Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2020/09
- 2020
This page is an archive of past discussions from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to request page protection, please do so at WP:RFPP.
01 September 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since August 18 user(s) from the range 2806:107e:1e:26a5:d2e:2e7d:c6d7:5242/50 (talk · contribs) have been adding that Ruiz was a National Action Party (Mexico) member, something that is false[1], he was a member of the Institutional Revolutionary Party[2]. © Tbhotch™ 18:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 19:26, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP immediately resumed edit warring their synthesis into the article after the last protection expired. This categorization has already been rejected on Talk. Crossroads -talk- 22:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- I gave a final warning to the IP who keeps reinstating the content (and I see another who has restored it in the past); blocking those two IPs (if they continue edit-warring) should be sufficient. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:40, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Declined stale report; template added for the bot (non-admin closure) © Tbhotch™ 19:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 00:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- The primary vandal has been rangeblocked for a long spell, as well as an accomplice. I'm monitoring, and will protect if more IPs make similar attempts. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 19:21, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 01:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Rangeblocked the Dreamworks LTA for a year (was targeting quite a few other articles as well). That should quash most of it. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:44, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 19:21, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:38, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- So far, it looks like this can be handled by selective blocks; IP is already blocked, and can be reblocked if they resume. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:41, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 19:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 12:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Rangeblocked and IP for a month. If more crop up, let me know. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 19:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Rangeblocked 41.114.0.0/17 for a couple of weeks. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 19:23, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IP user who insists that Disney should be credited as distributor due to its recent acquisition of 20th Century Fox. Areaseven (talk) 14:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- I rangeblocked 2001:e60:3170::/44 for a week, as they were making the same edits on other articles. Not sure why people get so obsessed with distributors, not the first time I've seen such silly edit-warring. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 19:23, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Pierce Brothers Westwood Village Memorial Park and Mortuary (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More specifically, persistent addition of personal commentary. To be honest, I'm amazed nobody else has requested protection yet. Thegreatluigi (talk) 18:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Not done, easily handled via a rangeblock of the IP for a long spell. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 19:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Paisarepa (talk) 17:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: It is today's Google Doodle & we are starting to see IP vandalism & test edits, but there are some good IP edits, too. I think a day or two of pending changes protection would be sufficient. Peaceray (talk) 17:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transphobia/discrimination against non-binary people. Violations of WP:BLP. User:Namiba 19:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:47, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lots of venting and/or spamming of the page, some constructive edits but mostly trolls. TropicAces (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)tropicAces
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:49, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism trying to paint him in either a positive or negative light. Fluffy89502 (talk) 19:58, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:50, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TheTVExpert (talk) 20:15, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of disruption. JMHamo (talk) 20:50, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: No real reason to keep the redirect fully protected. Goose(Talk!) 01:55, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Unprotected Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: Should not be necessary anymore after 5 years. The account of the protecting admin was globally locked -- Heiko Gerber (talk) 17:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotected Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:58, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- List of Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign endorsements (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Just to stop the IPs from consistently vandalism on the description of people (removing comments that are “biased” instead of using the talk page). Thank you! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 02:20, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:14, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 20:33, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict, has seen questionable COI/POV editing from a new editor. (t · c) buidhe 12:37, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Done Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Saqib (talk) 15:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent unsourced birthplace changes [3] [4] [5]. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 16:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:32, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is incessant vandalism on this page, particularly around the abortion part of the premise. Many users have replaced "abortion" with phrases like "murdering" or "killing her child". At the very least, this page needs pending changes protection. Factfanatic1 (talk) 17:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 19:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Another User:0lesson spam target. Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:14, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:58, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Already done by administrator EvergreenFir. Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: Protecting admin User:Beetstra was involved in a content dispute with other editors over inclusion criteria for databases on the list of time series databases in the article. When another editor repeatedly added a database that Beetstra didn't feel was appropriate to add in, Beetstra fully protected the page for six months. [6] [7] He's pretty clearly WP:INVOLVED here so I'm asking that this protection be lifted and an uninvolved administrator determine what, if any, protection level should be applied to the article. Protecting admin declined unprotection request here. [8]. Chess (talk) (please use {{ping|Chess}}
on reply) 05:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Chess, No, I have consistently performed maintenance and asked for references. Again, references were challenged and another edit war ensued. I have therefore reprotected the page. I will get you the list in a moment. Dirk Beetstra T C 05:35, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- The list (which is actually already years old, and where those without article and no references to show that they are worth mentioning are removed). The latest 'edit war' is here:
- removal by MrOllie - "clean list"
- reversal of cleaning by Kigelim - "TimeScale and OpenTSDB are major timeseries dbs" - no references supplied.
- re-removal by MrOllie - "recleaning list per WP:WTAF"
- reversal by IP 1
- re-removal by MrOllie
- reversal by IP 2
- re-removal by me - "If someone is challenging additions, then it is time to take it to talk. Claims like 'top player' need strong sources, and apparently that is what is challenged" (note: it is almost continuously discussed on talk)
- re-insertion by IP 3 of TimeScaleDB - no references supplied
- reversion by me
- reversal by Paul.wehland
- re-removal by MrOllie
- re-insertion by Paul.wehland
- re-removal by Meters
- re-insertion by Paul.wehland
- re-removal by Meters
- Because of this ongoing edit-war of previously discussed and found insufficient sourcing I have re-protected the article to stop these ever continuing edit wars. This article is continuously edited by what I start to suspect are sockpuppets (the number of new accounts and IPs that want TimeScaleDB in that list is massive)
- Courtesy pinging: @MrOllie, Kigelim, Paul.wehland, and Meters: from the last set of edits, @GermanJoe: who has been reverting these additions in the past.
- I agree, maybe it is time that this is brought to another forum or that we get more admins involved here, the pushing is at least 4 years old. --Dirk Beetstra T C 05:54, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe we could consider lowering to extended confirmed, but confirmed does not seem enough. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- I'm surprised to see that this article was fully protected, and for six months at that. I'm not familiar with the past history of this article (I believe my only involvement was the last two removals of a DB that had no article, just a bad draft with no independent refs and not even a claim of notability when I looked at it), but it looks like extended confirmed would handle most (maybe all?) of the editors adding challenged material. Dirk Beetstra, I think the issue of whether you are an involved admin here is a valid concern. Over the last four years you have made multiple removals of content, and extensive comments on the talk page about what should be listed. Meters (talk) 10:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Meters, I understand the remark regarding 'involved', but I remain that all the reversions are because of spam additions, coi additions, pushing of information without being able to show why it should be included. This is the last year worth of edits (54 edits), this is a block of edits of between August 2016 and September 2018 (212 edits, 79 editors). Both blocks do not substantially change anything in the document (in the 126 edits between September 2018 and August 2019 there was a rewrite of the prose. The article is a continuous attraction for spam, coi edits, and, basically, fancruft.
- I agree with the extended confirmed. Dirk Beetstra T C 11:31, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- In this specific case you removed the exact database which you fully protected the article to prevent inclusion of, TimescaleDB. As an aside I believe you should consider not editing the article till some consensus is reached and should use edit requests as someone who's involved. Chess (talk) (please use
{{ping|Chess}}
on reply) 15:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)- Chess, as did a large number of other editors, and I removed several others. Go through the history. I even allowed the inclusion until someone else challenged the inclusion. No, though I know where you are coming from, I disagree with making this personal and no, these are administrative actions and these are not making me involved. Dirk Beetstra T C 18:11, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- In this specific case you removed the exact database which you fully protected the article to prevent inclusion of, TimescaleDB. As an aside I believe you should consider not editing the article till some consensus is reached and should use edit requests as someone who's involved. Chess (talk) (please use
- I'm surprised to see that this article was fully protected, and for six months at that. I'm not familiar with the past history of this article (I believe my only involvement was the last two removals of a DB that had no article, just a bad draft with no independent refs and not even a claim of notability when I looked at it), but it looks like extended confirmed would handle most (maybe all?) of the editors adding challenged material. Dirk Beetstra, I think the issue of whether you are an involved admin here is a valid concern. Over the last four years you have made multiple removals of content, and extensive comments on the talk page about what should be listed. Meters (talk) 10:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
I have lowered the protection level to extended confirmed. --Dirk Beetstra T C 18:31, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. for the bot (non-admin closure) © Tbhotch™ 19:33, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Sokolokondo (talk) 08:47, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see no recent vandalism in the history of the article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lots of IP users editing the page to hide the fact that he is a felon. Fluffy89502 (talk) 09:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There's been no vandalism for more than a week. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Moxy 🍁 02:15, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:19, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Note: The page is currently semi-protected. @Moxy: What are you asking for here? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Guess full protection now...pls see edit history.--Moxy 🍁 01:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Or at least extended confirmed ... just looking to see if this will happen faster than the sockpuppet investigation of Noncheitaly is taking. Largoplazo (talk) 03:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Noncheitaly indef'ed. Holding back on the IP range pending further development. Favonian (talk) 15:19, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: Received an extremely high amount of edit requests. Sysages (talk | contribs) 21:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Declined Noting that the seven or so recent requests have all been handled, I'd say that's a manageable amount of edit requests. The protection is set to expire in a few days. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Note: Looks like the SP is stopping unsourced or poorly sourced edits and declining edit requests with no clear intent. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Declined. Bot-friendly template. Protection appears to perform as intended. Favonian (talk) 15:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 09:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:40, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 10:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:20, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism since mid-July. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 15:37, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same vandalism by a string of IPs. David Biddulph (talk) 08:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism by anons and various accounts. Kleuske (talk) 10:55, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Euryalus. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended semi-protection: Short term semi-protection of the page has unfortunately not been effective as a deterrent to persistent sockpuppetry. Article was semi-protected by administrators in January 2020, October 2019, May 2019, and February 2019. We hoped they would not return, but extended protection is required. - AmericanHistorian (talk) 17:52, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:02, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I see there are low vandalism in this edit, why not requesting indefinite pending changes protection instead? 180.254.161.72 (talk) 22:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 06:20, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism taking place, including IP and new user vandalism, involving persistent removal of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view content and addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content, amongst other vandalism. Throughout the past week on regular occasions, there have been instances of people vandalising this article by removing content from reliable, published sources and adding WP:OR information into this article, even at some points the name of the article itself having been vandalised. (Please see the article's edit history and Talk:Australian Unemployed Workers' Union for more in-depth information regarding this.) I unfortunately have reason to believe this isn't going to end in the short-medium term. JayBee00 (talk) 10:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 07:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Fans of their former rival seem to come here on occasion to "fandalize" this article. The team is no longer in operation and it's unlikely that this article will change much and any such changes will likely be handled by long-time editors across several articles. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Yet another round of Scott The Woz-related vandalism. O.N.R. (talk) 00:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA IP disruption since previous protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:49, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Someone using a variety of different IPs has persistently added false claims that Lewis and her current husband are divorced. gnu57 00:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from IP hopping anon. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 00:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:47, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP and new account vandalism which resumed almost immediately after the expiry of the last semi-protection period. It's actually quite rare to get a good faith edit from an IP or new user on this page. Please at least consider permanent semi-protection, or at least make it longer than a few weeks. Note that this is a level 4 vital article, one of the most viewed chess articles with an average of 4000 views per day, and a GA. It is of interest beyond the world of chess geekery. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 00:58, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Editor2020 (talk) 02:23, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:38, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Not a page IP,s should be able to vandalize. Moxy 🍁 02:50, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:37, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The user who wants Happy Tree Friends to be bought by Universal is at it again. And I thought dealing with Joshua Raymond (whatever his name is) was bad enough. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 14:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs continue to add unsourced information at their will after pp expired. Ab207 (talk) 17:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandalism and LTA disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:19, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 20:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Salt at admin level for consistency with Draft:Amir Sarkosh, repeatedly recreated by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArmanAfifeh. Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Done Bot doesn't like template-protection here. Lectonar (talk) 07:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. And please consider blocking the IP rage from York, PA. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP socks of blocked user User:Drewpalazzolo and the just-blocked User:DrePalamob just won't stop here and at a number of Australian TV articles. Largoplazo (talk) 03:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Deadman137 (talk) 06:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:32, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism shortly after (the Grand Prix after) previous protection expired.
SSSB (talk) 10:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term LTA disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Editor2020 (talk) 02:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Unverified meme relating to family members spreading about page 62.31.81.43 (talk) 02:38, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 15:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. /64 blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 18:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 23:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from Swedish IP-hopping anon. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 21:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:13, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
02 September 2020
Semi-protection: High level of IP hijinks. Volunteer Marek 08:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Not doneUser already blocked. Amortias (T)(C) 17:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The obsessive Happy Tree Friends fan is at it again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ mazca talk 20:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Football player apparently in talks with an Indian club, causing IPs to assuming he is signing with them already and trying to update his club. NZFC(talk)(cont) 20:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ mazca talk 20:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent (three IPs in last 24 hours) WP:DERRY violatons. FDW777 (talk) 12:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Canterbury Tail. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Articles that suffer edit warring
- Ni no Kuni (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Dragon Quest XI (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Batangas City (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Baguio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary full protection: High level of content dispute/edit warring. There are a edit warring between users that I was tired. 180.242.45.27 (talk) 12:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding a transfer which has not happened. Kante4 (talk) 16:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent edit warring – Continued deletion of sourced information in an article against the reversions of multiple users restoring the stable version (see Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Exhibit C, and Exhibit D). Given the long-term nature of this behaviour, I would kindly request at least one-month with respect to full protection to allow the reverting user to work out his/her issues on the talk page. AnupamTalk 03:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constantly being vandalized due to the sensitive religious nature of this article. James Richards (talk) 05:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Spam magnet. For over a year the only edits are spam and reverts, with occasional bots tweaking something. Staszek Lem (talk) 06:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection:High level of vandalism. XRedParrot (talk) 06:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:03, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 16:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:12, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Not done Since the article has no references whatsoever, it is difficult to know if the added items are good faith additions or vandalism. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations, plus general NPOV and citation violations – General NPOV and V violations in almost every edit as Pavlou is quite a controversial figure. Been NPOV tagged for a while, article pretty much rewritten, now there's enduring attempts to add undue and largely unsourced commentary. Several misrepresentations and opinions being thrown in about Pavlou being suspended for his anti-CCP protesting, even though that had nothing to do with his suspension (which was based on racist comments he made online, in-person and claiming to be a spokesperson for UQ). Violations from mainly IPs but also a seemingly SPA. ItsPugle (please ping on reply) 07:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Major professional sports leagues in the United States and Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Sudden increase of multiple IP and new users spamming links. Yosemiter (talk) 14:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A few different editors adding unsourced additions regarding trade. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jerm (talk) 13:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs and newly created accounts. Tayi Arajakate Talk 05:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 07:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 08:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 11:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: The page has been the subject of persistent data vandalism (mostly capricious changes in population numbers—not attempts to reflect more current sources; inaccurate changes to City-Area correspondences; & reorderings of city size) from accounts set up mostly to vandalize Vellore-related articles. (Several related articles are the targets of similar vandalism.) I have been tracking this for a little over a year. The page has been semi-protected twice, most recently for a month in late 2019. The majority of edits since that time have been vandalism, reverted by myself or other editors. Looking through the changes log, it seems to me that this vandalism has been recurring since 2014. As this page is based on the 2011 Indian census and a new census will not happen until next year, there is unlikely to be much need for uncomfirmed users to update this until late 2021. Pathawi (talk) 21:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Pathawi: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:36, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 05:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs removing image for series with no explanation, other non-improvements. DonIago (talk) 20:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User keeps adding Jim Henson Pictures to the page. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One IP has been blocked and the other is trying to make good faith improvements. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 02:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The single vandal has had a final warning. If they return please report to WP:AIV. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple unconstructive IPs since Sat 29 Aug. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 22:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:03, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No real reason to be edited. © Tbhotch™ 00:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User keeps adding projects Jim Henson Pictures wasn't even involved with all. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User keeps adding Jim Henson Pictures to the page. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Timothy19 (talk) 03:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Short-term LTA disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 05:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Short-term LTA disruption, see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Kingshowman. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 05:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Slow but consistent additions of BLP violations and unsourced claims by IP editors since the page was created. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Clearly the year-long protection that expired at the end of July did not deter the IP hopping vandalism. Last resort is this. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - I'm hesitant to go indefinite without a broader consensus. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism since previous protection ended on August 30th. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. © Tbhotch™ 05:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 01:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:50, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Same protection as Sarkhosh, Amir due to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArmanAfifeh abuse. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:37, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:32, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. MelanieN (talk) 23:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism by multiple IPs. POLITANVM talk 21:41, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:03, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The Gordon Freeman obsessed user is at it again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:19, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Unsourced edits relating to unconfirmed trade reports. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 20:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:44, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and other disruptive editing. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 08:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. (user has been blocked) Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:38, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by non-autoconfirmed/confirmed users. Cairo2k18 (talk) 11:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. (by Ohnoitsjamie Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Past page protection has expired and the disrupting editing has continued. Most edits have been disruptive. Darth Flappy «Talk» 13:58, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. (user blocked by Glen) Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
edit-confirmed protection: Repeated IP and new editor vandalism. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:20, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Trivialist (talk) 22:38, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:20, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 23:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
03 September 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 15:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 16:58, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed protection: An autoconfirmed user is changing the content of the article unnecessarily. Vaishno Devi is an article about a Hindu goddess. The article used to share information about a temple of the same name. Later, an article "Vaishno Devi Temple" was created and the information about the temple was shifted there. That user is bringing the content of the temple back into the article about the goddess, which is creating confusion. I have explained the situation to the user but my efforts were useless. 245CMR (talk) 15:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. MelanieN (talk) 16:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption starting right back up after previous EC protection ended. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 21:35, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Namecruft vandalism long term. John from Idegon (talk) 14:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This cat was created a few times back in 2015, and recently was recreated. Current consensus is for a category such as this to be better suited as a list (at List of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. characters) and to use a category for original characters created from the series (Category:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. original characters). See this CfD from September 2015 as well. Favre1fan93 (talk) 14:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. MelanieN (talk) 16:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ 17:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:58, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The continued addition of incorrect or unsourced content by IP Address. I recommend this should be implemented until Monday, September 14 2020. Happily888 (talk) 05:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are editing the page to change the subject's description from a feminist to a white feminist, refer to her as a 'Karen to writers of color' etc. Paisarepa (talk) 07:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:23, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by accounts who repeatedly adding unneeded info in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruption by undisclosed paid editors trying to insert promotional content. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 13:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. SarahSV (talk) 16:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors have repeatedly vandalized or disrupted this article since at least June. Scorpions13256 (talk) 07:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism from a few different IPs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ongoing disruptive editing in BLP. Joeyconnick (talk) 03:23, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 10:06, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since February 2020 there has been increasing incidents of vandalism and disrupting editing mainly from IP editors and SPA's. But of greatest concern is that this is the home page of all 2000+ WikiProjects. History DMZ (talk)+(ping) 05:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined I count about 6 instances of disruption in the last 5 months; these edits are not vandalism, but for a good part good-faith attempts to edit, or just misunderstandings about the function of the page. Page is well watched to boot. Lectonar (talk) 10:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 08:58, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment i dont see any vandalism except few IPs, so why not pending changes protection instead. 180.242.45.27 (talk) 09:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just keep this indefinite. Not only is this my fourth time requesting protection, but I haven’t seen a single IP address add a single thing constructive to the page ONCE. I doubt it’ll ever happen. All IP editors do is constantly add annoying “RIP LIL PEEP BB :,(“ spam or adding “members” who were never actually in the collective. Second Skin (talk) 09:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:21, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 01:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined We don't use page protection when we can simply block one vandal. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 11:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 01:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined We don't use page protection when we can simply block one vandal. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 11:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 01:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined We don't use page protection when we can simply block one vandal. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 11:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Tag-team of two new users adding Youtube links and BLP violations. Reverted multiple times, and ignores messages on their talkpage(s). Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 11:12, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This musician was kicked-out of his band for scandalous reasons. Editors have been adding the information in various locations across the article. It should probably be locked to anon and new editors for a few weeks until this settles down as it's listed in the correct location now. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's start slowly. Lectonar (talk) 10:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Subject to incessant promotional COI editing / whitewashing by a truly absurd number of single-purpose accounts. Citobun (talk) 04:21, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: I opened a related sockpuppet investigation: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Boman12. Citobun (talk) 06:06, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption is there, but with a rather low frequency. Pending-changes protection should be enough to handle this for the time being. Lectonar (talk) 10:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: I opened a related sockpuppet investigation: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Boman12. Citobun (talk) 06:06, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism primarily by new user accounts in recent days. Gwen Hope (talk) (contrib) 05:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent insertion of links to articles in draftspace. Binksternet (talk) 21:58, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined Has died down.Lectonar (talk) 06:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent and repeated abuse from LTA. Indef semiprotection clearly doesn't work as the sockpuppeteer is known to abuse the Sandbox in order to circumvent the autoconfirmed restrictions. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined While I agree there is disruption, it is rather few and far between. Better block the sockpuppets, ashas happened, when they appear on a one-on-one basis. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 06:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent and repeated abuse from LTA. Semiprotection (or heck, even indef semi) clearly doesn't work as the sockpuppeteer is known to abuse the Sandbox in order to circumvent the autoconfirmed restrictions. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined While I agree there is disruption, it is rather few and far between. Better block the sockpuppets, as has happened, when they appear, on a one-on-one basis. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 06:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent and repeated abuse from LTA. Indef semiprotection clearly doesn't work as the sockpuppeteer is known to abuse the Sandbox in order to circumvent the autoconfirmed restrictions. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined While I agree there is disruption, it is rather few and far between. Better block the sockpuppets, as has happened, when they appear, on a one-on-one basis. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 06:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent and repeated abuse from LTA. Semiprotection clearly doesn't work as the sockpuppeteer is known to abuse the Sandbox in order to circumvent the autoconfirmed restrictions. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined While I agree there is disruption, it is rather few and far between. Better block the sockpuppets, as has happened, when they appear, on a one-on-one basis. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 06:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent promotional editing by COI accounts. Citobun (talk) 10:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 06:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. In the meantime....Lectonar (talk) 08:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term disruption. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Preserve redirect. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 19:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- This looks like an issue with one IP, which is now blocked for 2 weeks and can be reblocked for a longer duration if necessary. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 06:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Plantduets (talk) 19:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Partial-rangeblock for 1 year looks like it might do the trick. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 06:09, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPv6 returns with BLP violations right after protection was lifted. Pikavoom (talk) 09:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – edit warring. Constantly adding and removing detail. Thanks, EDG 543 (talk) 16:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Done I have semi-protected the redirect for 3 months. Lectonar (talk) 06:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, mass attack from IPs and new accounts adding K-pop group Loona members to the list. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 03:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. bibliomaniac15 06:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IPs and accounts repeatedly changing info, i have no idea whats going on here Yvzcvtp (talk)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by different IP's. Robvanvee 14:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: Bloody Vikings --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 06:09, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Sudden increase of multiple IP and new users spamming links. Yosemiter (talk) 14:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Repeated IP attacks, probably caused by an old gang of socks that has been disrupting the Wikipedia for many years. Every time one IP is blocked the sockmaster uses another IP. My talk page has enough discussions with two admins, four IPs been blocked and the page has been semi-protected for some time. None of that worked. Perhaps indef semi-protection will work. Aditya(talk • contribs) 16:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. for the bot. © Tbhotch™ 06:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP disruption since previous protection ended a few days ago. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk • work) 04:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is one user repeatedly recreating the file; I would recommend taking the user to ANI rather than requesting protection, as the file could easily be reuploaded under another name. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Etymology section is perpetually disputed by editors (usually IP) of various Asian cultures and languages, and usually with no WP:RS. Current pp has expired. Zefr (talk) 01:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 19:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected until October 1, after the event in question has ended. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent of unsourced content and vandalism. TheDeviantPro (talk) 00:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 00:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Curbon7 (talk) 02:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- What vandalism are you referring to? This IP edit is removing an unsourced claim. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 10:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A lot of IPs and new editors are confused by the wording of this source, but this other source already there confirms what the previous source said. © Tbhotch™ 18:03, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
04 September 2020
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This article seems to be the target for a number of new editors who continue to add accolades and superlatives about the subject. I want to WP:AGF, but this pattern of WP:SPA accounts with an interest in this implies either serial WP:COI or WP:PAID editors whether it is by the artist or her management. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I suggest you requesting pending changes protection to this because while users have good faith to edits, there are plenty IP editors where vandalize the article. 180.242.44.228 (talk) 23:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Walter Görlitz: Can you clarify why this article should be protected as an arbitration enforcement action? What is the arbitration decision to be enforced? Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 06:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- I suspect the users want to protected the article due to persistent vandalism from IP users. But IP vandalism is very low at this point, so for me, pending changes protection would be working as intend to surpress vandalism by IP users while allowing all users to continue editing. 180.242.44.228 (talk) 07:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Walter Görlitz: Can you clarify why this article should be protected as an arbitration enforcement action? What is the arbitration decision to be enforced? Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 06:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I suggest you requesting pending changes protection to this because while users have good faith to edits, there are plenty IP editors where vandalize the article. 180.242.44.228 (talk) 23:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple instances of disruptive editing from IP accounts within the past week. I'm predicting that the disruptive editing will continue because the game was officially released today. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 17:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IPs — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 18:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- This is not the first time that this is an issue. Previously it lasted seven days, after which the issue immediately restarted. Can it be for longer this time? Gbear605 (talk) 19:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and disruption, including BLP violations, starting up right after previous 1-year protection ended. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term new editor vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:03, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. © Tbhotch™ 19:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- List of Universal Pictures theatrical animated feature films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The Happy Tree Friends fan troll is at it again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- 1 year partial rangeblock on their most frequent targets. I'm a little hesitant to protect this because this user targets a series of articles, and we'd have to semiprotect all of them. Let me know if they start using another range, and I can partial block that one to with up to 10 pages. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Nguyễn Anh Đức (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Nguyễn Tiến Linh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Same request as previously : pages targeted by anonymous IPs which continually changed the height of the players concerned without respecting what is indicated in the sources. --Martopa (talk) 15:56, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:41, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent increase in vandalism by IP users. PenulisHantu (talk) 17:17, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:12, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection Disruptive editing Possibly the same person has been adding unsourced, controversial information without providing a source for weeks now. User:Chrysalix was blocked for socking, his/her IP account was recently blocked also for two months. Now looks like the same person is back with another IP address making similar disruptive edits.--Harout72 (talk) 09:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. - Partial rangeblocked the IP for 6 months. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced info with a promotional tone. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 11:56, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Subject is a controversial figure in the Philippine internet. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 11:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- :
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see three or four bad IP edits since the beginning of August. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 06:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – some people want to call him a rapist, some dont. I think we should protect at the right version !. Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 07:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - I'm not seeing need for full just yet, though I may be missing something. If the vandalism/disputes continue through semi then re-request here and it should be increased. Anarchyte (talk • work) 07:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:50, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended semi-protection: Requesting again, as page vandalism continues. Article was temporarily semi-protected by administrators in January 2020, October 2019, May 2019, and February 2019 which was only effective for a short period of time. Please view the page's edit history, and provide appropriate protection at this time. AmericanHistorian (talk) 02:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @AmericanHistorian: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like a long-term issue. I've put it on my watchlist, and feel free to ping me if something else comes up. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 04:16, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent addition of transfer rumors. BlameRuiner (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 06:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP-hopping vandals. Sjö (talk) 05:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 06:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 06:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 06:54, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. -- Pratyush.shrivastava (talk) 18:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- What IP vandalism are you referring to? There was one IP edit a few days ago, and a few at the beginning of August. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- So why not implement pending changes protection that maybe? 180.242.44.228 (talk) 20:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Not done No compelling reason for protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined. Bot-friendly template. © Tbhotch™ 23:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- So why not implement pending changes protection that maybe? 180.242.44.228 (talk) 20:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. © Tbhotch™ 01:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 03:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated unsourced addition of date of birth without a source. Ravensfire (talk) 02:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:51, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A lot of IPs have added and/or changed things without citing any sources. As this is a controversial topic, I think protection is needed. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 12:06, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Brand new article just created today. At this point it looks as if the constructive IP edits outnumber the problems. Request again if disruption becomes more of a pattern. MelanieN (talk) 16:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- MelanieN, please take another look and reconsider. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 01:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Seconded. There is ongoing disruption by multiple IPs. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 02:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Just wanted to note that this diff mentions a twitter post incitng vandalism of the type we've been seeing on this page, suggesting a case of WP:MEAT. Hb1290 (talk) 02:38, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Seconded. There is ongoing disruption by multiple IPs. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 02:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- MelanieN, please take another look and reconsider. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 01:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You are right, things have gotten much worse. MelanieN (talk) 02:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. TK421bsod | talk | my contributions 21:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- I think that an indefinite protection is necessary. Vandalism is frequent enough IMO. SWinxy (talk) 23:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Recent problem editors have been blocked, but there are undoubtedly more where they came from. MelanieN (talk) 02:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism over the past week or so, apparently related to a recent controversy. gnu57 01:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. MelanieN (talk) 02:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Question: I'm seeing regular editing. Please give a few examples of the vandalism. SarahSV (talk) 16:23, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined for now. I can't see evidence of vandalism. SarahSV (talk) 19:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent hijacking of redirect. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Done Indef protected OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected Bot-friendly template. © Tbhotch™ 23:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Tbhotch: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Fully protected This bot is so pretentious. © Tbhotch™ 00:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism (now claiming to be reverting vandalism.) Fyrisdal (talk) 22:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Targeted partial-range block for six months. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
05 September 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term BLP violations, including unsourced content, and vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism for months, but particularly in recent days despite attempts to revert vandalism. Even led to a user forming an account named "Fyouscrubbythug" as a response to my vandalism removal. Furthermore, the Talk section has users explicitly stating that the vandalism is done as a running joke against Johnston among users on Reddit, with the relevant Reddit thread here: https://www.reddit.com/r/beachboyscirclejerk/comments/imie7z/they_got_rid_of_bruce_johnston_selfie_photo/ Thescrubbythug (talk) 12:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:28, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Frequent editing by the subject of the page (who is currently in a major mayoral election) and/or his staff via both new accounts and IPs. In attempt to keep this page neutral, I'd recommend keeping the page semi-protected until the day after Election Day (November 4, 2020). Thank you. Curbon7 (talk) 22:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Follow normal editorial processes in the event that editing continues. Additionally, @Curbon7: I know you didn't mean it this way but it can be considered WP:OUTING to link an editor to an identifiable individual. It may be more appropriate for you to say that the IP editor "likely has a conflict of interest" based on their pattern of editing. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Oops, edit conflict; sorry, Kevin. I felt the addition of unsourced/promotional material was enough to justify protection for this length. In addition, I took note that the first series of disruptive edits were made by a User:SteveBovo, who was promptly blocked; since then the promotional edits have been by IPs. MelanieN (talk) 20:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. © Tbhotch™ 02:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:38, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PC is doing fine. Anarchyte (talk • work) 16:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism of birth date changes. VietPride10 (talk) 15:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- I partial range-blocked the prime offender. That might be enough. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:41, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Same DE to infobox 4 times in 72 hours from 4 different IPs.[9] UW Dawgs (talk) 18:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – People are continuing to add a new voice actress despite the fact that still aren't any reliable sources confirming her. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 18:08, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent genre warring from newly registered users, throwaway accounts. Binksternet (talk) 19:39, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- I do not see disruption by confirmned users--Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:56, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:56, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: There seems to be an edit war going on regarding his nationality, though it's curiously been split between registered users and IPs. Zappa⚡Matic 15:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:59, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: All IP and new editors edits since July are DE or vandalism. 15:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 12:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Footballer subject to press speculation regarding transfer leading to vandalism and speculation added to BLP by numerous IPs. Egghead06 (talk) 17:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. © Tbhotch™ 02:26, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The plot section is indeed disproportionately long! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. © Tbhotch™ 02:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism for days. --Ureinwohner (talk) 10:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fantasy goals and appearances probably need adjusting. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 151.21.71.166 (talk) 05:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 08:08, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. 151.21.71.166 (talk) 05:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. (Only one recent vandal.) AlexiusHoratius 08:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. 151.21.71.166 (talk) 05:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. (Only one recent vandal.) AlexiusHoratius 08:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Repeated addition of unsourced content. AldezD (talk) 13:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:38, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Previously temporarily protected due to persistent disruptive IP editors, who resumed pretty much as soon as the temporary protection was lifted. Lazer-kitty (talk) 21:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. (Really only one incident since protection expired.) AlexiusHoratius 07:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent copy&pastes from FAU-G. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 08:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Vandals. Panda619 (talk) 14:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:46, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Systematic stripping of content by IP users for over a year and a half (since at least 1-2019) with misleading edit summaries. Normal Op (talk) 20:43, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- I've already spent a few hours trying to restore content and I'm nowhere near done. These IP users had been stripping entire paragraphs... one paragraph a day for the last several days before I took a closer look. So far, each one of their edit summaries was a lie. Normal Op (talk) 01:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 08:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NJD-DE (talk) 21:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:51, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Highly visible documentation page and there's really no reason for new editors to be editing it. Nathan2055talk - contribs 22:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – For at least a month, this has been going on since July. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 02:28, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 07:59, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. © Tbhotch™ 02:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 08:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. © Tbhotch™ 02:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 08:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple editors. ElKevbo (talk) 03:38, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 08:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Coleman and Hughes
- Jenna Coleman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Tom Hughes (actor) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism regarding their relationship status. DarkGlow (talk) 08:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- I see two IP ranges (possibly the same person) has recently added unsourced bits about the relationship, but none of those IP addresses have been given warnings; please at least try a few warning templates for unsourced edits before coming here. Adding pages to my watchlist. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Done, disruption continued, and I have protected both articles--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:08, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Short-term sock disruption today. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:08, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New accounts and IP's are disruptively editing this for long - trying to add podcast links / company name links within the text. Csgir (talk) 06:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- List of My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic characters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Timothy19 (talk) 07:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently came out of protection, but vandalism is on-going. Kj cheetham (talk) 22:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:19, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism Yowashi (talk) 23:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Update: It has been protected. Yowashi (talk) 23:51, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Offline 00:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected.. For the bot. © Tbhotch™ 02:31, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Deadman137 (talk) 00:35, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Richard Uihlein (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
General public edits are with good intent with valid reason to remove libel that misquotes source. Page protection is supposed to be for vandalism but fixing a sentence to clearly reflect the source is absolutely not vandalism; just the opposite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.127.124.151 (talk) 01:45, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- That's what edit requests are for. Feel free to propose your change on the talk page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @157.127.124.151: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
It was discussed on the Talk page (see comment by AccuracyFix) however the editor Neutrality went so far as to even cross out the comment in the Talk page, and to re-insert libelous content that does not reflect the source. This represents serious abuse of Editor privilege and needs escalation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.127.124.151 (talk) 02:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This page is not for discussing content disputes. See WP:Third opinion and WP:DR. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 245CMR (talk) 08:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- I can't make out what's going on in that recent edit history; there are edits from two different IPs in the last month; some, but not all of those edits have been reverted, and no warnings have been given. What exactly is the vandalism that's going on? This doesn't seem like a candidate for protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined, I agree--Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An editor or group of editors are changing the ethnicity despite talk page consensus being reached. AIRcorn (talk) 10:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. by User:Boing! said Zebedee OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:12, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated recent vandalism from multiple IPs. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
06 September 2020
Semi-protection: Recurring vandalism. 2409:4073:8B:9B6F:3C43:3469:3F48:E33D (talk) 17:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recurring vandalism. 2409:4073:8B:9B6F:3C43:3469:3F48:E33D (talk) 17:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: RD. High level of IP vandalism, as well as edit warring over (in particular) infobox image, which is getting in the way of improving the article. Kingsif (talk) 19:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Kingsif: because this actor is very notable due to become the main actors for "Black Panther", why not requested indefinite semi-protection for this article due to be high-risk of vandalism from IP users. 36.65.45.88 (talk) 22:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Speculative IP editing due to possible transfer. Few days protection should suffice. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP editor, from different addresses, consistently adding a film to Filmography that is not yet in pre-production. I believe that is in violation of Wikipedia: Notability (films). Several editors, including myself, have removed the entry multiple times, but the IP editor continues to add it, over the last few months. No discussion possible, as the IP changes addresses every time. Andrew Englehart (talk) 22:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hope the IP will get bored in the end! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Both this and move protection. I have opted out of the user page filter but I do not want newcomers editing this page, and I am not going to request a rename. -- PythonSwarm Talk | Contribs | Global 11:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined Per WP:UPROT, pages within the userspace are only protected when a need exists, and ""Pages within the user space should not be automatically or pre-emptively protected without good reason or cause." I don't see any evidence that a newcomer has ever edited your userpage. GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors and a newly-register editor adding unreferenced and, as far as I can tell, false, claims of subject's death. She's in the news for having tested positive for -- and recovered from -- Covid-19, and has not died. TJRC (talk) 16:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2605:E000:1204:C4BC::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by GorillaWarfare. I've blocked the IP range responsible for most of it and left a warning on the registered user's talk page about editing while logged out. Hopefully, that will be sufficient, but I've watchlisted the page in case it resumes. GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blah blah, "fake news fraud journalist", etc. Jorm (talk) 15:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vandalism from two IPs this month, and no other vandalism since May; the IP vandal hadn't even been warned yet. Please use warnings and WP:AIV to deal with individual IPs and editors first before resorting to page protection requests. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The knee-jerk reverting needs to stop to give the quarreling parties time to settle the dispute on the talk page. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also issued edit warring warnings to parties in the dispute. If this continues, blocks are in order. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The knee-jerk reverting needs to stop to give the quarreling parties time to settle the dispute on the talk page. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also issued edit warring warnings to parties in the dispute. If this continues, blocks are in order. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 10:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked., added to watchlist, will block any more hijackers on sight. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent changes to lead against established consensus. Funcrunch (talk) 18:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:51, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Disputing parties are unwilling to discuss on the talk page. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:51, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Page needs an extension of protection which has been doing well and greatly reduced cases of IP vandalism. In my view, it would be best for protection to remain in place until next Monday, when all contestants are revealed. Happily888 (talk) 03:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected until September 16 — through the reveal, plus a few days for things to settle. GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IP addresses have been continuously adding WP:SYNTH which is a part of WP:OR for days non-stop. — YoungForever(talk) 15:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent inappropriate humour. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Occasional disruptive editing/vandalism. 2409:4073:115:4E3B:4C2:D4A8:9B3C:D323 (talk) 14:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recurring vandalism and unsourced content addition. 2409:4073:2184:7E69:2CA0:1A34:E58A:BF37 (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – persistent unsourced DOB changes [10] [11] [12] [13]. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 15:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent protection was just removed, and disruptive editing began again. -. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from various IP addresses. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Ongoing BLP violations as a result of abuse allegations. (Of course, the allegations may well need to be discussed in the article, but they need to be discussed neutrally and backed by reliable sources). – Teratix ₵ 13:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Happily888 (talk) 13:20, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Registered users like (NerdyGenius1 (talk · contribs) and Ch.Rashid javed (talk · contribs)) continue to add unsourced material to BLP.. Saqib (talk) 08:26, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Not done. Semi-protection has expired. Anyways, neither it nor pending changes would have affected the two users mentioned. Favonian (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to event being brought up in the news. Garuda28 (talk) 16:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Talk page of deceased Wikipedian. Goose(Talk!) 02:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Not done Per Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians/Guidelines we don’t normally protect user talk pages, rather we clean it up if needed and allow editors to leave messages of condolences. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing from various IP addresses. Rinat Shakenov (talk) 11:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism and BLP violations, including addition of unsourced content. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits by various IPs about content currently discussed on the talk-page, has already had protection last month. ...GELongstreet (talk) 03:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Top importance chess article about current world chess champion. Persistent IP and new account vandalism, low level but constant. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 08:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected, better suitable for this pattern of disruption--Ymblanter (talk) 08:47, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Fairly low levels of vandalism and disruption, but the actress was recently mentioned in a BBC news article: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-54024810. Kj cheetham (talk) 09:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. No sooner than the two-day page protection got lifted, an IP edited the page with unsourced/irrelevant criticism of the game. Should have a longer lock. TropicAces (talk) 15:25, 5 September 2020 (UTC)tropicAces
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Deceased Wikipedian. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Done Condolences to friends and family. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been vandalised consistently over the past few days, apparently due to being in the media. Thepenguin9 (talk) 04:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced content additions and edits of the programming list from IPs and a user who's adding unsourced info on a reversion of this channel to Disney XD. Raymie (t • c) 07:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed after previous protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- There have been two incidences of vandalism since protection expired on August 3. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Concur with Jamie. MelanieN (talk) 20:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Article is on different countries positions with respect to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Chess (talk) (please use {{ping|Chess}}
on reply) 20:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. In fact vandalism (or editing of any kind) is almost nonexistent on that page. If any administrator feels it needs arbitration enforcement anyhow, feel free to overrule me. MelanieN (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Large amount of joke edits blaming the boats sinking on ANTIFA. Only needs a day or two for once this falls out of the news cycle. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 00:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. For the bot. © Tbhotch™ 04:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly all edits by IPs and newly registered accounts were reverted for the past few months. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 01:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. Indef. For the bot. © Tbhotch™ 04:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
07 September 2020
High risk templates, IAR ECP protected
- Template:Medical cases chart (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> semiprotection
- Template:Infobox power station (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> TE
- Template:Infobox dam (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> TE
- Template:Inflation/fn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> TE (5k transclusions, match parent)
- Template:INRConvert (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> TE
- Template:Gs/alert (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> TE
- Template:Gs/topics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> TE (these two were done for me)
- Template:Gong (band) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> semi would've been suitable then, but none probably now?
- Template:Birds tasks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> TE (25k transclusions)
- Template:Country data Iowa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> TE (as standard for active country datas)
- Template:Cite certification (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> TE (20k transclusions, maintainer is TE, ECP has flaws)
- Template:Blocked user (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) ->
none / semi? 0 transclusions, deprecated template.active vandalism - Template:Book list (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> semi. ~100 transclusions, was downgraded to ECP, but that's pre-emptive ECP
- Template:Coat of arms (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> TE (8k)
- Template:Certification Table Entry (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> TE (19k transclusions)
- Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/South Sudan medical cases chart (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) ->
maybe semi would've been more appropriate, unless that's a COVID DS action? (JzG)-- looks like DS action - Template:DYKproblem (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> semi or TE?
- Template:Metadata Population DE-RP (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> TE
- Module:NUMBEROFSECTIONS (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> TE
- Template:WikidataOI (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> probably semi
- Template:Community sanction (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> TE
- Template:List of Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign endorsements (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> Requesting a protection due to frequent IP vandalism. I hope I’m doing this right! If not, please point me in the right direction. Many thanks! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 01:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Was doing some template category housekeeping and came across these. Group of templates which are either WP:HRTs with IAR ECP protection, likely originally to help a non-TE work on them, but don't appear to have (in the last year) a non-TE editor edit them actively (and, even if they did, imo said editor should just be encouraged to request TE & likely given it if they can handle HRTs). Overuse of ECP on templates kinda beats the IAR part imo. Few exceptions for where it seemed appropriate, so I've omitted them from the list (as well as any DS usages or vandalism from autoconfirmed). For the data templates, they're pretty infrequently edited, so TPERs for them seem suitable as standard. One or two low-usage templates which are pre-emptive ECP protections, which was rejected by RfC. Thoughts on fixing their protections? I've given a suggestion for each. Ping protecting admins: Primefac, Ymblanter, Lectonar, MSGJ, Xaosflux, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- whoops, forgot Johnuniq. In hindsight, I probably should've put your pings next to each template for ease of access... ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Blocked user can be reduced to semi as far as I am concerned. Can not be unprotected due to a long history of disruptive edits.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Upgraded to TE for those as marked, as I agree. Primefac (talk) 23:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not researching all of these if you have a question about one - ask me about the specific one. "Overuse of ECP on templates " is a bit of a stretch, this is a minuscule list compared to all templates - and the IAR policy is well supported for edge cases of most anything. — xaosflux Talk 23:47, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- I tagged you as the protecting admin for {{Country data Iowa}} but that's been sorted now. I'd say it's overuse when the use is not appropriate, I don't think the majority of these were special in any regard to (still) be treated as edge cases. Certainly, such cases exist, and I omitted the ones I thought met that criteria. The remaining ones are actually for a decrease in protection level, which I guess is why Primefac hasn't touched them, so they need the protecting admin to look at them. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 10:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Summarising the remaining ones with a ping to protecting admin, for ease of access amongst the clutter above:
- Template:Medical cases chart (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> semiprotection. @Johnuniq:
- Template:Gong (band) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> semi would've been suitable then, but none probably now? @Fish and karate:
- Template:DYKproblem (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> semi or TE? @MSGJ:
- Template:WikidataOI (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) -> @Primefac: (protection reason given was to match module; looks like the module is the generic Module:Wd currently at TE, although this template has 1k transclusions, either/or seems fine to me?).
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:01, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- The three Template:Medical pages are edit and move ECP protected. The respective transclusion counts are 371, 334, 670. If someone wants to decrease them to semi-protection, please do so. I would prefer firmer guidelines but in their absence, I see no reason why someone under 500/30 should be encouraged to edit templates with hundreds of transclusions. I don't see any edit requests on the (single) talk page apart from feature suggestions. The time to decrease the protection would be when new editors put helpful changes in the sandbox. Johnuniq (talk) 04:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'd challenge that personally. The guideline would be WP:HRT, particularly
Note that a bot automatically template-protects pages with over 5000 transclusions and semi-protects pages with over 500 transclusions and that a 2018 RFC identified rough consensus to permanently semiprotect templates with at least around 200-250 transclusions.
It's policy to semi-protect for hundreds of transclusions, the numbers you cite aren't really extreme. It is explicitly rejected to pre-emptively or routinely EC-protect templates, and while there are such valid protections on a case-by-case basis, transclusion count alone should not cause rejection of semiprotection and EC-protection instead. I quoteThere is a clear consensus against using extended confirmed protection preemptively on high-risk templates. This leaves full protection, template editor protection and semiprotection as the three common protection levels, while extended confirmed protection can still be used when Arbcom specifies a 30/500 remedy, or when semiprotection has proven ineffective.
After all, it's completely wrong to think that having 500/30 makes one automatically more likely to know more about templates. There is no evidence of disruption here, or wider disruption in the template namespace when semis are used, and I would further note as an example that the entire {{Gs}} system of templates was unprotected for years and had no disruption (although this does meet WP:HRT and thus is protected which I agree with, but the point is true nevertheless). Aside from HRT and the RFC, I guess we also have WP:NO-PREEMPT here. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'd challenge that personally. The guideline would be WP:HRT, particularly
- @ProcrastinatingReader: These requests are stale. Why don't you try to request these and those below individually? © Tbhotch™ 22:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Fine with me if it clogs up the board less. Will archive manually, as I suspect the bot won't recognise the other actions.
Requesting immediate archiving... ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:55, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content and rewriting the article in a promotional tone. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 06:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:01, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Move-protection: Following an AfD, it was decided that the article would be better repurposed as a biography of the books' author Eileen Gibb. Discussion has been raised at talk re how best to go against this, noting that current COVID-19 restrictions mean this is not going to be achieved as fast as is would otherwise be. Requesting move protection to prevent a move of the article until it is in a fit state be be a biographical article. As an admin, I could do this myself, but am WP:INVOLVED in what could potentially be considered a dispute over moving the article. Hence this request. Please note that this is not an attempt to prevent the article being ever moved, or to override the consensus of the AfD discussion. I accept the result of the discussion and will work to achieve the result of that. Once the article has been rewriten, I am prepared to move it myself. Mjroots (talk) 09:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Whilst I was putting in this request, the article was moved, but not the talk page (now sorted). Might as well leave it moved now. Mjroots (talk) 09:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Not done No longer necessary. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Overprotected fully-protected templates
- Template:1952-Olympic-stub (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) - 60 transclusions, -> no protection. maybe a reason why this was moved to indef full? (PhilKnight)
- Template:Accepted (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) - 644 transclusions, -> semi-protect (or TE as standard) (Fish and karate)
- Template:/doc (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) - to TE (generic warning notice)
- Template:Did you know nominations/YOUR ARTICLE TITLE (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) - to TE, guidance template
- Template:Dollarsign (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) - to semi to match target (Backslash Forwardslash)
- Template:EICAR test file (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) - I mean... semi-protection, at best? Unprotect completely really, the article itself isn't protected at all, and so the usage could just be replaced directly to something "malicious" if wanted? (PrimeHunter)
- Template:Gdansk-Vote-Notice (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) - semi by usage, but probably TE to match eg typical DS templates (Aitias)
- Template:POTD/2013-10-14 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) - unprotect as standard, temporary 2013 dispute appears to have concluded. (Crisco 1492)
Older copyright templates (standard is now TE, & here):
- Template:Cc-by-sa-2.5-ca (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:DualLicenceWithCC-BySA-2.0-IntEng (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:DualLicenceWithCC-BySA-Dual-IntEng (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:DualLicenseWithCC-By-2.0 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:DualLicenseWithCC-BySA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-2.0 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-2.5 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Future (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Tri-2.5 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:DualLicenseWithCC-SA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:GFDL-self-with-disclaimers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:GFDL-with-disclaimers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:GFDL-with-disclaimers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:GFDL-1.2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:GPL-2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:ImageLicenseFreeUse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:License migration (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:License migration complete (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:License migration not eligible (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:License migration opt-out (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:License migration redundant (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:License migration review (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
All full protected templates which should be downgraded. Suggestion for new protection level given, per WP:HRT. Don't want to post on multiple different admin talks per template, so hope this works. Pinged protector in each case. Many of these are legacy pre-2012 protections. Others appear to be random. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 21:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- I've dropped protection on the
-marked templates, as well as the older copyright templates. Primefac (talk) 23:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Cheers. Also, just realised Backslash Forwardslash and Aitias are inactive since 2010 & no longer admins, so can another admin take a look at their 2 templates? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 10:48, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done those two. Lectonar (talk) 11:40, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Please unprotect the POTD template. I didn't even realize it was still protected, and I no longer have the mop to do it myself. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
{{RFPP|ad}}
for the bot (non-admin closure) © Tbhotch™ 19:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)- Deactivated. This request is not complete, as some templates in the list remain protected (lowering protection requires the protecting admin to address it, they've been pinged next to each template, i.e. the ones without ticks). ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Tbhotch: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:44, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Tbhotch: One or more pages in this request have not been unprotected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Per above. Will follow up on the remaining ones individually, to clog up the board less.
Requesting immediate archiving... ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:58, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Derbyboy2890 sockpuppet targets
- List of wars involving the Ottoman Empire (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of wars involving France (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Anglo-Turkish War (1807–1809) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, semi-protection suggested at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Derbyboy2890/Archive#17 August 2020 rather than the constant edit warring by sockpuppets. FDW777 (talk) 17:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Done, one is protected by Ohnoitsjamie, the other two do not need protection at this point--Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Template protection: High-risk template – Match protection level with Template:Commons. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Several IPs (certainly the same person) have repeatedly added the same edit including nonencyclopedic content, misspellings, repeated text, and other errors. Not sure if this counts as outright vandalism, but it's not constructive. There hasn't been a useful edit to the page since June. If there's a different solution here, please let me know. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 17:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous disruptive editing by IP users. Sricsi (talk) 17:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Will shortly be used by Module:Documentation. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. Onel5969 TT me 01:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Semi-protection would be ineffective as both editors are autoconfirmed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page history has shown repeated instances of vandalism. The last two edits (prior to my latest undo) had a racist edit with an unregistered user changing the league's name to either "blacks fly high" or "fairy tall blacks" in Spanish (I'm not sure what the proper translation is as I'm not a Spanish speaker). Another, changed the caption to call it the "bubblehead" games, a made-up term that is not a part of this topic.
As the NBA and its bubble play have been the focus of attention in sports and social justice, temporary protection for this page is necessary to spare it from vandals until, at the very least, the end of the playoffs and the bubble play. Further, this page is somewhat shoddy, in regard to some details and overall composition and vandalism will surely hinder the progress being made on this in-development* page.
footnote: in-development both in terms of production and the actual subject, as the bubble games are still on-going. Mehrpw (talk) 01:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Template protection: High-risk template – This template is complete and no additional edits are required so should be locked to template editors only now which will stop any future disruptive actively. Govvy (talk) 09:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Move protection: Page-move vandalism – Please protect this article from being moved. Recently moved by a vandal user to Arrest of Safoora Zargar. ─ The Aafī (talk) 11:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Done OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Done – bot-friendly template. Favonian (talk) 17:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Continuous disruptive editing by IP addresses Prolix 💬 13:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:53, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 17:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Article is already move protected and someone just moved this talk page, so the 2 were at different locations until I reverted. Spike 'em (talk) 14:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Done OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Done – bot-friendly template. Favonian (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page protection expired yesterday, the revisions from yesterday and today don't give a good promise. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 07:21, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 12:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:53, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Unsourced edits by IP addresses Prolix 💬 11:40, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Unsourced edits by IP addresses Prolix 💬 11:43, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:21, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple non-autoconfirmed users have made unsourced edits over the past couple days. Cairo2k18 • (talk) • (contribs) 12:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to event being brought up in the news. Garuda28 (talk) 16:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- So far there was only one bad edit. Let us wait a bit longer.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:26, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Several IPs from the same range have targetted this userbox, repeatedly replacing the userbox image. - Victor P. (talk) 00:58, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of badly sourced content and removal of reliable sources by new accounts. Synthwave.94 (talk) 02:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Happily888 (talk) 07:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing blp vandalism and disruptive editing. Joeyconnick (talk) 20:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:43, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Maybe just a day or two. S0091 (talk) 21:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and removal of sourced content. Previous semi-protection worked really well but problem has re-appeared since expiry in February 2020. Abcmaxx (talk) 21:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated blanking of sourced content by multiple socks. Blackguard 00:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 19:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There have been several edits within the last two hours disrupting the manual of style in the lead. Factfanatic1 (talk) 22:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Chetsford (talk) 03:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: No reason for the redirect to be fully protected. However, it remain semi-protected in case the LTA of the same name decides to vandalize the redirect. Goose(Talk!) 02:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism from an unregistered editor using multiple IP addresses. ElKevbo (talk) 20:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Likely WP:LTA/BKFIP. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 22:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism. Call me when you get the chance 03:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 04:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Listing generic as it seems to be a combination of persistent and disruptive editing. It's been a target for drive by edits for external links (those blocks have been done) but also by IPs. – The Grid (talk) 18:25, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP and unregistered user vandalism. KidAd talk 21:35, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Jerome has passed away according to this obituary. Rest in peace. Ionmars10 (talk) 23:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Fully protected indefinitely. RIP. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
08 September 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ 16:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Pending a transfer move (not official yet); a lot of IP activity eager to edit the player's team when the deal hasn't been made official yet. Nehme1499 (talk) 20:45, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Flori4nK
t • c 20:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Despite the use of a Pending Edits protection, IP users continue to commit unwanted, disruptive editing. Level of protection must be increased to stop this persisting. GUtt01 (talk) 23:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term disruption from block-evading editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:09, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. by Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit war. GizzyCatBella🍁 21:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 11:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. by Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Arameans (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Full-protection: Political driven editors who happen to be either biased or personally affected (See Assyrian and Aramean talk page) permanently try to revert, vandalize or distort facts of the article without consensus or reliable academic sources, surveys etc, e. g. the terminology "Assyrian" being the commonly accepted generic term in academia even though it is highly disputed to include the Arameans etc within the Assyrian people article, which is completely POV edited due to its disputed terminology. Opening several RFC-discussions until to reach their political motivated goals.--Optra2021 (talk) 13:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:41, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article on a gender nonconforming activist who uses they as a pronoun has been repeatedly vandalized. User:Namiba 19:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. This article is already pending changes protected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Moxy 🍁 15:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EC is not necessary as these socks are ephemeral creatures. Favonian (talk) 17:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 15:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:28, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruption by IPs as soon as the previous protection expired, four in the last twenty-four hours. FDW777 (talk) 17:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spamming by new users and multiple IPs. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from both IP and newly created accounts. Since this article is about a person that is in a major political campaign, in an effort to protect BLP and keep the page neutral, I'd recommend keeping the page protected until the day after election day (November 4, 2020). Curbon7 (talk) 20:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with the IPs edits here; they removed material sourced from "keepingupwithcava.com," a website whose sole purposes seems to be opposition to a political candidate; such a site clearly is not an appropriate source for WP:BLP. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Lectonar (talk) 05:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
SSSB (talk) 09:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Addition of transfer rumors. BlameRuiner (talk) 13:17, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Addition of unsourced transfer rumours. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:00, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – political fight. Chennai Passangai (talk) 19:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Chennai Passangai: The page is already semi-protected. © Tbhotch™ 22:55, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 05:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recent uptick in tagvand and unref changes by various IPs. Dl2000 (talk) 13:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:45, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – In the span of 9 months, prohibited undisclosed paid public relations editing occurred spanning across six obvious single purpose accounts that made edits freshly after making accounts before abandoning them. Graywalls (talk) 07:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:40, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:09, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BLP violations related to recent news coverage. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:51, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection. Chennai Passangai (talk) 06:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Pending Changes protection: High level of BLP Policy breaches and vandalism. AussieWikiDan (talk) 15:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Article has been a target by a group of vandals, who incite violence and hate in their edit summaries. See edit history. Drovethrughosts (talk) 21:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined Socks have been blocked and protection would prevent useful editing by IPs and new users. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:53, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs vandalizing the article, changing population figures without providing any source(s). Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. I have blocked the world's smallest IP range, 103.127.77.140/30, for a week. Please let me know if the disruption continues, Fylindfotberserk. Bishonen | tålk 11:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC).
- Thanks Bishonen, for blocking the world's smallest IP range
. This particular individual has been doing this for almost a year if I remember correctly. I'll let you know. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:28, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Bishonen, for blocking the world's smallest IP range
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 11:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:08, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – or indefinite. The vast majority of the ip edits on the page have been blantant hoaxes/vandalism. Some long form protection is in order. Starzoner (talk) 02:12, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 06:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs vandalising the page by constantly changing his club without providing any source(s). Likely to continue over the next month of the transfer window. Wolvesweb (talk) 11:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- I second this request, we currently have IPs of fans from 3 different PL teams playing around with the article. RetiredDuke (talk) 11:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 11:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Match protection level with Template:LDS. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent misgendering of a nonbinary subject. Funcrunch (talk) 16:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:17, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 06:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There have been at least three IPs in the past few days making unacceptable edits that either violate NPOV or aren't verifiable with the sources cited. Gwen Hope (talk) (contrib) 06:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – sometimes informations are changing. Chennai Passangai (talk) 19:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Heavily edited by banned socks; in this year alone, at least seven sockpuppets have targeted the article (H0llande, Nahroyo, MixedButHumann, Aram-Israel, OromoyoAWKITSuryoyo, Amerikanhistorylover, and Shabo.Hanna.Izgin). Mugsalot (talk) 21:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been another wave of vandalism directed at this page, and with the reputation this game has on the internet, it won't stop unless the page is protected. Helloimahumanbeing (talk) 01:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Heavy edited by banned socks see history/edit summaries. Shadow4dark (talk) 16:43, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:15, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article gets so much dumb vandalism b/c the subject is controversial. Please don't just close this as "no one warned the IPs" because you know how useless that is. Jorm (talk) 00:06, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring to removed sourced descriptor of a movement Lemp was associated with, one which has been decided upon by RfC at boogaloo movement. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term LTA disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:17, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. For the bot. © Tbhotch™ 03:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is receiving a lot of disruptive edits along the lines of “Matt Thomas needs to play more”. I’d assume some of that is coming from this Tweet: https://twitter.com/_DavidMorrow/status/1303130264848261123?s=20. Benica11 (talk) 03:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption too heavy for pending-changes. Lectonar (talk) 06:01, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Datebook (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – See Talk:Datebook#Protected edit request on 6 September 2020. Courtesy ping to JJMC89. – Uanfala (talk) 19:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Please ping me if responding here. – Uanfala (talk) 19:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Done I lowered the protection to semi. Lectonar (talk) 05:59, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rumours abound that Neil Buchanan is Banksy. Whether or not this claim is substantiated, it is drawing attention to the page and attracting vandals. E.g. replacing "Banksy" with "Donald Trump". Temporary protection against unverified users may help with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tdwright (talk • contribs) 10:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:12, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Full protection. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:18, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism and LTA disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:17, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. For the bot. © Tbhotch™ 03:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Unsourced article repeatedly created by same user. John B123 (talk) 08:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. For the bot. © Tbhotch™ 22:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Saqib (talk) 14:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —C.Fred (talk) 22:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful edits that need reverting. JMHamo (talk) 18:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
09 September 2020
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:30, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 03:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing, modifying text to better represent political viewpoints, number fudging by a number of repeat offenders. Intellectualyo (talk) 06:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
- Note to Intellectualyo: EC protection would do no good; all editors are extended confirmed. You could try dispute resolution, or ping someone who is an expert on this kind of article to weigh in. If after seeking knowledgeable help you still have a problem with one editor refusing to "get it", the only option may be ANI - and that may not be helpful since ANI is not for content disputes. Be sure to ping me or someone to restore the indefinite semiprotection when the full protection expires. MelanieN (talk) 22:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Semi protection for a few days to prevent vandalism due to this being an ongoing event and a high traffic page. Natadmim (talk) 23:41, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. While there is some vandalism, new and IP users also add valuable information; the page is well watched, disruption not too excessive. Lectonar (talk) 10:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Several IPs have recently changed the birth year to 1962. I couldn't find a source saying he was 58. © Tbhotch™ 00:53, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See my note at the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 22:18, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: The article was rewritten to reflect a neonazi POV by a user who has since been permanently banned. Since he got banned several IPs have reinserted his version of the article verbatim.Catlemur (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Soccer player whose club has just fired him for unspecified reasons. jnestorius(talk) 16:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 21:53, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent addition of content that violates Template:Infobox album#singles, which states to "not include singles that were added as bonus tracks on a re-release of an album.". livelikemusic (TALK!) 19:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 10:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ionmars10 (talk) 17:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Partial blocked IP range for edit warring on related articles. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: persistent IP vandalism. Guise (talk) 17:28, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ 23:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption resumed after the range block expired. © Tbhotch™ 04:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:38, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Product of undisclosed paid sock farm. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Missus IP for more. GSS 💬 10:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Product of undisclosed paid sock farm. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Missus IP for more. GSS 💬 10:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Since, I have changed my username to "TheAafi", requesting that my earlier userpage be protected indefinite. Thanks. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 14:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption by the range [[Special:Contributions/2600:1702:20E0:D3B0:0:0:0:0/64], blocked twice already. Binksternet (talk) 02:05, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. - rangeblocked for 6 months. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. © Tbhotch™ 06:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked /64 for 3 months.OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Repeated addition of unsourced, unverifiable list entries by IP jumper
- Fox Crime (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Fox Crime (Asian TV channel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- HTV3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Nick & You (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- TV8 (Italian TV channel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- TV8 (Turkish TV channel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- VH1 (Italian TV channel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP user keeps adding unsourced and seemingly unverifiable Vietnamese programs to numerous articles on TV channels. See WP:ANI#IP jumper adding questionable TV program(s) to TV station programming lists. Largoplazo (talk) 06:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked 2 ranges. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content by anonymous editors, who seem to be control-running this page. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk
Temporary semi-protection: Semi protection to prevent vandalism because it is a front page article. Natadmim (talk) 13:59, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:25, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined The one user disrupting has stopped after a friendly message on their talk-page. Mind: a friendly word never goes amiss. Lectonar (talk) 10:23, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- List of men's footballers with 50 or more international goals (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As Euro Nation's League going on, several ips are updating the article with unsourced, incorrect info and also using the article as NEWS, updating the article while matches are in progress. Need a 2-3 month protect till Euro League over. Drat8sub (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I see that a significant fraction od IP edits are constructive, so that we may want to try pending changes first--Ymblanter (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The TikTok sockfarm is making up false information about the voice actor. Goose(Talk!) 00:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistently has 3-4 disruptive edits from IPs per month. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption. 182.239.90.227 (talk) 17:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. © Tbhotch™ 00:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multi week long edit war from multiple IPs to add quote marks around certain words. Leijurv (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ 16:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:23, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ 16:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:23, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Long-term temporary semi-protection or pending changes protection - some IPs have been repeatedly adding lies and vandalising the page for various reasons including to promote a pro-Pakistan and anti-India POV without any sources (India is a state sponsor of terrorism? Presumably Pakistani vandals), to screw up the page formatting and to add spam. While semi-protection will stop me from contributing to that page, I'd rather be unable to improve the page directly (I can still use edit requests) than see vandals add anti-India narrative and spam to a page I have been regularly updating, being an Indian. 45.251.33.78 (talk) 10:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: I'd recommend 3 to 6 months of protection (either Semi or Pending Changes) seeing all the past (usully low level) vandalism by IPs outside my IP range (though there are a couple of good IP editors besides me). 45.251.33.78 (talk) 10:54, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think we can meet halfway here; disruption is steady, but rather low level, so it is a good case for pending-changes protection which I applied. No need for edit requests. Lectonar (talk) 11:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John of Reading (talk) 11:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also indeffed a couple of throwaway accounts and blocked the IPv6 for a week. Bishonen | tålk 11:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editor(s). livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last protection ended May 29; see above. Lectonar (talk) 06:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and sock-attacking. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP Vandals removing the plot and then changing up the languages for the film. SP013 (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Low levels of vandalism, but persistant over many months. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption not heavy enough for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: @El C: This shouldnt be extended protected anymore imo -- Heiko Gerber (talk) 02:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined No reason given why protection should be lowered. Lectonar (talk) 06:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. © Tbhotch™ 03:44, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined Not yet; the case has been reported to the appropriate noticeboard, IP seems willing to discuss. Lectonar (talk) 06:44, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-traffic page. If let IPs edit, there will be vandalism. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 13:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: Seems pretty quiet at the moment. One IP has been blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 13:59, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only the odd disruptive IP edit; page well watched. Lectonar (talk) 06:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors stemming from previous page protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last protection ended June 25; only 3-4 disruptive edits since then. Lectonar (talk) 06:48, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:15, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:34, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 06:53, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Date vandalism. -- /Alex/21 02:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing, addition of unsourced content, recently deceased actor. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:21, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Because I've received too much harassment in the past few days. A (talk) 23:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:22, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes protection Persistent disruptive editing to a High priority Human Rights and Thailand page by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/119.76.14.250 that have the effect of giving credence to a Thai state-sponsored conspiracy theory that alleges everyone from Netflix to the US government is conspiring against Thailand. The Arbitration Committee has been notified (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2020_Thai_protests) due to the possibility of this being a sockpuppet of a banned user. I am requesting Pending changes protection in the interim so we can rescue the page.Johncdraper (talk) 06:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 12:03, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. at least 5 accounts and 2 ips vandalising Sievert 81 (talk) 22:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. persistent block evasion ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 23:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 23:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
10 September 2020
Indefinite move protection: Paid editor constantly moving it around without following the AfC process. Please also protect Fahad Badar. GSS 💬 06:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also salted the article page. MelanieN (talk) 22:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. User 261115 (talk) 07:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 09:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent insertion of BLP violations. Chaheel Riens (talk) 10:19, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More transphobic editing by two different IP addresses. User:Namiba 20:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Page is under attack with frequent and persistent WP:BLP violations, including removal of references and sourced content, and edit warring. NedFausa (talk) 22:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Was semi-protected against abusive closes. When semi-protection expired, another abusive close was performed. Please reinstate semi-protection against vandals. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined Afd is closed and vandalism has stopped so protection would be moot. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 19:11, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 06:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Popular video game, is going to get vandalised by several vandals. P10n3rr (talk) 14:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. No recent vandalism either. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 19:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing resumed at end of previous protection. Magitroopa (talk) 00:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 03:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: I remove some text from the article because it's not related to article as article isn't a biography. But someone reverting it. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined, content dispute. Please discuss at the talk page first--Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Anonymous user making persistent unsourced edits, using multiple IP addresses over the span of a week after multiple reverts. --ZLMedia 21:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Potential BLP issues and additional issue of repeated reverts between multiple SPAs. RA0808 talkcontribs 21:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- List of Tour de France general classification winners (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, seemingly as a joke from this Reddit thread. RunningTiger123 (talk) 15:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Edit: It seems the request has already been made above by E0126E — apologies for missing this. RunningTiger123 (talk) 15:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced content and disruptive editing, much like 2020 Formula One World Championship which is already pending changes protected. FozzieHey (talk) 14:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism over past few days. High-traffic page. Usually Cat 4 or Cat 5 hurricanes are protected because of vandalism/disruptive editing. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 14:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting temp page protection; three ips have vandalized the article (here, here, and here) recently, so 24hr semi protection may be a good option to take. SamHolt6 (talk) 12:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator MER-C. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism and addition of unsourced content after 3-day semi ended. This would be the third semi since July 31, 2019 all on the same topic; wondering if it might be time for a long-term or even indefinite semi. Raymie (t • c) 16:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: I.P POV pushing. Also vandalism because they keep breaking the infobox image Zindor (talk) 17:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 17:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Anachronist.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – 136k transclusions, apparently. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Template protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 16:00, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Match target + 4k transclusions on redirect directly. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:30, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Template protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by several IPs. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 16:19, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection for 48 hours: Recent uptick in vandalism associated with trending due to nomination of Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. pbp 15:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- I don't see a pp record in the page's history, and we are still in that 48hr window and the page is NOT protected. I mention this because there is a current edit war happening. @Purplebackpack89: Zinnober9 (talk) 05:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive IP edits. KyleJoantalk 11:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs from a particular range removing soured content. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection for 1 month: two recent mass deletions by an IP [14] and a throwaway account [15], surely heralding drama all of us would rather avoid. Especially since half of the content at Talk:Blue Army (Poland) is about the unit's treatment of the Jews, mass deletion of content that's been worked out through battles and compromise over years is clearly and purely disruptive. -Darouet (talk) 16:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Warn the editor involved appropriately and report to AIV if they persist. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued reversal of AfD sanctioned redirect. ThanX. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 06:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Update: disruptive user has been blocked. Disregard request. Thank you. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 08:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A series of videos concerning controversy with the subject have been released lately making the page a target for vandalism. Idan (talk) 10:27, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ 18:14, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP's adding unreferenced and non-relevant information about distant relatives, i.e., second cousins and great-great-grandparents. Same editors that have been adding the material to Linda K. Burton. Paisarepa (talk) 19:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Paul wheelhouse page has been persistently vandalised needing a proctection to save it from further vandalism.Tbiw (talk) 20:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC). Tbiw (talk) 20:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Continue to warn editor appropriately and report to AIV if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Someone has twice wiped out the standard version, falsely described as the official CP version. In fact it comes from many sources, including former members who became anti-Communist. And the person is not registered.--GwydionM (talk) 06:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
190.233.26.44 who likely added false stories about CCP history, so why not report it to ANI or AIV to determine how administrators to action. If more than one IPs persistently vandalize the article in last 24 hours, pending changes protection would be likely to imposed. 36.69.63.48 (talk) 08:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Indeed. Lectonar (talk) 09:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful edits that need reverting. JMHamo (talk) 16:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:19, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent spamming, addition of non notable services. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:24, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism when there is no source. Expect a lot more vandalism as the tracklist is leaked but not officially released and no reliable source. Maxwell King123321 11:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talk • contribs) 13:53, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit about 15 days ago. Lectonar (talk) 06:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ips are still persistently adding unsourced info. Needs to be protected for at least a few months, long enough for actual show info to emerge. Crboyer (talk) 19:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ 19:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Addition of future flights that goes against WP:CRYSTAL Prolix 💬 19:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:29, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – original research, unsourced edits going on since around November. Graywalls (talk) 08:03, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 18:06, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:03, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. Scorpions13256 (talk) 08:00, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Glen (talk) 09:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced other name is frequently being added by multiple IPs. Ab207 (talk) 08:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:17, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: The article came under revert war because of the characterization of National Endowment for Democracy which some fabricated it as being US government funded. The person (seemingly the only one) used multiple IPs to edit it. Horus (talk) 09:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism. FozzieHey (talk) 20:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Errant IP blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Sockpuppetry. Blanking edits from multiple IPv6 addresses of the same text, citing vague reasoning. SpurriousCorrelation 08:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I'd tend to agree with the IP removals per WP:BLP and WP:PRIMARY. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined This may justified blanking rather than vandalism; see Jamie's edit and comment at the article. MelanieN (talk) 22:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 23:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Sro23. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. TJRC (talk) 00:11, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked the recent vandal (other IPs outside that range seemed to be editing in good faith). OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. The protection log is as long as my arm. The revdel log is almost as long. Enough already. MelanieN (talk) 22:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP's adding unreferenced and non-notable info about distant relatives; i.e., second cousins and great-great-grandparents. Paisarepa (talk) 19:30, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:12, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism by 7 different accounts and IP users Dylsss (talk) 20:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked 'em all. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
11 September 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 14:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not seeing any overt disruptive editing from the last couple days. If I'm missing something really serious (always possible) please provide diffs. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent changing of content to a more press-release like of tone / /addition of unsourced content. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 08:45, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP users. KyleJoantalk 16:19, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:02, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 04:02, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:30, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor keeps putting in information not corroborated by his inline citation. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We don't generally protect pages from a single IP. If disruptive editing persists after suitable warnings, report to AIV or ANI as appropriate. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 19:11, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:22, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. For instance by user who has been warned for WP:DISRUPTIVE editing. Please review and take appropriate action. A Thousand Words (talk) 16:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- I see a good faith but flawed attempt to add useful information which in fact has reliable sources. I added it with good sources to the lead, saying I wasn't sure where to put it and I didn't mind it being removed, and 1Kwords simply removed it. I've reinstated it in its own section. The article has enough watchers to deal with actual vandalism. Doug Weller talk 18:03, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- The "warned IP user" has several warnings and IP users made several WP:DISRUPTIVE edits, for instance in July. A Thousand Words (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: @Doug Weller: I took a look at the page history and there is a pattern of disruptive editing going back years depsite multiple previous protections. Given the subject, I am not surprised. Under the circumstances and with an eye on the long term page history, I am wondering if a lengthy page protection might not be in order. That said, I will defer to your judgement. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:16, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Doug Weller, I agree with Ad Orientem. This seems like a good candidate for indefinite semiprotection. El_C 19:22, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, I thought it was under control. Doug Weller talk 19:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Islam-related articles are routinely semi-protected due to the disruption they seem to attract; several have indef-semi, and Muhammad has indef ECP. However, if this particular article is experiencing good-faith attempts at constructive editing, we should hold off on protection, at least for today. I agree, though, looking in the history, it appears that the proportion of constructive to nonconstructive edits from anonymous IP addresses is so close to zero that indefinite semi-protection is warranted. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:27, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Doug Weller, I agree with Ad Orientem. This seems like a good candidate for indefinite semiprotection. El_C 19:22, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Endorse long-term protection' The vandalism and disruption will not stop. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 19:30, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, mainly regarding the generation of the fighter, of which there is concensus: [16]. In fact, almost all of the edits since the start of August were either vandalism or reverts of vandalism (although the vandalism started much earlier): [17]. --Liu1126 (talk) 16:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:21, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and BLP violations. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Deoxy99 (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP edits and minor vandalism, various BLP violations. This page is a BLP that is currently the source of rumours of a Premier League football player transfer. I would recommend two week protection. Krazytea(talk) 14:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Page is being subjected to persistent vandalism, incluidng WP:BLP violations. NedFausa (talk) 16:10, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent good-faith but disruptive edits changing/removing Johnson's biographical information (contrary to the consensus on the talk page regarding Johnson's self-identification) has resumed after expiration of previous protection. RA0808 talkcontribs 18:44, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent high level of IP vandalism by sockpuppet. BattleshipMan (talk) 03:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:44, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Manabimasu (talk) 04:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- There is also controversy surrounding Netflix at the moment. The vandalism is unlikely to let up any time soon. --IWI (talk) 16:07, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. Paisarepa (talk) 05:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Poorly sourced changes are still showing up in pending changes. Locking it down further will encourage editors to submit an edit request and to see the talk page to see whether their change was already proposed. Aasim 06:16, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I not see that vandalism or adding unsourced content occured by IP users. I think pending changes protection is working as intended. 36.69.63.48 (talk) 06:45, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:51, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of constant vandalism. 245CMR (talk) 08:17, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP keeps adding unsourced content that "In 2002-2003, the Navy tried a pirate “Aargh” sound (combined with a hook gesture)". This is clearly an attempt to insert a joke rather than a serious content dispute, and is turning into disruptive editing, boarding on vandalism, with personal attacks made on the talk page. Garuda28 (talk) 13:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. At least today it is always the same IP. Lectonar (talk) 14:07, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Protect this page from IP users. Looplips (talk) 05:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:13, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Significant WP:DISRUPTIVE editing and repeated WP:VANDALISM by WP:SPA accounts and IP accounts. A Thousand Words (talk) 06:30, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Only semi, but it appears to work. Favonian (talk) 16:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalized several times. I requested you to allow editing the page for autoconfirmed users. Thanks. ~ A. Shohag (pingme||Talk) 09:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:11, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:06, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy & Persistent disruptive editing by several IPs Soumyajit sc (talk) 14:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Always the same IP the last 2 days. Lectonar (talk) 13:02, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 23:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 13:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- PLEASE ATTEND. Page is now being subjected to constant barrage of WP:BLP violations. NedFausa (talk) 15:07, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:19, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced claims of company rebranding and name change. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:11, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent high level of IP vandalism despite talk page resolutions. Maxwell King123321 00:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:19, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's been persistent vandalism from IP's and vandalism-only accounts. Maka (talk·contribs) 10:51, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Currently target by an LTA. Victor Schmidt (talk) 11:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Glen (talk) 12:17, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 13:03, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:08, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per my rationale with the Baguio RPP. Neither autoconfirmed nor pending changes is stopping this miscreant. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per my rationale with the Baguio RPP. Neither autoconfirmed nor pending changes is stopping this miscreant. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per my previous RPP rationales. My previous protection requests don't appear to be fulfilled for some reason despite the egregious vandalism taking place. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This seems to be experiencing long term abuse; protected for the duration of that abuse. Needs to go back to indef-semi after expiration. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:44, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page has been persistently been disrupted by several ips and newly registered users in past few months. Importantly, information about players and the league has been changed without sources. Need an immediate protection. Drat8sub (talk) 20:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Can anyone please protect the page, its becoming a total mess. Drat8sub (talk) 09:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reinstated the semi-protection which was lost after a full protection was implemented in June 2020. Lectonar (talk) 11:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Not even autoconfirmed can stop this LTA, hence the call for a temp ECP to at least slow him down. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I agree that the existing semi-protection is inadequate, since there are autoconfirmed sockpuppets coming out of the woodwork. MelanieN (talk) 23:24, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A user keeps trying to edit the page to add their spam phone number that redirects to their travel agency. SM105 (talk) 20:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've removed your PROD as well as there was no reasoning provided. Woody (talk) 11:16, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Due to the Netflix controversy. (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:29, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Adding that the article seems to attract edits inspired by the Qanon conspiracy theories; see for example this recent edit. I would advocate for a semi-protection. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:04, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator TonyBallioni. Semi, to be precise. Favonian (talk) 11:11, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of poorly-sourced claims of abuse. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 10:22, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Short-term BLP violations due to recent news events. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:17, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Decker recently tweeted about her article having an inaccuracy, which has prompted IPs to try to make the change themselves despite a lack of citations. Zappa⚡Matic 04:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, specifically the re-inclusion of a former anchor despite the absence of an OFFICIAL press release from ABS-CBN News, such has been ongoing for the past two weeks (August 31 - ongoing). KuyaStephenAlaEH talk 05:25 UTC, 11 September 2020
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Significant level of IP vandalism/removal of WP:RS material in violation of WP:PRESERVE. Also WP:SPA edits and Propaganda. See page history and also talk page incivility. A Thousand Words (talk) 03:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Articles that suffer another edit warring
- Batangas City (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Ni no Kuni (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Leyte (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Baguio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Dragon Quest XI (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Dragon Quest X (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary full-protection: High level of edit warring/content dispute. Just as users was blocked, another users which suspect to be sockpuppet again conduct edit warring with other users. 36.69.63.48 (talk) 14:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined Already answered in individual requests above. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. ZimZalaBim talk 15:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch™ 20:00, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per my previous RPP rationales. My previous protection requests don't appear to be fulfilled for some reason despite the egregious vandalism taking place. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined per my reasoning in the section below. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:41, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per my previous RPP rationales. My previous protection requests don't appear to be fulfilled for some reason despite the egregious vandalism taking place. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined @Blake Gripling: I don't see any recent requests to protect this, but it appears that the sockpuppet accounts have been blocked, and the abuse in that article has been relatively short-term, which doesn't justify ECP of indef duration. Any new sockpuppets would be prevented from editing by the existing indef semi-protection on the article. If it happens again, ping me and I'll apply ECP, but for a finite duration. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- List of Tour de France general classification winners (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism coming from IP addresses. E0126E (talk) 14:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:07, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Sushant Singh Rajput-related talk pages
- Talk:Sushant Singh Rajput (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- Talk:Death of Sushant Singh Rajput (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- Talk:Rhea Chakraborty (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection - Continuous disruption from sockpuppets of ÆCE (talk · contribs). —A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 19:22, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined, whereas I clearly see disruption, in my opinion, it is still not at the level of protecting talk pages. Apologies for not reacting on time, I understand that the situation looked differently yesterday.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- It's all good, but given the sockpuppeteer's behaviour is all over the place (i.e. DUCK isn't possible) all we can do is request protection after the latest one is blocked. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 22:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Fake numbers
- Tourism in Cambodia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Tourism in Laos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Tourism in Myanmar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Tourism in the Philippines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent introduction of fake numbers. T*U (talk) 06:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: No reason to keep the redirect at full protected, however it should remain semi or even extended-confirmed protected for obvious reasons. Goose(Talk!) 01:08, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Done, reduced to indef ECP, which didn't exist back when this was fully protected. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP disruption starting right back up after previous protection ended. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: User:YoungForever has made it a personal mission to manipulate statistics on the page and is impersonating an admin to try and prevent anyone from making any edits they disagree with. The page should be protected to prevent stat manipulation and user vigilante policing to serve an agenda. 70.176.125.205 (talk) 20:17, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Your accusations are baseless, you were reverted by two different editors due to adding WP:UGC. Once by me and the second time by Favre1fan93. — YoungForever(talk) 20:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed. Per WP:UGC, we do not link to audience polls/consensus on sites such as Rotten Tomatoes, as you've attempted to add. This is addressed by a hidden note in the article which you ignored. We can not simply add user information without any commentary discussing that information. You did not do that, hence being reverted by myself and YoungForever. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- I made it clear that you were trying to serve an agenda, your rage here hasn't disproven that. WP:UGC says to not use user generated content. Rotten Tomatoes doesn't meet that criteria. Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Film#Audience_response and Wikipedia_talk:Review_aggregators#Audience_reviews explicitly state that audience reviews, especially when noteworthy compared to critical reviews is allowed. 80% v 13% certainly meets that criteria. Your attempts to hide valid information in order to manipulate the conversation are transparent. Let the administrators decide. 70.176.125.205 (talk) 22:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- What part of
Do not include user ratings submitted to websites such as the Internet Movie Database, Metacritic, or Rotten Tomatoes, as they are vulnerable to vote stacking and demographic skew.
you don't seemed to understand? Audience ratings/reviews directly from Rotten Tomatoes is considered to be WP:UGC. Audience ratings/reviews are allowed whenthe audience reception was commented on by reliable source
. This isn't the case here at all because no actual reliable sources are reporting that.— YoungForever(talk) 23:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)- Your personal notes don't override Wikipedia's Manual of Style. I could post a note on any article. It doesn't mean people have to do what I say. Drop the fervor. Wikipedia is supposed to be a place that shares unbiased information, you are a direct affront to that. 70.176.125.205 (talk) 23:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- This isn't a film. MOS:TVRECEPTION and WP:UGC clearly state audience ratings/review/fan polls are not acceptable. Yet, you are clearly add your WP:SYNTH from MOS:FILM#Audience response and Wikipedia talk:Review aggregators#Audience reviews. — YoungForever(talk) 23:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- MOS:TVRECEPTION: "Review aggregation websites such as Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic are citable for data pertaining to the ratio of positive to negative reviews" Nothing in there differentiates between audience and critical reviews. WP:UGC: Nothing to do with this topic. "Sites with user-generated content include personal websites, personal and group blogs (excluding newspaper and magazine blogs), content farms, Internet forums, social media sites, video and image hosting services, most wikis, and other collaboratively created websites." Does not include Rotten Tomatoes, obv. If it did, you couldn't site it as a source either. Also, that's not what WP:SYNTH is either. "If one reliable source says A, and another reliable source says B, do not join A and B together to imply a conclusion C that is not mentioned by either of the sources." These are both from the same source. It isn't unrelated information. I think you know you are intentionally trying to manipulate information to make it seem like you aren't at fault. You are. You are intentionally brigading and manipulating stats to feed an agenda while suppressing factual information from valid sources. 70.176.125.205 (talk) 00:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Yet, you have completely ignored this part
Be careful when searching for reviews, and make sure they are coming from professional reviewers, and not simply a fan of the series.
Are audience ratings/reviewers professional reviewers? Definitely not. On WP:UGC,Although review aggregators (such as Rotten Tomatoes) may be reliable, their audience ratings based on the reviews of their users are not.
— YoungForever(talk) 00:19, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Yet, you have completely ignored this part
- MOS:TVRECEPTION: "Review aggregation websites such as Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic are citable for data pertaining to the ratio of positive to negative reviews" Nothing in there differentiates between audience and critical reviews. WP:UGC: Nothing to do with this topic. "Sites with user-generated content include personal websites, personal and group blogs (excluding newspaper and magazine blogs), content farms, Internet forums, social media sites, video and image hosting services, most wikis, and other collaboratively created websites." Does not include Rotten Tomatoes, obv. If it did, you couldn't site it as a source either. Also, that's not what WP:SYNTH is either. "If one reliable source says A, and another reliable source says B, do not join A and B together to imply a conclusion C that is not mentioned by either of the sources." These are both from the same source. It isn't unrelated information. I think you know you are intentionally trying to manipulate information to make it seem like you aren't at fault. You are. You are intentionally brigading and manipulating stats to feed an agenda while suppressing factual information from valid sources. 70.176.125.205 (talk) 00:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- This isn't a film. MOS:TVRECEPTION and WP:UGC clearly state audience ratings/review/fan polls are not acceptable. Yet, you are clearly add your WP:SYNTH from MOS:FILM#Audience response and Wikipedia talk:Review aggregators#Audience reviews. — YoungForever(talk) 23:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Your personal notes don't override Wikipedia's Manual of Style. I could post a note on any article. It doesn't mean people have to do what I say. Drop the fervor. Wikipedia is supposed to be a place that shares unbiased information, you are a direct affront to that. 70.176.125.205 (talk) 23:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- What part of
- I made it clear that you were trying to serve an agenda, your rage here hasn't disproven that. WP:UGC says to not use user generated content. Rotten Tomatoes doesn't meet that criteria. Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Film#Audience_response and Wikipedia_talk:Review_aggregators#Audience_reviews explicitly state that audience reviews, especially when noteworthy compared to critical reviews is allowed. 80% v 13% certainly meets that criteria. Your attempts to hide valid information in order to manipulate the conversation are transparent. Let the administrators decide. 70.176.125.205 (talk) 22:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed. Per WP:UGC, we do not link to audience polls/consensus on sites such as Rotten Tomatoes, as you've attempted to add. This is addressed by a hidden note in the article which you ignored. We can not simply add user information without any commentary discussing that information. You did not do that, hence being reverted by myself and YoungForever. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a content dispute. We don't semi-protect to lock out one user (in this case, oddly, it would lock out only the plaintiff) from a multi-party dispute. Work it out on the talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:11, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing sock attack by accounts making the same edit. Goose(Talk!) 20:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by Zzuuzz around the same time this report was filed. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page will continue to be vandalized for the rest of time. Having a small level of protection is a must. Idan (talk) 10:24, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 22:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sybyll Trelawney is shocked after looking at the page history. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 11:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. The user whose page that is has not edited since 2010. There is no reason anyone should be editing it. MelanieN (talk) 23:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Curretly an LTA target. Please protect the other talkpages with a similar edit history that were edited by 49.196.164.144 (talk · contribs) as well. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 11:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Same situation as above. The user whose page it is has not edited since 2012. MelanieN (talk) 23:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent repeated vandalism by multiple sock accounts. SPI is also open. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. The protection is semi-protection but it looks as if that should be sufficient since the autoconfirmed sock has been blocked. MelanieN (talk) 23:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Constant irredentist/nationalistic pov-pushing (altering sourced info, adding bizarre stuff such as this [18]) seems to be made by one person, who has used different IPs and now a brand new account. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:11, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
12 September 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:33, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:18, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Expanded block on already partially blocked IP. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistant vandalism and disruptive editing by IP editors. Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:15, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, WP:BLP violations and defamatory content. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:46, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:10, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Alexf. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:09, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:12, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Last protection ends, same disruption resumes. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:14, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. FozzieHey (talk) 13:26, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:32, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated unsourced and defamatory edits being made by IP editors. Ravensfire (talk) 14:54, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:37, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – COI editing. Idan (talk) 15:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Unsourced additions by unregistered users Prolix 💬 15:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:43, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Short-term disruption from multiple IP editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:56, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. I've blocked the 2600:1700:9930:7CA0::/64 range for one week, and
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:37, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by new users. FozzieHey (talk) 12:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:12, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:26, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Needs a short term protection - lots of silly additions that just need stopping and they'll hopefully go away. Blue Square Thing (talk) 13:21, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IP addresses providing wrong information of venues and boxscore information. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 10:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:33, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:44, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Subject to vandalism; since September 11 attacks is already semi-protected, I don't see why this article shouldn't be. Opalzukor (talk) 15:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 15:21, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully that will be long enough for fans to lose interest in their petition. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:27, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Someone has three times wiped out the standard version, falsely described as the official CP version. In fact it comes from many sources, including former members who became anti-Communist. And the person is not registered.
And my earlier request mysteriously vanished.
Does no one care if a hard-line anti-communist view gets endorsed by this reference work?--GwydionM (talk) 08:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. It didn't mysteriously vanish: see the rolling archive. This is a content dispute, if the other user is refusing to discuss or is breaking the 3RR after appropriate warnings and invitations to discussion then the user will be blocked. Woody (talk) 10:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 151.21.72.247 (talk) 08:56, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:56, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Woody (talk) 10:54, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection. Chennai Passangai (talk) 09:09, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chennai Passangai (talk) 09:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Woody (talk) 10:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over last few days. Appears to be one user evading blocks to blank large portions of the article and add unsourced content. Bmf 051 (talk) 11:37, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:13, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Anarchyte. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Serious BLP violations from multiple editors the past day or so. -- LuK3 (Talk) 11:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Anarchyte. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 1 user keep making unnecessary changes. Paper9oll | Talk:(Paper9oll) 06:42, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Username (Junmin419) keep making unnecessary changes to the trainset family name from Hanvit (which there is article talking about the family name) to KTX. KTX is a train service type branding and not trainset family name. Paper9oll | Talk:(Paper9oll) 06:47, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Username (Junmin419) keep making unnecessary changes to the trainset family name from Hanvit (which there is article talking about the family name) to KTX. KTX is a train service type branding and not trainset family name. Paper9oll | Talk:(Paper9oll) 06:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:07, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Username (Junmin419) keep making unnecessary changes to the trainset family name from Hanvit (which there is article talking about the family name) to KTX. KTX is a train service type branding and not trainset family name. Paper9oll | Talk:(Paper9oll) 06:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined - Paper9oll - You really need to read through Wikipedia's protection policy before you file any more reports. Protecting a page because one user made changes to it is not going to happen. It rarely does. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by anonymous IP user. ApprenticeFan work 23:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent and extremely grotesque vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 00:46, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Adam9007:: Osmose now blocked indef by admin due to vandalism that you suggested. 180.244.188.191 (talk) 08:42, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aasim 07:12, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 10:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined - No explanation. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:43, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 10:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:23, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism, and content removal in a short period of time Leechjoel9 (talk) 06:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Semi would be useless here, as those of us who have reverted Leechjoel9 are established editors. This is a content dispute, one in which Leechjoel9 has violated the 3 revert rule. El_C 07:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- I dont think that is a fair explenation El_C. I restored alot of content (images, soruces, text) that has been removed without any clear explenation in the clast ouple of days, also there has been alot of vandalism between these edits. I restored the content and I have asked established users to resolve the issue in teh article talk page. I did not mean to voilate any rule and I did explain that you. Leechjoel9 (talk) 07:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Well, as I have pointed out to you multiple times, Leechjoel9, that rule violation is something which you may still redress — by self-reverting. But you have not done so. How do you account for that? El_C 07:27, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Additionally you have breached 3RR. Glen (talk) 07:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EruTheLord/Archive. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 07:27, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Jumping IP address trying to make a point. Keeps adding the same content. noq (talk) 10:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 10:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Lots of IP editors and new accounts trying to add the word "cult" to the lead. StAnselm (talk) 23:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also blocked all accounts involved for abusing multiple accounts. This is more than coincidence - especially when they're editing the same content to replace it with "cult". ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch™ 00:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:58, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 01:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – While likely player is changing clubs. There still isn't a reliable source confirming the signing. Just speculation by paper that the deal is done. Until deal is done, need to stop getting changed. NZFC(talk)(cont) 03:14, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 03:58, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:01, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch™ 04:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 04:15, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring and pov-pushing by some IP hopper. Wario-Man (talk) 06:10, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Once an IP outside the range of the block (178.246.0.0/16) began disrupting the article, semi-protection became necessary. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 07:05, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Glen (talk) 09:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – unsourced information & vandalism being added for the past few months by various IPs. Whisperjanes (talk) 20:06, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:44, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism from multiple IPs and at least one new account. Kj cheetham (talk) 21:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism, mostly by the same Brazilian LTA. IceWelder [✉] 21:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:47, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: There have been persistent attempts dating to July by IP and brand new accounts to add details about this person's ethnic background to the biography either without sources or using sources that do not support the claim. Appeals to take it to the talk page have failed. -Indy beetle (talk) 22:48, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:49, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another day, another LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Trolling from a certain LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:40, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 14:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Question: One or more IPs is making numerous edits, but it is not clear that these are vandalism. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalisms. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:57, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:44, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: While the subject is notable, edits to the page have calmed down from the rapid fire it was under as recently as a month ago, and attempts at Vandalism have disappeared. The talk page is active, edits generally have consensus, and there is no recent edit waring.
Going from Extended confirmed protection to Semi-protection just seams appropriate under current circumstances, and we can certainly return to Extended confirmed protection if things go wrong. Rklahn (talk) 06:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- This was ec-protected because of arbitration-enforcement, so I see scant chance to go back to semi-protection; @Swarm: and @Doug Weller: for good measure. Lectonar (talk) 11:44, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Noting that although visibility has simmered, I note we've got Trump, Biden and Harris at ECP, and I think it should stay that way until January probably, to ensure stability in the interim. Btw, curious, do AE protections have to go to enforcing admin talk or AE? (Non-administrator comment) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 18:10, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Agree - keep them at extended confirmed for the foreseeable future. High profile pages with lots of visitors and activity in the coming months. -- Fuzheado | Talk 23:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Noting that although visibility has simmered, I note we've got Trump, Biden and Harris at ECP, and I think it should stay that way until January probably, to ensure stability in the interim. Btw, curious, do AE protections have to go to enforcing admin talk or AE? (Non-administrator comment) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 18:10, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined. Given the prominence of the subject leading into the 2020 US presidential election, the risk of disruption from reducing protection is too high. This should be kept at ECP; we can revisit this in a few months. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:13, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
13 September 2020
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Persistent adding of misleading information. Haveyouseenthisboy (talk) 10:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A dynamic IP user from Portsmouth has been modifying numbers for weeks. (CC) Tbhotch™ 22:17, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 22:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs changing information without sources. Chennai Passangai (talk) 08:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent recent BLP vandalism, continuing the pattern from before the most recent previous protection. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A user, under multiple IP accounts, continues to change details without explanation or sourcing (examples [19], [20]). This dates back to 2018 ([21]), and it has become a frequent issue over the past six months. AJFU (talk) 16:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked the editor for one year, given the length of time they've been at this. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- PLEASE ATTEND. Serious WP:BLP violations. NedFausa (talk) 18:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant IP vandalism even with PC. Gives PCRs a headache. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 16:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Huge unsourced and WP:OR additions by IP. Edits indicate a possible WP:COI. Sabbatino (talk) 07:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:19, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Must be protected indefinitely. Gilbert.JW (talk) 07:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism after last protection expired. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk • work) 18:18, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 16:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: I'm not seeing a lot of the typical signs of heavy vandalism, like lots of reverted edits. If there is a serious and pervasive issue with vandalism here please provide some diffs. Thanks. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Barkeep49 (talk) 15:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, WP:BLP violations. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:18, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Seeing IP edits introducing uncited content or content that is introducing a POV. Ktin (talk) 03:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created and deleted per A7 3 times. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. AlexiusHoratius 14:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 08:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 09:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism continues after recent protection expired. FozzieHey (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism from multiple editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 11:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection and move protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Semi-protection is not enough to combat the unsourced claims of a company name change, which now includes page moves. Jalen Folf (talk) 11:37, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- I have started a requested move discussion in the meantime for this subject. Jalen Folf (talk) 12:26, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Question: : JalenFolf, I see that this is likely a content dispute and not distruptive editing because all users were involved in edit warring over naming the company in Albania. So, why not fully edit protected this page and take the discuss over naming changes into talk page. 180.249.244.242 (talk) 14:05, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn per IP comment and a source provided by one of the users involved in the dispute. The requested move discussion also seems to be keeping the unsourced moves at bay for now, but I encourage any uninvolved editor to re-request if this flares up again without a consensus. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor. MelanieN (talk) 19:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs repeatedly adding unsourced insults / QAnon claims. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 04:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: High level of IP vandalism. I've already requested for a "Semi-protection" but the request was rejected, so now I'm asking for a different type of protection. Meanwhile, the anonymous vandal who's been disrupting the page during the last months is going on doing the same things using very different IP ranges, we can either hope that sooner or later he gets tired or add a protection to the page for some months and prevent anonymous from editing it. Note that in over a year the vandal was the only anonymous who edited it, so a protection wouldn't actually create collateral damage. 151.21.71.107 (talk) 06:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Prevent page moves (pre-emptive) without discussion. Eyesnore 23:27, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recent high frequency vandalism from various IPs. Dl2000 (talk) 02:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/ edit warring between several ips and new users. Ym2X (talk) 23:33, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of Ip and new user vandalism. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 00:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been going on forever. Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor complaining about the use of the word "Pride" in the airlines slogan has jumped to a second IP, and appears persistent. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment One IP blocked, the other on last warning. I'll be happy to protect if it persists beyond these two IPs. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:41, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive edits by ip and recently joined editors. Spike 'em (talk) 19:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:49, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Twixister (talk) 19:56, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Per this discussion, I'm going to be introducing this template to a bunch of user warning templates (just centralizing some code already present, along with a small technical fix). Many of those templates are TEP, so this should be as well. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 20:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hijacking attempts by IPs and new users. NJD-DE (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by several IP users who rely on imaginative speculation. Areaseven (talk) 22:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is obviously a high profile article and it may end up needing to be indefinitely protected. We will see what happens in three months. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
14 September 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism by unregistered users Prolix 💬 18:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 20:00, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Volume of editing is too high for PC. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 21:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:39, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- List of men's footballers with 50 or more international goals (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of changing statistics without sourcing and some without consensus. It become a everyday phenomenon, correcting stats changed by newly registered or ips. Drat8sub (talk) 11:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Question: This article that your requested for protection is more likely a content dispute. So full protection would be necessary. 180.249.244.242 (talk) 13:23, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Most of the registered users who are pursuing this do not have more than 500 edits. At this point I think ECP would be enough to protect along with protection against the ips. Thank you. Drat8sub (talk) 15:17, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ECP is not justified based on current levels of disruption. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection for a few weeks for this article attacted lately by new vandal users. It seems the same person creating account after account when one is blocked and attacking the same article. Pierre cb (talk) 13:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content and rewriting the article in a promotional tone with a focus on long-term plans on the league and undue emphasis on viewership. Edits has been made by various IPs of the same nature within the past few days. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 13:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – See also previous protection, there is somethign that tatses weird in that article. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Must be protected indefinitely. Previous short-term semi-protections not sufficient enough.Gilbert.JW (talk) 17:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – vandalism and BLP vios from IPs, going on for a few weeks consistently. Whisperjanes (talk) 17:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple accounts today. Subject was mentioned in UK national news at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54142699 today. Kj cheetham (talk) 18:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It seems like there's been an uptick in vandalism within the last couple of months. I would think some protection would be good for an article of quite a prominent drink. Telsho (talk) 15:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Frequency of disruption is on the lower side of what is considered "semi-protectable", but it does look chronic, and not everything is caught. I've given the page 1 week of semiprotection; a longer-term protection or pending changes may be appropriate if things continue. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 17:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 17:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Or range block. (CC) Tbhotch™ 15:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked for 1 week, ping me for a reblock if they resume. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
IP-hopper persistently adding unsourced content
- Daniyal Mirza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Shakr-un-Nissa Begum (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Murad Mirza (son of Akbar) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Alivardi (talk) 12:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked the IP user for 1 week. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: big company, could get vandalised a lot. P10n3rr (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 14:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Stan Loona vandalism, persistent deliberate factual errors only 2 days after previous block. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 20:25, 17:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 17:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent attempts via IP sockpuppets to portray Turek unneutrally. This has been occuring since 28 May 2020. VistaSunset (talk) 06:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. (CC) Tbhotch™ 12:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. (CC) Tbhotch™ 12:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new SPAs are vandalising article. Some major vandalism, but most seems to center around changing the term used for his bibliography -- 'reporture' [sic] to 'oeuvre' to 'supply of dramas' etc. Paisarepa (talk) 22:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think that's vandalism; there's an argument to be made for simplifying the language in the intro. "Oeuvre" may not be in the vocabulary of even fluent English speakers. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:05, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Vandalism within the past 48 hours: [22], [23], [24] Paisarepa (talk) 00:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- RH618 is
on their last warningblocked, other IPs have been blocked. If more IPs resume vandalism, I'll be happy to semi protect. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)- Thanks, will do. Paisarepa (talk) 01:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined See above. Lectonar (talk) 11:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- RH618 is
- Vandalism within the past 48 hours: [22], [23], [24] Paisarepa (talk) 00:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Multiple non registered users editing page and some vandalism. Ron John (talk) 09:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: not seeing the need. 2nd set of eyes? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Btw, non-registered users are explicitly allowed to edit pages. Lectonar (talk) 11:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexiscid (talk • contribs) 7:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. SCP-2000 01:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Strong support. Multiple IPs vandalizing: 2604:3d08:6f7f:f5d0:4ccd:473:9780:276a (talk · contribs · WHOIS), 2604:3d08:6f7f:f5d0:b56a:61cf:26ae:1cd (talk · contribs · WHOIS), 121.200.246.74 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) 172.254.96.122 (talk) 02:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is being disruptively edited by several IPs on a daily basis. I find myself constantly reverting pending edits from IPs on this page, and they don't seem to stop. PC protection is already in place but is not enough in this case. CycloneYoris talk! 08:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 14:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2 IPs blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Didn't see the above--I think 2 days of semi won't make things worse, so I will leave it. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 14:39, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jasonbres (talk) 14:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 14:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Front page article. Semi protection for a day. Natadmim (talk) 13:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Fully protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of changing statistics without sourcing and sometimes without consensus.Kiro Bassem (talk) 16:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:42, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KRQ11 (talk) 19:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined I'm not seeing the usual signs of heavy vandalism like multiple reverted edits and so on. If I'm missing something please let me know and cite diffs. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP vandalism by multiple IPs, possibly at the request of the article subject. POLITANVM talk 21:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: User request Aasim 21:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 22:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Must be protected indefinitely. Edits indicate a possible WP:COI, being made on behalf of the company's PR representative. Fixerupper75 (talk) 08:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- 119.94.166.17 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is the only IP to edit the article and their edits were definitely not vandalism. SmartSE (talk) 14:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection. Chennai Passangai (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper and new account vandalizing school article. Meters (talk) 23:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- protected by user:Only at 00:59, September 14, 2020. Two weeks' semi. Meters (talk) 04:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Done (for the bot). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – 5 days of an IP-hopper adding an unsourced claim that he supposedly is dating or once dated someone named "Bree". Meters (talk) 04:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Elizium23 (talk) 04:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: How much longer it would wait for editing by an IP or new user after 7 years, but I cannot take this for semi-protection. 122.2.10.69 (talk) 23:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- @JBW: as the protecting admin. Woody (talk) 10:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- But unfortunately, there is no WP:BLP titles within articles. --122.2.10.69 (talk) 00:10, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- I’m not an admin here, but one thing I know for sure is that this article is protected because of you, IP vandal. Don’t think you’ll be able to convince an admin to unprotect the page. And also, how is the IPdavdal still able to edit this page? He/she should be blocked indefinitely. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 00:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe autoconfirmed users must be edited this school article, but instead of IP and new users, in order to comply with WP:BLP. --122.2.10.69 (talk) 13:34, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Exactly! That’s one of the reasons it’s protected. Now, I apologize for saying that you are a convicted vandal that should be blocked indefinitely, as you have made several constructive edits over the past few days. Don’t return to vandalism, though! ~ Destroyeraa🌀 16:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe autoconfirmed users must be edited this school article, but instead of IP and new users, in order to comply with WP:BLP. --122.2.10.69 (talk) 13:34, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- I’m not an admin here, but one thing I know for sure is that this article is protected because of you, IP vandal. Don’t think you’ll be able to convince an admin to unprotect the page. And also, how is the IPdavdal still able to edit this page? He/she should be blocked indefinitely. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 00:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- But unfortunately, there is no WP:BLP titles within articles. --122.2.10.69 (talk) 00:10, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Not unprotected. Rationale lands somewhere between insufficient and incomprehensible. Favonian (talk) 18:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent promotional push by several by multiple accounts. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I have removed some promotional edits and copyvios and we will see if problematic editing recurs. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:10, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism in the last few hours. Tampabay721 (talk) 01:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP(s), especially in the last few weeks but first appearing in June, who is not discussing or providing proof for their edit (based on misrepresented sources) in the talk page, even after being prompted to, and after several explanations. Sapedder (talk) 03:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:05, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is currently configured for pending changes protection but anonymous editors are not making any constructive edits. Instead, they all revert the article to a version from 30 May 2020 and were reverting to an earlier version than that. The pending changes still have to be addressed by established editors so it seems indefinite semi-protection would be a better option. AussieLegend (✉) 04:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:09, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After the expiry of protection vandalism and disruption has resumed. See [25] [26] and [27].
I request for protection for at-least one year as the politician is prone to vandalism due to controversies and upcoming 2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: SPA with COI constantly moving the draft to main without following the AfC process. Please also protect the title in main. Thank you. GSS 💬 20:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Also, please note that the article was previously deleted under Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IZZAT (musical artist) and Izzat (Izzat Khalikov). GSS 💬 20:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:55, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:54, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been hit by quite a lot of vandalism in the last few hours, from many different accounts. Thegreatluigi (talk) 00:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Red Phoenix talk 01:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
15 September 2020
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism (to do with trans people). Esowteric+Talk 16:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Short-term BLP violations from multiple editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent recent WP:BLP vandalism. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - TNT ✨ 20:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism from multiple IP editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - TNT ✨ 20:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Recent media attention concerning a possible transfer of Martínez to another European club has led to a strong increase in vandalism. Loewestein (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ohnoitsjamie: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch™ 15:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors, cut-and-pasting from off-site Wikia. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:38, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked for 1 week, can extend for a longer duration if they resume. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 15:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – a transfer that has not been officially announced, yet. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 12:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removals of reliably sourced content. — Newslinger talk 12:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. TheTVExpert (talk) 13:09, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruptive editing by IP vandals Prolix 💬 07:21, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 12:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Newslinger talk 12:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Heiko Gerber (talk) 08:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Can someone for the love of god lock this page down pleaseHeiko Gerber (talk) 11:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 12:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 08:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 12:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Arbitrary cast changes and addition unsourced figures by IPs. Ab207 (talk) 09:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 12:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism by multiple IPs and users. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 11:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'm working on it, trying to figure out the best method forward as there is an AC editor also involved in the vandalism. Primefac (talk) 13:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Primefac, you may want to consider a block for this IP, which has been edit warring to reinstate vandalised revisions for almost an hour now. Best, — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 13:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I report two IPs (42.189.119.175 and 2600:1700:B7E0:D5B0:A4F4:CCC3:D432:7BDB) to AIV for their vandalism. I also watch this article. If anyone vandalize, whenever IP or users, I also want to report that. 180.249.244.242 (talk) 13:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Primefac, you may want to consider a block for this IP, which has been edit warring to reinstate vandalised revisions for almost an hour now. Best, — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 13:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Bit of an edit conflict with the editor above, but there are IPs who are working to revert vandalism. I've partially blocked two editors and full-blocked the vagrant IP (and am now watching the article) so hopefully that will calm things down temporarily. If it gets back out of hand I'll likely set to ECP. Primefac (talk) 13:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Primefac: Oh, ah, I found the article's history via AIV, semi-protected the page for 2 weeks to prevent similar disruption from continuing, since it's clearly not limited to a small number of problematic users, and was about to check if someone had requested this action, to mark the request as "done". I didn't expect a declined request to exist. That said, if you consider ECP, having tried semi-protection before is probably a good idea, so I'll keep the protection for now. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:09, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Page has been the target for campaign-affiliated IPs and unregistered users since it was created. Please protect until November 4, 2020. KidAd talk 02:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All recent edits to this redirect have been unconstructive. As a redirect to a description of redirects, it may be considered an amusing target for vandalism. Most editors who understand Wikipedia's arcane processes well enough to improve the redirect will have an account by now. Sadly, I think this redirect needs protection similar to its target. Certes (talk) 09:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding a transfer which has not been completed. Kante4 (talk) 09:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: There is arbitration on this article that says IP and extended confirmed users are prohibited from editing. Yet the page remains unprotected and an IP user is doing BLP damage. Trillfendi (talk) 19:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. 11Fox11 (talk) 03:53, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple IP attack in progress. DB1729 (talk) 04:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Favonian (talk) 06:02, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is an ongoing discussion about the article's lead and multiple IPs refuse to engage on the talk page. User:Namiba 17:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment That looks like a content dispute. Where is the ongoing discussion? I don't see one at Talk:Sabrina_Ionescu. If there is one, the other editors should be directed to it. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined per above Ad Orientem (talk) 00:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:Vandalism; continuous removal/change of content by IP user without reason or source. Oliszydlowski (talk) 03:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Standard high level of IP vandalism to another team "owning" another team after a series loss. Probably only need 24-72hrs protection. Yosemiter (talk) 03:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been going on forever. Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. MPAY009 (talk) 03:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – The subject, Frank Leskaj, is an active contributor—if not the most active contributor—to this article, editing through dynamic IPs. Demonstrating their ignorance of Wikipedia policy, the user has admitted to violating WP:OWNERSHIP as well as WP:AUTO. To protect the article from COI edits made by an IP user, extended confirmed protection seems warranted. Jay D. Easy (t • c) 21:42, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Question: @Jay D. Easy: i see that there are more likely a content dispute than just BLP violation, so why not temporaily fully protected the page, or take the issue into talk page? If there was a IP involve in vandalism, i will report that in AIV 180.249.244.242 (talk) 22:09, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- The idea is to prevent the user from being able to contribute to the article of which they are the subject. So whichever way works best to achieve just that is fine by me! Jay D. Easy (t • c) 22:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Other than a handful of edits today, there was one on September 11, and then you have to go back to May to find the next edits. Also using ECP for a disruptive dynamic IP is like swinging a hammer at a fly. At most, if this were to become a pervasive issue, I might consider pending changes. Right now there is not enough disruptive editing to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I realize this person is currently in the news, but there is just not enough activity to warrant protection. This could change. If it does, come back. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:59, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Four months of an IP hopper falsely claiming that the dog Snowy from Tintin has a last name. Meters (talk) 00:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user:85.76.132.202 has been repeatedly removing sourced analysis from the article without explanation, and has ignored warnings on his/her talk page. — TAnthonyTalk 20:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:54, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 18:05, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Request article be salted. Recreated 3 times and deleted 3 times. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Salted for 1 year. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:39, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Done (for the bot). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A large amount of IP vandalism in the past day related to someone named Phil Burnell, a streamer who probably mentioned this article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:39, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been 3 IP addresses (180.246.174.52 (talk · contribs), 180.241.196.227 (talk · contribs), and 36.72.213.64 (talk · contribs)), all originated from Yogyakarta and used PT Telkom Indonesia, which keep erasing the history on the lead (the Southeast Asia thing), just the same like Aditiyo393 who on 19 April 2020 did the same because the sentence is "chauvinist" for him. Flix11 (talk) 06:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 07:55, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry by IP-hopping blocked user
- Rana Sanga (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Rajput dynasties and states (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Chahamanas of Shakambhari (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued probable sockpuppetry by blocked User:Showbiz826 after recent removal of protection on Rana Sanga (note both the IP and the user make the same grammatical errors of over-capitalising words and missing spaces after punctuation [28][29]). User has also targeted the other listed articles both through this IP as well as others. Alivardi (talk) 18:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Partial-blocked that range on the aforementioned articles plus a few others; there are slots for a few more if necessary. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been 3 IP addresses (180.246.174.52 (talk · contribs), 180.241.196.227 (talk · contribs), and 36.72.213.64 (talk · contribs)), all originated from Yogyakarta and used PT Telkom Indonesia, which keep erasing the history on the lead (the Southeast Asia thing), just the same like Aditiyo393 who on 19 April 2020 did the same because the sentence is "chauvinist" for him. Flix11 (talk) 06:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 07:55, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry by IP-hopping blocked user
- Rana Sanga (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Rajput dynasties and states (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Chahamanas of Shakambhari (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued probable sockpuppetry by blocked User:Showbiz826 after recent removal of protection on Rana Sanga (note both the IP and the user make the same grammatical errors of over-capitalising words and missing spaces after punctuation [30][31]). User has also targeted the other listed articles both through this IP as well as others. Alivardi (talk) 18:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Partial-blocked that range on the aforementioned articles plus a few others; there are slots for a few more if necessary. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
16 September 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longterm attempts to remove sourced information by KathleenKathleen12345 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) goign at least since January. I dont think this will end when the account is blocked. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 11:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: Meh. Not sure we want to SP prophylactically. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined per above. We don't protect pages proactively or to deal with a single disruptive editor. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Elizium23 (talk) 13:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:45, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP/new editor vandalism since yesterday. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:31, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Shadow4dark (talk) 21:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple IPs edit warring. Needs a block for a day or two. noq (talk) 14:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 19:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper vandalising. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- 2021 UEFA European Under-17 Championship qualification (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper vandalising. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:12, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 12:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. AydenBear (talk) 15:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 15:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Sentence in History section, Coordination of harassment subsection, para 1, third sentence - Almost certain that the following phrase:
is actually meant to say
- "cultivate a palatable narrative", rather than a "palpable" one, (meaning "able to be touched or felt, tangible", whereas the context suggests "acceptable or agreeable to one's taste", i.e. palatable, is meant).
Apologies if this is not correct place or procedure to ask for such an edit, but I found the directions a bit hard to follow. 122.105.187.37 (talk) 08:54, 15 September 2020 (UTC) 122.105.187.37 (talk) 09:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Done. This does appear to be the correct place to request such changes, since the talk page is protected. Thank you for your contribution! Vahurzpu (talk) 17:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Done – bot-friendly template. Favonian (talk) 19:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been consistently vandalized by unregistered users due to the nebula's naming so semi-protection would be greatly appreciated. There's also ongoing discussion in the Talk section on the issue of its name. Ponderosapine210 (talk) 10:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – already heavily vandalised in the past days. Victor Schmidt (talk) 13:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Its revision history says it all really. Telsho (talk) 16:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Reduce to extended confirmed: There is no good reason for this page to be fully protected. This article is not the subject of an edit war. Extended confirmed is enough. If anyone seriously violates BLP, they should be blocked or partially blocked from this page. Restricting editing to admins for no good reason directly violates WP:5P. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 22:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note there is discussion about this at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Full_protection_on_Susie_Boniface - MrOllie (talk) 00:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Done by Deepfriedokra. Favonian (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- actually, no. I just reset it after I lost it in a histmerge. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: High level of IP and new user vandalism. Seemplez 09:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined One user blocked, and IP stopped vandalizing after final warning. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP editors keep making unsourced changes to his year of birth. DH85868993 (talk) 10:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: resumption of defamatory claims [32], poorly sourced new claims, and readdition of same old claims, trying to defame the institution, that led to the page being semi-protected in March and April 2020 - Arjayay (talk) 11:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC):
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Attracting premature edits from IPs and new users because of transfer speculation. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by several IP users. Areaseven (talk) 13:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued IP vandalism after page protection removal over a possible Premier League transfer of a player. Krazytea(talk) 15:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated attempts to change the name of the star to one registered with a commercial star-name site. Lithopsian (talk) 15:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant additions of unverified information by his fanbase. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 07:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Random IP user persistently adding spam to article over several days. Could do with 3-4 days semi protection to convince them to stop. noq (talk) 08:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs from Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh POV pushing male-chauvinistic agenda [33] by rearranging caste in the Early life section as per their preference. The video source [34] clearly mentions the order in which it is reproduced in the article. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Caste warfare bullshit full of personal attacks. It's an edit war. Discuss
|
---|
}
Fylindfotberserk is a Brahmin Nazi. Pushing his Brahmin=Aryan nonsense on Wiki. Neil Nitin Mukesh is a fair skinned Indian so he wants to make him appear as if he is a fair skinned Brhamin so he can push his Brahmin=Aryan nonsense. One look at his profile tells that he is obsessed with genetics, whiteness and has some type of Nazi supremacist type ideology. Let's go through his name “Fylindfotberserk” first. Fylfot is an Anglo-Saxon swastika, while Berserk were Norse people. He has posted cherry picked “studies” and “genetic data” which show Brahmins as having high R1a1 DNA. Apparently, having high “R1a1” DNA makes someone more “Aryan" than others. He describes his ethnicity as *“Indo-Aryan (with some historical Mlechcha Indo-Scythian)”. Here is another interesting thread. This one is about the state of Bihar. This user has placed Bihar as part of East India and his reasoning for it is based on racial reasons. In this thread, they act as if different castes are different races or something even though no one can tell them apart. Talk:North India - Wikipedia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:North_India#Why_people_here_have_so_much_anti-Bihar_sentiments%3F) Some key points made by this user Fylindfotberserk. "Moreover Bengalis have ~40% R1a1a Y-DNA while Bengali Brahmins have it at HIghest 72%. If you go by that logic, you know what R1a stands for." —*Fylindfotberserk* These are cherry picked studies. People get different results from different DNA testing facilities and it is also based on statistical analysis and crap like that which is based on sample size. "For your Information, my forefathers migrated from Kashmir Valley and settled in Bengal, then in North East India." I guess he also wishes he were a Kashmiri. "fairest are the Semitic types and this look is highest among us Kasmiris. " "US KASHMIRIS" So, not only he wants to be Nordic, Anglo-Saxon, Scythian but also a Semite. No amount of studies can prove that one group is more "Aryan" than the other. If they test some 100 hundred people or even 10,000 people then they don't even represent 1% of any community in India, which has a population of over 1 billion people. This guy Fylindfotberserk has submitted cherry picked studies on Wiki which show Bengali Brahmins as having highest R1a1 DNA because he himself is a Bengali Brahmin and a Nazi/Aryan Supremacist with too much time on his hands. He literally believes in long debunked outdated Nazi race science. All Indians of all castes have both fair and dark people. Brahmins are not lighter than other castes. You can also find his name here. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Brahmin_Wikipedians He is obsessed with placing Brahmin first because that's the first thing someone will see when someone Googles his name. - comment from uninvolved editor Users seem to be involved in an edit war and there's little/no evidence of engaging in a discussion between either editors. RFPP is not appropriate measure to solve these issues as they will continue after page protection expires. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 10:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Your posting history clearly shows you are obsessed with genetics, skin tones and phenotypes, which is a long debunked Nazi pseudoscience. There is no "Dinaric" or "Alpine" or "proto-Nordic" as you talk in that thread. This is all debunked scientific racism. Nazis started measuring skulls, facial features and putting people in categories. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:North_India#Why_people_here_have_so_much_anti-Bihar_sentiments%3F Your profile is filled with genetic data about Brahmins and we can see how you boast of your fair skin on that Talk:North India thread. Why do you describe yourself as an "Indo-Aryan with some historical Mlechcha Indo-Scythian"? Brahmins are not lighter than other castes, let me remind you. No one can tell a person's caste or the state they come from based on their looks. I am not an experienced editor. But you have pushed your Brahmin=Aryan Nazi agenda all over Wiki. |
@Bishonen, Sitush, and RegentsPark: Check my work? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced information from IP edits. BOVINEBOY2008 09:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 12:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 19:12, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs making BLP violating comments. From one of them it appears that a guest on Fox said something negative about Norm Eisen, and so IPs are jumping on this article. Meters (talk) 01:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:00, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by 4 different users over an 8-minute span. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 04:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Elizium23 (talk) 21:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been plagued by disruptive editing for months. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 03:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is already getting vandalized again. It hasn't even been a day since it lost its protection status. Scorpions13256 (talk) 04:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Barumbarumba (talk) 18:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Range-blocked 82.78.0.0/18 on that article. Let's see how that goes; if more IPs crop up, we can semi. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. (for the bot) MelanieN (talk) 23:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated low-quality edits from tornadoguy (talk · contribs). Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. MelanieN (talk) 23:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repetition of IP disruptive editing. Jingiby (talk) 02:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; promoting non notable person by persistent addition to article. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism once again since the page has recently become unprotected. RM-Taylor (talk) 12:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I added the latest vandal to an existing partial block; I don't see much recent vandalism since protection last expired in June. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. (for the bot) MelanieN (talk) 23:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disputing editing by an anonymous editor. Keeps putting misinformed information on one of the tracks. HappyAppy10 (talk) 14:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @HappyAppy10: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment 171.237.74.68 is blocked for 2 weeks, and a small range used by them is also partial-blocked for a month. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. (for the bot) MelanieN (talk) 23:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Doubtful IDs, Sockpuppets and SPAs are involved in removing controversial/negative segments Hatchens (talk) 18:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – misinformation and vandalism. Hoppeboy13 (talk) 09:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism/unsourced edits spiking, as he has been sentenced to a jail term earlier today. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a couple of errant IP edits today, which have been handled. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:54, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Movies and TV series set in the Mickey Mouse universe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: IP disruptive editting. 98.230.196.188 (talk) 23:38, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of an extraordinary claim attributed to a blog like site. M.Bitton (talk) 00:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Ad Orientem (talk) 00:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I've issued a level 3 warning to the IP. If this continues, let me know and I will block them.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like this is either coordinated or the editor has a dynamic IP. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing to article by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - TNT ✨ 20:38, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been a vandal magnet for the last few days. Felicia (talk) 18:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Persistent page moving – This article needs to be stable as the current title. 110.137.122.52 (talk) 20:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: Article has been indefinitely edit and move extended confirmed protected by administrator El C. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:05, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator El C. (for the bot) MelanieN (talk) 23:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and/or disruption. Opalzukor (talk) 10:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I only see 2 reverts in the last 100 edits; much of the recent article has been written by anon IPs, and presumably most of what they've added is not vandalism? OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:09, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is not frequent but it's persistent. Let's see what PC can do. MelanieN (talk) 21:54, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreration of a page deleted multiple times under various names. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. Applies to Category:Survivors of COVID-19 and Category:People with coronavirus disease 2019. MelanieN (talk) 23:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Ongoing event. Natadmim (talk) 16:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The page is too heavily edited for PC to be effective. MelanieN (talk) 23:21, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
17 September 2020
Semi-protection: Match protection level with Template:Aired episodes. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 20:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Match protection level with Template:ColPollTable. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:50, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 20:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden, large increase in vandalism and problematic edits from IPs / new editors. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 16:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - TNT ✨ 17:21, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs from Lucknow vandalisng my talk page. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- (non-admin cmt) Looks like the IP got banned. Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 17:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- There are multiple IPs. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- (non-admin cmt) Looks like the IP got banned. Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 17:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. Favonian (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism by both anonymous and new users. Asartea (talk) 18:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Dispute over article name when I have noted WP:USPLACE and the exceptions of the state modifier based on the AP Stylebook. – The Grid (talk) 19:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations. Elizium23 (talk) 15:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch™ 15:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 16:45, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - TNT ✨ 17:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 18:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined There was a single IP editor making unsourced (though probably good-faith) edits, and had yet to be given a warning; I've since warned them about sourcing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:38, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. for the bot. (CC) Tbhotch™ 15:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent addition of unsourced birthdate to BLP article. Joeyconnick (talk) 16:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Deepfriedokra: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Perennial target for vandalism, and reversal of meanings / alteration of content without addition of sources. Controversial page subject to POV pushing. Every time I check in I find cleanup is needed due to IP and SPA changes that weren't caught at the time. Pending changes would also work. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 20:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: Merry meet and merry part --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. for the bot. (CC) Tbhotch™ 15:53, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The same anonymous user keeps removing content without any reasoning, 4th time now. I've asked why. No response. Maybe a little protection would dissuade them. TheLostBoy (talk) 13:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This is all about whether or not to include a photo of a badge taunting Leeds for having been supported by convicted paedophile Jimmy Savile? Yes, there are sources saying that the taunt occurs, but doesn't it border of goading to insist the photo be included here? [35] OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:31, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: This sounds like a content dispute, but I am loathe to protect the version that includes undue weight on a BLP issue. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:52, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: You should probably gain consensus before adding that back. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Well, it's a rivalry page. The content of the image shows the rivalry and is well-sourced, and can be backed up by other refs from Express, Telegraph, Metro and others. The same user is removing the image without reason. I'd leave it removed if there was a valid reason for it to be gone. TheLostBoy (talk) 16:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Does it really add anything to the page? The chant is already briefly mentioned (with a reference) in the text. Adding an image as well seems WP:UNDUE. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Well, it's a rivalry page. The content of the image shows the rivalry and is well-sourced, and can be backed up by other refs from Express, Telegraph, Metro and others. The same user is removing the image without reason. I'd leave it removed if there was a valid reason for it to be gone. TheLostBoy (talk) 16:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: ::::Well, that makes it a content dispute-- which needs discussion and consensus on the talk page. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 12:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending-changes: Extraordinarily high level of vandalism by IP addresses and users alike; the page's history shows more vandalism than any other type of constructive edit. Liamyangll (talk) 06:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been no edits at all for the last fortnight. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over the past few days. Angryjoe1111 (talk) 14:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Sock IP still extremely keen to have this article imply that Cohen might be Jewish (readding the same section on the day that the previous 6-month sock protection expired). Lord Belbury (talk) 07:53, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Move protection: Just recently got moved by a hacked account. Just saw it got hacked. 192.12.147.117 (talk) 13:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Move protected indefinitely. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:36, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Ohnoitsjamie: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)- Fixed the link. Iffy★Chat -- 13:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all edits over the last 2 weeks is vandalism from IPs or new users. Page has been on semi before, but vandalism has come right back after it ended. Requesting indefinite protection. NonsensicalSystem(err0r?)(.log) 13:53, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Protection User keeps ignoring MOS:DEADNAME and insists on renaming a transgender individual to their dead name, when the individual has requested to be known by their new name in media, with sources provided. There is unanimous consensus at Quinn's wikipedia page to use the new name, but the editor refuses to accept this and continually reverts it back to their incorrect name. I don't want to accuse anyone of homophobia, but the outright refusal to accept the new name is an example of it. 2607:FEA8:85E0:253:5960:D31:F672:ADAF (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- I appear to be that "user" (I thought I was an editor). The subject's article is in the process of a page move and I would like to see that happen before we affect other articles. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by an IP editor. JavaHurricane 05:27, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since protection was lifted on 9 September there have been 7 cases of non-constructive edits.
SSSB (talk) 08:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced and other BLP violations from IPs placing undue weight on his conviction yesterday. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent target of IP Socks over the last two years: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/A bicyclette/Archive. Mztourist (talk) 04:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined The SPI is not yet closed. I am also dubious about indefinite protection for a page that has never been protected before. That is not commonly done. I suggest this be discussed with the closing admin at the SPI. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ad Orientem I urge you to reconsider this given that the page has been frequently targeted by IP socks over the past 2 years. If you are unwilling to give indefinite protection at least give it a few months protection. I am tired of having to repeatedly take these POV-pushing IPs to SPI. Mztourist (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. Mztourist (talk) 05:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. CowHouse (talk) 04:42, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. per Wikipedia:General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: It seems the subject or their current management will not relent. The anon from Southern California continue to return to the article to remove an early work that is not longer for sale. Either indef protection to unconfirmed editors or indef ECP. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – To prevent reoccurring defamatory statements being added which are personal beliefs of the editor, and which have no valid source material. Lloydje (talk) 22:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:12, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism from multiple IP editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy 🍁 02:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 03:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – "New editors" (probably one person) constantly replacing sourced content with OR. M.Bitton (talk) 21:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – "New editors" (probably one person) constantly replacing sourced content with OR. M.Bitton (talk) 21:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should get the kids back to work. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 00:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism OpenMindedBloke (talk) 15:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined No vandalism since expiration of previous protection. On a side note; please do not add page protection icons to pages that are not in fact protected. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Flix11 (talk) 19:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing enough disruptive editing for protection, especially given the heavy level of editing and likely collateral damage. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 23:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Requesting upgrade to semi-protection due to serious BLP violations by multiple IPs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent disruptive editing; how many years has the pencil award business been going on at this bio? 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:23, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 23:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Basically a genre warrior, who shows up the instant protection is lifted, with the same stupid edits. Same as every other time protection has been added. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 05:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 23:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Smuckola: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- List of video games considered the best (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection: Persistent non-policy-compliant edits to a page with very strict sourcing criteria. This page is essentially a honeypot for casual IP address editors to add their favorite game. Article was semi-protected for a year by Courcelles in 2018, then for a year by Sergecross73 in 2019, and since the last year-long semi-protection expired, nothing but unproductive edits have piled up in the intervening month. See Talk:List_of_video_games_considered_the_best#Interesting_note_on_revision_history and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=List+of+video+games+considered+the+best . Think this page will never be safe to have not semi-protected, hence asking for indefinite rather than another year. SnowFire (talk) 19:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. for the bot. (CC) Tbhotch™ 15:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 23:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @SnowFire: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Lady A (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Numerous anonymous ips are making numerous "minor" edits over and over and running this article pushing a pov one sided view of the current name change case. Can the page be protected for a while until this does down a little, before being completely forgotten please? Plus, in the leade really? Thought it was an encyclopedia not a tabloid2A00:23C4:201:5F00:48DE:423E:637:9334 (talk) 22:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @2A00:23C4:201:5F00:48DE:423E:637:9334: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – DIsruptive, NPOV, COPYVIO and vandalism by the clubs' supporters. Bad faith edits, like the addition of false info, original research and theories etc. and the trend seems to rise. There some good edits also. Thus, requesting pending changes protection. ❯❯❯ S A H A 14:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see any problem edits by IPs at all in the past few weeks - and multiple IPs making constructive edits. MelanieN (talk) 22:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over the caste of the rulers. Disruptive edits to glorify the rulers and their caste. Reo kwon (talk) 14:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- 2020–21 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase and play-off round (Main Path) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Flix11 (talk) 17:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing the usual signs of serious disruptive editing. If I'm missing something please ping me with diffs. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Cognissonance (talk) 20:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Short range-block for the IP; if they return after 72 hours, could be a candidate for a longer partial block. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP hopping attacks. Meters (talk) 22:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Two vandals, two rangeblocks. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:36, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Slow chronic persistent vandalism. —valereee (talk) 00:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and vandalism war by User:216.115.138.237 and User: 2600:1702:1c50:c3d0:8c93:50:e83e:d892. Sportzpikachu (talk) 01:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
18 September 2020
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The article is about controversial sikh preacher and being continuously vandalized by unregistered users and IP Adresses. It needs to be protected. Jagmit Singh Brar 17:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP changes to DoB, contray to source and consensus on talk page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely.--RegentsPark (comment) 20:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism and addition of unsourced content. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:36, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--RegentsPark (comment) 20:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from a wide range of IPs. Nathanielcwm (talk) 10:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like only 1-2 instances of vandalism per day for a couple of days now, and the article is new so there is lots of potential for IPs to make positive contributions. If it gets any worse, though, please feel free to re-request. GoodnightmushTalk 16:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sakiv (talk) 16:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated vandalism, probably won't stop anytime soon due to the groups younger fanbase. Madbrad200 (talk) 18:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:37, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal or redirect and recreation of single sentence stub by different IP addresses who make no attempts at discussion. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 14:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked one range and one single IP. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper repeatedly hijacking redirect. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked one range and one single IP. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of IP unhelpfulness and vandalism, caused by the club going out of business a couple of days ago. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:59, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP vandalisms. Editoneer (talk) 13:36, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – I am scared if vandals move this page. Acidic Carbon (Corrode) (Corrosive liquid) 13:38, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined User talk pages are rarely protected, and if so, only for a short duration in severe cases of vandalism or abuse. I can see no abuse, and especially no attempts to move the page, so far. Lectonar (talk) 13:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SangrurUser (talk) 13:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:14, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obviously a subject where strong opinions are expressed and which is often the object of sweeping alterations by IPs without the least semblance of building an encyclopaedia, leading to drastically different versions of the page to appear depending on what PIV is being pushed and whether anyone has reverted the damage at that moment in time. GPinkerton (talk) 09:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protection would be overkill at least at the moment; disruption not too heavy. Lectonar (talk) 10:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from varying IPs. InterestGather (talk) 09:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I can't see a useful IP edit over the last three years that I looked. Johnuniq (talk) 10:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 10:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: He is a world leader now. Even short-time vandalisms can have have effects and will be in news. Semi protection is necessary. I propose to start with 2 months and continue. - The9Man (Talk) 11:12, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edit war. Sportzpikachu (talk) 04:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Multiple IPs edit warring over which catch phrase should be listed for 2020. None of them are sourced so I have blanked it pending a source. Meters (talk) 05:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Highly-used file on enwiki (virtually used on every user talk page with the welcome template). File is locked on Wikimedia Commons. Aasim 05:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- This looks desirable to me and the page information for the image on Commons confirms that only administrators (Commons admins) can upload/change the image. Any thoughts on full creation protection for the local file? If someone wants to do that, please go ahead with my support but I thought I'd ask for opinions first. Johnuniq (talk) 09:57, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Done I concur; if push comes to shove can be unprotected at a pinch. Lectonar (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by User:213.205.198.111. Sportzpikachu (talk) 06:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edit war. Sportzpikachu (talk) 04:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — LeoFrank Talk 05:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from anoymous IP user(s). --Salimfadhley (talk) 06:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 08:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP removal of content. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 02:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:15, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Sportzpikachu (talk) 03:15, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Quite surprised that this page has not been protected more often given the highly controversial nature of the subject. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple disruptive IPs and new accounts over the past 2 days. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk • work) 05:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- 2020–21 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase and play-off round (Main Path) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Flix11 (talk) 17:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing the usual signs of serious disruptive editing. If I'm missing something please ping me with diffs. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP hopping attacks. Meters (talk) 22:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Two vandals, two rangeblocks. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:36, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and vandalism war by User:216.115.138.237 and User: 2600:1702:1c50:c3d0:8c93:50:e83e:d892. Sportzpikachu (talk) 01:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 02:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:36, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – by multiple IPs - IPv6s continuing to change name without explanation, after 2600:387:b:5::ac was blocked. theinstantmatrix (talk) 02:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:37, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – DIsruptive, NPOV, COPYVIO and vandalism by the clubs' supporters. Bad faith edits, like the addition of false info, original research and theories etc. and the trend seems to rise. There some good edits also. Thus, requesting pending changes protection. ❯❯❯ S A H A 14:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see any problem edits by IPs at all in the past few weeks - and multiple IPs making constructive edits. MelanieN (talk) 22:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over the caste of the rulers. Disruptive edits to glorify the rulers and their caste. Reo kwon (talk) 14:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Cognissonance (talk) 20:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Short range-block for the IP; if they return after 72 hours, could be a candidate for a longer partial block. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Slow chronic persistent vandalism. —valereee (talk) 00:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruptive editing by adding unsourced content. Sricsi (talk) 22:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism. Recent edits have unsourced edits. Haveyouseenthisboy (talk) 23:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:42, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of a death date, which is a decided hoax; or at any rate, has yet to be reported in the media. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP vandals since today, Sept 17 is Constitution Day. I realize the vandalism is temporary, but today and the next couple of days it's a high-visibility article. TJRC (talk) 00:19, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- And I see it's featured on the Main Page via Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/September 17 ([36]), which is probably driving both the vandalism and the viewership. TJRC (talk) 00:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent problem with IPs and new users misusing this page to attack various public figures, by labeling them "useful idiots". There are obvious BLP implications for this persistent disruption. Examples over the past month: [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42]. Thucydides411 (talk) 15:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruptive edits are not terribly frequent, but since most of them are BLP violations, protection is warranted. MelanieN (talk) 22:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: All IP/SPA edits since June are same DE seen in prior page protection. UW Dawgs (talk) 18:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:37, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – shooting has recently re-entered public sphere/social media. page history shows several recent disruptive edits attempting to paint Rose as a criminal despite Hester's conviction. a few weeks max of giving page reviewers like myself time to review edits would be much appreciated. Amccann421 (talk) 22:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Jerry Harris (television personality) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Longer-term page protection: recently arrested for allegedly soliciting sex with minors. Now getting drive-by BLP VIOL. Gleeanon409 (talk) 22:50, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:36, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:37, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
19 September 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 21:19, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, changing nationality of film. BOVINEBOY2008 19:05, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's been a sudden barrage of edits from three IP addresses (two IPv4 in different blocks and one IPv6), all of them adding garbage in Portuguese. Largoplazo (talk) 21:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 21:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 21:19, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, changing nationality of film. BOVINEBOY2008 19:05, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's been a sudden barrage of edits from three IP addresses (two IPv4 in different blocks and one IPv6), all of them adding garbage in Portuguese. Largoplazo (talk) 21:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 21:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP addition of non-notable people to a list article. Has happened for years, but it's been weekly since August. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:35, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked range for 6 months. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:34, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 18:44, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This page has been protected six times since October 2018, due to the same IP-jumping editor re-adding unsourced content to the BLP. They've returned again to continue with this disruption. Note the last log was for a one year stint. They also like to blank the talkpage too. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- I was about to add the same request. I would strongly suggest the article talk page be protected for a short period as well. The same editor (using IP hops) has exhibited the same behaviour in the past on other articles. Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Instead of protection, how about a long-term partial block of 1.128.0.0/11 from editing both this article and its talk page? Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oh yes, didn't think of that. Good idea. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Although annoyingly, for technical reasons, that would have to be implemented as 32 individual partial rangeblocks of 1.128.0.0/16 through 1.159.0.0/16. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- I suspect the range block would be far too wide to be acceptable - it's a dynamic IP hopper, so if we block a range they will simply pop up someplace else - unless we tried to block everything fro 1.129 up - which strikes me as far too wide a range. The protection at Nathan Coulter-Nile has been successful in stopping the endless vandalism of the sort we're currently experiencing at Steketee. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Although annoyingly, for technical reasons, that would have to be implemented as 32 individual partial rangeblocks of 1.128.0.0/16 through 1.159.0.0/16. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oh yes, didn't think of that. Good idea. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Salvio 18:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- List of films in the public domain in the United States (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP6-hopping editor deliberately adding errors to article, refusing to engage on talk page. TJRC (talk) 02:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked IP for one week. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Edit warring by IP to introduce unsourced content. Display name 99 (talk) 03:48, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 16:05, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Looking at the page history, 90% of all edits in the last month have been vandalism or quickly reverted. Ghinga7 (talk) 18:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:18, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:04, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting on time.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:26, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Sushant Singh Rajput-related articles
- Death of Sushant Singh Rajput (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Sushant Singh Rajput (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Rhea Chakraborty (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Move protection: Highly controversial page. Please move protect this page in order to avoid users who moving it without consensus and please also invoke WP:ARBIPA in that pages. 118.96.188.179 (talk) 07:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- @El C: You ECP edit protected two of these (and ECP move protected Sushant Singh Rajput). Do you have an opinion on this request? I don't see any attempt to move the other two articles so am not inclined to preemptively protect, but would be fine with that if severe problems are likely. Is WP:ARBIPA applicable? Johnuniq (talk) 10:12, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Johnuniq, ARBBLP would be more applicable, I think, but ARBIPA, too. I don't recall any disruptive moves for any of these pages. I suppose disruptive moves of Death of Sushant Singh Rajput are within the realm of possibility, with ones for Rhea Chakraborty being far less likely. I have move protected Death of Sushant Singh Rajput at admin level due to its sensitive nature, which by definition precludes bold moves — only move requests would be appropriate for that page. I have opted to take no action at the Rhea Chakraborty page at this time. Sushant Singh Rajput is already move protected, so its mention is redundant in this request. El_C 17:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- I think that requests is done, and i withdraw this remaining request. 118.96.188.179 (talk) 20:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Johnuniq, ARBBLP would be more applicable, I think, but ARBIPA, too. I don't recall any disruptive moves for any of these pages. I suppose disruptive moves of Death of Sushant Singh Rajput are within the realm of possibility, with ones for Rhea Chakraborty being far less likely. I have move protected Death of Sushant Singh Rajput at admin level due to its sensitive nature, which by definition precludes bold moves — only move requests would be appropriate for that page. I have opted to take no action at the Rhea Chakraborty page at this time. Sushant Singh Rajput is already move protected, so its mention is redundant in this request. El_C 17:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 12:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Fan biased IP vandalism and edit war. Gabrielflorin01 (talk) 13:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors changing date format tag of article from MDY to DMY without consensus (presumably same editor). 76.69.143.146 (talk · contribs) used personal attacks on my talk page accusing me of being a "American hegemonist telling Canadians what to do.", asserting that Canada only uses DMY (which even our own article on date formats in countries contradicts). ViperSnake151 Talk 14:59, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:57, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please create-protect this title in draft space against re-creation. AFC is not used to submit corrections to existing articles anyway. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:43, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Already done by administrator L235. Favonian (talk) 11:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 06:05, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits by IPs, obviously same person, hell bent on removing/changing statistics of the pro-wrestler which is sourced from a reliable agency ESPN as per WP:PW/RS guidelines. Either he removed that citing no mention in the WWE profile [43] or uses an unreliable source like "WrestlingData" [44]. We should be maintaining the stable version. Also removed other external links like IMDb and twitter (follows WP:ELMIN) with an edit summary "useless links". The IP is currently blocked but vandalism may commence with other IPs. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:37, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 21:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been two IP edits since May, made by the same IP, and which appear to be good faith edits. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:37, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 00:48, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 3 weeks (talk · contribs). OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. iAdnan (talk) 03:44, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 12 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Titodutta (talk) 08:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – persistent vandalism by IPs which is going unnoticed by the bots, which leaves those harmful edits up for hours at a time. Curbon7 (talk) 19:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution.--RegentsPark (comment) 20:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Phineas and Ferb the Movie: Candace Against the Universe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jasonbres (talk) 20:35, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked several ranges that should address the issue; ping me if they resume. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Recent death; can we please IAR WP:NOPREEMPT as this article is already a troll magnet and is likely to rival the main page in views. It's unlikely to need to need to be moved anytime in the near future. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Done as a discretionary sanction which invokes WP:ARBBLP. El_C 23:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
20 September 2020
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 11:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This largely seems to be a difference of opinion as to which of two official photos to use. Please discuss this issue on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent additon of unsourced material by IP. I previously made a report here and a range block was instituted. It didn't work. Display name 99 (talk) 18:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. The original range block was literally one bit too short and a new one has been put in place. Favonian (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP with 100,000 pageviews, fewer than 30 watchers. at least one case of a BLP vio going unnoticed for eight minutes until it was reverted by another IP. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP disruptive editing. Appears to be one user avoiding WP:3RR by using many different IPs (that geolocate to the same place). Bmf 051 (talk) 11:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of disruptive editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator GiantSnowman. Favonian (talk) 20:29, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP hopping disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:43, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected as arbitration enforcement--Ymblanter (talk) 20:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)
Semi-protected indefinitely. It just came off a two year protection. This is not an article that can remain unprotected.– Muboshgu (talk) 20:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. InterestGather (talk) 10:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected No reason to edit this file. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:05, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Vandalism has continued after the expiry of the previous semi protection. Idell (talk) 16:00, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Western Balkans articles
- List of Serb countries and regions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Radoslav of Serbia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Vlastimir (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Serbs of Croatia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Michael of Zahumlje (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Zachlumia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Liburnia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Vlastimirović dynasty (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Kanalites (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Tribes of Montenegro (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Red Croatia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Administrative divisions of medieval Serbia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Zaharija of Serbia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Višeslav of Serbia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Klonimir (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Bulgar–Serb War (853) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Principality of Serbia (early medieval) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Miki Filigranski (talk) 16:43, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment It looks like most of those articles have been disrupted by a single (now blocked) IP; not seeing a recent "high level" of vandalism otherwise. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined, if some editors have seen more disruption than one or two edits of an already blocked user please renominate them.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs and User:Ahahshshs. Sportzpikachu (talk) 12:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Glen (talk) 13:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Request to pp-templates
The following pages include pp-templates and are not protected. Due to they are .css pages I cannot edit them myself.
- User:AHollender (WMF)/sandbox/2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/styles.css (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Alucard 16/userpage.css (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:BeywheelzLetItRip/common.css (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:D.wine/sandbox/styles.css (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Eteethan/userpage/userpage.css (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:GoldenRing/common.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:GoldenRing/difflist.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:GoldenRing/generate-diffs.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:GoldenRing/geotest.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:GoldenRing/userlinks.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:GoldenRing/wordcount.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Kvwiki1234/CovidTemplate/styles.css (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Module editer/common.css (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Morgankevinj/userpage.css (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Mr. Juicyfun/styles.css (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Tvx1/common.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Thanks. (CC) Tbhotch™ 22:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Tbhotch: Not even ordinary Wikipedia administrators can edit these .css and .js files. That's the privilege of the owners and interface administrators, the latter being a very select group of 13 members, one (officially) of whom is a bot. They can be reached at the interface administrators' noticeboard. Favonian (talk) 10:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch™ 15:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... (CC) Tbhotch™ 15:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism and unfounded claims of doping in the wake of his soon-to-be-confirmed TdF victory. Benjamin112 (talk) 23:04, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 23:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent hoaxing from multiple IPs and an account surrounding Elisa Lam's death. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 06:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis (talk) 08:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: This is more of a cautious move; this will probably be extremely contentious with trolls from either side trying to push their POV. Thanoscar21talk, contribs 00:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Talk pages are only protected in response to especially serious disruption due to obvious collateral damage. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Until investigation is over. Removing COI tags. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 01:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP edit-warring. Similar to other articles in the Balkan topic area that have seen persistent IP edit-warring.--Maleschreiber (talk) 01:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 04:15, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 04:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Originally at Superorganism, multiple moves back and forth. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war involving IP users. Tvx1 15:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined The edit warring seems to have died down. If it resumes come back. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:05, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – racist remark. Flix11 (talk) 18:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 20:19, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Chronic IP vandalism, insertion of unsourced or poorly-sourced opinion and commentary. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Unneccesary edits by IP addresses without adding references on where they got the information. Anonymous1941 (talk) 21:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:46, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined Looks like things have died down. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AR.EBE.owo; the sockmaster had also targeted this page in relation to its sublabels. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: 6th protection request: same IP range vandalizing and adding unsourced content. Nehme1499 (talk) 22:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I reports all IP range who intent to vandalize the article that you requested for protection (185.98.206.4, 185.98.206.10, 185.98.206.11), so blocking these IPs is more necessary. 118.96.188.179 (talk) 22:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked range for 1 month OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Preloaded onto every edit request page. Match wrapper protection level. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 21:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated bad faith edits and vandalism from IP addresses beginning on September 18, possibly from same individual who instigated an edit war on the same page a few weeks ago and was eventually banned for sockpuppeting. The talk page also shows that these IP address users seem unusually interested in defending the aforementioned banned editor. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 00:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Ad Orientem: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Looks like he got his ass kicked and like 50 people are letting us know by adding a death date, clarifying that he got sent to the shadow realm, etc which is informative but not quite encyclopedic. Might justify a semi for the next day or so { } 01:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:01, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper from Indonesia vandalising. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:36, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Template protection: High-risk template – Used by template-protected Template:Category articles containing non-English-language text. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:04, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Swarms of IPs keep tweaking the article, breaking syntax, with no regard for citing or formatting anything, apparently related to some current event. Should be over after a few days, but protection meanwhile would be good. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 09:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Long history of disruption here. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Contentious topic subject to unverified fake news vandalism by Indian nationalists. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 12:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent high level of IP vandalism and the constant changing of information. Maxwell King123321 12:44, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:01, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: The protection was back in 2017 so it is most likely no longer necessary. Also, the protecting admin (Wizardman) is no longer very active in protecting pages. 22059 (contribs) 19:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Why do not you ask Drmies first? He is an administrator and active.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- I see, because you are not confirmed. Well, let us see whether he gets the ping.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:37, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 21:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPv6 addresses have repeatedly blanked this draft, so semiprotection is needed. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 23:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
21 September 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated, unexplained blanking of content by editor using different IPs. — TAnthonyTalk 20:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This request was lazily dismissed yesterday as "just another content dispute". But it's not. It appears one person has been using different IP addresses since August to semi-regularly genre-war the infobox (27 August, 14 September, 16 September, 18 September, 18 September (again), 19 September, 20 September, 21 September, 21 September (again). These changes are directly in conflict with the long-standing consensus at the article's talk page and what is clearly verified in the article's Critical reception section. isento (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
List of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies characters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Temporary Semi-Protection: Persistent addition of a section that already has its own page. Unnamed anon (talk) 21:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:57, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Ad Orientem: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to Jovita Idár being the subject of today's Google Doodle. NedFausa (talk) 18:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IceWelder [✉] 18:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Rather relentless self-promotion using a series of IPs. MrOllie (talk) 14:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Upcoming TV show (it was pushed back to 2021) with high level of IP vandalism/false changes frequently. Protection expired a while ago, and the same types of vandalism has happened. TheFallenPower (talk) 18:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Removal of semi-protection: The article was semi-protected due to sock puppetry the better part of a decade ago. The protecting admin does not appear to be currently active. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 20:29, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Seeing as it's a request for reduction in the page's protection level, I can indeed confirm.
207.161.86.162 (talk) 20:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Seeing as it's a request for reduction in the page's protection level, I can indeed confirm.
Note: If there are no objections in the next 24hrs I will go ahead and unprotect the page. That said, I suspect it will be short lived. The subject is a lightning rod for disruptive and POV editing. Ping NawlinWiki. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotected Ad Orientem (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ad Orientem: One or more pages in this request have not been unprotected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 21:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Rather relentless self-promotion using a series of IPs. MrOllie (talk) 14:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Upcoming TV show (it was pushed back to 2021) with high level of IP vandalism/false changes frequently. Protection expired a while ago, and the same types of vandalism has happened. TheFallenPower (talk) 18:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Removal of semi-protection: The article was semi-protected due to sock puppetry the better part of a decade ago. The protecting admin does not appear to be currently active. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 20:29, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Seeing as it's a request for reduction in the page's protection level, I can indeed confirm.
207.161.86.162 (talk) 20:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Seeing as it's a request for reduction in the page's protection level, I can indeed confirm.
Note: If there are no objections in the next 24hrs I will go ahead and unprotect the page. That said, I suspect it will be short lived. The subject is a lightning rod for disruptive and POV editing. Ping NawlinWiki. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotected Ad Orientem (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ad Orientem: One or more pages in this request have not been unprotected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 21:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A lot of disruptive editing and/or vandalism on this page. If you look at the page's history you will see a number of big edits (vadalism) reverted to the original. Sometimes 'vandalism' is used in the edit summary. Especially IP user 176.74.124.9 does a lot of disprutive editing, but there are several other IP users who vandalise the page. This especially happens under heading level 2 "Contestant progress", which is updated every week, since there is a new episode of the show every week. The IP users add false information for the following weeks. Thijslandsmeer (talk) 11:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:54, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs are edit warring to add contentious info without any reliable sources. Grayfell (talk) 04:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are changing nationality and adding other names in lead without sources. Ab207 (talk) 07:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 10:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Done I'm not seeing any vandalism but as this looks like a high visibility template I have indefinitely semi-protected it. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:57, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by two IPs. Sportzpikachu (talk) 01:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been going on forever. Twenty previous protections is enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Same section has been blanked several times this month from different IP users. — motevets (talk) 01:51, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over removal of sourced content. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Template protection: High-risk template – Match protection level with Template:Infobox power station. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. Semi PP has been in place for a while. Not seeing a need to up the protection level. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 19:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. // Liftarn (talk) 12:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Latest IP blocked 31 hours. Bishonen | tålk 16:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Rising popularity has led to quite a few instances of unconstructive edits and vandalism in this article. I expect that it will continue unless action is taken. DatGoodDude342 16:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism dating back to the 15th. All appear to be in the same range and get used once before changing to try again. Helper202 (talk) 17:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Borderline; looks like at least three ranges, but at the moment all of those are blocked, and the blocks can be renewed if they resume. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped--Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Article is vandalised frequently after multiple semis have expired. As article is not edited frequently with regular content I think pending changes is appropriate here. FozzieHey (talk) 10:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 16:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandals. Re-protect the page, please. - The9Man (Talk) 14:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 15:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP disruption ongoing—same non-notable person being added to the list, almost daily since August. Range block insufficient. Also COI/N has been notified. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 15:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. More blocks issued. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Two different non-autoconfirmed users have claimed this person is dead, with no reliable sourcing. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Vandalism by posting uncited and potentially untrue facts by trolls after the page was linked to Reddit and reached the front page. 171.76.111.103 (talk) 08:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. isento (talk) 00:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined This looks more like run of the mill content disputes as opposed to vandalism. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- There are consensus's at the talk page supporting the revision this user (or users) is undoing. And they are using different IP addresses to do it for the last week. isento (talk) 08:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: For 24 hours. Seems to be attracting far more than the usual amount of vandalism. 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 24h, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., extended confirmed protection is not needed at this point--Ymblanter (talk) 11:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A lot of disruptive editing and/or vandalism on this page (especially at the contestant progress). Thijslandsmeer (talk) 21:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined I'm not seeing a pattern of pervasive vandalism. If I am missing something please provide diffs. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Added explanation: If you look at the page's history you will see a number of big edits (vadalism) reverted to the original. Sometimes 'vandalism' is used in the edit summary. Especially IP user 176.74.124.9 does a lot of disprutive editing, but there are several other IP users who vandalise the page. This especially happens under heading level 2 "Contestant progress", which is updated every week, since there is a new episode of the show every week. The IP users add false information for the following weeks, which all has to be reverted each time.
Long term semi-protection: Most of the IP edit are limited to adding spam links to mirrors, forks etc. Many of them have sneaky edit summaries. This has been going on for weeks. Let's stop it. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., disruption is steady but not so frequent, and there are rare useful IP edits--Ymblanter (talk) 07:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Five instances of blanking of broadly the same content in the last 2.5 days. Mutt Lunker (talk) 09:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is about an upcoming election, and improper manipulation of the content may result in manipulation of voters and therefore the election itself. This page should be protected until election day. Legowerewolf (talk) 20:04, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Question: I do not see any vandalism that occured after that, so why you request extend confirmed protection even not even IPs vandalize this? If this protection your request happens, this is more likely a semi-protected if IP vandalism persisted. 118.96.188.179 (talk) 21:27, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support the sentiment behind this, but unsure of any existing consensus on the issue Thepenguin9 (talk) 21:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalised by the same user on different IPs making flatulence related edits consistently since 12 August. Dylsss (talk) 21:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by an IP from St. Petersburg. Flix11 (talk) 13:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Presistent vandalism from IPs; [45] [46] [47] [48] [49]. Foxnpichu (talk) 16:05, 20 September 2020 (UTC)m
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism and ip users are adding misleading details for political fight. Chennai Passangai (talk) 16:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Khamzat Chimaev (fighter) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Khamzat Chimaev (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite full-protection until solution is found Persistent excessive use of deletion requests relating to a content dispute. Are finding a solutions on reliable sources for clarity and merge request is ongoing. Kent Bargo (talk) 18:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined Blanked and redirected Khamzat Chimaev (fighter) to the already created Khamzat Chimaev. The page history is preserved in case there is anything worth merging. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism since September 15, predominantly genre-warriors, but more sinister developments in the last 24 hours regarding Our Culture Mag being replaced by Rolling Stone. User:Konpappis seems to be the user account of Our Culture Mag's creator Konstantinos Pappis, while other users involved seem to have been adding that website's content to the critical reception sections of Wikipedia album articles for a year or so. Now one of the users involved has taken to removing sourced content with their IP. Week-Long Protection should do the trick while I investigate further and take this elsewhere. Thanks. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 00:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined Looks like the disruption has died down. If it resumes, come back. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Oceanwww (talk) 05:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 245CMR (talk) 08:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New users vandalise article with defamatory content. NJD-DE (talk) 22:01, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New users vandalise article with defamatory content. NJD-DE (talk) 22:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eóin (talk) 01:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated reversion and edit warring by one user jumping between several different IPs over the last couple days. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 19:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Recent spate of cast additions and removals. Potential sockery?. Thepenguin9 (talk) 20:29, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Mazca. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Help:Introduction/All and related pages
- Help:Introduction/All (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Help:Introduction to policies and guidelines/All (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Help:Introduction to editing with Wiki Markup/All (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Help:Introduction to images with Wiki Markup/All (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Help:Introduction to tables with Wiki Markup/All (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Help:Introduction to talk pages/All (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Help:Introduction to the Manual of Style/All (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Help:Introduction to navigating Wikipedia/All (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Help:Introduction to tables with VisualEditor/All (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Help:Introduction to images with VisualEditor/All (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Help:Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor/All (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Help:Introduction to editing with VisualEditor/All (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: The rest of the Help:Intro series is indef semi-protected. Since the introduction of the /All pages (which just transclude a series), the same sorts of test edits from beginners have been showing up. I'm requesting for those pages, as well as the VisualEditor pages which no one has bothered to make yet but which will take the same form. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 22:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected existing pages. The red linked can be protected once created. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ad Orientem: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 01:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: tv channel. Chennai Passangai (talk) 13:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined "tv channel" is not one of the criteria for protection. That article has been edited twice in 2020, and neither of those edits were vandalism. Please don't make further reports here until you read Wikipedia:Protection_policy. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism spanning multiple months. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:27, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Anonymous editors have repeatedly been adding unsourced information regarding a possible replacement for their recently-deceased singer Riley Gale. One editor even just used a poor unreliable source as a reference. I'm thinking maybe leave the page protected for at least one month or three months. MetalDiablo666 (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Frequent reversions back and forth violating NPOV (currently has a deeply wounded, I would say racist, tone), including by a user BMK with a suspicious amount of edits to do with Nazis and hate groups. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.18.145.104 (talk) 12:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Iranian military pages
- Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Islamic Republic of Iran Army (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Pahlevun (talk) 12:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected 6 months and 1 month respectively. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been going on forever. Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
22 September 2020
Macrophilia
Macrophilia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection (preferably on the longer side): Recent meatpuppetry going on at this article, which usually gets little to no traction. See what is stated here and here. The case for sticking to what the sources state and with WP:Due weight has been made on the talk page by three different experienced editors (me included), but we are being overwhelmed by obvious meatpuppets. A WP:CheckUser already looked into socking. Otherwise, I would state that there are multiple socks there. On the socking front, there is now an IP there making edits against consensus; this is very likely a logged-out editor. If semi-protection does not work, the article will likely need full-protection for a few days. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 21:43, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:35, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 21:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 22:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated in article space and draft space. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive edits by anon IPs. Vjmlhds 18:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits by anon IPs. Vjmlhds 18:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The usual "Persian victory" vandalism has returned. Brandmeistertalk 19:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--RegentsPark (comment) 20:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. At the page List of largest church buildings, I please ask you to take a look the Revision History of the page. For example, recently the user 2605:a000:121e:c507:c971:cc9c:862e:fbb0 and the user 2600:6C46:6B80:49EB:ACF1:4CDD:708A:54A9 made several random editions ignoring all the discutions on the Talk:List_of_largest_church_buildings and even mixing the information between the several lines there. The page since beginning 2020 is constantly being vandalized and/or being target of disruptive editing, therefore I would like to request that the List of largest church buildings be locked indefinitely to only allow editions of recognized editors. 84.241.194.81 19:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant reverting of correct info. Megppg99 (talk) 20:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous disruptive editing by adding unsourced content. Sricsi (talk) 20:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Higher than usual level of vandalism today. Kj cheetham (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
semi-protection. Vital Page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tokyo Metro 6000 series (talk • contribs) 03:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 14:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Moneytrees. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Low level vandalism throughout the year to BLP. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content from IPs. Article has been protected four times previously for the same reasons, and now the same type of edits have continued ever since the page was unprotected. Drovethrughosts (talk) 16:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 17:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – persistent unsourced changes to this footballer's current club, made by IPs. Likely to continue for a few more days. RetiredDuke (talk) 18:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IceWelder [✉] 08:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Continuous draftification is making me want to protect it. Acidic Carbon (Corrode) (Corrosive liquid) 14:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Glen (talk) 15:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent personal attacks. (CC) Tbhotch™ 18:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The topic is in the news due to the death by suicide of the alleged perpetrator. Various IPs adding non-BLP compliant material, such as here: [50]. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —valereee (talk) 17:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – persistent additions of unsourced and copyvio information, suspect coi editing by an IP. I'm hoping if we semiprotect for a few days, the IP will register an account and maybe we can get them to dialogue. —valereee (talk) 12:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:35, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This is a hot-button topic right now, and it won't tone down anytime soon. A look at the page history shows the need for protection. 1990'sguy (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism spate from 2 IPs and an account. DBaK (talk) 07:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 12:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – per WP:ARBEE and WP:APL. 122.2.10.69 (talk) 10:03, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Constant disruptive editing involving MOS:CAPS. ResPM come to my window 11:57, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 12:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Constant disruptive editing usually involving MOS:CAPS. ResPM come to my window 11:57, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 12:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. – 2.O.Boxing 15:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Glen (talk) 15:14, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: string of single edit accounts adding copyvio images last 16 edits = 8 additions + 8 deletions - Arjayay (talk) 11:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
SSSB (talk) 12:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – lots of IP edits around this (and her husband's article already semi'd), blp issue remained in article for several months. Ravensfire (talk) 13:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by anonymous editors over long-term period of time. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruptive editing. ZimZalaBim talk 15:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: The IP has already been blocked. Bishonen | tålk 16:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., a new one showed up--Ymblanter (talk) 11:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism. User OliverDeBriz has made a number of questionable edits on 3rd September and this User has since been blocked on the 17th (with a history of warnings on other articles). These same type of edits (practically the same) were made again on the 16th and once again on the 21st by 2 separate IPs. I have reason to believe that these IPs belong to this User. -- Tytrox (talk) 04:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:14, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of OR by autoconfirmed accounts. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:57, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article was recently temporarily protected but it seems like the vandalism hasn't really stopped. Telsho (talk) 22:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No disruptive editis that would be effected by semi protection. This looks like an edit war/content dispute. I have posted a dummy edit with a warning. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- I've issued a final warning to the disruptive editor. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nanjing Massacre denialism by multiple York University IPs, either one person changing devices or a coordinated attack. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 02:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:32, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by one or more unregistered editors. This has persisted for a few months and this editor has shown no interest in participating in the discussion opened in Talk or even using edit summaries. ElKevbo (talk) 23:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Short-term anon/new editor disruption, including addition of spam links. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. More than Twenty protections between this and the previously titled Oakland Raiders. That's enough. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: An IP hopping vandal keeps on changing the subject's name since yesterday. See 1, 2, 3. -WayKurat (talk) 01:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Based on recent news coverage, protection for a week would be helpful. KidAd talk 17:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. To my considerable surprise, after going through most of the edits for the last couple of days, I saw very little overt vandalism. I expect this to change if she is nominated, but we don't protect pages proactively. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 17:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP violations. Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandals have been at this article all day, adding exactly the same odd text to the lede. Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Bit of an protracted edit war going on between IPs and users over Perez's position. Attempted discussion at the talk page produced no response from the IPs involved. Zappa⚡Matic 02:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined Looks like it has calmed down for the moment. If it resumes, come back. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A bunch of IPs and new users making bad edits in the past hour. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 22:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is getting old. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
23 September 2020
Indefenite Semi-protection: IP disruptive editing by same users in the request above.Mr.User200 (talk) 19:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: IP vandalism in this week.Mr.User200 (talk) 19:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Whitewashing public relations editing by the company. L235 initially declined it saying first IP was banned but to request again if it happens again. The company representative returned and whitewashed again Special:Diff/979955003 using a different IP registered to company. Graywalls (talk) 19:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Subject of article announced a controversial indictment today; BLPvios being added by multiple unregistered editors. Schazjmd (talk) 19:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Also please enforce WP:ARBDS here as well. --IanDBeacon (talk) 19:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes Persistent vandalism of DOB, all from IP users. --Citrivescence (talk) 17:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has suffered active vandalism from multiple different anonymous IP address. I'd suggest a 7-14 day page protection. xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 18:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persisting disruptive editing by Anon Ips and Sockpuppets. On 8 August Admin MelanieN Protected the page for Persistent sock puppetry ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access]) but it expired, more Anon IPs restarted their disruptive editing.Mr.User200 (talk) 19:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism, has been temporarily protected twice. Opalzukor (talk) 07:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of copyrighted portraits (see talk page for Community Tech bot notifications). 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CatcherStorm talk 09:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs. – 2.O.Boxing 10:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection Page is relevant to current events, and of a living person. Please semi-protect this page, to prevent vandalism from unregistered IP addresses. 158.123.253.70 (talk) 14:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — motevets (talk) 14:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the past few days, there's been an increase in the number of vandalism edits by IP users, injecting content violating NPOV. Re-requesting semi-protection until election day. Legowerewolf (talk) 17:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Indian transfer rumor machine probably exceeds English one. BlameRuiner (talk) 19:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – On-going sporadic vandalism by various new accounts. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 14:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Moneytrees. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: Unnecessary now, article has not received vandalism for months, etc. Cairo2k18 • (talk) • (contribs) 04:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ping @CambridgeBayWeather: as protecting admin Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been the target of vandalism by changing population numbers since at least July. Sjö (talk) 05:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the page has never been protected before--Ymblanter (talk) 11:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Subject has been accused of ephebophilia in relation to a recent revelation from a woman who alleged she had a scandalous affair with the subject when she was a minor. I'm not sure if one autoconfirmed edit is enough to merit ECP tho. Blake Gripling (talk) 11:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see any violations by confirmed accounts--Ymblanter (talk) 11:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: Not required. Paytm was in news coz Google Playstore removed their app based on "gambling" clause violation. I feel this page does not need anymore protection. Nicehence (talk) 11:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Nicehence: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
@EdJohnston: protecting admin. Favonian (talk) 12:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotected – EdJohnston (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent addition of BLP violations by autoconfirmed editors and edit warring. Tayi Arajakate Talk 20:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely.--RegentsPark (comment) 20:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – long term public relations editing from freshly created single purpose accounts and IPs. Graywalls (talk) 05:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. IP has been blocked; page seems well-watched. Feel free to re-request or ping me if disruption resumes. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: The protection was back in 2017 so it is most likely no longer necessary. Tetihgsaud (talk) 04:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Not done. Favonian (talk) 05:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A troll keeps harassing me. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 02:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked user for 72 hours; can block for longer if they resume. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: There isn't really any reason for an IP to edit this template. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 02:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Done This is extremely borderline and I wouldn't object if another admin reversed this. This is on the low end of WP:HRT, and pages are generally not protected with just one disruptive edit, but there's probably no harm in protecting due to the internal nature of this page. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – No reason for an IP or non-confirmed user to edit this page. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 03:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Train of Knowledge, there was no sockpuppetry and the IP is already blocked.
Not done Drmies (talk) 03:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism, which inserts exact same hoax-like text and mislabelled gallery image. Identical edit has occurred since at least June 2016 from various IPs - some of which have been blocked in past, (e.g.[51], [52]) for persistently inserting and then un-reverting this unsourced nonsense, and some not, (e.g. [53], [54]).
Despite trying to quickly revert the edit over last week or two, as many others have done in the recent past, it is soon replaced. As I am also an IP user, I do not want to be seen to be a disruptive editor, but nor do I want this unsourced, silly misinformation disseminated through WP. 122.105.187.37 (talk) 03:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temprorary preotection required from IP vandalism which is adding invalid content (incorrect scores, incorrect teams) even after numerous reverts. Anbans 585 (talk) 14:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I have given the disruptive IP a final warning, so please report the problem again if the IP persists. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:21, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Full semi-protection: MPersistent Sockpupetry, Users User:TaherGhoneim User:Maistara and Anon IP disruptive edits, article was protected by a Admin but Sockpetry still present.Mr.User200 (talk) 23:29, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a handful of edits in the last week. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent spambot vandalising the article with the same material. Has been taking place since July 2019. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 00:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked /64 x 6 months. That should slow them down a bit. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent spambot/vandalbot vandalising the article with the same material. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 00:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Full-protection: Edit warring. Jerm (talk) 02:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 48 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over the name. GizzyCatBella🍁 22:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I made a dummy edit to alert people to stop the edit warring. If it resumes ping me or come back here. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary 1 month semi-protection: Active WP:VAND and 5RR+ by adding the edit back.
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism relating to some off-wiki matter. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 20:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Heights of presidents and presidential candidates of the United States (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, primarily over the height of the current US president, and their name. Kj cheetham (talk) 21:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Full semi-protection: Persistent Anon IPs disruptive edits, Sockpppets and block evation users. IE: User:Hambient1981, 2402:800:4176:6AC3:DBC1:EC38:8500:E20E, 2402:800:4136:187B:BC17:B87F:24D2:9A50 and now 176.88.136.86 Static IPs.Mr.User200 (talk) 22:57, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- I strongly suggest at least 1 month of protection could this be made. Various SP from Generic IP are targering those tipe of articles.Mr.User200 (talk) 00:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and adding of unsourced information and speculation. Herbfur (talk) 14:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 17:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: This is to prevent moving the page to the erroneous numbering. The official mock-up shows that the car numbering will be 13001 to 13120. HiwilmsTalk 18:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
24 September 2020
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Seems like an edit war’s now on going. Invoke request for WP:ARBDS. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I see the users that conduct edit-warring User:VK4000 were reported to AIV and is partially blocked. 180.244.145.224 (talk) 22:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked., indeed, the user has been blocked from editing this article, and edit-warring stopped.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly Visible Template. Go-Tsumaroki
19:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Go-Tsumaroki:
Question: Since you're not a template editor, you won't be able to edit this yourself anymore. Are you sure this is what you want? Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jackmcbarn: Can you make it instead semi-protected since I wouldn't be able to edit it anymore? Thanks,
Go-Tsumaroki
20:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jackmcbarn: Can you make it instead semi-protected since I wouldn't be able to edit it anymore? Thanks,
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:42, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Adding transfer rumours, coach rumours in the squad/Transfers/management section. So, I request for protection for a week, since all these are supposed to be announced officially by this week. ❯❯❯ S A H A 05:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:42, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Emerging disruptive editing, probably temporary sockpuppetry (check tweet here), hence temporary protection. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 12:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not sure whether this will work, but we can consider pending changes if it fails. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent attempts to insert "big floppa" nonsense. Requesting long term protection. DVdm (talk) 13:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note1: as far as I can see this started on 4 July 2020 with this edit (edit summary: "Fixed typo"). It has been going on ever since. - DVdm (talk) 14:47, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note2: Yet again, a "new" user tried to re-add it: [55]. Some of the previous attempts: [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62]. All IP's, new one-edit usernames, or very infrequent users. - DVdm (talk) 15:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note3: and here we go again. - DVdm (talk) 17:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent edit warring. BLP may have died. AussieWikiDan (talk) 17:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There are several IPs (probably all the same user) which since 2017 wants to exchange the weather data. The IP doesn't reply at the talk page where a weather discussion is open since April 2020. The edits are reverted by several users. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's not worth semi-protecting the article just because of one editor's obsessive behaviour. I have contacted the admin who partially blocked user Atsizat, and hopefully the problem will stop. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Accomplishments (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Unprotect. Deleted in 2008 because it was a promotional page for someone, then salted. Would like to create a redirect to Accomplishment. Acebulf (talk) 00:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Philip defranco (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Unprotect. Deleted in 2008 and salted because he was NN at the time. Is now notable and has an article at Phillip Defranco. Would like to redirect. Acebulf (talk) 00:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Tonage (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Unprotect. Deleted and salted, would like to redirect to Tonnage. Acebulf (talk) 00:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: I'm starting to get into the vandal business, and I'm worried that a vandal (or a group of vandals) will demolish my user-page as it is. Go-Tsumaroki (chat) 23:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined That's not a valid rationale for protection; we dont do preventative protection on user pages. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 11:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There have been IPs edit warring about the weather in Cizre since March 2020. I have created a weather discussion in Cizre but no answer has come yet of the other party. If I don't revert it, others revert the redflagged edits. It's just disruptive. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:06, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's not worth semi-protecting the article just because of one editor's obsessive behaviour. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – law enforcement. Chennai Passangai (talk) 11:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurrent vandalism. Lettlerhello • contribs 23:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Brojam (talk) 03:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article already has pending changes protection which seems sufficient. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – a transfer that has not been officially announced, yet. 10:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent IP disruptive editing. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 21:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk • work) 07:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of large blocks of content by an IP hopper, despite explanations that this content has largely already been discussed at length and was edited heavily on connection with those discussions, and that therefore the editor needs to wait for others to weigh in and get consensus for reversing the outcome of previous discussions. Largoplazo (talk) 10:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the page has never been protected before--Ymblanter (talk) 11:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism and ignorant editing as a result of the person's recent passing despite efforts to revert. APNOneTwo (talk) 10:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Just about to request this myself. Thanks for doing so. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 11:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Previous 1-week protection expired a few days ago, vandalism started again soon after. Fram (talk) 11:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please apply short-term full protection to stop the edit warring. gnu57 12:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: For inexplicable reasons, multiple IPs have been repeatedly vandalizing this page. Smashhoof (talk) 01:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two instances of IP vandalism in the past two months. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Heavy editing over the last couple days. While I've seen some disruption I don't think it's enough to justify the collateral damage from page protection. If it persists, come back. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:ARBDS can be further invoked. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined Already pending changes protected. Not enough disruption to justify an increase to Semi PP. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 23:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As per vandalism in page history. Nadzik (talk) 09:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: users removing redirect while the article currently does not meet wikipedia notability guidelines. iamluke16 (talk) 13:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Intermittent vandalism in last couple of months. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – spamming. Chennai Passangai (talk) 16:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Someone spamming Nikon is going to spam the rest of the camera sites; this is better handled by blocking the spammers and blacklisting as needed. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined Per above. Also insufficient disruption on this article to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
25 September 2020
- Template:Editnotices/Page/Help talk:IPA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Editnotices/Page/Help talk:IPA/Conventions for English (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Editnotices/Page/Help talk:IPA/Introduction (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Create protection Need to be protected to stop JJMC89 bot II from immediately recreating them after they were deleted per Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_13#Template:Editnotices/Page/Help talk:IPA * Pppery * it has begun... 11:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- @JJMC89:--Ymblanter (talk) 11:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Done @Pppery: You may want to post on JJMC89's talk page about this. Once it's resolved they can be unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 21:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Is there something wrong with keeping these pages salted indefinitely? See also User_talk:JJMC89/Archives/2019/October#Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia_talk:Wikidata, the previous time this came up. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:49, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Not really, I just didn't realize it was common practice to leave it salted until that link. — Wug·a·po·des 22:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Is there something wrong with keeping these pages salted indefinitely? See also User_talk:JJMC89/Archives/2019/October#Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia_talk:Wikidata, the previous time this came up. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:49, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Full protection: Used in MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-forbidden-edit. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Why do you think that the template editor protecion is not sufficient?--Ymblanter (talk) 06:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- For the same reason that template editors are not allowed to edit the MediaWiki namespace, they should not be allowed to edit templates transcluded in the MediaWiki namespace. Besides, Template:Submit an edit request was fully protected in 2017 due to being used in the MediaWiki namespace. Template:Submit an edit request/link wasn't used in the MediaWiki namespace at the time, so it wasn't protected, but now that it is used in the interface, the same reasoning that led to Template:Submit an edit request being fully protected then applies to Template:Submit an edit request/link. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple users and IPs with connections to the group attempting to change details, seemingly for personal/political reasons. It's getting pretty ridiculous really, they've even managed to have it temporarily deleted. Needs protection for a while until this all dies down. Vitalis196 (talk) 22:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Vitalis196: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/The Gates of Saturn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite full protection: This is an archived hoax article. JsfasdF252 (talk) 22:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Brand new accounts and IP disruption, reverted by several experienced editors, but still going on. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 07:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing election. Recently vandalised. -- Manasbose (talk | contribs) 15:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism/BLP violations started up again after protection expired – not surprising given this page's history. Conifer (talk) 16:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Protection log as long as my arm; the most recent, just expired protection was for a year; this will obviously continue to need protection as long as she is in the public eye. MelanieN (talk) 21:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Sakiv (talk) 17:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- It seems to me that the page currently sees more constructive IP edits than destructive ones. I would decline.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- :
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There were constructive IP edits in recent days, but today has been all disruption, so I gave it a short protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Highly Visible Template. Go-Tsumaroki
14:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Glen (talk) 14:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Glen: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Glen (talk) 16:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. Chennai Passangai (talk) 16:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Might be worth rangeblocking that 205.126 IP range. Jdcomix (talk) 11:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption has been ongoing since January. S0091 (talk) 19:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot's of vandalism and disruptive editing going on. Scorpions13256 (talk) 06:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Widr. Semi-protected for 1 week. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection persistent vandalism by IPs to revert the article to an older draft version that is unsourced or poorly sourced version (using Times of India and other unreliable sources) under claims that it has poor grammar, even though the current article as I have written has been sourced by detailed reliable sources. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 07:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Frequent vandalism. LeBron4 (talk) 12:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Please re-report if vandalism picks up again. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes or semi-protection: Vandalism to the page increasing a lot recently, by multiple different new accounts. Potential sock puppets. EdNg07 (talk) 09:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. Persistent piffle editing by IP hopper. Antique Rose 10:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. At least the last days this is no hopping IP, but 105.235.158.33. Lectonar (talk) 10:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 10:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 10:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
full protection: High level of vandalism. There is high level of vandalism by rival fans on this Football club article with changes in name of the club and adding transfer rumoured names in the squad list. Needs permanent Protection.SabyaC (talk) 08:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see full protection warrants to prevent vandalism, so why not requesting semi-protection or pending changes as all of them that vandalize the article are IPs. 36.68.187.70 (talk) 09:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC
Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 11:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see any recent disruption by confirmed accounts--Ymblanter (talk) 11:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper from Indonesia vandalizing. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IPs and new users. The most recent case of vandalism by an IP was particularly hard to notice and undo due to its subtle nature; the IP introduced false data to the polling graph and changed Trump's name to "Hitler" in the legend. — Tartan357 (Talk) 01:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: There is a repeated high level of IP vandalism with unsourced information. Maxwell King123321 01:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 03:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent insertion of false info, with it still going on despite a hidden note clarifying not to add in the false info and a warning to one IP. Either it is multiple IP's, or one whose address is constantly changing. Unnamed anon (talk) 15:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 04:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection - We're getting a rash of repetitive edit requests for the article as of late, triggered by what seems to be complaints about the article on Twitter. I wouldn't ordinarily deem this a problem, but we're seeing a lot of activity from drive-by accounts who're unable/unwilling to read literally anything else on the page and the requests all pretty much demand the same thing, varying only in what they want to replace it with (one option of which is a conspiracy theory). Since the requests are unlikely at best to be actioned with anything other than {{nd}}
and they're pretty much choking out other discussions on the page, I'm requesting semi-protection. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 23:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note the discussion at AN/I as well. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 05:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. The Little Platoon (talk) 04:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., so far less than a disruptive edit per day, and there are some good IP edits.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite or Temporary semi-protection: Page with a long history of persistent vandalism and content dispute, multiple short term protections were applied, to no avail. Coltsfan (talk) 16:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. I am not sure if WP:3RR has already been broken by one or more editors in the last 24 hours. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- I was planning to post this now. They have reverted it again. Two of the IP editors are on the subdomain and three seem to be acting in unison. scope_creepTalk 20:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 04:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 04:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 04:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive diting by various evasive IPs users.Mr.User200 (talk) 14:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 01:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 04:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IPs continue to change birth dates for no reason. Raritydash (talk) 02:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 03:49, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping editor reinserting the term racist into the lead. Kb03 (talk) 15:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Judging from the protection log, it may be necessary to install indefinite protection eventually. MelanieN (talk) 00:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Whitewashing attempts in BLP. Binksternet (talk) 00:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: What was thought to be a potential new name for this franchise was revealed, which has resulted in this article being moved to that name (The CWverse). However, per discussion at the talk page, it has been determined "Arrowverse" should remain. Given the most recent move attempt, I felt a short move protection would be beneficial. -. Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There appears to be sockpuppetry going on. Chelsea Manning's pronouns are continuing to be edit warred over. Scorpions13256 (talk) 05:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:26, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 14:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Pattern of WP:BLP vandalism continues. As this is persisting, a longer semi-protection is in order this time. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:36, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A new editor who has recently signed out is trying to get some LoLs by editing here. While there's not much more to add to this biography, I don't think permanent is warranted. Not sure how long it will take the editor to tire. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Togetherness54321 (talk · contribs). If the IP is the same person logged out, then it'll be autoblocked too. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – page is a regular source of nonsense edits by socks (both ip and logged in) of banned user Vallabharebel. Spike 'em (talk) 13:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been no edits for 10 days, but protection can be reconsidered if the problem recurs. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of “owner” vandalism related to this week’s NBA playoffs. Larry Hockett (Talk) 18:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: Would like to redirect to Merrimack Pharmaceuticals. Acebulf (talk) 22:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotected Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
26 September 2020
- Wikipedia talk:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/The Gates of Saturn (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite full protection: This is a talk page of a hoax article. JsfasdF252 (talk) 06:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 13:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Flix11: this is your fourth request to protect this page in seven days, all of which have been declined for the same reason. Please stop asking. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Coltsfan (talk) 20:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit dispute, persistent removal of sources with no explanation. BOVINEBOY2008 15:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:43, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated alteration of the lead sentence by an anonymous user to versions along the lines of "The World Bank is a parasitic international financial institution that steal resources from the governments of poorer countries with the purpose of personal enrichment.". Gbear605 (talk) 16:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 185.174.128.235 (talk · contribs) blocked by GorillaWarfare. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: BLP Policy Violations. Persistent vandalism and BLP violations Prolix 💬 17:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users. Areaseven (talk) 10:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined I don't see how the edits are vandalism. Talk to the user. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP hopping editor continuing the same edit after being blocked as well as a just recently ended page protection. DonQuixote (talk) 13:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 223.191.0.0/18 (talk · contribs). 6-month partial block of just that page. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced/hoax content by IP editors. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 16:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Other than one user who has been blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Probably will always be a vandalism target, primarily because of the irony of vandalizing a page called "Vandalism". Aasim (talk) 09:26, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined not enough recent disruptive activity, and pages are not protected preemptively. The bar is very high to protect talk pages. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Continuous vandalism by multiple Ip's Asartea Talk | Contribs 09:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Please make a new request if it keeps up. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:27, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Constant back and forth about her personal life (which has been going on for years really), but now people want to take to removing indisputably reliable sources just because they don’t like it. Trillfendi (talk) 21:17, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Minorax (talk) 12:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Glen (talk) 12:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Requesting it again as despite the blocks made the vandalism still continues. Asartea Talk | Contribs 14:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note I report 27.97.243.198 to AIV, which i see same IP as other ones that was blocked. Lets see whether this IP blocked or not. 36.68.187.70 (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from an user that's been going on over the last week or so, it's the same user that was making disruptive edits on List of All Elite Wrestling personnel article. TheDeviantPro (talk) 04:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see much editing by enthusiastic IPs but not much disruptive editing. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Nathan2055talk - contribs 06:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of poorly sourced information. BOVINEBOY2008 09:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try this instead of blocking everyone involved in this revert war. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism resumed after protection expired. See also Geolocation of all involved IPs. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. This page has been temporarily semi-protected many times and the vandalism always comes back. It's time for it to be indefinitely semi-protected. Bowling is life (talk) 01:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Increased disruptive editing as popular ufc event come super near to starting. Kent Bargo (talk) 06:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Page is of a deceased person and is constantly being targeted by vandalism coming from multiple IPs. VARNAMi (talk) 09:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see any vandalism at this article outside just one IP, which were blocked before. It there are multiple IPs were involved in vandalism, semi-protection or pending changes will be likely warranted to prevent vandalism as vandals are all IPs. 36.68.187.70 (talk) 10:06, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Agreed there is only one vandal, but he is using dynamic IPs. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JKOkay (talk) 11:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism coming from multiple IPs. Call me when you get the chance 20:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined - Two vandals in the last month; one blocked, one has made a single edit. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by new vandalism-only accounts and by IPs. User accounts (except IP) blocked, currently article is on main page and will attract a lot of editors. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 21:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
{{rfpp|nea}}
Vast majority of edits have been helpful and good faith, and the exceptions have been dealt with quickly. I don't think protection will be useful. — Wug·a·po·des 21:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)- @Wugapodes: Another IP has just vandalised the page. Just protect it for three days until it's out of the main page please. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 00:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jackmcbarn: What's your opinion? ~ Destroyeraa🌀 00:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Destroyeraa: Wugapodes's decision isn't obviously in error, so per WP:ADMINSHOP, I'm going to respect it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jackmcbarn: Wugapodes's decision was before the new account of vandalism. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 00:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'll give them a chance to respond to our pings. I'll take a closer look myself in a few hours if there's no response. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, Jackmcbarn. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 01:02, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'll give them a chance to respond to our pings. I'll take a closer look myself in a few hours if there's no response. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jackmcbarn: Wugapodes's decision was before the new account of vandalism. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 00:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Destroyeraa: Wugapodes's decision isn't obviously in error, so per WP:ADMINSHOP, I'm going to respect it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jackmcbarn: If you think the page should be protected, go for it. My worry with protecting front page content is always collateral damage since lots of readers means lots of potential new editors. Last I saw, the vandalism wasn't out of hand, but I'm on mobile at the moment and can't check easily. I don't think there's really a wrong choice so do what you thinks best. — Wug·a·po·des 02:26, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jackmcbarn: What's your opinion? ~ Destroyeraa🌀 00:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Wugapodes: Another IP has just vandalised the page. Just protect it for three days until it's out of the main page please. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 00:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see that much vandalism, and I see a few good edits from IPs/newbies. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IP, despite reverts from several editors and bots. – Rhain ☔ 02:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2a02:c7f:7ee8:1400::/64 (talk · contribs). Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Non-stop transfer rumor activity BlameRuiner (talk) 07:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the page is targeted by spam and vandalism the last two days by two different users who in total have 3 edits, I guess it is the same editor. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 18:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two obviously disruptive edits in the last couple months that I could see. — Wug·a·po·des 21:49, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing by different IPs. Gotitbro (talk) 18:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Persistent sockpuppetry. SMB99thx my edits 02:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Current consensus is not to create an article at this namespace, but to leave it as a redirect. Per a recent attempt to recreate the article, requesting some semi protection on the article. -. Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Favre1fan93: I'm having a hard time finding the discussion(s) where the consensus to not have an article was determined. I checked Talk:Spider-Man in film and its archives. A note to other admins: feel free to make a decision on this, as I will be logging off soon for the day. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 04:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Airplaneman: Hmmm, I thought there was a discussion regarding not having this article because it exists at the "in film" article succinctly. There was an AfD in 2007 to not include but I felt there was something more recent that occurred. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined. Attempts to expand this from a redirect to a full list have been going on since January 2019. The edit summaries here and here suggest that the reasons for restricting this to a redirect no longer exist. There is no discussion on the talk page. IMO either a talk page consensus or a community discussion such as AfD would be required to prohibit expansion to a full article. MelanieN (talk) 20:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Page was previously semi-protected, but vandalism has resumed. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 22:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Addendum: As far as I can tell, almost all edits to this page have been vandalism – or reverts thereof – for years now. Actual constructive contributions are exceedingly rare and the potential collateral damage regarding good-faith users who aren't yet autoconfirmed seems to be minimal to non-existent. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 23:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Highly visible page – Likely Supreme Court nominee; let's not have a repeat of the Cuntala Harris incident, please. Unlikely to need to be moved anywhere in the near future. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note This article more likely to be indefinite semi-protected as RBG article because after the article was unprotected there will lot more vandalism in the article. 36.68.187.70 (talk) 23:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
27 September 2020
Temporary semi-protection: A not registered user has decided to close the channel in 4 years. Nadzik (talk) 11:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
World Bank
- World Bank (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- World Bank Group (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: I requested indefinite semi-protection two days ago, but it was denied, and I was told to try again when the vandalism picked up. More of that happened today. The World Bank page sees frequent waves of vandalism, and while it might not be happening as this is being typed, it will more than likely be happening within the next 48 hours. LeBron4 (talk) 13:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- World Bank:
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. World Bank Group:
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.--LeftiePete (talk) 16:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment: I'd like to second this request – the article is subject to a constant stream of fringe conspiracy theorists aiming to advance their personal narrative on Wikipedia, none of whom engage in discussion (WP:NOTHERE). — Bilorv (talk) 17:46, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing/WP:BLP violations (specifically, WP:MINORS) – a week or 2 should do it, after which things should calm down. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. many recent vandalism edits from multiple IP users — motevets (talk) 19:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hoaeter. – Frood (talk) 17:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Black Kite.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – An Armenian-Azebejani (can't spell) conflict page under DS. Template on talk page. Has received media coverage so there is POV pushing which is only more likely to increase. Giraffer munch 17:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC). Giraffer munch 17:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement--Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism related to imminent transfer. There have been dozens of vandalistic and/or consciously incorrect updates that are making the page unusable. These types of edits are nearly endless with this particular page. Anwegmann (talk) 17:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors adding unsourced content fairly soon after previous protection expired. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 18:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper continually changing sourced text. I checked the source and it backs the original text. Doug Weller talk 13:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Glen. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 15:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dylsss (talk) 16:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Several IPs adding unsourced date of death to BLP. Couldn't find anything about it on a quick search on Google. Isabelle 🔔 03:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined Looks like the death is now confirmed and sourced. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Appears to be one user using multiple IPs. Bmf 051 (talk) 09:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:13, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- 2021 UEFA European Under-17 Championship qualification (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP from Indonesia has been persistently causing trouble on this page. They have already been blocked several times but they just reappear at a different address. Page is definitely in need of protection. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 11:42, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Elizium23 (talk) 23:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Liz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:51, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Crossroads -talk- 02:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: The protecting admin has set their user page to some level of protection, so I can't ask them. 209.166.108.199 (talk) 21:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined El C is the protecting admin and their talk page is not protected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Ivanvector: User talk:El C is indeed semi-protected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- My mistake, I was looking for a padlock. The IP editor has made an edit request on the article's talk page already, and the one-year protection expires in a little over a week. If El C wants to unprotect early that's up to them, but with the history of abuse on this article I'm going to stick with decline. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Ivanvector: User talk:El C is indeed semi-protected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent socking. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:32, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined This socking is so widespread that protecting one page is unlikely to have much effect. I've blocked several of the accounts and IPs involved. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Change to semi-protection: Why accepting disruptive changes!!, disruptive editing as "popular ufc" event is ongoing. Kent Bargo (talk) 23:58, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
IP vandal
- Adrian Pradhan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Phiroj Shyangden (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Hira Devi Waiba (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Asking for PP again, the disruptive editing from the IP vandal (through multiple IPs) is continuously going here. Gotitbro (talk) 00:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 27.34.0.0/17 (talk · contribs). 1-year partial block from just that page. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:36, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jackmcbarn: Can you consider the last two pages listed here as well, the vandal has disrupted those articles for quite some time as can be seen from their history. Gotitbro (talk) 00:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 01:02, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed. Adding semi-protection by way of confirming edits of IPs and unregistered users is pratically the same as not protecting the page. Please change it. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
28 September 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Nyook ✉ 09:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:48, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute. Jerm (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. It may be a content dispute but the IP editor has crossed several of my bright lines by following another user's contribs and mass-reverting them. With them blocked I don't believe protection is necessary. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: An IP user keeps removing citation and verifiability dispute templates. Please help revert the page to this version. Thanks. Matt Smith (talk) 15:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:24, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Not done - empty request, no clear need for protection. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined procedurally since the bot doesn't seem to know what to do with the "not done" template. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistant disruptive edit from Anonymous IP's and non confirmed users. Requesting temporary page protection. Outlander07@talk 17:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined, the recent IP edits may be poorly formatted but they do not appear to be vandalism. Try talking to the user. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:28, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch™ 23:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch™ 23:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch™ 23:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch™ 23:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch™ 23:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection Subject's page is already under Extended Confirmed protection. Subject's major political opponent is under Extended Confirmed protection. Article is being frequently vandalized, along with non-sensical edits. Rklahn (talk) 02:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment I see the article was already semi-protected. So for me semi-protection would be enough to prevent vandalism from IP users, so if IP or users vandalize the article, i will report that to AIV to be warned. I think you need to requesting impose indefinite 1RR for that article. 36.68.187.70 (talk) 03:20, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Requestor comment Im not sure of the rules of engagement here, so I'll keep this brief. I disagree with 36.68.187.70 here, and responded at length on this topic at my talk page. In short, I believe semi is not enough, and ECP is appropriate in this case, for reasons already stated. Rklahn (talk) 05:24, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined. I don't see evidence of disruptive activity since semiprotection was enacted, so that seems to be good enough for now.- Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:34, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:54, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked the main culprit, warned the other. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:32, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Persistent violations of WP:A/I/PIA, with few other constructive contributions by non-extended-confirmed users. The page has an edit notice saying that IPs and users with less than 500 edits may not edit it. So we may as well prevent them from doing so... IamNotU (talk) 22:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment and please requesting move protection for this article due to page moving suspectible to vandalism. 36.68.187.70 (talk) 22:58, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined - WP:A/I/PIA applies to pages related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, and this article about a plant does not appear to be within that scope. There is no evidence of move-warring, and pages are not protected preemptively. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Persistent violations of WP:A/I/PIA as this article includes in Arab-Israeli topics. 36.68.187.70 (talk) 23:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined - WP:A/I/PIA applies to pages related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, and this article describing food does not appear to be within that scope. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Joy Ride film series genre vandalism
- Joy Ride (2001 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Joy Ride 2: Dead Ahead (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Joy Ride 3: Roadkill (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. User hopping around to do genre vandalism changing sourced material. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined because the user's IP has been blocked, but ping me if they come back on another IP and I'll expand the block range. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism returned shortly after unprotection. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 16:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment Because this article was subjected to vandalism by multiple IP users with adding unsourced information and under general sanctions, i think this article would more likely to indefinite semi-protection. 36.68.187.70 (talk) 20:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The recent IP edits are not vandalism and I see no reason to protect the page. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Move protection: This article is heavily subjected to move vandalism by any users. El C already impose ECP edit and move for the article per Arbitration enforcement but for me it is insufficient because any users can move the page without consensus. For me, the move request shall be conducted via move request only in any controversial pages like this. 36.68.187.70 (talk) 21:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Not done - the page is already move-protected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: [63], [64], [65], [66] add fake info about her death, violate BLP. Wikisaurus (talk) 22:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined - these edits are more than a month old. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch™ 23:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, some radical nationalist or localist try to change her nationality. Mısaka ꮬ Mikoto 17:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Within hours of previous protection expiring, IP vandalism has resumed. Please reconsider. NedFausa (talk) 18:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:13, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by hopping IPs. Take a look at their edit summaries—no intent to stop. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 13:47, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JarrahTree 13:55, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of information that we don't include per WP:USCHARTS. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 15:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:20, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Silent disruption, NPOV by IPs and new accounts going on. So requesting for page protection again. ❯❯❯ S A H A 08:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. This article has enough history of problems to warrant it. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism & non-constructive edits from multiple unregistered users (IP addresses). Doesn't reply to warnings. Possible Sock Puppet Attack.-- AzfarShams (talk) 10:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Opalzukor (talk) 12:13, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:50, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:33, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:52, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 17:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:24, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreation of salted title Samuel Somerville and Draft:Samuel Somerville was rejected two months ago. GSS 💬 07:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Done - title added to the local blacklist. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:40, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AIRcorn (talk) 07:52, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for the rest of the MLB season. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – hoax articles about non-notable child. Captain Calm (talk) 16:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Done Salted. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:34, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The indefinite PC protection seems to be doing the job. MelanieN (talk) 01:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Multiple IP accounts have been removing sourced genres from the article's infobox for the last few days. Aria1561 (talk) 21:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:09, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:07, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Possible sockpuppetry too. Scorpions13256 (talk) 10:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator DGG. Semi-protected for 1 month. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disrupting editing by IPs by adding POV and unsourced stuff, ignoring talk pages. Snowflake91 (talk) 20:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:56, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Move protection: The subject of this article is controversial and prone to move vandalism by any users. Therefore, it should be moved via move request only. 36.68.187.70 (talk) 21:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined, the article is currently extended confirmed protected for 6 months, this should be good enough for the time being.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: New article related to a higly vandalized, hot in the media topic. StubCreatorAFC (talk) 02:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. Heart (talk) 02:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Vandalised television appearances in Indian actor's article and vandalised cast addition of actors in Indian television series articles whom never entered the series and also sometimes few other vandalised edits. Despite, I reverted few days ago, it is keeping on added. Not only this IP, i found different IPs retrieve it again after revertion through edit history of the article. While I try tracking the IPs, the vandalised articles keep on increasing under different IPs with same disruption. Regarding which some vandalised IP contributions which i found were :[67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76]. As traced from those article's history before and after revertions many more similar vandalisms by different IPs has happened related to cast and actor's television appearances.
Firstly I reported this at Administrator intervention against vandalism, [77] where i was asked to request page protection here instead of blocking each IP. Noobie anonymous (talk) 12:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sorry, but the most recent edit to the article was September 9. Before that there were widely spread out problem edits which can be dealt with through normal page watching. MelanieN (talk) 01:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Several fresh vandalism edits by IP and newly registered accounts inserting tendentious and unsupported by sources cited anti-LGBT rhetoric into the article. Indicates liklely sockpuppetry, possibly by the just blocked User:Zezen (who was active at the talk page of the article in question just a few days earlier), see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Zezen. Semi-protection of the article for a few weeks would seem prudent. Nsk92 (talk) 22:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Not done - Problem user being already being blocked should solve the problem. Fuzheado | Talk 02:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Will be used on Template:Infobox station - thus highly visible template. TE protection requested. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 03:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Question: You're going to have a user page be transcluded from articles? Can you move that to a subpage of Template:Infobox station first? Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:51, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- To first Q, no, plan was to move it before I sync the sandbox. I'm fine with moving it now (protections are moved over, so I wasn't sure if order of move-before-prot would matter). Also, just to clarify, requesting TE prot, not full, fwiw -- Twinkle just doesn't give options for TE whilst in userspace. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 03:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Moved. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Done Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:07, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Good Country Index and World Happiness Report
- Good Country Index (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- World Happiness Report (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Constant high level of mostly nationalistic vandalism from different IPs. Good Country Index got protected for 3 months in March, but right after the protection ended, vandalism began again. 85.76.16.175 (talk) 13:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to both. MelanieN (talk) 01:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This page is one of the major targets for anti-Persian sentiment vandalizing and persistently keeps facing such attacks by changing the titles to hateful and disturbing sentiments beside changes or removals of texts' parts without any source or justification by unregistered/new users. In hope of putting a stop to most of such disruptions I request Indefinite semi-protection for the page. Regards. Donovan.Se (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:00, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Reverted edits are not frequent, and most of the ones that are reverted are from autoconfirmed editors so semiprotection wouldn't help. MelanieN (talk) 00:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by IPs. 2.O.Boxing 00:34, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 02:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent adding of poorly sourced or unsourced content. This footballer is seemingly undergoing a transfer which means persistent disruption to the article. RetiredDuke (talk) 12:02, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:44, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from UK-origin IP user over the course of 5 weeks. Reverted multiple times by 3 different registered users, but IP user shows no signs of stopping despite prior warning. Aero777 (talk) 12:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:58, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and probable nonconstructive edits over past few weeks. Could someone look through the recent history and see if recent changes should remain? There's been a lot of back-and-forth and removal of content. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 21:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined, there were no edits to the article for a week. I reverted to the last consensual version, and the discussion presumably has to follow. If reverts continue without any discussion, by several user, please renominate the article here.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is currently an RfC to determine the wording of the lead sentence and short description. Despite mentioning in my edit summary that these parts shouldn’t be edited until the RfC closes, IP editors continue to edit these parts. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 05:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Note: Recuse-- I got spurs that jingle-jangle-jingle, as i go riding merrily along sing oh aintchya glad your single and that song ain't so very far from wrong. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:13, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 245CMR (talk) 09:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 245CMR (talk) 09:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism from multiple IPs removing the same sort of content. CogitoErgoSum14 (talk) 20:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Semi-protected for 1 month. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
29 September 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption, multiple new accounts. 2601:188:180:B8E0:4C1C:FC42:57CD:B2AF (talk) 17:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined and courtesy ping Materialscientist. While no edit summaries have been provided for the removals, they appear to be correct. The page indicates it lists cities with a population over 100,000, the source is a list of cities with a population over 1 lakh (100,000), and the towns that were removed from the list have populations below 100,000 and furthermore do not appear in that source (so their populations are unsourced to boot). If there is a desire to change the definition of the list, that is a matter for the talk page, and a new source will be needed. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:14, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Page previously protected due to edit warring by IP hopper [78] IP has returned and resumed edit warring. Requesting slightly longer protection this time, 1-2 weeks. Grandpallama (talk) 19:17, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Disruptive editing. Ips and regular editors are at loggerheads whether the subject is retired or not. Crboyer (talk) 20:03, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't read this as a content dispute; I read it as IPs adding unsourced content. MelanieN (talk) 22:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: What seems to be plenty of disruptive and/or vandal edits in just the past 24 hours by both users and IPs. Magitroopa (talk) 20:16, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has needed almost continuous semi-protection for several months. MelanieN (talk) 22:16, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qaidul (talk) 02:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Not done - I can't tell which edits are being identified as vandalism, but the back-and-forth seems to have stopped. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Person just died, some level of IP vandalism. Sherenk1 (talk) 15:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Some IP edits have been poorly formatted but I don't see any that are vandalism. If there are, the article is being edited heavily enough that users are taking care of it. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:24, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism on BLP article. — Czello 17:29, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. What a mess - I've reverted the article to the last revision from before the previous round of protection expired. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 86.20.206.26 (talk) 14:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. I don't see a "high level." Recent vandal blocked, not much else recently. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant disruptive edits from IP editors. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 16:44, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The article was previously modified to reflect a neonazi POV by a user who has since been permanently banned. After he got banned several IPs have reinserted his version of the article verbatim. The page got protected temporarily and the IPs returned right after the protection expired.--Catlemur (talk) 16:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated twice on August 30, after being salted following 6 deletions under this title in 2006. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:54, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined - the last recreation was moved to draftspace to be incubated, and that was a month ago; it was last recreated before that more than fourteen years ago. I don't see the need for protection at this time. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Nyook ✉ 07:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined - one IP doing all the vandalism was warned and hasn't edited since; that was six hours ago. Please report to WP:AIV if they come back. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:44, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: - persistent changes to personnel section.
Malmsimp (talk) 08:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Vandalism. AviationFreak💬 16:47, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection:Persistent vandalism from several IPs --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Prolix 💬 16:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:20, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: persistent disruptive editing of sourced content. Armegon (talk) 02:53, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. They're disrupting too many articles for protection to be effective. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism – a lot of non-sense has been going on in the last days, since the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict started. Perfect examples: [79], [80] --Koreanovsky (talk) 10:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:35, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment: Yes, the page is already semi-protected, my bad - we need a higher level of the protection. --Koreanovsky (talk) 10:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 13:16, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism – The same as above with the article about Turkey. A lot of non-sense has been going on in the last days, since the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict started. Perfect examples: [81], [82] — and there will definitely be much more of this stuff is the page keeps being unprotected. --Koreanovsky (talk) 10:35, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment: I messed something up. The page is already semi-protected, we need a higher protection level, because some people only create accounts to vandalise articles. --Koreanovsky (talk) 10:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:51, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 13:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. references constantly removed over and over. I don't see how the sources are propaganda, as they claim. Didn't want to get myself into another edit war. EDIT: The problem IP has been banned, so the page should be safe. You can remove this request. Thanks, EDG 543 (talk) 13:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor Lectonar (talk) 13:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lettlerhello • contribs 14:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism. Zangoose&SeviperMan4055 (talk) 14:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:17, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Vandalized by unregistered users multiple times in one day. BJackJS (talk) 15:03, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:19, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent vandalism – As this is high-profile news as of late, there has been several instances of vandalism. Lettlerhello • contribs 19:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment This article cannot be fully protected only due to vandalism conducted by all-IPs. So semi-protection would be enough to prevent this. I see WP:ARBAP2 sanctions applies here. 36.68.187.70 (talk) 19:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The back-and-forth is the editorial process at work. If it does become disruptive (revert warring, blatant vandalism or POV edits) please make a new report. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. An editor keep using multiple accounts to restore their edits in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Might be sockpuppetry, but given that those IPs geolocate to three different places, might also be multiple editors, given that the Rolling Stone list was recently updated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Ohnoitsjamie: Could be the edits are from different people but the edits look kinda similar, that's why I think it might be sockpuppetry. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Also, it's obviously not sockpuppetry. The album received a high ranking on one of the most notable lists of top musical works that has ever been published, and fans and other interested editors want to note this information in the article. Stop edit warring with them and work out how to do it properly. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 14:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected - three months didn't help, let's try a full year. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Attempts at advertising by Yoga businesses. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment It's better to deal with individual spammers (warn, block, blacklist as necessary); they're typically going to target more than one article, and it's not really practical to semi-protect all Yoga-related articles. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined (for the bot). Two users have been blocked already and the recent IP edits don't appear to be vandalism. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unfree images. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 02:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Nkon21, I see that only 120.29.84.232 that vandalize the page with adding unfree images, so i report the single IP to AIV. If more than one IP with a different range vandalize it again, it would be likely semi-protected. All of IPs that has a same range with one IP shall be automatically blocked if they vandalize again. 36.65.35.154 (talk) 03:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 120.29.84.232 (talk · contribs). for 2 days. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 12:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:19, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment CLCStudent, two users that engaged with vandalism now was blocked, one IP and one non-autoconfirmed user (Ycr764 6dgr and 207.190.191.6). 36.65.35.154 (talk) 13:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:54, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Increase of BLP vandalism/unsourced content over the last few days. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 14:06, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Some unregistered users are editing this page without a correct sources. As changing his current club so on WhiteFalcon1 (talk) 07:54, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:44, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive/vandalism edits by three different accounts/IP addresses to page within 48 hours of page protection expiring.
SSSB (talk) 10:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected through the end of the current racing season, since there seem to be trolls waiting around to vandalize the article when protection expires. Maybe they'll find something useful to do by then. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP users for months. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 10:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, has been temporarily protected 12 times in the past. Opalzukor (talk) 10:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Page was last protected more than two years ago. If disruptive editing resumes when this protection expires then I'll reconsider. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Disruptive IP editing resumed following the immediate end of the previous protection yesterday. Asking for this to be put in place until October 11-12, when this series is planned to end, to prevent further disruptions. GUtt01 (talk) 19:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A series of one-month-long protections don't seem to have helped. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:43, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism by a single determined editor with a new account who does always log in. A week should be enough. Pending-changes for the same time period would accomplish the same goal, use whichever is most appropriate. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Confirmed semi-protected for a few days. Let's hope this is long enough. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. (for the bot). Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated test page. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- JalenFolf, this is a very specific page title which leads me to believe the page was created by one user in the span of 4 days. Perhaps banning the user will do the trick. Heart (talk) 03:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- In reviewing who created them, a possible WP:SOCK investigation could be beneficial. This is my first dive into WP:RPP and WP:SOCK. So let me know if I do anything wrong! Heart (talk) 03:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- HeartGlow30797, the users are all IP addresses, so doing a SOCK check would serve no purpose. One IP is long-blocked as a school while the other two have rarely contributed. I see no huge problem that can be revealed by WP:SPI. Eumat114 (Message) 03:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- In reviewing who created them, a possible WP:SOCK investigation could be beneficial. This is my first dive into WP:RPP and WP:SOCK. So let me know if I do anything wrong! Heart (talk) 03:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. If the users start creating similar pages at different titles please ping me, there may be something more I can do. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Marco Augusto Dueñas
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing, POV editing, and COI editing. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 04:24, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of disruptive edits. JMHamo (talk) 10:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too many disruptive edits. JMHamo (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ChrisTheDude. Semi-protected for 3 days. -- LuK3 (Talk) 11:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Remove full protection: Vastly improved draft at Draft:Theresa Greenfield is ready for mainspace. Protecting admin. declined request, with minimal explanation, at User_talk:Muboshgu#Unprotection_request. Protecting admin. appears to be WP:INVOLVED, having nominated previous version of article for deletion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theresa Greenfield. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment To add more context, I also asked for unprotection at Talk:Theresa Greenfield#Notable (on September 22) and Draft talk:Theresa_Greenfield#Greenfield draft status, and we have also received only minimal responses there. Dreamyshade (talk) 21:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment To add more context, there is a draft article for Theresa Greenfield, the Democratic US Senate nominee in Iowa, a closely contested race that could determine control of the US Senate. Of 69 US Senate major party nominees this cycle, 61 have articles, and Theresa Greenfield should too, as she clearly meets general notability guidelines.Narayansg (talk) 04:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- The draft was declined by Robert McClenon two weeks ago. I suggest the draft is resubmitted for review. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:47, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Not unprotected. This article/draft has had a very controversial existence, from being deleted and redirected, not overturned three times at deletion review, and being declined three times as a draft. I see it's been significantly expanded since the last decline, but I don't want this to be seen as an end-run around AFC, so please resubmit. If the draft is accepted then make a new request. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- My concern is that this full protection is being used in an inappropriate way, against the spirit of the AFC process and against the spirit of full protection. As described at WP:AFC, AFC is meant to be a special pathway to article creation for unregistered and new editors. AFC is not meant to prevent experienced registered editors from creating articles in mainspace without AFC review - and there are several experienced editors who want to move this draft article to mainspace. WP:PROTECT describes protection as being appropriate when there is "a specifically identified likelihood of damage resulting if editing is left open". There's no threat of vandalism, edit wars, or other damage here - from what I've seen here, everyone involved in this discussion is being civil and making efforts to interpret policy in constructive ways. Dreamyshade (talk) 22:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Some1 (talk) 04:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:19, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP & newly registered editors. Peaceray (talk) 04:51, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Since the last temporary protection measure was lifted recently, disruptive editing by various IPs has continued. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 05:06, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from banned sockpuppet using an IP. User in question had been banned for edit warring and belligerent behavior towards fellow editors earlier this month. Additionally, user is unwilling to cooperate, instead making accusations of “coordinated trolling” against several editors. Page had been previously semi-protected for two days. Requesting a longer period of semi-protection if possible. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 109.144.0.0/16 (talk · contribs). Partial block of just that page for 1 month. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:12, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — LeoFrank Talk 03:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please see the create protection afforded to Draft:Zaleb Brown. The editors insistent on forcing the gentleman onto WP have now started to use talk pages to create their "work". They have also used different capitalisations. Please consider variants of Zaleb Brown in main and draft space with and without upper case letters art the start of the name. (example Draft:Zaleb brown. Note, please Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaleb Brown and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FAHADChughtai123. Fiddle Faddle 06:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Done - added to MediaWiki:Titleblacklist. Jackmcbarn (talk) 07:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article has been persistently disrupted with unsourced, unofficial rumoured contents since the article is a league article. Several newly registered user are being warned but no response from them, rather everytime a new registered disrupt the article. Previously semi protected but those ips now made accounts and continued their pursuits. Need protection for atleast for a month until the league starts. Drat8sub (talk) 13:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment This is more likely a content dispute for me because there are adding contents and some of editors that involved are Extend-confirmed users such as Abishe78 and SHISHIR DUA that edits you reverted. So for me a full-protection would be necessary, at least take the discussion on the talk page.36.68.187.70 (talk) 13:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for the duration of the original block. The page will reset to no protection when the block expires. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – current sports event. the page is crazy with vandalism. Idan (talk) 21:51, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined I only went back 10 hours but outside of one IP who changed Rivers' former team to the Rockets didn't see anything that merits protection. Barkeep49 (talk) 00:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Some1 (talk) 03:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: wikt:Best Korea. 213.166.146.139 (talk) 18:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- So? wikt:Best Korea is the appropriate place for a dictionary definition. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- I think it'd be reasonable to create this page with {{wiktionary redirect}}, and then re-protect it so it doesn't get turned into something else. If nobody objects here for a while, then I'll do that. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Done Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Paristant edit warring by an IP hopper who's reverting the page to the way he/she wants it (with a long, unnecessary bit about the parent company's history) and blames me for working with a professional user (although i'm not). Luigitehplumber (talk) 19:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined (for now). I've rangeblocked the IPv6 and blocked the single IPv4 causing the disruption for a significant duration for block evasion. If they squeeze around these blocks you can ping me directly and I'll semi the article. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – There is a lot of activity at the page a lot of reverts, and this is ok, but now someone wrote he committed suicide. Quim Torra was dismissed as President of Catalunya today for not withdrawing his solidarity to the Catalan political prisoners and his adversaries are bit... Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:55, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
unprotection This page has been protected because of ongoing controversies over Polish-Jewish relations during the Second World War. I am the author of this book, and the page was created and has been edited by partisans in those controversies who completely misrepresent its nature purpose of the book. It was never intended as a contribution to those controversies: it is a social history of the underground community of Jews hiding "on the Aryan side" in Warsaw, and not about the actions and attitudes of the Polish population towards those Jews. It does have implications for those controversies, but not the ones that the creator/editors think it does. The entire page as it stands is so wrongheaded and misleading that it cannot be fixed by some edits: it simply puts the book in the wrong category. It belongs in the categories of Jewish History, History of the Polish Jews, the Holocaust, Jewish responses to the Holocaust and others, but definitely not Polish-Jewish relations. By analogy: in the 1960s, the American Civil Rights Movement was often characterized as a struggle between northern white liberals and southern white racists, almost ignoring the role of Black people themselves. Now a Black author writes a book about that movement from the Black perspective, including interactions between Black people and southerners of various kinds. Southern white racists pick out passages that speak positively of those relations and misinterpret the author's actual findings as if they justified their views. Then northern white liberals denounce the book as a defense of racism. Literally black and white, no nuance, no understanding of the issues, based on misreading, partial reading or just hearsay. I would like to recreate this page, explaining the intent and purpose of the book and commenting on its reception. Gspaulsson (talk) 18:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – The protection is only WP:ECP, which prevents edits by users with less than 500 edits. Consider making your case for changing the article at Talk:Secret City (book). The original protecting admin was User:TonyBallioni. He issued his protection under arbitration enforcement, so it requires a process to lift. The {{Edit extended-protected}} template is available for your use on the talk page to propose any specific change that you want. I find it hard to follow your above complaint, because the present content of the article looks reasonable. The book itself sounds interesting. Note that our WP:COI policy applies to you as the book's author. EdJohnston (talk) 23:47, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued attempts to create a pov article despite consensus Talk:Obamagate#Request_for_comment_on_page_creation. Praxidicae (talk) 17:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. The page has also been protected by Muboshgu. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Req semi due to a spree of IP hopping and new account vandalism. Kb03 (talk) 20:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since expiry of protection on Sept 19, the page has been vandalized (defamatory/BLP policy violations) ~10 times by ip editors. Lookunder (talk) 21:56, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
30 September 2020
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/NS socking with IPs again immediately after expiry of semiprotection. JavaHurricane 04:38, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page really needs semi protection to deal with the quantity of vandalism. W42 19:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection expired and the vandalism immediately started. Jorm (talk) 19:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Nick. Semi-protected for 1 month. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – a transfer that has not been officially announced, yet. Robby.is.on (talk) 20:10, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Eyebeller (talk) 20:34, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. Semi-protected for 1 month. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Most edits are vandalism or anti-vandalism. After August 12, there have been twelve IP edits and four by new editors (out of twenty-eight total), and as far as I can see, every one of them was vandalism or anti-vandalism. Many of the twelve edits by experienced users were also anti-vandalism that wouldn't have needed to happen if the page was protected. 71.206.133.192 (talk) 03:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:45, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruption from different IP edits. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 13:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Semi-protection and pending changes applied. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Numerous IPs persist in adding unpublished credits, blatantly ignoring hidden note. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 16:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:42, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsupported contents being added, presumably, by someone close to the subject of the article. jojo@nthony (talk) 03:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:25, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. MYS77 ✉ 03:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:10, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Was created again by a bot days after it was speedily deleted. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 10:08, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Not done This gets recreated when an article gets reverted back to a version that's still in this category. SALTing it would result in said article then showing up in a redlinked category to readers. Jackmcbarn (talk) 13:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 16:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch™ 02:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:19, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP disruption. Nsk92 (talk) 12:07, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Semi-protected for 1 month. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP reverting my edits because IP does not understand WP:OR. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 14:08, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- NVM, Ohnoitsjamie warned the IP. Thanks. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 14:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:11, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra: Thank you. Lots of sockpuppetry/edit warring/disruptive editing all fixed by your protection. Thanks again! ~ Destroyeraa🌀 15:14, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Sockpuppetry. ImYourTurboLover (talk) 22:43, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:55, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment ImYourTurboLover, The full protection cannot used when there was a sockpuppet when edit the article. Full protection usually only used if there are edit warring/content dispute among users. If there are sockpuppet among ec users, please find the evidence that EC users are sockpuppet. 36.65.35.154 (talk) 23:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- @ImYourTurboLover:
Question: Which users who have edited that page are sockpuppets? Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:20, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined, the article is already extended confirmed protected and placed under arbitration enforcement. If there are any extended confirmed socks editing the article they should be dealt with individually.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:10, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- The Child (Star Wars) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Semi-protection is needed on this article daily vandalized by IP or new vandal accounts. Pierre cb (talk) 03:25, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated addition of unsourced content. The user Lsjusticels has a global block on their account, so has moved to jumping IP addresses. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 06:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP and new-user vandalism. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 02:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constantly vandalized by Macedonian and Bulgarian nationalists that are arguing over his nationality. James Richards (talk) 10:07, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see any reason for an indefinite protection--Ymblanter (talk) 10:12, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. 4 weeks period would be good. - The9Man (Talk) 10:13, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:20, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Reduction in protection level: Non consensus changes. Joey Camelaroche (talk) 01:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined Not a valid reason to reduce protection; looks like an ongoing content dispute. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:43, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 18:43, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Since the inception of this article created by a UPE editor who has now been blocked, it has continued to suffer from edits from obvious sockpuppets who have been doing so for a long while now. A quick review of the article’s history shows editors who are barely a day old making subtle “promotional edits” to the article every now & again. This has to stop. Celestina007 (talk) 19:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Remove full protection: Re-requesting (previous request is at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive#Theresa Greenfield); a draft, at Draft:Theresa Greenfield, has been submitted at AfC, and I am a neutral 3rd-party AfC reviewer who would like accept the article (this request is not an end-run around the AfC process, nor was the first one). As I said over at Talk:Theresa Greenfield I don't have a dog in this fight: the only 2 edits I have made to the draft are 1) to add the {{draft article}} template to it and 2) mark it as under review (current version). I am only trying to help other editors (who seem to me to be quite competent) follow the correct process to get what now looks like pretty high quality, and 100% suitable content into the encyclopedia, like I have done with all the other AfC's I have accepted in the past. (will probably use pageswap for acceptance since the rdr has significant history and talkpage history.) Unprotect also requested from protecting admin. Pinging @Ivanvector:. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined - see Draft talk:Theresa Greenfield. I now have two AFC reviewers declining and one accepting. Might I suggest putting this question before a wider audience? WP:BLPN might be able to help. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:55, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Now what do you need, unanimity? I think WP:AfD, after the article is created, would be the better forum. That's where I take articles whenever an AfC reviewer accepts an article that I do not think a worthy subject of the encyclopedia. I can not recall inclusion of a draft ever being discussed at WP:BLPN: focused almost entirely on defamation/vandalism (neither of which is an issue here AFAICT). UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- UnitedStatesian, you "don't have a dog in this fight"? Your previous talk page comments make clear that you do. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, was just trying to convey that I was neither an editor of the draft nor a participant in its AfD/DRVs, only an AfC reviewer, with all my various requests resulting solely from that role. Metaphor failed me in this case. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:55, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- UnitedStatesian, you "don't have a dog in this fight"? Your previous talk page comments make clear that you do. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Now what do you need, unanimity? I think WP:AfD, after the article is created, would be the better forum. That's where I take articles whenever an AfC reviewer accepts an article that I do not think a worthy subject of the encyclopedia. I can not recall inclusion of a draft ever being discussed at WP:BLPN: focused almost entirely on defamation/vandalism (neither of which is an issue here AFAICT). UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- For anyone reviewing who hasn't already seen it: WP:AN#Theresa Greenfield. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Liz. Semi-protected for 3 days. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:42, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content – a transfer that has not been officially announced, yet. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:41, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Multiple IPs making the same, identical change to birthdate without explanation or sourcing ([83] [84] [85] [86] [87]). Requesting indefinite semi-protection (or pending changes) as it seems to be a restart of a 10-year edit warring over the issue as discussed on the talk page (September 2010, September/October 2010, and February 2012). – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 00:07, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Semi-protected for 1 month. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:40, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Elizium23 (talk) 14:55, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Warned user. They haven't edited this page in a few days. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ivanvector's warning may have solved the problem. MelanieN (talk) 20:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Nyook ✉ 18:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This article is currently featured on the main page. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A series of editors (Praytvofficial, Muhammetemreaydinofficial and Aydınemremuhammet) continue to add promotional material to the article. They all seem to be socks of the blocked Praytvresmi. Helper202 (talk) 23:51, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:55, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: Sandboxes should not be protected. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ping MusikAnimal - do you know what would have triggered the bot to do this? The main template was TE-protected in 2018 but that protection hasn't been modified. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Ivanvector: It must have been transcluded somewhere that caused it to have a total transclusion count > 500. That is no longer the case, so protection can be lifted and the bot shouldn't re-protect it. — MusikAnimal talk 19:47, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotected per above. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Ivanvector: @Pppery: Why do we even have a /sandbox subpage from a template? Wouldn't that be better off being deleted per WP:G6? ~Anachronist (talk) 22:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Anachronist: No? What's wrong with that template having a sandbox? Most templates do. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Ivanvector: @Pppery: Why do we even have a /sandbox subpage from a template? Wouldn't that be better off being deleted per WP:G6? ~Anachronist (talk) 22:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)