to Yaysmay15 started to re-add non-notable events again in the article. While a few edits are helpful, most edits restored sensationalist events and non-notable events.TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 15:30, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BLP concerns. In the US news for controversial photo of a comedian holding a prop of a severed head. Recent slew of edits from apparent SPAs etc. Shearonink (talk) 02:47, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruptive editing/BLP vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 05:21, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 06:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Page was previously semi-protected due to persistent addition of unsourced/poorly sourced content. As soon as the protection expired on 30 May, the disruptive editing resumed. Extended semi-protection needed. Bennv3771 (talk) 06:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 06:39, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 14:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations – large percentage of edits are vandalism/reverts, long protection log. WNYY98 (talk) 22:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 04:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection After the protection expired, there's more vandalism there. Gary "Roach" Sanderson (talk) 00:06, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:10, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I did not consent for this page to be created in the first place and it's been persistently vandalized ever since. Please protect back to the original editor's truth or delete the page. – CharlesFloate (talk) 00:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Removal of sourced content and addition of anti-Semitic content by IP-hopper. Use of conspiracy theorist Jeff Rense's website as source. See diff Jim1138 (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:07, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 03:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:06, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of an unreliable antisemitic blog as a source by IPs. Grayfell (talk) 03:22, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Should be protected per WP:ARBPIA3. GalatzTalk 13:41, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of idefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by an IP hopper. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, it's the same person. With IPv6 addresses, it's normal for the last four IP groups to change like that. If the first four IP groups stay the same, then we can block (in this example, 2605:6000:f508:d800::/64) and it will fully block that person. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We have an edit warring IP with an WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT problem. Please protect. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Since it's just one user, I've warned them about edit warring. Let me know if they continue and I will block the IP. Mz7 (talk) 22:38, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Most recreations were labeled as vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Indef. There had already been a 2-week temporary create protection on this, which expired May 19. This is a hoax. — Maile (talk) 00:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Different people are making the same kinds of edits without knowing that they'll eventually be reverted based on the Talk page discussion. Greggens (talk) 19:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Sorry, but page prottection is not a remedy for run of the mill content disputes or good faith but erronious edits. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:55, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Per WP:BLP. High level of edit-warring. An editor keeps adding allegations. Off note, this pro-Iran regime editor Pahlevun is also edit-warring with other editors at another anti-Iran regime organization's article, People's Mujahedin of Iran, see this and the article's revision history. Thank you. Killian James (talk) 19:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Warnings issued to edit warriors. Further edit warring should be referred to WP:ANEW. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent targeted vandalism throughout the month. See [64], [65], [66], [67]. FlotillaFlotsam (talk) 19:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Page protection is normally only applied in response to sustained high intensity disruptive editing. Four edits spread out over more than a month doesn't meet that standard. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:59, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – target for spamming . WNYY98 (talk) 20:07, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Altamel (talk) 21:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:42, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Not sure where the last good version is. To many anons are making edits so blocks to likely be ineffective. Sakura Cartelet Talk 21:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the last good version with possibly some missing information? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_Onyekuru&oldid=780310946 Daniel0wellby (talk) 21:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:42, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 23:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 23:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]