Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2020/01

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2020

01 January 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:48, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing / adding a riot in the Netherlands as if it was part of the First World War. The Banner talk 19:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, disruptive editing by a user and addition of unsourced material to biographies of living people. Users, including myself, have been reverting their edits for several days. Keivan.fTalk 20:15, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: One user from multiple IP addresses trying to add biased phrases over the last couple monts. Akeosnhaoe (talk) 15:12, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:28, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Moxy 🍁 15:21, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term serious BLP violations and vandalism from new editors and IPs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:41, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:32, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP Vandalism. Addition of incorrect teams in the tournament bracket, even when the teams didn't even participate in the tournament. Anbans 585 (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism over a number of months. DarkGlow (talk) 18:10, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:15, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:28, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:28, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:44, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:45, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:53, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:56, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP and LTA vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP-hopping vandal keeps on adding hoax information on this article since October, particularly adding a supposed remake of the Power Rangers series in the Philippines. WayKurat (talk) 08:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:48, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. The Banner talk 11:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IP-hopper. The Banner talk 12:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:26, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Short-term IP BLP violations and vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:25, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:06, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected, I do not think we are ready for indef semiprotecton here--Ymblanter (talk) 14:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This article is the subject of infrequent but persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced BLP claims. There is no chance this will ever stop. As a pornographic actress the subject is a honey pot for vandals. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 00:56, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 07:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – person named User:MrCoolGuy159 vandalised page, replacing the top page with a twinkle message. he should be blocked because he has done this before. my alexa said his vandalous edit. Bryce M (talk) 01:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Tornadosurvivor2011: I warned the user that any repeats will lead to a block and there are no other recent edits at that page. If you notice any further problems, please let me know. By the way, are you sure you want to sprinkle "my alexa said his vandalous edit" around? Johnuniq (talk) 05:25, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of valid, sourced content. livelikemusic talk! 05:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Livelikemusic: Sorry but the problem edits are not recent and have not occurred often. Johnuniq (talk) 05:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Saucy[talkcontribs] 00:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:10, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 00:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two IPs pushing for edits to the article supporting antisemitism. 2nd IP started after 1st IP was blocked. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 02:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L1amw90 (talk) 04:06, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:30, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current v spree. Has he just done or said something?? Sheesh. . DBaK (talk) 00:08, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Apparently, Craig David has a New Year's Eve performance on BBC One. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 00:28, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ah! I see, thanks. Happy New Year, DBaK (talk) 00:40, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Carl Tristan Orense 00:19, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:32, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like you protected the page less than one minute before I did. I set the protection to 13 months to be consistent with Deaths in 2019, but feel free to reverse it if this is not necessary. — Newslinger talk 00:36, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That works for me, Newslinger. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Interstellarity (talk) 00:24, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Happy New Year. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:39, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Misuse of user talk (trolling) page by indeffed user. Hog Farm (talk) 19:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:03, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Forum is a marketing forum; seems like users from the forum have been intermittently adding links to tangential spam sites to the article. Just reverted one a minute ago. DirkDouse (talk) 19:59, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article hadn't been edited in almost six months prior to one IP edit. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. NedFausa (talk) 23:28, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 23:38, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

02 January 2020

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been a persistent amount of vandalism, defacement, and content blanking from Indian and other non-Singaporean IP addresses. It is getting increasingly tiresome to deal with. One example of where this frequently happens is the ethno-linguistic profile section. The data in the table is lifted from the Singapore government's official census, but we commonly have trolls and agenda-driven editors with their IP addresses visible replacing official stats with their own spurious stats in other to further random ethnonationalistic agendas that have no place on a Singapore Wikiproject article. It then becomes a constant tussle between established editors and random IP accounts, which takes time away from more important edits. I would appreciate it if this article could be indefinitely protected to keep the IP address accounts at bay. I am unsure as to which level of protection would be appropriate, and shall leave that to the admin's discretion. Thank you!. Tiger7253 (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent death. JMHamo (talk) 18:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. None of the edits I reviewed appear to be vandalism. IP editors do seem to be editing constructively, meaning protecting the article would cause collateral damage. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:54, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A few IP addresses and users have been vandalizing the wiki page of Aidan Gallagher. Lcodyh803 (talk) 22:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; addition of non notable by multiple accounts. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Silly regular edits by numerous IP accounts holding a fringe and obviously false view that POTUS Donald Trump is not yet impeached, amongst other disruptive edits. GaɱingFørFuɲ365 20:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism with racist claims by several IPs for over a week now. Denniss (talk) 21:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Active edit war over early career. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is often vandalized by anonymous IPs, either to advertise or to spread false information. Therefore, I am requesting page protection.  Avalerion  V  (let's talk?) 14:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Before last disruption, no edits at all since December 19th. Lectonar (talk) 15:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:17, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing and addition of unsourced content, all by IPs. Luigitehplumber (talk) 18:17, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing. Rocky 734 (talk) 12:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is always the same IP in the last days. Lectonar (talk) 12:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism continuing after protection expires . LakesideMinersCome Talk To Me! 13:43, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last IP disrupting, 2 days ago, stopped after being warned. Lectonar (talk) 13:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Bitter content dispute with a picky, all-powerful editor. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:49, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 13:54, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP libel by anons. Jorm (talk) 16:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Every IP edit has been reverted, and one-year semiprotection has already run its course, so the best option appears to be indefinite semiprotection and the removal of pending changes. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 16:55, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP Editors.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 16:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 16:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Repeated attempts to overwrite this individual's details with those of a different individual with a similar name. The vandalism is taking place from multiple IP addresses. PohranicniStraze (talk) 13:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Same reason as Nilesh Parmar above - the same IP-hopping attempts to overwrite this person with a different Nilesh a couple decades younger. PohranicniStraze (talk) 14:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two IP made several disruptive edits/ mass removal of content without any reason. So requesting for page protection. Sony R (talk) 14:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:14, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - Persistent disruptive editing resumed after recent protection expired. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate12:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:34, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent dating/relationship news - Has been causing unsourced/poorly sourced additions and disgruntled "fans" from also removing said news while adequately sourced. Lots of back and forth reverting. The other side of the relationship Kim Hee-chul has been protected already. Redalert2fan (talk) 12:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection for 30 days: Persistent and Continuing IP vandalism and BLP violations. Octoberwoodland (talk) 21:15, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one disruptive edit since the page came out of protection a week ago. Kosack (talk) 08:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Notability, that went unchallenged for a bit. FusionLord (talk) 21:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editor repeatedly adding unsourced material. Ravensfire (talk) 04:17, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP address editor(s) routinely removing mention of pseudoscience lately. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate07:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs has been continuously adding links that violates WP:EL. Tolly4bolly 09:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Emk9 (talk) 05:56, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Emk9: Could you elaborate a bit please? I see some disruptive editing by IPs, and some reverts of said disruption by IPs. Lectonar (talk) 08:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: 2409:4052:61a:e648::d41:58a1 and 157.37.219.230 are both ips of a frequent vandal of world leader pages, whose socks include Hfhjhu ujj, which was blocked a few days ago. They usually choose a page and make massive and/or confusing edits too it and don't leave the page alone until it is protected for a few days. Emk9 (talk) 08:32, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should deter them sufficiently; @Ymblanter:: if all else fails, we can re-semiprotect. Happy new year. Lectonar (talk) 09:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Back and forth edit-warring by IP users over long periods of time. DeluxeVegan (talk) 09:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – at least 4 of the most recent edits have been vandalism . Thanks, Thatoneweirdwikier Say hi 09:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 09:56, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Maybe 60 days. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:54, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP's keep putting a random singer's name (which is unsourced) repeatedly for the national anthem and will not stop. TheBigMan720 (talk) 02:57, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 33 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should get us through the game itself. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism, following his dating news. Lulusword (talk) 05:15, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:25, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism via IPs. QueerFilmNerdtalk 22:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:45, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Short-term BLP violations and addition of unsourced content. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LuK3, still a problem or resolved? I'm unclear. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Muboshgu, looks like the unsourced content now include the appropriate sources. I think we are good but will keep an eye out on it. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Ping me if things get worse. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Author is removing rejection notices and MFD notices. Author has less than four days, so semi-protection will prevent further disruption. Request semi-protection for 7 days for time that the MFD will run. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:02, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Author seems to be using talk pages and no longer removing the tag, and editors should be given the opportunity to improve the draft. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:20, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Black Kite. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:44, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

03 January 2020

Indefinite semi-protection: Repeatedly re-created as an article. –MJLTalk 16:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly would prefer Extended confirmed, but there wasn't a generic twinkle option for that. –MJLTalk 16:43, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 8 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 16:58, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra: Just a heads up -- it appears you applied the EC protection to this page's redirect target, rather than to the page proper. –Erakura(talk) 04:02, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done I took the liberty to ec-protect Jacob and unprotect the 2020 article. Lectonar (talk) 09:36, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Damn. damn, damn, damn, damn... Thanks @Lectonar and Erakura: -- Deepfriedokra 11:06, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:23, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:45, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism. TM 22:18, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism. TM 22:19, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:22, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – by multiple IPs and new users, going as far as calling the group a "sheep". theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:12, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor pending a case at SPI. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:34, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:06, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dey subrata (talk) 17:31, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dey subrata (talk) 17:31, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:12, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection This article has just come off semi-protection and is still being subject to vandalism. This is likely to continue especially after any Arsenal match so I request it be semied permanently. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 17:57, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rationale: In five days since protection ended, there have been 9 revisions by 7 users with no changes kept. Previous protection was for 2 months. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 18:42, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rationale: 4 days with 20 revisions by 11 users and no changes kept. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:09, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent IP-hopping and block evasion. IP tries to restore some stuff which was added by a sockpuppet. Please see this diff and compare it with the recent edits[1][2]. Wario-Man (talk) 19:14, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 96 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP's adding defamatory material. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 20:51, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:06, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of "test edits" seem to be made to this article. I don't understand how people are directed to this page but it seems bothersome to do reverts every few days. – The Grid (talk) 21:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No real constructive edits since the page was unprotected almost a month ago. Previous protection was for 6 months. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip vandalism . Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  12:13, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems more like a disagreement between the OP and IP. Needs more eyes probably. Lectonar (talk) 15:05, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing . JMHamo (talk) 15:05, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done It appears that most of those IP edits are constructive, meaning protection would cause collateral damage. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:18, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs. . Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:47, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:04, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MPS1992 (talk) 18:02, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:07, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:29, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:37, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP-hopping vandal adding the same phrase to the page repeatedly. InvalidOS (talk) 16:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:27, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Harshil want to talk? 10:00, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:17, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High media attention in Indonesia due to 2020_Jakarta_floods.  Kenrick  Talk 13:34, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 14:51, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:03, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mulitple IP’s putting Incorrect information. TheBigMan720 (talk) 07:26, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:48, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from random IPs. Meloras (talk) 11:23, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:48, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism target. FDW777 (talk) 11:46, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:52, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The page has received consistent vandalism for over a month, almost all by IP addresses. The page also is subject to IPs constantly trying to incorrectly state that she is no longer a politician. The page has also received attempts by IPs in the past (such as on 26 July 2019‎ and 27 July 2019‎, as seen in the edit history) trying to imply some kind of hypocrisy through an uncited claim about a house purchase, which breaks WP:BLPREMOVE and comes close to WP:LIBEL. Helper201 (talk) 12:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - vandlaism and violations of BLP policy. Buchdalh is a Reform Jewish rabbi. Vandals of a different religious stream of Judaism remove items they believe make her a "bad Jew" or because references are not to religious websites. Example is a deletion of her membership in Yale "Skull and Bones Society" whose member include George W Bush and John Kerry: "curprev 05:18, 2 January 2020‎ 141.226.9.49 talk‎ 13,963 bytes -591‎ Undid revision 933566693 by VanEman (talk) Membership in a non-Jewish quasi-religious organization "The Brotherhood of Death" validate that she a bad Jew and should be under a separate section called 'Controversies'. Removed reference to her conversion becasue there is no reference to it at her Central Synagogue website. undo Tag: Undo"

VanEman (talk) 02:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The disruption appears to have stopped. If it resumes, ping me and I'l protect it. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:44, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – In the past few months, IP editors have added a number of alleged spin-offs that are unsourced, and for which I can find no evidence of their existence in web searches. I am requesting 1 month of PC protection at this time to see if this helps curb the issue, and in the meantime to hopefully clean up some existing questionable entries. Thank you!. –Erakura(talk) 02:46, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:41, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 04:34, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:40, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing via many IPs. Sakura CarteletTalk 05:54, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:05, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Reports just now that he was arrested by Marines in Baghdad. If the pages of other people killed/arrested in tonight's actions are any clue, this page will soon see plenty of vandalism. Ultimograph5 (talk) 01:46, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 01:54, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 03:57, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:39, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ―Mandruss  06:39, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:41, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. S0091 (talk) 23:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:26, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Quiet Place: Part II

Temporary move protection: Due to petty move-warring to take the colon out of the article title, A Quiet Place: Part II. Attempts like A Quiet Place Part II, A Quiet Place Part II (film), A Quiet Place Part II (2020 film), and A Quiet Place Part II (movie) have been attempted. A move should happen after a proper RM discussion. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 01:43, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:54, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and violations of the BLP policy. Hog Farm (talk) 02:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced material. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:19, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:35, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA accounts attacking page. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:31, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 01:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 01:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP and new single-purpose account vandalism. See Talk:One America News Network#defined as Far-right in the U.S. / Radical right (United States) per multiple RSs comments also. X1\ (talk) 00:06, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:29, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing edit warring and vandalism from IPs. Nathan2055talk - contribs 00:29, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:30, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Extremely high-profile subject was just assassinated, already seeing some political edit warring and will likely see more if left unprotected. Ultimograph5 (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:27, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 21:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by users intending to prove that their language is the richest of all. Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 22:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:58, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP user changing their IP to repeatedly remove (and/or post screeds about) the fact that Longthorne was married. Lord Belbury (talk) 23:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Never been protected before so two days. Come back if the disruption resumes. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

04 January 2020

Full protection: BU Rob13 is now retired from the English Wikipedia because of (Redacted). 172.58.99.53 (talk) 23:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Retirement is not grounds for page protection. And talk pages in particular are only protected in unusual situations or where there is a very severe level of disruption. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 22:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users that ignore consensus and don't want to talk about their changes. My request was refused last time, since the vandalism wasn't seen as frequent enough, but I've had to restore the page four times and am now doing it again for the fifth time. On average, this type of vandalism happens every two days almost. And that's just the vandalism regarding the debates. There has been other instances of vandalism as well.

Here are some of the instances of vandalism : [3], [4], [5],[6] and [7]. MikkelJSmith (talk) 17:29, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let us try pending changes. I do not see the case for semi-protection here: there are some bad IP edits, but they are infrequent, and there are also good IP edits, semi-protection would cause collateral damage. It could be that the page is still edited too frequently for pending changes, but this will be clear soon.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:42, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of WP:BLP. NedFausa (talk) 22:24, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Senseless disruption coming from IPs who clearly lack understanding of how film articles are supposed to be, on top of the edit wars / content disputes. Lock these hooligans out. Movie doesn’t even come out until July. Trillfendi (talk) 03:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC) And in the meantime... sockpuppetry. Trillfendi (talk) 13:37, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:55, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various ip addresses have been continuously adding WP:USERGENERATED despite a hidden comment that states that WP: USERGENERATED are not appropriate to use. — YoungForever(talk) 21:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 21:42, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There's been a lot of disruptive editing and reverts recently, making it hard to understand legitimate edits to the article and causing edit conflicts. Qono (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Disruptive editing on page. Despite previous efforts to curb this problem, its been brought back today. We need this level of protection to further dissuade this behaviour on the article - length of protection is left to the discretion of the admin who handles this. GUtt01 (talk) 21:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see any disruption by autoconfirmed users, thus no need for extended confirmed protection at this point--Ymblanter (talk) 21:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by IP sock of User:Brianmagallano. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:04, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IP blocked by Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been targeted by vandals who, based on their tendency to vandalize the infobox, are apparently the same user (see [8] [9] [10]; I can't take it to SPI because I they now delete every attempt to report an already-blocked sockpuppet, and I don't take notice of the vandalism fast enough). ミラP 04:10, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High traffic page of a recent event. Nerd271 (talk) 05:18, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I see constructive edits by IPs. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:34, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism by IP addresses. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 10:20, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:28, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. The Banner talk 11:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced additions as well regarding death. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:25, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinked articles

Extended-confirmed protection: Unsourced articles currently located at Draft:Baurisole and Draft:2020 J.League Asia Challenge, which autoconfirmed editors (different one in each case) are repeatedly moving to mainspace despite multiple NPPs draftifying them. buidhe 14:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected – Muboshgu (talk) 16:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Lordtobi () 10:18, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:23, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:24, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, WP:BLP. I remember running into the same crap at this article months ago. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:15, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator L235. 🎄BethNaught🎄 (talk) 10:49, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Prevent adding of false information. --LH7605 (talk) 11:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Until the transfer window closes. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:14, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Non-stop disruptive edits by Special:Contributions/ShaynDiamond and his socks (both registered accounts and IPs) since Dec 2019. Wario-Man (talk) 05:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:14, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – for three weeks . Harshil want to talk? 09:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Support semi. Page being vandalized for its association with the ongoing Citizenship Amendment Act protests--DBigXray 09:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:11, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A long history of dynamic IP edits which change the player's role to the unsupported by source "Bowling all-rounder". This has involved blanking the talk page (this diff most recently, but this occurred in August and September as well) and refusing to engage in discussion.

Disruptive edits generally come in waves - so most recently, 18 December and 4 January. Page was temp sp from 22 August which helped a little and is worth trying again - on that occasion the talk page also ended up needing to be protected but I'd rather attempt to discuss the issues with this if possible. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User appears to be using sockpuppet technique to post the same edit over and over again, e.g. the latest example: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TSLAQ&oldid=933926180. Please protect this page indefinitely from edits from non-logged in users. QRep2020 (talk) 23:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 04:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 09:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ping El C. Both of these are related to an LTA. IanDBeacon (talk) 04:23, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 09:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Return of IP-hopping vandalism after recent end of previous protection. Ostracized (talk) 02:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:18, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Return of IP-hopping vandalism after recent end of previous protection. Ostracized (talk) 02:14, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:18, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP-hopping vandal. Emk9 (talk) 07:24, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 07:28, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP-hopping vandal. Emk9 (talk) 07:24, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 07:28, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ip vandalism . Sherenk1 (talk) 13:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. This is an actual event, well watched and continuouly updated. IP disruption and helpful IP edits are balanced out. Lectonar (talk) 13:51, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.Dey subrata (talk) 17:29, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple reversions today. Is this considered protection?. Bryce M (talk) 19:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, sorry, false alarm. Thought there was multiple edits to constitute sp. Bryce M (talk) 22:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:45, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism. TM 22:18, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism. TM 22:19, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:22, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ip vandalism . Sherenk1 (talk) 13:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. This is an actual event, well watched and continuouly updated. IP disruption and helpful IP edits are balanced out. Lectonar (talk) 13:51, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.Dey subrata (talk) 17:29, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple reversions today. Is this considered protection?. Bryce M (talk) 19:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, sorry, false alarm. Thought there was multiple edits to constitute sp. Bryce M (talk) 22:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

remove pending changes: article has been on pending changes for years, but doesn't seem necessary now. No sign of edit warring that I've seen. Doing a GAR, and nominator also suggests it could be removed. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 20:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. We would normally refer this kind of request to the admin who first imposed the protection. The indefinite PC protection was installed in March 2015 by User:Tabercil, but that admin is not regularly active any more. So I am going to remove the PC protection as requested. It doesn't seem to be accomplishing much - there are only a few IP edits a month - and it can be annoying at an article undergoing GA evaluation. -- MelanieN (talk) 22:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Automated comment: @Tabercil: One or more pages in this request have not been unprotected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:02, 2 January 2020 (UTC) It's OK, bot. The move protection remains in place. -- MelanieN (talk) 00:00, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:20, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

05 January 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:09, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 22:43, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 21:40, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:57, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 22:38, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:55, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From salted to extended confirmed protection. I have formed an article for Nolet on my sandbox which shows that she meets both WP:GNG and WP:ENT. DarkGlow (talk) 22:31, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected I looked in your sandbox and see that your draft clearly doesn't fail CSD A7. Whether or not it meets GNG and/or ENT I will not venture an opinion, but it's good enough to test the waters in mainspace. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:38, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Short-term unsourced content additions and general vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:35, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and violations of the BLP policy. Hog Farm (talk) 18:38, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – IPs keep adding crap about how the figure's father is a player for a rival team. Hog Farm (talk) 19:02, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:26, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 21:47, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Eagles247. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:54, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. S0091 (talk) 22:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This page has been a regular target for socks of Fangusu for a couple of years, and the most recent edits occurring on 31 December 2019. The most recent/current protection was for two weeks, whereas I think at this point, since this page has been repeatedly protected thanks to Fangusu socks, the semi-protection should really be at least 6 months, if not indefinite. Steel1943 (talk) 03:49, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The page has only been protected 3 times, including my latest protection. As it stands, I don't see the need to modify the existing protection at this time. El_C 11:20, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator El C. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:13, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – numerous attempts to change height and nationality, blp vio. Hydromania (talk) 05:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:15, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent addition of transfer rumors. BlameRuiner (talk) 09:56, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor seems not to understand that the infobox parameter of "Original network" is not for listing ever network it has ever been shown on, and has been reverted three times (albeit not within 24h). Le Deluge (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Non-stop disruptive edits by IPs. Wario-Man (talk) 20:21, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism on this article has resumed within 24 hours of the expiry of long-term (six-month) semi-protection. Wham2001 (talk) 20:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:05, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As requested (improperly) by this anon:[11]. funplussmart (talk) 20:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:10, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 20:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:02, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:06, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP. Thepenguin9 (talk) 08:03, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:51, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ΣΒ (talk) 11:29, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:39, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock IP's of LTA sockmaster.[12] -. LouisAragon (talk) 19:58, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:08, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Stuff like this: Special:Diff/934001026. –MJLTalk 03:42, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. N.J.A. | talk 14:08, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism actually addition of unsourced content (ed.), resumed after recent temporary protection, by different IPs in Philly and NYC, both related to the content that they are attempting to add. No way to communicate with the IP hoppers except by protecting the article they are attacking. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 09:20, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:39, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected, something must have happened in the news as it's been hit all day by petty vandalisms. Ifnord (talk) 17:34, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP intentional disruptions by Wikipedia:SPA aiming to ilustrate a point against the WP:MOSMAC. Jingiby (talk) 14:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:59, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:47, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:49, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Prevent adding of inappropriate bad words and hoax information. Myrabert01 (talk) 11:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:19, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced additions along with general IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:56, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months,, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. N.J.A. | talk 14:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Intense disruptive editing of WP:BLP. NedFausa (talk) 04:15, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HickoryOughtShirt?4. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:32, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent reinsertion of spammy and unencyclopedic detail--essentially a 15k table of contents. This has been going on for a while. Drmies (talk) 02:26, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Drmies: I protected on the basis that such a giant extract from the book would be copyvio (and if it's not from the book, it shouldn't be there). There probably should be a comment on talk about that. Johnuniq (talk) 09:41, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Move protect article until RFC has been finished. Sakura CarteletTalk 04:56, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. El_C 11:22, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Telluride (talk) 09:27, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: High level persistent IP disruptive editing mainly POV pushing. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 12:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. The Banner talk 13:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This seems to have quietened down a bit? Conduct issues for one user have been reported at WP:ANI. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now; the article is quiet, but the discussion has moved to ANI. There was definite edit warring earlier, and if it resumes, full protection (or sanctions against the warriors) should be considered. MelanieN (talk) 03:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Darren-M talk 18:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:40, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated addition of unsourced/unformatted list of players. Number 57 00:05, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Scott Burley (talk) 05:26, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 01:13, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Scott Burley (talk) 05:29, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. S0091 (talk) 02:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 12:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Mz7 (talk) 04:23, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page was semi'ed for a week on December 28th because of the persistent spam. Two hours after the protection expired, the same spam started right back up. This should be semi-protected indefinitely. . – Frood (talk) 23:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:54, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 04:35, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The pending will remain the same. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:46, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent edit warring involving EC users. Current protection is not sufficient. bonadea contributions talk 15:18, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. One of the users has been CU-blocked which ought resolve this. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. L1amw90 (talk) 15:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- MelanieN (talk) 03:42, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content, stats changes and fan boy vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- MelanieN (talk) 03:41, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JTP (talkcontribs) 20:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:44, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – MOS breaches, abuse directed at reverters. Darren-M talk 20:14, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The worst offender has been blocked. MelanieN (talk) 03:47, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 20:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:50, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Long history of anonymous edits in contravention of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Korean)#Sea of Japan (East Sea). Bsherr (talk) 21:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:52, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Interstellarity (talk) 00:42, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:56, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Return of IP-hopping vandalism after recent end of previous protection. Curiousness1 (talk) 01:35, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 01:43, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Return of IP-hopping vandalism after recent end of previous protection. Curiousness1 (talk) 01:36, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 01:49, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing disruptive editing from IPs including disruptive overlinking, ref-bombing, PROMO and POV pushing. Netherzone (talk) 01:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term LTA attacks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 23:24, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA vandalism starting right back up again after previous protection ended. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:05, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06 January 2020

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Non-stop disruptive edits and sockpuppetry since 21 December 2019‎. Semi-protection is not enough because they know how to become autoconfirmed and disrupts this article again and again. Please see history of this article. Wario-Man (talk) 08:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 10:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – LTA attacks by WP:LTA/BMX. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:56, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 21:56, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User:Samurai Kung fu Cowboy has been blocked multiple times for disruptive editing to the article Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. After his latest block, he appears to be evading the block by editing the same article anonymously (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2600:1011:B065:402A:AD19:CFB7:6FCE:F71F)

Semi protection needed to prevent further disruptions. SolarFlashLet's talk about it 20:31, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by Yamla. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 22:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected, may require a little more until the news quiets down. Ifnord (talk) 20:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 22:06, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: There is disputes of content over the past year. . TFFfan (talk) 16:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. We don't semiprotect for content disputes. Also, there hasn't been that much disruptive activity recently, and the IP has been blocked. Bishonen | talk 16:06, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The POV-pusher is back, straight after the last protection ended. The Banner talk 16:20, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for 10 days: High level of IP/registered users vandalism. The prize fund sections are being repeatedly vandalised and people making memes out of it. Dougal18 (talk) 18:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 18:23, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptive header

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 13:40, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Muboshgu (talk) 16:34, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ionmars10 (talk) 15:31, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:39, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various ip addresses have been continuously changing her last name to her husband's last name without a reliable source. — YoungForever(talk) 16:17, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:42, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pro wrestling titles

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The same user makes the same edition under different IPs. The IP removes templates to keep track of days. Other articles have been protected, like the Shine Championship, due to his actions. He has been reverted by several users and the level of vandalism it's one every one or two days. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:22, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Muboshgu (talk) 16:25, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Harshil want to talk? 12:29, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:11, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:27, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:31, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:30, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:26, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism once again, having previously been semi-protected. Requesting semi-protection at least until the actual event starts on 20th January. Thanks Keroks (talk) 11:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:08, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 14:32, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:05, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:37, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism and unexplained removal of content from IP and unconfirmed users. Tærkast (Discuss) 15:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent personal point of view editing on the article as well, see recent edit summaries.--Tærkast (Discuss) 18:06, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I've asked WikiPediaEditor to use the talk page of the article (Talk:Air transports of heads of state and government) on User talk:WikiPediaEditor. Please discuss the changes with the editor on the talk page, and escalate to the edit warring noticeboard if WikiPediaEditor reinstates their changes without discussion. — Newslinger talk 02:57, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Semi-protection is not enough. Disruptive accounts and sockpuppets create new accounts and know how to become autoconfirmed users. Please look at revision history. Wario-Man (talk) 08:23, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The sockpuppets have been blocked; better to do this via SPIs than extended-confirmed protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:48, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce to semi-protection, same as other MoS pages, or at least to template-editor protection for trusted gnomes. This was full-protected by Barkeep49 pending the outcome of an RfC on some line-item in the guideline. A now-calm dispute about that particular micro-topic isn't a good reason to protect the entire page, ongoing. The very fact that there's an open RfC about that matter indicates that things have progressed from two-editor editwarring (which I assume must have been happening at some point) to a business-as-usual consensus discussion. Ergo, no full protection is still warranted. The protection is preventing me from doing routine maintenance.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  10:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll let Barkeep chime in, but I would downgrade to semi-protection. Editors should now be able to discuss contructively after the short time-out which has been provided. Lectonar (talk) 10:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say since there was no protection before the full protection, there's no need to add semi protection afterwards, just because the page was fully protected. Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't mean that; rather, our guidelines and policies often have semi-protection to thwart frequent drive-by vandalism and "cluebag" changes. It's not common that an anon has sufficient WP:Policy writing is hard community experience to contribute meaningfully to P&G pages, and when they do they can do it via proposals on the talk page (which is how such pages should usually be edited anyway – after consensus is reached to make the changes). When it comes to routine gnoming, anons are already used to being barred from performing such edits on a zillion pages with one protection level or another. That said, not every MoS page has semi-protection (e.g. MOS:CAPS doesn't). It's not essential; my point was I wouldn't have objected to it, just to full protection.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  11:38, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The chronic longterm editwarring, going back years, involves multiple issues. One of which is at RfC now, one of which (the larger of which in my evaluation) is moving towards but not yet at RfC. As this disagreement involves multiple editors all of who qualify for even ECP, I placed the page under full protection. The dispute is anything but calm at least judging by the angry messages about the dispute on my user talk. So that's my perspective. If Galobtter, Lectonar or some other sysop feel that full protection is not the right level of protection at this moment I would not consider it reversing my administrative action to lower the protection but think semi- or extended don't make sense for this situation. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:55, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with User:Barkeep49's view. Given the intensity of the dispute, it does not seem excessive to keep the MOS page under full protection. Since 2 January about 140,000 bytes of discussion have been added to Talk. The entire talk page at WT:MOSMED is now twice the size of ANI. EdJohnston (talk) 23:13, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Procedural. Lectonar (talk) 07:48, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent additions of unsourced content by IPs; primarily Infobox & Categories. Ryk72 talk 04:56, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Only one IP's edits are recent. El_C 06:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Current event surrounding an individual performance that may or may not become controversial has the news and video of the monolog spreads. Similar to the reasons for protection of the event page related to this performance. 97.113.218.14 (talk) 07:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: New users are adding things the wrong way, or they add incidents that should not be included in the list. Lukasvdb99 (talk) 10:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:10, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:30, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:42, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dee03 20:44, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:39, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - IPs keep changing the dates despite the invisible comment displayed says not to do so. WildEric19 (talk) 01:50, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:38, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, WP:BLP violations by irate fans. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 06:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 06:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Most Horizontal Primate (talk) 14:11, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 02:47, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dee03 20:49, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 00:34, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:57, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:09, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:08, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:Persistent vandalism. Thepenguin9 (talk) 08:09, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is Breitbart of India and is bound to attract vandalism, of different kinds. High-quality sources are scarce and I don't see any realistic scope of any minimal improvement from a non-auto-confirmed editor. WBGconverse 15:07, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:21, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:21, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 23:59, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:27, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly visible template. I'd also recommend protecting the redirects Template:Pokédex and Template:Cite pokedex. I'm unsure if template or semi-protection would be more appropriate, due to this being a citation template, but one that is used exclusively in one topic area, so I'll leave that decision to the protecting admin. InvalidOS (talk) 15:53, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Muboshgu (talk) 21:10, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- /Alex/21 20:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. If vandalism continues, I'll protect the page. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent spamming, a dead link replaced by spamvertized site. Logged-in user indeffed for this but he/she/it continues under IP. Please consider adding spamvertized site to blacklist. Denniss (talk) 23:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:59, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 21:41, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:02, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ionmars10 (talk) 23:27, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:58, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 23:40, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:54, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

07 January 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page is in current event, protection would be helpful to avoid misinformation. . Accesscrawl (talk) 14:51, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. For now, no great disruption. And as has been said: a recent event, rather well watched. Lectonar (talk) 15:27, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. -- Deepfriedokra 17:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from IP user removing sources and references. Neverrainy (talk) 17:49, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 17:56, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced statements from IPs. The subject recently took over as the Chief of Indian Army, and draws a lot of attention. Semi-protection for a couple of weeks would help to settle things. KCVelaga (talk) 14:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 15:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring IP vandalism. — TAnthonyTalk 15:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 15:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It was protected a few days not long ago but the vandalism keeps coming in and probably never going to stop anytime soon. There was some recent drama due to a MeToo scandal that came up involving their now ex-vocalist so there’s consistent IP addresses that will understandably continue to do this . Second Skin (talk) 15:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption not heavy enough for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:25, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 15:22, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – For some joke, someone was on Twitter to mess up the work we voluntarily do here https://twitter.com/AmeyD1988/status/1214481146571943936. Besides, this is a country's Wikipedia page, it should be protected just as that of the US without double standards — it is exposed to testers and jokers. Danidamiobi (talk) 10:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Danidamiobi: - currently only one IP editor has vandalised it in the last 6 days. In any case, we only use the minimum protection level needed - so purely IP vandalism could be stopped with semi-protect. The USA article is only Semiprotected, and that's because it's constantly vandalised, not a "all country articles are protected" viewpoint. If it starts reocurring, please resubmit :) Nosebagbear (talk) 11:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to disruptive editing by some non registered users, please protect this article temporarily till 31 Jan 2020. Thank you :). Sai Raghavendra Puranam 12:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is in the news, IPs adding unsourced/poorly sourced info some of them violating WP:BLP and WP:BLPCRIME. DBigXray 13:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:15, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – previous page protect already expired. An ip use article word remove, that way i want indefinitely. -Nahal(T) 19:27, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I've asked 85.255.234.139 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) to use the article talk page (Talk:Aziz Mohammad Bhai) to discuss the proposed removals. If the IP editor continues removing the content without discussion on the talk page, please submit a report to the edit warring noticeboard. — Newslinger talk 22:01, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of politically-motivated IP vandalism, white-washing and removal of academic sources. Abcmaxx (talk) 03:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs destabilising the article, with ethnic POVs and original researches. Claiming that the historical king belongs to their preferred caste/community disregarding what the sources say. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 11:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Because Ms. Williams said something at the 77th Golden Globe Awards that made conservatives angry, the lack of protection has been free reign for them to make grotesque edits on her article and its talk page. ⌚️ (talk) 03:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Are we looking at the same page??? MelanieN (talk) 03:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@MelanieN: I pagelinked the wrong page on this one. Oopsie. ⌚️ (talk) 12:50, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: History of vandalism likewise to how Taylor Swift's Reputation Stadium Tour needed extended confirmed protection. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 03:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Deepfriedokra 07:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 07:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 04:27, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra 07:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: concerned about collateral damage -- Deepfriedokra 07:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 07:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hit songs by Rednex

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A guy that keeps giving credit for these tracks to Don Marcos, even though they are not. This has happened several times, always from an IP address Coolmonk -- 17:26, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:56, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war. Off-wiki is a big row going on where the RIC, Auxiliaries en Black & Tans are completely mixed up (and vilified). A commemoration takes place 17-1-2020, so I advice a temporary protection up to 19-1-2020. The Banner talk 19:16, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:51, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple unsourced or inadequately sourced changes. Text modifications are rarely supported by the sources cited. I suspect many contributors have COI... It gets tedious to constantly review the article and have to change the text to reflect the true results from all those cited studies and adopt a neutral point of view in the article. Spyder212 (talk) 01:08, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BART articles

Temporary semi-protection: A dynamic IP editor has been re-adding station diagrams that were removed by consensus at WikiProject Trains. Probably in good faith, but they have ignored my reverts and requests on their talk pages. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. NedFausa (talk) 02:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:25, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Some IP vandalism along with constructive edits. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:50, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Way too much editing activity for PC to work effectively. MelanieN (talk) 02:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP's keep putting unsourced information repeatedly. TheBigMan720 (talk) 01:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism. The page has already been temporarily semi-protected twice in the past but vandalism resumes after protection is lifted. Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 01:15, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every time protection expires, they go right back to adding speculative content the same day. Bollyjeff | talk 01:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Childish vandalisms by new created account and IP hopper. Short protection may have them find more constructive pursuits. Ifnord (talk) 23:13, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator PonyoMelanieN (talk) 01:52, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Right-wing UK politics whitewash POV ref stripping

Temporary semi-protection: Morphing IP for the last month, removing sources and accurate but unfavourable comment. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:51, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to all four. MelanieN (talk) 01:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long protection log. Carl Tristan Orense 00:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 00:56, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Intense vandalism of WP:BLP. NedFausa (talk) 01:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Generic File Names

Indefinite create/upload protection: Per protection policy. As a note, these titles were previously protected in the wrong namespace due to an error. InvalidOS (talk) 17:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 21:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Fish and karate, this is not too critical, but can you please unprotect the page names on this list, since they are in the article namespace? — Newslinger talk 21:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That’s why they’re protected. Fish+Karate 22:34, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. Rathfelder (talk) 21:08, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The vandalism appears to be an isolated incident, but please submit a new protection request if the article continues to be vandalized. — Newslinger talk 22:13, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:30, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 22:22, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08 January 2020

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from single-purpose accounts User:CometTitan and User:DG7edits. Has subsequently devolved into edit warring by other accounts. Believe it or not, this vandalism is South Korean boy band-related (Got7), so you know it's fanatical. NedFausa (talk) 20:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 23:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: As my dad used to say, "we've gone from the ridiculous to the sublime." -- Deepfriedokra 23:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Not quite yet. El_C 15:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP and non-autoconfirmed vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:06, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Alright...... last time I unwittingly pagelinked the disambiguation page rather than the actress (common name problems). Because of what she said at the 77th Golden Globes, she was called “baby murderer” both on the article and it’s talk page due to the lack of protection. I removed the fringe theory myself but this is vile. Protection should keep that stuff in line. ⌚️ (talk) 13:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Deepfriedokra 15:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 15:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: only two events over two days by anons, so I'm stretching it -- Deepfriedokra 15:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism from presumably the same user going through a series of dynamic IPs. 12:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:06, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection Edit warring for days of days with little to no input on talk page. Shivkarandholiya12 (talk) 12:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: To allow Talk:Hadouken!#Requested move 27 December 2019 to be implemented. Asking the original protector Jarry1250 didn't help, apparently. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:22, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected for page mover actions. @GeoffreyT2000: - normally it can be worth waiting a little longer than 24 hours, but as the Admin in question hasn't edited for several days and says that they may not be able to reply swiftly it seemed better to carry it out now. Cheers. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High media attention in Indonesia due to 2020_Jakarta_floods. Page has been protected before (previous request on 3 January 2019), but vandalism resumes as soon as the page protection expires.  Kenrick  Talk 05:56, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 07:16, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Hopefully, things will calm down. The vandalism is low-grade, but persitent, with low risk for collateral damage. -- Deepfriedokra 07:16, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!  Kenrick  Talk 13:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection repeated disruptive moves to mainspace by an extended confirmed user, see history of Draft:2022 in television. buidhe 06:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe: why would the disambiguation page in mainspace be disruptive? Lectonar (talk) 07:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar Buidhe, It should be deleted under G14 because it only contains one page. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 07:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, per WP:Disambiguation there should not be redlinks on a disambiguation page and there is no need for disambiguation page unless multiple items are bluelinked. The last time I saw the article there was only one bluelink. Initially it was rejected as a set index article without any citations. What is troublesome is when a user tries to ignore multiple NPPs who draftify because an article does not meet our standards, it is disruptive because it creates extra work for us and you. buidhe 07:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This strikes me as unnecessary bureauwonkery here, as this is a page that will assuredly be filled. I do not think the spirit of G14 were pages like that, but disambiguation-pages which have stayed with only one bluelink for a long time, and probably will never be filled. If any admin wants to protect here, go right ahead. I just aasked :). Lectonar (talk) 07:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, It should not be protected rather deleted under G14. I think the requester was looking for "move protection" not "Full protection". ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 08:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This here is Requests for protection...but the discussion veered away....Lectonar (talk) 08:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I will leave this to another deleting admin. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 08:06, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
this is an SIA article. undid my edits. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 08:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This is no disambig, but a set index article....got confused by the repeated use of disambig on page and in the request. Lectonar (talk) 08:42, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: an IP keep adding unsourced content which borders on vandalism (they keep adding someone—I assume it is themselves—to the article; it's quite common for this type of article). Mclarenfan17 (talk) 11:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 12:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent edits to the amount of honours won by a single football club to a figure not supported by facts or consensus. A previous user was blocked for edit warring now "co-incidentally" an IP account is making the exact same edits. The article history sufficiently proves this. Bungle (talkcontribs) 22:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent insertion of additional group members by multiple IP users; these edits are not sourced and their edit summaries are not useful - either they are blank or they provide links to pages for search results as justification (like [13], [14], and [15]). – Aranya (talk) 01:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essential 1 IP. Lectonar (talk) 07:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs frequently make arbitrary changes. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of vandalism is happening. Movie is going to be released. Harshil want to talk? 09:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lectonar and El C: please be quick and apply protection. Lots of vandalism is happening. I want to improve article but due to edit conflicts, I can't.-- Harshil want to talk? 09:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TK421bsod (talk) 03:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also revision deletion requested per WP:RD2 and previous incidents of the identical kind. -- /Alex/21 07:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, thanks! Unfortunately, one further PA slipped in before the revdels and page protection, and I've manually remove it; could that revision also be revdel'ed, please? Thanks again. -- /Alex/21 07:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done Lectonar (talk) 08:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by two established editors over several days. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 01:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 08:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: users admonished -- Deepfriedokra 08:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and refspamming. Hog Farm (talk) 03:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2, days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 08:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 08:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: You know what depresses me? -- Deepfriedokra 08:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent speculative, unsourced, and unconstructive IP edits. KyleJoantalk 04:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 07:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Previously SP'd for 3 months. Too much for PC, and persistent long term reversions of content added. -- Deepfriedokra 07:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 02:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:08, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP disruptive editing for changing pronouns. — MarkH21talk 01:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 02:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Officer Dobby (talk · contribs) blocked by Rosguill., not sure whether there's been enough vandalism from other editors to justify page protection. signed, Rosguill talk 02:57, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Due to the ongoing conflicts with Iran, and political subject of such conflicts, it is requested that this page be protected, in order to avoid misinformation, speculation, or otherwise improper edits being executed. Landryoliver (talk) 03:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. So far it just seems obvious disruptive vandalism, so I just semi protected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 19:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism by multiple IP users and non-autoconfirmed users in the last few days constituting a clear uptick in frequency. TompaDompa (talk) 19:30, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP vandalism. Dorsetonian (talk) 23:31, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to current events. ChristopherMeyers (talk) 02:42, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 02:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:35, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:08, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Funny, this article seems to need protection every January. MelanieN (talk) 01:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since article subject was announced as being hired as the New York Giants head coach, article has been targeted my multiple vandals, the majority of which are editing from IPs. Rockchalk717 22:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 02:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Similar to my request for Joe Judge (American football). Page has been targeted by vandals since news about him broke this morning, most of which has been done by ips. Rockchalk717 22:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 02:30, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Amanda.Yaya99 (talk) 16:55, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Appears to be constant WP:COI interference by inter-related accounts: User:Truthfinder23, User:Truthfinder13, User:2605:8D80:6C0:BCC2:C9B5:B782:9709:8D0, and others, which has turned this article into an WP:ADVERT mess. Loksmythe (talk) 17:22, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:28, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

North Carolina TV station articles

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by IP hoppers. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Lordtobi () 19:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 23:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP is reverting COI edits without talking. BernardoSulzbach (talk) 20:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 23:15, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:35, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 23:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced and incorrectly formatted information. Number 57 21:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 23:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism spree, happens every so often, . DBaK (talk) 21:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 23:20, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09 January 2020

Requesting create protection, as a repeatedly recreated promotional userpage. N0nsensical.system(err0r?)(.log) 14:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only recreated once. Lectonar (talk) 14:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 22:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TheBigMan720 (talk) 18:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 22:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 22:29, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 22:32, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Kutyava (talk) 11:53, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Last disruptive edit by an IP in October 2018, so pending-changes wouldn't be effective. If you disagree with another user, use the article's talk-page to hash things out; user talk-pages are also great for communicating. Lectonar (talk) 11:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, can you come to the article and check the latest activities. Kutyava (talk) 12:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An user removing the tags without fixing it. Kutyava (talk) 12:28, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have checked it, but this here is "requests for protection". And as you have already started thread at the edit-warring noticeboard for the article below...let's see what happens. Lectonar (talk) 12:29, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page often being vandalized by multiple IPs. Please protect the page. Sony R (talk) 12:35, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. One IP today, before that no edits at all for about 2 weeks. Overall disruption too low for any kind of protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – preferably till 27 January 2019. — Vaibhavafro💬 12:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And I see mostly good faith edits by IPs. Where is the vandalism you speak of? Lectonar (talk) 12:56, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obaseki

unprotect: Hi, could somebody please unprotect Obaseki so I can create a dab page there? Thanks! Dr. Vogel (talk) 15:20, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak:, the protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 15:22, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
no way he'll remember about this, it was 10 years ago! :) Dr. Vogel (talk) 15:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's not really about remembering, it's courtesy...and it's in the instructions. The admin is still active. Lectonar (talk) 15:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I can see what you mean, but it's not lack of courtesy. I just don't want to disturb them. This is entirely uncontroversial, and the vandals who caused this problem disappeared 10 years ago. But thanks. Dr. Vogel (talk) 15:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for ping, I've no problem with that, unprotected now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:44, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
UnprotectedEdJohnston (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistently vandalised by spammers, for some reason. Since October 2019, there have been four editors of the page, all of which appear to have been spammers. Kiwi128 (talk) 07:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not even enough disruption for pending-changes. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 11:48, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Editorial Cut (talk) 09:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. 2 disruptive edits by the same IP in the last 3 days; overall disruption not that high. Lectonar (talk) 11:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent target of IP vandalism. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same IP in the last days. Lectonar (talk) 11:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting page protection for the page Salford as two editors keep making a district and component rather than referring to it as a city. Which it is and has been documented as. Not a long term protection but one which stops informal edits from occurring. JoshuaistheFalco (talk) 22:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:36, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Seeing a few IPs adding unsourced and POV content starting yesterday. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:29, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting IP hammering yesterday/now. DBaK (talk) 00:35, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – raised levels of vandalism due to subject's controversial comments. Amccann421 (talk) 04:23, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism from presumably the same user going through a series of dynamic IPs. 09:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:51, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DeluxeVegan (talk) 09:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:50, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism sockpuppetrySammi Matt The user is continuously editing the content and removing controversy section. The user is paid and should be blocked as well. The page has been extensively edit and is about a pastor who has certain allegations so it should be protected to prevent any further destructive edits. (HinaBB (talk) 08:15, 1 January 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Protection is not the way to go here; better to deal with the user you mentioned. DFO has already queried him. Lectonar (talk) 11:06, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Far be it from me to (again) be accused of protecting defamatory content. (Chilling effect? You betcha. Nevertheless) I think the sourcing is adequate, but challenged negative BLP should probably not be added back without discussion, consensus, WP:BLPN, etc. This should not be interpreted as limiting any other admin from doing as they see fit. -- Deepfriedokra 11:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – One editor adding a large quantity of sourced content and another claiming it's COI and removing it, repeatedly. Largoplazo (talk) 11:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected -- Deepfriedokra 12:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Started a thread at WP:COIN -- Deepfriedokra 12:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:08, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:37, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ip and new users keep changing the IUCN status in the taxobox to extinct after a new study and subsequent news stories, despite the IUCN explicitly stating that it hasn't been re-evaluated yet. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – IPs adding poorly-sourced BLP violations. Dr. K. 03:06, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 11:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resume of disruptive editing by anonymous editors following previous blocks to page. livelikemusic talk! 03:28, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 03:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several IPs have been adding an unsourced, contentious category in this BLP since July of last year. I would recommend extending protection to a year. You've gone incognito (talkcontribs) 04:15, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see if pending-changes protection doesn't do the trick. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spamming an external link. BernardoSulzbach (talk) 19:30, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Nishajoshi448 (talk · contribs). There's not enough disruption in the article to justify protecting it, but the issue should be resolved. Please re-report if editors continue to spam the article. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 01:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More sock IPs of LTA "Эльбрус Казбекович".[16] - . LouisAragon (talk) 19:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:01, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP (and new accounts created solely to make one or two edits on this one article) vandalism. Davefelmer (talk) 19:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – May need WP:ARBDS enforced here too. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator SpencerMelanieN (talk) 03:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continuous inappropriate addition, and reverts. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 23:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator AcroterionMelanieN (talk) 03:26, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wiley is currently in the news due to drama with another MC, leading to a couple vandals. Madbrad200 (talk) 16:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator KinuMelanieN (talk) 02:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. — TAnthonyTalk 20:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous IP addresses repeatedly changing names of films and dates to incorrect ones. –Erakura(talk) 21:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Replacing PC with semiprotection. Too much disruptive editing for PC to work well.  MelanieN (talk) 03:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism: an unknown IP-user constantly delets the parts about Hitzelberger's sexuality. --LH7605 (talk) 22:57, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Filer warned. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:04, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2409:4073:390:DCE2:D0EB:DA3B:6124:820E (talk) 11:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. As there are virtually only IPs editing this article, I will not shut out the IPs who do good work there. While at it, I have removed one unsourced statement, btw.Lectonar (talk) 14:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP block evasion, per the admission here. VQuakr (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A two month protection period due to high levels of IP vandalism recently ended and IP editors have returned to vandalizing.

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:13, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10 January 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – definitely violates WP:3RR. Bryce M (talk) 16:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: The article White Arabian Filly has been on the Missing Wikipedians list for over one year. Last edit dated April 5, 2018. Request full protection for the user page. dawnleelynn(talk) 18:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Unclear with respect to sufficient recent disruption that would justify protection at this time, for either article. El_C 18:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:16, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. aboideautalk 19:57, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:13, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Last protected from anonymous editing in May 2011 due to a move war. Talk page activity gives no indication why it should remain protected. 73.71.251.64 (talk) 18:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. Good catch. El_C 18:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake. Was not semi'd in error. But I think after almost a decade, unprotecting is fine. Courcelles hasn't edited since August, but they are free to restore the indefinite protection in case I missed something. El_C 18:59, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 22:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs. So requesting for ECP. Sony R (talk) 16:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term new editor vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect and re-protect. As noted on the general disclaimer's talk page, this page (which is already protected and absolutely needs full protection) has no proper protection log. Please just re-protect it with a good rationale. Ditto with the legal disclaimer, which has no protection log at all. 208.95.49.53 (talk) 19:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for misreading your request, IP. El_C 19:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done – Muboshgu (talk) 19:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: an IP is edit-warring, insisting on adding a passenger manifest and accusing anyone who removes it of censorship. Mclarenfan17 (talk) 21:32, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Other IPs are maintaining the article. Article is well watched to boot. Lectonar (talk) 06:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 07:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. pending changes protection does its job; not enough disruption to up to semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Unit388/popups.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

At present a comment on line 7031 is inadvertently putting this script from 2015 in Category:Foo in breach of WP:REDNOT. The user has not edited since 2017 and has not responded to a talk page message. Could someone with the power to edit scripts just add two colons to change [[category:foo]] and [[Category:Foo]] to [[:category:foo]] and [[:Category:Foo]] which should hopefully fix it (and get us one small step towards finally clearing the backlog at Wikipedia:Database reports/Red-linked categories with incoming links <g>). Since it's part of a comment it should have not effect on the working of the code. TIA Le Deluge (talk) 14:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Enterprisey: Would you please look at this. It is pretty clear that User:Unit388/popups.js is an obsolete copy from somewhere, and is similar to User:Enterprisey/popups.js. I would be inclined to simply delete this page but that might be out of order, in which case would you please edit it to remove the category. Or blank the page (I hate duplicate code!)? Johnuniq (talk) 06:55, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done, and thanks for letting me know. I figured just adding the colons was the least invasive solution, as we don't really have a policy yet for this sort of case. Enterprisey (talk!) 07:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking resumed. There might also be an LTA going on here. InvalidOS (talk) 13:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And sock has been blocked. Lectonar (talk) 13:43, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's now...(grumbling). Lectonar (talk) 14:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The usual POV edit warring that plauges this article from time to time. Yet another IP editor is ignoring experienced editors and removing sourced information after being told to Wikipedia:JUSTDROPIT.★Trekker (talk) 15:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Northernrailwaysfan (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like to create a section on the banned Northernrailwaysfan's talk page (protected) to inform him about his block. F&C Templates (talk) 13:13, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: they are already informed about their block. Lectonar (talk) 13:35, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Semi-protection is not enough because the involved sockmaster creates new accounts and always bypasses autoconfirmed. Please see the article history. It has become a mess due to non-stop sockpuppetry and disruptive-only accounts' edits. Wario-Man (talk) 06:44, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 06:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs in tandem over the last few days. — MarkH21talk 11:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 13:06, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/disruptive edits by IPs. Gotitbro (talk) 18:44, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Gotitbro: There are not many recent IP edits and it's not clear WP:VAND. Please explain why there is a problem on the article talk page and link to the section in the edit summary of the next couple of reverts. Then post again if no discussion but issue continues. Johnuniq (talk) 06:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 18:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 06:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated Vandalism on incorrect information. TheBigMan720 (talk) 21:03, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @TheBigMan720: Sorry but it's hard to see why the edits are vandalism. Please explain why the edits are a problem on the article talk page and link to the section in the edit summary of the next couple of reverts. Then post again if no discussion but issue continues. Johnuniq (talk) 06:28, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Someone who edited the IP address witj the incorrect order of LTO licence plates was released in 2019 but here's the incorrect release (ex. NBG-H, O-T) but the correct ones for the original release last year... (ex. NBG-NBH, O, Q, S-T). However, NB(P, R) was released in 2018. Please update to protect the article immediately. Jon2guevarra (talk) 01:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Jon2guevarra: Sorry but it's hard to see why the edits are vandalism. Please explain why the edits are a problem on the article talk page and link to the section in the edit summary of the next couple of reverts. Then post again if no discussion but issue continues. Johnuniq (talk) 06:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of factual errors made by IPv6 user. IP user has been editing the article on a regular basis since October 2019. Edits containing errors came to my attention starting from Dec. 27 to now. Yowashi (talk) 08:36, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:36, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 03:35, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent WP:SPA vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 05:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Childish, tag-team vandalism. Please consider blocking vandal-only account. Kablammo (talk) 17:28, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 01:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More IP socking by LTA "Эльбрус Казбекович".[17] -. LouisAragon (talk) 20:10, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors. Rajeev2800 (talk) 20:37, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone with an ax to grind has been IP hopping. A short protection of this BLP may be in order. Ifnord (talk) 23:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, hot topic in news. Madbrad200 (talk) 01:43, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, someone please unprotect the page Abhishek Kumar Ambar, admin who protected the page offline from last 10 days. I have created the draft of the article also. Swapnil Kaustubh (talk) 06:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please do not attempt to main space this draf. It needs to be reviewed by WP:AfC. It was previously deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Kumar Ambar. It needs to be significantly improved to not be deleted again.-- Deepfriedokra 12:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 06:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:32, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 01:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued, persistent WP:BLP violations from multiple IP addresses. Likely needs REVDELs as well. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 20:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 01:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is scarcely anything but a magnet for petty vandalism. GMGtalk 22:44, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 01:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Huge load of IP vandal edits. I assume he has p*ssed someone off?. DBaK (talk) 00:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 01:45, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 00:56, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 01:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Promotional edits. Kutyava (talk) 12:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 12:31, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Kutyava (talk) 12:33, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:10, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I have looked back quite a bit in the history....the disruption is there, but so are IPs keeping this (rather well watched) article on course. Lectonar (talk) 14:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:48, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 01:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic talk! 16:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 01:14, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism by multiple, geographically-separated Ip addresses. Likely same person using some form of IP spoofing/vpn so block won't work. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 01:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only the single addition of nonsense. The IP seemingly tried to remove the offending material but accidentally took the lead with it. Kosack (talk) 21:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users keep putting unconfirmed information on this page. TheBigMan720 (talk) 21:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 01:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11 January 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Harshil want to talk? 08:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:34, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:16, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:33, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 16:26, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:54, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs refactoring talk page comments. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:17, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:45, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalized numerous times throughout its short history. WuTang94 (talk) 05:53, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @WuTang94: Sorry but admins here don't have much time and I only see one recent edit that might be vandalism and even that is is a bit hard to judge for someone unfamiliar with the subject. The talk page is empty. Please put an explanation of the problem there and post again with a couple of diffs and a brief explanation if the issue continues. Johnuniq (talk) 06:34, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip adding hoax (change Portugal to Malaysia) as well as unsourced material and rumour . Also use article namespace as a forum. Matthew hk (talk) 08:47, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:43, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by anonymous editors against MOS policies and guidelines. livelikemusic talk! 01:23, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:25, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Footballer subject of transfer speculation causing vandalism and addition of incorrect information to BLP by numerous IPs. Egghead06 (talk) 02:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:27, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:32, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:29, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SangrurUser (talk) 05:50, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:30, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Same unsourced edit needed to be reverted a dozen times over the past week. TropicAces (talk) 06:18, 11 January 2020 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:37, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs are constantly incorrectly changing the death date to January 10 in good faith. Ionmars10 (talk) 23:08, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:14, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism again.BabbaQ (talk) 23:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @BabbaQ: Please fix "asss streams". Johnuniq (talk) 06:16, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @FilmandTVFan28: Sorry but I cannot easily see the background. If there is an admin familiar with the background you might approach them and ask for longer protection (no need to consult me). Johnuniq (talk) 06:19, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and disruptive editing orginating from multiple IPs. ShadowCyclone talk 00:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 01:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:23, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is currently under PC-protection; it is a frequent sight for pending changes reviewers, particularly in the past week or so. The vast majority of edits in recent history is an attempt to remove wording describing Fox News as 'conservative' or biased. There is strong, consistent consensus regarding this. IMO this page probably deserves indefinite semi-protection given the highly contentious and fought-over subject matter; but short of that I think at least a week or two is in order. Thank you!. –Erakura(talk) 00:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:27, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – one or more people are trolling this page and it appears to be multiple people. TheSunofman (talk) 01:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:29, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: repeatedly recreated without any sources or evidence of notability. buidhe 02:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 05:55, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous IP editors are adding speculative or disruptive content. Lepricavark (talk) 20:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:20, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:44, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 22:04, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism over the last 30 days. . CNMall41 (talk) 21:52, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:06, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Please protect for longer period, the IP activity resumed immediately after last protection expired.BlameRuiner (talk) 22:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12 January 2020

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent copyright violation and addition of material based on predatory journals and self-published books (see Choir Press). Some concerns of socking/meatpuppeting too (see Garyjh28 (talk · contribs) and Garyh28 (talk · contribs)). Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting to a stable version will be needed too. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:32, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. The article has never been protected before, and the disruption only lasted one day and did not involve autoconfirmed users as far as I can see. Whereas it is likely that longer and/or higher level protection would be needed at some point, I think it is reasonable to start with one week semi.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All recent edits by IPs have either been straight vandalism or attacks against the candidate. This is only going to get worse as the election season gets underway. Suggesting a one-year-long semi-protection. — JFG talk 18:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People are jumping the gun that he’s already hired which there is no contract in place yet. TheBigMan720 (talk) 18:51, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 19:34, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dee03 19:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. History is just reversion after reversion for years, PC not working out. ~ Amory (utc) 19:49, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rotating IPs persisently inserting unsourced, POV text at the top of the article. MrOllie (talk) 15:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and User(s) blocked: 2601:2c6:4a80:c140::/64 (talk · contribs).. DMacks (talk) 15:36, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of BLP violations have been added (by new editors and several ips) to this article recently, probably due to recent media coverage of the subject. Requesting temp protection. SamHolt6 (talk) 16:06, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 13 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by User:JzG. DMacks (talk) 16:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:36, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 19:54, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:42, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 19:54, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent ECP: Would be justified as the article is a frequent target of many active sock farms like Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/संदेश हिवाळे, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rashkeqamar, and others. Aman Kumar Goel(Talk) 08:08, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, this will create more harm than good--Ymblanter (talk) 12:26, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The IPv6 user still continues to add the same unverified information regarding the original air dates of a couple episodes. –WPA (talk) 15:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 15:48, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring from an IP user with multiple IPs. Prefall 15:43, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 15:47, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 11:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:39, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As the volcano just erupted, this article has been the target of several IP vandals. Areaseven (talk) 12:13, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – PM changed the official name of the Kolkata port today. We have new users rushing to change the name to its new name without discussing. Please protect while the discussion happens. . DBigXray 12:34, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. El_C 12:38, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content (stats changed without updating timestamp) by varying weekly IPs for a year now. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 21:18, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Vaselineeeeeeee: Sorry but it's hard to see why the edits are vandalism. Please explain why the edits are a problem on the article talk page and link to the section in the edit summary of the next couple of reverts. Then post again if no discussion but issue continues. Johnuniq (talk) 06:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Dispute over the page's name, requesting move protection. Page has been infinite protected since December 2018 for WP:BLP. – The Grid (talk) 03:12, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The article is indefinitely semi-protected for editing and moving. The article was last moved on 12 January 2020 and 9 June 2019 (and reverted each time). The moves were done by autoconfirmed users and full move protection would require a recent RfC with a strong consensus. @The Grid: If there is something I'm missing, please let me know but I don't see what can be done without a recent RfC. Johnuniq (talk) 06:38, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Harshil want to talk? 07:30, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: What I saw was an edit war over negativel BLP. I reverted, so I cannot protect the page. -- Deepfriedokra 08:44, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:56, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion attack by dynamic ip , see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Josepolivares. Matthew hk (talk) 07:16, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. at SPI. Refile if disruption continues. – bradv🍁 04:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP edit warring refusing to talk and explain untechnical edits. Robertiki (talk) 07:53, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – bradv🍁 04:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frederickberman (talk) 01:57, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Protected by another admin and IP blocked. Johnuniq (talk) 06:43, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fixed. Johnuniq (talk) 07:07, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Consider blocking the IPv4 instead for now. Jasper Deng (talk) 01:11, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin and IP blocked. Johnuniq (talk) 06:41, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: WP:DE from multiple IPs, also adding unsourced information to the draft article for the next season. Magitroopa (talk) 02:05, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:40, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 06:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Page was previously semi-protected for 30 days, individual has since returned. Extended semi-protection requested AmericanHistorian (talk) 18:45, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP and new account restoring the same edit and a long history of similar disruptive edits by IPs some with negative and defamatory BLP considerations. Dartslilly (talk) 19:25, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:18, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dee03 20:41, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:20, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism (at least 4 times in last 10 days? => 1 + 2 + 3 + 4) - possible Page Protection Type? => "([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (indefinite) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (indefinite))" - in any case - Enjoy :) Drbogdan (talk) 21:54, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Surachit (talk) 22:40, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:25, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP user 86.28.95.135. L1amw90 (talk) 23:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:25, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism. 2409:4073:2017:DB0A:5C82:620E:4B6:71C6 (talk) 13:35, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also asked for help at WP:BLPN. Johnuniq (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – General disruption and vandalism from IP editors.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 13:48, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:23, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:07, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much unsourced editing by IPs. It's a permanent problem on this article because it includes controversial entries, both historical and current. — JFG talk 15:35, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Last protection was 3 months, a long time ago. Indefinite is a long time. Johnuniq (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:13, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:47, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:11, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism FrankP (talk) 18:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:12, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:: There seems to be a fascination with pronouncing him dead right now. Still alive the last time I checked.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:32, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:13, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This page has been a victim of unsourced changes since a long time. — Vaibhavafro💬 09:49, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is the first protection and indefinite is not warranted. Johnuniq (talk) 05:48, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Turkmens

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent reversion to copious original research about the male-line genetic origins of people with inadmissable (per WP:SCIRS) low quality references and exclusion of references that don't fit the agenda of the editors, by IP address users. Requesting autoconfirm for edits.Hunan201p (talk) 11:28, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will post note about edit warring at article talk. Johnuniq (talk) 05:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MPS1992 (talk) 04:47, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 05:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 05:11, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 05:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 06:46, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv🍁 04:30, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Plenty of IP editors changing the pronouns on this article over a tweet (see [18]). feminist (talk) 07:36, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv🍁 04:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hoax info, such as changing DOB by ip , adding not exist new employer of the footballer. Matthew hk (talk) 07:38, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv🍁 04:36, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism by several IPs over the last few hours. Hog Farm (talk) 02:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 04:41, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 04:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Hog Farm (talk) 04:00, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. -- Deepfriedokra 04:34, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Footballer subject to media transfer speculation causing vandalism and addition of incorrect information by numerous IPs. Egghead06 (talk) 04:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 04:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 04:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 04:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:24, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 21:40, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A little light for protection right now. Feel free to report again if disruption resurfaces. Kosack (talk) 21:41, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – by multiple IPs. theinstantmatrix (talk) 00:09, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 00:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

13 January 2020

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 19:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 19:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra 19:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People adding info about non-interesting stuff and changing the gender of this person everywhere in the article. DutchTina (talk) 20:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This will stop the current disruption, and we can extend it if this continues to be a problem. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and WP:Sock puppetry. User has created multiple special contributions accounts for months and makes edits that are inaccurate to certain sections within the page. Page was temporarily protected three weeks ago, but the very minute protection come off, the vandalism starts up again by the same users with different Special Contributions account. For the sake of other users and the integrity of the page, his IP or related such edits needs to be barred. XXzoonamiXX (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: I’m already in the process of reporting sockpuppetry, but stop the madness! Semi-protection for a month, please. (Sockmaster kept making disruptive edits about Kloss’s height with unreliable sources for which she was banned. Now she has returned under a new username). ⌚️ (talk) 16:33, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Pending changes appears appropriate. Before today, the article hadn't been edited in a week. Follow up with WP:SPI. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Kaltenmeyer (talk) 20:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A barrage of disruptive IP edits. Lepricavark (talk) 20:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistently vandalized since expiry of last protection. echo off (on public acccount) (see public contribs) 20:52, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malinaccier (talk) 21:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 18:59, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 19:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: I am trying to persuade an IP user to have a rational debate but without success. Nigej (talk) 19:02, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 19:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism . NZFC(talk)(cont) 19:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 19:57, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Persistent readdition of a death date despite absolutely no rs or source at all (and likely socking) . Praxidicae (talk) 16:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:54, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done I applied some WP:SALT to the mainspace page, but won't delete the draft via G4 as drafts are exempt, under the idea that it could be worked on in good faith. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Fandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 18:45, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fandalism. I like that. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs from Kerala adding identical unsourced fancruft - seems co-ordinated - Arjayay (talk) 15:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:34, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unsourced information repeatedly added by IPs; subject is recently deceased. Number 57 15:20, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:34, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:30, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has had many bogus edits in the last 4 days, all by unregistered users from different IPs, which had to be reverted at least three times by now. Proposing semi or PC protection. Juma93 (talk) 15:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:45, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jdavi333 (talk) 16:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism + sockpuppetry (filed separately = IP + 3-4 accounts). Eostrix (talk) 16:28, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content2409:4052:201B:BADF:0:0:8AA:20B0 (talk) 11:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Essentially one user. Lectonar (talk) 12:02, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content 2409:4052:201B:BADF:0:0:8AA:20B0 (talk) 11:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same user as above. Lectonar (talk) 12:07, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Several weeks of vandalism from several new vandalism-only accounts. Freezer Bernie (talk) 12:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:14, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content 2409:4052:201B:BADF:0:0:8AA:20B0 (talk) 10:33, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content 2409:4052:201B:BADF:0:0:8AA:20B0 (talk) 11:28, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. It's currently on ITN, so I would rather wait a while longer. El_C 11:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content

Declined. Seems to be limited to a single user. Please attempt communication with them first. El_C 11:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Not sure if it fits into the four criteria, even the generic one, but @Bishonen: declared intention to salt the article deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming which was done by @Jo-Jo Eumerus:, and this should have been done to any redirect targets because anyone can create that article there. Also List of notable scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming, List of scientists skeptical about global warming, List of scientists opposing the IPCC scientific assessment of global warming, List of scientists opposing the mainstream assessment of global warming, and List of living scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. ミラP 17:07, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's quite a muddled history, but most of those were just folks moving the page(s) around without consensus, yeah? Doesn't seem like there's been a great rush to disrupt using these titles. I could see doing the title page here (List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming) just given the long history, but I don't see a huge need for the other five. We don't regularly protect former redirects to every salted page unless there's a reason or evidence they've been abused as well. ~ Amory (utc) 19:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also enforce WP:ARBDS since these are climate change related articles. --IanDBeacon (talk) 03:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 08:52, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term problem of IP editor(s) adding a prominent section about a minor private dinner performance at the Jewish Museum. A 2014 edit war failed to get an unsourced "Cohen is Jewish" into the article and apparently settled on this instead. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edits before disruption were in November 2019. Lectonar (talk) 09:24, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. WBGconverse 12:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 07:59, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content 2409:4052:201B:BADF:0:0:8AA:20B0 (talk) 11:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continuous disruptive Editing. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  11:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of blatant IP vandalism. KyleJoantalk 05:48, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 05:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra 05:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Carl Tristan Orense 08:59, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 09:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pro wrestling titles

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. It's the same problem I had with the Shine Championship and the WWE Women's Tag Team Championship. An IP makes the same edition, removing usefull templates from the aricles. I tried to talk with him, but he never answers. Once the article is protected, he changes the target and now, it's vandalicing the Intercontinental and 24 7 titles. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:02, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, all, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Freezer Bernie (talk) 06:40, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 07:02, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Presidents of Guinea-Bissau

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content Emk9 (talk) 07:14, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, all, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption from IPs. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:33, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content 2409:4052:201B:BADF:0:0:8AA:20B0 (talk) 08:45, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:48, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. IanDBeacon (talk) 23:55, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. It looks more like conflicts in editing the naming the film and page moves associated with that issue. It has stopped for the last 24 hours. If it becomes an issue in the next few days, bring it back here or contact me on my talk page and I'll reconsider. Mark Ironie (talk) 02:33, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. JTP (talkcontribs) 04:33, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 05:10, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism.  :) S A H 06:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 06:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 04:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 04:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Condolences to the Ravens -- Deepfriedokra 04:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Relentless edit warring and usage of passive-aggressive language in hidden text deterring users who maintain the page. Aaryangupta23 (talk) • AllyJay50 (talk) 14:56, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2405:201:4801:665B:11CF:B87F:4C7:7FA8 (talk · contribs). for the hidden-text spamming. - CorbieVreccan 01:30, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Owynhart 02:43, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 03:28, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 20:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:15, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:14, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Electronic body music

Electronic body music (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Consistent IP vandalism. A temporary semi-protection was imposed several months ago, but vandal operating from several similar IPs (i.e. 178.11.254.97 and 188.96.206.249) continued vandalism afterward. I first made several manual reversions, stupidly. gentlecollapse6 (talk) 02:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 23:54, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected -- Deepfriedokra 01:33, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please protect this article at least for a week. Sai Raghavendra Puranam (talk) 13:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I agree it probably will need it for longer, but as it's never been protected before, and the majority of edits - both good and bad - come from IPs, let's see what happens. Feel free to come back if it just resumes. Maybe this will encourage some of the perennials to create accounts. - CorbieVreccan 01:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy spike in vandalism of school article. Hog Farm (talk) 21:30, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked 38.87.47.66 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 86.136.189.135 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). GorillaWarfare (talk)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 00:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TonyBallioni. -- Deepfriedokra 01:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Users are changing him to be a fan of the Eagles as a joke based on a recent episode of a web series Jcamping (talk) 00:54, January 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 01:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:49, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:46, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism over the past couple of weeks, all coming from IP editors in the 2601/2600 range. Echoedmyron (talk) 17:15, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:39, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:11, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:31, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 15:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a handful in the past week or so, nothing consistently pervasive; if this changes do re-report. ~ Amory (utc) 19:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I came here to make this same request. I have the technical ability to add protection to the page, but felt it would be WP:COI to do so. IP editor(s) continue to update boxscores while games are in progress. Useight (talk) 22:04, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 22:53, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Useight (talk) 23:13, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 22:54, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Far too much vandalism. 4 past temporary protections and vandalism is still unceasing. tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message; contribs) 23:06, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:08, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 23:07, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 33 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected through the 2020 Super Bowl, plus some buffer time. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:12, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14 January 2020

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 19:04, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra 19:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Ping me if the vandalism resumes -- Deepfriedokra 19:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP fake credits mostly. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 18:44, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 19:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Requesting 1 month protection. This individual has apparently done something to rile some people up; as a result a number of IP editors feel negative information must be added to the lead of the article. I expect it will die down in a few weeks. Jayjg (talk) 19:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., a months seems an overkill to me in this case--Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper adding unsourced information claimed to be personally witnessed. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 19:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 03:37, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just a spike. Lectonar (talk) 13:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 17:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 17:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and unsourced information added to BLP by numerous IPs soon after article unprotected. Egghead06 (talk) 16:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 17:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. N.J.A. | talk 11:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 02:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I really do not see vandalism, but rather good faith edits. Not everyone knows what belongs in an article, and what doesn't. Lectonar (talk) 13:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spamming with sources that aren't news worthy. With the only acceptable sources (news sites, toei THEMSELVES) can only be used. BlackGaia02 (talkpage if you dare) (talk) 02:54, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Who decides which news are worthy of being mentioned? Lectonar (talk) 13:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 03:29, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:08, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – There is already a draft for this school which has been declined. The creator then created the article in mainspace and then redirected the draft to this, so it seems the user is trying to circumvent the draft process. The protection will not only prevent recreation but the user can see the notice at the top that says "There is a draft for this article at". Steven (Editor) (talk) 20:20, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. N.J.A. | talk 11:30, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Brojam (talk) 22:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined not enough recent disruption, and further unsure semi protection would help here. It seems a sock may be involved, one suspect account blocked. See if that helps, N.J.A. | talk 11:39, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 04:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A little light right now, feel free to request again if it persists. Kosack (talk) 10:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of copyright violation and promotional text. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:54, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 14:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive edits.

@Noobie anonymous: Could you elaborate a bit, please? I see some back and forth reagrding cast etc., but nothing really disruptive. Lectonar (talk) 13:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 14:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: Shaheer Sheikh and Rhea Sharma play the leads in the series while Rithvik Arora and Kaveri Priyam play parallel lead/pivotal role which is also cited by reliable sources. But there is a edit war going on since long time placing Arora and Priyam also as the main leads of the series.

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – two words: edit history. Idan (talk) 13:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Deepfriedokra 13:37, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 13:37, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism filling edit history, there must be some offsite organizing of this, it seems endless. Gleeanon409 (talk) 14:07, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 14:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New users are making unsourced and unreferenced changes to the article. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - (Talk) - 14:26, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 14:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or at least Pending Changes. IP editors have continued to tamper with birth date following expiry of previous protection template, despite Talk page consensus. Muzilon (talk) 23:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Coordinated attack by multiple IPs claiming town name is now "King" or "King Corbin". Apparently the town renamed itself as "King Corbin" for one day as part of a wrestling promotion https://www.sescoops.com/kentucky-town-renamed-to-honor-king-corbin/, but that day has come and gone. . Meters (talk) 23:34, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If this one day event could be reliably sourced, perhaps a little mention in the article would appease people. Lectonar (talk) 12:59, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced information being added by IP User(s). Again.   Aloha27  talk  02:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Most of the IP edits in at least the last 100 edits are made to change the legal marriage to Rusev fact to the on-screen WWE drama of divorce and marriage to another wrestler. The frequency and tempo of these edits made are pretty disruptive, even for a pending changes protected page. robertsky (talk) 03:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:07, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by Honethefield98. Binksternet (talk) 20:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. – bradv🍁 03:24, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The protection expired today. Ips are again making controversial edits and unconstructive edits. I think the page needs to be protected for a longer duration. SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 20:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – ethnic editwarring. Atlantic306 (talk) 20:20, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:08, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 70.138.211.34 (talk) 21:30, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. N.J.A. | talk 11:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping petty vandalisms. Ifnord (talk) 22:13, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 10:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User keeps removing The Proud Family. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:14, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 02:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 10:08, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Aoi (青い) (talk) 02:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I made this mistake once before. Jimbo doesn't want his pages protected, under any circumstances. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. 2409:4052:201E:90B8:0:0:817:60B0 (talk) 03:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Bradv. Kosack (talk) 10:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent removal of sourced content that has been included as part of Wikipedia's fair use policies and has been previously agreed upon by consensus. Those who are removing this material edit under IP addresses; one or two in particular are at fault in this matter. They have been encouraged two or threee times to take their issues with the content in question to the talk page, and have failed to do so. Their edits constitute a violation of at least one Wikipedia policy, and possibly others, and page protection is thus necessary at this time. --Jgstokes (talk) 03:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv🍁 03:29, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism aka the adding of an asterisk to the winner of the 2017 World Series which there is no consensus for. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 03:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:08, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and new account vandalism, and doxxing of personal information. The page was previously semi-protected, but vandalism resumed after semi-protection expired, an extension seems necessary. Auberginandjuice (talk) 03:41, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. 2409:4052:201E:90B8:0:0:817:60B0 (talk) 03:51, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 04:26, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 10:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending Change is just wasting our time at this point. . Larry Hockett (Talk) 04:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 08:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 05:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:59, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 05:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:52, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 06:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism.  :) S A H 07:32, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page has been semi-protected for nine years. Please consider unprotection as a trial. After such a long period the editorial dynamics will undoubtedly have changed for this article. I would like to carry out some copy editing. The original protecting admin is now only intermittently active, but has responded negatively to my request. His rationale for maintaining protection seems to amount to preemptive protection as a result of the current geo-political situation in the US. See the Talk:Kiev#Article protection discussion, and my request to the protecting admin at User talk:Horologium#Unprotect. Thanks. 31.52.163.22 (talk) 21:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Further - I am specifically NOT asking for move unprotection. 31.52.163.22 (talk) 21:31, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. You can propose the copy edits you want to make on the talk page. – bradv🍁 03:32, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Too complicated to do so. What a stubborn bunch of bastards you are, here at Wikipedia. I know what your game is - to arrange it so that all high profile articles are permanently semi-protected. 31.52.163.22 (talk) 10:08, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm. Interesting. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia community building the world's largest free content encyclopedia.. You see yourself as an outsider? And no, the disruption on that page is unlikely to end any time soon.-- Deepfriedokra 10:19, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Disruption on the page? Well there hasn't been any disruption by IP editors for nine years. As for permanent SP, it strikes right at the heart of one of Jimbo's founding principles. I'm not an outsider, I've had an account since 2004. At the moment I'm working away from home on a shared computer, so I don't log on. 31.52.163.22 (talk) 10:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was the choice of personal pronoun that confused me. 'What a stubborn bunch of bastards you are. (emphasis added). In my case, an accident of birth. And while we are discussing principles, I feel the need to remind you of WP:CIVIL. Cheers, and happy editing.-- Deepfriedokra 10:49, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Let's meet in the middle here; I have pending changes protected and watchlisted, and so we will see if there is disruption, and to what level it rises, if at all. @Bradv:, @Deepfriedokra: if you feel that this is not the right course, just overturn it. Lectonar (talk) 10:54, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 70.138.211.34 (talk) 21:32, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 21:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Astros GM has just been fired. 70.138.211.34 (talk) 21:34, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Malinaccier (talk) 21:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 02:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Houston Astros sign-stealing scandal in the news 192.226.60.4 (talk) 20:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Most, if not all, of the disruptive edits were made by a single IP which has now been blocked. Other IPs seem to be cleaning up the mess instead. Kosack (talk) 21:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from non-registered users. Kaltenmeyer (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A single IP with a short spurt of disruptive edits. Has been several hours since last instance. Feel free to report the user if they continue. Kosack (talk) 21:13, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP addresses. Kaltenmeyer (talk) 20:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A short spell of semi-protection will be ineffective. The article had not been edited for over a month. It's just a shame any disruptive edits lasted so long. Kosack (talk) 21:11, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The very minute protection come off, the vandalism starts up again. If you cannot see fit to protect it for a longer period of time, I will give up and stop reporting it. The vandals will have won. Bollyjeff | talk 20:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I understand your frustration, but the article has had only one instance of disruption in the five days since protection expired. That is not enough to warrant further protection right now, especially with pending changes also implemented. Please feel free to report again if the levels of disruption increase. Kosack (talk) 21:23, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15 January 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page being attacked by new users today. – UnnamedUser (talk; contribs) 19:16, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 19:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuous WP:DE/unsourced hosts added by IPs, host for this year currently remains unannounced. Magitroopa (talk) 20:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 21:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is a program that blocks sites students can use to get off-task, and as such, enraged children, usually from an IP address take their rage out on this article. Auto-Confirm protection requested. One Blue Hat❯❯❯ (talk) 22:08, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 22:32, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism of a biographical page's talk page, and the article is currently also linked on the Main Page. Zugraga talk 20:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Do we no longer leave main page articles un protected to encourage new users to edit? -- Deepfriedokra 20:28, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I don't know what the current practice is re main page articles, but the recent editing on this page is largely productive. MelanieN (talk) 00:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm not sure if I'm allowed to post here, but anyway: the page has seen vandalism both on its article page as well as on the talk page. Moreover, the article is a biography of living person who has had a recent high level of media interest, namely his becoming a Prime Minister. Zugraga talk 06:09, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Zugraga: I only see one vandal edit on talk and one recent vandal edit on the article. Sorry, but that is not sufficient for protection. Johnuniq (talk) 08:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors (with their IP addresses recorded on the page history). The edits in question violate a consensus previously determined on the talk page about a particular source. And those responsible keep adding that information, and are refusing to weigh in on the talk page before adding it back. Full protection is needed to nip this issue in the bud promptly. Thank you. --Jgstokes (talk) 22:30, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 22:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Full would stop all but admins -- Deepfriedokra 22:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 14:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:50, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:45, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Quite a bit of back and forth over the past couple days . John from Idegon (talk) 18:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: 12 hours after previous protection was removed, same vandalism (driven by Korean boy band fanatics) resumed, and has continued. See Talk:NGC 278 for full discussion. Request protection be reinstated and for longer period. NedFausa (talk) 19:10, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 19:18, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ABH95 (talk) 19:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:44, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: it's not protected ABH95 (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection: Consistently recreated promotional userpage. N0nsensical.system(err0r?)(.log) 13:14, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 13:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:57, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 17:28, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection recently expired. Article is getting lot of interest due to its relation with CAA Protests. Article was WP:GOCEd today and the IP edits are mostly vandalism/disruptive edits. Fyi User:El C. DBigXray 17:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dee03 10:49, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same IP today, before that no disruption for days. Lectonar (talk) 10:50, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dee03 10:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Lordtobi () 13:48, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:28, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Emk9 (talk) 08:26, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra 13:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The miracle of the rangeblock -- Deepfriedokra 13:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Emk9 (talk) 08:26, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: they are a long term ip-hopping vandal, warning/blocking the one IP wouldn't stop them.
Blocking them will. There were no edits to the article from other IPs since November last year. Lectonar (talk) 09:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra 13:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: God's gift to us-- the rangeblock -- Deepfriedokra 13:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent driveby vandalism by one or two IPs. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 09:54, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same IP in the last days. Lectonar (talk) 10:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 09:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:03, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism around her gender/MOS:GENDERID. William Avery (talk) 09:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:04, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptions continue after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 05:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bobak:...perhaps reinstate infinite (semi-)protection? Lectonar (talk) 11:23, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Appears stale. The game is over for almost 24 hours, editing has settled down. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:45, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent persistent vandalism – addition of fraudulent cast – from a hoping IP editor. --IJBall (contribstalk) 04:13, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:25, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of sourced information, most probably by IP socks of blocked user. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:22, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, content dispute, edit warring and constant addition of false, unsourced material mostly by IPs and new accounts. . Starforce13 15:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article is being very heavily edited, but most of the editing by IPs/new users appears to be productive, so protection would produce a lot of collateral damage. MelanieN (talk) 00:19, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: High level of vandalism on a BLP, from IPs and registered users. DarkGlow (talk) 22:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:33, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple accounts since protection expired ~1 week ago. userdude 01:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I'm requesting indefinite. This page was recently protected from January 2017 until less than two weeks ago, and has had heavy vandalism since, some of which has hung around awhile because there's been so much that not all of it was immediately caught. Considering the past protection history, I think indefinite is justified. Hog Farm (talk) 03:11, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:48, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent IPs seem determined to change the airdates in this article from the existing, reliably sourced ones. Modernponderer (talk) 21:59, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not seeing persistent disruption, the only disruptive edits in more than two months were made by a single IP, within the space of ten minutes, a week ago. Kosack (talk) 22:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent IPs seem determined to change the airdates in this list from the existing, reliably sourced ones. Modernponderer (talk) 21:59, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive edit in nearly four months is not a reasonable grounds for protection. Kosack (talk) 22:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – by a IP hopping vandal. theinstantmatrix (talk) 01:09, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra 01:35, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 01:35, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Keith Okamoto (talk) 05:43, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:39, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Disruptive edits. Shaheer Sheikh and Rhea Sharma play the leads in the series while Rithvik Arora and Kaveri Priyam play parallel lead/pivotal role which is also cited by reliable sources. But there is a edit war going on since long time placing Arora and Priyam also as the main leads of the series.

Note: This has been going on long enough that I suspect SP would be ineffectual. Far more inclined to block the edit warriors . -- Deepfriedokra 17:08, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked., I wanted to test the functional of partial blocks, but Ritchie333 beat me, both users are now blocked for a week from editing this article. Exactly the duration I wanted to choose. Great minds think alike.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing IP edits since 2014 overemphasizing one performance for a Jewish organisation, seemingly to make up for failing to provide a source for Cohen being Jewish. Lord Belbury (talk) 22:00, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like sockpuppetry. MelanieN (talk) 00:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: One or more anon IP's with switching IP's appear to be disrupting/vandalising page avoiding 3RR on a living person page and using edit summaries for making views known. Will probably need a week.Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:30, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: speculation about his next position are running wild apparently. Lots of IPs adding poorly sourced material. Please semi-protect until the dust has settle, i.e. two or three days. --bender235 (talk) 23:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16 January 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting longer term semi-protection. As soon as all the previous semi-protections have worn off, the vandals descend like flies on this article. Toddst1 (talk) 22:28, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra 22:38, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Paying of the condo early, $70K. Nice bottle of amaretto, $70. The enduring arrogance of youth, priceless. -- Deepfriedokra 22:38, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The topic itself is very sensible, this was always the case. But now out of sudden some users started to abuse this list for promoting irredentism. Even the talk page, which was always used many months ago - is no longer in use. I even worry that we are even having troubles with some sockpuppets. It is finally the time to intervene. Some individuals are trying to make it look like, entire countries are about to collapse. This list had many problematic sections, I know, but it was still under control - until now. I kindly ask the administrators to protect this page, so we let this cool down a bit, look up the sources and finally fix this very problematic list. Koreanovsky (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Koreanovsky: semi-protection is more or less only effective when IPs or very new accounts disrupt an article. The last edit by an IP which could be called disruptive was about 2 days ago; since then, you have been virtually the only one editing. Even before that, not many IPs have been editing disruptively. I do not think the problems of this article can be solved by protecting it, but only by using the talk-page, hash things out and ultimately form consensus. Lectonar (talk) 15:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page previously protected and an IP was blocked for antisemitic edit. This edit has been reinstated by a different IP from the same general geographic area. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. We are reluctant to protect talkpages. All the IPs involved have been blocked for three months, including the one that signed with a fake IP (see page history). Feel free to notify me if there are more problems,North Shoreman. Bishonen | talk 16:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. Hoppeboy13 (talk) 00:44, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Full protection? Lectonar (talk) 07:04, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protection: IP editor keeps vandalizing the article describing the person as "corrupt" or "gay". Several registered users have been reverting these edits. — Emperork (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Always the same IP since about 2 weeks time. Lectonar (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article has been the target of an IP-hopping POV pusher for the past six days. One range this hopper has used is currently blocked but there are others. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 17:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently target of edits from inexperienced users and vandals. Apparently, the subject requested edits on her show/social media?. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:44, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 18:06, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:54, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 18:04, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 12:18, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra 12:18, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP editors making unsourced changes repeatedly. noq (talk) 13:21, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 13:34, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA: Manda 1993. — regards, Revi 14:12, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 15:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 12:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 13:15, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from two named accounts (one reported now to AIV) - Jeffs5306 and Britishafrica + 1 IPv4 + 1 IPv6. Eostrix (talk) 13:12, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Someone really must hate school there. Lectonar (talk) 13:17, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also partial blocked the IPv6 and the the non-reported named account from editing the article. Partial blocks are a rather fine-tuned tool for preventing vandalism; let's see how they will be used once policy is formulated. Lectonar (talk) 13:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPv6 editor making promotional edits (around movie casting?!?!) over the past few days. Ravensfire (talk) 13:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:31, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism (removal of sourced controversy section) Plandu (talk) 06:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a week. PhilKnight (talk) 11:41, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is in the news due to CAA Protests and only attracting vandalism from IPs. . DBigXray 09:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a week. PhilKnight (talk) 11:41, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Decade-persisting vandalism and disruptive edits by IPs and newly registered users (possibly sockpuppets?). Examples: [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] ilil (talk) 11:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 12:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC): Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 12:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Spurt of IP vandalism over the last two days, with violations of the BLP policy. Not enough to normally need protection, but some of it has been not caught in a timely basis and has hung around awhile. Hog Farm (talk) 04:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 07:35, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page targeted by well-meaning newbies or clumsy vandals, please protect until storm dies down. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:43, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Things have slowed down - happy to withdraw my request Ytoyoda (talk) 05:26, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Lectonar (talk) 07:35, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Current edit-warring. 3knolls (talk) 06:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Not yet needing full protection; use of the appropriate talk-page is recommended. Lectonar (talk) 07:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No reason why this should be protected ABH95 (talk) 20:25, 15 January 2020 (UTC). ABH95 (talk) 20:25, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No reason why this should be unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism after the subject's recent role as co-moderator of a Democratic debate. KidAd (talk) 17:50, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The IPs are just a sideshow here; 2 established editores disagree a little bit, and will be working towards building consensus. Lectonar (talk) 07:03, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP editor is determined to use uppercase when lowercase is indicated and makes no attempt to justify his actions. Nigej (talk) 18:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:03, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 03:26, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:06, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Protection needed till 27 January 2020 (at least). — Vaibhavafro💬 04:02, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:12, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: an IP editor has made a series of good-faith edits, but has misunderstood the sources (the sources apply to individual events, but the article is for an entire championship) and is constantly reverting the article. Mclarenfan17 (talk) 16:18, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 06:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Migsmigss (talk) 17:19, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Molecular Biology#Template:WikiProject Molecular Biology and Wikipedia:Bot requests#Consolidating multiple WikiProject templates into taskforces of template:WikiProject Molecular Biology, a number of task force template banners – including Template:WikiProject Molecular and Cell Biology and Template:WikiProject Genetics, which are both permanently template-protected – will soon be merged into Template:WikiProject Molecular Biology.

Since this template will have tens of thousands of transclusions following template merging, I figured it'd be prudent to request permanent template protection for it now. Seppi333 (Insert ) 02:24, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Lectonar (talk) 08:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 04:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Blatant vandalism right after protection expired. Long-term vandalism by a particular person with dynamic IPs. 2409:4073:209E:6018:8552:EEF1:C461:C284 (talk) 06:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:03, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A consensus is yet to be reached. Needs Extension . DBigXray 07:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:05, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of Persistent and IP vandalism. PK743 (talk) 03:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:07, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent efforts by anonymous editors to alter information without citing a reason for the change, along with a reliable source as verification for the changes, or discussing why they are needed on the talk page. Such edits have been repeatedly reverted by me, as well as with one or two other editors, which is evident on the page history. --Jgstokes (talk) 03:43, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, loads and loads of unsourced and incorrect materials are being added and materials being removed by ips and new user, in an attempt to spread wrong information among readers about the protest. Need an immediate protection to the pages. Dey subrata (talk) 04:12, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Flooding of hoax since January 2020 due to transfer window opening. No google hit for the rumour and seem a pure vandalism from registered SPA account and dynamic ips. Matthew hk (talk) 15:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:44, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 15:15, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:46, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism.User:Amkgp (talk) 15:57, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Mikemyers345 (talk) 16:08, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various ip addresses have been continuously disruptive editing the article again. — YoungForever(talk) 02:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:17, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ABH95 (talk) 19:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The disruptive edits were all made by the same IP which has now been blocked. Kosack (talk) 20:45, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting longer protection this time. As soon as previous protection ended, same vandalism re-started. . Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 22:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra 22:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amount of vandalism from multiple IP users over last two days. Tdc42 (talk) 22:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 22:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Editor2020 (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 01:41, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 01:41, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Having problem with a set of IPs changing the way a character name is shown ... namely Macaulay Culkin's character of Thomas J. Sennett ... persistent removal of the middle initial, which goes against how he is credited in the film, and MOS:COMMONNAME in the dialogue of the film. I'm going for pending changes here as opposed to semiprotection because of the relative infrequency of these edits (but it's becoming a persistent problem nevertheless). MPFitz1968 (talk) 00:20, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Seconded. This IP editor is not going to stop. As semi-protection is unlikely to be helpful for the slow-motion disruption here (unless applied longer term), pending changes is a decent alternative protection scheme for this, though it should be longer term (i.e. months, not weeks). --IJBall (contribstalk) 00:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 01:38, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 01:31, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 01:35, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17 January 2020

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – As an article about a pornographic actress, this page experiences infrequent yet persistent vandalism. This has been going on for years and it shows no signs of ever stopping. These edits some times seriously violate BLP and some times survive for several minutes to an hour because the page in not heavily watched. Pending changes should be a perfect solution to this problem while allowing good faith editors to edit. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 07:05, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:56, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent increase in IP vandalism (with vulgarity) since release from prison. PenulisHantu (talk) 12:16, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit some days ago; not much activity overall. Lectonar (talk) 12:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism. Repeated changes of "she/her" to "him/his". Restarted since previous protection expired. Requesting a longer protection period this time. Alex (talk) 15:40, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:52, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Lots of recent vandalism by anonymous users who keep switching their IP addresses. Ross Finlayson (talk) 15:55, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:58, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP (and new accounts created solely to make one or two edits on this one article) vandalism. Davefelmer (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Davefelmer: Sorry but it's hard to see why more than one or two edits are vandalism. Please post again with a couple of diffs and a brief explanation if the issue continues. Johnuniq (talk) 06:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High-traffic article, vandalism by IP editors. Ss112 08:58, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:51, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Long term problem. — Vaibhavafro💬 10:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:41, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP user across a number of different addresses. Ajf773 (talk) 19:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Ajf773: I can see it is frustrating but the IP had an edit summary with "Destination edits follow WP:Airports guidelines". If there was something on talk that explained why that is incorrect and why the edit is a problem, I would protect. How is it known the edits are disruptive? Johnuniq (talk) 00:17, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The IP is edit warring and not using the Talk page to discuss the matter with other experienced users. Ajf773 (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined @Ajf773: Sure, but established editors are doing the same (the last edit at talk was 1 December 2016) and someone such as myself with no knowledge of the area cannot see a reason to revert the IP other than claims of sockpuppetry. That may well be true, but there needs to be some evidence an admin can easily follow (such as a diff of a blocked sock making the same edit) before they can take action. The IP's edit is not vandalism and they gave the reason I mentioned in an edit summary and I see no refutation. Johnuniq (talk) 05:57, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing and edit warring in recent days by IP user with different IP addresses. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 04:25, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:51, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Dynamic IP random unsourced detail changes.Been going on for a while,. Geraldo Perez (talk) 07:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This should be sufficient for now; I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 07:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 02:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:30, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP (and new accounts created solely to make one or two edits on this one article) vandalism. Davefelmer (talk) 02:24, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Requesting WP:XCON for the this version of the article to prevent any further edit warring over a content dispute involving multiple editors. The primary source for the disruption appears to be some recently created SPAs/new accounts and an expansion of the article they're trying to make, but there maight also be some WP:MEAT involved. Anyway, an attempt to reach out to them has been made on the article's talk page; so, perhaps protecting the page will be unnecessary; at the same time, however, it may encourage all involved to try and resolve their disagreement through discussion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:00, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Marchjuly: WP:ECP should be applied after other measues are tried. I warned one newish editor (who has not edited since receiving other warnings). Let me know if further edit warring occurs. Johnuniq (talk) 06:23, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough and thank you for taking a closer look. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Years of DOB battles ....lets make it a bit harder for one time editors to change date. Moxy 🍁 05:44, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Moxy: Pending changes would require a lot of pointless reverts. Unfortunately the RfC on talk was not well attended and it lapsed so it's hard to justify any long-term protection. This will work for a while. Johnuniq (talk) 06:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you--Moxy 🍁 06:24, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: an IP editor keeps adding content to the article without understanding the source (their source is good for an individual event, but the article is for an entire championship). These were made in good faith to begin with, but now it is just sheer stubbornness. I put in an RfP last night for the same issue and the IP in question was blocked. Not sure if this is the same IP, but the issue is presenting the same way. Mclarenfan17 (talk) 13:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 13:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I have warned the edit warrior. If tha persist, please report them for blocking. -- Deepfriedokra 13:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 06:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism going on for years. VEOonefive 23:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:00, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism in last 48 hours by both IPs and new accounts. Inter&anthro (talk) 03:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:12, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of IP vandalism associated with the recent punishment handed down to Houston for sign stealing. Hog Farm (talk) 04:34, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy recent IP vandalism. Hog Farm (talk) 04:38, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:09, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing and vandalism in recent days by IP editors with various IP addresses. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 04:48, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:07, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Full of test edit and hoax player transfer as vandalism . Matthew hk (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@MelanieN: I verified all ip edits recently. None of them are constructive. One of them blatantly blanking section without purpose other than vandalism. Matthew hk (talk) 09:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, Matthew hk, as a non-expert in this area, I can only judge whether an IP edit was constructive or not by whether another editor reverts it. It looked to me as if many, possibly a majority, of recent (last day or two) IP edits were not getting reverted, so I assumed those edits were constructive. Any other admin with more familiarity with the area is welcome to overrule me and install whatever protection is necessary. Or you, Matthew, are welcome to file another request if the problem you identify continues. -- MelanieN (talk) 16:31, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well those ip were from the same ISP from that adding hoax player transfer such as Bafétimbi Gomis, Jay Emmanuel-Thomas and etc, in which such sport news should be readily available in the web for a Indian Super League team. Adding unsourced transfer for the first time should be AGF, but not the fifth time with that look like hoax in any way. Matthew hk (talk) 16:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption. TheAwesomeHwyh 19:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @TheAwesomeHwyh: Sorry but this is hard for an uninvolved admin to evaluate. There is nothing relevant to gender/sex on the talk page or its one archive. Is there a discussion somewhere? @Flyer22 Reborn: I see a claim about consensus to use "gender"—do you know where that might be? Johnuniq (talk) 00:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, and I saw this dispute via WP:Huggle, but I decided to stay out of it. Because "sex" can refer to sexual activity, I can see why one would want to use "gender" instead. But "sex-based oppression" is more accurate. Maybe Printfn (talk · contribs) can point to the consensus discussion since Printfn is arguing consensus for "gender." Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looking over it a few hours later, it seems to have cooled down and I don't see much actionable here. The edits had been going on for a few hours when I saw it happening but they've stopped now. Sorry about this. TheAwesomeHwyh 01:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(I would elaborate, but I'm getting pretty tired and I'm about to log off for the night.) TheAwesomeHwyh 01:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Apparently done for now. Johnuniq (talk) 01:59, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent news has brought a flurry of edits, mostly from confirmed users. There is one instance of vandalization, I suspect there could be more in coming days. - - mathmitch7 (talk/contribs) 00:34, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 00:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – There's a lot of back and forth on this page right now and it's going to need to be cleaned up. Also, vaguely antisemetic accusations being thrown about by editors. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 15:24, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, on-going vandalism by anonymous editors. livelikemusic talk! 15:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Livelikemusic: The most recent IP edit is not vandalism—it was undesirable but not WP:VAND. Other IP edits look defensible. If there is a specific problem, please identify it. Johnuniq (talk) 00:01, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:48, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:55, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr. K. 02:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect from creation: Protecting admin retired. See the request Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anthroponymy#Nelken Staszek Lem (talk) 20:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected @Staszek Lem: Done. Johnuniq (talk) 02:06, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Repeatedly recreated by a banned user with sockpuppets. Barkeep49 (talk) 19:38, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Barkeep49: Sorry but further information would be needed to justify creation-protecting that page. Is there a discussion somewhere? Johnuniq (talk) 00:23, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Johnuniq, so it's not just straight forward which I acknowledge. Under WP:BMB restoring the redirect is the appropriate response (rather than G5) in my opinion. If this had been repatedly G5'ed I would hope that under WP:SALT it would be protected. However just because there's been an ATD shouldn't mean we can't apply approprite protection. But I will understand if it's declined. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected @Barkeep49: I indefinitely semi-protected after seeing LTA evidence at fr:Wikipedia:Faux-nez/Correcteur21. Let me know if the semi-prot is insufficient. I probably should have made it a year and am happy if anyone wants to change it. Johnuniq (talk) 01:58, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: General – After a long day of reverting, I worry that the editors I reverted may take revenge by sabotaging my user page. I don't want to take chances... The Evil Sith Kitten 23:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We don't usually protect preemptively. And I read here that a filter stops new and unregistered users from editing our user pages, so it's like automatic protection.-- Deepfriedokra 23:05, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined @Evil Sith Kitten: Sorry but as explained pages are not protected before needed, see WP:UP#PROTECT. Johnuniq (talk) 00:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry-forgot to remove my request after DeepFriedOkra explained that to me. It sounds like user pages are basically semi-protected anyway:o) The Evil Sith Kitten 00:48, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 02:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. Child grooming accusations and so on. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:39, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It was protected for two years previously and the BLP problems have resurfaced since that expired. Johnuniq (talk) 00:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Large amount of vandalism from various IP users in last 24 hours. Tdc42 (talk) 01:01, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:00, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A longterm IP vandal using the 49.144.xxx.xxx IP range keeps on adding hoax information on this article, specifying that this movie will have a TV series. -WayKurat (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:02, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Months worth of disruption, violations of WP:No original research by the IP range Special:Contributions/2600:1702:1B20:97F0:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 21:14, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Binksternet: Sorry I can't decode enough of the history at the moment to justify WP:ECP. Please report again and ping me if needed are this elapses. Johnuniq (talk) 00:37, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting targeted by an LTA (who has long been trying to push this nonsensical "0-0-0-0" castling move). Jasper Deng (talk) 21:58, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:39, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful IP edits that are being reverted . JMHamo (talk) 00:04, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. BRADFORD talk 00:09, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:49, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most edits to the article in the past few months have been vandalism by IP editors. –WPA (talk) 20:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @WikiPediaAid: Unless I'm missing something, there are too few IP edits to justify long-term protection. Protecting for 3 days is pretty useless and is not easy to justify but it's something. Johnuniq (talk) 00:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs from the 216.172.253.* range (appears to be a school district) Tdc42 (talk) 21:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs from the 216.172.253.* range (appears to be a school district) Tdc42 (talk) 21:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Too many destructive vandalism on the page. Kaizenify (talk) 17:21, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Kaizenify: Please put something on the talk page explaining the problem with IP edits. Johnuniq (talk) 00:07, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page has too many destructive IP vandalism edits with their favorite party before the election. Please approve the edit rights only to Auto-confirmed or Extended auto-confirmed users until Feb 11, 2020. -Lesenwriter (talk) 17:30, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Lesenwriter: While Feb 11, 2020 would be the logical date, articles are not protected that long for this low level of problem. Johnuniq (talk) 00:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Restarted immediately after last protection expired. BlameRuiner (talk) 19:06, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As soon as protection expires, the same disruption recommences – a year-long protection expired five weeks ago, and two brief periods of protection after that haven't helped at all. Suggest a longer duration than just a few weeks or months. bonadea contributions talk 19:07, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Came to request exactly the same - we have tried explanatory FAQ at Talk:Sambhaji but these are always ignored - Arjayay (talk) 19:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Uptick in vandalism coinciding with the subject rising in visibility on the news. XOR'easter (talk) 14:46, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Semi this for a couple of days please, until this political/sexist/racist BS blows over. Note how many of these edits totally discredit her as a journalist. Drmies (talk) 17:21, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:02, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Yep. This. Again. There's an LTA going on as well. InvalidOS (talk) 23:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 23:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18 January 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level Constant vandalism. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  09:15, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:47, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 10:12, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:19, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Carl Tristan Orense 13:34, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:19, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:07, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree: the last stable version is this, after that there have been anonymous users from Canada removing content and sources, but also a pair of registered users who, without understanding why the removed text has to remain there as proven by sources and confirmend by a consensus lasting stably for years, thought paradoxically that the vandalism was restoring it instead of removing it without consensus, let's hope they at last have understood it after being given all the information to judge properly the matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.64.191.98 (talk) 14:39, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:21, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps removing references . TheSunofman (talk) 04:35, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked., IP blocked from the article for 72h--Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent dynamic IP vandalism on this BLP. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 11:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:33, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Harshil want to talk? 11:46, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:38, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism attempts based on recent news. Bubka42 (talk) 11:56, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:42, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This guy really is quite a persistent little bastard. :/. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:47, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And I'm generally loathe to protect user talk pages, but I see from the protection history that you're quite popular. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:45, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, persistently amending the article to the incorrect style of English. DarkGlow (talk) 20:52, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Person is editing content with false information and incorrect sources. . Skvbfx (talk) 04:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:34, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism following recent controversial TV appearance. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 14:23, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:40, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 19:01, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:04, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Another Believer, if you were an admin, you could have protected it yourself. (Hint hint ;)) – Muboshgu (talk) 19:04, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Muboshgu, Hah, thanks. Yeah, I've been asked dozens of times of the years, but never really wanted to take the plunge. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:06, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Another Believer, I know, I'm one of the people who tried to convince you. I will, sooner or later. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Muboshgu, Hah!, Yes, I recall. We'll see... ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:34, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier--Ymblanter (talk) 16:20, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 10:11, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:16, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 10:12, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:19, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 10:13, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:22, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 10:13, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:24, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 10:14, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:26, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 10:15, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:28, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 10:15, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:28, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 10:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 10:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:08, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce protection level: full protection (since 2006) is not required. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:07, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected I'm willing to give it a shot. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:13, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dee03 09:25, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:49, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 10:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:58, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 10:09, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive IP vandalism. Mayankj429 (talk) 07:46, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. This is my second request for temporary semi-protection: Since the expiration of the first period of semi-protection, there have been two further instances of vandalism. Most vandalism to this page has been the arbitrary deletion of city names or populations, but sometimes apparently random digits or punctuation are added to city populations. Because the vandals do not use Wikipedia accounts, I have not been able to engage them to discuss the reason that this. This has been an ongoing issue for some time. Ss112 Pathawi (talk) 16:45, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – OK we have a new disputed article causing two editors to already be reported for edit waring. Let's lock this up before they are both blocked and so we can get others involved. Can't solve much when they are just arguing back and forth and edit waring back and forth...... need to slow this down till others are involved. Moxy 🍁 17:13, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:23, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – LTA from dynamic IP in 37.16x range - mostly minor data corruptions. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism of the article. Driz 12 (talk) 02:39, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:30, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated and persistent long-term abuse. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:41, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See WP:LTA/MRY for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:49, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping editor with COI making unsoruced edits to casting section about casting by. Ravensfire (talk) 15:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:33, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of content without consensus by new and unregistered editors. It's getting to be disruptive; the editors are ignoring notes, reverts and warnings. Ss112 08:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:19, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP and non-autoconfirmed vandalism and BLP violations. . -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:08, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:22, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Already had a week's protection, IP editor keeps adding every network it has ever appeared on to the "original network" parameter of {{Infobox television}} in violations of its instructions that state that field is "The original network(s) on which the show has appeared. Do not add foreign broadcasters here.". Le Deluge (talk) 17:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:24, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Apparently, another gender identity change has taken place with this person. Article needs semi-protection to combat unsourced changes and the lead having a name that mismatches the article's title. Matter needs to be worked out on the talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:18, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:29, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism, same pattern as in October - replacing subject image with that of Al Gore. MB 15:52, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:17, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Ionmars10 (talk) 16:06, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the article has never been protected before, let us see first how pending changes would work--Ymblanter (talk) 16:15, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – resumption of previous vandalism by multiple IPs . MB 04:07, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A little light right now, two disruptive edits in quick succession but it's been three months since any further disruption. Feel free to request again if the disruption continues. Kosack (talk) 08:11, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism in lead, stating that various names own the town or that something is the official town phrase. Hog Farm (talk) 04:42, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Drive-by vandalism seems to have subsided, but we'll give it a day. Airplaneman (talk) 08:25, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nardog (talk) 06:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 08:23, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Apparently it will be renamed, but no official change has occurred. A RM would be required considering it's been named like that for decades. © Tbhotch (en-3). 22:16, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is no longer dispute/move warring about the name since a Disney spokesman confirmed to NYT that "20th Century Studios" and "Searchlight Pictures" are already the official names. If a company is renamed and the new names are confirmed to be effective by both the primary source and top reliable secondary sources... what is the rationale of preventing the company article from being moved? You can't use WP:COMMONNAME to justify keeping the old name. So, why would the move be prevented just to keep one editor's preferred branding? Starforce13 05:18, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. Please feel free to let me know when the move request has been closed. El_C 05:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Subject is a businessman who is also a TV personality and the vandalism is reminiscent of memes and jokes shared on social media and on youtube. Will likely continue to be persistent which is why I'm requesting a straight 6-months period semi-protection. DA1 (talk) 04:11, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:35, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptions back after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 07:30, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Controversial local politician and therefore long term vandal target. Valenciano (talk) 22:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Person using several IP's is changing content without adding sources, without any explanations and while ignoring any of my comments or warnings. As this person uses several IP's, blocking a single IP wont help. . Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:49, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:18, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:11, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User threatens to continue via sockpuppet: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jw110976&diff=prev&oldid=936333026. ZimZalaBim talk 04:03, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:14, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the recent ROC presidential election, there have been malicious edits of the lead section depreciating Mr. Han. JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 11:54, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:57, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of maintenance templates by IP addresses. Melcous (talk) 12:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:58, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by ips and new users. Dey subrata (talk) 18:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption from Massachusetts IPs. Binksternet (talk) 21:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:58, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring, unregistered users removing legitimate templates without addressing the issues. Qono (talk) 21:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:01, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The exact minute protection ended, vandalisms began anew. Ifnord (talk) 22:02, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator FloquenbeamMelanieN (talk) 01:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Lots of IP vandalism recently. Can probably be unprotected once this fire season is over for a while. twotwos (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I don't see much vandalism, I see IPs making disruptive edits, and other IPs making constructive edits. Article is well watched. Lectonar (talk) 07:05, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frederickberman (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

: Already protected by administrator Ad OrientemMelanieN (talk) 23:54, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Panda619 has been continuously making major changes to this controversial article without any sort of consensus. Bharatiya29 16:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:36, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19 January 2020

Semi-protection: Persistent IP changes without discussions due to controversy over North Macedonia vs. Macedonia. PenulisHantu (talk) 17:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:44, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP block evasion. VQuakr (talk) 19:34, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:52, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:31, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:53, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant longterm genre vandalism. RF23 (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:51, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP(s) repeatedly adding massive unsourced/poorly sourced material in spite of an on-going discussion on the talk page. . ——SN54129 12:07, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term BLP violations and vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, addition of unnecessary materials in the article again and again by ips and new users. Need protection for atleast 7 days. Dey subrata (talk) 14:40, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued changes to incorrect death date. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:55, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:27, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP hopper persists in adding list of films in development, will not engage in discussions with other editors. Trivialist (talk) 15:52, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8760 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:35, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:33, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: High level of violation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.252.104.9 (talk) 05:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to recent events, being expelled from the league and scandal the article seems to get a rather fair amount of disruptive editing. I think it would be helpful to semi-protect for a bit and probably put this article on the pending changes list. Govvy (talk) 12:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Assuming that the most recent IP edits are constructive, protection would cause collateral damage. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Muboshgu: What are you on about? There has been nothing but disruptive activity!! :/ Govvy (talk) 18:34, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Govvy, I may have misread the page history. Be aware that I don't know what is going on as well as the editors on that page, and those last IP edits had not been reverted when I checked the history. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:38, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:39, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WBGconverse 15:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. for the whole gambit of reasons. Appreciable collateral damage done, but way too active for PC Nosebagbear (talk) 19:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Page history is majority IP vandalism for the entirety of its nearly 4 year existence. Googol30 (talk) 13:06, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. I don't see any reason IPs should edit that documentation. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:07, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: We had this month already some IPs, writing non-sense in Croatian like: "Banana" ([25]) or vulgar words in Croatian ([26]). Koreanovsky (talk) 13:19, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:14, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 16:31, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing from anon IPs. OrgoneBox (talk) 23:38, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @HalfLifeKiss: The article has been pending-changes protected since 10 November 2019, expires 10 February 2020. There is insufficient recent activity to warrant semi-protection. Johnuniq (talk) 01:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page Protection Request for a page protection after big quick event ended due to disruption. Regice2020 (talk) 06:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:51, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constantly being vandalised by new/unregistered users. Vensatry (talk) 08:34, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:33, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP edits. Previously the page was protected, but since the page protection expired, the IP vandalism has continued on a daily basis. Anbans 585 (talk) 12:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sir Sputnik. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully-protected: Long standing wiki article with persistent non-sourced information for the sake of promotion, removal and conflicting edits among new and unregistered editors. Multiple temporary protections could be solved with a full protection. Yleonmgnt (talk) 16:44, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Yleonmgnt: Sorry but the protection policy does not cover that kind of action. Thanks for monitoring the article. There is not sufficient activity to warrant protection. Johnuniq (talk) 00:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – violations of BLP, changing surnames by unregistered users. HalfLifeKiss (talk) 19:53, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @HalfLifeKiss: Sorry but it's hard to see why the edits are vandalism and there is not much recent activity. There is no explanation on talk. Johnuniq (talk) 00:57, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 21:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 01:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuous WP:DE and addition of unsourced content, mainly by IPs (the content is celebrities that have not yet been revealed to be on the show as of yet). Magitroopa (talk) 01:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IPs continuing to add completely unknown/rumored information/speculation, seems like it won't stop until the page gets protected. Magitroopa (talk) 03:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 03:37, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – sudden uptick in BLP issues (accusing the page subject of murder). Probably the same person, so a short semi-protection should be sufficient. creffett (talk) 01:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by Drmies. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:14, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP with 13 counts of vandalism in the past ten days, from many different IP addresses and registered accounts. Lcodyh803 (talk) 02:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:17, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frederickberman (talk) 02:58, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:13, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted three times: Once G11, once A7, and once G11 and A7. Hog Farm (talk) 03:13, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:15, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruption and poorly sourced additions. Snowflake91 (talk) 22:51, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:04, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Request for semi-protection for 1 week due to increasing activity of disruption before event starts today in a few. This is a big event so its expected to have people illegally posting infected streams into the info. Regice2020 (talk) 23:23, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Some vandalism/problematic changes over the past few days, recommend protection until it's off the "in the news" section. creffett (talk) 00:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:12, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  01:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This probably should be semi-protected instead; repost is needed. Johnuniq (talk) 01:17, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:37, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CatcherStorm talk 17:08, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 00:51, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 17:12, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:52, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:37, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:53, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – violations of BLP. AIRcorn (talk) 19:44, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:54, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous WP:DE/addition of unsourced content by IPs (also contradicts sources being used) . Magitroopa (talk) 20:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:58, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: We've had a bout of serious, disruptive editing occur on this article. The page needs semi-protection to help dissuade this sort of behaviour returning. GUtt01 (talk) 21:40, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:59, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant vandalism since the previous protection ended last week.
Alivardi (talk) 22:34, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20 January 2020

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. hueman1 (talk) 12:27, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:56, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of information. Semsurî (talk) 13:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:02, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated and ongoing IP vandalism. Dorsetonian (talk) 13:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Harshil want to talk? 14:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two IPs from same rough geo-location inserting "dog" content. The first IP has been blocked for editing on Bohemia. The edits to Walter may not qualify as straight up vandalism, but they are disruptive for a DAB page. Eostrix (talk) 16:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:52, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. hueman1 (talk) 12:27, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:56, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of information. Semsurî (talk) 13:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:02, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated and ongoing IP vandalism. Dorsetonian (talk) 13:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Harshil want to talk? 14:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two IPs from same rough geo-location inserting "dog" content. The first IP has been blocked for editing on Bohemia. The edits to Walter may not qualify as straight up vandalism, but they are disruptive for a DAB page. Eostrix (talk) 16:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:52, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 05:17, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 06:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article has been seeing constant disruptive editing and vandalism since the person in question died. The article should be lock just like Kim Jong-hyun (singer), whose article faced the same thing and it was decided to lock it indefinitely because it was vandalized again as soon as the protection was lifted. . ~~ CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 08:18, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The frequency of disruption of that article doesn't rise to the level we had on Kim Jong-hyun (singer). Pending changes shoud be enough for now. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 10:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protection expired but still it is expired. Fix problem. . Harshil want to talk? 07:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: This page is not protected. I do not understand what you want us to do here. Lectonar (talk) 07:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, Apologies for it. Filed by mistake. It was actually to remove protection as vandalism is not happening. Harshil want to talk? 10:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Lectonar (talk) 10:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Nadda hasn't yet been elected as president. IPS and new users are running the gun . DBigXray 04:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 05:29, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – May need to enforce WP:ARBDS here too. IanDBeacon (talk) 06:15, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:59, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two lists of films

Move protection: Pages moved repeatedly after reversions to the stable title (WP:RMUM), and during an open move discussion listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves. I would do this myself but having performed some of the reversions it would be better to have someone else evaluate the request. Dekimasuよ! 06:28, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of indefinite, both, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I think theres probably going to be some vandalism since the AFC Championship loss and all Jokes gonna be poured on it. Swagging (talk) 23:32, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined per Wikipedia:NO-PREEMPT: "Applying page protection as a preemptive measure is contrary to the open nature of Wikipedia and is generally not allowed if applied for these reasons." Useight (talk) 23:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days. I checked, and it has gotten some vandalism., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 06:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent edit-warring by an unregistered editor using many different IP addresses. The discussion in the article's Talk page and the edit history clearly show that multiple editors object to the unregistered editor's edits but he or she persists in making them. ElKevbo (talk) 06:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Perhaps in the meantime I can figure out how to do partial range blocks...such a one might help here. Lectonar (talk) 06:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:22, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content should be frozen, as this is a interface page for a userscript. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: If full you cannot edit either. Is this neccessary and if so would ECP be more practical? N.J.A. | talk 13:54, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
NJA, Not editing it myself is kinda the point. I do not need to edit it, I can edit the script to adjust the UI. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 17:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But, yes, ECP would work too. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 17:58, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Asking another admin familiar with handling of script pages to action or decline, N.J.A. | talk 19:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Moonythedwarf, what about having the page use a subpage of Special:BlankPage? Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 01:02, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Like RTRC does (Special:BlankPage/RTRC). It would mean that no user could edit it. However, I do see that unless you have the script installed it won't display anything. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 01:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would possibly endorse protection, if the notice was wanted by the user. My other thought of using a .js or .css subpage wouldn't allow for the banner to show. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 01:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined @Moonythedwarf: I don't see mention of a discussion or an explanation. This page is not a good place for a novel proposal to pre-emptively protect a page that appears to be blank. Please ask for suggestions at WP:VPT where there are plenty of admins who can protect the page if considered desirable. It's standard to use a .js or .css (I think) subpage if only the user should edit that page. Johnuniq (talk) 02:49, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Draft:Powerbirds has been repeatedly recreated this year, 4 times in 17 days, even after being rejected at AfC. AussieLegend () 03:16, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 05:29, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:20, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High levels of Ip vandalism . Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  04:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This may need to be looked at by someone familiar with the subject. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:15, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The main recent problem was repeated removal of controversial but well-sourced information by a single editor. I have issued that editor a final warning. Aside from that, there is very heavy editing by many IPs and new users, and much of it appears to me to be constructive. So I am not imposing protection, but will defer that decision to someone who understands the issues better than I do. @Titodutta and Vanamonde93: Any thoughts? -- MelanieN (talk) 01:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@MelanieN: In your place I would not impose a restriction at the moment, because as you note, there are constructive IP contributions as well as unconstructive contributions by autoconfirmed editors. I have done content work on closely related subjects, and therefore do not want to make an admin decision here. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:51, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see some attempts to add a poorly sourced "Controversies & Scams" section. Johnuniq (talk) 02:53, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Returning Vandalism due to character being a meme. 195.174.198.233 (talk) 23:54, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:19, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same as above persistent long term sockpuppetry. Gotitbro (talk) 01:02, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. There was just a little bit of disruption, and that user has been blocked. -- MelanieN (talk) 02:04, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@MelanieN: The template has also been subject to IP socking (along with the socks) continuously for the last year, all the recent IP edits you see belong the same sockpuppeteer. Please reconsider and protect that page, its tiring for editors to continuously deal with the same thing repeatedly, the last protection was brief as well and we ended with up with the same thing. Gotitbro (talk) 02:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@MelanieN: I suggest the same two months semi as above to discourage the sock who inevitably will try again. Johnuniq (talk) 02:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, Johnuniq, the sock had been focusing all their attention on the Urdu template, so that a 2-month protection on that one was clearly justified. But looking at the history of this template, it's hard to see "persistent long term" sockpuppetry; the acute problem at this Hindi template began on December 17. This template received only three sock edits in the month since the previous protection expired, and the most recent was 10 days ago. Furthermore, the sock who was editing here was auto-confirmed, so semi-protection would not have helped. Given all that, I found it hard to justify protection for this one. But I will go ahead and impose it based on your recommendation. -- MelanieN (talk) 03:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. andritolion (talk) 02:26, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:59, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I wouldn't call it significant "edit warring," but there is a content dispute over this information page. Per being alerted to this by Headbomb, could you kindly full protect this page for, say, 1 week, until the parallel Wikipedia talk:Talk page layout discussion concludes? Also, can you confirm that the good faith reversion by Bsherr to January 3rd, 2020, appropriately restored the status quo pre-dispute?. Doug Mehus T·C 03:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It did not, the most-recent prior-to-dispute revision is this one. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:05, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Doug Mehus is correct, the status-quo-ante is January 3. The page as protected reflects the status quo ante for the portion in dispute. Thanks. --Bsherr (talk) 03:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism of WP:BLP driven by subject's participation in NFL championship game. NedFausa (talk) 01:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Protected for one day. Useight (talk) 02:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evading user on IPs who would really like the image on this article to be a photo of himself. MrOllie (talk) 02:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RL0919. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:24, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 02:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:17, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unusual spike in IP vandalism today . Hog Farm (talk) 02:21, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:24, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Editor2020 (talk) 21:54, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitelyMelanieN (talk) 01:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Needs long term protection, has been subject to continuous sockpuppetry and IP socking again an again. Gotitbro (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Migsmigss (talk) 12:52, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:SOCK or WP:MEAT, changing myth to belief, contrary to WP:RNPOV. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:34, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:24, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 23:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:18, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 195.174.198.233 (talk) 23:58, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21 January 2020

Semi-protection: Article blanking by sockpuppets, three times in 9 days. Geogene (talk) 18:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 18:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra 18:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: looks like some sort of bot -- Deepfriedokra 18:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very popular article. This article was defended on the Ukrainian and Russian Wikipedia. 2.133.224.44 (talk) 14:16, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. N.J.A. | talk 14:59, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumption of IP vandalism following expiration of previous protection. Dorsetonian (talk) 16:09, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:06, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Auto-confirmed users indulging in content-removal/edit-warring/disruption. — Vaibhavafro💬 16:45, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:06, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Particularly from the Phillippines based on IP Lookup. Speedthief1 (talk) 12:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:35, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Several unwarranted statements have been added. Gilbert.JW (talk) 13:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 14:27, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IP vandalism. Persistent Removal of one of the former lead of the series. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noobie anonymous (talkcontribs) 14:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Noobie anonymous: Sorry but it's hard to see why the edits are vandalism. The IP is one of the few editors using edit summaries and there is nothing on talk—an explanation at talk is needed. Johnuniq (talk) 06:35, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some IP keep vandalized this article, blocked many of them but I thinks we should protect this page from IP users to make sure they couldn’t do that again. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 04:12, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most recent IP is blocked and previous was five days ago. Johnuniq (talk) 06:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant disruptive edits.
Alivardi (talk) 11:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:41, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent sockpuppetry – Almost 4 years of socking and block evasion to make same appalling edit. Compare today's IP's [27] with last month's IP's [28], last summer's blocked account's [29], 2017 IP's [30], 2016 IPs' [31] and [32]. There's also a revdelled edit that is the right size to be the same thing. Little other activity on this article. Meters (talk) 05:24, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've hit a problem that I don't have time to solve at the moment. I did the above semi on instinct but I've read Meters' post more carefully and tried to add pending changes. It failed due to either my error or because I need to first remove the semi. Will return later. Anyone is welcome to clean up. I think indefinite pending changes is required per diffs above. Johnuniq (talk) 07:07, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also pending-changes protected for a year after wondering whether two year semi-protection might be better. Pending changes will leave the junk in history and there has only been one good IP edit in recent years that I can see (19 February 2019‎). Johnuniq (talk) 08:34, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 05:56, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:14, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With the recent videos surfacing of him, vandals have been pouncing in his page since. ZappaOMatic (alt) 07:31, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:15, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page creation protection: Drafts have been created with this erroneous title many times; Draft:First draft is already so protected. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: I wonder if it would also be helpful to add an informational editnotice at Draft:First Draft and Draft:First draft that explains to the editor proposing to title their draft as that, to title it related to the article they're drafting? Doug Mehus T·C 23:47, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Might be an even better idea to implement both the protection and the notice with the title blacklist. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:00, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected Please discuss any wanted wording for these pages at a suitable location. Johnuniq (talk) 06:49, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting temporary protection. Some IP keep vandalized this article, just blocked few of them but I thinks we should protect this page from IP users to make sure they couldn’t do that again. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 04:15, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:54, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Rumours about this player leaving his current team abound. Two weeks should be enough for the issue to resolve itself. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:23, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:55, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeatedly created by globally blocked sock - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Swarup_Kumar_Solanki/Archive. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:37, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Muboshgu (talk) 17:51, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 06:32, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 16:16, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I declined last time but am protecting now due to some minor BLP issues. Johnuniq (talk) 06:38, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IP vandalism. Persistent changing of Surname from Mouh to Kumar, Actual name "Achraf Hakimi Mouh" being changed to "Achraf Kumar Hakimi", the request to protect was earlier declined by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Johnuniq and the name is again changed by unregistered user. Please change the name to "Achraf Hakimi Mouh" and semi protect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HalfLifeKiss (talkcontribs) 16:55, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There were BLP issues. Johnuniq (talk) 06:41, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: As predicted, user DerekHistorian has resumed warring on the Turkmens article, by adding original research that is not reflected in the references cited. I am requesting indefinate full protection to this page, as it existed on 17:23, 20 January 2020, which was approved by veteran editor User:Wario-Man in the talk page long ago. DerekHistorian has a clear and persistent record of warring over original research, as reflected on the talk page at Talk:Mongoloid (see Finns and Sami section), where he is now going against consensus by adding falsified POV based on a white supremacist's fallacious article about Y-DNA origins.Hunan201p (talk) 17:46, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: I am requesting full indefinate protection to the Mongoloid article as it existed on 17:16, 20 January 2020. A user named DerekHistorian has attempted to salvage the "Finns and Sami" section of the article, which was purely original research, as none of the references cited ever supported the statements in the Wikipedia article. Specifically, no reference says that the Y-DNA Haplogroup N is Mongoloid. In his first attempt to salvage the article, DerekHistorian cited a racist article by Mankind Quarterly author Edward Dutton, which has been shown in the talk page to misrepresent references that it cites. Consensus already existed since 2019 to neutralize the page, as reflected in the "Mongoloid admixture?!" section of the talk:Mongoloid talk page. He is now accusing prominent and respected editors like User:Ermenrich of "bias" and claiming that he is justified in restoring the fallacious original research because "the entire article is racist anyway". It's clearly impossible to get him to reason with anyone and so this page needs indefinate protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunan201p (talkcontribs) 18:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:02, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – consistent spam and vandalism on a low traffic page. Hydromania (talk) 03:18, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:03, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The edit warring continues on this page despite previous locks, with an ongoing fight on the talk page about whether to include the word "liberal" in the first sentence. Some of the edit warring has been coming from anonymous IP-address editors. I think semi-protection would help, at least until some consensus is established on the talk page. Thanks. – numbermaniac 03:20, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:59, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:04, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An off-wiki campaign to hide/modify this person's nationality resulted in six months of semi-protection. When it expired, the attempted modifications resumed. Jayjg (talk) 20:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 2 years. Changing nationality is also a BLP violation. Risker (talk) 00:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. -- BullRangifer (talk) 21:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:23, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant disruptive edits.
Alivardi (talk) 22:43, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/NS vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:56, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 01:19, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs are adding unsourced, contentious content to this article. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:18, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:00, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs continuously adding completely unsourced production codes, not listed in any of the sources currently on the page and don't add on any source for the info. Magitroopa (talk) 17:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The IP is now also changing production codes perfectly sourced from Futon Critic, a block may be needed. Magitroopa (talk) 19:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:15, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been reverted here for weeks. Jayjg (talk) 21:05, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:12, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent IP BLP vio's (birth date changes). - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 23:56, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:08, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Sock-puppetry. [33][34]. Another article Unda (film) is now indefinitely protected because of his socking there. 2409:4073:29D:678D:240B:2399:15E7:F795 (talk) 14:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:39, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism . Crboyer (talk) 18:29, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:39, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive vandalism. 198.161.28.80 (talk) 19:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

22 January 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – There is an active IP on this page that User:Doug Weller is trying to warn about discretionary sanctions. However, there is evidence that this IP is likely a sockpuppet of a banned user (including location evidence and language evidence). I don't know if I can file an WP:SPI since the rules on WP:OUTING are a bit ambiguous, but it dawns on me that semi-protection for this contention page may be advisable to prevent disruption. jps (talk) 12:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If it is sockpuppetry, it would really be better dealt with by an SPI. But let's see how the threat of discretionary sacntions works out. I would not protect the talk-page yet, as we are still at the point where people talk to each other. Any other admin who sees a need to protect: go right ahead. Lectonar (talk) 12:33, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
How does one file an SPI about an IP while keeping WP:OUTING respected? jps (talk) 15:22, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Let's quote the hatnote of WP:SPI: "...if you need to submit off-wiki evidence for some other reason, you must email the CheckUser team to open an investigation. Private information, emails, logs, and other sensitive evidence must not be posted on Wikipedia. All evidence related to a sockpuppet investigation must otherwise be posted on the designated page." Lectonar (talk) 06:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Protection, particularly on talk pages, is for disruption or vandalism, and this IP's editing isn't disruptive; it is participating in discussion. If they turn out to be a sock puppet they can be blocked (more likely rangeblocked since it is a shifting IPv6), but that is a separate issue from protection. MelanieN (talk) 16:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Ionmars10 (talk) 16:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 17:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated IP edits removing sourced material. . Plandu (talk) 17:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: (Non-administrator observation) Only one IP seems to be removing content. A block seems to be a better option. InvalidOS (talk) 18:25, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 19:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; don't know why this wasn't locked long ago. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Article has been created several times recently, including twice by members of a sockfarm (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Billphil1). As such, the title should be temporarily salted to allow for proper vetting of the topic and to prevent further abuse. SamHolt6 (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SamHolt6: It looks like it's only been created twice in the past couple of days, and then once around six months ago? The history is a little jumbled from the moves. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:14, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Now that the drafts have been merged, I can see that the topic has been created three times - once in the draftspace (later declined by an AfC reviewer) by User:Popculturegirl in July and twice in the mainspace by the Billphil1 sockfarm this January. I will re-firm my support for salting the topic, as the article has been created in the mainspace twice in the last week by a sockfarm tied to undisclosed paid editing. The topic remains in the draftspace, and if AfC reviewers deem the topic notable then an admin can be contacted to move the article to the mainspace. SamHolt6 (talk) 02:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm personally not keen on salting a topic that's only been created twice in recent history, but I'll leave this open in case another admin wandering by feels differently. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:41, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm going to take the unusual step of a time-limited create protection, based on the fact that the recreations were very recent and by a sockfarm. This stops the recreation temporarily, while giving time for the subject to be evaluated in draft space, and if accepted moved to mainspace without needing to go through the hoops of unsalting. MelanieN (talk) 16:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
MelanieN, I'm not sure if there's a "requests for page protection stalker" template, but just wanted to say I 👍 Like this time-limited rationale to creation protection. A functional exemplification of the guideline that Wikipedia is notionally not a bureaucracy, as I agree that there are consensus hoops to jump through to remove creation protection. Doug Mehus T·C 17:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dirkbb (talk) 15:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Just named manager of the New York Mets; short-term surge in petty vandalism. 24.76.103.169 (talk) 18:14, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:27, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple editors adding unsourced divorce information since September 2019, and twice in the last two days. – Thjarkur (talk) 18:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: New accounts out of nowhere constantly disrupting these two articles. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to both. MelanieN (talk) 19:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by dynamic IPs. Buffaboy talk 12:14, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IP addresses have been removing and blanking content. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - (Talk) - 13:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:16, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sudden incoming alarming levels of vandalism, apparently arising from a Google Doodle about her which happened just today. Lemonreader (talk) 14:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should be enough time for the Doodle to be forgotten. Deor (talk) 17:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 16:25, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too infrequent for semi-protection--Ymblanter (talk) 17:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP block evasion. VQuakr (talk) 16:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple vandalism due to being TFA, see history. Asking for a one-day semi-protection. HaEr48 (talk) 17:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. —Unforgettableid (talk) 10:54, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined 11 years between creations...let's see if it really gets recreated again. Lectonar (talk) 11:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Harshil want to talk? 11:52, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, but infrequent vandalism. Rarely has any meaningful contributions otherwise. moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 14:26, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected. Favonian (talk) 16:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This page is already pending changes protected. This has not prevented editors from adding serious BLP violations which I cannot discuss publicly. You will notice in the past month the article has required several suppressing action from the oversight team. As one of the most public figures in the impeachment trial of Donald Trump, this vandalism is not going to stop any time soon. It will also likely continue in the next several years. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 14:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not comfortable with indef. The current political season will eventually pass, and I'd like for people to be able to assess this from a historical perspective when that happens. A year might not be enough, but we'll see if vandalism resumes 12 months from now or if we've all moved on to the next thing.  ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 15:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. The disruptive editor repeatedly disregards my questions or requests for explanations. Sakiv (talk) 17:40, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary. I'm following your way. What I recently added is not disruptive editing. About the time I didn't know.--79.34.216.248 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Socks trampling over each other without detection for over 2 weeks. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 08:02, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2 users already blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:04, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chengdu&type=revision&diff=936924322&oldid=933481114 Socks trampling over] each other in the past two weeks, undetected for most of that stretch. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 08:04, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism due to recent death. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:47, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs making large and drastic changes without references or explanation. Trivialist (talk) 23:07, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Trivialist: There are only two IPs doing this, so probably an issue better handled with blocks than page protection. I blocked the IPv6 editor, but the IPv4 editor hasn't been warned. If they continue to disrupt, I would recommend warning them and then taking it to WP:AIV or WP:ANEW as needed. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:47, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. As above. Lectonar (talk) 06:37, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Autoconfirmed has been failed. Editors are removing properly sourced details of this controversial Indian Baba. Please take them upto ECP. . Harshil want to talk? 04:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Wikipedia articles usually can not be used as sources for other articles. Lectonar (talk) 06:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: subject was tonight involved in a chair-swinging basketball brawl that went viral and has now spread to his WP:BLP. NedFausa (talk) 04:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – An Australian user keeps replacing Russi Taylor with Jennifer Hale without a valid reason. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 06:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:52, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP consistently returning to add information (details of vision loss accident involving son) that is not present in the citation provided. IP also modified the citation's headline. The IP is claiming they are a family member and that they have "inside information". Eostrix (talk) 06:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same IP since December 18th. Lectonar (talk) 06:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Kskhh (talk) 18:34, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm only seeing one disruptive IP edit in the past two weeks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Resumed less than ten minutes after end of previous protection. CatcherStorm talk 02:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 06:44, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Per WP:DENY. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:26, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by GorillaWarfare. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:45, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Might be MRY. Ping El C. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Walang Forever Boy (talk · contribs) blocked by EvergreenFir. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Ionmars10 (talk) 20:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The page has had pending changes protection for a significant period in the past, but the problem has resumed since protection expired. Given the popularity of the subject it may just need low-level protection fairly permanently. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/BMX vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:14, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page subjected to WP:BLP violations due to subject's prominence in Trump impeachment trial. NedFausa (talk) 02:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Interstellarity (talk) 20:14, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is done, it may be wise to also protect my userpage, as it's the next most immediate target after my talkpage. moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 20:22, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Interstellarity, Now that I've thought a bit more about this, I think this is a bad idea. I need to be able to hold a conversation even with the newest users on my talk page. moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 20:42, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Moonythedwarf: Let's see what an admin thinks. Sometimes admins protect pages not necessarily to prevent constructive editors from editing the page, but to prevent disruptive editors to editing the page. Interstellarity (talk) 20:45, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Moonythedwarf, you sure pissed somebody off, which means you're probably doing a good job. I could protect it, but only if you feel it's necessary. I'd make it brief. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:58, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Muboshgu, I don't think it's necessary now, but I won't hesitate to contact you and/or relist my talk page should it get bad. moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 22:30, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Moonythedwarf, sounds good to me. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:57, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Muboshgu (talk) 22:57, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. -- Ishtirak (talk) 21:51, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has just come off its second protection and already had vandalism or unsourced fan desire/rumours additions from 7 users. I suggest before it escalates to the level it did last time it's locked down again as it appears to be attractive to fan cruft . KylieTastic (talk) 21:51, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That protection will last through the event itself, and hopefully vandalism will die down afterwards. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An IP has been adding unsourced editor interpretation, and reverting my removals of it, using more than one IP. I have reached out on his/her current IP talk page but would like the page protected in the meantime to avoid an edit war. — TAnthonyTalk 23:03, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection is not needed for an IP, but I have Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit warring by sock puppetry. Sirfurboy (talk) 13:56, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ETA: SPI is in place. Temporary protection being requested pending outcome. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 14:29, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 14:31, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent edit warring by sock puppets. Sirfurboy (talk) 13:58, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ETA: SPI is in place. Tempoprary protection being requested pending outcome. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 14:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 14:33, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:09, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:40, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. JTP (talkcontribs) 00:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:37, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs furiously adding any film with a Christmas connection (Die Hard, Iron Man 3'...) Trivialist (talk) 01:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term new editor and IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:47, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:56, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 116.33.83.190 (talk) has vandalized this page, and, please protect "Oh My!". Keyacom (💬 | 🖊) 19:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See article history, talk page discussion and this post on my talk. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:17, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

23 January 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User is suspected of WP:3RR which he has been done 2 times per 24 hours. Bryce M (talk) 15:23, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:55, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly changing Kiev to Kyiv by multiple ips and newly registered accounts. Dartslilly (talk) 15:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – That's actually not vandalism. "Kyiv" is closer to the Ukrainian spelling than Kiev is, so it's probably people attempting to improve the article. Anyway, the article already has pending changes configured so unnecessary changes can be rejected. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:52, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 94.64.96.165 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Cleanup template. InvalidOS (talk) 16:28, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very in the news at the moment, quite a bit of IP vandalism over the last few days. Temporary protection until it blows over. N0nsensical.system(err0r?)(.log) 09:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. There are disruptive edits by IPs, but also IPs who add positively to the article. The page is rather welll watched. Lectonar (talk) 10:38, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost the entire edit history of this article consists of one IP or another removing the word "fictional" from the first sentence, followed by another user reverting it. If not that, some other IP vandalism; the article seems to be a magnet for this. Of the last 250 edits, 79 indicate from their edit summary that they are reverting an edit or series of edits by an IP or new user - all that I checked were vandalous. As this means one or more vandalous edit, followed by a reversion, that totals at the very least 158 edits, and in all likelihood closer to or over 200, regarding vandalism that could have been avoided by semi-protection. Many more summaries (at least 20?) are connected with related page protection matters. This is not something that is going to go away with another temporary protection. Please can it be made indefinite to stem the large cumulative waste of time incurred?. Mutt Lunker (talk) 15:21, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:07, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Garflingo (talk · contribs) blocked by Reaper Eternal. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:42, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:21, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:12, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One instance of possible vandalism is not "persistent". Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:40, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Significant unnecessary edits from user:NEDOCHAN. Consistently engages in edit wars with other users too, reverting unnecessarily without any explanation. Gilbert.JW (talk) 18:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:39, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 18:36, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Test edits and formatting mistakes are not vandalism. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:38, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Given recent news, please consider WP:ARBDS. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:37, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:36, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Pelmeen10 (talk) 19:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:35, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:32, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:54, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to disruptive editing. Sai Raghavendra Puranam (talk) 16:52, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:32, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:54, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to disruptive editing. Sai Raghavendra Puranam (talk) 16:52, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Inaccurate Edits and Vandalism. Edwardesanders (talk) 02:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: moved as a courtesy to new-user, I have no opinion on merit of the request. 2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D (talk) 02:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:50, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated IP removal of sourced material that complies with BLP. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:04, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is always the same IP, which has been blocked for the same cause before. Lectonar (talk) 10:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 14:50, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 14:56, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. —Unforgettableid (talk) 10:54, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined 11 years between creations...let's see if it really gets recreated again. Lectonar (talk) 11:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dear admins: Perhaps the main reason why it hung around for so many years between creations is because it took us so many years to finally delete the article after its third creation. It's a small for-profit school, of questionable quality, which might never become notable. But I think it's quite possible that (now that the article has been deleted) the owner will eventually notice and create the article a fourth time. Which (like for any non-notable school) might force yet another long and time-consuming AfD debate. Any thoughts? Kind regards, —Unforgettableid (talk) 03:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~Swarm~ {sting} 03:35, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting increase in protection due to recurring vandalism over past week. Page was most recently protected on 13 January; all edits since that protection expired have been vandalism and reverts thereof. Dmoore5556 (talk) 05:11, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:20, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I am asking for the current protection to be reduced time-wise, not sure why it's currently set until June 2020. Secondly, not sure why move protection is set for admin only, since there hasn't been any move vandalism as best as I can tell and I tried to do an advanced page move but wasn't able to do it. So I think an autoconfirmed page protection for maybe a week or so more until the new name change news dies down would be appropriate, and maybe a page move for either autoconfirmed or page-mover if you can do that in the system would work. Thanks, Sir Joseph (talk) 02:52, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done I, the protecting admin, have removed it after being notified on my talk page. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing (addition of unsourced content). Citobun (talk) 02:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:24, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There are personal attacks being posted by anonymous accounts. Kaltenmeyer (talk) 02:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:28, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 02:58, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: IP numbers have repeatedly over extended periods made small edits that try to describe her as "liberal" when she is "conservative". These edits are hard to pick up on, and it would help to have semi-protection. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 02:51, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 03:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 03:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ip address has been continuously disruptive editing the article by adding WP:COPYVIO and WP:SYNTH non-stop despite final warning. — YoungForever(talk) 21:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.--BlameRuiner (talk) 21:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 23:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption from multiple IPs based in the same area. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/207.206.238.37 and the ranges Special:Contributions/207.206.238.0/24 and Special:Contributions/2601:183:C600:20A:0:0:0:0/64. . Binksternet (talk) 22:23, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 00:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and possible sock puppetry.--DragoMynaa (Talk) 22:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 23:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Due to repeated IP vandalism. GoodDay (talk) 23:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 00:04, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandalism. TheEpTic (talk) 20:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 23:43, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Planters has stated in kayfabe on social media that Mr. Peanut had "died", as a promotional stunt tied to an upcoming Super Bowl ad. Nonetheless, editors are modifying the lead to acknowledge the so-called "death", even as Planters stated to Advertising Age this may just be a comic book death. ViperSnake151  Talk  20:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 23:45, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 20:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 23:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GSK (talkedits) 22:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 23:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

24 January 2020

Extended confirmed: High level of IP vandalism – Some IPs tried to falsely add the date of birth of Junko Minagawa while correcting, protection is needed for 1 year to prevent them from re-adding in future editions. 148.0.126.176 (talk) 04:21, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I see only one or two problem edits from IP, while many IPs are editing constructively. MelanieN (talk) 01:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@MelanieN: Look even if you don't believe it, an IP removed the year of birth because it did not indicate the references and even so, users have long guessed the age of the Japanese voice actors, I also do not think they get their own data in the search for Google, Ann, MyAnimeList and IMDb to re-add it again. MelanieN does not believe that it will change the Extended confirmed for 1 year so that the IPs and users will edit again, thanks. 148.0.126.176 (talk) 02:34, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'll reply at your talk page since this report will soon be archived. -- MelanieN (talk) 06:25, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:50, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:32, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Low-intensity but persistent vandalism/disruption. — Vaibhavafro💬 14:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:34, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:54, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IP stopped disrupting after last warning. Lectonar (talk) 09:21, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Significant vandalism from IP editors since it has been in the news lately. Tdc42 (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Graham Beards. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP repeatedly adding unsourced "partner" to Infobox. Vistadan 11:27, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. As you say:the same IP. Lectonar (talk) 11:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP repeatedly replaces section with text from the organization's website. Robincantin (talk) 03:11, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. As you say: the same IP...Lectonar (talk) 08:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated uncited edits and rollbacks from same IP. Recent unfavourable news coverage being removed. PabloZ 03:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Yes, the same IP. Lectonar (talk) 08:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary or Indefinite Pending Changes: Infrequent but consistent additions of casualty statistics that are not cited, protection is requested for 3 months or more. JesusEatingTacos (talk) 08:50, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is too infrequent, just a couple of edits per year overall. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Edit warring IPs changing height. . N0nsensical.system(err0r?)(.log) 08:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:02, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page was protected against persistent vandalism on 2 December 2013 by admin Mark Arsten, whose user contributions show that he is inactive. Since there is presently no evidence of persistent vandalism, please remove this unnecessary protection. NedFausa (talk) 00:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined As there is from time to time (like now) a spike in disruptive editing, the pending-changes protection is of use. Lectonar (talk) 08:53, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Barneysss talk) 00:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:46, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:30, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:48, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Additions of uncompleted deal. Dat GuyTalkContribs 11:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:48, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  23:10, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:24, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  23:11, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same IP yesterday, before that no edits for about 10 days. Lectonar (talk) 08:25, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Adam9007 (talk) 00:19, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that User Adam9007 has made this request in order to prevent the removal of a violation of WP:BLP policy. If this continues, I shall raise the matter at WP:ANI. 165.120.15.119 (talk) 00:23, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The material the IP is removing from the article comes from an independent source. The IP has not explained why they feel the source is not reliable. —C.Fred (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The 'source' is a quiz mentioning the subjects in passing. 165.120.15.119 (talk) 00:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose full protection. Today's editing in no way constitutes vandalism and is questionable even as edit warring. This BLP should be unprotected ASAP. NedFausa (talk) 00:58, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Adam9007 (talk) 00:19, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that User Adam9007 has made this request in order to prevent the removal of a violation of WP:BLP policy. If this continues, I shall raise the matter at WP:ANI. 165.120.15.119 (talk) 00:24, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The material the IP is removing from the article comes from an independent source. The IP has not explained why they feel the source is not reliable. —C.Fred (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The 'source' is a quiz mentioning the subjects in passing. 165.120.15.119 (talk) 00:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of information in a partisan manner by an IP address. User refuses to discuss in the talk page despite being warned. AuburnShuffle (talk) 20:24, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent ban evasion. DannyS712 (talk) 23:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page targeted by IP socks of banned user. Spike 'em (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:18, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been created and A7'd multiple times. Hog Farm (talk) 04:32, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only recreated once. Lectonar (talk) 07:39, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created and A7'd multiple times. Hog Farm (talk) 04:33, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only recreated once. Lectonar (talk) 07:39, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created and A7'd multiple times. Hog Farm (talk) 04:34, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only recreated once. Lectonar (talk) 07:40, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page currently had protection but it seemed like something happened and it was removed. The page should have the protection put back do to it being a high traffic page. also The page is starting to get vandalized . Omeglesub (talk) 02:47, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request increase in protection as multiple IPs have been preemptively trying to change the current club to Inter Milan when nothing is confirmed yet. robertsky (talk) 05:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:58, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 07:24, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The sockmaster User:ShaynDiamond just targeted this article again.[35]. Wario-Man (talk) 07:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 09:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Sock puppetry might be involved too. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:08, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi should be enough for now; frequency of disruption not very high. Lectonar (talk) 08:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We have a current Subtropical Depression that has not officially been named yet. However, one IP is insisting that it has been and despite attempts to tell them otherwise continues to add it to the article.As a result of this and him IP hoping, I have to ask for the article to be protected. Jason Rees (talk) 01:17, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 08:46, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SangrurUser (talk) 01:27, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:47, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Random IP’s keeps putting unannounced information repeteadly. TheBigMan720 (talk) 02:33, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Lectonar (talk) 08:48, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of defamatory content and non-notable people to the page by new editors / IPs today. Dorsetonian (talk) 00:03, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant disruptive edits; four instances since the previous protection ended yesterday.
Alivardi (talk) 00:05, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:30, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive addition of honorifics violating WP:NCIN; MOS:HONORIFICS by multiple newly created users. See [36], [37], [38], [39]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:34, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:HarveyCarter. Binksternet (talk) 16:50, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 07:04, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent attempts to change the name of the article/how the article refers to the subject, by individuals employed by the subject, against talk page consensus, as a clear marketing strategy. ElAhrairah inspect damageberate 19:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 07:08, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected indefinitely. You didn't ask for move protection, but I could tell it was needed. MelanieN (talk) 07:11, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High continuous level of IP disruptive editing. The latest example of simply removing references with the tag Remove references.Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:04, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:35, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:12, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:50, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 09:10, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 06:48, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 09:10, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 06:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 09:10, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 06:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 07:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 09:10, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 06:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 09:10, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 06:44, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 09:10, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 06:46, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 09:10, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 06:47, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The article has existed for about five or six years. Throughout those five or six years, there's been a repeating pattern of likely-spammy edits by IPs and/or unconfirmed users. Possibly these users are SoulCycle staff. Please see, for example:

Since the disruptive editing has persisted for so many years, I think indefinite semi-protection would be better than temporary semi-protection. —Unforgettableid (talk) 03:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sorry, but one or two disruptions a year don't qualify for protection. Not even Pending Change protection.  MelanieN (talk) 01:33, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: High level of IP vandalism – Some IPs tried to falsely add the date of birth of Kae Araki while correcting, protection is needed for 1 year to prevent them from re-adding in future editions. 148.0.126.176 (talk) 04:21, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:35, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Automated comment: @MelanieN: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:59, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, bot, my error. Protected now. -- MelanieN (talk) 06:14, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: High level of IP vandalism – Some IPs tried to falsely add the date of birth of Michiko Neya while correcting, protection is needed for 1 year to prevent them from re-adding in future editions. 148.0.126.176 (talk) 04:21, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 06:11, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, pending changes does not seem to be helping. — TAnthonyTalk 06:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The PC protection will persist. MelanieN (talk) 02:39, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Interstellarity (talk) 11:21, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 23:51, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection until December 2023: Persistent disruptive editing of a biography of a living person. QatarComms (talk) 14:23, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, why December 2023, of all dates? El_C 23:54, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: High level of IP vandalism – Some IPs tried to falsely add the date of birth of Chie Nakamura while correcting, protection is needed for 1 year to prevent them from re-adding in future editions. 148.0.126.176 (talk) 04:21, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Amid a torrent of new information after the Luanda Leaks the page is attracting a lot of attention from IPs fooling around, making it tedious to go through each edit every day. Thanks. . Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 00:13, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:25, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing by various anons. Sakura CarteletTalk 01:11, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:25, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 09:12, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 09:13, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 09:13, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 09:13, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:50, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of User:Akisuto Zeniko. Areaseven (talk) 09:14, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:50, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Feel it should not be moved without discussion and find no talk page discussion. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:11, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. El_C 23:53, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

25 January 2020

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article about a British sex offender attracting unhelpful IP edits, mostly from outside the UK. Le Deluge (talk) 13:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. qedk (t c) 18:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. qedk (t c) 18:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IPs changing ordering for months; previously semi-protected for 3 days. — MarkH21talk 17:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. qedk (t c) 17:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of socking by User:Mwiner. Evidence is partly here[40] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 20:38, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:54, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. qedk (t c) 15:49, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over the unresolved content dispute has resumed. Adam9007 (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. qedk (t c) 15:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Somewhat frequent vandalism. I think that this article would benefit from pending changes protection. Clovermoss (talk) 19:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 20:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 11:59, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:20, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Red Phoenix talk 12:53, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Green Bionix (talk · contribs) blocked by Ritchie333. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:24, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon IPs making disruptive edits. Vjmlhds 15:13, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 18:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – page been subjected to much vandalism by ip / socking editors over past few weeks. Spike 'em (talk) 16:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:22, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 15:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term anon vandalism. . -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: There has been a content dispute for last couple of months. I gave up all my edits for a status quo, so I decide to go back to the earlier stable version back to September 2019. However, the other user keeps reverting the stable version, and insisting on his biased version. Bluesatellite (talk) 11:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 14:56, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Frequent vandalism in the last two weeks ([41], [42], [43], [44]), [45]), [46]), [47]), [48]), [49]), [50]), [51]), [52])).—J. M. (talk) 12:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 14:50, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism and BLP violations starting a few days ago. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 14:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Consistent high level of IP vandalism and unexplained mass-removals/renaming of list entries. (Mainly the same vandalism that was happening at List of programs broadcast by Nick Jr. until that page was semi-protected a year ago.) Hammill Ten (talk) 13:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:56, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Migsmigss (talk) 23:55, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Migsmigss: I understand that those articles are subject to a lot of silliness but more explanation is required for an uninvolved admin. For example, diff says "Unexplained deletion of part of full name; no RS to support such action" but the IP did explain and the only source that I can see agrees with the IP (the source is not what I would call reliable, but it appears to be all there is). Johnuniq (talk) 07:14, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gestrid subpages

Permanent semi-protection: Per WP:UPPROT. My other archive pages are already protected. Gestrid (talk) 03:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Gestrid: It looks like you have subpages User:Gestrid/Archive_N for N = 1 to 9, where each redirects to User:Gestrid. Why? Similarly, there are quite a lot of other user and user_talk subpages which are merely redirects. WP:UPROT says "may be protected upon a request from the user, as long as a need exists—pages in user space should not be automatically or pre-emptively protected." and I do not see evidence of vandalism which at any rate would need to be sustained to warrant protection. Johnuniq (talk) 08:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of ungrounded, biased and politically oriented changes. Corymbia42 (talk) 04:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Corymbia42: Sorry but it's not clear which IP edits warrant semi-protection per WP:SEMI. Because the topic involves climate change I'm sure your description applies to many of the edits at the article. About all you can do is add {{subst:alert|cc}} ~~~~ in a new section with a heading like "Climate change notification" at the talk page of any editor or IP who is disruptive. Johnuniq (talk) 09:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Non registered user manipulating information and no citation. . 649pardeep (talk) 14:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @649pardeep: Sorry but it's hard to see why the edits are vandalism. In diff the IP removed some text with edit summary "No mention in airline schedule". That needs a response, preferably with a new section at article talk explaining the issue. That would help the IP and an uninvolved admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pelmeen10 (talk) 17:47, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Pelmeen10: Sorry but it's hard to see why the edits are vandalism. An uninvolved admin cannot see why the IP edits are a problem. Your edit summary is either missing or "Rvv" but unfortunately that is not clear to others. Please put an explanation at article talk (last edited in 2016) and link to that in your next edit summary. Then repost if necessary. Johnuniq (talk) 07:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is being overrun by anonymous user changes. . Nemov (talk) 04:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:56, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP edits and reversions that ignore WP:ERFC. Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 22:21, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Might as well consider adding semi-protection to the rest of the candidates' pages as well. It's worth noting that some of the pages have extremely high volumes of edits. For example, just take a look at the page history of List of Elizabeth Warren 2020 presidential campaign endorsements. Removing poorly sourced entries is becoming a chore. Bobbychan193 (talk) 04:58, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: At the moment I would protect neither, because I see no real vandalism or too much disruption. I see disagreements about sources. And yes, I see a high level of edits by IPs (those are valued editors too, just as a reminder) which is to be expected, and indeed something we want. Not everyone knows about our sometimes rather byzantine policies. If another admin sees a need to protect: go right ahead. Lectonar (talk) 09:07, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Even though I can understand either side as pointed out by Global Cerebral Ischemia and Lectonar, I do think that semi-protecting all democratic primary candidates' pages will reduce the number of deletion/trash-adding wars. Of course we need to value IP editors but I'd prefer slowly changing but reliable Wikipedia pages over high volumes of edits. If the endorsements are real and publicly known, they will appear on Wikipedia eventually anyway. But if it's the case for Andrew Yang's page then I do think all other pages should be treated equally since all pages face similar issues. After all, politics is a sensitive topic with a lot of people being engaged. Stoepkrijtske (talk) 16:14, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, the suggestion that "we should semi-protect them all" is directly contradictory to Wikipedia policy. See the lead-in to our policy page on the subject: "Wikipedia is built around/with the principle that anyone can edit it, and it therefore aims to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing so that anyone can add material and correct errors. However, in some particular circumstances, because of a specifically identified likelihood of damage resulting if editing is left open, some individual pages may need to be subject to technical restrictions (often only temporary but sometimes indefinitely) on who is permitted to modify them." We even have a templated response to such suggestions: DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. We protect only when necessary for that particular page, and for as short a time as seems reasonable.  MelanieN (talk) 04:14, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by mutiple IP addresses. Clovermoss (talk) 23:59, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:15, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – So many cases of persistent vandalism on this article by different IP users and users of newly created accounts. DerDFB (talk) 01:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of anon IP vandalism of a vile and defamatory nature, essentially no constructive IP edits. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 06:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Harshil want to talk? 08:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP on a rampage. Actually I'm changing my mind. There's a few editors who are tag-teaming the IP who I think had a point; if you try and restore the material they reverted, you hit the edit filter for reinserting a WP:SPS. Which is what the others have been doing all this time. Will mention this at the talk. There's a discussion started on talk, but the IP has not few have chosen to join it. ——SN54129 15:34, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment:Full protection is not needed, but temporary semi-protection is needed. Perhaps the anons "have a point" but so far there is no protection, they simply delete what they do not like and ignore the talk page. The phrase about tag-teaming is definitely lacking AGF.--Nicoljaus (talk) 18:03, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I know it's the featured article of the day and more activity is to be expected, but it seems to be getting hit left and right today with vandalism and very few useful IP edits. Red Phoenix talk 18:15, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 18:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:04, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:55, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Migsmigss (talk) 23:53, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption from Massachusetts IPs. Block evasion by the ranges Special:Contributions/207.206.238.0/24 and Special:Contributions/2601:183:C600:20A:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 15:50, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:20, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Interstellarity (talk) 16:24, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The underlying PC protection will remain in place. MelanieN (talk) 04:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:33, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:27, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:34, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The underlying PC protection will remain in place. MelanieN (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 16:52, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dee03 16:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 18:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 02:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Really. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:39, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. and User(s) blocked. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:52, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – The article has a history of disruptive COI promotional/whitewashing edits by the article subject and his PR representatives. They are creating socks to edit through semiprotection, and we need better protection level. OrgoneBox (talk) 20:16, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I've warned the latest user who claims to be Montelongo's PR manager. Please report at WP:COIN or WP:ANI if they edit the page again. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry from a user who claims that the university is antisemitic. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 01:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected - 1 month. Apparent sockpuppetry. EdJohnston (talk) 02:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IPs and unconfirmed editors have been adding promotional external links to this article at least for the last one year. Some of these links would be live for 6 hours or so, as it took some time before active editors who are watching the page to notice the changes. robertsky (talk) 05:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., if it continues we can always increase the duration--Ymblanter (talk) 22:18, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Addition of unsourced content and general vandalism from multiple IPs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone? Reaper Eternal? Dat GuyTalkContribs 00:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:42, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting semi-protection for 1 day to prevent the IP editor from removing MfD and CSD tags until MfD/CSD conclude. Doug Mehus T·C 21:31, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined page has been deleted. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ivanvector, Thank you. Even better. Doug Mehus T·C 21:44, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring between several editors. Call to discuss was only answered by two of them. François Robere (talk) 22:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

26 January 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:00, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:29, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 14:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:28, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated IP vandalism since previous protection expired. IP range block might be required, since a rotating IP starting with 2601 is at the root of it. Echoedmyron (talk) 16:19, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. qedk (t c) 18:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of death hoax. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 21:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 21:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 21:17, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:23, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is an ongoing content dispute. The page protection will hasten reaching a consensus. Sakiv (talk) 22:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: Why was the stable revision before dispute not restored? The editor made obvious vandalism by removing references.--Sakiv (talk) 22:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sakiv: the version that got protected is the one which I immediately encountered. El_C 22:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: An IP user has been constantly editing the page (Vandalism) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.25.62.58 (talk) 11:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. OP range-blocked. Favonian (talk) 12:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:51, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Robvanvee 17:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 17:19, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is being targeted and there have been numerous reverts in recent days. The troll is probably the same one that was blocked two days ago as User:Disney1999 and other names. No Great Shaker (talk) 14:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC). No Great Shaker (talk) 14:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 14:52, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Disruptive editor keep reverting other editors and refusing to seek or abide by consensus. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 14:14, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 14:52, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive agenda-driven IP editor is repeatedly adding the race of the perpetrators to the lead section in a manner that would suggest it is relevant to the crime or the motivations for the crime. The editor has been warned and is ignoring invitations to discuss in the article talk page. Felchueef (talk) 04:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. qedk (t c) 06:15, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring from IP user with no sign of participating in discussion on talk page. lullabying (talk) 07:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. qedk (t c) 08:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 08:51, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued disruptive editing since previous protection ended a couple days ago. Alivardi (talk) 10:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 13:15, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content - IP users have been trying to change Iyer's father's ancestry without providing a supporting source. Dee03 10:55, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 13:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Previous semi-protection expired, persistent vandalism. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 01:50, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, for now. Previous protection did not expire. Acroterion lifted the protection to test the waters. Anyway, it's very actively edited, so there's bound to be some disruption. But can you demonstrate it is truly acute? El_C 02:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not seeing enough bad editing to merit protection right now, editors are doing a good job of regulating edits at the moment. Acroterion (talk) 02:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I only got to glance at the last day or so, but that is also my impression. El_C 02:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've done it for a day (before reading here tbh) just because of the shear volume of edits and a few bad actors. But please feel free to undo it El_C or Acroterion EvergreenFir (talk) 02:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
EvergreenFir, I have done so per the above. We're still in the stage of testing the waters, I think. El_C 02:41, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@El C, Acroterion, and EvergreenFir: What should occur at #Current requests for reduction in protection level below? There is a request there to reduce from semi-protection to pending changes protection on the basis that many desirable edits from IPs are now not occurring. I haven't looked at the situation. Johnuniq (talk) 02:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq: Works for me. There's not an easy solution here. Pending changes makes sense though. EvergreenFir (talk) 02:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Johnuniq, EvergreenFir, no there's too much volume for pending changes. Maybe in a few months (hopefully!). El_C 02:41, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Good; do you want to close the request below? Johnuniq (talk) 02:46, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. El_C 02:51, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Don't it's exist a protection that allow everyone that have an account ? Just to block peoples with ip's ? We can talk to account, even unexperenced but not really with ip's, specially thoses that get ip dynamically. That's my suggestion. --Eric1212 (talk) 02:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It was semi-protected. I removed it after editors expressed confidence that it could be dealt with by the editors working on the article. Nobody will be completely happy either way, but it appears that bad edits are being handled without protection, and the few really malicious edits can be dealt with via blocks. Acroterion (talk) 02:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The past protection was blocking both ip and unexperenced accounts. I was suggesting to block just ip. Following the edit, i think most "bad" edits are mistaked of understanding source. A protection regarding only ip would allow to get contributors knowing what they do and how to not repeat it in the future. But yes, we have a really fast paced situation there, data are nearly following a fibonacci curve... I think we all should expect mistakes, low sourced data and some troll inbetween and keep that in mind during next months. --Eric1212 (talk) 03:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We cannot just stop IP editing without stopping new accounts. Anyway the page is closely monitored so mistakes, poor editing and misunderstandings do not last long. Most edits have been well intentioned here. So no need to protect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:45, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 06:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. KH-1 (talk) 06:52, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 08:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A couple of vandal users have been blocked, but I have a feeling there are more where they came from. MelanieN (talk) 03:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and possible sockpuppetry – There has been an editor who is using multiple accounts to restore unsourced content in the article, by adding a producer who is not credited on the album's credits or supported by an reliable source [53] [54] [55] [56]. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 03:46, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 04:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPv6 editor adding unsourced and promotional edits to article. Ravensfire (talk) 04:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, both, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Sensitive subject – The article has a lot of sensitive topics in it, such as drug abuse, her pregnancy, her mental issues, etc and a vandalism on this can be very harmful. In case, I believe that Pending changes protection would be just enough to prevent any future vandalism/unwanted or unsourced changes. DaanaPlaato (talk) 16:26, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Galobtter (pingó mió) 00:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: For 24 hours. Article is on the front page, under attack from IP vandals. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:46, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From semi-protection to pending changes protection WP:PCPP. This page is well patrolled by editors and some of the latest and more reliable edits actually came from IP addresses/ unregistered users living in Asia. PenulisHantu (talk) 16:42, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

* Thanks. There've been multiple requests for valid edits in the talk page by unregistered users over the last day. Would reach out to Ivanvector. PenulisHantu (talk) 03:10, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think you mean me. I'm open to removing the protection, but it would be best if you opened a discussion on the talkpage first to see if other editors agree with you. I've been thanked by some for protecting, so I'm not convinced that your impression is widely shared. Acroterion (talk) 03:15, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected. Pending changes is not suited for articles with very high activity. Acroterion has lifted the protection to test the waters. El_C 02:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption by IP hopper adding fake titles and info. Trivialist (talk) 19:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption by IP hopper adding fake titles and info. Trivialist (talk) 19:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 20:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Inexperience editors keep putting false information and pending changes is not helping. TheBigMan720 (talk) 21:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:11, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term IP vandalism, BLP violations, and addition of unsourced content. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:13, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I'm aware of the seemingly odd request, but I would appreciate a temporary semi-protection of my talk page (about 2-3 months). It's been over a month since an IP-hopper keeps writing stuff less and less related to Wikipedia. I don't consider it harassment, but it starts to be annoying nevertheless. I told them twice that that's not a chat and I asked them to please stop once, but with limited results. Khruner (talk) 22:14, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Khruner: I protected it somewhat reluctantly because it looks like you responded to them a couple of times. However, it has to end. Johnuniq (talk) 02:15, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anons with whitewash agendas. Jorm (talk) 01:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is a level-5 vital article and GA article and hard to maintain from continuous Unknown IP edits. This article was a former FA article and because of the vandalism and disruptive editing the article lost its FA status over time. To make this article FA status again page protection will really help achieve that goal. J.Stalin S Talk 02:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 02:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. MPS1992 (talk) 18:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. qedk (t c) 18:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: The definitions for the terms in this article are based on a published and oft cited research paper. This paper has its own definitions for "democracy", "presidential", "semi-presidential", "parliamentary", etc. that are not the common-use definitions. This is similar to how the term "weight" is often misused in common speech but has a scientific definition.

After adding the table for this page based entirely on the work of this paper ("Democracy Dictatorship Revisited 2008), it has frequently been the victim of incorrect or politically motivated edits. The classification scheme for the Democracy Dictatorship Index is not subjective and is in fact outlined in this article. Despite this, numerous people have unknowingly made incorrect edits to the page.

In addition, this index was last updated in 2008. I have contacted personally the authors and they say an updated version in currently in the works. Because of it's 12 year time gap, it is possible that what the current classification would be differs greatly from the last reported classification. This has also caused many incorrect edits.

The most common edits are people changing the classification of a country based on their personal beliefs (common targets are Bangladesh, Thailand, and ESPECIALLY Singapore). The full protection of this article would stop edits from those who do not understand the Index's definitions. Olfbir (talk) 01:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This level of protection may seem extreme but many of the edits which I had to correct were done by auto confirmed accounts and not unregistered IPs. This level of protection is the only one which would effectively protect the article. As stated previously, it will not need to be edited again for the foreseeable future until the Index itself is updated.

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:47, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: subject in the news, a lot of back-and-forth (i.e, vandalism and reverting) going on right now. Please semi-protect for a few days. --bender235 (talk) 23:45, 25 January 2020 (UT

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

27 January 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various ips adding speculative, unconfirmed info about a transfer, Suggest semi-protection until 1 February (when transfer window is closed) . Valenciano (talk) 21:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: for 1 week; high level of IP vandalism BLP concern. Page previously had semi-protection applied by admin Lectonar from 24 January - 27 January once semi-protection expired and page reverted back to pending changes protection high levels of IP editing resumed. The IP editing is not beneficial and is putting and undue workload on pending changes reviewers as none of the IP edits are being approved by the pending changes reviewers. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 21:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:27, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP edit warrior is insisting on things their way without using the talk page. It's a slow burn edit war and I've asked them to use the talk page both in edit summary and on two of their talk pages. Several editors have reverted them, so hopefully a page lock will finally push them into a discussion. Thanks SchroCat (talk) 21:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:29, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple IPs, all the same editor, edit warring to include poorly sourced or unsourced content; non-defining categories. Likely editor Pedro8790 who was indeffed for sock puppetry using IPs. Ryk72 talk 14:36, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 20:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Anonymous editors have been making nonsense edits. I fear with the completion of Super Bowl LIV on Sunday people will move over here and try to cook up some stupidity on this page. Have been close to a WP:3RR violation a few times. Maybe protect for a week or so. Jdavi333 (talk) 17:16, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 20:27, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: same pointless changes have resumed after previous protections end. MarnetteD|Talk 17:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Kinu, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:08, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Content dispute/edit warring, sockpuppetry - it appears that an IP from someone mad about a complaint against them by the bio subject for copyright infringement is edit warring with multiple other IPs. 2605:E000:1701:C274:20CB:586B:13EE:F04C (talk) 19:15, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also Talk:Dario_Hunter#Be_aware_that_Dario_Hunter_is_trying_to_alter_his_biography_before_2020_rally and Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Dario_Hunter.
Multiple IPs within `2605:E000:1701:C274::/64` range is Dario Hunter himself trying to forge his biography before the rally.
So yes, please freeze the page in the state **before** `2605:E000:1701:C274::/64`'s edits
62.192.168.106 (talk) 19:59, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The user above - 62.192.168.106 - is the user at issue who has edit warred with multiple IPs, engaged in sockpuppetry, posted self-sourced materials (non-verifiable under Wiki guidelines) about a copyright dispute with Hunter directly to the article and its talk page, and even posted personal info about Hunter (personal email, phone number) to the talk page. It is suspected that he is the person Hunter's copyright complaint was against (clear COI). This user wants the page to be frozen to the point where he posted the non-verifiable, Wiki-standards violating info that has since been corrected. The user is also known as 93.185.28.40 (by his own admission in editing comments). 2605:E000:1701:C274:9803:E00A:68FB:FB82 (talk) 20:54, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly the other way around: it is 2605:E000:1701:C274::/64:
who posts self-sourced materials instead of historical material which had been preserved in web archives. He deleted links to archived material and replaced in with links to his own website, which contains the biography tailored to the political rally he is going to participate. Please restore the page in yesterday's state. 62.192.168.106 (talk) 22:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't care who is "right" or "wrong", so don't @ me saying I "protected the wrong version". Stop edit warring and hash it out on the talk page. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:08, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated claims by IPs of a contestant being disqualified despite the sources claiming otherwise. Dorsetonian (talk) 19:55, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:20, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs. Red Phoenix talk 21:06, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:22, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  14:30, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. SarahSV (talk) 20:18, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There's an edit-war happening between an IP user and an auto-confirmed user that's gone WAY past 3 reverts, but no discussion other than a talk page post talking about vandalism (it's not, but a content dispute). Requesting the full protection to force both sides to discuss rather than reporting to EWN which would end up with both blocked. Ravensfire (talk) 15:24, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. qedk (t c) 15:45, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: WP:DENY. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:29, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:28, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: At least one instance of vandalism occurring practically every week. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 11:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of edit warring and other problematic edits from new accounts, likely socks. This has always been a problematic topic area, and the problems intensified few months ago where a high profile contributor to this page got indeffed. Check edit history. I recommend the same type of semi that prevents relatively new accounts (i.e. socks with few weeks of edits) from jumping there, just like we have stabilized the Home Army (affected by the same recent plague of socks which seem to have moved to greener pastures, i.e. this article, let's nip this in the bud before it gets worse and take the toys away from the socks). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:46, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page is currently fully protected, re-request after protection lifts if a pattern of disruption appears that cannot be addressed by dispute resolution and or blocking problem users, N.J.A. | talk 12:04, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Detected vandalism from the IP address: 2409:4055:29F:E5DF:0:0:2E2:60A1 and 157.39.248.245. Removing a huge amount of contents continuously without discussion. Bakwas Drama (talk) 15:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. qedk (t c) 15:46, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... qedk (t c) 15:46, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Tampering box office figures right after protection expired. Two accounts created solely for the same. 2409:4073:80:C638:38DC:DCB7:8F5E:5205 (talk) 12:46, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 12:59, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 12:59, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ditto for Paramount Television Studios. El_C 13:02, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Kobe Bryant’s father. Lots of poor IP edits, including many that introduce wrong information with misleading edit summaries. Zagalejo^^^ 13:50, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 14:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content dispute, particularly by IPs adding the singer recently winning a Grammy award. There is a talk page entry talking about why she did not (even though she has a featured artist credit on the song in question). MPFitz1968 (talk) 11:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. N.J.A. | talk 12:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent recent and ongoing IP vandalism. Loopy30 (talk) 11:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. N.J.A. | talk 12:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated IP and new account additions of unsourced material to BLP. Gogolwold (talk) 12:15, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed Page has been subject to attempts at whitewashing for years by WP:UPE editors. For background, please see the talk page as well as This ANI thread and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurbaksh Chahal (2nd nomination).-- Deepfriedokra 09:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator El C. For one year. Lectonar (talk) 11:20, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Sure, it stands to reason the problems would still be there a year from now. El_C 11:23, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed once again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 11:08, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:22, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Harshil want to talk? 11:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:27, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Harshil want to talk? 11:28, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Addition of speculative content after the death of Kobe Bryant. The team announced that number would not be issued and editors assume that it is retired. Sabbatino (talk) 08:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed returned again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:51, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:45, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:13, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed once again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:47, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:16, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:38, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Two reverts is short of what I'd protect. If it does continue, let us know. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:36, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The actress was revealed to be playing an incarnation of The Doctor in tonight’s episode of Doctor Who, thinking that the article should be protected for the time being. Pahiy (talk) 02:30, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:39, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive IP edits and vandalism. KyleJoantalk 07:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:52, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 07:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:51, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Requesting increase in protection from pending changes. Gilbert.JW (talk) 07:49, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:55, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Some socks vandalizing the past day or so. -- LuK3 (Talk) 04:04, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. The article just came off of a three year protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:08, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Sakiv (talk) 06:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 06:35, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gogolwold (talk) 07:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. qedk (t c) 07:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 07:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – extensive unsourced, probable COI IP. Gogolwold (talk) 07:12, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra 07:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP block evasion. Maybe 2 weeks this time around?. VQuakr (talk) 16:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:58, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This page has seen the addition of unsourced material from three new editors who are almost certainly affiliated with the candidate in question: 1, 2, 3. I request temporary semi-protection to prevent this WP:ADVOCACY. — Kawnhr (talk) 01:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:56, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism regarding the death of Kobe Bryant. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 05:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:27, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. KH-1 (talk) 05:51, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:55, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emergency Temporary page protection: Request for emergency assistance @QEDK: @Galobtter: or other page protectors, High volume of disruption to ongoing ufc events. Considering a new rule to allow temporary page protection for ongoing ufc events beforehand. Regice2020 (talk) 00:47, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Regice2020: There are a lot of edits but a few that I checked seem defensible. What is an example of a problem? Johnuniq (talk) 02:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your ping did not go through (don't know why). Most edits seem OK, we cannot place PC due to high rate of edits and putting semi is too harsh as lot of them are good edits. --qedk (t c) 06:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Regice2020 and QEDK: The pings did not work because they were added in a subsequent edit that only modified an existing paragraph; pings require the edit to include a new line (and four tildes). See Help:Fixing failed pings. Modulus12 (talk) 23:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cancel Request Regice2020 (talk) 00:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... El_C 05:56, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.ColinBear (Talk), 15:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Fuzheado | Talk 05:16, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

0s and 0s BC

Temporary semi-protection: Presistent vandalism. Warned an annoying IP not to add this into the article since other editors think it was useless and redundant. He ignored my warnings and went on with it. WildEric19 (talk) 18:42, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Fuzheado | Talk 05:18, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism; numerous attempt to add episode results before premiere date. --Another Believer (Talk) 01:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. SlitherioFan2016 (Talk/Contribs) 01:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:35, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated thrice. ミラP 02:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected – Muboshgu (talk) 04:39, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Adding so-far unconfirmed information about possible death. All articles are based on report from TMZ which the disagreeing editors edit war over. Dat GuyTalkContribs 19:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: can you cite a few diffs to support upping the protection to EC? El_C 22:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, at this time. El_C 01:22, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary increase protection: - Persistent random disruptive editing by Kobe Byrant fans. Regice2020 (talk) 00:30, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, again. Volume of disruption relative to number and frequency of edits does not warrant this action at this time. El_C 01:29, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:18, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:28, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP and puppet vandalism. User User:Matianian, a now blocked puppet of the blocked User:Эльбрус Казбекович, apparently an Armenian nationalist with fringe theories, inserted false claims in October 2019 dif. Since then, despite being reverted several times, he kept coming back with several IPs and fake accounts to insert the same text: dif 1, dif 2, dif 3, dif 4, and dif 5 Attar-Aram syria (talk) 03:43, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Short-term unsourced additions from IPs due to recent events. -- LuK3 (Talk) 04:16, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. R.I.P. Kobe. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:27, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce to semi-protection, There was no policy violating or bad faith editing involved. As per WP:GNG the crash would be notable even if Kobe was not involved. This article is mostly likely to undergo massive expansion while the topic is in current news. All technical details regarding the cause of the crash would be written on this page, not the Death of Kobe Bryant. Valoem talk contrib 23:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zzyzx11? El_C 23:11, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The issue had to do with editing warring as to whether to merge/redirect the page to Death of Kobe Bryant. It has nothing to do with WP:GNG. Full protection is warranted for edit warring between established users. Zzyzx11 (talk) 23:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, per the above. El_C 23:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Zzyzx11 and El_C I left a message on your talk page, I have no issue with the full protection, but only if the article is restored. This will however prevent further expansion when technical details involving the crash is released. Valoem talk contrib 23:38, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism recently. Gilbert.JW (talk) 16:36, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. IP vandalism is neither intense nor recent. - CorbieVreccan 23:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Current slew of requests for the main page to be protected. Hdjensofjfnen (Can I get a connection? Alternatively, trout me.) 20:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Would rather keep the article talk page open for as long as humanly possible. El_C 22:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I know this is pre-emptive with no recent vandalism yet but with Mr Bryant passing away today I'm sure it's just a matter of time until the trolls come out. Shearonink (talk) 22:53, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The page is already semiprotected indefinitely. El_C 23:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – In regard Kobe. John from Idegon (talk) 23:36, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant edit warring regarding the inclusion of flag icons currently, by IP hopping. Revers causing new edits ben hard to be saved due to edit conflicts. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Waters were tested but were found to be... troubled. El_C 00:23, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. It went OK for a while, but it's been getting worse. Acroterion (talk) 00:24, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, WP:BLP violations. Rev/deletion going back some hours is recommended. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:56, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieVreccan 23:23, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Highly visible page – Highly visible page for someone who just died, redirects trying to be made. A consensus should be made before people move it. Recommended it be admin protected. QueerFilmNerdtalk 22:15, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. El_C 22:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Highly visible and high traffic page. Semi so that the editing frenzy can die down. QueerFilmNerdtalk 22:17, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, for now. Has disruption become acute enough relative to overall activity? El_C 22:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: It wouldn't be a bad idea, I have reverted multiple IP vandal edits. funplussmart (talk) 22:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:33, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated additions of unsourced information by anonymous editors. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 22:38, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will consider PC once that protection expires (remind me). El_C 23:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

28 January 2020

No protection Persistent vandalism. PansyPita (talk) 08:04, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is a malformed request. The page is not currently protected and the one disruptive user has been blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Harshil want to talk? 08:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:29, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Despite being protected twice, disruptive edits and edit wars has begun again in the article soon after the protection expired.

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jetstreamer Talk 16:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. qedk (t c) 18:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alongside several other airline articles. El_C 19:36, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same edit (reservation number) by countless IPs. David Biddulph (talk) 18:53, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:33, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism. Chris (talk) 19:39, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 20:09, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated BLP violations by IP editors over the past few days . Ravensfire (talk) 19:49, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 20:06, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Despite being protected frw times, disruptive edits and vandalism by a lot of users are still being added on this page please for now please do it for permanent.

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 20:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or pending changes: most IP edits are from timewasters.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 09:34, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. qedk (t c) 16:18, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Footballer subject to press speculation re transfer causing vandalism and unsupported additions to BLP. Egghead06 (talk) 16:41, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 18:11, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive juvenile vandalism over last few days to page about footballer. Struway2 (talk) 16:55, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. This page just came off 2 years' protection. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of fictional/speculative clubs. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 07:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:29, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending-changes protection: Repeated vandalism related to current events. PraiseVivec (talk) 14:35, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. PraiseVivec (talk) 14:55, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:23, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism and BLP violations starting a few days ago. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:25, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 14:03, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Usual IP vandalism has returned. Brandmeistertalk 10:59, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. qedk (t c) 14:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – WP:DENY. IanDBeacon (talk) 12:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator 331dot. qedk (t c) 13:51, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... qedk (t c) 14:10, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and BLP violation. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 13:56, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every so often a new or "new" editor comes up with the novel idea of saying the Proud Boys aren't neo-fascist, and removed sourced content from a minor footnote of this page. Can we please protect the page and revert Rectipaedia's edits (who has been warned) as they are ignoring consensus by declaring there is no consensus simply because they don't agree with it?. JesseRafe (talk) 19:50, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 21:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated unsourced date changes by IP since September 2019. Robvanvee 04:34, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. qedk (t c) 07:45, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unreliable sources claiming he's been killed in a crash leading to IP BLP violations. Given the subject also disruptive edits coming in. Gogolwold (talk) 09:37, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 10:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Prone to vandalism by IPs. Scrooge200 (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent ignorance of MOS:DATERANGE and other Wikipedia style guidelines. livelikemusic talk! 00:02, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This needs to be addressed to the editor(s) concerned first. Protection is used only to deal with pervasive disruptive editing when other lesser measures have either failed or the matter is so serious that common sense demands immediate intervention. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:18, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nardog (talk) 01:12, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 07:38, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Doesn't seem like something that new accounts should be able to edit. Has been vandalised, disrupting Talk:Main Page in the process, twice in the past month. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 03:15, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. qedk (t c) 07:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – controversial figure, recently in the news. Multiple attempts at vandalism have been reverted today. Rusf10 (talk) 05:23, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 07:36, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 07:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. qedk (t c) 07:34, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 07:34, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – See edit history, specifically edit summary by JBW on 1/20/2020 and then the resumption of disruptive editing that began today. MB 22:23, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @MB: I'm unclear as to whether all of the editing by the IP over the last 24 hrs is disruptive. If it is not, what is the basis of this request? If it is, why has it not been reverted? Ad Orientem (talk) 00:15, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ad Orientem, all reverted now. Same pattern of adding excessive images, unsoured personal narratives, etc. MB 00:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 8760 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:29, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Adding in illegal links to watch the show illegally. Multiple users & ip addresses were warned but warnings ignored. It might be proactive to protect high profile award shows around the time they air in the media. FusionLord (talk) 00:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced and/or poorly sourced content by an edit-warring IP user. livelikemusic talk! 00:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Please protect this till it can be sourced. Thanks. Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 17:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forget it. I'll manage. I shouldn't have wasted my time Did I see four new people wanting to be admins this week? Where are they?-Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 18:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) @Roxy the dog: You posted this request under the section Current requests for reduction in protection level but according to the protection log admin Samsara applied indefinate pending changes protection on November 15, 2017. Are you wanting the protection increased to semi-protection or extended-confirmed protection? If so you might want to repost your request under the section Current requests for increase in protection level with the type of increased protection you are requesting and your reasoning for the increased protection. Admins are actively responding to requests in that section. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 21:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Samsara. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 21:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done Was posted in the increase protection section too, where I semiprotected it. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Muboshgu I wasn't sure what to do so I posted a duplicate request in the proper section myself after seeing the edit history. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 22:39, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmmm. Looks like Twinkle messed up. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 22:59, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

29 January 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant edit-warring without any discussion. . Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 17:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Manchester United have announced that they have agreed a deal with Sporting CP for the transfer of Bruno Fernandes, but their press release acknowledges the fact that the player has not yet passed a medical or signed a contract; therefore, the transfer is not complete and the editors who insist on changing his current club to Manchester United are incorrect. I recommend semi-protection until 1 February, after the transfer deadline has passed, by which point the transfer will have either been finalised or cancelled. – PeeJay 18:20, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:50, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:05, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: One week is sufficient to let RS verify if any truth. Issue is continuous inclusion of his purported death. No RS has made such claim. All articles are referencing statements from Russian Intelligence and Iranian State media. Pending changes is not sufficent and adding work for other editors. Slywriter (talk) 19:44, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:49, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism starting yesterday. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:19, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 17:24, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Temporary semi-protection didn't help as uncited fancruft from IP addresses quickly returned afterwards, so it should be indefinite this time. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 18:02, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 18:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:07, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 18:09, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – The article is about Bangladesh's one of the greatest athlete (cricketer) and this page is being disruptively edited by various IP and users which are often being difficult to revert. So, requesting for ECP . Sony R (talk) 11:20, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated additions of false cast information from attention seeking hoaxer, they've been persistent over the past couple of days. Ravensfire (talk) 14:54, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:10, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Long-term IP BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:17, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:08, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 09:02, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Fuzheado | Talk 10:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP and beginners vandalism. This article needs high security and must be at least 90% reliable, so strongly needs Indefinite Semi-protection. Thank you very much. Geografi (talk) 10:32, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fuzheado | Talk 10:54, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated addition of unsourced content by socks of Gounder vamsam. – Thjarkur (talk) 13:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  06:50, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 10:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Migsmigss (talk) 08:50, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Fuzheado | Talk 10:47, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An IP and now new editor continues to add content to the infobox, without sources or explanation. Hoping protection will bring the editor to the talk page here. I cannot imagine that there is much information to change in this article so a long lock should not be problematic. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:37, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor Ad Orientem (talk) 03:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Emk9 (talk) 03:23, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:49, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cause : War editing, for article and song
  • Cause : Repeated and excessed vandalism for the sandbox,

Manchesterunited1234, January 28, 2020. 18:44 (CEST)

Declined Insufficient activity to warrant protection. This should be in the section above. Johnuniq (talk) 05:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism of personal information in this biography article (unsourced changes in age and year of birth). Khestwol (talk) 17:09, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined One editor, relatively new. I've posted a caution on their talk page. If the problem persists after suitable warnings, report to WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Indefinite is needed because of the meme, for example Guy Standing (economist) or Norma Yeeting (redirected from Yeeting). Hddty (talk) 05:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It was six months last time so try doubling that first. Johnuniq (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protected since 2014 by now-former-administrator over naming dispute, which seems to have died off around 2015. Only 2 edit requests or talk page discussions since then have concerned the city's name and has ~150 watchers so any future disruption will not go unnoticed. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected If any problems occur, the edit and/or move semi-protection can be reinstated. Johnuniq (talk) 05:32, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP user with poor knowledge of English who refuses to learn basic Wikipedia rules and insists on adding incoherent machine-translated text to a fine article, ruining it.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:59, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Only a single IP is being used. We only protect if there's more than one. And that's not vandalism — those are good faith edits. They are just subpar. I've instructed them to refrain from that. El_C 23:39, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism resumed after semi-protection expired yesterday. Emk9 (talk) 03:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8760 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:45, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism resumed after semi-protection expired yesterday. Emk9 (talk) 03:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Authordom (talk) 13:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:49, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ωικιωαrrιorᑫᑫ1ᑫ 16:53, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:51, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I am concerned that it may not be possible to monitor the IP-hopper active on this page in terms of discretionary sanctions. To encourage account creation, could we temporarily IP-protect the page? Thanks. jps (talk) 20:14, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:58, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors keeps putting unsourced information repeatedly. TheBigMan720 (talk) 17:39, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. qedk (t c) 18:06, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The protection on the page is set to expire, but there has not been movement on the talkpage. I suggest extending it longer as I believe it possible that edit warring will break out as protection ends. jps (talk) 20:15, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. qedk (t c) 20:17, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced material from IPs. —KuyaBriBriTalk 22:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – This article receives distruptive edits somewhat frequently. I think pending changes would be beneficial for this article because of what is usually in these edits (and it sometimes takes awhile for it to be noticed and reverted). . Clovermoss (talk) 23:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

30 January 2020

Semi-protection: Inhuman, abusive comments left day by day: [59] and [60] from block evading vandal User:HankMoodyTZ who is using multiple IP ranges to evade his block. Some IP ranges were reported here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/HankMoodyTZ, but he uses many more IP ranges. Oleola (talk) 17:18, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. qedk (t c) 18:56, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 17:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ Amory (utc) 19:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dirkbb (talk) 18:37, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 20:52, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary increase page protection: Persistent vandalism. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 21:21, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. GABgab 22:13, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Anonymous IP user with shifting IP address keeps posting policy-violating (BLP, FORUM) post to a talk page despite being reverted 3 times. Shifting IP makes warning impossible, and user appears to not understand WP policy nor reads edit summaries. A short term semi-protect would get the point across.Legitimus (talk) 11:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 week. EdJohnston (talk) 20:34, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term but constant IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 18:51, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Many IPs adding unsourced content, along with BLP violations and obvious vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:49, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 18:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LG-Gunther :  Talk  13:13, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. qedk (t c) 14:27, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started (again) as soon as page protection removed. --Another Believer (Talk) 16:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:04, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:07, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:13, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. Dialectric (talk) 15:10, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppet vandalism resumed on expiry of previous protection - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sreekumarps0. Cabayi (talk) 15:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 16:53, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In trade speculation. Request multi-month protection or until transaction is made. TM 16:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP who admits to having a conflict of interest continues to revert and change article despite refusing to provide a reliable source. Almy (talk) 01:58, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. qedk (t c) 10:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MrOllie (talk) 12:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:53, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think PC isn't going to help, considering the title is too similar to an all-too-familiar derogatory term that's been long protected for vandalism. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 14:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. qedk (t c) 16:48, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – 36 hours should be enough. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2604:3D09:6781:9700:C19B:60CA:53CD:8EC2 (talk · contribs).. Since it was a solo IP user, they were blocked and the article doesn't need protection. Fuzheado | Talk 09:51, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:04, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:27, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same IP vandalism from before a recent 14 day block has (surprise, surprise) started again. 11:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 12:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: It's tiring to be continuously reverting IP vandalism on this article. MewMeowth (talk) 12:18, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 13:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Over the past month, unsourced content has been added> There has also been one case of vandalsim. I think that this page should be temporarly pc protected to approve of unsourced material. . TFFfan (talk) 22:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Socking. ML 911 10:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 10:18, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 10:56, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - multiple escalating lengths of protection for mixed varieties of disruptive editing. If it reoccurs after this, indef protection may be suitable. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:02, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-protection: per WP:SILVERLOCK with a Persistent IP vandalism that seems to have increased over the last 20 days, with an even more frequent uptick in past 24-48 hours. The latest 24 hours, A few other editors and myself have reverted several IPs that are engaging in IP hopping. Evidence of IP hopping because the IPs continue adding similar vandalism but switch after a warning or two so no single IP has reached uw-vandalism4/block status. After reading through the talk page, it appears the page has been temp semi-protected multiple times, I recommend a perm semi-block or at minimum, extended temp semi protection. Bhockey10 (talk) 01:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 10:13, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Brojam (talk) 04:53, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Brojam: Long term, multi-IP problems for an article getting lots of interest warrants longer block. Fuzheado | Talk 10:04, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:43, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Multiple red-linked users adding dubious content over many weeks warrants an attempt to use pending changes. Fuzheado | Talk 09:58, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple IPs continue to delete information and add false claims about Frank West in Dead by Daylight to all three pages over the last month. There is an open SPI case located at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FrankWestDbD. Cyberlink420 (talk) 06:02, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previously semi-protected for a week. Recent multi-week, multi-IP vandalism warrants longer block as SPI proceeds. Fuzheado | Talk 09:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frederickberman (talk) 09:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 10:10, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The vandalism on this page is blatant and persistent; pending changes usually addresses sporadic and subtle vandalism. only two of the last 50 edits have been something other than vandalism or reversion. Hydromania (talk) 06:50, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Hydromania: The volume and diversity of persistent vandalism warrants a long term semi-protection given how many short-term protections were performed in the past. Fuzheado | Talk 09:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Launchballer 08:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Persistent indeed. Previously it was 1 week and 1 month semi-protected, so with current levels of new vandalism 3 months is warranted. Fuzheado | Talk 09:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please protect this page until 9 February (the day after the elections) to prevent further ado about their ideology. The Banner talk 09:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. From the current activity, semi-protection should suffice. If full protection (fairly unusual) is needed, feel free to come back to submit that request. Fuzheado | Talk 09:38, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring. © Tbhotch (en-3). 23:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done, for two weeks--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Almy (talk) 01:52, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 05:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism and unsourced material. Saucy[talkcontribs] 07:51, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Fuzheado | Talk 00:53, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:19, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Fuzheado | Talk 00:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Neil S. Walker (talk) 20:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fuzheado | Talk 01:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Fuzheado: Look again; this article is being spammed with external links to loan agents. I'm not saying you haven't examined the individual diffs, but I am saying you haven't looked hard enough. Neil S. Walker (talk) 01:17, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Rob (talk)

Note: Protection only expired a couple of days ago and already it is being vandalised. Article is a magnet for bigots and vandals. Suggest a longer period of protection. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 01:29, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued vandalism/edit warring/WP:DE. Main IP in question has already been reported. Magitroopa (talk) 00:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Although the recent misbehaving IP has been blocked, there is continual IP vandalism on this article, justifying the longer term semi protection. Fuzheado | Talk 01:25, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Per the page history, a hopping ip continues to vandalize the article with this edit [61]. SamHolt6 (talk) 01:48, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 02:49, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Brojam (talk) 21:37, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 01:03, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection This article has been subject to COI disruption since I can remember, there have been discussions at noticeboards as well, including disrupted RFC. This still persists from multiple IP addresses... Thanks, —PaleoNeonate21:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 01:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: one (or more) IP editor(s) keep adding unsourced content (listing Loubet/Landais as driving a Hyundai). Mclarenfan17 (talk) 22:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 01:06, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The pending changes protection for this page is insufficient given the high quantity of disruptive editing. It creates a lot of work for reviewers and clogs up the page history. Sdkb (talk) 22:26, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Volume of vandalism from IPs justifies going beyond pending changes. Turning on for one month for now, but may justify a longer term protection. Fuzheado | Talk 01:13, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing by socks of User:Geronikolakis. SPI is opened. Austronesier (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: (Non-administrator observation) Seems like there are some users to be blocked here. Also, with disruption resuming immediately after the ECP expired, I'd say ECP for a week and semi for a week after that would be reasonable. InvalidOS (talk) 14:24, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. qedk (t c) 18:07, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Pending changes seems to be working as intended. El_C 19:47, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Troy is repeatedly being called homophobic (and referred to by other BLP-violating terms) in the Wikipedia article. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 23:27, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 01:00, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

31 January 2020

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Red Phoenix talk 12:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too infrequent for semi--Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Migsmigss (talk) 13:02, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism and BLP violations amid current events. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:39, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Bobherry Talk Edits 14:00, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 18:16, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 💴Money💶💵emoji💷Talk💸Help out at CCI! 15:17, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 18:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and changes to lead without consensus. Funcrunch (talk) 16:44, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 18:09, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP. ZH8000 (talk) 17:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 18:15, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 11:39, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:08, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:29, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:38, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:59, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:20, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 11:31, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. N.J.A. | talk 12:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clickHereToGoToMyUserPage (talk) 13:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lectonar. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 15:17, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, for weeks. This may be the third time I've requested page protection, following long term edit warring. To insert the word 'ravioli.' 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:15, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Although the single IP that was doing the vandalizing is blocked, semi-protecting this since there has been a pattern of other IPs. Fuzheado | Talk 10:59, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – FA article test edits (good faith and otherwise). ~ Elias Z. (talkallam) 08:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 10:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is attracting a lot of drive-by IP vandalism in the run-up to an election. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 10:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs coming in and vandalizing in the past 24hrs. Jerod Lycett (talk) 01:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:21, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Not too familiar with the article content but I am seeing multiple IPs adding unsourced material. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:41, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 10:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lakota standardized spelling

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Have warned the (same) IP user multiple times, but their IP changes daily. Refuses to open dialogue on talkpage. oncamera 03:46, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 10:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs adding unsourced content, blanking, and POV violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:55, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dekimasuよ! 08:39, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism/disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 04:49, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 10:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent race-related vandalism by IPs. Alivardi (talk) 22:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah: Just had another IP vandalise the article 15 minutes ago. I'm still thinking a temporary protection would be more appropriate here.
Alivardi (talk) 01:34, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Alivardi - Dang it, the user switched IP ranges... alright,  Done. Semi-protected for 3 days. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:35, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NASCARfan0548  01:57, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Liz Read! Talk! 04:29, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/NS vandalism from multiple IPs after previous protection expiration. -- LuK3 (Talk) 04:28, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:22, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/NS vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 04:38, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:22, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Highly controversial subject. Editors are removing details and many times tag bombing is being done. Edit war type of situation happens regularly. Kindly take it to full protection. If some content needs to be posted then will do with t/p consensus. . Harshil want to talk? 10:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Not yet. I do see some reverting that took place a few days ago, but it doesn't appear to be occurring today... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:18, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. I attended a seminar in which the subject was a panelist. When I asked to take his picture for Wikipedia, he ranted and raved about how his article has been vandalized and the Foundation had been unhelpful. I investigated the situation and found it's more complicated that I first understood. The subject has edited his own article at least under two user accounts: thrice in 2011 as Ffigliuzzi, and once in 2017 as Cffigliuzzi. Starting in August 2019, there has been some vandalism: 1, 2, 3, 4, all by IP anonymous, SPA users, in late 2019. I interpret his request as a request for semi-protection. If you need proof that I talked to him in person yesterday, I can email you the evidence. Bearian (talk) 20:02, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:36, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary increase page protection: Persistent ongoing disruption everyday. We want to fix page but it pretty much not allowing us smoothly polish the page up. 1 2 (pretty much you see it in the edit history) Regice2020 (talk) 21:02, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Semi-protection is working fine. Any "disruption" I'm seeing (with the exception of one instance of vandalism by a now-blocked account) is content-related. See dispute resolution. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:46, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring by an IP against multiple registered editors. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 21:39, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism. Clovermoss (talk) 22:51, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:49, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and general disruption since previous protection expired. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:13, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been vandalized a lot recently. The article is today's featured article. Clovermoss (talk) 23:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to recent transfer rumors. Nehme1499 (talk) 00:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still a vandalism target by IP editors. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 00:11, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IP addresses have been continuously vandalizing the page nonstop by changing the episode title of the final episode of the series to a nonsense episode title. — YoungForever(talk) 00:21, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mazca. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, disruptive edits and personal attacks in edit summaries. Tærkast (Discuss) 17:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – It appears that the dispute over duplication of Sun Yat-Sen has been resolved. (The entry was, in fact, duplicated). There are no IP edits since 8 January, so unsure what that is about. One editor did use bad words in edit summary. Let's hope it doesn't recur. EdJohnston (talk) 21:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Rjensen (talk) 20:27, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protections: Multiple IPs (likely one person) edit-warring to add an inappropriate infobox parameter. (Not a content dispute - consensus is clearly not to have it.) Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:40, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:38, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Emk9 (talk) 20:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:42, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I warned y'all and it came to pass. The edit warring seems to have returned. Please protect. jps (talk) 21:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Repeat request for full protection due to edit warring about the ideology. Repeated removal of sourced info. Protection to 9 February (the day after the elections) will do. This edit makes clear why semi-protection is not enough. The Banner talk 12:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: (Non-administrator observation) Less than 8 hours have passed since the page was protected. @Fuzheado: Pinging protecting admin. InvalidOS (talk) 16:31, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Consider filing at WP:AN3 if you see continuing problems. The edit rate is not fast enough to justify protection. The requester, User:The Banner, might post something on the talk page if this is being often reverted. EdJohnston (talk) 21:10, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of un/poorly-sourced promotional content by an apparently undeclared paid editor (Mmizeasrm); said user is now using an IP address to add the same content. See relevant discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#21:15:36,_29_January_2020_review_of_submission_by_Mmizeasrm and User_talk:Robert_McClenon#Request_on_13:55:45,_30_January_2020_for_assistance_on_AfC_submission_by_Mmizeasrm, and User_talk:Mmizeasrm. Dorsetonian (talk) 18:12, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cullen328. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:19, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection (e.g. for a few days). Someone a while back (without discussion and without anyone apparently noticing until a couple of days ago) injected a bogus requirement to put hypocorisms (shortened names like Will for William) into quotation marks as if they are nicknames (like "Killer" or "Philadelphia Fatty"). This appears to be tied to editwarring at Tina Fey, and a (strongly resisted) desire to inject Tina Fey into MoS as an example of how hypocorisms "must" be treated. But this not only does not have consensus, it's the exact opposite, since it is not how we deal with hypocorisms. (When's the last time you saw 'William Jefferson Clinton, better known as "Bill" Clinton'?) While Tina Fey can maybe tolerate some back-and-forth revert-warring, a site-wide guideline cannot, especially when the entire matter is under extensive discussion on the talk page, here. This needs to stop, now, until that matter is consensus-resolved. This is basically an attempt to WP:WIN a silly style dispute at the Fey article by using WP:FAITACCOMPLI to change the rule in the background, to make the guideline say what the minority position in the article-level dispute wishes it said. PS: I have no objection to also locking down the Fey article for the interim, but suspect that wouldn't be necessary.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  18:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. I understand that the talk page is hosting a major discussion about this issue, but I don't see any edit warring or actual disruption occurring on the Manual of Style page at this time and where full protection is needed. Remember that protection should be applied as a reactive measure, and (if it can be helped) not in a preventative measure. I do see back-and-forth reverting over on Tina Fey, and like you said, it's not to the level where protection is needed. I also agree that policy and guideline pages should not be disrupted or messed with, and need to be stable in order for them to do their proper job. Hence, I'm okay with applying indefinite semi-protection due to the issues, but I can't fully protect it unless a current situation calls for it. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:27, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: An editor is making sweeping changes on the article that can be disputable. Please fully protect the article to encourage discussion at the talk page. Koraskadi (talk) 19:43, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:28, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's a persistent vandalism from a user hiding behind multiple IPs. Over the last 2 weeks, they've used the following IPs to add back the same false content: 98.22.231.142, 50.96.34.251, 174.130.206.195, 98.21.58.194, 98.22.228.30, 98.22.228.214. Starforce13 19:52, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also applied range blocks to 98.21.56.0/22 and 98.22.228.0/22 for one week due to the repeated disruption to the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:35, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]