Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2024/10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2024

01 October 2024

Reason: Disruption from IPs...again. hamster717🐉(discuss anything!🐹✈️my contribs🌌🌠) 23:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cullen328. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A few months have passed, and this article could benefit from allowing newer users to improve it. Disruption from semi-confirmed users is low-risk at this point. DarmaniLink (talk) 18:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. As an Arbitration Enforcement action, this cannot be unprotected via a request here. See WP:AE for information on how to appeal. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:06, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page was protected due to valid concerns on sockpuppetry. However, Articles for Creation by its very nature is designed for "any editor" to request articles (and by extension, redirects). I think there should be a warning on watching for sock behavior, but that's beyond the scope of this decrease request. @NinjaRobotPirate: added the page protection just a few hours ago as of writing this. LR.127 (talk) 18:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. The protection is short-term, expiring tomorrow. Short term semiprotection is appropriate to prevent disruption. We occasionally protect article talk pages for the same reason, which are also intended for "any editor". ~Anachronist (talk) 18:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent extended-confirmed protection Contentious topic, fits well under WP:CT/HORN. Back and forth edit warring stretching back to multiple months. Previous temporary extended-confirmed protections have expired and edit warring has resumed since then. Ecrusized (talk) 14:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ecrusized, YOU started this edit war, and you are not discussing with ANYONE to resolve it. I don't know how else i can tell you to come up with conensus with me, @Replayerr, or anyone else, I have went on your talk page to try to discuss this with you, Please answer!!! Zabezt (talk) 18:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent extended-confirmed protection Contentious topic, fits well under WP:CT/HORN. Back and forth edit warring stretching back to multiple months. Previous temporary extended-confirmed protections have expired and edit warring has resumed since then. Ecrusized (talk) 14:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ecrusized, YOU started this edit war, and you are not discussing with ANYONE to resolve it. I don't know how else i can tell you to come up with conensus with me, @Replayerr, or anyone else, I have went on your talk page to try to discuss this with you, Please answer!!! Zabezt (talk) 18:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Contentious topic etc. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 03:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article has faced ongoing disruptions by IP users for several months. They repeatedly damage the infobox template and add duplicate parameters. Since there are no significant daily updates needed for this person's life, using edit requests would be a more efficient solution for everyone involved. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 13:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/IPA. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:18, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous protection applied 29 June for 3 months. The day after it expired (today), "Nicolle A. Morea" began adding her "marriage" back. Please apply at least another 3 months, if not longer; apparently the vandal has a long attention span. Schazjmd (talk) 20:28, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 05:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Because it needs updating as the evidence now shows this was a directed government plan and President Trump and his supporters did NOT intend and insurrection but were led on by government operatives to enter the capitol building. Its all on video and government records as is the General Milley's testimony that the President requested National Guard help well in advance of 6 Jan. 2605:59C8:4300:1308:2076:C89B:A86F:2B43 (talk) 20:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source?Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 00:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even if this were true (it's not), why would that merit unprotection? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:55, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. This request demonstrates clearly why the talk page is semiprotected. Edit requests can be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit, in the format "change X to Y" with reliable sources cited. Any other kind of edit request will be rejected. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continues after page protection lifted.   Aloha27  talk  20:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued IP sock adding the same disruptive topic. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:11, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RickinBaltimore. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Guettarda. Favonian (talk) 14:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Quite so, the protection has already expired. Favonian (talk) 15:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock activity flared up right after expiration. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle seems to be drunk, why did it send it to the decrease protection section??? ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:22, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ABG No idea, but there's no issue manually moving the request over to RPPI, as I've just done. Thanks for helping keep this place sane. :) Zinnober9 (talk) 03:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd rather not protect as they're just going to hop to another page. Elli (talk | contribs) 03:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 13:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism. I requested a downgrade previously as the article had semi-protection since it had been protected since 2011 and such long protection seemed excessive for the article. It seems I was unfortunately proven wrong. A handful of productive IP edits have come but the majority of recent edits are vandalism (or reversion of vandalism) Traumnovelle (talk) 07:55, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:45, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 16:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 12:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 15:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: lots of edits after reports said he died 45BearsFan (talk) 23:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:35, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Under attack (once again) by LTA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acalamari. Favonian (talk) 14:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are constantly removing the RfD tag from this redirect. Please protect. CycloneYoris talk! 05:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 17:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS ARBPIA. Borgenland (talk) 17:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 03:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:6c50:9f0:9250::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Drmies. Favonian (talk) 15:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 12:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:18, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Aydoh8[contribs] 12:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:18, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent insertion of WP:NOTNEWS content by sock IPs of LTA Yayismay. See [1] and [2]. Borgenland (talk) 14:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:4453:200:0:0:0:0:0/40 (talk · contribs). Partially blocked from editing that article. @Borgenland: They are also editing List of programs broadcast by DWPM/TeleRadyo Serbisyo if you want to check out those edits. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Caste based disruption and socking [3][4]. Ratnahastin (talk) 13:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: sustained IP vandalism, seemingly connected with anti-gun political group/activism. Alyo (chat·edits) 14:18, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/AP. @Alyo: Please submit a new request if semi-protection isn't sufficient. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:23, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also note the previous issue of an IP editor claiming to be the article's subject editing the article. So this protection would help with that matter as well, in case that person comes back under a different IP. Stefen 𝕋owers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 18:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: He died today and IPs are having a field day changing his date of death. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 18:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism as of late. A.S. Brown (talk) 17:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of IP vandalism. A.S. Brown (talk) 17:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of the edits over the last few weeks are major vandalism. I think a longer period of protection is appropriate here. thanks. Aszx5000 (talk) 20:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Aszx5000: Indefinite protection would be premature, please see WP:PREEMPTIVE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism, editing the words of a cited tweet to be inaccurate. Previously protected for one week, and once the protection expired the user got back at it again. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 20:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level Ip vandalism and many unsourced edits. Sush150 (talk) 16:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors repeatedly adding unsourced names of competitors to articles. Show broadcasts in about a week so the list will be known by then, but it's pure guesswork and speculation without any sources supporting. Ravensfire (talk) 17:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several LTAs and vandal disruptions from Sept.27. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 13:43, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Leonidlednev (TCL) 20:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of pronoun-changing vandalism lately. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – The event is correctly ongoing. Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence: Revision history - major contributors of the article are IP editors. 😬CsmLrner 20:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TParis., I do not see any need for the move protection at this point. Ymblanter (talk) 21:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – User:Mosalman786 (semi-confirmed user) has been adding spam links to external sites. Look like an account used only for link-spamming. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now there's an IP keeps changing the number of matches against the given source... Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 05:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
+1 Multiple IPs disruptive editing now. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:PIA-related article with recent contentious IP edit Vyvagaba (talk) 20:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper keeps edit warring for no reason. An increase in protection seems necessary to avoid any further disruption. CycloneYoris talk! 22:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 23:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

02 October 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:44, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 04:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same IP disruption has resumed after expiry of last semiprotect. MrOllie (talk) 20:36, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The disruption all comes from the same /64 range. Page-blocked for 3 months. Bishonen | tålk 20:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by IP socks of LTA Yayismay. See [5] and [6]. Borgenland (talk) 02:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 20:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sir Sputnik. Favonian (talk) 05:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi for 48 hours due to instability and edit warring. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 05:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persisent addition of an identical non-constructive trivia edit by multiple accounts: 60.227.221.174, Funify01, and Forggot112. Rift (talk) 04:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of unconstructive edits and IP vandalism in the wake of damage from Helene HelpMyUnbelief (talk) 04:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent vandalism (scores/result have been altered on multiple occasions) Electricmaster (talk) 07:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued vandalism from a variety of IP addresses. DH85868993 (talk) 09:36, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 10:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Leonidlednev (TCL) 18:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 18:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: ARBCOM protection needed. Several Arbcom reversions have already occurred due to non-EC editors editing a page with a topic they are not allowed to. See the page history for all the reversions and non-EC editors. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection: persistent vandalism. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: persistent disruptive editing 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:17, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:17, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: unconstrutive edits 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection: disruptive editing 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:51, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism, The someone from different IP addresses keep on deleting the text without any reference or data. Umar shahid (talk) 09:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. Persistent vandalism on 9/28 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 01:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Hauntbug (talk) 12:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 12:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Disruptive edits, and all edits in general actually, are extremely sparse. The 2 most recent disruptive edit were on 6 June and 15 May. Before then would be 29 Feb and 25 Jan. I think the sparse amount of vandalism allows unprotection. TheWikiToby (talk) 19:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't contact the protecting admin btw (@Samsara) since they've been inactive since 2021. TheWikiToby (talk) 19:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's because it's getting caught in the edit filter. The most recent attempts were in August, and they tried three times in under a minute. The vandalism is not "extremely sparse" just because the filters might be catching some of it. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. Even if we don't count what was blocked by the filter, there have been ten reverts of problematic edits in the last year, and that's too many for me to be comfortable unprotecting, especially given how unintrusive pending-changes is. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued targeting by IPs and SPAs (assuming it's all one person) adding serious and oversightable BLP violations. Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 21:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism and current event Mgfdhsrhe (talk) 10:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by IP users that continues after page was restored to correct version. Ocifur (talk) 12:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection expires today 2603:8080:D03:89D4:C18D:20C4:C242:7644 (talk) 00:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't an argument for removing the protection. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 00:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected: the protection has already expired. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruption from IPs despite multiple warnings. Discussion is currently ongoing at WT:NPOV, with no consensus yet for the IP's proposed changes, and yet they are continuing to repeatedly restore their edit. InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: persistent disruptive editing after the page protection has expired Anita5192 (talk) 15:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing. —J.avanzado (talk) 14:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from newly created vandal-only accounts. Hotwiki (talk) 15:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent disruptive edits from IP editors and single-purpose accounts that are possibly connected to the subject of the article Helioz9 (talk) 21:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Prolog. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 18:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:FORUM and WP:DENY violations by IPs with POV-pushing agendas. Borgenland (talk) 05:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:37, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Abo Yemen 07:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Abo Yemen: is there actually enough disruption there that ECP is required? We usually allow talkpages of these pages to be edited so people can make edit requests, and ECPing a talkpage is sort of a "last resort"; semi is often enough. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:38, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
all i am seeing in the talkpage for the most part is new ip editors using iranian sources to try and push the iranian perspective and whatever this is. The only constructive discussions ive seen made here are by regulars Abo Yemen 14:44, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. per above. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism on the article for the last couple of months. Wikibear47 (talk) 13:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One IP blocked. Bishonen | tålk 13:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protected because of wrongfully transclusion. Christian75 (talk) 17:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:12, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unexplained edits with no source and original research. Mehedi Abedin 09:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at WP:GS/CASTE Daniel Case (talk) 18:21, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued socking and IP hopping. Felida97 (talk) 10:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued socking and IP hopping. Felida97 (talk) 10:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Because some facts are outdated Toblerone101 (talk) 08:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Lionel Messi is not protected. Favonian (talk) 15:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per WP:GSCASTE. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued socking and IP hopping. Felida97 (talk) 10:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sean Combs is in the news and the many accusations against him also involve a product for infants. Some people now believe this is already a lasting association and that it should be mentioned there. It shouldn't. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued vandalism & BLP violations by IPs and non-confirmed accounts after previous protection expired. – Recoil16 (talk) 11:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry by Adhinayaka/HinduKshatrana sockfarm. Per WP:GSCASTE. Ratnahastin (talk) 12:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at GS/CASTE even though it's just a redirect. Daniel Case (talk) 19:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per WP:GSCASTE ,ban evasion by Hindukshatrana/Adhinayaka sockfarm. Ratnahastin (talk) 12:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log. Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Return of disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated WP:CASTE disruption by socks, IPs etc. Gotitbro (talk) 15:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Recent death of a principal person mentioned in this article has resulted in several unsourced (and false) edits.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 16:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection - persistent POV pushing by IP(s) who seem to be associated with the late Trostkyist leader Gerry Healy and the World Socialist Website due to a recent critical biography of Healy which mentions a violent attack on Ernie Tate and an article by the WSWS's David North attacking the bio[7]. Wellington Bay (talk) 15:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Anons continue to add information about the subject's political views sourced only by third-party social media posts. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 20:21, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IPs. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A month or so ago we had a problem where Allan Lichtman told his followers to go edit his pages to remove critical material. He has continued to agitate about Wikipedia and his followers have been reverting the pages in contravention to the talk pages again though I do not know if he said anything about it in the last week. I did my best to remove vandalism or content editing against the talk page consensus and redirect them there, where the issues were resolved months ago. I do not think the pages need full protection, but blocking unregistered users may help, as that seems to be the root of the problem on all "sides" (both critics and support). This is for both his main page and the The Keys to the White House page. As far as I can tell I got it back to where it was before someone started editing everything again but I will check. One of the editors has a user name matching the name of his wife. Caraturane (talk) 21:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize I flipped the pages, the edits are occurring on The Keys to the White House page today, but semi-protecting both is probably most practical given the apparent conflict of interest edits. Caraturane (talk) 21:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined but only so the bot will not flag this as "not done". I have protected the Keys article for three months, and I have decided to take the step that I don't usually take of logging that protection at CTOPS under AP due to the proximity of the election. Daniel Case (talk) 17:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism CassiJevenn (talk) 22:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A single IP has done this twice in the last month. Daniel Case (talk) 18:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High IP of vandalism, adding uncited sources that Valdes will be transfer on GMA Network as a new news chief of GMA Integrated News, even though she already retire as a journalist and news chief of News5, the news and current affairs department of TV5. BeemoKincaid (talk) 00:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last such edits were a couple of days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 18:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandalism (section blanking). Amigao (talk) 01:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 18:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: this article rapidly abducted by the vandals while the article is in semi-protected layer of restrictions but nothing seem to be impactful due to various radicals involved in such offensive organisation. Helper1.of~Devine (talk) 04:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection - repeated addition of unsourced content. McPhail (talk) 19:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Left CTOPS and WP:GS/PW notices on talk Daniel Case (talk) 20:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Long term protection: High level of IP vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 10:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Case (talk) 18:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing from IP who will not cease, contrary to good faith JJNito197 (talk) 12:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is extremely disingenuous, JJNito has been repeatedly trying to push a specific WP:POV, going so far as to entirely remove references to the party's fascist ideology. There is absolutely no reason to remove the content or their sources beyond whitewashing the party. This individual has been disruptively editing Syrian Social Nationalist Party for quite some time, and it's clear they're trying to seek to protect their version. I'm going to remind that we should not tolerate efforts to present such parties as less extreme than they are, as per WP:NONAZIS. 69.157.2.197 (talk) 12:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 12:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was 10 days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

03 October 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Moxy🍁 19:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A02:810A:12BF:E2A0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. from the article for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 20:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High levels of vandalism Wildfireupdateman (talk) 19:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The IP that had been doing this has not edited since they were warned. Given that this is a breaking news story and thus the article is likely to be heavily and quickly edited I do not feel disruption is at the level yet where we must intervene. Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 02:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sock puppetry Stephen McKeever (talk) 03:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be banned block evasion/sock puppetry. Stephen McKeever (talk) Stephen McKeever (talk) 03:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Stephen McKeever: What? I'm not even sure what the last part is supposed to mean, but page protection can only be done by administrators. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of birthdate and personal life without a source. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Noticeboard disrupting sock activities. At this rate, every single noticeboard is going to need a lock. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:51, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cullen328. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:45, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism. Has been going on since July 16. Constant target 2603:8080:D03:89D4:DC93:E450:E062:5CA7 (talk) 01:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:51, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:6577:42B4:213C:24CF (talk) 01:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:51, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:6577:42B4:213C:24CF (talk) 01:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. There is nowhere near enough recent disruptive activity to consider any form of protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:57, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:6577:42B4:213C:24CF (talk) 01:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. There is nowhere near enough recent disruptive activity to consider any form of protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:58, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:6577:42B4:213C:24CF (talk) 01:40, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. There is nowhere near enough recent disruptive activity to consider any form of protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:6577:42B4:213C:24CF (talk) 01:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. There is nowhere near enough recent disruptive activity to consider any form of protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:6577:42B4:213C:24CF (talk) 01:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. There is nowhere near enough recent disruptive activity to consider any form of protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:B1FA:FAB2:B066:C59A (talk) 01:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. There is nowhere near enough recent disruptive activity to consider any form of protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same disruptive editing as at TVO. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:23, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:12, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same disruptive editing as at TVO. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:23, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter, please protect the article 142.114.181.79 (talk) 21:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see any need for protection at this point. Ymblanter (talk) 21:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:12, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hey fallow moderators, Straightforwardly jump to the topic so Mobilisers potentially keep abducting the article on a mutual purpose of WP:POV with seriousness of WP:CASTE sanction so look there i provide the summary if you are willing to revert the the older version before this allegedly so called vandal LubanaPB02 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) make it sure source still attributing to be previous perimeter with Sandhawalia Jats and Sidhu you can clearly figure it out in rest of periferal in revision only without any expertise Supreme~limitless (talk) 22:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Edit requests should be left on the article talk page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:DC93:E450:E062:5CA7 (talk) 22:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:10, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gotitbro (talk) 01:23, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gotitbro: Could you please clarify which specific recent edits are vandalism? (Other administrators: Please feel free to resolve this request.) Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The page has faced serious WP:CASTE based disruption by multiple IPs (see the recent reverts by different editors and the edits further post that). Gotitbro (talk) 03:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gotitbro: Please link specific edits. To avoid going back and forth on this request, please also explain why each edit is disruptive (e.g., why an edit is caste-related disruption). Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Quinlan: [8], [9], [10] (this edit also disparages the Gurjar caste): The CASTE sanctions cover disruptive and dubious insertions and edits related to various caste groups in India. The same is happening here with various IP users (likely socks, as caste based sock disruption has severely increased on enwiki in recent years), using non-RS sources, inserting stuff related to Rajput, Gurjar [the latter derogatorily] into the lead/article which are also a violation of WP:ETHNICITY [see also WP:CASTEID]. Gotitbro (talk) 07:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP disruption. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 04:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No further edits since being warned. Please report to WP:ANEW if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: persistent disruptive editing, uncivil behavior from someone creating multiple accounts and IPs. User:Qalandar303 was blocked indefinitely, IP range 2001:8003:ED8F:EB00:0:0:0:0/64 was blocked for 3 months, and User:CarnelianSun108 was blocked in this sockpuppet investigation. About 24 hours later 101.188.188.160 and the newly created User:John Eternity started making the same edits. I recommend a 1 or 3 month semi-protection. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 06:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption by dynamic IP. VQuakr (talk) 07:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 08:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: New accounts (sock or meat puppets?) changing the name of the principal to “Peter Griffin”. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 23:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blockedTjplourdelover (talk · contribs) blocked by Discospinster indefinitely. Aydoh8[contribs] 00:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The other accounts are not, and the article continues to spawn socks. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 15:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Favonian (talk) 15:52, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandalism. DuncanHill (talk) 11:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent Block Evasion by MAB IP's, please protect this page Asap!. Untamed1910 (talk) 13:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. It's stopped for now, and there are worse pages they could be using. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of Edit wars , Request to persistent extended protection for a month Chandbhaiya05 (talk) 16:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Request by sock. Favonian (talk) 16:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: User has request the protection to be removed over at WP:RM so they can move their article over User:Soulbust/iHasCupquake. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:45, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Ponyobons mots 16:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 13:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, @Untamed1910. Pinging Alexeyevitch, Canterbury Tail, Knitsey, Pickersgill-Cunliffe, Frost, ScottishFinnishRadish, Mackensen: all of you were among those reverting that IP. They created 19 sections over the course of three hours with the same off-topic accusation against an editor. Next time, if you've got the tools, please semi the noticeboard. If you don't, please don't wait until it's already been reverted a dozen times before posting here. (RFPP requests are very easy in Twinkle, which you can enable in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets if you haven't already.)
Also, thank you for keeping an eye on Wikipedia. Most of these were reverted within a minute or even less, and I really appreciate it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just don't know if protection works in this case. I can certainly ask for protection as soon as they start, but they just move on to another noticeboard. By the time they're all protected, the first round of protection runs out so they start back at the beginning (so to speak). Knitsey (talk) 16:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done For good reasons that I can explain via email if necessary. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing from block evading IP. HorrorLover555 (talk) 18:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 92.40.212.173 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuing vandalism by IP's attempting to turn the lede into a press release Esolo5002 (talk) 19:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent bouncing IP changing Invacar to Invacare. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:55, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (Miminity | contribs) 11:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 15:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very high level of improper IP editing. Anwegmann (talk) 09:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very high level of improper IP editing. Anwegmann (talk) 09:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:05, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very high level of improper IP editing. Anwegmann (talk) 09:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very high level of improper IP editing. Anwegmann (talk) 09:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism of living person, sensitive issue. Subject is named in unfounded rumours circulating online. Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also RevDel'ed the relevant diffs Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent vandalism ltbdl☃ (talk) 12:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts to remove negative cited information (whitewashing) over the past several days, from various newly registered users and IP editors. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 14:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism. •Cyberwolf•talk? 14:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:11, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition of unsourced content being added into article. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by unregistered accounts, some of which went unaddressed for several days or more. Almost immediately after previous protection expired in April 2024, vandalism began again (Special:Diff/1219835731). By my count, from January 2024 to today, 12 edits were disruptive/vandalism from unregistered accounts out of a total of 32, including a few bot edits and several edits to revert said vandalism. Minimal positive contributions from unregistered accounts over the last year — I only found one possible example: Special:Diff/1224703699. WhinyTheYoungerTalk 15:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS per WP:CT/AP. Daniel Case (talk) 22:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

04 October 2024

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from newly created accounts and Ip users. Hotwiki (talk) 08:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Libel action by third parties on this page to discredit page IppolitoG (talk) 11:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User requesting the protection increase was nearly blocked for violating 3RR for removing a section of the article with no explanation. Only after a little digging did I realize that the section was lacking independent sources and should be removed. Assuming the IP does not attempt to re-add the section, I don't think any action is necessary here. —C.Fred (talk) 11:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 20:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Giraffer (talk) 21:57, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 16:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not a clear enough nexus to the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 20:45, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – One or multiple IP users have been repeatedly adding Linux and later Proton to the "platforms" in the infobox, neither of which are appropriate to include as there is no native Linux version of this game yet and Proton is an emulation tool and not a computing or gaming platform. The user or users have persisted (for about a month at this point) in adding this information in spite of being routinely reverted by experienced users who explained as much in their edit summaries. silviaASH (inquire within) 17:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP disruptive editing with biased agenda. Jingiby (talk) 18:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User that requested protection is blatantly violating MOS:OVERLINK, besides edit-warring. 62.74.24.247 (talk) 18:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Daniel Case (talk) 20:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A COI editor is edit warring over material previously declined to be included in the article following a COI edit request. Axad12 (talk) 18:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very high level of improper IP editing. Anwegmann (talk) 09:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 21:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users: adding unsourced or poorly sourced content (probably copied from a Facebook "movie leaks" post) and blanking sourced sections. Prince of EreborThe Book of Mazarbul 11:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The IP hasn't edited since you began discussing on their talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Daily or near-daily vandalism since 27 September. Sam Sailor 12:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Both /64s for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 21:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Maheep Singh24 (talk) 13:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP has made multiple reverts to add unreferenced material. Page is covered by pageants general sanctions. ☆ Bri (talk) 13:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. They might also consider stopping if you warn them. Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Titore (talk) 00:14, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 01:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Until this is resolved. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Star Mississippi. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 01:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent re-addition of unsourced content. Onel5969 TT me 08:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. GoodnightmushTalk 00:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 09:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 00:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended protection: Contentious topic restriction WP:ARBPIA 2603:8080:D03:89D4:5475:A5BD:E077:1D06 (talk) 01:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I agree it's probably directly relevant to the current conflict, but ... no one's edited it at all for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 01:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – addition of unsourced content - hiring rumors. Will120 (talk) 02:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If true, presumably the Reds will make an official announcement in that timeframe, per [11]. --Kinu t/c 06:19, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Michael "Bink" Knowles, known as Binksternet on Wikipedia continues to revert 100% accurate information I have had on my dad's wikipedia page (Tony Terran) for many years. This person provides no reason for doing this and does not have the royalty statements and musician union contracts that I have access to that proves that my dad was part of these recordings. Can you please help me put this to a stop?

Dave Terran Daveterran (talk) 06:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The reason is the repeated addition of content without proper sourcing, for which you have been warned on your talk page. See WP:BURDEN, and WP:EDITWAR. --Kinu t/c 06:15, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that a map of ground controlled by Israel/Lebanon/Hezbollah be added to the article. I know that the invasion has only just begun and that there may be more time needed for reliable data, but we should look for whatever information we have at the moment and see if we can add this to give readers a better understanding of how the invasion is unfolding. LordOfWalruses (talk) 00:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This board is for requests for specific edits (ie: change text, add text, remove text, add/remove existing image), not to request someone actually create content to be included. As you don't have an actual map to request to be included, there isn't anything we can do. I would also note that maps for rapidly developing situations are typically not done anyway, as they are out of date as fast as they are created, plus they are often contentious, meaning many editors would disagree with inclusion, so not something we can just pop in without a full discussion on the article talk page. Dennis Brown - 06:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 24 hours is enough, but this evidence page has twice been overwritten by an IP. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Guerillero. Favonian (talk) 10:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent harassment from 3 random IP ranges originating from Philippines since 3 October. Maybe socks returning under IP, I'm not sure about this, but their behaviour is random, persistent, and annoying. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 09:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create as a redirect to The Sound of Revenge to match the over-disambiguated Grind Time (song) * Pppery * it has begun... 17:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. The protection is really old, and was after only two creations, so it doesn't seem likely that protection is needed. Feel free to create it yourself. Dennis Brown - 00:26, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 10:52, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Persistent block evasion. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 07:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protectedFavonian (talk) 12:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA blocked on one IP back with a new one. CMD (talk) 09:14, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:25, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: BLP violations, disruptive editing. ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 11:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:CT/BLP. Protection log is a mile long. Favonian (talk) 11:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by several IPs Adakiko (talk) 03:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 13:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 16RR edit warring by IP in the past 24 hours. Borgenland (talk) 06:13, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit warring by both parties for over a week now while talk page discussion is ongoing. Unclear what the WP:QUO version is. — Czello (music) 06:25, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk? | contribs) 01:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection : Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 01:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection : Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 01:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users and newly created accounts. Hotwiki (talk) 02:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 15:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Consistent IP vandalism, IPs have already created accounts to get around the pending changes lock on the page. Sinclairian (talk) 20:14, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:04, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent and repeated vandalism by multiple unregistered users over several months for commercial advertisement. VoluntasDei (talk) 20:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:56, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Cambial foliar❧ 20:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

05 October 2024

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: persistent disruptive editing. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:90E1:86C6:BEFE:2D55 (talk) 21:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 22:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Per the recent discussion at WP:VPR. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 00:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. Per the plan outlined here. Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing and repeated IP/new user vandalism re-ensuing after the end of a previous page protection. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 15:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Page may be prone to vandalism as the figures are very popular at the moment. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 15:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the page is constatnly the target of vandalism. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:56, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Continuously inserting flag icon into infobox. Annh07 (talk) 17:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under ARBIPA. Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is likely to get vandalised persistently as long as the 2023-2024 Manipur violence continues. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:12, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely.. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High IP vandalism changing budget and boxoffice numbers without sources. RangersRus (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Contestant progress table for a currently airing television series is repeatedly being edited to add spoilers/results of unaired episodes—sometimes by anonymous IPs, sometimes by named users. needs protection to prevent this content (which is unsourced, as it cites episodes that have not aired) from being added. Griffindaly (talk) 22:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Aintabli (talk) 22:45, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite Semi Protection. Persistent Vandalism from ips 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 22:49, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of vandalism , changing of name & entering of pin-codes by unregistered users. Maheep Singh24 (talk) 10:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP editing to reinsert contentious material which has no secondary sourcing. Only sourced by WP:BLPPRIMARY. TarnishedPathtalk 13:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2403:4800:7498:5E14:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. one week for violating 1RR. Daniel Case (talk) 03:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A lot of vandalism, the article gets changed from “P. Diddy’s Starmaker to P. Diddy’s sex toys and baby oil. He is a controversial subject Wcamp9 (talk) 14:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sock puppet vandalism. Politically contentious figure in upcoming election. Perhaps protect until the election on October 19 to reduce low quality edits. Deathying (talk) 23:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Factsoverfiction118 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indefinitely per ANEW report. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: primary reason for protection no longer relevant due to reds hiring being made official. Will120 (talk) 17:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. The protection expires on its own in a few hours. Just wait it out. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Well, IP users have recently been making a series of unnecessary grammatical fixes which have become difficult to navigate in the event of multiple edits by such users. Hence, seeking protection for this page. MSincccc (talk) 15:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Such edits seem to have occurred once every few days. Annoying no doubt but the regular editors appear to keeping it under control. Daniel Case (talk) 03:32, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of incorrect/unsuitable image by an IP editor who refuses to engage on article talk page. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: spammer. The Banner talk 16:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined He says on his talk page now that he understands what he was doing wrong. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Former pastor who confessed to sexual abuse. The man himself may not deserve protection, but his page does, as it has recently suffered a fair bit of the sort of emotionally charged edit-warring that would be expected in this situation. — HelpMyUnbelief (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent! We agree! Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, declined. But whence the seeming gleefulness about the decision? — HelpMyUnbelief (talk) 03:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – "Harassment" vandal current target. McSly (talk) 02:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a big kids board. They can handle it. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWP:RBI. Favonian (talk) 08:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. Noorullah (talk) 05:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Noorullah21 removes sourced material without a specific reason and does not discuss on the talk page. I reminded them several times about the reason for their removals, that please discuss on the talk page, but they don't act and complain disruptive editing instead.--Nooritahir734 (talk) 05:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected., since 2020. The matter is now at ANI. Favonian (talk) 08:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that... Updating the image and description below because Th3 3ra is now complete. Time for changes. Bnika33 (talk) 18:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – No target specified and generally meaningless. Favonian (talk) 08:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Common hijacking target for various promotional/advertising accounts. Alith Anar 12:41, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 15:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 19:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I can't discuss this with the protecting admin because of the semi-protection. This page has been semi protected for a while but there have been almost no edits, maybe pending changes would work better on this article? 2601:282:4700:272:5037:157D:2724:BE5D (talk) 16:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. The talk page, Talk:Dhar Mann isn't protected. Nthep (talk) 16:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06 October 2024

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Aintabli (talk) 23:13, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing 2603:8080:D03:89D4:F14D:7CAF:17B3:D513 (talk) 23:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not edited much to begin with. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 02:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 00:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, primarily by socks. Johnj1995 (talk) 00:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Time for me to chew on a nail (talk · contribs) blocked by Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Indef, and globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 21:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, primarily by socks. Johnj1995 (talk) 00:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: All days say im mean to the moon (talk · contribs) blocked by Zzuuzz. Indef and globally locked, like other sock vandalizing this and other articles. Daniel Case (talk) 22:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruptions. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 01:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by different IP addresses. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 01:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Shnfox and/or 81.106.150.115 are censoring this page. They have removed information that is important to be featured in the main section of the article. He/she did it from a fan's point of view, perceiving this information as negative, using as argument that "This has never been proven or spoken about by either sannie or ann lee and is just gossip mongering." However, the added paragraph is no gossip, but information provided by authorised sources. There is no rule that states that information must be validated by the artists themselves. If the the artist had denied or confirmed this, that would, obviously, be included, but Carlson have not said anything. Although Ann Lee has not outright confirmed it either, her performances of the same song are worthy of remark. Therefore, Shnfox's reasoning for censoring is void.

There are three facts that I added to the article after reviewing the sources carefully. Firstly, Ann Lee's producer Mauro Farina literally said during an interview that "she lent her voice for Whigfield and it was a worldwide success." This interview is listed as source. Secondly, Carlson performed in Spain on February 2024 "Saturday Night" and her voice sounded completely different than the voice in the original recording. This performance was aired live on TV (Televisión Canaria) and is also listed as source. Thirdly, the live performances of "Saturday Night" by Ann Lee, also available, have a voice that is very similar to the one that is featured in Whigfield's recordings.

I request this article to be protected from the removal of this information (955), since articles should not be censored by fans that perceive some information as negative. In this case, the removal of information should be checked by experienced Wikipedia users or administrators, so the article remains objective and accurate and not just eulogistic, biased and fully controlled by a fan or artist. Fixfxx (talk) 11:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. If you have to write something this long to justify protection, it's better off at the latter page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:32, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Should fall under WP:GENSEX. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 07:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:16, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. Onel5969 TT me 10:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS but under BLP and not PIA ... nothing in the article connects her to any current or past conflict, and really this is the kind of nationalistic edit warring that occurs in topics everywhere in the world that we really need to have designated a contentious supertopic. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Pelmeen10 (talk) 11:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP renaming following the change of the official name - Arjayay (talk) 15:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous accounts triggered by misinformation are vandalizing the page. Paris1127 (talk) 15:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Skitash (talk) 16:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Skitash (talk) 16:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Skitash (talk) 16:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS> Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Skitash (talk) 16:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:44, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. There's been persistent edit warring on the plot section from an IP-hopper the past few months that has become especially pronounced in the past few days. Grandpallama (talk) 18:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Computermichael (talk) 18:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extreme and sustained vandalism. This has lasted over a period of at least six months. My last request to get this genus article and species articles of Neolithodes protected resulted in an account or two being blocked, but the same person has since been sockpuppeting incessantly over months and months trying to vandalize these articles only being reverted by myself and Mitch Ames. Neither blocks of these accounts nor temporary semi-protection can resolve this due to the user's persistence; indefinite is unfortunately the only way. Requesting this for right now on just 'Neolithodes', but may request it on various species of Neolithodes (and other lithodids, which they've also persistently vandalized) in the future. Also requesting that 143.44.169.184, Dl. DRJAJAL, and Michael 281818 be blocked as obvious sockpuppets of Michael2176. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 20:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#143.44.169.184 - Mitch Ames (talk) 02:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have blocked the two registered accounts indef and the IP for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Even after the initial protection period along with talk page consensus and the addition of a hatnote asking editors to not change the page to past-tense, people (mostly IP editors from my observation) are still changing the page tense to past despite there being no word at this time that the village will be disestablished and there being an intent to rebuild the town from my understanding, as well. TinglesFrickinMap (talk) 21:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – [12][13][14][15][16][17]. ®asteem Talk 22:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing in the past few weeks. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:9EC:C8DA:4D77:7E9D (talk) 23:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 48 hours protection. Heavy vandalism after Bama-Vandy game. Hog Farm Talk 00:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent violations of the WP:BLP policy (i.e., poorly sourced contentious material), repeated addition of his height even after users have explained its irrelevance KyleJoantalk 01:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs continue to vandalize the article with a Twitter post of an unverified account, which is considered not reliable. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 01:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – When the previous protection expired, IP vandals immediately returned. Sariel Xilo (talk) 02:20, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalized so much by so many IPs and accounts. I am in the process of fixing it but I believe it needs protection. نوحفث   Let's Chat! 02:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced and speculative edits by numerous IP users. Areaseven (talk) 03:37, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Sinclairian (talk) 05:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/A-I. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:5100:1200:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aintabli (talk) 03:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS under ARBAA. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued removal of content by IPs from same location. Soapwort (talk) 04:05, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice (per AP) on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Keeps being vandalized by new/IP editors. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 06:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: IP account edit warring and re-adding questionable BLP content despite being advised to use the talk page to discuss. Given the the subject of the article is described as intersex, this might even fall under WP:CTOP and need 1RR at some point if the TSP doesn't work. In addition to the PP, the IP's diffs might need to be revdeleted per BLP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2406:5A00:90B6:4100:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week, on top of the 48-hour block by Ymblanter specific to the offending address but counter to recommended practice with IPv6es. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock puppets, followed by edits in contentious area again by 119.94.160.0/19. Graywalls (talk) 11:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 119.94.160.0/19 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 02:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive removal of member from Personnel section. HorrorLover555 (talk) 11:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A04:4A43:981F:FE82:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Elli. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nationality warring, IPs have been changing an ethnically Palestinian American's nationality for months. Nswix (talk) 13:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New user disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 13:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two edits, and none since you warned them. Daniel Case (talk) 02:53, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing from different IP addresses. Amigao (talk) 15:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several IP's (all from the same place) have been removing players from the squad section over and over again, without ever explaining their edits, even though these players are part of Dortmund's squad for the season (see the source above the squad list). I already requested protection before, the IP's had been blocked from editing after that, but now a fourth IP (again from the same location) popped up and kept removing these same players without further comment. IronMaximus (talk) 18:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: IP vandalized article’s short description. 2600:100C:B0AA:6CE6:83E:69D9:3ABA:8DF4 (talk) 22:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resumption. Geraldo Perez (talk) 07:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 08:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is now the third time we're requesting page protection. The article is continuously a target for the addition of unsourced information to the entry list. Once again, I ask for pending changes protection, until the end of the current F1 season on 8 December. I do not see any reason why this request would again be ignored, past protections have lasted for a couple weeks only for vandalism to immediately resume. This is not a productive use of editors' times to constantly be reverting garbage edits from IPs and new users and then coming back here to keep asking for the same thing that would prevent this. 5225C (talk • contributions) 07:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Banjja (talk) 14:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to respectfully request the unprotection of the article titled "Marehan." I understand that this page is currently protected to prevent vandalism, but I believe that unprotecting it, or at least reducing the level of protection, would allow for valuable contributions from knowledgeable editors like myself and others. I am particularly interested in making well-researched edits and updates to enhance the quality and accuracy of the information on this page. I am aware of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies and will ensure that my contributions comply with the platform's standards. Thank you for considering my request. I look forward to contributing to the improvement of this article.

+1 Reason: I believe that unprotecting it, or at least reducing the level of protection, would allow for valuable contributions from knowledgeable editors like myself and others. I am particularly interested in making well-researched edits and updates to enhance the quality and accuracy of the information on this page. I am aware of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies and will ensure that my contributions comply with the platform's standards. Thank you for considering my request. I look forward to contributing to the improvement of this article. Banjja (talk) 14:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This reads like an AI chatbot wrote it. We don't entertain arguments made via large language model. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected per above. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations. BlueboyLINY (talk) 06:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1001:b000::/40 (talk · contribs). 1-year partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 10:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥  07:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remsense is continuously putting biased pov unsourced nonsense into this article. I have just reverted it to the non-pov version with reference sources to support all the information, unlike Remsense who has provided NO REFERENCES whatsoever for his biased pov edits. Thank you128.90.165.16 (talk) 07:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome! I shouldn't have to justify content issues here, but the sockpuppet has already been patiently told why their additions weren't accepted, and they have very little to do with POV, but structure, style and coherence. Remsense ‥  07:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
STOP posting biased lies on this article Remsense, you did not provide any reference sources for your biased pov edits. I have provided numerous academic reference sources to the non-pov version, I did you a favor since you either uneducated in history or just being a vandal, You’re Welcome..!! 128.90.165.16 (talk) 07:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Someone else needs to deal with this, because I've already reacted more than I should have. Just put an "East Asians" top level section there outside where it should go over and over, whatever. I shouldn't've restored that content, I'll fess up. But you didn't communicate in response to me about what was actually wrong until now or respond to the things I pointed out were wrong. I'm not looking forward to the EW block I probably deserve for this, because I've really been trying to do better since my first one. But someone fix up those additions, please. Remsense ‥  07:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Remsense, you need to stop posting biased POV edits that have no academic reference sources backing it up. Am I wrong to to say that? I have simply posted a NON-POV edit in accordance with Wikipedia policy guidelines about neutral points of view and supported everything with academic reference sources unlike you who keeps posting biased pov edits with NO REFERENCES to support it. You should be thanking me for doing you a favor and keeping this article historically accurate and supported by academic reference sources. Thanks 128.90.165.16 (talk) 08:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Like I said, I realize it was wrong and contributed to you feeling you had to do what you did wrong. Together, we disrupted the article and I wish I had done better. How's that? Remsense ‥  08:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Listen, I’m not ripping on you or disrespecting you in any way. I am just telling you that we need to keep this article historical accurate and factual backed up with academic reference sources and not just the biased pov opinions that you keep pushing. Peace, Love and Understanding..!! 128.90.165.16 (talk) 08:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To admins: I messed up here. The article is in a much better state content-wise and likely doesn't need protection. While the IP socked, they did so in response to my careless reverting in response to other issues I saw first. Sorry to all about this. Remsense ‥  08:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor. Favonian (talk) 10:01, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 11:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 38.222.128.0/18 (talk · contribs).
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Electrou (formerly Susbush) (talk) 12:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 14:02, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:F14D:7CAF:17B3:D513 (talk) 14:20, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Disruption is long-term, but relatively low-frequency. Favonian (talk) 14:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP and 1 new editor vandalizing BLP over past 2 days. Schazjmd (talk) 16:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GiantSnowman. Favonian (talk) 18:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry by socks of User:BIMARU Kumari, which includes the blocked User:Bengali related page protectors and the IPS. [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently involved in a crash due to being on his phone while driving that has resulted in criticism and vandalism to this page. --Ferien (talk) 17:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry by socks of User:BIMARU Kumari, which includes the blocked User:Bengali related page protectors and the IPS [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:53, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of persistent edits by sock accounts. Also, need page protection for Dvaita Vedanta for similar reasons. Asteramellus (talk) 19:50, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Individual keeps vandalizing 'owner' section, in infobox. GoodDay (talk) 14:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 21:35, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant vandalism from IP address. Instate temporary semi-protection for at least 2-3 months. ѕιη¢єяєℓу ƒяσм, ᗰOᗪ ᑕᖇEᗩTOᖇ 🏡 🗨 📝 18:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 21:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Socking/IP hopping continues after previous, recent protection expired. Felida97 (talk) 20:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 21:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism in the past 3 and a half weeks 2603:8080:D03:89D4:F14D:7CAF:17B3:D513 (talk) 21:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 21:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Socking/IP hopping continues after previous, recent protection expired. Felida97 (talk) 20:37, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 21:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent socking and IP hopping. Felida97 (talk) 20:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 21:53, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent socking/IP hopping. Felida97 (talk) 20:44, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

07 October 2024

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous vandalism continues shortly after protection expired. IceWelder [] 18:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 159.146.0.0/17 (talk · contribs). 3-month partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 19:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to change settings of vandalism for two years Stephen McKeever (talk) 22:35, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Airplaneman (talk) 22:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I Don't Want Vandalism or False Information on This Page To Spread Quentin23J (talk) 23:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ... discospinster talk 23:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To Keep Up Her Legacy Quentin23J (talk) 23:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ... discospinster talk 23:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Copyright and false information Quentin23J (talk) 23:58, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ... discospinster talk 00:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. GSK (talkedits) 02:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 03:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Successive vandalism for multiple reasons (caste, political rivalries, etc.) Drusekoana (talk) 10:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repetitive addition of unsourced information relating to this actor supposedly being in Super Mario Party Jamboree, which is yet to be confirmed. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 16:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: genre warring by several MariaJaydHicky's IP socks. Blueberry72 (talk) 17:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 05:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent blanking and vandalism from multiple IPs. Lenny Marks (talk) 04:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 05:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP addresses and new accounts since 16:53, 29 September 2024‎. Alith Anar 17:16, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Nearly every edit made to the article is someone believing that they are correcting the aphorism by adding "...in matters of taste", but per Talk:The_customer is always right#Full quote? there's no evidence that this was ever a part of the quotation. Belbury (talk) 17:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: persistent disruptive editing. WP:RUSUKR applies. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 21:16, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log. Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent spelling changes, blanking, and unsourced additions by IP addresses since 20:10, 1 October 2024‎. Alith Anar 21:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disrupting editing and unsourced; stay semi-protection expires 6 November 2024 (UTC) Stephen McKeever (talk) 22:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP addresses since 02:06, 24 September 2024‎. Alith Anar 00:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Still under a spate of vandalism re: redirects. Amigao (talk) 16:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request for at least semi-protection on the Transformers One article due to persistent vandalism against reliably sourced information regarding the film's budget. Per Template:Infobox film, "If there are conflicting estimates, do not cherry-pick; list each estimate either as an individual value or as a number range.". Many unregistered users, presumably fans who are upset about the film's box office performance, are removing the higher $147 million figure from the budget range in the infobox and the verifiable source that lists this number. Any protection would be appreciated. Thanks. DESERTSCHo0L20 (talk) 02:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism in the past 5 days. Pc not working. At least 30 previous protections. That's enough! 2603:8080:D03:89D4:F14D:7CAF:17B3:D513 (talk) 03:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Under attack by LTA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 04:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism continues after expiry of temporary protection. Requesting WP:PCPP. JoshuaJ28 (talk) 04:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 13:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:01, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And it really doesn't have a sufficient nexus to the current conflict beyond being bombed a few times. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 14:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Radharaman Daas (talk · contribs) blocked by Izno. indef as well as globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 05:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Show finale today so many ip edits making pov edits.. requesting pp for next week. Kiran_891 (TALK) 14:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: While Bad Blood (2024) was a top read trending in Wikipedia, Multiple IP Addresses have vandalized the article or added a unreliable sources in the article and lack of citations, leading to an uncontrollable edit war. Need it as soon as possible. Royiswariii | D-GENERATION X | u can talk me :) 15:01, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It doesn't look to me like an "uncontrollable edit war", and seems to be dying down as the weekend fades into the week. Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Lahsim Niasoh (talk) 19:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Lahsim Niasoh (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:50, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. and globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent, on-going disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Repeated disruptive edits as article is currently subject to a content dispute via a proposed split disguised as a move request due to recent high-profile social media comments. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For full protection over an edit war I generally think it should look a lot worse than this. Daniel Case (talk) 05:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated addition of speculative information on the opening date. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Years of sock puppet abuse. Moxy🍁 00:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User Bluethricecreamman sabotaging page due to antisemitic bias. 2A02:C7C:405D:5400:1893:41A7:C38C:2CA3 (talk) 07:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Nothing objectionable about said editor's contribution. Favonian (talk) 10:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same LTA vandalism as previous protection, which expired yesterday. Belbury (talk) 11:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 11:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Three years ago, this page was extended-confirmed protected due to an edit war. I talked to the protecting admin and stated that there is zero chance for him to unprotect the article. Would consider downgrading the protection to semi. ScarletViolet tc 11:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: For some clarification, since I found this to be a little confusing, here's the link to their discussion. Zinnober9 (talk) 18:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Yes, they may be doing their military service, but ... really? You want us to unprotect the article on the world's most popular boy band, and open it up to editing by one of the world's most toxic fanbases? Hard no, per Jamie. Daniel Case (talk) 06:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism ongoing, not a suitable article for IP edits at the moment. ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The IPs being proxies operated by the banned WP:LTA/GRP, of course. JavaHurricane 08:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large volume of disruptions. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aintabli (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Six months. See the protection log for the prior events. EdJohnston (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Gauravs 51 (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I eventually come across this page entitled as Sukerchakia Misl but before any further expedition, I immediately figure out an Jassu712 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who creating the problematic turbulence while allegedly having serious conflict of interest with WP:CASTE and acting like an arrogant individual while oversighting the poor quality source without providing any quotations not at all, look at this issue asap Our Panjāb (talk) 08:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you are the one who creating trouble i already provided more reliable sources then you the only source you have who is gs chhabra you need multiple sources to cross check information it's true or but all you mentioned is self published book or website Jassu712 (talk) 08:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
and with my each reference i provide page number to with multiple sources to verify information unlike you i don't have any conflict of interest it's you who is obsessed with caste Jassu712 (talk) 08:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment:: look at his attention,within the matter of time he gambled the access of extended confirm right to hypothetically breaking the outlaw of Wikipedia Our Panjāb (talk) 08:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: look like suspect it self playing the victim card to gain the sympathy from the rest of us but in this case you are exceeding all regulation of Wikipedia, wait for some movement of time before doing such organised way of manipulation Our Panjāb (talk) 08:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
you are the one who playing victim let's see who is wrong i already told you to ask neutral point of view but instead you want to do edit war with me go and read "WP:V" you need some knowledge about Wikipedia Jassu712 (talk) 08:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
and instead of argue why don't you provide multiple reliable sources? with page number from reputable author's Jassu712 (talk) 08:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so but we can clearly you see the repulsiveness of behaviour , as far i know @MaplesyrupSushi is the experience contributor who added the content on this page
Disclaimer: this is not talk page respectfully leave this page before someone invigilate on behalf of us Our Panjāb (talk) 08:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Sikhs Commonwealth or Rise and Fall of the Sikh Misls by Hari Ram Gupta page number 293 clearly mentioned Maharaja Ranjit Singh ancestors are Sans jatt Jassu712 (talk) 08:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Temporary Extended-protection: Persistent vandalism. and edit war by User:103.132.8.24 using very abusing language even giving rape threats and Our Panjāb is also engaged in edit war and report by me and AKP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jassu712 (talkcontribs) 11:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment::yes he was engaged in edit war but i still request for page protection for avoiding future disruptive edit Jassu712 (talk) 13:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – block evasion occured right after the page was unprotected. Plasticwonder (talk) 15:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2a0d:e487:3100::/40 (talk · contribs).
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalized three times in the five hours after a six-month protection block expired. Ttwaring (talk) 17:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive minor edits by various IP socks of blocked user User:Harry the house, going back months - most recently 146.199.140.43. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 11:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 146.199.140.43 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Favonian (talk) 17:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. •Cyberwolf•talk? 17:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Favonian (talk) 18:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SirMemeGod18:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Elli. Favonian (talk) 18:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. — Czello (music) 16:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we do that, since we usually go to full-protection for only a few days and MediaWiki does not currently allow us to layer full and semi-protections, the article would remain unprotected when the protection expires until we could reprotect it if necessary. Might 1RR be a better option? Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1RR would be a decent solution as this is a CTOPs article — Czello (music) 07:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done And logged at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 06:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism in AFD. Gauravs 51 (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last was a couple of days ago. I am really loathe to protect AfDs (although I have done it) since it could be seen as tipping the process toward one side or the other. Daniel Case (talk) 21:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP addresses has continued after a previous protection. SB678 (talk) 08:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated edits, mostly by unregistered users, changing his nationality from Russian to Ukrainian without any discussion. [34] [35] [36] [37]

That dispute itself is covered in the article and no serious scholar considers him Ukrainian in any meaningful way. --Երևանցի talk 08:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jlwoodwa (talk) 10:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 12:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive addition of unsourced content. HorrorLover555 (talk) 13:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:8003:3813:C301:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks (this is hardly the only article they've been doing this on, and they were blocked for this a couple of months ago as well. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism, likely related to the war. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Svito3 (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under CT/EE due to the current disruption involving Poland and Ukraine. Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection - We have a series of IPs who're claiming SSR is still alive and being hidden by his management - a far cry from what was the case even last year but still not something supported by the sources. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Nthep. for one year. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think it would be a good idea to protect this article so that users without an account cannot edit them, since for about a month there has been a user with an IP from Macedonia (the last one he used was 77.29.162.92) who is constantly being blocked because he keeps vandalizing football team articles (Málaga CF, Real Oviedo, Granada CF, Athletic Bilbao, FK Partizan, FK Voždovac, etc.) AlejandroR1990 (talk) 16:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 77.29.128.0/18 (talk · contribs) blocked by Drmies. for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and disruption Kaustubh42 (talk) 17:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Arbitration enforcement: WP:CT/AI. Multiple non-EC editors have edited a contentious topic area on this page. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 17:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not going with indef here because I doubt there will be this level of editing interest come April. Will log at CTOPS, though. Daniel Case (talk) 03:41, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – An editor is using multiple IP addresses to edit the page, falsely claiming that two episodes that were left unaired in the US aired. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 18:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Reason: High level of vandalism by sockpuppet. Jassu712 (talk) 19:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Reason: High level of vandalism bh sockpuppet IP Address and account. Jassu712 (talk) 19:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protection: Reason: High level of IP vandalism by sockpuppet account and one user was blocked for edit war but he still using sockpuppet account and IP address. Jassu712 (talk) 19:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 19:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:59, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes doesn't seem to be working. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing on a newly released popular film, mostly by IPs (specifically from the 103.38.17.0/24 range which has already been blocked once for this [likely connected to the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Symon Sadik). These edits disrupt the lead/ib despite Talk page consensus to the contrary. Gotitbro (talk) 20:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That range hasn't edited the article in at least a few days. Recent history shows few reverts if any. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit-warring from Colorado IP range Special:Contributions/2601:283:4600:7050:0:0:0:0/64, blocked once last April. Disruption also from France IPs. Binksternet (talk) 20:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, both times this change has been reverted, the explanations have been unhelpful and somewhat bitey (i.e., remove unsourced text when the text includes sources, and Rv edit warring when it's the second attempt to add the text). Protecting this article for a single editor making what appears to be good faith edits is not justified. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DrKay (talk) 21:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator DrKay. for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 21:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Favored target of an LTA (Sevgilerde) using too wide of an IP range to block. All IP edits over the past 12 months have been disruptive. Sable232 (talk) 21:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP spam. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by Favonian. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @SNUGGUMS: Please don't use this kind of edit summary. It starts off confrontational and focuses on the other editor instead of the content. Overall, it's bitey and it's no wonder the other editor made the same edit again. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what comes off as confrontational about pointing out inaccuracies or defiance of a hidden note that was meant to be followed. Nevertheless, this is far from the only IP who did such things, and leaving the page unprotected isn't helping matters. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SNUGGUMS: Starting a summary with a word like "False" reads as an attempt to shut down any discussion. Combined with "you shouldn't have ignored" and "fabricated claims", the tone feels accusatory and confrontational. These types of edit summaries are more likely to escalate disagreements (which happened) than result in a civil discussion.
By the way, I wonder whether adding a link to a talk page discussion might help with that inline comment.
As to protecting the page, only one IP editor has edited the article in the last 16 days. One person making the same edit twice isn't sufficient justification to protect an article, especially in these circumstances. The protection policy discusses the general principles involved in its lead and first section. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: disruptive editing Skyerise (talk) 21:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism; immediately resumed after unprotection 2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (talk) 21:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (talk) 21:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinte semi-protection: Ipersistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (talk) 21:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi -protection: persistent disruptive editing in the past 3 weeks. pc not working. at least 25 previous protections. That's enough 2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (talk) 21:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Mdelvins (talk · contribs) blocked by Elli. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:32, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 22:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Reason: Persisent addition of an identical non-constructive trivia edit by multiple accounts: 60.227.221.174, Funify01, and Forggot112. Rift (talk) 23:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also warned the IP editor about edit warring. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism; Palm Desert IP added Tibetan characters 2603:8080:D03:89D4:59E0:F5C3:2AAF:E3E9 (talk) 23:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

08 October 2024

Reason: WP:ARBPIA Isi96 (talk) 00:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And doesn't have much direct connection to recent events. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users keeps replacing the high quality infobox image with low quality. [38] [39] Requires WP:SEMI protection. JoshuaJ28 (talk) 00:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: To allow a finished draft be moved to mainspace. UV is bugged, so I'm forced to put a different thing but I'm trying to have this unsalted. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:27, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Partially done. Create-unprotected, but until the article's in mainspace we can't do anything else. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Partially done, see response by Daniel Case. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, no I only wanted it unsalted, but for some reason UV forces me to select anything that's not "No Protection", so I was forced to press semi-prot instead. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 08:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AlphaBetaGamma: You can submit requests to lower page protection levels at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Decrease. You can also manually edit requests after submitting them to fix up any mistakes. I'll take care of that now for this request. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Changed Indefinite pending changes protection to Unprotection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected by Daniel Case. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing edit warring/content dispute. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:29, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing and edit-warring by several IPs and User:Epnesthede. I suppose the IPs are Epnesthede himself. They also refuse to discus the issue at the talk-page. Only blynd revert of the stable version. Jingiby (talk) 03:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article has not been edited since it was created 18 years ago. Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I am sorry Daniel Case, the correct spelling is distinct and the real article is Krste Misirkov. May you check the case again. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 07:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Changed request from Kraste Misirkov to Krste Misirkov. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per WP:GSCASTE. Long term disruptive editing over his caste.[40][41] last 500 revisions. Ratnahastin (talk) 05:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – intense vandalism after last pp expired. Ca talk to me! 05:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of Sourced content. MRRaja001 (talk) 07:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: No idea what the edit warring is about, but the entire edit history is reverts of IP editors. Worth semi-protecting, perhaps an admin should issue some blocks, too. Toadspike [Talk] 09:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 207.136.93.6 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:17, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. [42] [43] [44] JoshuaJ28 (talk) 09:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 18:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Same IP user vandalized the page again just few hours ago by changing the infobox image with a random image of unknown person. [45] JoshuaJ28 (talk) 01:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection Disruptive editing from various IP addresses with similar GeoLocs over the past couple of weeks. Barry Wom (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:56, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection Disruptive editing from various IP addresses with similar GeoLocs over the past couple of weeks. Barry Wom (talk) 09:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:56, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel Quinlan, the article needs protecting, the IP user is hopping IPs, they've made the same edit since your message Darkwarriorblake (talk) 16:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They have not made the same edit since the blocks. Most of the disruption was from one IPv6 address and one IPv4 range, both of which are blocked now. If they resume, please report the involved IPs with links to repeated edits to WP:ANEW. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection Disruptive editing from various IP addresses with similar GeoLocs over the past couple of weeks. Barry Wom (talk) 09:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Targeted harassment, originating from Twitter. Request assistance Fml657 (talk) 10:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by User:Yoshutup. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 10:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just two edits today. Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: For some inexplicable reason, ‘not bebop’ is inserted on this page (see version history) every few weeks by IP addresses that are apparently not logged in. This is annoying. :-) Tuxman (talk) 11:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – New editors have been frequently adding irrelevant and/or unreliable content as of late, with some adding references without the content it claims to cite. Milesq (talk) 12:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Wikipageant (talk · contribs). from the article for a week, since it's in an area subject to community sanctions (WP:GS/PAGEANT). Let's see if that gives them the hint they need. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several accounts and IP's attempted to delete the crimes section at least 5 times this very week. نوحفث   Let's Chat! 12:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A string of IPs all trying to add the same POV and unsourced edits today. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited the article so shouldn't protect it, but I support this. Doug Weller talk 13:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Located in a country involved in the IPC YannisL (talk) 13:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: we don't protect every city page in Israel or Palestine. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by removing sourced information. Semsûrî (talk) 14:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:GSCASTE, IP hopper edit warring. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I believe only account holders should edit the article (if not just for a temporary period), as the film has been controversial and IP editors are not adding constructive edits to it or vandalizing as well. Trillfendi (talk) 15:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It doesn't look like every IP edit is getting reverted, and the article is getting a lot of attention at the moment, as eagerly anticipated new films tend to. I'm not even sure pending changes would be justified. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruptive edits and personal attacks by IPs. Sid95Q (talk) 15:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's just that one IP, a couple of times, and they've been warned. Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistant disruptive edits by IPs asking for protection, when there is no vandalizism to the list. Catfurball (talk) 15:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent, on-going disruptive editing by anonymous editors from beginning of article's creation, due to its recent events status. livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continually changing the player's club/introducing factual errors before the player's been traded; please protect for two weeks to limit majority of these edits until after the trade period ends – thanks. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 16:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also put {{current sports transaction}} banner on page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unconstructive IPs attempting to use the talk page as a forum, likely after reading the recently published news article on the page. --Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 17:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Black Kite. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent Violations of the Biographies of Living Persons. An I.P. keeps changing Walmsley L's nationality to Greek, and saying that she was born in Athens Greece. 142.114.1.184 (talk) 18:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New user, possibly using multiple accounts (compare the following edits: 1, 2, and 3), continues to make the same edit about a Pakistani incident that is unrelated to this article's subject. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 18:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – New user Kokoonore (talk · contribs · count) now 198.232.116.26 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) infobox content removal and prose removal. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 18:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Hello, we are getting daily IP posts in the talk page with insults etc directed at the subject of the article. Not sure if protection is warranted at this point?. — Diannaa (talk) 18:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition/removal of content about a new book due to be released in November, examples:[46][47][48][49][50][51]. The IP beginning with 145 seems to be the more disruptive of other users involved in the mass editing over recent days. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 19:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 145.40.150.126 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 19:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Daniel Case (talk) 19:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09 October 2024

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of unsourced content, and removal of the one existing reference, by two new editors and an IP editor, here, here and here. Tacyarg (talk) 20:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by a variety of different IPs signed, Willondon (talk) 20:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:59, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The last few days in the edit history are a hot mess. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:GSCASTE, IP hopper edit warrings. ®asteem Talk 00:31, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP edit warring and attempts to subjectively troll, condemn or praise the film TropicAces (talk) 01:24, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:22, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Somebody keeps joking about Family Guy in this article. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:31, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:20, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: This is a Lebanese village very near the Israeli border - is part of the Arab-Israeli conflict contentious topic; article should be ECP. BugGhost🦗👻 07:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A year is good enough for me - thanks Callanecc BugGhost🦗👻 07:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because people like and specially Wikipedians want to make this page better Sig ma rehan (talk) 12:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. OhNoitsJamie Talk 12:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And can't be done unilaterally anyway. Request unprotection at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement or WP:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.  Requesting immediate archiving...Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page is factually incorrect and misinforms readers 2601:248:8481:B370:287F:D4AE:14F4:CB21 (talk) 13:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Any request to lower the protection on articles related to the Arab-Israeli conflict will not be entertained on any venue on Wikipedia at this time.  Requesting immediate archiving...Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change the death part to assassination, so then the article will be more specific to explain on that part Fredd the boy (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done but it really doesn't matter if somebody changes it back, because the entire section already calls it assassination, and even to the article that is already titled that way. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible." This is an opinion and interpretation of Zionism. You cannot present this in the opening page about Zionism since it is not one of the main aspects of Zionism at all, and not a universal aspect of Zionism and most certainly was not a priority in Zionist ideology. It was an aspiration of several factions of Zionism and was acted upon during the 1947-1949 civil war in Palestine. In her work, Manna, Adel (2022), argues for this interpretation because during the war "the principal objective of the Zionist leadership to keep as few Arabs as possible in the Jewish state" (p.2) and "in the 1948 war, when it became clear that the objective that enjoyed the unanimous support of Zionists of all inclinations was to establish a Jewish state with the smallest possible number of Palestinians" (p.4). These were war objectives and not key tenets of Zionism. Mana then goes above and beyond and claims: "The Zionists had two cherished objectives: fewer Arabs in the country and more land in the hands of the settlers" (p.33). First, this is also a war objective and not an ideological objective. You can also say the same about the other side "The Arab countries had two cherished objectives: fewer Jews in the country and more land in the hands of Arabs". While both are true, they were not a key tenet in their ideology (and I would argue that Arabs made clear they wished the land to be Jew-free more than the Jews wanted it to be Arab-free, they just couldn't act upon it because of military inferiority). Furthermore, this statement was never proven, but simply given as a fact and quoted here on Wikipedia. The Zionists main objective was to secure safe borders regardless and prevent Arab countries from occupying any land that was part of the British Mandate for Palestine. In their aim to do so, the most strategic move, was to occupy as much land and depopulate it from the civilian population that was hostile to the Jews and supportive of the Arab countries. This is not an opinion, this is a fact of war and you don't need to be a military strategist to understand the logic in that. I would suggest that you simply write "Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine". The rest of the sentence is Mana's own beliefs and thoughts and is highly disputable and a personal slander for most Zionists. You cannot write this on Wikipedia which should be a neutral ground. You can move that part to a sub-chapter and write "Many scholars today believe that Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible". This means that it is not a neutral fact and is open for debate! But if you honor your own neutrality, as you write in the Page title "Wikipedia:Neutral point of view" (All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias), then take that sentence down from the opening page and most certainly don't write it as a fact, because it isn't a fact, it isn't neutral and it is most certainly not bias. EshcharG (talk) 16:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, can I ask whether a social media post(s) or media report led you to submit this request? If so, which posts/reports? Sean.hoyland (talk) 16:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@EshcharG: Mighty Wall O' Text requests will not be entertained. If you want people to take your request seriously, you need to be as concise and clear as possible. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due To Many Copy Edits By Trolls That Spread False Information On This Page, Due To the Fact That People Would Spread Lies On Lots Of Pages, This Will Not Happen On This Page Anyway Or Anyhow Quentin23J (talk) 19:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In cryptocurrency genre WP:GS/CRYPTO, seems to be getting IP address promotional edits promoting something called trollcoin (no idea what that is, but unrelated). Jtbobwaysf (talk) 20:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:52, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection could be helpful. Useless IP edits during several years that were all reverted. тнояsтеn 20:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Repeated BLP violations of WP:GENSEX arbitration level. Request raising page protection to ECP to prevent further disruption and logging of it under CTOP sanctions. Raladic (talk) 21:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Similar vandalism by multiple newly created accounts (possible socks). Lenny Marks (talk) 23:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring over a perceived typo by:

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism of WP:GENSEX topic after previous protection expired. Request indef semi this time per arbitration sanctions for CTOP. Raladic (talk) 03:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:21, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Forked from Extended confirmed protection main article The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done ECPed. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 07:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 23:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article recenlty came out of protection and IPs have been editing to remove material. TarnishedPathtalk 02:26, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi two weeks. Valereee (talk) 12:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks TarnishedPathtalk 12:48, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – I have become tired after continuously reverting the edits related to caste of the subject as everytime some random ip or new user remove it like it was done here [52]. It goes unnoticed every time. This page need extended confirmed protection so that only reliable editors can edit it and no BLP violation takes place by random new users. Adamantine123 (talk) 10:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, that page has had pending changes protection for a month. Valereee (talk) 12:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I went ahead and gave it an indef semi, as pending changes wasn't working and this is chronic and a major BLP issue; if anyone objects to that, happy to discuss. Valereee (talk) 12:24, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent Nobel Prize laureate, he is being subject to adding info without or with dubious sources and now of vandalism. Protection for the week would be ok, if not at least 24h. ReyHahn (talk) 10:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done 1 week semi. Valereee (talk) 12:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing by registered users. Article has been previously extended protected so need a longer duration now. The topic is also affected by misinformation and fake news by Indian media. Nomian (talk) 05:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done extended semi another month. Valereee (talk) 12:49, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users and newly created accounts. Hotwiki (talk) 07:37, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Valereee (talk) 13:09, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from LTA for over a week. Wikishovel (talk) 08:26, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi'd one week. Valereee (talk) 12:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 12:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GoodnightmushTalk 12:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Antisemitic vandalism BobFromBrockley (talk) 13:27, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Valereee (talk) 14:59, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that in the Casualties and losses section, "1,000+ Lebanese civilians killed[36]" will be removed or rephrased. That is because the article itself doesn't mention if they were civilians or fighters, while Hezbollah hasn't published official death numbers since the beeper attack. Thus we can't know how many civilians were killed - and the Al Jazeera article doesn't say it either — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.55.173.215 (talkcontribs) 16:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've copied this request over to the talk page. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:52, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:38, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced material by anonymous editors of current concert tour event. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 17:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Persistent vandalism – Specifically, indefinite move-protection to deter a certain LTA from performing move vandalism. Blake Gripling (talk) 17:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. (only move protection, article remains semi-protected) Elli (talk | contribs) 17:09, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Changed request from Indefinite semi-protection to Indefinite move protection and moved archive request below these comments. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected by Elli. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... All Shall Be Well, oh Bot. Favonian (talk) 17:26, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to request to change the article name because clearly Israel didn't invade the whole Lebanon and it's not it intention. They said that their operation is to drive Hezbollah from south Lebanon So i want to make request to change it into 2024 israeli invasion of south lebanon أحمد توفيق (talk) 12:56, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This would be a controversial move, and non-extended-confirmed editors are not permitted to participate in requested move discussions. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:53, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not to mention that south Lebanon isn't an independent state; it'd still be an invasion of Lebanon overall.  Requesting immediate archiving...Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:06, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: lots of ip vandalism with making it "were" vs "are an inactive" 45BearsFan (talk) 16:41, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @45BearsFan: Please read vandalism because it's not vandalism. While we will protect articles having issues with unsourced or poorly-sourced edits, it would help if the edit summaries in the article were clearer about the reasons for reversions, restorations of content, etc. That's to help both newcomers and anyone reviewing the history. A summary like bringing this back is not ideal. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It`s been edited by someone who shouldnt have the authority to edit what was effectively an acurate page. Your "editor" has already been cited many times as being extremely biased against certain protected categories and allows his fetishes to dictate what and how he edits! 124.244.164.104 (talk) 08:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:36, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is a complete fabrication of the proven truth. 109.146.139.172 (talk) 10:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:36, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page contains false and misleading information. 90.180.72.152 (talk) 13:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:36, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Any further requests for this from another user who is here because of the GBNews piece and does not provide a defensible "change X to Y" style of request will be reverted off as disruptive.
@Muboshgu: The talk page is currently semi-protected due to a glut of drive-by users coming in thanks to a GBNews piece about the topic. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha. WP:DR is over <-- there. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Filmssssssssssss, it's got pending, which seems like it's working? Valereee (talk) 15:50, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Favonian (talk) 17:30, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruption. ZimZalaBim talk 14:18, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I blocked a bunch of IPs who were using the same edit summary. Any idea what that's about? Valereee (talk) 14:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism in aftermath of yesterday’s firing. The Kip (contribs) 18:30, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kinu. Favonian (talk) 18:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-time history of vandalism by IP addresses. dotXK 03:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to some of the buzz around the movie, the page is being persistently vandalized. Professor Penguino (talk) 07:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page protection appears to have expired, and IP editors are once again seeking to remove a redirect established a few months ago by AfD consensus per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zee Marathi Utsav Natyancha Awards 2023. Please re-apply protection, thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:21, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently deceased public figure, with high visibility and vandalism/test edits. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:32, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the love of god can someone please hurry up and lock this page? It's completely unmanageable with the number of tribute edits for unregistered IPs and newbie registered editors. Requires a high level protection. --Jkaharper (talk) 19:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Pachu Kannan (talk) 19:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe semi is good enough? It's mostly IPs and new users keep changing the death date, using invalid parameters, and not following MOS. Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 20:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs who keep changing the opening sentence to include the subject's nationalities when they are expanded upon in greater detail in the second sentence. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:53, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continuous disruptive editing by IP user since 27 September, just the last ones: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BMW_3_Series&diff=prev&oldid=1250318178 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BMW_3_Series&diff=prev&oldid=1250127155 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BMW_3_Series&diff=prev&oldid=1249207495 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BMW_3_Series&diff=prev&oldid=1248169546. Zac67 (talk) 20:21, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:23, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:06, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10 October 2024

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – One month semi to prevent ongoing disruption by IPs/new accounts trying to push a racial POV on this BLP. Valereee (talk) 12:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Reluctantly. The bar for protecting article talk pages (WP:ATPROT) is very high and it's happened twice in the last week, which isn't frequent enough to reach that bar in my opinion. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection expires and the vandalism returns a week later. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An unregistered user keeps adding statements said during oral argument using a transcript as a "source". Said user has been reverted and warned several times about WP:OR but insists it is fact. Snickers2686 (talk) 19:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 71.161.114.16 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. Protection is not for single users/IPs. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by two editors to reinstate POV tags to the article despite a lack of consensus for the additional of those tags. TarnishedPathtalk 09:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:49, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @TarnishedPath: Do not edit war and please follow the guidance in Template:POV before removing it again. There is no requirement to have consensus prior to adding a tag. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:18, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruption. ZimZalaBim talk 14:16, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk Daniel Case (talk) 01:18, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive removal of band member from Personnel section. Also requesting page protection for the following articles for the same reason: Act I: Live in Rosario, Colours in the Dark (album) and The Shadow Self. HorrorLover555 (talk) 15:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Strange users keep reversing any edits about the ancentry of the admiral. His Serbian ancestry is absolute non-sense and is not confirmed by any source. Karadzic46 (talk) 15:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:34, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. BattleshipMan (talk) 16:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:38, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is within scope of WP:ARBECR, which states "this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection". Sean.hoyland (talk) 16:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:41, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Users repeatedly recreating article despite AFD consensus to redirect. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Chronic disruption of nationality of company, specifically it being changed to being Chinese by IP editors. Has been previously protected and has resumed since expiration. TylerBurden (talk) 17:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The Wikipedia page for Ratan Tata has recently been subjected to frequent vandalism by new and inexperienced users. Given the significance of Ratan Tata’s contributions to industry and philanthropy, it is crucial to maintain the accuracy and integrity of this page. The ongoing vandalism is disrupting the quality of information and misleading readers. Therefore, I request that this page be semi-protected for a duration of one week to prevent further unauthorized and harmful edits. If the vandalism persists after this period, I would appreciate consideration for extending the protection. Ravi3270 (talk) 21:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. until October 12. Daniel Case (talk) 02:04, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death. JMHamo (talk) 21:57, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP can't stop reverting sourced info. Not sure how to request a range block so not sure if that's better... Nswix (talk) 23:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS message on talk, under AP rather than BLP. Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The deeply contentious nature of the topic means we're likely to keep having problems; like Western Sahara is protected, this should be too. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:08, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. I couldn't agree with you more that the Maghreb needs to be a CTOPS area as much as, and for the same reasons as, the Horn already is. But I don't have the time nor the familiarity with the topic to put together a request for ArbCom to make that designation. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user keeps adding further information about the Dundas renaming proposal without consensus. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:31, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some weird sock-based vandalism thing going on. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:52, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This surname page keeps on getting redirected by sockpuppets of Truthfindervert. GTrang (talk) 01:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent edit-warring and disruptive editing of BLP article. livelikemusic (TALK!) 02:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to conflicting views in the community, many people vandalise this article to suit their own individual conveniences rather than the beliefs held within the majority of the Sikh community (for example, depicted mona sikhs rather than sahajdhari ones) 2A00:23C8:4B00:D301:A9DC:4B8F:F3DF:8CB7 (talk) 15:50, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 01:32, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is within scope of WP:ARBECR, which states "this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection". Sean.hoyland (talk) 16:36, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Honestly? This article hasn't been edited at all in a week and has seen hardly any attention in the past year. Its subject is also long removed in time from the present conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page called Tharavad has this guy keep deleting cited sources for no reason. Requesting Extended Protection for the page. Tnx. DravidianSingam (talk) 16:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war between IP user and registered user, IP user unwilling to talk it to talk page. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 17:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:405:8403:AFB0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. for 72 hours Protection is generally unnecessary in cases involving a single IP (or in this case a /64). Daniel Case (talk) 02:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip vandalism. Mostly removal but a few BLP issues. Knitsey (talk) 17:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Both IPs vandalizing the page blocked by different admins. Daniel Case (talk) 02:03, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Some IP vandalism (not all of the recent IP edits, but several). GraziePrego (talk) 23:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like it's being handled just fine for now. Daniel Case (talk) 02:22, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Only autoconfirmed users can may file enforcement requests, after this invalid request by a non-autoconfirmed user. 103.190.228.133 (talk) 02:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Since non-autoconfirmed users are allowed to comment, protection wouldn't be appropriate unless there are more serious issues than that. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:22, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An event that has already passed, and mostly final infomation. Wikihelper910 (talk) 17:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikihelper910: This was protected under the auspices of a contentious topic designation (post-1992 politics of the United States) and cannot be unilaterally unprotected. Appeal at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement or at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected per above. Daniel Case (talk) 02:41, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert title change from current to original "Muslim grooming gangs in the UK" 47.25.189.113 (talk) 02:34, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done As the many archived discussions on the talk page indicate, this is not how we do this when the article title is this contentious. There is, in fact, an open discussion on the talk page of this issue. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent, RD2-worthy pagemove vandalism by an LTA. See this LTA page for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:08, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked by PhilKnight. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:32, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And the article is indefinitely extended confirmed move protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:32, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism continues after edit protection, and will very likely continue after it has expired due to the circumstances which prompted the vandalism in the first place. Asking for IP users to be barred from editing for the remainder of the protection period. Ocifur (talk) 04:52, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 05:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Callanecc. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:37, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Falls under WP:PIA. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 08:25, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Might fall under WP:RUSUKR; more news to that ship might happen in the future, which could lead to disinformation. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 08:28, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Might fall under WP:PIA. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 08:29, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 05:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism in the form of joke edits of subject matter in the article Ocifur (talk) 08:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Falls under WP:RUSUKR. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 08:24, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of antisemitic vandalism by IPs and SPAs (e.g. GeneralZOGgy) BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:31, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:53, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from IPs and newly registered users due to subject being arrested for sexual assault Bnwkr (talk) 10:49, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting a lot of vandalism/test edits on this page today for some reason - two new accounts and an IP. BugGhost🦗👻 14:13, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Favonian, please protect the page 142.114.1.184 (talk) 15:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:18, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:21, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Angry IP football fans again. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 19:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 12:03, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Hooliganism. Leonidlednev (TCL) 18:50, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Favonian (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (TCL) 18:51, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator L235. Favonian (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator DatGuy. Favonian (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: We're having quite a night for IPs angry at football-related things. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 19:10, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: potential vandalism Bird244 (talk) 10:43, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pages are not protected preemptively 142.114.1.184 (talk) 15:28, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UserRGT (talkcontribs)

I see no IP edits on that page since May. Protection will not be issued to lock down a preferred version.Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:43, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:49, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:51, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:51, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: His fans writing insane paragraphs like the article is a true crime podcast, and then in return, other people calling them names in the article back and forth. JohnnyBallswell (talk) 18:22, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: More angry IP football fans. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 19:14, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:18, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Mass attack. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:32, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

11 October 2024

Reason: High level of vandalism after Bahrain vs Indonesia match KIDE777 18:22, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: A bunch of hooliganism on the talk page as well. --Leonidlednev (TCL) 18:41, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Leonidlednev (TCL) 22:45, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparent multiple socks are committing identical edits of removing sources & content with edit summaries of "Jewish nonsense"/'Jewish revisionist nonsense". Suggest at least some sort of temporary protection, preferably auto-confirmed accounts etc. Shearonink (talk) 19:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:4808:9374:ec00::/64 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 19:57, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Strange disruption changing a single word, with the editor insisting on this change now possibly trying to force it through by using IP. TylerBurden (talk) 19:31, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism from different anonymous I.P. addresses. The nature of the vandalism is defamatory (the page is a BLP). SpookiePuppy (talk) 22:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:38, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 22:53, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of disputed, unsourced content by IP editor. AusLondonder (talk) 05:11, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism over the last two weeks JP (Talk) 08:24, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruption by LTA-IP. Griboski (talk) 20:12, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Griboski: Which LTA? More specifics are needed before the page can be protected for this reason. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:02, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Quinlan: It is this one. It is a bit stale but only because it is impossible to keep up with its consistent but sporadic appearances. More recent examples include this and this. Though this range is different, it is all coming from the same location and with the same behavior. As you can see from their comment below, they are well-acquainted with me and other editors. --Griboski (talk) 22:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator, I didn't write anything bad, read it. This is the standard option of user Griborski, I reviewed his edits and he did it several times to protect the page because he doesn't like what he writes. And that no one can edit, so that he makes his own version when the page is protected and I can't edit it, without valid sources. Please see my edits. I didn't write anything bad. Those are his tricks, he thinks if he has an account he can do whatever he wants. He has no answer for this, he needs to provide the source of what I told him. Look at my edits and decide. Thanks78.1.141.127 (talk) 20:25, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 11:28, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please, protect my user talk page due to LTA Wikinger's high activity. Karol739 (talk) 15:12, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been attracting multiple IP vandals since the end of September. Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:51, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary or Indefinate? please verify 142.114.1.184 (talk) 19:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The length of time is usually up to the protecting admin anyway. Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: disruptive IP editing on his career stats 45BearsFan (talk) 16:32, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 17:07, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive/Vandalism continues for the past few days. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 17:50, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated bad faith addition of unsourced false information from IP users, mainly adding two non-existent upcoming films titled "Intergalactic" and "Sleep". SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 18:02, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lots of insults added by IPs to this BLP on a football referee in the last hour or so. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 18:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jauerback. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Leonidlednev (TCL) 18:43, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (TCL) 22:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Snowman304|talk 00:11, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 00:15, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A return of IP/new user insertion of unsourced/poorly sourced content immediately after protection expired. Looks like DUCK socking. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GSCASTE, IP hopper edit warrings, Persistent disruptive editing & addition of poorly sourced WP:CASTE cruft. ®asteem Talk 01:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GSCASTE, IP hopper edit warrings, Persistent disruptive editing & addition of poorly sourced WP:CASTE cruft. ®asteem Talk 01:57, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am a living person. An anonymous user changes my page to say I'm retired (I am not) every time it gets corrected. They change all my history to be as negative as possible and take out positive things and replace them with negative ones. I am recovering from cancer and am not retired. It's malicious. 75.84.245.208 (talk) 03:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 03:52, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is within scope of WP:ARBECR, which states "this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection". Also, there seems to be some IP edit table tennis going on over there. Sean.hoyland (talk) 04:09, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mellk (talk) 06:50, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2003:DF:7F2D:6F00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 36 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user is repeatedly adding CSD tag and random things. I request at least a 1 week protection. JuniperChill (talk) 12:14, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User requested its deletion, according to log. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nobody (talk) 12:29, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Debunktrolls (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IPs over several days. AusLondonder (talk) 13:11, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 93.157.84.22 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 48 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: roof issues leading to unconstructive editing. Will120 (talk) 15:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User has not edited since their most recent warning. Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High ip vandalism on page changing boxoffice figures without sources. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's died down in the last couple of days. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. GiraffenCode (talk) 23:03, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:152:5081:CB20:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for one month. Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of edit warring on semi-protected article HackerKnownAs (talk) 00:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Indeed, but no edits in over a week as discussion has moved to talk. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 00:19, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 102.218.59.37 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Gets vandalised often by new users. Got twice temporary semied before. win8x (talking | spying) 02:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, a revdel on the usernames would work. Just a bunch of sockpuppets. win8x (talking | spying) 02:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. All socks. But I did do the RevDel'ing. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone has made themselves an admin to this page and is posting disinformation. The person that this page is about has no access to edit or even view. 2600:8800:7100:1F90:6959:D99B:79CD:ECA3 (talk) 05:34, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is not how Wikipedia adminship works - it is not per-page - and Greg Smith has every ability to read the article about himself. What is going on here is a content dispute where the IP editors are choosing to blindly revert rather than actually explain their case rationally to other editors on the page, something which Smith himself can (and should) do. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:33, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected per above Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption by dynamic IP. VQuakr (talk) 04:08, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 10:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 12:20, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 12:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello fellow editors,

I am submitting a request for an increase in page protection for the Trade Republic Wikipedia page, due to a growing issue of vandalism that is part of a larger fraud operation. Fraudsters are repeatedly adding false information, such as fake personnel and entities, in order to impersonate the official company and scam unsuspecting customers. This has led to hundreds of people falling victim to these scams, believing they are interacting with the legitimate Trade Republic bank when they are, in fact, transferring money to fraudsters.

One of the fraudulent websites involved in this scam is hxxps://cfd[.]traderepublicatrading[.]com, which impersonates Trade Republic using the fake entity 'Trade Republica' that scammers add to the page. The false information added to Wikipedia is being leveraged by these scammers to lend credibility to their operations, causing significant financial harm to users who trust the content on Wikipedia.

Given the seriousness and the real-world impact of these malicious edits, I believe higher protection is necessary to prevent further abuse. We have had hundreds of cases of individuals falling victim to this scam, and extended protection would go a long way in ensuring the integrity of the page and protecting the public from being misled.

I hope the community and administrators can consider this request for longer-term protection to safeguard both the page and its users.

Thank you for your attention to this serious issue, Secbot at Trade Republic (talk) 13:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:58, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recurring LTA target, see page history and this page for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 07:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Drmies (talk) 16:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liliana doppelganger redirects

Indefinite full protection: Doppelganger redirects, no reason for anyone to edit those pages. Protection matches my user page, which was fully protected per WP:UPROT. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 08:31, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected Drmies (talk) 16:06, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Popular musician that is the target for vandalism and disruptive editing. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:31, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Drmies (talk) 16:08, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistence of unregistered users presenting erroneous information about a high-profile article. – Relayed (t • c) 10:57, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Drmies (talk) 16:08, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Rotating/proxy IPs posting BLP violating screeds. Note that this is happening on both the article and the talk page. MrOllie (talk) 14:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Thanks MrOllie. Drmies (talk) 16:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism after previous protection expired. Mellk (talk) 08:33, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:21, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User keeps adding information about a poor human rights airline to the USA which has no place and it is not a free advert either. 31.112.157.96 (talk) 13:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. --Kinu t/c 13:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:24, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:43, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP changing editor that doesn't understand what an acting role is. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:47, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing continues. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2a02:8440:3000::/37 (talk · contribs). 1-month partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 15:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP changing editor that doesn't understand what an acting role is. Has been repeatedly reverted. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing continues under a different IP address. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2a02:8440:3000::/37 (talk · contribs). 1-month partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 15:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same IP changing editor that doesn't get a hint. Has been repeatedly reverted, no success. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing continues. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2a02:8440:3000::/37 (talk · contribs). 1-month partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 15:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP changing editor that keeps adding the same bit in. See my other recent RPPs. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:37, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2a02:8440:3000::/37 (talk · contribs). 1-month partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 15:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:12, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. The most recent edit from an IP user, included references that don't align with the references they've posted.[53] Hotwiki (talk) 15:17, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. There is really not enough disruption to warrant disruption. Just revert the most recent edit, with an explanation of course. Drmies (talk) 15:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 15:22, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I blocked the most recent one, but there's really not enough IMO to warrant protection. Drmies (talk) 15:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term series of test editing. Jalen Barks (Woof) 15:35, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I see only one disruptive edit in the last year and a half. Drmies (talk) 15:51, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS ARBPIA. Borgenland (talk) 15:47, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Drmies (talk) 15:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ®asteem Talk 09:20, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2409:408C:8D49:BD9C:B90A:CC26:DBB6:2535 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:18, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent disruptive edits from IPs (COI?) even after previous protection. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 79.244.61.130 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:20, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:20, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: War editing due to "Legacy" section, users stopped to add "Grounded Videos" on Legacy section, despite this, there are a real problem, some users continue to add text revealing Caillou with these next sources : [1][2][3].

An example, if I show my "Wrapper Offline" series at Stade Le Gallo (AC Boulogne-Billancourt) and they filmed an episode of my series and upload it on YouTube, posted it on Facebook or make an article on their website (see here), these sources are reliable? IMO, YouTube is not reliable, is Facebook, Twitter, Instragram and ACBB Foot website are reliable? Do we need reliable sources like Le Parisien, BFM, Sky News, CNN, BBC or other French and especially English real sources to add "Grounded Videos" on Legacy section?

IMO, if this war editing don't stop, unless the users find a consensus on the discussion page (see talk), the best is or protect the page or use a filter. Thanks. Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 14:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:30, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Hart, Hugh (2008-07-25). "GoAnimate Leashes Underdog for D.I.Y. Site". WIRED. Archived from the original on 2024-07-13. Retrieved 2024-07-13. GoAnimate announced Friday at Comic-Con that it's roping in a posse of old-school cartoon characters for laptop animators to have their way with.
  2. ^ Alper, Meryl (2023). Kids Across the Spectrums: Growing Up Autistic in the Digital Age (PDF). MIT Press. p. 81. ISBN 978-0-262-54536-5. Retrieved 2024-03-08. Nour repeatedly complained about Karim watching fan-produced Caillou and Baldi videos on YouTube that were animated by using the software program GoAnimate.
  3. ^ Bernama, Oleh (2020-02-02). "Remaja istimewa mampu hasilkan video dengan 'Goanimate'" [Special teenagers can produce videos with 'Goanimate']. Sinar Harian (in Malay). Retrieved 2024-07-21.

Reason: indefinite semi protection - A bunch of User:Shame on PJ Santos sockpuppet accounts have vandalized my user talk page for the past few months. My talk page was semi-protected for a few days last August but the vandal resumed their activites after the protection expired. - WayKurat (talk) 08:58, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Re-emergence of disruptive IPs since the last page protection lapsed. TarnishedPathtalk 13:22, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 but may I suggest it be indefinite considering the subject matter? LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 17:10, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:37, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed users protection: An IP user is persistently thinking Wikipedia to be a fanpage of actor Baseer Ali and editing these 3 pages in same way from multiple IP addresses. Like all confirmed reliable sources mentions Sana and Adrija being casted opposite actor Paras Kalnawat just like another lead of show Shraddha Arya is being mentioned casted opposite all 3 actors who played Karan. Similarly they increase length of article by copying things from career section to info section by doubling same sources too. I request confirmed user access on these 3 pages for few days to stop further efit warring. Pri2000 (talk) 16:02, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disrupting editing for two weeks by deleting his voice cast, yet again. Stephen McKeever (talk) 18:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:43, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, disruptive editing, and spam since 22:21, 18 September 2023. Alith Anar 19:20, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 19:35, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:16, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by anonymous IP Surayeproject3 (talk) 14:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correcting my reasoning to:
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing[54] - IP user continuously switches the article between Aramean and Assyrian, while the sources use the name "Assyrian" and linked articles use Assyrian as well Surayeproject3 (talk) 14:10, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Surayeproject3, no need to link "disruptive editing"--we know what it is. You reverted that IP twice; if you had warned them each time, I could simply block them right now. Drmies (talk) 15:57, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, thanks for the help. If they continue to make these types of edits after the 60 hour block, should I follow up with you? Surayeproject3 (talk) 17:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sporadic IP/unregister user vandalism. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 20:12, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:48, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 21:58, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12 October 2024

Reason: Edit war, inaccurate portrayal of evidence based medical research 130.113.151.234 (talk) 22:30, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an accurate portrayal of events. The IP user geolocates to where the subject works and has a likely conflict of interest. There is consensus at BLPN that the content in the article is not libellous as the IP claims and that the disputes regarding claims Yusuf has made regarding cardiovascular risks of salt and saturated fat are valid to include: Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Salim_Yusuf. I would support semi-protection of the article to prevent disruption by this IP user. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:20, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:23, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An unregistered user who previously vandalized the article for Stitch! to add false information about a non-existent crossover between that TV series and Dragon Tales (among other unrelated IPs such as Teletubbies) has since shifted their efforts to the latter show's article after Stitch! indefinite semi-protected status (due to their years long history adding such misinformation). They've made several such vandalizing edits at various points this year but have increased their edits significantly in the past 24 hours. –WPA (talk) 22:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 22:57, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:23, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated uncited edits/vandalism by IP hopper. PersianFire (talk) 22:51, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:23, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Awful lot of unhelpful edits from IP editors, due to the fluid status of the Internet Archive. Until this blows over, it'd be helpful to limit editing... cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 23:58, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget about how many Wikipedia articles link to the Internet Archive, especially in the References section of these articles, hence the need for longer-term semi-protection, alongside the data breach. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:51, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:23, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A new account vandalizes in the same manner, two hours after the recent three day protection is lifted. We're going to need a bigger block. signed, Willondon (talk) 00:22, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:51, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:51, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated removal of sourced content AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:38, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:23, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IPs and new accounts. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 01:37, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:15, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 02:12, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: What you did is a disgrace. You are covering up for rapist of children. Those children and women need justice, and to be able to speak for themselves, not to be dehumanized by your political agenda. 136.244.7.9 (talk) 20:52, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy non-stop edit war with weak or no sources. Articles history has been destroyed. Gharouni Talk 01:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IRP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:25, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA. TyphoonAmpil (💬 - 📝) 05:12, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Joyous!. Favonian (talk) 07:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change "kontol" statement to "yes". "Kontol" is an extremely vulgar slang word in Indonesian (means "penis"). 120.188.6.172 (talk) 06:36, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done: thank you for reporting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:43, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 08:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been vandalized a lot in the past few days. A temporary semi protection would be greatly appreciated. نوحفث   Let's Chat! 03:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Buldok465 (talk) 08:12, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Aside from these misguided edits, 4 days ago, there has been no disruption in recent memory. Favonian (talk) 08:21, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Buldok465 (talk) 08:18, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Pending changes protection appears to work just fine. Favonian (talk) 08:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article is currently very biased, and every time I add primary sources to add more accurate details, my edits are deleted and restored to original state. BigCityOrigins (talk) 02:46, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. As your account was created yesterday, protection of the article is not in your best interest. Favonian (talk) 13:51, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Andre🚐 08:42, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected I waffled a little as it's not frequent, but it's regular, and page isn't heavily watched. Valereee (talk) 17:19, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Socking starts again immediately after unprotection. Sjö (talk) 13:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:00, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently, it's happening here too. SirMemeGod16:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Valereee (talk) 17:23, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, persistent addition of inaccurate information. SirMemeGod16:03, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Valereee (talk) 17:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IPs. Some1 (talk) 17:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Valereee (talk) 17:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism of this BLP has resumed almost as soon as the last protection expired. Suggest a longer period of semi-protection or maybe even permanent. DanielRigal (talk) 17:28, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Valereee (talk) 17:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs repeatedly changing the image to unrelated images. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 08:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Also reblocked the vandal IP, whose block had recently expired. Valereee (talk) 18:01, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing multiple persistent vandalism-edits from associated anons. Please consider permanent confirmed/auto-confirmed protection. Shearonink (talk) 15:42, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bot, the IPs/anons who were vandalizing the article...1 was blocked but that hasn't stopped the associated accounts from moving on and continuing to vandalize. And, frankly, continually cleaning up their nonsense is wearing. Could someone here at RPP consider auto-confirm/confirmed protection. - Shearonink (talk) 17:35, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:56, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pc not working2600:100C:B012:5E15:B5A9:6EC1:3B69:4452 (talk) 17:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Unsourced content and fancruft being added once again. Rusty 🐈 15:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:57, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, addition of incorrect information. I have also been given information that a group of Redditors have been targeting these pages in specific, for some reason. SirMemeGod16:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Looks like it's all the same user? Valereee (talk) 17:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Jeffrey R. Clarktalkcontribs 19:25, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 19:45, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism throughout article’s entire history. 24.28.96.155 (talk) 17:36, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Request from user intentionally evading a block. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism since last protection. 24.28.96.155 (talk) 17:37, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Request from user intentionally evading a block. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism. Pc not working24.28.96.155 (talk) 17:37, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Request from user intentionally evading a block. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 174.197.58.100 (talk) 17:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Request from user intentionally evading a block. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 174.197.58.100 (talk) 17:40, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Request from user intentionally evading a block. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 174.197.58.100 (talk) 17:43, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Request from user intentionally evading a block. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 174.197.58.100 (talk) 17:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Request from user intentionally evading a block. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism in the past 2 months. 2600:100C:B012:5E15:B5A9:6EC1:3B69:4452 (talk) 17:49, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Request from user intentionally evading a block. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2600:100C:B012:5E15:B5A9:6EC1:3B69:4452 (talk) 17:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Request from user intentionally evading a block. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13 October 2024

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. WP:ARBPIA – you know the drill. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 ⚧ 【=◈︿◈=】 02:03, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Steven Walling • talk 23:42, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Plenty of edits by IP and newly registered editors reverted. Last constructive edit by IP was late August of this year. George Ho (talk) 21:13, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 22:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent disruptive IP edits adding some nonsense about Julie Andrews. Seeking semi-protection for a while to get the IP-hopped to give up their foolishness. oknazevad (talk) 22:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 22:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP editor is repeatedly adding back false/unsourced information about a character after being warned on their talk page. Blubewwy (talk) 03:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 23:51, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection : Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 03:21, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Steven Walling • talk 23:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism going on for months. Wikibear47 (talk) 08:13, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 23:56, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Wikibear47 (talk) 08:15, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 23:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Target of persistent vandalism. Was temp protected but vandalism started again after protection expired. Wikibear47 (talk) 08:22, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 00:00, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:ARBCOM CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 20:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Steven Walling • talk 00:00, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Return of long term, persistent vandal. EdwardUK (talk) 18:45, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 02:00, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs changing cast order according to the own fanPOV apparently, not following film credit order [55] [56] [57] [58]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:51, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FanPOV change of film cast-order vandalism continues [59]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 21:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 02:02, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SimplyLouis27 (talk) 21:21, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 22:57, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP keeps adding a huge version of the table that isn't helpful. Please see the talk page of some other attemptted solutions. @MrOllie:Mason (talk) 22:12, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Steven Walling • talk 22:56, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unsourced or poorly sourced and blocked for a week. Stephen McKeever (talk) 03:19, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 23:52, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and edits by unverified users. ShrimanBhakt (talk) 04:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 23:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IP addresses edit warring over the contested origin of the dynasty. PadFoot (talk) 07:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 23:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – An odd spate of vandalism by various IPs/new users. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 02:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA and WP:RUSUKR; this weapon is used in both the Israel-Hamas war and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 20:27, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The article is only tangentially about either conflict. Other equipment used by involved armed forces, such as the M16 rifle, are not subject to Arbitration enforcement. Steven Walling • talk 00:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection (or reinforced semi-protection) is being requested for repeated budget vandalism in violation of the Template:Infobox film rules. Unregistered users have made it very clear that they will continue to violate this rule every day it is unprotected. It has previously been semi-protected for three days. DESERTSCHo0L20 (talk) 01:57, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continued disruptive editing in Set list section after page protection expired. HorrorLover555 (talk) 03:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 10:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 01:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 20:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 02:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change

Later in 2023, Saudi Arabian crown prince Mohammed bin Salman said normalization with Israel was "for the first time real",[64] even though Israeli PM Netanyahu had rejected a Palestinian state again in August.[65][66][67] Neverthelees Saudi Arabian crown prince Mohammed bin Salman said normalization was "for the first time real".[64]

which has grammatical errors and sounds repetitive, to

Later in 2023, despite Israeli PM Netanyahu's statement denying the creation of a Palestinian state as a condition for a normalization with Saudi Arabia, [65][66][67] Saudi Arabian crown prince Mohammed bin Salman said that normalization with Israel was "for the first time real". [64]

Tom125213 (talk) 11:13, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Thanks for the suggestion, it's more concise. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 09:19, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit protection has just been lifted, vandalism and unconstructive editing is back immediately. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:13, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:51, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – That puppeteer with the nonsense user names is changing "sloth" to "lion" again, this time from IPs. I learned about Jefferson's natural history work in school, too, but I grew out of thinking that mistake was funny. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 08:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2804:389:e1b3:1cf8::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Bishonen.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EC doesn't seem necessary. Favonian (talk) 09:42, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Back when this article was protected, it was a featured article. That was in 2011. Hopefully, protection is no longer necessary now that 13+ years have passed. 2600:382:12B4:E73D:591C:E954:CAFE:4867 (talk) 16:45, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. The edit request mechanism has been working fine. You can use Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard to guide you. When the talk page shows a history of accepted edit requests, we can consider removing protection. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protection not needed 2603:8001:6FF0:850:366C:37B5:66DE:9C8A (talk) 06:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. No valid reason given to unprotect. Get your account unblocked. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protection no longer needed 2603:8001:6FF0:850:366C:37B5:66DE:9C8A (talk) 06:17, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. As that talk page says, protection will no longer be needed when the block evasion stops occurring. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm requesting to make some edits on Template:Country data Maldives. In the |link alias-air force=, You should change because it has a page now "MNDF Air Corps", Note: Do not add "Maldives Maldives Air Corps" because per https://mndf.gov.mv/mndf/en/org-structure.php?cmd=air-corps, the official name is "MNDF Air Corps", in that case you should change to link alias-air force = MNDF Air Corps. Also you should change link alias-marines = MNDF Marine Corps|Maldives Marine Corps to link alias-marines = MNDF Marine Corps because its official name is MNDF Marine Corps, not Maldives Marine Corps. And then link alias-coast guard = Maldivian Coast Guard should be changed to link alias-coast guard = MNDF Coast Guard, the same reason. Thanks. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 08:12, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. You didn't read the instructions. The template talk page is not protected, so any request should be made there. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP edit warring, simple IP temporary ban should suffice as information is being gathered for the page DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 04:14, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism after a day of page protection Thoriq1024 (talk) 04:15, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 13:36, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Balakashyap at Senthamangalam, Senthamangalam taluk and Sendamangalam (disambiguation). Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:09, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppets vandalize the talkpage. Kadı Message 14:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppets vandalize the talk page. Kadı Message 16:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More misinfo being posted. Paris1127 (talk) 17:53, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is in poor shape, with multiple spelling and grammatical errors. The History section of the article is too long. In fact, there seems to be no reason for it to have an extended-protection tag. TNM101 (chat) 13:39, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected The article is the target of long term socks. You can either request changes on the talk page or, looking at your editing history, wait a bit and you'll be able to directly edit the article. RegentsPark (comment) 15:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: blue beetle 2603:8001:6FF0:850:18C7:9CDB:F28C:7493 (talk) 15:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Vacuous request. Favonian (talk) 15:13, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is within scope of WP:ARBECR, which states "this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection". Most of the recent edits appear to be by IPs and socks. Sean.hoyland (talk) 04:38, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is not a CTOPS action. There is nothing on the page or talk page to inform editors that ECR applies, and this article is about an action that well predates the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 19:06, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 07:00, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why not include the dates of each conflict, also the displaced civilians of Gaza so far which are over 1 million?

Also is it not important to mention the context of Hezbollah involvement and how this has impacted civilians in Lebanon? Classyhippie (talk) 12:02, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The editors here are not involved in that article. We are not here to discuss it, but examine uncontroversial edit requests. We are not going to do the work for you. If you have a specific request to propose, then propose it in the form "change X to Y", "add X after Y", or something similar, and provide sources. You have neither stated where the change should be made, nor how it should be made, and you have not cited any sources. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:01, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Previous high level of IP vandalism. There has been a concerted effort by nationalist editors to platform fringe views (in particular a primordialist view of the languages' origin). Currently one user is attempting to force these changes on the page and is refusing to discuss on the talk page as Wikipedia policy recommends. Metta79 (talk) 09:33, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The user is now forcing his fringe view through without taking part in a constructive discussion on the talk page, and is distorting the existing sources on the page. Metta79 (talk) 10:23, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I very much prefer not to protect pages in ways that essential award a victory in an edit war to the editor with greater access, but in this case my review of the talk page discussion leads me to believe that Jino john1996 is editing against consensus here. JJ, please do not attempt to permission-game your way to EC status during these next three weeks. Editors who have tried have been blocked and disallowed from gaining that permission automatically.

I will also be leaving a CTOPS notice on the article's talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:26, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have also given JJ a CTOPS alert. Daniel Case (talk) 19:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed soon after previous protection expired. Don't believe it's anything long term based on page history, probably just caused by the recent World Cup qualifiers. Liu1126 (talk) 12:59, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:33, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Can this please get a long protection template like its related Afsharid dynasty? Don't think I've ever seen a constructive edit by a IP / new user here. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:00, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will log as CTOPS action under IPA based on extent of empire into present-day Afghanistan and Parkistan. Daniel Case (talk) 19:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, it's already under AA, so logging it that way. Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP disruption. I think it is one editor who keeps returning with different IPs. StephenMacky1 (talk) 13:36, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP disruption. I think it is one editor who keeps returning with different IPs, as with previous. StephenMacky1 (talk) 13:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent re-addition of uncited claims. Onel5969 TT me 15:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 17:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:09, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Respectfully requesting protection due to ongoing edit warring around subject nationality being Russian or Ukrainian.

References to nationality removed until consensus can be reached. Article has previously been protected for this same issue.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&action=view&page=Marie_Bashkirtseff&type=protect

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marie_Bashkirtseff&action=history&offset=20221116064504

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marie_Bashkirtseff&action=history&offset=20230701181815. OXYLYPSE (talk) 19:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Clearly a concerted effort by her supporters to disrupt this page. Protection is the only way to stop this. Lard Almighty (talk) 19:43, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:22, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recurrent WP:SPA edit-warring. The page was previously protected because of SPA edit warring, which has continued since the protection expired. GuardianH (talk) 19:57, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14 October 2024

Reason: IP who is changing IPs keeps adding a joke. A short term (3-7 day) protection should likely make him give up RedPatch (talk) 13:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One edit each in the last two days after the article has gone unedited for two months. Let's see if they've gotten their jollies enough to move on. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am requesting semi-protection for the Wikipedia page on the Kushwaha (surname) due to ongoing disruptive edits and vandalism. Despite the presence of reliable sources to verify the content, certain users continue to remove essential information without providing valid reasons or citations.

Reasons for Protection:

1. Persistent Vandalism: The page has been subject to repeated edits that remove verified information, disrupting the integrity of the content.

2. Importance of Content: The information on this page is crucial for understanding the Kushwaha surname, its origins, and cultural significance. The removal of this content undermines the educational value of the article.

3. Available Sources: There are numerous reliable sources available that support the content currently on the page. These sources can be referenced to validate the information and demonstrate its importance.

4. Community Consensus: Protecting the page would help maintain a stable and accurate representation of the Kushwaha surname, reflecting the consensus of knowledgeable contributors.

5. Encouraging Constructive Editing: Semi-protection would allow only registered editors to contribute, helping to foster a more constructive editing environment.

I believe that semi-protecting this page will help preserve the integrity of the information and ensure that it remains a valuable resource for readers seeking to learn about the Kushwaha surname.

Thank you for considering this request.

Ankitspeaks (talk) 16:24, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ankitspeaks: Requests created via large language models and AI chatbots will not be entertained. Write a request by hand. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:58, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, without prejudice, per above. Daniel Case (talk) 20:57, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing and potential vandalism by anon IPs over the past week. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 17:14, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:6C51:427F:2100:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by NinjaRobotPirate. for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 21:00, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add a little information inside the template since houthi is already added on the Belligerents side i think we should add the casualties of the yemani also in the template same as egyptians or syrians especially those who died as resulted from isreali airstrike and according to those articles 20 July 2024 Israeli attack on Yemen and 29 September 2024 Israeli attacks on Yemen, the yemani casualties are 20 killed, and +147 injured 70.26.36.11 (talk) 03:48, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The request is vague, nonspecific, and cites zero sources. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anachronist have u even read my request? How it's vague and nonspecific. I want to add the yemani casualties resulted from isreali airstrike as it's part of the conflict and if you literally opened the 2 articles you will found all the sources you need.--70.26.36.11 (talk) 07:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those monitoring this request page are not involved with that article, and are not going to enter into debates or discussion. Requests made on this page must be complete and actionable. Your request is neither. You have not stated how you want anything changed. You have not made any specific request in the form "change X to Y" with proper wiki-markup and sources cited. Basically make your request as if you are editing the article yourself. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:48, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anachronist, i want to add information not change

I want to add the yemani casualties to the first template under or with the casualties of lebanon and syria because they were killed by Israel as resulted from this conflict. The sources are here source 14 killed in july attack, source of six killed in September attack. If u can't add this information could you at least put it in the talk page.--70.26.36.11 (talk) 14:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier you said 20 killed in Yemen? Are you getting this by adding 14+6? That's called WP:SYNTHESIS, which isn't allowed, because no source actually says 20 were killed. Both sources are dated the same day, July 21. And they contradict each other. The first one said the death toll "rises" to 14, meaning that is the total. We can't work with contradictory sources, but I have mentioned this discussion on the article's talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:15, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
sorry i fixed the source so now it's not contradicting.

if you look at 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon article that's exactly what happened in the Lebanese army casualties it's stated 4 in 2 sources for each incident. --70.26.36.11 (talk) 21:09, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the second paragraph it states that "The desire to prevent the collapse of the Palestinians and to avoid more refugees were some of the reasons for the entry of the Arab League into the country, which began the 1948 Arab–Israeli War." It is absurd to characterize the invasion by the Arab league into Israel, which triggered the War of Independence as an "entry". The words "entry of" should be changed to "invasion by" which is supported by the source text and just about every other paper on the Israeli War of Independance. Apndrew (talk) 01:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The two sources cited for that sentence don't mention an "invasion". At most, one of the sources simply mentions "sending [in] the Arab armies" in response to a massacre. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:22, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:59, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:248:4780:60:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Joyous!. from article for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 21:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and the removal of essential information without valid reasons. Ankitspeaks (talk) 20:08, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, content dispute, pls discuss at the talk page Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protecting talk about this page hides the breadth and depth of concern that the page is doing harm to Wikipedia's reputation. It plays into the narrative that Wikipedia is being captured by activists with minority (not to say extreme) views and objevtives. Neverbeen~enwiki (talk) 08:54, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Neverbeen~enwiki: Such as the massive amount of drive-by editors drawn to the page by the GB News piece who make one abusive comment and then never edit again? Talk pages are not protected except as a last resort to kerb disruption that would make them all but unusable. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:32, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"objevtives"? Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Muboshgu (talk) 22:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary pending changes: I found some IPs of type 62.74.24.215 or different ranges repeatedly messing up the article Raye changing from "British" to "English", as well as messing up categories without having left any summary of editions. 190.166.83.153 (talk) 23:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your own edits would be subject to PC. Are you OK with that? Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Related to contentious topic. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 08:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (TCL) 04:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 05:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Please change edit sysop to semiprotected. This is one of my user subpages that I protected as an admin. I'm no longer one, so I'm unable to edit my own page. WikiLeon (talk) 20:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done OK, since we don't yet have a "protection reduced" icon yet, the title of this section of the page notwithstanding ... Daniel Case (talk) 22:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of a multi-IP vandal. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent content removal and unconstructive editing from IP user. Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:53, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I.Pachu Kannan (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 08:55, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:33, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS ARBPIA. Borgenland (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 08:57, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS ARBPIA. Borgenland (talk) 07:55, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 08:59, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Persistent unexplained content removal (even after warnings) happening by a wide variety of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, a block wouldn't help because the vandal is using multiple addresses. MolecularPilot 08:12, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I.Pachu Kannan (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:31, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is getting silly vandalism from multiple IP addresses. Dr vulpes (Talk) 09:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 10:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page is being constantly vandalised by IP addresses. Specially the box office section. Please provide temporary semi protection. BhikhariInformer (talk) 09:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:47, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 07:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:33, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ip vandalism changing box office numbers and removing sources. Update: A new account created minutes ago after filing this request began to do the same. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 07:52, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:41, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism Rere Rayendra (talk) 08:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism over the past few months (see here, here, here, and here, among others).

This article is already previously semi-protected in 2021 with a 3 month duration, and in 2023 with a 1 year duration, but disruptive edits continue after the expiry of the latter.

This article is very prominent on popular media due to the nature of the object, and has a high level of visibility among astronomy articles, with 41,000 views in the past 30 days. I would like to kindly ask for a longer duration semi-protection. SkyFlubbler (talk) 10:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:36, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinate Extended-Confirmed Protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by Auto-Confirmed accounts 142.114.1.184 (talk) 21:51, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing in the recent history that would indicate increased protection is necessary... the only reversion in the last week was this diff and it wasn't even an actual edit to the content of the article, it was just adding a note to a commented out notice within the article source. RachelTensions (talk) 06:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 08:43, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism due to the recent departure of one of the group's members. RachelTensions (talk) 03:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Piping in as one of the top contributors and watcher of the page, I'm suggesting to protect it for a month or two as IP users will keep vandalizing. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 04:02, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:47, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs removing sourced content persistently. Lard Almighty (talk) 05:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long term abuse (WP:LTA and WP:EVADE) from a blocked sock-puppet Mikemikev who has been using dozens of accounts going back over 12 years to leave often abusive and disruptive messages on the talk-page. His most recent account has been blocked (check the SPI [60]) but this user creates a new account every few months and uses the talk-page again. Examples of previous blocked socks exclusively using the talk-page to attack other users and cause disruption: Richard Calthrope, Bogestra Bob, Verena Boddenberg, Alan B. Samuels, Cheesecake Denier, Badger Farmer, Redundant Farmhand, Pant Wrangler, Beet Farmer, Retired Farmer, Mbutu Collins, Essentially Dave, Von Clown, David Smyth5, Rupert the Frog, Dave Davidson, Peasant in Suit, BanjoBruce.

This is a form of long-term abuse that has been happening for over 12 years. I believe there should be stronger protection. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just piping up to say I strongly support this request, and I imagine that many or most of those who watch the page will agree. This talk page is an especially frequent target for time-wasting LTAs such as Mikemikev, as well as soapbox diatribes by IPs. The same thing was done over at Talk:Race and intelligence and the tenor of the conversation improved immediately. Generalrelative (talk) 23:13, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dennis Brown: You semi-protected Talk:Race and intelligence in December 2021. Do you think protection is required at Talk:Race (human categorization)? I support that but would like another opinion. If you agree, please protect. Johnuniq (talk) 08:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've not been very active lately, although I do try to log on and follow up on requests like this. After reviewing the logs and considering the topic, it is my opinion that the talk page should be indef semi-protected. There are certain topics that simply attract a type of bias that isn't seasonal, and will likely outlive us all, and this article seems to have been abused enough, and it overlaps Race and intelligence enough to justify the protection. From my perspective, we owe it to the editors to provide a reasonable environment to improve the articles. Rarely is this type of protection uses, for good reason, but we shouldn't be afraid to use the tools when the benefit to everyone is many times greater than the inconvenience to a few. Anyone that has a sincere desire to participate in either article only has to make a simple request for edit, or make a few edits and wait 4 days. This is a low bar, and I don't see how this minor limitation will hurt the reader, who is our primary concern. Because I'm less active, I would prefer a more active admin protect, but I will if others are not comfortable doing so. Dennis Brown - 11:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I went ahead and protected, but may be slow to respond if there are questions about it. Dennis Brown - 13:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Dennis Brown. For the bot. Favonian (talk) 14:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disrupitve editing: A study by the University of Granada has apparently revealed that Christopher Columbus was a Sephardic Jew and not a Genoese. This has been questioned and is still being discussed. However, several editors have changed the article saying he was a Sephardic Jew and completely ignoring the discussion on the talk page. This has already happened at least 10 times since October 13. RobertJohnson35 (talk) 13:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Aintabli (talk) 13:57, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Already blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Aintabli (talk) 13:57, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Already blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Aintabli (talk) 13:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Already blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Aintabli (talk) 13:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Already blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Aintabli (talk) 13:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Already blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 16:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"was a Sephardic Jewish[4] explorer" to "was an Italian explorer" 80.235.211.34 (talk) 13:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – The article has been fully protected for two weeks in a version with Genoa as his city of origin. What happens in the long run will be settled at Talk:Christopher Columbus. Favonian (talk) 14:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism, addition of unsourced content, etc. Sparkbean (talk) 13:34, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 172.56.24.0/24 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 15:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed or full protection: Edit warring. 96.56.133.246 (talk) 14:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Protection isn't necessary for issues with single users. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It’s not a single user issue.70.23.74.120 (talk) 15:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: (Redacted) They have been trying to take gays against groomers down all over social media, and it really did a lot of damage. Gays against groomers isn’t far right at all. 2603:9001:1BF0:20B0:BDBB:A334:508C:7116 (talk) 07:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This protection was done under the auspices of a contentious topic and cannot be unilaterally reversed here. Start by asking El C (talk · contribs) if they are willing to revisit the protection; if not you must appeal at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement or WP:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. I will tell you that if your appeals elsewhere are along the lines of what's written above (including and ESPECIALLY the rather extreme personal attacks), then they will be rejected out-of-hand. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 08:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for the reasons already given. Favonian (talk) 15:00, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 07:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting semi-protection for the Ram Pothineni page to prevent repeated vandalism. Despite multiple undo attempts, deliberate edits from IP addresses persist. MySlack1222 (talk) 13:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking immediately resumes after previous protection expires. 96.57.75.102 (talk) 15:01, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:06, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking immediately resumes after previous protection expired. 96.57.75.102 (talk) 15:02, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:08, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking resumed. 96.57.75.102 (talk) 15:02, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Approximately 11 reversions by 6 users in the last 24 hours. Sam Sailor 15:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:59, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs and a new ID (likely the same person) [61], after the IP got warned by me for vandalism [62] [63] [64] [65]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:57, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – And could we have a block, please. Sam Sailor 18:07, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Sahana Devi (talk · contribs). They appear to have been the only source of the recent vandalism to your talk page. Favonian (talk) 18:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism Zingo156 (talk) 20:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Would it be possible to extend the page protection to its Talk page? The disruption to the content page has now resumed on the Talk page. Thanks, Declangi (talk) 20:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting temporary page protection to maintain stability while we build consensus on the talk page.

Significant changes were made despite open discussions with no consensus, introducing new sources and altering the article’s scope. I reverted these changes to the stable version ([66]) and invited the editors to continue discussing the individual sources, which is where the conversation was left before the changes.

To prevent potential edit warring and ensure constructive collaboration, temporary protection would help maintain stability while we work toward consensus on the talk page. Qono (talk) 03:37, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Might fall under WP:RUSUKR. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 07:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: It likely does fall under RUSUKR but looking at the page history I don't think protection is needed. I'll leave this open in case an admin wants to protect. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Previous autoconfirmed protection hasn't been helpful, requesting temporary ECP to prevent a possible edit war, user has modified other articles as well, often removing sources/content. Some examples here [67], [68], [69], [70], [71] Sir Calculus (talk) 11:54, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. It sounds like the problem with the user might be better dealt with at AN/I. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

15 October 2024

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:38, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Daniel Schappacher pickleball goat (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. New users persistently add poorly sourced content that needs to be removed. The Blue Rider 16:07, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:12, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly you didn't take a look into its edit history...sigh. The Blue Rider 20:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Plus it is a indefinite request, it doesn't have to be recent, but instead a long-pattern of addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Just take a look at my and Yamla reverts. The Blue Rider 20:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bbb23:

Reason: High levels of IP Vandalism RimeklinRike (talk) 22:21, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 19:41, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jauerback. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:05, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One very persistent person keeps replacing this redirect with an unsourced article, no matter how many times or by how many users they're reverted. This has been going on for something in the region of four years, and they have yet to add a single source on any of their reverts or respond to any of the many, many attempts to warn them across a dozen or more IP user talk pages. Given it's just a redirect, indefinite protection would be quite low-impact. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:37, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I propose the creation of a new page for an "Israeli Regional Conflict." I believe the conflict has expanded to the point where engagements with Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq, and Iran means that the situation cannot be fully expressed in isolated pages. It should be in addition to the pages that already exist. But there is too much interplay and respoonses between these various actors to adequately address it in a page that is limited to Isreal-Hamas or Israel-Lebanon etc. Jdftba (talk) 21:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done That page already exists.Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 21:50, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Armenian section is being vandalised by unconfirmed accounts Athoremmes (talk) 13:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are numerous disruptive edit and an edit war going on by ID accounts, which must be regulated. They ignore the Talk page and continue with editing. Athoremmes (talk) 22:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:41, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 20:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 06:58, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: remove protection 139.104.3.56 (talk) 02:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected That's not going to happen. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:07, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to warn the user about a disruptive edit on Niyi Osamiluyi however due to the last four letter of the username, I am unable to make a talk page for them so I can warn them. Sigh. Good old Scunthorpe effect Gaismagorm (talk) 18:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, it might be a good idea to make exceptions to these kinds of stuff for user talkepages (at least for extended confirmed users) Gaismagorm (talk) 18:38, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gaismagorm: To clarify, are you asking an administrator to make the edit due to the title blacklist? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 19:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
yes Gaismagorm (talk) 19:29, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They've vanished now so warning them is pointless. C F A 💬 02:22, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Marking this as  Not done (moot). MediaWiki talk:Titlewhitelist and/or MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist are the places for further discussion. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:33, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 06:57, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism Pemilligan (talk) 23:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 07:45, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. Ips keep inserting unsourced info. CRBoyer 03:26, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Worth adding that the person vandalising appears to have jumped to a different IP immediately after receiving a final warning. — Czello (music) 07:39, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Callanecc. Favonian (talk) 08:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism/edit warring which include WP:BLP violations. TarnishedPathtalk 04:26, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 07:55, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Favonian thank you. TarnishedPathtalk 07:57, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very persistent Harassment from user with throwaway accounts. CRBoyer 04:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acalamari. Favonian (talk) 06:56, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of nonsense edits by random IPs. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:08, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This has only occurred once in the last two months. Talk pages are protected only in exceptional circumstances and one instance of vandalism in two months is not exceptional. Chetsford (talk) 05:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurrent attempts to make unsourced blp over this appropriate redirect. PamD 07:45, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 08:58, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Model & Actress DIKSHA SHANDILAY (talk) 09:08, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – This is not an edit request. Favonian (talk) 10:45, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – LTA. TyphoonAmpil (💬 - 📝) 01:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 15:48, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GS/CASTE IP hopper persistent unsourced caste related edits. ®asteem Talk 15:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, especially hate speech content. CricketXP (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:45, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Per other protections like Talk:ChatGPT, IP users consistently mistake this talk page for a direct interface to an AI text-to-image service called Ideogram. Every IP talk page comment since January 2023 (there have been 75 such comments in total) has been reverted for this reason. Belbury (talk) 15:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:38, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The Protection is no longer necessary because the personality seems to be a controversial profile based on the available news, even the supreme court of India gave judgement against her, but some users are refraining the page to get edited and gave it the semiprotection level. I request to unprotect it so that the users can see it as a neutral platform to give them the equal rights to edit pages like it. Pinnacle1213 (talk) 06:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected That doesn't make any sense. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:45, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 23:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Since August 1st, there have been 3 vandalism reverts. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing - IP editors keep changing a fictional character named 'Jack Black' to wikilink to the actor Jack Black, despite reverts & a hidden note explaining that the character and the actor are not related. Waxworker (talk) 23:43, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:52, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent nonconstructive editing by IP users in the past couple weeks. Bridget (talk) 00:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:54, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:54, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request indefinite semi-protection for the same reason Neolithodes was given it several days ago: persistent sockpuppet vandalism (IPs and burner accounts) from an extremely persistent editor from the Philippines. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 23:31, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention this vulgar WP:NPA statement in Cebuano: [72] Borgenland (talk) 03:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Possible to hate speech due to recent events. Kurogaga (talk) 15:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 15:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: about a dozen vandalism-only edits after semi-protection expired Draken Bowser (talk) 15:37, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Good evening, I'm ShawarmaFan07, very recently, I have been witnessing several edit-warring on and off due to the following things; neither of which are ethical. There had been removals of Israel's style of cooking that dish, and this is not appropriate to transfer the Israel-Palestine conflict online as it is not necessary and promotes racism. Furthermore, there had been arguments to whether or not shawarma is just an Arab dish or generally Middle Eastern; with mentions of Israel, Turkey and Georgia, it is appropriate to say that it is a general Middle Eastern food, nevertheless, there are edits that continue to revert back into calling the dish "Arab". I also suspect that this editing conflict will continue. Using the talk page to gain consensus did not help as I had no response for the past several minutes, but I have been accused of inappropriately edit warring, despite revert back to the correct edits of how shawarma is a general Middle Eastern dish (again, due to Israel and Turkey consuming it). So I suggest that there should be protection for this sub to prevent further conflicts. Of course, in general, using Wikipedia for any personal attack is not appropriate. Any of your suggestions and actions will be great. Thank you! ShawarmaFan07 (talk) 20:02, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think the article needs protection at this point. Ymblanter (talk) 21:29, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:30, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit warring; addition of unsourced content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I warned the editor about the unsourced changes. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:00, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There is a high level of trolling and restated arguments on the talk page. The article is extended confirmation protected, and the talk page will become very important when the election occurs, to gain consensus on calling states. I'm requesting semi-protection for the talk page until say January 21, 2025. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 02:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:28, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. I realize many of the edits are disruptive, but people need to be able to make edit requests and many of the edits from non-autoconfirmed editors are not vandalism. Also, "restated arguments" is not a good reason to protect a talk page, especially for an article that is protected and edited frequently. Finally, some discussions on election day may be easier to conduct on state-specific articles. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Article not about the conflict, but edits have come up that relate to WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Jalen Barks (Woof) 21:50, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @JalenBarks: Also, if this continues and protection becomes necessary, we should try short-term semi-protection first, especially if all of the disruptive edits are from non-autoconfirmed editors. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:05, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:11, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism/nationalism-pushing. Recommend semi-protection or extended protection ASAP Buffs (talk) 20:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:00, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP disruptions again. hamster717🐉(discuss anything!🐹✈️my contribs🌌🌠) 20:54, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:58, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:49, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Angry football fans. 80.42.207.226 (talk) 21:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:06, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Daniel. 80.42.207.226 (talk) 21:07, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very few unreverted IP edits recently. Might be a pending changes candidate. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 21:21, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 21:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs continuing to add FANCRUFT and unnecessary descriptors despite reverts and warnings. Last IP has long talk page warnings and previous blocks. CNMall41 (talk) 22:12, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @CNMall41: I applied a short protection which won't achieve much for longg. There should be some attempt to explain the situation on article talk. The IPs may not see the explanations, but admins wondering whether to protect will see there has been an attempt. Johnuniq (talk) 22:05, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I.Pachu Kannan (talk) 02:46, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 22:07, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits and vandalism. Yuvaank (talk) 06:32, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:11, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 09:39, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 22:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 09:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 22:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Numerous people seem to be creating accounts just to make major edits of the article 37and7 (talk) 16:57, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see two WP:SPA accounts since August. Please use WP:AIV. We don't need protection for an issue with 2 accounts. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:51, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 18:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 22:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR, unit notorious for war crimes makes it a contentious article. TylerBurden (talk) 19:21, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. Test edits and other unconstructive editing.2605:B100:143:3B0F:10B3:9C2B:F622:B5F0 (talk) 21:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Restored the previous protection. Unprotecting this article was worth trying, but it does not appear to have worked out well. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:52, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: The revision history much speaks for itself. Also, the case was on WP:AN/EW just yesterday[73], and it still goes on. Note also the WP:CLEANHANDS issue noted by the closer in AN/EW. Austronesier (talk) 10:43, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's sad, but as one of the other principal editors involved, I would support this request at this point. Vlaemink (talk) 11:32, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vlaemink: It wouldn't be necessary if you could prove to take a step back for a moment without waiting to be forced to... Consensus isn't built in an hour (and it's not built by mere assumption of implicit consensus), but you repeatedly create fait accomplis. –Austronesier (talk) 11:46, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Austronesier: Please do not make it seem as if I am the only one to blame for the current predicament, you know this isn't true; and I'm not supporting you so that I will be forced to take a step back. I'm supporting your request so that De Wikischim will prevented from editing the article while major discussions take place on talk. Vlaemink (talk) 12:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"I'm supporting your request so that De Wikischim will prevented from editing the article while major discussions take place on talk": this is textbook WP:BATTLEGROUND. Why should only one editor show restraint from editing the article while major discussions take place on talk? –Austronesier (talk) 12:05, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Austronesier: That's the question exactly: why should only one editor show restraint from editing the article while major discussions take place on talk, while another should not. Throughout the past days, while discussions were taking place, both you, me, and De Wikischim have still been editing the article.
I don't like protected articles, they obstruct and delay improvements, but what I dislike even more are discussions on talk pages where everybody is requesting the article to be left alone while discussions take place, with nobody actually doing that. All participants, myself included, but you yourself as well, have done this. A temporary protection of the page would force all participants, to focus on forming a properly sourced consensus on talk, without any distractions, over hastily editing provocations in the article while discussions take place.
If it was just you and me discussing the article, I would not think this would be necessary. In fact, I firmly believe it would have never would have gone as far as it has, but this hasn't been the case. Temporarily protecting the page takes some pressure off and forces participants, all of them, to focus on the long term and give users the time to truly evaluate proposals. Vlaemink (talk) 12:39, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:21, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing. HorrorLover555 (talk) 12:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User:Mohit Dokania is adding non-neutral ("feloniously built upon rama's birthplace") - on issues that hardly relate here. They're closing to hitting WP:3RR as well. Regards, Aafi (talk) 12:49, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of the good articles and shouldn't be left too open for this much disruption. Regards, Aafi (talk) 12:50, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 22:30, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Pending Charges obviously did not work; disruptive editing. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 16:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16 October 2024

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GS/CASTE. ®asteem Talk 15:22, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, along with hate speech from some IP users. CricketXP (talk) 15:22, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:56, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Prevent from IP vandalism, especially the hate speech. CricketXP (talk) 15:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:38, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 23:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looks like the Sammy Williams / Sam Williams vandalism is back at it again. Raladic (talk) 23:46, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:00, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There had been records of vandalism due to the tension of the Matt vs WPEngine situation, and is likely to be subjected to continued vandalism until this situation can be concluded and properly documented,. Requesting protection from unregistered and new users Alexllte (talk) 05:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Alexllte: Please ask again if it continues but it seems ok with few actual WP:VAND edits at the moment. Johnuniq (talk) 22:10, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk, though. Daniel Case (talk) 22:11, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from block evading IPs. The article's history for the last several weeks is nothing but the same vandalism and reverts. This is the same as the related request for Billy Chapman (character). MrOllie (talk) 19:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All IPs. Daniel Case (talk) 22:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from block evading IPs. The article's history for the last several weeks is nothing but the same vandalism and reverts. This is the same as the related request for Silent Night, Deadly Night. MrOllie (talk) 19:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 141.195.161.178 (talk · contribs) blocked by Pickersgill-Cunliffe. For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Per Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict Mason7512 (talk) 21:00, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not, to me, enough nexus with the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 22:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: User request within own user space. GSK (talkedits) 15:46, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Um, why? Daniel Case (talk) 22:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Other administrators, please feel free to protect if a good reason is provided. @GSK: As the protection policy states: User pages and subpages within their own user space can be protected upon a request from the user, as long as a need exists. Pages within the user space should not be automatically or preemptively protected without good reason or cause. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:26, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Leonidlednev (TCL) 17:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, in this case, simply revoking TPA would make more sense then protecting the page. Babysharkboss2!! (Yes, this is indeed...a JoJo reference.) 18:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by Daniel Case. Daniel Case (talk) 22:22, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Many instances of vandalism and disruptive editing in the last 24 hours. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:50, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GS/CASTE. ®asteem Talk 15:23, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged. Daniel Case (talk) 22:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Goofies violating the CTOPS regarding arab-israeli conflict. 2601:586:5300:E340:197D:7D63:BF86:C5 (talk) 00:39, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Callanecc. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 02:09, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 02:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Semi-protection would advantage your position over the IP's. The contentious NPR source does seem to contain a reference to "angry" ... Sdrqaz (talk) 02:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Binksternet is the one here that is currently in need of a block for a clear violation of 3RR. He is clearly displaying some kind of petulance toward people who can't be bothered to register an account and choose to IP edit. In my case at great risk to my own sanity because I don't see the point of registering due to the persistence and prevalence of people throwing their weight around even though the IP may be right. Stress the word MAY because none of us are ever really 100% right on anything. Science, in this case political science, doesn't work that way either.
I should also thank Binksternet for not notifying me of this request, which is clearly also bad faith. --27.96.194.9 (talk) 03:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1) Unlike ANEW, here there is no requirement that any other party be notified of the request as the requests concern the page, not the user (Yes, we may sometimes choose to block a user or users rather than protect a page. But that's less likely in response to a report here than it is at ANEW).
2) Binksternet did not violate 3RR as, following his third revert in 24 hours, he came here to make this report.
3) You are correct that the word "angry" does appear once in the NPR story. But the place to work this out is on the talk page, not in edit summaries. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Further that I am using it in the context per the page. If there is a significant issue to discuss I'd be happy to do so. The thing is, wp:bold applies here that I would either be brave (or stupid as the full saying goes) to edit here. No I don't want to engage in a process of wp:brd cycles that only filibusters out other contributions either.
So far we are on the right track here, I even opened a discussion about recent changes also, so Wikipedia:Assume good faith should apply at least at the bare minimum until otherwise proven not to be the case --27.96.194.9 (talk) 03:31, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry * Pppery * it has begun... 03:21, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper hijacking redirect with unsourced article. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:30, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:31, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant box office vandalism from IPs. Please semi - protect it for 1 or 2 weeks. BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Abo Yemen 05:50, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:30, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement – Continuous disruption around heritage on WP:ARBAP2 CTOP. Raladic (talk) 05:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/AP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:30, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The election related to this page is very soon, and as the event approaches, vandalism is likely to increase due to the controversial nature of the subject. 70P53D (talk) 08:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Chetsford (talk) 10:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Blanking of sources by an IP address which were replaced by sources that are not considered reliable. Wozal (talk) 12:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 14:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of BLP vandalism over the last couple of days, with IPs and new users adding an unsourced death date. bonadea contributions talk 12:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism (Hate based) Refael Ackermann (talk) 13:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 14:22, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Leonidlednev (TCL) 03:40, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Jpgordon. Favonian (talk) 19:07, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 12:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing attempts to add promotional information about this politician. VVikingTalkEdits 14:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi'd for one week Babysharkboss2!! (I spread pro-Weezer propaganda) 15:58, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Robertsky. Favonian (talk) 19:06, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The LTA IP harasser again (initals MAB). Zinnober9 (talk) 15:57, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Reasons explained via email if needed. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent but persistent vandalism from what seems like at least a sockpuppet and at most an LTA. Klinetalkcontribs 18:03, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Weekly vandalism on this redirect over the past month. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:41, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent edit warring by IPs without taking concerns to talk page. Random IPs keep arguing about casualty numbers, ignoring the well cited evidence for such numbers, and reverting or changing the numbers without actual reason. Another editor said to take concerns to talk page, and yet, they changed the infobox yet again without any input into the talk page. An editor back on September 30th also fixed a mess up of well cited content by IPs,[74] yet they then just changed it again on faulty logic that they keep citing but is not even true regarding what they're using as evidence. Before that editor fixed it, another editor reverted the changes by IPs and noted it as unnecessary,[75] and continue to not cite sources despite all the cited evidence going against their opinions. This is the second or third time that protection has to be requested for the page. The IPs ignore the citations by scholars including Frieser et al, and Töppel. As a result of IPs not discussing at all, I have entered a new topic in the talk page for discussion as well. As of October 14, 2025, IPs are still changing what is agreed upon by editors.[76] Reaper1945 (talk) 14:15, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will be logged under WP:CT/EE. Favonian (talk) 19:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruption and vandalism, has been protected many times in the past so indefinite protection or at least a lengthier protection might not be a bad idea. TylerBurden (talk) 15:17, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Frequent vandalism and unreferenced additions to this BLP since 21:04, 9 October 2024. Alith Anar 19:20, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous IP vandalism with misleading summaries, adding the same false information each time. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 19:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:39, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17 October 2024

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. From AS-RNY (talk) 09:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log under WP:GS/CASTE Daniel Case (talk) 01:50, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has a lengthy history of repeated changes to the date of birth without reliable sources. Numerous attempts have been made by both IP and registered users to alter this information as shown in the differences [77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87]. This ongoing issue is wasting a considerable amount of time for both the community and the pending changes reviewers, who are continually reviewing and reverting these vandalism.

I request that the protection level be increased to "extended confirmed user" to address this issue and allow the community to focus on other projects. Chanel Dsouza (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The section "Generalized Formulation of the Higher Orders of Dispersion – Lah-Laguerre Optics" has been repeatedly deleted. This section contains the mathematical formulation of dispersion, which is fundamental to understanding the physics behind the theory of dispersion. Its removal significantly undermines the scientific integrity and comprehension of this topic.

I kindly request the reinstatement of the content in the section "Generalized Formulation of the Higher Orders of Dispersion – Lah-Laguerre Optics" and a temporary protection from editing for at least one month. This protection will help prevent further vandalism and potential removal due to any conflicts of interest, such as possible financial or proprietary motives from operators or other interested parties seeking to suppress common knowledge. Thank you very much. Ole7777 (talk) 17:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Nom blocked for 3RR violation. Favonian (talk) 18:47, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Per own admission, it appears that several IPs are adding unsourced content involving alleged rape and illegitimate children to which they have a direct familial conflict of interest. These additions have occurred from different IPs in bursts over many months with down time in between and no sources have been cited. Lenny Marks (talk) 20:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:00, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Was protected before for rampant BLP violations and other unverified content. Today, improperly sourced material was added again. — W.andrea (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of antisemitic vandalism BobFromBrockley (talk) 15:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. under ARBPIA. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recurring and recent IP edits contrary to Manual of Style. [88][89][90]Bri (talk) 16:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page was subject to an edit war in the past with editors trying to remove negative info, now an IP is doing the same. Mach61 22:29, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Right back to nationality warring, immediately following protection lapse. Nswix (talk) 00:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS again. Daniel Case (talk) 02:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. From AS-RNY (talk) 09:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have already given them their first warning. Daniel Case (talk) 01:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IPs. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 09:56, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:4455:159:6500:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IPs. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 09:56, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:4455:159:6500:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of content and references that don't align with each other.[91][92][93] Hotwiki (talk) 10:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:4455:159:6500:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Contentious topic (ARBPIA) Procyon117 (talk) 13:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. under name the article has been moved to, Attack on Nabatieh municipal council. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:01, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor repeatedly removing content. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 22:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2603:8000:B001:603D:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week; possible UPE. Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High traffic IP vandalism. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 00:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. It has been just one IP. I have warned them, which had not been done. Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated longterm disruptive editing preventing updated material from being retained. Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. As someone notes in an edit summary. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IPs content deletion. Shenaall (t c) 05:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP disruptions. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some people tried to change the picture and use the picture that wear Thai national costume instead. Kromla (talk) 12:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 13:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Kromla: It has been protected due to recent vandalism, not because of the picture. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP editor keeps deleting a fact that is backed up by a cite to the Dictionary of National Biography. Deletion and restore pattern has been going on for 3 weeks, and has been the only activity on the page during that time. Never provides a cite in support of their views, only deletes. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 12:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 30 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz, I'm not sure PC protection will actually resolve this issue but that's the only level of protection that seems to be applicable given this specific set of circumstances (static IP editor making a slow, but annoyingly regular, series of edits that are probably vandalism but, if they were to communicate more fully, might be a case of a content dispute). If the cadence of the disruption increases to the point that it is too much for the PC patrollers to handle, or they continue after the expiration of protection, you may want to report it to WP:AIV. Chetsford (talk) 15:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It would be helpful if they would at least come to the talk page for a discussion. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 18:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from anonymous user without providing a reason Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 14:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 30 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The cadence and nature of the vandalism seems like it would be appropriate for the Pending Changes patrollers to handle. If I missed something, though, let me know. Chetsford (talk) 15:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition of unsourced information by anonymous editors following previous page protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 15:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Frequent vandalism to this BLP since 17:21, 3 October 2024. Alith Anar 03:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thank you, Alith Anar. Chetsford (talk) 15:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Article targeted by WP:LTA/ARARAT. Already just got range blocked, but they just jumped into another range. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:35, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Assassination of one of the most important person in the Israel-Palestine conflict ever. Abo Yemen 15:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Thank you, Abo Yemen Chetsford (talk) 16:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users are treating many users talk page including mine as a forum, I have reverted their edits five times from my talk page; it's intolerable at this point. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 09:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: The upcoming political election might [already] have an effect on this article- there already are slight vandalism cases in the edit history. Cooldudeseven7 tea talk 14:50, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. If a serious outbreak of vandalism occurs, you can bring it back here for protection. Though, realistically, this article gets so little traffic I'm not sure anyone other than the active editors are even reading it so it seems like a low probability target for disruption. In general, current events-inspired IP vandals tend not to dig down into the bowels of the encyclopedia. But, who knows. Chetsford (talk) 15:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 19:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Although sporadic, there has been disruptive editing from the changing of sourced content/figures from the infobox. The page has also been protected before. Noorullah (talk) 05:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. @Noorullah21: The previous protections were not very long, but if disruption resumes in a year, we can consider indefinite protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:11, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Leonidlednev (TCL) 19:50, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 20:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 19:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple IPs are edit warring. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 03:52, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Requesting semi-protection 'til election day for persistent subtle IP vandalism. Over a dozen instances of changing the election ratings on this page, all from IP users (likely the same user?). It doesn't show signs of stopping, and will likely subside after November 5th. TheSavageNorwegian 18:01, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Leonidlednev (TCL) 18:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Multiple IPs not following WP:FOOTBALL rules for inputting information into the page, causing persistent vandalism. M48SKY (talk) 18:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18 October 2024

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of an irrelevant image and flat refusal to engage on the article's talk page to explain why such an image is needed. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:30, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Rimini, Montana, Rimini, South Carolina and Uceta Yard are infrequently but persistently vandalized by User:Vicinijose, a user in the Dominican Republic who insists that these obscure places were founded by a renowned railroad engineer from the Vicini family of whom no evidence seems to exist. Pending changes status requested. 2601:642:4600:D3B0:928:AD00:C590:26B8 (talk) 16:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The infrequency with which this vandalism occurs makes protection impossible. By my count, it appears to occur once every 8-10 months. To abate even one instance of vandalism, therefore, we'd have to apply something like 12 months of page protection. Preventing non-autoconfirmed users from contributing to these articles for months or years just to stop the possibility that an IP editor might vandalize an article once or twice in that time would be inconsistent with our ethos. However, if the cadence of vandalism increases, please do come back to request protection again as a different calculus might then apply. Chetsford (talk) 19:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: According to the protection log, the protection for this page expired on October 11 (6 days ago) at 14:05 UTC. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 20:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Acalamari Courtesy ping for this curiosity. Zinnober9 (talk) 20:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already unprotected. No need for further action as it expired on the 11th, as the requesting IP has stated. Acalamari 21:48, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. On initial inspection, it looked like an IP editor couldn't edit it due to the Lock template still displaying and instead of "edit source" the tab stated "view source", but after looking further, that isn't the case and is editable at IP level. Apologies for any bother, I've removed the template, not sure why it hadn't been removed by a bot yet. Zinnober9 (talk) 22:48, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP disruption – this page had been temporality semi-protected before, but this did not solve the problem, and thus the non-constructive edits have since continued. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 12:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The logs show no previous protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change infobox location of death.

Old: "| death_place = Rafah, Gaza Strip, Palestine"

New: "| death_place = Rafah, Gaza Strip"

This would reflect the convention for other similar pages for recently assassinated Hamas officials in the Gaza Strip, such as Ayman Nofal, Jamila Abdallah Taha al-Shanti, Marwan Issa etc. The status of Gaza Strip as part of the State of Palestine, or as part of the autonomous Palestinian Territories (with the State of Palestine not recognized by most Western or OECD countries), is contentious (it does have limited observer state status in the UN). See International recognition of the State of Palestine. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 17:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done already by someone else. I don't see "Palestine" appended to that line anymore. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:32, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reinstate the Template:Palestinian leaders sidebar removed without reasoning or discussion. Articles of other deceased leaders retain the template (see Ismail_Haniyeh & Abdel_Aziz_al-Rantisi). 2A00:23CC:D202:A201:0:0:0:1410 (talk) 22:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. It seems it was removed inadvertently during a maintenance edit. I have restored it. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:32, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sometimes several times a day vandalism. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 21:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. EggRoll97 (talk) 21:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lots of destructive edits from many different IPs, and no (or almost no) constructive IP-edits during the last two years. So perhaps at least a year of semi-protection? David Göthberg (talk) 22:35, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Article from draftspace is ready to be moved. Draft:Michael Stein passes WP:NAUTHOR but might not pass WP:NPROF. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:59, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editors, IP and not, are consistently reverting one another about the movie's success in the Reception section. Ornov Ganguly TALK 00:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:04, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs edit warring promotional information despite warnings. Previously semi-protected. CNMall41 (talk) 01:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:12, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 02:22, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Section blanking about his legal issues. Karst (talk) 10:22, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring and a block evasion by a WP:Single-purpose account KryptonianHero performing the same edits as the recently blocked offender Hahonryuu solely on the article in question. I also started an SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hahonryuu just in case it is needed. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:49, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP range edit-warring. DonIago (talk) 05:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thank you for reporting this, DonIago. I feel like the cadence and nature of disruptive edits at this point is low enough that the PC patrollers can mitigate this for now, however, if I've missed something or the disruption does not abate, please feel free to re-report. Chetsford (talk) 06:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extended confirmed protection. Certain user insists/edit warring on redundant information copied from another article. User warned. Beshogur (talk) 15:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The talk page hasn't been touched since July. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is within scope of WP:ARBECR, which states "this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection". Sean.hoyland (talk) 15:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And this page is about events 22 years ago, not directly relevant to the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 04:34, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is within scope of WP:ARBECR, which states "this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection". Sean.hoyland (talk) 16:01, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Again, not much recent editing and about something that happened 22 years ago. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is within scope of WP:ARBECR, which states "this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection". Sean.hoyland (talk) 16:01, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article has a long history of vandalism and disruptive/unconstructive editing. To prevent further instances of that occurring, I am requesting that indefinite semi-protection be applied to this article. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 00:31, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Which is putting it mildly ... the last edit was almost five months ago. This has to be a record for stalest protection request . Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by disgruntled family members who do not like the fact that Neil remarried. User: Snowman304 (Neils nephew) and Jakezbrown (his Great nephew) repeatedly remove accurate, well-sourced information about Neils life and his widow. Despite multiple attempts to restore the correct information, the user continues to delete it. They are obsessed with this and constantly make false edits and will not allow others to edit it, He died on June 24, 2021 and they last edited it as recently as October 5, 2024. Neil and his nephew, Andy, aka "Snowman304" had a contentious relationship. Andy's son, Jakezbrown aka, "Jakezbrown" were mad that they did not get more of an inheritance. PLEASE consider blocking these "editors, Snowman304 and Jakezbrown" from constantly vandalizing Neils page and memory. PLEASE provide semi-protection to stop these users, unregistered or new users from editing the page. THANK YOU 174.176.149.36 (talk) 01:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And given these allegations, this really should be discussed at WP:COI/N. Daniel Case (talk) 05:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:37, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:37, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Conflict between the school authorities (blatant marketing plugs) and irate parents (adding frivolous controversies). Some level of edit protection is required to prevent a repeat of previous problems. Ajay Platinum (talk) 07:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a bit IAR but the disruption obviously will only stop if the article is protected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:06, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GS/CASTE persistent disruptive editing by anonymous IPS. ®asteem Talk 08:43, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 09:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We're back to the lunatic vandalism from shifting IPs. Can the page please have some form of protection against it? Thanks. DBaK (talk) 08:51, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:14, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and continuous vandalism by an IP address user. Request temporary protection of the article page. QEnigma (talk) 09:04, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:12, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GS/CASTE persistent disruptive editing by anonymous IPS. ®asteem Talk 09:05, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 09:16, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GS/CASTE persistent disruptive editing by anonymous IPS. ®asteem Talk 09:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 09:16, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:28, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page protection recently expired and vandalism/disruptive editing has resumed on the BLP. Some1 (talk) 10:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:30, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page keeps getting vandalised with incorrect information. Backboard0417 (talk) 11:42, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:47, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Change of census figure or blanking of census data by an IPs, likely the same IP range [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:33, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 12:39, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥  12:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP replacing English names, despite warning. Mellk (talk) 12:59, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:01, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New accounts and unregistered IP users editing abusively. HinduKshatrana (talk) 13:45, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:04, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent IP vandalism. Babysharkboss2!! (I spread pro-Weezer propaganda) 13:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:GENSEX. El_C 16:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Babysharkboss2!! (I spread pro-Weezer propaganda) 16:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive IP edit warring despite having no consensus on talk. Snokalok (talk) 14:32, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Side note - on a WP:GENSEX arbitration CTOP. Requesting arbitration enforcement. Raladic (talk) 14:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:GENSEX. El_C 16:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Slow motion edit war as various accounts argue whether it was a Ottoman-Algerian or Greco-Russian victory. 2A00:23C5:50E8:EE01:208D:22DF:6D36:FDE2 (talk) 14:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That is not slow motion! El_C 16:16, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs continue to add an unsourced birthplace to this BLP. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 15:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:21, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and new accounts removing sourced text. Mellk (talk) 16:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Iran-Israel conflict Abo Yemen 10:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 15:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Abo Yemen 10:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 15:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (TCL) 16:25, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:30, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. CsmLearner 💬🔬 17:14, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Pachu Kannan (talk) 10:16, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 15:25, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:01, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(That, or block the LOUTSOCK vandalizing the article) I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:01, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm open to ideas on how to do that. In the meantime, Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:03, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended-confirmed protection - Legacy redirect (began as a subpage of Art in 2004, moved to Draftspace 2015); has seen multiple attempts to hijack it to turn it into a draft about unrelated subjects since. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 19:06, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: First 105.112.221.248 and now 154.113.117.190 Polygnotus (talk) 18:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcementWP:ARBPIA. Thegreatrebellion (talk) 15:02, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 16:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and new users have been making edit requests based on unreliable sources repetitively. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:05, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The edit request activity is a bit unusual, but we don't generally protect article talk pages unless the disruption is longer-term and more significant than this. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:28, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent bad faith and disruptive additions of false information by IP vandals. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 17:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @SleepDeprivedGinger: It looks like most of it is from a single editor so let's try warning them before we protect the article or consider blocks. I've done so. The edits are also a bit old at this point. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:33, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Kids always changing the page to promote their instagrams or making fun of each other 185.104.244.242 (talk) 20:28, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:34, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Pachu Kannan (talk) 10:13, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 15:25, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These requests are per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 19:01, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sporadic changes of the countries that make up the peninsula by IPs and other editors; the topic of the Horn of Africa has been a designated contentious topic since December 2022. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 17:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Kinda wild that Horn of Africa isn't protected under Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Horn of Africa (WP:HORN), but Oct 2 Sept 25 is simply too Stale. El_C 17:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism in the past few months. 2600:100C:B0A1:195:54A8:F1E5:B5B6:EF15 (talk) 21:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19 October 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism and disruptive edits since the organization was branded as a terrorist entity by the US. Should be temporarily restricted until things calm down. Ïvana (talk) 21:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 23:05, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption, belongs in WP:GS/CASTE. Sir Calculus (talk) 22:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log as well. Daniel Case (talk) 23:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism and probably sockpuppetry. Fork99 (talk) 23:13, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 00:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Goodnightmush: Twinkle went ahead and did my conflicting protection after it saw the banner was already present and I clicked "cancel". I'm not sure why there's no button that will let you completely abort. Anyhow, I protected it for a full year because it looks like sockpuppetry that has been going on for three years. If you have any objections or concerns, please let me know. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Quinlan: Sounds fine to me! Thanks for heads up! GoodnightmushTalk 01:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's a consistent pattern of sockpuppetry and vandalism over the last three years. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:02, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:32, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Talk page discussion seems to be underway, but feel free to re-report if things get worse. GoodnightmushTalk 01:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:38, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 00:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent disruptive editing pertaining to a real-life death of a former lover, which has no baring on this BLP. livelikemusic (TALK!) 01:19, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has a history of nationality warring, which hasnt subsided apparently. Nswix (talk) 01:27, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:31, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name – No reason to have an article or draft titled this. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:41, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's only been created once and was deleted two minutes later. See WP:SALT. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:49, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This blocked editor is no longer an administrator; I don't see a reason for full protection. I would like to be able to fix the half-dozen Linter syntax errors on the page. Some level of protection below full is fine with me. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, reduced to ECP for now. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:17, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 08:09, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It is currently in draft and needs to be in article space as show has been started and as audience should know the information regarding show. Kaustubh42 (talk) 16:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you listened to literally anything you were told at AfC/HD?Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 23:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: He was a important figure in Bangladesh so to prevent unwanted added infos and vandalism, protect this article with at least semi. Niasoh (talk) 05:30, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Now he is the Chief Adviser of Bangladesh (equivalent to a prime minister) and also a Nobel laureate, so there's a high chance that this article is at risk of adding biased or unwanted information, and to prevent vandalism, add semi-protection for a long time. Niasoh (talk) 05:36, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Targeted by vandal User:ColourWolf for harassment. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 05:44, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:31, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continous unreferenced edits. Hotwiki (talk) 04:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:12, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I am TIRED of trying to protect articles where vandalism goes unnoticed. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:19, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from various IP ranges. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 11:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:39, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I.Pachu Kannan (talk) 05:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Round 2. El_C 09:26, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I.Pachu Kannan (talk) 05:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Round 2. El_C 09:26, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I.Pachu Kannan (talk) 05:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Round 2. El_C 09:27, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I.Pachu Kannan (talk) 05:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Round 2. El_C 09:27, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I.Pachu Kannan (talk) 05:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Round 2. El_C 09:27, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandals. ZimZalaBim talk 12:44, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:13, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Mr.International35 (talk) 10:01, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove protection, more information to be added.

Declined – No article specified. Favonian (talk) 10:06, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change :supected" to "suspected" in the segment: <<During his time in prison, Sinwar continued to coordinate the execution of Palestinians supected>> RomanKaiser (talk) 02:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:15, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – disruptive editing (replacing sourced content with OR), sockpuppetry and personal attacks (see diff). M.Bitton (talk) 13:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Favonian (talk) 14:56, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruption regarding result. Mellk (talk) 14:59, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:CT/KURD. Favonian (talk) 15:05, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 15:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:04, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs are continuously changing the birthdate. I tried to remove the birth year so they would stop, but It was reverted and they still keep on doing it. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 12:27, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 16:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry and spam. Every edit since 12 February has been either adding or reverting edits by block evading sockpuppets or promotional spam. Aoidh (talk) 16:30, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Immediate resumption of vandalism after expiry. Orchastrattor (talk) 16:49, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:59, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being hassled by a cross-wiki LTA abusing proxies. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 16:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:56, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing of Droop quota, instant-runoff voting, single transferable vote, counting single transferable votes, and electoral quota by a series of IPs. IPs do not belong to a single range that could be excluded by a range block, but all appear to be the same person. IP often introduces mistakes, typos, unsourced content, confusing or unclear wording that breaks up the flow of the text, and external links into the body of the article (prohibited by MOS). – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 16:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a formal close on my part, but ... have you tried talking with them about this? I agree that, since at least some of the IPs resolve to the same area of Alberta, and the writing style seems the same, it's the same user on different IPs (probably the school connection and the home connection). On Talk:Droop quota they've opened up two sections that might be relevant and to which no one has responded (and on Counting single transferable votes I see no sign of disruption as the article hasn't been edited much in the last two months). Nothing you wrote, and nothing I saw, indicates that the user is editing in anything but good faith. Yes, cleaning up after them is a pain but ... when you don't let them know they're doing the right things the wrong way, don't expect them to stop doing it that way. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No response from Closed Limelike Curves. Sorry, this board moves quickly. Feel free to relist if and/or when protection looks warranted. With Daniel Case's notes in mind, of course. Thank you.  Requesting immediate archiving... El_C 18:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: they seem to have opened 2 new sections yesterday, but I've already repeatedly explained the dispute elsewhere, in addition to providing citations and such; it's a bit of a Wikipedia:ICANTHEARYOU case where they've repeatedly reopened the same handful of arguments over and over on different talk pages. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 18:49, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In which case that really becomes something better dealt with at AN/I. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption may also fall under WP:RUSUKR. Mellk (talk) 14:26, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:15, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous vandalism by IP users despite multiple warnings. At the moment, two top films are competing at the Nepal box office and thus high level of IP vandalism. Protecting this page for at least a week would suffice. Sneshik (talk) 16:15, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:11, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Tim Membrey has been linked with a delisted free agency move to the Collingwood football club. However some not logged in users have fallen under the impression that he has officially been signed on with them and no longer plays for the Saints. If Collingwood do end up signing him the earliest he can do it is on November 1st 2024. Flipstatic Energy (talk) 09:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:47, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High IP vandalism for days changing boxoffice numbers. Please protect page for longer time. RangersRus (talk) 14:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:02, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editwarring. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:20, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly 70 vandalism edits. No idea if I've reverted to the correct version but it seems OK now. Ip and new account vandalism. Knitsey (talk) 18:46, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:52, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Looks like Dylan Florida is testing on this one too. Jalen Barks (Woof) 14:35, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 180.150.38.85 (talk · contribs). Its predecessor, 1.152.106.165 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), as well. In view of their general editing pattern, successors should probably just be shipped off to SPI for processing. Favonian (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits, requesting temp-semi. Sir Calculus (talk) 19:20, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:ARBPAK. El_C 20:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason:High level of IP Spam and sockpuppetry, including block evasion. Qutlooker (talk) 19:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:AP2. El_C 20:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥  20:30, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:39, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Nothing but vandalism in the last 50 edits 2601:282:4700:272:3DB5:130D:61A1:6E05 (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple IPs, same person. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No WP:CHILDPROTECT component that I was able to immediately observe, at least, but the article subject is 14 at the time of writing, so I made a note of that in the protection summary (obviously, this means far greater scrutiny and generally erring on the side of severity). El_C 20:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anon IP edits, using WP:SPS like X, Ex-Twitter as source. Also unsourced material. Recomend to restore to mid protection. 30days accounts Mr.User200 (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended protection due to Arab conflict 2600:100C:B0A1:195:54A8:F1E5:B5B6:EF15 (talk) 15:46, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last occurence of "X, Ex-Twitter" sourcing was on September 30, and "restore to mid protection" seems odd as the article has never been protected. Favonian (talk) 18:20, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP disruption. May fall under WP:RUSUKR. Mellk (talk) 17:46, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 92.253.236.0/22 (talk · contribs). One-month partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 18:05, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued changing of cited information. Onel5969 TT me 18:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Ineam (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 18:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Since he conducted an autopsy on Sinwar's Body, I suggest that he is temporarily semi-protected as he is now known well. Freedoxm (talk) 20:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. As WP:PIA, WP:ECR. El_C 20:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20 October 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP vandal. ZimZalaBim talk 21:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:59, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unsourced track lists keep getting added, and "7th studio album" keeps getting changed to "8th studio album", even though Bastard is a mixtape. 77551enpassant (talk) 22:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unsourced IP vandalism on both articles continuing for months [102], [103], [104], [105] / [106], [107], [108], [109]. AntEgo (talk) 22:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:49, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both articles have been semi-protected for 10 days. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:52, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Extended-Protection: Should be Extended-Protected per WP:PIA. Freedoxm (talk) 21:17, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/A-I. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. This is better suited for a report to WP:ANI. I am moving this discussion momentarily. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:24, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 00:40, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 01:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated addition of unsourced info. Nswix (talk) 20:52, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Nswix: It's a bit shy of the point where protection makes sense. I'd suggest trying an inline comment first. Please also try to leave warnings when reverting these types of edits. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:02, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Unless I'm losing my mind, this is happening across multiple China-related pages. It's inexplicable. Remsense ‥  01:13, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Request em if you got em, Remsense. But if there's a ton of em, please list them all in a single request. El_C 01:43, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I just filed my first SPI ticket about it. Thanks for the help! Remsense ‥  01:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, I meant in a single protection request, but SPI works, too. El_C 01:46, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 01:20, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also persistent block evasion. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:53, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:56, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:59, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent troll edits. Dronebogus (talk) 21:02, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1004:B04E:1D6D:0:3F:7D4E:4201 (talk · contribs) blocked by Orangemike. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:12, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS ARBPIA. Borgenland (talk) 23:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 00:27, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Stephen McKeever (talk) 01:21, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tried for 2 days didn't work, it was a block evasion edits along with Tik Tak. Stephen McKeever (talk) 01:32, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: @Stephen McKeever: I edited and reformatted your comment to remove the template portion of the response to avoid confusing the bot. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:28, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Stephen McKeever (talk) 01:21, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 01:53, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection: Persistent disruptive editing from unregistered ips. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 03:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:50, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Arbitration Enforcement (Israel-Palestine conflict) 180.216.225.132 (talk) 04:17, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. El_C 04:27, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Extended-Protection: poorly sourced content + some vandalism 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 04:47, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done for the duration. El_C 04:56, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This news channel is one the biggest in India and just wanted to bring up a small concern regarding the introduction. The way it's currently phrased makes it seem like the channel is directly associated with the BJP, which could be misleading to readers at first glance.

Also, there is no citation for that information as someone is regularly editing that personally.

Kinldy help us in that situation. AnuragBisht108 (talk) 05:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please limit yourself to one account, AnuragBisht108. For help with sources, you can check out the Reliable sources noticeboard. El_C 05:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noted, whatever you said and Thank you so much. AnuragBisht108 (talk) 05:30, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Non-descriptive title, repeatedly created. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:51, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's clear that salting that title is the best option here. It might be better to create a redirect to Draft:Example. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:27, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't see your comment until after I salted it but I agree that a redirect is a good idea and have done that. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:33, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Callanecc. May this comment please the bot. Page protected, but then created as per above discussion. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 11:28, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... This bot is not easily pleased. Favonian (talk) 14:12, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. Will120 (talk) 10:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:35, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 13:16, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per WP:GSCASTE, IP belonging to this sock farm [110] is constantly edit warring. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:17, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:GS/CASTE. Favonian (talk) 15:16, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs including proxies (possibly the same person), is removing sources and sourced content and adding unsourced [111] [112] (non-Indian IP, likely a proxy) [113] [114]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:ARBIND (likely heading for indef protection in the next one). El_C 16:40, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An LTA has a bee in their bonnet about a section of this BLP article. They periodically come to change the same section causing a drain on editors' time. This BLP event is long over and does not seem to see much editing otherwise. Alanscottwalker (talk) 13:58, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alanscottwalker, FYI: WP:SEMI covers all IPs without exceptions; WP:ECP is for named accounts that reached WP:CONFIRMED status. El_C 16:43, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection Edit warring from sockpuppets of blocked user Jaszen. Began yesterday when a tranch of their socks were identified and blocked [115] Barry Wom (talk) 15:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2605:a601:a0e8:fb00::/64 (talk · contribs).
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:33, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent spamming from unautoconfirmed users. Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 13:00, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 182.239.64.0/18 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Favonian They've returned. Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 18:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Myrealnamm: Huh? Their last edit to the article in question (Special:Diff/1252239480) was five hours ago. Favonian (talk) 18:28, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, it was in my watchlist, but I didn't pay attention to the time. Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 18:30, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:00, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:21, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent attempt of gaslighting the same Objective to manipulate the autnomy of WP:GSCASTE and terrifically reverting the article Neverthless (Note:Suspect seem to be Sock Master [116]of User:Apnawasebb, earliest intruder to abruptly use multiple evasion on same article within same intercaction timegap. Ontheloop (talk) 17:33, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:GS/CASTE. Socks galore have been edit-warring. Someone qualified should clean up the mess. Favonian (talk) 17:53, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism, WP:CT/AP 2601:282:4700:272:50F0:E7D6:AFEA:BC4C (talk) 17:01, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. See WP:ATPROT. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:13, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very High level of IP & non-IP vandalism. Perz00 (talk) 18:09, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:KURDS. El_C 18:33, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive and High level IP vandalism, changing the content of articles as per own whims and fancies, violating the discussion on talk page. Imsaneikigai (talk) 06:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:37, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Continuously inserting flag icon into infobox. Annh07 (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:35, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Continuously inserting flag icon into infobox. Annh07 (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:34, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Continuously inserting flag icon into infobox. Annh07 (talk) 16:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per ARBPIA. Controversial subject and matter related to current wars in Middle East. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:15, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Round 2. El_C 18:34, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of well-sourced content by what appears to be an IP sock. — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 19:29, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: For 12 days now, two IPs have been revert warring over something in this article. Some time off may be beneficial to both. 2A00:23C5:50E8:EE01:6826:7ED6:69A8:AF98 (talk) 19:38, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:29, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 19:46, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

21 October 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated changes from different IPs without providing sources for change. Graywalls (talk) 21:42, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:46, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism and unreferenced additions to this BLP since 16:14, 8 October 2024. Alith Anar 21:51, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:50, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 23:52, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated changes from different IPs without providing sources for change especially regarding Malaysian-Indonesian batik Alteaven (talk) 01:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Alteaven: Please try communicating with the editor, ideally in both edit summaries and user talk page comments, before we resort to page protection or other measures. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Whitewashing by suspected sock of banned COI editor User:Gabnaparato. See [[117]. Borgenland (talk) 02:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:13, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 10:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple edits without specifying the source from different IP addresses. Rxsxuis (talk) 06:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:29, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 10:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yamla. BusterD (talk) 13:16, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism throughout article’s entire history. Just look at the protection log 2600:100C:B0A1:195:F59F:2C60:2A3E:F970 (talk) 13:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:25, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS Eastern Europe Borgenland (talk) 03:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:BALKANS. El_C 16:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS Eastern Europe Borgenland (talk) 03:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:BALKANS. El_C 16:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. The page has been protected before, but only temporarily. Almost immediately after each protection has expired, IPs (mainly from Indonesia) and some new accounts start vandalizing the page. I'm not sure which level of protection would be best, but I nonetheless believe that the protection should be permanent. OpalYosutebito (talk) 07:21, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: Repeated IP vandalism after the corresponding talk page was protected because of extensive IP-vandalism. Draken Bowser (talk) 10:53, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:24, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Non-modern, but still treating as a primary article. El_C 15:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An editor is working across two accounts and a handful of IPs making persistent disruptive edits - mostly the addition of unsourced content - and has ignored numerous warnings across their various talk pages. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:CASTE. El_C 15:58, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued BLP vandalism by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 15:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated misogynistic vandalism related to politician Kamala Harris (extended protected). There aren't a lot, granted, but the ones that are there are wildly defamatory and are likely to continue in the lead-up to the 2024 US general election. Request semi-protection. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 11:24, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. No disruption for last nine days; the only two ip edits were beneficial. Please re-read the protection policy linked almost everywhere on this page. No evidence of sustained mischief; we don't protect pages when there's zero disruption currently occurring. BusterD (talk) 13:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Constant evasion of sock block since September. Aintabli (talk) 14:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:KURDS. El_C 16:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS RUSUKR. Borgenland (talk) 14:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 15:58, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (TCL) 15:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 16:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP changing editor that doesn't understand that 'theme song singer' isn't a role. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting one month full protection: Persistent edit-warring over the status of the band (e.g. "... is a band" / "... was a band"), which members are present or past, that sort of thing. There is an ongoing discussion at Talk:One Direction#RfC: Band status and members in the infobox, despite which, some of its participants have continued to edit the article. Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., after the expiration one needs to restore indefinite semi-protection Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP changing editor that keeps editing disruptively. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page only receives vandalism from unregistered users. DaHuzyBru (talk) 04:28, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 22:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP keeps adding misinformation to page lead. GoodDay (talk) 21:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A spate of vandalism based on some sports trade I believe. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:28, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 22:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

22 October 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term target of childish vandalism, possibly because it's a beer and that makes it "funny". It doesn't. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 00:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruptive editing on the page over the individuals ethnic origin. Page has been protected before. Noorullah (talk) 04:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under IPA. Daniel Case (talk) 00:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Members of the band were keep changing from current to past and vice versa on infobox even though an RfC about it is still ongoing. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 06:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated incorrect changes from IP users going against what reliable sources state. Trailblazer101 (talk) 07:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:04, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection Ongoing disruption from various Russian IP addresses. Barry Wom (talk) 10:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several users and IPs vandalizing. Sjö (talk) 12:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:24, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Page was recently repeatedly revandalized by an account that got just enough edits to pass semi. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nat Gertler Moved here from RPPDecrease. Zinnober9 (talk) 03:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined User has acknowledged the last warning. Daniel Case (talk) 22:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs and new users are adding unsourced info frequently. Ab207 (talk) 16:16, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same person under different IPs vandalising the page on subject discussed multiple times on talk page. Pelmeen10 (talk) 17:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:36, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a CTOPS notice to the talk page, since the subject of the edit warring comes under WP:CT/EE Daniel Case (talk) 01:39, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from new accounts since the expiry of the last protection template on 00:51, 30 September 2024. Alith Anar 19:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:57, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP violations by IPs starting on October 19. These edits may need to be deleted: advertising harrassment website another ad to the same site [118] [119]. Badbluebus (talk) 19:43, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:56, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, pending changes is useless and completely unsuited for dealing with this sort of thing. DuncanHill (talk) 21:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One rejected edit is not nearly enough to demonstrate the need for a higher protection level. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; immediately resumed after previous protection. That’s enough! 2600:100C:B0A1:195:F59F:2C60:2A3E:F970 (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Request from editor that is evading a block. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism throughout article’s entire history. Pc not working 2600:100C:B0A1:195:F59F:2C60:2A3E:F970 (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Request from editor that is evading a block. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive edits and vandalism from IP editors over the last few days. RachelTensions (talk) 21:21, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 02:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-term problems with ip and new editor vandalism. - Hipal (talk) 23:25, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting semi-protection of article about the Sandy Marton song indefinitely due to high levels of IP-vandalism. I have invited them to justify their inclusion of the non-relevant pornographic meme, but they simply edit-war with no feedback or justification. It is difficult to keep the article cleaned up of unrelated meme references with no protection. Snickerdoooodle (talk) 20:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @Snickerdoooodle: These edits not appear to be "vandalism" as the term is used on Wikipedia. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:58, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs are mistakenly editing that Higgs is no longer premier, because his party just lost a general election. Higgs is premier until he resigns, which won't be for another roughly two weeks. GoodDay (talk) 01:57, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent daily additions of OR, and vandalism. Surprised this hasn't eaten an indef protection given the aspects of the product. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Extended-Protection: Should be extended-protected per WP:PIA 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 04:56, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits at all in six weeks. And, he's been dead almost as long as I've been alive. Not much relevance to the current conflict there. Daniel Case (talk) 00:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent factual misinformation from ip hopper. CRBoyer 06:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:F40:98C:172D:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 00:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly no constructive edits. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:43, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuation of IPs posting false death reports of the former US president on this talk page. MPFitz1968 (talk) 02:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 16 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 03:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring and disruptive changes by IP-range Special:Contributions/2600:8805:D1B:7500:7F29:95D9:1832:6ADD since 18 October. Mann Mann (talk) 07:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I agree that they've been a pest, not just here but on other PW articles, for a while. However they have not been warned on any of the IPs they've used, so it's not surprising that they've continued. I just changed that ... let's see how it turns out. Daniel Case (talk) 01:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone keep editing without valid reasons. Editorialph (talk) 17:21, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I have instead warned this user about the edits they keep getting reverted over. Daniel Case (talk) 01:47, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See also: User talk:FuelTheFuego 23 ~SG5536B 02:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jpgordon. Favonian (talk) 04:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP changing editor that doesn't understand that 'theme song singer' isn't a role. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A02:8440:3000:0:0:0:0:0/37 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. from that page and others for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 02:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuos High level of POV Push based on unauthentic self published sources and addition of content not available in any source cited. Another reason is addition of portraits of notable individuals which isn't encouraged as this article is a caste article. Vedant Katyayan (talk) 21:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 23:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:D959:1700:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the page for a week}} Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has been overrun by editors with very specific political objectives. For instance, the abstract of this article in Google now shows "Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible" which is not an accurate or correct representation of the movement by people who have held or currently hold it. Rather, this edit is being used on Wikipedia by bad actors intending to promote antisemitism and to disparage both the Jewish people and the State of Israel - it uses as its citation an biased source promoting what can only be considered opinion, as the definition cited is by no means authoritative and is not used by adherents. The page should be protected, the copious edits being made nearly minutely reverted, and reviewed and rewritten as necessary by senior editors. Adrade (talk) 02:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: the page is already under ECP as part of the Arab-Israeli conflict contentious topic and no compelling argument for full protection has been made here. Elli (talk | contribs) 03:04, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A year ago, I requested this article's indefinite edit protection to be lifted. I was wrong. It has seen so many disruptive editing by newly created accounts, it seems this decade-old game has some die hard fans out there that do not necessarily care for Wikipedia's guidelines on video games. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since the block was lifted on October 19, there have been 22 revisions already. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous addition and removal of Trump's comments involving Palmer. Wikipedialuva (talk) 05:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by WP:LTA WP:HEVAL through new accounts and IPs since late September. Aintabli (talk) 21:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/KURD. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock vandalism on page. — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 03:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Waxworker (talk) 04:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2607:FEA8:DE2:F000:BDE1:A556:5A2:2801 (talk) 03:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article has not been disrupted since 15 October 2024. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Garry's Mod is long-term protected, so vandalism regularly boils over to this embedded image. IceWelder [] 06:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 07:39, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistant IP-hopper vandalism and disruptive edits. User3749 (talk) 07:45, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also Toby Tarrant. User3749 (talk) 07:51, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months (both), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:06, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism. Several IPs made fake editions to the article, despite I reverted them. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 08:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Under Wikipedia:General sanctions/Professional wrestling. El_C 09:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism just before an election at the end of October. Alexwiki0496 (talk) 09:06, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:14, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request for full protection, an auto-confirmed user is continuously vandalising the article with his unsourced and POV edits for many days. Hbanm (talk) 03:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: Request for full protection, an auto-confirmed user is continuously vandalising the article with his unsourced and POV edits for many days. Hbanm (talk) 04:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block-evading IP hijacking after final warning. They were blocked for 31 hours, and almost immediately resumed after it expired. I've always said we should require a log-in to edit, and things like this are the reason why. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Sumanuil, I've extended the present block from 31 hours to two weeks (contra the previous 31 hours block under a different IP). Please feel free to relist or alert me on my talk page if further vandalism occurs before or after that block expires, and I'll probably protect for a considerable time (probably under the WP:ARBPAK sanctions regime). Thank you. El_C 09:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism continously 1 2 3 Baqotun0023 (talk) 06:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 07:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, specifically over political position and ideology. Protection should be temporary until the fallout from the election dies down, I'd say a month or so.PlateOfToast (talk) 11:06, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: "The page has been subjected to frequent vandalism and biased edits that disrupt its accuracy. The subject matter is sensitive and related to regional history, making it a target for personal or politically motivated changes. To ensure the integrity of the content and maintain a neutral, well-researched article, we are requesting semi/full protection." 223.123.14.45 (talk) 11:49, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just reverted caste-related article hijacking by the nominator. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 12:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Under WP:CASTE. El_C 13:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See Brian Calle. GPL93 (talk) 11:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 13:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page seems to be the target of being recreated many times for some reason. Therefore, I request for it to be salted to extended confirmed protection JuniperChill (talk) 12:35, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 13:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandlism from someone in the 2600:1015:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 (talk · contribs), 2600:1015:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 (talk · contribs) and (just once) 2601:805:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 (talk · contribs) ranges. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:21, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello, I’d like to request that the protection on my user page be removed so that I can collaborate and edit. Thank you. Kimberlyctd22 (talk) 14:04, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage isn't protected, see Kimberlyctd22, which you yourself have edited some minutes ago. The page you linked to isn't protected neither, but it is a page in WP:Mainspace. Lectonar (talk) 14:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that wording be changed in the first paragraph because it is biased ... (Your edit request here) . 82.30.253.128 (talk) 06:44, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Wanted change not specified. Lectonar (talk) 10:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone keep editing a fake info Editorialph (talk) 13:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Editorialph: you have been reverted multiple times, reasons habe been given in the edit-summaries. Protection isn't the way to go here. Lectonar (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar Requested user is now the subject of an ANI report. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Edit-warring and WP:SOAPBOX Borgenland (talk) 13:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Racist edits. Requesting protection. Knitsey (talk) 15:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I attempted to request this also but Twinkle said there was an active request. For context, this is in the media at the moment due to the trial outcome. A few days of protection should be all it needs before the media cycle is over and it calms down again. -OXYLYPSE (talk) 16:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: People with strong opinions and vandals on a BLP Polygnotus (talk) 16:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:47, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is an extremely high level of Single Purpose Account (SPA) vandalism on the page. Discussion on the talk page hasn't helped, as the SPA keeps reverting any changes, manipulating sources, and clearly violating BLP policy. The article should be extended-protected at the very least, or user should be blocked from editing it. However, given the nature of their edits, I doubt they won't create a new account to continue editing the page. 美しい歌 (talk) 10:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Honestly both of you should be blocked for this, at least from the page, and if this resumes after the block I would suggest strongly that any other admin consider this. But since discussion is underway both on the talk page and at BLPN I feel it is best that we let that take its course.

Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism on this page about a Wikipedia hoax page, nonsense edits. IP vandalism seems to get more frequent lately, several cases per day. Chrisahn (talk) 11:57, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – WP:GSCASTE; surname article that was recently hijacked with low-quality caste-related content. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 12:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log. Daniel Case (talk) 21:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes doesn't seem to be working. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Indeed, too active for pc. El_C 21:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This Featured Article, for whatever reason, attracts vandals. Maybe it's all the same LTA but the accepted version/limited protection is wearing to deal with. They/him/her think they've succeeded so they keep coming back for their funfunFUN. Make it stop. Please. Shearonink (talk) 17:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done El_C 21:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of WP:SPAM by IPs. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 17:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article Presently detoxicated by the sock imposter in a organised way to vandalise the notable people with uncertain exaggeration while stressing their strategic approach at WP:GSCASTE sanction Lifechance (talk) 20:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After all of this turbulence it sound better to inbound this article accordance with WP:GSCASTE just like other sensitive topic. Lifechance (talk) 20:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Indeed, under WP:CASTE. El_C 21:04, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: All editors agreed that whatever we put on this page will only be edited once everyone reviews it. AnuragBisht108 (talk) 04:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AnuragBisht108: Where is this consensus? I see no such agreement on Talk:Aaj Tak. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 05:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Note that the user making this request had been previously been blocked for 31 hours for edit warring and 8RR on the same subject in what some editors suspect may be a case of whitewashing and COI as noted on their talk page and in the article in question, and that they have a sockpuppet account linked to them (User:AnuBisht21) that was used to edit the article and was the very reason why this article was protected in the first place. That the reason they claim is also not supported in talk also raises questions as to user's intentions. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive Edits and Misinformation by User "Ratnahastin" on AajTak Wikipedia Page. Borgenland (talk) 13:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done There is no such consensus; the requesting editor is the reason for the page protection and should think carefully about their future involvement with the page. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If anything, this is an argument to increase protection to extended-confirmed from semi.  Requesting immediate archiving...Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs often retarget this to Pepe the frog, since Pepe memes sometimes use the term, but that article neither uses nor explains this word at all. Belbury (talk) 13:04, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Sparkbean (talk) 13:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently being targeted by sock accounts. MrOllie (talk) 14:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 21:19, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism of changing the birthdate and changing an album link, without adding any sources. Multiple edits done by different IPs (possibly the same human). Bunnypranav (talk) 15:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:21, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated attempts to whitewash the article to remove sourced content, often with less than truthful edit summaries (for example removing all sources and saying it's "unsourced" or that the sources don't exist). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:57, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS per BLPGROUP. Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-Protection: I think this diff says it all: 68 edits in 9 months, all vandalism and reversion of the vandalism. The Mountain of Eden (talk) 18:45, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Steven Walling • talk 21:39, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This page has been repeatedly edited by sockpuppets of the globally locked account Lustigermutiger21 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki) since July, including Akihawaranabiak, OnikageTenchu, Light Jagami, and multiple IPs. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lustigermutiger21. The sockpuppeteer appears to create multiple accounts and edits other articles briefly before making editing the Mark Karpelès article. Requesting extended confirmed page protection because of the frequency of the sockpuppetry. – notwally (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Under WP:GS/CRYPTO. El_C 21:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection Syrian-German activist primarily known for her views about the Israel-Palestine conflict, has been extensively edited by non-ECP editors about content regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict in volation of WP:ECR requirement for WP:ARBPIA. Much of this editing has been disruptive, and there has been considerable edit warring. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 21:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

23 October 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. CsmLearner 💬🔬 13:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 73.127.47.16 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. for 31 hours. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 20:21, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Article is attracting various IPs contributing unsourced, non-neutral content. Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 21:57, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article doesn't have a huge volume of edits and hasn't been protected previously, so trying 30 days of pending first. If it gets out of hand we can escalate to semi-protection. Steven Walling • talk 21:56, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Threats by Editorialph (talk · contribs) to vandalize the article. See [120]. Borgenland (talk) 15:47, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unnecessary changes occurences from DDkay KingdomNone91 (talk) 19:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Steven Walling • talk 21:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP disruption. Mellk (talk) 20:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Steven Walling • talk 21:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent spamming the WP:CASTEID and changing the wikimarkup with repulsive editing while stressing the early life of historical figure 188.47.3.92 (talk) 16:39, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:CASTE. El_C 01:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP users. Ongoing for a week now. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 16:47, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism in the voice acting section. BoythisisworsethanthetimeIwassus (talk) 21:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:41, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Leonidlednev (TCL) 22:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 01:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A pernicious sock account has decided to use this as a bizarre sandbox of some kind (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Verizon2027 for several days and under several accounts. Also suggesting some revdels and suppresions as the sock deals in inane nonsense in edit summaries. Nate (chatter) 22:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent additional unsourced or poorly source, some incorrect information and makes no sense to revert back. Stephen McKeever (talk) 22:46, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP anon repeatedly adding nonsense with future dates written as though they have already happened. idk if this is AI generated trash or what. Dual Freq (talk) 23:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:45, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring and disruptive editing by a single user, despite warnings and attempts to open a discussion. I have reported the user to AI:V as well (for vandalism after recent release of 3RR block).

ECP will stop the edit warring without blocking the user again. GSK (talkedits) 18:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The single user already appears to be blocked for one month? If they persist we can always block them again. Steven Walling • talk 21:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, I think this request is now moot considering the block. GSK (talkedits) 23:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. For the bot. El_C 01:08, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing on the article. Wikibear47 (talk) 01:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Wikibear47: If the disruption quickly resumes after protection expires, please submit a new request. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My crystal ball shows an WP:ARBPAK in that article's future as a near-certainty... El_C 03:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People keep putting Steve from Minecraft on the image. نوحفث   Let's Chat! 03:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article Tusi (drug), following a passing of high profile individual, has experienced a surge in problematic edits including: unverified claims about substance, and inflammatory edits. Multiple editors have had to revert these changes. Suggest elevation to semi-protected level for two weeks or until media coverage subsides. ElectronCompound (talk) 04:10, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 05:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeated recreated by multiple different accounts. Page has been G3'ed and creator blocked 6 times but they keep using socks. MolecularPilot 04:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Steven Walling • talk 05:18, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Per [121] Cremastra (uc) 01:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cremastra: Even for consensus changes like this, please try to contact the protecting administrator to request unprotection first. Thanks! @Black Kite: Any objections to lifting the protection? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks. Cremastra (uc) 12:20, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. @Cremastra: Please ask Black Kite on their user talk page. If you don't get a response within several days, please repost your request here adding a link to the user talk page request. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:13, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent flurry of vandalism with a specific pattern (name changing) by several IPs, indicative of perhaps a response to a meme or similar (just guessing). Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 04:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content and also original research content by various IPs ranges. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 06:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Essentially only one IP today...the rest of IP edits are more than 4 days old. Lectonar (talk) 09:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous protection has just ended 2 days ago, every edit since has been vandalism also. OXYLYPSE (talk) 11:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism not letting up. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: BLP with high level of IP vandalism (subject recently subject to off-wiki harassment campaign on social media, driving up engagement) BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially one IP; we shouldn't shut the article down for disruption by a single IP. Lectonar (talk) 11:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous COI and unsourced edits. Bunnypranav (talk) 10:48, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar There have been multiple ips and accounts editing Bunnypranav (talk) 11:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:34, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Not sure what is going on, but this article has been very popular for IPs and new users these past months, resulting in constant disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of promotional content by an IP editor. Tacyarg (talk) 12:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Protection is not appropriate for an issue with a single IP. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ip snoopers persistently violating the insensitive provision of WP:GSCASTE and trying to vandalised the article while asserting the Non-Notable individual with extremely contemptuous background such as Lawrence Bishnoi and his companions Goldy Brar to standardise the repulsive turbulence without any single reference or solid intelligible source 103.229.40.146 (talk) 12:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing over the last few days from multiple IPs. RachelTensions (talk) 15:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 15:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The last few sentences of the second lead paragraph regarding assassinated Hamas leaders are too detailed for the lead. I don't believe including all of their names without reason is appropriate when the Infobox can convey a simpler understanding of their demise and state. Instead, figures of utmost relevance should be accounted for with reasons outside of their killings.

My suggestion is to change this:

In January 2024, Saleh al-Arouri, the deputy political chief of Hamas, was assassinated in Beirut, Lebanon. In July, Israel claimed to have killed military leader Mohammed Deif in an airstrike in al-Mawasi. In August, Ismail Haniyeh, the political leader of Hamas was assassinated in Tehran, Iran. In October, Yahya Sinwar, the chief and preceding political leader of Hamas, was killed in a shootout in Rafah.

To this:

Throughout 2024, Israel has killed many of Hamas' political and military officials. Prominent figures killed by Israel include Ismail Haniyeh and Yahya Sinwar, who have collectively served as political leaders for Hamas since 2007, and supposedly[citation for clarity] Mohammed Deif, who led Hamas' military branch, the Ezzedeen al-Qassam Brigades, since 2002.

This connects to Israel's goals described prior to this section, while establishing the impact of those killings pertaining to Hamas and Palestine as a whole. The readability of this is a bit wonky though, so if you have any better ideas, please let me know! Ecco2kstan (talk) 04:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OOPS! I made a mistake in the title. This DOES NOT pertain to the Gaza Genocide article! This is about the Israel-Hamas War. Ecco2kstan (talk) 04:13, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have amended the title. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The sentences that you refer to were removed from the lede later on 18 October, there is now nothing to change. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant IP vandalism and blanking. Sangsangaplaz (talk) 13:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked a few IPs, removed a lot of crap and copyvios. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:10, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 16:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Just off protection for 24 hours yesterday, and the vandalism edits are back. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 16:01, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 16:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Right back to vandalism after recent protections expiration. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 16:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of unsourced additions from IP users, which have constantly been reverted over the span of several months. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 14:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 15:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent false info. Ip hopper is inserting themselves as a cast member. Blocking the range might also be good idea. CRBoyer 14:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked 2 ranges. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 15:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:01, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of repeated vandalism. 2603:300B:73A:E300:346F:1F3A:95B:D0FA (talk) 18:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/AP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page was semi-protected on 11 October 2024 for period of 10 days, but since ending the same moving IP vandal (117.) has returned. Please can a longer period of semi-protection be applied. JP (Talk) 08:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:34, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of ip vandalism Theonewithreason (talk) 15:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 15:54, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The bot archived this for some reason. Leonidlednev (TCL) 18:18, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spike in vandalism since 15:40, 23 October 2024. Alith Anar 18:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by different IPs, specially removal of its seal/logo imagee. Niasoh (talk) 19:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (TCL) 20:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

24 October 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP hopper disrupting the article. M.Bitton (talk) 21:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Serious BLP violation with several IP socks. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:54, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock hopping IPs to send personal attacks. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (TCL) 14:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Since we cannot layer protections on each other yet, and we don't know how long this situation will go on, this is just the better option. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Forum comments are being added by IPs and non-autoconfirmed accounts due to the election. I think one month of protection would be good. GrabUp - Talk 14:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism, contentious issue, should be protected like how Hezbollah/Israel conflict and Gaza/Israel war categories are. Thudinspecies (talk) 15:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring. Beshogur (talk) 17:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you check edit history. "quarantining" happens without protection! Weird. Beshogur (talk) 21:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Star Mississippi. for one week. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip vandalism. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move Saleh al-Arouri from military to political due to him being the Deputy Chairman of the Hamas Political Bureau before his death ElementalKnight987654321 (talk) 06:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. That was the infobox template, not the article itself. I changed the heading and links for this request. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Israel–Hamas war (2)

Add a map key indicating what color denotes "Lebanon under Israeli control" in the legend for the map showing the "Northern Israel sector of war." It is already shown in the file and on other pages that use this file, so this edit would merely be to align with the file and the other articles. 129,743rd user (talk) 00:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, copied from one of the other articles, although I think the color matching on that legend is horrible. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change Minetest to either "Luanti" or "Luanti (formerly Minetest)" 5.195.47.111 (talk) 08:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change "In that same month, according to Gallup, just 24% of Palestinians supported a two-state solution, a drop from 59% in 2012.[126]" to "Polls from before the 7 october massacre show that just 24% of Palestinians support a two-state solution, a drop from 59% in 2012.[126]"

Now the contents of the quoted source [126] are misrepresented. The poll among palestinians was conducted BEFORE the 7 october massacre. GRoorda (talk) 19:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, but not exactly with the words you proposed. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request for long term semi-protection as page is being vandalized by an editor using two or more IPs in order to insert and preserve WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Mr Fink (talk) 21:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. For a month. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This individual recently died, and after his death allegations of child sexual abuse were published, and police confirmed he had been under investigation. The subject was even discussed in the media by the New Zealand prime minister. An anonymous IP editor has been removing references to these allegations, claiming they are false and defamatory. The issue has already been to WP:BLPN where it was determined that the abuse allegations should be included. I suspect the IP editor has an undeclared WP:COI given their tone and tenacity on this issue. David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 21:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS per WP:BDP. Daniel Case (talk) 05:49, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 21:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruption particularly regarding changing the nationality of the company to Chinese. TylerBurden (talk) 22:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP and new account vandalism, getting worse lately, probably related to Talk:Alan MacMasters hoax#Recent spike. — Chrisahn (talk) 01:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:58, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All socks globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the words due to multiple reason.

  1. The statement "Lu Xun’s observed lack of evidence about the translation of the Ramayana is no true" is incorrect. The reference 12, an article by Xianlin Ji, clearly says that "It is plausible to say that Sun Wukong came through the South China Sea instead of coming directly from India."
  2. This whole paragraph is obviously unrelated to SunWuKong, especially when there is no evidence proving that it is inspired by Ramayana.
  3. This paragraph is clearly an introduction of Ramayana's influence in asia. It should be under the page Ramayana.

“However, recent research has suggested that Lu Xun’s observed lack of evidence about the translation of the Ramayana is not true.[12][13] The Indian literary scholar A. K. Ramanujan had written about the numerous versions of the Ramayana in India and around the world in his essay Three Hundred Ramayanas,[14] he looks at examples from Southeast Asia, and mentions how countries like Tibet, Thailand, Burma, Laos, Cambodia, Malaysia, Java and Indonesia, all of these regions and countries have their native Ramayanas. He looks particularly at the Thai version of the Ramayana, the Ramakien, and the changes in narrative and characterisation. There is also the aspect and possibility of religious transmission of Hanuman through the Tibetan Buddhist and Khotanese traditions of the Ramayana, notably culminating through the Dai ethnic group and their version of Ramayana, known as the Lanka Xihe, or the ten heads of Lanka (referring to Ravana), scholars estimate that the Ramayana story might have reached the Dai people even before the spread of Buddhism, by the means of trade between India and China.[15]”

Kingzwbq (talk) 05:10, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. It isn't clear what you want done, and this is the wrong venue. Make edit requests on Talk:Monkey King, per the instructions above. That talk page isn't protected. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that...the Current and legit Founder/CEO on LVMH Laura Aguirre is the owner Founder/CEO of the LVMH Company since 1997, Mr. Arnault is an Advisor for the company since 2019. announcements. 2603:8081:8BF0:A50:CC89:1C7:60AA:75EE (talk) 11:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@2603:8081:8BF0:A50:CC89:1C7:60AA:75EE: What’s the title of the article? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:41, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Malformed request, and failure to read instructions. Changes should be proposed on the article talk page. Talk:LVMH is not protected. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:BLPCRIME violations by IPs and possible CTOPS. Request same protections for 2024 Ankara attack. Borgenland (talk) 16:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think at this point it will be counterproductive, the recent IP edits are constructive. Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: not even sure if this page should exist, but history is nothing but vandal rvs Tule-hog (talk) 17:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the page and leave another admin to decide whether create-protection is needed. Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I think deletion is sufficient for now. Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:MOREVOTE/WP:PANICVOTE at the XfD - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sanyamjain. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:13, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No signs of sock !voting, and SPI was inconclusive. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The correct terms should be used! Zionism is a nationalistic movement. Zionists wanted to create a Jewish State in the land formerly known as Judea, the ancient homeland of the Jews (Hebrew: Eretz Yisraʾel, “the Land of Israel”); which at the time was ruled by a British Mandate. See Encyclopedia Britannica as a source. 2607:FEA8:565E:1000:DCA3:DB8A:B61C:5887 (talk) 18:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then surely you can provide a citation to a source that Encyclopaedia Brittanica themselves cite? For something like this in this hellhole topic area, we'd need a better source than another encyclopaedia. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 20:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Malformed request. Requests should be in the form "change X to Y" with reliable secondary sources cited. No specific change is proposed here, and another encyclopedia is a tertiary source. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement, WP:AP2. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 03:01, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also enforce WP:CT/GENSEX. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And I am also wondering how this could come under GENSEX. Though anything's possible. Daniel Case (talk) 05:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/ARARAT at it again. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:37, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:53, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:49, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continues right after recent protections expired. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 17:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:33, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Slow vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of whitewashing and IP editing 12.202.180.135 (talk) 16:53, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:45, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple accounts, which upon examination of their edit histories are found to solely focus on this page, have been used to whitewash well-cited and established content, sourced from reputable outlets such as Reuters and the Associated Press, concerning sports corruption controversies that are of public interest. Daftard (talk) 17:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Averaging vandalism every 5.3 hours for the past 47.5 hours. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 03:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 21:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing. HorrorLover555 (talk) 05:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 21:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Nearly all edits to this article are spam links from box retail websites. Belbury (talk) 14:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want indefinite, not temporary

2600:100C:B0AA:C978:BDB8:EB40:557E:B44A (talk) 14:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 21:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Caste warrior IP disruptive editing. Nxcrypto Message 15:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 15:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very broad-topic article, high spot for vandalism. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 15:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For the current stuff. Not enough disruptive activity for indefinite semi. We could consider lengthy pending protection after this, though. GoodnightmushTalk 20:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs edit-warring to include unsupported genre categories. DonIago (talk) 16:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:14, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 22:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent changing of Infobox image to copyrighted image. Have also requested for blocking at WP:AIV and at Commons for the registered account however the various logged out editing WP:DUCK IPs is not yet warned sufficiently to fulfil AIV requirements hence requesting for page protection instead. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 14:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

25 October 2024

Reason: Contentious topic, per WP:PIA. Zinderboff(talk) 03:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A few socks have been blocked (not autoconfirmed) and they are back editing using IPs. Please apply protection to stop wastage of time. Veldsenk (talk) 07:01, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism by what is likely a single IP user, whose edits have required multiple editors to revert. Please increase to semi protection

I believe these different IPs all belong to the same user, who has taken to griefing the page: 2A02:1808:87:6A5F:692B:8BD8:B5D4:D81, 2600:6C40:5B00:48B3:4C12:BC24:394A:E653, 2A0D:6FC0:745:D000:B8DF:82C9:355B:197, 2001:818:E279:DA00:C553:EB98:74BE:F9C1 Xland44 (talk) 09:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Reformatted request. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. I initially semi-protected it, but updated the protection after reviewing the log further. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/A-I. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – CTOP - Arab-Israeli conflict. AntiDionysius (talk) 12:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant pushing of the unsuitable source SimpleFlying contrary to WP:SIMPLEFLYING. The Banner talk 12:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think protection is the right instrument to use here. Ymblanter (talk) 20:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done GoodnightmushTalk 20:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Nxcrypto Message 15:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 23:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disturbance by Ip address Peachyo (talk) 17:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 20:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs repeatedly adding around 300 characters of "steam trains are powered by ghost to create that it takes the passengers or cargo" nonsense for over a year. With few other edits, semi-protection would be more effective than pending changes. Belbury (talk) 18:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Pending seems fine for the slow stuff. If there's a much more immediate stuff, just re-request. GoodnightmushTalk 20:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Can we have full protection please? Beshogur (talk) 16:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I'm hoping this won't be necessary in this case now that a discussion is taking place. GoodnightmushTalk 20:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 20:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disturbance by ip address Peachyo (talk) 17:14, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 20:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism spurred from X (https://x.com/omor_odion/status/1846155696728916228?s=46). Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 18:14, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (The article, not the talk page.) GoodnightmushTalk 20:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done (for the bot) GoodnightmushTalk 21:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 23:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 182.239.64.0/18 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Anonymous IP making unsourced edits and affecting the neutrality of the article. StevePrutz (talk) 12:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 173.63.0.217 (talk · contribs). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:14, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LaffyTaffer (talk) 21:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MrOllie (talk) 22:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Coming in without much context, this looks less like vandalism and more like a dispute over which world record is actually valid. I've left a note in my protection log summary to consider a talk page discussion and dispute resolution. Airplaneman (talk) 00:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism, edit wars Firecat93 (talk) 23:49, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - I don't think the amount of disruption warrants semi-protection at this time. However, the disputed content in this BLP is serious, and I think pending changes can add a good layer of review while this develops. Airplaneman (talk) 00:23, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inform readers of the distinction between the dagger symbol and the cross symbol in the infobox.

Under "Commanders and leaders" in the infobox Yahya Sinwar has a dagger next to his name, but others such as Marwan Issa have a cross next to their name. The distinction between these symbols is not immediately clear to someone reading the article, I feel that this should be explicitly noted on the page. The Elysian Vector Fields (talk) 20:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheElysianVectorFields: That isn't the article page, that's the infobox template. I changed the target for you above. It seems the dagger means "killed in action" (KIA) and the cross means "assassinated". I honestly don't know how I'd add a note to that effect. Maybe someone smarter than me can figure it out. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now. No response for a week, no suggestion about how to improve it. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For power bi analysis Rifaatrizaa (talk) 07:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Failure to read the instructions above. The article talk page is not protected, make an edit request there. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism and POV push Vedant Katyayan (talk) 00:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:33, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated reverts of WP:GF edits by Mlb8589 who adds unverified/unverifiable location information to past champions table. Primary sources used for championship history do not include localities, though some added by Mlb8589 can be assumed to be correct—but not all. To verify would require parsing 40+ years of score recaps to determine which champions are from where… which has yet to be completed. Requesting revert to [122] and locking page to prevent WP:EW. Thosbsamsgom (talk) 03:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User is continuously using different IPs to edit. User then made an account and made 10 quick edits to get autoconfirmed status. I cannot revert further as I've already reverted three times. — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 03:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Wkektsnent (talk · contribs). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been plagued with disruptive edits (all involving the content being replaced with "Emulador de xbox para gamecube") on this wiki and multiple other wikis. It has become more persistent in October. German Wikipedia has already protected the page on their wiki. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 03:32, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and false informations. 2RDD (talk) 06:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disrupting editing; but the voice actors are not coming back, otherwise, the page caused personal attacks. Stephen McKeever (talk) 00:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 01:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism by caste warrior IP. Nxcrypto Message 15:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 02:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism and numerous unsourced edits Zamekrizeni (talk) 21:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GS/CASTE - persistent disruptive editing. ®asteem Talk 21:45, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GS/CASTE - persistent disruptive editing. ®asteem Talk 21:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged. Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 22:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS per WP:ARBAA. Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs calling her "woke" as vandalism. Paris1127 (talk) 01:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change "he withdrew his candidacy in July 2024 he became the first U.S. president to decline to seek reelection" to "he withdrew his candidacy in July 2024 and became the first U.S. president to decline to seek reelection" NowInHD (talk) 21:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I made the same mistake as the person above. I will make a request on the talk page of the article. NowInHD (talk) 21:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done per above. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 23:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. WP:ARBPIA. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 ⚧ 【=◈︿◈=】 11:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And not really enough nexus with the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 02:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Deletion of reference and referenced information. Kansas Bear (talk) 01:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: The Amused Albanian (talk · contribs) blocked by NinjaRobotPirate. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:19, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced edits. Tektonson (talk) 02:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Tektonson: Please warn the editor. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent hijacking over the past week. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There's only two users during this week, probably can be dealt with individual user measures as needed. Snowolf How can I help? 03:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection due to a recent spike in vandalism by anonymous users (IPs). Yue🌙 04:14, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – massive persistent vandalism. soibangla (talk) 04:26, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The harassment would just move elsewhere. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page recently unprotected, almost every IP edit since has been vandalism. OXYLYPSE (talk) 10:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 10:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism over the last few weeks. Sparkbean (talk) 13:22, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Bimmy nonsense across multiple IPs. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 14:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP sockpuppet making disruptive edits. INeedSupport :3 03:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:23, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 11:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism.Also a country page hence needs protection to at least extended confirmed. Edasf (talk) 12:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi should work 174.244.86.142 (talk) 13:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 15:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 12:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 15:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Niasoh (talk) 03:41, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. GoodnightmushTalk 15:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page was recently vandalized by someone. Even though, I restored the previous content, this could happen in a large scale so that restoring would be harder and time-wasting. That's why I have requested for protection of the page. W Dinuwara Binudith De Silva (talk) 04:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose(ish): I think that full protection of the page would be unproductive at best, and painfully inconvenient at worst. I think that semi-protection would work much better, as it'd mean no dodgy IP users could vandalize, nor any ultra-new editors. Maximalistic Editor (talk) 09:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 15:19, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consider permanent semi-protection given that the page often attracts IP-vandalism. Regards, Aafi (talk) 05:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. GoodnightmushTalk 15:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: As to prevent IPs from editing such an important article; an IP user was spamming the article with pro-RCP (as for context, RCP is a pollster disowned by WP:RSP) edits, re-adding them about a dozen times. As to prevent that and other nasty things, can you semi-protect it? The talk should not be protected though. Maximalistic Editor (talk) 08:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. GoodnightmushTalk 15:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: For some reason this talk page has been repeatedly having completely irrelevant sections added (both in terms of not appropriate for a talk page and not related to the subject matter), mainly from drive-by single edit users. 2600:1012:A021:4D69:D54A:5D93:8635:30BC (talk) 05:06, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I don't have a clue why the most random people (I geolocated them, they couldn't be much more random, one is in goddamn Malawi??? are bombarding the page with garbage Maximalistic Editor (talk) 09:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple removal of templates by permanently blocked spammers and sockpuppets and IP. Again immediately after the end of the previous protection. El-chupanebrej (talk) 09:22, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion to edit war resuming after prior protection just expired today. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bradv. Favonian (talk) 19:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arbitration enforcement: Arab-Israeli conflict. Recent edits in violation of 30/500. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 19:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Disruptive edits from auto-confirmed users, including WP:CRYSTAL violations. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 20:13, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Remsense ‥  20:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users are removing redirect to add unsourced content. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 20:40, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i want to add the history of this georgian surname, as it is my last name. Nikolozi5512 (talk) 15:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nikolori5512: Any title would need to be Anglicised, as we don't accept titles not in English. You will need to create a draft, with sources to back up the article text, and have it go thru the Articles for Creation process. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for the reason explained above. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

26 October 2024

Reason: Too much IP vandalism. Am resubmitting because my old request isn't there for some reason??? Maximalistic Editor (talk) 21:41, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 23:13, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GS/CASTE - Disruptive editing, article is extensively a soft target of caste warriors of multiple sockgroups, and poorly sourced CASTE cruft is persistently added are removed recently. ®asteem Talk 22:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 90 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This article has only once been previously protected so, while I can imagine the time will come when indefinite semi-confirmed protection will be needed, that time is not now. Moreover, the cadence and nature of the edits mean that the PC patrollers can monitor this for now. Please file a new request when or if this situation changes. Chetsford (talk) 23:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This page falls under the Arab-Israeli conflict contentious topic so should be extended-protected like the others. Thanks. Brandon Downes (talk) 23:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting extended confirmed protection as several accounts working together and focused exclusively on this page are whitewashing established and well-cited (Reuters and Associated Press) content related to international sports corruption that are in the public interest. Daftard (talk) 16:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Goodenightmush. for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disrupting editing and didn't work approve your edits summarized. Stephen McKeever (talk) 17:26, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 21:19, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Said IP is still targeting Tigranes (legendary)(4 reverts by IP). Kansas Bear (talk) 21:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism RedactedHumanoid (talk) 21:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 74.15.199.50 (talk · contribs). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Long term abuse (WP:LTA and WP:EVADE) from several blocked sock-puppets, one of these is associated with the white nationalist Human Diversity Foundation, another is Mikemikev who uses IPs since his recent block. We had a similar problem at Talk:Race (human categorization) just over a week ago from the same group of socks and that article has now been protected with WP:SILVERLOCK [123]. I believe the same should be done for the talk-page for Intelligence quotient. This recent IP is block evasion from Mikemikev [124].

Another IP blocked [125] who left messages on the talk-page has been involved in harassment of Wikipedia editors. And the other IP is also a blocked sock [126] confirmed here. The new account leaving disruptive messages on the talk-page is obvious block evasion [127]. This is an issue that has been going on for a long-time. A scan through the editing history of the talk-pages reveals other block evasion, for example [128] [129] etc. Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Going further back this has actually been going on for years. Here are some of Mikemikev's other socks [130], [131] on the same talk-page. The talk-page is obviously a magnet to neo-Nazi trolls. Per WP:LTA I believe better protection is warranted. Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GS/CASTE persistent editing. ®asteem Talk 22:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log. Daniel Case (talk) 03:20, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Confirmed-protection: Arbitration Enforcement  – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:18, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 03:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: insulting vandalism for several weeks Huhru (talk) 01:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/A-I and WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 01:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Request Arbitration enforcement of WP:AMPOL article due to repeat IP disruption. Raladic (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is in order. A simple semi-protection would do fine, and if it failed, I think that ECP would be on the table. Maximalistic Editor (talk) 09:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A long-term slow edit warring between an Albanian party and a Serbian party, buth represented by multiple editors. Probably needs to be reverted to the pre-war version and full protected for at least a month, otherwise this is not going to stop. Note that the Eastern Europ and Balcans has been designated as contentious topic. Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Typical Albanian (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a month as a CTOPS block. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/A-I - as a related topic. IanDBeacon (talk) 01:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unreferenced additions and vandalism to this BLP since 15:05, 25 October 2024. Alith Anar 15:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because this was recent, this may not be fulfilled, maybe check the activity in say, three days? Hellow Hellow i am here 18:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm saying it might not because of previous protection requests, but it might get fulfilled. Hellow Hellow i am here 18:18, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:41, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: No longer necessary low profile article ModernDaySlavery (talk) 02:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Airplaneman: last protecting admin...any thoughts on that? Lectonar (talk) 09:13, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: sure, I think trying un-protection is reasonable after this long. Airplaneman (talk) 00:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected but rather downgraded to pending change protection. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page was given an indefinite protection in June 2014 when the subject agreed to move club, effective from July; there was disruptive editing jumping the gun. This is quite clearly not an ongoing issue. IPs can do well with updating things. The page was demoted from GA in 2019 due to lack of update and maintenance. Subject has gone from a high-profile player to an average manager, so risk of vandalism is decreased. Protecting admin has 50 edits in last two years. Unknown Temptation (talk) 17:13, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ged UK: - courtesy ping, as the last protecting admin. Airplaneman (talk) 00:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now. It would be more effective to write a note on User talk:Ged UK, who has edited only yesterday. There is no hurry about this because WP:There is no deadline. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The edits prompting protection were made in good faith after the subject complained about inaccuracies on the page. I've used the post as an WP:ABOUTSELF source, so it should be good now. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 04:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider this carefully. The primary source disagrees with itself, as noted even by Thebiguglyalien, while the secondary source that was usurped was quite clear. The clearly contentious name and birth dates need to be more thoroughly investigated and solidly sourced before the article contains them; I have removed them for the time being. Since the Facebook post is likely the source of the sudden attention, it is fair to assume more ill informed attempts will continue, at least for a while, and I suggest maintaining the protection until we have consensus and accuracy. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 05:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. a heads-up next time might be nice; as a currently and directly involved editor, I only saw this request for unprotection when looking at Thebiguglyalien's contribs. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 05:26, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Be aware that this issue is now being discussed on the talk page of Devin the Dude and (because having the same conversation in multiple places is a great idea) on the Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 15:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Given the current discussion, it seems the protection is still warranted. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:41, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Current semi protection is clearly insufficient based on the recent repeated BLP violations of WP:GENSEX, so requesting raising to ECP per Arbitration enforcement and logging at CTOPs. Raladic (talk) 02:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting indefinite protection due to persistent level of IP vandalism (please see edit history). Also, please block User: 120.29.97.64 as this is vandalizing a lot of articles/pages. –J.avanzado (talk) 16:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There had been at least three instances where the page was recently vandalized, with very vulgar words replacing some of the paragraphs. Please reconsider locking the page. Thank you. –J.avanzado (talk) 04:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. TheWikiToby (talk) 02:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is the page of a vocational high school under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education of the Repulic of Bulgaria. Protection is requested to prevent edits which are damaging the institution's reputation and do not correspond to the truth. Milenspasov (talk) 23:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Milenspasov: Administrators on the English-language Wikipedia cannot take admin actions (incl. (un)protecting pages) on any other Wikipedia project. Ask on the Bulgarian Wikipedia's equivalent of this page. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for the reason stated above. Favonian (talk) 08:11, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 09:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Largely vandalised by users such as STRAWBERRYCHIP101. trusername (talk) 13:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous 3-year protection had just expired when cirkus came to town. Bunch of SPA clowns retired. Favonian (talk) 13:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several IP addresses with no other edit history have been consistently vandalizing this page for weeks to change the details of a deceased trans woman to use her deadname and incorrect pronouns. The page should be locked from IP editing. Ashvio (talk) 07:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/GG. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and unsourced additions since 15:49, 14 October 2024. Alith Anar 15:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by IP users. This is a very common occurrence on the page, happening 4-5 times in the past three days alone. The Morrison Man (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP-editing, including adding crap-sources to a BLP and repeated submissions that wastes time. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:34, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And fwiw, there seems to be a Commons-aspect to it:[132][133]. Ping @Yann if you wish to comment. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the account who ulpoaded files deleted as copyvios, also added them to the draft: Special:Contributions/XarrosGuy124. Yann (talk) 14:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. @Gråbergs Gråa Sång: As far as I can tell, the primary editor making additions recently has not been warned about their edits to the article. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism throughout article’s entire history. 2600:100C:B0AA:C978:123:AC11:3670:35FB (talk) 20:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive edits and warring. ZimZalaBim talk 21:08, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: History of unregistered and sockpuppet re-addition/modification of section "Former airlines and destinations" which does not meet standards for inclusion (WP:NOTDIR), and in its current form takes up 22k bytes and is largely unsourced. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kai+Tak+Airport&date-range-to=&tagfilter=mw-undo&action=history Transgenderoriole (talk) 09:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 103.241.37.0/24 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected due to sockpuppetry. @Transgenderoriole: Please try to make greater efforts to leave user page warnings when reverting changes that violate policies and guidelines. Thanks! Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism and to prevent adding poorly sourced content. This party is popular now so risk of adding misinformation. Niasoh (talk) 10:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of BLP-violating vandalism from IP users over the last few days. AntiDionysius (talk) 11:35, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question: @Ymblanter: I was about to protect this for a few days (possibly a week), but you got to it first. Just curious: why did you go with indefinite protection? The page has only previously had several pending changes protections, but it's been several years since the previous one. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Quinlan: I was indeed in doubt, since the article was protected for a month and then for a year between 2021 and 2022, so that the indefinite protection was in order in 2024. On the other hand, if I were a protecting administrator back in 2021, I would likely not escalate the second ever protection to a year. I have now lowered the protection to 10 days, let us see whether it would be enough, and if not, a long-term protection will be in order. Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Thanks for the report. BusterD (talk) 21:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

27 October 2024

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Several radio accounts spamming the article. Knitsey (talk) 21:41, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Alternative account of deceased editor. Steel1943 (talk) 21:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{RFPP#deny}} We don't protect pages pre-emptively; there's zero history of disruption and the ACTUAL userpage is unprotected and unmolested. BusterD (talk) 21:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BusterD: Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians/Guidelines#On the user page disagrees with you, so I'm TL'ing your template and reopening this request. Steel1943 (talk) 22:22, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ouch. I'm wrong. Thanks for correcting me. BusterD (talk) 22:24, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BusterD: Happens to us all from time to time. But, that does prompt me to see a need to create a shortcut to that section. Thanks for protecting the page! Steel1943 (talk) 22:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected indefinitely. BusterD (talk) 22:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FifthFive (talk) 23:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:11, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent edit warring by Vofa (talk · contribs). Beshogur (talk) 11:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. It should not be protected. Check Bashkirs talk page. @Beshogur is WP:NOTHERE Vofa (talk) 11:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, edit-warring by one user against everyone might be a reason for a block (and an ANI request has been open) but should not be a reason for protection. Ymblanter (talk) 21:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP user Skteosk (talk) 15:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IP 121.200.5.105 has been blocked for three days. Let us know if this disruption resumes. The other IP editor appears to be editing constructively so raising protection level is not necessary at this time. BusterD (talk) 22:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, such as removal of sourced content and changes to Malaysia. Ckfasdf (talk) 21:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the user stopped six days ago after a warning. Ymblanter (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism farm during RfD. Jalen Barks (Woof) 23:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:26, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. VolatileAnomaly (talk) 23:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gen Alpha brainrot vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 00:53, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Protected due to continual vandalism for the last two years whenever this is unprotected. @JalenBarks: That's not helpful. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:36, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 01:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:23, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Continued disruption by IPS [134], [135], [136], [137], [138], [139], [140], and other extended confirmed violations. The article should be EC protected per WP:GS/AA and to avoid further disruption. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log. Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Frequent sockpuppetry by User:Akaora since the expiry of the last protection level on 02:17, 8 April 2024. Alith Anar 23:18, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:52, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Since September, new users have been warring over adding/removing a controversy section that is very poorly sourced, and esp. an issue for a page on a $100 billion+ revenue company. Boo1210 (talk) 00:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:46, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is commonly disrupted in its infobox. Noorullah (talk) 22:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at WP:CT/CID Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – POV-pushing. The Banner talk 23:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IPs. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:47, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 03:33, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism and POV pushing. See [141] for example. Borgenland (talk) 09:08, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Offending IP restored WP:NPA comment on talk. See [142]. Borgenland (talk) 17:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
More targeted harrassment: [143] and [144]. Borgenland (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 188.119.21.26 (talk · contribs) blocked by Pickersgill-Cunliffe. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:22, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IPs. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:46, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Other than the two edits today, nothing since the beginning of last month. Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last protection expired. The repeat vandal was promptly back. Request indef this time to stop this endless vandalism of the Sammy/Sam Williams articles. Raladic (talk) 05:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We're not really at the point where indefinite protection makes sense. We can consider a longer duration if the disruption resumes. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:06, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the last protection of the article, there has been a persistent info box removal for multiple Australian TV channels, including 10 Peach Comedy and numerous other networks including Paramount-owned Network 10. Yours sincerely, Bas (or TechGeek105) (talk to me) 06:24, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Escalating from previous protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:40, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – immediate resumption after last protect expired, dynamic IP. Geraldo Perez (talk) 07:56, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 14:47, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – While the UK Far Right activist Yaxley Lennon, known as Tommy Robinson, is in the news his acolytes have turned their attention to this article, albeit in dribs and drabs. Yaxley Lennon is likely to be in the news periodically. It would make sense to allow only longstanding editors to edit. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:39, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm going to escalate from the previous protections and up the ante to this. If you discover confirmed users disrupting the article, we can upgrade the protection then. Indefinite ECP is overkill at this point. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There's no reason to capitalize all the words of a term. Terms should be presented consistently with the title of the article about it. Annh07 (talk) 08:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User talk:Aditya Chonker blocked for 3 days. Please let us know if this user becomes a further problem. BusterD (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Proposed for deletion, but is currently being repeatedly edited for BLP violations on one of the article subject's children. Escape Orbit (Talk) 09:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've blocked the /64. BusterD (talk) 15:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:56, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 15:53, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 12:02, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Fairly consistent vandalism from IP editors since previous protection expired a few days ago. The subject of this article has been charged with sexual offences and has been removed from his K-pop group, so this will likely continue. RachelTensions (talk) 13:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:52, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked the /64. That appears to be disruptive range. BusterD (talk) 15:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been subjected to frequent vandalism and unsourced additions, as subject is in the news in the UK for a recent incident. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:47, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Crazycomputers. Favonian (talk) 20:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Skitash (talk) 19:26, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 20:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:56, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under IPA. Daniel Case (talk) 21:56, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism, edit war and POV push Vedant Katyayan (talk) 10:24, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Endorsing this request; the pending change protection that the article has right now is limiting the impact of the edit warring but it's going on anyway, and repeated changes (whether visible or not) make it very hard to work out what a stable version of the article might be, and don't incentivise the parties to talk.
AntiDionysius (talk) 15:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logging at WP:GS/CASTE, something that should have been done a while ago. Daniel Case (talk) 22:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. CsmLearner 💬🔬 13:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism. Vandalism has occurred throughout most of the page's history. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 15:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 18:23, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing sneaky vandalism from various IPs. Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:53, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:09, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CsmLearner 💬🔬 13:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:46, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: More POV-pushing, now by full accounts. The Banner talk 17:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Since I semi-protected the article yesterday, there has been that one editor. The issue could easily be handled with an increase to ECP if it continues. Daniel Case (talk) 19:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced and poorly-sourced BLP-violating content has been added for months. Requesting ECP because editor is autoconfirmed. Woodroar (talk) 22:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Woodroar (talk) 22:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

28 October 2024

Indefinite pending changes: Former head of government, still an active politician. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 14:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. You didn't even state that any was taking place. Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: David Cameron has been protected indefinitely since 2010, so I don't see why Rishi Sunak shouldn't have been similarly protected indefinitely. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 21:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:NOPREEMPT, we generally only protect articles in response to active disruption (the sort-of exception would be articles about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, where since ArbCom ruled that newer articles in that area are extended-confirmed restricted, many of us have felt it only makes sense to actually apply extended-confirmed protection to those articles indefinitely regardless of what is actually happening with the editing).

The logic behind your argument is not reflected in our protection policy ... in fact, you have made a case for ending protection on the Cameron article, since he is years away from No. 10, now in the opposition after this year's elections and, thanks to the way his premiership ended, highly unlikely to ever be "leader of a major Anglophone nation" again. WP:RFPP/D is available for this should you decide to take this step. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think unprotecting David Cameron would be premature based on the article history. Nevertheless, I agree about the Rishi Sunak article. The article is not being significantly disrupted. Whether articles on similar topics are protected is irrelevant. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:53, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 16:38, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of continuous edit-warring and reverting by multiple IP WP:SPA editors. GuardianH (talk) 18:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NB: Semi-protected for one month by @Cullen328:, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phillips_Exeter_Academy&diff=prev&oldid=1253758179 Namelessposter (talk) 19:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Cullen328. per above. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Some harassment here goin’ on. Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 01:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 01:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP-hopping WP:GENREWARRIOR has resumed removing sourced info because it differs from their original research. The article's protection for this same exact reason ended just earlier this month. Xfansd (talk) 23:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since 23:11, 24 October 2024. Alith Anar 00:17, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi protected, but now targeted by autoconfirmed WP:SPAs. Boo1210 (talk) 00:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. — Chrisahn (talk) 01:35, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. atop the existing PC. Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Users saying the N-word Avishai11 (talk) 01:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 14:28, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Thesigmaofthiswebsite (talk · contribs) blocked by Muboshgu. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 00:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. I think it is obvious from the article name Abo Yemen 15:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined as moot since the article has been moved. Will protect under its new name, Hamas temporary committee. Daniel Case (talk) 00:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuing BLP:CRIME violations by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 15:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Brettandelle, using multiple IPs and sock accounts. I expect that Template:The Hoosiers and The Hoosiers discography will need the same protection because they were targeted by Special:Contributions/148.252.159.73. Binksternet (talk) 15:38, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Irwin Sparkes, Alan Sharland and Leighton Allen (talk · contribs) blocked by Ingenuity. Indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – User has requested their talk page be speedied three times (previously declined twice) now under the guise of "I don't want to use or edit Wikipedia anymore at all" after being indef'd for sockpuppetry.

Requesting semi-protection to discourage further requests; they clearly do not wish to be part of the project any longer. GSK (talkedits) 16:27, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by Justlettersandnumbers.
Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Coordinated POV pushing and WP:FORUM violations by IPs and newly-created accounts following recent developments on the article. Borgenland (talk) 18:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing much reverting going on. Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of sourced information. Semsûrî (talk) 19:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. And they have responded on talk, although, I admit, not encouragingly. Will leave a CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, there already is one. Sorry. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: LTA target, happened many times before. – 2804:F1...E4:60B (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:55, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I am concerned, pending changes protection is working as intended. Ymblanter (talk) 22:06, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems a little on the high end for pending changes. 26 out of the most recent 100 edits were from IPs and only 5 of those were accepted. And 9 out of 9 edits by users with fewer than 10 edits were reverted. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:36, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think protection is necessary based off of this? Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm on the fence so I'll leave it to another administrator to decide. If I wasn't on the fence, I would have already accepted or declined the request, which is still open. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:56, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I don't think the disruption rises to the level of needing semi-protection, overall. Plus, the article is on my watchlist anyway. Lectonar (talk) 07:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7E:2661:E00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 02:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Fully-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2402:800:63B8:D00F:9479:34D8:A99A:5E75 (talk) 07:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined as no one, registered or not, has touched the redirect in over 90 days. It is already semi-protected. Dennis Brown - 07:17, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of edit-warring; users keep replacing "Serbo-Croatian" with "Bosnian", which I assume is due to political reasons and not due to a genuine desire to contribute. This edit gets reverted every single time, but the users involved simply revert it again and refuse to back down. This has been going on since at least September 2023. The users involved either always use the same exact source (Spirit of Bosnia) or do not supply a source at all. LVDP01 (talk) 10:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent, thank you! LVDP01 (talk) 11:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The album was released today. Selected IPs have a field day with silly vandalism. Sam Sailor 11:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This needs priority attention. The number of vandals ransacking this page is worse than anything I've ever seen at Wikipedia. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
TBH this might need XC with the amount of vandalism. I'm convinced there'll be vandals gaming autoconfirmed so they can vandalize the article, might be WP:CRYSTAL on my part though. mwwv converseedits 11:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that would indeed be premature. Can be escalated and up-protected at need. Also, when reliable sources begin to come in, things tend to quieten down measurably. Lectonar (talk) 11:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple vandalisms — RafaelTLS talk 11:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See above. Lectonar (talk) 11:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection. Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Codename AD talk 09:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 09:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Its getting vandalized by so many now. Semi Protect real quickly. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 11:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 13:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Urgent protection needed MAL MALDIVE (talk) 12:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – consistent vandalism from several IPs and accounts. Neo Purgatorio (pester!) 13:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalized by 2 accounts and 1 IP in the last hour, with one RD2 worthy vandalism. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 12:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 13:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continues after protection. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 12:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An individual using multiple IP addresses (174.231.133.252 and 174.215.114.79) is disregarding the article's consensus and repeatedly making grammatically incorrect edits to the lead. Bluerules (talk) 14:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:17, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Xexerss (talk) 09:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 16:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please see Tellihero, Teli22o and an obvious third sock (created after the block of the other two). M.Bitton (talk) 12:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Ionianeditor (talk · contribs).
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: the changes had been doing were not appropriate Yogini143 (talk) 13:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war by ECR. Valereee (talk) 16:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 16:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (TCL) 18:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Hypnôs (talk) 19:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant Vandalism on nominees, winner. 165.124.84.117 (talk) 19:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

just adding some events he had organised during the tenure as d.cm and the things that had been done during the last 140 days Yogini143 (talk) 13:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Pawan Kalyan is not protected. Konidela Pawan Kalyan is merely a redirect. Favonian (talk) 15:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism Vagenie1 (talk) 16:03, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GoodnightmushTalk 17:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A range of IPs adding spurious middle names. This is a meme ( https://www.tiktok.com/@stayingrelevant_podcast/video/7428526391114681633 ) so it's likely to be a persistent problem. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 17:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Leonidlednev (TCL) 18:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

29 October 2024

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring - it looks like one editor may be in the right, in which case it's vandalism, but something needs to be done to stop it. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Inherli (talk · contribs). Elli (talk | contribs) 20:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism Sparkbean (talk) 16:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: already under pending changes protection, which is working fine. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Contentious topics: Arab-Israeli conflict. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Part of WP:CT/AP - post-1992 US politics. Disruption on this article may be particularly likely and at least one POV addition/reversion has appeared already. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 19:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Hauntbug (talk) 21:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. C F A 💬 23:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:15, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous editor is remove sourced commentary detailing the debunking of mediumship and investigations into fraud. Example edit summary: "Your paycheck to hide the existence of our gifts doesn’t impress me.". Betty Logan (talk) 00:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Chance of high level of IP vandalism, due to the controversial “ballon d'or” result ceremony 2024.

Already done. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Extended-Protection: Was extended-confirmed until yesterday, it should have a reinstatement. At least 2 ip users also added unnecessary things in that article, including unsourced content and vandalism 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 05:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Let's see if semi-protection is sufficient now that he's no longer PM. Airplaneman (talk) 01:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 21:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 01:46, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Andre🚐 00:34, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 12:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 01:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism and unconstructive edits from IP users that have had to be reverted numerous times. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 01:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lots of IP vandalism after recently being dropped JP (Talk) 20:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 01:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. l ke (talkcontribs) 21:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 02:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis (talk) 21:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 01:52, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Crytony/Archive. Rastinition (talk) 10:03, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RoySmith. for a month Daniel Case (talk) 02:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same person from 3 IPs repeatedly removing sourced material for nonsense reason, refusing to discuss. 1 2 3 EducatedRedneck (talk) 10:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Editor has made an account to continue the disruption with two more reverts (ex this). EducatedRedneck (talk) 22:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: HIGH level of ip vandalism 43.224.131.121 (talk) 11:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Minimal IP vandalism, but 2/3 of it is by the IP requesting protection - Arjayay (talk) 12:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: people are changing box office collection fakely , so make it protected 43.224.131.121 (talk) 11:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Minimal IP vandalism, but 2/3 of it is by the IP requesting protection - Arjayay (talk) 12:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry since mid-September. Aintabli (talk) 13:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: immense amount of bad faith editing motivated by politics, clear and obvious violations of WP:RSUW. he is now described as an "american loser"? NotQualified (talk) 00:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
not good enough, we have a new user adding "far right racist" to the lede. considering the election is in a week, the entire BLP has to go on total lock down until afterwards NotQualified (talk) 01:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
user in question needs a censuring, clearly bad faith unsourced edits NotQualified (talk) 01:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
NotQualified, I'm sure JohnAdams1800 is acting in good faith and with the goal of improving the encyclopedia. Please (re-)evaluate their edits from this point of view. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
they violated wikipedia rules. end of. they need to cite their claims, not WP:NOR a contentious claim. they cant justify original research because they want him fired. they can not violate edit warring rules, especially immediately after the page was raised in protection due to similar vandalism. their excuses have been appeals to authority. he has also claimed he is in the ranks of literal neo-nazis. id like to remind you, all the comedian did was call puerto rico a dump. NotQualified (talk) 02:15, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to add that NotQualified is the user in question, who is clearly asking a rhetorical question, and needs to be censured. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 02:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced content by WP:AIV-reported IP editor. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:22, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Continued IP disruption on AE CTOP. Raladic (talk) 15:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noted page restriction in talk page CTOPS notice. Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits. Hotwiki (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of content by IPs from court documents (WP:BLPPRIMARY) regarding alleged criminal conduct. – notwally (talk) 20:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing edit-war. User:Namiba 21:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruption relating to unsourced edits and WP:NPOV by IP switching editor. TylerBurden (talk) 21:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS under WP:CT/EE. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP users. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 23:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of unsourced content resumed after previous protection expired yesterday. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 23:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of unsourced content resumed by IP users after previous protection expired last Tuesday. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 23:27, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:53, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content resumed by IP users after previous protection expired today. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 23:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Infighting regarding which company actually retains the rights to the game. Also the constant removal of a link to the steam version coming out soon. Urbanracer34 (talk) 23:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Just had to revert some vandalism pertaining to the subject. Article was previously protected until Jan 2023, and with the 2024 presidential election just 1 week away, clearly there may be more coming to this. 2601AC47 (talk) 01:46, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war. Multiple users frequently reverting changes without any prior discussion on talk page. Request page protection to stop disruptive edits. Sreeking (talk) 02:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from several IPs and accounts since the new album release. Neo Purgatorio (pester!) 02:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:11, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from several IPs and accounts since the new album release. Neo Purgatorio (pester!) 02:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from several IPs and accounts since the new album release. Neo Purgatorio (pester!) 02:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since 18:48, 27 October 2024. Alith Anar 03:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Sort of ironic, no? Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – distruptive editing and vandalism of the article and the behind was the IP Address. Royiswariii Talk! 04:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the history it looks like the editor that added the dubiously sourced claims was extended confirmed so this protection won't help there. The IP editor seemed to be removing potentially disruptive content. RachelTensions (talk) 20:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Airplaneman (talk) 02:02, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Semi-protection is getting bypassed. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 13:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done オラグ has been globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – My talk page is becoming "rant board for vandals" again. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Tickle My Pickle! Yay, plz (talk · contribs) blocked by ToBeFree. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Lame edit warring to restore a bloated list despite lack of participation on talk page discussion started last week.[145] Capitals00 (talk) 05:06, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Quite lame, yes. If talking doens't help: there are more instruments available in dispute resolution before there's a need to fully protect a page. Lectonar (talk) 07:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TabbyFir (talk) 07:22, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No vandalism I can see, also see WP:UPROT: user pages are automagically protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:35, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Add. TabbyFir (talk) 07:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:35, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Under the category "Professional Career", a new (edited) subcategory labeled "2024" in which a News article, of an article (duly referenced) relaying a factual occurrence which happened on live television, in an unbiased manner as an historical event to Nick Bosa's Professional Career. The reference in question follows:

On October 27, 2024,Bosa interrupted a live TV interview of his teammates “to show his support for former President Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election with a hat emblazoned with Trump’s slogan: Make America Great Again.” [1] Wp914 (talk) 22:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit is merely a reporting of a factual event that occurred on live television with an audience of millions.
The reference follows current methods of submission. Wp914 (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Wp914:, the talk page is not protected on Talk:Nick Bosa. Make the request using {{Edit semi-protected}} on the talk page, not here. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 03:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Nick Bosa is not protected. Favonian (talk) 06:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that the real age and birthday of the actress Aditi Rao Hydari be posted. She was born in October 1978 as per publicly available and accessible court documents. She is 46 years old, but her page says she is 38. (Your edit request here) . 103.213.203.212 (talk) 02:42, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@IP editor, you provided a blank article name. What is the article that you want us to look at? Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 03:19, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done You didn't say what article this was in; it may not even be protected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 09:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP, and auto-confirmed SPA vandalism, BLP violations, etc. The article should be extended-protected 71.249.111.233 (talk) 09:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Freyam Muhan 12:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Please see Draft:Gerard Gertoux which I believe has a better than. 50% chance of surviving an immediate deletion process. I intend to accept this draft on that basis and would appreciate notification of any unprotecting. The draft does need some trying and pruning, which I believe should be left to the community. Unless, of course, there is an overriding reason for preventing its creation still relevant today. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: Unprotected. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing from IPs including content removal and additions of unsourced material and reverting to older versions the IP prefers. Seems to be a long-term abuse of the same individual across different IPs given the similarity of the edits and their nature. Trailblazer101 (talk) 05:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amounts of vandalism as of late because the article's subject recently got into even more controversy. I don't see this dying down soon-ish. Sirocco745 (talk) 10:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All pending changes seem unconstructive, it might be better to set it to (Auto)confirmed. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 13:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All un-confirmed edits are non-constructive. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 13:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Recent controversy involving him has led to a large amount of BLP violations from IPs and newly registered accounts ItTollsForThee (talk) 13:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism Koopinator (talk) 08:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:52, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Was proteced today (Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access) but it still experiences the high level of auto-confirmed SPA vandalism, BLP violations, etc. The article should be extended-protected for 6 months or 2 years 2601:183:4B7F:7E40:3C7B:9C4B:26A5:58A6 (talk) 15:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done – 6-month protection increased to EC. Will be logged under WP:CT/BLP. Favonian (talk) 16:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism today. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very high chance of getting the page vandalized with Elon Musk's tweet : [146] MDCCCC (talk) 17:19, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Confirmed-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:22, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Confirmed-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Confirmed-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 04:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of ip vandalism, same reason why it was protected until recently Theonewithreason (talk) 17:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock IPs of User:Kagan21 have been changing height for months. Nswix (talk) 18:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Gunther :  Talk  17:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of same image using different IPs and users. Sjö (talk) 17:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Confirmed-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – One of the primary of the sockfarm User:Srimonbanik2007 as can be seen in the article's recent history. Case page here. Some of the blocked socks tried gaining autoconfirmed status by editing sandboxes and random pages. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. now. Will note at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:25, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A WP:CT/EE article with a high level of edit warring from one very persistent IP editor. –Vipz (talk) 15:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 67.175.12.221 (talk · contribs). Likewise their alter ego, 2601:243:1a00:4510::/64. Favonian (talk) 16:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and WP:OR by IPs also targeting Orakzai. Borgenland (talk) 18:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 19:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Both articles. Daniel Case (talk) 19:34, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant erroneous false vandalism updates by unregistered users. ValerieCherishBerman (talk) 19:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'm requesting semiprotection for the article as it could end in vandalism and edit war in its current state. There are people that are fans of (or they are closer to) Bartek Krysiuk's band and they're interested in turning it into an article for his band Patriarkh. Krysiuk lost the lawsuit against Krzysztof Drabikowski and he is not allowed to use the name Batushka anymore. Also the article can benefit from a temporary protection until Krysiuk's band change of name is complete and a rewrite of the article can be made. Thank you very much. Grojasp44 (talk) 17:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Active politician, high level of IP vandalism Aneirinn (talk) 17:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP edit-warring Babysharkboss2!! (Viva la Vendetta) 18:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Protection isnt for issues with single IPs. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:49, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing vandalism and WP:OR by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 18:32, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:BLP violations and socking. Codename AD talk 20:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Favonian (talk) 21:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Mulla Shahzad (talk · contribs) blocked by Rosguill. indefinitely. And while this is very possibly likely to change, right now there isn't enough nexus between this article and the present conflict (note the minimal editing over the last year) to justify any protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:35, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Mulla Shahzad (talk · contribs) blocked by Rosguill. indef, as noted above; article has otherwise little nexus to current conflict as its subject was killed 20 years ago. Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection. Reason: Edit war. Codename AD talk 19:15, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 22:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 22:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

30 October 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Elon Musk twitter situation. Please advise. — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 19:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not seeing a lot of reverting going on, and if people are being directed her by another website, there are measures we can and usually do take prior to requesting protection (like that template I can't remember what its name is right now). Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Understood! I'll keep an eye out for further disruptive edits. Thanks for the help! — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 20:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant censorship from (assumedly) school personnel regarding information around the shootings. Synorem (talk) 19:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:644:9183:5C00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. from article for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 23:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP edits contrary to consensus from recent discussion Robminchin (talk) 21:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP edits contrary to consensus from recent discussion (linked to above request for New Mexico State University)Robminchin (talk) 21:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new users hijacking to talk about some kind of new religious movement. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 21:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Wongzhiqiang13 (talk · contribs). Likewise their IP, 14.100.78.140. Favonian (talk) 21:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pervasive subtle vandalism by both IPs and new accounts. Lenny Marks (talk) 22:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. IP blocked. Drmies (talk) 22:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war over adding/deleting map. No discussion yet on talk page. BilCat (talk) 19:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If this becomes a WP:3RR case it can be reported to WP:AN/3. Chetsford (talk) 01:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This help page has been vandalized repeatedly over the last few years, with (as far as I can tell) zero constructive edits from new editors. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Aydoh8[contribs] 04:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from unconfirmed users. Perhaps semi could work too. Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 23:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Chetsford (talk) 01:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The regime in Iran executed Jamshid Sharmad based on coerced false confessions extracted under torture. Sharmad worked closely with the Tondar group, which the regime often seeks to discredit. The Islamic regime has a history of targeting and discrediting opposition figures and dissidents through misinformation campaigns, including the spread of false information on Wikipedia. Therefore, in cases like this, it is crucial to verify edits and consult with reliable sources. Specifically, Gazelle Sharmad, Jamshid Sharmad’s daughter, can help clarify issues and verify accurate information due to her firsthand knowledge.

This request for page protection is also based on similar incidents involving other members of the Iranian opposition, such as the page on Reza Pahlavi. The pages of opposition figures have been frequent targets of disinformation and bad-faith edits. Given these risks, it is essential to take proactive measures to maintain the integrity of this page. DavidSallam (talk) 23:49, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Chetsford (talk) 01:23, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The regime in Iran executed Jamshid Sharmad based on coerced false confessions extracted under torture. Sharmad worked closely with the Tondar group, which the regime often seeks to discredit. The Islamic regime has a history of targeting and discrediting opposition figures and dissidents through misinformation campaigns, including the spread of false information on Wikipedia. Therefore, in cases like this, it is crucial to verify edits and consult with reliable sources. Specifically, Gazelle Sharmad, Jamshid Sharmad’s daughter, can help clarify issues and verify accurate information due to her firsthand knowledge.

This request for page protection is also based on similar incidents involving other members of the Iranian opposition, such as the page on Reza Pahlavi. The pages of opposition figures have been frequent targets of disinformation and bad-faith edits. Given these risks, it is essential to take proactive measures to maintain the integrity of this page. DavidSallam (talk) 23:53, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Chetsford (talk) 01:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP misrepresenting the sources to push a POV. In case it's not evident, what they are doing, such as here, here (using a different IP) and here, is making it look as though Ecuador supports the autonomy proposal, when in fact, it only suspended its recognition of SADR (which they removed here). M.Bitton (talk) 00:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Chetsford (talk) 01:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Demographics vandal. Binksternet (talk) 04:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Demographics vandal. Binksternet (talk) 04:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent content removal, addition of unsourced information, and vandalism by non-autoconfirmed editors (last few hours has been 1 IP and 2 non-autoconfirmed editors, possibly socks). RachelTensions (talk) 06:23, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Several others have popped up to continuously remove information; I have a feeling this article is being meatpuppeted by people coordinating off-wiki. RachelTensions (talk) 06:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the semi-protection of this page due to persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by non-autoconfirmed users. There have been repeated removals of sourced content, along with the addition of unsourced or biased information. RDWolfgang (talk) 07:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of sock vandalism. GenoV84 (talk) 22:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Ymblanter (talk) 09:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Request ECP until after the election, say, 14 days. Increasing disruptive activity from non-extended-confirmed users. ―Mandruss  04:28, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The current level disruption doesn't even rise to the point where semi-protection is warranted. Also, if we protected this talk page, new edit requests would just accumulate on WP:RFED and most of the disruptive comments would be posted somewhere else. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by IP user/new account. I'd like us to be able to restore the non-vandalised text without an edit-war. Alarichall (talk) 09:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals/promo-only accounts putting random phone numbers that seem to be spam on the page. Tube·of·Light 08:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Rash of new editors adding multiple copyvios and unsourced additions - may be some form of ill-organized class-project - Arjayay (talk) 09:28, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 12:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The disruptive editing persist. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting temporary protection due to disruptive edit warring from COI editor. Encoded  Talk 💬 20:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 10:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IPs. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 03:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone using the IP address 130.20.80.209 is persistently removing content from the page without making any actual edits. I believe placing the page under Extended Confirmed Protection could help mitigate this vandalism. Thank you. পেতনীপিসি (talk) 06:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@পেতনীপিসি I'm not an admin but this page is not for requesting protection from a single vandal. You should go to WP:AIV, and you should give at least 3 warnings on their talk page usually before reporting them. Also, semi-protection should be enough as it is just an IP. Tube·of·Light 08:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Indeed. Lectonar (talk) 10:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 07:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The disruptive user has also been reported to AIV earlier by me and by the bot. They are also already WP:COMMUNICATE on the copyright violation images as per their talk page hence protecting the article may the best course of action to prevent the spawning of socks, in addition to blocking. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 07:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 10:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:21, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 15:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page has been incessantly vandalized over the past few hours by IPs from multiple networks. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 14:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 15:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 15:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/A-I. Aydoh8[contribs] 02:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I moved the page, and changed the request accordingly. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 05:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one edit/revert in the last month. Joyous! Noise! 15:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recently deceased. Page has had some vandalism RedPatch (talk) 11:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 12:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent vandalism. Janhrach (talk) 13:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indef semi 2600:100C:B0AF:8610:A1DD:45AF:212F:539 (talk) 13:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The last protection was lifted on Friday, and BAM: multiple disruptions each day. Largoplazo (talk) 17:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being vandalized day 1 after protections expired. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Since her death, there have been lots of edits where they replace her photograph with Hitler and Osama Bin Laden, and changing her cause of death to be jokes including hitler being resurrected and someone called her the chocolate lady in the lead of the article at one point. This IP vandalism could be prevented with semi-protection. EytanMelech (talk) 21:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

31 October 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is still consistently receiving disruptive edits from IP editors. Nemov (talk) 19:04, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism related to Middle Eastern conflicts. Hypnôs (talk) 21:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 22:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protection is no longer necessary as the page is largely in active and complete only needing to fix minor typos Balling200 (talk) 20:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force is not protected. Favonian (talk) 20:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock-puppetry and disruptive editing. Done potentially by user Ntr123, Mohsin1970 and/or paid unregistered editors to read like advertisement. Mmnwla (talk) 23:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I meant to type user Ntrr123 and Mohsin1970, although I’m not sure it’s them. Regardless it looks like there's disruptive editing from unconfirmed and unregistered users so thought to be safe that it wouldn’t be a bad idea to suggest temporary semi-protection. Mmnwla (talk) 06:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting on time. Ymblanter (talk) 22:16, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A rolling edit war between quite a few different users over the past few days. AntiDionysius (talk) 17:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Updated article location for the bot. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Intense edit warring since 27th October. Article has been renamed multiple times and 9 out of 10 of its sources have a failed verification tag. Kwesi Yema (talk) 18:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Updated article location for the bot. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian (talk) 05:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 06:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection 2600:100C:B0AF:8610:A1DD:45AF:212F:539 (talk) 21:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Filmssssssssssss: Disruption is very spaced out, with around a week between each instance. Sdrqaz (talk) 06:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – MidAtlanticBaby is attempting edits (see filter log), IPs are Proxies. Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 23:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: this isn't a page we should really protect under any circumstances as this defeats its purpose. The LTA would also just jump to another page. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Requested page protection earlier, but it was declined as not enough, vandalism has continued. Recently deceased individual. Four different examples in past couple days by four different IPs Example, Example Example Example. I think we should be a bit stricter with vandalism for recently deceased individuals, who deserve to have their memory honoured, not vandalized, so I'm all for the protection standards being a bit lower for the recently deceased. RedPatch (talk) 23:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since 11:06, 6 October 2024. Alith Anar 01:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Favonian (talk) 05:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edit-warring to replace a TV channel with a production company. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2A00:79E0:2E5A:7:618A:FFF1:212F:1969 (talk) 23:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP/new editors keep restoring citations to predatory journals without explanations. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 06:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 06:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – edit-warring readdition of LYKSTAGE by anon socks of User:Hemantrj18 and co. Wikishovel (talk) 11:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 08:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think this deserves a indef, it gets a whole lot of general vandalism. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 13:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Kingsmasher678: The last human edit was over ten days ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 06:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive changes from IPs. Trailblazer101 (talk) 22:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 207.178.123.204 (talk · contribs) blocked by Amortias. 8.48.113.65 is a little stale, so leaving that one for now. Sdrqaz (talk) 06:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: BLP violations by IPs over the past 72 hours. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A00:23C5:DB6E:1901:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. Sdrqaz (talk) 06:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Skitash (talk) 15:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 09:41, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hindus and Muslims are arguing about throwing shit at each other... gotta love the internet. Nswix (talk) 15:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: Constant back-and-fourth edit warring, no consensus being reached - some users using it as fuel for religious-based personal attacks. Synorem (talk) 15:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 It would appear we may need an extended or full protection, as some users that are edit warring are autoconfirmed. This edit warring is still active. INeedSupport 🎃 20:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please post on article talk with explanations concerning perceived problems. Johnuniq (talk) 09:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 16:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and unconstructive edits. Mehedi Abedin 16:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:49, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unambiguous advertisement and unsourced content added by SPA and IP. Badbluebus (talk) 17:04, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Badbluebus: Let me know if it continues. Johnuniq (talk) 09:53, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Regular addition of unsourced, promotional content by various IPs and occasional WP:SPAs. —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Past couple days IPs have been adding lots of unsourced content. I think a short temp protection would help prevent constant reverts. Lenny Marks (talk) 20:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The regime in Iran executed Jamshid Sharmad based on coerced false confessions extracted under torture. Sharmad worked closely with the Tondar group, which the regime often seeks to discredit. The Islamic regime has a history of targeting and discrediting opposition figures and dissidents through misinformation campaigns, including the spread of false information on Wikipedia. Therefore, in cases like this, it is crucial to verify edits and consult with reliable sources. Specifically, Gazelle Sharmad, Jamshid Sharmad’s daughter, can help clarify issues and verify accurate information due to her firsthand knowledge.

This request for page protection is also based on similar incidents involving other members of the Iranian opposition, such as the page on Reza Pahlavi. The pages of opposition figures have been frequent targets of disinformation and bad-faith edits. Given these risks, it is essential to take proactive measures to maintain the integrity of this page. DavidSallam (talk) 00:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:04, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring over substantial (3K+ bytes) changes to article - see article talk page. As the editor initiating the changes has 415 edits semi-indef may provide some relief until cooler heads prevail. Oblivy (talk) 05:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This can't be solved via protection; it's a content dispute, borderline slow edit war, which needs more eyes. Getting a WP:3O might be a good idea. Lectonar (talk) 08:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Mobile editor is making unconstructive edits. GoodDay (talk) 06:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: there is lots of POV pushing and brazen/large edits + rewrites without regard for ongoing discussion in the talk page

see:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Instant-runoff_voting&diff=prev&oldid=1254208089

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Instant-runoff_voting&diff=prev&oldid=1254146037

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Instant-runoff_voting&diff=prev&oldid=1254048805

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Instant-runoff_voting&diff=prev&oldid=1253161951

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Instant-runoff_voting&diff=prev&oldid=1252389457 Affinepplan (talk) 00:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No objections to temporary page-protect, if it's combined with opening something on WP:DRN. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 00:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Disruptive editing unsourced additions to a BLP by an IP user. Sciencefish (talk) 08:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:21, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and sockpuppetry. Annh07 (talk) 10:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Callanecc. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Bgsu98 (Talk) 10:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There appears to be some kind of active edit war going on over the budget in the infobox. The page was recently temp protected twice in response to disruptive editing. Lenny Marks (talk) 20:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note It seems that at least some of the previous edits that resulted in the protection were related to the same content about the budget in the infobox. Lenny Marks (talk) 21:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BusterD. Favonian (talk) 13:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper keep adding "transgender" to describe the serial killer in this film with no sources. It's not true and their other edits have been on pollical pages. Mike Allen 10:51, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IP blocked from the article for 48 hours. Other non-disruptive edits from IPs, so blocking avoids collateral damage. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – L. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked the /64. BusterD (talk) 12:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. WP:ARBKURDS 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ 【=◈︿◈=】 13:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No idea why this scholar's page should so often be vandalised, but it is. Time to start some sort of page protection. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:59, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced box score information since last page protection for the same thing. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:14, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ban evasion by User:Brettandelle. Binksternet (talk) 14:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brettandelle. HorrorLover555 (talk) 14:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Girth Summit. Favonian (talk) 18:04, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent disruptive editing by IP hopper. Perception312 (talk) 15:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Included on main page Realtent (talk) 16:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, some vandalism. I'm not sure about the policy on this so if I'm in the wrong I apologize Realtent (talk) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Shorter than I usually do this, but this will not last beyond today and tomorrow, I think. Daniel Case (talk) 18:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism about the game being inclusive. Sariel Xilo (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk in case this persists, so GENSEX can be invoked. Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Someone beat me to that, apparently. Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of controversy sections by different accounts and IPs (possible sockpuppetry). Lenny Marks (talk) 18:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock-account using anonymous IPs to edit page during their one-week block. livelikemusic (TALK!) 17:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being attacked by Piermark socks. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:40, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - There has been quite a bit of disruptive editing since this character became a meme. Di (they-them) (talk) 18:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by new accounts and IPs since early October using the talk page to rant. KoA (talk) 17:40, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The topic also falls under the WP:ARBPS CTOP. For some context, a few newer accounts such as Not a similar account name and Open Minded Spiritual Guy have already been blocked earlier in the month for disruptive editing. A new account Darragh7000 recently showed up with screeds like this and IP edits as well in a similar tone. They claim YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT BLOCKING ME BECAUSE I DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR PETTY DICTATORSHIP AND YOUR "MEAT PUPPETRY" WHICH YOU'RE DOING AS WELL AND "TAG -TEAMING, WHICH WAS THE GET-GO WHEN YOU STARTED ATTACKING MY SECOND FRIEND.. That second "friend" comment comes across as pretty WP:DUCKish, so WP:SPI is an option at least for the registered accounts, but it seems like it would still end up at ECP anyways eventually. KoA (talk) 17:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I thought macrobiotic diets were supposed to make people calmer and less prone to angry outbursts? Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Political candidate whose page has been recently vandalized. Please protect until after the election. User:Namiba 18:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Left CTOPS notice on talk per ARBAP. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – there are lot of IP edits and unregistered accounts ignoring the hidden note with regards to policy about championship status in the infobox and continuously adding it. request temporary protection. Omnis Scientia (talk) 18:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced caste additions. WP:DE by IPs due to Amaran (2024 film)'s release. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:54, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page under IPA. I should note that BLP does not apply in any way to someone who's been dead for ten years or so. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same ARBPIA issue continues to be brought up by IPs. Please semi-protect the talk page. Hypnôs (talk) 18:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Before it was turned into a redirect and still now, Gallery of sovereign state flags has been semi-protected to prevent disruptive editing. For some reason, the article it now redirects to is not also semi-protected. Can this be fixed?. ―Howard🌽33 22:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page has never been protected (of course), the linked redirect has never been protected, protection was moved from a previous namespace eleven years ago. Other more experienced admins may choose to protect, but this page hasn't been protected on the merits for many years. The case presented today for indefinite semi-protection is unconvincing; it's not currently under attack. As an aside, page stability is normally a part of featured anything criteria, which is why I hesitate. Input from other sysops? BusterD (talk) 13:04, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I was looking at this on and off for some hours, but was on the fence about protection or not. I do not see an urgent need to protect, tbh. To be on the sure side, we could perhaps move protect only (although there was no attempt to move), as moves might present some danger. Lectonar (talk) 13:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Per above. Daniel Case (talk) 17:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject has expressed pro-pedophilia opinions and therefore attracts frequent vandalism. Daask (talk) 14:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And most of that recent vandalism doesn't seem to relate to this at all. Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have, however, added a CTOPS notice to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 18:21, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The last dozen or so edits today have been different IPs adding the same - let's say controversial, unreferenced - content, and being reverted. GRuban (talk) 18:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Previous protections for a few years have not stopped this, apparently. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS IR Iran. Borgenland (talk) 17:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 18:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing continues after I semiprotected the article with WP:OR/WP:SYNTH by autoconfirmed users. I have WP:INVOLVED myself and seek an uninvolved admin tp at least get this ECP through Election Day, November 5. Consider arb enforcement for post-1992 US politics. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that ECP would solve the main issue given the reverting between extended confirmed users, but I'm reticent to fully protect this article at this time. It seems like greater efforts could be made to warn several users about the relevant policies and guidelines. A prominent inline comment about the relevant policies could also help. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can try that. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 18:54, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Muboshgu: I'm a little less certain about warnings being as broadly necessary as I first thought given WP:THEHILL and WP:THECONVERSATION being cited in at least one edit. Please also see the below note about the talk page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's "reluctant". Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: I am definitely not immune from making English mistakes, but Merriam-Webster has something to say about this. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do they give any usage attestations? Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel Case, they discuss it further in this article, but the examples given are fairly recent. It's not difficult to find earlier examples of broader usage such as this one from 1943, though. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm ... never knew it could be used that way. TIL ... Daniel Case (talk) 21:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/AP. I looked further at the history and there is sufficient disruption from autoconfirmed users for protection to make sense. I'm most concerned about the lack of discussion on the talk page after looking at some of the sourced edits that have been removed. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll go post on the talk page. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:59, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Ymblanter (talk) 22:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, protect it for 1 month just like every year 2A06:C701:4CF3:BB00:8C3F:414C:6FE7:8AF (talk) 21:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given the page's past history with repeated instances of vandalism, I don't see a point in specifically asking for the protection to only be temporary; we could save lots of trouble by instead making that indefinite. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 22:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition of unsourced content. livelikemusic (TALK!) 19:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:26, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A lot of recent editing from IPs appears promotional, possible COI. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Both IPs, from the article, indefinitely. One of them even resolves to GE—very easy call. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Ymblanter (talk) 22:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP has re-added disputed content reverted by multiple editors after being asked to go to talk page to discuss. New IP address then re-adds the same content to try to bypass 3RR. BBQboffingrill me 21:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]