Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2022/03

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2022

01 March 2022

Reason: IP's are being disruptive by adding NY Post as a source which is not considered to be reliable per policy regarding sources. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from unregistered IP users. This has continued for several years now, usually involving replacing Content with a single word or phrase. PerryPerryD (talk) 15:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to include the protection level that is being requested. Semi-Protection. PerryPerryD (talk) 15:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. bibliomaniac15 19:35, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There is an IP user that has made dozens of edits on this page; they don't seem to be constructive (one of them was reverted by me, the user has reverted their own edits multiple times in what looks like an attempt to get their edit count up) by any means. I am hoping that semi-protection for a temporary period (a few days or 1-2 weeks) will discourage whatever is happening to this page. ➤ Zᴇᴇx.ʀɪᴄᴇ ✪ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Protection is not an ideal solution from single-editor disruption. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 20:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant vandalism and contradictory changes by 'IPs' to date of birth in light of death announced today. Bylandandsea (talk) 21:15, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 03:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 21:56, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Wretchskull: not seeing it. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neither do I, sorry. I almost instinctively requested protection when I saw an IP get reverted multiple times. Wretchskull (talk) 22:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 22:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent news outlining potential use in conflict.

Ongoing vandalism.

Ongoing changes that attempt to minimize US involvement in their research/development. 119.17.155.64 (talk) 00:53, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 03:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 02:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 03:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 03:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Harmful to human beings 2600:1700:E6A0:A220:ECB5:AAC0:87AA:BD8F (talk) 00:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 00:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated unsourced stadium and match start time additions despite hidden notices requesting sources. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:51, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 03:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continues after the last protection expired. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 01:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of off-site brigading to make changes to the page, add unreferenced and low-quality edits, etc Hornpipe2 (talk) 02:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 22:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 03:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A high level of vandalism and irrelevant sources has been used frequently throughout the page. Thecybergulf (talk) 12:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 03:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Existing user account that has been created for experimental purposes. So, genuine SPI reports cannot happen. It has been used for an example at {{sock vote}}. This page should be never be created, though it's visibility in a documentation may prompt someone to create it anyway. Creation of this page by anyone will break the example. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 13:12, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 03:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnuniq: TornadoLGS (talk) 03:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Unclear if the vandalism will continue. Either way, Johnuniq is an administrator and can choose to protect their user talk page if desired. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 03:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP disruption for about 2 months now. Request temp semi protect for 30 days. Thanks - wolf 04:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption not heavy enough for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Short term protection new user and IP continue to add non notable people to "Notable Alumni" section. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 04:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 30 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. wizzito | say hello! 07:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page gets messed up often by unregistered users who, for example, remove Trump from list of presidents who were removed. FlyDragon792 (talk) 03:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Trump was impeached, but not removed. Lectonar (talk) 09:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism. POV-Pushing spreading factual disinformation (removing Western Sahara) Askelaadden (talk) 09:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 10:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: England is much larger and all English people are lawful. Mydearpeople (talk) 02:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I’m hearing dogwhistle from the reasoning--CreecregofLife (talk) 06:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: We want to re-live that page Brakshit23 (talk) 07:18, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why? So it can be written as an advertisement to hype the person up rather than be written in an encyclopedic manner? And who’s "we"?--CreecregofLife (talk) 07:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Please create an article in draftspace which can then be evaluated. Lectonar (talk) 08:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ZitoutFadadich (talk) 08:39, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full of wrong information

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 09:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 04:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last IP edit 2 days ago. Lectonar (talk) 09:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users making a large amount of dubious edits about a military unit involved in an active war, my hunch is Russian intelligence or possibly Kadyrovtsies themselves are behind this https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kadyrovtsy&oldid=1074609648 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kadyrovtsy&oldid=1074584119 MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 04:58, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:21, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Almost all recent edits have been either disruptive (usually from IP editors) or reversions of disruptive edits. Some of these disruptive edits have been obvious vandalism (such as this one, this one, this one, this one, or this one), others are good-faith edits which are still disruptive as they go against established consensus (usually the consensus that subnational flags should not be used to indicate location). HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 10:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note - The article has been vandalised twice again since I made this request. I can't really establish why but there's no clear indication that these IPs are related. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 11:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Recurring vandalism (several times a month) - doesn't appear to be a widely watched article so often goes unreverted for long periods. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 11:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:24, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because this clearly a disputed theory, it is dangerous to present this as a conspiracy theory, “conspiracy theory” is a term hypothesising that there is a conspiracy. But putting it across this way is heavily biased and leaves little room for critical discussion and influences people to believe in an unfounded claim That it is a conspiracy theory. Jarcha98 (talk) 09:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Name of article not provided. Favonian (talk) 09:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption immediately started up again after expiration of semi. wizzito | say hello! 00:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 14:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page is full of vandalism and misinformation, which will just get even worse with Russian forces on the outskirts of the city. Fijipedia (talk) 12:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:26, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism – I and other users are having to tackle this on a daily basis now. IPs are removing sourced content, namely anything mildly critical of his premiership. Much of it seems to be politically motivated. Jkaharper (talk) 12:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Vitaium (talk) 04:16, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Favonian. Bbb23 (talk) 14:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 14:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Blocked vandal is back and introducing same vandalism from various IPs. Originally identified IPs are being addressed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yungkash3x, but this is now going on for two days and I don't think an IP range can be identified. Article was previously protected due to this specific vandal, and vandalism began again not longer after protection expired. Singularity42 (talk) 14:40, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. They are constantly adding their favorite musicians. The valid version is the latest edit by the creator of the article, user JuliánLeiva66, on 28 January 2022. Oroborvs (talk) 22:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 16:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BALKANS; persistent ethno-nationalist vandalism and other disruptive behaviour. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 03:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Which it could be shorter, but it looks like this goes back months. --Jayron32 16:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP disruptive editing due to 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine after expiry of protection 2409:4061:4E08:1781:A8C1:D968:280D:2E5C (talk) 11:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IP vandalism over a number of weeks. – DarkGlow14:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Deepfriedokra. Jayron32 16:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High level of IP disruption since March 2021, including adding uncited information and inexplicable rollbacks. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 23:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 14:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 03:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request upgrade to permanent template protection. This template now has over 3,000 transclusions, and when BareRefBot starts work the transclusion count will climb towards 30,000. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: ı dont want deleting this page Volkan1881 (talk) 16:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This page does get vandalised frequently, but not enough so to warrant semi IMO. Helen(💬📖) 19:39, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Worth a try, thanks HelenDegenerate!
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recommend "semi-protection". IP edit warring, possibly an evading banned editor. GoodDay (talk) 17:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edits that change "Messi" to "Pessi" account for the majority of changes to this article. Adeletron 3030 (talkedits) 19:40, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please redirect the page to New Page, because there is only a case difference and it is reasonable. ⸺Q28 is preparing for the senior high school entrance examination 10:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This page is intentionally left as a red link for technical reasons. Jayron32 16:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: repeated IP vandalism Painting17 (talk) 18:15, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jayron32 18:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD02:31C0:51F5:19CA:8E3:81D3 (talk) 21:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD02:5E7:D01E:6CB2:67E6:4ED4 (talk) 21:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 21:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP editors. — Newslinger talk 21:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:19, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

02 March 2022

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent re-addition of obvious false information. Onel5969 TT me 21:56, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD02:B1DD:30F9:472D:D1BA:BFA8 (talk) 22:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Gross BLP vandalism after protection ended. Isabelle 🔔 23:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 00:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article has been the target of a Vyera IP and apparent newly-registered employees over the past week. Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war by Cypriot IP address 114.124.146.60 (talk) 23:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP's violating NPOV and other disruptions in the past few days. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP cast hoaxing, etc. wizzito | say hello! 00:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a while, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Disruptive edits as some autoconfirmed users are trying to shove in their viewpoints on various points. I think WP:ARBEE applies, no? Curbon7 (talk) 01:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. WP:ARBEE, same as above Curbon7 (talk) 01:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I totally love edits that not only include incorrect information, but also remove the source for that incorrect information. [1] Curbon7 (talk) 01:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IP addresses, possible warn/ban evasion. PritongKandule-✉️📝 05:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 06:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 07:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 07:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes for this one, here vandalism has been less frequent so far--Ymblanter (talk) 07:35, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – various IP editors trying to add Ukraine to the list of current operators of this weapon, when it reportedly only captured the vehicle. – robertsky (talk) 01:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 07:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Users have been adding speculation and unsourced info to the article. I'd say a week would suffice (if protection is deemed necessary) ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 04:04, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:18, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – ongoing addition of unsourced biographical information over an extended period. Joeyconnick (talk) 04:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 07:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 07:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalisms, the latest by IP user 194.146.157.91, possibly the same as or belonging to the same group of vandals tendentiously adding their preferred anachronistic modern Turkish Metehan in article's opening paragraph Erminwin (talk) 21:24, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:14, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has been the target of nationalists for quite some time. Mostly SPA and passing IPs who are intent on censoring the mention of either RASD (a founding member of the AU) or Western Sahara. If you look at the article's history, you'll understand what I mean. The last one edit warred over the removal and has been reported to AN3, but unless the article is protected, the disruption will continue until they get what they want (one way or the other). M.Bitton (talk) 01:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The recent Valve game has led to a lot of edits adding it to this page, despite no reputable sources confirming the engine runs on source 2. Page protection for no more than a week or 2 would probably be appropriate. 9yz (talk) 07:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Arbitration enforcement: WP:ARBIPA. Many Afghans are still mad he left, so we can expect more "Ferrari" vandalism (related to the claims of embezzlement) and the like for some time to come. It's obvious stuff that PC is good for. ― Tartan357 Talk 08:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP and a new editor (presumably the same individual) have engaged in repeatedly adding to the article unsupported information both here and at Liverpool F.C.–Manchester City F.C. rivalry. Explanations to the changes made have been made, and the changes have been reverted by multiple users in response. Koncorde (talk) 21:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This is a case of unilateral edit warring. Since no warning had been issued, I just did so. If it starts up again, report this user to WP:ANEW instead. Jayron32 16:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined See above. Lectonar (talk) 08:43, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE; general vandalism; disruptive editing Curbon7 (talk) 09:04, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 09:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruption by multiple IPs. FDW777 (talk) 09:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism (NPOV and biased wording) from User talk:JaggedHamster - JohnnyCoal (talk) 11:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Looks like they've resolved their content dispute. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection Common target for enbies to force exclusive use of they/them into a she/they enby, and I am sick of seeing it having to constantly be reverted and would like to see the most effective preventative measure taken. Unnamed anon (talk) 03:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semiprotected more than a decade ago, because of vandalism. The protecting admin hasn't edited in more than five years. It's a children's TV series, and probably all the vandals are old enough that they won't care about the series anymore, or will have outgrown the childishness that led them to vandalise it. 49.198.51.54 (talk) 02:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More likely the latter.--CreecregofLife (talk) 03:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected A decade is a long time; let's see what happens. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 16:40, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it's unprotection will be a joke.[Joke] (Because it's being unprotected on April 1) ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:42, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: We at the Wikipedia do not have a sense of humor we're aware of. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: No, we just make feeble attempts. Lectonar (talk) 08:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 17:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: At least they did not redirect it to a feminine product --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Or a french swearword...Lectonar (talk) 08:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism 103.171.181.133 (talk) 05:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Content dispute with each side accusing the other of vandalism --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommi1986 let's talk! 11:35, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 14:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same vandalism by numerous IPs. David Biddulph (talk) 10:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 16:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent vandalism and adding unsourced material started again after protection expired. This IPs won't get notification as they use mobile for editing. Shinnosuke15, 11:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 16:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to edit citation link 163 ("Medal – AN216454001") to https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_M-9010 because the current link does not work. Aaw8283 (talk) 04:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Aaw8283, I have done this for you. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Highly controversial article, source of many high controversial events. 2603:8080:600:AA7F:353E:5655:A667:26CE (talk) 13:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Super declined. El_C 14:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Disruptive editing started not long after previous protection expired ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, [2], [3], [4] . The Supermind (talk) 14:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like a content dispute to me. Not vandalism at all. Use the talk page to reach consensus. Jayron32 17:04, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant edit-warring by a series of IPs and new users (most likely related) over the map in the infobox, which has been ongoing since at least February 25 (see history), and intermittently before that (e.g. [5]). All edits since Feb 25 have been on this one editwar. Another IP, almost certainly related, reached out to me here on Feb 27, where I advised them to go to the article talk page, but the edit-warring has continued since. Hoping that semi-protection will discourage the edit warrior(s) from continuing and/or force them to go to the talk page. R Prazeres (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has received a fair bit of disruptive edits the past week. Nemov (talk) 16:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add the information on Ukrainian war as its being coordinated from Kremlin WorldFreeFromPutin2022 (talk) 06:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please make a request on the protected page's talk page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add this information on war against democratic Ukraine as this war is being started and coordinated from Kremlin:

On 24 of February 2022 Putin’s regime started a war in Ukraine. Russian army invaded the independent democratic country of Ukraine, attacking peaceful cities in all of the country under the propagandic statement that the reason of the so called operation is to save local people - “we came to save you”, they state. It’s still unknown and its explained, from what or whom the Ukrainian people are supposed to be saved, as for many years they are living in the country with free media, democratically elected parliament, president, freedom of expression and freedom live their live as they choose to. As a result of Russian army attacks, civil areas, including residential houses, hospitals, schools, kindergartens, of the Ukrainian cities are being attacked from air and the ground. Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians are forced to leave homes often having only few minutes to collect their belongings before their houses are bombed. Children and pregnant women hiding in the basements of the houses with no food or water. Mothers giving birth in the hospitals under missile attack. Putin and its regime along with Belarusian illegal “president” Lukashenko are executing the crime against humanity, breaking all the possible laws, international agreements. This war will already is the most shameful and unprecedented event of aggression in Europe after II world war. WorldFreeFromPutin2022 (talk) 06:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please make a request on the protected page's talk page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

United Kingdom needs to be changed to British Empire Lordlopp (talk) 14:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please make a request on the protected page's talk page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent recreation of article redirected as result of AfD. Onel5969 TT me 11:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article has changed significantly since prior AFD; AFD redirections are not damnatio memoriae and this article is sufficiently distinct from the version that was redirected that it should stand. Also of note, the AFD in question had one vote (two if you count the nominator). If you think this needs to be revisited, start a new AFD discussion. Jayron32 16:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A lot of Ip's has been adding false information like Bash at the Beach to WCW Bash at the Beach and this has been going on since July 2016. Requesting indefinite Semi-Protection Chip3004 (talk) 20:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 20:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

03 March 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent LTA socking. CutlassCiera 19:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:06, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:06, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurrent IP vandal edits. Geoff | Who, me? 22:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:49, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please double the duration of the last protection thanks to anon conspiracy theories and other problem edits,. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive edits from IP adding user-generated and questionable links to the article. Xexerss (talk) 16:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. VictimOfEntropy (talk) 21:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs adding "6 kills" to Vitali's boxing record. 2.O.Boxing 22:18, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resumption of disruption by sock puppets after expiration of protection; see User:EvergreenFir/socks#31_Minutos_(Sao_Paulo,_Brazil) for more details. wizzito | say hello! 22:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users has recurred today. Geoff | Who, me? 22:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:23, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors repeating vandalism. Geoff | Who, me? 22:35, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:25, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Requesting temporary semi protection due to sock puppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DJdjPollard15. Bungle (talkcontribs) 22:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP edits keep adding unsourced content. Ue3lman (talk) 23:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Curbon7 (talk) 23:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFreeMelanieN (talk) 03:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD00:1046:5844:7FE4:6E24:EA00 (talk) 01:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE. Curbon7 (talk) 01:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP unsourced claims / persistent IP vandalism Propork3455 (talk) 01:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The Bob the Builder problem has resumed. As if dealing with the Splash and Bubbles vandal was bad enough. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:37, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:56, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Curbon7 (talk) 01:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page has been EC protected by Scotty Wong. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. For the bot. MelanieN (talk) 03:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I knew there was a template to do it but I didn't know what it was.Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 04:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The existing semi-protection is mostly working. I have blocked one particularly disruptive user (who is autoconfirmed but not extended confirmed) from the article for a week. MelanieN (talk) 03:17, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article has been the target of an IP-hopping POV-pusher over the past six weeks. IP editor refuses to discuss the issue on the article's Talk page. Skywatcher68 (talk) 02:13, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:25, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. M&JTV vandalism (AKA changing Arceus to Arcoos/Arkoos which is a running joke on that Youtube channel) ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:30, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs trying to include the name of a non-notable person "Mehabin" in the "associated-acts" parameter of the infobox, which is against the Template:Infobox_musical_artist documentation guidelines which says "This field is for professional relationships with other notable musicians or bands that are significant to this artist's career." [6] [7] [8]... Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. People messing with the cast, storyline etc. again and again Imsaneikigai (talk) 10:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting a second round of page protection as the anon IPs who had performed disruptive editing have waited out the protection period and have continued their disruptive editing. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 10:29, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

followed by

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing vandalism Fachidiot (talk) 10:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:56, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 11:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. (CC) Tbhotch 04:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:11, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism Elenatina (talk) 08:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Kosack (talk) 09:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE; oh yikes this page history is wild Curbon7 (talk) 09:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: regular admin action --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I hate to disillusion anyone, but porn stars are notable if they have a Wikipedia article. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Did you comment this on the wrong request? Anarchyte (talk) 14:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Anarchyte: "Porn is not notable. Removed a "pornstar" from the list" — someone forgot to tell porn! El_C 16:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD00:35D7:5885:6E0E:19AB:467E (talk) 13:13, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Abuse of editing, targeted by multiple IPs with the same intent of harming the page. 109.12.6.224 (talk) 14:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vitali Klitschko was protected yesterday due to IPs adding "6 kills" to his boxing record. The vandals have now jumped to his younger brother's article with the same edits. – 2.O.Boxing 15:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:24, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuing IP vandalism or disruption over many months. This is a stable article, little of value has been added for a very long time. In the unlikely event that there is anything new to said, it can be requested. at the talk page. John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:23, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by new users and IP's, calls for discussion at the talk page is being ignored. Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 17:11, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive content removal. Content is sourced. $chnauzer 02:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Recuse. Not protecting negative BLP. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:12, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. FDW777 (talk) 08:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Recuse. One person's terrorist is another's freedom fighter. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I normally wouldn't protect it this long, but this one has been dragging on for a while. Jayron32 17:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism via multiple IP addresses Bonusballs (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 17:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. talk-pages have a higher threshold of (disruptive) edits before we protect. Edits every other day, like now, aren't enough. Lectonar (talk) 14:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip block evasion persistently adding unsourced content and war editing (the other pages vandalized have all been protected). Tommi1986 let's talk! 14:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:39, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 16:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:23, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

then

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:23, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On your "About Wikipedia" page, you state: "Anyone with Internet access in good standing can write and make changes to Wikipedia articles, except in limited cases where editing is restricted to prevent further disruption or vandalism." Do you mean that anyone with an internet provider in good standing? Or, do you mean anyone in good standing with Internet access? This is a confusing statement. I would think that this statement means anyone in good standing with Wikipedia and who has an Internet connection may edit Wikipedia articles.

Thank you!

Martha Kruy Mjkruymls (talk) 14:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined If you click on the blue words (= Wikilinks), you are taken to pages which explain that in detail, and the confusion evaporates. Lectonar (talk) 14:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of language changes - I'm placing this request whilst looking at an edit where the editor adds the words 'and attack'. This is a volatile topic right now. AidenTEM (talk) 15:23, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Disruption was being caused by a single IP, which has now been temporarily blocked. If further disruption appears, then protection may be warranted. Kosack (talk) 15:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP (edit warring across multiple articles) is adding unsourced content. GizzyCatBella🍁 15:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Transcluded into the lead of the main invasion article so it should probably be protected as well for the same reasons the invasion article is protected. Phiarc (talk) 19:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To match ECP on main article. Jayron32 19:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See also Cornelius Keagon (humanitarian) and Cornelius Keagon (Liberian humanitarian). GPL93 (talk) 04:03, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Most recent recreation of that specific article was in October of 2021. Only the middle one has been since created, and only once. Jayron32 17:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Someone from the area of Atlanta, Georgia, has been disrupting this page. Involved IPs include:

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Qwerfjkltalk 20:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:33, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:34, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Nearly constant IP and unregistered user disruption. KidAdSPEAK 05:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: KidAd, Innocence (band) or Innosense? Bring your proof. Thanks. El_C 09:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Wikipedia destroyed the last vestiges of my innocence. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Favonian thwarted! What, it was an innocent query. El_C 16:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: WP:DEADLINE notwithstanding, its time had come. Favonian (talk) 16:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Favonian: I'm inclined to give KidAd a bit more time to respond, actually, if that's okay (per my original query, which was only a few hours ago). El_C 16:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jayron32 16:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Innocence (band). KidAdSPEAK 16:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Bring your proof. El_C 16:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This is not the correct venue for complex investigations. I have no idea what KidAd is going on about, but WP:ANI is thataway. When you get there, bring some diffs and some explanation of your evidence.--Jayron32 16:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jayron32: maybe give me a chance to see it through, even if you think my question to be complex. A little courtesy. El_C 17:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever. Via con dios. --Jayron32 17:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dude, what is your deal? El_C 17:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5 Card Stud? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's a movie. No one actually plays 5 card stud anymore since the 1970s. It's all Texas Hold'em nowadays. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I refuse to believe it's ever going to go out of style.[9] Sumanuil 22:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: … You've got to know when to hold 'em // Know when to fold 'em --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... No Limit Texas Hold' em and/or bust. El_C 22:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: extensive history of IP vandalism, including multiple RD2 and RD3 edits. Painting17 (talk) 20:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection Numerous vandals claiming the plot was orchestrated by the FBI without evidence. TomCat4680 (talk) 21:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try this first--Ymblanter (talk) 22:17, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by IPs, the same kind it's always been —El Millo (talk) 22:13, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 22:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection because of IP disruptive editing, like changing names [10], performing test edits [11] so on and so forth. 2402:3A80:1C44:8EF0:AD96:278:DC71:2704 (talk) 19:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one editor, only today, and has not returned since bing reverted. Jayron32 19:33, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs since page protection expired on February 18, 2022. Beccaynr (talk) 19:17, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Heavily watched article, averaging less than 1 vandalism per day since unprotected. That's not enough to justify protection. Jayron32 19:36, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism from a dynamic IP for a number of weeks. – DarkGlow19:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 3 times in two months, and never before that, is not persistent. Jayron32 19:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

04 March 2022

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Putin's war attracting vandalism to Putin's source of wealth. Bellezzasolo Discuss 20:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 23:12, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP's making wholesome unsourced changes. Twice in the past year, I had to undo their changes. Violating the BLP policy. Request only registered accounts be allowed to edit the article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:25, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 23:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rathfelder (talk) 23:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 23:33, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:37, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 22% of the past 50 edits are vandalism. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 00:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Coffeesweet (talk) 01:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User is using many, many open proxies in order to push a fake Bob the Builder reboot on many pages, including this one. wizzito | say hello! 02:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User is using many, many open proxies in order to push a fake Bob the Builder reboot on many pages, including this one. wizzito | say hello! 02:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. One editor continually adding false information. TheCartoonEditor(he/him/they) (talk) (contribs) 00:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Blocked; please use AIV in the future for issues with single editor disruption. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – target of IP hopping vandal. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 03:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IPs since invasion of Ukraine. wizzito | say hello! 07:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 07:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandalistic edits by IPs since February. wizzito | say hello! 07:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 07:49, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -Alabama- (Talk) 01:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I request the page to be Semi-protected due to an IP user continuing to modify the page and add incorrect data, a discussion was held with the user on my talk page but it wasn't helpful. Alawadhi3000 (talk) 03:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 01:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 10:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 02:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 10:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Lot of disruptive editing by IPs regarding this page. WP:ARBEE probably applies, but I'm not sure. Curbon7 (talk) 02:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 10:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting semi-protection. High level of IP vandalism over long periods Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 10:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated editing by IPs and autoconfirmed users, contrary to previous talk page discussions including an RfC, and refusal to discuss on talk page. Reidgreg (talk) 04:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of Disney+ in violation of MOS:TVINTL despite being told not to do in hidden comment/note. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 04:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Troll edits from unsigned editors, especially since the participating artists have been revealed. TreseTrese (talk) 04:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Also some map-related vandalism going on. Mellk (talk) 10:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit conflicted by the bot again. Sigh. Bishonen | tålk 10:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism. Please protect. Thanks. PubliusJ (talk) 07:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 07:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 10:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 10:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 10:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and misinformation Onawutayuin (talk) 10:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Blank Ref section, wow. El_C 10:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page is being moved without voting, irresponsible deletion and addition of material. Thespearthrower (talk) 10:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely.
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 11:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Similar disruption as last years article List of Music Bank Chart winners (2021) which was protected thrice last year. EN-Jungwon 10:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 12:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:17, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Avoiding collateral damage --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:17, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 10:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leave me be, bot, I was here 3rd! Erm: Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 11:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs recently trying to make unsourced changes to nationality. Mellk (talk) 12:41, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 13:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A week may help. A Malaysian football nationalist keeps changing an American player with Malaysian heritage to that nation. I have requested that the editor be blocked but that has not proven successful. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The /40 has been blocked. El_C 10:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page has received a lot of vandalism seemingly attempting to damage Mr. Strieber's reputation 81.132.179.86 (talk) 08:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing it. El_C 10:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing unexplanation of content removal Theoder2055 (talk) 10:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. El_C 10:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-term disruptive editor returned to this page literally the day after the last protection expired. See page history for background. PohranicniStraze (talk) 13:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PohranicniStraze: It's unclear to me why the cross-wiki links that the IP is trying to add are inappropriate. Can you clarify why you find this disruptive? —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Scottywong: Appears to be ongoing activity by a sock of LTA Charliewolf79, who has been socking on Game of Death related pages for years. Geolocates to the same vicinity as other known Charliewolf79 socks. If it would be more appropriate to deal with at SPI I can file a report there, but since I only saw the activity on this page, I figured page protection might be enough. PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. A pity we can't pending-changes protect category pages. Lectonar (talk) 11:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – It is to bring to your attention that banned LTA User:WorldCreaterFighter seem to be at work again, especially in this article. Uses Austrian IPs/Proxies which seem to be one of the behavioral patterns of the LTA which coincides withh the LTA's interest in genetics. As well as a pro Dravidian/East Eurasian and anti West Eurasian bias. As can be seen here. A look into the various IP edits is a testament of that in the article, not to mention large changes to content without discussion [12] [13].

I would request the admins to protect the article (possibly extended since the LTA had created IDs in the past) and take stringent actions against the proxies. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Fylindfotberserk, you should take this to WP:SPI or WP:ANI. This request is probably too complex for this forum. El_C 11:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks El_C for the suggestion, I already opened a case at ANI here. Kindly have a look. Will SPI be necessary after filling a case at ANI? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fylindfotberserk, RE: SPI — I don't know. Depends how it goes, where it goes. RE: ANI — sorry, this isn't an area with which I am familiar. El_C 11:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pavlov2 (talk) 11:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandals persisting for more than 3 months trying to degrade the article. Tommy has a great username (talk) 16:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

then: Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I thought my sister was the only one who still called the cops "the pigs." How retro. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP who refuses to respond on Talk despite being reverted by multiple users. A temp semi PP is needed. Gotitbro (talk) 17:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Please discuss content and sourcing on article talk page and achieve consensus for any changes Please make WP:EDITREQUESTs on talk. "All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ManaliJain (talk) 12:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There was no vandalism. Someone just added information without any sources and I have added the source there but there was no vandalism only good faith edits. AAhap36 (talkcontribs) 12:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Even if it would have been vandalism...not enough disruption. Lectonar (talk) 13:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sock keeps spamming WP:ELNO social media links to the external links section. Yosemiter (talk) 17:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tons of vandalism from multiple IPs and users. CutlassCiera 17:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very high level of repeated IP vandalism. Anwegmann (talk) 18:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page. Vitaium (talk) 14:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of unusual IP edits is being done in this article Partha protim konar (talk) 16:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly visible page. Provides JS to import into userspace, potentially compromising code can be added. — Berrely • TalkContribs 19:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP's making unnecessary changes such as information not backed sources or changing article section titles for no reason. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 26% of the past 50 edits are vandalism. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 16:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Individuals are changing the pronouns from they/them to gendered pronouns. MOS:NON-BINARY This is a BLP. I believe changing this to semi-protected is in order. ElectraInTheVoid (talk) 19:28, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – About a quarter of the past 50 edits are vandalism. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 19:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 28% of the edits this year are vandalism. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 20:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  14:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Not seeing any recent problems. Jayron32 19:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Victor Trevor (talk) 18:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last IP edit was in February, and was "good faith." --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think it’s important that people are able to include emerging information about this man. I’d like to replace the picture of his face with one of my anus.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:c7e:ef1:ec00:71b1:1dec:f6fc:8685 (talk) 20:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's an excellent reason to keep the protection. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedFavonian (talk) 21:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Drat. Just when it was getting good. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

05 March 2022

Reason: Repeat edits which clearly follow an agenda from a number of accounts, which additionally remove valuable information within the article without justification. Note, this page is already semi-protected, but given many of the troubled edits are coming from people with Wiki accounts, I do not find this to be sufficient.. HiddenHistoryPedia (talk) 20:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The edits you're trying to add violate WP:NOR, specifically WP:SYNTH. Please discuss your proposed changes on the talk page of the article and seek consensus for your edits. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 22:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection of this page should be lowered to semi-protected, because I believe that there are many enthusiastic people who want to contribute due to the invasion, but they can't because of the protection level. If these people could add information I believe that it will greatly help keep the article updated. Torpschez (talk) 03:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Torpschez: It's more important that the information added to these pages is accurate and based on reporting from reliable sources, than it is that the information is added quickly after events take place. WP:NOTNEWS. Based on the edit request you made recently for this page (where you wanted to add information that was sourced to some kind of map website that apparently anyone can add information to), I'd say that EC protection is doing its job. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And the “enthusiasm” is probably going to be very disruptive, which is probably why the protection is in place. Unprotecting would surrender to an invasion of its own--CreecregofLife (talk) 17:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Torpschez: Are you SURE you want to stick your face in this particular clowder of leopards? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Disruption from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1090#LTA sockpuppetry, puffery of Karna of Mahabharata in 2 days. Both users are part of the ring. Consider blocking the latest user (Ghanjuni (talk · contribs) is globally locked). Both added the same info, also a duck case of socking — DaxServer (t · c) 17:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC) (amended 17:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC))[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A Certain IP has been Vandalizing WWE Hell in a Cell and this been happening since 2015, I would be grateful if this article can be Semi Protected for a least a year. Chip3004 (talk) 19:26, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 04:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This page has been the target of LTA for well over a year and has already been semi protected indefinitely for that reason. The LTA, however, is knowledgeable enough to get their sockpuppet accounts to autoconfirmed status. See these diffs for comparison: [14], [15], [16]. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:26, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 04:09, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – account an ip's removing sourced information. RF23 (talk) 22:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too active for pc at this time. El_C 04:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs repeatedly adding unsourced demographic information. No response to user or article talk page posts. Meters (talk) 23:49, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increased disruption by IPs after protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 02:24, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 04:15, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unfortunately not able to get IP to talk page. The ip edits also include the addition of copyrighted material over and over as seen by bot removal here .Moxy- 02:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:20, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP range keeps adding unsourced nickname to page. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 03:50, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:24, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article is an easy target for disruptive editing by people wishing to promote flat earth beliefs. The previous protection expired 3 weeks ago and the article is already being vandalised. BalaM314 (π) (talk) 04:03, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. El_C 04:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 04:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. El_C 04:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Violation of the Biographies of Living Persons policy. The helper5667 (talk) 04:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 04:30, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP disruption. — Mhawk10 (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 08:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism from a IP hopper (over a wide range so I don’t think blocking is an option) Nick Levine (talk) 09:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Spillover disruption after this fellow was apparently KIA'd in the recent invasion of Ukraine. IPs removing well sourced information as "biased" or "propaganda" (even when both sides are saying it). Clearly a frivolous dispute. Mako001 (C)  (T)  11:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  IP blocked too. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:42, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruptive editing from IPs — DaxServer (t · c) 09:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bishonen | tålk 09:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruptive editing from IPs — DaxServer (t · c) 09:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bishonen | tålk 09:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous changes to nationality and ethnicities against sourcing. Mellk (talk) 14:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 10:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 11:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Decrease to semi-protected. This page is actually relatively mundane with little editing or even dispute. Sometimes updating to his page is slow and I believe the heavy protection on this article is overall being harmful to improvements. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 01:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyBallioni: Any thoughts? I would leave it at ECP, tbh...article might see more action because of the situation in Ukraine. Lectonar (talk) 11:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think the page is only mundane because of ECP, seems like it would be an extreme target for vandalism. I support keeping the protection level. BalaM314 (π) (talk) 04:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian (talk) 11:48, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There's no reason for a page to remain perpetual full creation protection. Some protection made sense in 2013, when the page was recreated 3 times, but it should have been lifted long ago. And the fact that it remains has incidentally led to another disruptive creation (likely to do with an unrelated subject with the same name) getting displaced into weird places [17] [18]. – Uanfala (talk) 23:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – The subject of the recent, misguided efforts is the same as the one causing the protection in 2013. Favonian (talk) 11:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent BLP violations and disruptive edits nearly every day on this high profile football athlete's article, last protection lasted a month and the disruptive editing has continued so should probably be longer. TylerBurden (talk) 12:44, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 12:50, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 16:28, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous poorly sourced edits by IPs/new users; requires a clean up every now and then. --. Ab207 (talk) 13:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:30, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism is constant, on top of people changing the leading picture without consensus. Fijipedia (talk) 14:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by IP, that if we looked up with Geolocate, always from Semarang, Central Java. Always putting status E or R in the league table. Wira rhea (talk) 14:48, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all recent edits are vandalism. CutlassCiera 15:02, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Restored 2017 indef semi. As mentioned, there is no record in the log of the protection having been lifted (at all). El_C 16:39, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent re-adding of unreliably sourced material. Onel5969 TT me 15:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To bot: I got scared. :( El_C 16:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Sporadic IP vandalism. Have been changing to incorrect types of bad guys in the movie for awhile. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:25, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 15:25, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 15:26, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:28, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:03, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indian film released on 3 May - endless stream of unsourced claims + puffery - over 100 today - Arjayay (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:06, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Cyberpunk2077JohnnySilverhand socks keep creating this. CutlassCiera 16:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 17:06, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 16:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months (of WP:SRSBSNS!), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

06 March 2022

Reason: Im requesting protection for this page because I have done my research and references, but every time I post an edit on this page, a user deletes it constantly. I was messaged by this user that I was in a editing war with them and that I was changing other people work, but I did not edit or delete or do anything of any kind to the text that was already there. This is important to me because I did all the relevant research and references and I did not know why only my work was being deleted! but since I got that message on my notice board I relied this user is relentless and won't stop deleting my hard work. Id like to request protection for this page so I can make my necessary edits without being scared that this user has taken it down. Thank you! Ro513R3dxoxo (talk) 00:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:ARBEE, and persistent vandalism or otherwise inappropriate changes by IPs in relation to the current invasion. RGloucester 03:20, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Block and protect page of user of the Gilvane Lima da Silva Gilvane Lima da Silva (talk) 04:47, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User is altering a message which is not allowed at all. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 22:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, all from IP-address users (and rarely from the same address twice), apparently due to a social media meme. Rcombs (talk) 03:58, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, obvious sockpuppetry. Atlantic306 (talk) 05:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 09:27, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – This page was recently the target of page-move vandalism from an LTA, who has carried out similar name-related vandalism at Tropical cyclone naming ([19], [20], [21]). I recommend that move protection be set to Extended confirmed or higher, as this LTA has used autoconfirmed sockpuppet accounts. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:03, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 12:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism, both from IP's and a registered user. MSport1005 (talk) 19:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:57, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Alarmism and violations of WP:NOTFORUM mostly by new users. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 21:35, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The pages national anthem has been changed to a non-vocal version, by Russian IPs thrice. I believe this is a form of vandalism or even propagandism, as the vocal version (provided by Tuva's national orchestra) is sung in Tuvan & not Russian. This is my first attempt to request protection for a page, so feedback is welcomed on my talk. Thanks. 86.168.105.42 (talk) 22:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 23:03, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism. Semi-protection would suffice Pyramids09 (talk) 00:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A high spike of vandalism recently. 18% of the past 50 edits are vandalism. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 01:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please semi protect this article for autoconfirmed users only, religion is a very sensitive issue in Indonesia. People are trying falsely vandalize the article to make the percentage of religions different in an inaccurate data. Bayu Fuller (talk) 02:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bayu Fuller, religion is a very sensitive issue everywhere. El_C 12:21, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: This page lists "globally enabled users" - unless I'm mistaken as to the purpose of this array, this means that anyone could add a username here and use AWB globally (overriding Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPageJSON, which is protected). Remagoxer (talk) 17:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Remagoxer, in Engrish please. El_C 12:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: Random IP passing through, not op. This page is the JSON implementation of Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage/Version which includes a number of important settings, such as the list of users who have access to AWB on all wikis. This needs to be fully protected to match the non-JSON version, because at the moment anyone can grant themselves AWB rights on all wikis by editing that page. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected indefinitely. Please check my work! El_C 12:34, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term problems. (CC) Tbhotch 02:49, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:35, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism of the "foreign deaths" section resumed immediately when protection ended today. Suggest indefinite protection. Danstronger (talk) 03:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. El_C 12:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting pending changes. There is a bit of vandalism and unconstructive editing from IP's on this page. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:28, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 12:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Relatively high level of IP vandalism. ― Tuna NoSurprisesPlease 04:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Man, I hope they optimize the pc port'ing soon, because this game looks fuckin' awesome (doesn't need to be Car Stealers 5-level port'ing, though that would be sweet). El_C 12:49, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page consistently gets vandalized by unregistered and mobile-unregistered users. FlyDragon792 (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – This article seems like a good candidate for indef (or long-term temp) pending changes protection, as it has a tendency to attract subtle disruptive or nonconstructive edits that takes days to months to be noticed and reverted. This happens on both "sides". Since the last semi expired in October, we have:

Given that this is a DS area and that people probably aren't going to stop having strong opinions about a famous trans person, I think long-term or indef PCP is justified. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 08:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. El_C 12:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term vandalism from a dynamic IP; has been warned over and over again but they just change IP. – DarkGlow09:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. MT111222 (talk) 10:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A09090091 (talk) 10:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:56, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 500/30 protection due to WP:PIA. FDW777 (talk) 12:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 12:58, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 12:27, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 13:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 12:36, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 13:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant reverting of edits and inserting of unconfirmed subjective information by a user (Benjichilders) without prior consensus made with other editors. Uncleangelo (talk) 12:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent controversy has caused vandalisms from unregistered editors. --*Fehufangą✉ Talk page13:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 13:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 58 percent of the past 50 edits are vandalism. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 18:28, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Another user is undoing my updates for no apparent reason. I have provided citations for all of my updates! The first sentence totally makes sense. Naxh (talk) 02:02, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: This page needs special protection because a user is undoing justifiable edits and updates! Naxh (talk) 02:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Naxh, did you just +1 yourself? El_C 12:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Person has recently made comments on Fox news about the Russian invasion of Ukraine that are supportive of Russia and dismissive of the Ukrainians and his page is now being attacked with edits. Page may already have been under attack from earlier. 78.69.119.83 (talk) 13:14, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 13:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of ip user vandalism Editor123ALOP (talk) 03:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 12:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: EXTREMELY HIGH levels of edit warring and adding information with non-reliable sources. And there are also people vandalizing the article by adding statements and sentences to different sections that are solely from personal feelings and opinions and not based on facts. I would also like to add that this article was placed under a temporary semi-protection before for these very same reasons, but shortly after the protection was lifted, it resumed again. IntellectualChristianWikiUser (talk) 04:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. IntellectualChristianWikiUser, last edit was Feb 20, so this is quite Stale atm. El_C 12:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs continuously making unsourced changes e.g. "is" to "was". Mellk (talk) 16:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 17:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion, you may want to block IP too. Muhandes (talk) 15:51, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion. Muhandes (talk) 15:51, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion again after former protection expired. Muhandes (talk) 15:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07 March 2022

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The latest protection was for two years, and expired today – an ipsock of the same tired LTA appeared right away. bonadea contributions talk 18:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Liz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 23:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator discospinster. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:29, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. TartarTorte 23:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator discospinster. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:29, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This was previously semi-protected long-term for IP vandalism alleging negative BLP info. Now that the protection has been lifted, the IP vandalism has resumed. Chubbles (talk) 14:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done indef semi'ed for obvious reasons Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done – for the bot Favonian (talk) 06:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Once you edit the page, it will give you an edit notice saying that the Aishiyeh massacre page can only be edited by Extended-Confirmed-Users as it's related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. However, this is not the case. No protection has been applied to the page, despite what the edit notice says. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 14:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - good catch and fixed Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 06:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Right after I reported an IP for adding the Islamic State flag to random articles, other IPs decide to make coincidentally similar edits, including to my talk page. Benjamin112 01:48, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was first deleted in April 2020 as per WP:TOOSOON, and due to repeated attempts to create the page has since been Create protected (by @CactusWriter:). There is a currently a Draft version of the page that I would like to approve, as the original deletion reasons no longer apply. Greenman (talk) 09:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated disruptive editing by IP address(es). No response to talk page or edit summaries. Loopy30 (talk) 15:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 15:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced edits from IP editors. Ravensfire (talk) 16:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jasonbres (talk) 18:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:39, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of unsourced WP:DOB by numerous IPs. Toddst1 (talk) 19:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 21:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:46, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page received indefinite protection in July 2016, when this player was a stand-out youngster at UEFA Euro 2016. His fame since then has not been sustained. There has only been one edit request on this page, in 2018, to ask for an updated shirt number - clearly not the same situation that requires for his compatriot Cristiano Ronaldo to be protected. It is also worth noting that the biggest recent contributor has been User:7Road, a proven sockpuppet of site banned User:Martimc123 - protection limits the pool of users who can WP:REVERTBAN 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:30EB:4B27:DD0F:2F39 (talk) 20:52, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Considering the recent sockpuppet edits to the page, I think remaining protected for a while longer is the right move. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page was protected because people kept trying to add Aperture Desk Job to the list of games using the engine, but the changes were getting revered because no source existed saying that. A source has been found, so the page can be unprotected now. 9yz (talk) 01:57, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This was short-term protection, let it expire in a few days. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – sock vandalism, persistent. Pavlov2 (talk) 00:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:59, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Razali Osman (talk) 00:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – most recent edits other than mine have been vandalism. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 01:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:06, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anonymous user wrote it "Goat" many times. -St3095 (?) 04:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Should be protected. Is a target for vandalism a lot of the time, and is under a DS topic (longevity). wizzito | say hello! 05:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 10:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring between two editors. Trillfendi (talk) 05:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:23, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism from persistent sockpuppeteer Howtonotwin (talk) 06:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:29, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Major disrupting edits from IP user(s) Hwi.padam (talk) 20:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 09:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Trying to avoid vandalism and inaccurate evaluations of his work Animumquoque (talk) 22:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: high level of vandalism, persistent harassment from the part of the editor Animumquoque (talk) 22:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Aside from a single sock edit in October of last year, I don't see any disruption, ever. --Blablubbs (talk) 09:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Animumquoque, the page was last edited Dec 2020, so this is quite Stale. Also, what is up with red link usernames +1'ing their own requests? Like yesterday: diff. Posting +1 is like saying "seconded," or "hear hear," "I echo that," etc. You don't echo what you just said because you, yourself, had just said it (tautology). Why am I so invested in +1 decorum? Who knows. But I very much am, so much! El_C 09:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I was here 3rd! 😾 El_C 09:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Second verse, same as the first. More then half of discussion on the talk page violates WP:NOTFORUM and it's very annoying to constantly respond with basically the same message because people can't be bothered to read the box at the top. Requesting Semi because most of the bothering is from IPs or very new accounts who haven't quite gotten it. casualdejekyll 01:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For example, see Talk:SCP Foundation#I would like a job here, Talk:SCP Foundation#Let me join, Talk:SCP Foundation#SCP - 84654|| The pretty Wolf, Talk:SCP Foundation#Scp 5000 the inanimate suit, Talk:SCP Foundation#Alagadda and the Lord's, Talk:SCP Foundation#I no what u are, Talk:SCP Foundation#Fun scp games for mobile, Talk:SCP Foundation#Hi, Talk:SCP Foundation#Abnormal creatures, Talk:SCP Foundation#Scp 1940 casualdejekyll 01:50, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And that's just the stuff that hasn't been archived yet casualdejekyll 01:53, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
tbh what I do is just revert when I see one of these comments. I'm surprised some of them are up. wizzito | say hello! 05:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not enough for an article talk page protection. Unless of an egregious nature, the threshold for these is higher. @Casualdejekyll and Wizzito: courtesy pings. Yours, El_C 10:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The helper5667 (talk) 02:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was 10 days ago. El_C 10:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 05:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 10:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. THe disruptive editing is probably because the website currently redirects to Vladimir PutinBlaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It's been 84 11 years. 2A02:908:1A6:8E80:FAA4:D7B1:D235:418F (talk) 19:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Considering this was circa Dark of the Moon, the protection made sense back then. Not so much now. I imagine the (actual cannibal…) song (released in 2012) exacerbated the protection so people wouldn’t play along with the song, but I think even 10 years after that is a bit much--CreecregofLife (talk) 19:16, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected I'm not particularly optimistic, but let's see what happens. Any significant vandalism will almost certainly result in the protection being applied indefinitely again. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done – Sure, it's still move protected. It's a feature. Favonian (talk) 16:23, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism from a IP user who was previously caught using a sock puppet account Persesus (talk) 13:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Changed target from "The Palmer Report talk page protection request" to "Talk:Palmer Report". Favonian (talk) 16:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This talk page was semiprotected three times in 2021, the longest was one month. The rationale for those protections is this thread on the talk page. (In addition to the coordinated editing campaign, an admin reported an off-wiki legal threat). One IP has been being a nuisance recently; those edits can be seen at Special:Contributions/2600:6C65:7E7F:B93E::/64. This IP range might quality for a personal attack block for accusing User:Persesus of lying. I don't know anything about Persesus' claim of sockpuppetry by the IP and don't see anywhere where Persesus has provided evidence. EdJohnston (talk) 16:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just look at the wording on how they write it. it's the same person EdJohnston compare it to what they said to the archived version of the sockpuppet account its nearly identical wording and speech pattern. The personal attacks from said user were uncalled for.--Persesus (talk) 16:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Persesus, who do you think the IP is a sock of? EdJohnston (talk) 22:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think its a sock puppet account or either Nora or Joe since the IP address is identical if you look at the archived talk page of PR more specially pages 4 and 5. The word styling is the same and idenitcal as well as the layout or format of it. The IP location is the exact same as well EdJohnston .--Persesus (talk) 05:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. (for the bot) MelanieN (talk) 17:49, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP-hopping person keeps on adding unsourced information (6 times in 5 weeks so far) that the phone supports USB on-the-go and has an aluminium frame. Tube·of·Light 11:49, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator OhnoitsjamieMelanieN (talk) 17:53, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content dispute / edit warring between two auto-confirmed users. Ab207 (talk) 12:29, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protectedFavonian (talk) 16:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Copyright violations. DanCherek (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 15:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring. Aircorn (talk) 16:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BusterD. Favonian (talk) 17:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Incorrect information about the history of the region and the Ethiopian state edited into the article by non-autoconfirmed Eritrean nationalists ZemenfesKidus (talk) 17:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:20, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Violating Biographies Of Living Persons. RyuzakiDavenport (talk) 14:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mega Man is not a living person. Can you show WP:DIFFS of the BLP violations? casualdejekyll 14:45, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article's protection expired today. There also haven't been any disruptive edits today. @RyuzakiDavenport: Did you possibly request protection for the wrong article? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:57, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, You Should Not To Damage The Page Again, Doing So Cause Prohibited From Editing! RyuzakiDavenport (talk) 15:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Uh... I've done absolutely nothing to the page. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 16:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Atlantico 000 (talk · contribs) has an agenda and refuses to allow the consensus to be applied by a neutral third party. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Objection, please read the discussion about Lukas Podolski. There, for many days, there has been a discussion about whether to remove the footballer's nationality from the lead. It has been shown that nationality should be removed in line with Wikipedia policy. There had been no consensus before; and I was deliberately waiting until the end of last week to make changes, and there was no vote against. It is more the user of Walter Görlitz who should be banned from further editing (per not referring to the arguments, forcing his point of view). Atlantico 000 (talk) 16:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I think you need a third opinion, not protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent of unsourced poorly or disruptive editing NSAandGCHQ (talk) 18:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anonymous users repeatedly add detail to the plot summaries in violation of MOS:TVPLOT. Due to the recent airing of series 6, the page will see more traffic soon. BenbowInn (talk) 23:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 17:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Bunch of IP vandalism / edit warring Phiarc (talk) 18:57, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed an error in the death tolls tallies for the last week report for covid pandemic in British Columbia, could this be corrected? ColinF3745 (talk) 06:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This page isn't even protected. You're free to make any corrections you want, as long as they're referenced to reliable sources. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism by various IP addresses. 2402:3A80:138C:9425:A832:AE5:70B2:E862 (talk) 15:36, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 18:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. MT111222 (talk) 15:49, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 18:05, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism, BLP policy violations, unsourced content and unreliable sources. Alphazelf (talk) 21:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08 March 2022

Temporary semi-protection: vandalism after player was suspended the entire 2022 season for gambling. Swagging (talk) 21:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 36% of the past 50 edits are vandalism. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 23:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The redirects 0.000001 and 0.000000001 exist, which means this redirect could also exist. 62.28.36.147 (talk) 21:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Same IP that was vandalizing Aq Qoyunlu and Qara Qoyunlu. Kansas Bear (talk) 23:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent "owner" vandalism (of the tired, overdone 1990s variety). Larry Hockett (Talk) 03:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:22, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from multiple IPs signed, Willondon (talk) 03:49, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: Has been the target of an IP-hopping vandal for over a month. They have also targeted several other pages of similar types. The person has also threatened me with profanities to try and get me to stop reverting his/her vandalism. Luigitehplumber (talk) 15:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. so these are fake/hoax games then? Just checking as I can't see a discussion on the talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Casliber - IP is also saying very mean things in their edit summaries, which to me at least suggests they may be WP:NOTHERE, especially if they are hoax games. casualdejekyll 02:08, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Luigitehplumber: Like Casliber I was reluctant to take action because this has not been handled well. Next time, please post a new section on article talk with a polite explanation for why gag.wiki is not useful. Do not mention the IP or their edits, just focus on article content and say why the addition is unsatisfactory. We don't protect articles because an IP was offensive but this is a busy noticeboard and things have to progress. Johnuniq (talk) 04:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)`[reply]
Thanks for doing so, but I’m a little confused with your reply. The link is of a Wikipedia mirror site... Luigitehplumber (talk) 04:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Based on the comment, "I DONT CARE. TOMORROW MORE." we can assume the editor is returning. 88.14.150.13 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 88.15.117.124 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) are the same editor and the return will likely be a different address. A range block would be unnecessarily large. Some sort of protection would be appreciated. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:59, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting semi-protection because an editor using multiple IP is edit warring in order to insert WP:SYNTH about new films because the user is hoping/wishing for more films to be made. Mr Fink (talk) 17:04, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 04:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User undoing my updates Naxh (talk) 16:34, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Naxh: Wikipedia doesn't work like that. Please do not ask for protection again. Instead, you must follow dispute resolution procedures. If needed, you can ask for guidance at WP:Teahouse. The discussion at article talk needs to proceed as outlined at the dispute resolution link. You might need more experience editing articles before insisting that your addition should be retained. Johnuniq (talk) 04:09, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple SPAs causing disruption with the AfD process and edit-warring. Kbabej (talk) 16:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Kbabej: The most recent problematic user (at the time of your above request) has been indefinitely blocked. That might be the end of it. If there is a problem post here again or ping me from article talk. Johnuniq (talk) 04:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page 1, first paragraph, Dr. Robert Malone

incorrect statement: "During the COVID-19 pandemic, Malone has promoted misinformation about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.

Please change to: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Malone has provided empirical data that shows reasonable concern for the safety and efficacy of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and over 17,000 medical doctors and scientist agree worldwide. One Awake (talk) 19:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)https://doctorsandscientistsdeclaration.org/ One Awake (talk) 19:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 19:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The techy stuff is a bit over my head...sorry to bother. Just felt like this bit of info regarding Dr. Malone is defaming. I support WIKI. Free speech and free sharing of info is so incredibly important. But, this sort of misuse of the platform makes me feel very sad.
I haven't been able to navigate the edit request. Perhaps, if it matters on a human level, someone could look into it. Here again is the statement of concern;
Robert W. Malone (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Page 1, first paragraph, Dr. Robert Malone
incorrect statement: "During the COVID-19 pandemic, Malone has promoted misinformation about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.
Please change to: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Malone has provided empirical data that shows reasonable concern for the safety and efficacy of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and over 17,000 medical doctors and scientist agree worldwide. One Awake (talk) 19:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)https://doctorsandscientistsdeclaration.org/ One Awake (talk) 19:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC) One Awake (talk) 20:36, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why would we add a patently obvious bit of astroturfing into our articles, especially in a topic area under sanctions in part because of the anti-intellectualist astroturfing? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:39, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Even the CDC tells us that mRNA vaccines can have side effects. Would it help if I cited the actual health data, say case by case? It just seems so authortarian to dismiss and defame folks.
Totally not trying to be backwards here - just generally concerned about my human family. If there is additional evidence about our health risks, we have the right to know. We still have freedom of speech here, even if we dont agree. Otherwise, we are not Democratic. One Awake (talk) 21:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Technically speaking, on private property such as Wikipedia you only have whatever free speech rights the proprietors allow. We are not government property and the First Amendment does not apply here. If the First Amendment applied to private entities, much of the media that exists today would not exist.Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How do we know we aren't being anti-intellectual ourselves if we refuse to hear anything but one voice? One Awake (talk) 21:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How do we know we aren't if we're giving voice to their views? This isn't a both-sides issue, and remember: This is in a topic area under sanctions. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I honestly did not know there were sanctions on providing facts about any topic on WIKI. I do feel rather certain that mRNA vaccines are a "both sides" issue, otherwise, we wouldn't be having this conversation, every last person on Earth would have happily been vaccinated with mRNA vaccines and you wouldn't be able to refer to "giving voice to their views" if there were no other views.
I took the time to read through all the information provided by the CDC and then I took the time to read through the links provided by Dr. Malone and his colleagues. I assume you have done the same in order to be well informed. There are literally tons of links that trace back to scientific data, patents, case studies and so on. On top of everything, he has spent his life creating vaccines...trying to do something that he thought would help the world. Now, because he expresses doubt about the mRNA vaccine safety, he is being demoralized. If it can happen to him, it can happen to you or me in the future. This is not very American and it's ethically wrong.
So from your reply, I am to understand that Wiki only allows information to be posted if certain proprietors agree? And, I assume that must mean that what has already been said about Dr. Malone (even if it wrongfully defames him) is okay with Wiki? Because "proprietors" say so?
It's very important for me to be able to make sense of these policies because I support WIKI with small donations. If the voice of "SOME" doctors and scientists are going to be limited (all of whom have gotten their degrees in the same way as all other doctors and scientists), then I'm going to withdraw my future financial support from WIKI. What a shame, I was going to dontate today.
I'm not afraid of being proven wrong - I'm vaccinated and I'm a Democrat. We are all ignorant of many things until we actually learn what is true - and even the truth we learn today may change tomorrow as we continue to learn. I want WIKI to be open to providing info that truly reflects the nature of their subjects otherwise it isn't worth supporting. There are two sides to this debate and it is morally wrong to defame a person who has not been legally convicted of any wrong doing. One Awake (talk) 23:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of arguments, but none of any actual substance here, plus the usual "I'm not donating unless you favour my weltanschauung" blackmail threat that means nothing to us unpaid volunteers who're tired of dealing with the denialism and efforts to use Wikipedia to push a specific narrative, all in defence of blatantly obvious astroturfing cited to a website homepage which we wouldn't be able to cite in the first place (no comment on the website itself). From my responces, you should be getting the impression "Do NOT edit this topic unless you are fully willing to accept the consequences arising from your actions, for good or for ill." You're a new editor who appears to have a particular bee in their bonnet about this topic; I would be making the exact same recommendation if you were instead editing Joe Biden, Love Jihad, Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, or any of literally thousands of other articles that fall under anything listed here. This is not a topic you want to be anywhere near as a user unfamiliar with Wikipedia, nor is this a hill you want to fight on. I take no position on the actual content of the article in question, and am specifically targeting your arguments and debate tactics. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 02:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr Salvus 22:50, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The subject is being heavily edited because there has been news of his death. Risk of disruptive editing. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 00:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 13:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I'm being trolled. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:34, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 10:40, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persisent disruptive editing NSAandGCHQ (talk) 18:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:47, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing by IP hopper. FDW777 (talk) 08:00, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs and SPAs. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:37, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:41, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The holiday is being celebrated today, and the page is seeing an uptick in vandalism. Firefangledfeathers (talk | contribs) 15:22, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:49, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring on policy page - Repeated attempts to remove existing policy through edit warring without gaining consensus. Already protected once in January before RfC, which ended with no consensus gained for removal or other issues. Recent attempt to remove text again after RfC[22] prompted this request. More background here.[23] I feel like my hands are tied here, and I don't want to have to be the one reverting on a policy page, so admin input appreciated too. KoA (talk) 19:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KoA, you reverted away from the stable language of the guideline without having consensus for the change. You should indeed not be reverting away from longstanding language against consensus, but I am curious about your request to increase the page protection: is that to prevent yourself from edit warring? Newimpartial (talk) 20:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I requested the protection to prevent editors from trying to remove existing policy without gaining consensus even after the RfC, which you just did after this request.[24] It's been a recurring problem at that policy page lately with respect to "stable". I have not made any edits at the page that don't contain existing policy language, and it's backwards to require consensus on my part for restoring already approved policy language. It would be a different case if I did propose any real policy changes or additions not already in policy. The avenues for disputing existing policy were already discussed on the talk page before you reverted again.
For admins, this is exactly why I am asking for help. For a policy page, this is not going very smoothly after the RfC. KoA (talk) 20:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Admin, please take a look at this explanation. KoA seems to be under the misapprehension that they can copy-paste text from one policy page to another against consensus. Unless this is what you want to see, you should treat KoA's request here with all due skepticism. Newimpartial (talk) 20:33, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Multiple editors at WT:BLP have asked KoA to stop reinstating their bold change to WP:BLP without first gaining consensus. Rather than increasing page protection of WP:BLP, I'd ask reviewing admins to remind KoA not to edit war. Levivich 21:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Levivich, this is not a full blown AN3 thread, but part the reason I asked for page protection was because you were not engaging on the talk page in addition to edit warring linked above. If you wanted to make a bold change and remove existing policy language even after no issues were found with existing policy, consensus was needed. This is an extremely nuanced policy discussion that can't be painted in broad strokes like you're or Newimpartial are doing, and it isn't helpful for those of us trying to walk a fine line within it all.
Admins, it looks like the policy page itself has blown up with edit warring by others again (which is why I came here first hoping it maybe wouldn't). Obviously the first RfC didn't work to quell opposition to existing policy about self-published sources in BLPs not being considered independent or that being a researcher, etc. are not exceptions. Process obviously isn't working as intended there, but I'm also stepping back from this dispute at this point. Dealing with edit warring is just exhausting. I'm open to suggestions from admins for cutting through the sort of meta-mire that's forming here, but that's either something for my talk page or the policy page itself. KoA (talk) 21:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What I see is other users reverting you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

: User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'm sorry. You had alrady stopped. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:11, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:11, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Same vandal that was disrupting the Aq Qoyunlu and Qara Qoyunlu articles. Kansas Bear (talk) 23:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Permanent semi-protection and move protection needed for redirect, as it continually has an old revision from 2017 restored before it changed its name to Universal Kids. Nate (chatter) 23:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:17, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated test edits by IP hopper. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Globally. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There was a well publicized brawl at the match. News is coming out quickly and we should have sourced content added to the article, not opinion. A week should be enough for the dust to settle. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:19, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Permamemt semi-protection. This article is a target of Macedonian pseudo-nationalists since years. Arbitration enforcement: WP:ARBMAC . Jingiby (talk) 18:36, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: rutroh. it goes back for months, several users, and I semi protected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@OhNoitsJamie: -- --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – High Risk Templates About De Minimis On Commons. RyuzakiDavenport (talk) 09:10, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Same reply you got when editing as Ryuzaki124 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 14:43, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism Damedamemmemel (talk) 11:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent and continuous IP vandalism. Merangs (talk) 14:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 15:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by IPs. Jacona (talk) 16:19, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An anonymous editor is persistently replacing sourced content with unsourced content. If we can semi the article for a week hopefully the editor will grow bored and move on. Betty Logan (talk) 17:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Renewed attention from repeat troll, who typically gives up after a week or two until another few months have passed. HouseOfChange (talk) 17:11, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandelism Aarshgangulwar (talk) 17:36, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:26, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing by a multitude of different IP's, most likelly all belonging to the same person. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 17:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption from different IP accounts for a while now. Semsûrî (talk) 17:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: watching in case they come back --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been at least sixteen instances of vandalism from fourteen different IP addresses since 2022-01-15 . Please, let's require autoconfirmation for several months. Peaceray (talk) 18:31, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced or poorly sourced content after he was traded to the Seahawks. Swagging (talk) 19:06, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced or poorly sourced content after he was traded to the Seahawks. Swagging (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 20:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Favonian (talk) 20:35, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to the Querétaro–Atlas riot. (CC) Tbhotch 20:44, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IP sockpuppet began subtly vandalising the page again shortly after protection expired. – DarkGlow20:45, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:19, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip users and newly created accounts are constantly making unconstructive edits to this page since it's the first article linked on the front page; requesting semi until page is removed from front page. Trg5503 (talk) 21:09, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:17, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Regular addition of a link to a third-party ticket site. Seasider53 (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:29, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CarlostheJackal01. FDW777 (talk) 09:30, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CarlostheJackal01#02 March 2022 for the gory details. Favonian (talk) 18:35, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced or poorly sourced content. Swagging (talk) 21:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:26, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looking to create article HMS Cruizer 1705. currently no such article exists but it shows that this creating this article is blacklisted. I do request permission to create this article under this title HMS Cruizer 1705Rgdem999 (talk) 20:09, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Rgdem999 Rgdem999 (talk) 20:09, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done - It appears that the title for other similar ships uses parentheses around the year, so I've created the article at HMS Cruizer (1705) instead. I've created it as a redirect for now, just as a placeholder. Feel free to remove the redirect and start writing an article there. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 21:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09 March 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Giubbotto non ortodosso. Binksternet (talk) 18:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP editors repeatedly changing "T-72" to "Javelin bait" (and similar names) within the infobox, due to the tank's combat performance during the ongoing 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. --benlisquareTCE 00:21, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 00:23, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Harassment by various IP editors Cullen328 (talk) 01:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (hopefully they'll be bored by then..) -- TNT (talk • she/her) 01:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Couldn't he have just protected his own talk page since he's an admin? Or is there something that prevents admins from doing so? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 01:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer to let uninvolved administrators evaluate the situation, Blaze Wolf. Cullen328 (talk) 01:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Cullen328: Ah alright then. Not trying to say you shouldn't have request your talk page to be protected here, just found it odd that you didn't do it yourself. But I guess even admins have their personal preferences in how they do things. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 01:31, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP address keeps removing a sentence from the lede without reasonable justification. Keepcalmandchill (please ping in responses) (talk) 03:13, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Seems to have stopped. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: That's because I let their edits stand to stop edit warring. Keepcalmandchill (please ping in responses) (talk) 01:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's not just that one IP editor causing problems. MelanieN (talk) 01:44, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since the last protection expired on March 2 there has been three cases of the same type of off-topic posts added to this talk page. DB1729 (talk) 04:26, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Seems to have stopped. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is not a short term problem. The page has needed almost continuous protection for the past year and a half. MelanieN (talk) 01:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Address and bot user of the 2022 in Philippine television they hoax, vandalism and unsourced schedule of the upcoming program and channels. Kindly semi-protection of the page to prevent vandalism of the page. Thank You. Rvreyes 11 (talk) 11:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Potentially embarassing article for Russian government, given Utkin is an alleged GRU operative and neo-nazi. High amount of edits, suspect vandalism. 80.200.124.19 (talk) 11:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Not seeing the need. Deferring --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:43, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:52, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Potential IP vandalism. Talk page Politicially embarrassing article for Russia, given group's ties to GRU and allegations of far right sympathies. 80.200.124.19 (talk) 11:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Not seeing the need. deferring --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:44, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:53, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs, possibly the same person given similar vandalism and edit summaries. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:16, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TFA being vandalised. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: One person whitewashing this fringe unregistered Neo-Nazi group by adding WP:OR. TolWol56 (talk) 05:31, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:48, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 05:34, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:52, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:Persistent vandalism mostly by unlogged users Volten001 05:39, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:56, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 05:54, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 06:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:05, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term vandalism from dynamic IPs. – DarkGlow19:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruption from new editors due to the ongoing 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, likely due to a popular twitter trend (example1, example2, example3, example4, example5) among those who follow OSINT circles. --benlisquareTCE 00:05, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism; continued removal of references, referenced material. IP editor is already blocked by an administrator for disruptive edits to the page Hope (given name). ExRat (talk) 00:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. IP has not edited article since final warning. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lots of unreasonable editings. AlexandraRock88900 (talk) 02:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of IP vandalism Phiarc (talk) 08:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See request above. Lectonar (talk) 11:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit war. Rastinition (talk) 22:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:13, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Seems to have stopped. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:13, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 05:39, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Let me know if it starts up again. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism - negative exponent in CDF Anon685 (talk) 06:01, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:30, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: (in my sheldon cooper voice) One person's passion is another's Poisson --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:30, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple attempts to delete the section on her assault, and the well-documented accused CapnZapp (talk) 17:37, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:14, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: More flies than I can smack, they seem to be following CMD around. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 23:29, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The IP address has been blocked. Dunno if protection is still needed. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 01:47, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Should be ok for now. Lectonar (talk) 11:16, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User 'Ilovetati91' keeps adding unreliable, illegitimate, and potentially false information into this page:

The Wikipedia editing rules regarding “biographies of living persons” clearly demonstrate that “editors must take particular care when writing biographical material about living persons. Contentious material about a living person that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately; do not move it to the talk page. This applies to any material related to living persons on any page in any namespace, not just article space.” Further, “BLPs should be written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone, avoiding both understatement and overstatement. Articles should document in a non-partisan manner what reliable secondary sources have published about the subjects, and in some circumstances what the subjects have published about themselves.” In Nickson’s book about Carey, no reliable published source was provided to prove that 150k and 200k tickets were respectively sold for Carey’s Tokyo concerts in 1996 and 1998. In this sense, Nickson’s claims could be entirely fabricated, and editing such claims into Carey’s page could be seen as an overstatement or even an understatement of Carey’s touring career. Moreover, by labelling his own book as an “unauthorized biography”, Nickson clearly attempted to avoid his legal liability for the content since an “unauthorized biography” would no doubt give rise to untrue or false claims as well as pure fabrications. Thus, it is unlikely that Nickson’s book is an appropriate source considering all mentioned aspects and it should not be included in any Carey-related pages. KMO2014 (talk) 06:46, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 11:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User 'Ilovetati91' keeps adding unreliable, illegitimate, and potentially false information into this page:

The Wikipedia editing rules regarding “biographies of living persons” clearly demonstrate that “editors must take particular care when writing biographical material about living persons. Contentious material about a living person that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately; do not move it to the talk page. This applies to any material related to living persons on any page in any namespace, not just article space.” Further, “BLPs should be written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone, avoiding both understatement and overstatement. Articles should document in a non-partisan manner what reliable secondary sources have published about the subjects, and in some circumstances what the subjects have published about themselves.” In Nickson’s book about Carey, no reliable published source was provided to prove that 150k and 200k tickets were respectively sold for Carey’s Tokyo concerts in 1996 and 1998. In this sense, Nickson’s claims could be entirely fabricated, and editing such claims into Carey’s page could be seen as an overstatement or even an understatement of Carey’s touring career. Moreover, by labelling his own book as an “unauthorized biography”, Nickson clearly attempted to avoid his legal liability for the content since an “unauthorized biography” would no doubt give rise to untrue or false claims as well as pure fabrications. Thus, it is unlikely that Nickson’s book is an appropriate source considering all mentioned aspects and it should not be included in any Carey-related pages. KMO2014 (talk) 06:46, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 11:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple accounts and ips. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 06:54, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 11:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppet constantly vandalizing article after several warnings. Investigation open at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/1.52.214.189. Emir Shane (talk) 08:37, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Subject to a campaign of text deletion today from very broadly spread IPs, all saying “ Content needs citation” so probably just one person. Something very temporary will do. Nick Levine (talk) 09:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Considering current events, a longer temporary protection is in order. Ifnord (talk) 14:36, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Cyberbot, you're working too hard. go get some coffee. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A number of unsourced edits over the past week or two, please also invoke Arbitration Committee Discretionary sanctions. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:41, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: regullar admin action --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello! I wanted to ask if the level of protection on the page could be reduced to semi-protected as nobody is editing the page and updating it. I used to edit it but I don't have enough time due to my personal issues so please reduce the protection level as there are a lot of users who will edit the page like before. Nikita Bhamidipati (talk) 14:27, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: this is fairly recently protected by you. — xaosflux Talk 14:33, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This article attracts an overwhleming amount of sock accounts and new accounts adding unsourced info. I chose EC protection specifically to curb such edits. Wikipedia articles are to include information supported by published reliable sources, not each individual's interpretation of what they just saw on their TV screen.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 11:21, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Need to add a photo to her page, since there's only one photo in her page. Tiamaligfa (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unless the photo has already been uploaded to here or Commons and is freely licensed, that's a nonstarter. See WP:NFCC. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 17:57, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined At need use an edit-request on the pertaining talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 11:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - I want to keep it protected from fake IPs and vandals so that no one except autoconfirmed users and administrators can edit my user page. Please make it protected for a permanent time. Thank you. Rjsb0191 (talk) 05:26, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: And if memory serves, non autoconfimred users cannot edit user pages, so you are already protected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It serves :) --Blablubbs (talk) 15:53, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Ccai2053 (talk) 07:31, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:21, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued content removal without a valid reason by several IP addresses. Edit summary is "errors" but they've given no indication why they think it may be incorrect and talk page messages have been ignored. Suonii180 (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. OceanHok (talk) 17:07, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Exaggerated information regarding Chinese combatant numbers with unconfirmed sources being written in the page. Some edits cite Philippine government sources, but they are also exaggerated. The issue has plagued the page for more than a decade. WikiKnight15 (talk) 09:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started after page protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 12:50, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content, possibly violating WP:BLPPRIVACY with no reliable sources; myself and Materialscientist already made 2 reverts today — DaxServer (t · c) 15:52, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:34, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – What is the point of pending changes here? The article is subject to frequent IP vandalism, and constructive IP edits are nowhere to be seen. There is no reason to pointlessly increase the burden on pending changes reviewers, please semi-protect this article. RGloucester 18:07, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:21, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute: one or more IP users have constantly added in a nationality to the player where in reality he was born in one country but plays for a different national team, making his nationality ambiguous. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 15:53, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 18:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: His fathers hyperlink is nonexistent. I can find out about every celebrities father, even Jeff Bezos and American Presidents. 68.117.133.190 (talk) 15:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does this have to do with the page needing unprotecting? You can make an edit request on the article talk page. Zippybonzo (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. — xaosflux Talk 16:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: some disruptive editing plus it is a controversial topic I request a semi-protected if can extended confirmed protection Angshaojun08 (talk) 08:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I only see one clearly bad edit since the beginning of the invasion. I would recommend to decline the request, until smth changes.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:24, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 16:41, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is known information you are ignoring. 68.117.133.190 (talk) 15:56, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may find it useful to make an edit request to the page if you need an edit making. Zippybonzo (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – This redirect isn't protected, but you probably want to edit the target article, and your request to do so has recently been declined. Favonian (talk) 17:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10 March 2022

Reason: Persistent vandalism in the past 24 hours. Blackjays1 (talk) 18:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:41, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent adding of unsourced claims regarding to the ship's status. BlackFlanker (talk) 20:29, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 00:20, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent adding of unsourced claims regarding to the ship's status. BlackFlanker (talk) 20:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 00:20, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor keeps removing cited material. An alternative is to block the IP editor. Your thoughts will be welcome here. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 23:13, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism (30% of past edits), even with pending-changes protection. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 23:23, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – consistent vandalism from early on in the lifetime of this page, and intensified recently. Very likely to continue given the ongoing nature of this infodemic.: [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36]. — Shibbolethink ( ) 23:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. Shibbolethink, generally, WP:ECP only if WP:SEMI falls short. El_C 00:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ahhh, understood. Will keep that in mind for future requests. Thank you! — Shibbolethink ( ) 00:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IP users. Barry Wom (talk) 10:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 22:44, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IP users. Barry Wom (talk) 10:16, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 22:45, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edits removing negative information on BLP by editor with COI, and other editors. Lenny Marks (talk) 10:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 22:45, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent target of an LTA (WP:LTA/PINK). wizzito | say hello! 14:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Even more LTA vandalism from socks that gamed autoconfirmed. CutlassCiera 20:41, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected upgrade for the duration. El_C 00:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 19:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 02:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nonstop LTA vandalism/socking. CutlassCiera 20:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: User g-locked --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. for the bot. (CC) Tbhotch 02:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP editors since March 5. Schazjmd (talk) 01:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 02:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent target of an LTA (WP:LTA/PINK). wizzito | say hello! 14:02, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Increase to extended confirmed protection: Would it be possible to bump this page up to extended confirmed protection? I've been monitoring this page since pending changes protection was added to it, and it seems that the vast majority of edits made to the page by IPs have been junk edits of vandalism hits. (One look at the History page will show you the sea of reverting.) Gen. Quon[Talk](I'm studying Wikipedia!) 14:58, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page history proves as much as it can with at least two types of vandalism which has been going on for ages. One type: "lego muncher" which has gone on for years by multiple IP addresses (I don't know if any registered users has done the same). The other type: someone keeps thinking he has changed his name and therefore changes every instance of "Brown" to "Dixon", Scott to "Sid" et all. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 15:45, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Adding of poorly unsourced content. So, need this pending changes protection. Fade258 (talk) 16:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection, possibly ECP - There's a concerted effort (mainly by IP editors, but also a named account) to try and insert specific content into the lede section for the purpose of using Google for activism by manipulating what it displays in the search snippet and Knowledge Graph. See the related AN/I thread for more details. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 18:54, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by likely sock puppet. BusyWikipedian (talk) 20:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Loads of IP addresses causing disruption to an association footballer who has made recent headlines today. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 22:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:02, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism since March 1, 2022. Cassiopeia talk 02:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:10, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 13:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amaravati is a city with people living in it and is under construction in phases. Hence, the proposed status is removed. Your vandalism claim is baseless. 117.249.176.228 (talk) 13:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:27, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 13:50, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 00:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user constantly reverting changes and engaging in Edit warring. Emir Shane (talk) 16:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This looks like a content dispute. Also we don't protect pages to deal with disruptive behavior by one editor or IP. If problems persist I suggest WP:3RRN. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:44, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 01:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to election season in the Philippines. RafaelPPascual (talk) 04:02, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced content/POV-pushing. TornadoLGS (talk) 04:10, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – History of disruption on a redirect that has no need for frequent edits. Last vandalistic edit managed to stay up for 42 days (although one might argue that its nature gives any reviewing administrator a bit of a COI ;) ). -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:05, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting temporary full protection, persistent edit warring over how to implement the consensus of a recently closed RFC (and this is despite talk page discussion). IffyChat -- 22:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that there is some opposition from editors who disagree with the consensus; I don't believe stopping the implementation - or locking the article at the implemented version and preventing sensible modifications following the implementation, such as is being done at WP:NRU - would be helpful. BilledMammal (talk) 22:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:12, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page has been repeatedly edited by IP users who appear to be angry about the subject's controversial stance on the current Ukraine/Russia controversy. Their edits are becoming disruptive and it is difficult to maintain a consistent level of quality on this page. HamOntPoliFiend (talk) 05:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request create protection for this page title on a fictitious Philippine broadcasting outfit recreated by socks. This is the second time it has been made in 3 months. Note the spelling error in the title. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 07:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Regular and repetitive IP vandalism. I'm hoping 2-4 weeks of page protection will break the chain. Ciridae (talk) 05:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry repeatedly requesting the censorship of a photo, which we won't do and have explained numerous times. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/256Moin256. FDW777 (talk) 09:19, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:02, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – anonymous IP is continuously posting their autobiography. Hajrakhala (talk) 10:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IP users. I requested protection of this page yesterday which resulted in bans for some of the IP addresses involved but this was insufficient as the users' IP keeps changing [37] Barry Wom (talk) 08:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs: [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]. Phlsph7 (talk) 11:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:27, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive IP edits almost every day. Xexerss (talk) 12:04, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:51, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some IP addresses are adding misleading and unclear content again and again. Natureisablessing (talk) 19:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Could someone offer some specific examples of disruptive editing. I am not familiar with the topic and I am not seeing a lot of reverted edits which is a quick indicator of problematic editing. Thanks. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:51, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Accusations of wrongdoing were made against one of the members of this group by a popular YouTuber. While there has only been one instance of vandalism so far, I am the only person who regularly checks this page, and I would rather the page be semi-protected for a few days than be forced to periodically check the page throughout the day to ensure there has been no more vandalism. Keep in mind that the vandalism involves BLP violations, so the threshold for protection should be lower. Mlb96 (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Or I can just add it to my watchlist. You could add it to your watchlist. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's already on my watchlist. The problem is that I am the only person who checks the page, and I don't want to have to check every hour to make sure there hasn't been more vandalism. Mlb96 (talk) 21:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 13:48, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ERA edit warring, IP refuses to use the talk page. tgeorgescu (talk) 13:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Era, Oxford comma...One IPv6 IP, one other IP...you pointed them to the talk-page, give them time to go there. Lectonar (talk) 13:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued hoaxing by IP-hopper in Italy after page protections expired. wizzito | say hello! 14:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP user. User has been reported at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism but no action taken yet. MSport1005 (talk) 11:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs: [43], [44], [45], and many more. Phlsph7 (talk) 11:57, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. AK965 (talk) 12:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Permanent semi-protection. The article is a target of Macedonian pseudo-nationalism since years. Arbitration enforcement: WP:ARBMAC . Look for example Clement of Ohrid . Jingiby (talk) 17:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Current events will only make things worse. --An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 17:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit wars over meme additions to the page have already started, as people try to add "Igor" to the "Operators" list due to civilians capturing some of these systems in Ukraine. Ultimograph5 (talk) 18:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism (changing lists of cities, miscaptioning an image) from a dynamic 2409:4042:2d01:5bb5:* IP user over the past few days. Lord Belbury (talk) 20:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Zhmailik with a new sockpuppet account. He has been using IPs from St Petersburg, Russia, recently blocked as Special:Contributions/37.145.191.20. Binksternet (talk) 20:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 21:26, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Number 57 21:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Number 57. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 21:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated addition of nonsense data (unsourced alleged opinion polls for a 2016–17 election with fieldwork dates in 2021 and 2022). This has been going on for over a month now. Number 57 21:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after a reported trade to the Los Angeles Chargers. Swagging (talk) 22:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:26, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11 March 2022

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Adding Unsourced content. Fade258 (talk) 16:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Resurgence of IP changes against established status of the article following recent protection. Tærkast (Discuss) 19:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If problems persist feel free to come back. But there have only been a handful of reverted edits in the last ten days. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, resumed immediately following expiry of previous page protection Bonusballs (talk) 22:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:22, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ECP: Just like El C did the protection of a 99% similar subject (Breast tax) here, this page should be ECP protected as well to avoid further disruption. Wareon (talk) 18:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I'm not seeing any evidence of major disruptive editing. If you think I'm missing something feel free to ping me with diffs. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just noting that I did not protect or upgrade the protection of Breast tax preemptively. I've protected 1 page preemptively in 2021 (Jill Biden from none to indef semi upon Joe Biden assuming the presidency) and 0 in 2022. @Wareon and Ad Orientem: courtesy ping. El_C 23:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users keep adding an opinion poll that was commissioned by a party, this was already settled down last year on the page by multiple editors, protection will be needed. Vacant0 (talk) 23:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:33, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Probably due to 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. McSly (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism, appears to be multiple vandals. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 00:33, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:36, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism instantly continuing after protection lift. TylerBurden (talk) 01:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated editing by IP socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xayahrainie43. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:05, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 05:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The birth date is always changed by IP users. —Ctrlwiki (talk) 03:22, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The birth date is always changed by IP users. —Ctrlwiki (talk) 03:23, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To not let the others vandalism 136.228.131.202 (talk) 03:24, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please read the instructions at the top of this page before posting here again. OhNoitsJamie Talk 05:33, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:ARBEE, persistent IP vandalism and no constructive edits. RGloucester 04:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 08:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 05:12, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please provide indefinite ECP protection so that reviewers can accept from draft space. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 08:15, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 05:43, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:09, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Adding of blank table where there is no any content to put under it. Fade258 (talk) 07:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined How about talking to the users who do this, and explain a bit? Not every new user can be expected to know everything about editing. Lectonar (talk) 07:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. AK965 (talk) 07:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 06:10, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism and addition of unsourced content; requesting protection JohnnyCoal (talk) 09:49, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 09:52, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistently bad edits from IPs, seem to be going on for quite a while. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 08:03, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. both of them Less Unless (talk) 13:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 08:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. same as above Less Unless (talk) 13:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 14:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:02, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruption since last protecting expired. MB 15:34, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:40, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs inflating numbers. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 09:20, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 13:54, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — DaxServer (t · c · m) 09:47, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Less Unless (talk) 13:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Venkat TL (talk) 11:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 13:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Less Unless ok. Can you help me understand the threshold? This will help me not waste my time in future. Venkat TL (talk) 14:02, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there! I'll cite you the guidelines "Semi-protection is useful when there is a significant amount of disruption or vandalism from new or unregistered users, or to prevent sockpuppets of blocked or banned users from editing, especially when it occurs on biographies of living persons who have had a recent high level of media interest". If you want to know more, please read Wikipedia:Protection policy. You are also welcome on my talk page with any further questions. Best, Less Unless (talk) 14:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Today, some newly registered accounts repeatedly delete content for strange reasons.And what he removed was almost exactly the same. Like removing sources with the reason uncited edit(09:29, 11 March 2022) as reason, removing content with the reason unexplained content removal(12:07, 11 March 2022) as reason and removing content with the reason Citation needed(14:01, 11 March 2022) as reason. Since the filter shows Filter description: Ukraine/Russia logging, there may also be problems with misuse of multiple accounts and PROXY.

PS:User creation log

  1. 09:21 User account Chernoe Znamia was created
  2. 11:57 User account Ahlatshahs was created
  3. 12:34 User account Merav Michaeli] was created

Rastinition (talk) 12:22, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:47, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:54, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See the edit history. A brief respite from this vandal would be in order. Ifnord (talk) 15:28, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Contacted by page to edit. Dwalsh1022 (talk) 15:26, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No idea what that means, but smells like COI. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 86.5.176.28 has repeatedly made the same edits that remove valid information for no apparent reason and is ignoring TP warnings (not cooperative). Multiple editors have reverted IP. If RFPP is not possible, a block for IP may suffice. — B. L. I. R. 16:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent NPOV violations. (CC) Tbhotch 18:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:58, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – removal of term "terrorist" from the lede, despite being sustained by multiple reliable sources and sections of the article itself. No attempt to remove term from any other part of the article, or edit it elsewhere. Chaheel Riens (talk) 19:04, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:12, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Russo-Ukrainian War related vandalism Fondycardinals (talk) 19:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:55, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP disruption editing 42.105.1.36 (talk) 19:26, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP SPA's inserting puffery and POV pushing. Over a period of days (maybe even socking). Slatersteven (talk) 19:46, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sensitive topic. Zippybonzo (talk) 18:09, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:11, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry and disruptive editing by IPs and sock accounts. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:17, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:21, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We really need long-term protection on Metaverse. This article has received constant vandalism and promotional editing for nearly a year now, and it's only going to get worse. One month isn't gonna cut it. BrigadierG (talk) 20:45, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:10, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Venkat TL (talk) 20:52, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been going on since the day after Adam and Eve left the garden. Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:15, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Disruptive editing/vandalism, this has always been common, so I request this page possibly be permanently protected to a certain degree of access. Noorullah21 (talk) 20:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely.. Yep. Another case of extremely long term disruption. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:20, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – socking by self-declared "LTA". CutlassCiera 19:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constantly having to revert edits and this will be its 2nd time being protected if accepted. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 21:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:36, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated redirect overwrites by confirmed and suspected socks of Cyberpunk2077JohnnySilverhand. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:51, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:52, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12 March 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two silly IPs taking turns. Ifnord (talk) 22:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent additions of copyright violations by IP and unconfirmed editors. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:54, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 23:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 22:58, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 23:15, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection The disruption by 117.228./117.223. IP is going on since last month. Protection is needed now. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 20:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs making lots of reverted edits but all recent ones are in good faith. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 20:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:22, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:ARBCOM enforcement, recent disruptive edits like this have been ongoing sporadically for a while, and that obviously falls under then American politics DS. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also the topic of this article doesn't appear to deal specifically with an issue in American Politics. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:24, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent problem of talk page vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 21:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Protection is rarely assigned to talk pages and then only when the level of disruption is both extremely high and immediate. If there are specific editors or IPs behaving disruptively consider reporting to WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:33, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to say: I've seen it done on Talk:Roblox, Talk:Minecraft, Talk:Poppy Playtime, and Talk:Twilight Sparkle for short periods, which are all pages that receive a great amount of NOTFORUM and vandalistic talk page nonsense. wizzito | say hello! 21:36, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not saying it's never done. I am saying it's rare. This talk page has had all of six edits in the last three days. That's nowhere near enough to justify protection, even on the article page, much less a talk page. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editors. Constant314 (talk) 00:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:43, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ScienceFlyer (talk) 00:30, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I issued a warning to the principal IP that appeared to be causing trouble. But I think it best to protect the page until the AfD closes. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edits with no reliable source. PedigreeWWEFigz87V2 (talk) 01:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting semiprotection for a while because the "Disney's Pete is a wolf" vandal has returned, and is notorious for his persistence in vandalizing his favorite pages through both multiple/morphing IPs and waiting until page protection expires. Mr Fink (talk) 02:28, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been going on for years. Enough.Ad Orientem (talk) 03:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please restore semi-protection to this page, as the same exact vandal has returned to resume censoring the page. Mr Fink (talk) 03:02, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:29, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vacant0 (talk) 23:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IP warned. Also we don't protect articles from single editors or IPs. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent violations of WP:BLP and WP:VAN from IPs and unregistered users in response to increased media visibility. KidAdSPEAK 00:43, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User warned. Not enough disruptive editing to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
97.116.176.16 (talk) 03:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dove Olivia Cameron is a American actress best for roles of Liv and Maddie in the Disney Channel sitcom of the same name and as Mal in Disney"s Descendants Descendants 2 and Descendants 3

Not done The article says "She has also portrayed Mal in the Descendants film series." There is no reason to name all the films in the franchise. (CC) Tbhotch 04:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Content was unjustly removed under the reason 'defamation', however was fully referenced and fact-based. Trinity2022 (talk) 04:40, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done The large section you're trying to add has some problematic sourcing, and doesn't even mention the subject of the article, only her husband. I'd suggest you drop it unless you can find third-party reliable sources that are explicitly about the subject, per WP:BLP. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism after a Philippine presidential candidate and team held their grand rally on March 11, 2022 at the said venue (PhST) Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 07:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 08:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary since no one is putting in the effort to edit this article. Hence the page is left outdated without any recent information added. Subulakshmi (talk) 02:39, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wasnt unprotection just requested? CreecregofLife (talk) 02:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 04:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA activity continued right after protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 06:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA activity continued right after protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 06:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of copyright violations. DanCherek (talk) 07:38, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SN54129 08:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:29, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:29, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Are you looking at what I'm looking at? Your edits seem to assert this fighter is almost 7 feet high, when the UFC profile lists him at 71" and 186 lbs. BusterD (talk) 09:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sigh. Attempt #2. Please tell me you see how this page is attacked at least once a week, consistently, since the news broke of Dileep's alleged involvment

The previous editure sure didn't: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase&oldid=1076105684#Bhavana_(actress) CapnZapp (talk) 12:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good bot. CapnZapp (talk) 13:38, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 10:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. /64 blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page is consistently vandalised with people adding unsourced information. Sahaib3005 (talk) 11:54, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing and persistent vandalism Theoder2055 (talk) 12:30, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of long lasting vandalism. Permanent semi-protection needed. Arbitration enforcement: WP:ARBMAC. Jingiby (talk) 13:39, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:16, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High Level of IP Vandalism. Sadly the even though the IP's were banned for sometime they are back deleting contents and trying to disgrace the page and the airport. Please give only registered users edit access for the page. Banning ip's they will still comeback after ban is lifted. Rvananthunair (talk) 14:34, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by IP and probable sockpuppets - keep trying to add the same thing. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:40, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:17, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:24, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by IP and probable sockpuppets - keep trying to add the same thing. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:40, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly add and revert of unsourced/ unreliable content... — B203GTB(talk)14:50, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Sockpuppetry. It seems a bit late, most of the disruption was a couple of weeks ago, but the sockpuppeteer, Jellywings19 seems to be very determined, and it is almost certain that they will be coming back. If this can't be upgraded, no big deal though. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:20, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not enough disruption to justify an increase in protection at this time. If high levels of disption return, come back. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by IP and probable sockpuppets - keep trying to add the same thing. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:27, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:27, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page is consistently vandalised with people adding unsourced information. Sahaib3005 (talk) 11:37, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article has disruptive edits that are being disputed Jibreel23 (talk) 12:40, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – As before previous protections, too many IPs are having to be reverted for disruptive edits, many of which are unfounded claims. Subject is currently a significant figure in world sport so BLP is always likely to be breached. No Great Shaker (talk) 16:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been a long term issue despite numerous temporary protections. Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has been semi-protected for almost 11 years; might be worth removing it to see if it still experiences that same amount of vandalism as it did back when it was protected in 2010 and 2011. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 10:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Protecting admin is only semi-active these days so rather than check with them, I'll unprotect the article to see if protection is still needed. You and Hawkeye7 surely have your eyes on it. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users consistently reverting sourced changes to keep iris menas' name without capitals in the cast list. DeputyBeagle (talk) 16:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I only saw a couple instances of this. Am I missing something? There are very few reverted edits which are a common indicator of disruptive editing. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption resumed after protection expired. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 16:35, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a couple of disruptive edits since protection expired a month ago. All from the same ip. I dropped warning on their talk page. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. — B203GTB(talk)16:38, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:49, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism continues despite this recent request, which only resulted in one IP being blocked. This page needs page protection. Phlsph7 (talk) 16:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:54, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Range blocked /64 x 1 month. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:54, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page needs protection but not at an extent that is is not edited at all. The page is not being edited like for example the nomination table and wekkly summary is not being edited at all. The page is being negleted and extended confirmed users are rarely editing it like I also don't have the time else I would have definitely edited it. So please reduce the protection level so that the page can be edited. Nikita Bhamidipati (talk) 13:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Same answer as last time you asked, 3 days ago. Favonian (talk) 14:29, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But no-one is editing the page and who is going to do that then? Not to be disrespectful but if you are going to watch all the episodes and edit the page accordingly, then I have no problem Favonian. My only problem is that the page is not being edited. Please don't be offended but please try to think in my point of view like would you like the season to end with to write about 12 weeks then on the page or edit it regularly so as to reduce the workload on the page? Nikita Bhamidipati (talk) 16:11, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Over the course of a long period of time, many IPs continuously remove Yugoslav from the lead, infobox and short description. Griboski (talk) 18:54, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent disruptive editing, OR and vandalism. CaffeinAddict (talk) 19:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism. SWinxy (talk) 19:54, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 20:24, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:LefterisApos using Greek IPs in the range Special:Contributions/62.74.0.0/21. Binksternet (talk) 20:36, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talks without evidence, IPs vary per users so it's merely a misunderstanding. Plus vandalism as user try to impose edits without having gain consensus first as you can see in [Foureira: Revision history] 62.74.2.148 20:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If it's a misunderstanding, then I trust the IP's next edit will be to (re?)engage in discussion at the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 20:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —C.Fred (talk) 20:49, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13 March 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors vandalizing BLP (came across this via twitter brags). Schazjmd (talk) 22:39, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IPs in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 22:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: We have to stablish the history of the facts that contributed to his campaign emerging as a strong candidate. Gulliusa (talk) 05:28, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You already have a request at /Edit - and you need to provide a published source of some sort, as WP:BLP applies. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 06:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A campaign itself is never the candidate. Also, a history of the facts about him is not the same as his history CreecregofLife (talk) 07:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Make appropriate edit requests on the talk page while presenting WP:RS that support the suggestion. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:36, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 18:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:52, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Disruption resumed after protection expired. Let's try one more time to get them to talk. Hold off on blocks for one more attempt at discussions. Moxy- 18:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User warned. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after a reported trade to the Cleveland Browns. Swagging (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:34, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recommend protecting until the 16th (when the trade will become official) in order to prevent the flood of comments about it. ––FormalDude talk 20:29, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Talk pages are only rarely protected and then only in the case of really extreme disruption. In this case it would be even more problematic because the article is extended confirmed protected. Protecting the talk page would make it almost impossible for IPs and new editors to request edits. While some disruption has occurred and is likely to continue, I do not believe it is enough to justify such a heavy handed response. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:16, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive and unsourced content. Cassiopeia talk 21:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a handful of edits overall in the last month. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:17, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:03, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Four edits in the last two years; are you kidding? Ad Orientem (talk) 22:19, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Seems to be some rumors about which team he is playing for along with some controversy about a tweet he made. Requesting short protection (a week?). S0091 (talk) 00:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page was protected to prevent previous edits that were made in good faith and improving of the content, which is currently under consideration for deletion because of the biased tenor and questionable references. Anti-vandalism tools, such as Twinkle, Huggle, and rollback, should not be used to undo changes that are constructive and made in good faith. —135.180.8.124 (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The page is indeed the target of edits that violate core policies like WP:NPOV and WP:V, and this includes edits made by you. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The edits don't violate core policies, and the use of the Twinkle tool is improper. 50.1.123.184 (talk) 19:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The edits need to be restored. 50.1.123.184 (talk) 19:27, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If so, suggest them on the talk page and gain WP:CONSENSUS for them. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:37, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And so why is consensus not needed for the deletion of the edits in the first place, and for the existing text which was corrected but restored in the process of deleting new edits? 50.1.123.184 (talk) 20:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I need access to the original edits in order to put them on talk page. 50.1.123.184 (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They're in the page history, aren't they? We see your motives, you're not going to play us CreecregofLife (talk) 20:16, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not going to play us... who, you and the mouse in your pocket? Are you one of authors contributing to the biased text currently in place, your defensiveness is showing. 50.1.123.184 (talk) 20:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If stating facts is bias, you're against stating facts--CreecregofLife (talk) 20:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The so-called facts are arranged in a biased way and again, have not been subjected to the consensus that's currently being required of the deleted edits removed before the protection. Subject those to consensus and then you can make some kind of claim of neutrality, perhaps. 50.1.123.184 (talk) 21:20, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The "neutrality" you're seeking is not neutrality in any sense of the word, and this conversation has outlived its purpose.  Requesting immediate archiving...Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by dynamic IP. BilCat (talk) 22:36, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a handful of reverted edits on the last month or so. And all of the recent are from a single IP. We don't protect pages in response to single editors.Ad Orientem (talk) 22:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Youngstown music vandal, active at the ranges Special:Contributions/172.58.139.0/21 and Special:Contributions/173.91.200.0/21. Binksternet (talk) 01:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:51, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandal edits from different anon IP's. KNHaw (talk) 02:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:53, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 02:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (1) That birthdate doesn't seem to be currently sourced; (2) If we accept this as WP:SELFPUB [46] it looks as if perhaps the IP is correct? OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:03, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Deja vu? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:33, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of fake movies by an IP hopper. Rctgamer3 (talk) 04:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Seeing Ghits for both. Don't read Japanese --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:35, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent removal of content and resourceful tables from the page. Dannywithay (talk) 04:27, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Can we get a week or so of protection? I assume there has been some sort of YouTube drama or a video or something to spur this recent glut of disruptive editing. Should die down soon. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 04:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I very rarely protect talk pages due to the collateral damage. However in this case I believe the level of disruption necessitates it. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:47, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting semi-protection due to medium levels of vandalism that has lasted for years. Bobisland (talk) 04:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:27, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 03:53, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Engr. Smitty Werben 05:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 11:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 07:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 11:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tayi Arajakate Talk 10:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 11:59, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term disruptive edits by IP users. Also this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds_and_Kurdistan#Enforcement_of_restrictions. Shadow4dark (talk) 12:32, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:49, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Loafiewa (talk) 12:54, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:04, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary for this page since no one is vandalizing or abusing the page currently. Since the page is Extended protected, no one is able to edit the page as much as the article is left very outdated without new and recent information being added into the article. Please consider reducing the protection so every user has a chance to edit the page and provide reliable sources to keep it up to date. Subulakshmi (talk) 05:43, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again? This is the fourth time in two days CreecregofLife (talk) 06:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Given the article was protected in part due to sockpuppets, this request is fishy as hell. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 06:36, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They made the previous request ~28 hours prior. They seem unable to take no for an answer, whether they're a sock or not CreecregofLife (talk) 06:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined For the same reasons as the previous requests. Furthermore, there is no requirement for Wikipedia articles to be updated to-the-minute with respect to TV show results. firefly ( t · c ) 11:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jair Bolsonaro was campaigning for president on Sept. 6, 2018 in Juiz de Fora, about 115 miles north of Rio de Janeiro, when he was attacked. NPR's Philip Reeves reported that Bolsonaro was sitting on a supporter's shoulders when an assailant plunged a blade into his stomach. "The man reportedly told investigators he was acting on the orders of God," Reeves reported Gulliusa (talk) 05:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source?Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 06:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Please use an edit request at Talk:Jair Bolsonaro to request specific changes to be made to the protected page, and remember to include reliable sources. Favonian (talk) 11:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On Vladimir Putin's page it has his age listed as 69 when his actual age is 70 (he was born October 7, 1952 according to the article). Shadow gritz (talk) 22:29, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021-1952=69. (CC) Tbhotch 22:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We're still several months out from October 7, 2022. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 01:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Faulty original research. Favonian (talk) 11:48, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was created on commission by the executress of Erich Engelbrecht in 2018. Updates were made between 2018 and 2022, which were in principle accepted by her and the original author.

Today, it has been discovered that an association convicted in Germany in a procedure concerning the copyright of Erich Engelbrecht has made changes to the page. The association "Amis des Fougis", indicated here as user "ADF1091" and which is run by the other two people also convicted in the same copyright case in 2018, is not allowed to publish images of Erich Engelbrecht's works on the Internet.

For the time being we have only verified an unauthorised change in the label of this page.

There is a risk that this page, as well as the other associated pages in German and English, will be modified by this user (or by others commissioned by him).

As the creator of this page created on behalf of the executress of Erich Engelbrecht, Mrs. Waltraud Engelbrecht, we hereby request a protection of this page against such modifications. Since the end of 2018, there is no longer an executor, but an indivisible execution takes place until July 2041. Any action regarding editorial changes requires the agreement of all members of the Community of heirs of Erich Engelbrecht. The modification registered today (13.02.2022) has not been authorised.

If requested, we can send you a copy of the above-mentioned judgment of the Hamm High Court of September 2018. Jjdeav (talk) 11:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

fyi: there are similar requests at frWP [47] and deWP [48]. Looks like undisclosed paid editing by @Jjdeav and @ADF1901. -- Johannnes89 (talk) 11:11, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a renumerated edition, but the contribution of a private person to the divulgation of Erich Engelbrecht's works, both on the Internet and in book form.
Knowledge for the edition comes from the participation as former technical advisor of the artist for the construction of the sculpture park as well as from the voluntary collaboration with his widow in the elaboration of an inventory of his work.
Any other suggestion is out of context and pure speculation. Jjdeav (talk) 12:20, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:56, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP removing sourced info, has been told to discuss on TP and has failed to do so, and has threatened to sock and continue the disruptive edits if he is blocked. Tommi1986 let's talk! 11:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Tommi1986. If they actually evade the 2-week block, please let me know and/or re-request protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Long term edit war over height between many users. Talk page already semi'd because of disruption. Please full protect to encourage talk page discussion. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:18, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism - constant adding of unsourced content and persistent disruptive editing maybe even by the same person. Nubia86 (talk) 15:32, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, disruptive edits and discriminatory or insulting comments in edit summaries, which included vandalising my personal talk page. Advocating for a permanent block on the IP (again) and extended protection for the Warsaw article. Merangs (talk) 15:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 10:33, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 18:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:30, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Eurofan2000, also known as User:Dealer07 and User:LefterisApos, using Greek IPs. Also requiring the same protection is Vladana Vučinić, Aida Baraku, Hovig Demirjian and Fuego (Eleni Foureira song). Binksternet (talk) 15:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 18:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Death hoax vandalism by IPs stemming from Hall's current condition. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 15:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 17:04, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent IP vandalism. Distorted unverified claims being put on this article. Shreymaan (talk) 14:33, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection. Continued obstinate editing against consensus by IP-hopping editor regarding the end date of the series. The current consensus was determined by a discussion at the TV wikiproject. oknazevad (talk) 14:33, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level vandalism of deleting page Ruralgreek (talk) 15:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. CMD (talk) 09:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:49, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:57, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:51, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:246:CF80:3990:59F0:6999:99F5:A0F8 (talk) 13:53, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I rarely protect talk pages due to the collateral damage. But the level of sustained disruption here seems to necessitate some intervention. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:54, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism - likely by the same person. lol1VNIO (talkcontribs) 13:54, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JBW. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit warring/revert-round-robin over disputed section of criticisms. (I don't believe the 3RR has been broken, but there are lots of recent reverts while the discussion is ongoing at WP:NPOVN. This has been disputed since the beginning of this page, and the status quo does not include these disputed additions. See: [49] [50]. — Shibbolethink ( ) 14:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This probably should have been done a while ago. Not ready to go Full Lock... yet. Let's see if this cools down the edit warring. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:59, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A string of IP editors (who are suspected sockpuppets[51]) keep reinserting poorly sourced puffery and removing reliably sourced content from the article. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:03, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:09, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Newest target of an LTA (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dusty8686). wizzito | say hello! 18:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs over last few weeks. wizzito | say hello! 18:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Released a polarizing film in India etc. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:30, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:16, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse. (CC) Tbhotch 16:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 17:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Ameveveryman (talk · contribs). — Newslinger talk 17:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse. (CC) Tbhotch 16:56, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 17:09, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Ameveveryman (talk · contribs). — Newslinger talk 17:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many vandalism within this month. Tazuco (talk) 21:16, 13 March 2022 (UTC) : Extended confirmed protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:36, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Bloody free for all --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:36, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14 March 2022

Reason: Lots of cases of vandalism from IPs have occured, with no sign of stopping. Logosvenator wikiensis (talk) 17:47, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits disruptive or otherwise in the last 48 hrs. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Loafiewa (talk) 22:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism since March 4, 2022. Cassiopeia talk 22:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same rapid disruption as before the previous protection, which expired yesterday. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 22:59, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Blablubbs. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:30, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism since Feb. 25 2022. Cassiopeia talk 23:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:36, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason:

There has been persistent vandalism on the Gadabuursi page ever since the protection templates were removed. Since the protection templates were removed on the 18th February 2022 there has been roughly 7 vandal edits as you can see on the history tab here ([[52]]). I'm requesting for the page protection to be restored.

Best regards

Wadamarow (talk) 23:27, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism Lightninggamer2009 (talk) 23:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP jumper repeatedly vandalising this article Nick Levine (talk) 21:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued re-adding of uncited material. Onel5969 TT me 21:53, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User Warned: Just one ip. We don't protect pages from single users. If this continues report to either AIV or ANI as appropriate. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Likely prone to vandalism given the current Russo-Ukraine War. The helper5667 (talk) 22:46, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If disruption levels increase, come back. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:29, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The band themselves keep trying to nominate the article for deletion despite clearly being notable. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 23:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. It looks like just one account. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism Lightninggamer2009 (talk) 23:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:44, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism; happens enough but infrequently. wizzito | say hello! 00:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This was a close call. But I don't think there is enough regular disruption to justify protection right now. Part of my reasoning is that a lot of IP edits look constructive and PC will leave a lot of edits for review. There is just too much IP editing and a lot of it looks constructive. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 01:11, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:20, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ― Tartan357 Talk 03:07, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:31, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent vandalism by IP and suspected sockpuppet account. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:34, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandals are adding false information referring to sexual activity, murder, and war crimes on this kids' franchise, after a YouTube streamer played a game in this franchise. Tube·of·Light 02:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 04:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Racist vandalism. BilCat (talk) 04:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will revdel. El_C 04:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This page was blanked twice by an IP account recently, I checked into the IP account since it had never edited any other page before, and it seems the IP hails from the exact region (Pensacola, Florida) that the article in question represents (Michelle Salzman is a Florida rep. from Pensacola), I am requesting temporary (perhaps 60 days) semi-protection for this article since this happened recently, just to protect this page for the time being. Thank you. Th78blue (talk) 04:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would a period of 10 days be better? There were two back to back. I suspect the rep is probably editing their own page based on the IP search. Thank you. Th78blue (talk) 05:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I want to keep it semi-protected so that IPs with viruses cannot edit my user page. Rjsb0191 (talk) 04:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: HIgh level of IP and new user vandalism. Been reverted almost 10 times in last 2 hours. Funandtrvl (talk) 04:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 05:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request for semi-protection or pending edit. Page keeps getting attacked by vandals, both IPs and single-purpose accounts, insisting on putting in a really stupid, profoundly inane meme based off of a moronic mistranslation. Mr Fink (talk) 04:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:49, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I'm surprised to see such a major hot-button topic unprotected (see Uyghur genocide), and the recent editing history includes plenty of deleterious edits from IPs. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 06:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting a week or so due to odd repetitive IP vandalism from hopping IP. CMD (talk) 07:30, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continual vandalism by IP'S. HONDA Gang (Talk) 07:31, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Homechallenge55 (talk) 04:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – need admin access or please blocked that users who break 3RR repeatedly. — B203GTB(talk)05:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:50, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:50, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP repeatedly adding unsourced and little needed statements in poor English. 〜イヴァンスクルージ九十八[IvanScrooge98]会話 10:11, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, always the same edit about some place and TV station called OPASB, that do not exist, I'm getting tired of reversing the page. Bastewasket (talk) 09:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:50, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:50, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Excessive vandalism 2601:246:CF80:3990:60A1:7CD8:FF49:6A2A (talk) 12:23, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:34, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:34, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Excess vandalism. 2601:246:CF80:3990:60A1:7CD8:FF49:6A2A (talk) 13:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP LTA vandalism. A09090091 (talk) 14:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 15:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content from multiple users after reports of him signing with the Steelers. Swagging (talk) 17:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 18:23, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 18:23, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 20:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 20:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please allow me to edit the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Uttar_Pradesh_Legislative_Assembly_election Karimkhan473 (talk) 09:10, 14 March 2022 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Uttar_Pradesh_Legislative_Assembly_election[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request at Talk:2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 16:21, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: – Refusal to discuss changes and constant reverting despite reversion by several editors. Andrewgprout (talk) 17:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism (related to caste). Ekdalian (talk) 18:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. Ekdalian, that is not "vandalism," please don't misuse the term (see WP:NOTVAND). El_C 20:53, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — trn (debate me) (my accomplishments) 20:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 20:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Heavy IP vandalism tied to NFL free agency - just had to revert past a bunch of mayhem. Might be good to semi for a while. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You know its NFL Free Agency when there's vandalism on the players Wikipedia LOL! Swagging (talk) 21:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 21:33, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism from reddit attention https://www.reddit.com/r/Reds/comments/te7z5r/doing_my_part/ redlegsfan21 (talk) 21:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
2409:4063:4D8A:4238:0:0:2E4A:690A (talk) 17:25, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What page? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ – Muboshgu (talk) 17:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:55, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. WesGeek (talk) 22:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Persistent disruptive editing; going back years, despite multiple temporary protections. Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:17, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. WesGeek (talk) 22:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been going on for years. Enough.Ad Orientem (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Significant disruption by new accounts. Some by autoconfirmed, but hopefully with semi that disruption won't be overwhelming. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:31, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I rarely protect talk pages due to the collateral damage. However the level of disruption here seems to require intervention. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15 March 2022

Reason: Fragile topic, high risk of vandalism. JBHayven (talk) 20:08, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 21:33, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same as The Kashmir Files. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days. , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As per previous request. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of Extortion. H2H3fanbase2TP (talk) 12:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Extortion? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please visit the Talk page and my latest edit - someone uses the page for posting anti-Catholic conspiracy theories - you can't just have an article with claims that the Catholic Church wants to take over the world. The author claims that the Catholic Church was behind the Gundpower Plot and Lincoln's Assassination, without providing any proof at all.

Brat Forelli (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not much naked disruption. Protection is mostly intended to protect against vandalism and similar types of disruptive editing. This looks like content disputes and with a heavy dose of WP:FRINGE thrown in for flavor. I suggest dropping a line at relevant wiki-projects like WP:CHRISTIANITY & WP:CATHOLICISM and request extra eyes on the article. You can also drop a note at WP:FTN. Courtesy ping Brat Forelli. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 03:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection of this page is unnecessary because of so many false bigoted anti Muslim untrue pro Hindu statements. 67.243.228.9 (talk) 00:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a hill you want to fight on.Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 00:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeesh--CreecregofLife (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The wording of this request illustrates the need for ongoing protection of this and similar pages. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection IPs keep making unsourced changes regarding what team this football player plays for, including one baseball team. Egsan Bacon (talk) 04:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:18, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection - A large number of anon users from different IPs have been removing what they claim is "false information", all of which is sourced. Appears to be a mix of pro-Ukrainian and pro-Russian activity. There is also some addition of uncited statements about the ongoing war. Kylesenior (talk) 04:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection - Frequent deletion of redirect by IP address users. Brandon.b2005 (talk) 06:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected I can't think of a compelling reason why IPs would need to edit this redirect, so I made this indefinite, but I am fine if any admin would like to set a definite expiration time. bibliomaniac15 07:27, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Carlos Jasinski García (talk) 01:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As the information on this page is not neutral but propaganda. I would like to do so.

: Not done  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. (CC) Tbhotch 04:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Disruptive edits that are unsourced and borderline illegible [53], straight up copyright violations [54], and much much more. Falls under arb enforcement (WP:ARBEE). Curbon7 (talk) 06:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. Revdel'd the copyvio. El_C 09:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of TV stations not owned by ABS-CBN from other TV networks (such as from TV5 Network and ZOE) and adding nonexistent ones that were added by multiple IPs, some were blocked due to the said behavior (Disruptive editing). VictorTorres2002 (talk) 10:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one year (all), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not this again! El_C 10:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because some of the information is incorrect particularly surrounding people dying.

Declined This request is probably malformed. bibliomaniac15 07:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 11:35, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism since page protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 13:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent target of an LTA. wizzito | say hello! 13:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MrOllie (talk) 14:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increasing level of vandalism, IP editor and new editor editing behavior is similar to blocked user, possible block evasion attempt Ckfasdf (talk) 14:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 14:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PCPP doesn't seem to be cutting it here. wizzito | say hello! 15:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 15:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of indefinitely. , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has been going on for long enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unilateral change from British to English despite there being sources in the article that explain Ella Henderson has a Scottish grandfather. IPs have also removed verified information from the lead for no reason.

Also requesting the same protections to be applied to parent page Ella Henderson. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 15:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 month, as well as the Ella Henderson article. EdJohnston (talk) 16:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Remove all exodus and replace with Genocide of Kashmiri Hindus. Remove all stuff related to Islamophobia. In Europe, it is illegal to speak against Holocaust. Similarly, this is the genocide of Kashmiri Hindus and nothing should be said against it. Mention that State of Rhode Island has officially recognized the genocide of Kashmiri Hindus by Islamic terrorism. 67.180.124.149 (talk) 07:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian (talk) 12:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism. 120.29.78.233 (talk) 13:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Many fake account users are changing the Dhobi page and constantly destroying the credentials,Wikipedia administrators are asked to lock this page for my humble request.Baba God (talk) 13:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 13:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. There have been practically no constructive edits from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't think I've ever protected a talk page for this long. But the level and persistence of disruptive editing necessitates a stronger intervention. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NFL Trade

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after both players got traded. Swagging (talk) 16:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 16:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism. 78.190.159.57 (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Almost the entire history is vandalism - not worth unprotecting. Qwerfjkltalk 17:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requests for citations, for Place of Birth, Spouse, etc., are being reverted by unregistered user(s), with Ad hominem attacks. Pratish_K (talk) 17:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring between many users and IPs that are evading their block. It continues despite the protection of the article for a week. C messier (talk) 18:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring between many users and IPs that are evading their block. C messier (talk) 18:24, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:24, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring between many users and IPs that are evading their block. C messier (talk) 18:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article have a long history of vandalism by multiple editors. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:34, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constantly subjected to abuse and harassment in editors trying to justify a Chinese-centric point of view on a clearly VIETNAMESE surname. 110.175.125.253 (talk) 19:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)110.175.125.253 (talk) 19:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 08:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Meme vandalism after protections expired. wizzito | say hello! 20:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 20:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IP editors adding unsourced death. Schazjmd (talk) 20:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA activity by WP:LTA/WKHF. See protection log. wizzito | say hello! 20:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 mlnths, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism. 78.190.159.57 (talk) 16:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: unsourced content. 78.190.159.57 (talk) 16:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits of any kind in four days. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is some disruptive edits about violating WP:twitter and edit warring for penalty player adding then removing. Hhkohh (talk) 17:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm not seeing a ton of disruptive edits as a percentage of the whole.. Lots of IPs editing and most appear constructive. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA activity by WP:LTA/WKHF. wizzito | say hello! 20:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP and sock vandalism, both on the article and the talk page. Skyerise (talk) 17:46, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a trade. Swagging (talk) 21:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 21:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse. This page has a history of being protected for several months at a time and is usually vandalized in the same manner within a few days of protection expiring. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been going on for years. Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism Tiamaligfa (talk) 19:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:35, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalisms about him and sierra Tiamaligfa (talk) 19:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism related to rumoured free agent signing Tony Fox (arf!) 22:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16 March 2022

Reason: Vandalism Tiamaligfa (talk) 19:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Disruptive request by sock of User:Isupportkimilsung. Favonian (talk) 19:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 22:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. BusterD (talk) 23:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Since all of the member's pages are not protected Tiamaligfa (talk) 17:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Disruptive request by sock of User:Isupportkimilsung. Favonian (talk) 20:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MyeongBay (talk) 08:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Ach, so! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Ad Orientem (talk) 00:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long history of vandalism, semi protection should be infinite Tiamaligfa (talk) 19:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The only revent reversion I see is of your edit --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA activity by WP:LTA/WKHF. See protection log. wizzito | say hello! 20:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA activity by WP:LTA/WKHF. See protection log. wizzito | say hello! 20:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA activity by WP:LTA/WKHF. See protection log. wizzito | say hello! 20:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA activity by WP:LTA/WKHF. See protection log. wizzito | say hello! 20:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA activity by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dusty8686. wizzito | say hello! 20:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA activity by WP:LTA/WKHF. wizzito | say hello! 20:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 23:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed: editor repeatedly recreating them despite consensus to delete at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheeljack and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shockwave (Transformers). Comment on their talk page without reply. (t · c) buidhe 23:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Block limited to this page. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 02:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The vandalism continues. Kautilya3 (talk) 01:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 02:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After the protection expired 2 days ago, the disruptive editing by IPs resumed, on March 14 and 15. This is contrary to the RfC here: Talk:Kyiv/Archive 9#RfC: Kyiv/Kiev in other articles. Please protect for a longer time. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:33, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring vandalism in the last few days from anonymous editors. WuTang94 (talk) 03:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Twelve previous protections over the last few years for the same crap. Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Spotify and FC Barcelona recently reached a deal where the former is able to acquire the naming rights for Camp Nou, renaming it to Spotify Camp Nou. However, the deal pends approval and a decision will be made April 3rd. Media organizations have claimed that it's being renamed now, and as a result many IP addresses and some users are editing the page and starting edit wars periodically. I have exercised my rights attempting to stop the problem but nothing is working. elijahpepe@wikipedia 03:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:22, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by Ficzere21, using IPs and socks. Binksternet (talk) 04:56, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:23, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock accounts evading their block(s) and disrupting article and its talk page. ManaliJain (talk) 05:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change of country 37.159.35.57 (talk) 22:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Insufficient information to consider this request. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent vandalism. I'm not a fan of the show, far from one, but its controversial nature makes it a target. elijahpepe@wikipedia 06:03, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 07:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Permanent semi (established accounts) to block IP-hopping edit-warrior claiming to be fighting "vandalism" (i.e., the consensus version). Not the first time. I've been thanked multiple times for cleaning up this mess, but there's a continual low-grade nationalistic battle over the definition of "Finn", which has been going on for years and will presumably continue for years. — kwami (talk) 06:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:43, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. Perry Caravello is a streamer; primary audience interaction is pranking him and annoying him. Sorry sir, that's classified information (talk) 06:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:48, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring by ip to include poor references. This is a reoccurring dispute, going back almost a decade. - Hipal (talk) 03:56, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent target of vandalism. --Pokelova (talk) 04:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BALKANS. Persistent disruption. See the article's recent revision history. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 04:43, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BALKANS. Persistent addition of unsourced population figures. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 04:55, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: ongoing scientific (and social) discoveries, contention, and controversy. Also: overly-strong financial incentives BigPharmaceutical companies to lobby, and manipulate Universities, Research, and Government to suit their private interest (a significant, urgent threat to global human health). Afam1986 (talk) 04:57, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page not saved K2022ra (talk) 06:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect all the links which we have used in article K2022ra (talk) 06:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. What? Who is we? El_C 07:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP addition of unsourced BLP info over the last week. X201 (talk) 09:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 10:24, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
117.234.54.244 (talk) 07:37, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 08:03, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Heavily disruptive editing of a BLP. Falls under WP:ARBEE WP:ARBBLP Curbon7 (talk) 09:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 10:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. JBL (talk) 10:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 193.219.130.166 and 89.249.80.10 for 6 months each. Favonian (talk) 11:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The Article about the 2022 movie 'The Kashmir File', is biased. The writer has depicted the movie to be a hate-mongering and Islamophobic movie, while in real life there is no such thing. The movie only focuses on showing the genocide and the brutal ways the Kashmiri Pandits/Hindus where killed at the hand of Islamic Terrorists. The movie is historically accurate till a large extent and does not exaggerate the events. To allow proper unbiased articles on Wikipedia, the protection should be reduced so as to make sure people of both parties Hindus and Muslims have a equal right to write the article and does not get based. HimanishPuri (talk) 04:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please use the article's talk-page to hash this out. Lectonar (talk) 08:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it is shwoing false identity of a terrorist as a separatist. Karankapadiya (talk) 09:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 11:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. While unusual, protecting talk pages that are the target of spam and disruption has worked in the few extreme cases when it has been implemented, this being such an extreme case. All of these diffs are just from the past 3 days: [55] [56] <-- (this one is kind of funny though lol) [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62]. As you can see, these range from completely illegible to unhinged rants. Curbon7 (talk) 09:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined As you said, we only protect talk-pages when disruption rises to an unmanageable level, and even then only for a short time. I do not think the disruption rises to that level yet. Also, we have IP edits to the talk-page which are useful. If another admin wants to protect, feel free. Lectonar (talk) 11:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 12:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 12:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – nonstop LTA activity. CutlassCiera 12:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:23, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nonstop LTA activity. CutlassCiera 12:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:24, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA activity after protection expired. CutlassCiera 12:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nonstop LTA activity. CutlassCiera 12:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has been going on for a while. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent misgendering of a trans BLP; requesting indefinite semi rather than pending changes protection. Funcrunch (talk) 15:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC was left in place and will become the default protection when semi expires. Let's see if this deters the vandals. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Large scale sock & meatpuppetry from new accounts and IPs to flood the AfD with keep votes. GPL93 (talk) 12:23, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: All new accounts, so SP --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: One drink to keep the wolf from the door, and five more in case she had puppies. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This is weird. It didn't show the previous protection when I was looking at it. and I think I just duplicatedDeepfried's earlier protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:52, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 16:52, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism. 120.29.78.233 (talk) 13:33, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Always the same IP today. Lectonar (talk) 13:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
different IPs vandalizing since the past days, how it will prevent? 120.29.78.233 (talk) 13:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:38, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several cases of IP vandalism over the past few days. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:09, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:52, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated financial vandalism by IPs and new users [63], [64], [65], [66]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ashkar Saudan is indian actor. Ssvlogs369 (talk) 14:52, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I have only create genuine person and films only. i want to protect my profile Ssvlogs369 (talk) 15:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP (adding unnecessary thumb sizings.) Has been warned several times. BilCat (talk) 16:24, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing by IPs Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 16:57, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:59, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, there have been multiple attempts to add hateful content and to destroy citations , This page needs to be protected like any other related ethnicity in Kerala . 2409:4073:4D90:237C:95FC:C060:25ED:8E5D (talk) 18:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Sixteen previous protections. That's enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of IP vandalism recently. Panini! 🥪 18:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs (likely the same person) changing the writing style, including introduction of capital letters where sentence case should be maintained [67], [68], [69], [70], [71].. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2409:4040:C00:0:0:0:0:0/38 x 1 month. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Stream of IPs and new accounts changing the financial figures without providing any supporting references - over 50 edits today
Has previously required protection, which expired yesterday - Arjayay (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article subject sent a dumb tweet. Multiple IP editors and one new editor trying to force it into the article (sourced to twitter). Schazjmd (talk) 20:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I checked the history of this article going back to December 2019; I see not a single edit by a non-autoconfirmed user that was worth keeping in the article. Over the same period we have had multiple hundred unwanted edits. PC protection isn't a good use of the community's time here; it's time for indefinite semi-protection. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Agreed. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi protection— Repeated vandalism and bad edits (mostly adding unsourced info to an FA). Was perfectly stable while semi protected last year Aza24 (talk) 20:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP/NPOV issues continue after previous protection expired. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Possibly vandalism, but it's unclear exactly what is going on. BilCat (talk) 20:55, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Twelve previous protections. Last one was for five years. Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism and disruption. KidAdSPEAK 21:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has arleady had three vandalic edits since its last unprotection. Dr Salvus 19:23, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been going on for years. Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Way too much vandalism by IP users who are beyond motivated to revert good edits. ➤ Zᴇᴇx.ʀɪᴄᴇ ✪ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 20:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommi1986 let's talk! 21:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bagumba. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17 March 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 22:24, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent problem of nonsense, vandalistic, and WP:NOTFORUM comments, from many IP users who will likely not understand an edit notice. wizzito | say hello! 22:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Escalating from previous protections. I don't like protecting talk pages, because they shut out the ability for a lot of people to make any changes at all, contrary to the spirit of Wikipedia. However, this talk page seems to attract a load of rubbish for reasons that clearly escape me. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've noticed an uptick in disruptive editing in talk pages. In the few days that I've been back, I have protected four. I think that's more than I did during the previous four years. One of them I had to protect for a month. - Ad Orientem (talk) 23:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP violations have continued since the previous temporary protection measure expired last month. Some of the BLP violations have been in the article for over an hour before they have been reverted. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:58, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 22:58, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 23:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism [72] [73] [74] U-Mos (talk) 00:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because no one has ever vandalized that page . Abhay18082001 (talk) 16:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The linked page does not surrently exist and the name is not protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined - According to this log, no article of this name has ever existed on the English-language Wikipedia. Favonian (talk) 17:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like there was an earlier request regarding this nonexistent page last year. Liz Read! Talk! 18:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Abhay18082001 is not yet auto-confirmed - they have fewer than ten edits - so are unable to create the article. Perhaps they are confusing this with protection? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Deadnaming and other BLP violations. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:55, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism, probably from this post https://www.reddit.com/r/ireland/comments/tfdhsq/the_irish_are_at_it_again/ Jh2684 (talk) 01:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:42, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not really enough activity for semi-protection but I do see why you're here. Since this page is lightly edited, let's try pending changes. BusterD (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent disruption by throw-away accounts probably because the page is under WP:1RR. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 02:38, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely.Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article is a favorite target of a long-term IP-hopping vandal as evidenced by the page history. There has not been a productive IP edit to this page since September 2020 - it should be safe to apply semi-protection for an extended time period. Sable232 (talk) 03:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:32, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: protect from Unuasl edit Publiconline123 (talk) 06:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 06:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: need protection from unwanted edits and blocked or unregistered users Publiconline123 (talk) 06:08, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 06:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued BLP violation by hopping IP for many many months: [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83]. — Shibbolethink ( ) 23:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:08, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Ooops. we cross protected at the same time. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like you, me and Ponyo all protected at the same time, in different ways and for different times. A multi-admin pile-up. In my case, the two weeks is a starting point as the article has never been protected before, with the potential to escalate as and when required in the future. Anyway .... shall we settle this by rock, paper, scissors? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Blablubbs has rangeblocked the IPv6 /40 from the article for 6 months, so I'm fine with whatever.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:33, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, at least there is one page that is relatively safe. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:51, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 12:19, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent disruptive edits and removal of sourced content. It always happens at this time of the year (Nowruz holidays). 1-2 month ECP will be helpful. Mann Mann (talk) 04:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Move protection. There's no foreseeable reason to move this page, and as a well-known element, it's included in "highly visible pages that have no reason to be moved". 49.198.51.54 (talk) 07:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive editing by the same IP address, has continued to ignore my WP:CRYSTAL tags on reverts of purely speculated English air dates that have not been confirmed and/or verified by the TV network's schedule or official TV guide listings: [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] 2 weeks should do, by then the official schedule will have been released for all the episodes. GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 07:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 117.98.102.185 (talk) 07:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:13, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kpddg (talk contribs) 11:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reverted back to an earlier version. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 10:16, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:21, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More IP vandalism (adding unwanted honorifics, restarts as soon as the page is unprotected). I, and the few other editors watching this page, are getting tired of having to manually revert every time it happens. Can we please look at indefinite PP until it eases off? Dāsānudāsa (talk) 12:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC). Dāsānudāsa (talk) 12:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More IP vandalism (adding unwanted honorifics, restarts as soon as the page is unprotected). I, and the few other editors watching this page, are getting tired of having to manually revert every time it happens. Can we please look at indefinite PP until it eases off? Dāsānudāsa (talk) 12:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC). Dāsānudāsa (talk) 12:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:24, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent unexplained change of dates in conflict with source by multiple anons Adakiko (talk) 07:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jackfork (talk) 14:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – This page was subject to page-move vandalism today. I am shocked that it is not move protected. There will never be a good reason for this page to be moved without a consensus, and leaving it unprotected is leaving us open to vandalism, which requires unnecessary clean-up. Please fully move protect this page under WP:ARBEE. RGloucester 14:37, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It was (and is) extended-confirmed move protected; the move was done by a compromised account which is now globally locked. Should be fine now. Lectonar (talk) 14:41, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected On second thought...fully move protected. Lectonar (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP accounts probably connected with the subject have repeatedly tried to add contact information to the page Zarasophos (talk) 09:08, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing a ton of recently reverted IP edits. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs continually adding BLP violations. While both the recent additions [89] [90] have been a single IP Special:Contributions/‎2001:8003:1d5e:9f00:9d9a:9927:d7cc:6d32, it was originally added by Special:Contributions/2600:1700:54a2:8e0:1904:216e:89fb:4cc5 [91] so I'm not sure blocking IPs or /64s will work Nil Einne (talk) 12:05, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP edit warring especially by what appear to be multiple proxy IPs attempting to revert the article back to the edit by User:MyeongBay who has been banned for abusing proxy IPs. [92] [93] [94] 2001:569:7BD5:CC00:5D02:D070:29D3:2883 (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The IPs that have made the recent reverts back to the revision by the banned user User:MyeongBay are registered as the abusive proxy IPs according to this site: https://www.ipqualityscore.com/free-ip-lookup-proxy-vpn-test 2001:569:7BD5:CC00:5D02:D070:29D3:2883 (talk) 15:40, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:52, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jackfork (talk) 16:40, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article was indefinitely semi-protected in 2010 due to vandalism by specific IP editors. It has been 12 years since that ruckus, so it seems appropriate to allow this article to be edited like most other articles on Wikipedia. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 13:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Well, it was essentially protected because of one recurring problem: what is his nationality? Looking at the at the talk-page and the edit reqeusts, this, so my opinion is that getting rid of the protection will lead to problems with the article. I wouldn't unprotect, but opinions from other admins are welcome. Lectonar (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If the problem persists, semi-protection can be restored. I just find 12 years to be an inordinately long time to have kept this applied, with editing patterns and behavior likely to have changed since then. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 13:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like an invitation to trouble. Three countries claim him. We could down grade and see, but I have doubts as to how long it lasts. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is pending changes protection a lighter alternative, compared to no protection at all? Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 18:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 89.242.25.196 (talk) 13:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 14:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Fully protected for ten years. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 14:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Neveselbert: It's the redirect which is fully protected, and correctly so. The article at Ariel Sharon is only extended-confirmed protected which strikes me as sensible, too. And a page being fully protected for an x amount of time is not necessarily grounds for unprotection. Lectonar (talk) 14:50, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jackfork (talk) 16:40, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Much of the recent edits to the page are either vandalism or reverting vandalism. EDM fan 2 (talk) 17:39, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent attempts from IPs and an account to whitewash the article. JavaHurricane 18:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
66.43.44.9 (talk) 15:15, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 15:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The "Lokesh writer" vandal is back. Skyerise (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite move protection. Too many moves against WP:COMMONNAMEDaxServer (t · m · c) 17:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:37, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. TylerBurden (talk) 19:54, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Seems to attract vandalism, unexplained reverts, and edit warring from anonymous editors. Semi-protection should be sufficient. Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 19:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18 March 2022

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Re-created four times, moved to draft space four times. That is more than enough. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Ohnoitsjamie did in fact salt it Favonian (talk) 21:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of ip vandalism Maria23vini (talk) 22:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:39, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism by multiple IPs. Vandalists leave unproven biased comments and call the person who the page is based on, a liar. Pashtoisawesome (talk) 23:13, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like a lot of POV editing- some from auto-confirmed accounts. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 23:38, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has been going on for a while. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruption has been going on since September 2021. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [] 20:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC): User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent spell of IP vandalism Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 20:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC): User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is a victim of rampant trolling since last month. Consider protecting it from IPs and new accounts for at least some months. TolWol56 (talk) 00:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One week is enough for the vandalism to go away and the IPs can go on vacation. NASCARfan0548  01:05, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Systematic disruptive editing from numerous users (registered and anonymous) aimed at erasing any mention of the influence Khmer cuisine may have had on Thai cuisine. Turaids (talk) 17:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:32, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem: how is it content dispute when properly referenced content keeps getting removed without any justification or explanation? –Turaids (talk) 20:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have dropped a note on Chutinonp's talk page. However there have been only a handful of edits over the last few days, none of which justify any protection. This still looks like a content dispute. If an editor is behaving in a manner that is clearly disruptive, and they have been adequately warned, you can request intervention at WP:ANI. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. The helper5667 (talk) 22:29, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:41, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kpddg (talk contribs) 02:10, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For whatever reason, user Aayat1998 is trying to change the Article name unnecessarily, vandalizing the edits and removing source content: [95]. The same user has been destroying other articles such as Miss Teen International that had to be repaired. Yahsabaot (talk) 07:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Pass. Content dispute??? deferring --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:08, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Fake edit 117.98.102.185 (talk) 07:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:15, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Only disruption I see is from OP --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:15, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine TV channel articles

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from the block evading IP hopper who keeps adding vandalism and blalant hoaxes to the affected pages listed above. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 14:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i think the list of abs cbn..... page is not the main page for the request, talk page i think as i saw at the requestors edits 120.29.78.233 (talk) 14:54, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@120.29.78.233, Oops, I forgot to remove it though I've removed it already. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 15:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one year (all), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Like I did with the ABS-CBN -related list of protections from a dew days ago. How many of these are there? Also, shoutout to 2019 past me. You did great! At sucking. El_C 02:59, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Stub about an obscure NSW politician seems unlikely to need protection 13 years after his death Find bruce (talk) 00:32, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging protecting administrator @Orderinchaos: for their input. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done The protecting admin is rarely active anymore. I have lowered to pending-changes protection for 6 months, and have watchlisted. It there is no great disruption, this can slowly peter out. Lectonar (talk) 09:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Moved to Article Tv serial wala (talk) 15:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t have the powers to do a formal decline, but I would based on being unable to parse what’s desired--CreecregofLife (talk) 17:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I guess User:Tv serial wala is asking for the draft to be moved to article space, but this is not the way to do it. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They would be told in no uncertain terms their sources are junk. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 01:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve definitely been considering submitting my 2023 in American television draft but I was concerned that there were too many empty sections and that there weren’t enough known awards show or scheduled event dates for it to be accepted right now CreecregofLife (talk) 02:04, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Request out of scope. Lectonar (talk) 09:54, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: User pages are not meant to be redirected. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions | block) 23:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection is a standard way of linking two accounts belonging to one user. I’m not seeing a need here to change that nor to raise this after so many years. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:04, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: User pages are not meant to be redirected. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions | block) 23:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This (and the page above) are already at discussion at WP:AN, I don't know why you decided to bring them here too. The redirect is there because these are old sock accounts of someone who was allowed a second chance at editing. 192.76.8.70 (talk) 23:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. AK965 (talk) 10:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 14 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Warnings to multiple IP addresses issued, partly without effect. It seems that the company has made a decision seen as unfavorable by employees and they are trying to make it into an opinion piece. Multiple reverts by other editors over the last days. Lokfahrer (talk) 15:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yes, the joys of of free ports. Lectonar (talk) 15:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello, a page is extend protected some point over a year ago just because of some blanking and vandalism by some account. At least should be restored to semi protection and see it, you can just protect the page again if there would be the same sort of vandalism, but I doubt that would be there. 113.185.46.16 (talk) 13:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: last protecting admin, for input please. Lectonar (talk) 14:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See Special:Diff/1069409544. This IP editor is probably the person it was protected against. See also Special:Diff/1069218874 and other repeated requests here; Special:Diff/1069801011 and Special:Diff/1069802321 when given an answer he doesn't like (blanking sprees, how original); Special:Diff/1027252641 and Special:Diff/1027150132 as IP editors continuing the same discussion on User talk:Badass Flare#Ok. From Blocklog for "59.153.0.0/16" , you can see that the range block on Special:Contributions/59.153.0.0/16 was done to stop this particular vandal, and the conversations on Badass Flare's talk page seem to be an explanation of why this vandal engages in blanking sprees. This LTA actually believes that by removing content from Wikipedia articles, it causes his favorite teams to win games ("I noticed that when I started making edits changing the article to a new style (the layout/format/style that I'm advising you to follow) instead of keeping the previous format, the UAE team changed a lot, their playing style and performance is different now and much better.") So, what I propose is that people just ignore requests from this LTA. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Lectonar (talk) 15:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@NinjaRobotPirate: any way that the IP making this request can be blocked for block evasion and LTA? wizzito | say hello! 15:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
looks like they're on the range 113.185.40.0/21 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)), which has been used to make very similar requests here before. wizzito | say hello! 15:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What does that ip range has to do with proctection of this page here? 113.185.47.170 (talk) 16:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Quite a bit, and now it is (you are) blocked. Favonian (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It and its talk page are redirected, so can you remove the redirects? Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions | block) 23:09, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Lectonar (talk) 10:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – LTA (see protection log). (CC) Tbhotch 01:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of rapidly changing IPv6 vandalism, generally promoting the handle of a certain actor. Addition to an existing abuse filter could help here, too.   — Jeff G. ツ 10:06, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: high level of IP vandalism Aarshgangulwar (talk) 16:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs removing image, infobox and changing/removing other sourced content giving invalid rationale/POV reasons [96], [97], [98], [99], [100]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:20, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please to put protection page Tom Stoltman. because IP Users edits “Scottish” and reverted “British” too many also may be vandalism. he is not Scottish. Thank you. Usernogood (talk) 16:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extension of semi-protection request for at least 3 days if possible. Persistent vandalism due to political rally by a presidential candidate. Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 16:06, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Deceivingly linking to articles that don't exist. Howard the Duck (talk) 13:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mh, mainly because it's a template and it's used on about 50 pages. It's not "high risk" in the classical sense.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs constantly changing the subject's name in the lead sentence and the infobox [101] [102] [103]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: NATO has been in the news a lot over the last month due to the conflict in Ukraine (and Wikipedia's top 25), and it and several daughter articles have seen a marked increase in various edit wars. We're dealing with a certain amount of what might be considered pro-Putin propaganda. NATO was raised to WP:BLUELOCK last week, and I was hoping Enlargement of NATO could get the same. Thanks! -- Patrick Neil, oѺ/Talk 15:10, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Except in rare cases, mostly cases where the Arbitration Committee has explicitly already protected the area and recommends technically implementing the protection using extended-confirmed protection, articles are only extended-confirmed protected if semi-protection has "proven to be ineffective" (WP:ECP).
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!-- Patrick Neil, oѺ/Talk 16:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Patrickneil, if disruption continues through this protection, please do let me know; feel free to report this on my talk page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent and disruptive vandalism in violation fo WP:BLP and WP:NPOV. KidAdSPEAK 04:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 14:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. AK965 (talk) 10:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two IPs edit warring; likely sock/meat puppets, both geolocate to the same area; evidence of COI/undisclosed paid editing (one says they are "protecting their brand"); repeatedly unsourced/promotional content. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. as 185.16.77.249 for a year; please report block evasion if it occurs after the three months.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Disruptive BLP editing continues, although at a somewhat reduced rate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 09:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:07, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 10:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:05, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Many non-Wikipedia account users are constantly changing the views of this page.Persistent vandalism recently. Special:Contributions/2601:600:A37F:F111:283F:35D7:1A3D:8A79 Baba God (talk) 12:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. Baba God, some of your own edits have been reverted there. Please make sure not to assert ownership of the article and be careful when editing about contentious topics such as South-Asian social groups.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Numerous reverts concerning chronological asimmetry (article is considered the target of continuous edit warring). 178.89.243.153 (talk) 12:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection The page's protection level has been moved from extended confirmed protected to fully protected. This decision was based on the actions of two editors who administrators felt were edit warring between each other. However, as pe Talk:Siege of Mariupol#Chesapeake77, these two editors have reached a consensus to apologize for their actions
It is unfair to keep this article fully protected based on the edits of just two users as it is related to an ongoing event that has had over a hundred edits by other users, especially when the two users have reached an agreement. I find it unlikely that this article would be regularly updated with this current status of protection (Indeed, as I write not a single edit has been made since it was last protected, despite numerous requests on the talk page). I understand the rationale for fully protecting this article, but the need for doing so has passed. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 15:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ping TheresNoTime, El C, Scottywong. Semi-protection as a minimum from my side (would semi-protect for 1 year if protection expired); no opinion beyond semi-protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree: I've removed my full protection of the article—y'all welcome to protect it otherwise. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 17:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm good with whatever. El_C 17:07, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done EC protected by ToBeFree for a year. Looks good to me. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP range removing the parameter 'years_active' [104] [105] [106] [107] [108]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism continues [109]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tommi1986 let's talk! 18:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 19:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing. Jingiby (talk) 19:21, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent high level vandalism, same change by multiple IPs, likely to continue for a while as currently in the news. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:53, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Can we get a two week full protection here? This edit warring has been going on for months between registered editors but especially the last month. She's a retired player so no stat updates are regularly needed, just news occasional news updates on her whereabouts. These updates need to be ironed out on the talk page "before" changes get made so our readers don't have to see a tornado of changes made every day. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tommi1986 let's talk! 18:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: LTA, barely watched page. (CC) Tbhotch 02:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 04:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Pretty much all new edits have been vandalism. Scorpions13256 (talk) 21:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19 March 2022

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism recently. 2001:8004:4430:D507:F092:ED29:5C6F:DC4E (talk) 07:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blablubbs: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IP hopper was issued a range block in the recent past,[110] but is now at it again, for round #2. - LouisAragon (talk) 19:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

She (Ute Falasch) with username Louis Aragon is continuously promoting her own work on Badi' al-Din see this [111], which had been reverted in past see this [112]. Now she have come again to spam that article with her low valued research. And there is no question of sock puppetry since the range block has now expired. 37.111.217.175 (talk)
You will never succeed removing WP:RS. You can use IP socks as much as you want, you will still get reverted and range blocked. WP:NOTHERE = WP:NOTHERE. - LouisAragon (talk) 20:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The title in the lede of the article should match the name of the page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated SPA violation of RfC consensus. BSMRD (talk) 22:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 monhs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. WP:ARBEE --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 04:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 04:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:15, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:20, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism with a number of different IP addresses making changes to the cast and producers that do not line up with information on IMDB. Aspects (talk) 00:07, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:33, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumption of the previous disruption that led to the protection that just expired a few days ago, by the same suspect (seemingly on a dynamic IP, so protecting is more effective than playing whack-a-mole). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:08, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 20:21, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Graham87. El_C 06:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of citizenship/nationality oriented changes Second qwerty (talk) 22:08, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:11, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A TON of vandalism in the past 2 days. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 22:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 06:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption has resumed on this article (by the same editor it seems) virtually as soon as semi-protection expired. Betty Logan (talk) 04:26, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. plus a rangeblock. OhNoitsJamie Talk 05:21, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: History of repeated IP vandalism & content deletion over several years (since 2019). Indefinite semi-protection requested. AmericanHistorian (talk) 00:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:20, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Giordano is the subject of several trade rumours. IP users have targeted the page.   Aloha27  talk  01:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 06:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Blake Gripling (talk) 01:29, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has a couple of IP addresses reverting sourced material multiple times in the last couple of days despite requests to discuss in talk from multiple editors. This includes one that has reverted 3 times within 24 hours. Erp (talk) 05:23, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:29, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 06:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed is evading his block again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 06:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: due to this being a page about the recent conflict in ukraine, i think that the page should get some level of protection due to recent cases of vandalism, POV pushing, etc into pages of the same style, in addition, someone keeps putting back some "resistance commitee" thing in the page, even though told several times to stop, thanks in advance. EpicWikiLad (talk) 00:15, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, for now. EpicWikiLad, not really seeing anything too bad (not many reverts) over the past few days. El_C 06:18, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent promotional editing by sock accounts. —WildComet talk 00:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 06:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Several more Australian state articles

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism this month. These are also Australia's two most populated states (NSW is the most, VIC is the second-most) and therefore high vandal targets, so an admin can decide whether you make it indefinite or not. Thanks. SupremeMinecraftGod (talk) 04:07, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's been a few days now. El_C 06:25, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SupremeMinecraftGod (talk) 04:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's been a few days now. El_C 06:26, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SupremeMinecraftGod (talk) 04:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Getting Stale. El_C 06:27, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, plus it's an upcoming major political event here in Australia. SupremeMinecraftGod (talk) 04:58, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 06:27, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SupremeMinecraftGod (talk) 05:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 06:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed sock puppets again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:32, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Block evasion from both new IPs and user accounts- I believe all stemming from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Glam-girlz. Magitroopa (talk) 07:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:21, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Pavlov2 (talk) 07:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Block evasion/vandalism immediately upon end of recent page protection. Same as above... stemming from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Glam-girlz. Magitroopa (talk) 07:39, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Curbon7 (talk) 07:59, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:26, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism and disruption that has been going on for years now. Semsûrî (talk) 08:32, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. El_C 09:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism. Vandalized 3 times in the last 2 days. (t · c) buidhe 08:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 09:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:37, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of POV bullshit. Aivazovsky has zero relation to Ukraine whatsoever, but Ips and new users persistently try to represent him as Ukrainian or Ukrainian-Armenian. Ymblanter (talk) 09:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 10:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Ydixfydjfsrusmhr5i Kp923tutjfyry yet x. K Panchal (talk) 10:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Kartikpanchal923 (talk · contribs) blocked by BusterD. BusterD (talk) 10:37, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Theonewithreason (talk) 10:25, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 10:39, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent test redirect overwriting, possibly from IP socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dylan Florida. Jalen Folf (talk) 11:07, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:45, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism over the past week; changing stats (a boxer's height) against reliable sources. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:15, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 14:00, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:41, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism and newly registered users attempting to insert poorly sourced content on a recent controversy (article is WP:BLP). Source of controversy is a Youtube video from a journalist but ideally editors should wait for non-Youtube independently sourced references. Ujwal.Xankill3r (talk) 14:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:45, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Block evasion: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Negitota. Having tried four block evasion accounts, they are now using the same IP address at Flag of the East India Company and Flag of Malaysia‎. Storchy (talk) 14:37, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:46, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This conflict won't start WW3. LeonardBernsteinFan (talk) 11:59, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. – a) Wait and see. b) Check the edit history for ample explanation why protection is needed. Favonian (talk) 12:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Indeffed sockmaster using IP socks to add material with a non-RS source to the article. -. LouisAragon (talk) 15:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Only disruptive edits from non-autoconfirmed users over a long timeframe; no big need to edit this redirect. 1234 kb of .rar files (is this dangerous?) 15:46, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by different IP users since December 2021 Iaof2017 (talk) 16:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:ARBCOM enforcement (COVID). Low-level but persistent IP disruption, which hasn't really shown signs of stopping since the previous protection expired months ago. Most of the recent edits to the page are that, or reverts thereof. Given this is a BLP, there's probably no good reason why it shouldn't be put on PC pending the time that the DS sanctions are no longer needed, when disruption will likely have died down. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WP:ARBCOVID --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent POV pushing by what looks like a single anonymous user with a dynamic IP. – Uanfala (talk) 12:53, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:40, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:40, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Looks like editing Polish entry about the OLX has been blocked for edits by politicaly motivated admin, who is starting to show pattern in removing content related to Russian invasion on Ukraine. I would like to edit this page to include the same information as presented in the English wikipedia in the Controversy section. 187.63.13.161 (talk) 15:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But wouldn’t that be out of English admin jurisdiction?--CreecregofLife (talk) 15:08, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As you can see I'm new to contributing to wikipedia. Can you point me to the right place to submit this request? 187.63.13.161 (talk) 15:12, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I’m not sure myself, and I do completely understand going to another language Wiki for help, but I don’t think admins for one language necessarily have the same powers across all of the language wikis--CreecregofLife (talk) 15:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Administrators on en-Wiki cannot modify protections on other wikis. Favonian (talk) 15:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Relentless edit warring by block-evading IPs. This needs a long-term solution. tgeorgescu (talk) 15:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I do see what you're saying, but there's no protection log whatsoever. It would be inappropriate to apply indefinite semi-protection without trying something else first. Stay in touch. I'll keep watching the page, perhaps pending changes would work out best. If the offender knows their edits must be approved, perhaps the free choice might be self-moderated... BusterD (talk) 21:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 54% of the past 50 edits have been reverted. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 18:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a trade.. Hey man im josh (talk) 21:23, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A handful of IPs (probably just one or two editors) and a couple of now blocked SPAs constantly attacking. T*U (talk) 09:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Sheesh. Americans eat it too. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Shish! El_C 09:19, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Shush! -- MelanieN (talk) 22:08, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:08, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason Page affected with back-to-back disruption by block evading IP editors since January this year. Azuredivay (talk) 12:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure about whether the frequency justifies protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree: 107.115.165.11,[113] and 107.115.165.20[114] is a block evading sock of this user, who has been trying to add this information for the last 2 years as IP.[115] You can check the IPs of these both IPs and they geolocate to the same location.[116][117] This block evasion can be reduced if the page has been protected. Azuredivay (talk) 18:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Individual problematic edits have not been frequent recently, but the article's history indicates a longstanding problem of sockpuppetry. For this reason, previous protections have been for 3 to 6 months. MelanieN (talk) 22:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP user, requested for semi-protect. Pavlov2 (talk) 05:46, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 06:33, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's not my fault, it expired ten minutes after! El_C 09:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The particularly nasty attacks going on deserve a little longer protection than one hour. MelanieN (talk) 22:18, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion of LTA User:WorldCreaterFighter. Austronesier (talk) 14:20, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No sock evasion, but simply a case of WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT. It does neither improve the article, nor is related to vandalism or any harm. It is simple dislike, or maybe the user follows some personal agenda? Removal of references and quotes is not encyclopedic, regardless of if you agree or not!
I must ask: What is the sense to remove quotations/inline citations? Does the user fear that other neutral user may see the references and inline citations and work in an encyclopedic way, as opposed to his own personal view?
The user must not agree with the interpretation of the IP, but removing references is a no go, especially when he favors primary papers instead of secondary/tertiary ones, which is a violation of WP:RS and WP:MEDRS.
There was even an SPI, which resulted in no action against the many accused IPs! See:[1] - 2001:4BC9:926:4F95:810D:2019:5D5:3B9A (talk) 15:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:25, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: At least 15 of the past 100 edits are attempts to delete one specific relevant, reliably sourced section, with another 15 restorations by myself or other editors. Many more attempts to delete are found in extended history. 11 of those 15 attempts are from unconfirmed users, who often give invalid edit reasons (“typo”, etc.) to obfuscate attempts to delete. The real reason is WP:IDL. Jtrevor99 (talk) 17:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and BLP violations. Seckends (talk) 17:46, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20 March 2022

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:10, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and blanking. Photonsoup (talk) 22:25, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:33, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of Disruptive editing, I request an indefinite protection, as this has happened a lot over sporadic periods of time. Noorullah21 (talk) 22:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A subset of this wiki is about the OSMTJ. A specific member was recently removed from the group and has been attempting to remove references to the Grandmaster who expelled him from the group. This would result in an edit war if allowed to persist. 74.69.254.97 (talk) 12:32, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:20, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Non-constructive/vandlism immediatlly after previous protection expired. SSSB (talk) 23:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:57, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a trade. Swagging (talk) 00:46, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It's still under construction Munshi Srijon (talk) 02:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It's still under construction. Munshi Srijon (talk) 02:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:41, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:18, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent reverting of grammar edits and imposition of partial wording. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:08, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It's still under construction. Munshi Srijon (talk) 02:21, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:11, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry/block evasion. Magitroopa (talk) 05:53, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:03, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same user (with different IPs) keeps adding translations for Arabic and Farsi of Meles Zenawi, neither of which are his native language. Ue3lman (talk) 02:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Additionally this looks like a content dispute. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:16, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs have been adding irrelevant info to page and refusing to engage in discussion DHN (talk) 04:55, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:12, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2009, the last 50 edits go back to 2010, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. Terasail[✉️] 18:47, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. Thanks for requesting this. — Newslinger talk 06:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism from multiple (4 so far) IPs signed, Willondon (talk) 04:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Over half of the last 100 edits are either reverts or reverted edits. — Newslinger talk 05:56, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 07:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2009, the last 50 edits go back to 2010, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. Terasail[✉️] 18:47, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. Thanks for requesting this. — Newslinger talk 06:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: because of many of people harm this page Pari Vaishy (talk) 05:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. This page does not exist, and does not appear to have ever been created or deleted on the English Wikipedia. — Newslinger talk 05:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: There is no need for this page to be protected indef. This page was indef semi protected in 2011 for vandalism from one IP address. wizzito | say hello! 15:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Brandon: As the administrator who protected this page indefinitely, would you like to unprotect this page? — Newslinger talk 06:33, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected This was likely related to an OTRS ticket. Given I no longer have access to the original context and there has been no further BLP violating edits in a decade, unprotecting is more than prudent. Brandon (talk) 09:08, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page has inaccurate and biased information that need to be corrected. Rrshankar (talk) 02:46, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure this is a hill you want to fight on?Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 02:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The article is still subject to persistent disruptive editing, and decreasing the protection level would increase the level of disruption. — Newslinger talk 06:19, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new editors are overwhelmingly making edit requests to violate MOS:GENDERID. A. C. SantacruzPlease ping me! 11:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TNT (talk • she/her) 11:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – continued POV disruption by a single IP (who may need to be blocked): [118] [119] [120] [121]. Additional recent IP disruption: [122]. Page was Semi'd for 1 month, then 1 month, then ECP'd for 6 months. ECP just recently lapsed, which is what directly preceded the disruption. Literally Musikbot removed the template, and next edit was disruptive removal. — Shibbolethink ( ) 11:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. WP:ARBCOVID --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:18, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite protection was placed 7 years ago and even before it was placed, there wasn't enough activity to warrant an indef protection. Zaxxon0 (talk) 06:00, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. Thanks for requesting this. — Newslinger talk 06:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done – Still move protected, and that's the way it's gonna stay. Favonian (talk) 11:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 04:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An editor with a constantly-changing IP address is repeatedly adding the same entry to the infobox[123][124][125] while refusing to participate in the relevant discussion at Talk:Vietnamese language#Writing systems. Kanguole 09:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A ton of vandalism in the past few hours. I don't know if blocking or protection is needed, but if someone could take a look, thanks. Mike989 (talk) 10:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: multiple instances of IP vandalism. Julianbrelsford (talk) 12:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:46, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 12:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Zhmailik, using IPs from St Petersburg. Binksternet (talk) 13:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was protected in 2008 and I would like to create a redirect from "Samuel Prakel" to Sam Prakel as he is currently competing in the 2022 World Athletics Indoor Championships. This seems reasonable to me and I don't see a reason to keep it protected at the moment. Simeon (talk) 12:58, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected ~TNT (talk • she/her) 13:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from an IP hopping anon; latest example: [126]. Additional disruption from other IPs. Please protect the article temporarily. --K.e.coffman (talk) 14:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:33, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The page has been vandalised too much especially by IP users. Volten001 15:19, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry by blocked user (User:Yukiaika3, User:Oppanina, User:Tota negi, User:Negitota, User:British friend345). Same decision has been made for Flag of Malaysia and Flag of the East India Company. Surijeal (talk) 15:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, primarily by IPs. Almost every edit to this page from the last two years has been reverted. Johnj1995 (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anon user keeps adding unsourced statements for which no trace can be found on-line. Woodstone (talk) 16:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and unsourced credit. Thank you! Usernogood (talk) 16:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:27, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism magnet. FDW777 (talk) 16:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:29, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive edits over a long period of time. ℛonherry 03:50, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:35, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 04:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing. Jingiby (talk) 08:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. 18 previous protections. Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'm requesting semi-protection for this article for a few weeks because unfortunately it has been getting edits from anonymous users (and even at least 1 registered user) that have been reverted because they've been adding drivers that haven't been announced to race for a particular team or adding races for drivers that haven't been announced to be running them. (Note: This article was previously semi-protected for a few weeks in January and February due to the same problem and it largely fixed the problem.) Cavanaughs (talk) 08:37, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:50, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: In the morning two IPs started editing the article (changing "is" to "was" etc.), another IP swooped in and starting reverting pretty much all edits (including non-vandalism), and now we're up another two IPs doing these edits. Requesting protection Phiarc (talk) 16:46, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:52, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive IP editing. ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 14:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Whereas the party of the first part was rude to the party of the second part, the party of the third part did block the party of the first part. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent adding of unsorced claims. Merchancano (talk) 17:47, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of an IP-hopping LTA; see User:Wizzito/sock_drawer#MartinLutherKingISgreat for more info. wizzito | say hello! 18:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. As noted by CT55555: on the talk page, there seems to be a lot of disruptive editing that violates BLP rules or are regularly having WP:NPOV be disrupted without regard to talk page discussions. It seems like this page could benefit from a bit of protection. TartarTorte 19:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:17, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of POV-pushing, disruptive editing and edit-warring by set of partially blocked IP-s. Jingiby (talk) 07:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2804:14d:ae84:85e3::/64 x 3 months Ad Orientem (talk) 16:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of POV-pushing, disruptive editing and edit-warring by set of partially blocked IP-s. Jingiby (talk) 08:00, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2804:14d:ae84:85e3::/64 x 3 months Ad Orientem (talk) 16:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of POV-pushing, disruptive editing and edit-warring by set of partially blocked IP-s. Jingiby (talk) 08:00, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations by IPs in the Maidenhead area, west of London. Binksternet (talk) 16:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 86.187.128.0/17 x 1 month Ad Orientem (talk) 16:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent adding of outdated claims. Jacob Barus678 (talk) 19:17, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think that this page should be protected for copyright reasons and the credits attribuited to Stephen Hillenburg, it´s one of the main characters of Spongebob Squarepants...

Carletteyt (talk) 20:37, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Duplicate request. BusterD (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think that this page should be semi protected because was a universal character and should be threated like an popular page... His creations have copyright and need protection for his author Thanks Carletteyt (talk) 19:54, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:03, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think that this page should be protected because his actions were terrible and the edia coverage was really important. And some people could change this article to his own appearance... Carletteyt (talk) 19:58, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I believe that this page should be protected for the copyright laws that are attribuited to Stephen Hillenburg Carletteyt (talk) 20:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 20:52, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page has recently been constantly edited by IP address and newly registered users (which may be dummy accounts) to add non-notable information. Sanglahi86 (talk) 10:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:30, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: es muy quapo, no? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:30, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done (CC) Tbhotch 21:17, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think that this page should be semi protected because was a universal character and should be threated like an popular page... His creations have copyright and need protection for his author Thanks Carletteyt (talk) 19:54, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:03, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think that this page should be protected because his actions were terrible and the edia coverage was really important. And some people could change this article to his own appearance... Carletteyt (talk) 19:58, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I believe that this page should be protected for the copyright laws that are attribuited to Stephen Hillenburg Carletteyt (talk) 20:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 20:52, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of an LTA who is known to game AC; has just done it on this article. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dusty8686 and the protection logs of Random.org and Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test for info. wizzito | say hello! 18:46, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:13, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. mediafanatic17 talk 21:29, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:08, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism by user changing IP addresses Chrisanthusjohn (talk) 21:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21 March 2022

Reason: I think that this page should be protected because his discoverement is a new language and it´s neccesary a semi protection for them... Thanks Carletteyt (talk) 20:00, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 20:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page should be protected because his invention was really revolutionary and causes attacks with artefacts that causes a couple deaths during WW2, under my opinion this page need protection Carletteyt (talk) 20:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 20:47, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think that this page shoul be permanently semiprotected because is one of the most popular characters in the world of animation and he had a big repercussion in TV story...

Thanks Carletteyt (talk) 20:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 20:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pleasant disruptive editing from a user by the name of CreecregofLife. Continues to believe that The Owl House is “ending” but is actually “canceling”, and continuously adds Amphibia to the shows that are ending, but the third season is only implied as the last season, not officially. Note that “ending” and “canceling” are actually different meanings. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 18:12, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Edits by CreegregofLife do not appear to be obviously disruptive. There does appear to be a content dispute, which BaldiBasicsFan is part of; I'm not sure that full protection of the article is the best way to bring the parties to the talk page for civil discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 19:20, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@C.Fred: I highly urge you to check out their response to your warning on their talk page about personal attacks. They doubled down and are no longer acting in good faith. Using the WP:NOTPERFECT defense for themselves, while insisting on calling me disruptive. It's becoming very apparent they're trying to push a narrative they're attempting to win the dispute with--CreecregofLife (talk) 20:56, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I mean it is disruptive, in the sense, that it is part of an edit war. There is undoubtedly a content dispute, but discussion on the talk page is ongoing. I would support protection for the time being until the content dispute is resolved. Historyday01 (talk) 23:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The disruptive editing is too much, and I can't handle it because the issue is really serious. It would be fine if the page was protected. It really depends on your views if the users are disruptive or not. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 00:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was just stated it wasn't disruptive, but that's not enough for you. The discussion can't be in good faith if you continue to use such language--CreecregofLife (talk) 01:17, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I thought that the death of George Stinney go linked to capital punishment laws and racim should be protected under my opinion Carletteyt (talk) 20:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 20:53, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hi, i´m sorry for the highly number of requests, but i´m new in Wikipedia i want to tell y opinion about articles. I think that this page should be protected or semiprotected because talks about a national problem that causes violence and racial inequality in Southafrica. We have to think the problem discussed with Nelson Mandela, still causing controversy in his country and for no more vandalism should be protected.

Have a nice day :) Carletteyt (talk) 21:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: You need to stop until you know the criteria for requesting page protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done (CC) Tbhotch 21:18, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hi, i think that this page could be protected for his high number of victims and had a important media coverage for crysis actors and conspiracy theories about gun control. Thanks Carletteyt (talk) 21:37, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Let's take this to your talk page. BusterD (talk) 21:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP keeps changing article to apparently be about someone else with same/similar name. Changing birth from 2000 to 1993, etc. MB 23:57, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MB & Gri3720, would you clean it up please? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:28, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 5201 197.253.212.45 (talk) 00:38, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. Semi-protected for 5 days. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent IP vandalism Chrisanthusjohn (talk) 22:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This special purpose template primarily sits atop the fully protected user page of former Wikipedians, now deceased. Guidelines stipulate full-protection for these user pages to prevent defacement by vandalism. In my opinion, this template's current level of semi-protection is inconsistent with that goal and serves opportunistic vandals an inviting breach to overcome the efforts in place. I am requesting that this high visibility template, with 423 transclusions, be elevated to TE-protection (at minimum) if not full-protection, to tighten or close this breach respectively. I prefer TE-protection because I feel it's an adequate increase which will allow for the possible editing solution of converting this template to substitute only, which I intend to pursue. Thank you. --John Cline (talk) 23:37, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. If another admin disagrees, please feel free to change protection as they feel best. BusterD (talk) 02:43, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper persistently redirecting the page with no explanation or communication. wizzito | say hello! 01:41, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wow. Thanks for bringing this in. Not a bunch of recent mucking but I see this disruptor for over ten years. I'm inclined to indef this but IMHO we are wise to apply the least necessary force. Thanks the eyes. Bring this in again right away (or straight to me) if it looks like we need to go extended confirmed. BusterD (talk) 02:39, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced additions by IPs —El Millo (talk) 22:58, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Those ought to cover it through release and its run in theatres. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:53, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gaetr (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been no edits since March 9, I don't think an indefinite semi-protection is necessary at this time. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Users starting an edit war rather than discussing their disagreements in the talk page. This page is also linked with the personal page of a user which already has a warning due to said user writing/ editing a substantial portion of the page. This user also deleted support tickets/ issues on Github relating to this incident for the purpose of spinning the narrative, so there is a high risk that he will personally vandalize the page. This page is also related to an issue of current events which has political undertones, further increasing the chances of vandalism. The Gentle Sleep (talk) 00:45, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to call attention to The Gentle Sleep's POV pushing. This is the edit he's trying to lock in by protecting the page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peacenotwar_%28malware%29&type=revision&diff=1078287148&oldid=1078224662
In a previous revision The Gentle Sleep has called it a "hate crime" which is even more POV. Please look over the revision history.
CC GhostOfDanGurney who was the first to revert these changes. 216.73.163.131 (talk) 00:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't PoV pushing, and I noted in the talk page (where this issue should be discussed) why I changed the link to racial profiling instead. This attack targeted anyone of a specific nationality, which is by definition racial profiling per the definition from the ACLU. The Gentle Sleep (talk) 01:01, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. BusterD (talk) 02:46, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued vandalism after previous RfPP expired redlegsfan21 (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection has been put into place by the same mod who polices this article and deletes any criticism to Thomas even when coming from RS. Just see how the TALK PAGE is protected.. 108.34.231.7 (talk) 01:55, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your transphobia is showing. It's not genuine criticism--CreecregofLife (talk) 03:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. The page is protected to enforce the MOS:DEADNAME guideline. The discussion at Talk:Lia Thomas indicates that there is a high chance of this guideline being violated if the page were unprotected at this time. — Newslinger talk 04:25, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly unprotect this page for few time so I can add some most necessary information , there are many rajput states which were neglected in this article 2409:4043:692:1375:4678:A1BB:CA67:782B (talk) 05:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You want the /Decrease subpage, and you will need to both provide the name of the article you want the protection lowered on and a much more convincing rationale. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 07:11, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 09:20, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. An increase in baseless evidences.Jacob Historian (talk) 12:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Content dispute? deferring --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 09:35, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple people or sockpuppets vandalizing. Mike989 (talk) 02:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:43, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 106.196.51.66 (talk) 06:21, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:46, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. Multiple ips have removed a specific event from the schedule (start of final voting) for no real reason. $chnauzer 23:00, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:29, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry by the same users voting multiple times after being canvassed at reddit. 2001:4455:364:A800:894F:FBF8:A5AA:921F (talk) 23:08, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. The closer will take sock-/meatpuppetry into account. Lectonar (talk) 11:31, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous ip vandalism Sajaypal007 (talk) 04:02, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 106.196.51.82 (talk) 06:16, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think that this page should be protected for vandalism and talks about political ideologies that can be confused between users and jews . Finally i´ m gonna say that maybe can be protected or semiprotected. It´s a important association for the jews and should be protected on my opinion for a time. Carletteyt (talk) 07:51, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:25, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: request semi-protection - Numerous attempts at contacting subject of the article by various anon IPs over last 2 months Dialectric (talk) 09:35, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The threshold for protecting talk-pages is rather high. While these edits are a nuisance, the disruption is simply not high enough. Feel free to revert said contact attempts. Lectonar (talk) 11:25, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page should be protected because talks about episodes and have a high vandalism. Go linked to another page called Happy Tree Friends.

Thanks you Carletteyt (talk) 10:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:27, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the article titled, "The Kashmir Files", a sentence in the lead says,

the film is based on the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits during the Kashmir Insurgency

and I request that it be changed to,

the film is about the exodus of Kashmiri Hindus during the Kashmir Insurgency

as the source says it, "deals" with it - I asked to change the, "Kashmiri Pandits" to, "Kashmiri Hindus " because the term, "Kashmiri Pandits" in that sentence links to the, "Kashmiri Hindus " article.-116.75.78.177 (talk) 16:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC) 116.75.78.177 (talk) 16:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Stale. Lectonar (talk) 11:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the movie is produced with 2 partners one is Abhishek Agarwal and Zee studios.

Only Zee Studios is coming up.

Currently it's :

The Kashmir Files is a 2022 Indian Hindi-language drama film,[2] written and directed by Vivek Agnihotri. Produced by Zee Studios,[5] the film claims to be based on the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits during the Kashmir Insurgency.[6] It stars Anupam Kher, Darshan Kumar, Pallavi Joshi and Mithun Chakraborty.[7] The film was theatrically released on 11 March 2022.

It shall be :

The Kashmir Files is a 2022 Indian Hindi-language drama film,[2] written and directed by Vivek Agnihotri. Produced by Abhishek Agarwal and Zee Studios,[5] the film claims to be based on the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits during the Kashmir Insurgency.[6] It stars Anupam Kher, Darshan Kumar, Pallavi Joshi and Mithun Chakraborty.[7] The film was theatrically released on 11 March 2022 VirtualBeast (talk) 22:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, VirtualBeast, this is the page to request page protection. You are requesting an edit. Edit requests should be made on the talk page of the article to be edited. In this case that would be Talk:The Kashmir Files Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 06:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Stale. Lectonar (talk) 11:33, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Deleting of legitimate sources outside official one. Merchancano (talk) 03:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 15:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism as people keep deleting the official code name for the character. Soobinofc (talk) 11:41, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism.and to protect from unwanted edits by contributors also 37.111.248.26 (talk) 11:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We cannot protect pages on the Bengali language Wikipedia via requests made here. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandal target, as seen from the history. —Svārtava (t/u) • 14:52, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:55, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:20, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For now...but I am sure this will increase. Please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 12:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 223.187.110.170 (talk) 06:17, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent proxy block evasion. CMD (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:08, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: (Requesting a second time due to initial request being archived without any decision to approve or decline.) The article was indefinitely semi-protected 12 years ago, and per WP:PPLIST, this seems like "a reasonable period has elapsed". There could either be full unprotection or pending changes protection. The latter could be a good way to see if the nationality-based disruption from over 12 years ago will resume or not, and allow passerby editors to make other kinds of changes. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 13:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Link to initial request here: Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2022/03#Alexander Graham Bell. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 13:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Courcelles: As the administrator who protected this page indefinitely, would you like to unprotect this page or switch to pending changes protection? — Newslinger talk 06:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Protecting admin is inactive. Article has been protected for 12 years, so the request seems reasonable. Let's give it a try and see what happens. If vandalism returns, we'll likely go right back to indef semi. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:08, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2008, the last 50 edits go back to 2015, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregisted edits. Terasail[✉️] 18:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dbachmann: As the administrator who protected this page indefinitely, would you like to unprotect this page? — Newslinger talk 06:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Anonymous edit warring doesn't justify protecting a page for 14 years. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:10, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from same LTA began almost immediately upon the end of the last protection. JBL (talk) 11:20, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jackfork (talk) 11:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:17, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring over subject's birth name, mostly from IPs. Lord Belbury (talk) 11:28, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2009, the last 50 edits go back to 2009, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. Terasail[✉️] 18:45, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MBisanz: As the administrator who protected this page indefinitely, would you like to unprotect this page? — Newslinger talk 06:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse by Xayahrainie43. JBL (talk) 15:43, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:10, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:43, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
5.127.80.9 (talk) 13:13, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 13:38, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think that this page should be protected because is a serious case and still in investigation if we don´t have any proofs about the real killer, we have to cut vandalism semi protecting the article Carletteyt (talk) 14:22, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:46, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple anonymous IP users today, likely needs temporary protection. Bsoyka (talk) 17:13, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cullen328. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:29, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a trade. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:40, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:51, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Note that I would not have reverted, but in this case it's not about WP:RIGHTVERSION; see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather#‎RfC: Changing the color scheme for storm colors to make it more accessible. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:38, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If there is an edit war going on the appropriate venue is WP:3RRN. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:06, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent IP Vandalism History quester (talk) 11:12, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. If it looks like a range of IPs you may request a range block at WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:11, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent reversion of edits and imposition of biased perspectives. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 15:33, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by Bears247 (Persistent Editor). If he creates an alt the article's vulnerable because it's not protected at all. We should semi-protect this article. SteelerFan1933 (talk) 15:21, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We don't protect pages from any single editor. This sounds like a content dispute. See WP:DR. But if you believe they are behaving disruptively after being suitably warned, you can ask for intervention at WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I still thinking that this page should be semiprotected because jjust has been edited multiple times and talks about capital punishment in USA and racism Carletteyt (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a handful of edits in the last month. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:45, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:45, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: is really old Carletteyt (talk) 21:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While that's not a reason we can use to unprotect a page, the article is clearly less popular than it used to be, with no vandalism or disruptive edits for years. @Reaper Eternal: As the administrator who semi-protected this page indefinitely, would you like to unprotect this page? — Newslinger talk 04:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No , are you the administrator? Carletteyt (talk) 09:47, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What do you think? Should be protected? Carletteyt (talk) 09:50, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I won't say no to unprotection, but given the topic matter and the types of vandalism (mostly libelous pedophilia accusations) that kept popping up, I wouldn't recommend it. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okey, better we left the page looks like Carletteyt (talk) 15:35, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:33, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22 March 2022

Reason: Recently there have been repeated instances of anonymous users editing the member timeline charts using incorrect formatting, so that the page ends up attempting to display tables within tables and becomes unreadable.

This has happened on:

March 9, 23:46 by 174.215.221.67

March 11, 23:01 by 2600:1017:b025:233b:2196:ca1b:ec7a:1572

March 17, 11:06 by 72.224.11.135

March 19, 18:16 by 108.4.145.181. Richferrara (talk) 19:16, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:53, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removals of sourced content without much explanation of engagement; IP-hopping disruption. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:21, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:07, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 20:33, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant vandalism and the changing of the current flag to the White-red-white flag, likely for political reasons. (talk) 21:31, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:16, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Inbetween the time of this request, and the commencement of it, the flag was changed again. Im new to editing wikipedia, where would I go to request a protected edit? (talk) 22:43, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In most cases, edit requests are made on the article's talk page. If the article's talk page is protected, it is instead done at WP:RFPP/E. More details can be found at Wikipedia:Edit Requests Alphazelf (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant Vandalism Persesus (talk) 20:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 23:45, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – disruption continuing; PCP needed as with last protection. wizzito | say hello! 23:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: His Birthname should be added as is done for other figures like Kaye West. This is because Thomas has swam under this name several times and recieved considerable coverage. This will also inform readers about more of his background. BritishToff (talk) 20:24, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Nthep (talk) 20:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BritishToff, do not misgender people. Thomas' pronouns are she/hers. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I believe that this page should be extended protected more that the initial time for reasons of posible vandalism to Kyle Rittenhouse Thanks Carletteyt (talk) 16:48, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Carletteyt: What have you already been told --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Carletteyt (talk) 16:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: @Carletteyt: The time for sorry is drawing to a close. Please stop posting to RfPP. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Meme spamming. ★Trekker (talk) 23:50, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Give me a sec to find that YouTube link, you monster! Erm: Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Terrorism cancelled. El_C 00:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism, mostly by IP edits and newly registered users. Pyraminxsolver (talk) 23:51, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Position disputes. I cited a source for his switching from OLB to DE with the Raiders 68.234.69.24 (talk) 00:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Many disruptive edits; unrelated to the specific request above. IP, use the article talk page to advance whatever position with the aim of gaining consensus for your changes. El_C 00:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection of the page from unbiased proper editing is, in itself, a form of vandalism. The vandals need to be stopped. TruthChecker777 (talk) 21:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The only way this rationale could be less persuasive would involve RevDel criteria 2 or 3. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 21:22, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Disruptive edits by multiple IPs. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore the morgue) 14:22, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem: I'm not sure this was necessary. Most edits were constructive, with only maybe a few isolated instances of deliberate vandalism. PC might have been better? RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The volume of editing precludes PC. But I will take another look. - Ad Orientem (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Ad Orientem (talk) 16:37, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Match protection level with Template:Ns has subpages, which was fully protected by Trialpears. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:16, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Already Template protected. Additional protection does not appear to be necessary. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attempt by new user to remove redirect w/ no discussion. wizzito | say hello! 23:02, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. Final warning might have done it. El_C 23:47, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is the third time I am placing this request. So far it has been ignored, while there is an unregistered user who persists in reverting good edits. What's going on? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant IP disruption; having this article be unprotected clearly does not work. KingErikII (Talk page) 07:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP disruptive editing since protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 07:30, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:49, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:16, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:23, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP editors are repeatedly altering data to make it look like a different political group is in majority. Tube·of·Light 04:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:30, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 05:57, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amigao (talk) 01:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Greek IPs. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dealer07. The same protection is needed for Me tana. Binksternet (talk) 02:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article and its talk page were protected around a decade ago due to BLP violations. As the subject left the legislature four years ago, I imagine the coast is clear (at least for the talk page, if nothing else). Graham (talk) 05:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have downgraded to pending-changes protection for 6 months, and watchlisted the article. Lectonar (talk) 09:15, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edits are incomplete at best. They're just editing stats of a specific player, not of all players. It's tiring having to cleanup everytime. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 12:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 09:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 12:07, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 09:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 12:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content immediately after the protection ran out. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has all the relevant information and supporting references Sportsflashes010 (talk) 05:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page doesn’t exist and therefore has no information to support with references it also doesn’t have--CreecregofLife (talk) 06:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My guess is that they want it unprotected to bypass AfC. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 07:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to happen frequently with Indian subjects. I’m not quite sure why. Rather than making the assumptions myself and looking worse, I’d probably rather have fuller concrete analysis CreecregofLife (talk) 11:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I agree. OP, please wait for the draft to be accepted; only then can it be moved to mainspace. Lectonar (talk) 09:10, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 2607:FEA8:A21F:FD00:4BC:B9C8:8C8C:FF43 (talk) 09:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 09:30, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP and newbie editors. 180.194.127.148 (talk) 01:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. You have been informed, through edit summaries of those who are reverting you, that there are ways of dealing with this. Protection is not needed. Jayron32 12:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from unregistered IP users and newly created users. It has been continued for months, which involves replacing the name or codename with words or phrases. OThreeSys (talk) 02:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined No reason has been given for this request. Jayron32 12:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:52, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent disruptive editing by IPs/new users, a lot of which appears random. Most other IP/new user edits are good faith but unhelpful (usually due to being incorrect or sourcing issues). The topic is highly contentious, it's one of the most viewed psychology and medicine articles (I'm guessing the same is true for any of its other projects as well), and it's on a lot of watchlists. It also receives 2.3 edits per day (according to xtools), so it's not ideal for pending changes. It has previously had various forms of protection, including infinite semi-protection that was removed from the page due to the protection being temporarily increased, and the semi-protect not being reinstated after the higher level expired. Vandalism immediately picks up again whenever protection has been removed.

Preferably it would be infinitely semi-protected again. Xurizuri (talk) 11:54, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:54, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent patent nonsense added by IP editors that has to be removed roughly every day. Endwise (talk) 12:04, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:56, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is a redirect page and a dynamic IP with help of one more IP is continuously adding content on this redirect page. Sajaypal007 (talk) 14:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:59, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:10, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Genre warring in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 16:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chuka Chieftalk 16:22, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Could you re-protect the page with the same level as right now (edit=autoconfirmed:move=sysop), but with a more useful log entry? Right now, the latest log entry is just "Move vandal target", and the previous entry is "per talk". You may want to use the entry before that, "Continuous anon vandalism, never ends". 49.198.51.54 (talk) 06:16, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Article is adequately protected and anyone looking at the protection log will understand there have been long term issues with disruptive editing. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term abuse from Greek IPs and sockpuppets. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dealer07. Binksternet (talk) 17:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection recently expired; disruption has continued. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:57, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Moxy- 12:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:57, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Shadow4dark (talk) 13:42, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:59, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Shadow4dark (talk) 13:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary protection to prevent unreferenced edits by unregistered users, regarding this developing event. — Bacon Noodles (talkcontribsuploads) 14:39, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Most IP edts appear constructive. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:08, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [] 15:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism since March 20, 2022. Cassiopeia talk 19:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated pov-pushing based on non-WP:RS Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent violations of WP:CRYSTAL, primarily from IPs. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:52, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High volume of constant edits; some individuals purposely add in misleading information that could cast a biased and negative impression onto this page's described actor. St0P3ditin5 (talk) 19:52, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: Edit War involving I.P User, More than 3 reverts. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 16:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad OrientemThank you PerryPerryD Talk To Me 17:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping disruption. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:54, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Sanu099 (talk) 18:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – You are the one causing the disruption! Favonian (talk) 18:39, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Inappropriate changes of photos Forshinee (talk) 14:35, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I did and ive explained everything but no one is actually listening so im requesting a protection since this people are overusing their power Forshinee (talk) 18:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 21:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 21:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent edits that introduce informations not officially released yet, coming from leaks and spoilers. 95.232.66.28 (talk) 21:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

23 March 2022

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of BLP violations by a wide variety of IP editors. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 18:42, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2600:1700:B120:7EF0::/64 x 2 weeks. I didn't see much recent disruption outside of that range. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:08, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Full protection for 30 days. Persistent disruption, vandalism and unsourced changes with possible BLP vios. Basically, people are changing yacht ownership to the names of sanctioned Russians due to the war in Ukraine. One boat in particular repeatedly having ownership listed as Putin's. This is a usually quiet article. Thanks - wolf 21:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Multiple people vandalizing the article. Elijahandskip (talk) 23:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 21:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linked from Twitter's verification process, so that might account for the high level of disruption. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 22:03, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The previous article is being restored by socks of User:Extrapolaris, who has been globally blocked from editing English Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Extrapolaris. BilCat (talk) 22:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: constant vandalism, possibly from sockpuppet accounts Painting17 (talk) 00:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:30, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – BLP content dispute and edit war between multiple users (possible socks). Possible BLP violations. Being discussed at [127]. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – BLP content dispute and edit warring between multiple users with possible socks. Possible BLP violations. Currently being discussed at BLP Noticeboards[128]. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm requesting to edit the page for Greta Van Fleet. It has not been updated since December 2020. Joshlail (talk) 21:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request at Talk:Greta Van Fleet to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 21:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page experienced a high level of IP vandalism recently. Extending the partial protection will help deflect additional vandalism; the subject is a TikTok creator who has decided to exit the app and this will be sure to stir up unwanted activity here on Wikipedia. Coffeesweet (talk) 21:15, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users inappropriately restoring article that was redirected at AFD. wizzito | say hello! 01:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Swagging (talk) 01:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:51, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most of the IP edits since the last period of semi-protection in 2018 have been the same type of vandalism as what led to the 2018 semi-protection to start with (and a good chunk of the edits that aren't have been reversions of that vandalism). WCQuidditch 01:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:53, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: large amount of unconstructive IP edits Painting17 (talk) 23:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Russian separatist forces in Donbas and Far-right politics in Ukraine

Both pages should be temporarily fully protected because of unexplained content restoration despite the problems with the content has been already highlighted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ukraine#Far-right politics in Ukraine and User talk:Asarlaí#Edit warring. Segaton (talk) 01:55, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected Both pages locked for two days. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection: WP:HNE. (I cannot say more about it without streisanding.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 02:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given the extraordinary amount of oversight that has been required there, the ongoing lower-grade trolling and the absence of much else going on, I'v3e semi-protected for a year. I am reluctant to indef protect a talkpage, but it may come to that. Acroterion (talk) 02:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I'm working on getting the most recent crap RD'd/OS'd. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 02:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 06:52, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:59, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: All for 2cm --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:57, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 07:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: pending protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repititive IP Vandalism by removing Azhar Sheikh aka Pinku's name from Main to Recurring who's a integral part of series since very first episode and can be seen in every other episode. Also the IP is merging Pinku's character with Sundar's character who appears once in 2-3 months for it's random edit. IP Vandalism is happening since long on this page. IPs were warned but they didn't stopped. Pri2000 (talk) 01:52, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. IP given level II warning. We don't protect pages from one or two editors or IPs. If they refuse to engage and have been adequately warned, you can request intervention at WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:04, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 02:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Not WP:ARBEE Any admin may remove or modify as desired. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring over preferred pronouns, editors have been persistently changing the pronouns from she/her to they/them without providing a source indicating that her pronouns have changed Chrisanthusjohn (talk) 02:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 10:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism; most comments since October-November 2021 have been from IPs vandalizing. wizzito | say hello! 04:33, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky. (CC) Tbhotch 05:26, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent WP:BLP violations. FDW777 (talk) 08:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 10:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: one of the few crypto mainstream projects amongst countless cryptocurrency scams is unavoidably going to be targeted. requesting a semiprotection to avoid the already happening vandalism, NPOV and insert of promotional content. JohnnyCoal (talk) 08:18, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 10:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. cross-wiki abuse: w:Karna promotion sock farm, see w:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1090#LTA sockpuppetry, puffery of Karna of MahabharataDaxServer (t · m · c) 08:30, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. cross-wiki abuse: w:Karna promotion sock farm, see w:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1090#LTA sockpuppetry, puffery of Karna of MahabharataDaxServer (t · m · c) 08:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dove's talk (talk) 08:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. cross-wiki abuse: w:Karna promotion sock farm, see w:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1090#LTA sockpuppetry, puffery of Karna of MahabharataDaxServer (t · m · c) 08:52, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection for months. Disruption resumed after the page got unprotected. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 09:09, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 10:26, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of an LTA. wizzito | say hello! 05:26, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 10:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and introduction of unsourced information by IP editors (and some with accounts) continues over a long period, see previous short blocks and edit log. Thanks. |→ Spaully ~talk~  10:33, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, also autoconfimed user disruption.  F1V8V10V6!  11:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jetstreamer Talk 11:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP (and now a registered user) repeatedly removing Controversies section, without consensus. intforce (talk) 13:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:17, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting semi-protection for this page as it's undergoing an edit-war by a long-term abuse vandal using multiple IPs. Mr Fink (talk) 15:17, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by Deepfriedokra. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article was only protected to stop it from being converted from a redirect before the subject became notable, which it did long ago. None of the other player season articles are EC protected. Letcord (talk) 03:42, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fish and karate: Any thoughts on that? Lectonar (talk) 09:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar, that admin doesn't seem to be very active anymore. Regardless of the outcome of this request, could you please just remove Category:Articles which contain graphical timelines from that article? Thanks. Letcord (talk) 09:40, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I was aware they aren't very active anymore, but he had some contributions this year. It's just courtesy from my part; if there is no reaction from their part, I will remove or downgrade the protection (still mulling that over, pending-changes might be a good option to phase protection out slowly). Will remove the category in a moment. Lectonar (talk) 09:56, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: No objections! Fish+Karate 15:45, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Lectonar (talk) 15:48, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HistoryofIran. Is this in the right place? (This section is where we request a reduction in protection). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ops, it's not. My bad. --HistoryofIran (talk) 16:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, it’s been protected. I’ll marked this as done so it can be archived. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:14, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:16, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2009, the last 50 edits go back to 2015, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. Terasail[✉️] 15:52, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jayron32 Pinging Jayron32, the protecting administrator, for their input. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done Wow. I have no memory of this, but apparently I protected it indefinitely 13 years ago. I'm presently unprotecting it. It's been long enough. I have not indefinitely protected anything for that long in many years, AFAICR; I see no reason to keep it that way. --Jayron32 16:09, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing, sock-puppetry and edit-warring. Jingiby (talk) 16:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:24, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Full protection for 30 days. Persistent disruption, edit warring, vandalism and unsourced/poorly sourced changes with possible BLP vios. Basically, due to the sanctions stemming from the war in Ukraine, people are listing Putin as the yacht's owner though no RS has determined that. Thanks - wolf 17:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:26, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is constant threat of vandalism and dominative disruption from one user Random Haste. A few instances of the disruptive and inconsistent behaviour is already observed in some of the talk pages between the user and uder with IP 116.86.139.253. Similar trend and an inconsistent application of Wikipedia rules with a prejudice and malicious intent are noted in articles related other airports in South India. The user seems to be intentional in glorifying a city while degrading other cities, while expressing no concern about net neutrality and utilitarian considerations of such airport pages where, several consumers refer to plan their travel. Mugunthsboa (talk) 12:56, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We do not protect pages from one or two users. If you believe a user is behaving disruptively, and that they have been adequately warned/refused discussion, then you may request intervention at WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:20, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:28, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:55, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism making either dumb jokes or messing up links and information. Swagging (talk) 18:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:28, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits regarding fake new movies in this series by anons since early January. Rctgamer3 (talk) 20:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:28, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was WP:SALTed by User:Seraphimblade in 2018, as it was being repeatedly created and deleted. However, with the release of Mach-Hommy's 2021 album Pray for Haiti, he has been discussed more in music and entertainment media, and two substantial interviews with him have been published within the past few months. Therefore, I feel that there now exist enough sources to support a Mach-Hommy article. I have a draft in my userspace showing the article I intend to create if the salting is lifted. ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 16:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade: Pinging Seraphimblade for their input. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The references used here are at least of substantially higher quality than before, so that's very much an improvement. It does appear that a lot of what's there is interviews, which don't contribute to notability, but some of them do have at least some non-interview biographical content with them as well. Given that, I'll unprotect it, and if anyone thinks it's still insufficient, this version is at least different enough to warrant a new AfD to decide on that. Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, much appreciated! Thanks as well for bringing up the point about interviews not contributing to notability – I hadn't realized that, so it'll be good for me to keep in mind going forward. I've aimed to foreground the non-interview content in the sources I've used thus far, but I'll keep an eye out for other sources to beef the page up as well. ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 03:11, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:44, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2012, the last 50 edits go back to 2017, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. Terasail[✉️] 16:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57. It looks from the protection log as though Number 57 protected the article Maki (current political party) in 2008. Subsequently, the protection went with the page when it was moved to the current title in 2012. Pinging Number 57 for their input. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've unprotected it. Cheers, Number 57 18:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sexual assault allegations being removed (and being replaced with claims of unfoundedness without a source). Nobodyatallest555 (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:20, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism of same sentence / type from IP users.

Links:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jersey&diff=prev&oldid=1078850363&diffmode=source https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jersey&diff=prev&oldid=1069916852&diffmode=source https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jersey&diff=1052191116&oldid=1051992904&diffmode=source https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jersey&diff=prev&oldid=1052191116&diffmode=source https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jersey&diff=1060115269&oldid=1060014468&diffmode=source

Please consider semi-protection. Jèrriais janne (talk) 18:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sorry, but the level of disruption is extremely minor, often spaced by weeks. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP keeps adding unnecessary information that's a) not in the source, b) not necessary to the page c) not written in sentence form. Has now been added back-to-back days. The father's job is irrelevant to the son's article - an unnecessary addition to the article. RedPatch (talk) 18:19, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If an IP is behaving disruptively and they have been suitably warned, you may request intervention at WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:30, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated pattern of IP users adding unsourced content suggesting the subject of the article has reached the world no. 1 ranking in women's tennis - this has been driven by the announcement of the current world no. 1, Ash Barty's, retirement. Barty needs to request for her ranking points to be removed, which she hasn't done at time of writing, otherwise she will remain no. 1 until another player gets more points than her. Bonoahx (talk) 21:18, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

24 March 2022

Reason: User is removing the content of the page and placing a redirect to an unrelated article to avoid having to justify deletion. 47.208.103.244 (talk) 18:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:26, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – vandalism on an occasional-ish basis. wizzito | say hello! 21:30, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – vandalism on an occasional basis. wizzito | say hello! 21:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by someone on a very wide range of dynamic IPs. Sable232 (talk) 21:55, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:24, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism immediately after protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 22:03, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – occasional yet continuous vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 22:04, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content from various IP users continued shortly after past protection expired. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 22:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant vandalism by IP users and others Fijipedia (talk) 22:17, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:40, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various ip addresses have been repeatedly adding unsourced content non-stop for several days now. — YoungForever(talk) 22:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:14, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs and non-confirmed users signed, Willondon (talk) 23:53, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:57, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent additions of transactions not confirmed by the team by IP addresses. Rockchalk717 23:55, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 00:24, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't generally start PP at three months, but given current events it's inconceivable that this page is not going to be a target for the foreseeable future. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:28, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism continuing after page protections, almost no edits from IPs or new users are constructive. wizzito | say hello! 00:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The page has a long history of vandalism, and I requested it for protection a few months ago. Maybe it should be semi-protected indefinitely? Painting17 (talk) 00:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism,disruptive editing ,attempt to spread misinformation . Bilgiljilll (talk) 21:59, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Linked article does not exist. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:55, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism by IPs, presumably by an IP-hopping vandal. Painting17 (talk) 00:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous edit warring and unsourced changes by IPs/new accounts over nationality. Mellk (talk) 01:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A Russian swimmer showing support for the Russian invasion of Ukraine, asking for protection due to the recent vandalism, similar to Ivan Kuliak. --*Fehufangą✉ Talk page01:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:54, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 01:52, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. 25(!) previous protections. Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent IP vandalism owing to player backlash against the game. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 22:24, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a handful of reverted edits over the last few days despite a good deal of editing. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Somebody keeps changing his position. Mike Purcell has played nose tackle for Broncos and will likely stay at nose tackle for the 2022 season 68.234.69.24 (talk) 22:26, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 02:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – occasional vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 02:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism target, also under a DS topic (longevity). wizzito | say hello! 02:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism in last few days. wizzito | say hello! 02:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism target. wizzito | say hello! 02:52, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 07:22, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Vanamonde (Talk) 04:54, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level IP Vandalism. I am trying to keep it reverted, but I can not keep up with the additional vandalism. Shortsword (talk) 05:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP persistently adding fictional names. Loafiewa (talk) 09:14, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Loafiewa, that is not vandalism (WP:NOTVAND). Vandalism is a narrow subset of disruptive editing, so best to keep the language precise. El_C 12:13, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 09:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:21, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant changing IP, socking, keeps editing the page. Request a at least a years semi to protect the article. Govvy (talk) 11:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 12:22, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued vandalism after protection decreased. Painting17 (talk) 03:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Last protection ended about a month ago. Only one user vandalising after that. Lectonar (talk) 09:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr Salvus 09:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. FDW777 (talk) 11:11, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lots of IP vandalism. Viewer719/Contribs! 12:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the only constructive edits were made by auto confirmed users, from what I see. Viewer719/Contribs! 12:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Different users (including autoconfirmed users as well as IPs) consistently edit the page to add an unsourceable statement that "Barabbas" is pronounced "The Rabbits". Globg (talk) 13:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hypebeast has since been unprotected, but Talk:Hypebeast remains protected. Requesting for unprotection.

A bit of background:

Hypebeast was deleted before, probably because it may have been poorly written before, had issues with WP:TOOSOON, or maybe was too promotional. I can't see the previous versions though. So, following WP:TNT, I gave this a complete restart by translating from the Japanese edition of Wikipedia, which has a pretty good-quality version. I actually have a lot of in-depth knowledge about hip hop publications and related topics, and Hypebeast is definitely a very notable publication that shouldn't be protected/salted.

Also, please note that Hypebeast is currently linked to from many Wikipedia articles [129]. There are also hundreds of hits if you search of "Hypebeast," and it's a widely cited publication used mostly in musician BLPs, so it certainly meets GNG and is worth including on Wikipedia. MaghrebiFalafel (talk) 00:29, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done (via resorting the deleted talk page) — xaosflux Talk 13:44, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: We suspect that someone might make changes on the page related to personal information which is why we are requesting protection on this article. Ronitsunny 10:28, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We can't protect pages on the Hindi-language Wikipedia. Lectonar (talk) 11:10, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kempegowda International Airport has been on indefinite protection and is against the spirit of Wikipedia. Several of the information on this page are not true and has caused miscommunication and discomfort to the consumers of such information. For example there is no AirIndia flight to LHR after 27th March. The article is replete with such inaccuracies and denying such changes have only stood the cause of perpetrators of partial and paid journalism 116.86.139.253 (talk) 13:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please use an edit request on the article talk page to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Lectonar (talk) 11:11, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to make an edit to this page as it has not been updated since December 2020 Joshlail (talk) 15:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please use an edit request on the article talk page to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:51, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Previously declined under very similar circumstances. Favonian (talk) 20:52, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Lectonar (talk) 11:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: LTA, see User:Beyond My Ken/Brescia LTA. FDW777 (talk) 07:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of b, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gah, I can't type. User(s) blocked. El_C 12:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent linking to copyright violating YouTube links and violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:52, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 14:49, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:52, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protecting the page from vandalism that includes his nationalist writings and his sorbiquites that appeal to general Indian Population. 27.5.97.78 (talk) 15:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I want to change the redirect target from Seth Putnam to Seth Putnam#Impaled Northern Moonforest ----FMSky (talk) 10:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done (but - processed this as an edit request). — xaosflux Talk 13:46, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2409:4041:2D9D:51E7:0:0:8CB:CA10 (talk) 13:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 13:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent vandalism. Painting17 (talk) 15:24, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. -- Valjean (talk) 18:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TNT (talk • she/her) 18:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user waited out the last protection and began edit warring again as soon as it expired. MrOllie (talk) 18:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandal attacks by different users in just a few hours. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Last page protection just expired and IP vandalism continues: [130] Phlsph7 (talk) 17:09, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – -. LouisAragon (talk) 19:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The protection expired, and today the LTA-like IP group is back to edit this page. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 17:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing– The year long protection expired just recently, and since then various anonymous IP users have vandalized the page. Given the subject is the reigning NBA MVP, the page is at increased risk of persistent vandalism and should be protected indefinitely to prevent such acts in the future. Spirit Fox99 (talk) 20:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:20, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA with highly dynamic IPs continuing to edit right off of page protection. See this ANI thread for context: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1093#Hoaxing,_personal_attacks,_etc._by_constant_IP_hopper_in_Italy. wizzito | say hello! 22:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:19, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

25 March 2022

Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2008, the last 50 edits go back to 2008, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. Terasail[✉️] 23:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected I'm watching the page and will reprotect if the problem returns. Wug·a·po·des 23:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2008, the last 50 edits go back to 2021 (Mostly due to the fact that 1 user made 65 edits on 6 June 2021), the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. Terasail[✉️] 23:19, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Watching the page and will reprotect if problems return. Wug·a·po·des 23:54, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2009, the last 50 edits go back to 2014, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. (Protecting admin @User:Cuchullain) Terasail[✉️] 23:23, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected A 13 year protection for a content dispute is rather long. Watching the page, will reprotect, etc Wug·a·po·des 23:58, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:NOTFORUM vandalism by IP addresses in Southeast Asia. wizzito | say hello! 01:36, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to recent news re: sexual harassment allegations, there have been several instances of IP vandalism. It has mostly been edits in violation of WP:BLP and/or WP:NPV. However recently an edit by an IP editor disclosed the name of the anonymous accuser (currently not public information). This edit was undone but the same IP editor added it again. I am suggesting semi-protection due to the amount of vandalism and BLP considerations. Apologies if this is not an appropriate request. Dizzyflamingo (talk) 01:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent with the target article, Ariel Sharon. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 21:40, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    This is a new request with a different desired result CreecregofLife (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I don’t see any vandalism and the target page is ECP. I’m not seeing a case for reducing protection of the redirect to SP. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    In which case the redirect should be unprotected. There is just simply no reason for this redirect to be fully protected. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 02:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    It was protection due to reasons that you cannot see ([131]). Couretsy ping @NawlinWiki: (CC) Tbhotch 02:47, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Neveselbert, the case you put forward doesn’t hold up - Vandalism? Consistent with the target article? Nor can you see the BLP violation, now deleted, that necessitated the protection. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I did notify NawlinWiki, but they appear to be inactive. I waited a day before requesting unprotection here, which was declined and archived before I had the chance to respond. So I've since requested a reduction in the protection level, to SP which would be consistent with the level for the redirect's target. I don't believe the rationale for locking the page still holds up, since the subject of the redirect has since died, voiding any possible further violation. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 03:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The target page is ECP not SP. If only you were clear in your initial request - you asked for SP due to persistent vandalism, consistent with the target page. Why don’t you start again and ask for a lowering of protection to ECP without any mention of vandalism? It won’t be lowered further than that because the page falls under arbitration enforcement as it can be reasonably construed as belonging to the Arab–Israeli conflict. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry of course, I've struck out the mention of vandalism and I apologise for not being clear in my initial request (I did mean ECP, not SP, sorry again for the confusion). ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 04:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Of course it could be lowered to ECP, but why? Is there an urgent need to do so, an article to be written? Or is the intent just to synchronize the protection levels? Lectonar (talk) 08:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    An argument against "synchronizing" the protection levels is that the article currently has 690 watchers while the redirect has 3. Undesirable changes to the redirect by an EC user are thus much more likely to go undiscovered. Favonian (talk) 09:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think this is a particularly controversial redirect, like Hitler for example. The vast majority of redirects in Redirects from sort names are not protected, let alone fully protected, like this. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    You still haven't answered the basic question: why? Why does it need to be unprotected? Are you planning on turning into an article that differs from it's current target? Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I originally wanted it unprotected to tag the redirect, which has since been done by an admin. It's still however tagged as a fully-protected redirect, which I think is unnecessary for the reasons I've given. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not sure how this page got protected at all. The protection log says it was protected because of persistent vandalism. There have only been 3 edits to the page, and none of them were vandalism. As far as I know, if the target of a redirect is getting vandalized, that doesn't justify protection of its redirects. My vote would be to unprotect it altogether until there is evidence that it is actually a target for vandalism. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The explanation may be found in the deleted revision log. Someone moved the article (when that was still possible) to an unpleasant/derivative name involving the words "War Criminal", and a bot obligingly fixed the double redirect. Then it got deleted, recreated with the proper target and protected. As there's no need for changing the current redirect that cannot be handled with an edit request, I prefer keeping it fully protected. Favonian (talk) 16:27, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Just move-protect it, that way it will never happen again. As for edit protection, semi is enough. 103.149.248.196 (talk) 00:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator NawlinWiki. Wug·a·po·des 00:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An editor repeatedly attempts to restore the content, despite the content of the article being merged with another article Sylhet Division. This editor has had multiple warnings on his talk page, and has now resorted to editing with his IP. I would also request Sylhet region (another redirect) and Sylhet Division also be protected as the person is actively damaging it and edit warring. Cheers. UserNumber (talk) 14:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent level of IP vandalism 202.50.90.40 (talk) 02:35, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 02:53, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because this article is missing essential information that is already publicly known . 96.246.147.136 (talk) 23:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is that the IP's here due to the content dispute over her birthdate. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 00:17, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please use an edit request on the article talk page to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:14, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Wug·a·po·des 23:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page is rarely edited because of extended confirmed protection. Reducing it to semi-protection will help editors to update the page when necessary. Thank you. Shinnosuke15, 06:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

From what I see it's had 500 edits in about the last year. I've seen pages come through here the past few days whose last 50 edits go back years. Seems it's updated rather reasonably CreecregofLife (talk) 06:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. There are still ongoing sock problems so reducing the protection is a bad idea. Wug·a·po·des 23:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2009, the last 50 edits go back to 2020, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. Terasail[✉️] 23:21, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected Despite the protection a number of problematic edits still get through, so I don't think unprotection would be successful. Wug·a·po·des 23:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by anonymous editors. wizzito | say hello! 01:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Skynet me, bot! Erm: Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: unverified users keep changing the status of Jack Nicholson from retired to not retired; which has been verifiably sourced by him years ago Stuv3 (talk) 02:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:47, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2016, the last 50 edits go back to 2015, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. No edit request have been made since the page has been protected and it does not get a lot of pageviews. Terasail[✉️] 23:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected Protected as an arbitration enforcement action (30/500 restriction) which is still in place. Wug·a·po·des 00:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
More specifically, WP:ARBPIA4#ARBPIA General Sanctions bullet B. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 01:32, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2016, the last 50 edits go back to 2014, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. No edit request have been made since the page has been protected and it does not get a lot of pageviews. Terasail[✉️] 23:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected Protected as an arbitration enforcement action (30/500 restriction) which is still in place. Wug·a·po·des 00:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
More specifically, WP:ARBPIA4#ARBPIA General Sanctions bullet B. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 01:32, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. General Ization Talk 03:25, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Following 7-year long protection (2016-2021). El_C 05:04, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism restarted 4 days after semi-protection expired. Latest vandal is adding references to Adolf Hitler and spreading COVID-related misinformation. (Note: Please block the offending vandal, CluuuzJustify, if deemed necessary). Tube·of·Light 05:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:19, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism as well as multiple edit conflicts. Fijipedia (talk) 01:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GABgab 03:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: This page has been moved to at least six different titles over the years, as can be seen by following the links on this page. At a well-attended RM here, which I just closed, several editors agreed that full move protection would be helpful in preventing further out-of-process moves. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:47, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Fade258 (talk) 05:52, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 15 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That's a lot of activity for pending changes, so semi-protection would better suit here. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Regular vandalism from IPs & new users since being posted on the Main Page via WP:ITN. — MarkH21talk 05:53, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:57, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Low edit volume and politically-disputed topic, was presenting a biased picture from 24 November 2020 until today and seems likely to return to that state and (again) not be noticed for a considerable time. 184.23.20.208 (talk) 02:56, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sorry, IP, I don't think there's enough to warrant even pending changes at this time. El_C 04:57, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: New edits about school reputation can be made with proper citations as well. Such an interview was recently conducted with school alumni. 73.59.10.100 (talk) 01:08, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:28, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The current Google article states: "... the word googolplex, the number one followed by a googol zeroes...". This is incorrect. A googolplex is the number *ten* followed by a googol zeroes. 2601:205:8301:68F0:70F8:233C:CD30:A3FF (talk) 00:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. A googolplex is the number ten to the googol power, but it is correctly described as the number one followed by a googol zeroes. I apologize for wasting anyone's time. 2601:205:8301:68F0:70F8:233C:CD30:A3FF (talk) 00:39, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I’ll mark this as withdrawn. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:16, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:16, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Seems to be a lot of BLP violations by non-autoconfirmed users since it's last protected. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 07:31, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2011, the last 50 edits go back to 2017, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. (Protecting admin @User:LadyofShalott) Terasail[✉️] 23:14, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm ambivalent on this. I don't think it needs protection, but given the history and fact that it's a school I'm not sure how successful unprotection would actually be. Welcome more thoughts. Wug·a·po·des 23:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Schools are a nightmare when it comes to vandalism that often targets real life youth. Terasail, I see you making the argument that protection is no longer needed because there is no vandalism. I could easily turn that around and say that there is no vandalism because the page is protected, so the protection should remain. On articles that have a history of abuse and the potential for real world harm to individuals, as an admin I'm going to err on the side of caution to protect these individuals.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 03:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is actually a forgotten indef semi used against a banned sock in 2008 (OP misread the log). Should be a procedural unprotect at this point. Also, looking through the page history, the protection literally did f-all to protect the page as the socking continued on that page throughout the years. There's no point, there never was. Page history looks quiet going back to 2018 and I don't think the semi is to thank for that. ~Swarm~ {sting} 06:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Downgraded to pending-changes protection for a month. Will watchlist, and if there's no great disruption, then that's that. Lectonar (talk) 09:29, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sunnymadi (talk) 04:28, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This movie is totally based on true events.in Wikipedia description only one way propaganda is mentioned. Kindly go through facts and maintain the credibility of Wikipedia

Declined. Please discuss improvements to the article on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:21, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the history here, I have an idea what article they've taken umbrage to, and I have accordingly issued the appropriate DS warning to the filer. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 06:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 10:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone keeps posting slanderous messages about other people in their family. This has nothing to do with the current life of Umapine, or facts about the town of Umapine. The paragraphs are only about other individual family members and things that happened in the 1980s. As soon as they are deleted the person comes back and puts them on. You can review this in the history. Smurphy2000 (talk) 00:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Smurphy2000, what do you mean keeps? I only see the one (which I WP:REVDEL'd). Possibly I missed it...? El_C 04:39, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed these comments twice. Another neighbor said they deleted it once also. So that would be three. There may be more.
Also, I am not sure if it was same person but happened at same time. In almost the same paragraph. Someone is putting in specific details of the murder mentioned. This has been distressing to the victims family. It was an especially brutal murder. They didn’t mind us referring to the crime, since it led to changes in Umapine. It isn’t really necessary to have morbid details of the tragedy in the page. The victim was a private citizen, not anyone famous.
I hope that makes sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smurphy2000 (talkcontribs)
Smurphy2000, I just was unable to find any other mentions of it on that page. If you find any other mentions of it that I might have missed, feel free to contact me personally on my talk page (User_talk:El_C) with the WP:DIFFs and I'll revdel those too. El_C 05:13, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
El C I think it's this (diff is the removal of it, it was added over 4 diffs previously). wizzito | say hello! 07:56, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh, right under my nose. Thanks. El_C 08:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP disruption. wizzito | say hello! 07:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:45, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:45, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP disruptive editing. wizzito | say hello! 08:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See page history; even if it's only 12-24 hours. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 11:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, yes bot...sheesh Lectonar (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent large removal of content by ip hoppers. Atlantic306 (talk) 11:34, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As new accounts are also involved, I've applied ECP. Jayron32 12:32, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is no vandalism or sock puppetry going on with this page anymore and neither is ECP required for this page now. ArnavSharma602 (talk) 04:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's probably due to the strict protection, it's not an indication that the behaviors will improve CreecregofLife (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No vandalism or sock puppetry is a feature of protection! @NJA. Pinging NJA, the protecting administrator, for their input (though they have not edited for a while). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. ECP is working just fine. Lectonar (talk) 10:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2016, the last 50 edits go back to 2016, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. Only 3 edit request have been made since the page has been protected and it does not get a lot of pageviews. The protection did its job and has not been providing anything useful since then (Protecting admin @User:Ponyo) Terasail[✉️] 23:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would want input from Ponyo before acting on this. I'd hesitate to completely unprotect in any case. Wug·a·po·des 00:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The page wasn't EC protected to prevent vandalism, it was protected to keep an LTA sockmaster, who is still active, from posting extensive BLP violations to the article. If the page views are minimal and only 3 edits requests have been made, then I fail to see why it should it should be unprotected to allow this BLP subject to continue to be open to abuse.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 03:18, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am curious what kinds of falsities were being added so bad enough that the revisions were deleted CreecregofLife (talk) 06:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Lectonar (talk) 09:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry through IPs (note: named account is unrelated). CMD (talk) 14:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question: @Ritchie333: Check my work? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:53, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of WP:LTA/BF101. wizzito | say hello! 09:34, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 13:58, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption resumed after recent automatic unprotection. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 11:23, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – It looks like each time the page protection finishes disruptive editing starts happening again. Gusfriend (talk) 11:52, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: H2H3fanbase2TP (talk · contribs) blocked by Jayron32. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RK777713/Archive. Jayron32 12:24, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seems a perennial problem. Lectonar (talk) 13:56, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See Lance Franklin. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 12:21, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism: over a long period, unregistered editors from multiple IP addresses have kept removing the word "unofficial" despite this having been opened for discussion on the Talk page (trying to avoid an Edit War), and despite authoritative sources having been given for the description as "unofficial" (no authoritative sources have been given for the stated view that it is the "official" national anthem). Ozaru (talk) 12:45, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On Jeremy Corbyn's page, it states 'He sits as an independent as of January 2022.' change this to 'He sits as an independent as of March 2022.', as he is still an independent.

He sits as an independent as of January 2022. ---> He sits as an independent as of March 2022.

195.195.40.250 (talk) 12:10, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 14:34, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 15:22, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:34, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Considerable long-term disruption by IPs and new accounts, including instances of egregious NPOV violations. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:24, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 15:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism - removing info & adding false information Pashtoisawesome (talk) 15:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Besides your own edits, this article has a total of 5 other edits in 2022, the last one weeks ago. If an editor removes sourced content again, please use warning templates and take to AIV if necessary. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:49, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry, I already pc'd it independently (unaware) of the above decline. My reasoning is that it took too long for the last re-correction (March 5-25). El_C 15:53, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of WP:LTA/BF101. wizzito | say hello! 09:34, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Wizzito: on the Stale end at this time. El_C 13:56, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinitive pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The IP insists on changing the initial sentence to the Crunchyroll article here on Wikipedia indicating that it is an entertainment company like Funimation, which is the main provider of dubbing and distribution of Asian content included in anime and drama and the truth is that I do not see that Crunchyroll is doing dubbing in mid-March after the merger with it if it only distributes, edits, produces and licenses anime for the following seasons. See: 1, 2, 3. 148.101.48.149 (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:45, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same disruption resumed after expiration of prior protection. MB 16:03, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP use of talk page as FORUM on subject's gender identity/transition. A. C. SantacruzPlease ping me! 16:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:42, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has a long history of vandalism and disruptive editing, which has continued even after several previous short-term protections. Since this is the sort of article that naturally attracts vandals, indefinite semi-protection is probably a good idea. Pending-changes protection might also be an option, although there seem to be far more unconstructive IP edits than constructive IP edits. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:25, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The last protection was attempted in 2017, so let's start with something temporary and soft.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:32, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous unsourced changes by IPs to nationality. Mellk (talk) 17:53, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Regular admin action. Might want to consider WP:ARBEE if needed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I am suspicious that blocked user Capitan Xavi Farhad is going after me with sock accounts. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent addition of unsourced information by Australia based IP users: . Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:17, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: Given that the IP user 114.75.148.145 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) has been adding this information to the article over several weeks, can I request a three month block for that IP and 49.197.125.4 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), which geolocates to the same area and is presumably the same person? (also geolocates to the same area Brooklyn Denaro states where they live in their instagram, which was linked in one of the edits) Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:26, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent ongoing vandalism related to trans swimmer from a number of IP addresses. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 18:38, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request permanent template-protection for this high-risk template. Currently 2237 transclusions. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:17, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:42, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More sockpuppetry from dynamic IPs following recent expiry of 2 protections. – DarkGlow19:29, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

173.186.201.37 (talk) 15:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 15:47, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of BLP resuming immediately upon expiration of previous semi-protection. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 20:08, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent edits violating WP:BLP and against consensus. General Ization Talk 20:28, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite Pending Changes remains in place once the semi expires. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dronebogus (talk) 21:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:18, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:ARBEE. Disruptive editing by IPs and new accounts continues on this page. RGloucester 22:22, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Regular admin action. Any admin can undo without an act of ArbCom --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: @RGloucester: May soon need an upgrade to WP:ECP --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant IP vandalism. BRDude70 (talk) 18:49, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:22, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Slow, but persistent, changes to sourced content by an IP hopper. – Uanfala (talk) 22:16, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:24, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

26 March 2022

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let's see if we can get these two to the talk page before heading blocks to both. Moxy- 22:25, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:35, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary Semi-protection - High levels of dubious IP and non-autoconfirmed editor activity in the past 24 hours, including vandalism (e.g. [132][133]) and additions to a BLP with sourcing problems (no sourcing [134][135], sourcing to YouTube [136][137]) Egsan Bacon (talk) 22:29, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:35, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 11 months of nothing but IP attempts to label the subject's brother, Bob Moran as an antivaxer. Meters (talk) 22:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:22, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Big spike in vandalism due to recent news item. Tony Fox (arf!) 23:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Persistent unexplained, or inadequately explained removal of content by multiple IPs. Has to do with the upcoming elections there, Phillipines is pretty well-known for its information wars online. BastianMAT (talk) 00:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism–4 IPs vandalising this page. Severestorm28 01:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CSG Marcomm. There has been persistent sockpuppetry on this page which is very infrequently edited (twinkle doesn't let me file with "persistent sockpuppetry" for pending changes). Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 01:42, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent unexplained , or inadequately explained removal of content by multiple IPs. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Sourced but negative WP:BLP. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:29, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:13, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I request for this page to have pending-changes protection indefinitely or at least a long period of time. It’s a disambiguation that gets hit with random acts of vandalism regularly. Vandalism seems to outnumber constructive edits. This is likely due to the pop culture influence of the musician Drake. There’s rarely anything useful to be added to this page in comparison to the frequency of persistent troll/vandalism edits. This page was temporarily protected at some point a few years ago, but alas in its current unprotected state, the article still gets vandalized for the same reasons. Temporary protection didn’t seem to change that paradigm. This will likely continue in some persistent manner for as long as Drake the musician is an actively famous popular public figure. Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 03:13, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If vandalism continues the protection can always be renewed at that time. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Recent death. Lots of IP edits breaking the infobox. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 03:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That ought to give things time to simmer down to a manageable level. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:23, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism is continuing. wizzito | say hello! 04:12, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected one month, followed by two months pending changes. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IPs, possibly dynamic. BilCat (talk) 04:05, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Swarm~ {sting} 05:25, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. An IP address massively removed contents without explaining UNITE TOGETHER, STRIVE FOR SURVIVAL! 04:29, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., as this IP range is already partially rangeblocked for sockpuppetry I've protected the page for more of an extended duration, also the IP has been blocked. ~Swarm~ {sting} 05:40, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. समता1988 (talk) 04:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Swarm~ {sting} 05:49, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 21:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Btspurplegalaxy: Could you elaborate? I am not familiar with the subject. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:39, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There's a high activity of IP users coming in and out, editing constantly. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 22:52, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's not against the rules. Unless they are actually vandalizing the article or in some other way behaving disruptively, we don't protect articles. As long as the edits are mostly constructive, that's a good thing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:36, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They don't seem to be constructive edits. Things are being changed randomly. It doesn't help that there isn't an edit summary of what the IP users are adding. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 01:23, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes, the two most recent edits seemed to make random changes to the tables of her victories - but two problem edits are not enough to justify protection. It's also hard to understand why you earlier reverted, in a single edit, more than a month's worth of edits by at least a dozen different people. I suggest you be more selective in your editing. MelanieN (talk) 03:24, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gaitinjammerkid (talk) 03:05, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent death of band member; As with the main Taylor Hawkins page, lots of additions of unsourced information about place of death by IP editors. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 05:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Swarm~ {sting} 05:52, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of an LTA; section blanking by this LTA after page protection expirations. See WP:LTA/WKHF for more detail, thanks. wizzito | say hello! 06:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of an LTA; section blanking by this LTA. See WP:LTA/WKHF for more detail, thanks. wizzito | say hello! 06:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of an LTA; section blanking by this LTA after page protection expirations. See WP:LTA/WKHF for more detail, thanks. wizzito | say hello! 06:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of an LTA; section blanking by this LTA after page protection expirations. See WP:LTA/WKHF for more detail, thanks. wizzito | say hello! 06:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of an LTA; section blanking by this LTA after page protection expirations. See WP:LTA/WKHF for more detail, thanks. wizzito | say hello! 06:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:40, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 08:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:48, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Weezer is thirty? Get out! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:49, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content; WP:CASTE. Ekdalian (talk) 08:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Other user is autoconfirmed anyway. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing over the last couple months, claiming that the show isn't cancelled, even though it has been over a year since the last new episode aired. BrickMaster02 (talk) 03:25, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined reread the page history, the last time an IP did that was back in January. Everyone else removing it since then has been an established editor. The last IP to edit the page was on your side, they readded that the show was over and they were reverted by an established editor. There's no need to protect the page because it's not coming from unregistered users, much less indef semi. Indef semi is an extreme last resort. ~Swarm~ {sting} 05:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Stop playing these anniversary games. 9/11 was not a joke. More than 2500 innocent people were killed. Having SP on such a page is injustice to the victims and their families. In the Pulwama attacks, only 40 something people were killed, which means 63 times less number of people were killed in the Pulwama attacks. Apart from that, this is a highly controversial page and will surely be subjected to disruptive editing in the future. I strongly reccomend having indefinite ECP on this page. Thanks. ArnavSharma602 (talk) 04:34, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~Swarm~ {sting} 05:43, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP addresses keep adding false, unsourced and random informations copy-pasted from other Nickelodeon channels and then redirect the other channels to this page ([138]). Thibaut (talk) 07:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Swarm~ {sting} 07:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: So many recent IP edits reverted, indicating either vandalism or test edits. George Ho (talk) 07:24, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 08:56, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 07:27, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 08:59, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr Salvus 07:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Getting to the business end of this international tournament and the IP vandalism is starting to increase. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:14, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Jeux sans frontières --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:14, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Curbon7 (talk) 08:54, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive edits by new users. AntonSamuel (talk) 09:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 09:14, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Six IP addresses have been adding in six nonsense or test edits for ten days since the 16th of March, and both user InfiniteNexus and I've reverted them six times since then, and the day before that, the former user reverted another six edits by five IP addresses, the latest one on the 10th of March and the earliest one dating all the way back to the 19th of January. -- PK2 (talk) 09:44, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP addresses reverting each other. Gusfriend (talk) 11:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Casino, what? El_C 11:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps adding unsourced content [139] [140] and removes sources [141], edit warring in the process. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:32, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IP is blocked for 31 hours but would request page protection for some time since IPs (possibly the same person) are active in this range. As can be seem by this IP's contribution which overlaps and very similar to the blocked one [142][143] [144] [145]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cypriot Chauvinist. FDW777 (talk) 08:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dude youre removing perfectly sourced, peer reviewed books, you cant just revert peoples edits then get mad when they bring it back, ive already gone to your talk page and asked you to discuss and you refuse and delete the message. 46.199.42.202 (talk) 08:37, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. IP blocked. El_C 09:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High traffic article with frequent vandalism. — Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 14:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Volume of editing is quite low but most ip edits have been unconstructive. Let's see if this helps. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:32, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is video proof, with joe biden himself saying he withheld the billion dollars until the prosecutor was fired, before he left in 6 hours. He laughed as he bragged about it. 2601:244:8301:B500:AC3C:AE88:971D:2A66 (talk) 21:38, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Please specify an article. And sources. Sumanuil. 21:47, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – No article specified and no sources provided. Favonian (talk) 10:26, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Continuous vandalism. See the article history [146]. Super Ψ Dro 14:40, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP editor repeatedly adding back unsourced material about living persons. Ravensfire (talk) 14:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:56, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 15:24, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This has been a low-frequency vandalism target for quite a while (since 2017 or so). Tol (talk | contribs) @ 15:27, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:12, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editors. dizzyflamingo (talk) 16:05, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IceWelder [] 17:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:36, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Steady vandalism today and yesterday by different users. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:54, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jmabel. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:30, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a request to restore Special:Diff/1068022507 to the last edit on 26th January 2022.

User FelicityWiki has made edits that subtly defames John Gordillo as you can tell by

  • unlinking his website
  • removing links to his "Podcast for Kel" podcast
  • editing the main content to make it seem less favourable about his achievements and
  • editing to seem he's generally an unfavorable character

I know John Gordillo personally and have given my attention to this so I created an account to appeal to administrators to have the page restored to the last version before FelicityWiki edited the page who we both believe it's someone who has continually engaged in online harassment against John on every social media platform and now seeks to defame him further.

John and I have decided to directly appeal to administrators instead of engaging FelicityWiki as, historically she has been hostile and we both believe this would be a waste of time. We are appealing for swift action on these defamatory edits which can clearly be differentiated by reading the current Vs previous versions. Comedymod (talk) 13:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Comedymod, the page is not protected, so this is not the correct forum for your problem. Please try to settle your disputes on the talk page first, and if this fails, you can request a third opinion or try other methods of dispute resolution. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 15:33, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is now at WP:ANI#FelicityWiki reported by Comedymod. Archiving from here.
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Quite a lot of vandalism in a month's time. Therefore, please set this security. Drummingman Talk 17:13, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:44, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:44, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism after previous protection expired. Mellk (talk) 20:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:53, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The pending changes protection is redundant with the semi-protection, as all edits will be auto accepted. Don't see a need for the former. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 19:03, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done PC protection reset. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Bianca Anne Martins (talk) 18:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Split discussion is ongoing, but multiple editors believe it should be an article, without participating in the discussion. Elijahandskip (talk) 20:46, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. User Elijahand deleted the article without any discussion! He is vandal, not me. Please restore the article and use the full deletion proccess. Reverting unjustifed deletion which did not follow proper procedure, if you have a problem with this take it to WP:AFD. 46.211.111.220 (talk)
Noting that Ip was alerted of the discussion two times on their talk page. Elijahandskip (talk) 20:55, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppety/LTA, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071 and Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/KızılBörü1071 FDW777 (talk) 21:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gadfium. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

27 March 2022

Reason: User Annapiccioni director of marketing for Energy Vault keeps updating the page to sound more like an advertisement for the company. Requesting some level of protection to keep the page from being an advertising tool. Snickerdoooodle (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruption from a single user doesn't merit protection. Issue warnings and report to WP:COIN if warnings are not heeded. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the recommended course of action. I will go this route and only request protection of the article in the case that multiple employees attempt to do the same. Snickerdoooodle (talk) 21:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant IP vandalism. dizzyflamingo (talk) 22:14, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 22:42, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of and persistent IP vandalism. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:41, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The fans of other actors edit the page with bad aims. JZ1640 (talk) 22:44, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No disruption since previous protection expired. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – it may be possible recreating this template. it should to be need protection. HurricaneEdgar 23:27, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only recreated once, and that was not intentionally disruptive. If this becomes recurrent, drop me a line. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:36, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP addresses are updating the page before an official announcement is made of him signing with a new team. Policy is to wait for an official announcement. Rockchalk717 01:49, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 02:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Death rumour on internet, experiencing a lot of vandalism and disruptive editing. CaffeinAddict (talk) 01:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 02:13, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent messing-with-numbers and addition of unsourced content. This has been going on for a very long while... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:14, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Levels of Vandalism. 115.188.90.19 (talk) 04:44, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 07:03, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – over the past few months this page has seen repeated vandalism by IP editors and addition of uncited info - considering WP:BLP I am requesting semi-protection. dizzyflamingo (talk) 05:44, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 07:06, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blanking vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 05:57, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 07:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much vandalism occuring in the box office section along with the MOS of the page. SP013 (talk) 04:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: He died two days ago and there's been persistent vandalism from IPs ever since. I think the page should be protected for at least a week. Zoolver (talk) 08:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems my one day wasn't long enough, so let's do it your way this time. Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism; people adding fortnite references. wizzito | say hello! 09:57, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: LTA, see User:Beyond My Ken/Brescia LTA. FDW777 (talk) 10:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 11:24, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 11:34, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 11:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Multiple IPs and now socks attacking this page Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:13, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection. Ssvlogs369 (talk) 10:56, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Ssvlogs369 Warned. Ssvlogs369, you are not permitted to remove the WP:AFD notice, please desist. El_C 11:26, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting reduction of full protection because she is heading toward career notability independent of her parents as an adult and as a screenwriter; she will inevitably have her own article in the foreseeable future. Trillfendi (talk) 15:43, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be saying she is not notable at present but may be sometime in the future. I suggest you wait until she is before requesting unprotection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:48, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, if it’s taken that way then I guess waiting is the best choice. Trillfendi (talk) 05:11, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:39, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: no longer needed. wizzito | say hello! 10:00, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.
Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Prone to IP Vandalism Vaishu1005 (talk) 11:44, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 12:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:43, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of edit warring. Users are updating with speculation of upcoming seasons which haven't yet been confirmed. Millzipede (talk) 13:03, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant vandalism, see the article's history [147]. Super Ψ Dro 13:14, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:46, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because libel and slander are not factual and that is what specific editors have established regarding Molyneux. Molyneux has a diverse opinion which changes and has helped a broad crowd on broad issues. 2600:1009:B040:828A:A850:CAA0:C7D8:64B3 (talk) 21:53, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well that’s just not true--CreecregofLife (talk) 22:01, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The comment was triggered because the target page wasn’t identified and is referring to Example Article Name--CreecregofLife (talk) 22:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There's highly unlikely to be a need to unprotect this page before its automatic expiry in November. If you'd like to edit this specific article, please create an account or make an edit request instead. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:56, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Couresy ping Bishonen.
Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:56, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:56, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Proxying, abusive vandal on this page and others. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:00, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:48, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Proxying, abusive vandal on this page and others. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:04, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:49, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Proxying, abusive vandal on this page and others. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:50, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Proxying, abusive vandal on this page and others. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:12, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:51, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – It took only three days after the expiration of the protection template for disruption to resume. This article is better off protected imo, considering its long history of ethno-nationalistic disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:56, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Long term disruption despite multiple temporary protections. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:59, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Proxying, abusive vandal on this page and others. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:59, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Proxying, abusive vandal on this page and others. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:59, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user from Indonesia tries to implement his wording on several road signs pages without any explanation or explicit motivation. ZH8000 (talk) 16:12, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 114.122.128.0/18 x 2 weeks. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:29, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user from Indonesia tries to implement his wording on several road signs pages without any explanation or explicit motivation. ZH8000 (talk) 16:14, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 114.122.128.0/18 x 2 weeks. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:29, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user from Indonesia tries to implement his wording on several road signs pages without any explanation or explicit motivation. ZH8000 (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 114.122.128.0/18 x 2 weeks. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:29, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user from Indonesia tries to implement his wording on several road signs pages without any explanation or explicit motivation. ZH8000 (talk) 16:34, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last vandalism was in February. However after checking the ranges contrib log, it has become clear that they have been on a vandalism rampage going back months and covering hundreds of edits. Accordingly I have extended the block to six months. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:40, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user from Indonesia tries to implement his wording on several road signs pages without any explanation or explicit motivation. ZH8000 (talk) 16:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Range blocked x 6 months. See above.Ad Orientem (talk) 16:46, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page vandalism Ahmed Calaango (talk) 16:43, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user from Indonesia tries to implement his wording on several road signs pages without any explanation or explicit motivation. ZH8000 (talk) 16:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @ZH8000: Please stop posting page protection requests. I have range blocked this user for six months. If the vandalism starts again before then you may drop me a line on my talk page or ping me as that would indicate they are accessing an IP outside the range I blocked. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user from Indonesia tries to implement his wording on several road signs pages without any explanation or explicit motivation. ZH8000 (talk) 16:46, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:53, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user from Indonesia tries to implement his wording on several road signs pages without any explanation or explicit motivation. ZH8000 (talk) 16:49, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:53, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from user using different IPs everyday, adding unsourced content. Same kind of edits in Kaiji 2 and Kaiji: Final Game. Xexerss (talk) 17:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject of the article is a BLP recently arrested for sex crimes. The article has been targeted by trolls. I suggest long-term protection to limit future BLP violations. User:Namiba 17:33, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:57, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Vaishu1005 (talk) 17:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:40, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Edits against WP:ARBPIA despite no relation to the conflict. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Levels of Vandalism. Devin Muir (talk) 17:40, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:44, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent Vandalism. Proxying, abusive vandal on this page and others MN Shenoy (talk) 16:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:33, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:33, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring with relation to the subject's pronouns. Pink changed his/her/their Twitter bio to "she/them", but it is almost certainly a joke, given the subject's past remarks and provocations, and the fact that the Twitter avatar was also changed to a portrait that was obviously processed through some phone app.. ili (talk) 18:30, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 41.114.171.115 (talk) 14:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Insufficient information. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:19, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. AK965 (talk) 08:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent financial vandalism by IPs and new users : [148] [149] [150] [151] [152]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:48, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Not worth Pending Changes - it's only a redirect. Qwerfjkltalk 19:58, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ad Orientem (talk) 20:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent & on-going vandalism since 04/02/2022; image of comic actor Norman Wisdom (Norman Wisdom Peel IoM 2005 -CCR27366-.jpg) repeatedly being input in infobox for actor William Simons. Image used is clearly inappropriate for use in this article in this capacity. Domhnallbeag (talk) 20:19, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:29, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: no longer needed; was protected in 2016. wizzito | say hello! 09:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be fine with unprotecting this page; pinging Bishonen for potential objections. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:19, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see some crazy person protected the page indefinitely in 2016. Lord have mercy. No, no objections, ToBeFree. Bishonen | tålk 19:09, 27 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]
😅 Well then.
...But you've already unprotected the page! :)
Already done. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

28 March 2022

Reason: High level of one-time IP edits, adding the same picture to the heading. See [153] and Talk page [154] and page edit history. I have already moved pic to the Film section and they keep adding it back to the header. Tropic Wolf (talk) 18:28, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like this is being addressed at WP:3RRN. Also we don't protect pages except in cases of very widespread disruptive editing where lesser measures either have failed or obviously won't work. That is not the case here. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:56, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't actually being addressed, the editing is disruptive, and I don't know exactly what measure is supposed to work when he is jumping from computer to computer and refuses to justify his edits or engage in discussion or heed any warning. ~~ Tropic Wolf (talk) 03:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor is ignoring my attempts to discuss a content issue on the talk page (see Talk:Body Offering (novel)#25 years in lead). DanCherek (talk) 21:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If attempts at communication have failed and/or you believe the editor is behaving disruptively, you may request intervention at WP:ANI. However, be sure you have exhausted other courses of action first, and if appropriate, issued a formal warning. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 21:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Page has been a running target for IP vandalism. Curbon7 (talk) 21:51, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:56, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 22:06, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:05, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to edit this page as a lot of information is missing. Angole17637 (talk) 07:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please make an edit request on the article talk page to request a specific edit to the article. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:14, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:34, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Swagging (talk) 23:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:08, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent unsourced additions after the splitting from Absolute pitch, whose page is already temporarily semi-protected. Liamyangll (talk to me!) 00:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edits from a variety of IPs adding the word "racist" to the lead. Marchijespeak/peek 01:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Someone on different IP keeps making changes without explanation or apparent notice of my edit summary: "Back to last stable version, this broke refs, added dab links, blocks of unsourced/likely copied and unattibuted text, and changes made with no explanation or edit summary". MB 01:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. per ARBIPA. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tayi Arajakate Talk 02:28, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recently several IP editors have been making unconstructive and unreferenced edits in the last 24 hours. Inter&anthro (talk) 03:25, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:29, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increase to semi-protected due to high levels of vandalism. Devin Muir (talk) 03:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 03:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increase to semi-protected due to high levels of vandalism. Devin Muir (talk) 04:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Devin Muir (talk) 04:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I almost declined as not enough disruptive activity, but seeing as there's no real constructive editing going on from IPs or new users and with the low edit rate Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:15, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has resumed... This is still linked from the main page, probably should be extended for a bit longer. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 80 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to tonight's events at the oscars, has been receiving IP vandalism. dizzyflamingo (talk) 04:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:45, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent protection: vandalism edit by new user on fairly widely used, single character template. Rare need for anyh editing. Adakiko (talk) 05:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 06:46, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism since the last protection expired. ManaliJain (talk) 05:46, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to tonight’s events, persistent vandalism. dizzyflamingo (talk) 06:27, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:39, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: No need for IP to edit this. Moxy- 06:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 06:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increased amount of IP Vandalism ScienceisAmazing (talk) 04:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia users have also been contributing blatantly false information to the page. ScienceisAmazing (talk) 04:42, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Johnuniq (talk) 06:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dizzyflamingo (talk) 06:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Looking through the history it seems that there has always been a high level of IP users coming though and messing with the article. I think having it set as indefinite would help with the IP users. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 07:46, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Page has never been protected before; disruption far from havy enough to warrant semi-protection at the moment. @Btspurplegalaxy: Please read our protection policy if you haven't done so already. Lectonar (talk) 08:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of AfD template by IP editor(s). Semi-protection for long enough to allow the AfD process to take its course - or just speedy delete it - it's crap after all. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism of an IP giving Dunne 9 children and 3 wives, contrary to the sources given. Most likely due to an anti-traveller stance. The Banner talk 09:27, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Everything shown in The Kashmir Files is 100% true based on evidences documented in public domain . The article portrays it to be fictional which is wrong . Violation of truth is being done in open in this article . Violation of sentiments of victims is done here . Please make it editable so that real things can be portrayed .106.202.230.161 (talk) 06:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is most probably not in the public domain, but please check out the last 2 or 3 pages of RFPP Decrease archives for reasons on why this page will most likely not be unprotected CreecregofLife (talk) 07:07, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 07:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
176.205.152.91 (talk) 07:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 07:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism; Also a really famous current event Imsome1 (talk) 08:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Within a day of the protection being removed, persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing resumed. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:14, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurrent IP vandalism. Iskandar323 (talk) 11:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dizzyflamingo (talk) 04:17, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: disruptive editings by IP vandal 103.110.10.126 that again & again misrepresented sources while pretentiously telling others to "Be honest with History" Erminwin (talk) 12:28, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PCPP is not helping; almost all IP edits are unsourced. wizzito | say hello! 13:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of five years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA with highly dynamic IPs continuing to edit right off of page protection. See this ANI thread for context: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1093#Hoaxing,_personal_attacks,_etc._by_constant_IP_hopper_in_Italy. wizzito | say hello! 14:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jibran1998 (talk) 15:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:02, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Chief minister submits resignation, however the resignation is yet to be approved by the Governor. Jibran1998 (talk) 15:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dove's talk (talk) 09:26, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: "And your wise-men don't know//how it feels//to be thick-- as a brick" --Jethro Tull --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Russian criminals keep sabotaging the page. It's Odesa in the town's native language. Not Odessa. 85.229.114.17 (talk) 13:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There are not any Russian criminals sabotaging the page. This is a normal editing dispute. Take it up on the article talk page. Jayron32 14:05, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent financial vandalism, removal of sourced content by IPs and new users [155] [156] [157] [158] [159] [160] [161]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:07, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent Vandalism Sneha04 (talk) 13:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of an LTA; resumed their editing right off page protections. See WP:LTA/WKHF, thanks. wizzito | say hello! 13:32, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: Only one user involved, who has stopped after final warning. Not currently seeing justification for protection but I will leave open in case another sysop has a different view. Stifle (talk) 14:20, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But come back if necessary. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of an LTA; resumed their editing right off page protections. See WP:LTA/WKHF, thanks. wizzito | say hello! 13:32, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:35, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of an LTA. See WP:LTA/WKHF, thanks. wizzito | say hello! 13:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of an LTA. See WP:LTA/WKHF, thanks. wizzito | say hello! 13:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of an LTA; see User:EvergreenFir/socks#31_Minutos_(Sao_Paulo,_Brazil), thanks. wizzito | say hello! 13:42, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Borderline, but besides the spike today, there's not much activity. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism resumed right off page protection. wizzito | say hello! 14:05, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:26, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SSSB (talk) 16:42, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 16:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tournament going on and being vandalised a lot in the past hour. Réunion (talk to me) 16:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jibran1998 (talk) 16:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Various IP users constantly removing referenced information ever since the article was created Elserbio00 (talk) 17:42, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:08, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of content. Tommi1986 let's talk! 17:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 18:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing/vandalism over sporadic periods of time from either Turko or Afghan nationalists, I request an indefinite protection over the page, as this has been happening for a long time, just over sporadic periods of time. Noorullah21 (talk) 17:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:18, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level disruptive editing going on [162], [163],[164],[165], [166]. Requesting temporary/Indefinite ECP protection. R.COutlander07@talk 17:58, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A lot of vandalism and unsourced or poorly sourced content. Swagging (talk) 18:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 18:39, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The anniversary for 9/11 has long passed, so not much vandalism will likely be encountered on this page until the date inevitably comes again. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 12:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion:: last protecting admin: any thoughts on that? I wouldn't it deem wise to unprotect the article, though. Lectonar (talk) 12:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just because the anniversary passes (a weird yet somewhat interesting thing to say around its halfway point) doesn’t mean it doesn’t come around again. I feel like 9/11-related articles will always attract conspiratorial people without the proper precautions CreecregofLife (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. Is there a way that I can withdraw this? CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 14:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:39, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing is slowly continuing after semi-protection ran out; I think some longer-term pending changes protection would help. Bsoyka (talk) 19:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP's possible WP:BLP violations -->[167] I attempted talking to them about the way BLP articles should be written[168], but unsuccessfully. The IP keeps reverting. Please inspect and maybe protect the page temporarily. GizzyCatBella🍁 19:14, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work, GizzyCatBella!
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dizzyflamingo (talk) 19:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Just like Schindler's list , this movie depicts the true story of the genocide faced by Hindus in the Kashmir valley in the late 1980s and 1990s and has been validated by victims and their families too.Calling a film based on true stories of violence against kashmiri pandit community a fictional story and infact falsely accusing the film of inciting violence against Muslim based on one off incident is like making mockery of their suffering. Kashmir genocide is a well documented fact , where more than 500000 were forced to leave their homes and more than 4000 were killed just because they refused to convert to Islam. Even after 30 years , they have not been able to return.We are not against any religion but the voice of the minority/oppressed shouldn't be suppressed too. Plead with folded hands to allow people accurately present the facts, the current form seems to be an opinion of someone who didn't want the truth to be told 223.233.78.98 (talk) 17:26, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. —C.Fred (talk) 17:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

only one word kindly Remove Fictionally word Sams1828 (talk) 17:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done the word is sourced and you haven't demonstrated it is incorrect. (CC) Tbhotch 17:35, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. eviolite (talk) 20:45, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:02, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition of unsourced content by IPs regarding the subject's tennis ranking - she will not be no. 1 until Ashleigh Barty officially retires, which should occur on 4 April. Bonoahx (talk) 21:05, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of until 2022-04-05, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-Protection: Due to vandalism as a result of the related event that took place in the 94th Academy Awards. Lidistat67 (talk) 21:35, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:45, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – 3 IPs–possibly sockpuppets, vandalising page in a 15 hour period. Severestorm28 21:24, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:29, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ukrainian vandals returned after they have figured out that the previous protection has expired. Ymblanter (talk) 21:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:28, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent vandalism. Eg224 (talk) 22:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:27, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:20, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

29 March 2022

Reason: Dynamic IPs (possibly same person) repeatedly adding incorrect information that subject had the title Sir [169] [170] [171] [172] [173] [174] or was even a British citizen. It has already been discussed on talk page that honorary knights (those who aren't subjects of the Queen) are not called Sir, which is widely covered in sources [175] and it is fragrantly false that the subject was a British citizen, he just got an honorary medal from Britain. This user seems to live to add this false information over and over again, never with an edit summary. Unknown Temptation (talk) 21:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term pending changes would be recommended so that these disruptive edits can be subject to review. Semi-protection may be useless due to user returning to a page with few watchers. Unknown Temptation (talk) 22:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article Ali Ahmeti has also been targeted by this user with a similar type of addition. --Local hero talk 22:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi one week to both pages. Plus both added to my watchlist. Blocking three /64s for a month. Let's see what happens. Thanks for the eyes. BusterD (talk) 22:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 22:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 22:35, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by IP since yesterday, readding unsourced changes. Request to protect page for atleast 2 weeks or longer. MehmoodS (talk) 22:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification, MehmoodS; as yours appear to be unsourced as well, I have removed the disputed content for now. Feel free to restore it with the required citation.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:24, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you ToBeFree. You are right in removing most of it as after double checking the sources, I couldn't find any of the names except for the name of the leader Shivaji. The citations that support it are under Background section. MehmoodS (talk) 23:29, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Curbon7 (talk) 22:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism after previous protection expired. Mellk (talk) 23:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 00:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. EthanGaming7640 00:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 00:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Or a rangeblock. (CC) Tbhotch 23:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A04:4A43:53BF:E31E:F5C3:6F68:D824:6444 (talk · contribs) blocked by BusterD. Blocked the /64, which covered all ip edits in the last few weeks. BusterD (talk) 23:18, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 23:24, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is always going to attract vandalism. Ironmatic1 (talk) 23:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent meme vandalism ("one private tripped and fell"). Jprg1966 (talk) 01:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. in my opinion, the page does not qualify for semi-protection, given how the last disruption before the most recent edits was a few weeks ago. It is a persistent issue, however. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:31, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Vitaium (talk) 22:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hate replying to RfPPs, as it is not a non-admin's business, but this is yet another in a long line of bad requests submitted by Vitaium. May be worth seeking an RfPP-TBAN at this point. Curbon7 (talk) 23:05, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Frivolous report Bbb23 (talk) 01:08, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 05:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 06:02, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the extensive history of protection and continuing vandalism, Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:10, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 23:02, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leave me be, I was here 5th! Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 08:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Almost all edits made by non-autoconfirmed editors are either vandalism, or persistently replacing committed suicide with died by suicide despite consensus having been reached on the talk page and no new consensus having been reached about it since. Increasing this article to semi-protection would save a lot of trouble for pending changes reviewers who have to constantly revert back to consensus since the person/people are not discussing on the talk page. TylerBurden (talk) 23:14, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 08:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Urgent - Pls have a look at the talk page - many revert by confirmed editors and pls protect the page just to allow admin to edit until the consensus is truely reach as it removed all the SNG sport in Wikipedia. This need to be ready look at. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 01:27, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:24, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Seems like this template’s doc have become a target of vandalism; it have been replaced numerous times with unrelated contents. UNITE TOGETHER, STRIVE FOR SURVIVAL! 04:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 08:27, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – birthdate changes due to questionable age. Will120 (talk) 05:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:29, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, continuous arbitrary editing without any source of information or referenceIamritwikaryan (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 08:31, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continual attempts to recreate page by anonymous users despite it not qualifying for WP:GNG. Yes, Amy Rose is a popular Sonic character, but she is not discussed enough by secondary sources to be considered notable for a separate page (most of the article relies on primary sources). - Shadowboxer2005 (talk) 08:40, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:03, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of eight weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:25, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Wretchskull (alt) (talk) 10:10, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:28, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 36.37.239.2 (talk) 02:28, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. No way to tell which page this request is about. El_C 08:25, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. promotion Venkat TL (talk) 10:12, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:40, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism. ongoing event for next 2 months, so imagine there were will be spurious editing from IPs for a couple of months. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:03, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 11:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by IP user after 4th warning. Bonoahx (talk) 09:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. By Widr. Ks0stm (TCGE) 09:08, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

36.37.239.2 (talk) 02:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 09:55, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tidy420 (talk) 02:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 09:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Dronebogus (talk) 10:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 13:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Knuthove (talk) 12:08, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism problem. wizzito | say hello! 14:51, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:33, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:54, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:34, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism occurring as of today. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:36, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, including homophobic and anti-semitic attacks, currently featured on main page. Nosferattus (talk) 15:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandals as at Kiril Petkov‎, which was recently protected. Knuthove (talk) 16:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism or generally not helpful edits 213.55.220.81 (talk) 14:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:51, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – same guy. Thibaut (talk) 16:31, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:59, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs vandalizing the article in a short timeframe. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 16:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will re-protect if necessary. Sdrqaz (talk) 17:24, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lots of vandalism, 52% of the past 50 edits are vandalism. InterstateFive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 16:55, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated mass additions of NN people by dynamic IP - Arjayay (talk) 10:58, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:10, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – One account constantly copying the contents of another page in this one, as he does not seem to understand "requested moves". The Banner talk 13:45, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We do not protect pages from one or two editors. If you believe this editor is behaving disruptively and has been adequately warned, you may request intervention at WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem: I have blocked the user in question (Webbloger) from all three of the pages in question. If you disagree with it, I can lift it. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No issues. It looks like a good block to me. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – One account constantly copying the contents of this page to another page and redirecting in this one, as he does not seem to understand "requested moves". The Banner talk 13:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We do not protect pages from one or two editors. If you believe this editor is behaving disruptively and has been adequately warned, you may request intervention at WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – One account constantly removing the redirect. The Banner talk 13:51, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We do not protect pages from one or two editors. If you believe this editor is behaving disruptively and has been adequately warned, you may request intervention at WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Partial block. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple new and IP editors adding unsourced defamatory accusations to BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 17:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IP. WikiLinuz {talk} 🍁 13:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This looks like a single editor operating in the 117.209.128.0/17 range. I suggest a careful review of their edits. If they are clearly disruptive, request intervention at WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:25, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user continues to vandalize this page with links to Mr. Bungle, a completely unsourced and incorrect edit. As many times as I revert these edits, they're added back. RobotGoggles (talk) 18:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I would like to redirect this page to Wikipedia:Main Page/sandbox. I can see myself using this redirect a lot. Interstellarity (talk) 10:54, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:57, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – New biography about recently deceased person has had three vandals adding unsourced hateful cause-of-death info in as many days. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP hopping editor repeatedly adding unsourced content. They also personally attacked me and another editor in their edit summaries. Xfansd (talk) 20:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Make it redirect to 9000 (number)#9001 to 9099. (9001 can only be created by administrators/sysops.) Viewer719/Contribs! 11:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 19:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Dronebogus (talk) 16:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:02, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extensive and continuous sockpuppetry, see [176]. I can't start a new sockpuppet investigation every time someone edits the page. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:25, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:SOCK - in recent days, a persistent sock puppeteer has gone round editing this page, thus doing some block evasion in a short space of time since last protection was expired. Their edit summary "Added some new information" [177] is a clue a couple of experienced editors have noticed that socking is going on while editing that page. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent influx of vandalism. Eridian314 (talk) 17:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC) Never mind. A few friends of mine were vandalizing it, and promised to stop. protection is no longer needed. Eridian314 (talk) 17:53, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor @Eridian314: I would caution your "friends" that they are exactly one disruptive edit from being blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem: Are you saying "friends" as in they're sockpuppets (which they are not), or something else? Just want to clarify. Eridian314 (talk) 18:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am saying that I don't have friends who vandalize Wikipedia (AFAIK). And if I discovered any, I would make sure they understood my strongest disapproval. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Just freaked out. My bad. Eridian314 (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. LTA — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:28, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by RoySmith Ad Orientem (talk) 18:33, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. More than half of the edits on the most recent history page are either vandalism or reversion of vandalism, mostly from IPs. Can be expected to continue, given the long-term prominence and controversy of Xi. TheOfficially (talk) 21:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. due to the extensive history of prior semi-protection and ongoing vandalism. Ks0stm (TCGE) 21:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruptive editing by IP addresses. McClenon mobile (talk) 21:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism adding the same content repeatedly over time. All additions appear to be legit but are actually blatantly false/irrelevant information. IP editor(s) seem to be reposting from multiple addresses. Page was protected late last year for disruptive edits. A new round of these disruptive edits began February this year. Teancum (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page was protected about six years ago due to persistent WP:GAMECRUFT violations. All edits since the template was put in place after that time period have been put in by registered, confirmed users, and vandalism has been nonexistent. 68.224.243.48 (talk) 20:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. El_C 21:58, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Four different IPs vandalising with the same change. signed, Willondon (talk) 22:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:28, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aircorn (talk) 22:28, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the way down the page, someone used a template to request an edit to Exodus Kashmiri Hindus, which of course didn't exist. This, in turn, causes issues elsewhere. Could you simply replace "Exodus Kashmiri Hindus" with the correct "Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus"? 49.198.51.54 (talk) 19:25, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 22:36, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 22:58, 29 March 2022 (UTC) As I search this page, both user (with anonymous user and with the name user) looks like having an edit war after they added, removed, re-added again and being removed even the source applied. I hope this page would need protecting like for 1 week to avoid edit war. Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:04, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 23:55, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to add Greece in terms of diplomatic support to Jugoslavija LaithAzn (talk) 04:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. You also did not indicate which article you are requestingJayron32 16:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 19:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Madesh Babu (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 19:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

30 March 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 01:36, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:43, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP / user vandalism Liv is alive (talk) 01:37, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 02:14, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 02:18, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Sakiv (talk) 00:14, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:19, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. eviolite (talk) 01:31, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:33, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jayj222000 (talk) 03:04, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent disruptive editing by user Vivianwrme. This user constantly changes and adds skewed information that could result in a false and negative image being cast on the actor whom the page is about. Several different users have attempted to correct the information many times, but user Vivianwrme continues to vandalize the page afterward. St0P3ditin5 (talk) 02:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 05:59, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:17, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to persistent disruption from trolling sock, request semi-indef - wolf 06:43, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:56, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, Thewolfchild, but we don't normally indefinitely protect user talk pages. I've blocked the user and semi-protected for one day; if they come back you are more than welcome to request protection again. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:56, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ks0stm: thanks for responding. A couple things, can you check the settings? It appears it expires the same time as when you added. Also, this has been going on for weeks now, same person, multiple ip addresses and registered accounts... could a longer period be considered? Lastly, I only asked about the indef becuase of the recent discussion about the list of uaerpages that are pp-indef. (I can't find it rigjht now, but maybe you know what I mean? It was from just a couple days ago.) Thanks again - wolf 07:09, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Thewolfchild: I was just circling back to say that after some digging I found the SPI for the sock farm that's been harassing you, and I filed a report with the latest ones from your user talk. Considering the sockmaster's extensive history, I went ahead and extended your semi to three months. I would recommend that you create a page like User talk:Thewolfchild/Unprotected talk, prominently link it from your user talk page and watchlist it; this will allow you to still get messages from IPs and new users without the disruption of new message notifications if the socks attack it. Ks0stm (TCGE) 07:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 07:19, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, as per usual for this page. – Rhain 07:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:22, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: John Campbell (YouTuber) does not spread misinformation. 2A02:1810:3E12:100:908D:FAD3:C230:2705 (talk) 01:30, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Well, the WP:CONSENSUS right now seems to be that he does do that. A challenge to that is not grounds for unprotection. Rather, the expectation is for that to be attempted on Talk:John Campbell (YouTuber), with an emphasis on attribution from reliable sources (and reliable medical sources, specifically, when applicable). The protection summary lists Arbitration enforcement: WP:COVIDDS as its basis. El_C 01:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruptions/vandalisms to the lead/ib by IPs and new accounts, going on for quite sometime now. A mid-term semi is required. Gotitbro (talk) 08:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Low edit rate for semi, so Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:23, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term pending changes: – getting hit with ongoing IP troll/vandal edits. Seems to be usually just a few words, and similar types of edits most times, and doesn’t appear to be any repeat offenders if at all. Mostly just “drive-by” type of edits. Semi-protect would probably excessively kill the ability of general users to edit. It seems like some unregistered IPs and new users are contributing well-intentioned edits. Pending changes protection would weed out most of the bad edits while still letting the good edits flow through. (Mrbeastmodeallday)(talk) 09:15 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:30, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 09:38, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 09:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations with different IPs. - SUN EYE 1 08:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:05, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:05, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 09:43, 30 March 2022 (UTC) Idk if this page was protected but this IP user keeps editing and disrupt the page without any providing any reliable sources plus this is considered as IP vandalism. I hope this page will be protect like 1 month or depends what's your decision. Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 09:43, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Our old friend VXFC is back again on open calendar articles, IP hopping (xref WP:LTA/VXFC). Very few GF edits from genuine IP editors to this long-stable article. John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:17, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPv6 range & IPv4 have been trying to add nonsense over the past week. Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:14, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism Arubamadness (talk) 10:32, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 11:18, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent multiple user vandalism/gender slurs. BilCat (talk) 14:23, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 14:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"change fictional storyline to real-life incident inspired ". Akhileshwar3 (talk) 11:35, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Ongoing discussion on article talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 11:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism MN Shenoy (talk) 12:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @MN Shenoy: you have resumed the edit war. You and others may end up being blocked and/or the page will be back in full protection. Favonian (talk) 12:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive Editing by Multiple users. SkyTheWolf (Talk) 12:16, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Three edits since December is not enough to justify protection. Jayron32 14:04, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Dealer07, using sockpuppets and IPs from Greece. Binksternet (talk) 16:31, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by user who keeps referring to the singer as "German" while not providing a respectable source for their sayings. 89.210.55.8 (talk) 16:36, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And they just rved my edit there. 89.210.55.8 (talk) 16:37, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 15:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple IP editors changing his status in company in the lead, contrary to what the sources and the article says. Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:42, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death. JMHamo (talk) 16:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:04, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dizzyflamingo (talk) 18:14, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 20:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Series of edit warring by IPs/blocked SPA. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:22, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A perfectly logical thing to give a little bit of breathing space. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're quite right. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:05, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing, probably by the same old 2a02 IP troublemaker. ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 20:17, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 20:23, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because this page has been heavily fixed. All required touch up's have been edited and fixed. From what it looks like, the page was originally protected years ago from a potential Wikipedia spam account? The original wiki account that tried publishing an article on this topic appears to be suspended or deleted.

Im currently in the process of writing a draft for this article and would love the chance to post this when the article is fully complete.

I have attached the draft article below as well as my sandbox link that helps prove that all sources are reliable.

Draft:BADVOID Sandbox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GenesisGSE/sandbox GenesisGSE (talk) 15:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Wait for the AfC review. If the draft is approved, it will be moved to article space. Favonian (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

31 March 2022

Reason: IP editors consistently adding fake content to the article. They add citations (that are reliable) but do not contain the information they are citing. They consistenly add the actor "Ray Strachan" to the article when this actor is nowhere to be found in the sources they are citing. IPs have been known to spam this actor on Wikipedia; please see Draft:Ray Strachan. Drovethrughosts (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked the IP's range; they've been spamming unsourced (or poorly sourced) stuff about RS all over the place. I suspect a hoax; I've seen this before, someone is able to inject a name into a few user-editable cast lists, and then other sources pick up the name. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long time vandal hopping between different IPs and several new users. Goes at least as far back as October 2021: [178]. Knuthove (talk) 20:38, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:41, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring, repeated addition of WP:OR list of arbitrary protagonists by frequent IP hopper. Largoplazo (talk) 21:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. firefly ( t · c ) 21:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content over a long period of time. Loafiewa (talk) 21:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:43, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection needed as network is closing tonight and the usual gang of IPs has been trying to insert false or superfluous (and unsourced) information about last shows and sign-offs, including YouTube links and the like. Nate (chatter) 22:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:45, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from an IPv6 user despite multiple warnings: [179]. Temporary edit block may be needed for this page. 106.213.62.31 (talk) 16:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:36, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content/OR by IP. BilCat (talk) 16:14, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:37, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The talk page has been subjected to several weeks of IPs adding nonsense, often just one word and signature. Maybe a few weeks of protection will discourage them. BilCat (talk) 16:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be part of a pattern at numerous other articles. It seems to be from a wide range of IPs which, apparently, is too large for a range block without collateral damage. A very large number of articles would require similar treatment. This has previously been raised at WP:ANI. A bright idea is required in this case. 86.167.69.234 (talk) 18:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:39, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think that this page should be semi-protected because was a really controversial discussion around the media coverage and people can tell lies about the reasons of Kyle Rittenhouse act.

Carletteyt (talk) 17:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Carletteyt: You have been told to stop requesting PP because a page might be vandalized. Repeatedly. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to suggest blocking them from this page, but I see you have done that already, in which case I endorse your block. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:05, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can I reiterate this request, disruptive editing has started back up. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:34, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent/trending incident that is vandalized every few hours. This should help to stabilize it until a consensus is reached at the AfD. Painting17 (talk) 00:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – I have made 3 reverts on this page in the last 24 hours and would like to avoid violation of 3RR, but I am dealing with persistent genre warring and being provided edit summaries that don't even make any sense. dannymusiceditor oops 23:45, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If you have one or two editors engaging in disruptive behavior, warn them and then take the matter to ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:52, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It just got put on the main page and good faith but messy and unsourced edits have already been made by an IP. An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 00:06, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This could change. Come back or drop a line on my talk page if this continues. I should be online for a few more hours. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disrespect of hidden notices with repeated violations of WP:DEADLINE. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring of content by IPs, despite a few established editors trying to gather a consensus on the talk page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:09, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Truth is a little tweeting bird chirping in a meadow. Truth is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell *bad*. Are you sure your circuits are registering correctly? Your ears are green. --adapted from Star Trek, I, Mudd --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:09, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. WiiBoi (talk) 01:31, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The "editing disputes" which have justified the page protection have already been resolved in this RfC. Page protection is simply administrator endorsement of the recent stonewalling by editors who refuse to allow the consensus to be implemented. Avilich (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1. The day the protection expired, edit warring resumed. 2. "Resolution" is unclear because the RfC close is unclear. 3. m:Wrong version. It's odd that the reporting user says endorsement when the protection tag reads: "This protection is not an endorsement" (bold in the original), but then again, this. 4. As mentioned, any admin is welcome to do whatever with the protection. I do not object to any action an uninvolved admin sees fit to take in this matter (like, unprotecting the page and blocking disputants instead, whatever). El_C 21:50, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you can't interpret the situation ("the RfC close is unclear") then why are you even involved? Avilich (talk) 22:03, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP:EW stop-gap measure. El_C 22:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • For the record, the RfC close is very clear, it says "there is a rough consensus that participation-based criteria are a problem and that the best way forward is to remove them". All that remains is for this part to be implemented. This is the third time the page has been protected and the problem persists, so stop-gaps are a weak excuse at this point. If this page absolutely needs to be protected, the protector should assume the responsibility of becoming involved and to make an actual effort to understand the matter. Avilich (talk) 22:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For the record: two admins and a couple of other users thanked me for the protection, so who really knows. El_C 22:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would have thanked you too but I was offline. Actually I would have fully protected it for the third time if I had seen it. No, we are not responsible for getting involved in that mess. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Muboshgu. It's absurd to me that we have veteran editors here who would have rather the edit warring just kept going (for how long? who knows), until an admin has met their requirement of reviewing massive material on multiple pages, including a revision history dig for no apparent reason. Sports, right? El_C 23:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The whole process looks FUBAR to me and it has brought out the worst behaviors in some of the editors. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support unprotection - The RfC outcome is clear, the closure review was archived without consensus to overturn, and the closer has clarified that the only remaining question is where exactly the line lies between merit and participation (if you don't know what I'm talking about, please step away from the page and let others handle it). This can be resolved through normal discussion, which is currently taking place, and disruptive behaviors such as mass reverting to the participation based version or demanding that projects be given more time to develop replacement criteria should be addressed directly instead of through ever-increasing stopgap page locks. The admin who protected the page has told us that they are leaving the page protection decision to other admins and they do not need to be consulted or notified. Please give us a chance to implement the RfC consensus, and if you're going to protect the page, please make the effort to address folks who are editing against consensus instead of just protecting and walking away. –dlthewave 02:17, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So you want the page unprotected to do what, exactly? Edit war your preferred version back? I don't understand. And for the last time, no, I'm not gonna do that (the "effort" of which you speak), please stop asking (everyone). That's not how admin actions work. We are not ARBCOM and are not obliged to engage in an in-depth review of every single action undertaken. If you're lucky enough to find an admin who wants to dig deep here, that's great, but I make no apologies for curbing an edit war absent that. Again, I am not obliged to do anything else, and to repeat, will no longer act on, or assist in, this dispute. Hope this clears things up, at least in so far that I won't need to reiterate these points yet again. El_C 02:30, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't about anybody's 'preferred version', it's about implementing the objective consensus of a discussion which this page protection is supposed to encourage, but which in fact has already happened; that it's indeed our preferred version is merely a coincidence. This isn't an 'edit war' in which both sides are wrong, this is a straightforward case of one side being obstructive, and they'll keep doing it because they know you'll give them exactly what they want by locking the page. The only 'effort' you need to do is making sense of that one sentence I quoted from the RfC closure, and not getting in the way of it's implementation. Avilich (talk) 02:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, not interested. El_C 03:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
El C, you do in fact seem quite interested in defending your page protection, but you seem to lose interest as soon as the conversation turns to the actual facts of the matter. May I ask why you chose page protection as the best course of action here? –dlthewave 03:17, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am interested in defending my position, to which I have nothing further to add at this time. El_C 03:26, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support unprotection so that the RfC result #3 can be implemented by removing participation criteria. I don't understand what is complicated about that. There is nothing unclear about the RfC question 3, or the closing statement, or that the close challenge did not result in overturn. I would like to go through the page and make edits that have consensus, such as some of the outstanding edit requests. Muboshgu, El C, if you're going to full protect the page, please articulate the criteria necessary for unprotection. "Ask another admin" is not a satisfactory response in my view. If the criteria is consensus, I direct you to RFC #3 and ask you to explain to me why that consensus doesn't meet your criteria. Thanks, Levivich 06:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I decline to provide you with any further assistance here, whatsoever. El_C 07:04, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm busy Tuesday evenings, so I'm only just getting around to parsing the latest mess. It's still late for me, so I'm not going to act on this until I've slept, but for now I'm just going to float my plans. The protection by El_C was within policy, and I can completely understand why he's not interested in getting involved with this farce. That said, I think a month-long full protection is not the ideal way to handle a handful of editors who refuse to comply with policies on consensus and edit warring. Maybe I need a nap, so El_C and Muboshgu tell me if this sounds crazy, but my plan is to (1) go through the page history tomorrow and partially block (probably for a month) editors who have been edit warring, (2) lift the full protection with a log entry requesting administrators block instead of protect, and (3) put a note on the talk page warning that I will be making liberal use of the block button for editors who continue to behave disruptively on the main guideline page. It's been over three weeks we've been dealing with disruptive editing at that page and everyone just seems to keep waiting-out the protection. Wug·a·po·des 07:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As I note above: "unprotecting the page and blocking disputants instead," is perfectly fine with me. Indeed, I don't want to deal with this and, of course, I don't have to. It's bewildering to me the approach that some here have taken to, uh, try to motivate me to do so, but that has had the complete opposite effect. Anyway, thanks for stepping in, Wug. I'd also recommend making it clear which user in addition to yourself has closed which proposal by adding sigs and time stamps to any unsigned closing statement/s. Because, as it stands, that close is presented in a very confusing way. Good luck! El_C 08:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse the above plan by Wugapodes. At this point, after the RFC has been closed and review completed, edit warring in contravention of the RFC consensus results needs to be handled on an individual basis. --Jayron32 13:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
+1 with thanks. Levivich 14:56, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:58, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
+1 and thank you as well. –dlthewave 22:56, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected I followed through with parts 2 and 3 of my above-discussed plan. See talk page note and unprotection. After a good night's sleep, I think going on a blocking spree is a little harsh right now and strains the limits of the blocking policy. Better to give a warning for how things will move forward and give everyone one last chance to shape up. Wug·a·po·des 05:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dizzyflamingo (talk) 04:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism. Mellk (talk) 06:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relatively low edit rate, so Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 06:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Hardyplants (talk) 07:13, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and re-enabled pending changes for when that expires. Ks0stm (TCGE) 09:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP and Sockpuppetry Vandalism. Sneha04💬 07:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and re-enabled pending changes for when that expires. Ks0stm (TCGE) 09:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tugiyon21 (talk) 04:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. No information about the edit given. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent disruptive and unhelpful edits by IP users due to recent appearance (debut) of this pro wrestler in a new company. Semi-protection would be very helpful. Mann Mann (talk) 07:40, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 09:13, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IPs. Armegon (talk) 08:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 09:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated additions of 'Igor' into current operators section without sources. NonsensicalSystem(error?)(.log) 08:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ks0stm (TCGE) 09:11, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey as student I want to change error in Israel page (wrong Gini index) can you let me do it ? Thanks! Tamar274 (talk) 18:58, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. Find a less volatile area to work in. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:34, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Lectonar (talk) 09:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rickpic (talk) 06:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 09:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
2409:4063:4D91:BF89:75FB:FA07:9D24:7D15 (talk) 08:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 09:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to edit Israel Gini index economy please Tamar274 (talk) 09:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined See above. Lectonar (talk) 09:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over a number of weeks about her ethniticy and nationality. – DarkGlow11:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: LTA, see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Linde plc vandal. FDW777 (talk) 11:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs to the Infobox. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 12:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 13:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism mostly by IP users. Volten001 13:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Weyant has recently been the focus of some political news. After previous page protection expired [180], IPs began adding inaccurate information to the article and removing accurate information, e.g. [181], [182], [183], [184]. There is a somewhat-related discussion about the general issue on the article Talk page [185]. Beccaynr (talk) 01:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As a follow up, soon after I posted this request, one of the IPs was blocked. Also, the other has two warnings and two D/S notices on their Talk page, including a warning I added after posting this request. Beccaynr (talk) 02:15, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Disruption resumed after protection expired. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 13:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 13:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Howard the Duck (talk) 15:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note that reverting vandalism is exempt from 3RR requirements. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 13:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 13:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Moxy- 17:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Please see [[186]] which states "At the same time, I strongly disagree with Notre Dame’s decision to provide funding for contraception in its health insurance plans, which involves it even more directly in contributing to immoral activity. " and then see this [[187]] temp protection is not enough. Unbroken Chain (talk) 02:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't that be an increase? CreecregofLife (talk) 02:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@CreecregofLife - not really, it is currently semi-protected so PC would be a decrease - either way, there really isn't a need to take the level down, edit requests would probably work. Zippybonzo | talk 15:36, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Article is already semi-protected, reducing to PC protection wouldn't help, and there's no justification for an increase in protection. This doesn't appear to be too far beyond a content dispute that should be discussed on the talk page as normal. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to on going economic boycott of Muslims in India. https://twitter.com/hashtag/BoycottHimalaya. talk 17:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Low-frequency vandalism is continuing since protection expired. PC or semi-protection should work, ideally for a longer period. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 18:12, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs persistently vandalize this page. --Maddy from Celeste ♥︎(they/she)♥︎ :: talk to me uwu 19:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – It's a children's TV channel, so a vandalism magnet in and of itself, but also there's dispute by editors about the channel's start date and how its history should be represented—and those editors are not talking much in the merge discussion I opened to deal with it. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 17:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Random yet consistent edits, especially changing numbers without any refs. Sir Tragedy (talk) 19:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP unconstructive edits over recent days U-Mos (talk) 20:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:36, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level IP vandalism Karadakli230 (talk) 20:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has been going on for years. Enough. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:41, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – vandalism, etc. wizzito | say hello! 22:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]