Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2017/01

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2017

01 January 2017

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued disruptive/unsourced changes made by IPs. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 15:55, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:10, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – ip's editing over unsourced d.o.b. Amortias (T)(C) 17:55, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 17:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The user GORI 40, tries to impose its editions through different ips. I already talked to him about the topic in his discussion but it did not seem to matter and what he did was erase the messages in his discussion. Philip J Fry Talk 18:43, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additional: I would also ask that this article be protected. Because the user insists on placing nominations that do not exist in several awards. Report this here, but so far they have not done anything.--Philip J Fry Talk 18:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and blocked for 24 hours. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:21, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Mlpearc (open channel) 21:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 21:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:36, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Page is currently seeing an uptick in WP:vandalism by an IP-hopping vandal who's also using sockpuppets.--Mr Fink (talk) 17:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. CogitoErgoSum14 (talk) 17:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:15, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. CogitoErgoSum14 (talk) 17:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:16, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism over several months, attracted by necessary mentions of defecation. There have been no substantive improvements to the article apart from reverting vandalism since October last year. MichaelMaggs (talk) 14:18, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 15:29, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: It's been over 5 years since protection was applied to the page to prevent IP hopping vandals. Perhaps we could try unprotection?. Sakuura Cartelet Talk 05:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have you asked Ronhjones? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DoneRonhjones has been active, so I'm going to assume they missed the ping, and go ahead and unprotect this: no sense in getting too hung up over a minor issue. Ronhjones, if you feel my unprotection was in error, feel free to reverse it without consulting me. Vanamonde (talk) 15:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Missed ping, sorry. Fine by me. Too many vandals on commons at present! Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Appears to be a target for the anti-semitic ref-desk troll. 172.56.42.226 (talk) 20:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:31, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – reversions by floatingIP. 331dot (talk) 11:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unexplained removal of "baseless" content. EF 12:44, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Users are still vandalizing the page by adding a irrelevant Grounded Video topic when it should not be in the page. TTCTransportationFan4644 (talk) 15:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like content dispute to me, I would decline.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring all day by two anon editors. 24 hours semi-protection might cool them both down. Wikishovel (talk) 20:45, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, looks like cooler heads have prevailed GFOLEY FOUR!06:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One Year Semi-Protection: Make it get the same treatment as 2013 did, like how it was semi-protected for one year (from January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2014) due to excessive vandalism. 206.45.42.137 (talk) 23:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, for now, re-report if vandalism happens again after protection expires on the 5th GFOLEY FOUR!06:46, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism since early December. No improvement in the article over the last month. MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 09:36, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done GFOLEY FOUR!10:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – All my other user pages are semi-protected because of persistent trolling and vandalism by one determined individual, and I'd like to have this new talk page archive protected as well. Thanks!. bonadea contributions talk 10:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. @Bonadea: all your subpages are currently semi-protected by the title blacklist, so this is redundant, but one might as well explicitly protect this page. Happy New Year! 🎄BethNaught (talk)🎄 10:10, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I didn't realise - that is good to know. Thanks very much BethNaught, and Happy New Year to you, too! --bonadea contributions talk 10:15, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:103:A63E:A87E:C0F2:D49A:3425 (talk) 05:05, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection 45.124.227.105 (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 19:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:04, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the last 45 edits made by 23 users - results in no change to the page. Kellymoat (talk) 20:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:23, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.42.226 (talk) 20:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:29, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – We have a lot of IPs editing to change neutral and referenced statements of this religion's beliefs into unreferenced assertions of those beliefs as facts. This has been going on for years, on and off, so I am almost tempted to ask for indefinite semi-protection but maybe lets try it for a good long temporary period and see if that is sufficient. DanielRigal (talk) 01:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:39, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by dynamic IPs, overall preventing the improvement of the article. --Sundostund (talk) 02:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:41, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by dynamic IPs, overall preventing the improvement of the article. --Sundostund (talk) 02:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP addition of somewhat-contentious content which is under discussion at the article's talk page. It is regarding whether to include the person's ethnicity in the lead section, the discussion of which the IPs have continually ignored for weeks now—which is getting rather disruptive. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 03:05, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:45, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Brianmagallano Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  15:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GFOLEY FOUR!07:12, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP user with widely varying prefixes repeatedly insists on adding wrong or unreferenced content, even though it's either clearly wrong (like the old name of macOS) or unreferenced but likely also wrong – like overstating the role of Digital Video S.p.a. (although the Github contributor stats show no involvement of anybody by Digital Video, shun-iwasawa seems to have ties to Dwango). In rare cases that IP user left change comments, they are usually on the hostile side, like [1]. Therefore I request temporary semi-protection for that page. Maybe a week or so. --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 19:09, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by another admin. GFOLEY FOUR!07:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Used by almost 300 pages. The YouTube phenomena would make the template visible and a potential risk. --George Ho (talk) 02:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done GFOLEY FOUR!07:01, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is regularly vandalised by anonymous IP address user/s who add false chart peaks and remove valid chart peaks from the page. The vandalism has occurred over an extended period of time. Nqr9 (talk) 02:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GFOLEY FOUR!07:05, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – (Generally) IPs keep adding that "Islam" was the perpetrator of the 2017 Istanbul nightclub attack or that it was Daesh, without sources.  Seagull123  Φ  02:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GFOLEY FOUR!07:08, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protect for a few days until Clemson fans get over their win over OSU. General Ization Talk 05:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GFOLEY FOUR!07:03, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite protection: Used by 700+ pages, most of them about flags. Visible in articles mostly. George Ho (talk) 23:10, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected. GFOLEY FOUR!06:58, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – By IP hopping-vandal. Sro23 (talk) 23:53, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done GFOLEY FOUR!06:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry. 2601:1C0:106:1F37:3C5F:30A8:4F3B:E6C0 (talk) 00:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GFOLEY FOUR!06:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Appears to be a meatpuppet attack. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GFOLEY FOUR!06:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Beyhive returned immediately after old protection expired; vandal edits as recently as 28 December 2016. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:54, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GFOLEY FOUR!06:55, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite protection: Somehow accidentally unprotected. Also transcluded in 4000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 02:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected. GFOLEY FOUR!06:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring.

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.42.226 (talk) 21:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GFOLEY FOUR!22:54, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term/Indefinite semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Per the editing history, this has been going on for way too long now. Also if possible, please rev-del this edit summary. Thanks. 172.56.42.226 (talk) 22:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 03:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping person(s) back pushing agenda and abusing edit summaries - continuation of previous behaviour: page has been protected several times and edit summaries removed. . KylieTastic (talk) 22:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 03:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sro23 (talk) 03:17, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 03:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sro23 (talk) 03:17, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 03:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple ip's causing issues with the plot section. Amortias (T)(C) 20:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done GFOLEY FOUR!22:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – content dispute, edit warring . - Mlpearc (open channel) 21:52, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.; I am not watching this page, do not forget to reapply for restoring the semi-protection after the full protection expires.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BilCat (talk) 02:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:16, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BilCat (talk) 02:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

02 January 2017

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted 3 times per 3 AfDs and once per WP:CSD#G4. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 15:48, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist Moi? Moi. 18:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page keeps being edited by both members of Steve Hoffman's forum and rival StereoCentral to "improve" Hoffman's image and tarnish it respectively. Thetamlakid (talk) 19:48, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:54, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP editors keep adding the UK Independence Party. Regardless of any personal opinions the IP editors never add sources nor do any reliable academic sources exist defining that party as fascist. My latest reversion was in turn reversed by an IP so I'm bringing it here as a last resort. Keresaspa (talk) 19:51, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is continually attracting drive-by vandalism by anonymous editors. I request protection to the page. DanJazzy (talk) 20:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: User page -- no reason for anonymous users to edit this. RedPanda25 15:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Click history and you'll see most edits these past months have been vandalism and reverting vandalism. Probably the same idiot using different IP addresses each time, they all seem to have one edit only, and that to vandalize that page. Dream Focus 15:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist Moi? Moi. 15:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 07:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 07:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 07:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Some reverted edits were marked as "good-faith edits". Other reverted edits were either disruptive or vandalism. --George Ho (talk) 12:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple ip's vandalising page. Amortias (T)(C) 11:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde (talk) 12:05, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ErerfAnocaj Long-time vandal adding poorly sourced text against consensus while insisting that policies and consensus is on his side. . Sjö (talk) 11:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 12:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent spamming – IP-hopping spammer returning daily to add links to the same website. Deli nk (talk) 13:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 13:33, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Merged" banner templates

Template protection: Used in 6000+/7000+ talk pages. Highly visible. George Ho (talk) 02:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant BLP vandalism within the past week, by a stream of socks from a single SPA: Toooled, Reeeded, Addeded, Loodd. The article only came off protection just now, and straight away the vandalism resumed. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 09:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: After protection ended in November, more reverts on vandalism occurred. George Ho (talk) 09:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:BuickCenturyDriver has used User:97.33.65.230 and User:97.47.69.79 (signs comments as self) to disrupt RfA. Rangeblock not possible. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 10:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GB fan.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – BLP violating edit war; misuse of primary sources. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 11:17, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. The article is subject to a normal edit dispute on the talk page. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I note that NBSB was the last to edit this page: however, the protection is not an endorsement of either version. Go sort it out on the talk page, please, and refusing to discuss changes while "your" version is protected may be considered disruptive. Vanamonde (talk) 12:04, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – I just transcluded this into {{S-rail}}, so it should soon have about 23,000 transclusions. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
11:35, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Vanamonde (talk) 12:06, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Vandalism / joke edits: Bielefeld keeps getting added to the list of fictitious entries. While the status of Bielefeld remains unknown, it isn't a fictitious entry. Matsunishigaru (talk) 00:54, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GFOLEY FOUR!04:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A fanboy of Shiva Rajkumar keeps adding unnecessary content to the table and reverts my efforts to keep it clean. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:00, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Longtime troll. Formality. Will note that they are targeting my sandbox as well but there's no need to protect that just yet. —DangerousJXD (talk) 08:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:36, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. MusikAnimal talk 03:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A redirect to Template:Merged-from; also transcluded in 400+ talk pages. George Ho (talk) 03:05, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's template-protected, CambridgeBayWeather. Did you mean semi- or template-protected? --George Ho (talk) 06:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ah that's what it is. The bot sees the s but I should have used tp. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Used in 400+ mainspace articles, making the template highly visible. George Ho (talk) 03:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Cyberbot I and cyberpower678. I think that is an error. I protected 17 minutes before the report. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected indefinitely. Never mind I see the problem. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:48, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Very long history of vandalism, especially given the nature of the topic (and there are numerous BLP issues as well). Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. too many edits for PC. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: Used in 700+ or 800+ talk pages. Potentially at risk. George Ho (talk) 02:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:12, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Unsourced additions reverted. --George Ho (talk) 05:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of 'Lucifer' as occupation by various IPs. Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract05:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist Moi? Moi. 21:28, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced content changes by new/IP users. Nördic Nightfury 21:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of Lil Uzi Vert by various IP editors. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:04, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Alex|The|Whovian? 00:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:06, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Redirect page to Template:Single chart. Also used by 17,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 02:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected. GFOLEY FOUR!04:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I noticed a Facebook post encouraging people to vandalize this article. They're doing just that. APK whisper in my ear 03:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GFOLEY FOUR!04:41, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 04:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.--Bozalegenda (talk) 00:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GFOLEY FOUR!04:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Rumors of Chip Kelly to be fired fired have unleashed a storm of BLP violations. Toddst1 (talk) 00:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:35, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Previous 1 year semi-protection lapsed on 29 December 2016, and persistent vandalism and disruptive editing returned to the article soon after. Sgcosh (talk) Sgcosh (talk) 03:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 04:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Longtime troll. Formality. —DangerousJXD (talk) 21:39, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Longtime troll. Formality. —DangerousJXD (talk) 21:39, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:41, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 23:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GFOLEY FOUR!23:44, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GFOLEY FOUR!23:45, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr. Neurosis (talk) 19:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Consistent changing of the wrestlers weight without sources. -- Dane talk 19:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For some unknown reason, this page has for a long time been a magnet for IPs and single purpose users who want to add Hamilton as a relative of Laurens. Last page protection was in December for two weeks but the vandalism has resumed. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 20:59, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 03:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 22:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done GFOLEY FOUR!23:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Sro23 (talk) 18:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 18:23, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous IP users has continued to change content that contradicts to what the source says. Andrew (talk) 18:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 18:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.32 (talk) 21:59, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GFOLEY FOUR!23:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and severe BLP violations. Lizard (talk) 22:41, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GFOLEY FOUR!23:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

03 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection: IP user keeps readding same unsourced and unobjective contribution day after day. -- Whats new?(talk) 05:26, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Someone is repeatedly wiping all references to an accident that occurred on January 1, using multiple IP addresses but always stating that "incident is under investigation".

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: ... Or downgrade to at least semi-protection. Not a likely vandalism target anymore. This redirect has been protected for over 10 years, and its protecting admin hasn't edited since 2009. Steel1943 (talk) 17:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Samsara 18:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been continually adding nonexistent storms over the past 2 weeks. ~ KN2731 {talk} 10:17, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protectction: Repeated vandalism over the past month of similar nature from IP addresses. Treeve315 (talk) 14:43, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – 🐈? (talk) (ping me!) 18:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LouisAragon (talk) 12:29, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IP hopper is reinstating non-WP:RS sources on a structural basis, ignoring the talk page, removing the reliable sources, as well as WP:WARing. - LouisAragon (talk) 12:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: One of a number of pages targetted by a persistent IP-hopping vandal. Needs protecting for long enough for the vandal to get bored and go away. David Biddulph (talk) 13:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:45, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by someone using a new IP for every edit. John of Reading (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from an IP with 49.xxx every time. Five such edits within the last month. Suggest PP duration to last a few months and maybe they'll leave it. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 09:43, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persist disruptive editing from IP. Alexbrn (talk) 12:23, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Increase in protection level: Page was recently unprotected and the same IP jumping editor immediately returned to make the same vandalism.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:15, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:23, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist Moi? Moi. 03:50, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:45, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism. High level of IP vandalism, slander and continuous defamation or blatant deletion of material for a extensive period of time , discrediting subject in question and cataloging the person in negative light by particularly IP source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/50.143.44.47 . Page has ALREADY been approved to be protected but unfortunately for a short time , immediately after same source continued its VANDALISM . Anaphoto (talk) 04:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See also edit filter log. Dat GuyTalkContribs 10:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like an IP editor I reverted, 24.21.53.134 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), has been repeatedly trying to vandalize my user page. The edit filter stopped him, for example: link. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Per Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Protect user pages by default, user pages are protected from edits by unconfirmed users already, no need for semi protection. Sam Walton (talk) 10:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There have been repeated backwards/forwards edits on this article by multiple authors which intimate that Microsoft has discontinued sales and production of Lumia devices - this may well be the case, however, the sources being cited are of poor quality and therefore a large amount of conjecture is being relied on.

As no consensus appears to be reached and the content of the page is changing as often as a weather forecast, I would like to request that the page be protected temporarily, until such time as a verifiable source can be used to cite with some accuracy what is actually going on. Otherwise, the article is just a misleading mess and that is unfortunate. Demonuk (talk) 03:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP addresses. Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 03:46, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:10, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Because of banned user of Terry Shelton. Teddy Bear (talk) 08:37, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, articles normally have to been deleted a few times before salting is considered GFOLEY FOUR!08:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent attempts by AAFM-related COI SPA to add promotional material to the article and undo the work of numerous editors in keeping the article balanced and well-cited. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:48, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have warned the user that has recently been adding such content. If that user continues, I or another admin will block him/her. If different accounts continue the behaviour, the best approach would be extended-confirmed protection. Yaris678 (talk) 23:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 04:51, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Justeditingtoday (talk) 04:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GFOLEY FOUR!07:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 06:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user has been systematically removing wikilinks from this article. I believe it is well-intentioned, at the same time an attempt was being made to sort the entries alphabetically; hence I have not raised this at AIV. Several different IPs have been used: 5.80.113.163, 5.80.114.82, 5.80.114.37 and a couple of others. Since a different IP is used each time it would appear pointless to use talk pages to feedback the problem. Could the page be semiprotected for a short while to combat the removal of the wikilinks please? Thanks,. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 22:52, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP has constantly vandalised these Big Brother articles (changing various days and names), This has gone since January 2016 and clearly who ever this person is they're not ever going to go so I'm requesting indef protection, Temporary protection would obviously stop the issue however that'd only be temporary so once expired they'd simply return so am asking for indef,

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., since the other articles were also pending changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Simione001 (talk) 03:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Immediately after expiration of page protection, new removal of properly sourced content, see talk page consensus DVdm (talk) 16:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'd want to wait for a second blip of independent activity. Samsara 16:52, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, fair enough. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 18:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, (not sure if bot will remove it without this) GFOLEY FOUR!03:18, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 20:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being consistently vandalised by multiple unauthenticated users (IP addresses) and the wave of edits seems to be continuing incessently. . Demonuk (talk) 05:46, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Demonuk. I was here for the same. It is due to heavy influx due to Google Doodle on her today.--Nizil (talk) 06:15, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP addresses. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 05:45, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP User 190.181.202.83 has refused repeated requests to use the talk page to build consensus and has engaged in an edit-revert war. GetSomeUtah (talk) 01:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. MusikAnimal talk 02:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is another page on which IP User 190.181.202.83 has refused repeated requests to use the talk page to build consensus and has engaged in an edit-revert war. GetSomeUtah (talk) 01:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I have warned them about edit warring MusikAnimal talk 02:24, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP editor sourced removing content they do not agree with. ViperSnake151  Talk  01:23, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. MusikAnimal talk 02:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism. NikolaiHo☎️ 02:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 02:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Raise protection level: from none to template editor protection. This is a new template forming part of the automated taxobox system. It currently shows about 37,000 transclusions; I would expect about 43,000 when the database catches up. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 06:26, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User Losangelesfan03, whose contributions are only on this article (I find it difficult to believe that a regular user will spend months fixated on a single article doing the same edit over and over again) is repeatedly adding a lot of advertising from the parent company of this article's subject. . Kingsocarso (talk) 17:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 04:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Same vandal who made Boeing 737 and Airbus A350 XWB semi-protected. 172.56.42.77 (talk) 18:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1002:b113:c67a:9dcb:aba2:5e2c:3b43 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Samsara 01:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Either the anon needs to be blocked or the article needs to be locked. Discussion on talk page and nationality supported by WP:FOOTY. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 213.238.192.236 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ronhjones. Samsara 01:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 03:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – many previous protections. WNYY98 (talk) 04:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection content dispute boling over to edit wars with tags and revert after revert. Let's lock the page for a bit till the editors involved work it out.--Moxy (talk) 17:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 02:33, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected MusikAnimal talk 02:26, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Because of banned user of Terry Shelton. 180.249.5.128 (talk) 02:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done GFOLEY FOUR!03:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Page is under attack. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi'd for a day RickinBaltimore (talk) 03:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP users are adding live updates to this event, which is currently ongoing. – Sabbatino (talk) 19:25, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, game is over GFOLEY FOUR!21:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: What? NBC also maintains brand licensing agreements for international channels in South Korea and Germany? I don't think this is not true, but I guess semi-protect this page so no strangers, unestablished registered or unregistered users vandalize it! BadPiggies (talk) 21:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 22:09, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jericho Walls, recent vandalism by several socks. Sro23 (talk) 01:26, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 11 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:46, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism by IP accounts. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:53, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GFOLEY FOUR!21:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: I think this page should be permanently protected because when the protection expires, more anonymous users will add fake stuff there. Pachisu124 (talk) 22:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:17, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An endless variety of IP addresses likes to redirect this talk page to Alaska. Bradv 00:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 01:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsible infobox section templates

Semi-protection: Used in highly-viewed articles out of 100+ pages, like Frank Sinatra and Margaret Thatcher, making the template vulnerable to risks. --George Ho (talk) 13:25, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. The use on high-profile articles, some of which have various forms of protection, means template protection is justified. Yaris678 (talk) 23:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over and over again. Myself and another user have been policing it but this much vandalism by so many IPs in so little time is warisome L3X1 (talk) 22:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully that's long enough for the kids to be back in school and no longer have time on their hands. ‑ Iridescent 00:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – sudden recent increase in vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 00:39, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 00:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

04 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The 'Stellar Skateboard' vandal is back. †dismas†|(talk) 15:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It looks like one IP and I've issued a warning. Anymore problems come back. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism to current club by number of IPs. hwalk | talk | contribs 15:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Already pending changes protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. No response at AIV, where this ought to be handled, so coming here. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IP blocked. If the problems persist or they switch IPs come back. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pretty regular vandalism over the past couple of months since last expiry. Mcewan (talk) 17:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 20:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism of user and IP adding non-notable entry to page (Bob Reed) . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 20:34, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple vector new account and IP vandalism over the last few days. Some of the vandalism has been revision deleted. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 20:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Pages were disingenuously moved by a user who had previously accused my moving of pages as about being seen as the creator of them, but then actually did what he accused me of himself by moving the existing redirects for these pages into his namespace, then pasting discography content from the respective artists' pages over the created redirect, so I undid these moves. To prevent any further silly move wars, requesting the pages be protected. Ss112 20:54, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined PP request is confusing and at this point stale. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protection: Arbitration enforcement. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 07:45, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hanif Al Husaini: We just had a discussion resulting in the general conclusion that we wouldn't protect articles pre-emptively even under ARBPIA3 - has there been a recent problem at this article? Thanks. Samsara 18:06, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined See above. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism on Knights of Columbus Hostel fire by I.P 24.224.234.183 KoshVorlon}User:KoshVorlon/Template:TimeStamp.

User(s) blocked: 24.224.234.183 (talk · contribs) blocked by Samtar. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Because of popular dance trend, this page has become a frequent target of vandalism. Maybe semi is in order until it dies down? Almost all of the recent edits have been vandalism (or reversing vandalism.) . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There's a rather large edit war going on between a couple of IPs. Figure semi-protection would be good until it can be sorted out. Will probably be taking them both to 3RR as well. Primefac (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page came off one-month semi-protection, and is undergoing edit-warring again. It seems that the same unregistered users are doing it. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same problem as List of wars involving Pakistan above. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Persistent vandalism. – A bad history of changing factions and gaslighting positions, frequent reverts and content removals. As per church history goes there would be nothing new to be added but this seems to be field of test and testy edits by both registered and unregistered editors.59.96.161.101 (talk) 18:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent financial vandalism. Yackmann (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. It's unclear that this is vandalism. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Need a break for financial vandalism. Yackmann (talk) 20:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Just removed a load of vandalism from this page that had been partially reverted by various people. It appears this BLP is in the running for the Hull City job, and as such is attracting a lot of attention. Gricehead (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Its Donald trump he is a controversial figure . Lt Timothy Robinson (talk) 14:04, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Timothy Robinson12345: Can you give examples of more than one autoconfirmed editor being disruptive at this article? Thanks. Samsara 17:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've blocked one abuser. Still waiting for response. Samsara 17:24, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined All edits over the past 24 hours seem to be good faith from a cursory glance. Since Trump is hardly an out-of-the-way article, any actual disruptive edits are probably going to be fixed quickly as a part of natural editing. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:49, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TwoTwoHello (talk) 13:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Well, no protection was worth a shot, but it's just not working. PC may be possible, but semi seems like the best idea. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Telfordbuck (talk) 03:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gfoley4. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – various IPs and accounts keep adding unsources promotional material to article. one recent user went further to issue me a legal threat. Saqib (talk) 12:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Should definitely be under the same type of protection as Lesbian sexual practices. 2601:1C0:10C:7016:A936:BC70:AE89:8A1A (talk) 12:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I see reverts lately; one IP is claimed to be a sockpuppet or something. Actually, I started the discussion, which has been hatted but then un-hatted cyclically. George Ho (talk) 00:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the IP seems to have stopped reverting--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing from IPs and anonymous users by adding false boxscore info and unproved tour dates. After a six month semi-protection, disruptive editing shortly began again. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 05:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Not sure why this is not protected already, & template protection makes most sense. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 08:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah: What was the reason for downgrading the request to semi? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ritchie333 - An unintentional one. Fixed. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done

Temporary semi-protection: presistant disruptive editing. 203.198.134.195 (talk) 11:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated BLP-violations by IP-hopper. The latest protection was for six months, ending in December, with the BLP-violations starting again soon after the protection expired, so requesting at least the same length of semi-protection again. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 12:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:16, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Possible sockpuppetry. Twitbookspacetube (talk) 12:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edits under pending changes coming as fast as ever since expiry of previous week's semi. I'm unable to find a closing date for the show but going by previous series it's likely to go on until about the end of the month. : Noyster (talk), 12:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Indefinitely banned user SchoolcraftT has a past history of using IP address sockpuppets to circumvent his ban and edit this page. There have been a series of recent edits by IP address users that focus on the same topics as SchoolcraftT and exhibit a similar editing history. I believe they are further attempts to circumvent his ban. Semi-protection would protect against this and ensure the ban is enforced.

I am requesting indefinite protection because the sock puppets have been a recurring issue over several years. They will go away for months, sometimes a year, but they seem to always come back. A temporary ban isn't going to solve this problem. Bitmapped (talk) 19:47, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us see whether they re-appear after one year protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated additions by IP despite multiple users reverting them.  LeoFrank  Talk 10:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page protection recently expired on this page and it looks like the disruptive editor is at it again. This person is again leaving abusive messages on my user talk page (User talk:Simione001) indicating that they have no intention of stopping the disruptive editing. I suspect this issue will only snowball if not handled now. Requesting that the page be protected until 1 January 2018.Simione001 (talk) 11:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. The previous pending-changes protection by NeilN was for six months, and expired before the disruption. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hoping vandalism. Twitbookspacetube (talk) 11:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's not obvious vandalism to me, but it is a BLP violation, so pending changes is best. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Second request. Persistent disruptive editing, edit warring with multiple IPs for removal of sourced content. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create-protection: Repeatedly recreated. A fortnight of SALTING should do. Of course, please delete before salting (if it's not already deleted). Lourdes 07:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Request creation by admin only - article deleted four times already. Citobun (talk) 08:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction to permanent Template-editor protection requested. On December 26, I posted a note on the talk page of the admin who protected it, but I have received no response. I'd like to add unknown parameter detection to this template. I see that it is cascade-protected, but it has only 1,600 transclusions, and I don't know why such a rarely used template would be listed on that page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:46, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 04:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. That worked perfectly. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, increasing in attempt to remove article from AfD consideration. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:33, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Disruptive editor blocked for 24hrs. If they return to this activity after coming off block drop me a line on my talk page or report them to ANI. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism, and another IP keeps inserting edit that appears to be a BLP violation as the sources imply Donald Trump attended a Sinn Fein fundraising prior to an IRA bombing. Linking the two events together, though actually unrelated, implies Trump was involved. I suspect that is the purpose of the original article in The Guardian. . SW3 5DL (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sinn Fein is the political wing of the IRA. The fact that the US President attended a terrorist fundraiser is certainly notable. It had been in the article for months before you tried to remove it. (2A00:23C4:638C:4500:F875:52D7:9F51:17C9 (talk) 23:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC))[reply]
He was not the president of the United States at the time. The event was in 1995, and The Guardian resurrected the event as click bait for their website back in November 2015. The article attempts to link Trump to the bombing. That makes it a BLP violation as no real reliable source supports this. WP is not a tabloid. Your persistence in reinserting it into the article is disruptive, as well as your wild, unsourced BLP violating claims on the Donald Trump talk page here and here and here and here. SW3 5DL (talk) 23:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Take it to the talk page and DO NOT (re)add controversial material w/o consensus.-Ad Orientem (talk) 00:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent vandalism by adding the words "has no weakness" or similar sentences. Mainly vandalism by IP users but some by new editors. ILikeCycling (talk) 22:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 05:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 05:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Makecat 03:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP violations. 172.56.42.13 (talk) 03:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – POV pushing by IP users - subject is under scrutiny by unions and HM Government. Nördic Nightfury 10:21, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: - Continued disruptive editing by an anonymous user. Oath2order (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: - Continued disruptive editing by an anonymous user. Oath2order (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. IP warned on their talk page. Come back if the problem persists. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:49, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Because of banned user of Terry Shelton. Teddy Bear (talk) 08:53, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If it's recreated again, renominate the article for salting. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unreliable information is being added, maybe a protection will stop this Cheng Weng (talk) 09:47, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 23:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent level of IP vandalism all coming from Malaysia, changing of current squad list to include random players and deleting current Gamba Osaka players. JNicol (talk) 00:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy IP-hopping vandalism for an hour. Wikishovel (talk) 21:29, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism in short period of time from multiple anon accounts. Drewmutt (talk) 22:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gfoley4. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Seems to get an awful lot of vandalism that no one notices for a long time but IP's are also a large part of the contribution here so PC seems right. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 23:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – It's getting silly. Whether there's a sock there I don't know, but this needs to stop. Doug Weller talk 16:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks like a heated content dispute. Settle it on the talk page. If there are other issues either deal with them there or report it to the appropriate noticeboard. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IPs have constantly added CRYSTAL info despite being told to stop, Thanks,. –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 18:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: High-risk of content dispute/edit warring/source removal.

Declined. No activity at all except by filer. Bbb23 (talk) 19:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Longtime troll. —DangerousJXD (talk) 11:23, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 17:17, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruptive edit, the user is not willing to use the talk page. Kouhi (talk) 17:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Neither so were you. Samsara 18:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 18:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Ongoing addition of rumours. SLBedit (talk) 20:04, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:04, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

05 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IP adds a TBA (2017) to the infobox despite repeated requests to not do so without a reference. Karst (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. – Juliancolton | Talk 17:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Stereorock (talk) 14:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Juliancolton | Talk 17:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Stereorock (talk) 14:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Juliancolton | Talk 17:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Stereorock (talk) 14:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Juliancolton | Talk 17:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same IP user returns at various intervals to delete a well sourced segment. Initially made attempts to claim the segment was unsourced. Now refuses to even justify edits. User is clearly ideological and motivated. This is the second request.Senor Freebie (talk) 13:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. We don't generally protect pages from a single IP. I have warned them over edit warring. If they refuse to abide by established consensus then AIV is this way. There is also WP:AN3. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Being created for promotional purposes by COI user, and appears non-notable. Largoplazo (talk) 15:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from IPs. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruption by IPs. Please consider indefinite semi-protection as the related Transgender article has. Funcrunch (talk) 19:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. – Juliancolton | Talk 19:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Three unconstructive edits in the last 3 months, two of those in 13 and 16 December. Preferably, protect for an entire year. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 09:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 45.124.227.254 (talk) 13:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This appears to be a long term problem. Semi-protection however does not look like a good idea as a very large percentage of edits, including constructive ones, come from IPs. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP addresses constantly change the genre to things along the nature of "shonen ai" or "yaoi" with no sources or reasons other than their own opinions. {{SUBST:JackOfTrades1776}} (talk) 14:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 17:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IPs. JTP (talkcontribs) 15:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 17:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Now a redirect to Template:In title. Used by 5000+ pages, mostly dabpages. --George Ho (talk) 22:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Why would we protect a redirect? Vanamonde (talk) 06:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Reopen: I found a counterexample: Template:Cn, a redirect to Template:Citation needed. Both are protected. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 09:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going disruptive editing by IPs and anonymous editors, by way of removing sourced content, and adding in information that is unsourced or poorly sourced. livelikemusic talk! 13:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent low-grade vandalism from IP, who has been blocked several times already. Semi-protection may be more effective. BilCat (talk) 13:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Seldom edited since 2013. Edits by one user were reverted. One good edit was done by an administrator. Used by 500+ dabpages, potentially a high-risk. --George Ho (talk) 20:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, if the IP continues they should be blocked for vandalism. If the vandal flips their IP, feel free to reapply here.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long term Semi-protection: IPs and new users continue to add phone numbers to this article. Was protected for short time previously. Long term is needed. First Light (talk) 10:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Many IPs are editing with vandalism in mind. Luigi Boy ルアイヂ ボイ talk 13:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Triptothecottage (talk) 02:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Vanamonde (talk) 06:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – An already protected template (Template:NHL team season) has be upmerged & redirected to this template. Would follow that this template should now be protected. . Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. All those matters were discussed on article's talk page and there was an understanding about how this page should look like, but IP users just don't care and remove what they don't like. This has been happening for quite some time. Sabbatino (talk) 09:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of "Pinoy GTA" nonsense by an obsessed IP-hopping vandal. Blake Gripling (talk) 09:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by shifting IP 49.126.255.95, 49.126.255.211, 49.126.255.95, blocked user Anusodh_Bhattarai (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) DVdm (talk) 10:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Targeted by the sockmaster himself. Blake Gripling (talk) 10:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's constantly adding crystal crap, A few days ago I somehow requested pending changes which I don't recall doing - Anyway PC changes are useless so was wondering if this could be changed to Semi so the IP edits stop altogether, Thanks,. –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing

This page needs to be protected as it has been disruptively edited a lot of times

Jinsen John (talk) 03:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Too much of this looks like your run of the mill content disputes. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism to the page from 2 January onwards by at least several different IP addresses.— Nohomers48 (talkcontribs) 04:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Shortly after protection expired, two different users vandalized the page again. -- Dane talk 05:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Already indefinitely pending changes protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Long-term edit warring in progress. Blurp92 (talk) 02:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Go sort it out on the talk page: as far as content disputes go, this one seems as silly as they come. Vanamonde (talk) 06:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page is experiencing a heightened degree of vandalism and unilateral edits from IP editors. I'm recommending that this page be given a few weeks of semi-protection, as new content about the film is revealed and so any recommended edits by IP editors will have to be petitioned through the talk page. DARTHBOTTO talkcont 02:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been consistently vandalized for the past few days -- I'm not entirely sure why, because I'm not that into the sports-ball, but I'm pretty sure it has to do with rivalries. It's ranged from obscene to just petty, and it's enough of an issue for me to request protection. ɯɐɔ 💬 02:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced information to BLP by numerous IPs. Egghead06 (talk) 18:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like one IP and they have been warned. If they don't take the hint come back or report it to AIV. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If the problem persists feel free to come back. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lower to extended confirmed protection or unprotect: I recently created Dumb Bitch (title case) as a dabpage. I thought about contacting the administrator who salted the page to prevent re-creation. However, the administrator is inactive. Therefore, I ask that the page be reincarnated as a redirect to that dabpage. --George Ho (talk) 01:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Ad Orientem (talk) 03:00, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 23:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been a years-long campaign by anon. editors to remove cited information from this article or to attempt to "balance" the film's claims with claims from unreliable sources. Long-term semi-protection is necessary to maintain the integrity of the article. The Old JacobiteThe '45 00:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. There is credible of evidence of high levels of vandalism over a multi-year period, possibly orchestrated. Enough is enough. BTW TheOldJacobite I really like your user name. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 14:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing

This page is being continuously edited and reverted to add biased content.

Alw1216 (talk)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This appears to be a content dispute. You both need to take this to the talk page to discuss the edits in question. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 4chan brigades; see Talk:Operation_Barbarossa#Vandalism. Qzd (talk) 23:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: If the problem resurfaces after this expires I would probably support some level of permanent PP. But I prefer not go permanent right off. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing This page was previously protected and its protection expired on Christmas day. I have seen some vandalism which I reverted recently.Would request that this page to be semi-protected for a few months at least since this entity is in the news on an almost daily basis FlyingBlueDream (talk) 08:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Telfordbuck (talk) 03:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent NPOV vandalism . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 22:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. This page was previously protected and IPs are still making false edits stating that GoAnimate will be shut down when it is not after the page semi protection was expired. 2607:FEA8:A29F:FDEE:D442:F515:10A4:A897 (talk) 22:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Barek. 172.58.41.99 (talk) 23:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

06 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is a persistent IP, edit warring to remove "International" in the lede. Adam in MO Talk 03:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by EdJohnston. 172.58.40.242 (talk) 19:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple IPs and newly registered editors vandalizing. . -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Samtar. 172.58.40.242 (talk) 19:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 20:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism mostly from anon users. Bluesphere 03:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism for the past few days due to her homophobic comments recently in the news. Jennica / talk 09:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism target from a variety of IP addresses on a nearly-daily basis. This article was protected for a week in October; I'm requesting a more permanent solution this time. PKT(alk) 12:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism mostly from anon users. Bluesphere 03:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism for the past few days due to her homophobic comments recently in the news. Jennica / talk 09:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism target from a variety of IP addresses on a nearly-daily basis. This article was protected for a week in October; I'm requesting a more permanent solution this time. PKT(alk) 12:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: - continued vandalism by Surtsicna at all articles about Swedish royal family (warned and blocked for it before). No current vandalism as per today but persistency. Would happen again if I reverted.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution.. Full protection would be overkill at this point. Please observe that Surtsicna's edits do not constitute vandalism in Wikipedia's sense of the word. Favonian (talk) 10:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A series of IPs are significantly and inaccurately changing dates. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 01:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Superchunk22 (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:101:395F:9121:1434:5D7D:8A8A (talk) 11:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Widr. 2601:1C0:101:414D:E14D:4805:9581:5275 (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protectedJuliancolton | Talk 18:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Many different IP's changing his club data. Thepersoncalledme (talk) 17:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We seem to have a tedious IP hopping vandal here. Maybe a period of protection would persuade him to seek entertainment elsewhere, preferably elsewhere to Wikipedia. DanielRigal (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism from new accounts and unregistered ones. LandenRitz (talk) 19:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced content, bad categories, and other unproductive edits from IPs. —Farix (t | c) 22:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Per a discussion on my talk page. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User keeps on blanking page, and other pages related to this article. XboxGamer22408 (talk) 22:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Please lift move protection so we can switch this page to AD 44 per Talk:AD 1 RfC consensus. — JFG talk 19:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, I still see it as protected against move (pp-move-indef). — JFG talk 20:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Favonian did it, case closed. — JFG talk 10:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected – "official" template to appease the bot. Favonian (talk) 10:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Req: 1 month semi - Persistent disruption of financial data after recent block expiration, like here and here where the gross values are changed from "disputed" to 630 crore and 700 crore. There is a significant dispute surrounding the gross figures of this film, and pro-Tamil editors seem to be swallowing the high values and in the case of the links above, trying to bury the idea that the numbers are disputed. There was a lengthy discussion about this at RSN and presenting the info as disputed seems the smartest overall choice, per consensus. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Borcker. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 15 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism by IP and named account reported in the SPI. Meters (talk) 04:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Trade to Hawks not official yet leading to unconstructive editing. WNYY98 (talk) 05:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – recent death has led to heavy vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 07:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template editor protection. Page has been inactive for about a month and the talk page is filled with requests to edit without any responses from administrators for weeks. Tntad (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Beeblebrox (talk) 22:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
information Administrator note This is only because the OP actually reported a redirect from alternate capitalization, the actual problem was at the target article. It's all good. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I'm seeing long-term vandalism. Although the previous protection was in 2012, the page has been always been under vandalism. . -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done by someone else. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – unconfirmed trade info being added. WNYY98 (talk) 03:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done by someone else. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AIRcorn (talk) 03:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated instances where IP editors change "sitcom" to "anime.". Calidum 05:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has had long stretches of mostly peaceful unprotection, and the current disruption only seems to go back a few weeks, so I don't think we need indefinite protection here. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent drive-by IP vandalism of a nasty, racist, depraved sort. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 06:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Prevent vandalism against a highly prominent redirect. --Nevéselbert 18:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. last act of vandalism was 15 months ago...Beeblebrox (talk) 22:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 22:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Looks like a short stack of blocks has been served up to those ips. If the manage to evade the blocks and come back, please re-report. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip hopper. Sro23 (talk) 05:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template editor protection. Page has been inactive for about a month and the talk page is filled with requests to edit without any responses from administrators for weeks. Tntad (talk) 18:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're one section off, mate. Requests for reduction in protection level goes below "Current requests for reduction in protection level". JackOfPanTrades Card Hunter (Engage in intellectual conversation) 18:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Created a new one. Thanks. First time using this system, sorry. Tntad (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done (for the bot) Beeblebrox (talk) 22:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 22:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandalism. Wolbo (talk) 01:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 01:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Haunted by socks. Tgeorgescu (talk) 18:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - Mlpearc (open channel) 19:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. limited constructive ip/new user editing WNYY98 (talk) 22:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of One month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from one person using different IPs; unsourced changes/citing sources that do not verify the changes. Dan56 (talk) 19:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. in order to give a chance for discussion. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from one person using different IPs; unsourced changes/changes with sources that do not verify the changes. Dan56 (talk) 19:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC) : Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC) reconsidering as it seems cleart his is the same dispute as at the album article. Beeblebrox (talk)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – coaching job rumors. WNYY98 (talk) 21:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of One week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Juliancolton | Talk 17:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist Moi? Moi. 18:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 21:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

07 January 2017

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like mainly one IP who has not re-offended since their final warning. If that changes report to AIV. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – for the vandalism of the article names and constant changing without sources . MatthewTardiff 17:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There just doesn't seem to be enough vandalism that can't be solved by regular reverting. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 21:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Alieu Darbo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) extended confirm protection request forever protection from new users (possible socks with only one article edited, the page) and IP user (again single page edited) that keep adding hoax stats. to bluffing the career of the player. (Soccerway, or community site transfermarkt can confirm Croatia, England and France stats. are hoax. Soccerway and transfermarkt may be wrong, but no source from Croatia (.Hr) from France (.Fr) from England (.UK) can confirm the alleged stats. ) Matthew_hk tc 19:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Moreover I was msged by a possible sock user that he was instructed by the player, thus it is my rational to keep the page away from new created account. Matthew_hk tc 19:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: If a particular user is inserting hoax material, warn them and if they continue, report them to WP:AIV or WP:ANI. Thank you. Samsara 22:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: In ten days, if I don't remember to do it myself, request return to semi from me, another admin or through this venue. Thank you. Samsara 22:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Page-move vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. There was only one improper page-move, and that user has been indef blocked. --MelanieN (talk) 16:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – I'm concerned this title may be used to try and bypass create protection at Joshua Travagli. Earlier today, an editor moved a draft of the article, to Talk:Joshua travagli, presumably by accident intending to move it here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. -- Samtar talk · contribs 20:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Insertion of promotional text & removal of references by IPs and new user a/c in rapid succession. Alexbrn (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 18:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent block evasion by User:Mriduls.sharma. Sro23 (talk) 18:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Samtar talk · contribs 20:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same problem as last time. Continuous genre changes by IPs, contrary to what the sources say. This has been happening multiple times a day since the last protection. Kokoro20 (talk) 18:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 20:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs making unsourced claims that he has died. Media coverage says that he has suffered a heart attack, not that he has died. Meters (talk) 19:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Samtar talk · contribs 20:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Consistent IPs insertion of unsourced claims/introduction of POV material/unconstructive editing. Neutralitytalk 19:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 20:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and edit warring. --Another Believer (Talk) 19:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 20:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There seems to be an upswing in idiocy here as people try to insert an irrelevant and inappropriate item of trivia about Stevens' personal life. Stevens' own article is already protected, presumably for the same reason. Maybe a period of protection will stop this. DanielRigal (talk) 15:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kellymoat (talk) 17:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 17:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Has been protected for a long time I think we can try unprotection as that anon patriot is long gone. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 13:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UnprotectedJuliancolton | Talk 17:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 12:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editor keeps attempting to restore article about non-notable person which was changed as a redirect as a result of an AfD discussion. Onel5969 TT me 12:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I used full protection because the user who keeps trying to recreate the article is autoconfirmed. MelanieN (talk) 16:53, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Why would this ever need to be moved. Sro23 (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. The article already restricted moves to autoconfirmed users. That is clearly inadequate and I have fully move-protected it so that only admins can move it. MelanieN (talk) 17:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated and continued vandalism from anons and newly-registered users. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined one recreation isn't a lot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 13:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – There is a person(s) who do not favor having this article subject having content showing that they have been convicted of a crime. BarkeepChat 08:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: It's difficult to view the removal of content that shows the subject in an unfavourable light as a BLP violation. However, my main comment would be that a single user is involved, therefore protection is not the remedy to seek. Samsara 08:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 08:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP editors repeatedly making similar non-neutral POV edits removing mention of Russian annexation in 2014.

  1. 01:28, 7 January 2017
  2. 19:13, 6 January 2017
  3. 17:47, 6 January 2017
  4. 11:30, 5 January 2017
  5. 01:35, 5 January 2017
  6. 01:28, 5 January 2017
  7. 22:04, 4 January 2017
  8. 17:38, 31 December 2016
  9. 17:19, 28 December 2016
  10. 17:03, 28 December 2016
  11. 17:01, 28 December 2016

Toddy1 (talk) 08:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 10:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism since last month. ~ KN2731 {talk} 10:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 03:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now – Users warned. I'd really like to avoid full protection here. – Juliancolton | Talk 04:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Melonkelon (talk) 07:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page has been blanked on more than one occasion. Fleets (talk) 09:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Semi protection would not work here, IMO. I have also posted on the other editor's talk page encouraging them to take the issue to WP:TFD.) AustralianRupert (talk) 10:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Between standard vandalism and this IP hopper adding info about a fake character. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by new users and IPs. Protection for more than 2 weeks if allowed. Accireioj (talk) 05:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by new users and IPs. Protection indefinitely if allowed, and at least for a year if at all possible. The current senior class going on this page and constantly makes incorrect changes, that are often rude. There is warring between students and information that they write, such as choosing to put their favorite teacher as the principal. The page already requires a cleanup, as "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject." It would be best to give this page semi-protection at least temporarily. Azeyrt (talk) 06:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 07:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I would advocate semi-protection or pending changes to be implemented on this page for a week or so. This lists terrorists incidents and users on WP have often been adding misleading, false, and disruptive information. It seems here that users are more concerned with how fast they can place information on the article without reliable sources (e.g.: the shooting in Florida that has taken place in the past hour has already been labelled a terrorist incident without any sourcing). This has been protected before for 3 days because it's a fast-moving page subject to vandalism/disruptive editing and I would advocate this protection for a longer period to ensure that the information here is correct, and not just rumours. st170e 20:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:27, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Frequent vandalism and unsourced additions.LM2000 (talk) 02:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 06:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing WP:DE by IP hopper blatantly falsifying statistical content from WP:RS. Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aurato (talk) 04:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 30 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Long protection log, most recent protection expired only a week ago and vandalism from IPs and new editors has resumed. WNYY98 (talk) 05:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 06:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Persistent IP vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 11:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm not seeing strong evidence of recent vandalism like lots of reversions. It also doesn't help that no one seems to believe in edit summaries on this article. Beyond that IPs seem to be making a disprortionate amount of the edits, including constructive ones. I am going to need stronger evidence before I slap PP on this article. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Stuff with citations keeps getting removed by IPs. Statik N (talk) 18:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. with 14 reverts in a couple of days, this seems to me to be necessary: Ad Orientem, I hope this is okay with you. Some of the reverts are, admittedly, after you declined this. Vanamonde (talk) 06:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The tour was over a decade ago and now an IP-hopping editor from the Indian sub-continent has decided that the genre in the lede needs to change from that which is in the band's article. Clear case of WP:GWAR. Since the tour was in 2004, it's unlikely that any significant changes need to be made to the article that can't be handled by an edit request on the talk page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restore indefinite semi-protection: Was used before full protection, which expired an hour ago or so. The original protection should be restored. --George Ho (talk) 05:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 06:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. JudgeRM (talk to me) 22:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, due to disruption by Gabucho181 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log); they've decided to move their vandalism to the talk page in response, it's a yearly 'tradition' at this point. Nate (chatter) 00:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done by someone else --slakrtalk / 03:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zupotachyon Ping me (talkcontribs) 01:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A different IP pops up with the same edits to Huell Howser and California's Gold every few days since November. See the page history; these edits have been suspected of originating from block evasion. EricEnfermero (Talk) 01:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's been a lot of uncaught vandalism on this page over the past few months. I've tried to undo as much as I can, but it seems not a lot of the vandalism is being caught when it happens. Help!. Aristophanes68 (talk) 00:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – same vandal repetitively using different names and ip addresses. Kellymoat (talk) 12:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. This article continues to be a target of long term disruptive editing despite off and on PP. Enough is enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs/SPAs reverting to the article's earlier, funnier and less illustrative photo, presumably because of https://www.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/comments/5lmxsz/someone_changed_the_famous_image_from_the/. McGeddon (talk) 11:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks manageable at the moment. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unauthenticated users 190.181.202.83 and 181.189.226.120 are in an edit-war, continually reverting information within this BLP article to reflect their own chosen state of events. The former IP has been the most active, however, there is a storied history for both, and, from even the most cursory glance of the edit styles, it is clear (to me at least), that the edits appear to be being carried out by the same editor.

Multiple messages have been left for the editor over the various talk pages by various people and have not been heeded, and, likewise, messages have been left on the article's own talk page to establish consensus, however, this has not received a response.

It does not seem like ARV would be the best course of action as the editor has already shown that they will submit edits from another location.

Could this page please have some protection enforced? Thank you. Demonuk (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 22:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost no constructive edits by new/unregistered users in recent history. Everymorning (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated addition of fake death information (he is still posting on his Facebook page) and other vandalism by socks and 106.67.*.* IPs. Please consider a bit longer protection. GermanJoe (talk) 18:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. Samsara 22:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism adding negative statements. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 22:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 22:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis (talk) 00:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry by IP-hopping block evader. JudgeRM (talk to me) 02:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - no issues in 16 hours, and Samtar could semi-protect it himself if he wishes. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP-hopping editor making same disruptive edits that led to a recent semi-protection. Deli nk (talk) 17:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same IP-hopping disruptive editor that has necessitated semiprotection of Spawn (comics) is doing the same thing with this article too. Deli nk (talk) 17:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 20:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeat re creation of an autobiography over the past few days (5x). Constantly CSD tagging. PP would stop the creation. Thanks all! TheMagikCow (talk) 18:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. -- Samtar talk · contribs 20:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

08 January 2017

Temporary full protection: People have been modifying the list of animes for quite possibly no reason and I feel like it'll happen again soon. No1dead (talk) 07:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 11:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:48, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Very subtle changes. This will help to keep the non-constructive edits out, but will not hinder the constructive editor's contributions. Aurato (talk) 17:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected. Favonian (talk) 17:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – or Semi-protection: There's a dynamic IP range here that has been adding completely unrelated "FanFiction" topics that are not relevant to the article at all... This has gone on for several months now... Aurato (talk) 06:21, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us see what happens after the expiration.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Article was unprotected three days ago and has already been spammed three times by IPs. Looking through the article history it seems that immediately after a 15 month term of indefinite semi-protection lapsed late last year, the IP spammers have added a massive list of numbers almost on a daily basis whenever the article wasn't semi-protected (for escalating lengths of time, most recently about two weeks). Daveosaurus (talk) 10:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protection was for prevention of editing by a blocked puppeteer. No cases have been made against the subject since 2013. Seems rather pointless to have protection. Nördic Nightfury 09:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Redrose64 as blocking admin. Nördic Nightfury 09:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I guess, but are we sure that Waterspaces is not still lurking somewhere? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constantly being vandalised this month. ~ KN2731 {talk} 04:16, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP vandalism; multiple IPs. Qzd (talk) 04:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently a sockpuppet with a long history was inserting BLP violating comment into this article and at Donald Trump. That IP, as well as another, were both blocked. Now another IP is back reinserting the same material [3]. Please page protect for a couple of weeks. Maybe they'll move on to another article. Thanks. . SW3 5DL (talk) 05:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, had asked for PP when incident first occurred. Was turned down, and IP turned out to be sockpuppet Harvey Carter who has long history. Now another IP is back with the same source and edit. Please PP this article. This is a huge time sink for everybody, not to mention the admin who had to revdel all the comments this edit causes. Thank you. SW3 5DL (talk) 05:23, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aurato (talk) 05:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Prolog.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:22, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aurato (talk) 05:41, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:23, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aurato (talk) 05:49, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aurato (talk) 05:50, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:26, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Very subtle disruptive edits, though not occurring too often. Would help keep the unconstructive edits out and it would not hinder the legitimate edits that are (occasionally) made. Aurato (talk) 06:06, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aurato (talk) 06:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or pending changes: most of the recent IP edits have been unconstructive.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:23, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism and BLP violations. Page logs indicates article is a high target for vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 07:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:21, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – this editors sure is keep off those cast and information. Oripaypaykim (talk) 07:58, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~ KN2731 {talk} 08:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:16, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Already deleted six times; could have have this deleted and salted? Thanks, . — Sam Sailor 23:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. Repeatedly recreated. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done for the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philip J FryTalk Tag me! 00:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nohomersryan (talk) 04:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent IP section blanking and edit warring.VictoriaGraysonTalk 04:16, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kellymoat (talk) 21:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like one editor who has been blocked by Widr. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:52, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This, and the following requests from Kellymoat, is related to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PeopleEater143. PeopleEater143 admitted to edit warring while logged out and was subsequently blocked for disruption. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent disruptive editing by IP despite multiple, specific, reverts and warnings by multiple editors. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 00:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IP blocked. Anymore problems from this source report it to AIV. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. CogitoErgoSum14 (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined We rarely protect article talk pages unless the problem is really serious. It looks like the canvassing votes have been identified and I'm sure will be discounted. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content dispute; person or persons removing valid information from page. 331dot (talk) 23:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. Vanamonde (talk) 06:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate disruption after previous protection period expiry. Aurato (talk) 05:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Kellymoat (talk) 21:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like one editor who has been blocked by Widr. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Kellymoat (talk) 21:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like one editor who has been blocked by Widr. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kellymoat (talk) 21:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not vandalism. What YOU'RE doing is vandalism, as you are refusing to provide a source. Do you not understand how Wikipedia works. You either provide a source, or you back down and accept that you're wrong, which you are here. I really don't understand why you're doing this. Is it to prove a point? The only thing you're proving is that you cannot just accept things as they are and move on. You HAVE to make things exactly how you want them to be. PeopleEater143 (talk) 21:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I hope you know that in a few days I will be a confirmed user, so your page protections won't mean anything. Just accept that you're wrong and move on. You tried it. PeopleEater143 (talk) 21:53, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like one editor who has been blocked by Widr. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Prone to Vandalism. Qweshypedia (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see any vandalism. Can you point it out? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism from different addresses. VmKid (talk) 00:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined According to page history this article was last edited in 2010.Perhaps another article was intended? Ad Orientem (talk) 02:35, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've corrected the link; actual target has an ampersand rather than 'and' in the title and original link was merely a rd. Nate (chatter) 03:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP bouncer who throws in fictional networks, removes additional items placed in the since their preferred 'good' fictional item-packed revision was first added months ago, and inappropriate use of outdated racial terms to boot. Nate (chatter) 03:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Pending changes isn't working; unsourced additions still continue, even going so far as to include factual errors. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There have been several people (or one making several accounts/sockpuppets) acting in conjunction to vandalize the article anarcho-capitalism today by inserting the word "oxymoron". I therefore request protection for the page from unconfirmed users for a short amount of time (whatever is usually proper). Thank you. Knight of BAAWA (talk) 23:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent disruptive editing/edit warring by IP. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 00:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – heavy IP vandalism over past two days. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 00:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Vsmith. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:37, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent ip spam: addition of defamatory content, section blanking, etc. Lookunder (talk) 01:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent ip vandalism per article history and edits that are reverted from time to time. Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism — Large amounts of vandalism from both IP and registered users. All vandalism has been related the the release of YouTuber FilthyFrankTV's new parody mixtape of the same name. Chewwie100 (talk) 22:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bradv 23:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 00:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

09 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated insertion of OR by similar IPs. Talk page also affected, but less so. Alternatively, a rangeblock would probably work. RivertorchFIREWATER 06:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Confirmed Protection: Persistent vandalism - IP users are constantly changing religious breakdowns of the group to values that are grossly incorrect as per the cited sources. Have a look at the recent history to understand what is happening. The edits by IP user 106.51.23.81 are edits that are correct and are attempts to reverse vandalism. All other edits are vandalism and hence warrant immediate and urgent protection. Thecorrector12 (talk) 02:19, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see why extended confirmed protection is needed at this point--Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry. Unknown who the master is. -- Dane talk 04:06, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Infrequently edited page with persistent vandalism. Has been semi-protected in the past, but vandals pop up a few times a month. AlexEng(TALK) 19:31, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Experienced editors reinserting / deleting the same materal. Many calls to 'go to the talkpage'- but so far neither editor has. There was a previous edit war by IPs in December, which resulted in a semi. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 16:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (length to match the semi expiry) -- Samtar talk · contribs 16:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Samtar. I didn't mean to step on your toe here. I think we were working on this at the same time. Did you want to lock the article for three months? -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:34, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No worries! I'll defer to your time here - reasoning was that the protection level could be changed once things had settled down but hopefully that can be done in 48 hours -- Samtar talk · contribs 16:37, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been subject to strange vandalism over the course of the last few months. . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 16:22, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 15:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Tavix (talk) 15:26, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of promotion from multiple user accounts . Twitbookspacetube (talk) 13:18, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 15:14, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent potentially defamatory vandalism by IP user(s) using unreliable (blog) sources. TBH am not sure this page reaches notability requirements. FOARP (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 15:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Every few days since early Dec 2016, a disruptive editor has been trying to promote a hairstylist named Byron Cuellar in this article against consensus, despite warnings, and despite repeated removals. Deli nk (talk) 13:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 15:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant disruptive editing by various IP addresses. JackOfPanTrades Card Hunter (Engage in intellectual conversation) 14:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 15:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing.   Aloha27  talk  03:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see any call for ECP (yet) -- Samtar talk · contribs 10:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock puppetry. Master unknown. Demonstrated pattern of anti-zeitgeist vandalism. -- Dane talk 07:17, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 10:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Lots of IPs claiming he's been transferred to Everton, despite no confirmation from either Everton or Manchester United. I recommend semi-protection until either the transfer is confirmed or the end of the transfer window (1 February). – PeeJay 10:21, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 10:38, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant Vandalism . MatthewTardiff 00:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. MelanieN (talk) 03:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism that will no doubt persist throughout the year as all years have demonstrated. Rusted AutoParts 03:28, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: One good edit by IP; the rest have been reverted as test/vandalism within four days after end of protection. George Ho (talk) 05:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:48, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Aurato (talk) 22:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:47, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Unregistered editors using IP addresses repeatedly added the birth year once or twice a month. It's happening now. I repeatedly reverted it as no reliable sources would verify the person's actual age. The subject's official website does not reveal his birth year. George Ho (talk) 00:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:44, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user is constantly removing referenced material. Regardless of whether the protection is added, please have a look at recent history; I do not want to revert again to break 3RR. Matt Deres (talk) 01:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: due to persistent disruptive editing and vandalism (see [4]). Quis separabit? 23:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:01, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 00:28, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 00:31, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Qzd (talk) 00:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:51, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MRD2014 (talkcontribs) 00:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aurato (talk) 22:22, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 22:38, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:49, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – BLP violations. Aurato (talk) 22:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:50, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Regular IP vandalism. McPhail (talk) 20:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Yankees10 20:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 21:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Long-term pattern of GA BLP vandalism; multiple IPs. Qzd (talk) 22:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:22, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 10:43, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Marvellous Spider-Man 14:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The user has just died. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:43, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Coderzombie (talk) 15:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GABgab 18:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kuru. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing by sock-hopping IP, by removing content based on speculation or their belief that should a series not produce a new season within 12 months of previous premiere, it is cancelled, without verification. livelikemusic talk! 18:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seeing some short-term vandalism and general BLP violations the past few days. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 19:58, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gogo Dodo. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:16, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

10 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Recurring vandalism by IPs, removing information relevant to the article. Including most recently an unregistered user (holds two IPs) that has been disruptive and removes sources that are completely reliable and widely used. Don't seem to be giving up anytime soon. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 14:59, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 130.43.7.219 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Samsara 15:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rapid vandalism from a lot of different users. J991 17:09, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Info-box dispute now descending into an edit war, with WP:CANVASing not helping either. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 19:59, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hut 8.5 20:06, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

temporary Semi-protection: In Real Life, the subject of the article was threatened with possible article deletion. Geraldshields11 (talk) 13:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There hasn't been any activity on the page. If there does become a need to protect the page, the page at that point can be protected. Also, unless an admin chooses to delete the page either via a speedy deletion (which this page does not meet), or consensus at an AFD, the page can't be deleted. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:12, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon IPs using the article as a playground for their own amusement. Vjmlhds 15:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Increase in protection level: From no protection to template editor protection. High use template; currently about 42,000 transclusions, will be more when the database catches up. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 17:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent blanking. Triptothecottage (talk) 11:34, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 11:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP's are adding unsourced information repeatedly. Rameshnta909 (talk) 14:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:33, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Modern Harpoon (talk) 15:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Seven times in the last six months, an anonymous editor has blanked a sentence that is supported by the citation, and done so without explanation. Perhaps they have a point, but they never "come clean" and explain themselves. LaurentianShield (talk) 15:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 12:24, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 13:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Melonkelon (talk) 13:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 13:38, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing by multiple IPs and new users: unsourced content, vandalism, POV issues. Vanamonde (talk) 14:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 13:54, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Last January 7 my semi protection has expired. And there's another IP address who vandilizes the page by putting inapproproiate content. I am requesting for semi protection for another 3 months to avoid vandalism of different IPs. Thank you. Leo kingston (talk) 04:27, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 1 IP edit. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:33, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High rate of IP vandalism past hour. : Noyster (talk), 11:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 12:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This page has suffered the most obscene COI editing I may ever have seen. Despite numerous warnings everywhere - talk page of article & editors, and a COI noticeboard report, the IP editor continues to ignore and defy requests to abstain. Not sure what the next logical step is but perhaps page protection may curb their activity?. Rayman60 (talk) 23:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:09, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Kids' Choice Awards pages have historically been subject to much vandalism in the weeks and months leading up to the show. There is already an AFD for this page, which has been removed at least one, and multiple IPs and new accounts vandalizing the page. . Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:42, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Zackmann08 are you sure you have the correct page? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@CambridgeBayWeather: nope. My bad! Thanks. I meant the article (2017 Kids' Choice Awards), not the AFD. Thanks. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK that's what I thought. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:23, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated attempts by unknown IP addresses to vandalise factual information, such as by changing his birth place and removing his current club. Vnonymous 08:27, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:14, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This player is quite controversial in the sport and the page is therefore subject to reasonable amounts of vandalism. This page was previously protected and expired on 22 September 2016, since then, nearly every edit has been reverted due to IP vandalism. This player retired over 18 months ago and the vandalism on the page will probably never cease, therefore an indefinite protection is needed; also requesting pending changes as some good faith edits can also be controversial. i.e. relating to racism, reasons behind why he was booed etc. Flickerd (talk) 10:07, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. —MBlaze Lightning T 18:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I've blocked the primary culprit. If the problem persists come back or just drop me a line on my talk page. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:37, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 07:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:05, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated sock puppetry by unknown master. -- Dane talk 08:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 09:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated sock puppetry by unknown master. -- Dane talk 08:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 09:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This sock puppetry has been going on for over 2 years now and the page continues to be targeted. Requesting that page semi-protection moves to Indefinite as temporary falls off and the sock starts again consistently. -- Dane talk 09:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done for the bot -- Samtar talk · contribs 09:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: - continued persistent vandalism and edit warring. I suggest revert back to 18:02 my edit that gave the original version so the matter can be discussed between the editors.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the place to have this discussion. It only however proves my point of yours and the others involved bickering behaviour sadly. Simply stop doing edit wars.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:30, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not accuse people of edit warring. You are arguing against three other editors on that page.O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 17:34, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. See my post on the talk page. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing attempt by IP-hopping user to delete sourced material without consensus. Nat Gertler (talk) 17:25, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I am planning on taking this to FL, but the article is extremely vulnerable to vandalism from the subject actor's strong fanbase, as well as an equal number of haters. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. King of 07:10, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It might sound silly to request Page Protection for an old Articles for Deletion discussion, but a quick look at the history for this AfD will show you why I believe it's necessary. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note I reverted back to the edit that closed the AfD. I would suggest permanent rather than temporary semi-protection, clearly no reason for any IP or non-autoconfirmed user to be messing with an old debate. Safiel (talk) 05:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&action=edit&section=20 Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user 69.119.168.78 (talk · contribs) continually blanking content. Karunamon 02:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:23, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple IP users vandalizing article. Jusdafax 04:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Numerous attempts of adding death hoaxes by a number of IP addresses. Aurato (talk) 04:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Euryalus. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A whole load of BLP's /unsourced content. A couple dozen edits within the last hour or so... Aurato (talk) 04:21, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:32, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zupotachyon Ping me (talkcontribs) 04:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:34, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Aurato (talk) 04:39, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A sudden but intense spate of vandalism/disruptive editing in the last 24 hours. Safiel (talk) 05:37, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:37, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - currently receiving large amounts of traffic (50,000 - 100,000 views per day vs. 1,500 usually) due to Tilikum's death. This has attracted quite a few vandals. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ) 21:36, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. King of 05:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple different vandalizing IPs and non-confirmed editors in the past ~48h. There's also a long-term vandalism issue with this page, albeit low-speed. ClueBot NG is the article's most frequent editor. (It has more edits to the page than the three next most frequent editors put together) At a quick estimate, around 600-700 of the article's ~900 revisions are either vandalism or the removal thereof. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 22:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. King of 05:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IPs. The Banner talk 23:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:07, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full-protection: edit warring.

2602:304:68AD:3220:54C4:7389:89C3:C2A9 (talk) 23:26, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:09, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Aurato (talk) 19:26, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. King of 05:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistant vandalism. 2600:1:9243:D9D9:1928:FA79:A7E0:629D (talk) 20:27, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. King of 05:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Adding name change that was provided by a unreliable source . MatthewTardiff 21:26, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. King of 05:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: POV-pushing. The Banner talk 21:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. King of 05:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring/content dispute. Aurato (talk) 03:25, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Principal party warned. If problems persist suggest edit warring noticeboard. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:39, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Numerical changes. Modern Harpoon (talk) 07:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not seeing the issue. If you think I'm missing something (always a possibility) feel free to post diffs. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant unsourced vandalism today. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:25, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It looks like this has been an ongoing problem for some time. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:21, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism, BLP. Lizard (talk) 18:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP, new user, and sockpuppet vandalism. Might be worth doing permanently. Kaldari (talk) 18:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:53, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip edit warring about restoring article about non-notable fictional character . Onel5969 TT me 12:51, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

European Parliament Group members

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism with updates without source, reversed several times before figures are confirmed or official. Wykx (talk) 14:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:14, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist Moi? Moi. 14:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Suddenly a wave of vandalism and/or unhelpful edits by IPs. I suspect an IP-hopper. I think that a week will be enough to spoil the fun. The Banner talk 15:30, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted 3 times (no claim of importance, housekeeping, and AfD consensus, respectively). KATMAKROFAN (talk) 22:17, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done You fail to mention that prior to the most recent deletion, the most recent deletion was nine years ago. We don't speculatively protect pages without anything to suggest abuse. ‑ Iridescent 23:03, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article just came out of 2-month semi-protection yesterday after persistent anonymous IP attempts to alter the color-blind accessible color scheme selected via an RFC on the talk page. The disruption has started again almost immediately. Unfortunately some editors are seemingly unable to get their heads around the idea that accessibility is a higher priority than aesthetics. Betty Logan (talk) 08:04, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:48, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 12:32, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblio (talk) 00:40, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Identical edits by an IP to previous edits by sockpuppet, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Matt500066/Archive. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblio (talk) 00:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:18, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Biblio (talk) 00:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:59, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Aurato (talk) 03:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:34, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Five days of persistent blanking by IP-hopping vandal. Wikishovel (talk) 18:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

11 January 2017

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 17:49, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP hopping editor is making a dedicated effort over years to introduce Americanisms into an article about an Australian subject, introduce undue weight, alter the article to refer to the subject by her childhood nickname of "Jessie", alter the article to make an unnecessary reference to one of her characters as "#2" in her filmography. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 18:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Adminitration page that new editors dont need to edit. Its a stable page that see nothing but new editor blanking. Moxy (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Who thinks it is time to unprotect the astrology articles?

Who thinks we should Unprotect these articles: The astrology articles were very vandalized and needed protection back in September. This was due to several announcements by NASA. The Aries article was protected for 2 months, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpio, Capricorn, Aquarius, and Pisces will be protected for 1 year, and Sagittarius has been protected indefinitely. The Aries article has been doing fine unprotected even while the rest are protected. So does this make you think these articles should be unprotected by now?68.224.116.208 (talk) 03:14, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Did you ask the protecting admin, EdJohnston, first? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:12, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, I just looked at Sagittarius (astrology) and would endorse Ed's judgement - the article went bad in August 2012, and the history shows a mess of reverts since then. Samsara 12:52, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I recommend leaving these semiprotections in place. If an IP wants changes, they can propose them on the talk page. It is likely that promoters of Ophiuchus as a member of the zodiac will continue to revert if protection is lifted. EdJohnston (talk) 14:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 15:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by varying IPs (both v4 and v6). DVdm (talk) 10:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IP addresses despite warning from users. JackOfPanTrades Card Hunter (Engage in intellectual conversation) 14:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsubstantiated claims about this territory being claimed by a soccer group. clpo13(talk) 16:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:06, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending Changes Protection: Temp whitelock requested (1 week or so) because of possible edit warring and accusations of sockpuppetry between 2 IPs and someone named Nirmal Mathew. 6 contradictory edits in tecent time. Was redirected to here from edit warring page. L3X1 (talk) 14:57, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @L3X1: I've opted to make this a full protection so that the editors discuss the dispute and make edit requests on the article's talk page. Pending changes would just be messy -- Samtar talk · contribs 15:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thank you very much. L3X1 (talk) 15:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP repeatedly reinserting unsourced, controversial POV = WP:BLPVIO. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 15:27, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. —MBlaze Lightning T 15:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:43, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits by IPs. One IP adding the name "Maharaj" to the title in the lead and infobox, another IP adding all flights that are not operated. .  LeoFrank  Talk 15:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced edits in violation of WP:NPOV. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:30, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:19, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Flood of transfer rumour. The news was Atlanta rejected the bid, not even in the stage of medical, but ip user keep on editing the page to "reflect" he was completed the deal to Everton. Matthew_hk tc 13:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Consistent vandalism from IP and new users. Coderzombie (talk) 14:27, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 14:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 14:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nördic Nightfury 14:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 14:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection is requested for the page at edit 759438607. The editors requested British era sources and some local unreliable publishers to not be referenced or used. This has been achieved. Only highly reliable sources have now been used. Still, changes were undone by someone else with comments such as, 'this doesn't seem likely', without discussion on references, books, history or other sources. Digvijaykatoch (talk) 04:24, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:00, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FrB.TG (talk) 08:57, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:48, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —MBlaze Lightning T 09:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism and edit-warring, with at least two IPs repeatedly adding unsourced claims and hurling racist abuse and accusations of vandalism at editors who revert them. . Wikishovel (talk) 08:33, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 08:35, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism and edit-warring, with at least two IPs repeatedly adding unsourced claims and hurling racist abuse and accusations of vandalism at editors who revert them. Wikishovel (talk) 08:37, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism and edit-warring, with at least two IPs repeatedly adding unsourced claims and hurling racist abuse and accusations of vandalism at editors who revert them. Wikishovel (talk) 08:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:48, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent & persistent unsourced edits from multiple editors. Shearonink (talk) 00:33, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Already pending changes protected. Additional protection does not appear necessary at this point. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:36, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Already pending changes protected. Additional protection does not appear necessary at this point. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:40, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page needs protecting because of persistent disruptive editing from IP editors, ongoing for some time now. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 07:56, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes based on published speculation. When change in coaching venue is officially announced, then that can be reflected in the article. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:30, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism by User:2001:56A:F536:3B00:6D54:B096:64D3:53E8,User:2001:56A:F536:3B00:70DB:2A86:6CCD:2DE8, User:68.188.111.212 and User:66.87.124.124 like [5], [6] and [7]. 2602:304:68AD:3220:B5BA:C49A:9B0E:3AEC (talk) 05:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism that's only going to get worse until the inauguration. Ravensfire (talk) 05:35, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too much for PC. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:06, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Page was protected until January 1 to stop an IP user who constantly vandalizes the page. I would report their IP address but their IP address constantly changes. So, this page needs to be protected again because they have begun vandalizing the page. (121.219.109.233 (talk) 05:49, 11 January 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – or Semi-protection. Long-term pattern of vandalism/disruptive editing. Aurato (talk) 23:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:29, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Or Semi-protection. Persistent disruptive editing. Aurato (talk) 23:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:27, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Appears to be obvious sockpuppetry in play. That man from Nantucket (talk) 01:49, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection would be appreciated. This BLP has been developed since 2008 by over 60 sockpuppets or SPAs. Some are listed on the talk page and at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thumpgoggles/Archive. They have been adding positive material about the subject, either unsourced or poorly sourced, and removing or misrepresenting the negative. The latest accounts were SVass2016 and LilyHumfrey last month, and SiWren yesterday and today. SarahSV (talk) 03:40, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:59, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Sir Joseph (talk) 16:53, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13Talk 17:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant tampering with cast billing and reviews. TropicAces (talk) 01:12, 11 January 2017 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - users and IPs are still vandalizing the page by adding the Grounded Video topic and stating that the site will be shut down when it will not because there are no sources stating that the site will shut down. 2607:FEA8:A29F:FDEE:649E:AC60:A0E0:12F3 (talk) 03:06, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 03:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persisent addition of material outside scope of wikipedia prevents me from conducting maitenance upon the article. Many poor reversions must be sorted through, and it's hard to do that while some IP is copy/pasting poorly formatted lists and hitting "save". L3X1 (talk) 21:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 03:12, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zupotachyon Ping me (talkcontribs) 01:15, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:52, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism. John from Idegon (talk) 02:35, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also re-blocked the principal IP. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zupotachyon Ping me (talkcontribs) 23:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive vandalism from IP users. There was also a temporary block last year on the article due to vandalism. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:52, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zupotachyon Ping me (talkcontribs) 01:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:49, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The subject of the page was concerned about personal information about his marriage which was added by an unknown actor. leifberg (talk) 13:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I reverted the edit, other that just this single edit I do not see any reasons to protect the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: User Debauched Libertine is making multiple, highly partisan changes. 66.127.146.6 (talk) 19:14, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Debauched Libertine (talk · contribs) blocked by Zzuuzz. Hut 8.5 20:08, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent replacement of reliably sourced content with unsourced content by unconfirmed editors. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 20:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

12 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 21:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism and general BLP disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 21:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 1 day probably enough, I expect this editor back tonight . Doug Weller talk 21:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 21:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 16:36, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not a lot of vandalism, the two IPs already blocked. -- ferret (talk) 16:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2600:1:92D6:E225:184B:26DA:2AB4:1280 (talk) 20:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2600:1:92D6:E225:7CF2:64E6:6B1B:D2FC (talk) 20:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 21:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by Orchomen. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by Orchomen. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by Orchomen. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by Orchomen. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by Orchomen. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by Orchomen. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Disruptive editing – Year of birth being changed to 1935 without explaining why. Many of Fujiwara's obitauries listed his age at death as "82". A one week protection will do. 206.45.11.108 (talk) 14:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- ferret (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page is frequently edited by various IP addresses seeking to change instances of "crab" to "lobster" for some reason. It's an ongoing problem, but seeing no protection log, I'm asking for temporary semi-protection first. AlexEng(TALK) 18:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same disruptive edits by IP-hopping editor that necessitated the prior semi-protection. Deli nk (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued vandalism. Including changes dates and random words El cid, el campeador (talk) 19:32, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 19:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is one of the important issue going on the state of Tamil Nadu. This must not be deleted as well as blanked because this article contains the depression of TN farmers who died this year or 2016. wiki tamil 100 (talk) 13:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 13:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps removing massive chucks of Panyd's talkpage- see the history. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 14:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi I think you mean semi protection, not full protection? Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 14:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, Class455, as that wouldn't have stoped you from editing it too. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 14:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 15:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. For the bot. -- ferret (talk) 17:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One of their players has been in the press. This has lead to many additions of speculation, gossip and opinion by numerous IPs - all unsourced and unencyclopedic. Egghead06 (talk) 17:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 17:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unpopular guy for good reason, but his bio is getting lots of silly vandalism. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 16:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 16:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism due to recent news events. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 17:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by a bunch of IPs DVdm (talk) 17:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 17:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Semi-Protection has failed on this. Requesting ECP. -- Dane talk 05:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. King of 06:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High school. Vandalism by IPs. Laurdecl talk 12:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done It looks like there's only been two cases, both by the same IP. Please leave warnings for the IP. If they persist after appropriate warnings, use WP:AIV. -- ferret (talk) 12:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Amaury's talk page is being vandalized by sock puppets of Orchomen. . Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 15:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:16, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is about a country, therefore a big target for vandals of any sort. . FriyMan (talk) 08:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 09:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 13:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:23, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of non-neutral POV material and edit-warring as a result. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 14:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 14:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An editor is making a dedicated effort to promote the subject of the article. Has already been blocked at least once and is using multiple IPs for block evasion. . Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:23, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to semi protection for six months. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To help the bot to archive this:
Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. Samsara 11:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nine days of IP-hopping vandalism. Wikishovel (talk) 09:32, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent potentially defamatory vandalism by IP user(s) using unreliable (blog) sources. Began again right after previous 2-day semi-protection period expired. FOARP (talk) 11:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 12:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent adding of the unconfirmed information. Corvus tristis (talk) 04:35, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: incessant recurrent IP vandalism ([8], [9], [10] [11]). Quis separabit? 05:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. King of 06:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, specifically due to political views that some may view as being polar. Examples include changes made that called the a "Qatari news..." which isn't true, with no historical backing. As well as biased edits such as "is extremely left winged, and in recent years has become more controversial through repeated accusations of racism" and additional edit calling it "an American, left-biased, fake". Revision history shows consistent edits of people that are Alt-right and simply do not like the show TempTTC (talk) 09:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is of high importance, so it is a big target for vandals of any sort. FriyMan (talk) 10:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 11:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shrike (talk) 10:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Only highly reliable sources have been used. Still, changes were undone and most of the information on the article erased by someone else without discussion on references, books, history or other sources.. .... added 13:24, 11 January 2017‎ by User:Danyal.252.

I'll refrain from dealing decisively with this request, and will instead simply point the person who does toward Talk:Katara Rajput. -- Hoary (talk) 13:33, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Semi will not stop the problem. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and sock puppetry. -- Dane talk 07:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Simply not a page new editors need to blank....or edit for that matter. Administration page that really only ever needs to be edited by those very familiar with coding. Moxy (talk) 08:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., but, to be honest, I do not see why unconfirmed editors should edit this page at all.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: Just saw your protection and thought the same thing - would you consider bumping this up to indef? The disruption has been somewhat long term, and you're quite right in saying that there really is no reason for it to be edited by unconfirmed users -- Samtar talk · contribs 08:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samtar:, let us wait a bit, and, if there have been no objections, I will upgrade it to indef later today.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. I already commented on the dispute so don't feel comfortable protecting the page myself. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined See talk page. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:35, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – recent ip edits have frequent tendency to be nonconstructive, see edit history. WNYY98 (talk) 03:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 06:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. King of 07:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: An editor has repeatedly made dubious edits to the results table despite repeated requests to stop. A source was provided but does not back up their additions (in fact it contradicts them). More details on the talk page. Could someone revert their addition and lock the page, as unfortunately I have already reverted them three times today. Thanks, Number 57 12:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. It looks as if the two of you are already discussing it at the talk page. Work it out there, and don't edit war in the meantime. MelanieN (talk) 02:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Evking22 (talk) 00:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 04:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 05:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This article has been receiving vandalism lately, mostly from IPs. I suggest temporary pending changes until it's off the main page. MediaKill13 (talk) 04:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. King of 06:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Months of slow edit warring by two named accounts with no attempt at discussion. I don't know if this is blanking of content or repeated insertion of unsourced (or even fake) material since no-one is leaving edit summaries or warnings. Both editors have been given edit warring warnings by other users. Meters (talk) 05:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. King of 06:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Human, All Too Human evading block by persistent posting on talk page. Flat Out (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. King of 06:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Flood of transfer rumour (unsourced, not even with a reported medical check). Matthew_hk tc 02:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 03:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 03:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Low trafficked page that has been getting the same nonsense reddit related vandalism for many many months now. Thought it would stop after a while but it hasn't. PC will still allow edits but I am asking for indefinite as it has been going on since May. Majora (talk) 03:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 03:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Nördic Nightfury 14:14, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator RHaworth.. MelanieN (talk) 02:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:24, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism (usually by haters or lovers of the club) by different IPs every few days. Pending changes worked well in the past. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:00, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, unsourced BLP violations. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think that would be a wild overreaction Tamadrum313 (talk) 02:12, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The page was protected in the past. Marvellous Spider-Man 17:28, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Anaconda Hunter (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. - that should remove the disruption for now as it appears to have been the only vandalism this month so far. Obviously pop back if it repeats. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced season two finale date. Amaury (talk | contribs) 22:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – BLP violations by established user. - Mlpearc (open channel) 19:59, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 20:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected mr bot - I believe you need a Done to shush you? -- Samtar talk · contribs 21:35, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Linguist Moi? Moi. 21:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. -- Samtar talk · contribs 21:36, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continues by unregistered users after unprotection . epicgenius (talk) 21:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:57, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

13 January 2017

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued long-term abuse by IP socks of Kay Uwe Böhm . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 19:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued long-term abuse by IP socks of Kay Uwe Böhm. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Chrissymad: It doesn't look like this one has seen any reverts and the only two IPs since November have no blocks. -- ferret (talk) 19:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Chrissymad: Seems like the content was moved to the 2016 article, and then partially reverted there. You may want to remove some of the content that The Banner (Good faith) moved over, as it was originally added by an IP in the ranges used by the sock. -- ferret (talk) 19:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued long-term abuse by IP socks of Kay Uwe Böhm. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 19:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. A recent block was made and expired for the same reason. Air.light (talk) 18:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – A user (SweetYagoda) has attempted to change the subject of the page via a series of edits without consultation. . Triptothecottage (talk) 12:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -- Samtar talk · contribs 12:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Alex|The|Whovian? 17:06, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 17:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 17:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 59.95.71.63 (talk) 14:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 15:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP shifting vandal. MrOllie (talk) 16:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 16:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No vandalism recently, and it has been protected for 2 years already. 221.126.236.94 (talk) 05:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. MatthewTardiff 03:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Declined Content dispute, which does not rise to the level requiring protection. Not vandalism. Vanamonde (talk) 09:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – content dispute from nonautoconfirmed user making legal threats. WNYY98 (talk) 05:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Offending edits have been oversighted. Vanamonde (talk) 09:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Only about 200 links, not exactly a high risk template. --221.126.236.94 (talk) 08:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template was never protected. Samsara 09:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 09:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whitelock Persistent vandalism by a block evader. I am RCP, so I need to be able to communicate with IPs, thus SEMI won't work. Whitelock allows IPs who wish to protest or discuss a revert can still file it, and I can sort through the vandalism of SlitherioFan2016's sockpuppets.L3X1 (talk) 03:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Already semi protected -- Samtar talk · contribs 12:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing resulting in edit warring. Mórtas is Dóchas (talk) 04:12, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by Widr--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs vandalizing. APK whisper in my ear 10:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More Nintendo Switch vandalism. ~ฅ(ↀωↀ=)neko-channyan 04:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 09:12, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent blanking of West Coast Customs by self-described employees[12] hopping IPs. Since in a recent edit this person has apparently been "put in charge of moderating the West Coast Customs Wikipedia page" by West Coast Customs, I would like to ask for the page to be semi-protected so only autoconfirmed editors may edit it. Note that I'm doing my best to assume good faith here and despite my authorship of 80% of the current article I am not trying to claim WP:OWN or anything like that, but these IPs and now user accounts all with the same modus operandi completely ignore my and other editor's attempts to engage them in discussion [13] If it is too premature to ask for page protection, I'm sorry, I'm just trying to protect WP from vandalism which is quite likely to continue because it's obvious upper management of WCC does not like my article rewrite. Semi protection will allow these editors, if they have real grievances with the new version of the article, to ask for changes on the talk page and get consensus instead of the current hopping and blanking. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 05:54, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 09:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 08:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 09:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full-protection: Continuous and repeated additions of unsourced content by User:96.245.231.131 and User:Il2writeaboutsports like: [14], [15] and [16] Regards, 2602:304:68AD:3220:F9FB:9B59:72A2:F033 (talk) 04:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing (if not downright vandalism) by anonymous user. He's turning the "recent call-ups" section into "alternative players" and just putting whoever he wants there. See: [17], [18] and [19] among others. Intruder007 (talk) 05:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite Semi-protection: High risk template, about 1400 links. 221.126.236.94 (talk) 08:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 09:06, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite template protection: High risk template, about 5100 links. 221.126.236.94 (talk) 08:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Samsara 09:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Biden was just awarded it tonight, and the internet is going wild.

See: 'medal of bromance' edits. ~ฅ(ↀωↀ=)neko-channyan 03:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: This page has been under attack for several hours. Each IPs block leads to a new one so perhaps a few hours protection will discourage them. MarnetteD|Talk 03:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gogo Dodo.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated additions of unsourced content. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 03:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gogo Dodo.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 06:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP user making disruptive edits, engaging in what will be an edit war if it continues. Jennica / talk 00:55, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not really seeing any disruption, just minor content disputes. Please give the talk page a try and engage the other editors. -- ferret (talk) 01:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Excessive vandalism. —MRD2014 (talkcontribs) 03:39, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beat me to it. Vandalism by several IPs is so persistent that I have been unable to restore a clean version. Donner60 (talk) 03:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. Can't clean this up until it is protected. Meters (talk) 03:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Gogo Dodo. -- ferret (talk) 03:53, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same thing, same sort of vandalism, some of the same users apparently as at Kingdom Hearts III. Persistent and repeated vandalism. One of the vandals now has a user name. Donner60 (talk) 03:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator David Levy. -- ferret (talk) 03:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. oknazevad (talk) 01:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Yamaguchi先生. -- ferret (talk) 01:42, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – highly visible page. WNYY98 (talk) 02:06, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – vandalism has resumed since protection expired 3 days ago. WNYY98 (talk) 02:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Article was semi'd by Pats1 indefinitely in 2010 (the only time the article was ever semiprotected) and it has been six years since then, so it probably isn't necessary now and unprotection is worth a shot. —MRD2014 (talkcontribs) 02:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Ad Orientem (talk) 02:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same IP is putting up false block notices, and ignoring warning over and over and over again. WP:AIV Has not banned the IP yet, so a 2 or 3 hour SEMI would do the trick until AIV blocks him. L3X1 (talk) 20:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IP blocked by RickinBaltimore. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, blanking the page and redirecting to an unrelated title. Received protection in November for same issue. -- Whats new?(talk) 23:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 23:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full-protection: Vandalism by sockpuppets of User:UnderArmourKid like User:Robot and Nascar!! and User:OceanicFish!!. For example: [20], [21] and [22]. Regards, --2602:304:68AD:3220:F9FB:9B59:72A2:F033 (talk) 00:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 00:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

protection: - edit warring. User removes sourced info.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – see the revhist. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 19:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. Favonian (talk) 19:16, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Triptothecottage (talk) 23:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 23:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:12, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. MatthewTardiff 22:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 22:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 23:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 15:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I am not a member of the WP:ARBCOM, but I think that this could be placed under WP:ECP as it could be considered as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:23, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Casliber: Do you think the that the Committee restriction on Arab-Israeli conflict applies hear and means that extended protection should be put in place? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, and done. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. For the bot. -- ferret (talk) 22:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:52, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 21:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Seeing some sockpuppets of UnderArmourKid vandalizing the article. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism and sockpuppetry. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:05, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

14 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs keep adding unsourced credits to the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 13:54, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:57, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Rash of IPs (9 to date) claiming he has died - none with any sources - Arjayay (talk) 16:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined For now. I have found at least one source saying he has died. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In addition, can the defamatory edit by an anon IP placed today be redacted please. Karst (talk) 17:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I warned the IP and revdelled the offensive edit. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and blanking since Sept 2016 by multiple IP editors. Thanks for your attention and for working the queue. --Lockley (talk) 18:45, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks like a long term problem. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Amaury's sandbox is now being vandalized by sockpuppets of User:Orchomen following their talk page being protected. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 19:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template editor protection. SparkTroy (talk) 14:57, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article is not protected. Samsara 15:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Samsara 15:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism from multiple IPs and newly registered editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:29, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP hopping genre warrior. - Mlpearc (open channel) 17:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry. 73.96.112.156 (talk) 15:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This appears to be an ongoing problem. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – caused by user:Kellymoat who has been told numerous times to stop vandalizing the page and keeps continually vandalizing it. 2A02:C7F:DE12:2400:BD0C:23A8:A4FF:4F6A (talk) 15:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Coincidently, I just filed a complaint against that user. For using multiple IP addresses to edit war on. Kellymoat (talk) 15:49, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah? You're the one who's been IP hoping between accounts; my talkpage is proof. 2A02:C7F:DE12:2400:BD0C:23A8:A4FF:4F6A (talk) 16:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The talk page that you just blanked?Kellymoat (talk) 16:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Enough. ANI is this way. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This article is regularly edited by people who try to recast the beliefs of this religion as absolute facts. Now we also have at least one person doing the opposite and mocking their beliefs. This is all pointlessly disruptive. DanielRigal (talk) 15:49, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Problematic editing resumed immediately after previous PP expired. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:52, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes or semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of Trump still continuing. Recommend pending changes as not likely to get better anytime soon. Ebyabe talk - State of the Union11:55, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal repeatedly adding irrelevant information despite attempts to explain why the information is not necessary and repeated warnings. The Old JacobiteThe '45 13:47, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Only about 300 links, not exactly a high risk template. --219.79.97.173 (talk) 12:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is a current discussion about this on the talk page. You may wish to contribute there. Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Do you have a need for editing this template, and have you attempted to contact the protecting admin? Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: The IP did contact the protecting admin, AGK, but I reverted because AGK hasn't edited in months.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite semi protection WP:HRT, about 1,800 links. --218.102.34.64 (talk) 02:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Vanamonde (talk) 09:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vanamonde (talk) 09:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Repeated removals of sourced content with unsourced stuff on three occasions within the last two days. Usually done by IP accounts and disingenuously titled as "minor edit" while large swathes of content are removed.Damien2016 (talk) 10:57, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – repeated addition of unsourced statistics. ww2censor (talk) 11:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent vandalism throughout 2016, 33 times by multiple unregistered users, 14 times by 4 SPAs (one SPA nominating the page for deletion, which was overwhelmingly rejected), one long vandalism edit war in February 2016. In 2014 and 2015, the constructive edits from unregistereds outnumbered the disruptive ones (2014: 3 to 1; 2015: 9 to 2), but this balance was overturned in 2016 (7 to 33). I'm not sure if semi-protection will solve the problem, because some vandals simply create an SPA. Also, most disruptive edits are reverted the same day, the page is relatively well-guarded. However, according to my calculation, 52 of the total of 232 or 22.4% of all edits are vandalism, which is far above the average of 5%. Interested in your opinion. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 04:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes--Ymblanter (talk) 09:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unverified possibly false rumors about this actor's alleged health status and alleged death (the situation is unclear with conflicting forum posts). Google came up empty on reliable news (both in English and Spanish). Repeated BLP addition without source. GermanJoe (talk) 08:51, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lower to template editor protection: I want to be able to add these to Category:Unused taxobox templates as they are almost certainly unused now, but I don't want them deleted until I've finished working on the conversion of parts of the system to Lua. (I did ask the protecting admin in another case – see User talk:Anomie#Protection level 2 – and was referred onwards. There is no covering project.) Peter coxhead (talk) 08:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 09:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a meme going around involving the lead singer (Sarah Midori Perry) being nicknamed "Crusher." The page had to be fixed a dozen times today.

Please protect it for a week or more. That, hopefully, will be enough time for the meme to die down. KNHaw (talk) 03:50, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 07:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From template protection to semi-protection, only about 1600 links. 221.126.236.94 (talk) 08:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is a current discussion about this on the talk page. You may wish to contribute there. Samsara 09:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also pinging Mark Arsten. Samsara 09:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite template protection WP:HRT, about 6,000 links. --203.186.21.230 (talk) 04:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 07:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite template protection WP:HRT, about 7,000 links. --203.186.21.230 (talk) 04:23, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 07:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite template protection WP:HRT, about 20,000 links. --203.186.21.230 (talk) 04:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Samsara 06:57, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite template protection WP:HRT, about 11,000 links. --203.186.21.230 (talk) 04:35, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 07:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently being brigaded by 4chan. See thread 107034471 on pol. Interference 541 (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 07:04, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by numerous IPs. —ATS 🖖 talk 06:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:54, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Only about 600 links, not exactly a high risk template. --221.126.236.94 (talk) 08:42, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is a current discussion about this on the talk page. You may wish to contribute there. Samsara 09:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping genre warrior. - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. I've removed the page from my watchlist, maybe you can watch it. Cheers, - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:54, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – When Toronto Maple Leafs play Ottawa Senators, which is happening this weekend and next, there is regular vandalism. Alaney2k (talk) 00:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We don't preemptively protect pages. If the vandalism picks up, feel free to come back. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandal from the past few weeks, changing the aircraft as supersonic. McSly (talk) 02:47, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/Metalac1406. Binksternet (talk) 22:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IP blocked, first incident. If evasion continues under new IPs, request protection again. -- ferret (talk) 23:03, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/Metalac1406. Binksternet (talk) 22:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done IP blocked, first incident. If evasion continues under new IPs, request protection again. -- ferret (talk) 23:03, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite template protection WP:HRT, about 12,000 links. 218.102.34.64 (talk) 02:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Samsara 02:58, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent re-addition of unsourced material by anon editors. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 00:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Page name keeps getting changed, using reference that cannot be considered 100% accurate. Have reverted to original name, but unsure if editor will change it once again. Hellboy42 (talk)

Move protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Settle this on the talk page. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:51, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Four days of anons (or an IP-hopping vandal) changing his football club. There's talk in the press of him possibly moving to Esteghlal F.C., but nothing has happened yet. Wikishovel (talk) 01:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:29, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:33, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Materialscientist (talk) 01:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. MatthewTardiff 19:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems like a small content dispute. Please try the talk page or DRN. -- ferret (talk) 19:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued removal of {{COI}} by new user and an IP which is prolly the new user . - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IP blocked fro 48 hrs. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Dat GuyTalkContribs 00:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued long-term abuse by IP socks of Kay Uwe Böhm . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Chrissymad: I hesitate to protect this since the article was just created and split from the main topic. I would be happy to watchlist it though and protect if it continues. -- ferret (talk) 19:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined New article for 2017 events, only two disruptive edits. Will monitor. -- ferret (talk) 19:36, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. MatthewTardiff 19:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one revert in the last two weeks for an IP edit. -- ferret (talk) 19:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full-protection: Spam by User:Schorma, User:188.96.181.15 and User:88.71.54.111 like: [23], [24], [25] and [26]. Regards, 2602:304:68AD:3220:E5B7:9A82:7D7C:8A13 (talk) 23:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:53, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There have been multiple unexplained deletions, reverts, and removals of vital content in the lead paragraph by anonymous IP accounts and sock puppets. I would like to request that this page be protected so that only established editors can make reasonable edits to it. Tiger7253 (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It looks like several good faith efforts have been made to change the article, including removal of unsourced portions, updating or adding new sources, etc. Definitely not persistent disruptive editing. -- ferret (talk) 19:12, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move-protection: See this section. The article continues to be moved against consensus and without a policy-based rationale. It needs indefinite move-protection to protect the article from this back and forth. If anyone has a valid argument for moving the article, that person can start a WP:Requested move discussion. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous semiprotection was still in affect but autoconfirmed users who have past move-warred involved. Protection increased to sysop. -- ferret (talk) 19:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ferret, thanks. The reason I requested indefinite move-protection, though, is that the moving of this article will continue. People will keep moving it to "Lucas Horton" regardless of the arguments made on the talk page. It's better to have the article indefinitely move-protected than to keep requesting move-protection for it. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent recent addition of unsourced content. --IJBall (contribstalk) 22:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism by multiple diff accounts in 24 hour period. Drewmutt (talk) 19:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Samtar. -- ferret (talk) 19:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Article has been CSD'd twice for A11 and has been repeatedly recreated. I reached out to the author letting them know they can use AfC next time if they want to create this article in the future with different content (if it should be found notable at that time). Garchy (talk) 21:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. -- Samtar talk · contribs 22:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent link spamming of a 'private' (read, copyright violating fork) 'successor' to this closed MMO. A pirate server for a game about pirates. MrOllie (talk) 21:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I've blocked the single user involved. -- ferret (talk) 21:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User appears to be using hosting service to evade. -- ferret (talk) 22:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:SchoolcraftT is using IP addresses to circumvent his permanent ban. The main page has already been protected but he continues to edit on the talk page using IP addresses, so I'm requesting the protection be extended there as well. Bitmapped (talk) 22:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

15 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The same specific unsourced edit has been repeatedly reverted since 2014. Not constructive change from unregistered, all reverts. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 17:54, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Appears to be a long term issue. Sro23 (talk) 18:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This appears to be a long term problem that two previous instances of PP did not resolve. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:51, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Series of new single purpose accounts (Tazandra, Slavaboo, Palpameme) and IPs (24.236.76.195 and 166.182.81.148) trying to promote their social networking app. Justeditingtoday (talk) 19:05, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism will never end due to the film's lead actor's popularity and wide recognition. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP's. . Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 17:05, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:25, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short term vandalism past few days. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long-term sockpuppetry by User:Vote (X) for Change. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Vote (X) for Change. Also reported at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vote (X) for Change‎. Jc3s5h (talk) 15:28, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Future Perfect at Sunrise. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:58, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term disruption, currently PC is not working for now, but the IP kept reinserting whether the claims he made. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks like long term disruptive editing and PC was not working. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:41, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition by IPs of the number of episodes in season 2 of this series (e.g. [27]), without providing a reliable source. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant needing to revert IP tampering of infobox and cast list edits that go against Wiki Rules. TropicAces (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2017 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unexplained removals and additions of unsourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 13:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like the last pp did not deter.Ad Orientem (talk) 14:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – Various IP editors are changing the name of a song from A to CTRL. It is not supported by the source cited. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:38, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated.  LeoFrank  Talk 14:54, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:58, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: only about 200 links, no need protection. IP and new users should have rights to edit it --165.84.174.129 (talk) 07:49, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: WP:HRT, about 5,000 links. --165.84.174.129 (talk) 07:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is already semi-protected: I see no reason for template protection. On the contrary, it would inconvenience many folks who appear to be improving the template. Vanamonde (talk) 10:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: disruptive tag-bombing by AfD proposer, before and after article survived AfD. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:28, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:12, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per its log, last time's year long protection doesn't seem to deter two specific instances of repeated unsourced disruptive editing. Extended duration this time, perhaps. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite template protection: WP:HRT, about 14,000 links. 219.79.97.173 (talk) 03:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@HJ Mitchell: Your protection comment mentions an ANI discussion - is that something we need to take into consideration here? Samsara 05:47, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:10, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite move-protection: My user and talk pages have been moved today by a vandal user. I would like to ask to move-protect my both user and talk pages permanently. Thanks--Sahehco (talk) 12:09, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've put both at semi-protection for moves - if you experience further problems, let us know and we can elevate it further. Samsara 12:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Under heavy attack by vandals; only 41 revision of fourth and back reverts today. Worst of all this is an IP address from the 1.32.70.x range that conducts sneaky vandalism under heavy disguise of dummy edits and multiple revisions. (But he hasn't done even one positive improvement.). Codename Lisa (talk) 12:47, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguisttalk|contribs 10:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption began soon after previous protection expired: I would suggest a longer period this time. . Vanamonde (talk) 10:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous target of IP disruption, using different socks! . —IB [ Poke ] 10:33, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:48, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of IP edits trying to claim so series was renewed or that season 9 exists. . EvergreenFir (talk) 06:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:32, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:54, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent driveby and anon IP vandalism. Montanabw(talk) 09:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected, quite sufficient--Ymblanter (talk) 09:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite semi-protection: WP:HRT, about 1,300 links. 219.79.97.173 (talk) 02:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:25, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruption from dynamic IPs of indef-blocked User:Tlrtls1478 who insists on lengthening airport names beyond their official names and article titles. HkCaGu (talk) 03:42, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism Lizard (talk) 04:38, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kuru. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:28, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  04:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Bertrand101 Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  05:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:30, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP users. Areaseven (talk) 06:34, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:10, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 04:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite template protection: WP:HRT, about 9,000 links. 219.79.97.173 (talk) 03:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Samsara 05:48, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced content by IPs. Player has recently announced retirement. Lizard (talk) 04:34, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 04:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An AfD about a similar article closed as redirect; an IP user keeps making this an article even though many have said otherwise. A conflict of interest discussion is also relevant. JudgeRM (talk to me) 20:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There has been no further edit warring since the level 4 warning. I'm now watching this page, if there is anymore of this nonsense I will block the IP. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP socks continuing to deny and change subject and subject's parents' racial heritage without sourcing, as has been a problem for years on this article. Nate (chatter) 01:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. An examination of the editing history shows this has indeed been an ongoing problem for years. Enough is enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:14, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, that works for me perfectly. Nate (chatter) 02:30, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Only about 600 links, not exactly a high risk template. 219.79.97.173 (talk) 12:36, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is a current discussion about this on the talk page. You may wish to contribute there. Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Do you have a need for editing this template, and have you attempted to contact the protecting admin? Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Samsara 17:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Only about 100 links, not a high risk template. --219.79.97.173 (talk) 12:42, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is a current discussion about this on the talk page. You may wish to contribute there. Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Do you have a need for editing this template, and have you attempted to contact the protecting admin? Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Samsara 17:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Only about 300 links, not exactly a high risk template. --219.79.97.173 (talk) 12:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is a current discussion about this on the talk page. You may wish to contribute there. Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Do you have a need for editing this template, and have you attempted to contact the protecting admin? Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Samsara 17:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Only about 700 links, not exactly a high risk template. --219.79.97.173 (talk) 12:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is a current discussion about this on the talk page. You may wish to contribute there. Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Do you have a need for editing this template, and have you attempted to contact the protecting admin? Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Samsara 17:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Only about 300 links, not exactly a high risk template. --219.79.97.173 (talk) 12:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is a current discussion about this on the talk page. You may wish to contribute there. Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Do you have a need for editing this template, and have you attempted to contact the protecting admin? Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Samsara 17:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Only about 300 links, not exactly a high risk template. --219.79.97.173 (talk) 12:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is a current discussion about this on the talk page. You may wish to contribute there. Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Do you have a need for editing this template, and have you attempted to contact the protecting admin? Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you use {{Edit template-protected}} insted of listing multiple reduction requests. - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Samsara 17:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: only about 600 links, not exactly WP:HRT. --203.186.21.230 (talk) 04:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is a current discussion about this on the talk page. You may wish to contribute there. Samsara 07:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question: (1) Do you have a need for editing this template, and (2) have you attempted to contact the protecting admin? Samsara 07:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Samsara 17:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent political based additions to the notable people list. Certain it is the same person every time. Ipv6 switches every edit so communication is futile. An edit filter for the name may be more appropriate. . John from Idegon (talk) 01:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks like it's been a long term problem. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of recent vandal activity. -- Dane talk 01:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:32, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – 34,000+ transclusions, and what runs {{country alias}}. Primefac (talk) 01:37, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Dat GuyTalkContribs 23:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm having a hard time seeing any urgent need IPs or newly registered editors will have for editing this category. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism over the last day from different users and IPs; restored stable version. -- Dane talk 23:58, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samtar. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 00:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:38, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of content associated with claims of libel from one IP user who violated 3RR. Another IP user joined in. Both have IPs from Seattle area near location of Bastyr. Delta13C (talk) 00:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued unsourced changes added by a jumping IP. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 21:13, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High IP vandalism. MYS77 21:48, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recently in the news and lots of disruptive editing. -- Dane talk 23:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samtar. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent addition of reference that does not pass WP:RS for BLP article. - Mlpearc (open channel) 16:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. Level 4 warning issued. If there is further disruptive editing we can block the user. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:51, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Between the confirmed sockpuppets, the suspected sockpuppets, IP users, and new accounts - changing the genre of a 13 year old album, perhaps we need some protection for a few days.

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP sockpuppets of User:M Rob1119 are overwriting this redirect with an article about some other person. Persistent. No need for IP users to create articles anyway and generally can't but overwriting redirects is a loophole. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From template protection to semi-protection, only about 900 links. --219.79.97.173 (talk) 12:39, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is a current discussion about this on the talk page. You may wish to contribute there. Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Do you have a need for editing this template, and have you attempted to contact the protecting admin? Samsara 14:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Samsara 17:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

16 January 2017

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – This page shouldn't be moved. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 15:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done For one, this is an essay, not a Wikipedia policy or guideline. Second, no one has attempted to move it. I don't see a move of this as either imminent or likely to be irreversibly disruptive if it would happen, so I am not inclined to override our practice against preemptive protections. If another admin disagrees, they are free to override me. Go Phightins! 17:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguisttalk|contribs 16:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Looks like a content dispute here. If the IP in question reverts again, please re-report and we can look at a block. If hopping becomes an issue, we can do page protection, but as far as I can tell, one IP editor is the sole problem here. Go Phightins! 17:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of relevant, sourced information by a number of Single Purpose Accounts. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP still keeps adding crystal crap so could I ask this gets protected for a year?, Thanks, . –Davey2010Talk 18:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 19:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Ferret :) –Davey2010Talk 20:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – IPs are persisently adding poorly sourced claims on a BLP currently in the news. Bradv 19:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 20:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism as can be seen from the edit history. JerrySa1 (talk) 20:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 20:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: High level of IP vandalism. 95.49.119.170 (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The Wikipedia Sandbox is a sandbox and should never be protected. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 15:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: This Wikipedian has been deceased since 2014. Wikipedia's deceased editors' policy states that their user pages should be protected. —Maethoredhel (TalkContribsLog) 17:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Go Phightins! 17:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Go Phightins!. -- ferret (talk) 19:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editor was warned and blocked. Now engaging in an edit war using IPs. —Farix (t | c) 18:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, student variety. 2601:188:1:AEA0:7C6B:EA79:991E:758C (talk) 19:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 19:46, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Let's try about 90 days of page protection; assorted drive-by anon IP edits are almost all trivia and inevitably unhelpful for this particular featured article. Montanabw(talk) 19:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 19:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing by an IP address editing venues. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 04:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Other IP edits are not getting reverted, looks like collateral damage is likely if protected. Samsara 14:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 14:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mahveotm (talk) 13:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 154.66.34.88 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Samsara 13:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs making unsourced changes to the article. There is no reference either in a news source or in the official website of the airline regarding these changes. Despite reverting, IPs keep re-instating the same.  LeoFrank  Talk 17:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Thanks so much for your attention to this issue, LeoFrank. Let us know if we can be of further assistance. Go Phightins! 17:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page may fall under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. In any event, it is frequently the target of unregistered or newly registered editors, who have included the subject himself, who don't like what the sources say about him. Please use WP:Pending changes protection or Extended confirmed protection for this BLP related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would say it qualifies for that remedy. Samsara 06:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 06:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Could be equally BLP, vandalism & disruptive. For 3 weeks while the show is airing. Repeatedly subject to non-encyclopedic additions by IPs, basically fans of the show adding and amending based on chat forums. Leaky Caldron 17:07, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We don't block preemptively, as you know, so for now I gave it one week. Feel free to re-report if the editing continues after a week is up. Thanks for your attention to this issue. Go Phightins! 17:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon (talk) 17:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.: Hey John from Idegon! I hope all is well. I gave this a month of semi-protection. Let me know if it needs a longer term after this expires. All the best, Go Phightins! 17:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Continued and persistent vandalism or insertion of unencyclopedic content, presumably from fans of the franchise. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – This page shouldn't be moved. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 15:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 15:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis (talk) 15:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 15:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New Users and Ip Vandalism . ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 07:32, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samtar. Samsara 13:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a significant amount of disruption or vandalism from new or unregistered users. Phyo WP (message) 13:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, and blatant racism. GalatzTalk 13:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Mentioned on reddit, will probably be vandalised a few times in the next few days. Slashme (talk) 13:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We don't protect pre-emptively, but due to past unhelpful contributions, the page is eligible for PC1, which I've enabled. Samsara 13:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by a single new user. --Local hero talk 04:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, this is just one user, who has been warned and for the time being stopped. If they continue edit-warring, WP:3RRN should be used to get them blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Google Doodle related vandalism. Safiel (talk) 05:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 13:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Target of long-term block evasion by User:Alex9777777. McGeddon (talk) 10:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Widr (talk) 12:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection "Edit war" by ip users (5, 10?) that did not known the use of infobox was intented for domestic league only. Matthew_hk tc 10:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 13:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. It has received temporary protection several times but vandalism has continued to occur and has required many reversions. Most of the vandalism seems to come from unregistered users so hopefully extended confirmed protection will remove this problem. Josephus37 (talk) 12:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 13:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: With his death today and his murder trial in the news for the past year or so, this has attracted a lot of IP vandalism. GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realise we get no information on who the mysterious oversighter was that declined to protect yesterday... Samsara 07:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't know about the incident that Samsara is referring to: but this appears to be necessary, and I am therefore protecting it. If there are important reasons to unprotect that I am unaware of, then feel free to unprotect without asking me. Vanamonde (talk) 09:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: only about 400 links, no need protection. IP and new users should have rights to edit it --165.84.174.129 (talk) 07:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Have you asked Airplaneman who was the protecting admin? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This needs to be unsalted so that Vijayam (film) can be moved there. The AfD already has one "keep" argument. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 15:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @GeoffreyT2000: Ping me if the AfD closes as keep or no consensus and I'll unprotect the page, but let's wait for that to happen. ~ Rob13Talk 06:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalized for the 3rd time, by the same IP who keeps mistaking Bebe Rexha for Iggy Azalea. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 20:58, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[User talk:L3X1]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unnecessary removal of content by IP users. Superchunk22 (Superchunk22) 04:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. In short, he's a mixed martial artist who's expected to face a Russian fighter, Khabib Nurmagomedov, and what's probably happening is vandalism from Khabib's large Russian following. TBMNY (talk) 00:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal with multiple accounts. Dawnseeker2000 00:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:02, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting upgrade to semi-protection from pending changes due to uptick in vandalism activity. -- Dane talk 00:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Anon IP, including one who has erased several warnings from his talk page, are adding uncited personal-life claims both in violation of WP:BLP but contrary to the RS sources in the article. As well, they are including disallowed reference links to IMDb. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – This request is in line with the one above: Another sock puppet of User:Orchomen has now vandalized this page with a confirmed user account. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 19:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:37, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism by IP users after repeatedly explaining changes made on the page. VietPride10 (talk) 23:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: NEEDS PROTECTION NOW. Lizard (talk) 01:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism has died down. Putting it on pending. If edits are made at a high rate tomorrow, please ping me and I'll raise to semi. ~ Rob13Talk 06:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article is vandalised frequently by IP users. Daylen (talk) 04:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 06:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. high level of vandalism in progess WNYY98 (talk) 04:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 06:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 04:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 06:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism and disruptive editing. Lizard (talk) 04:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 06:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The protection seems to have become preemptive. The last edit prior to the version I reverted was October last year. I think that the PC should be reinstated once those unsourced additions come back again. Babymissfortune 08:17, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Have you asked Ponyo who was the protecting admin? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 157.49.161.90 (talk) 17:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Another sock puppet of User:Orchomen has now vandalized this page using a confirmed account. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 19:25, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:33, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – After the infbox battle that happened just before Christmas, a new edit war has started. It seems one editor wants WP:CONSENSUS before a major change and I'm not sure what the other wants. A full lock, with a formal request for unlocking until an agreement is reached (on both topics) would be appreciated. I can't see a lot happening to Canada over the next few months that would require immediate change to registered editors. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Almost 9k transclusions of this module and the related template {{Team appearances list}}. Since the /data is stored on a separate page, requesting TE protection on it as well. Primefac (talk) 00:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 06:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Well, I'm sure you know why I am requesting this. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Coordinated attack by multiple IPs and one new account. Some of the vandalism is BLP material. Meters (talk) 05:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: During the months of January and February, the page tends to get a rise in IP vandalism due to the Peruvian "National Pisco Sour Day" celebrations held on the first Saturday of February.--MarshalN20 🕊 23:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected until the observance has passed. Biblio (talk) 23:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal with multiple accounts (article was just unprotected on Jan 14). Dawnseeker2000 00:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 05:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism due to 2016 NFL playoffs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Immense IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 02:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. used by vandals as attack page towards the admin WNYY98 (talk) 03:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page protection will reduce frequency of vandalism by unregistered users. Eruditescholar (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:10, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 22:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:19, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations – Various IP users claiming a death, unsourced, seems to be reference to ingame incident. Triptothecottage (talk) 23:12, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17 January 2017

Semi-protection: WP:HRT, about 1,400 links. 219.79.226.134 (talk) 14:38, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined In the roughly six years since creation there have been only a handful of edits and none that look disruptive. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:05, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Months of vandalism and BLP violations by IPs. Lizard (talk) 20:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 20:38, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 20:46, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 21:15, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – currently under pending changes, very few constructive ip edits, long protection log. WNYY98 (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 21:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Following the previous week-long SPP, the same IPs have returned to make the same edits, namely adding contentious content to the lead which is under discussion at the article talk page. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:54, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:47, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by one or more editors using different accounts and IP addresses. ElKevbo (talk) 18:46, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:53, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Other pages already protected, this page in the same set is seeing massive vandalism. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 18:47, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pages are not protected preemptively. Samsara 18:50, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:50, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism. MYS77 11:40, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Edit war seems to have died down. Also, there are some good edits by IPs. Yaris678 (talk) 13:06, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Fairly high level of recurrent IP vandalism. Albrecht Conz (talk) 18:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:30, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: More disruptive editing, editing against consensus by unconfirmed contributors since last semi-prot expired. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:25, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Removal of content by IP editor. The same edit keeps being removed. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:06, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection An IP editor in Thailand with a dynamic IP address keeps vandalizing the article. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 14:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 15:25, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:43, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This article has been protected several times over the last few years. Every time protection expires, a new rash of IP vandalism starts. The subject is a polarizing public figure and will continually be in the news, which is why I'm asking for indefinite protection. We can revisit the issue in a few years' time. PC1 would prevent vandalism from being immediately visible while still allowing constructive IP editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:17, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection should not be used on pages with a high edit rate, like this one. Samsara 16:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Many IP edits are reverted, most of them vandalism. George Ho (talk) 10:43, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 67.217.12.15 (talk · contribs) blocked by Excirial. Samsara 10:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – part of this stupid meme. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 13:37, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 14:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – A recent edit made many of the approximately 2000 transclusions of this template display in a poor fashion and about a month passed before the problem was remedied. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 14:42, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 09:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Vanamonde (talk) 10:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – page has now been moved three times to Nor cheese (its Turkish name), and has been returned to Anari as all the sources listed use that name. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. Yaris678 (talk) 12:57, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Long term sock-puppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vote (X) for Change and Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Vote (X) for Change. Jc3s5h (talk) 12:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by contributions, an apparent sock of Theeasytarget. Triptothecottage (talk) 04:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 05:20, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – at RBF Production Pvt.Ltd. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 08:09, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Indefinitely. Vanamonde (talk) 09:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of disruptive IP editor. Grayfell (talk) 08:17, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 09:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socking by at least two masters. . GABgab 02:47, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 4.34.62.251 (talk · contribs) blocked by Bbb23.—CYBERPOWER (Around) 02:50, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: One recent edit by IP was reverted. It's more of an opinion about the article subject itself. Past reverts are more likely vandalism or unreasonable removals, although they have happened once or twice a month. George Ho (talk) 07:31, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 8 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:43, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Many people have been editing the key personnel section in the Infobox of late. The folks editing this have added random names, those absolutely in no way shape or form associated with Jio. The kind of edits done almost amount to vandalism. Request protection for this page for at least the next few months. Thanks! FlyingBlueDream (talk) 07:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too unfrequently edited for semi and also there are some good IP edits.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beall's website is down and we have IP editors and editors with few edits bombing the page claiming that it was hacked. Please at least temporarily semi-protect but ideally fully protect for say 3 days after which time the site should be back up or there should be reliable sources saying what is happening. Jytdog (talk) 22:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neither page has been edited in the last 5 hrs - likely stale. Samsara 22:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 02:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Dynamic IP keeps re-adding a genre based on an unreliable source (a WordPress blog post that does not meet WP:SPS). —Farix (t | c) 23:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 02:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: 9 months of rev-del'ed personal attacks from an IP hopper. I think this is still the original IP editor getting back at us for his blocks. Not much we can do since he waits for the protection to end on this page, and comes back from whatever his current IP is. Meters (talk) 06:16, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:21, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection as close to forever as possible, for obvious reasons, this dab page is a target for a lot of kiddie vandalism and patrolling is a waste of editor resources. Montanabw(talk) 01:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 01:37, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism due to 2016 NFL playoffs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:26, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Samsara 05:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: repeated additions of unsourced content. Saunders is rumoured to be signing with Philadelphia but it is not official yet. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 05:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 05:22, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently the user AlexMiller2, has returned, through the IP (200.84.139.254) and continues to generate editing war. Philip J Fry (talk) 00:31, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined SPI is in progress. I think that's the wisest route to follow here. Go Phightins! 00:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – 10-day ECP has recently expired after disruption from autoconfirmed-but-not-yet-extended-confirmed users following New Year's Eve performance, and had previously been indefinitely semi-protected since 2010 after a long history of vandalism. Let's not take the risk of more autoconfirmed-but-not-yet-extended-confirmed disruption. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:30, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. PC1 is doing it's job just fine for now.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 01:45, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On the contrary, admin Samsara said to bring this back to RPP or let him/her know once ECP had expired if it wasn't already re-protected. Pending changes are also useless to begin with because they don't stop disruption. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, did it just now. PC was just a stop-gap so it wouldn't stand completely unprotected. Samsara 02:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I was not aware of that discussion. @Samsara: I would appreciate being pinged so I am aware when you decide to override me. :-)—CYBERPOWER (Around) 02:48, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Cyberpower678: I had the article on my watchlist, so there was no overriding - Snuggums' ping arrived after I changed the status. In any case, discussion of this issue is here. Samsara 05:08, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: Good to know thank you. :-)—CYBERPOWER (Around) 13:14, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 02:07, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Tunisian schoolkid keeps creating a page on himself with attempts starting in September last year using various accounts - also on his website Fozbal. Has offered on the talk page to pay money to keep it, so seems pretty determined to keep trying. Blythwood (talk) 03:00, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Primefac (talk) 03:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary upload protection: Consistent attempts to upload an incorrect version of the poster for O.J.: Made in America. Guidelines for both the TV and Film projects recommend the initial release poster be used, not subsequent reissues or new ones for created after release, which users have been attempting to upload. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 22:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all of the edits (that I checked) seem to be anons doing silly vandalism or test edits. . Sakuura Cartelet Talk 00:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 01:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Also should salt Kaley marie. Wgolf (talk) 00:37, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protectedCYBERPOWER (Chat) 01:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – A good deal of past edits are vandalism. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 20:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. – Juliancolton | Talk 20:32, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by large bunch of unrelated IPs DVdm (talk) 22:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zupotachyon Ping me (talkcontribs) 00:06, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 00:22, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zupotachyon Ping me (talkcontribs) 00:27, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

18 January 2017

Semi-protection: Currently experiencing vandalism due to subject being in the news in relation to an alleged rape. Jellyman (talk) 19:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism- see recent history. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 19:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: What the? This was only created once. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 04:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC) @JamesBWatson: This does look odd, the log indicates an WP:LTA user was involved somehow but I'm not seeing it, paging protecting admin in case there is something less obvious going on. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:31, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@KATMAKROFAN and Beeblebrox: Well, this relates to an action I took in 2013, so you will perhaps not be surprised when I tell you that I don't remember it. However, a couple of minutes searching through histories was enough to make it apparent that this was one of a number of related templates that had been misused and/or disruptively edited by the editor variously known as EgayovikiW, DASL51984, Dy11111, Floating Inputs, and numerous other names, many (but not all) of them listed at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Dy11111 and Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Dy11111. My guess is that there is no longer any need for the protection, so I'll remove it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already unprotected by administrator JamesBWatson. -- ferret (talk) 20:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name – Protecting because any recreation attempt, no matter what the content, will be deleted or moved without leaving a redirect, because of the offensive name. Also blacklist any title containing "Twinkle Twinkle Little Sperm". Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 15:24, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't see a reason to create protect this. It was a vandal move 8+ years ago with no further activity. There's an essentially infinite number of possible offensive names a vandal could move a page like this to.. -- ferret (talk) 15:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – ip/new contributions commonly unconstructive, previously semi-protected/currently move-protected. WNYY98 (talk) 18:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't seem to be a lot of traffic, primary recent vandal has been blocked. -- ferret (talk) 19:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry to disagree with you ferret. I was looking at it already when you declined it. There is a long history of vandalism on this article. While the recent vandalism hasn't been massive, there hasn't been many recent edits at all. A very high proportion of the edits over the last few months have been vandalism or reverting vandalism. Yaris678 (talk) 19:38, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No problem from me at all. :) I was considering switching my stance to PC1 anyways, but this is fine. -- ferret (talk) 19:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of the POV. Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites18:14, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 19:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IPs deliberately changing to false information (silver medal -> gold medal). Stevie is the man! TalkWork 19:24, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 19:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template editor protection. Enable access by template editors. 219.79.226.134 (talk) 07:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protecting admin has been notified and has recently been active. Samsara 08:14, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This template is used in MediaWiki:Protect-text, so I would not be in support of lowering the protection level. As far as I can recall, standard practice is to fully protect templates used in system messages. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 14:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, Mr. Stradivarius, we need to bump up {{cot}}, as it's only at TE. Primefac (talk) 16:47, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You mean {{Collapse top}}. It was lowered in response to a request by SMcCandlish, see diff. He is a template editor and did subsequently edit the template. Last edit to that page by anyone was in July 2016. Samsara 18:43, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There was an unopposed proposal to merge {{Collapse top}} and {{Collapse}} as well, but it has not been done yet. If it's not necessary to full-protect these, I would leave them as is. It seems highly unlikely that a template editor is going to do something destructive to MediaWiki:Protect-text, which is really just a quite simple template that isn't in Template namespace. The protection of that MediaWiki-namespace page is there seemingly because the content is WP:OFFICE controlled, but this doesn't seem to have anything to do with templates (like Collapse top) that it uses as utilities.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  19:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Samsara (talk) 08:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Reactivated template. Steel1943 (talk) 20:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted self. I thought my concern was addressed, but I was mistaken. Steel1943 (talk) 21:05, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Reactivated again. See below. Steel1943 (talk) 21:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Reopening request. @Samsara: This is a valid request since the template is not cascade-protected and since per the instructions in this section, the protecting admin does not need to be notified for full protection to template protection downgrade requests. (Unless someone wants to place this template on Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items, if that's technically possible ... Mr. Stradivarius?) Steel1943 (talk) 19:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused by your seemingly contradictory argument. I'm sure if you were to argue that you have specific improvements you want to make to this template, we would allow you to do that. Otherwise, I'm not sure why we're having this discussion. A request for lowering protection can be made at any time, and template editors know where to do so. Samsara (talk) 19:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: That's okay, since I'm confused on what you are trying to tell me as well, or why you are telling me this. Would it be a bit clearer if I state that I am, in a nutshell, requesting this template have its protection level downgraded, or would it help if I say ... that cascading protection supersedes template protection if both are applied to a page? Steel1943 (talk) 19:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Linking to it from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items will make it fully protected, which is the opposite of lowering it to TP. Now you seem to be saying that you would like its protection to be lowered, but is that because you want to edit it, or because you're wikilawyering about a matter of principle? We had a discussion recently where we concluded that we would not honour random requests for lowering protection unless a good reason was given - see the talk page for that. So if you have specific changes in mind, we would probably lower the protection to allow those to be made. If you don't have any at this time, no change is needed as you can request the lowering of protection when you are ready to edit, and it will be granted within a short time. Note that the proposed change mentioned by SMcCandlish can be made right now - both {{Collapse top}} and {{Collapse}} are editable by template editors right now. Samsara (talk) 19:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I see where the confusion lies now. For one, cascading protection and full protection are not technically the same thing. Also, what I was actually providing were two different paths to resolve this: One is to cascade protect this page, and the other is to lower its protection level to template protection. In its current state, I believe that the page should by default have its protection level lowered to template protection since it is a page in the template namespace and ... again, by default ... should have its protection level lowered to template protection. The creation of the template editor right was to allow editors with the right to edit all templates ... with the exception of those with cascading protection. In fact, I do agree with you that the fact that this has essentially turned into some sort of "wiki lawyering"-ish discussion is rather disturbing as well; the IP made a simple, within consensus established policy request, and now here we are debating the validity of the whole ordeal. If there was a discussion that established consensus otherwise, a link to that information should be added to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/URheading ASAP. Without that information ... In a nutshell, in my opinion, the fact that Mr. Stradivarius raised the protection level of this page from template protection to full protection was WP:IAR and the fact that you denied the IP's request to downgrade it again is also WP:IAR. Steel1943 (talk) 19:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sooooooo... in a previous discussion, I pretty much volunteered for going through highly transcluded templates and ensuring they have the correct protection values, but we kind of got stuck on what cut-off value to use and whether to enact such protection at all. If I have a clear mandate, I will go through them and fix them, but it makes the most sense to me to change them in either direction, both lowering and elevating as needed. The protection policy provides no guidance on when a protection should be increased, however, other than vague relative terms. But honestly, if I have to have the finger pointed at me for relaying consensus from previous discussions to you because you haven't read them, I'd rather walk my dog. Samsara (talk) 19:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: Nah, I'm just not the biggest fan of being told to look at a talk page that has several pages of archives, leaving me with no real clue of how to find the exact discussion I'm being directed to find... And that linked discussion has nothing to do with my concerns... It seems that I have a rather strong disagreement with the way that linked discussion turned out, but I'll leave any concerns I have with that discussion to be stated at a later time since I'm sure we are both getting exhausted dealing with this here at this specific juncture (a random page protect request.) Either way, if I were an admin, I would have also volunteered to do what you volunteered to do as well, considering I'm a bit of a consistency and M&P stickler; makes Wikipedia easier to navigate and edit for good-faith editors, so I very muchly agree with your take on the whole ordeal. Anyways, with that being said, thanks for the information (as well as your take on the matter), and I will reactivate the "denied" template for the bot. Steel1943 (talk) 20:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, turns out that I was mistaken that I was pointed to this discussion. Wikipedia talk:Requests for page protection has 9 archive pages, so trying to find whatever consensus was formed for what I see to be WP:IAR upgrades (upgrade template protection to full protection without proof of template editors editing in violation of the template editor editing guideline) and denials (deny downgrading full protection to template protection) for "Template:" namespace pages is like trying to find a needle in a haystack. And I've seen quite a few of such upgrades and denials when it seems quite clear as stated in Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/URheading that these requests for downgrading should have no controversy and shouldn't be reverted unless the template page has or gets cascading protection (or the obvious case of template protection not working due to template editors not following the template editor guideline themselves while the page is template protected.) So, at this point, I am a bit troubled by the fact that I was directed to some sort of consensus ... but where is proof of that consensus located? This question seems to be bringing up more additional questions than answers. And, honestly, any such drastic change to neuter the permissions granted by the template editor user right really needs to be a discussion that is advertised via a WP:RFC since it is such a big change. Steel1943 (talk) 21:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, never mind for now. I just realized how many community resources may be wasted by discussing this here on this page, as well as the fact that it may drive volunteers away from fulfilling these requests if they see this big wall of text. I'll copy my concerns somewhere (probably in my user space) and probably start a more structured discussion later. Anyways, I'm going to reactivate the decline tag now for the bot. If anyone has the desire to continue on this discussion, probably best to do so on this page's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Template editor for proper exposure. Steel1943 (talk) 21:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Long effort to delete well-sourced material and insert off-topic WP:OR, ESSAY and WP:PRIMARY.VictoriaGraysonTalk 05:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Additionally, the edits back in September and the most recent revert appear to be by autoconfirmed editors, so PC and SP wouldn't stop them. -- ferret (talk) 14:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The article started as a rant. Since then, some editors reduced the amount of NPOV. One stable IP keeps vandalizing the article. 141.51.213.117 (talk) 10:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara (talk) 11:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Right after protection ended, vandalism fired up again. See also edit filter log. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has come under attack from new SPA accounts trying to whitewash it, ranging from making minor comments about the accusations not being proven to repeated attempts to replace the entire article with marketing material from Onecoin. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 13:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 14:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Many different IP's changing his club info. Thepersoncalledme (talk) 14:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 15:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Major vandalism/possible edit warring between IP addresses. Requesting at least ten days to let this thing die down. It appears to have been going on for a while. UNSC Luke 1021 (talk) 14:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Based on numerous protections in the past year. -- ferret (talk) 15:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: WP:HRT, near 7,000 links. 221.126.236.94 (talk) 03:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page is already semi-protected indefinitely: I see no justification for increasing the level of protection. Vanamonde (talk) 09:07, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: WP:HRT, about 5,300 links. 221.126.236.94 (talk) 03:05, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page is already semi-protected indefinitely: I see no justification for increasing the level of protection. Vanamonde (talk) 09:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: WP:HRT, about 6,500 links. 221.126.236.94 (talk) 03:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page is already semi-protected indefinitely: I see no justification for increasing the level of protection. Vanamonde (talk) 09:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: an IP editor is sitting on the page, reverting edits that they disagree with and insisting that the article must be consistent with previous articles (ie, Mercedes F1 W07 Hybrid). Although they have made some effort to learn from their mistakes, such as including references when requested, much of the content that they restore is regarded as inappropriate for inclusion, as per long-standing consensus at WP:F1 (ie, launch dates unnecessary and fail WP:NOTNEWS). Their attitude also needs work; they are dismissive of the need to reference content. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 02:48, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update — IP editor in question is reportedly known to WP:F1 community for disruptive editing in the past. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 06:09, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, we do not protect articles against a single IP. They should be dealt with differently.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis (talk) 03:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara (talk) 08:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Request for indefinite long-term semi protection as the sock is continue to make disruptive editing by adding unsourced content. Seems the sock will not stop although have been given repeated warnings before. Molecule Extraction (talk) 09:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 09:32, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 30 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 09:32, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: WP:HRT, about 800 links. 221.126.236.94 (talk) 03:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Indefinitely. Vanamonde (talk) 09:07, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: WP:HRT, about 1,500 links. 221.126.236.94 (talk) 03:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 08:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: WP:HRT, about 7,200 links. 221.126.236.94 (talk) 03:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 08:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There are a bunch of disruptive SPAs and IPs (with possible conflict of interest) trying to add badly sourced information. I also suspect sockpuppetry here. They are even removing templates from the talk page [28] (this strikes me as bizarre because it is not the article COI template). I would suggest semi or extended confirmed protection for a month or so. Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 09:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: WP:HRT, about 9,300 links. 221.126.236.94 (talk) 03:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 07:48, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism from multiple accounts in small period of time. Potential WP:MEAT. Drewmutt (talk) 04:30, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 07:55, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruption and factual errors from changing IPs of the same user like 2602:306:bcaf:8aa0:949a:c263:42ea:4dea (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 2602:306:bcaf:8aa0:157b:389:988c:3c8b (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Protect the article for few weeks and lets see if it tones down. —IB [ Poke ] 04:44, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 07:52, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 07:52, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection - Persistent vandalism from multiple different IPs. More action will not be taken unless vandalism persists. UNSC Luke 1021 (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Main offender warned and stopped. Might go stale. Samsara (talk) 20:00, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. – Juliancolton | Talk 02:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: WP:HRT, over 20,000 links. 221.126.236.94 (talk) 03:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 07:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – VodkaPoise socks. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 07:41, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Attempting to redirect my userpage. The IP is certainly trolling and probably socking. . O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 13:45, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Modified to allow IPs to make requested edits. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:23, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Too many complaints. We will just have to deal with it. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done For the bot -- ferret (talk) 01:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Just until the Trump inauguration eventually subsides; note there has been a rise in disruptive edits in the last 24hrs. --Nevéselbert 19:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two recent reverts is not enough justification to raise protection from indef semiprot to extended confirmed. -- ferret (talk) 01:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page was vandalised See here by troll from He:wiki. also in Commons The text on summary editsis in Hebrew and it is abussive in Hebrew and need to be hide. This is User:יעל י That was blocked globally on Meta see here for abusing users on Hebrew wiki and Commons. She has a lot of Sockpuppets some of them were record in commons in Category:Sockpuppets of יעל י. also here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/יעל י/Archive My talk page was protected because of her before, see here. I am asking now for indefinite protection, because she will reture in the future and it will happen again. I am an Administrator in Hebrew Wikipedia an OTRS volunteer and an active user in commons, and Meta-wiki. And it will happen again. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 20:40, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We only protect user talk pages in exceptionally serious cases of vandalism, and then only for short periods (see the protection policy). This page has only had two vandal edits recently, from the same user who has now been blocked. I suspect the reason your talk page was protected previously is because at that time it was just a redirect to somewhere else. Hut 8.5 22:37, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Hut 8.5: Can you at least protect for a month? This is a troll that wiil return with another user name. Did you looked at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/יעל י/Archive? Thanks. Hanay (talk) 23:14, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Hanay: - Looking at your talkpage history - this vandal has edited your talkpage twice in the last 30 days. Unfortunately, I don't believe that we would be able to semi-protect your talkpage for such minor disruption at this time. SQLQuery me! 01:19, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly recreated. Can this be WP:SALTed?. Marianna251TALK 17:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, it was twice recreated by the same user who has been warned. If it gets recreated again, the user should be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:49, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Every so often someone comes in and adds something stupid and not useful. Creeperparty568 ~ Cool Guy (talk) 22:27, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mz7 (talk) 22:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP disruptive edits. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 04:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of One week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:WoodMarshArchitecture, User:Lauren.wm, User:Lauren.g.wm and I.P User:150.101.223.12 are all the same editor, adding unsourced POV despite clear COI. Flat Out (talk) 01:05, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 01:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Extendedconfirmed cannot be applied to this article. SQLQuery me! 01:14, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ferret , if I revert to last clean version will this effect pp status? Flat Out (talk) 01:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Flat Out: It would remove the template but not affect the protect. Just add template back. :) -- ferret (talk) 01:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock-hopping IP of blocked user, Wingard, who continues to make edits that violate MOS:TV and consensus at Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas. Longterm history of abuse. livelikemusic talk! 01:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 01:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism the past few weeks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:09, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 02:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Numerous uncited and non-encyclopedic entries by numerous users and IP's. Garchy (talk) 20:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Likely collateral damage given positive contributions from IPs. Additionally, protection during an AfD is problematic. Samsara (talk) 20:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed days after protection expired. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:15, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 01:14, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long protection log, LTA target. WNYY98 (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 01:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same disruptive IP as Kripalu Maharaj. See this chunk of nastiness for another example. Grayfell (talk) 22:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 00:07, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism from multiple IPs due to recent news events. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: WP:HRT, about 1,400 links. 124.244.40.6 (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:05, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of the article is in the news lately and vandals + POV pushers are coming out of the woodwork. AlexEng(TALK) 18:26, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:55, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:14, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 23:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – For obvious reasons. Bradv 22:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We can extend the pending changes later or upgrade it to semi-protection if necessary. Mz7 (talk) 23:05, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

19 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Suggest a couple of hours. IP inserting unsourced BLPVIOs. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 20:55, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Widr. Hut 8.5 21:51, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again, a couple of hours. Same insertion (related article) as above. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 20:55, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Widr. Hut 8.5 21:51, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. —MRD2014 (talkcontribs) 21:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hut 8.5 21:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

20 January 2017

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Flayer (talk) 12:38, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 5.15.84.70 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. If they return as a different IP report it. For now just wait and see as there have been some good IP edits. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 17:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. Aaryan33056 (talk) 13:13, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:58, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguisttalk|contribs 14:16, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Juliancolton | Talk 14:25, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Used for any project page that is under discussion. It comes and goes. Also, it was vandalized just once in 2016. George Ho (talk) 08:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User clever.ape42 is repeating vandalism on this page. Maybe the page should be protected. Thanks. Pra1998 (talk) 13:10, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If the user continues vandalizing, consider reporting to WP:AIV instead. Mz7 (talk) 13:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

pending changes: Continuous edits from some users that affect the neutrality of the article, as it is a protest that is in progress. Aadhitharajantalk 14:22, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 14:24, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism / trolling by IP-hopping blocked sockmaster (AdnanAliAfzal). GermanJoe (talk) 16:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some short-term vandalism due to the recent presidential inauguration. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:43, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:49, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous linkspam from multiple editors over the past few days. MereTechnicality (talk) 14:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Juliancolton. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please, stop the vandalism on this page. Thanks. Pra1998 (talk) 14:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You listed the talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Recent history of page-move vandalism. BilCat (talk) 14:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rotating IP. Waited out a one week semiprotect of the article and has just started up again. MrOllie (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 16:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Playking616 (talk) 05:18, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde (talk) 10:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 15:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 15:35, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I don't see a reason why this was protected, there was not much vandalism or disruptive editing happening, and still isn't. Creeperparty568 ~ Cool Guy (talk) 03:20, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected Has never been unprotected since 2007, and I think for good reason. There are certain high-profile articles that will inevitably attract IP vandalism. The reason you don't see it is because they're blocked from doing it. King of 05:19, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. JimRenge (talk) 13:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:56, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. Karst (talk) 13:07, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 13:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 22:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 08:06, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/The_UPN_Vandal resuming within 12 hours of previous six-month protection expiring. McGeddon (talk) 12:28, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs making edits due to the current political situation in The Gambia. Could do with a very short period of semi-protection, maybe 24 hours. CMD (talk) 09:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 12:43, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User keeps reverting to include content that is subjective opinion/questionable about a living person. Also keeps reverting to include a line that is unsourced.

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.39.178 (talk) 04:56, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Watchlisted. Samsara (talk) 07:46, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara (talk) 07:46, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Reverts lately, including poor spellings and vandalism. --George Ho (talk) 09:16, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All recent reverts have been near-instantaneous. I don't see the value proposition of PC in this situation. Second opinions welcome. Samsara (talk) 12:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think semi would be appropriate here.—CYBERPOWER (Around) 02:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
IMO no protection needed. Vandalism is not frequent enough for semi, plus IPs do seem to make constructive edits at times. PC could be appropriate, but probably not needed. Next admin up gets to make the call! --MelanieN (talk) 04:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like that's me. :) With no activity in the last week, I think the best thing is to watchlist the page and hit it with semi if it gets as busy again as it was at times in September and November. Samsara (talk) 05:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Samsara (talk) 05:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.39.178 (talk) 01:43, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 04:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: After revert edits stopped between two users (who were told to stop), while a dispute resolution procedure was made and while the conflict was being discussed in the Talk Page, waiting for a possible resolution this weekend, another user made a revert edit. . Fulgery (talk) 04:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion didn't end, and he want to Leave his version (the controversial version) of the page. It's more appropriate to protect the version which was before the debate until the problem is resolved. As it will mislead the readers of the page. --Aṭlas (talk) 04:21, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing is misleading or controversial in the current version. Before the appearance of another user, the edits had stopped in the current version (the version before a dispute resolution request was made) and the question was discussed in the Talk page. The problem could be resolved this weekend by unbiaised users hopefully, but until then I think the article should be protected. Fulgery (talk) 05:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am that other user. I find the edits controversial and very misleading, and reversed them. Your edits are not supported by the sources you cite - you evidently have not read them or have not understood them. Moreover, you are not even trying to address the multitude of secondary sources contradicting your edits others have produced in the talk page. You have engaged in edit-warring on this page, violated WP:3RR, and are now trying to solidify your version with page protection? I see you only registered three days ago, and have contributed nothing else but edit-warred on this. May I ask that you take a breather, gather your argument, and address the evidence, rather than going around forum-shopping? If you're concerned about other readers seeing your edits, you can provide diffs. The page itself should be as it was before your controversial edits. Walrasiad (talk) 09:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My edits are supported by my reliable and authoritative sources. I responded multiple times in the Talk Page to the objections. I have not violated WP:3RR and the page should be in the version preceding your rekindling of the fire by your edits, while the edits had stopped and the problem was being discussed.
"Please wait until this weekend as hopefully unbiaised users will try to resolve this conflict.". Fulgery (talk) 09:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sort this out on the talk page: this is not an endorsement of either version. Vanamonde (talk) 10:46, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, violation of Wikipedia polices such as Wikipedia:Assume good faith,Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored, edit war, neutral point of view policy, disruptive editing, no original research policy, spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Under the light of the edits and editing behavior displayed so far by Chaabano (after KevinAbdulqader and ProtectorOfHaq) (Please, see 108.16.242.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 68.119.101.19 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), Chaabano (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) KevinAbdulqader (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log),2001:56a:7230:b00:508e:53d1:e1a9:a05d (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 2001:56a:7230:b00:445b:84dc:d278:846d (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 2604:2000:B088:7000:C597:5416:5908:CD47 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and 50.117.45.69 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)) and the talk history of this article, one can safely determine that this editor is a possible reincarnation of an old and/or blocked editor (possibly KevinAbdulqader and ProtectorOfHaq or Baboon43) as he is removing the same independent, academic and verifiable content from the article which has been "discussed" and "re-discussed" over and over again throughout the history of this article. The only difference this time IS that Chaabano claims to be "researching" Qibla with MIT and he would like to share his "findings" on Wikipedia by inserting promotional links to Qiblah.us (Please, see here, here and here. Furthermore, since Tariq Ramadan has dared to say something about the Al-Ahbash in one of his academic and peer-reviewed work, thus, he should be maligned and his academic and peer-viewed statement should be removed from the article, an attempt which has been quite a few times by users like Chaabano. Despite the fact that Tariq Ramadan and Qibla has got their own dedicated pages on Wikipedia. It is important to note that Chaabano suddenly showed up few days ago and made his first edits by lifting content from other web-sites as well as removing referenced material from the Al-Ahbash. He is accusing me of being the sole author of that article despite my clarification. Thus, it will be prudent to protect this page on temporarily basis if not on indefinite basis before situation gets out of hand and drive each and every editor who will get involved to reinvent the wheel again. Thank you. McKhan (talk) 07:21, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is getting very disruptive, but all editors here have Autoconfirmed rights. Even though I recognize that this dispute is not entirely symmetric, I have to ask you to sort it out on the talk page. Vanamonde (talk) 10:40, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – This BLP has been under attack by a host of SPAs who continually insert massive amounts of promotional language about their non-notable punk band beginning around 2009 and continuing today. The article subject himself has even attempted to revert this and been edit warred with. The accounts in question have edited virtually nothing but this article and a "now redirected" article about their own band and have nothing constructive to add. Please protect this BLP. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 01:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The following IPs keep adding the Monarchist Flag of Brazil to the Article as a "Variant Flag": 187.101.92.131, 191.255.157.2, 189.47.231.246. By Law, Brazil has no "official" Variant flag and neither are Monarchist movements relevant enough in the Political Scenario to be featured like that in the Infobox. I'm always trying to revert their Vandalism, but they always end up doing it again. 2804:14C:B385:69E5:E473:3F45:CD9C:1510 (talk) 05:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 07:23, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP image deletions. The title card in the infobox has been deleted around fifteen times in the past four months without edit summaries or talk page discussion, including five times in the past three weeks since I started a talk page discussion at Talk:Dill Mill Gayye#Infobox image. While this could be numerous IP addresses, it seems more likely to be one editor IP hopping without using edit summaries or joining the talk page discussion. Aspects (talk) 06:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 07:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent edit warring. Unsourced editing for the articles about Kelantan Football Association Shafiqabu (talk) 17:43, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism from School IP. The IP has been block multiple times so unsure if better to block the School IP or protect the frequently vandalized page. Apriestofgix (talk) 22:29, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Jewish woman says Jews will promote multiculturalism. Cue anti-semitic conspiracy theories that she's the smoking gun who's revealed a zionist conspiracy for white genocide. . Brustopher (talk) 23:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Immediate resumption of disruptive editing after previous protection period expired. 172.56.39.178 (talk) 01:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.39.178 (talk) 02:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:40, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalisim by ips, no useful ip edits PC: No, no useful ip edits SEMI: Yes. Creeperparty568 ~ Cool Guy (talk) 03:06, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 04:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeatedly re-created. Should be WP:SALTed with at least semi-protection. Avicennasis @ 03:18, 22 Tevet 5777 / 03:18, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 04:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly re-created. Should be WP:SALTed with at least semi-protection. Avicennasis @ 03:22, 22 Tevet 5777 / 03:22, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The salt is at the semi-protection level. Mz7 (talk) 04:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly active page right now for obvious reasons and a result various IPs are changing listings with no sources or explanation. Nohomersryan (talk) 03:50, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:50, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Reliably sourced, referenced and correctly cited information has been removed on four occasions during the last 48hrs, by IP editors and Single Purpose Accounts. . Exemplo347 (talk) 23:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also was previously semi-protected for six years. WNYY98 (talk) 00:28, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 00:41, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing has continued as well as POV-pushing edits since the protection fell off; likely related to their recent appearance in the news. -- Dane talk 01:06, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs making non-consensus approved information regarding her citizenship. —Fundude99talk to me 19:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. CLCStudent (talk) 19:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 23:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by unregistered editor who is IP-hopping. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:48, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 06:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly not a sufficient length of time. (Why five hours? Was 15 minutes not an option?) The vandalism resumed immediately after the protection ended. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 13:58, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@MShabazz: The protection was changed to 10 days. 172.56.39.178 (talk) 01:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:13, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent edit warring. The film had its first release anywhere in the world in Europe last month, which by Wikipedia policy, makes it a 2016 film. Numerous IPs have either changed the date to 2017 or removed the earlier Europe release dates. Crboyer (talk) 16:58, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated severe BLP violations. I foresee no end to this vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note Before I saw this request, I had already protected the article for two years. It had previously been blocked numerous times for periods of either a week or a month, but that was ineffective, as the unacceptable editing just came back each time. However, considering how long the problem has been going on, and the high likelihood that it will continue, I am borderline for whether to accept EvergreenFir's suggestion of indefinite semi-protection or not, so I am leaving this request open, to let another administrator can decide on that question, if any administrator chooses to. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs all coming in to change "Oakland" to "Las Vegas". – 🐈? (talk) (ping me!) 18:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.39.178 (talk) 01:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah.. Mz7 (talk) 01:21, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A user keeps putting in the same information of the kermit's performers in the "voice actors" section of the infobox, I've told the user countless times that they are already listed in the infobox and they don't need to be listed in there twice in a row, but the user keeps on doing it no matter how many times I explained it to him. Can some please protect the article indefinite, please. 174.192.18.219 (talk) 01:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The involved user appears to have started a discussion at "Talk:Kermit the Frog#Editing issues in article, from users that are not listening" a few minutes after you posted this request. Mz7 (talk) 01:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it was the IP who requested page protection who began the talk page section. I should also note that the IP has violated WP:3RR. JudgeRM (talk to me) 01:29, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops! Thanks for clarifying that. As of right now, I'm not sure what to do here. I would defer to another administrator's judgment. Mz7 (talk) 02:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your right, I know I shouldn't have violated the 3RR rule, I don't mean too. I just didn't want this to get out of touch and out of control. 174.192.18.219 (talk) 01:35, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Y'know, I would consider protecting this page; at least 3 IP's (including the one who reported this) have removed the content without discussion. If you do protect this page, though, make it temporary. JudgeRM (talk to me) 01:46, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still, they need to say removed, they completely mess up the infobox. 2600:1000:B027:FEA7:C1F2:26EC:1A2:7B0F (talk) 01:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And still, there is already a discussion on the talk page of the article JudgeRM. 174.192.10.245 (talk) 01:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It should be noted that these IP's are socks of banned User:Bigshowandkane64. Would recommend applying temp. semi-protection to stop the IP hoppers, not the registered user (who is autoconfirmed anyway). Sro23 (talk) 01:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that info. Please protect ASAP. JudgeRM (talk to me) 02:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 02:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent attack by IPs not permitted to edit by WP:ARBPIA3. Zerotalk 11:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 12:09, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – as per Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3#500/30. DrStrauss talk 17:35, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 19:30, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – As per Arab-Israeli judgement. DrStrauss talk 21:14, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Hut 8.5 21:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – As per Arab-Israeli judgement. DrStrauss talk 21:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Hut 8.5 21:30, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is vandalized once a day by anonymous IPs using similar edits. I'm hoping a temporary protection would discourage the vandal. KNHaw (talk) 21:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:41, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Based on repeated protections. -- ferret (talk) 22:14, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by an IP-hopping anonymous editor who is currently edit-warring to insert, and reinsert sources deemed unreliable as per WP:SOURCE guidelines.--Mr Fink (talk) 21:51, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent attempts by IP anonymous editor to defend the Pizzagate conspiracy theory. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:17, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3. DrStrauss talk 22:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 05:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3. DrStrauss talk 22:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No edits from non-extendedconfirmed editors in recent months. ~ Rob13Talk 01:42, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. An anonymous editor seem to think the series is science fiction. Request to protect for a week or so. Jdavi333 (talk) 23:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Acroterion. 208.54.5.158 (talk) 05:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Samsara (talk) 05:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Huldra (talk) 23:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@K6ka: I would not usually second-guess a decision here, but Nablus falls under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30, and since disruption of a POV nature is evident, I have applied EC protection to the page. Vanamonde (talk) 06:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This is perhaps pre-emptive, but this article has attracted high levels of IP vandalism as well as well-meaning but unhelpful editing in the past. Baird announced his resignation today, effective next week, and already a few IPs have made both well meaning but unhelpful edits as well as another vandalising. Requesting protection for a week or two. Melcous (talk) 23:19, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 05:50, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism by IP's. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:31, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 23:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs adding the same non-notable person to the school alumni list (five times now, and once to a different school). It's likely the same editor using multiple IPs, and based on the latest edit summary [29] likely the alumnus in question making the edits. Meters (talk) 23:41, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 23:52, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 01:52, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection or PC: Massive edit warring involving multiple IPs. Page history shows huge (15,000+) addition and removal of content. Laurdecl talk 00:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 05:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuous IP disruptive editing and vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 00:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The most recent edits to the page don't appear to be vandalism. A user was attempting to correct an unsourced date of birth in a biography of a living person. I've removed the unsourced date of birth instead. Mz7 (talk) 01:58, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The abominable Wiki troll has returned to editing this article. See this comment and this edit. -- Dane talk 00:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 00:31, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recurring target of long-term abuser Bertrand101. Blake Gripling (talk) 01:42, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Requesting temporary full protection; massive edit war going on over what photo to use in the infobox. . MelanieN (talk) 01:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Mz7 (talk) 03:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RCP's WP:DG account

Full Indef Protection: Created to prevent upset vandals from impersonating me or trying to damage my credibility. L3X1 Complaints Desk 02:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. Yaris678 (talk) 13:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continued vandalism after previous protection ended. Lizard (talk) 02:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 03:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP hopping vandal; long-term abuse. 208.54.5.158 (talk) 03:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 04:29, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Alex|The|Whovian? 04:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 05:40, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP-hopping and one new account all inserting the same fake band member. Thanks for checking into this. Chill-- (talk) (c) 05:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 05:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Chill-- (talk) (c) 15:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism (and, apparently, IP-hopping to evade blocks). I know we don't usually protect talk pages, but this situation is particularly bad. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 05:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Modern Harpoon (talk) 06:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 06:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky. Binksternet (talk) 07:43, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7F:DE2F:7900:214E:1BDF:DCD0:4440 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ymblanter. Samsara (talk) 08:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unexplained, unsourced changes by IP for several days. BilCat (talk) 08:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 13:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism, mostly unregistered users (IP addresses). S Khemadhammo (talk) 08:32, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 08:59, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist 08:56, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The editing level on the page is not enough to justify indefinite semi-protection, but since there appears to be a pattern of repeated additions of unsourced content to a biography of a living person, I've placed pending changes on the page temporarily. Mz7 (talk) 14:26, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several incidents of vandalism by various IP addresses. DrStrauss talk 10:05, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 12:05, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There have been attempts by an unregistered user who changes the 'total population' persistently, located in the infobox section. The current figure of 1,964,300 derives from a source with false and/or unreliable data. The real figure should be something like 46,000 Buddhists according to the 2010 census, for which I have a link. Whenever I change it back to the 46,000 number, it gets reverted back to 1,964,300. Can you please semi-protect this page?. Agila81 (talk) 10:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 13:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 12:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 12:41, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by a group of new users, possibly socks. —Bruce1eetalk 12:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 12:50, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The previous protection has expired in November 2016, and since December 2016 there is constant edit war with few IPs which edited revision and activity seems to be related to the previous socks by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PavelStaykov (see Talk:Dulo clan#December 2016 - January 2017). Article needs prolonged protection (previous was 3 months), and some admin should check these IPs (83.228.2.103, 198.245.63.142, 85.187.110.237, 82.137.86.40) if they are related to PavelStaykov. --JoyceWood (talk) 13:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:56, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Linguisttalk|contribs 14:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:59, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism (changing year, deliberate factual errors) . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 15:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP edits contrary to MOS rules, as explained to him/her on my talk page. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 15:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblio (talk) 21:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblio (talk) 21:37, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblio (talk) 21:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long term issues with disruption, including deliberate factual errors. Previous semi-protection was for a year. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long term issues with disruption, including the insertion of deliberate factual errors. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:29, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 17:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 17:16, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.33.175 (talk) 19:04, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblio (talk) 21:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – going to be a vandal magnet tomorrow in addition to current vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 20:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblio (talk) 21:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Sabot Cat (talk) 20:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblio (talk) 21:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from user Awsomespy8895. Meretechnicality (talk) 20:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblio (talk) 21:56, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.--Bozalegenda (talk) 20:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., to diffuse edit war. Biblio (talk) 21:59, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template editor protection. Enable access by template editors. Only about 400 links. 219.79.180.148 (talk) 23:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No rationale provided for lowering protection. Consensus at WT:PERM is not to re-evaluate the protection levels of templates without a specific rationale for doing so. ~ Rob13Talk 00:50, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@BU Rob13: Can you expand on your comment to address the following? 1. WT:PERM relates to permisions, and so does not appear directly relevent to protection. 2. The IP does indicate a rational - it is useful because it allows more people to edit; it doesn't introduce undue risks because of the low number of links (I assume the IP means transclusions). Is this not specific enough? Yaris678 (talk) 13:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yaris678: Sorry, typo. Meant to type WP:RFPP. Due to recent mass requests to lower protection, it was decided not to consider these requests here unless there's evidence that more people actually want/need to edit the template. In this case, there have been no edits needed at all for quite some time, so there's no such evidence. We don't have the personnel to consider potentially thousands of requests to lower protection on templates that will never actually need to be edited. ~ Rob13Talk 15:18, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK. That makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.
219.79.180.148, unless you know of a template editor that wants to change that template, or specific changes that need doing, it will stay at full protection.
Yaris678 (talk) 17:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

21 January 2017

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kokomokoz (talk) 15:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will monitor to see if things die down after that or if further protection is needed. Thanks.--Mojo Hand (talk) 16:37, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lowering protectection as i dont think extended confirmed protection is needed. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 15:35, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier we had a request for increasing protection. Samsara (talk) 16:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara (talk) 16:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguisttalk|contribs 11:28, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Number 57 13:53, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Boleyn (talk) 12:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 12:59, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated attempts to add an unsourced "controversy" into the article by dynamic IPs and newly created accounts. —Farix (t | c) 13:34, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Number 57 13:50, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Not enough vandalism for semi, so I think this should be proper. Creeperparty568 ~ Cool Guy (talk) 03:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. This is one of the first pages people would target for vandalism if it were not protected. This is a case of semi-protection working, not a reason for reducing it. ~ Rob13Talk 03:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Creeperparty568: I would encourage to read WP:Protection policy and understand how the different levels of protection work. Samsara (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Samsara (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP addresses. JackOfPanTrades|Card Hunter (Converse intellectually) 01:50, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 12:53, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.119 (talk) 02:03, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 12:37, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —MBlaze Lightning T 06:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 12:41, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. somebody changed her age every 2 weeks

Actually, Elnaz Golrokh's birth info is completely unreferenced, so I remove it according to WP:BLP guidelines. Some additional unsourced and POV info has been removed as well, but most of the article needs sourcing. --Ebyabe talk - State of the Union11:36, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 12:57, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.112.136 (talk) 04:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 30 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 12:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-rotection: Edit warring and persistent disruptive editing. – Return of a known IP hopper. Also violating WP:PERSONAL (e.g. [30]) and WP:SOCK. - LouisAragon (talk) 07:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator SpacemanSpiff. Samsara (talk) 12:21, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: ((very) long term). See [31] by Indef blocked user Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asdisis. Page was protected many times before. DVdm (talk) 12:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DVdm: Does two years sound like enough? Given this is not THE talk page, I see no reason we can't indef. Samsara (talk) 12:16, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 12:16, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi () 12:18, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 12:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: recent IP vandalism. MisterJay123 (talk) 00:39, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:25, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.119 (talk) 01:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:38, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term pending changes: Slow but steady vandalism/BLP violations. 73.96.114.238 (talk) 06:56, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 11:39, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 11:39, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly deleted article on amateur soccer team--non-notable at best, possibly a hoax. --Finngall talk 10:10, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:34, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting PC for only a few days because of the recent disruptive editing on the article. The article is really high profile at the minute because of the election being called and a few days of protection would stop any more disruptive editing. st170e 10:24, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Semi-protection tends to be the better solution for this kind of disruptive editing rather than pending changes. If the disruption continues after a week or so, pending changes might be a better solution. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 10:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:32, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Page is being vandalized daily by an anonymous vandal (ab)using a morphing IP.--Mr Fink (talk) 23:46, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism was left earlier today for seven hours. I have reverted it. I've seen other vandalism to the Falcons' page. NFL team pages during their playoff runs are sometimes protected, including the Falcons during their last run to the NFC Championship in 2012-13. Protect until the Super Bowl is over. 68.228.254.131 (talk) 00:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:30, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. See contributions: 1, 2, 3 and 4. 179.52.218.102 (talk) 00:30, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Armbrust The Homunculus 05:59, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Deleted the page instead. Materialscientist (talk) 06:05, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Just announced as senate's new defense secretary, is now a high-risk vandalism target. MrQueeba (talk) 22:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism the past two days. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:41, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I have instead blocked the two vandalism-only accounts who were responsible. — Maile (talk) 01:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: A deprecated template without any article links. 219.79.180.148 (talk) 05:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated at TfD. Samsara (talk) 06:12, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected for the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – I am requesting ECP because Amaury is again being a target from User:Orchomen's socks. Should a semi be more appropriate to the admin, please do so. . Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 20:53, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:35, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism. JMHamo (talk) 22:13, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent attempts by anon IP editor to push POV and change description of the subject of the page since 17th Jan. Shimlaites (talk) 11:46, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've urged me via my talk page to look into this, but as I am not particularly familiar with this subject, I have trouble seeing if this is a dispute or something else. I have previously been told that Sitush can give second opinions on this region. Sitush, if you have time, what would be your assessment here? Thank you. Samsara (talk) 12:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It looks right now like I won't have a lot of time for this (or perhaps much else) today, either, and since we haven't heard back from Sitush, anyone should feel free to take another look and make a decision on this. Cheers! Samsara (talk) 16:48, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. There have been no edits in about 24 hours so it may be OK. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
They're back. I was going to add this, not knowing it had already been listed and declined. Should it be relisted, or is there a way to get it reconsidered? --Ronz (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:33, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dan56 (talk) 19:48, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:35, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper (a well-known IP-hopper geolocating to Chengdu, Sichuan, China, who regularly makes this type of edits on various articles...) repeatedly removing sources and making unexplained and unsourced changes to dates in the article (see [32]). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 20:19, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:38, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Another page of Amaury's is being vandalized by more sockpuppets of User:Orchomen. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 20:40, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Callmemirela looking out for me! Thank you! However, given the nature of the page, I think it should be an indefinite extended confirmed protection to keep potential accounts away as well, and the page it redirects to should be upgraded to indefinite as before AO changed the protection to extended confirmed, Rob had it on indefinite semi-protection. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. Give that a try for a while and see. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:39, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Libel and continuous vandalism. Lulushja (talk) 16:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Orchomen at it again with sockpuppets, and I expect there will be more. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:58, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Trump takes office at noon - many confused edits until then. Silvrous Talk 15:23, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. It's been protected since '09. Primefac (talk) 15:29, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protection request: TheUSConservative (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:36, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name – Attack pages are not tolerated. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 16:43, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm asking for full create protection, because no one will create a page that names itself an attack page. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 17:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This page has been repetitively vandalized by Hotndead and suspected IP socks. . Kellymoat (talk) 19:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP and new-user vandalism, usually adding copyrighted lyrics from Hamilton. Getting worse since related pages were protected. Ibadibam (talk) 19:43, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:30, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

22 January 2017

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of non-notable child names from various IPs. These can't be added to the Jamie Dornan article due to that one's protection level. Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel18:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:02, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 18:57, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – inflating sales figures and certifications - by both IP addresses and new accounts. Kellymoat (talk) 19:15, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:12, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – inflating sales figures and certifications - by both IP addresses and new accounts. Kellymoat (talk) 19:16, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – inflating sales figures and certifications - by both IP addresses and new accounts. Kellymoat (talk) 19:16, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:13, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – inflating sales figures and certifications - by both IP addresses and new accounts. Kellymoat (talk) 19:16, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:12, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TJH2018talk 19:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:10, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal. Already reported for 3rr. Kellymoat (talk) 19:57, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: archive of user talk page, to prevent unneeded changes and vadalisms from IP addresses (I work on recent changes patrolling). . Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 19:57, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:07, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistant vandalism from IP addresses. JackOfPanTrades|Card Hunter (Converse intellectually) 20:05, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:15, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPv6 user (same /64 but rest of address is different, and three different addresses have been logged in the past few hours) has been adding a false credit (actor and non-existent character) to the cast list of this movie article. MPFitz1968 (talk) 22:24, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It may be easier to just rangeblock 2604:2000:710E:5300::/64 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). No collateral damage, since a /64 is assigned to only one customer. 73.96.114.238 (talk) 22:38, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:23, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring – edit-warring involving several parties. Mtattrain (talk) 05:41, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Primefac (talk) 15:18, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ariel Camacho's article has been vandalized again for some IP users. See contributions: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. 179.52.218.102 (talk) 17:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Orchomen sockpuppets. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirming. Semi-protected indefinitely by 5 albert square Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator 5 albert square. For the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:30, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Orchomen sockpuppets. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request. Sro23 (talk) 18:35, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Favonian (talk) 18:39, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara (talk) 12:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Given that this is an on-going event, a temporary lock on this page would be wise to prevent disruptive edits. I have warned 2 anon editors already, but there could be more later. Bluesphere 11:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Collateral damage likely; better to report disruptive users to WP:AIV individually. Samsara (talk) 13:02, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara (talk) 13:02, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP is vandalizing the article, he was reverted by two established editors and a section was opened on the talk page, but the IP is unwilling to discuss the case and keeps reverting. Please revert the article to the last stable revision and protect it. Kouhi (talk) 18:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 18:23, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Highly visible template· Links to more than a million of article. 219.79.226.138 (talk) 04:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As per policy, we trust our template editors to only make well-functioning contributions and keep their access details safe. Samsara (talk) 12:18, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara (talk) 12:18, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by User:Wattsj528. Sro23 (talk) 15:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article discussing film currently being screened in theatres is being consistently vandalised. Requesting temporary page protection. RoCo(talk) 16:29, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 16:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 13:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 13:40, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Some editors and I have agreed that protection is needed for this page (see here), because of the poor referencing, grammar and editors are too quick to add in information (which turns out to be false). It's completely disruptive, and I'm requesting PC protection so edits can be reviewed before they are implemented. This page was semi-protected before, but it needs further protection (and I would argue indefinite, but it's only a list of terrorist incidents for January). st170e 13:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 15:23, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – More blowover from the disruptive editing on Hetalia: Axis Powers, this time repeated removal of a character under claims that the character is "insulting". —Farix (t | c) 13:51, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 15:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request. Sro23 (talk) 14:49, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 15:05, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism on a high-traffic article. IgnorantArmies (talk) 15:12, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Primefac (talk) 15:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 07:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 13:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 08:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 12:51, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – Documentation page of fully protected template. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 10:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protecting at template editor level. Samsara (talk) 12:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 12:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: WP:HRT, near 7,000 links. --219.79.226.138 (talk) 13:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you constantly trying to get these protected? Several admins have already declined these in the past, and they have explained why they were declined to you... 73.96.114.238 (talk) 22:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:25, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzuuzz: The reason is High-risk template, not persistent vandalism. It links to a certain amount of article, there is a need to increase the protection level to prevent vandalism that affect a large amount of article. Like Template:Infobox Wikipedia user. --219.79.127.74 (talk) 02:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You're right I should have phrased it better. I agree with the previous declining admin who saw no justification for increasing the level of protection. These are not templates that never need editing. The syntax is not overly complicated. There aren't any high profile swimming/tennis/volleyball events to increase their risk from autoconfirmed sockpuppets. There's nothing to indicate the risk to these templates has increased. -- zzuuzz (talk) 07:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing 747 and others

Temporary semi-protection - all targets of repeated IP vandalism. C628 (talk) 04:23, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:07, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism. WackyWikiWoo (talk) 04:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long term edit war. User logging out and edit warring as multiple IPs to try to get a file deleted against our rules. Making this request here as an administrator since I could be seen as involved. Magog the Ogre (tc) 18:22, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Image has been moved to Commons, so the edit war is now their concern. Primefac (talk) 04:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Edit summaries describing sockpuppetry edits reverted. George Ho (talk) 20:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Primefac (talk) 04:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term pending changes: Slow but steady disruptive edits, vandalism. 73.96.114.238 (talk) 22:18, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done That certainly puts the "long" in long-term. Page is only edited about every four months, and any vandalism seems to be taken care of quickly. Honestly it just doesn't look like enough of an issue to merit protection. Primefac (talk) 04:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: WP:HRT, about 5,300 links. --219.79.226.138 (talk) 13:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you constantly trying to get these protected? Several admins have already declined these in the past, and they have explained why they were declined to you... 73.96.114.238 (talk) 22:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:26, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzuuzz: The reason is High-risk template, not persistent vandalism. It links to a certain amount of article, there is a need to increase the protection level to prevent vandalism that affect a large amount of article. --219.79.127.74 (talk) 02:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: WP:HRT, about 6,500 links. --219.79.226.138 (talk) 13:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you constantly trying to get these protected? Several admins have already declined these in the past, and they have explained why they were declined to you... 73.96.114.238 (talk) 22:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:26, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzuuzz: The reason is High-risk template, not persistent vandalism. It links to a certain amount of article, there is a need to increase the protection level to prevent vandalism that affect a large amount of article. --219.79.127.74 (talk) 02:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term pending changes: Slow but steady disruptive edits, unsourced content. 73.96.112.126 (talk) 21:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 04:19, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term pending changes: Slow but steady disruptive edits, vandalism. 73.96.114.238 (talk) 22:49, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I went back through two months of editing and with the exception of a few blanking edits picked up by ClueBot I don't see any obvious vandalism, and the page hasn't been edited since 9 Jan. If re-requesting, maybe provide diffs? Primefac (talk) 01:54, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring. I already asked an admin (diff) to look into this but there was no response. Jetstreamer Talk 14:16, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ‪MilborneOne‬.. MelanieN (talk) 04:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – edit-warring involving several parties, vandal-type edits which could perhaps be sock-puppetry. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:07, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ferret.. MelanieN (talk) 04:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and 3RR being broken by Kellymoat who has been warned on numerous occasions. 2A02:C7F:DE37:A100:8DE5:6A06:A636:10FB (talk) 18:33, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Believe it or not, I went to put in a request for page protection and it was declined because there was already a pending request. LOL
The reporting user is an IP hopping vandal that just had 7 accounts blocked earlier today. And I will also be filing a report to have the IP ranges blocked.
However, to set the record straight - I did not violate 3RR, they must have gotten confused between this and the other pages they vandalized that caused them to get blocked. Kellymoat (talk) 18:41, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing as my only edit has been Always Be My Baby; please get your facts right before you accuse. 2A02:C7F:DE37:A100:8DE5:6A06:A636:10FB (talk) 18:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Don't edit comments from other users, such as you did here. Kellymoat (talk) 19:04, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:24, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 04:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism as the species is named after Donald Trump's hair. Might be worth giving it a week or so of semi-protection and see if it needs more long-term protection to see if it settles down after the inauguration. Kingofaces43 (talk) 20:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 04:12, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations – New users/IPs repeatedly changing her gender to male. Has been PC-protected for this in the past. See Talk:Lauren Southern#Lauren Southern Becomes a Man for relevant discussion. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 20:58, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 04:15, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. XboxGamer22408chat with me 23:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 23:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - TheMagnificentist 07:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 02:05, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP repeatedly adding a national vote to the local elections template. Number 57 13:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:34, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 02:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism since the press conference. Stikkyy (talk) 02:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 02:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - MrX 02:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 02:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: "High level of IP vandalism."

Comment: Over the last year alone, there has been constant inaccurate number changes (dates, sums etc.), unexplained content removals or changes (by both IP and new users with a few edits) and an extremely high level of IP vandalism. 9 controversial edits in this month alone. Majority of edits in its history of the article are largely vandalized edits to the point where I have to backtrack every edit from now to indefinitely back to restore its accuracy according to what was sourced. Many of these edits are also happening in bunches, in relation to other articles such as History of Haiti etc.; to their extent is unknown at this time. I am preparing to do some very tedious work. Thank you kindly. Savvyjack23 (talk) 22:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. — Maile (talk) 01:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent disruptive editing (content dispute). I'd request full protection for 24 hours if I thought there was any chance it would be given. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 23:14, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DerbyCountyinNZ, ping me if any of them get autoconfirmed and you need it bumped up to EC. Primefac (talk) 01:49, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Pending changes isn't helping; disruption is continuing, and most recent semi-protection for such concerns was for a year. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Primefac (talk) 02:02, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP addresses have been vandalizing the page in recent days. GoPurple'nGold24 04:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism/edit warring. FOX 52 (talk) 06:12, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism. XboxGamer22408chat with me 22:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 01:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. XboxGamer22408chat with me 00:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism ramped up right after previous protection ended on January 13th. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:06, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 01:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of sourced content by multiple IPs. Jim1138 (talk) 00:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 01:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of sourced content by multiple IPs. blocked IP back again as user:2600:1:f10f:a28e:95c3:3092:7ded:7a62 Jim1138 (talk) 00:16, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – While many IP edits to the article are generally helpful. Over the last few weeks, there have been a sudden increase of IPs removing plot details on the pretense that they are "spoilers", contrary to Wikipedia's guidelines on the matter. —Farix (t | c) 00:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:14, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:15, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by same user using many different IP address. InFlamester20 (talk) 03:58, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara.. MelanieN (talk) 01:16, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by same user using many different IP address. InFlamester20 (talk) 03:58, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara.. Duplicate listing. MelanieN (talk) 01:16, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - TheMagnificentist 08:40, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant trolling of user talk under different IPs by same user: harassment, verging on stalking. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 20:12, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by DeltaQuad. 73.96.112.126 (talk) 21:21, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

23 January 2017

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page needs permanent semi-protection, looking at edits over a year, nearly all edits by new or IP editors have been vandalism, ongoing waste of editor resources. Montanabw(talk) 21:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 21:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 21:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 21:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also, please check the block of the recent IP vandal. Bradv 21:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 21:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP editor warring and refusing to engage in discussion. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 14:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neither editor has engaged in discussion. Samsara (talk) 14:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 14:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, check my edit comments: I said to open a discussion but the IP ignored me. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 14:56, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And did you open a discussion? Samsara (talk) 14:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Do I have to do that? Is it not sufficient to invite the warrior to do so? If the guy isn't reading edit comments, are they any more likely to read a talk page? Is there a policy or guideline to answer this point? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 15:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I see it there now. But please don't think I was warring unacceptably. May I refer you to WP:3RRNO#4: "Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language." Now go check the offensive language you just locked me out of reverting. Hey, this problem is yours now, I'm outta here. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 15:11, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Samsara (talk) 15:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) In all disputes reported to RfPP and responded to by me, I have consistently required people to be pro-active in offering talk page discussion. In all other cases, you are doing no better than the other person (objectively, you're both edit warriors). Compounding that, in this particular dispute, you are an established editor and the other person may be a newcomer. So for either one of those reasons alone, and certainly both of them combined, I expect more from you if you expect anything more than a neutral decision, which is what you got. Samsara (talk) 15:19, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would expect neutrality to respect WP:3RRNO, not to ignore it. You might like to think about that, but really, I have moved on and post this only for your reflection. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 16:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well slap me round the face with a wet kipper, I'm back. Because the IP warrior has created an account and sent me a very polite PM asking what the problem is. I have replied here and here. Don't worry about me, but it would be a courtesy to them to lift the full protection, so I am now reversing my original request. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 18:56, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I look forward to seeing the discussion. Samsara (talk) 19:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Did you follow up the links to my replies? One of them is that discussion. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 20:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see a monologue. Samsara (talk) 20:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Nowadays the page is a tool of political fight. There are many trolls writing jokes on the website for political reasons and then some newspapers are sharing these things on facebook. I suggest to block page from editing and return the state of things on the website to the state of 4 January 20.58 which is politicaly neutral. 95.103.142.84 (talk) 16:23, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Harassment (block notices impersonating Materialscientist. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 05:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Already stopped. Please only request protection of user talk page for particularly egregious or persistent vandalism, as all other requests are usually declined. Two IPs generally wouldn't float the boat. ~ Rob13Talk 07:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You are joking of course. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 07:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 113.210.199.111 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. Samsara (talk) 13:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Cyberpower678. PC1 was set. -- ferret (talk) 20:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant removal of critical info like proper release date and removal/addition of spoiler material. TropicAces (talk) 16:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Note: I'm not sure I agree with high level of vandalism. Definitely some back and forth editing, and a few disruptive edits, but in bulk it seems to mostly be good faith with several solid contributions from IPs in the last week. On the fence, but might consider PC1. Anyone else? -- ferret (talk) 18:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. In view of constructive IP edits. -- ferret (talk) 20:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Attempts to add unsourced data. Newly released film. The Worst Case (talk) 17:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection will be fine. The Worst Case (talk) 18:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seems to be a lot of positive IP contributions as well. -- ferret (talk) 20:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 20:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Numerous poorly sourced and unreferenced contents were added to that page by IP vandals. They said that the site will shut down in June 2017 but there is no proof that it will shut down. TTCTransportationFan4644 (talk) 18:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 19:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: general lack of unconstructive editing to justify PCP. WNYY98 (talk) 19:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Samsara (talk) 20:19, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. clpo13(talk) 18:24, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No disruptive editing afterwared. This page should be unprotected so as to let other editors discuss about the issues of the article, especially the article is being protected. 219.79.180.57 (talk) 10:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Courcelles: Request for unprotection. --219.79.180.57 (talk) 10:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This protection is part of an Arbcom enforcement. -- ferret (talk) 15:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – 2 IP addresses 89.160.219.247 and 82.148.70.9 keep edit warring (Possibly same person) on this article and would like a temporary page protection. D Eaketts (talk) 17:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 18:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Non-constructive edits from IP addresses. JackOfPanTrades|Card Hunter (Converse intellectually) 17:57, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slow moving vandalism, a short semiprot wouldn't do much good, will try PC1 for a while. -- ferret (talk) 18:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An anonymous user is trying to add a claim this article without providing a reliable source for it, all he is providing is just some local unreliable source in Turkish language, I opened a section on the talk page to discuss the case, but he doesn't participate in the discussion constructively, he keeps reverting and adding his POV to the article while the discussion is still ongoing and a consensus is not reached, please revert the article to the last stable revision and protect the page. Kouhi (talk) 18:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 18:24, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 18:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 18:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 18:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 18:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed Per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Laurdecl talk 00:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13Talk 07:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Person article is about is requesting protection Hughes.1517 (talk) 12:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No disruption. Samsara (talk) 13:11, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara (talk) 13:11, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection except move protection: The doc subpage should not be protected if the main template is protected unless it was being vandalised. This doc page has been protected for 7 years, and there is no more vandalism. It should be umprotected. 219.76.15.12 (talk) 05:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's enough now. If you continue to post such frivolous requests, I will start reverting them as clear disruption. Please read WP:PP to familiarise yourself with the effect protection has. Samsara (talk) 13:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara (talk) 13:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consistent edits to sourced material

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent changes by IP addresses to sourced height and weight without ever providing new source. InFlamester20 (talk) 02:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. All four articles covered. -- ferret (talk) 13:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Modern Harpoon (talk) 12:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 13:24, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template. Links to near 5,000 articles. 219.79.227.218 (talk) 14:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. -- Samtar talk · contribs 15:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of a similar edit by IP editors. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some semi-protection: An IP editor continues to add questionable content. He/she has been reverted by 4 different editors and will not discuss the proposed addition at the article's talk page. We hope (talk) 11:56, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion of this on the talk page where the IP editor can participate. There is also a longer history of varied disruption, by many participants, of this article's editing. Samsara (talk) 13:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 13:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – At least a few months. Repeated introduction, mostly from 92.* IP addresses, of unsourced insistence that this is of Turkish origin. Similar to the protection issue at Tsatsiki. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Shingling334. Largoplazo (talk) 12:57, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 13:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:19, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gogo Dodo. Vanamonde (talk) 10:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent reinstatement of an unsourced paragraph & another where the source does not seem to support the statement - discussion opened on talk page but is being ignored. Sitush (talk) 05:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Persistent IP edit and Registered user edit warring to add inflammatory claims about a living person. I am going to go a head and mention this is appears to be "Trump protest related". Mark Miller (talk) 06:24, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 10:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: persistent sockpuppetry. 110.136.237.93 (talk) 01.59, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Declined. Neither page has been vandalized; I could see no reason to protect them. MelanieN (talk) 03:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Editor's talk page access has been revoked. MelanieN (talk) 03:59, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. It's a brand new Google doodle with a rather unfortunate cartoon graphic of a wheelchair-bound Roberts using a breathing apparatus, and it's attracting far more than the usual amount of vandalism. 184.96.140.48 (talk) 05:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done a kind adminstrator on IRC did the needful. 184.96.140.48 (talk) 07:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Semi-protection currently ineffective against autocomfirmed socks. Sro23 (talk) 01:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 07:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism by IPs and newly registered editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gogo Dodo.. MelanieN (talk) 03:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks of John Daker are still active and disrupting this article. -- Dane talk 03:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: vandalism. 14.2.34.140 (talk) 17:07, 22 January 2017 (UTC) A few users have attempted to mark this article as "to be Deleted" but there excuse for doing this is slanderous and based on no creditable information when genuine reliable sources can be found in the article for example TV.com which isnt user generated and must be verified played in cinemas. ALSO note that the following articles seem to have been accepted by wikipeida despite having low to near poor referances, no visisubl support at all in internet searching, contain totally dead links or a google book which could have been uploaded by a student: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_(film) this film was accepted on two references one which is IMDB(told not acceptable as user generated much like Wikipedia) this film also cannot be found anywhere on the internet! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Jeffries is in violation of copywrite, has dead links and the only link working refers to google books which anyone can add too.[reply]

this is not very acceptable and seems totally discrimination if the article is deleated or not protected from this type of vandalism.

  • Looking at the edit summaries of the article and the above statements, I suspect that sometime later this article and possibly the AfD that I just opened will need semi-protection for reasons other than the ones stated above. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:29, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently very hot topic, seeing lots of attention – quite a few IPs and new users adding questionable content . Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 20:40, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for the bot CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:51, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Borderline case, I'm seeing long-term vandalism since previous protection ended in November. However, I see some constructive edits from IPs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IMO the disruption at the article is too great at present for PC to work. MelanieN (talk) 03:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism due to 2016–17 NFL playoffs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Related to the controversial 2017 Women's March, unknown IPs and new users adding questionable content. Kamalthebest (talk) 02:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A large amount of vandalism recently in the month of January. A view of the logs also shows that this high-profile article has suffered from considerable vandalism. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 02:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. This appears to have been going on for a very long time. Enough is enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – it only took a few hours since page protection expired for the genre warrior to return. Kellymoat (talk) 18:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both versions are unreferenced, so until a reference is added, it's technically a dispute, and dispute resolution will be recommended. Samsara (talk) 18:19, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. For the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Was protected recently, new vandalism arose as the protection ran out. Lordtobi () 20:02, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:05, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous users keep removing Joe Biden, request semi-protection. MB298 (talk) 01:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Just like in Template:Philippine Senate election, 2001, a variable IP keeps on adding inaccuracies. As this election happened 15 years ago, and that the terms of office of the people elected here have ended, possibly no more updates are to be needed unless something major comes up. Either pending changes or semi-protection is requested, although the former would suffice. –HTD 01:39, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Nonstop malicious vandalism from IP editors. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 21:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:41, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lots of active vandalism due to nfc championship. WNYY98 (talk) 22:40, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:49, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing by IP user or users. Coretheapple (talk) 23:13, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Protect until Super Bowl LI is over. I, as 68.228.254.231, made a request to protect until the Super Bowl is over. It expires on January 28. A Great Catholic Person (talk) 23:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, PC is overwhelming. BilCat (talk) 23:39, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:56, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. SLBedit (talk) 21:02, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AIRcorn (talk) 21:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Probably needs upgrading to extended confirmed protection. This page seems to fall within the scope of Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2 (post-1932 United States politics) and there have recently been a few edits on the article that violate WP:1RR. Steel1943 (talk) 17:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Steel1943: Would you mind pointing out the relevant edits? I've identified one user that this applies to, wondering if there are others. Samsara (talk) 18:16, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: See this edit and the three edits following it. I think I saw another instance after that, but since I reported this a few hours ago, I'm not sure what that was anymore. Steel1943 (talk) 23:00, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected, I spotted more disruption after the request was filed, so it is better for the article to stay extended confirmed protected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:57, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-protection :      I think that the article page Melania Trump, should have the same protection level as the article page Donald Trump.  I am sorta new to Wikipedia, (read a few Wikipedia rules while I was off from editing for 6 months).  I was surprised by a blue lock that I have never seen before on any article, and clicked on it.  I learned about the "Extended Enhanced page protection".  However, when I went to Melania Trump's page, it was only a gray one, learned that it was semi-protected and less secured.&  I think that it would be a good idea to put the same "Extended Enhanced page protection" on Melania Trump's article, if one thinks about it, vandals and protesters,  would be able to attack there.  

  

     Also, the fact that she is a First Lady and the wife of the President of The United States of America, should be reasonable enough to conclude the need for a greater protection on the page.  The reason why I think the blue lock was placed on Donald Trump's article, was that he is now the President of The United States.  

  

Scincerly,   

Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2017 (UTC)   [reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., hopefully will be sufficient.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:10, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 21:54, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

24 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not enough recent disruptive editing and the one IP has been blocked. Come back if the problem persists. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism and violations of BLP policy - also, edit warring. Garchy (talk) 17:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Garchy (talk) 19:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of unnecessary IP editing and disruptive editing of a living person's biography. Ruanxen (talk) 11:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • There has been no recent flurry of IP edits and no disruption that I can see. As I've been slightly involved in trying to improve the article, I won't make a decision on the request for page protection. But rest assured I do have admin eyes on the article and will happily intervene if any obvious vandalism occurs. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 12:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined No evidence of recent disruptive editing. However the article is being watched. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism 1234.--Marlo Jonesa (talk) 11:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 50.200.116.252 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  12:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism by Hopping IP address. LG-Gunther :  Talk  12:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Barek (talkcontribs) - 19:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —MBlaze Lightning T 15:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not altogether sure what's going on here but there has been a flurry of what I can best describe as suspicious editing by new editors and IPs. I have posted a note at WP:MILITARY requesting review by someone more familiar with the subject. If additional protection is required just ping me or drop a line on my talk page. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi - Fairly consistent IP hop vandalism over the past month or so despite multiple blocks. TimothyJosephWood 16:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 18:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection ("salting"); Page has been recreated multiple times by the same author after speedy deletion (CSD A7), without any consensus. If it is deleted again, it probably makes sense to salt the page. MereTechnicality (talk) 17:46, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gogo Dodo. Mz7 (talk) 17:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Bertrand101 sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  12:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Edgar181. - Ad Orientem (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – one year, Vandalism of this talk page by an IP Address. cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! (Talk | Contributions) 03:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. and the IP is blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:46, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock puppets of ShantaethePirate are vandalizing this page. -- Dane talk 07:53, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara (talk) 09:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Requesting semi-protection for about a week. There has been a recent persistent attempt at adding unsourced content. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.38.166 (talk) 05:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Likely to be even more aggressive this week as the finale is taking place for the show. Please protect the page from IP edits. AkshayAnandTalk! 05:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: High-profile controversial politician. Almost all IP-edits in the last 12 months had to be reverted: repeated additions of vandalism, personal commentary and BLP-violating OR. GermanJoe (talk) 07:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 19:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 20:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 19:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara (talk) 20:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.38.180 (talk) 01:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.38.180 (talk) 01:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High-risk template. Links to over 2,000 articles. 219.79.227.218 (talk) 14:19, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 22:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – easy target for childish vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 00:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous edit-warring by ips, probably socks of blocked users 'Henk gekhoor' and 'Gekhoor'. Suggest a one month semi-protection. Wolbo (talk) 03:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced trivia and non notables. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.38.180 (talk) 00:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long protection log. WNYY98 (talk) 02:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – highly visible page due to current events. WNYY98 (talk) 02:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Since the last temporary protection was lifted in November 2016, there has continued to be considerable vandalism and BLP violations over the last couple of months. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 02:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected: disruptive editing concerning nationality, which has already been established on talk page, by an unregistered user. Oliszydlowski (TALK) 22:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated vandalism and/or AGF-yet-disruptive editing from anons, presumably youngsters who happen to own the dolls and other such collectors. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 00:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 00:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 19:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No disruption since 2012, and the current consensus is not to protect pre-emptively under ARBPIA3. Samsara (talk) 20:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara (talk) 20:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Will monitor though. Blocked two of the vandals. -- ferret (talk) 20:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No disruptive editing afterwared. This page should be unprotected so as to let other editors discuss about the issues of the article. 219.79.227.218 (talk) 13:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protected under arbcom provision. Please do not nominate pages for unprotection that have been protected under arbitration committee provisions. Samsara (talk) 13:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Samsara (talk) 13:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No disruptive editing afterwared. This page should be unprotected so as to let other editors discuss about the issues of the article, especially the article is being protected. 219.79.227.218 (talk) 13:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protected under arbcom provision. Samsara (talk) 13:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Samsara (talk) 13:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 23:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editor returned as soon as the semi-protection expired and restores the exact same unsourced materials to the article. —Farix (t | c) 22:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 23:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:24, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 23:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism. MYS77 16:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only three obvious IP reverts in the past year, and there appears to be a regular IP that contributions positively. -- ferret (talk) 18:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – previously requested & agreed temporary protection against IPs adding unsourced, disruptive and fancruft appears to have ended early. Needs to be until 31/1 please. Leaky Caldron 22:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.@Leaky caldron: Be aware that some of the editors involved will be autoconfirmed soon. -- ferret (talk) 22:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. WNYY98 (talk) 22:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

25 January 2017

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is the target of consistent vandalism from unregistered users. — አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 17:41, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:45, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued IP disruption . - Mlpearc (open channel) 17:54, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several temporary protections failed to stop IP-hoppers/sockpuppets' disruptive edits. This article is targeted by them since 2013. So I request a indefinite or long-term semi-protection. Wario-Man (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 18:11, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:51, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:27, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:53, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:46, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:54, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: repeatedly recreated, needed WP:SALTed. Avicennasis @ 19:27, 27 Tevet 5777 / 19:27, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected MusikAnimal talk 19:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection used on template-protected Template:Tfd links. Pppery 18:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. wiki tamil 100 (talk) 13:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AustralianRupert (talk) 14:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:12, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:41, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced edits to a BLP. Qed237 (talk) 14:51, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —MBlaze Lightning T 15:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Thepersoncalledme (talk) 15:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:28, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Last several edits have been reverted as unconstructive or vandalism; as the NFL commissioner, it may continue as the Super Bowl gets closer. 331dot (talk) 17:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. For the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Only about a few user has used the template. It is not an intricite template. Should enable access by template editor. 219.79.227.79 (talk) 14:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already unprotected by administrator WOSlinker. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:38, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The topic of this article makes it a long-running spam magnet for web development shops placing EL adverts here. No other solution seems practical. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:56, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:16, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguisttalk|contribs 12:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:18, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguisttalk|contribs 12:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:20, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from range of IP addresses, including removal of improvement templates and insertion of copyright material with edit summaries that don't adequately reflect the changes being made. Drchriswilliams (talk) 14:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:39, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new accounts are getting a little crazy in trying to update the article following the subject's controversia remarks about the 2017 Women's March. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors vandalizing page with hoax season 9. Series is over (see Regular Show). EvergreenFir (talk) 20:19, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by user adding hoax info about a non-existent season 9. See User_talk:179.60.97.112 for nature of disruption. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:58, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deli nk (talk) 21:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:59, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguisttalk|contribs 21:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Three SPA accounts repeatedly adding back the same YouTube-sourced "Controversy" section. McGeddon (talk) 22:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 22:17, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:03, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 22:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 04:35, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:07, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An upcoming film of a superstar just days away from release, it is already affected by rampant vandalism. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:08, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant IP vandalism that changes the order of words to achieve the meaningless "the inevitable road to philosophy". See also Talk:Property_(philosophy)#Order_of_.22logic.2C_mathematics.2C_and_philosophy.22 fireattack (talk) 17:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP disruptive editing. - Mlpearc (open channel) 03:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 14:44, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP SPA editing of politician's bio.

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:53, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP adding BLP-violating material sourced to wordpress blogs per WP:BLPSPS. Before protecting in wrong-version, please check for a revision absent the problematic material. Only in death does duty end (talk) 17:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:07, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 04:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rami R 07:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 10:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Repeated attempts to add unsourced factual inaccuracies about the state of the agreement, in addition to plain old vandalism. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The offending editor has now been blocked, which I think is a better call than protection. --Mkativerata (talk) 23:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There are also IP numbers that have been disruptively editing the article. I made the request before the other individual began to sabotage the article, because of those IP numbers. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 00:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question: I see a lot of editing but not a lot of back and forth. Other than the blocked editor. Can you provide examples of other disruptive editing? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. [1](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trans-Pacific_Partnership&type=revision&diff=761680794&oldid=761677889), [2](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trans-Pacific_Partnership&type=revision&diff=761610215&oldid=761609798), [3](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trans-Pacific_Partnership&type=revision&diff=761568609&oldid=761568589). Editors are also repeatedly (I count half a dozen IP numbers) in the last 12 hours) saying that TPP was (rather than is) a trade agreement, which needs to be supported by sources and discussed, but which the constant back-and-forth makes impossible. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 09:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – these editors could keep remove pictures quality from 480i SDTV should not confirm as said before also 480i made used on the television shows not a 1080i HDTV should not confirm on GMA HD. Oripaypaykim (talk) 08:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP's. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent additions of unsourced/poorly sourced content - Saltalamacchia's contract with Toronto is pending a physical and team confirmation. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 22:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 07:42, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A news story of the day, hence a new article. But there's a problem with new and IP editors making unsourceable claims. MIRV has already been protected similarly. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 07:38, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent spate of apparent vandalism. Shearonink (talk) 03:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 07:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The vox populis is consistent in their opinion of Ted Cruz being some sort of higher-up in Deadspin. (read: more!! vandalism!!). ɯɐɔ 💬 05:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah.. Rami R 07:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editor. Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 00:47, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The user appears to have stopped after receiving a final warning. Report to WP:AIV if the user persists. Mz7 (talk) 02:59, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeatedly recreated - needs WP:SALTed . Avicennasis @ 03:56, 27 Tevet 5777 / 03:56, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected at the autoconfirmed level. Mz7 (talk) 05:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeatedly recreated - needs WP:SALTed . Avicennasis @ 03:56, 27 Tevet 5777 / 03:56, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected at the autoconfirmed level. Mz7 (talk) 05:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Slow edit war, predominently IPs and new users but a few old hands (myself included) are involved, so full protection might be an option too. A discussion is underway on the talkpage but it looks as though the page isn't going to remain stable while that's concluded. Yunshui  13:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I have left a note on the talk page. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 22:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mz7 (talk) 00:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc (open channel) 00:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To the acting Admin, if this page is protected please restore the article to a version before the disruption, Thank you, - Mlpearc (open channel) 00:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This seems more like a situation where a block would be appropriate than where page protection would be helpful. If another revert occurs, I'll block. ~ Rob13Talk 00:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal keeps on making logo big. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 00:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Mz7 (talk) 02:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Not used that much and currently on TFD. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 15:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Will possibly become moot after the TfD, so no sense in discussing this now. Feel free to return if the TfD closes as something other than delete. ~ Rob13Talk 00:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - article about author of a bunch of fake news has been regularly getting fake news or promotional content added. Please semi protect for one month. Jytdog (talk) 23:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13Talk 00:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A rotating set of IPs continue to insert info that a talk page thread (Talk:Endeavour (TV series)#Running total) has agreed does not belong. When asked to make their case for the edit they stated that they did not have to. A few days protection may bring them to the conversation. MarnetteD|Talk 17:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cyphoidbomb. Mz7 (talk) 22:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Bishonen | talk 21:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disgruntled customer/IP-hopping sock targeting article. Toddst1 (talk) 00:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 00:47, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2017

27 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection persistent edit warring against consensus by a floating IP user. Refuses to discuss on the talk page. oknazevad (talk) 13:42, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  15:40, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring, disruptive editing. Gamebuster19901 (Talk | Contributions) 17:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor Issue is no longer being fought over via edit warring. Gamebuster19901 (Talk | Contributions) 17:43, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

27 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 19:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc (open channel) 19:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@CambridgeBayWeather: Pending changes will have no effect as the disruption is by the established user Catholic Laitinen
Thank you, Cheers, - Mlpearc (open channel) 21:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 19:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced information by IP editors. TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of multiple IP users from Italy name 151.67. Continous edit war. 2001:569:70DD:7500:39EA:19D8:DF90:EF4D (talk) 21:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's false: he always delete official news from Corriere della Sera and other newspaper. You must block him, not me.--151.67.43.10 (talk) 21:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 21:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long term issues with disruption. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long protection log, highly visible. WNYY98 (talk) 19:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long protection log. WNYY98 (talk) 19:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent increase in vandalism by IP's. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 13:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two IPs, one of which is now blocked. -- ferret (talk) 17:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Garchy (talk) 15:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Block was updated to forbid talk page usage. -- ferret (talk) 16:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP addresses are adding unrelated information. TM 16:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Very light activity, recent two IP edits appear to be good faith, not vandalism. -- ferret (talk) 16:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: I don't want the page to be vandalised. LeonardoIannelliCOMPUTE (talk) 03:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bob Pony was blocked. -- ferret (talk) 14:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected MusikAnimal talk 20:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeatedly recreated, needs WP:SALTed. Avicennasis @ 18:58, 29 Tevet 5777 / 18:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Not the first of this kind, will try to figure out what's going on MusikAnimal talk 20:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi We could play whack-a-mole with IP blocks, but this seems easier. IP hopper repeatedly inserting barely coherent vaguely religious rant. TimothyJosephWood 14:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This was filed under requested for reducing protection, but the page was not protected at the time. A separate request above for semiprotection has been fulfilled. -- ferret (talk) 14:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Derp. That's what I get for getting in a hurry. Same needed result. TimothyJosephWood 15:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Numerous vandalism, disruptive and unsourced edits made by IP vandals. TTCTransportationFan4644 (talk) 19:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I only see a few clear reverts right now, and most of current work at the article (Appears to be converted from list to table since last month) is being done by IPs.-- ferret (talk) 14:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 07:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Violation of the Biographies of living person policy. 203.145.94.110 (talk) 08:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rami R 13:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. The IP address of the vandal(s) keeps changing so an IP block is insufficient. Sizeofint (talk) 17:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still in the news and hours after protection lifted, vandalism begins again. Egghead06 (talk) 18:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 03:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Users have been warned. Rami R 07:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Biased statements. Anahid66 (talk) 10:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rami R 13:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Biased information regarding jurisdiction, outdated figures. Anahid66 (talk) 10:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rami R 12:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection:: Ongoing phishing from darknet market sites and scam sites. Deku-shrub (talk) 14:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Activity isn't very high. Past PC1 expired, going longer. -- ferret (talk) 16:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguisttalk|contribs 15:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 16:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguisttalk|contribs 15:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. -- ferret (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Until the 89th Academy Awards ceremony is held. Several IPs have vandalized the list, the Oscars bit in particular. FrB.TG (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 17:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: biased information on church jurisdiction. Anahid66 (talk) 10:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rami R 12:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – biased information regarding present clergy. Anahid66 (talk) 10:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rami R 12:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued reverts, removing material which has been reliably referenced, but failing to justify this on the talk page despite requests to do so. - Meticulo (talk) 10:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rami R 12:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for 1 month: Persistent IP hopping by blocked user. Yaysmay15 IPs keep on adding routine, non-notable, sensationalist and tabloid journalism events, especially a New Year stray bullet death, whose page ("Death of Emilyn Villanueva"), made by a Yaysmay15 sock, had been deleted. TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 16:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Stereorock (talk) 15:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's an IP involve here (and editing many articles) who comes back periodically, making what appears to be good faith but unsourced edits. I've applied PC1 for a month. It's slow moving, and a short semiprot likely wouldn't accomplish much. -- ferret (talk) 16:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Jemele Hill and Michael Smith recently appeared on a popular (though not relevant to their articles) podcast. Today alone there have been several unconstructive edits relate to this fact. Mizike (talk) 16:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 16:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Michael Smith and Jemele Hill recently appeared on a popular (though not relevant to their articles) podcast. Today alone there have been several unconstructive edits relate to this fact. Mizike (talk) 16:27, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 16:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Vandalized once or twice per year. --George Ho (talk) 22:32, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seem every edit of the last two years has been reverted. Very slow moving but consistent vandalism. -- ferret (talk) 14:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Forgot this was WP namespace, so cannot use PC1. -- ferret (talk) 14:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs think they need to censor this article from spoilers. Over the last two months they have made edits like that every day or two. Since this is a recent film, I suggest a month of semi-protection. Debresser (talk) 13:41, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 14:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Sock-hopping anonymous user, known for attacking The Bold and the Beautiful and Days of Our Lives, is now attacking this page. Edits violate sticking to the source, MOS:TV and a consensus found as the Soap Project. livelikemusic talk! 14:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous 1 year SP expired Feb 2016, but looks like most of 2016 was the same. -- ferret (talk) 14:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been subject to these nonsense edits for almost as long as the page has existed, there's no reason to believe they will ever stop without protection. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous PC1 for a year, everything during which was reverted it looks like. I've set 1 year, but if someone wants to make it indef, no argument from me. -- ferret (talk) 14:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by an IP-hopper. Eperoton (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 14:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP addresses from Florida keep trying to remake the article into a promotion for a Miami business. Binksternet (talk) 21:51, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 14:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: recent uptick in IP vandalism. Dl2000 (talk) 22:47, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 14:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection: Disruptive editing. There's been a lot of back and forth over Chris O'Dowd's placement in the cast list. Users have kept switching his name between the "Peculiar Adults" and "Non-Peculiar Adults" sections. Another user pointed out, with evidence from the film, that his character should be listed as "Non-Peculiar Adult;" the switching still continues. It's mainly a wide range of IPs that initiates the switching so temporary protection should calm the page down.Crboyer (talk) 00:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 14:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There hasn't been a constructive edit to BMW since January 13. . Dennis Bratland (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 14:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruptive editing from IPv6 re: infobox. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 01:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I already pointed it out "{{Infobox comedian" is not s big deal. 2600:1000:B07F:2F4C:6089:1D1:C191:24DA (talk) 03:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 14:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Return of sock. Grayfell (talk) 07:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 14:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been a lot of vandalism from IP users recently. Semi-protection should solve the problem. Slashme (talk) 13:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP constantly adding unsourced and unverified voice credits to article despite being reverted every time by a number of editors . I count 18 such edits on this article alone this month. Shows no desire to discuss or prove they should be listed. Their last edit to the article saw them misusing a source I had just added on the article that didn't back up their claims.See also Doraemon (1979 anime). SephyTheThird (talk) 08:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 13:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Recent history of page move vandalism, no reason page needs to be moved in near future. BilCat (talk) 08:41, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected. Rami R 13:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. —MBlaze Lightning T 09:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. —MBlaze Lightning T 09:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Edit-warring. HighnessAtharva is pushing a bloated in-universe summary of OR and synthesis that is poorly formatted and written. Also claims to not be the IP whose only edits were also to undo reversion of HighnessAtharva's contributions. AlexTheWhovian very patiently explained and detailed the reason's why on HA's talk page, but the advice seems to have been unheeded. JesseRafe (talk) 14:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined warnings issued. Come back if the problem persists. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem: Continued disruption after previous request. Alex|The|Whovian? 08:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same as Doraemon (2005 anime). 203.145.94.203 (talk) 10:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 13:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent ignoring of AfD decision. Onel5969 TT me 12:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Rami R 12:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the Vaibhav Kasyap vandal has added his name to this page. if his history can be used to predict the future, he will return over and over. Kellymoat (talk) 16:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13(talk) 17:56, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, there is one user who reverted ten times. They have been warned and at the next revert should be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection Persistent vandalism - The page is under full protection until 30 January, 2017. I am requesting an extension of the protection, at least in semi-protection format. The page was vandalized is being from multiple IPs and sockpuppets.Messiaindarain (talk) 08:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent change of soured content by IP editors.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 09:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.39.190 (talk) 01:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rami R 07:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.39.190 (talk) 01:41, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rami R 07:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 10:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations – Unreferenced bio info. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:58, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism from Burma for some reason.. lovkal (talk) 18:32, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – There has been some inappropriate vandalism by unregistered users. . MON5T3R (talk) 23:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I couldn't find any BLP violations or persistent vandalism upon looking through the page history. Mz7 (talk) 04:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated removal of referenced detail by editor (Nicosmith23 ) who has identified himself as the former singer in the band. He disagrees with the official statement released by the band, and is just intent on constantly removing it when it is relevant to the article. He has personally attacked me in edit summaries ("You fucking weird bitter cunt") and tried to add a photograph that he didn't have the rights to use. This has been going on since May last year (using previous user name Nicky smith23777 and IP 81.104.252.77), and obviously required protection for an extended period of time. Jimmygotyback (talk) 16:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • (Non-administrator comment) I think this issue is best handled by the two users in question discussing the issue on the article's talk page, rather than edit warring back and forth or resorting to page protection to lock out one of the editors. I've asked both editors to use the article's talk page. Deli nk (talk) 17:47, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No - there is a conflict of interest here. I am merely keeping reference to an official press release in the article. The other user is a single use account to remove information they don't like. What discussion is there to be had? There's no reason to not quote the reason given for the band splitting up.

Jimmygotyback (talk) 18:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Warnings issued to involved parties. If this continues I will take stronger measures. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Seven vandalisms within the past week. FoxSerfaty (talk) 01:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 07:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 07:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There's an edit war ongoing in the "Rosters" section of this article. A temporary lock would lead to a discussion. –HTD 10:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm not seeing a heavy duty edit war. Come back if the situation escalates. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 03:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 07:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Increased semi-protection: Extreme levels of IP vandalism. Vandalism will most definitely increase as well now that the competition is in a few days. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 03:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the Vaibhav Kasyap vandal has decided to return. Kellymoat (talk) 15:43, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 (talk) 03:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 05:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 (talk) 03:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 05:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.39.190 (talk) 04:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 05:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the Vaibhav Kasyap vandal has decided to return. Kellymoat (talk) 15:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the Vaibhav Kasyap vandal has decided to return. Kellymoat (talk) 15:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the Vaibhav Kasyap vandal has decided to return. Kellymoat (talk) 15:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:27, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the Vaibhav Kasyap vandal has decided to return. Kellymoat (talk) 15:47, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the Vaibhav Kasyap vandal has decided to return. Kellymoat (talk) 15:47, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the Vaibhav Kasyap vandal has decided to return. Kellymoat (talk) 15:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection persistent edit warring against consensus by a floating IP user. Refuses to discuss on the talk page. oknazevad (talk) 13:42, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  15:40, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring, disruptive editing. Gamebuster19901 (Talk | Contributions) 17:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor Issue is no longer being fought over via edit warring. Gamebuster19901 (Talk | Contributions) 17:43, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

28 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection another example of IP socking by blocked sockmaster User:Vujkovica brdo. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:44, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Yaris678 (talk) 17:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I have never made such a request, so forgive me if these circumstances don't quite warrant protection. Nevertheless, someone is modifying the page to express their opinions of the results of a race by creating a section that does not constitute an appropriate statement for Wikipedia's encyclopedic standards. Sonoflamont (talk) 10:54, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But no worries. We are all learning. Yaris678 (talk) 17:39, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor, apparently using multiple addresses, is repeatedly adding inappropriate and speculative content, declaring their intention to edit war. [33] and [34]. C628 (talk) 21:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The content being added is true! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1016:B018:B70E:94DD:763:33BD:20B7 (talk) 21:41, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:44, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Banned user Eurocentral

Semi-protection IP socking by User:Eurocentral. Borsoka (talk) 08:56, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:45, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing sockpuppetry. Nördic Nightfury 20:06, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 20:17, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced edits or edits directly against given sources. Qed237 (talk) 20:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:23, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. XboxGamer22408talk to me 21:21, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 21:26, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rather heavy recent vandalism from various IPs. William Avery (talk) 11:06, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Vanamonde93. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:39, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Repeatedly abuse info in the page. To much abusive cause can't undo. And affected the genuine information about the page. Almost everyday I have to undo the vandalism. Shafiqabu (talk) 16:10, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:42, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I'm not an experienced editor and don't claim to know much about protection protocol, but this article seems to keep getting vandalized by people of all kinds of political reasons. I just removed an irrelevant reference to LaRouche in the article's intro, and the talk page here seems to indicate this is a pattern. 108.179.174.179 (talk) 19:16, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:44, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:11, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 19:04, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection, please, due to persistent inaccurate changes to the subject's surname (albeit in good faith, but based on historical misunderstanding) ... richi (hello) 18:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 19:10, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Only about a few user has used the template. It is not an intricite templater. --219.79.227.79 (talk) 16:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Plastikspork: as the protecting admin. The page has two transclusions, both documentation/test pages. Hut 8.5 22:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it was intended for https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Documentation&oldid=396606074 but Module:Documentation no longer uses this. Probably a case for Wikipedia:Templates for discussion and free to unprotect. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:52, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already unprotected by administrator Plastikspork.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 19:11, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection This page has been a victim of high level of IP Vandalism for a long time but I came to notice this only recently. As it can be seen from this page's history, the number of edits made by IPs far exceeds that of edits made by registered users and most of those IPs don't make constructive contributions to the article. Most of them are playing with the page. One of many idiotic edits I noticed was that of 24.184.20.208 who made his only edit of Wikipedia on this page by changing length of one of three runways of airport in infobox from 3,810 m to 88 m. Isn't it offensive ? No one noticed this foolish edit for 12 days. This page needs immediate and indefinite semi-protection. Vibhss (talk) 08:57, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 17:12, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Coretheapple (talk) 13:25, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 15:26, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:48, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To see if it will dissuade ip editor from continuing to attempt to evade decision of AfD discussion. Onel5969 TT me 16:30, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:47, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For the same reasons that Feta and Tsatsiki are now protected (routine Turkicizing by mostly 92.2*.*.* IP editor associated with blocked sockmaster User:Shingling334). Largoplazo (talk) 16:40, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:50, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations by ip's and SPA's regarding comments in a recent panel discussion on how Trump could be removed from office. No responses on Talk page. --Ronz (talk) 17:25, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:52, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption from South American IPs. Binksternet (talk) 17:39, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:53, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We have an ip hopping serial edit warrior here, it would help if the article was semi protected for a bit. Thanks. Dbrodbeck (talk) 17:47, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 17:57, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has had recent vandalism from one specific user without an account. I attempted to add a protection template using the "tag page with protection template" button on this page but I saw no result. RobP (talk) 05:20, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Please feel free to re-report if the vandalism persists even after the user has been blocked. Mz7 (talk) 06:26, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: persistent repeated IP additions of unattributed copied material and/or copyright violations, going back more than two years – there've been several removals of this material, but it just keeps on coming; edit-warring, too. Pending changes might work here too. . Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:40, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 11:46, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP edit warring over the date of death. There have been two statements with conflicting information, and an edit war has developed. I opened a talk page thread to which no-one has commented, preferring to continue the warring. This should be temporary, as I suspect clarity will come to the situation in the next day or two. Thanks. The Bounder (talk) 13:08, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:29, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sro23 (talk) 03:09, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. 219.79.226.147 (talk) 06:11, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. TomCat4680 (talk) 04:20, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:46, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Steady IP vandalism since previous protection expired. Lizard (talk) 04:24, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator AustralianRupert.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:47, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent heavy IP vandalism and Google Doodle now added on to that. Safiel (talk) 05:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP Violation. 219.79.226.147 (talk) 06:08, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:51, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection IP socking by User:Vujkovica brdo. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:10, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:53, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User reverts my correct edit and insults my on my talk page. Arch2all (talk) 20:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Arch2all this is not vandalism. Semi-protection would not help as both of your are autoconfirmed. Nobody has ever left an insulting message on your talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, it was not my talk page, it was the talk page of the insulting person [Edelseider https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Edelseider] --Arch2all (talk) 22:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page constantly disrupted, vandalized, and blanked by random IPs. Marquis de Faux (talk) 23:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:13, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden spurt of vandalism in the past wekk. Given that the time is approaching, a month-long duration till the end of Feb should be enough. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 02:05, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Around) 02:41, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I've warned the user that they will be blocked if they do it again. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Non Registered users are constantly removing chinese flag from Al-Khalid MBT origin on Line 279 in spite of accurate source provided. Requesting protection because this third time flag is removed. The source provided is same as used in main article of MBT itself. Source: http://www.dawn.com/news/1217909 Please refer to paragraph 5 in "The MBT" section for required information. Aman 21:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High levels of malicious IP vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 23:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:11, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Single individual is attacking multiple pages in addition to this one with non-sensible "bad url" messages. Thomas H. White (talk) 23:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:16, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Resumption of behavior that led to previous block. -- ferret (talk) 19:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ferret: Thank you, - Mlpearc (open channel) 19:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of attendance contrary to the official source. There is also an edit war going on: 95.233.109.157 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is the major vandalizer (he's said some things in Italian on 87.12.198.227 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) talk page which basically say he will continue to edit war. Blocks may be necessary. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 22:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

29 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An IP (223.225.X.X) has been edit-warring, modifying sourced content, and now another IP has joined (39.43.Y.Y). Things are getting out of hand. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 21:16, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection: For several days, anon IPs have all made the same uncited personal-life claim at this article. They change the birth year, without explanation, from 1972 as given by two cited RS sources, including Biography.com, to 1970. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:07, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 21:18, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent attempts by a dynamic IP to create this article, after consensus per an AfD discussion determined an article for this character was unnecessary at this time. Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:10, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 21:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Repeatedly created. Mar11 (talk) 13:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 16:28, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – * Manolo Gabbiadini (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Kő Cloch (talk) 18:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temproary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - various IP keep puting a dash in the club's name, was protected several times before for a long time for the same reason.--The TV Boy (talk · contribs) 19:53, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:41, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:57, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:45, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent additions of unsourced content - Moss's contract with Kansas City is pending a physical team confirmation. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 20:43, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:47, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – First, you should know that there is a dispute in this page but I and the other party is working it out. However, an IP user with a vivid harassment background is engaged in revert war for the purpose of harassment. If any admin has doubt about the intent of this IP edit, I have complementary evidence that I can supply on demand. Codename Lisa (talk) 10:49, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. If this continues from other IPs (or accounts) I would be happy to block more and/or protect pages. Yaris678 (talk) 16:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 18:22, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stale for last four days. Watchlisted. Samsara 18:47, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 18:47, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Samsara Ooops looks like we cross posted. I did PC for six months given the long track record of vandalism and frequent PP that didn't seem to be working. Feel free to remove if you disagree. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My assessment here is that it probably will need semi at times in the future, just not right now - it makes sense to keep it open when there isn't current ongoing disruption. It also has a relatively high edit rate, which is why I wouldn't reach for PC in this case. I'm aware that interpretations of "high edit rate" vary - perhaps we have to work on that. So there's nothing wrong with PC here (and it's a BLP, which might strengthen that case), but it also doesn't quite address the problem imo, and it's likely looking at the prot log that we'll be reaching for semi again before too long. Hope that makes my perspective clear. Cheers, Samsara 19:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:59, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to be a lot of vandalism in the recent past, enough to warrant protection. Qaei 19:47, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

temporary semi-protection: Seems to have a lot of IP traffic currently. Home Lander (talk) 17:42, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 17:52, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection - anonymous attempts to put a POV on the article. As I have edited the article and have a strong opinion on Trump (to put it mildly), another admin needs to do this. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:54, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. -- Samtar talk · contribs 17:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 18:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely.. I'm not a big fan of perma PP but in this case it appears to be justified. This article has been a persistent target of disruptive editing for a long time and pending changes wasn't stopping it. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:37, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Linguisttalk|contribs 18:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:42, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Well meaning but ill-informed drive-by editors keep "correcting" the number of Trump executive orders that have been issued, failing to note the distinction between executive orders and presidential memoranda. The media reports have contributed to this confusion. Because it's different editors each time, I have not been successful in engaging in talk page discussion. Gigs (talk) 08:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 16:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Users request for this permission can only be auto-confirmed user. New users can apply for confirmed rights. 219.79.127.74 (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There is no history of a problem on this page. This is neither a template, nor a highly visible page. — Maile (talk) 13:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon repeatedly removing well-sourced info. Sitush (talk) 14:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:28, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism increasing as Super Bowl approaches on Feb 5, 2 weeks semi-protection ought to be sufficient. BilCat (talk) 14:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:30, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – blue jays signing not official yet. WNYY98 (talk) 17:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

30 January 2017

Semi-protection: Presistant disruptive editing. 219.78.191.75 (talk) 15:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Most editors involved are autoconfirmed. There's some back and forth edits but disruption appears light and talk page discussions on going. -- ferret (talk) 17:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Having written this page at least 6 times, it is being constantly hacked to destruction. I do not want to be disrupted from editing this page, which should have been finished by now. I do not want to have unwanted requests to talk. Nor do I want to see Bots on the page that are unhelpful. Please Block all attacks on this page, and by request, I shall finish it once and for all! . Justin Grant Duff 16:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Taken to user's talk page. -- ferret (talk) 17:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated vandalism from socks of User:Macer75 recently. McGeddon (talk) 21:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: A highly visible template. 219.78.191.75 (talk) 11:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is already edit protected, and has been for the last 5 years. — Maile (talk) 16:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots and lots of rumors and unsourced content from multiple IP users. Nickag989talk 18:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salt - Repeatedly created test page and/or thinly veiled vandalism. TimothyJosephWood 19:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seni-protection A couple of related pages have already been semi-protected; this needs it too due to persistent IP vandalism. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 13:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours. Qed237 (talk) 16:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – THis user is currently embroiled in controvery in india. I suspect this to be the reason for so many vandal edits to this page. I suggest maybe a moth of protection. Arkhaminsanity (talk) 17:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by unconfirmed users. Funcrunch (talk) 18:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon (talk) 17:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 17:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - TheMagnificentist 17:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see a few positive contributions from IPs, including some attempts to cleanup the unsourced additions. Trying a longer PC1. -- ferret (talk) 17:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: An anonymous user using/abusing multiple IPs or a morphing IP is constantly deleting sourced information with no discussion and very cryptic explanations, if any explanations are given at all. Has repeatedly ignored pleas to discuss on talkpage.--Mr Fink (talk) 17:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Had been long-time protected, but vandalism continued immdetily after protection lift late last year. Lordtobi () 15:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 17:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please increase the protection level of this article - recent vandalism by multiple accounts (just now an IP after a named account that had passed "pending changes" was blocked). Shearonink (talk) 16:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 17:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Low activity, trying PC1. -- ferret (talk) 17:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every time this page is unprotected, it is vandalized again... Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is only the second time the page has been protected. -- ferret (talk) 17:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

24 hours Pending - Subject of today's Google Doodle. There are still some constructive contributions from anons and newbies, so semi would not be appropriate, but given the attention of the day, there is an increased risk that even short-lived vandalism will be viewed before it is reverted. TimothyJosephWood 17:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 17:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, due to the ongoing (and extremely tedious) debate about whether Rangers F.C. continued to exist after their liquidation in 2012. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 10:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.@Jmorrison230582: You may want to review this edit that stayed live, not sure whether it was meant to be removed or stay. -- ferret (talk) 15:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguisttalk|contribs 10:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 15:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Logged-in editor and an IP repeatedly reverting each other as to which 'official language is more important in India. Complete trivia: but this has actually been going on for a week... O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 14:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 17:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Requests require at least 365 days and 1000 edits. Using 30/500 will enforce this further. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 10:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. This is already semi-protected indefinitely. — Maile (talk) 13:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also, just as a note, they don't require 365 days and 1,000 edits. The guidelines for granting are important, but not the be-all, end-all. More importantly, that's one of the PERM pages where we tend to invite community comments, so I would want to preserve the ability for non-extendedconfirmed editors to comment on requests. ~ Rob13Talk 01:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 20:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 20:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism, although likely IP hopper. Lizard (talk) 01:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 02:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Edits do not constitute vandalism, but rather are part of a content dispute between autoconfirmed users. Some agreements appear to have been reached, so I am holding off of protection at the moment. Please note that vandalism from an account, rather than hopping IPs, should generally be reported to AIV. Vanamonde (talk) 08:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

protection: - Just won Miss Universe. Already IP vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 03:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I know I've asked for this not to be protected before, but here I am changing my mind. Too much vandalism. . Sro23 (talk) 04:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —SpacemanSpiff 04:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 174.51.213.28 has repeatedly deleted valid material and added uncited information with a clearly biased POV. RobP (talk) 04:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Vandalism from 6+ accounts/IPs in the past 30 minutes Alex Cohn (talk) 04:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 08:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High levels of vandalism following the crowning of new titleholder. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 04:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism even after pending changes page protection. Reverting pending change, and some reversion of even new user changes, can be seen in 100 edits view on page history. This continuous reversions and undoing, makes the history look all jumbled up. At this rate it would be pretty obvious that vandals would create a new account to just vandalize. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 04:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. 219.78.191.75 (talk) 08:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from (mostly anonymous) users seeking to remove sourced material that's unfavorable to the subject of the article. The page has been vandalized 4-5 times in the last month and a half-- as far as I can tell, all by different people. OmgItsTheSmartGuy (talk) 04:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Indefinitely, since the vandalism is not too frequent. Vanamonde (talk) 15:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. It has received temporary protection several times but vandalism has continued to occur and has required many reversions. Most of the vandalism seems to come from unregistered users so hopefully extended confirmed protection will remove this problem.--Josephus37 (talk) 05:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Vanamonde (talk) 08:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: IPs that are currently reported for sockpuppetry edit warring, abusing people in edit summaries and insisting they will continue being disruptive by removing whatever they see fit: [35], [36], [37], [38] (this is the same IP, as they also edit the same topics as each other). Edit: Still warring, attacking other editors in summaries: [39] Ss112 13:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To start. Definitely no need for EC. -- ferret (talk) 15:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone who seems to deny the Armenian Genocide is removing information about it from this article, has changed IPs at least once. 331dot (talk) 13:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disclaimer note: As far as I can tell, Armenian genocide is not yet under any arbcom ECP provision (these arbcom documents really need to be formatted better imo). Samsara 15:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism being done by users like, User:Lunafame86721 and User: Gogo198763 , and as well as IP addresses. A page about the number 1 should not have this many edits and reverts. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 04:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Vanamonde (talk) 15:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 04:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 15:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There have been reverts on the same edits in the past few or several days. George Ho (talk) 05:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 15:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long term semi-protection: Page is a regular target of the Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Has been protected four times previously for similar abuse--the vandalism resumed literally one minute after the expiration of the most recent three-month period of semi-protection. --Finngall talk 05:09, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 15:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Multiple accounts, probably one person. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 15:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 05:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Based on all non-confirmed edits for December and January appearing to have been reverted. No issue from me if someone wants to lower to PC1. -- ferret (talk) 15:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 05:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Vanamonde (talk) 08:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – no reason to be edited. WNYY98 (talk) 06:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 15:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 (talk) 06:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 06:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Eddie891 (talk) 11:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 15:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please can we give this page some protection so that only registered users can edit it?

This follows some dubious changes which are being made by sockpuppets our to discredit her - this article mentions edits to this page http://mg.co.za/article/2017-01-27-00-hidden-hand-drives-social-media-smears. Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 (talk) 05:09, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Vanamonde (talk) 07:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism in the past few days, especially in the past few hours. Alxeedo TALK 05:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism target. WNYY98 (talk) 05:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Vanamonde (talk) 07:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC doesnt look like its working+vandalism related to donald trump meme. WNYY98 (talk) 05:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Vanamonde (talk) 07:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Hi! Requesting for increasing page protection due to edit wars, Thanks! M. Billoo 13:28, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 16:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Both users warned on the article talk page. I will check back on the article in a bit. If things do continue when I am not looking, you do have the option of taking the case to WP:AN/3RR yourself. Yaris678 (talk) 16:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and, some low level user vandalism can be seen, if thoroughly looked thru article's past.  

Sincerely,    Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 00:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)   [reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 01:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent adding of IP's of controversial unsourced content like teams that are not entering or teams' stadiums that are not yet confirmed. Babymissfortune 01:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Babymissfortune: Could you comment on whether this is a productive edit? It's not obviously disruptive, but the edit summary gives me pause, obviously. Also, Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 01:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@BU Rob13: Well, he only made minor modifications like changing the dashes into en dash. Since the teams' articles actually uses en dashes, I will say that that edit is productive. The editor seems to be new to Wikipedia so I think he might be toying around with the edit summary box. Babymissfortune 01:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Binksternet (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 22:22, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant addition of unsourced content and trivia by IP's after it had already been removed several times. Originally left out of the request to protect Doraemon (1979 anime) and Doraemon (2005 anime) (both now protected) because the problem was perceived to be of a lower level. However clearly there is an issue as there have been a number of unhelpful IP edits on this page in the time since those articles were protected. SephyTheThird (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 22:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Binksternet (talk) 22:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 22:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Binksternet (talk) 22:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 22:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Binksternet (talk) 22:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 22:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 22:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 22:28, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term drive-by vandalism; seems to have gotten more frequent lately. Psychonaut (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 22:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

31 January 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bradv 17:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesBWatson: Did you mean for that to be indef? Samsara 18:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SLBedit (talk) 19:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs keep inserting comments stating he has died, without sources. Home Lander (talk) 20:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt - recreation of Parashar bapu, already salted because of repeated recreation. Or consider a judicious block since recreating these pages is basically the only thing the user has done. TimothyJosephWood 20:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also apparently Wikipedia:Parashar bapu. TimothyJosephWood 20:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected indefinitely. Mz7 (talk) 20:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've also blocked the account in question for two weeks. Number 57 20:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temp semi-protection: Excessive IP vandals. Home Lander (talk) 20:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 18:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism by IPs & non-autoconfirmed (vandalism-only) accounts. (Note: This page has already been protected twice before, only for high levels of vandalism to resume once the page protection expires.) Blurp92 (talk) 18:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Heavy traffic. I even goofed on a revert. Home Lander (talk) 18:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent IP and unconfirmed user vandalism. Davykamanzitalkcontribsalter ego 08:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 'Controversies' section keeps being deleted though it is well sourced. The matter was raised in Talk but the editor hasn't been forthcoming. RightSaidFred (talk) 09:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.– Without a justification, and in this respect, although it is the department of etymology, To ignore this part and to use wikipedia for various purposes and to edit war. Editors violates its neutrality policy by trying to bring an ethnicity to the forefront.--88.251.8.23 (talk) 12:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Started right up again after protection expired. Bradv 13:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours and unsourced edits to BLP. Qed237 (talk) 15:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on BLP article. Changing of team names, player names and fans seem to be using the page today specifically to slag each other off. Robvanvee 16:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jauerback. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and additions of material that violates BLP policy. Marquardtika (talk) 16:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Lourdes 17:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Last protected for the six months up to October 2016, this article has a constant stream of poor edits from anons and new accounts. It's a timesink and every occasion when it comes off protection, the rubbish starts again. Let them propose changes on the talk page - that will reduce some of the load because a lot wouldn't bother, whereas PC would not reduce the load at all. Sitush (talk) 17:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Sitush, I've responded to your request. I've sent you pings in the past, do you have them disabled? Samsara 18:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: no, I do not have them disabled. In fact, I've got your ping for this. I think there may still be bugs in the notification system. - Sitush (talk) 18:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 18:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Presistant disruptive editing. 219.79.226.196 (talk) 04:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A borderline case, as PC was enabled and is principally working in terms of the frequency of disruption; however, I've granted brief semi as there have been no recent constructive edits from non-autoncofirmeds. Samsara 18:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Bertrand101 Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  06:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Used in 800+ articles. George Ho (talk) 06:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. — Maile (talk) 13:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Maile66. George Ho (talk) 18:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Used in 1300+ articles. George Ho (talk) 07:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. — Maile (talk) 13:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Maile66. George Ho (talk) 18:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Would personally lean towards semi. But I'll leave that decision to an admin. 172.56.39.73 (talk) 00:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 11 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Currently unprotected after moved from Template:Cleanup-list, which is template-protected. Now transcluded in 800+ pages. --George Ho (talk) 08:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. — Maile (talk) 13:22, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Maile66. George Ho (talk) 18:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of important information by multiple IPs (sockpuppetry may be involved). Dtg50 (talk) 16:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Modern Harpoon (talk) 12:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No reverts for vandalism since 23 Jan, no reverts of anyfind since 26 Jan. - GB fan 13:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism despite reverts and warnings. Changing of information in contravention of BLP while not sourcing. Sunil The Mongoose (talk) 15:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3RR - I am now at the point of 3RR, I cannot revert anymore of this IP editor's changes, lest I hang myself with my own rope! Sunil The Mongoose (talk) 15:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP disruption. Citobun (talk) 17:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long term history of vandalism, although there are a few constructive edits here and there, so it would probably be a better idea to try PC first, then raise to semi if it proves ineffective. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 16:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi - No reason to waste everyone's time on pending. Every time a new piece of gossip comes out there is a deluge of fanboys adding unsourced information. My first inclination was just to remove it from my watchlist because I'm tired of seeing it, but this seems like the more responsible thing to do. TimothyJosephWood 13:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unreferenced bio changes by dynamic IP socks of blocked User:M Rob1119. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incessant socking problem from Europefan (talk · contribs) (see SPI) All the "<Year> in Germany" articles are affected. . Andy Dingley (talk) 00:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Man, you're asking someone to protect 42 different articles? Does any admin here know of some sort of automated tool for this? I know that if I did this manually, it would take hours. Is there an alternative solution? ~Anachronist (talk) 05:47, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Twinkle has a tool for protecting all pages linked to from one page. Hut 8.5 07:41, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would prefer a limited protection period if we're protecting 42 articles. Samsara 13:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:PP says that cascading protection isn't available for semi, and isn't supposed to be used in this way. It's also not available for PC, but I wonder if PC isn't preferable here. I'm currently undecided about protecting this entire group of articles. If there isn't any pattern to which ones are affected, we also need to consider that new titles in this series may provide new cannon fodder when/if they are created without protection. Samsara 15:52, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • What we'd need to correctly resolve this per the cascading proposal is the ability to have semi-protection (or PC) cascade from a fully protected page. This type of cascading afaik has not been implemented or enabled yet. Samsara 16:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist, Hut 8.5, and Vanamonde93: Any objections to me going through the list and protecting on a case-by-case basis as needed (and watchlisting any unprotecteds)? I see no reason why we shouldn't at least do that. We can then still continue the discussion of whether some sort of blanket protection should be applied based on expected behaviour of the vandal. Vanamonde, if you were hoping to do this, feel free. Samsara 17:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: I have no objection, and I agree this shouldn't be indef, but something shorter term, starting with a month. The problem is, if we find ourselves needing to escalate the protection period, I am concerned that doing it manually one by one will waste a lot of someone's time, so doing it in an automated way would be preferable. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely no objections, Samsara. Please go ahead. Vanamonde (talk) 17:32, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Checking to see if protection is necessary. Samsara 20:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone through about half of them at this point and found one clear case meriting longer term protection; I'm still hovering over a few others as I learn more about what kinds of insertions are being made, and on what schedule. Will continue going through them as I find time today. Samsara 13:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Following on from Hut 8.5's comment. If you have Twinkle installed go to User:Vanamonde93/sandbox/Temp and there should be a tab that says TW. The drop down menu has P-batch which will protect all the links on the page. Bee careful because right above the P batch is D-batch and that will delete them and it works real good. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No objections, but indefinite. At least not for all. I don't think some of them even need protection at all.—CYBERPOWER (Around) 02:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, some of them will not need protection. Gotta dash right now, more in a few hours. Samsara 19:07, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Andy Dingley, General Ization, and Sro23: Did you discuss these edits anywhere, in the sense of developing consensus that football players should not be included? I found them to be routinely included in the corresponding articles for France, Italy, and Turkey. Samsara 02:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Man, is this a mess. Samsara, if you've done a cursory look and gotten the obvious ones, I'd recommend closing/archiving this. If further attention is needed, an editor can nominate a single page and make the case for semi-protection. It's very difficult to review a mass-nom like this for page protection, since page protection is highly individual to each page. ~ Rob13Talk 01:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A mess indeed. There's about ten or so left that I've yet to look at in detail, but I can do that without keeping this thread open. Samsara 15:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over the last week. IP numbers are removing text without justification. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 15:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Wikipedian is deceased - see the protection policy. PhilrocMy contribs 13:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. Mz7 (talk) 14:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. —Granger (talk · contribs) 15:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Samtar talk · contribs 15:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated moving of Gamer's Guide to Pretty Much Everything and Lab Rats: Elite Force to former series despite there being no official announcement/source claiming the series have ended. Amaury (talk | contribs) 00:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – no good edits for a long time. I say indefinite because page has been protected many times but they keep vandalizing it. DashyGames (talk) 01:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Too much traffic for PC. Samsara 12:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated additions of unconfirmed rumors about Shanahan becoming the 49ers' new head coach. . A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 02:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can be unprotected if and when news are confirmed. Samsara 12:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Multiple creations were seven years ago: no disruption since AfD closure. Vanamonde (talk) 06:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism... Kante4 (talk) 05:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 04:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Mz7 (talk) 04:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Uptick in recent vandalism on this article. -- Dane talk 04:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New article, under constant vandalism by dynamic IPs. Should be protected until controversy simmers down. Inploded (talk) 08:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Shubinator (talk) 09:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There was very little vandalism. Request to have to page locked is an attempt to protect the page's biased and non-neutral point of view. 70.209.196.77 (talk) 09:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, the word "vandalism" wasn't even mentioned in the edit history until Shubinator protected the page. Please reverse course. 70.209.196.77 (talk) 09:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent and unconstructive contributions, as well as persistent copyright violations. This page is additionally a Featured List candidate and needs to remain stable. DARTHBOTTO talkcont 23:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed soon after semi protection ended. Again. . EvergreenFir (talk) 01:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed soon after semi protection ended. Again. . EvergreenFir (talk) 01:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 03:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – highly active user, already had attack page created with this name. WNYY98 (talk) 04:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was only created once and is a bit stale at this point (since December 2016). Since this hasn't strictly speaking been "repeatedly" recreated, this would normally be declined. However, given that this is an active user and that there is no reasonable expectation that a "Sro23" will become notable in the future, I wouldn't object too loudly if we invoked WP:IAR here. I will defer to the judgment of the next administrator. Mz7 (talk) 05:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected Indefinitely. Mz7 is correct, IMO, and this is a valid application of IAR. The likelihood of a legitimate page being created here is virtually nil, and can be addressed if that situation arises. Vanamonde (talk) 06:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – This page is extremely related with the Arab-Israeli conflict. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 18:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption from long-term abuser, multiple IPs from Peru. Binksternet (talk) 22:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spikes in vandalism, disruptive editing, and IP POV edits in the last few weeks. BurritoBazooka Talk Contribs 23:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. Karst (talk) 23:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: From the little I got told, this page got fully protected in the middle of a move war sometime ago. I tried to discuss this with the admin who protected the page, but the idea that I wish to move the page too was stuck in his mind, so the discussion went nowhere, no matter what I said. The original page that started everything is move protected for quite sometime now, so I can't see why this is a issue anymore. Bertdrunk (talk) 22:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: Would you care to comment here?—CYBERPOWER (Around) 02:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Bertdrunk: What's the benefit of unprotecting this given that there's no consensus to move anything to this page (at least as far as I see)? I'm not a fan of considering unprotection requests when there are no edits needed by those being restricted from editing the page, given constraints on admin time/resources. ~ Rob13Talk 01:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
>>I DON'T WANT TO MOVE ANYTHING<<. In the page I linked there's a long discussion in which I keep repeating that to no avail. How can this still popup? Even if someone tries the other pages are move locked, so that won't be a problem. If somehow that's still a problem, move-protect this one too. Bertdrunk (talk) 01:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This title wound up being full protected as a redirect due to an edit war that was first reported in July, 2016. It continued in early September, 2016 as you can see from the history of Anglo-Spanish War (1779–83). There appear to be two groups of people, those who want the fighting in North America to be described in Spain and the American Revolutionary War and those who want the material to stay in Anglo-Spanish War (1779-1783). From time to time, someone comes forward and just wants the redirect unprotected but they don't explain whether they intend to copy the existing material from the other article. In my view, the redirect should stay protected until someone will explain how a two-article solution would work and how they propose the material be arranged. And, they should get consensus. If you don't like the idea of a WP:RM then please explain what form of discussion you would set up. See Talk:Spain and the American Revolutionary War#Redirect for the prior discussion that led to the status quo. EdJohnston (talk) 05:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You say consensus but fully-protected a page cause a guy asked you, that's all the "consensus" that exist. There's nothing beyond you ignoring whatever is said and sitting over the top of this. What I propose is that you should pick whatever problems you ever had with any editor and take it to them. Then you should stop pretending that everyone else would do exactly the same thing for whatever reason it may be. And why you keep insisting on a RM is really beyond my comprehension. Bertdrunk (talk) 07:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Bertdrunk if you don't want to move the other article but create a new one, then write the new one in your user or draft space first. Once that is done then ask for other opinions as to the suitability of the new article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like a punishment for someone else's fault, a rationale for an article was never discussed, so it was never decided either (beyond what the guy above decided alone of course). But anyway, have a nice day. Bertdrunk (talk) 00:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – highly visible, anons have high tendency to be unconstructive. WNYY98 (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The article is under Pending Changes protection which seems adequate for now. When there is a burst of vandalism, request temporary semi-protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – There's a "let's vandalize the notable people section" edit war going on between a few people; it's exhaustive to have to revert it all, and more effective to simply protect the page (especially if more people get involved). . ɯɐɔ 💬 02:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 month. If there is continued vandalism by registered accounts we can use blocks. EdJohnston (talk) 03:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Pending changes not viable. Not a single constructive edit from an IP or new user in the past 2 weeks (or ever for that matter). Lizard (talk) 03:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Mz7 (talk) 04:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 02:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tons of poor edits. Semmendinger (talk) 02:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Missvain . Materialscientist (talk) 03:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tons of poor edits. md_5 (talk) 02:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Materialscientist (talk) 03:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: A highly visible template. 219.78.191.75 (talk) 11:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. — Maile (talk) 16:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.39.73 (talk) 02:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Vandalism. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 02:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 03:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Talk:AlphaBay. Persistent changes to URL for phishing purposes. Toddst1 (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is pending changes protected already. Samsara 15:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Samsara 15:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – currently under pc but most anon edits still unconstructive. WNYY98 (talk) 22:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - I think the pc is going alright for now - relist if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 22:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Third time requesting semi-protection. The previous two stints of temporary semi-protection have both been followed immediately by (and indeed proceeded by) vandalism, and hardly anything aside from vandalism. Reil (talk) 00:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temp semi-protection: Heavy IP abuse. Home Lander (talk) 20:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – despite pc, majority of anon edits unconstructive. WNYY98 (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. After the semi-protection expires, the PC protection should remain in place. MelanieN (talk) 00:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – similar reasons to above request. WNYY98 (talk) 22:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The PC protection will persist after the semi-protection ends. MelanieN (talk) 00:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Evking22 (talk) 22:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – unconstructive anon edits likely to increase in coming days with LI being Sunday. WNYY98 (talk) 22:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Full-blown edit war over the inclusion of a ranking. Looks like a WP:3RR breach for both parties. clpo13(talk) 22:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done I left it at "indefinite" which was already on the Extended Confirmed. But changed it to Full Protection. — Maile (talk) 23:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC) — Maile (talk) 22:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: as per WP:TOOSOON should too early from events, also user can keep recreate the article with no source venue and date. Oripaypaykim (talk) 12:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple unregistered users. Mfarazbaig

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Low activity, no past protections. See if the current burst passes, if not suggest a longer PC1. -- ferret (talk) 22:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]